Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02-20-24 Agenda and Packet
A.6:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER B.PUBLIC HEARINGS B.1 Proposed Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Variance request for Market Street Addition; Redevelopment of the Chanhassen Cinema and Hotel. (Planning Case 24-01) C.GENERAL BUSINESS D.APPROVAL OF MINUTES D.1 Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated January 16, 2024 E.COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS F.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS G.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION H.ADJOURNMENT I.OPEN DISCUSSION AGENDA CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2024 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by 9:00 p.m. as outlined in the official by-laws. We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda. If, however, this does not appear to be possible, the Chairperson will notify those present and offer rescheduling options. Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. If a constituent or resident sends an email to staff or the Planning Commission, it must be made part of the public record based on State Statute. If a constituent or resident sends an email to the Mayor and City Council, it is up to each individual City Council member and Mayor if they want it to be made part of the public record or not. There is no State Statute that forces the Mayor or City Council to share that information with the public or be made part of the public record. Under State Statute, staff cannot remove comments or letters provided as part of the public input process. 1 Planning Commission Item February 20, 2024 Item Proposed Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Variance request for Market Street Addition; Redevelopment of the Chanhassen Cinema and Hotel. (Planning Case 24-01) File No.2024-01 Item No: B.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By Eric Maass, Planning Director Applicant Roers Companies Present Zoning Central Business District (CBD) Land Use Mixed Use Acerage Density Applicable Regulations Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article 20-XVIII “CBD” Central Business District Chapter 20, Article 20-XXIII, Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments 2 SUGGESTED ACTION Staff has prepared two suggested motions for this planning case due to the Planning Commission's designated decision making authority regarding variances and it's designated recommending body capacity related to subdivisions and site plans. Provided below are each of the suggested motions: Action 1: "The Planning Commission acting as the City's Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the requested build to zone variance and adopts the attached findings of fact and decision." Action 2: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat and site plan contingent on compliance with the city staff review memo and adopts a resolution finding the tax increment financing plan for tax increment financing district number 13 is consistent with the City of Chanhassen's Comprehensive Plan." SUMMARY The applicant is requesting preliminary plat, site plan, and a variance to the build to zone for the construction of two mixed use buildings totaling 310 market rate apartment units and approximately 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space. BACKGROUND Roers Companies has applied to redevelop approximately four acres of property near the intersection of West 78th Street and Market Boulevard. The four acres proposed consist of the Country Inn & Suites and the now-closed Chanhassen Cinema. The plans submitted for the redevelopment include two buildings, which would include about 14,000 square feet of first-floor commercial space to be used for restaurants, retail, or additional commercial services. Upper stories would consist of approximately 310 market-rate apartments and amenity decks. The buildings themselves have a variety of building heights, including areas that are one, two, five, and six stories in height. The project would include approximately 408 structured underground parking stalls as well as surface parking to support residential and commercial uses. In addition to the subdivision, site plan, and variance requests, the applicant has submitted a request to the city for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Part of the review process for that request is the City's Planning Commission reviewing the TIF Plan for conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan as it relates to land use. The TIF plan outlines the proposed redevelopment of the site into a vertical mixed use development consisting of both commercial space as well as residential uses which does align with the City's Comprehensive Plan guidance for the parcels in question. As such, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the resolution included in your packet. The City's Economic Development Commission (EDC) reviewed the financial aspects of the TIF request at its meeting on January 9, 2024 and recommended approval of the TIF request. Timeline 3 March 11, 2024 | The City Council will consider the proposed redevelopment project applications for project approvals, including the request for tax increment financing. (Date is based on current knowledge and is subject to change.) February 20, 2024 | The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing for interested community members to provide public comment on the proposed project. The Planning Commission will provide a recommendation to the City Council. January 22, 2024 | The city received formal land use applications from Roers for the proposed redevelopment project. January 17, 2024 | Roers Company hosted a public open house at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. Residents who attended provided feedback on the project and were able to ask questions about the future of the site. January 9, 2024 | The Economic Development Commission reviewed the requested Tax Increment Financing request and recommended approval of the request to the Economic Development Authority. The City Council serves as the City's Economic Development Authority. September 25, 2023 | Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 715, adopting new standards for the downtown area zoning district and lifted the development moratorium. August 21, 2023 | Neighborhood open house hosted by Roers Companies to gather neighborhood feedback on the proposal. July 17, 2023 | Roers Companies presented a preliminary redevelopment concept to the City Council. July 17, 2023 | Chanhassen City Council enacts development moratorium to update Central Business District (CBD) zoning district. April 5, 2023 | Chanhassen Cinema announces its permanent closure. DISCUSSION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat, site plan, and build to zone variance as requested contingent upon compliance with the staff reports and recommends approval of the attached resolution regarding the TIF plan. ATTACHMENTS Development Review Application Applicants Project Description Architectural Site Plan Sheets and West Building Architectural Plans and Renderings East Building Architectural Plans and Renderings Civil and Landscape Plans Planning Dept Staff Report - Subdivision, Site Plan, Variance Request Engineering and Water Resources Department Staff Report - Subdivision and Site Plan Variance Findings Parking Study TIF Plan - Chanhassen TIF District No. 13 TIF Resolution - Finding the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 13 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan 4 Affidavit of Public Hearing Mailing Project Communications Graphic Public Comments 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Date: CC Date: 60-Day Review Date: Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Single-Family Residence ................................ $325 All Others......................................................... $500 Interim Use Permit (IUP) In conjunction with Single-Family Residence .. $325 All Others......................................................... $500 Rezoning (REZ) Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 All Others......................................................... $500 Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 Site Plan Review (SPR) Administrative .................................................. $100 Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (______ thousand square feet) *Include number of existing employees: __________ *Include number of new employees:__________ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_____ units) Subdivision (SUB) Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $500 Create over 3 lots ....................... $1000 + $15 per lot (_____ lots) Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 Administrative Subd. (Line Adjustment) .......... $150 Final Plat + $15 per lot .................................. $700* *(Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs) *Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Single-Family Residence ............................... $150 All Others ....................................................... $275 Appeal of Administrative Decision........................ $200 Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Notification Sign (City to install and remove) ...................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners’ List within 500’ (City to generate after pre-application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (____ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ....................................................................... $ per document Conditional Use Permit - $50 Wetland Alteration Permit - $50 Variance - $50 Interim Use Permit $50 Easements (__ easements) $85 Metes & Bounds Sub (2 deeds) $250 Site Plan Agreement - $85 Vacation - $85 Deeds - $100 TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Legal Description: Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? Yes No Present Zoning: Requested Zoning: Present Land Use Designation: Requested Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: Check box if separate narrative is attached. 6 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed b y the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to pr oceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Email______________________________ Name: Applicant Email______________________________ Address: Engineer Email______________________________ City/State/Zip: Other* Email______________________________ Email: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. 7 Project Descripon · ID: 25-11-90-030: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Parking) · ID: 25-11-90-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Hotel/Parking) · ID: 25-11-90-040: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Parking) · ID: 25-11-80-020: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Hotel/Parking) · ID: 25-11-80-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (High Timber Lounge) · ID: 25-44-60-011: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Sliver west of Theater) · ID: 25-28-30-010: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC (Theater) Required Applicaons: · Preliminary Plat · Final Plat (later) · Site Plan · Vacaon of Easements Urban Design: The development site sits within a super-block bounded by 78th Street to the north, Market Boulevard to the west, Market Street to the south and Great Plains Boulevard to the east. This block, measuring 670’ north to south and over ¼ mile east to west is unbroken by any roads. Several parcels have no frontage on a public right of way and rely on access easements through adjacent parcels. The large amount of grade change from north to south further inhibits access through the superblock. One of the primary urban design goals of the proposed development is to provide more legible connecons through the site. Toward that goal, the development is split into two buildings separated by an extension of Laredo Drive to the southern boundary of the development site. This extension of Laredo Drive will be sloped to the maximum praccable extent in order to facilitat e a future further extension of Laredo south to Market Street, if and when the property to the south is redeveloped. Within the two buildings, spaces at the street level are organized to minimize the visual impact of automobiles and promote walkability. Retail spaces and residenal support spaces line 78 th Street and the Laredo Drive extension. Walk-up townhomes line the west side of the West Building. Structured parking is located behind these acve uses at stree t level and below grade. Below a 51-stall surface parking lot in the northwest corner will be underground stormwater tanks. Sidewalks will line all streets, and planted boulevards with canopy trees will be provided wherever possible, both to provide shade for pedestrians and to create a buffer between the street and sidewalk. All retail spaces will have their primary entrances facing the street. Customers will park either in the northwest surface lot or within the street-level structures parking garage in the west building. Two paseos allow pedestrian access from the customer parking area to 78th Street and the business entrances. The retail space on the corner of 78th and Market is designed to house a restaurant including a covered, outdoor dining terrace facing the corner and the new City Hall building. 8 Architecture: The development team’s design goal is to create an architecture suited to a mixed use downtown. Along 78th Street, the retail spaces are expressed in one- and two-story volumes. The upper floors of housing are stepped back from this retail base. The West Building is the larger of the two buildings and has more than 300’ of frontage along 78th Street, similar in scale to the length of a tradional city block. The massing of the building is sculpted into several disnct volumes that help evoke the idea of a tradional town center made up of individual buildings that have accreted over me. The two larg est recesses in the façade coincide with the paseos that provide pedestrian connecons from the custome r parking to 78th Street. These recesses help provide way-finding to the paseos. Several upper-story step backs contribute to a varied cornice line. The West Building features a large, west-facing outdoor recreaonal terrace along Market Boulevard. An addional amenity space occurs at the upper level o f the building affording views toward the Civic Center Campus. The East Building is oriented toward Laredo Drive and is set back from 78th Street, aligned with Aldi and The Venue. This setback serves to maintain exisng traffic paGerns, namely the connecon of the Aldi parking lot to Laredo Drive. Stormwater tanks serving the enre development sit below this parking lot . Similar to the West Building, The north elevaon of the East Building is composed of a one-story base of commercial storefronts, with several stories of housing above that are stepped back from the base. A strategic upper story step back on the north façade accommodates an upper-level terrace and club room that face north and west. Due to the grade change across the site, the East Building’s underground parking is gradually revealed toward the south and on the south façade, the parking is lined with four walk-up flats with generous paos. Parking: In an effort to develop a compact, pedestrian-focused, vercally-mixed-use community in the Downtown Mixed use character area, the development team is endeavoring to make the most efficient use of parking stalls both within the redevelopment parcels and among several adjacent parcels that have an effecve surplus of under-ulized parking. The propo sed plan provides 467 stalls (of which 406 are enclosed) on the development sites. In addion to t hese on-site stalls, there are several legal agreements in place that allow the Cinema (East Building) parcel rights to parking stalls on adjacent properes. The Chanhassen municipal code provides t hat for mixed use projects, parking requirements shall be determined by the city based on the uses. A parking demand study is being prepared to calculate the parking demand of the enre project, taking into account differing peak mes generated by different uses. Listed below are the off-site parking resources the development team proposes to use in order to sasfy the development’s required parking: · 25 surface stalls south of the “cinema parcel” (East Building): o An exisng easement (Doc # A387167) allows the cine ma parcel unrestricted use of 25 stalls. We propose to use these stalls for residents of the East Building. 9 · 103 enclosed stalls in the Southwest Transit parking garage: o An exisng easement (Doc #A662708) gives The Venue and Cinema parcels access to 103 stalls in the SW Transit parking facility but restricts use to weekends and weekday nights between 6:00 pm and 2:00 am the following morning. This me restricon doesn’t allow these stalls to be effecvely used for resident parking but the allowable mes correspond closely with the typical peak use of guests of residents. The development team proposes to use 37 of these stalls toward the combined 65 required guest stalls for The Venue and East Building. · The “cinema parcel” has rights to park in the enre parking lot south of The Venue, but overnight parking is restricted. 10 VENUE APARTMENTS(6 STORIES)ALDI(1 STORY)CHANHASSEN STATIONCHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERS974977964960975ROOFROOFMARKET BLVDW 78TH STMARKET STPET EXERCISEPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATIONAREA WELL FOR MECH EXHAUST971972976RETAINING WALL9646 STORY BUILDING5 STORY BUILDINGCOURTYARD AT LEVEL 2COURTYARD AT LEVEL 25 STORY BUILDINGLAREDO DRJIMMY JOHNSFUTURE LOREDO DRIVE EXTENSION6,669 SFAMENITY1,448 SFRETAIL1,581 SFRETAILPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT5 STORIES5 STORIES5 STORIES 1 STORY2 STORIESSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota2/14/2024 3:35:50 PMA.02DISTRICT SITE PLANProject NumberAuthorChecker05/02/23Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MN2/14/2024OVERALL BUILDING METRICSNo. Description Date11 ROOFROOFPET EXERCISEPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATIONAREA WELL FOR MECH EXHAUSTRETAINING WALLFUTURE LOREDO DRIVE EXTENSIONVENUE APARTMENTS(6 STORIES)ALDI(1 STORY)CHANHASSEN STATIONCHANHASSEN DINNER THEATERSMARKET BLVDW 78TH STMARKET STLAREDO DRJIMMY JOHNSRESTAURANTLOBBY RETAILRETAILRESIDENTIAL (TOWNHOMES)GUEST/CUSTOMER PARKING RESIDENT PARKINGLOBBYRETAIL GUEST/CUSTOMER PARKINGTERRACEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENTRETAILSignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota2/14/2024 3:35:55 PMA.03DISTRICT STREET LEVELPLANProject NumberAuthorChecker01/16/24Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MN2/14/2024No. Description Date12 97427,907 SFRETAIL/GUEST PARKING3,952 SFRETAILW 78TH ST1,854 SFRETAIL4,366 SFRESTAURANTPATIO964'975'976'2,983 SFLOBBY / LEASING787 SFTRASH975976977977974972977'-0"101'-0"971980'-0"980'-0"3.23%3.23%977'-0"977'-0"977'-0"FOUNDATION WALL BELOW1,494 SFRETAIL972100'-0"100'-0"976'-0"976'-0"ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATION10' - 2"12' - 9"10' - 7"16' - 4"14' - 11"18,511 SFRESIDENT PARKING9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"18' - 0" 26' - 0" 18' - 0"PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT1 BR + D2 BR1 BR + D2 BR1,017 SF3,785 SFRESIDENTIALSTORAGEEQUIP5,232 SFAMENITY1,323 SFAMENITYPOOLACTIVE AMENITY TERRACE9' - 6"6' - 8"25' - 2"8' - 4"8' - 4"3' - 0"14' - 0"9,568 SFRESIDENTIAL6,470 SF13,961 SFRESIDENTIAL9,897 SFRESIDENTIAL2 BR1 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BRALCOVE2 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR + D1 BRALCOVE1 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR3 BR1 BR + DALCOVE1 BR1 BR 1 BR3 BR3 BR2 BR2 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BRALCOVE2 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR + D1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR + D3 BR2 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR2 BR6,274 SF3 BR3 BRALCOVE 1 BR2 BR1 BRALCOVE7' - 10"2 BR1 BR2 BR2 BRSKY DECK1,198 SFAMENITY1 BR + D1 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BR2 BRALCOVE2 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR1 BR + D1 BR1 BRSTUDIO1 BR1 BR2 BR1 BR + D2 BR1 BR7,042 SFRESIDENTIAL6,895 SFRESIDENTIAL13,961 SFRESIDENTIAL5,324 SF9' - 11"3 BRALCOVE1 BR1,541 SFRESIDENTIAL10' - 8"28' - 9 3/4"89' - 4"49,990 SFPARKINGRETAIL ABOVE (UNEXCAVATED)5.16% DN4.35% DN5.56% DN93'-4"93'-4"5.16%5.95% DNPERIMETER OF BUILDING ABOVE18' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 6"18' - 0"26' - 0"18' - 0"LOWER LEVEL OF 2-STORY TOWNHOMELOWER LEVEL OF 2-STORY TOWNHOME1,585 SFRESIDENTIALSLOPED WALKXFMR XFMRELECMOVE INGEN18' - 0" 26' - 0" 18' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0"38,024 SFPARKING4.52%4.52%5.56% DN78'-8"GARAGE MUAGARAGE EXHAUST AREA WELL18' - 0" 26' - 0"9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0"SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota2/14/2024 3:35:57 PMA.10WEST BUILDING - FLOORPLANSProject NumberAuthorChecker12/01/23Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MN2/14/20241/32" = 1'-0"A.101STREET LEVEL PLAN1/32" = 1'-0"A.102LEVEL 2 PLAN1/32" = 1'-0"A.103TYPICAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN1/32" = 1'-0"A.104LEVEL 6 PLAN1/32" = 1'-0"A.105MINUS 1 LEVEL1/32" = 1'-0"A.106MINUS 2 LEVEL1/32" = 1'-0"A.107ROOF LEVELWEST BUILDING UNIT MATRIXNo. Description Date13 DNDNDNUPUP11'3456789101213BCDEFGF.5HJA.11110.32.2AA.397496427,907 SFRETAIL/GUEST PARKING3,952 SFRETAILMARKET BLVDW 78TH ST1,854 SFRETAIL4,366 SFRESTAURANTJIMMY JOHN'SFUTURE LAREDO STREET EXTENSION2BR/2.5BA TOWNHOME(1490 SF)PATIO2,983 SFLOBBY / LEASING787 SFTRASH975976977977974972977.00'971980.00'980.00'3.23%3.23%3.23%977.00'977.00'[No Slope]FOUNDATION WALL BELOW1,494 SFRETAIL972968100'-0"100'-0"976.00'976.00'GARAGE EXHAUST AREA WELLPROPOSED CURB LOCATIONEXISTING CURB LOCATION10' - 2"12' - 9"10' - 7"16' - 4"14' - 11"2A.151A.151.3BUILDING PERIMETER ABOVEGARAGE MAKE UP AIR INTAKE LOUVERTRASH ROOMBELOW-GRADE STORMWATER STRUCTURESELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERSEMERGENCY GENERATORMOVE IN ROUTE98'-0"974.00'2BR WALK-UP(1015 SF)20' - 8"976PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT2BR/2.5BA TOWNHOME(1490 SF)2BR WALK-UP(1015 SF)977.00'977.00'TYPICAL BAY29' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"9' - 0"27' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE26' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE26' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE26' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE26' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"16' - 0"PARKING STALL18' - 0"DRIVE AISLE26' - 0"10' - 0"16' - 11"15' - 3"SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota2/14/2024 3:36:04 PMA.11WEST BUILDING - STREETLEVEL PLAN ENLARGEDProject NumberAuthorChecker05/19/23Market Blvd & W 78th StMarket Blvd & W78th StChanhassen, MN2/14/2024DOWNTONW MIXED USE CHARACTERHIGH QUALITY ARCHITECTURE WITH GROUND LEVEL RETAIL ALONG WEST 78TH STREET, UPPER LEVEL RESIDENTIAL OR OFFICE, BUILDINGS TOWARDS THE STREET, PARKING IN THE REAR, PEDESTRIAN FOCUSED. SEC 20-732 PERMITTED USES WHEN A MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING USE HAS FRONTAGE ON WEST 78TH STREET, A PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL INCORPORATE A RESTAURANT, ENTERTAINMENT, COMMERCIAL SERVICE, COMMERCIAL RETAIL, BREWERY, BREW PUB, OR MICRODISTILLERY USE.SEC 20-736 LOT REQUIREMENTS NO MINIMUM LOT AREA, FRONTAGE, OR DEPTH NO MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE SEC 20-737 SETBACK AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS FRONT YARD BUILD TO ZONE: 0' - 15No. Description Date14 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"11' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10C1B 1A 1A 6A 12C 5A 3A 2A 1D 8B 1D 1A SEE PLAN PASSAGEWAY SEE PLAN PASSAGEWAY OPEN 2B 2B 2B 13A2A 12A 12A 13A 2A 6A1B6A8A5A 5A 10A 10A 12C 1B 12C 6A 6A 8A 5A 10C 1D 3A BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] 2B 2B 5A 12D 6A 10A 6A 6A 2B ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ 5-STORY PORTION63' - 0"BUILDING HEIGHT (TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN)76' - 8"1D 8B 12D 12D 1C 8B 5B 1C8B LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4" 10A 8A 6A 1A 1D 3A2A8B 5A 8B 1B 10C 1A 1C2A 3A 8B 8C 1C5A 5B 5A5B8C 1C 1B 12A 12C 8A 6A 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"10' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] 2B 8B 8A 12C 10C 2B AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN76' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ TYPICAL 6-STORY PORTION72' - 0"9E 1C 6A 10C 9A 9C 5A 5A 12D 1D 5A 8A6A10D Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/14/2024 6:53:01 PMA.12 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker 05/19/23 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 2/14/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.12 1 NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.12 2 EAST ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR BLEND #3 1D BRICK - COLOR BLEND #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B COMPOSITE METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 7A 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #1 9B EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #2 9C EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #3 9E PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 12D PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #2 13A METAL CANOPY 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date 15 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"10' - 8"LOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART MURAL OPPORTUNITY COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND. SEE SHEET #/4 A.14 8A 10A 10A 1A 3A 10A 12C 12A 6A 10B 10A 8A 10A 10D 1A 8A 6A 1A 5A 5A 8A 10A BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL] ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART MURAL OPPORTUNITY 2B 10A 3B 2B 1B AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ TYPICAL 6-STORY PORTION72' - 0"976.00' 1C 5A 9E 1A 12C 9A 10D6A 12C LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" MINUS 1 LEVEL 89' - 4" COURTYARD ELEVATION BEYOND. SEE SHEET #/1 A.14 8A1B 12C 1B 10C 2A 8B 8B 13A 9E12A 6B 12A 3A6B 1A 10A 2B 6A 5A 2B 12C 10C 6A 8A 10A BUILDING HEIGHT GROUND LEVEL 100'-0" (EL: 976') [10' ABOVE LOWEST ADJOINING GROUND LEVEL]10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"GROUND STORY HT.16' - 0"BASEMENT10' - 8"UPPER STORIES HEIGHTS10A 6A 5A AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT (TO ELEVATOR OVERRUN)76' - 8"BUILDING HEIGHT @ 5-STORY PORTION63' - 8"1A 10C 10D 3B 5A 12C8A 16A10D 5A 5A1C 8A 10C 1C 8B Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/14/2024 6:53:05 PMA.13 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker 05/19/23 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 2/14/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.13 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.13 2 WEST ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR BLEND #3 1D BRICK - COLOR BLEND #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B COMPOSITE METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 7A 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #1 9B EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #2 9C EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #3 9E PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 12D PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #2 13A METAL CANOPY 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date 16 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION1A 5A10A 8A 10C 9A 10A 10C8A 9A 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"8A 5A 6A AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 6A 12C LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 6A 1B10A 8A 1B 6A 10C 8A 9A 9B 8B 12C 5A 12C 10D 6A10A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 6A2B AMENITY ROOF 172' - 4" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 8B LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 6A 8A10D10B 10C 12C 1A 6A 10D 1A 10A 1CPROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 10A9A 8A 6A 10A 2B ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 5A 12C LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 10B9A10C6A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 8A 10A ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 12C 10D LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 8A 10D10A10B 8A 10D 6A 10C 9A 9A PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"10C6A ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 12C 12C LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 116' - 0" LEVEL 3 127' - 8" LEVEL 4 138' - 4" LEVEL 5 149' - 0" LEVEL 6 159' - 8" ROOF LEVEL 170' - 4" 6A 10D 10B 10A 6A 12C 1A 12A 10A 10D PROFILE OF BUILDING IN SECTION 10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"11' - 8"9A 2B ELEVATOR OVERRUN 176' - 8" 12C Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/14/2024 6:53:10 PMA.14 WEST BUILDING ELEVATIONS Project Number Author Checker 01/15/24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 2/14/2024 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 1 WEST COURTYARD - WEST-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 2 WEST COURTYARD - SOUTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 3 WEST COURTYARD - NORTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 4 SOUTH COURTYARD - SOUTH-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 5 SOUTH COURTYARD - EAST-FACING ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A.14 6 SOUTH COURTYARD - WEST-FACING ELEVATION EXTERIOR MATERIAL KEYNOTES 1A BRICK - COLOR #1 1B BRICK - COLOR #2 1C BRICK - COLOR BLEND #3 1D BRICK - COLOR BLEND #4 2A STONE - COLOR #1 2B CAST STONE STRINGCOURSE - COLOR #1 3A ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #1 3B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST - COLOR #2 5A PREFINISHED METAL PANEL - COLOR #1 5B COMPOSITE METAL PANEL - COLOR #2 6A FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #1 6B FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - COLOR #2 7A 8A COMPOSITE WINDOW/DOOR UNIT 8B ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 8C OVERHEAD DOOR 9A EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #1 9B EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #2 9C EXTERNAL LOUVER GRILLE - COLOR #3 9E PREFINISHED MECHANICAL LOUVER 10A PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #1 10B PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING/TRIM - COLOR #2 10C PREFINISHED METAL HEAD PANEL 10D PREFINISHED METAL SILL PANEL 12A METAL RAILING SYSTEM 12C PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #1 12D PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM -COLOR #2 13A METAL CANOPY 16A CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN KEY PLAN No. Description Date 17 Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/14/2024 6:14:34 PMA.16 3D VIEWS Project Number Author Checker 01/26/24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 2/14/2024 No. Description Date WEST BUILDING -STREET LEVEL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM NW CORNER OF MARKET BLVD & 78TH STREET INTERSECTION WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF WALK-UP UNITS AND STREETSCAPE ALONG MARKET BLVD WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF SOUTHWEST CORNER LOOKING NORTH ALONG MARKET BLVD WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF RESTAURANT, RESIDENTIAL LOBBY ENTRY, AND PARKING ACCESS PASSAGEWAY ALONG 78TH STREET WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF NORTHWEST CORNER AND 78TH & MARKET BLVD FRONTAGES WEST BUILDING -VIEW OF NORTHEAST CORNER AND LAREDO DRIVE EXTENSION BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS 18 Signature Typed or Printed Name License #Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 2/14/2024 6:12:55 PMA.17 WEST BUILDING - EXTERIOR FINISHES Project Number Author Checker 02/13/24 Market Blvd & W 78th St Market Blvd & W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 2/14/2024 No. Description Date BRICK 1A -COLOR #1 BRICK 1B -COLOR #2 BRICK 1C -COLOR #3 BRICK 1D -COLOR #4 STONE 2A CAST STONE 2B ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 3A -COLOR #1 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST 3B -COLOR #2 METAL PANEL 5A -COLOR #1/ METAL BALCONY & RAILING 12D METAL PANEL 5B -COLOR #2/ METAL HEAD PANEL 10C/ METAL SILL PANEL 10D FIBER CEMENT PANEL 6A -COLOR #1 COMPOSITE WINDOW FRAME 8A/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAME 8B/ METAL BALCONY & RAILING 12C METAL FLASHING 10A 19 LEVEL 1103' - 4"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 8"LEVEL 4135' - 4"LEVEL 5146' - 0"ROOF PLAN156' - 8"MINUS 1 LEVEL87' - 0"LEVEL RETAIL100' - 0"14' - 0" 10' - 8" 10' - 8" 10' - 8" 10' - 8" 4' - 0"975'975'4' - 0"971'8' - 6"64' - 8"14' - 0" 10' - 8" 10' - 8" 10' - 8" 10' - 8"BRICK COLOR #1BRICK COLOR #1 - HORIZONTAL DETAILINGBRICK COLOR #1BRICK COLOR #1 - HORIZONTAL DETAILINGFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOALFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - WARM GRAYHORIZONTAL ACCENT PANELFIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BRONZE COLORALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEMBRICK COLOR #2PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEMELEVATOR OVERRUN69' - 2"59' - 11"LEVEL 1103' - 4"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 8"LEVEL 4135' - 4"LEVEL 5146' - 0"ROOF PLAN156' - 8"MINUS 1 LEVEL87' - 0"LEVEL RETAIL100' - 0"BRICK COLOR #1FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOALFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - WARM GRAYHORIZONTAL ACCENT PANELFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOALBRICK COLOR #2PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEM71' - 11"8' - 6"78' - 2"72' - 11"SignatureTyped or Printed NameLicense #DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensed architectunder the laws of the State of Minnesota2/15/2024 12:19:24 PMA.22EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONSProject NumberAuthorChecker01/19/24Market Blvd & W 78th St -East BuildingMarket Blvd & W78th St -EastBuildingChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/20243/32" = 1'-0"A.221NORTH ELEVATION3/32" = 1'-0"A.222SOUTH ELEVATIONNo. Description Date20 LEVEL 1103' - 4"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 8"LEVEL 4135' - 4"LEVEL 5146' - 0"ROOF PLAN156' - 8"MINUS 1 LEVEL87' - 0"LEVEL RETAIL100' - 0"BRICK COLOR #1FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOALFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - WARM GRAYFIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BRONZE COLORFIBER CEMENT PANEL - GREIGEBRICK COLOR #2 FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOAL FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - WARM GRAY BRICK COLOR #1 PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEMPRECAST DARK GRAYPRECAST GRAYBRICK COLOR #1BRICK COLOR #1 - HORIZONTAL DETAILING975'971'60' - 8"69' - 2"71' - 11"LEVEL 1103' - 4"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 8"LEVEL 4135' - 4"LEVEL 5146' - 0"ROOF PLAN156' - 8"MINUS 1 LEVEL87' - 0"LEVEL RETAIL100' - 0"PREFABRICATED METAL BALCONY & RAILING SYSTEMBRICK COLOR #1FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - CHARCOALFIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL - WARM GRAYFIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BRONZE COLORFIBER CEMENT PANEL - GREIGEPRECAST DARK GRAYPRECAST GRAYBRICK COLOR #1BRICK COLOR #1 - HORIZONTAL DETAILINGHORIZONTAL ACCENT PANELFIBER CEMENT PANEL - LIGHT BRONZE COLORBRICK COLOR #2HORIZONTAL ACCENT PANEL975'971'4' - 0"59' - 11"72' - 11"69' - 2"65' - 2"Signature Typed or Printed Name License # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota2/15/2024 12:19:27 PMA.23EAST BUILDING ELEVATIONSProject NumberAuthor Checker01/19/24Market Blvd & W 78th St -East BuildingMarket Blvd & W78th St -EastBuildingChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/20243/32" = 1'-0"A.231EAST ELEVATION3/32" = 1'-0"A.232WEST ELEVATIONNo. Description Date21 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota2/15/2024 12:19:30 PMA.25EAST BUILDING 3D VIEWSProject NumberAuthor Checker01/19/24Market Blvd & W 78th St -East BuildingMarket Blvd & W78th St -EastBuildingChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/2024123456123456No. Description Date22 Signature Typed or Printed Name License # DatePROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BY CHECKED BYORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:KEY PLANNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota2/15/2024 12:19:31 PMA.26ADDITIONAL 3D VIEWS +EXTERIOR MATERIALSProject NumberAuthor Checker02/14/24Market Blvd & W 78th St -East BuildingMarket Blvd & W78th St -EastBuildingChanhassen, MNLAND USEAPPLICATION1/19/2024No. Description DateADDITIONAL VIEWSBRICK COLOR #1BRICK COLOR #1 - HORIZONTAL DETAILINGBRICK COLOR #2PRECAST DARK GRAYGREIGEWARM GRAYCHARCOALLIGHT BRONZEPRECAST LIGHT GRAYFIBER CEMENT PANELHORIZONTAL ACCENT PANEL878723 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITEMATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH fullbleed E1 (30.00 x 42.00 Inches) SHEET.3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODESAND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TOANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINALUTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:SITE BENCHMARKS:(LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY)PROJECT BENCHMARK: TOP OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPIRATION GEODETIC MONUMENT "HASSEN MNDT"ELEVATION=983.31 (NAVD 88)SBM #1: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NEAR NORTHEASTERLYCORNER OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.ELEVATION= 978.35 (NAVD 88)SBM #2: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT NEAR SOUTHEASTERLYPORTION OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY.ELEVATION=964.09 (NAVD 88)BENCHMARKSNORTHVICINITYN.T.S.SITECHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: 651-645-4197CONTACT: MITCHELL COOKASGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERBRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438TELEPHONE: 952-995-2000CONTACT: AARON R. SCHULZETENBERGPROJECT TEAM:SURVEYOREGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, SUITE 200NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112TELEPHONE: 612-466-3300CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDOENGINEERKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: MICHAEL C. BRANDT, PE767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE: 651-645-4197OWNER / DEVELOPERROERS COMPANIES2 CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 400,PLYMOUTH, MN 55447TELEPHONE: 763-285-8808CONTACT: NICK ASTACHANHASSEN APARTMENTSSECTION 13, TOWNSHIP116 N, RANGE 23 WFORSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallARCHITECTESG ARCHITECTS500 SOUTH WASHINGTON AVENUE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415TELEPHONE: 612-339-5508CONTACT: BOB LOKENARBORETUM BLVDW 78TH STMARKET BLVD GREAT PLAINS BLVDMARKET STC000COVER SHEETSheet List TableSheet NumberSheet TitleC000COVER SHEETC100GENERAL NOTESC101PARCEL MAPV100ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYV101ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYV102ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYC200SITE DEMOLITION PLANC201TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLANC300EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1C301EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C302EROSION CONTROL DETAILSC400SITE PLANC401TRUCK CIRCULATIONC402SITE DETAILSC403SITE DETAILSC404SITE DETAILSC500GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC501STORM SEWER PLANC600UTILITY PLANC601UTILITY DETAILSC602UTILITY DETAILSC603UTILITY DETAILSC604UTILITY DETAILSC605UTILITY DETAILSC607UTILITY DETAILSC608UTILITY DETAILSC609UTILITY DETAILSL100LANDSCAPE PLANL101LANDSCAPE DETAILSPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E.01/19/2024462661DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.DescriptionDateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMMARKET BLVD& W 78TH ST24 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3.PERFORM ALL WORK IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS, STATE CODES, AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING THE NECESSARY MATERIALS & LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 5.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 6.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 9.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 10.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 12.ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 13.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 15.SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 16.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION, ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. 6.BMPS SHOWN ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT. 7.EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 7.1.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. 7.2.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO VERIFY THAT A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS MAINTAINED. SEEDED AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RE-SEEDED AS NEEDED. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 7.3.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 7.4.THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF ROCK TOP DRESSING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.5.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF TOP DRESSING IF THE TEMPORARY PARKING CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.6.PERFORM ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, OR THE STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5.THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6.ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7.THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9.ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10.BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11.MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5.BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 6" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7.AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO STATE DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED TO MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 70% IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14.SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 17.PAVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AND CITY & STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19.LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20.IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22.BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23.ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24.ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25.ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER MANHOLES AND PIPES, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10-FEET AND A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18-INCHES. 11.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GASKETED AND/OR GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17.ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 2.0% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18.PROVIDE INSULATION OF UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES IF ADEQUATE FROST DEPTH CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21.A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 5-FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22.GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26.REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR ROUTING OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL & COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT. THIRD PARTY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIRD PARTY CONSULTANTS. 1.BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY: EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. ADDRESS: 475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, SUITE 200, NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 PHONE: 612-466-3300 DATED: 09/26/2023 2.GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PERFORMED BY: BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ADDRESS: 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 PHONE: 952-995-2000 DATED: 10/18/2023 3.CONSTRUCTION TESTING TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ·DENSITY TEST REPORTS ·BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM ·PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER ·LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS ·ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY C100 GENERAL NOTES PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 25 PID:254460010 OWNER:KRAUS-ANDERSON INC PID: 254510010 OWNER: MARKET SQUARE ASSOC LTD PTRSHP AND C/O V CLAYTON & ASSOCIATES PID: 254490010 OWNER: NEARCO IV LLC PID: 254510040 OWNER: MARKET SQUARE ASSTS II LLC PID: 257740020 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 250122000 OWNER: AREA INVEST LLC PID: 250122200 OWNER: STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN PID: 251720010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN RETIAL LTD PRTSHP PID:251720020 OWNER: SPIRIT MASTER FUNDING VII LLC PID: 251720030 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 254610050 OWNER:CITY OF CHANHASSEN PID: 254610020 OWNER: CHANHASSEN MEDICAL ARTS II LLS PID: 251680021 OWNER: NEW CHANHASSEN HOLDING COMPANY LLC PID:2570300030 OWNER:CHANHASSEN FRONTIER LLC AND C/O CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD PID: 257030020 OWNER: AGREE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PID: 251680010 OWNER: SOUTHWEST TRANSIT PID: 252490020 OWNER: VIRGINA S THOMAS FAMILY LP PID: 252490010 OWNER: REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 3 LLC PID: 252520010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN LETSOS LLCPID: 254510020OWNER: MARKET SQUAREASSOC LTD PTRSHP ANDC/O V CLAYTON & ASSOCIATESPID: 257740010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN CITY PID: 252750020 OWNER: BHB INVESTMENTS LLC PID: 257900210 OWNER: HAVLIK FAMILY TRUST AGMT PID: 257900220 OWNER: PAUL J & STACY K OSEN PID: 257900230 OWNER: DAVID & MEGAN L WOODS PID: 257900240 OWNER: DEAN HARLAN WALLENTINE PID: 257900250 OWNER: JACK GOGGINS PID: 257900260 OWNER: MICHAEL MEYERS PID: 257900270OWNER: MARK & ROSEANN SCHLENKPID: 257030010 OWNER: CHANHASSEN FRONTIER LLC PID: 259990200 OWNER: TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD PID: 251680 0 6 0 OWNER: C H A N H A S S E N C I T Y PID: 250136600 OWNER: CHANHASSEN HRA PID: 251190070 OWNER BLOOMBERG COMPANIES INCLAREDO DRIVE78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDNORTH LEGEND PROPERTY LINE Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C101 PARCEL MAP PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 26 V100 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 27 V101 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 28 V102 ALTA TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 29 RELOCATE COMMUNICATION LINE, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE BUILDING OVERHANG. REMOVE FLAGPOLE REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE GAS METER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMERS, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. REMOVE TRANSFORMERS, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHTS. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM. REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS, COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND KA DEVELOPMENT. G G G G G G G PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POWER LINE. REMOVE TRANSFORMER, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. B B B BB B B B B B B B C C C C C C C CC C C C D D D D D I I I I I I PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALLS H H TYP. TYP. F F TYP. TYP. E PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLEREMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING MANHOLE STRUCTURE, REMOVE EXISTING PIPE TO THE EAST AND PLUG STRUCTURE.A A A A A A A A A PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING POWER LINE. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER REMOVE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. J J J J K K K K K K K K KK K K K K K L L L L L M M N N N L L L O P P P P P Q Q Q Q Q R R RR B D WATERMAIN LOOP MUST BE KEPT INTACT UNTIL NEW LOOP LINE IS IN PLACE, COORDINATE WITH CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND KA DEVELOPMENT PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE, REMOVE EXISTING PIPE TO THE EAST AND PLUG STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF ALDI WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH STORE MANAGER. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ALDI STORE MANAGER FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. WATERMAIN REMOVAL MUST BE COORDINATED WITH ALDI STORE MANAGER AND CANNOT BE REMOVED UNTIL NEW PIPE IS IN PLACE. M A A A A A A A A A A A A A A WATERMAIN LOOP MUST BE KEPT INTACT UNTIL NEW LOOP LINE IS IN PLACE, COORDINATE WITH CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND KA DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH KA DEVELOPMENT FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH AMERICANA COMMUNITY BANK FOR ACCESS SHUT DOWN. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF OLD NATIONAL BANK WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH BANK MANAGER. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF OLD NATIONAL BANK WATER SUPPLY TO 2 HOURS AND COORDINATE OUTAGE WITH STORE MANAGER. R R R R R R R R R R R R PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL HYDRANT. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN. SALVAGE AND REINSTALL SIGN CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TRAFFIC LIGHT. REMOVE EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE K PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER LINE EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT REMOVE LIGHT POLE 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING OF THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, INCLUDING THE TYPE OF DEBRIS AND LOCATION WHERE IT WAS DISPOSED. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES TO PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED WORK AREA. 6.EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORD PLAN DATA AND/OR FIELD UTILITY MARKINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION. ADDITIONAL UNMARKED OBSTACLES MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINES AND CAP ANY ABANDONED LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE PROPOSED WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE DOT AS NECESSARY. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS / SWPPP. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT OR CURB, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE CITY WATER AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS. 14.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE; ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 16.IF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING CURB REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING FENCE REMOVE EXISTING TREE REMOVE EXISTING SIGN REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING WATER LINE / HYDRANT / VALVE REMOVE EXISTING SEWER LINE / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING STORM LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING STORM LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING WATER LINE / HYDRANT / VALVE PROTECT EXISTING SEWER LINE / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE PROTECT EXISTING LIGHT POLE PROTECT EXISTING TREE A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q RNORTH C200 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN ABANDON UTILITY LINES IN PLACE 30 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGA A A A A A A A A A AA A A A A A A AA A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B BB B B B B B B B A AAAA A A A A A A C C C C C C C C C C C BA B A C C C C C TREE TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND TREE REMOVAL: 43 TREES TREE REMOVAL: ~744 CAL. IN. REPLACEMENT CALIPER REQUIRED:~1,488 CAL. IN. = 2X THE CALIPER INCHES REMOVED TREE MITIGATION DATA 1.PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2.NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3.SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 4.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5.TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. TREE PROTECTION NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE LOCATED PER AERIAL IMAGE, DATED 08/22/23. SIZE DETERMINED VIA GOOGLE STREET VIEW, IMAGE DATED MARCH 2023, BASED ON ADJACENT TREE IN SURVEY A B C EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE C201 TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA 5652201/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 31 591 78TH STREET WEST 575 78TH STREET WEST 570 MARKET STREET 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T M A R K E T B O U L E V A R D7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T B O U L E V A R DM A R K E TITEM 11 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 19 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 18 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 14 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 15 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 SD SDSD SD SD SD SDSD SDSDSDSDS DSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSD SDSD SD3.29%2.47%4.04%3.46%1.11% 1.11% 1 . 4 3% 1.6 3 %3.01%4.87%2.73%1.2 7 %4.00%8.88%A B B B B B B B A C 9709 7 5 9 6 6 966966 967 9 6 8 9 6 9 971972973 97397397497 4 976977975 975973973 973974 974976976977 D D B A CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING OFF-SITE PARKING SURFACES B SOIL TYPE: KB 3.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KC-2 0.3 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KB 0.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: LA 0.1 ACRES SOIL TYPE: CO 0.1 ACRES B B B B B B B3.74%3.57%4.76 %4.94% 4.64 %5.14%1.72% 2 . 0 2% 2.80 % 4.14 % 2.86 %2.27% 1.1 0 %1.40%0.72%1.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL (I.E. SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER INLETS. 2.CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND CONCRETE WASHOUT 3.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4.CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. 5.CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 6.BEGIN MASS SITE GRADING AND ROUGH GRADE SITE SUFFICIENTLY TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 7.START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES AND/OR CITY GRADING PERMIT(S). NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE SILT DIKE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14.EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES PHASE I BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE ±1,355 LF INLET PROTECTION 17 EA ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT DIKE ±1,250 LF THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS KEYNOTE LEGEND SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT DIKE A B C D C300 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 NORTH PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SD SOIL MAP LEGEND CO - CORDOVA CLAY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES KB - KILKENNY-LESTER LOAMS, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 3.8 ACRES KC2 - LESTER-KILKENNY COMPLEX, 6 T O10 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED 0.3 ACRES LA - LE SUEUR-LESTER COMPLEX, 1 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 32 78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVESD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDS DSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD3.72%1.26%3.92% 2 . 0 8% 2.66% A B B B B B B B D C B B B BB B C 965 970970970 975 966967968969 97197197 1971971 972972972972972 9739749 7 6 977965 97 0 975966 967 968 96 9 971 97197197297397397397 4 974976 975974 976 976 977 9 7 7 B SOIL TYPE: KC-2 0.3 ACRES SOIL TYPE: KB 0.4 ACRES SOIL TYPE: LA 0.1 ACRES SOIL TYPE: CO 0.1 ACRES B 5.21%5.21%3.66%3.66%3.22%3.49%3.49%7.41 % B B B B B B B B B B BBB B1.46%1.48%SOIL TYPE: KB 3.4 ACRES 12.21%19.49%9.82%7.27%3.71 % 4.7 9 % 3. 5 5 % 1.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE. 2.CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 3.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ANY NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED. 4.COMPLETE SITE GRADING AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5.PLACE PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL AND INSTALL SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEM. 6.CONSTRUCT PAVEMENTS, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS. 7.AS APPROPRIATE, REPLACE & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITHIN PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8.COMPLETE FINAL GRADING AND INSTALL OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING, SODDING, ETC.) WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 9.WHEN THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS, REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND RE-STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 2 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE SILT DIKE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14.EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES PHASE 2 BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE ±1,330 LF INLET PROTECTION 31 EA ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT DIKE ±680 LF THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS KEYNOTE LEGEND SILT FENCE INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT DIKE A B C D PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C301 EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 NORTH SOIL MAP LEGEND CO - CORDOVA CLAY LOAM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES KB - KILKENNY-LESTER LOAMS, 2 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 3.8 ACRES KC2 - LESTER-KILKENNY COMPLEX, 6 T O10 PERCENT SLOPES, MODERATELY ERODED 0.3 ACRES LA - LE SUEUR-LESTER COMPLEX, 1 TO 6 PERCENT SLOPES 0.1 ACRES PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF DISTURBED AREA 5.57 AC / EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SOIL BOUNDARY - PER NRCS SD 33 C302 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST N.T.S. APRON ON THIS SIDE OF THE DIKE SHALL BE FOLDED UNDER THE DIKE SECTION 20" AND GLUED DOWN CONSTRUCTION AREA ASPHALT PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE OR A A APRON ADHESIVE FLOW ADHESIVE 20"20"ADHESIVEADHESIVEADHESIVE ADHESIVE NOTES: 1. INSTALLED SILT DIKE UNIT SHALL HAVE CONTINUOUS AND FIRM CONTACT WITH PAVEMENT. 2. ADHESIVES SHALL BE LIQUID NAIL OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT APPLICATIONS AND EMULSIFIED ASPHALT FOR ASPHALT APPLICATIONS. ADHESIVE SHALL BE PLACED WHERE THE UNITS OVERLAP AND A 20" STRIP ALONG BOTH EDGES. FLOW OVERLAP PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION A-A DIKE PLAN VIEW 1 SILT DIKE 34 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT 10.5'10.4'PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED 6' D&U EASEMENT TIE INTO EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 9.3'16.0'A A A A A A AA A A B B C D D D D D E C 18.0'26.0'18.0'7.0'18.0'8.0'8.0'5.0'P F F P P 9.0' M ME E E N N N N N N G G G G H H H H H H H E TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS TRANSFORMERS, SEE MEP PLANS18.5'15.9'7.3'9.5'11.2' 116.7'35.9'5.0'5.0'11.0'II K A L O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O OOO FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS FUTURE CURB - BY OTHERS PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT PROPOSED D&U EASEMENT 26.0'18.0'7.9'36.0'12.1'5.6'24.0'36.0'4.7' 9.0' 19.8'9.8' EXISTING CURB 7.0'4.6'8.6'6.0'1.8'26.6'27.7'12.4' 8.1'1.9'24.0'2.7'2.5'10.8'8.9'13.4'11.3'11.9'6.0' 8.8' 60.0' FUTURE ROW R30.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' R10.0' 3.1' 11.0' 0.6' 2.9'1.1'0.6'JJ J J J J J JJ J 13.0'10.0'10.1'7.5' LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A P Q Q 8.0' 6.2' 5.1' R R R RETAINING WALL STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS STAIRS STAIRS - SEE ARCH PLANS H H H H GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS BARRICADES PER CITY DETAIL 7.3' 11.6'5.0'N5.0'6.0'11.3'5.3'18.0'9.0'13.0'37.3'GENERATOR, SEE MEP PLANS S DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL T T5.0'I L K BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM EXTENTS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM EXTENTS COORDINATE TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATION WITH CITY EAST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (126 HOUSING UNITS) WEST BUILDING - SEE ARCH PLANS (184 HOUSING UNITS) 10.0' 13.7' 17.1' 23.6'14.1'5.7'9.0' 11.6'13.8'20.0' 111.8' 20.0'16.7'3.7'1.9' 5.0' 42.1'N 21.7' 9.0' EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT 8.3' R10.0'R3.0'R10.0' R20.0' R3.0' R5.0' R3.0' R3.0' R5.0' R10.0' R3.0'8.3'14.5'J J J J J P P 1.7' 3.5' 11.9' 16.0' F F F F F G G U U F F F F 6.2'13.9'G G U OUTLOT B BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS BUILDING OVERHEAD - SEE ARCH PLANS 4.0'4.1'DOG RUN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NORTH LEGEND PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 4.09 AC / 178,247 SF DISTURBED AREA 5.57 AC / EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.36 AC / 146,306 SF / 82.1% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.73 AC / 31,941SF / 17.9% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.66 AC / 159,455 SF / 89.5% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.43 AC / 18,792 SF / 10.5% SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPOSED LAND USE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING AND RETAIL REQUIRED PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 0' RIGHT OF WAY = 0' REQUIRED/PROVIDE BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.4' SIDE (EAST BLDG) = 0' / 7.5' REAR (WEST BLDG) = 0' / 10.8 RIGHT OF WAY (WEST BLDG) = 0' /10.5' SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. BUILDING DATA WEST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)66,721 SF EAST BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)39,221 SF TOTAL BUILDING AREA (FOOTPRINT)105,943 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 59.44% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 78' WEST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 76'-8" WEST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT VARIES 15' TO 16' WEST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" EAST BUILDING PROPOSED HEIGHT 69'-2" EAST BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HEIGHT 14'-0" EAST BUILDING UPPER FLOORS HEIGHT 10'-8" TO 11'-8" PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY PARKING ANALYSIS PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - WEST BUILDING 338 SPACES PROPOSED INTERNAL PARKING - EAST BUILDING 68 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - NORTH AREA 59 SPACES PROPOSED EXTERNAL PARKING - EAST AREA 9 SPACES SOUTHERN OFF-SITE PARKING (RIGHTS VIA EASEMENT NO.A387167)25 SPACES SOUTHEAST OFF-SITE VENUE APARTMENT EXCESS PARKING 20 SPACES TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING 519 SPACES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 15 SPACES PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION RIGHT OF WAY PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C400 SITE PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND SIDEWALK, SEE INSET A PUBLIC ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET B HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT, SEE INSET C STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT, SEE INSET D HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE INSET E B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM FULL HEIGHT TO FLAT CURB MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY, SEE CITY OF CHANHASSEN PLATE 5207 RAISED PATIO, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TRANSITION CURB & GUTTER FROM B618 TO B612 STOP SIGN BOLLARD "NO PARKING - LOADING ZONE ONLY" SIGN FLAT CURB A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U FUTURE CURB AND GUTTER - BY OTHERS UNDERGROUND BMP PROPOSED TREE TRENCH LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 35 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKING9.3'16.0'18.0'NORTH Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R C401 TRUCK CIRCULATION Width Lock to Lock Time Track SU-40 Steering Angle 4.00 : : : 6.0 8.00 8.00 31.8: 25.00 feet 39.50 22.007.00 43.00 :33.3Steering Angle 8.50 8.50 6.0 Aerial Fire Truck feet : : : Width Track Lock to Lock Time PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM © MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 36 C402 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST PAVEMENT SECTIONS FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT OR CITY DETAILS FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. N.T.S. TYPICAL SIGN MOUNTING6 1'-0" 1'-6" 3'-6" 2'-0" MIN. 7'-0" MIN. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL N.T.S. N.T.S. ADA PARKING STALL LAYOUT5 STANDARD STALL ADA STALL ACCESS ISLE ADA STALL STANDARD STALL 6" TRANSITION PAVEMENT TO FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK INTEGRAL SIDEWALK CURB SEE DETAIL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN WITH BOLLARD SEE DETAIL 2' STRIPING - 4" TRAFFIC WHITE INTEGRAL SIDEWALK CURB SEE DETAIL INTEGRAL SIDEWALK CURB SEE DETAIL (2% MAX.) PLAN VIEW OF ADA PARKING SECTION A-A SECTION B-B B B AA STANDARD STALL STANDARD STALL 1/2"6"12"60"-66"'18"ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE N.T.S. WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGOUND LEGEND & BORDER: WHITE BACKGROUND: BLUE NOTES: 1.ALL LETTERS ARE 1" AERIES "C" PER MUTCD. 2.SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE REFLECTORIZED LEGEND AND BORDER. 3.FINE NOTIFICATION SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) WITH WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY FINE AMOUNT. 5.ONE(1) SIGN REQUIRED FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. 6.INSTALLED HEIGHT OF SIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 24-23 OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 7.ALL ACCESSIBLE FEATURES TO BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A STANDARDS AND LOCAL LAWS. K-1479 12"x6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE3N.T.S. STOP SIGN2 30"30"12" 3/8" 7"7' N.T.S. FLUSH CURB1 37 C403 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 38 C404 SITE DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 39 NO PARKING78TH STREETMARKET BOULEVARD LAREDO DRIVE NO PARKING CO DDCO COD9709759699719729739749769779759 7 4 9769769 7 6 977970966967968969971972973965970975962963964 966967968969971972973974976976977977975974974974976977960965961962963964G:976.68G:976.62G:975.79G:975.39G:975.61G:973.70G:973.60G:973.76G:973.70G:974.00G:974.66G:974.88G:974.74G:974.90G:974.95G:975.20G:975.39G:975.51G:976.17G:976.51G:975.38G:974.79G:975.35G:975.14G:974.23G:974.10G:973.17G:972.90G:971.06G:970.87975.00FFE = 975.0975.00974.65965.41962.00962.59964.00971.05967.92972.80972.00973.12973.92976.00975.50970.73968.54967.47965.98965.98966.21966.07969.50TW:975.90TW:975.90TW:975.90TW:975.75TW:975.81BW:972.16BW:972.87BW:974.84BW:975.74BW:975.893.38%3.10%2.60%2.78%3.03%3. 6 6 % 4.9 3 %5.21%5.21%1.83%5.84%3.81%7.54%3.11%5.12%3.22%2.08%2.84%0.76%1.50% 1.50% 1.73%1.86%2.62%2.70%3.5 6 %2.88%28.42%3.48%2.73%3.50%3.51%4.19%4.08%FFE = 976.0FFE = 976.0FFE = 976.0FFE = 975.5FFE = 975.5FFE = 969.5FFE = 969.518.71%4.74%13.19%3.04%13.80%2.85%3.92%974.49974.49974.49974.49974.76974.76974.76974.76G:975.07G:975.07G:975.11G:975.17G:975.39G:976.55G:976.14G:976.38G:977.46G:976.13G:975.69G:975.56G:975.13G:975.17G:976.54G:977.30G:977.22G:973.38G:974.31G:974.53G:974.00G:973.24G:973.00G:974.18G:968.97G:968.34G:969.68971.85973.23973.27971.89974.00973.96975.50975.42976.92977.00976.83976.90977.00977.00976.81975.86976.00976.00975.98976.00975.98976.00976.00972.05975.50969.00968.77ME:964.27ME:963.73962.00G:974.14FFE = 976.0FFE = 977.0FFE = 977.0FFE = 963.4FFE = 974.0FFE = 971.9FFE = 966.4FFE = 967.0971.66971.84972.05972.34971.51968.68965.75965.01965.21965.90968.24968.05967.25967.06969.92970.05970.52970.40ME:965.34ME:965.26965.54965.86966.39G:970.32G:970.67G:970.84G:970.20G:970.80G:974.84G:975.01G:976.65G:976.90G:975.39G:975.50G:974.05G:974.67G:974.76G:973.71G:973.60G:973.22G:972.58G:972.52G:972.47G:965.30G:963.94G:962.97G:962.31G:961.88G:961.70G:960.54G:960.64G:960.86G:960.86G:960.60G:960.56G:960.38G:960.42G:960.66G:960.12G:959.66G:959.91G:958.66G:958.42G:958.37G:958.11G:957.97G:958.21G:960.12G:959.75G:958.52G:958.68975.00975.00975.00962.00962.00961.91961.84961.77962.00961.58961.09961.58961.58961.35961.35960.87960.87960.87960.87962.00960.57959.99959.59962.00962.00FFE = 975.0FFE = 961.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0FFE = 962.0G:960.86G:962.00G:962.00974.64974.55974.66974.87975.00975.00975.00974.86973.01971.89964.47ME:964.35ME:964.51ME:964.32GRADING PLAN NOTES1.PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONSAND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.4.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTINGTHE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.5.IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READYFOR SUB-BASE.6.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.7.ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONSALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITYITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THECONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.9.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOCOLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENTAREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.10.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENTGRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THEGUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER.11.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSEDCONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED.12.GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS:ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12).SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%.LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%.ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANYDIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED.SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADACOMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANYLOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BEACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES.13.UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITEAREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINALCONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHESOF TOPSOIL.14.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATIONT/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODPROPOSED RIDGE LINEPROPOSED SWALEPROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0BW:0.0RETAINING WALL NOTES1.RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.2.PLANS SHOW THE HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF THE TOP OF THE WALL AND PROVIDESFINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM FACE OF THE WALL ONLY.3.RETAINING WALL DESIGN PLANS SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER AND SUBMITTED TO THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY AND KIMLEY-HORN ENGINEEROF RECORD FOR APPROVAL.4.RETAINING WALL DESIGNER MUST ACCOUNT FOR DRAINAGE AROUND THE WALL ASSHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN. SURFACE RUNOFF SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO DRAINOVER THE TOP OF THE WALL.5.RETAINING WALL MATERIAL AND COLOR SHALL BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER.6.RETAINING WALL DESIGNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING GEOTECHNICALINFORMATION AS NEEDED FOR DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED WALL.NORTHC500GRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E.01/19/2024462661DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.DescriptionDateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©MARKET BLVD& W 78TH ST40 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T M A R K E T B O U L E V A R DITEM 16 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2 6 7 5 0 1 7 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T B O U L E V A R DITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 16 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 M A R K E TITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 20 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2 6 7 5 0 1 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 11 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 7 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 20 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 19 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 18 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 10 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 17 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 ITEM 14 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 13 &2MMITME1T 12 67501 ITEM 8 &2MMITME1T 12 6 7 5 0 1 ITEM 16 &2MMIT M E 1 T 1 2 6 7 5 7 3 ITEM 15 &2MMITME1T 12 67573 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGBMP#1: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. TOP OF STRUCTURE: 972.00 BOTTOM IE: 957.00 NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 961.00 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30 DEPTH OF TANK: 15' BMP #2: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. TOP OF STRUCTURE: 969.00' BOTTOM IE: 959.00' NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 963.00' 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30' DEPTH OF TANK: 10' PROPOSED PUMP CONTROL PANEL 0+00 0+80 23 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% 68 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.13% 61 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% 36 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 86 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 36 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 60 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% 5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% 6 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27% 22 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.48% 3 - 9 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.00% 18 LF - 15" RCP @ 11.03% 5 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% ST-203 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:976.36 IE:972.27 N IE:963.65 S ST-402 CBMH W/ 4' SUMP RE:975.22 IE:968.80 W IE:968.80 S ST-403 RE:975.19 IE:968.98 E ST-201 RE:974.59 IE:962.44 S IE:962.44 N IE:962.44 E ST-200 RE:974.63 IE:961.00 W ST-401 RE:971.81 IE:968.37 N IE:968.37 S IE:968.37 W ST-104 RE:974.10 IE:961.00 E ST-100 REPLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:972.84 IE: 968.1 S IE:969.60 W IE:969.87 NW ST-202 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:974.29 IE:962.91 N ST-601 RE:969.60 IE:963.00 S ST-600 PROPOSED STORM SEWER STUB FOR FUTURE CONNECTION. RE:969.36 IE:962.90 N ST-501 CBMH W/ 4' SUMP RE:970.61 IE:968.67 W IE:968.67 N ST-502 RE:971.79 IE:968.85 E ST-101 STMH 72" RE:974.12 3 - IE:971.00 W IE:970.00 E ST-103 10' x 12' LIFT STATION BOTTOM IE: RE:973.95 IE:960.90 W STUB ST-301 RE:974.20 IE:963.00 E ST-300 RE:974.45 IE:961.00 W ST-400 RE:971.94 IE:968.35 E ST-700 RE:974.64 IE:961.00 S 11 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% ST-701 ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH MEP, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:974.80 IE:961.22 N106.0'22.0'115.1'106.0' STORM CROSSING ST-402 TO ST-401 966.53 ST-201 TO ST-200 963.35 CLEARANCE IS 3.18' STORM CROSSING ST-402 TO ST-401 966.12 ST-301 TO ST-300 962.99 CLEARANCE IS 3.13' 10' SETBACK FROM WATER MAINCO 55.7'46.2' D RELOCATED CATCH BASIN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE, AND PIPE MATERIAL IE:972.29 CBMH ST-801 RE:973.08 27 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% CB ST-800 RE:974.57 84 LF - 6" SLOT DRAIN @ 0.50% 75 LF - 6" SLOT DRAIN @ 0.50%34 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50%39 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50% CB ST-1001.A RE:965.00 IE:959.09 N IE:959.09 SW 94 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.45% 57 LF - 15" RCP @ 0.50% ST-902 REPLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:961.98 IE:958.79 N IE:958.79 S20 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.21% ST-901 BMP#5 - ADS BAY FILTER RE:961.14 IE:958.55 N IE:958.55 S NYLOPLAST ST-905.B RE:958.83 IE:955.71 E (4' SUMP) 54 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 10 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 23 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB ST-906 RE:958.90 IE:955.60 E IE:955.60 W CB ST-907 RE:958.68 IE:955.67 E IE:955.67 W 13 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 22 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% CB ST-908 RE:958.45 IE:955.78 W 46 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% OLDST-902 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:958.57 IE:953.71 W CB ST-1001.B RE:969.00 IE:959.51 S BMP#6 ADS BAY FILTER VAULT ST-1000 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES RE:963.65 IE:958.80 NE ST-904 RE:959.30 IE:955.44 S IE:955.44 W ST-903 RE:959.67 IE:953.94 E BMP#3 TREE TRENCH BMP#4 TREE TRENCH NYLOPLAST ST-905 RE:958.41 IE:955.49 E IE:955.49 N (4' SUMP) ST-900 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. RE:960.63 IE:955.72 N 150 LF - 15" RCP @ 1.21% ST-EX CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE. RE:967.70 IE:960.60 S PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN CO PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION D STORM SEWER NOTES 1.INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C501 STORM SEWER PLAN NORTH PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 41 NO PARKING78TH STREET MARKET BOULEVARDLAREDODRIVENO PARKINGCO CO 8" INCH DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" DIP WITH 8"X8" WET TAP WITH 8" GATE VALVE SSWR-201 RE:976.84 COORDINATE WITH MEP IE:964.73 E SSWR-100 RE:961.14 COORDINATE WITH MEP IE:947.66 S EXISTING SSMH RE:960.80 IE:947.60 N 30 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.50% 12 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.50% 45° BEND 8"x8" TEE 8" SERVICE - CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" VALVE. COORDINATE WITH EXISTING OWNER PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 45° BEND EXISTING WATERMAIN CONNECT INTO EXISTING 10" DIP WITH 10" GATE VALVE 8" GATE VALVE 8"x6" TEE 8" DIP 8" GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 10"x6" TEE 8" DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING 8" DIP WITH 8" GATE VALVE CONNECT INTO CONNECT INTO 10" GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN - SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 6" GATE VALVE CONNECT INTO EXISTING 10" DIP WITH 10" GATE VALVE 150' HYDRANT COVERAGE (TYP) PROPOSED UNDERGROUND DETENTION, SEE STORM SEWER PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND DETENTION, SEE STORM SEWER PLANS FOR DETAILS 11.25° BEND 11.25° BEND 10"x6" TEE 10" GATE VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT AND 6" GATE VALVE 18" DIP 18"x6" TEE AND GATE VALVE18"x6" TEE AND GATE VALVE CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL 10"x8" REDUCER AND 8" VALVE 10x10 TEE CONNECT TO EXISTING MAIN 18"x10" REDUCER AND 10" VALVE 10"x10" TEE 10" VALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING MAIN 18"x10" REDUCER AND 10" VALVE 18" VALVE 10" DIP 10"x10" TEE 10x6 TEE10" VALVE 10" DIP 8"x8" TEE AND 8" VALVE FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE SERVICE 10" GATE VALVE 45° BEND 45° BEND 45° BEND 45° BEND 18" VALVE AND TEE 45° BEND 45° BEND 10" VALVE FOR DOMESTIC AND FIRE SERVICE - COORDINATE WITH MEP EXISTING HYDRANT TO REMAIN 10" DIP CONNECT INTO EXISTING SSWR CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT RE:968.17 IE:964.58 W CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.INSTALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-1785, F-714, F-894 SANITARY SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-2794, F-1866 5.WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-1785, D-2241, AWWA C-900 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C115 WATER MAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC:ASTM D-2464, D-2466, D-2467, F-1970, AWWA C-907 DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-153, C-110, ASME 316.4 5.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 6.WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING UTILITY LINE, FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING PIPE(S) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LINES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 7.PLACE AND COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 8.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATER LINES. 9.FOR WATER LINES AND STUB-OUTS UTILIZE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 10.MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE SEWER PIPE CROSSES WATER LINES (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). PROVIDE 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE AND WATER LINES. 11.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (OR ANY OBSTRUCTION EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR PVC C900 AND HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18-INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 12.ALL PVC & HDPE SEWER AND WATER PIPE SHALL HAVE A TRACER WIRE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH AND TERMINATED PER THE DETAILS. 13.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACING BACKFILL. 14.IN PAVEMENT AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. IN GREEN AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION & INSTALL A WATERTIGHT LID. 15.REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ROOF DRAINS TO THE INTERIOR BUILDING SYSTEMS. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) & METERS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. 16.CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 17.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 19.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 20.EXCESS MATERIAL, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 21.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 22.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 23.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 24.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 25.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C600 UTILITY PLANNORTH 42 C601 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 43 C602 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 44 C603 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 45 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C604 UTILITY DETAILS 46 LIFT STATION DETAIL PROFILE 952 960 970 980 952 960 970 980 22 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.48% 3 - 9 LF - 8" PVC @ 0.00% 6 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27%ST-101STMH 72" 2'RE:974.12IE:971.00 WIE:970.00 EBMP#1: PROPOSED STORMTRAP DOUBLE TRAP UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM TOP OF STRUCTURE: 972.00 BOTTOM IE: 957.00 NORMAL WATER LEVEL: 961.00 100-YR HIGH WATER LEVEL: 965.30 PROPOSED 10' X 12' STORM WATER LIFT STATION H-20 TRAFFIC LOADED ACCESS HATCH STORM WATER LIFT PUMPS QTY #3 REQUIRED FLOW RATE (EACH): 230 GPM REQUIRED HEAD: 25 FT 8 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27%8" PVC 18 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.27% 8" PVC8" PVC CBMH ST-100RE:972.84IE:969.60 WIE:969.87 NWD PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN CO PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION STORM SEWER NOTES 1.INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. C605 UTILITY DETAILS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 01/19/2024 462661DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 47 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C606 UTILITY DETAILS 48 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C607 UTILITY DETAILS 49 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C608 UTILITY DETAILS 50 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION01/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST C609 UTILITY DETAILS 51 LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SODDING/IRRIGATION,SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.)ROCK MULCH (TYP.)ARTIFICIAL TURF, SEE DETAIL (TYP.)AABCDELANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)ARTIFICIAL TURF (TYP.)SOD (TYP.)MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.)NO PARKING78TH STREETMARKET BOULEVARD LAREDO DRIVE NO PARKING DDDDDDDDDBEBBBBBBEBEBEBEBEBEBEBEBADCABBPROPOSED 10' D&U EASEMENTPROPOSED 10'D&U EASEMENTUNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER SYSTEMEXTENTSUNDERGROUNDSTORMWATER SYSTEMEXTENTSBOULEVARD TREES WILL BEPROVIDED BY THE CITY ASPART OF MARKET BLVD.RECONSTRUCTION IN 2025EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN (TYP.)SYMBOLCODECOMMON NAMECONIFEROUS TREEBHSBLACK HILLS SPRUCEORNAMENTAL TREEARMARMSTRONG RED MAPLERVBRIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKOVERSTORY TREEBOLBOULEVARD LINDENIHLIMPERIAL HONEYLOCUSTPREAMERICAN ELMCONIFEROUS SHRUBSGOJGREY OWL JUNIPERSGJSEA GREEN JUNIPERDECIDUOUS SHRUBSANHANNABELLE HYDRANGEABLCIROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRYCBFIREDANCE™ RED TWIG DOGWOODDBHDWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEDVBDWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUMGGDGARDEN GLOW DOGWOODGLSGRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMACSEMSEM FALSESPIREAORNAMENTAL GRASSESHMSHEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASSKFG2KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASSPERENNIALSBES2BLACK-EYED SUSANEBPEMERALD BLUE CREEPING PHLOXNWWALKER'S LOW CATMINTPBSPRAIRIE BLAZING STARPCFPURPLE CONEFLOWERSH4PRAIRIE DROPSEEDPLANT KEYREPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTSCALIPER REPLACEMENT REQUIRED:1,488 INCHESCALIPER REPLACEMENT PROPOSED:100 INCHESNOTE: REMAINDER OF REQUIRED TREES TO BE PROVIDED AT OFF-SITE LOCATION OR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF (CITY TOCONFIRM)LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSBUFFERYARD REQUIRED:BUFFERYARD A(EAST SIDE 519 L.F.)6 OVERSTORY TREES = 1 OVERSTORY TREE / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE11 UNDERSTORY TREES = 2 UNDERSTORY TREES / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE16 SHRUBS = 3 SHRUBS / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGEBUFFERYARD PROVIDED:4 OVERSTORY TREES(EAST SIDE 519 L.F.)0 UNDERSTORY TREES18 SHRUBSBUFFERYARD REQUIRED:BUFFERYARD A(SOUTH SIDE 905 L.F.)10 OVERSTORY TREES = 1 OVERSTORY TREE / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE19 UNDERSTORY TREES = 2 UNDERSTORY TREES / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGE28 SHRUBS = 3 SHRUBS / 100 L.F. OF FRONTAGEBUFFERYARD PROVIDED:11 OVERSTORY TREES(SOUTH SIDE 905 L.F.)4 UNDERSTORY TREES98 SHRUBSLANDSCAPE SUMMARYL100LANDSCAPE PLANNORTHPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA5652201/19/2024DATE:SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALMNLIC. NO.PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLAND USE APPLICATION1/19/2024ORIGINAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:No.DescriptionDateMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMMARKET BLVD& W 78TH STNOTE: SEE SHEET L101 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE52 SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER CAL/SIZE CONIFEROUS TREE BHS 8 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE ARM 7 ACER RUBRUM `ARMSTRONG`ARMSTRONG RED MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. RVB 3 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 8` HT. OVERSTORY TREE BOL 4 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. IHL 7 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `IMPERIAL`IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONTAINER SPACING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS GOJ 6 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. SGJ 25 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT.5` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS ANH 6 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. BLC 120 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.4` O.C. CB 28 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE'FIREDANCE™ RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.4` O.C. DBH 39 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. DVB 16 VIBURNUM OPULUS `NANUM`DWARF EUROPEAN VIBURNUM #2 CONT.3` O.C. GGD 49 CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW`GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD #5 CONT.5` O.C. GLS 108 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.4` O.C. SEM 43 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM`SEM FALSESPIREA #5 CONT.3` O.C. ORNAMENTAL GRASSES HMS 106 PANICUM VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL'HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASS #1 CONT.3` O.C. KFG2 84 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 24" O.C. PERENNIALS BES2 10 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.18" O.C. EBP 109 PHLOX SUBULATA 'EMERALD BLUE'EMERALD BLUE CREEPING PHLOX #1 CONT.12" O.C. NW 34 NEPETA X 'WALKER'S LOW'WALKER'S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.18" O.C. PBS 13 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA PRAIRIE BLAZING STAR #1 CONT.18" O.C. PCF 55 ECHINACEA PURPUREA PURPLE CONEFLOWER #1 CONT.18" O.C. SH4 80 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.18" O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED)NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED ON CENTER SPACING PER PLANT SCHEDULE. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1012 MULCH 3/16" X 5" STEEL EDGER 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE TURF/SOD SUBGRADE 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 5" STEEL EDGER4'MULCH TURF/SOD TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD PLANSECTION STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1013 BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH 2' MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED SOIL MIX FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L10154"1"PLANTING 1.CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.INSTALL PLANTS BY PLANT INSTALLATION PERIOD INFORMATION IN THE LATEST STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS FROM MNDOT. PLANTINGS BEFORE OR AFTER THESE DATES ARE DONE AT RISK. 10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. SOIL 16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 17.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. MULCH 18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL IN COLOR (DYE-FREE), OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE TRAP ROCK, 1 1/2" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. APPLY PREMENEGRENT HERBICIDE PRIOR TO MULCH PLACEMENT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS, USE PREEN OR PRE-APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). EDGER 19.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK x 5" TALL, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. WHERE EDGING TERMINATES AT A SIDEWALK, BEVEL OR RECESS ENDS TO PREVENT TRIP HAZARD. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). SEED/SOD 20.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED, PER MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. IRRIGATION 21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION / PROVIDE NEW SYSTEM, OR MODIFY EXISTING IRRIGATION PER OWNERS DIRECTION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY. 22.IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO INCORPORATE WATER REUSE FROM UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM - COORDINATE WITH MEP PLANS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ESTABLISHMENT 23.PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 24.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WARRANTY 25.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 26.MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, SEED AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, SEED AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 60 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4” IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. 27.SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING. LANDSCAPE NOTES L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ARTIFICIAL TURF DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1014 NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MITCHELL COOKAS, PLA 5652201/19/2024DATE: SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL MN LIC. NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LAND USE APPLICATION 1/19/2024 ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: No.Description Date MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST NOT FORCONSTRUCTION 2024 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM MARKET BLVD & W 78TH ST 53 Page 1 of 22 Project: Chanhassen Market Street Addition (Planning Case 2024-01) Planning Commission Review Date: February 20, 2024 City Council Review Date: March 11, 2024 Drafted By: Eric Maass, AICP, EDFP, Planning Director Staff Report Date: February 16, 2024 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat, site plan, and a variance to the build to zone for the construction of two mixed use buildings totaling 310 market rate apartment units and approximately 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat, site plan, and variance for the construction of the project as proposed subject to updating of plans based on staff review comments. LOCATION: 591 78th Street W and 570 Market Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 (Subject Property) OWNER: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC 366 South Tenth Avenue, PO Box 727 Waite Park, Mn 56387 Chanhassen Properties, LLC 900 Wayzata Blvd East, Suite 130 Wayzata, MN 55391 PROPOSED MOTIONS: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves the requested build to zone variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the requested preliminary plat and site plan for the construction of two mixed use buildings subject to conditions within the staff report.” 54 Page 2 of 22 CURRENT ZONING: Central Business District (CBD) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial Land Use / Central Business District ACREAGE: 4.05 acres DENSITY: 76 units/acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with zoning ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the zoning ordinance for a variance. The city has a moderate level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. City Code requires that notice of the public hearing be mailed to all property owners within 500 feet (dashed circle). City Staff sent notice to all property owners within 1,000 feet and additional single family residential properties in the general vicinity. 55 Page 3 of 22 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article 20-XVIII “CBD” Central Business District Chapter 20, Article 20-XXIII, Division 20-XXIII-9 Design Standards for Multifamily Developments ZONING OVERVIEW Zoning Designation The property is zoned Central Business District (CBD). Multifamily housing is a permitted use within the CBD zoning district so long as a portion of the first floor adjacent to 78th Street West includes commercial space. The project as proposed provides the required commercial space. Environmental Protection Districts Bluff Creek Corridor - This is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Protection - The proposed project is located outside of the required bluff setback. Floodplain Overlay - The proposed project is located outside of the floodplain. Shoreland Management - The property is outside of the Shoreland Protection District. Wetland Protection - There are no wetlands on the site. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW The preliminary plat as shown would subdivide the subject property into two lots and two outlots. Lot 1, Block 1 would consist of the westerly mixed-use building. Lot 2, Block 2 would consist of the easterly mixed-use building. Outlot A would be 60.01 feet in width and provide land area necessary for the extension of Laredo Drive. A drainage and utility easement would be placed over the entirety of Outlot A and contain a private underground stormwater retention system. Outlot B would contain a parking lot as well as a dog run area on its surface and a portion of the outlot would also consist of an underground stormwater system. With the reconstruction of Market Boulevard and proposed redevelopment of the Country Inn & Suites, the northwest corner of the plat shows private property extending beyond the curb line and into the intersection of 78th Street West and Market Boulevard. As the final design for Market Boulevard reconstruction proceeds, the preliminary plat shall be updated to dedicate additional public right of way if necessary. Drainage and utility easements should also be updated according to any adjustments to property lines associated with the Market Boulevard road design. The preliminary plat should be updated so that the southeast corner of Outlot A encompasses the roughly 10-foot x 10-foot area directly south of the outlot area so that in the future that area is established as outlot and available for additional road extension. 56 Page 4 of 22 The CBD zoning district does not have a minimum lot area, lot frontage, or lot depth. As a result, the preliminary plat does not require adjustment to meet those aspects of City Code. SITE PLAN REVIEW The developer is requesting site plan approval for two vertical mixed-use buildings. Together the buildings will consist of 553,064 square feet. That building area includes 310 market-rate apartments, 406 structured parking spaces, 14,882 square feet of leasable commercial space, and 18,087 square feet of amenity space as well as a large pool deck on level 2 of the west building. Approximately 46% of units will have at least two bedrooms which is advantageous in attracting both young professionals looking to split rent to make housing more affordable as well empty nesters transitioning into the next stage of their life who don’t want the maintenance responsibility of a traditional home but retain the desire to have a guest bedroom when family or friends visit. The project proposes to construct a sidewalk along the north side of the development where currently no sidewalk exists. This is an important improvement to the city’s downtown pedestrian network. The 57 Page 5 of 22 project also proposes to extend Laredo Drive south of West 78th Street with sidewalks on both sides of the street extension. This street extension is aligned with the city’s desire to improve the walkability and pedestrian experience within the downtown area. The site is encumbered by cross-access easements over the drive aisles within Outlot B. These cross-access easements restrict the viability of the construction of a building and as a result are shown to be continued as a surface parking lot but with improvements including sidewalks, a pet exercise area, and an underground stormwater management system. The CBD district establishes Character Zones of “Downtown Mixed-Use” and “Downtown West”. The subject property is located within the Downtown Mixed-Use district and as a result, has a “build to zone” off of 78th Street and Market Boulevard of 0’ - 15’ from the property line and a “build to zone” of 0’ – 30’ for building frontage along Laredo Drive. While a majority of both the west and north elevations are within the build to zone, the very southwest corner of the west elevation has a maximum setback distance of 23 feet 6 inches which is the greatest proposed setback that exceeds the build to zone and requires a variance. Parking Typically projects consist of a single “property use”. Those property uses are defined as commercial, residential, office, or industrial uses and City Code establishes minimum parking requirements for those property uses. A vertically mixed-use project presents a unique situation based on varied parking demand between commercial and residential users of the property. City Code Section 20-1124(a)(4) states that for mixed-use buildings, parking requirements shall be determined by the city based on the existing and potential uses of the building. To measure the parking demand, the city contracted with HKGi to conduct a parking study to measure the parking demand that would be generated by the proposed redevelopment with the amount of parking proposed. Uses Parking Spaces (Peak Demand) New residential demand 496 New retail/restaurant demand 122 Peak parking demand removed (cinema/hotel/lodge) (527) Total net parking demand (increase) 91.4 Proposed parking stalls 521 (additional parking relocation of dog run / shared surface parking) 39 Grand total parking stalls 560 Findings The findings of this study determined that the proposed vehicle parking spaces are adequate to meet the peak vehicle parking demands of the proposed development. While the parking already shown on plans was deemed adequate, the study provided recommendations for additional parking to support the project. Two of these are proposed to be incorporated into the project: 58 Page 6 of 22 1. Relocating the pet exercise area from the center of the NE surface parking lot to the SE corner of the project. This results in an additional nine surface parking stalls in the surface lot. 2. Parking easement over an increased portion of the surface parking lot on the south side of The Venue. The plan set currently proposed easement over 20 spaces. The parking easement can be increased to 50 spaces. a. Staff have been monitoring this surface lot dating to January 12th and assessing the lots utilization in the morning, afternoon, and evenings as well as weekdays and weekends and found the surface lot to be consistently underutilized. During that time, the Venue apartment has been operating at or above 95% occupancy. The surface lot contains 136 surface parking stalls. The highest vehicle count occurred on the evening of February 12th when 62 vehicles were present. That resulted in 74 surface parking stalls being vacant. Site Furnishing The project as proposed shows the addition of sidewalks around each building where it interfaces with a public right of way or parking area providing strong pedestrian connectivity. Each building shows an area for an outdoor patio to provide street activation and site furnishings including tables and chairs. The applicant should explore the addition of a bike rack. Loading and Refuse Areas Screening of service yards, refuse, and waste-removal areas, loading docks, truck parking areas, and other areas which tend to be unsightly shall be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, dense planting, or any combination of these elements. Screening shall block views from public right-of-way (pedestrian views) and shall be equally effective in winter and summer. The electrical transformers at the SW corner of the west building shall be screened either through vegetation or fencing. Lighting Wall-mounted lighting in commercial, industrial, and institutional districts shall be shielded with a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. Fixture height shall not exceed 30 feet. Fixtures are shown at a height of 20 feet which adheres to City Code. Shop drawings shall be provided to show proposed fixtures. Lighting on the building faces shall also be restricted to having a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. Signage The renderings provided depict signage for both the commercial tenant spaces as well as apartment portions. Signage for the project will require separate permits and signage will be reviewed for conformance with City Code at the time of sign permit application. 59 Page 7 of 22 Building Architectural Reviews Required Architectural Standards The city intends that all multifamily developments within the city should strive toward the highest level of quality in both design and construction. Architectural Style City Code states that architectural style shall not be restricted and that the evaluation of the appearance of a project shall be based on the quality of its design and in relationship to its surroundings, guided by the provisions of City Code. Site characteristics to be evaluated for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback, and orientation. Designs that are incompatible with their surroundings or intentionally bizarre or exotic are not acceptable. Monotony of design, both within the projects and between adjacent projects and their surroundings is prohibited. Variation in detail, form, and sitting shall provide visual interest. Site characteristics that may be used for this purpose include building and landscaping, colors, textures, shapes, massing of rhythms of building components and detail, height of roof line, setback, and orientation. All buildings shall have a minimum of 20 percent accent material. Accent material may include brick, stone cut face block, or shakes. The use of any EFIS shall not be on the first story of any building or one story in height. West Building The CBD zoning establishes height requirements for the area. The district allows structures up to six stories in height but also prescribes the total height allowed for each story. The maximum height of a six-story building within the CBD-zoned area is 78 feet. The west building as shown would mostly be 72 feet 4 inches for the portion which would be six stories in height with a maximum height of 76 feet 8 inches when accounting for the areas where the elevator overruns are located. The total height as well as individual floor heights conform to City Code. Requirement Proposed First Floor 14’ to 18’ 15’-16’ Floors 2 through 6 9’ to 12’ 10’8” – 11’8” Total Height Max of 78’0” 76’8” Build To Zone (west/north elevations) 0’ to 15’ 23.6’ * Build To Zone (east elevation) 0’ to 30’ 11.6’ *Requires variance 60 Page 8 of 22 Massing and Placement The proposed structure would occupy nearly all of Lot 1 Block 1 of the proposed preliminary plat as the parking for the project would be entirely structured parking. The building consists of a variety of massing’s including areas that are one story, two stories, five stories, and six stories in height. The stepping back in height along 78th Street West provides necessary relief to the street level to ensure the overhead structure is not overbearing and negatively impacts the pedestrian experience. The same treatment is provided along the western elevation adjacent to Market Boulevard. A ground-level patio space is adjacent to a five-story building span and then the middle of the elevation consists of two stories and then the southern part of the west elevation extends back up to five stories prior to an additional setback before reaching the full six story height. The courtyard at level two that opens to the south currently does not have access to it from internal corridors. The building adheres to the intent of the CBD to create the effect of a traditional downtown area whereby the building is adjacent to the sidewalk and promotes walkability. Proposed Elevations North Elevation (facing 78th St W) East Elevation (facing Laredo Ave extension) 61 Page 9 of 22 West Elevation (facing Market Blvd) South Elevation (facing private property) Interior courtyard elevations 62 Page 10 of 22 Material and Color The proposed building has a strong variety of materials including four varieties of brick, stone, cast stone, metal flashing, metal pan stone, architectural precast panels, prefinished metal panels, and fiber cement wall panels. These are all acceptable materials. It’s required that at least 20% of the building contains accent materials (brick or stone). Architectural Interest, Material, and Color North Elevation – The one-story corner commercial spaces in the middle and left sides of the north elevation are marked overhead with sections of vertical brick spans. This creates a strong presence for the commercial aspects of the building and quality massing to the structure. The materials shown are complimentary without being too busy. The elevation shows white awnings over portions of the commercial spaces. The awnings will require additional refinement. South Elevation - Presently the south elevation stories -1 and -2 utilize architectural pre-cast panels. The panels consist of two panel types with each of the panel types alternating. The narrower of the two-panel types should explore adding either standard windows or spandrel glass windows to provide additional relief to the precast panels. The remaining portions of this elevation contain two types of brick, accent metal, and fiber cement wall. 63 Page 11 of 22 East elevation – The first floor commercial spaces are marked with vertical laid bricks overhead which provides nice articulation between the commercial and residential components of the building. The elevation contains all four of the brick types shown on the building. The left side of the elevation has brick type 1B on floors two, three, and four with the top two stories being fiber cement panel 6A. The applicant should explore extending brick type 1B to the top stories of the building to mimic the expanse of the same brick at the NW corner of the west building over the restaurant space. West elevations – This elevation contains three of the four brick variations as well as some fiber cement panels. Accent metal is used around the windows of the walk up townhome units as well as the elevator on the south side of the elevation. The elevation shows white awnings over portions of the commercial spaces. The awnings will require additional refinement. Interior courtyard elevations – The interior courtyard elevations incorporate one color of fiber cement paneling. The exterior material keynotes indicate two colors of fiber cement wall panels. Staff recommends exploring the option to introduce another material and possibly the second color of fiber cement wall panel on the interior wall elevations especially in the area of the amenity courtyard as it is a prominent area in proximity to Market Blvd. Roof Design The buildings shown consist of flat roofs as required by City Code. The massing’s provide a variability to the roof lines providing the desired “step back” appearance desired by the city. East Building The CBD zoning establishes height requirements for the area. The district allows structures up to six stories in height but also prescribes the total height allowed for each story. The maximum height of a six-story building within the CBD zoned area is 78 feet. The east building elevation details are provided in the below table. Requirement Proposed First Floor 14’ to 18’ 14’ Floors 2 through 6 9’ to 12’ 10’8” – 11’8 ‘ Total Height Max of 78’0” 69’2” Build To Zone (west elevation) 0’ to 30’ 9.0’ Massing and Placement The proposed structure would occupy nearly all of Lot 1 Block 2 of the proposed preliminary plat as the majority of the parking for the project would be entirely structured parking. Surface parking in front of Lot 1 Block 2 is also proposed and shown as Outlot B on the proposed plat as well as additional surface parking to the south of the proposed building in existing surface parking stalls through an existing easement. 64 Page 12 of 22 The building consists of a variety of massing’s including areas that are 1 story and 5 stories in height on the north elevation. Due to the changes in elevation north to south across the site, parking that is underground on the north side of the site is exposed on the south end. The proposed building fronts on the extension of Laredo Drive. The north side of the building has two single story commercial spaces as well as a leasing office. A ground level patio space is adjacent to the commercial space on the west side of the building. The building provides for adequate pedestrian circulation both adjacent to the adjacent roadway as well as internal to the site. The building adheres to the intent of the CBD to create the effect of a traditional downtown area whereby the building is adjacent to Laredo Drive and promotes walkability through sidewalks throughout the site. Material and Color The proposed building has a large variety of materials including two varieties of brick, two colors of precast architectural panels, four colors of fiber cement panel, and a metal horizontal accent panel. These are all acceptable materials. Applicant to demonstrate that brick occupies at least 20% of the building façade. 65 Page 13 of 22 Architectural Interest, Material, and Color North Elevation (facing 78th St) South Elevation (facing Market St) East elevation (facing private property) 66 Page 14 of 22 West elevation (facing private property) Architectural Style North Elevation – The elevation contains brick color #1 in both standard as well as horizontal detailing as well as charcoal, warm gray, and light bronze-colored fiber cement panels. Brick color #2 is visible on the far-right side of the elevation above the commercial space adjacent to the Laredo Drive road extension. The brick color #1 is both modern and timeless in its tones and variation and compliments well with the proposed fiber cement wall panel colors shown. The brick expanse along the entire first floor provides necessary prominence to those spaces and the vertical expanse on the left side of the elevation provides added interest to the façade. South Elevation – This elevation consists of both varieties of brick, two colors of fiber cement panel and the horizontal access panel. Floors minus one and one consist of leasable apartment units are comprised of brick with the upper four stories being a fiber cement panel. The west side of the building has charcoal cement panels over a story of the darker brick color #2. Applicant should explore an additional horizontal band of brick color #1 between levels one and two so that the brick has a more prominent grounding effect on this elevation. East elevation – The elevation contains both varieties of brick and all four colors of fiber cement wall panels in addition to both gray and dark gray precast wall panels. Both brick materials are shown on the south end of this elevation near a garage entrance. Applicant should explore spreading out the brick material or adding additional brick on levels one through five on either the south or north ends of the building. West elevation – The elevation contains varieties of brick, precast architectural panels, and three colors of fiber cement panels. It has a step back in height along the north end of the elevation above the leasable commercial/patio space as well as articulation on the south end that provides relief to the roof line. Roof Design The buildings shown consist of flat roofs as required by City Code. The massing’s provide a variability to the roof lines primarily along the north elevation with some undulation in the roof line occurring on the south ends of the west elevation. 67 Page 15 of 22 Variance Request – Exceeding “Build To Zone” As noted in the site plan review section above, two portions of the proposed western building exceed the build to zone established by the city’s zoning district. The city’s zoning code establishes the criteria for granting variances which are based on state statutes. The following criteria must all be met in order to grant a variance. 1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. The purpose of the build to zone is to encourage a more traditional main street character of development that provides for activation of the sidewalk and accompanying streetscape. The vast majority of the west building is within the build to zone required by City Code and as proposed the structure is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the chapter and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 2. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The proposed use of a vertical mixed-use building with ground-floor commercial space and apartments above is permitted and therefore a reasonable use of the property. An overwhelming majority of the proposed western building adheres to the build to zone requirement with the two areas that do not adhere to the build to zone resulting from the curvature of the adjacent roadway. The project as proposed creates the desired walkable environment with commercial and residential uses in close proximity to the sidewalk. 3. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. The variance is based solely on practical difficulties related to the adjacent curvature of the roadway and is not based on economic considerations. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The curvature of Market Boulevard and the intersection of Market Boulevard and 78th Street West creates a unique circumstance unique to the property which is not created by the landowner. 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 68 Page 16 of 22 The intent of the “CBD” district is to provide for a concentration of specialized goods and services, commercial and office spaces including cultural, entertainment, finance, restaurants, retail, and multi-family development that are accessible and in conformance with the downtown redevelopment plan, goals and objectives. The proposed project meets the intent of the CBD zoning. 6. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The proposed project does not include an earth-sheltered construction project and therefore is not applicable. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance subject to the conditions of approval and the attached findings of fact and decision. Staff Comments Requiring Plan Set Updating Planning Department: 1. General a. Provide shop drawings of proposed pole-mounted light fixtures as well as proposed wall-mounted lighting fixtures. Fixtures shall not be mounted more than 30 feet in the air and shall have a maximum cut-off angle of 90 degrees. 2. Preliminary Plat a. The preliminary plat should be updated so that the southeast corner of Outlot A encompasses the roughly 10-foot x 10-foot area directly south of the outlot area so that in the future that area is established as outlot and available for additional road extension. 3. Site Plan a. The applicant should explore an opportunity to add a bike rack. b. The electrical transformers at the SW corner of the west building shall be screened either through vegetation or fencing. c. Site plan notes “future curb by others”. With the removals on both the north and south side of 78th Street West, the development project will have to replace the pavement, curb, and lane striping in the areas where removals are taking place. 4. West Building Architecture a. Provide the amount of accent material on the exterior building faces as a percentage. Code requires at least 20% brick or stone. b. North Elevation – the elevation shows white awnings over portions of the commercial spaces. The awnings will require additional refinement. 69 Page 17 of 22 c. South Elevation - the narrower of the two precast architectural panel types should explore adding either standard windows or spandrel glass windows to provide additional relief to the span of precast panels. d. East elevation – the elevation contains all four of the brick types shown on the building. The left side of the elevation has brick type 1B on floors two, three, and four with the top two stories being fiber cement panel 6A. The applicant should explore extending brick type 1B to the top stories of the building to mimic the expanse of the same brick at the NW corner of the west building over the restaurant space. e. West elevation – The elevation shows white awnings over portions of the commercial space at the northern edge of this elevation. The awnings will require additional refinement. Physical material samples will be required notably for material 5A (prefinished metal panel color #1) to verify the actual color of the material. f. Interior courtyard elevations – Staff recommends exploring options to introduce another material and possibly the second color of fiber cement wall panel on the interior wall elevations especially in the area of the amenity courtyard as it is a prominent area in proximity to Market Blvd. 5. East Building Architecture a. Provide the amount of accent material on the exterior building faces as a percentage. Code requires at least 20% brick or stone. b. North Elevation – Excellent elevation. In the event that brick materiality evolves based on comment below on the west elevation, this may require refinement on the right side of this elevation as well. c. South Elevation - the applicant should explore an additional horizontal band of brick color #1 between levels one and two so that the brick has a more prominent grounding effect on this elevation. d. East elevation – both brick materials are shown on the south end of this elevation near a garage entrance. Applicant should explore spreading out the brick material or adding additional brick on levels one through five on either the south or north ends of this side of the building as those are the parts of this elevation that are most visible to the public. 70 Page 18 of 22 e. West elevation – the two brick colors individually are aesthetically pleasing. However, it is unclear how complimentary the two brick colors shown are to one another. Physical samples are required to verify. Refinement to brick choice/location may be necessary if not complimentary. Forestry Department 1. The current landscape must be updated to meet the city’s species diversity requirements where no more than ten percent of the trees may be from any one tree species, no more than 20 percent of the trees may be from any one genus and no more than 30 percent of trees from any one family. 2. Applicant must include a list of the existing landscape material. This shall be in the form of a tree survey where the species, DBH, size, condition and location of all trees and any damaged or diseased trees on site. All trees shall be tagged and identified by number on the survey. 3. Applicant should better utilize the area along Market Blvd for planting of trees nearer the sidewalk and revise accordingly around the walk-up townhome entrances in that area. 4. Landscape plan shows tree plantings in confined spaces. To maximize viability potential, prioritize overstory planting spacing of at least 15 feet and spacing of at least 12.5 feet between ornamental trees. 5. The landscape plan shows eight black hills spruce where the future Laredo Drive will extend. The city recommends only planting four trees in that area. Plantings should not inhibit visibility to the potential mural on the adjacent wall. 6. Note that the cost for in-lieu plantings is based on $300 per inch of caliper for replacement trees. 7. Note that there are no calls for any roof-top or courtyard plantings (think trees in raised planters like along Nicollet Blvd in downtown Minneapolis). If designed to accommodate trees in these areas, we would give credit towards other required plantings. 8. During one of the meetings with the design team, we requested implementation of Silva Cells (or similar technology) to improve the rooting ability for plantings. In particular, we mentioned the entrances to residences along Market Boulevard and along the sidewalk on Laredo. 71 Page 19 of 22 Engineering Department 1. The Developer shall vacate all previously recorded public easements no longer necessary due to the relocation and or removal of public utilities associated with the redevelopment prior to recording of the final plat. 2. The Developer shall provide all access agreements and temporary easements necessary to access and work on any abutting properties prior to the city issuing a Notice to Proceed for construction operations. 3. The Developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for private improvements located within a public easement and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The Developer shall deed Outlot A to the city for future public access needs in association with the extension of Laredo Drive to the south. 5. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining Outlot A until such time that Laredo Drive is connected to Market Street to the south. 6. In an effort to promote collaboration and sequencing of necessary improvements between the development and on-going public improvements in the downtown corridor, the Developer shall: a. keep the city promptly informed of all project schedules and any changes that may affect either party to the fullest extent feasible. b. invite representatives from the city to participate in all preconstruction meetings to facilitate coordination and address potential concerns. c. ensure the city's participation in weekly construction meetings, allowing for ongoing collaboration and coordination of construction schedules. 7. The Developer shall provide engineered plans which illustrate the impacts (e.g. centerline grades, grading extents, etc.) necessary to facilitate the Laredo Drive extension to the south with the final plat submittal. 8. Final geotechnical and environmental assessment reports shall be provided with the final plat submittal. 9. The Developer shall provide updated trip generation assignments based on the proposed development and verify no substantial changes from the 2023 Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study with the final plat submittal. a. If based on the updated trip generation assignments there is a substantial change in the capacity analysis, such as a drop in level of service at any intersection within the study area or a needed change in lane capacity, the Developer must provide an update to the Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study. Improvements necessary to facilitate the development’s need will be the responsibility of the Developer. 72 Page 20 of 22 10. The Developer and their Engineer shall work with city staff in amending the construction plans, dated January 19, 2024, prepared by Michael C. Brandt, PE with Kimly-Horn and Associates, Inc., to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns attached to the Staff Report dated February 26, 2024. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording of the final plat. 11. The Developer shall provide a sanitary sewerage capacity analysis verifying that the existing sanitary sewer mains have adequate capacity to convey flows with the final plat submittal. 12. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required with the final plat submittal. 13. The Developer shall incorporate warranted crosswalk enhancements at the intersection of Laredo Drive and West 78th Street per the City’s Crosswalk Policy with the final plat submittal. 14. All sanitary sewer and water mains will be publicly owned and maintained after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 15. The applicant will be required to enter into a Development Contract with the city and all applicable securities and fees provided prior to recording of the final plat. 16. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), Board of Water and Soil Resources, MPCA, etc.). Water Resources Department: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of conditional approval from the RPBCWD as part of any future plan submittals. 2. The applicant shall update the models (HydroCAD and MIDS) per city and any watershed district comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat submittal. 3. The applicant shall provide additional information to determine the access agreements and easements required to install and connect to storm sewer systems on adjacent properties which are not publicly owned. 73 Page 21 of 22 4. The applicant shall provide additional information on the proposed BMPs (Best Management Practices) such as water reuse, ADS Bay Filters, green roof, tree trenches, etc. to confirm modeling matches the proposed plan as part of any future plan submittals. 5. Prior to the final plat submittal, the applicant shall work with staff to revise and optimize the design of the storm sewer system that would be public in a future condition. An underground BMP located within future Right of Way (ROW) or easement will only be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. 6. Additional details on the proposed building elevation shall be provided with future plan submittals to confirm the site is meeting the City’s freeboard requirements. 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. Building Department: 1. A demolition permit must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site, each demolition site address will require separate permits. 2. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 5. A SAC determination letter must be provided to the city prior to building permits being issued. 6. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 7. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 8. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 9. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key Plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, 74 Page 22 of 22 Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Ext walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 10. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high, measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. Retaining walls (if present) under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 11. Accessibility will have to be provided to all portions of the development and a percentage of the units may also be required to be accessible or adaptable in accordance with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341. Fire Department: 1. The fire department requests that if the project is approved, that prior to the demolition of existing buildings that the Applicant provide the city’s fire department the opportunity to conduct some training exercises in the buildings. 75 Page 1 of 10 Memorandum To: Eric Maass, Planning Director From: Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Jamie Marsh, Environmental Resource Specialist Charlie Burke, Public Works Operations Manager Date: 2/9/2024 Re: Chanhassen Market Street Addition Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review – Planning Case No. 2024-01 EASEMENTS The Developer is proposing the preliminary plat “Chanhassen Market Street Addition” which will re-plat Bloomberg Addition, Bloomberg 2nd Addition, and Frontier Cinema Addition into two (2) lots, Block 1 Lot 1 and Block 2 Lot 1, and two (2) outlots, A and B. The lots are configured to accommodate the build-out of two buildings which will be comprised of both residential and commercial uses while the outlots are configured to accommodate mainly parking, vehicular access, and underground stormwater BMPs. As the Chanhassen Market Street Addition preliminary plat is proposing re-platting three separate plats and redeveloping a large portion of a “superblock” located in the downtown area, the existing properties are encumbered by numerous utility easements that must be vacated. The Developer has provided an ALTA survey which outlines these encumbrances and has shown the easements anticipated for vacation or release. All public utility easements no longer needed due to public utilities being removed and/or relocated must be vacated, while all necessary public easements must be provided on the final plat. The proposed easements illustrated on the preliminary plat generally meet the needs of the public and the development and generally align with Sec. 18-76 (Easements) of Chanhassen City Code. Both outlots are proposed to be entirely encumbered by public drainage and utility easements (DUE), while both of the lots are proposing 10-foot wide DUE abutting right-of-way, with other 76 Page 2 of 10 DUEs proposed as needed based on existing and proposed utilities. Staff recommends minor amendments to the location and extents of the DUE which will accommodate potential future public needs as well as existing needs based on the proposal which should be implemented prior to recording the final plat. This includes the extension of a 5-foot wide DUE along the south property line of Block 1 Lot 1 to accommodate a portion of public watermain and a fire hydrant. Multiple areas outside of the development’s property are proposed to be impacted to facilitate its build-out. This includes PIN 257030030 to the east, 254460010 to the south, and 250122200 to the north. The Developer will be responsible for providing all agreements and temporary easements necessary from the impacted property owners prior to a Notice to Proceed for construction operations. Lastly, any private improvements located within a public easement must have an associated encroachment agreement in accordance with Sec. 20-923 of Chanhassen City Code and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. This includes, but is not limited to, any privately owned stormwater BMPs and their appurtenances. More discussion regarding a proposed public underground stormwater BMP located within Outlot A, which is planned to be a future public right-of-way, is discussed under sections “Streets” and “Storm Water Management” of this report. GRADING & DRAINAGE The existing property is a fully developed site with drainage flowing to onsite storm sewer which connects into existing City owned storm sewer within the adjacent roadways. There are currently no stormwater best management practices (BMPs) onsite. All storm sewer from the lot eventually drains to an existing stormwater pond located north of Highway 5 and west of Market Boulevard. In the proposed condition, drainage from the proposed building roofs and parking lots will be directed to a large 15 foot deep underground detention system (BMP #1). Drainage from Outlot A which encompasses the future proposed extension of Laredo Drive, a public roadway, through the middle of the site is designed be kept separate from the runoff from the private development. Runoff from Outlot A will be directed to a separate, smaller 10 foot deep underground detention system (BMP #2). In the interim condition, BMP #2 will discharge to BMP #1, which will outlet east through a lift station where it will be pumped to a connection with existing public storm sewer to drain south. The remaining runoff from the proposed site will be picked up in onsite storm sewer and will be treated either through tree trenches or ADS Bay Filter treatment devices before also connecting into existing public storm sewer. All runoff from the site will continue to drain south to the ultimate discharge point to the existing stormwater pond, as it does under existing conditions. All storm sewer and BMPs within the private property will be privately owned and maintained. BMP #2 proposed within Outlot A (the future Laredo Drive extension) is anticipated to become public if the Laredo Drive is extended south and becomes public right of way (ROW) with future development. 77 Page 3 of 10 The design and configuration of proposed storm sewer and underground BMP proposed within the future ROW is a maintenance concern for the City’s public works staff. The large structure located underneath the roadway could cause differential settling which could weaken the roadway section at transition points likely reducing the roadway’s service life. The City does not currently own any large underground wet detention systems so training and equipment may be needed to enable maintenance activities. Material deposited within the underground system would have to be removed periodically, likely with the use of a vactor truck. During routine maintenance the road would have to be shut down to protect maintenance workers from traffic which creates additional work and risk. Furthermore, the placement of the system within the ROW blocks utility routes of other public utilities that are typically routed underneath street sections such as water and sanitary sewer. A potentially more suitable design would be to move BMP #2 outside of the future public right of way into the adjacent parking lot area and provide a drainage and utility easement and access agreement over the area when the roadway is extended, and the BMP system potentially turned over to the city for ownership in the future condition. As such, the applicant shall work with city staff to optimize the proposed future public storm sewer system to address concerns with functionality and maintenance. The proposed storm sewer design includes several areas where connection to existing storm sewer is proposed outside of the property boundaries. Some of these areas, specifically on the east side of the project, are in areas where no easement exists and therefore the storm sewer 78 Page 4 of 10 system appears to private. The applicant shall provide additional information on the ownership and easements when connecting to existing systems to confirm the viability of the design and any associated agreements and easements required. Private BMPs and storm sewer shall be located outside of public drainage and utility easements. EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will impact one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which was submitted as part of the preliminary plat application. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for final site plan review along with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) in accordance with Section 19-145 of City Ordinance. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. STREETS The development is situated within a “superblock” bounded by Market Boulevard to the west, Great Plains Boulevard to the east, W 78th Street to the north, and Market Street (a private street) to the south. The Developer is proposing vehicular access to the development via the extension of Laredo Drive from W 78th Street, as well as pedestrian access via sidewalks surrounding the development which includes re-alignment of the trail along Market Boulevard and the addition of sidewalk along W 78th Street and internally within the development. The re-aligned and newly installed sidewalks aligns with the vision for Chanhassen’s downtown of fostering a more walkable and accessible corridor. These new sidewalks along W 78th Street will be incorporated into the city’s existing downtown snow maintenance and clearing operations after installation by the Developer. The extension of Laredo Drive is speculated to connect to the south with Market Street, however this final connection won’t be made until the property to the south redevelops. The Developer has indicated Outlot A on the preliminary plat as the area to be future right-of-way to facilitate this connection. In order for this to occur the Developer will be required to deed Outlot A to the city, and if the connection is made to the south the city can provide public access through Outlot A. Because the connection wouldn’t be made until a future date, and in the interim condition it can’t be built to city standards for public roads (i.e. turnarounds in the interim condition), the Developer will be responsible entering into an Encroachment Agreement and be responsible for maintaining the area which shall include snow removal. The Developer is proposing to re-align the north/south trail along Market Boulevard. The proposed north/south trail re-alignment is required in conjunction with the development, however, is integrally influenced and impacted by the upcoming Market Boulevard Street 79 Page 5 of 10 Reconstruction Project (Project #25-02). It is critical that the Developer and their design and construction teams coordinate with the city’s design and construction teams as plans continue to develop and as construction commences. In an effort to promote collaboration and sequencing of necessary improvements, the Developer shall keep the city informed of project schedules and any changes that will impact either project to the maximum extent practicable. Additionally, the Developer shall include the city in any preconstruction and weekly construction meetings in order to coordinate construction schedules. In order to verify the feasibility of the future street extension of Laredo Drive to the south, the Developer must provide conceptual engineered plans with the final plat submittal material which illustrate the impacts (e.g. centerline grades, grading extents, etc.) necessary to facilitate the street extension. Furthermore, draft geotechnical and environmental assessment reports were provided with the preliminary plat submittal. While this is adequate information to conduct a review at this stage of the submittal process, final geotechnical and environmental assessment reports must be provided with the final plat submittal. Lastly, the city initiated a Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study in 2023 in conjunction with on- going city projects (Project #23-01 and #25-02). The study evaluated existing conditions, conducted traffic forecasts, and reviewed multiple build conditions and future improvements for the Chanhassen’s downtown. The study included the Chanhassen Market Street Addition in its traffic forecasting, however the uses and densities for the proposed redevelopment were assumed. The resulting assumptions of redeveloping a hotel into 350 residential units and 12,000 square feet of restaurant and retail space produced an approximate increase of 3,000 daily trips to the study area. The project as submitted contains 310 residential units (a decrease of 40 units) and 14,880 square feet of commercial space (an increase of 2,880 square feet). It appears these changes are nominal to the overall traffic generation, however the Developer will be required to provide updated traffic forecasting data based on the actual proposal. If based on the updated trip generation assignments, there is a substantial change from the previous assumptions, such as a drop in level of service at any intersection within the study area or a change in lane capacity, the Developer must provide an update to the Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Due to the total redevelopment of the area associated with the Chanhassen Market Street Addition, a majority of the utilities abutting and internal to the development are proposed to be removed and/or relocated. The Developer’s preliminary utility plans appear to account for the required sanitary sewer and water services necessary to facilitate the private build-out while maintaining public needs. However, there are updates required within the preliminary sanitary sewer and watermain plans, and as such final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording of the final plat. These updates include, but are not limited to: • Elimination of redundant watermain valving and/or relocation of valving to a more accessible and maintainable location. 80 Page 6 of 10 • Further evaluation of the proposed watermain loop on the east side of the development (adequate water loops appear to service the site without the need for the additional proposed public improvement). • Addition of a fire hydrant on the southern portion of the site to accommodate firefighting capacity and access. • Reconfiguration of tie-in points to the existing main near W 78th Street and Market Boulevard to account for the future realignment of trunk watermain located within W 78th Street planned for with the Civic Campus Project (Project #23-10). • Profile drawings associated with all public water and sanitary sewer improvements. • Typical updates to meet the City of Chanhassen’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (2024). A complete set of review comments is attached to the Staff Report. Additionally, as discussed under the “Streets” section of this report, there is a considerable change of use associated with the redevelopment. Previously the area facilitated commercial uses (hotel, movie theatre, etc.) and is now proposed to introduce residential units. These changes in use can impact the amount of sanitary sewerage flows entering the system. The Developer will be required to provide confirmation that the existing sanitary sewer has adequate capacity, or, if improvements are necessary to account for any change to the sanitary needs associate with the redevelopment. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will have to be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, NPDES, Minnesota Department of Health, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by Developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The proposed project is located within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek (RPBCWD) and is therefore subject to the watershed’s rules and regulations. A Stormwater Management Report dated January 19, 2024 was submitted by the applicant to the City and provided to the watershed district concurrently as part of the preliminary plat review. Comments provided by the RPBCWD must be addressed and a permit from RPBCWD is required prior to construction. The site is within RPBCWD and is required to meet all applicable watershed rules which includes volume abstraction of 1.1 inches of runoff from all new or fully reconstructed impervious areas. The required volume abstraction is 14,614 cubic feet based on the disturbed impervious area of 3.66 acres. Soil borings were submitted dated October 23, 2023, which included 19 soil borings within the project location. The soil borings showed clayey sands and sandy lean clays throughout the lot. Additionally, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 81 Page 7 of 10 (ESA)was conducted which showed elevated PID results (staining and petroleum like odors) in one of the soil borings. Based on the soil borings and Phase II ESA, the applicant noted this is a restricted site and that the full volume abstraction could not be provided onsite due to the unsuitable soils. The applicant proposes going through sequencing and providing the maximum extent practicable for volume control, in line with the RPBCWD rules and meeting water quality requirements onsite. Volume abstraction is proposed to be provided by the onsite water reuse system to irrigate the green spaces on the project. Additional information is needed to confirm the water reuse design and feasibility. A green roof is also currently noted as being designed however additional information is needed on the green roof at this time. The provided abstraction volume is 1,560 cubic feet from the proposed water reuse. Because the RPBCWD rules are more restrictive and may require iterative revisions, conditional approval from the watershed district is required prior to submitting future plans to the City for review. MIDS modeling was provided and reviewed to confirm the site is providing the required 90% TSS and 60% TP removal requirements. The modeling shows the site is meeting the required treatment removals, however there is additional documentation needed to confirm the design meets water quality treatment requirements. These updates must be made, and the water quality requirements shall be confirmed to still be met once the modeling has been updated. Electronic copies of the updated MIDS model must be included in future submittals. The Stormwater Management Report and supporting Hydrologic and Hydraulic HydroCAD models were reviewed. The HydroCAD modeling shows the site is meeting rate control for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events at the proposed discharge events. There are comments on the modeling that must be addressed to be consistent with the plans. Once those comments are addressed that applicant shall confirm rate control requirements are still met. The applicant shall provide final versions of all modeling (HydroCAD and MIDS) and SWMP report to address remaining comments and confirm rate, volume and water quality requirements are still being met as part of the final plat approval. As outlined in Chapter 19 of City Code, the City requires at least 3 feet of freeboard between a building low floor elevation and adjacent ponding features. It is not clear based on the current plans what the lowest building elevation proposed is. Additional information is needed to confirm freeboard requirements are being met. The proposed BMPs for the private development are to be privately owned and therefore will require an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement and associated plan. The plan will need to identify the maintenance schedule, responsible party, and shall include information on how the system will be cleaned out. ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are either due at the time of final plat or can be postponed until building permit applications are received in which the entire hookup fee is due. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. 82 Page 8 of 10 The properties that make up this development application are subject to assessments that will be levied as part of the City’s Market Boulevard Street Improvement project. A Feasibility Study will be prepared and a formal MS 429 Assessment Process will be utilized. The assessments will be handled by that process separate from the approval process of this proposed development. FEES An updated engineer’s estimate must be provided with the final plat submittal in order to calculate Administration Fees. Based on the proposal the following fees would be collected with the development contract if recorded in 2024: a) Administration Fee: if the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000, 2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% of the remainder. b) The project will be required to pay applicable development fees including the following: a. A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,750/unit, or, the full amount with the building permit: $8,841/unit b. A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $750/unit or, the full amount with the building permit: $2,383/unit c. Park dedication fee: $12,500/acre for commercial and $5,800/dwelling for residential. d. Surface water management fee $36,190/net acre. c) GIS fees: $100 for the plat plus $30 per parcel d) Street light operating fee for one year: $1000 per light RECOMMENDATION ENGINEERING: 1. The Developer shall vacate all previously recorded public easements no longer necessary due to the relocation and or removal of public utilities associated with the redevelopment prior recording of the final plat. 2. The Developer shall provide all access agreements and temporary easements necessary to access and work on any abutting properties prior to the city issuing a Notice to Proceed for construction operations. 3. The Developer shall enter into Encroachment Agreements for private improvements located within a public easement and recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The Developer shall deed Outlot A to the city for future public access needs in association with the extension of Laredo Drive to the south. 5. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining Outlot A until such time that Laredo Drive is connected to Market Street to the south. 6. In an effort to promote collaboration and sequencing of necessary improvements between the development and on-going public improvements in the downtown corridor, the Developer shall: 83 Page 9 of 10 a. keep the city promptly informed of all project schedules and any changes that may affect either party to the fullest extent feasible. b. invite representatives from the city to participate in all preconstruction meetings to facilitate coordination and address potential concerns. c. ensure the city's participation in weekly construction meetings, allowing for ongoing collaboration and coordination of construction schedules. 7. The Developer shall provide engineered plans which illustrate the impacts (e.g. centerline grades, grading extents, etc.) necessary to facilitate the Laredo Drive extension to the south with the final plat submittal. 8. Final geotechnical and environmental assessment reports shall be provided with the final plat submittal. 9. The Developer shall provide updated trip generation assignments based on the proposed development and verify no substantial changes from the 2023 Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study with the final plat submittal. a. If based on the updated trip generation assignments there is a substantial change in the capacity analysis, such as a drop in level of service at any intersection within the study area or a needed change in lane capacity, the Developer must provide an update to the Downtown Chanhassen Traffic Study. Improvements necessary to facilitate the development’s need will be the responsibility of the Developer. 10. The Developer and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated January 19, 2024, prepared by Michael C. Brandt, PE with Kimly-Horn and Associates, Inc., to fully satisfy construction plan comments and concerns attached to the Staff Report dated February 26, 2024. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to recording of the final plat. 11. The Developer shall provide a sanitary sewerage capacity analysis verifying that the existing sanitary sewer mains have adequate capacity to convey flows with the final plat submittal. 12. Construction design elements associated with the street plans such as stationing, curb tables and alignments, centerline grades, and intersection details will be required with the final plat submittal. 13. The Developer shall incorporate warranted crosswalk enhancements at the intersection of Laredo Drive and W 78th Street per the city’s Crosswalk Policy with the final plat submittal. 14. All sanitary sewer and watermains will be publicly owned and maintained after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 15. The applicant will be required to enter into a Development Contract with the City and all applicable securities and fees provided prior to recording of the final plat. 16. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, Board of Water and Soil Resources, MPCA, etc.). WATER RESOURCES: 84 Page 10 of 10 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of conditional approval from the RPBCWD as part of any future plan submittals. 2. The applicant shall update the models (HydroCAD and MIDS) per City and any watershed district comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat submittal. 3. The applicant shall provide additional information to determine the access agreements and easements required to install and connect to storm sewer systems on adjacent properties which are not publicly owned. 4. The applicant shall provide additional information on the proposed BMPs (water reuse, ADS Bay Filters, green roof, tree trenches, etc.) to confirm modeling is matching the proposed plan as part of any future plan submittals. 5. Prior to the final plat submittal, the applicant shall work with staff to revise and optimize the design of the storm sewer system that would be public in a future condition. An underground BMP located within future ROW or easement will only be allowed if approved by the City Engineer. 6. Additional details on the proposed building elevation shall be provided with future plan submittals to confirm the site is meeting the City’s freeboard requirements. 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 85 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2024-01 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves the requested build to zone setback variance for the construction of a vertical mixed use building, subject to the conditions of approval. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and following platting is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Market Street Addition, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the staff conditions provided in the staff report dated February 16, 2024 drafted by Eric Maass, Planning Director, Et al. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially commenced, this variance shall lapse. Approved by Planning Commission: February 20, 2024 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2024 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 86 2 DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 87 800 Washington Avenue North, Suite 103 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Memorandum To : Eric Maass, Planning Director, City of Chanhassen From: Kevin Clarke, HKGi Subject: Parking Analysis for Proposed Market Boulevard & West 78th Street Mixed Use Project Date: February 13, 2024 Project Introduction Parking in Chanhassen’s Downtown Area between W 78th Street, Market Boulevard, Great Plains Boulevard, and the railroad tracks is provided through both private/restricted parking and through shared parking agreements. Shared parking in this district is beneficial to reduce the amount of parking needed by allowing spaces to be used by multiple users at different times. For example, the parking demanded for hotel and grocery do not often overlap so the same space can serve multiple vehicles over the course of a day rather than requiring both users to build separate stalls. This contributes to a denser, more walkable environment that is desired within the downtown area. There are limits to this, as demand for some spaces overlaps and cannot be “doubled up” and some additional supply needs to be built in with the intent of ensuring available parking. Because there are potential benefits and opportunities for shared parking, the City can utilize a parking study to review the impacts of a proposed development, rather than relying solely on code ratios. This study is intended to examine the parking impacts of the proposed development project at Market Blvd and 78th St. within the context of the larger Downtown Chanhassen area. This study utilizes similar methodology as used to evaluate parking demand in the area in 2013 and when evaluating the Venue/Aldi project. This approach takes into account changes in parking demand over the course of a day, and expected parking demand from different land uses. This study reviews findings from the City’s zoning code, the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), and the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and applies a hybrid approach using all three when appropriate to anticipating demand. Findings More detailed findings can be found below and in the parking generation tool spreadsheets, but at a high level, the proposed project will more fully utilize parking compared with what is observed today. This is in part because the Cinema is not generating demand currently, the transit ramp is not being used for park-and-riders, and peak hotel use is more occasional than a restaurant or housing. If the current spaces were occupied and being used as modeled, the district would be seeing about 88% parking utilization at peak conditions. If the project as proposed is built, the district would be seeing about 92% parking utilization at peak conditions. Using the same methodologies as previous parking studies for the district, parking across the study area will increase in peak demand conditions from 73% modeled utilization (with the theater closed) to 77%, or a net increase in about 54 spaces demanded as compared to supply. 88 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 2 This project will also create more impact on the west side of the study area. When looking at the parking availability north and south of the proposed project (eliminating the SWTransit Parking Ramp and the large lot east of the Chanhassen Dinner Theater), the peak utilization numbers reach 92% utilization for the retail uses and parking spaces anticipated for residential users would be nearly fully utilized. This study finds that the proposed parking is adequate to meet the demands of the proposed development. In total, the area will see an increase utilization of parking from 88% based on existing land uses to 92% at peak demand. This increased demand can be further mitigated through shared parking facilitated through shared residential parking on the south side of The Venue . Additional strategies, if necessary in the longer term, are available and discussed at the end of this study. A note on ratios and utilization The ratios that are used in this study are intended to represent the highest reasonable parking demand created by a land use. For example, when considering numbers for a restaurant, the intent is for the ratios to represent a Friday or Saturday at a popular restaurant. A less frequented restaurant on a Tuesday will not have nearly the same parking counts, but the study is intentionally using the highest reasonable numbers. It is common for parking counts and parking demand to lag behind both zoning and the model. In the study area, the model would anticipate The Venue generating demand to park 215 vehicles. Informal observations would suggest the actual number is closer to 160-180. The model also includes shared parking considerations. Demand is modeled hourly and the max demand over the course of a day is the reported “Peak” demand. That means even if two uses both generate 100 spaces of demand, the total peak demand may still be less than 200 stalls if the demand does not fully overlap (ie. hotel demand is heaviest overnight, while office demand is heavier during the day). The model does not include conclusions for “one-off” events that may exceed the numbers shown. Consider the Fourth of July when the City is hosting festivities at City Hall and City Center Park, or a hypothetical where the businesses throw big a block party, it is more likely that parking would be in short supply. Proposed Development Roers Companies is proposing the development of two mixed use buildings. These buildings will replace the existing Country Inn and Suites, High Timber Lounge, and Chanhassen Cinema. The west building will include 184 units of housing and 11,853 SF of retail uses spread across four spaces. The east building will include 3,029 SF of retail over two spaces and 126 units of housing. Both also include structured parking and amenity space. A more detailed review of the proposed uses is below: 89 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 3 West Building East Building Residential (Units) 184 Residential (Units) 126 Studio/Alcove/1 Bedroom 93 Studio/Alcove/1 Bedroom 72 2 Bedroom/3Bedroom 91 2 Bedroom/3Bedroom 54 Retail Uses (SF) 11,853 Retail Uses (SF) 3,029 General Retail 7,400 General Retail 3,029 Restaurant 4,453 Parking Generation Residential – East Building The east building will contain 72 units with 1 or fewer bedrooms. The City’s zoning code would require 1.5 spaces for every unit, anticipating that some units would have 2 people living in them, each with their own car. Furthermore there should be enough parking for guests. For the purposes of this analysis, 1.38 spaces per unit is a more appropriate ratio. This is the ratio utilized by ITE for all apartments (including multi-bedroom units). It is further reinforced by observed parking demand generated by The Venue project immediately to the east. The east building will also contain 54 units with 2 or 3 bedrooms. Zoning would require 2 spaces for each unit. This analysis finds that 1.85 spaces per unit is more appropriate. This is consistent with ULI’s findings. Based on observations of The Venue and anecdotal trends that suggest more people are using second bedrooms as guest bedrooms (only occasional parking need) or home offices, the 1.85 spaces per unit ratio is potentially higher than true demand. Residential – West Building The west building will contain 93 units with 1 or fewer bedrooms. An additional 91 apartments will be 2-3 bedroom units. The same ratios are used for the east and west buildings. Residential Parking Impacts Units Ratio Spaces 0-1 BR 165 1.38 227.7 2+ BR 145 1.85 268.3 TOTAL 310 496.0 As illustrated above, the residential land uses associated with the two buildings are expected to generate demand for 496 spaces. The City’s zoning code and this project expect at least 1 dedicated, structured parking stall per unit. The current design as submitted includes 342 parking stalls dedicated for residents with controlled access, which is more than the 310 units being built. These stalls will not be available to other users, and cannot be included in shared parking agreements, or generate shared parking efficiencies. 90 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 4 With 496 spaces demanded and 342 dedicated, structured spaces supplied, there is anticipated demand for an additional 154 stalls. The 154 additional stalls necessary at peak are provided through the surface parking lots. Residential parking demand peaks overnight, but even during the day it remains well used, only dipping to 65% of total demand at mid-day. Demand in late afternoons/evenings is between 90-100%. Dedicated, structured parking stalls are counted as 100% occupied, even though they may not have a car in them, because they are not available to other parking users. General Retail – East Building The east building is designed with two retail bays, totaling 3,029 SF of space. The City’s zoning code uses 1 parking stall for every 250 SF of retail space. ITE and ULI, with observed counts, use similar demand numbers at 1 per 244 SF (ITE) and 1 per 250 SF (ULI). For this analysis, 1 stall per 250 SF is used. General Retail – West Building The west building has 3 bays slotted for retail, adding up to 7,400 SF. As discussed above, these spaces are counted as generating demand at 1 stall per 250 SF. Restaurant – West Building The west building also incorporates 4,453 SF of restaurant space. The City’s zoning code utilizes a ratio of 1 space for every 60 square feet of restaurant space. If the restaurant has a full liquor license, the ratio is one space per 50 SF. This study utilizes a ratio of about 1 stall per 55 square feet. This is consistent with the ULI ratio. For comparison, ITE, which is based solely off of observed conditions, found the highest typical peak demand closer to 1 vehicle per 75 SF at suburban restaurants. Commercial Parking Impacts SF Ratio Spaces East Building Retail 3,029 0.004 12.1 West Building Retail 7,400 0.004 29.6 West Building Restaurant 4,453 0.018 80.1 TOTAL 121.9 As illustrated above, the retail/restaurant land uses associated with the two buildings are expected to generate demand for 121 spaces. These uses peak in the late afternoon/evening, but carry some parking demand through the day. This can be highly dependent on a business’ hours of operation. For example a bank will not typically have much demand after 5:00 PM, while a dinner only restaurant may only require a few spaces until then. Overnight demand is expected to be minimal. Land Uses/Parking Generators Removed As part of the development, the hotel, High Timber Lounge, associated meeting rooms, and the Chanhassen Cinema will be removed. This also frees up a number of spaces when calculating available parking. Chanhassen Cinema is closed, so it is not currently generating parking demand, but 91 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 5 previous calculations for other development projects have included the demand when calculating parking availability. Rooms/SF/Seats Spaces Hotel 122 Rooms -152.5 High Timber Lounge 950 SF -15.7 Meeting/Conference 1,849 SF -212.3 Cinema 1,115 seats -301.1 TOTAL -526.5 It is worth noting that these numbers do represent peak demand, not typical demand. Furthermore, the cinema has been able to utilize the SWTransit parking ramp if necessary, as the cinema peak was typically in the evening, while transit ridership was typically during the day. Change in Net Parking Demand Spaces New Residential Demand 496.0 New Retail/Restaurant Demand 121.9 Removed Demand -526.5 TOTAL 91.4 The proposed development will generate demand for an additional 91.4 spaces than what exists today. As discussed below, the proposed development results in a net parking change of 323 more parking spaces that what currently exists. Parking Supply Existing Parking Supply 92 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 6 There are currently 933 surface parking spaces in the study area. These spaces are regulated by a series of cross access parking agreements, but are in general available to serve demand. In addition to those surface spaces, SWTransit owns a parking ramp with 424 spaces. These are reserved from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM, and residents are not permitted to park overnight. SWTransit is not currently running routes through this location. The Venue also has 134 structured parking spaces that are reserved for residents. Observations of the site suggest that parking is not a problem in the study area and spaces are readily available. Parking removed as part of the development As part of the proposed development, the surface parking nearest the hotel will be removed. This represents 143 spaces. Parking added as part of the development The two buildings will build a mixture of surface and structured parking. Proposed plans show 49 surface spaces north of the east building and 9 surface spaces at the south end of the east building. The west building is dedicating a portion of the parking structure to serve retail and the restaurants. This will have 64 spaces that are publicly available. In addition to the public parking, the west building parking structure has 274 dedicated residential spaces. The east building has 68 structured, reserved spaces for residents. Changes in Parking Supply Existing Public Structured and Surface Parking 1357 Existing Surface Parking 933 Existing SWTransit Ramp 424 Removed Surface Parking -143 New Commercial Surface and Structured Parking +124 Net Parking Change - Commercial Parking -19 Total non-Reserved Structured and Surface Parking 1338 Existing Reserved Residential 134 New Reserved Residential Parking 342 Net Parking Change - Reserved Residential Parking +342 Net Parking Change +323 Overall, the project adds 323 spaces worth of parking. 93 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 7 Demand Modeling with Shared Parking One of the benefits of a mixed use district is the ability to use a shared parking approach. Most of the study area already has cross access and shared use agreements. This improves the efficiency with which each space is used. It also helps contribute to a more vibrant, walkable district, by reducing the amount of space dedicated to parking, and putting that back into a productive use. For the purposes of this study, multiple scenarios were run. Demand and supply of reserved residential models were assumed at 100% and are not illustrated in the following charts. The charts have weekday (left) and weekend (right) utilization shown. District Model – SW Transit Ramp is approximately 50% available for use during the day District Model – SW Transit Ramp is not available for use from 2:00AM to 6:00PM on weekdays - 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 1,400.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise - 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 1,400.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 94 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 8 Areas of Concern & Strategies Retail/Restaurant and 78th Street Side (Up the Hill) While there is parking available throughout the district, it is likely that most of the retail and restaurant demand will need to be filled by the “up the hill” parking. It will be important that the parking provided does not impact other properties across Market Boulevard or 78th Street (without a shared parking agreement. Excluding residential uses, analysis of the “up the hill” locations (new retail, new restaurant, ALDI) shows 193 spaces of demand, with 211 spaces available at peak conditions. On these occasions, that is about a 91% utilization rate which will feel very full, but there are spaces anticipated to be available. This relies on sorting residential parking out of this location. While adequate parking is supplied, it would be preferrable to open additional capacity in this location. Continue to monitor demand and if parking is getting tight, consider the strategies below: • Enhanced signage to make sure general parking users know they are permitted in the top level of the parking garage. • A more careful determination of retailers to reduce overlapping demand. For example, a coffee shop has higher morning demand, but less overlap with evening demand for the restaurant. • Shared parking agreements with properties across 78th. • Adjusting the split of public/private parking on the top deck of the parking structure. Given the tightness of parking because of the proposed restaurant, there may be an opportunity to shift some of the reserved parking on the top level of the ramp into a general use. 32 stalls could be shifted and still maintain a 1 structured stall per unit for the residential uses. • Encourage residential parking to remain “down the hill” particularly during the afternoon/early evenings to keep spaces available for retail/restaurant users. • Consider shifting the dog area in the upper parking lot to the south side of the east building to build additional parking spaces on the north side of the east building where commercial parking demand is greatest. - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 Senior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 95 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 9 Residential and Market Street Side (Down the Hill) Even though many of the residential parking users have structured parking available, demand will exceed what is being built in the structures by about 154 spaces. Currently, the surface lots south of the Chanhassen Cinema and The Venue are very empty. Recent counts at different times of the day and evening have seen between 10 and 25 cars on 190 stalls (surplus of 165-180). This suggests that typical demand for the 134 units at The Venue is closer to 1.2 stalls per unit overall than the average of 1.6 that the model uses or the 2 stalls per unit that was the zoning at the time the project was built. It is possible that some of this demand is currently being filled in the “up the hill” locations. Looking at the “down the hill” parking counts, and excluding the parking structure, the model sees only 3 spaces available with tightening occurring during the day when including the Krause Anderson project south of the west building, but with significant supply remaining overnight. When eliminating the Krause Anderson project and only looking at the lots immediately south of the east building and south of The Venue, the tight spot is overnight. Including parking in the Kraus Anderson project (approaching capacity mid-day) Just the two lots south of The Venue and the east building (exceeds modeled peak capacity overnight) - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise - 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AM7:00 AM9:00 AM11:00 AM1:00 PM3:00 PM5:00 PM7:00 PM9:00 PM11:00 PM1:00 AM3:00 AM5:00 AMSenior MFR 2 BR MFR Studio 1BR Parking Garage SF Studio or Classroom SF Restaurant Nightclub SF Restaurant Fast Food SF Restaurant Sit Down SF Dinner Theater SF Cinema SF Convention Hotel Rooms SF Office SF Service Commercial SF Retail General Merchandise 96 February 13, 2024 Downtown Chanhassen Parking Analysis Memorandum 10 Based on observed counts, it would appear that there is more capacity than the model is showing as it is designed to consider the peak conditions and is erring on the side of caution. Continue to monitor parking demand in this location. If additional strategies are required, consider: • Overnight parking further into the Krause Anderson project with limitations on daytime parking. • Improved walkability and coordination between the dinner theater and overnight parking users. • Coordination with SWTransit on use of the ramp (see below) Status of the SWTransit Ramp Currently SWTransit is not running busses through this station. This has been the case since COVID 19 impacted ridership numbers. Even before 2020, ramp utilization by transit users had never been strong enough to fill anywhere close to the 424 spaces. Long term plans for SWTransit and routing have not been identified as part of this study. As a strategy, there should be discussions with SWTransit to remove or reduce restrictions on the parking ramp. 97 Adoption Date: March 11, 2024 City of Chanhassen Carver County, Minnesota MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area & Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Plan Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 (a renewal and renovation district) BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO. Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, Minnesota 55113 98 TABLE OF CONTENTS Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area 1 FOREWORD 1 Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 2 FOREWORD 2 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 2 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES 2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW 3 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY ELIGIBLE TO BE ACQUIRED 3 DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION 4 DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF TAX INCREMENT 5 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS 5 SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED 7 USES OF FUNDS 7 FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION 8 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 8 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 11 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION 11 Appendix A: Map of Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications Appendix D: Renewal and Renovation Qualifications for the District Appendix E: Permits Issued 99 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area FOREWORD The following text signifies a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area (the “Redevelopment Project Area”). This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the original Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, the substantive change includes the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 within the Redevelopment Project Area. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area is recommended. It is available on file at the office of the Economic Development Manager at the City of Chanhassen. Other relevant information is contained in the tax increment financing plans for the tax increment financing districts located within the Redevelopment Project Area. 100 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 2 Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 FOREWORD The City of Chanhassen (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 (the "District"), a renewal and renovation tax increment financing district, located in the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the City has certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S."), Sections 469.124 - 469.133, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area, as modified. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The District currently consists of six (6) parcels of land and adjacent roads and internal rights-of-way. The District is being created to provide financial assistance to facilitate the redevelopment of two aging and underutilized hotel and commercial properties in the City into a $135 million mixed-use development consisting of two five-six story buildings containing approximately 310 multi-family housing units, 18,000 rentable square feet of commercial space, and 466 structured parking stalls. The redevelopment will include demolition and mass grading of the site, an extension of Laredo drive through the property, utility relocations and interior and surrounding road and sidewalk improvements. The City anticipates entering into an agreement with Roers Acquisitions LLC or an affiliate as the developer. Development is anticipated to begin in 2024. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area. 101 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 3 The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the District. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the City is authorized to undertake the following activities in the District: 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN THE DISTRICT AND PROPERTY ELIGIBLE TO BE ACQUIRED The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed below. Parcel number Address Owner 25.1180010 575 78th St W Chanhassen Lodging 25.1180020 575 78th St W Chanhassen Lodging 25.1190010 591 78th St W Chanhassen Lodging 25.1190030 N/A Chanhassen Lodging 25.1190040 N/A Chanhassen Lodging 25.2830010 570 Market St Chanhassen Properties 102 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 4 Please also see the map in Appendix A for further information on the location of the District. The City does not own any parcels of the property to be included in the District. The City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street or other rights of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets, utilities and facilities; and/or carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION The City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with the TIF Act, finds that the District, to be established, is a renewal and renovation district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10a. In meeting the statutory criteria the City relies on the following facts and findings: • The District is a renewal and renovation district consisting of six (6) parcels. • An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70% of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures. • An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that at least 20% of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix D). • An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that more than 30% of the other buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as inadequate street layout, incompatible uses and others as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix D). Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. 103 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 5 DURATION & FIRST YEAR OF TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 15 years after receipt of the first increment by the City (a total of 16 years of tax increment). The City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2026, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2041, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY, TAX RATE & ESTIMATED CAPTURED NET TAX CAPACITY VALUE/INCREMENT & NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2023 for taxes payable 2024. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2026) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the District; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the City. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2024, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2024. The final tax rates for 2024 were not available at the time the District was established. 104 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 6 The projected ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The City requests 100% of the available increase in tax capacity be used for repayment of the obligations of the City and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2026. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed. Estimated Project Tax Capacity upon completion (PTC) 1,364,901 Estimated Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) 132,719 Fiscal Disparities 32,231 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)1,199,952 Original Local Tax Rate 84.7681% Prelim Pay 2024 Estimated Annual Tax Increment $1,017,176 Percent Retained by the City 100% Project Tax Capacity Note: Tax capacity includes a 1% inflation factor for the duration of the District. The PTC included in this chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 16. The net tax capacity of the District upon stabilization of the project in year two is estimated to be $1,187,414. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the City shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City has reviewed the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City. One reroofing permit has been identified for PID # 25.1190010 and will accompany the request for certification. The permitted activity is not expected to increase the Original Net Tax Capacity. Please see Appendix E for the building permit that was issued. 105 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 7 SOURCES OF REVENUE/BONDS TO BE ISSUED The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES Tax Increment 14,372,772$ Interest 718,638 TOTAL 15,091,410$ The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The City reserves the right to issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) or incur other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by one or more pay-as-you-go notes. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal modification to this TIF Plan. This provision does not obligate the City to incur debt. The City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The City may issue bonds secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $15,091,410. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. USES OF FUNDS Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate the renewal and renovation of two aging and underutilized properties within the City’s downtown. The City has determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described herein. The City has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. 106 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 8 USES Land/Building Acquisition 1,000,000$ Site Improvements/Preparation 2,000,000 Affordable Housing - Utilities 2,500,000 Other Qualifying Improvements 2,946,419 Administrative Costs (up to 10%) 1,437,277 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL 9,883,696$ Interest 5,207,714 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL 15,091,410$ The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in the Sources of Revenue section. FISCAL DISPARITIES ELECTION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities. The City will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b (inside). ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Entity Preliminary 2023/Pay 2024 Total Net Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) upon completion Percent of CTC to Entity Total Carver County 217,510,096 1,199,952 0.5517% City of Chanhassen 64,817,920 1,199,952 1.8513% ISD No. 112 (Eastern Carver County Schools)128,134,116 1,199,952 0.9365% Impact on Tax Base 107 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 9 Entity Preliminary Pay 2024 Extension Rate Percent of Total CTC Potential Taxes Carver County 29.9930% 35.38% 1,199,952 $ 359,902 City of Chanhassen 20.9102% 24.67% 1,199,952 250,912 ISD No. 112 (Eastern Carver County Schools)28.5491% 33.68% 1,199,952 342,576 Other 5.3157% 6.27% 1,199,952 63,786 84.7681% 100.00% $ 1,017,176 Impact on Tax Rates The estimates listed above display the CTC when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the Preliminary Pay 2024 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Preliminary Pay 2024 figures. The District will be certified under the Final Pay 2024 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is $14,372,772; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt. A marginal impact of the District on police protection is expected as it is with any increase in development density. New developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. Based on the type of building, the City estimates 30 to 50 calls per year. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities. The probable impact of the District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. New buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction that is compliant with the latest building codes and fire protection systems. One existing building, located at the site, which will be eliminated by the new development, has outstanding code violations. The City expects a very small increase in call volume, if any, and does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment in vehicles or facilities for fire protection. 108 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 10 The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements external to the area and the project will provide necessitated road, utility and parking infrastructure improvements as part of the private development costs. This will include extension of a public roadway through the property and watermain relocation. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are not anticipated to be any additional public costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks. The development in the District is expected to contribute all sanitary sewer (SAC) and water (WAC) connection fees in accordance with its Site Plan Agreement. The probable impact of the issuance of any general obligation tax increment bonds payable from tax increment revenues from the District on the City’s ability to issue debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. As presently proposed, it is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this project. Any such issuance, if considered, would not be expected to require the City’s general revenue support and would not apply to the City's debt limit. (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $4,840,624; (4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $5,085,442; (5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. 109 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 11 No requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received to date. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 this TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. (i) In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon (1) written representation made by the Developer to such effects, (2) review of the Developer’s proforma; and (3) City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site within the District, which is further outlined in the City Council resolution approving the establishment of the District and Appendix C. (ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market value both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix B and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the use of tax increments. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Administration of the District will be handled by the City’s Economic Development Manager. 110 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Appendix A: Map of Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and the TIF District 111 112 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Appendix B: Estimated Cash Flow for the District 113 Roers RedevelopmentCity of Chanhassen, MN Mixed-Use RedevelopmentASSUMPTIONS AND RATESDistrictType: Renewal and RenovationDistrict Name/Number: TIF 13County District #: TBDExempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00%First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2024Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.)Existing District - Specify No. Years RemainingFirst $150,000 1.50%Inflation Rate - Every Year:1.00%Over $150,000 2.00%Interest Rate:6.00%Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I) 2.00%Present Value Date:1-Aug-25Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25%First Period Ending 1-Feb-26Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)Tax Year District was Certified:Pay 2024First $100,000 0.25%Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2026 Over $100,000 0.25%Years of Tax Increment 16 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res. 1 Unit)Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2041 First $500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA]Inside(B)Over $500,000 1.25%Incremental or Total Fiscal DisparitiesIncrementalHomestead Residential Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.)Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 36.7257%Pay 2023First $500,000 1.00%Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 123.0260%Prelim Pay 2024Over $500,000 1.25%Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 84.768%Prelim Pay 2024Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00%Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 84.768%Prelim Pay 2024State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 30.0000%Prelim Pay 2024Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.17166%Prelim Pay 2024Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class AfterLand Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After ConversionPID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.125.1180010 Chanhassen Lodging 575 78th St W 335,400 273,600 609,000100% 609,000 Pay 2024C/I12,180 C/I12,180 2225.1180020 Chanhassen Lodging 575 78th St W 323,200 1,641,700 1,964,900100% 1,964,900 Pay 2024C/I39,298 Rental24,561 2325.1190010 Chanhassen Lodging 591 78th St W 701,300 4,623,100 5,324,400100% 5,324,400 Pay 2024C/I106,488 Rental66,555 1425.1190030 Chanhassen Lodging N/A 536,700 0 536,700100% 536,700 Pay 2024C/I10,734 C/I10,734 1525.1190040 Chanhassen Lodging N/A 18,300 0 18,300100% 18,300 Pay 2024C/I366 C/I366 1625.2830010 Chanhassen Properties 570 Market St 663,200 802,600 1,465,800100% 1,465,800 Pay 2024C/I29,316 Rental18,323 22,578,100 7,341,000 9,919,100 9,919,100 198,382 132,719Note:1. Base values are for pay 2024 based on review of County website on December 18, 2023.2. Located in SD #0112, WS #064.Area/ PhaseTax Rates BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity)114 Roers RedevelopmentCity of Chanhassen, MN Mixed-Use RedevelopmentEstimated Taxable Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First YearMarket Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full TaxesArea/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./UnitsValue Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2024 2025 2026 2027 PayableApartments 281,500281,500 31087,265,000 Rental 1,090,813 3,519 40% 100% 100% 100% 2027Retail 270270 18,0284,867,560 C/I Pref. 96,601 5 40% 100% 100% 100% 2027TOTAL92,132,560 1,187,414 Subtotal Residential 310 87,265,000 1,090,813 Subtotal Commercial/Ind. 18,028 4,867,560 96,601 Note:1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by the Assessor's office.Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide MarketTax Disparities Tax Property Disparities PropertyValue Total Taxes PerNew Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. Ft./UnitApartments 1,090,813 0 1,090,813 924,661 0 0 149,795 1,074,456 3,465.99Retail 96,601 35,477 61,124 51,813 43,647 28,305 8,355 132,121 7.33TOTAL1,187,414 35,477 1,151,936 976,474 43,647 28,305 158,151 1,206,577Note: 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary significantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted.Total Property Taxes 1,206,577Current Market Value - Est. 9,919,100less State-wide Taxes (28,305)New Market Value - Est. 92,132,560less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (43,647) Difference 82,213,460less Market Value Taxes (158,151)Present Value of Tax Increment 8,617,446less Base Value Taxes (105,256) Difference 73,596,014Annual Gross TIF 871,218Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than:73,596,014 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF? MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR ANALYSISTAX CALCULATIONSPROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity)115 Roers RedevelopmentCity of Chanhassen, MN Mixed-Use RedevelopmentTAX INCREMENT CASH FLOWProject Original Fiscal Captured Local Annual Semi-Annual State Admin. Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD% of Tax Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Present ENDING Tax PaymentOTC Capacity Capacity Incremental Capacity Rate Increment Increment 0.36% 10% Increment Value Yrs. Year Date- - - - 02/01/26100% 474,965 (132,719) (5,641) 336,605 84.768% 285,334 142,667 (514) (14,215) 127,938 120,594 0.5 2026 08/01/26100% 474,965 (132,719) (5,641) 336,605 84.768% 285,334 142,667 (514) (14,215) 127,938 237,675 1 2026 02/01/27100% 1,187,414 (132,719) (26,928) 1,027,767 84.768% 871,218 435,609 (1,568) (43,404) 390,637 584,751 1.5 2027 08/01/27100% 1,187,414 (132,719) (26,928) 1,027,767 84.768% 871,218 435,609 (1,568) (43,404) 390,637 921,718 2 2027 02/01/28100% 1,199,288 (132,719) (27,282) 1,039,287 84.768% 880,983 440,492 (1,586) (43,891) 395,015 1,252,537 2.5 2028 08/01/28100% 1,199,288 (132,719) (27,282) 1,039,287 84.768% 880,983 440,492 (1,586) (43,891) 395,015 1,573,721 3 2028 02/01/29100% 1,211,281 (132,719) (27,641) 1,050,921 84.768% 890,846 445,423 (1,604) (44,382) 399,437 1,889,040 3.5 2029 08/01/29100% 1,211,281 (132,719) (27,641) 1,050,921 84.768% 890,846 445,423 (1,604) (44,382) 399,437 2,195,176 4 2029 02/01/30100% 1,223,394 (132,719) (28,003) 1,062,672 84.768% 900,807 450,403 (1,621) (44,878) 403,904 2,495,718 4.5 2030 08/01/30100% 1,223,394 (132,719) (28,003) 1,062,672 84.768% 900,807 450,403 (1,621) (44,878) 403,904 2,787,506 5 2030 02/01/31100% 1,235,627 (132,719) (28,368) 1,074,540 84.768% 910,867 455,434 (1,640) (45,379) 408,415 3,073,960 5.5 2031 08/01/31100% 1,235,627 (132,719) (28,368) 1,074,540 84.768% 910,867 455,434 (1,640) (45,379) 408,415 3,352,071 6 2031 02/01/32100% 1,247,984 (132,719) (28,737) 1,086,528 84.768% 921,028 460,514 (1,658) (45,886) 412,971 3,625,093 6.5 2032 08/01/32100% 1,247,984 (132,719) (28,737) 1,086,528 84.768% 921,028 460,514 (1,658) (45,886) 412,971 3,890,163 7 2032 02/01/33100% 1,260,464 (132,719) (29,110) 1,098,635 84.768% 931,291 465,646 (1,676) (46,397) 417,572 4,150,381 7.5 2033 08/01/33100% 1,260,464 (132,719) (29,110) 1,098,635 84.768% 931,291 465,646 (1,676) (46,397) 417,572 4,403,019 8 2033 02/01/34100% 1,273,068 (132,719) (29,487) 1,110,863 84.768% 941,657 470,828 (1,695) (46,913) 422,220 4,651,028 8.5 2034 08/01/34100% 1,273,068 (132,719) (29,487) 1,110,863 84.768% 941,657 470,828 (1,695) (46,913) 422,220 4,891,815 9 2034 02/01/35100% 1,285,799 (132,719) (29,867) 1,123,213 84.768% 952,126 476,063 (1,714) (47,435) 426,914 5,128,187 9.5 2035 08/01/35100% 1,285,799 (132,719) (29,867) 1,123,213 84.768% 952,126 476,063 (1,714) (47,435) 426,914 5,357,674 10 2035 02/01/36100% 1,298,657 (132,719) (30,251) 1,135,687 84.768% 962,700 481,350 (1,733) (47,962) 431,655 5,582,952 10.5 2036 08/01/36100% 1,298,657 (132,719) (30,251) 1,135,687 84.768% 962,700 481,350 (1,733) (47,962) 431,655 5,801,668 11 2036 02/01/37100% 1,311,643 (132,719) (30,639) 1,148,285 84.768% 973,379 486,690 (1,752) (48,494) 436,444 6,016,369 11.5 2037 08/01/37100% 1,311,643 (132,719) (30,639) 1,148,285 84.768% 973,379 486,690 (1,752) (48,494) 436,444 6,224,817 12 2037 02/01/38100% 1,324,760 (132,719) (31,031) 1,161,010 84.768% 984,166 492,083 (1,771) (49,031) 441,280 6,429,437 12.5 2038 08/01/38100% 1,324,760 (132,719) (31,031) 1,161,010 84.768% 984,166 492,083 (1,771) (49,031) 441,280 6,628,096 13 2038 02/01/39100% 1,338,007 (132,719) (31,427) 1,173,862 84.768% 995,060 497,530 (1,791) (49,574) 446,165 6,823,104 13.5 2039 08/01/39100% 1,338,007 (132,719) (31,427) 1,173,862 84.768% 995,060 497,530 (1,791) (49,574) 446,165 7,012,433 14 2039 02/01/40100% 1,351,388 (132,719) (31,827) 1,186,842 84.768% 1,006,063 503,031 (1,811) (50,122) 451,099 7,198,280 14.5 2040 08/01/40100% 1,351,388 (132,719) (31,827) 1,186,842 84.768% 1,006,063 503,031 (1,811) (50,122) 451,099 7,378,713 15 2040 02/01/41100% 1,364,901 (132,719) (32,231) 1,199,952 84.768% 1,017,176 508,588 (1,831) (50,676) 456,081 7,555,826 15.5 2041 08/01/41100% 1,364,901 (132,719) (32,231) 1,199,952 84.768% 1,017,176 508,588 (1,831) (50,676) 456,081 7,727,781 16 2041 02/01/42 Total14,424,701 (51,929) (1,437,277) 12,935,495 Present Value From 08/01/2025 Present Value Rate 6.00% 8,617,446 (31,023) (858,642) 7,727,781 116 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Appendix C: Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 (the “District”), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes (M.S.), Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of six (6) parcels and their internal and adjacent rights-of-way, with plans to redevelop the area into a mixed-use development consisting of approximately 310 multi-family housing units and 18,000 rentable square feet of commercial space. Parcels consisting of 70% of the area of the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. One of two buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, is structurally substandard and the other building requires substantial renovation or clearance to remove inadequate street layout and obsolescence not suitable for improvement or conversion. (See Appendix D of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the activities proposed in the TIF Plan meet the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains substandard or obsolete buildings whose renovation requires high costs related to demolition, remediation, site improvement, and construction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires substantial investment toward public improvements including the extension of Laredo Drive, utility relocations, and various internal and external sidewalk and roadway improvements to connect with the downtown area. 117 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Because of the combination of limited amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the renewal site and the public and private costs of financing the proposed improvements which are essential to the comprehensive redevelopment of the area, this project is feasibly only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer provided a pro forma outlining project sources and uses as well as projected rent, operating cost, vacancy and financing assumptions. City staff and the City’s financial advisor reviewed the information and have determined that the project is not feasible without assistance due to anticipated net operating income and market returns not supporting the overall redevelopment costs for the site. This review supports justification that the Developer would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax based created on currently underutilized and declining property requires site and public improvement costs that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the costs of site preparation, demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include infrastructure and site parking will add significantly to the total redevelopment costs of any development in this area. Site and public improvements costs in this area have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be $82,213,460. 118 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $8,617,446. d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $73,596,014 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The City of Chanhassen Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan on February 20, 2024 and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the City will provide an impetus for the renovation of substandard and underutilized property, construction of a new mixed-use private development which will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, an increased tax base of the State and add a high-quality development to the City. 119 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Appendix D: Renewal and Renovation Qualifications for the District 120 REPORT OF INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS FOR DETERMINING QUALIFICATIONS OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT WEST 78TH STREET RENEWAL AND RENOVATION TIF DISTRICT Prepared for CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 1, 2023 121 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 1 of 12 Final Report Table of Contents Part 1 – Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose of Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Part 2 – Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10a Requirements ...................................................... 3 A. Coverage Test .................................................................................................................................................. 4 B. Condition of Buildings Test ............................................................................................................................... 4 C. Distribution of Substandard Buildings ............................................................................................................... 5 Part 3 – Procedures Followed .................................................................................................................... 6 Part 4 – Findings .......................................................................................................................................... 6 A. Coverage Test .................................................................................................................................................. 6 B. Condition of Building Test .................................................................................................................................. 8 1. Building Inspection .................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Replacement Cost .................................................................................................................................. 8 3. Code Deficiencies ................................................................................................................................... 8 4. System Condition Deficiencies ............................................................................................................... 9 C. Distribution of Substandard Structures ........................................................................................................... 10 Part 5 - Team Credentials .......................................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX A Property Condition Assessment Summary Sheet APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX C Property Condition Assessment Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs 122 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 2 of 12 Final Report Part 1: Executive Summary Purpose of the Evaluation LHB was hired by the City of Chanhassen to inspect and evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Renewal and Renovation District (“TIF District”) proposed to be established by the City. The proposed TIF District is bounded by West 78th Street, Market Boulevard, and Market Street (see Diagram 1). The purpose of LHB’s work is to determine whether the proposed TIF District meets the statutory requirements for coverage, and whether two (2) buildings on six (6) parcels located within the proposed TIF District, meet the qualifications required for a Renewal and Renovation District. Diagram 1: Proposed TIF District 123 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 3 of 12 Final Report Scope of Work The proposed TIF District consists of six (6) parcels with two (2) buildings. Both buildings in the proposed TIF District received interior and exterior inspections. The Chanhassen Cinema building was determined substandard. The Hotel building did not meet the qualifications to be determined “structurally substandard”, but a full building report was still completed showing significant structural and code deficiencies coming up just short of the 15 percent code deficiency requirement. Building code and Condition Deficiency reports for both buildings are in Appendix B. Conclusion After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Renewal and Renovation District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, it is our professional opinion that the proposed TIF District qualifies as a Renewal and Renovation District because: The proposed TIF District has a coverage calculation of 100 percent which is above the 70 percent requirement. 50 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard which is above the 20 percent requirement. 100 percent of the other buildings require substantial renovation or clearance which is above the 30 percent requirement. The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed. The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail. Part 2: Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10a Requirements The properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), which states: Interior Inspection “The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property...” Exterior Inspection and Other Means “An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard.” 124 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 4 of 12 Final Report Documentation “Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1).” Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (a) (1) requires two tests for occupied parcels: A. COVERAGE TEST 1. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (a) (1) states: …“parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots” The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states:“For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains building, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.” B. CONDITION OF BUILDINGS TEST 1. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a) states: …“20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard; and 30 percent of the other buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well-being of the community.” Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statues, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), “For purposes of this subdivision, ‘structurally substandard’ shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.” a. We do not count energy code deficiencies toward the thresholds required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b) defined as “structurally substandard”, due to concerns expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001. 2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states: “A building is not structurally substandard if it follows the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence based on reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence.” “Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building is not disqualified] include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence.” 125 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 5 of 12 Final Report i. LHB counts energy code deficiencies toward the 15 percent code threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c) for the following reasons: 1) The Minnesota energy code is one of ten building code areas highlighted by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry website where minimum construction standards are required by law. 2) Chapter 13 of the 2015 Minnesota Building Code states, “Buildings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the International Energy Conservation Code.” Further more, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1305.0021 Subpart 9 states, “References to the International Energy Conservation Code in this code mean the Minnesota Energy Code…” 3) Chapter 11 of the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code incorporates Minnesota Rules, Chapters, 1322 and 1323 Minnesota Energy Code. 4) The Senior Building Code Representative for the Construction Codes and Licensing Division of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry confirmed that the Minnesota Energy Code is being enforced throughout the State of Minnesota. 5) In a January 2002 report to the Minnesota Legislature, the Management Analysis Division of the Minnesota Department of Administration confirmed that the construction cost of new buildings complying with the Minnesota Energy Code is higher than buildings built prior to the enactment of the code. 6) Proper TIF analysis requires a comparison between the replacement value of a new building built under current code standards with the repairs that would be necessary to bring the existing building up to current code standards. For an equal comparison to be made, all applicable code chapters should be applied to both scenarios. Since current construction estimating software automatically applies the construction cost of complying with the Minnesota Energy Code, energy code deficiencies should also be identified in the existing structures. C. DISTRIBUTION OF SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS 1. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a. (a) (2), states that the conditions described above must be “reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the district”. 2. Our interpretation of the distribution requirement is that the substandard buildings and other buildings requiring substantial renovation or clearance must be reasonably distributed throughout the district as compared to the location of all buildings in the district. For example, if all the buildings in a district are located on one half of the area of the district, with the other half occupied by parking lots (meeting the required 70 percent coverage for the district), we would evaluate the distribution of the substandard buildings and buildings requiring substantial renovation or clearance compared with only the half of the district where the buildings are located. If all the buildings in a district are located evenly throughout the entire area of the district, the substandard buildings and buildings requiring substantial renovation or clearance must be reasonably distributed throughout the entire area of the district. We believe this is consistent with the opinion expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001. 126 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 6 of 12 Final Report Part 3: Procedures Followed LHB was able to schedule interior and exterior inspections for two (2) buildings in the proposed TIF District on July 27, 2023. The Chanhassen Cinema building (570 Market Street, Parcel A in Diagram 2) received an on-site interior and exterior inspection and was determined substandard. The Hotel building (575 and 591 78th Street West, Parcels B, C, and E in Diagram 2) including the former High Timber Lodge addition, had visible water issues but did not appear to have enough condition deficiencies during the initial inspection to be considered “structurally substandard”. However, the Hotel building did exhibit existing conditions warranting renovation or clearance as defined by Minnesota Statutes Subd. 10a. (1) (iii) in which it requires substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions of incompatible land use relationships and obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion. Part 4: Findings A. COVERAGE TEST 1. The total square foot area of each parcel in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, GIS mapping and site verification. 2. The total square foot area of buildings and site improvements on the parcels in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, GIS mapping and site verification. 3. The percentage of coverage for each parcel in the proposed TIF District was computed to determine if the 15 percent minimum requirement was met. The total square footage of parcels meeting the 15 percent requirement was divided into the total square footage of the entire district to determine if the 70 percent requirement was met. FINDING: The proposed TIF District met the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which resulted in parcels consisting of 100 percent of the area of the proposed TIF District being occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or paved drives or parking lots (see Diagram 2). This exceeds the 70 percent area coverage requirement for the proposed TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a (a)(1). 127 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 7 of 12 Final Report Diagram 2: Coverage Shaded area denotes parcels more than 15 percent occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. 128 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 8 of 12 Final Report B. Condition Of Building Test 1. BUILDING INSPECTION The first step in the evaluation process is the building inspection. After an initial walk-thru, the inspector makes a judgement whether a building “appears” to have enough defects or deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. If it does, the inspector documents with notes and photographs code and non-code deficiencies in the building. 2. REPLACEMENT COST The second step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2023. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, retail, residential, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor’s overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural fees, legal fees or other “soft” costs not directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for each building that was inspected is tabulated in Appendix A. 3. CODE DEFICIENCIES The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies exist with respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to new buildings in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. As a result, it was necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for each building in the proposed TIF District. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. LHB utilizes the current Minnesota State Building Code as the official code for our evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Code is a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to the adopted international codes. After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost Works 2023; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the identified deficiencies. We were than able to compare the correction costs with the replacement cost of each building to determine if the costs for correcting code deficiencies exceed the required 15 percent threshold. FINDING: One (1) out of Two (2) buildings (50 percent) in the proposed TIF District contained code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). Complete Building Code and Condition Deficiency Reports for the building that was inspected in the proposed TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report. 129 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 9 of 12 Final Report 4. SYSTEM CONDITION DEFICIENCIES If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then for such building to be “structurally substandard” under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building’s defects, or deficiencies should be of sufficient total significance to justify “substantial renovation or clearance.” Based on this definition, LHB re-evaluated each of the buildings that met the code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted “substantial renovation or clearance” based on the criteria we outlined above. System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial deterioration in site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and electrical components, fire protection and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors, and doors. The evaluation of system condition deficiencies was made by reviewing all available information contained in City records and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. LHB only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible upon our inspection of the building or contained in City records. We did not consider the amount of “service life” used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that component’s deficiencies. After identifying the system condition deficiencies in each building, we used our professional judgment to determine if the list of defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify “substantial renovation or clearance.” FINDING: In our professional opinion, one (1) of the two (2) buildings (50 percent) in the proposed TIF District is structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. This exceeds the 20 percent requirement of Subdivision 10a. (a) (1) (ii). SUBDIVISION 10a. (a) (1) (iii) Subdivision 10a. (a) (1) (iii) requires that at least 30 percent of the other buildings (i.e., all buildings excluding the 20 percent minimum standard) meet the Subdivision 10a (1), clause (iii) test in which the “other” buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove existing conditions such as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well-being of the community. FINDING: One (1) out of the one (1) remaining buildings (100 percent) in the proposed Renewal and Renovation District exhibits existing conditions warranting renovation or clearance as defined by Minnesota Statutes Subd. 10a. (1) (iii), described as follows: 130 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 10 of 12 Final Report PARCEL B, C, and E: In 2023 the City of Chanhassen began a visioning process for the future of Downtown Chanhassen, which is typically referred to as the areas surrounding West 78th Street between Powers Boulevard and Great Plains Boulevard. The downtown plan, generated from the visioning process, showed a desire for a more walkable, pedestrian-scale downtown with buildings near the streets and parking tucked to the rear, side, or underground. The continued addition of housing opportunities within the downtown is also seen as a priority to increase the number of people within the downtown area at all times of the day to promote a healthy business climate. Over time, West 78th Street will be transformed into more of a traditional 'main street' with on-street parking opportunities, contiguous sidewalks, and opportunities to eat, shop, and recreate. The new civic campus currently being planned by the city will consist of a new city hall, senior city, and city park. The city park will include a splash pad, and an outdoor performance center and winter ice skating to serve as a draw attracting the public to downtown Chanhassen year-round. The new city hall will be located at the intersection of Market Boulevard and West 78th Street and will set the tone for building placement for future downtown developments and redevelopment projects. The City has a vision for this area that is a departure from the suburban Hotel model. Concurrent with the City plans changing for this area, the Hotel ownership group is faced with water penetration issues on the exterior skin of the hotel that if not addressed, will lead to serious consequences. The building has been well-maintained to this point, but will become more difficult to maintain and costly to fix. LHB inspectors found code deficiencies totaling 14.4% of the replacement value of the building. While this is slightly short of what is required to be labeled a “substandard” building by MN TIF Statutes, it is a significant issue for the owners and will impact the viability of this building into the future. The Hotel building as configured is obsolete in terms of current urban standards, and is situated in a large surface parking lot, contrary to the planning vision for this area. While this parcel would naturally be grandfathered into the new land use/zoning, major additions, or improvements to the structure incompatible with the new planning goals would not likely be approved, leading to a disincentive for reinvestment and ultimately blight conditions. C. Distribution Of Substandard Structures Much of this report has focused on the condition of individual buildings as they relate to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 and 10a. It is also important to look at the distribution of substandard buildings throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District. FINDING: Buildings meeting the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 and 10a are reasonably distributed compared to all parcels that contain buildings. 131 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 11 of 12 Final Report Diagram 3: Distribution of Substandard Structures Yellow: parcels with buildings. Orange: Structurally Substandard Building Blue: Other Conditions warranting renovation or clearance (Subd. 10a. (1) (iii) 132 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 12 of 12 Final Report Part 5: Team Credentials Michael A. Fischer, AIA, LEED AP - Project Principal/TIF Analyst Michael has 34 years of experience as project principal, project manager, project designer and project architect on planning, urban design, educational, commercial, and governmental projects. He has become an expert on Tax Increment Finance District analysis assisting over 100 cities with strategic planning for TIF Districts. He is an Architectural Principal at LHB and currently leads the Minneapolis office. Michael completed a two-year Bush Fellowship, studying at MIT and Harvard in 1999, earning master’s degrees in City Planning and Real Estate Development from MIT. He has served on more than 50 committees, boards, and community task forces, including a term as a City Council President, Chair of a Metropolitan Planning Organization, and Chair of the Edina Planning Commission. Most recently, he served as a member of the Edina city council and Secretary of the Edina HRA. Michael has also managed and designed several award-winning architectural projects and was one of four architects in the Country to receive the AIA Young Architects Citation in 1997. Phil Fisher – Inspector For 35 years, Phil Fisher worked in the field of Building Operations in Minnesota including White Bear Lake Area Schools. At the University of Minnesota, he earned his Bachelor of Science in Industrial Technology. He is a Certified Playground Safety Inspector, Certified Plant Engineer, and is trained in Minnesota Enterprise Real Properties (MERP) Facility Condition Assessment (FCA). His FCA training was recently applied to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Facilities Condition Assessment project involving over 2,000 buildings. Appendices APPENDIX A Property Condition Assessment Summary Sheet APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX C Property Condition Assessment Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs 133 APPENDIX A Property Condition Assessment Summary Sheet 134 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District Property Condition Assessment Summary SheetTIF Map No.PID # Property AddressImproved or VacantSurvey Method UsedSite Area(S.F.)Coverage Area of Improvements(S.F.)Coverage Percent of ImprovementsCoverageQuantity(S.F.)No. of BuildingsBuildingReplacementCost15% of Replacement CostBuilding Code DeficienciesNo. of Buildings Exceeding 15% CriteriaNo. of buildings determined substandardMeets Subd. 10a. (1) (iii) RequirementsA252830010 570 Market Street Improved Interior/Exterior 39,640 37,658 95.0% 39,640 1 $3,792,114 $568,817 $964,004 1 1 1B251180010 575 West 78th Street Improved Interior/Exterior 23,958 22,520 94.0% 23,958 See Parcel E Note 1C251180020 575 West 78th Street Improved Interior/Exterior 23,086 23,086 100.0% 23,086 See Parcel E Note 1D251190040 N/A Vacant Exterior 1,307 1,307 100.0% 1,307E251190010 591 West 78th Street Improved Interior/Exterior 50,094 47,088 94.0% 50,094 1 $16,449,055 $2,467,358 $2,370,924 0 0 1F251190030 N/A Vacant Exterior 38,332 34,499 90.0% 38,332TOTALS 176,417 176,417 2 1 1 2100.0%Note 1: One continuous building covers Parcels B, C, and EThe Parcel E line contains the full building information 50.0%50.0%M:\23Proj\230558\300 Design\Reports\Final Report\[230558 West 78th Street TIF Summary Sheet.xlsx]Property InfoPercent of other buildings meeting Subd. 10a. (1) (iii) Requirements 100.0%Total Coverage Percent:Percent of buildings exceeding 15 percent code deficiency threshold: Percent of buildings determined substandard: Chanhassen, MinnesotaWest 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF DistrictLHB Project Number 230558.00Page 1 of 1Property Condition Assessment Summary Sheet135 APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports 136 West 78th Street TIF District Page 1 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel A – 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District Building Code, Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis Report Parcel A Chanhassen Cinema Address: 570 Market Street, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Parcel ID: 252830010 Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): July 27, 2023 10am Inspection Type: Interior and Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost, NOT including energy code deficiencies. Estimated Replacement Cost: $3,792,114 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $964,004 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 25.4% DEFECTS IN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS 1. Exterior masonry walls are failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. 2. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting per code. 3. Masonry foundation walls are failing allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. COMBINATION OF DEFICIENCIES 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. There is no code required accessible parking. b. There is no code compliant accessible route into the building. c. There is no code required accessible route to all levels of the building. 2. Light and Ventilation a. The lighting system does not comply with code. b. The HVAC system does not comply with code. 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Natural gas meter should be protected per code. b. Interior stairs do not comply with code. c. Damaged flooring material is creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. d. The emergency notification system does not comply with code. e. Flammable material is improperly stored which is contrary to code. f. Exterior stairs are damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. 137 West 78th Street TIF District Page 2 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel A – 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. The ceiling tile is damaged or missing and should be replaced. b. Mold is present though out the building. c. Interior walls should be repaired and repainted. 5. Exterior Construction a. Exterior walls should be repainted. b. Hollow metal doors are failing and should be replaced. c. Steel railings are rusting and should be repaired or replaced. d. The roofing material has failed, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. e. Exterior caulking has failed, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. DESCRIPTION OF CODE DEFICIENCIES 1. Exterior masonry wall should be repaired or replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. 2. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting per code. 3. Failing masonry foundation walls should be repaired and or replaced to comply with structural integrity per code. 4. Code required accessible parking should be created. 5. A code required accessible route into the building should be created. 6. A code required accessible route to all levels of the building should be created. 7. A code-compliant lighting system should be installed. 8. A code-compliant HVAC system should be installed. 9. The natural gas meter should be protected, per code. 10. Interior stairs should be modified to comply with code. 11. Damaged flooring material should be replaced to create a code required unimpeded means for emergency egress. 12. The emergency notification system should be replaced to comply with code. 13. Flammable material should be stored in a code approved container. 14. Damaged exterior stairs should be repaired to create a code required unimpeded means for emergency egress. 15. Failed roofing material should be replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. 16. Failed exterior joint caulking should be removed and replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. OVERVIEW OF DEFICIENCIES This building has been vacant for several years and is showing severe signs of exterior structural system failure. The exterior concrete masonry units are failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. There is no code required accessible parking. The existing accessible ramp does not meet current code. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting to comply with code. A code required accessible route to all levels of the building should be created. The interior stairs do not comply with code. Interior walls should be repaired and repainted. Damaged or missing ceiling tile should be replaced. There is mold throughout the building. The interior flooring is damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. The lighting system does not comply with code. The HVAC system does not comply with code. The natural gas meter should be protected per code. The emergency notification system does not comply with code. The exterior concrete stairs are damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. Failed roofing material should be replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. Failed exterior joint caulking should be replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. 138 West 78th Street TIF District Page 3 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel A – 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 ENERGY CODE DEFICIENCIES In addition to the building code deficiencies listed above, the existing building does not comply with the current energy code. These deficiencies are not included in the estimated costs to correct code deficiencies and are not considered in determining whether or not the building is substandard. M:\23Proj\230558\300 Design\Reports\Building Reports\A - 570 Market St Building Report Redevelopment District.docx 139 West 78th Street TIF District Page 1 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel E – 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District Building Code, Condition Deficiency and Context Analysis Report Parcel E Country Inn and Suites Address: 591 West 78th Street, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Parcel ID: 251190010 Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): July 27, 2023 9am Inspection Type: Interior and Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building IS NOT Substandard because: - Substantial renovation IS NOT required to correct Conditions found. - Building Code deficiencies DO NOT total more than 15% of replacement cost, NOT including energy code deficiencies. Estimated Replacement Cost: $16,449,055 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $2,370,924 Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 14.4% DEFECTS IN STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS 1. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting per code. COMBINATION OF DEFICIENCIES 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. No deficiencies observed. 2. Light and Ventilation a. The lighting system does not comply with code. b. The HVAC system does not comply with code. 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Floor tile is damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. b. Thresholds do not comply with code for maximum height. c. Smoke gaskets on fire rated doors are damaged and will not comply with code. d. Personal hand railings on the exterior are not properly secured and should be repaired. e. Stairs do not comply with code. f. Electrical panels do not have the code required 36-inch clear space. g. The entrance canopy does not have a code required sprinkler system. h. Exterior sidewalks are damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. 140 West 78th Street TIF District Page 2 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel E – 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 i. Exterior stairs are damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. j. Staff reports that the building sprinkler system is failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. k. Staff reports that the building emergency notification system is failing, which requires replacement per code. l. Staff reports that the smoke detectors are failing and should be replaced per code. 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. The ceiling tile is damaged or missing and should be replaced. b. Interior walls should be repaired and repainted. c. The carpet is stained and should be cleaned and or replaced. d. Mold is present within the building. e. Ceramic wall tiles are damaged and should be replaced. f. Ceilings are stained from water damage and should be repaired and repainted. 5. Exterior Construction a. Areas of the exterior walls are compromised, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. b. Exterior control joint caulking is failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. c. Exterior wood surfaces should be repainted. d. Staff reports that windows are failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. e. Staff reports that the roofing material is failing, allowing for water intrusion which is contrary to code. DESCRIPTION OF CODE DEFICIENCIES 1. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting per code. 2. The lighting system does not comply with code. 3. The HVAC system does not comply with code. 4. Damaged floor tile should be repaired/replaced to create an unimpeded means for emergency egress per code. 5. Thresholds should be modified to comply with code. 6. Smoke gaskets on fire rated doors do not comply with code. 7. Loose hand railings should be properly secured per code. 8. The stairs should be modified to comply with code. 9. A code required 36-inch clear space in front of all electrical panels should be maintained. 10. The entrance canopy does not have a code required sprinkler system. 11. Exterior sidewalks should be repaired to create a code required unimpeded means for emergency egress. 12. Repair existing sprinkler system to comply with code. 13. Install a code compliant emergency notification system. 14. Install code compliant smoke detectors. 15. Repair exterior walls to prevent water intrusion per code. 16. Remove and replace failed exterior caulking to prevent water intrusion per code. 17. Replace existing windows that are failing to prevent water intrusion per code. 18. Replace failing roofing system to prevent water intrusion per code. 141 West 78th Street TIF District Page 3 of 3 Building Report LHB Project No. 230558.00 Parcel E – 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 OVERVIEW OF DEFICIENCIES This building is currently being operated as a hotel. Steel lintels should be protected from rusting per code. The lighting and HVAC systems do not comply with code. Sidewalks, exterior stairs, and interior floor tile are damaged creating an impediment to emergency egress which is contrary to code. Thresholds should be modified to comply with code. Damaged smoke gaskets on fire rated doors should be repaired to comply with code. Loose hand railing should be properly secured per code. Items in corridors that are obstructing emergency egress should be removed per code. Interior stairs should be modified to comply with code. The entrance canopy should have a code required sprinkler system installed. The building sprinkler system should be repaired to comply with code. A code compliant emergency notification system and smoke detectors should be installed. Repair exterior walls to prevent water intrusion per code. Replace failing window system to prevent water intrusion per code. The failing roofing system should be replaced to prevent water intrusion per code. ENERGY CODE DEFICIENCIES In addition to the building code deficiencies listed above, the existing building does not comply with the current energy code. These deficiencies are not included in the estimated costs to correct code deficiencies and are not considered in determining whether the building is substandard. M:\23Proj\230558\300 Design\Reports\Building Reports\E - 591 W 78th St Building Report Redevelopment District.docx 142 APPENDIX C Property Condition Assessments Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs 143 Replacement Cost Report Square Foot Cost Estimate Report Date:8/24/2023 Estimate Name:570 Market Street Building Type:Movie Theater with Concrete Block / Steel Joists Location:CHANHASSEN, MN Story Count:1 Story Height (L.F.):20.00 Floor Area (S.F.):22400 Labor Type:OPN Basement Included:No Data Release:Year 2023 Quarter 3 Cost Per Square Foot:$169.29 Building Cost:$3,792,114.90 Quantity % of Total Cost Per S.F. Cost A Substructure 8.26% $12.15 $272,208.46 A1010 Standard Foundations $4.63 $103,717.00 A10101051560 Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY/LF, 7.2 PLF, 12" thick 650 $2.93 $65,615.23 A10101102700 Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide 650 $1.62 $36,269.68 A10102107200 Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 50K, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 3' ‐ 0" square x 12" deep 7.47 $0.08 $1,832.09 A1030 Slab on Grade $7.13 $159,768.90 A10301202240 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced 22400 $7.13 $159,768.90 A2010 Basement Excavation $0.39 $8,722.56 A20101104560 Excavate and fill, 10,000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth, on site storage 22400 $0.39 $8,722.56 B Shell 27.42% $40.37 $904,200.80 B1010 Floor Construction $1.41 $31,600.53 B10102461250 Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on bearing wall, 25' span, 22.5" deep, 100 PSF superimposed load, 145 PSF total load 2250 $1.41 $31,600.53 B1020 Roof Construction $13.06 $292,524.29 B10201206500 Roof, steel joists, joist girder, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns/bearing wall, 60'x50' bay, 40 PSF superimposed load, 71" deep, 65 PSF total load 22400 $12.36 $276,950.02 B10201206550 Roof, steel joists, joist girder, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns/bearing wall, 60'x50' bay, 40 PSF superimposed load, 71" deep, 65 PSF total load, add for column 22400 $0.70 $15,574.27 B2010 Exterior Walls $7.13 $159,736.20 B20101116280 Concrete block (CMU) wall, regular weight, 75% solid, 8 x 8 x 16, 4500 PSI, reinforced, vertical #5@32", grouted 10400 $7.13 $159,736.20 B2020 Exterior Windows $8.31 $186,139.98 B20202101250 Aluminum flush tube frame, for 1/4"glass, 1‐3/4"x4", 5'x20' opening, three intermediate horizontals 2600 $3.31 $74,149.92 B20202201400 Glazing panel, insulating, 1" thick units, 2 lites, 1/4" float glass, clear 2600 $5.00 $111,990.06 B2030 Exterior Doors $2.20 $49,237.16 B20301106950 Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, narrow stile, double door, hardware, 6'‐0" x 10'‐0" opening 1.87 $0.75 $16,703.82 B20302203450 Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal, 1 door with frame, no label, 3'‐0" x 7'‐0" opening 9.33 $1.45 $32,533.34 B3010 Roof Coverings $8.26 $184,962.64 B30101051400 Roofing, asphalt flood coat, gravel, base sheet, 3 plies 15# asphalt felt, mopped 22400 $4.04 $90,497.34 B30103203090 Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite 22400 $2.72 $60,943.90 B30104201400 Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face 650 $1.16 $25,976.18 B30106305100 Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4", mill finish, .050" thick 650 $0.34 $7,545.22 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 1 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 144 C Interiors 19.33% $28.45 $637,264.72 C1010 Partitions $4.23 $94,785.78 C10101045500 Concrete block (CMU) partition, light weight, hollow, 6" thick, no finish 8960 $4.23 $94,785.78 C1020 Interior Doors $1.57 $35,214.61 C10201022600 Door, single leaf, kd steel frame, hollow metal, commercial quality, flush, 3'‐0" x 7'‐0" x 1‐3/8" 31.77 $1.57 $35,214.61 C1030 Fittings $0.52 $11,586.22 C10301100460 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, stainless steel 4 $0.45 $10,041.60 C10305100130 Directory boards, outdoor, 36" x 36" 1 $0.07 $1,544.62 C2010 Stair Construction $3.04 $67,992.96 C20101100760 Stairs, steel, pan tread for conc in‐fill, picket rail,20 risers w/ landing 3.73 $3.04 $67,992.96 C3010 Wall Finishes $3.47 $77,820.26 C30102202000 2 coats paint on masonry with block filler 10400 $1.78 $39,929.14 C30102300320 Painting, masonry or concrete, latex, brushwork, primer & 2 coats 17920 $1.69 $37,891.12 C3020 Floor Finishes $6.76 $151,341.98 C30204100160 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz 21280 $5.17 $115,731.07 C30204100220 Carpet, padding, add to above, 2.7 density 21280 $1.12 $25,003.36 C30204101720 Tile, ceramic natural clay 1120 $0.47 $10,607.55 C3030 Ceiling Finishes $8.86 $198,522.91 C30302107400 Acoustic ceilings, 3/4"mineral fiber, 12" x 12" tile, concealed 2" bar & channel grid, suspended support 22400 $8.86 $198,522.91 D Services 34.67% $51.03 $1,143,116.52 D1010 Elevators and Lifts $3.80 $85,088.40 D10101102200 Hydraulic, passenger elevator, 3000 lb, 2 floors, 100 FPM 1 $3.80 $85,088.40 D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $14.23 $318,717.14 D20101102080 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung 50.77 $9.21 $206,203.20 D20102102000 Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung 9.52 $0.73 $16,358.64 D20103101600 Lavatory w/trim, vanity top, PE on CI, 19" x 16" oval 19.04 $1.50 $33,523.54 D20104404300 Service sink w/trim, PE on CI,wall hung w/rim guard, 22" x 18" 3.17 $0.93 $20,940.59 D20108201880 Water cooler, electric, wall hung, dual height, 14.3 GPH 9.52 $1.86 $41,691.17 D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $0.39 $8,705.74 D20202202260 Gas fired water heater, residential, 100< F rise, 30 gal tank, 32 GPH 1.7 $0.39 $8,705.74 D2040 Rain Water Drainage $0.86 $19,213.44 D20402102120 Roof drain, DWV PVC, 5" diam, 10' high 3.4 $0.48 $10,797.89 D20402102160 Roof drain, DWV PVC, 5" diam, for each additional foot add 128 $0.38 $8,415.55 D3050 Terminal & Package Units $12.35 $276,713.92 D30501504440 Rooftop, single zone, air conditioner, schools and colleges, 10,000 SF, 38.33 ton 22400 $12.35 $276,713.92 D4010 Sprinklers $5.78 $129,527.46 D40104100620 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 10,000 SF 22400 $4.76 $106,541.79 D40104100700 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, each additional floor, 2000 SF 4480 $1.03 $22,985.67 D4020 Standpipes $1.47 $32,951.80 D40203101540 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor 1.87 $1.19 $26,671.40 D40203101560 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, additional floors 1.87 $0.28 $6,280.40 D5010 Electrical Service/Distribution $1.16 $25,993.87 D50101200320 Overhead service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 400 A 1 $0.33 $7,303.53 D50102300320 Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 400 A 100 $0.56 $12,525.40 D50102400200 Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, 120/208 V, 3 phase, 400 A 0.5 $0.28 $6,164.94 D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $8.70 $194,855.37 D50201100200 Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 2.5 per 1000 SF, .3 watts per SF 22400 $2.29 $51,381.12 D50201350200 Miscellaneous power, to .5 watts 22400 $0.18 $4,110.40 D50201400240 Central air conditioning power, 3 watts 22400 $0.78 $17,412.42 D50202100500 Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling, 0.8 watt per SF, 20 FC, 5 fixtures @32 watt per 1000 SF 22400 $3.87 $86,720.26 D50202901000 Daylight dimming control system, 10 fixtures per 1000 SF 11200 $1.57 $35,231.17 West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 2 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 145 D5030 Communications and Security $2.12 $47,558.54 D50309100220 Communication and alarm systems, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire, sound systems, 12 outlets 0.28 $0.33 $7,299.94 D50309100452 Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 25 detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire 1.12 $1.19 $26,752.10 D50309100462 Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit 1 $0.60 $13,506.50 D5090 Other Electrical Systems $0.17 $3,790.84 D50902100200 Generator sets, w/battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch, gas/gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 7.5 kW 2.63 $0.17 $3,790.84 E Equipment & Furnishings 10.33% $15.21 $340,700.72 E1020 Institutional Equipment $4.26 $95,405.60 E10203100210 Architectural equipment, movie equipment film transport, including platters & autownd, econ 1 $0.34 $7,512.00 E10203100220 Architectural equipment, movie equipment lamphouses, including rectifiers, xenon, 1000W 1 $0.46 $10,386.56 E10203100240 Architectural equipment, movie equipment, projector mechanisms, 35 mm, economy 1 $0.66 $14,880.00 E10203200090 Architectural equipment, movie equipment projection screens, rigid in wall, acrylic, 1/4" thick 1600 $2.80 $62,627.04 E1090 Other Equipment $0.00 $0.00 E2010 Fixed Furnishings $10.95 $245,295.12 E20105100110 Architectural equipment, movie equipment seating, painted steel, upholstered, economy 560 $10.95 $245,295.12 F Special Construction 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 G Building Sitework 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 100% $147.21 $3,297,491.22 15.0% $22.08 $494,623.68 0.0% $0.00 $0.00 0.0% $0.00 $0.00 Total Building Cost $169.29 $3,792,114.90 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) Architectural Fees SubTotal User Fees West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 3 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 146 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market Street, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Building Name or Type Parcel ID 252830010 Chanhassen Cinema Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Unit Quantity Total Accessibility Items Parking Create code required accessible parking 500.00$ Lump 1 500.00$ Accessible Route Install a code approved accessible route into the building 1.00$ Lump 50,000 50,000.00$ Install a code approved accessible route to all levels of the building 3.80$ SF 22,400 85,120.00$ Structural Elements Exterior Masonry Walls Repair failing masonry walls to prevent water intrusion per code 5.00$ SF 22,400 112,000.00$ Steel Lintels Protect steel lintels from rusting per code 500.00$ Lump 1 500.00$ Masonry Foundation Repair failing masonry foundation to prevent water intrusion per code 1.62$ SF 22,400 36,288.00$ Exiting Stairs Modify interior stairs to comply with code 2.00$ SF 22,400 44,800.00$ Repair damaged exterior stairs to create a code compliant means for emergency egress 2,500.00$ Lump 1 2,500.00$ Flooring Material Repair/replace damaged flooring material to create a code required unimpeded means for emergency egress 6.29$ SF 10,000 62,900.00$ Emergency Notification System Install a code compliant emergency notification system 0.60$ SF 22,400 13,440.00$ Fire Protection Natural Gas Meter Protect natural gas meter per code 1,500.00$ Lump 1 1,500.00$ Flammable Material Store flammable material per code 500.00$ Lump 1 500.00$ Exterior Construction Caulking Remove and replace failed caulking to prevent water intrusion per code 0.25$ SF 22,400 5,600.00$ Roof Construction West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 1 of 2 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 147 Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Unit Quantity Total Roofing Material Replace failed roofing material to prevent water intrusion per code 8.26$ SF 22,400 185,024.00$ Mechanical - Electrical Mechancial Install a code compliant HVAC system 12.35$ SF 22,400 276,640.00$ Electrical Install a code compliant lighting system 3.87$ SF 22,400 86,688.00$ Total Code Improvements 964,000$ West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 2 of 2 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel A - 570 Market St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 148 IMG_9404.JPG IMG_9407.JPG IMG_9410.JPG IMG_9405.JPG IMG_9408.JPG IMG_9411.JPG IMG_9406.JPG IMG_9409.JPG IMG_9412.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 149 IMG_9413.JPG IMG_9416.JPG IMG_9419.JPG IMG_9414.JPG IMG_9417.JPG IMG_9420.JPG IMG_9415.JPG IMG_9418.JPG IMG_9421.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 150 IMG_9422.JPG IMG_9425.JPG IMG_9428.JPG IMG_9423.JPG IMG_9426.JPG IMG_9429.JPG IMG_9424.JPG IMG_9427.JPG IMG_9430.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 151 IMG_9431.JPG IMG_9434.JPG IMG_9437.JPG IMG_9432.JPG IMG_9435.JPG IMG_9438.JPG IMG_9433.JPG IMG_9436.JPG IMG_9439.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 152 IMG_9440.JPG IMG_9443.JPG IMG_9446.JPG IMG_9441.JPG IMG_9444.JPG IMG_9447.JPG IMG_9442.JPG IMG_9445.JPG IMG_9448.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 153 IMG_9449.JPG IMG_9452.JPG IMG_9455.JPG IMG_9450.JPG IMG_9453.JPG IMG_9456.JPG IMG_9451.JPG IMG_9454.JPG IMG_9457.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 154 IMG_9458.JPG IMG_9461.JPG IMG_9464.JPG IMG_9459.JPG IMG_9462.JPG IMG_9465.JPG IMG_9460.JPG IMG_9463.JPG IMG_9466.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 155 IMG_9467.JPG IMG_9470.JPG IMG_9473.JPG IMG_9468.JPG IMG_9471.JPG IMG_9474.JPG IMG_9469.JPG IMG_9472.JPG IMG_9475.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 156 IMG_9476.JPG IMG_9547.JPG IMG_9550.JPG IMG_9477.JPG IMG_9548.JPG IMG_9551.JPG IMG_9478.JPG IMG_9549.JPG IMG_9552.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 157 IMG_9553.JPG IMG_9556.JPG IMG_9559.JPG IMG_9554.JPG IMG_9557.JPG IMG_9560.JPG IMG_9555.JPG IMG_9558.JPG IMG_9561.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 158 IMG_9562.JPG IMG_9565.JPG IMG_9568.JPG IMG_9563.JPG IMG_9566.JPG IMG_9569.JPG IMG_9564.JPG IMG_9567.JPG IMG_9570.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 159 IMG_9571.JPG IMG_9574.JPG IMG_9577.JPG IMG_9572.JPG IMG_9575.JPG IMG_9573.JPG IMG_9576.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel A 160 Square Foot Cost Estimate Report Date:8/24/2023 Estimate Name:591 West 78th Street Building Type:Motel, 2‐3 Story with Brick Veneer / Wood Frame Location:CHANHASSEN, MN Story Count:3 Story Height (L.F.):9.00 Floor Area (S.F.):84267 Labor Type:OPN Basement Included:No Data Release:Year 2023 Quarter 3 Cost Per Square Foot:$195.20 Building Cost:$16,449,055.28 Quantity % of Total Cost Per S.F. Cost A Substructure 3.15% $5.34 $450,258.01 A1010 Standard Foundations $2.84 $238,974.23 A10101051560 Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY/LF, 7.2 PLF, 12" thick 1400 $1.68 $141,325.10 A10101102700 Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide 1750 $1.16 $97,649.13 A1030 Slab on Grade $2.38 $200,345.92 A10301202240 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced 28089 $2.38 $200,345.92 A2010 Basement Excavation $0.13 $10,937.86 A20101104560 Excavate and fill, 10,000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth, on site storage 28089 $0.13 $10,937.86 B Shell 25.06% $42.54 $3,584,918.37 B1010 Floor Construction $4.78 $402,614.24 B10102613750 Floor, wood joist, 2 x 12 @16" O.C., 1/2" CDX subfloor 56178 $4.78 $402,614.24 B1020 Roof Construction $3.87 $325,863.86 B10201027200 Wood roof, truss, 4/12 slope, 24" O.C., 44' to 60' span 28089 $3.87 $325,863.86 B2010 Exterior Walls $12.43 $1,047,147.22 B20101291400 Brick veneer wall, standard face, 2x6 studs @ 16" back‐up, running bond 32130 $12.43 $1,047,147.22 B2020 Exterior Windows $7.36 $620,218.62 B20201066850 Windows, aluminum, sliding, insulated glass, 5' x 3'378 $7.36 $620,218.62 B2030 Exterior Doors $11.92 $1,004,408.35 B20301106950 Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, narrow stile, double door, hardware, 6'‐0" x 10'‐0" opening 3.44 $0.37 $30,778.01 B20301107300 Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, bronze finish, hardware, 3'‐0" x 10'‐0" opening 13.76 $0.74 $62,465.58 B20302203450 Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal, 1 door with frame, no label, 3'‐0" x 7'‐0" opening 261.4 $10.81 $911,164.76 B3010 Roof Coverings $2.19 $184,666.08 B30101401100 Asphalt roofing, strip shingles, inorganic, Class A, 4" slope, 210‐235 lbs/SQ 29493.45 $0.91 $77,026.57 B30103203090 Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite 29493.45 $0.95 $80,243.12 B30104300040 Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" 1400 $0.20 $17,252.37 B30106100050 Gutters, box, aluminum, .027" thick, 5", enameled finish 700 $0.09 $7,262.56 B30106200100 Downspout, aluminum, rectangular, 2" x 3", embossed mill finish, .020" thick 464.33 $0.03 $2,881.46 C Interiors 31.86% $54.09 $4,557,592.81 C1010 Partitions $22.41 $1,888,513.85 C10101045020 Concrete block (CMU) partition, light weight, hollow, 4" thick, gyp plaster, 2 sides 96305.14 $20.11 $1,694,682.56 C10107101001 1/2" fire rated gypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring 32130 $2.30 $193,831.29 C1020 Interior Doors $11.33 $954,984.67 C10201022510 Door, single leaf, wood frame, 3'‐0" x 7'‐0" x 1‐3/8", birch, hollow core 1203.81 $11.33 $954,984.67 West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District Replacement Cost Report Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 1 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel E - 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 161 C2010 Stair Construction $3.73 $314,304.90 C20101100740 Stairs, steel, pan tread for conc in‐fill, picket rail,16 risers w/ landing 20.64 $3.73 $314,304.90 C3010 Wall Finishes $4.00 $337,482.89 C30102300140 Painting, interior on plaster and drywall, walls & ceilings, roller work, primer & 2 coats 173349.26 $1.99 $167,481.39 C30102301940 Ceramic tile, thin set, 4‐1/4" x 4‐1/4" 19261.03 $2.02 $170,001.50 C3020 Floor Finishes $7.04 $593,416.26 C30204100160 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz 71626.95 $4.62 $389,542.45 C30204100220 Carpet, padding, add to above, 2.7 density 71626.95 $1.00 $84,159.52 C30204101720 Tile, ceramic natural clay 12640.05 $1.42 $119,714.29 C3030 Ceiling Finishes $5.56 $468,890.24 C30301104800 Gypsum board ceilings, 1/2" fire rated gypsum board, painted and textured finish,1" x 3" wood, 16" OC furring, wood support 84267 $5.56 $468,890.24 D Services 38.68% $65.65 $5,531,937.93 D1010 Elevators and Lifts $5.17 $435,816.54 D10101109150 Hydraulic passenger elevator, 4000 lb., 3 floor, 9' story height, 125 FPM 3.44 $5.17 $435,816.54 D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $33.11 $2,790,382.20 D20101101880 Water closet, vitreous china, tank type, wall hung, close coupled 2 piece 298.03 $11.05 $931,395.98 D20102102000 Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung 3.13 $0.06 $5,378.28 D20103101560 Lavatory w/trim, vanity top, PE on CI, 20" x 18" 298.03 $7.22 $608,771.03 D20104101800 Kitchen sink w/trim, countertop, PE on CI, 32" x 21" double bowl 6.24 $0.16 $13,470.83 D20104404300 Service sink w/trim, PE on CI,wall hung w/rim guard, 22" x 18" 8.51 $0.67 $56,174.58 D20105102080 Bathtub, recessed, PE on CI, mat bottom, 5' long 295.11 $13.70 $1,154,604.08 D20107101840 Shower, stall, fiberglass 1 piece, three walls, 36" square 3.13 $0.08 $6,880.50 D20108201880 Water cooler, electric, wall hung, dual height, 14.3 GPH 3.13 $0.16 $13,706.92 D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $0.71 $59,849.08 D20202502140 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 300 MBH input, 278 GPH 3.63 $0.71 $59,849.08 D3050 Terminal & Package Units $8.84 $745,171.58 D30502700220 3/4 ton, thru wall, heating. & cooling units 180.57 $8.84 $745,171.58 D4010 Sprinklers $4.09 $344,737.73 D40104100620 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 10,000 SF 28650.78 $1.62 $136,272.56 D40104100740 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, each additional floor, 10,000 SF 55616.22 $2.47 $208,465.17 D4020 Standpipes $0.42 $34,986.89 D40203101540 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor 1.72 $0.29 $24,572.00 D40203101560 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, additional floors 3.1 $0.12 $10,414.89 D5010 Electrical Service/Distribution $1.26 $106,297.94 D50101200400 Overhead service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 800 A 1.25 $0.29 $24,291.38 D50102300400 Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 800 A 200 $0.71 $59,604.60 D50102400280 Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, 120/208 V, 3 phase, 800 A 1.2 $0.27 $22,401.96 D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $9.78 $823,984.42 D50201100560 Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 10 per 1000 SF, 1.2 W per SF, with transformer 84267 $4.60 $387,550.67 D50201300360 Wall switches, 5.0 per 1000 SF 84267 $1.51 $127,576.03 D50201350200 Miscellaneous power, to .5 watts 84267 $0.18 $15,463.00 D50201452080 Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size 2 $0.07 $5,796.50 D50202100200 Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling, 1 watt per SF, 20 FC, 5 fixtures @40 watts per 1000 SF 84267 $3.41 $287,598.22 D5030 Communications and Security $2.14 $180,209.44 D50309100456 Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 100 detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire 1.81 $1.86 $156,981.84 D50309100462 Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit 1.72 $0.28 $23,227.60 D5090 Other Electrical Systems $0.12 $10,502.11 D50902100200 Generator sets, w/battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch, gas/gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 7.5 kW 7.29 $0.12 $10,502.11 West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 2 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel E - 591 W 78 th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 162 E Equipment & Furnishings 0.16% $0.28 $23,527.21 E1010 Commercial Equipment $0.28 $23,527.21 E10106100110 Architectural equipment, laundry equipment dryers, gas fired, com, 30 lb capacity, single 3.44 $0.09 $7,264.78 E10106100170 Architectural equipment, laundry equipment, washers, commercial, coin operated, deluxe 3.44 $0.19 $16,262.43 E1090 Other Equipment $0.00 $0.00 F Special Construction 0.00% $0.00 $0.00 G Building Sitework 1.09% $1.84 $155,292.00 G2040 Site Development $1.84 $155,292.00 G20409204600 Swimming pool, motel class, concrete sides, tile finish, 28' x 60' 1 $1.84 $155,292.00 100% $169.74 $14,303,526.33 15.0% $25.46 $2,145,528.95 0.0% $0.00 $0.00 0.0% $0.00 $0.00 Total Building Cost $195.20 $16,449,055.28 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) Architectural Fees SubTotal User Fees West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 3 of 3 Replacement Cost Report Parcel E - 591 W 78 th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 163 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel E - 591 West 78th Street, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Building Name or Type Parcel ID 251190010 Country Inn and Suites Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Unit Quantity Total Accessibility Items *No Deficiencies Observed*-$ Structural Elements Steel Lintels Protect steel lintels from rusting per code 1,000.00$ Lump 1 1,000.00$ Exiting Concrete Sidewalks Repair damaged concrete sidewalks to create an unimpeded means for emergency egress per code 3,500.00$ Lump 1 3,500.00$ Concrete Stairs Repair damaged concrete stairs to create an unimpeded means for emergency egress per code 1,500.00$ Lump 1 1,500.00$ Floor Tile Repair damaged floor tile to create an unimpeded means for emergency egress 1,000.00$ Lump 1 1,000.00$ Handrails Repair loose handrails to create an unimpeded means for emergency egress 500.00$ Lump 1 500.00$ Interior Stairs Modify stairs to comply with code 0.73$ SF 84,267 61,514.91$ Emergency Notification System Install a code compliant emergency notification system 0.28$ SF 84,267 23,594.76$ Fire Protection Circuit Breaker Boxes Maintain a code required 36-inch clear space in front of electrical circuit boxes 250.00$ Lump 1 250.00$ Entrance Canopy Install a code required sprinkler in entrance canopy 4.09$ SF 1,400 5,726.00$ Building Sprinkler System Repair existing sprinkler system to comply with code 2.25$ SF 84,267 189,600.75$ Smoke Detectors Install code compliant smoke detectors 1.86$ SF 84,267 156,736.62$ Fire Doors Replace damaged smoke gaskets on fire rated doors 500.00$ Lump 1 500.00$ West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 1 of 2 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel E - 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 164 Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Unit Quantity Total Exterior Construction Exterior Walls Repair failing exterior walls to prevent water intrusion per code 1.00$ SF 84,267 84,267.00$ Exterior Caulking Replace failed caulking to prevent water intrusion per code 0.05$ SF 84,267 4,213.35$ Windows Replaced failed windows to prevent water intrusion per code 7.36$ SF 84,267 620,205.12$ Roof Construction Roofing Material Replace failed roofing material to prevent water intrusion per code 2.19$ SF 84,267 184,544.73$ Mechanical - Electrical Mechanical Install a code compliant HVAC system 8.84$ SF 84,267 744,920.28$ Electrical Install a code compliant lighting system 3.41$ SF 84,267 287,350.47$ Total Code Improvements 2,370,924$ West 78th Street TIF District LHB Project No. 230558.00 Page 2 of 2 Code Deficiency Cost Report Parcel E - 591 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 165 IMG_9390.JPG IMG_9393.JPG IMG_9396.JPG IMG_9391.JPG IMG_9394.JPG IMG_9397.JPG IMG_9392.JPG IMG_9395.JPG IMG_9398.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 166 IMG_9399.JPG IMG_9402.JPG IMG_9480.JPG IMG_9400.JPG IMG_9403.JPG IMG_9481.JPG IMG_9401.JPG IMG_9479.JPG IMG_9482.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 167 IMG_9483.JPG IMG_9486.JPG IMG_9489.JPG IMG_9484.JPG IMG_9487.JPG IMG_9490.JPG IMG_9485.JPG IMG_9488.JPG IMG_9491.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 168 IMG_9492.JPG IMG_9495.JPG IMG_9498.JPG IMG_9493.JPG IMG_9496.JPG IMG_9499.JPG IMG_9494.JPG IMG_9497.JPG IMG_9500.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 169 IMG_9501.JPG IMG_9504.JPG IMG_9507.JPG IMG_9502.JPG IMG_9505.JPG IMG_9508.JPG IMG_9503.JPG IMG_9506.JPG IMG_9509.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 170 IMG_9510.JPG IMG_9513.JPG IMG_9516.JPG IMG_9511.JPG IMG_9514.JPG IMG_9517.JPG IMG_9512.JPG IMG_9515.JPG IMG_9518.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 171 IMG_9519.JPG IMG_9522.JPG IMG_9525.JPG IMG_9520.JPG IMG_9523.JPG IMG_9526.JPG IMG_9521.JPG IMG_9524.JPG IMG_9527.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 172 IMG_9528.JPG IMG_9531.JPG IMG_9534.JPG IMG_9529.JPG IMG_9532.JPG IMG_9535.JPG IMG_9530.JPG IMG_9533.JPG IMG_9536.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 173 IMG_9537.JPG IMG_9540.JPG IMG_9543.JPG IMG_9538.JPG IMG_9541.JPG IMG_9544.JPG IMG_9539.JPG IMG_9542.JPG IMG_9545.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 174 IMG_9546.JPG IMG_9580.JPG IMG_9583.JPG IMG_9578.JPG IMG_9581.JPG IMG_9584.JPG IMG_9579.JPG IMG_9582.JPG IMG_9585.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 175 IMG_9586.JPG IMG_9587.JPG IMG_9588.JPG West 78th Street Renewal and Renovation TIF District | Parcel E 176 Prepared by: 701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55401 LHBcorp.com LHB Project No. 230558.00 177 City of Chanhassen Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 Appendix E: Permits Issued 178 179 1 CH135-65-934233.v1 Chanhassen Planning Commission Member ________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: A RESOLUTION FINDING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13 CONSISTENT WITH THE CHANHASSEN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) and the City of Chanhassen (the “City”) have determined that it is in the public interest to establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 (the “TIF District”) within the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the EDA and the City have prepared a tax increment financing plan (the “TIF Plan”) for the TIF District which authorizes the expenditure of tax increment to meet, in part, the expenses of the TIF District and the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the TIF Plan is included in a document entitled “Modification to the Redevelopment Plan, Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 13, (a renewal and renovation district)”, draft dated March 11, 2024 on file with the EDA and the City, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed the TIF Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission that the TIF Plan is found to be consistent with Chanhassen’s comprehensive plan. The question was on adoption of the resolution and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: WHEREUPON SAID RESOLUTION WAS DECLARED DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF February, 2024. _____________________________________ ATTEST: _____________________________________ 180 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on February 8,2024, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice to consider a request for subdivision, site plan review, and possible variances for redevelopment for property located on the SE corner of W 78th St & Market Blvd. Property Owner: Chanhassen Lodging, LLC and Chanhassen PropertiesrLLC; Applicant: Roers Companies to the persons named on attached ExhibitooA", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the rutmes and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 4*te Kim T. Meuwissen, City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me h ;euruIreR ANN PoTTERifl f,foury pubtic-Minnesda f My Commt don ExptrB3 Jen Al, AfaT this V day of E ,2024. 181 slN(o<.FrSNrtorf)S(OOC\rlrl(OOr:FlFt-(OFlslslOONOrlOr()f\c!()Orf\(f)(O6f\(o(ou.j@(orlrE"B stsIEspE$: U gig:B:3833:rrrr+r=rr. CD CD CD CD .B c? $ s cD o/) CD Fr = d D CD lf) - (Y) cr) (n (r) CD (Y) (v) o.) (Y) 0D (O N 3 3 3 3 H 3 3 3 3 3 - ^'',' -r co rn ro !') ro rr) ro ro rf) ro ro rr, rr) rr) 'f)B - z z z z) z *zz z: * H 3 H : H < $ 22222222222 -JF d z zzz ujz> @ zzz o > -t Z Z z d 3 zzzzzzz z z z z - ra LlJ IIJ LlJ LU = IJJ - -i Ul l! l! 7 = - ., UJ = r= . UJ LU IIJ IIJ IJJ IIJ l-lJ IJJ lJ..l LU llJ: = a @ o a = a ) A a a cn F z i * a z i.r -{ o a @ u) @ a a a a a as i = 2222#2? E ? 22',d ; f 2 s7- 422222?-9-2229-< ;III-(LIo:s--I )z==r==r-I-IIIII-IIE cri q Z Z Z Z 7 Z t- = Z Z Z a >z = = Z N r) = Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z =d-= f f f f E f ==1f f f E E = f < q = f f f f f f f f f t fl- r.l: Lu () (J (J (J uJ () u, Z O O C) O - o 5 () 5 co 5 C) (J C) (J () () (J (J C) (J () ooNF =EOc1-\orl =6=5Hocot9du..r;ico F = fi t = E =p E E ;; a E a = E = u r I = Ee rr = at = n E e H5ssssBEneEBsesXBEE:=SEe553eEpEs88A N $ (o (o (o L) tf) (Y) tO N (o (o (g O Fl (J (J N O rr (J (o N N O (o O (O (J (o (o (o - s ro l- N r\ cL (o r\ H \t N r\ r\ (o rl o- o- $ cD rl o- N s st ro N (o N o- r\ N N :.=il s E frF= cr q "-i?EH = = z = tr = :..gF-;u -p-f =* E frg =g=tEo- aE?*-*+ E;* *=x:. =E=" #==frli* E=E55=E=EE==- E E g ; E E ifilE H E E = E #?=====lEE = E I E E E E = 182 (r)NNsf$FlNsftr,(f)(otOtO$$l\NNOO$HOrrQOFI@o)$(Y)OO(OOCr)cD @oo)(o@ (o(oNN N r-{ st (o@$ (oNoor(f,No)o)orooooo@oro)oo)otttrtrttttrtttrlN l'\ F N N N f\ N f\ N N N N <f f\ N N N N f\ N f\ |\ N f\ f\ f\ N NFl rl rl rl r{ rl rl rl rl ra r-l Fl !-.1 Fl .i Fl Fl Fl Fl rl rf rl rl rl Fl rl Fl Fl r{ rlcr, -^ cD (f)co(f)(Y) cD cDCD i{ cy) co(f) (f)= cf) (f)(r) (f)cf) cD co (f) Cv) LoCr)(f) cDco cD (9lo r"l ro ro lf) lo lt) ro lo rr) N ro |r, Lo lr) rd to r.o Lo Lo t.r) rr) rr) rr) lr) r\t lr) ro ro rr) l() lr)ro = lr) - r.r) rr) r.c) rr, rr) r.c) |r) tr, lr) lo ro rr) 6 rr) lr) ro 1o ro lo ro ro rr) il |r) lo tr) rf) 1r) lozio z = z z z z z z z d z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 2 z z z z z z =', E q2 E = = = E = = N E E = = = = = = E = = = ZZ=E = E= E Ei< i3 z z i i i 2 ii i i 2 ; a ; i i i i i i 2 i= i i i i i iIIJ - I-IJ 7 I! !) I.J,J UJ LU I-IJ IIJ U/ IIJ I-rJ LU LU -i LU LU LU LU IIJ IJ-I IIJ IIJ LU . IJJ IIJ LU lII IIJ LUu) rr? u) - a a a a a (n tn z u) a a a = a a a a a a a a u) ) u) (n u) a a aa = a 1 a a a u) (n @ o = a a a a Y a a a a a a a a u) = u) (n @ (n a (n - = Ii I r - r - T- ;- I - r I r r - r I I - - r o E - -- r rZ -u Z a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z = Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z t- Z Z Z Z Z Z IOII-I-I---=-I-I=IIIII-I-I=-----I()EC)O()()O(J(J(Jc) G ()()()() E C)O()C)(J(J ()(J()od()OO()C)() o:ilocoi!/)sfttrcrocEl!- 26-d- LUE< z6*F- LU ct 6 o LU?;' l."6i>g = i=BB HaE=3 E= = f x?ExHgE =*3rrHr* x*= =BBx=E ==*rx=HgHEgEES=EHSsEEsEEEEilgssEg=ggEEB- $ ii -r O c5 to O 6 <o <o ( 6 <o O O c.l O @ O O cn o <o 6 O @ b o ; 6 O O1r) rr lr) rr o- tr) 1.. o- N N N Fr N N o- o_ |r) o_ r\ o- o_ N lr) N l.\ o- (f) lo lr) lo N o- o- :F o-FE-p=a 7- F -.= =B e =E E 3l6 i ;,2 =2i g fi= E == I=E;Is *ilzi=ilii El lgrrE =;Il; t=s= lEE==He9sE = =:1x t = = A e i TAAAC=== = = E * E * i = = tr tr s # #6aau<Lz2O cr -z>== 183 sf $ (f)(oN sN (o OOTIOIOF{OO(o(orr(O@o)(o(oo)o) oo,o h? N q,55555555E o 555I 5: IhcD d) (f) (o (f) (o (r) (f) x @ 04, (f) (r) (r) -L cD o (f) +833333333H-Q_3333sHBNBB ^=, z. z z. z z. z. z. z - 6 s *, z z z z c,t,n z * z z f z z 2 2 i 2 2 2 "i9 qG z z z z z = 2d z a- LU LIJ III IJJ UJ IJJ LU LU = = J J LU IIJ I-IJ IIJ ' -- UJ J UJ --i Q E E 3 E E E E E = =. P = 3 8 3 8 "t X 8 i. 3 Q a z z z z z z z z z t -< 7 z z z z > i z -, z = Ao (J()(J()(J(J(J frz4()ooC)o(, oo()()= gFr,i , E = = 8-H = 6 N n -6o-uF fi aaa= I E* xE E x E I g g = sEE E* EE I 3 I = I I I E g ; F i o - o o N .o co ,,, o r\F{ (O (O (o (o (o N (o (J $ tr) L) Fl (O (O (o (o O, N O) Fl (O (OH I T\ F F N (( T.. o. rI N O- H T\ F\ F N N C\ F\ Ft N rI 6 Ict=F -j F =frctfo=j i= .-, 5 il r ugs L 2iifr #, ZiaZE ;n= i-nzz==lEllgE EH=E E q E fr4 i *EfiEEE ll*EEEEE Cl CE CL CC CL A (n A U' A A 1- 184 This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and ts not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic lnformation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 2'l (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic lnformation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exactrng measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly watves all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the useis access or use of data provided.185 loICl>,PtoElEr lor -lc oI'u- E lE blEo l_@ ilscllolc u) lO:ElaclEsI(O o)lrElolsPlN.=loclNot_>loolel or>-c(E- L.€ElJ-.g JE(EEE :t'o-Eh i-(, ldt> IElc)l-YILI(5 ooNN uiL o)o E (U _co olEI =lolol :l(Elrl lclolole .9lh Il;Pl.o a IB ElL gl- oIL Ll(tr o- lEp s 3EE.o ak(,) o=:>62E >oo ;fiPh -Ebl,iJ.o Nt sE=l +PEIegbl sgb'loorol,e -o ull 9'a_ albRolo E-51 o .9c(5 o- Eoo o oot l9 l._lol0)IElo)o-I(L coooG !coco E'c Gol -JlJI-lcDlEI 6!lEIolJIclolatol(5l -clElolttol cto otr .9 o o!,'6 o eo E o.c col ol cLl rEltrl;t .el rElolol <t IEt> IE t0)l-YIL(E od U) ! @t- B o Loc o(, LlJa lEEe !i A EEE $O E o d)= s.= r'l a e = E 3,, E'-o'd o o='Ftr-E - O--C.o F =-^ O# I RAFVLL^- 5eq.*gE€E 3 s€',pE iE e.=.c98.96oo EgE€ E 9fiEs::Ee i= *; BaHi-ae= H Be #E;EgflfEE E gsgET E€ fi&-;.gtj(/)ForE5 6!co-.9 E.o - ^i <.i +oE-5Es o--o =l--o(Uo_ l, ,,8fr b.6l= =,EH3 Ei ie figEcfi;I ElE Pltsir h-Ij6EIs BIS:t;Ere6 IP-EIaEIEfifBE le $ulBElEE Eer lHgElf Hs ssE* ItEEIEHE#EEE ;gHpglafrEEg F$fliiN#giF, oo o).6- Lo- Lo-c o o .o fooo oo([oo-f o E o)o. oo'o o a- ,co :6to ,E oc oE c Eo Eoc co E oo ,Ecc !I @t N co o og d og co FCa! tDooOE >-! E.Eqo -o 2P !6!EnoDA JO :c o )c i= l= lotc iBr() !rlt6I;qt!,B;r{Pc .o o5E !coaoa E8 oo EE ccocE63r- lo-8o- eE oo.co!ohH Eg oco?!:b ^oE3OFa6 oO HE EO .E :E DQr5ic 9E ,x ; a':o r '6:rc io lo(;9] :dri.=tro( EI €so0-o*5.9 sirot!: c(.a .! E}o_ oEq)\ CQoodoo9 6p r!f\h E8 P.ai,Eioi?!o ;EoEaPno1-)-r>i6 ,! i' IE:r'io;io o'!-1N] d( ojo( o -.1 .t2 ' EI@t( :lN, o0 Lla;, oc.gr pa OEoc€ (-:oo€5srEooc=pt !o>36f\e6E@ )E;;r;i DO '-L| ,tj )o IO lo io,!'; Eo. .o !gl .G.'=t'oo_co ol 6'i gi 9,!dlo; or biq! ii) o+o+ -0oro0 ot5:eirLO<E !a-c !ei6-c )f ro:>ii5 li LOc ;f.oo:! LEco:.g o.,E.E o c) oiE.t..o(o: olEl c( 6!q! o!5isi a1 qi o_'oI =cOI oooco< UF G_ #96EEC a9o->c6oi' 3e &P, ,.!21al o:::Ui E: ! >: :<i5.i i Er 6o!aei\9i . ci IE: r $I;91-o0l@:io. :sEi >tio (cc xc -q .E-octrc6Sor EE ;);i;9e; .46 E5 oBFO qd p _a cN ,9c o oi co qoN:oIE ro Ef s o @ .g > Do o o:o a c .9 o s:ol o o) =iEIo(o.! :tJr'i' I, C!sN! bi EqX( =,NA Clo!E('',9 ot Eo FC o>Eit(cq ECoo EO of, -oDO do a6ooci EO9sOE;s 3-o 6E 9o l= -o c*!!bb9 EsE}.,tr6.9.-o =EEoNA oE2o9oDO yi lc i E',!) c')o :o)ol,Ei -ol io(;srlr.! .c !lsiig! 'o(Nfo-.di ;dot !a OE Ed Ol Er _o -E ,AE .9. atro oPc- oP LO PE >l hoo}\ b6 .einorcd!! oo oLlb }EcE.9ofis F;69(J; ONEF-F- .6oc 8,qovai.l o()i.E or oF- qE i!E( oo: -o. 6o- ret ! 3e i8EioEo e 6i-En 3EI YEE;oE 3E_;--C)! o!FsiE F,oE 19d l! o iqE i;o iEd.! o:cr I a-l:EE,'L- Nioo EO i.9-E,fco 9EQ!9o E3 E=3=Dc;3 2.9. !E-Ei39o,.trF :91I Er loi)-q tEi :o.c :-(DE: ! oi6( ol .E.r,o Io(oih.[o! oaoq*; 8i .eI O(l_ o-9c'- co +E o!go =^}E Eh EE a FIoEeE Egod oE o6 FE coQE -A o- EE ooocE; dopi6F 59EON_tr6EO JO.s> ! oiF o' Eoo=q' ot 3;'-gci cdt:qiEEr c.Q l o'=l 35ioo I o.!. d 6 j o[:!o(c€ I o .-r gcd o dEa9co_cE ioAs:d€; Eo=e6de o..E oo E oE !co o o !a .s .2 roo!o o. o c q) ccCE tsio.E ",4 8:o gF Ic9; 9o 5.q a6!c DO 1o 9g 26 :o :a- ia :5 l; Iorii i.Etc i, Eio <dCo5 ef E5ai o-cop=o.s -)o(J>r;o6a EE o!o.E ccFC6_q 9; 2a E€oq;(,E J N,: ol!r' D,V' ,i o' Bo)E:+,5p, tCt;9) i<r: o) ^oa :kS | .9..EolQto:<i s;98t d:Et>gi= dEEqEOcooc <E 6ori9. ^'o O,Q dEEEoo(J(J t6lslo loItlPloIElo I <. lEl5I O.I =.lol3 E,trgr S.lEl ftt ai E<c(o1o(^(;:.9. o(( -0i!r.t Ltnt €EQ( 8gg5 OEof*c ]Eirio(Loc€ ESo crtd ItpE '.09.9.c6>.>: &E E Ea3o. l! o 9i; s6+o E=to =5 €..o9ECoo o=oE5ogo lril>l6 lol-YILl(ut>lololr- lNuiLo_o E(E -cl el (JIclrlot 9l (5lrl -l5l I>ol(E glE Ol-ElEr !Ic el'= ol(E -clo#Itclo ol-c (r, ILCI .ElF cl- o)lo o_ lael(O o)l-cl(5'El$olN>looN6.l oiNcb'r(EoJG-oIOELLC(U-IE>-E3E Ioo(t9rsL F! o .9Eoo- EoooLoot letl;Plo -> l0 [lc Polo o->lExoIs:6 I;PEl(, oool-> ox l5fiF l-E aB 6 oE(DOu =oocrc coo:lL'- UI r g,il o o(/)l EEel! (,el 6 851 oIJ o .9 o op o ooLo o o -tr olol o-lolFI-l LIol (Elolol <l IE't> lo- t0)l-YILo 06 U) 5@N =o L o)E oo tu @ l.E ct-c o!lP --l= !E oIHES -j g I(Ud)= H El=o= '6'- E li€ s E" H., E, i:Ee,*3€=El- f O)i,D O-O *n l3?€ seEee IH E g EtSEEloEoEB=tE l€;EE fl BEs-"aEE'*i="Hi3 EE;EIEHF*- 3 [PP,Pg€ E; 3.: IuE $EE s *s-=i#E5Egso-ofF O O O-rNd).rt oJJ uioEoo-oL(L cq)oo(U !co-co Ec(u c-: I -Jl-,- l I -3E -Hlfr iH^EEa,*l> = H og d,E It gtggEEeaE l=sfl+HE;Ea; Ir gElE*lE t sE r E H=qEEgEsE *; IE E gE fiIE ; } T '* E 5!ElH5r3+E=;H E3El!Es$ FEE E $5EIg #s EtE E E ie EIE$Hg;aFs o o(, o oo'6' Lo- Lo-c o Lo .ot fooo U'g oEo- = o Eoo. oo'oL o o-. Eo)-6: lggigsEEEeEi,$f,E ;i*sigi;fiFiiigi fggEEESBEgigEi€iE EgEEs$*EEEEEEgFE3gEOo (E o I iit s6+o E=EO =5 oU ..o9treoo o=oE =ooo 186 187 Hello Mr. Maass: I had attended the January 17, 2024 Public Open House to learn about the proposed market-rate apartment buildings for downtown Chanhassen. In my opinion, the complexes seem too massive and dense for the space they would occupy. They don't seem like they would fit in well with the rest of downtown and nearby residences. To me, it looks like the developer is looking to maximize the number of units possible to the detriment of the surrounding area..I think that the proposed parking spots seem small too.. Would smaller buildings possibly be considered? Please share my thoughts with the Chanhassen Planning Commission as well. Thank you for hearing my opinion. Respectfully, Patricia Hastreiter 6990 Tecumseh Lane Chanhassen 188 From: Beth Mastel Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 9:24 AM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Downtown Redevelopment: People and traffic density Concern: High people and traffic density due to the increase of 310 apartments with the potential of 408 extra cars in an already saturated space. Redevelopment of this space is needed, agreed. However, adding an extra ?1000-1500? additional residents in 4 acres of property along with a potential of 408 extra cars does not do any favors for current residents. I don’t want to feel like I’m in Wayzata. They’ve ruined their ‘used to be’ quaint destination. You can’t get that back. Please, please, during this needed renovation with goals to make Chanhassen ‘current’, don’t lose our ‘quaintness’ among decisions for city revenue and increased residential density. This is an exciting time for Chanhassen residents. Thank you for serving our community! Beth Mastel Chanhassen resident for 23 years 189 From: Renee Squires Date: February 19, 2024 at 9:49:16 PM CST To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Prince mural My concern with this development is the future of the Prince mural. I want to see this saved. Thousands of people come to Chanhassen every year to visit Paisley Park. We are Prince’s home. The only thing we have left is the highway being dedicated to him. We should be capitalizing on the fact that people come to chanhassen to go to the Park. I am surprised Chanhassen doesn’t have more Prince landmarks or sites for fans to want to come into the downtown area when here. If we give them reasons to come into downtown chanhassen, visitors will then shop in our stores and eat in our restaurants etc. I know many people who feel the same as me in regard to the Prince mural being saved somehow. Thank you. Renee Squires 190 From: Andrea Rich Date: February 19, 2024 at 11:45:18 PM CST To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Planning commission As a citizen of Chanhassen I take great pride in our city. It is a wonderful place to live and we enjoy sharing it with visitors. While I am all for progress, I do have concerns with the proposed Roers Companies redevelopment. One of the concerns is with the Prince mural. As a beloved member of our community that gave so much to us, it is essential that we maintain this important tribute. In addition, we need quality hotel accommodations in our area. We have many visitors that come to visit and, as you are quite aware, there are thousands of people that visit our area for various events and areas of interest. Paisley Park alone brings thousands of visitors annually. Lastly, we miss the cinema and would love to see one return to our area. Thank you for your consideration and willingness to take under advisement the concerns of your citizens. Sincerely, Andrea Rich 7901 Autumn Ridge Avenue Chanhassen, MN 55317 191 From: Darren.Anderson Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 4:08 PM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: cinema & hotel redevelopment Hi Eric, I’m supportive of the project – it makes sense to me to add some higher density housing/apartments in the downtown area given the proximity to most amenities such as grocery stores, restaurants, pharmacies, etc. I think it will also increase use of the SW transit station nearby. The site design is appealing with the buildings closer to the street/sidewalks and parking behind. The more “U” shape design seems more inviting than the “island” design of the building behind (forget the name, but the building with Spalon, Wink, etc. I think that was a huge flop and missed opportunity how that building was designed looking outward in all directions. I was wondering how the existing roads would handle the incremental traffic but see the plans accommodate an additional future through-road, which seems like it would take some pressure off Market Blvd. I’m very supportive of more restaurant space – NOT more fast casual. Kudos on putting Zapas with a drive through on hold. I think that would be a mistake to add all of that car traffic given the plans for the future Municipal campus which looks to be more pedestrian friendly. Thanks, Darren 192 From: David Benedict Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 9:24 AM To: Maass, Eric <emaass@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Chan Cinema/Hotel Redevelopment See my feedback below- •For the restaurants- do they have outdoor seating opportunities? I would like to see roof seating or outdoor patio seating options for visitors. •Density: Why can't the 5 stories be 6 stories? Can we add more interior parking? •In regards to the surface parking lot on NE side of plot: o Is that a city requirement? Or market driven by storefronts? o Ideally, I would want the 5 story building to extend to W 78th (ie bring building much closer to the street) while moving parking into interior parking lots o If we cannot, I would reduce the parking as much as possible and increase the W 78th pedestrian areas- the Dinner theater will be redeveloped and this will become a main pedestrian thoroughfare (and I'm still mad Aldi wasn't brought to the street) •Downstream effects... with the only hotel downtown going away, do we have line of sight into future hotels? How can we incentivize? •Is Laredo drive extension really going to happen? Thank you, David Benedict 193 Message submitted from the <Chanhassen, MN> website. Site Visitor Name: Brian Hauth I generally support the development, but have a few recommendations. 1. Bring the north edge of the east building farther to the north to the edge of the sidewalk and relocate the parking to behind the building or underground. This will bring the retail space to the street, giving more visibility and creating a more walkable downtown feel. 2. Shift the sidewalk that is north of the east building, to the south, to create a wide boulevard (6- 10’) between 78th St and the sidewalk. Having sidewalk that butts right up against the roadway creates a very unsafe feeling for the pedestrian, meaning that very few people will use that sidewalk. 3. Ensure the sidewalk is wide enough for multi-use. This would be 8-10 feet wide. 5-6 foot wide sidewalks are not sufficient to allow walkers and bikers. If we want to create a walkable downtown, 8-10 ft width should be what we’re striving for. 4. Does the east building have underground parking? Consider moving the residential parking entrance to the rear (south) of the east building, off of Market Street, to create a more pedestrian- friendly entry along 78th street. 5. Anything that helps separate vehicles from pedestrians would be helpful, to create the downtown feeling that people strive for. Thanks for the consideration. Brian Hauth 7131 Alphabet St Chanhassen, MN 55317 194 From: Audrey Johnson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 3:07 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Prince Mural / Chanhassen Theater I am writing to express comments about the Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment project that includes the dearly departed Chanhassen Cinema with Prince’s beautiful mural on the side wall facing the Country Inn & Suites Hotel. As evidenced by Prince stories from those who worked directly with him, celebrities, and locals alike, there is much history in this iconic block of real estate. I’m sure you are aware that Mr. G (artist Graham Hoete) traveled from Australia to paint a mural that is a one of a kind work of art visited and viewed by thousands and thousands of people from around the world since it’s installation in 2016. Chanhassen is like a second home to many of us from around the world that revisit the site over and over again during the last almost eight years. While change and growth is inevitable, such an iconic and one-of-a-kind mural is a gift to your city - as well as the legacy of Prince - that deserves preservation! I implore the City of Chanhassen Council members to defend this historic piece of art that could never be replicated. I know you have the ability to impose certain conditions upon your approval in the many steps ahead of this development process. It will not only affect visitors to this famous site in the coming years for the city but could even go so far as to have an economic impact in many ways to the local businesses and residents that visit the mural almost daily. Thank you in advance for your service and commitment to the beautiful City of Chanhassen and its future development for all who love it and, more importantly, those affected most directly by future development. Lifelong Prince Rogers Nelson Supporter Audrey Johnson 195 From: Nancy Smith Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 2:13 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Traffic control Will the intersection by Jimmy John’s remain open to Crossing into Market Square?Cub and businesses? That’s already a very busy and dangerous crossing or turning left. Thank you, N Smith 196 From: Jeff Commander Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:41 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Proposed projects for hotel and cinema Please start the demo!! Three of the people in my neighborhood that are opposed to the project don’t plan to live here in five years. The majority of the people I hang out with want it to happen. 197 From: Hal Newell Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:37 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers develop[ment Dear Sir / Madam; I think Chanhassen needs to move away from the, "15 minute city", dense pack myopia and preoccupation with tax revenue. Moreover, we do not need any more of this silly first floor boutique retail garbage. Shops in these types of locations have a high turnover rate with one retailer going broke and the next moving in. Let concentrate on putting available space to better use than just another apartment building. Sincerely, Hal Newell 198 From: Will Annett Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:21 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: 78th Street Redevelopment Project Hello, Although I realize the plans for redeveloping the former Chanhassen Cinema building and surrounding area are in an early stage, I have a few questions and observations: Will the development enhance the experience of being in Chanhassen? The current architectural renderings have all the charm of a Soviet apartment complex. And while downtown Chanhassen has never been a model of new urbanism, it seems that an opportunity to improve the street-level experience of walking in the city center is being overlooked. I would favor designs and materials that echo classic downtowns like those in Excelsior, Stillwater, and the Old Town district in Minneapolis. These are places where pedestrians want to stroll and linger, and stimulate commerce by shopping and dining. Which segues to the next point. What is the proposed mix of street-level retail and dining? Sadly, Chanhassen lives up to the disparaging moniker, “Chainhassen.” With the exception of some notable independently owned and operated spots like Tequila Butcher and Chanhassen Brewery, it is a vast wasteland of franchises. By creating a new space that encourages original independent restauranteurs and retailers to launch businesses, the city will encourage visitors to stay longer, enjoy unique experiences, spend money, and return frequently to do it all over again. What will happen to the Prince mural? Dominating the side of the Chanhassen Cinema building, the vibrant, colorful image of Prince is a splash of life and culture in an otherwise dreary and monotonous suburban landscape. Since its creation in the wake of the musician’s death in 2016, it has become an iconic fixture and favorite of many Chan residents—whether they are fans of Prince’s music or not. Just as Liverpool, England celebrates the lives its most famous native sons— the Beatles—with public murals and sculptures and other attractions, Chanhassen should embrace its most renowned inhabitant. Beyond civic pride and cultural connection, it can also be a differentiator that draws tourism. Thank you for taking the time to review my questions and comments. I look forward to learning more about the redevelopment project in the weeks to come. Sincerely, Will Annett Pioneer Pass Neighborhood, Chahassne 199 From: Anne-Marie Cookson Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:22 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: ROERS Company Development Comments I have lived at VENUE apartments since opening day 4.5 years ago, and I can say that this is one of the best uses of this space imaginable, and it has added so much to Chanhassen in every way, from increased revenue to local businesses to increased tax revenue to the city and Carver County, plus it's a fantastic place to live!! I wholeheartedly support the new plans under consideration and believe that a mix of additional residential with retail & restaurants, plus improved use of parking, new sidewalks and crosswalks makes tremendous sense for downtown Chanhassen and will benefit all people in the surrounding area, not just apartment dwellers or business owners. We owe it to the future of Chanhassen and its citizens to be proactive and move on the opportunities that present themselves when all parties and circumstances align. There are so many instances when a perfect opportunity is delayed or vetoed and the opportunity is lost for years to come, sometimes forever. Very excited at the prospect of the property adjacent to VENUE being redeveloped and appreciate all the Mayor and Council are doing to keep us informed! The renderings for both the Roers development AND the City Park redevelopment are really great! Thank you and good luck! Anne-Marie Cookson VENUE /Chanhassen Resident 200 From: Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:44 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers Companies Downtown Redevelopment Public Comment I am writing to express comments about the Roers Company Downtown Redevelopment project that includes the dearly departed Chanhassen Cinema with Prince’s beautiful mural on the side wall facing the Country Inn & Suites Hotel. As evidenced by Prince stories from those who worked directly with him, celebrities, and locals alike, there is much history in this iconic block of real estate. I’m sure I don’t have to give you information on how Mr. G (artist Graham Hoete) traveled from Australia to paint a mural that is a one of a kind work of art visited and viewed by thousands and thousands of people from around the world since it’s installation in 2016. Chanhassen is like a second home to many of us from around the world that revisit the site over and over again during the last almost eight years. While change and growth is inevitable, such an iconic and one-of-a-kind mural is a gift to your city - as well as the legacy of Prince - that deserves preservation! I implore the City of Chanhassen Council members to defend this historic piece of art that could never be replicated. There are engineering challenges for sure, but as a Zoning Board of Appeals Chair in DeKalb County, Georgia and lifelong Prince fan, I know you have the ability to impose certain conditions upon your approval in the many steps ahead of this development process. It will not only affect visitors to this famous site in the coming years for the city but could even go so far as to have an economic impact in many ways to the local businesses and residents that visit the mural almost daily. Thank you in advance for your service and commitment to the beautiful City of Chanhassen and its future development for all who love it and, more importantly, those affected most directly by future development N Rivers-Johnson Prince Fam for Life 201 -----Original Message----- From: Brenda Vatland Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 12:30 PM To: DL Public Comments <publiccomments@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Roers development I not in favor of the height of the buildings, the density of the development, and the two bedroom units only having one parking stall. I do not agree with the amount of traffic this development will add to west 78th street. I do not want to see TIF money given to this project Thank you Brenda Vatland 7290 Kurvers Pt Rd Chanhassen 202 Planning Commission Item February 20, 2024 Item Approve Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated January 16, 2024 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section APPROVAL OF MINUTES Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Applicant Present Zoning Land Use Acerage Density Applicable Regulations SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves its December 5, 2023 meeting minutes" SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION RECOMMENDATION 203 ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 2024 204 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 16, 2024 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Noyes called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Eric Noyes, Erik Johnson, Kelsey Alto, Perry Schwartz, Ryan Soller, Edward Goff, Steve Jobe. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Rachel Jeske, Planner; Eric Maass, Planning Director; Joe Seidl, Water Resource Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: Kevin Brueggeman 2840 Tanagers Lane Tiffany Brueggeman 2840 Tanagers Lane Holly Bussell 651 Bighorn Drive PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. ORDINANCE XXX: AMENDING LOT COVER STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (RSF) ZONING DISTRICT Eric Maass, Planning Director, gave a summary of the current ordinance for Residential Single- Family (RSF) zoning district and the proposed ordinance for RSF zoning district to increase the ordinance to 30 percent impervious lot cover. Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer, provided background information to define impervious surfaces and highlighted problems for stormwater management. Mr. Seidl shared information regarding the best management practices to offset these problems along with government regulations of impervious surfaces. Mr. Seidl reviewed the potential impacts residents could experience, including increased pollutant loads, increased frequency and duration of street flooding and high water levels, increased erosion of natural and manmade stormwater conveyance systems, and an increased frequency and duration of nuisance drainage. He noted that increasing lot cover limits was inconsistent with the goals and policies adopted in the Local Stormwater Management Plan. Mr. Seidl shared that the Water Resources Department does not support the code amendments as written. Chair Noyes opened the public hearing. Kevin Brueggeman, 2840 Tanagers Lane, stated he built a new house in 2021 and considered using permeable pavers. He was informed by his builder that there were necessary certifications 205 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 2 to obtain to install permeable pavers and they were unable to locate an individual with these requirements. He questioned what brought the amendment into consideration. Mr. Maass shared the background considerations of this ordinance. The City Council discussed this topic on various occasions and the Planning Commission discussed permeable pavers during 2023 sessions. Mr. Brueggeman stated they would enjoy additional lot cover opportunities but also value water management issues. Mr. Maass shared that the City Council has heard concerns from residents about the lot cover limitations. Tiffany Brueggeman, 2840 Tanagers Lane, asked if there was data about the amount of pollution over time, based on a lot cover increase. Mr. Seidl stated he did not have a certain answer. The city would need to hire a firm and complete many hours of modeling to find a concrete answer. Mr. Seidl explained there are standard models, such as the mids-model, which would allow a resident to consider the lot cover in a scenario to see how many average pollutants would be generated. Holly Bussell, 651 Bighorn Drive, requested the city analyze the proposed changes. She constructed a shed and considered how it would impact her desire to expand her kitchen in the future. She stated if this change is made, all residents would use the additional 5 percent lot cover. Ms. Bussell stated that she and her daughter utilize the lakes in Chanhassen, and it would have a negative impact on the water quality of the lakes if this change was made. Chair Noyes closed the public hearing. Chair Noyes stated it is important to consider the why behind changing the lot cover. He stated residents can readily consider the lot cover requirements when purchasing the property. Commissioner Alto said the Planning Commission considers variances for lot cover carefully and often says no so as not to set a precedent. She questioned the purpose of changing the ordinance. Commissioner Goff asked about the new developments being built and the model used to consider the capacity of climate change for heavy rains. He asked how the old stormwater systems and new stormwater systems interact. Ms. Seidl stated that city staff does not build the infrastructure for new developments. Those engineers design infrastructure based on current rules and regulations and reference an Atlas 2014 dataset. Those engineers use updated data and can consider climate change. When building infrastructure, engineers consider 10- and 100-year storms. Mr. Seidl asked if Commissioner Goff is wondering if there is built in room with existing best management practices to treat 206 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 3 excess lot cover. He explained the more impervious area that is built out, the more volume is conveyed and there is decreased performance. Commissioner Goff asked about tying in other sites to increase capacity. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the requested change to the ordinance is due to aligning Chanhassen with other cities. Mr. Maass confirmed the City Council brought this change forward based on concerns from Chanhassen residents who observed Chanhassen is more restrictive than neighboring towns. Commissioner Schwartz inquired what factors are motivating the city to consider the ordinance when staff has not recommended increased lot cover. He questioned whether there were additional factors aside from neighboring districts. He noted that increasing lot cover would negatively impact the red areas highlighted on the map. Mr. Maass shared that the City Council took into account water resources, planning, future infrastructure, and other perspectives before providing direction to city staff. Chair Noyes asked if the information presented to the Planning Commission was already seen by city staff and the City Council. He inquired about information flow. Mr. Maass explained the City Council receives the Planning Commission packet. The City Council held a work session and provided direction for the basis of the ordinance. The ordinance specifications required coordination with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Maass stated the City Council has seen approximately 75 percent of the ordinance presented tonight. Commissioner Schwartz shared that if this ordinance is approved, the likelihood of a property owner maintaining permeable pavers is very low. He encouraged the City Council and the Planning Commission to take this information into account. Chair Noyes recognized the proposed ordinance does not include a requirement to use permeable pavers. Property owners could install a bigger driveway or kitchen if they were under 30 percent lot coverage. Commissioner Alto stated the Planning Commission previously did not agree to an additional five percent lot cover with permeable pavers. The ordinance focuses on 30 percent of lot cover. Commissioner Soller clarified if the current ordinance allows for 25 percent lot cover with five percent additional coverage with permeable pavers. He questioned the current ordinance language if permeable pavers do not work long-term. Chair Noyes shared a resident could increase lot coverage by five percent with permeable pavers but not other materials. The math is similar, but the materials are different. 207 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 4 Commissioner Soller asked if there were different degrees of impervious surfaces. He noted that whether residents use pervious or impervious surfaces, the runoff increases. Commissioner Alto stated the Planning Commission might not agree with permeable pavers. She wondered if the ordinance should consider allowing 25 percent lot cover and not allow additional permeable pavers. Commissioner Goff referenced the difficulties of installing permeable pavers and wondered if the additional five percent of permeable pavers are not utilized due to costs. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the property owner could not find a contractor to install permeable pavers and does city staff know of what steps the property owner takes. Mr. Maass stated residents submit a lot cover calculation worksheet with an image of what they are proposing to build on their property. Staff reviews this worksheet to ensure the lot cover falls within the current ordinance. Mr. Maass agreed pervious pavers are expensive and difficult to maintain. Commissioner Soller requested clarification about the map with different shades of red. He asked if they have the potential to get worse and whether they are trending towards a worse degree. Mr. Seidl shared that if a water resource is below a threshold for its intended use, it is considered impaired water. The city is responsible for managing the resource. Commissioner Soller asked if other agencies assist in maintaining water quality. Mr. Seidl answered the local government agency is responsible for taking the lead on maintaining the bodies of water. Commissioner Soller asked if the city can continue to improve water quality. Mr. Seidl explained it is rare to take lakes off the impaired water list and many more lakes are added to the impaired water list than are being removed. The city has projects planned to improve the quality of local water resources. Commissioner Schwartz questioned if there were metrics that defined the water quality level on the maps in red in comparison with neighboring communities. Mr. Seidl did not have a direct answer and stated the information would have to be gathered through an extensive research project. Commissioner Alto shared that without data from other cities, it is difficult to consider the impacts of this ordinance. 208 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 5 Mr. Seidl stated the lot cover is dependent on when the specific cities were built out. The concept of best management practices for stormwater regulations did not exist when older areas of the metro were being constructed. Mr. Maass highlighted that new developments are designed according to the ordinances at the time of construction. New developments are more capable of satisfying stormwater runoff generation volumes. It is difficult to manage existing lots that would impact stormwater runoff generation. He stated they would need to manage and mitigate for both future and existing properties. Commissioner Schwartz questioned if it would be easier for Chanhassen to develop construction if the lot cover was increased. Mr. Maass shared that the Chanhassen development is strong and did not think the lot cover would be a determining factor for a developer. Chair Noyes stated the new developments are creating stormwater management systems for lot sizes. The new developments can create an infrastructure for whatever current lot cover requirements are in place, but properties undergoing rebuilds do not have the infrastructure in place if there is a five percent increase so there would be further stress on the system. Commissioner Soller asked for the lot cover restraint on commercial and industrial development. Mr. Maass did not have a specific number available. In the downtown area, there is not a maximum lot cover requirement. Often, commercial and industrial have larger lot cover requirements. Commissioner Soller questioned if new commercial developments can mitigate their impact with new infrastructure being built. He asked if these commercial developments are having an adverse impact on water resources or if they are fully mitigating their impact. Additionally, he wondered whether the 5 percent increase in residential lot cover is minimal when compared with these other properties. Mr. Maass shared that commercial properties walk through the same process to determine the best water management practices and generate permitting with watershed districts. These properties also consider soil type and design a specific solution for their property that aligns with city ordinances and watershed district requirements. The five percent increase in lot cover is minimal compared with these properties, but these commercial properties create private best management practices on site. On a residential aspect, no offsetting best management practices are required to be installed. The exception is with subdivisions, which trigger the subdivision ordinance and requires stormwater mitigation such as rain gardens. Commissioner Soller wondered if commercial properties with a majority of paved surfaces have a negative impact on water bodies to such a large degree, that the proposed five percent increase of lot cover for houses has negligible impact. 209 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 6 Mr. Maass shared that these commercial areas with large impervious surfaces manage their water runoff through onsite best management practices prior to being discharged into the city’s systems. He stated the comparison between a commercial and residential lot are not even on the same scale. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the pollutants generated by business parks significantly impact bodies of water or if they are mitigated on-site by best management practices. Mr. Seidl explained the best management practices are designed to meet the removal requirements of pollutants in stormwater. There should be no net impact on the downstream water resource as the pollutants should be removed. Commissioner Soller wondered if the lot cover increase would have an impact on water quality resources in the future. He also wondered what the appropriate balance between lot cover increase and water quality would be and stated it is difficult to decide. Commissioner Alto referenced the number of current impaired waterways. She stated it does not make sense to increase lot cover requirements if there are already negative impacts on the waterways. Commissioner Johnson asked why best management practices were not included in this section but were included in the Shoreland Overlay District. Mr. Maass noted that best management practices were discussed originally. The priority was placed on the shoreland overland district for offsetting best management practices, as there is stormwater management infrastructure in place in these residential zoning districts. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Schwartz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed ordinance amending lot cover standards in the RSF zoning district. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. 2. ORDINANCE XXX: AMDENDING LOT COVER STANDARDS IN THE SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT Eric Maass, Planning Director, gave a summary of the staff report, noting the proposed ordinance amendment for the Shoreland Overlay District that would allow lots platted before January 1, 1976, to have an increased impervious lot cover up to 30 percent. For riparian lots, there would need to be 25 percent or 20 feet of vegetative lake buffer of the shoreline. Mr. Maass shared that the city worked with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to establish the draft ordinance in accordance with the DNR’s alternative approach method for deviating from the DNR’s template shoreland ordinance. Rachel Jeske, Planner, provided multiple examples so the Planning Commission could understand the diversity of the shoreline properties. 210 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 7 Mr. Maass stated the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources wanted to see one square foot of impervious area over 25 percent with one square foot of best management practices. There would be the ability to scale the width and the depth of the best management practices based on the lot and property owner’s preferences with the guidance of the city. Chair Noyes opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chair Noyes closed the public hearing. Chair Noyes understood the association of the platted lots with the ordinance. He asked if there were other considerations beyond the date to fall into the lots that are allowed to have a five percent impervious coverage increase, such as the lot grade. He gave an example that if a lot had a certain grade above a specific amount, they would be ineligible for increased impervious lot cover to protect the lakefront. Mr. Maass shared that city staff consider the slope for erosion control measures in terms of construction. He stated the city could explore additional regulation options such as the rate of discharge in this measure. Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer, stated the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources considers the aesthetics and characteristics of the lake with the goal of naturalizing the shoreline rather than the considerations of the slope. Chair Noyes asked if a property owner was granted a five percent increase, if they would need to have the best management practices in place before project construction, or if it was a simultaneous requirement. Mr. Maass answered the impervious lot cover and best management practices are all in one permit so city staff would investigate the information for both. The best management practices should be installed at the same time as the project completion. Chair Noyes asked whether the Planning Commission should not allow the ordinance for Shoreland Overlay Districts considering the previous ordinance vote. Commissioner Jobe asked why the plant species were selected for the buffer zone. He questioned whether the buffer zone was just for aesthetic reasons. Mr. Seidl shared that native vegetation has deeper root systems, so there is more water and pollutant uptake they can take on. The deeper root system also better holds together the shoreline and helps stabilize the site. Commissioner Schwartz shared that his neighborhood association is applying for a grant to install a vegetative buffer. Certain plants are required for the vegetative buffer. He asked for clarification about the vegetative buffer on the examples provided by Ms. Jeske and why it is not required to expand upon the entire shoreline. 211 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 8 Mr. Maass understood applicants might prefer options for a beach or a dock. There are requirements that the best management practice would be located where it would capture runoff directed towards the lake due to increased lot cover. He shared that vegetative buffers are beneficial as they provide a deep root system and would provide diversity in vegetation to capture pollutants. Commissioner Schwartz asked if staff could direct and enforce the property owner to place the vegetative buffer in a certain place on the lot based on runoff. Mr. Maass confirmed for a best management practice to work, it needs to be in a location that the stormwater runoff is moving towards. Commissioner Schwartz asked who would monitor the compliance of this ordinance. Mr. Maass stated this would be monitored through the building or zoning permit process. Property owners would need to complete the math and figure out the amount of run-off generated. Commissioner Schwartz questioned who would monitor the vegetative buffers in future years after installation. Mr. Maass shared that an operations and maintenance agreement would be established along with an easement and boundary markers would need to be installed. Commissioner Schwartz asked if there would be passive or active enforcement of these vegetative buffers. Mr. Seidl shared these best management practices could be turned into assets and placed into the assets management system. City staff will need to travel out to these sites to ensure they are maintained. If they are not maintained, city staff will need to work with the resident to re- establish the best management practice. Chair Noyes asked if the 1-to-1 ratio was the minimum the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources required. Mr. Seidl confirmed this was his understanding. Chair Noyes asked why the city did not require larger buffer requirements to help protect the lakes. He questioned whether the city could go above and beyond what the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources required. Mr. Maass stated the shoreland vegetative buffer could be used as the required best management practice if it is of an adequate scale to treat the additional stormwater. If the vegetative buffer is not adequate, there would still need to be a best management practice created to capture the increased stormwater runoff. The city staff did not discuss an additional requirement beyond the 212 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 9 1-to-1 ratio but could do so after discussions with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Seidl explained that part of his job is to consider the naturalization of the shoreline while still allowing property owners to utilize their properties. He considers reconstructed areas to ensure regulations are applied to improve water management options. He provided an example that a new home construction would allow for the potential for better water management options. Commissioner Soller questioned whether the best management practice needs to create a net zero impact on the new construction. He wondered if there was an algorithm to determine this number. Mr. Maass shared that Mr. Seidl's review of the design and calculations are effective and are the best solution. Mr. Seidl explained the department reviews the permits and confirms they are good designs that operate properly. Commissioner Soller wondered if a trade-off system in place with a net zero or a net positive impact would allow the Planning Commission to approve the proposed ordinance. He asked if there was any evidence that would support a net positive impact and increase lake health by requiring a larger trade-off above a 1-to-1 ratio. Mr. Seidl answered any treatment beyond the current proposal would be a net positive but he would need to study the information further to understand different limitations. Commissioner Schwartz asked if there could be language in the ordinance that stated the minimum trade-off for impervious lot cover and best management practices would be 1-to-1 to allow residents to go beyond the minimum requirements. Chair Noyes questioned how the city would respond to a resident in the residential single-family district who desired to increase lot coverage to 30 percent and was willing to put a stormwater pond in their yard, as this would meet the requirements in the Shoreland Overlay District. He stated affirming the Shoreland Overlay District would potentially provide a variance route for residential single family district members. Commissioner Soller stated a stormwater pond is not a vegetative buffer on a lake. Chair Noyes stated not all lots in the Shoreland Overlay District are on the lake. Mr. Maass confirmed there are riparian and non-riparian lots in the district. The basis is the offsetting best management practice to mitigate the increase of stormwater. A vegetative buffer could be the best management practice if it meets the requirements and design needs. 213 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 10 Chair Noyes asked if the best management practices in the non-riparian lots could be employed in the residential single-family district as well. He thought there could be confusion for residents regarding this differentiation. Commissioner Alto inquired whether Mr. Seidl engaged in a discussion with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District regarding this topic and the letter sent and reviewed at the May 16, 2023, Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Seidl stated staff did engage the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District in a conversation but did not hear back in a specific memo. He stated the information read in the letter still applies to the situation and the watershed district does not support the construction of impervious surfaces without offsetting best management practices. Commissioner Alto stated it is more important not to have an increase in lot cover closer to the bodies of water that are already negatively impacted. Commissioner Soller asked if there were differences between the residential single family district lots and the non-riparian Shoreland Overlay District lots and if the runoff with these lots would be similar. Mr. Maass shared that the difference would be the distance to the resource. Lots farther away have a diminishing effect on the lake, as there are streets with stormwater infrastructure to assist in catching stormwater. Commissioner Alto suggested the city should implement the best management practices without allowing increased lot cover. Commissioner Soller asked if the water resources city staff had a negative impression of the first proposed ordinance tonight. Mr. Seidl said the water resources city staff is not in favor of the code amendment for the residential single-family district because it does not have best management practice requirements. For the Shoreland Overlay District, he recognized there are impaired waterways in Chanhassen. The ordinance might not go far enough and there could be consideration to move towards a net positive rather than a net neutral. Commissioner Schwartz asked how far the ordinance would need to go to be acceptable to the Water Resources Department. Mr. Seidl did not have this information prepared for tonight. Commissioner Goff stated this ordinance is designed for a very small portion of residents in Chanhassen. Residents can propose a variance if necessary. 214 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 11 Chair Noyes said residents can know the standards when purchasing the lots. By approving this proposed ordinance, residents might try to submit variances to move beyond 30 percent lot cover. Commissioner Soller asked if the riparian lots could be significantly improved by this proposed ordinance. He questioned why the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources wanted to limit it to specific properties if it was truly beneficial to the lake. Mr. Maass shared that the model ordinance of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources does not require the naturalization of the shoreline for a certain percentage of impervious surfaces. The naturalization of the shoreline was viewed as a tradeoff for additional lot cover. Commissioner Alto stated all roads lead to water, whether in the Shoreland Overlay District or in the residential single-family district. Both districts are responsible for the water moving towards the lakes. Commissioner Soller stated improving natural vegetation along the shoreline helps improve the Shoreland Overlay District in ways other properties could not. Chair Noyes said this idea is accurate, but there are additional ways to approach this topic. If the Planning Commission is trying to improve and protect the lakes, it would be beneficial not to tie it to the five percent impervious lot cover. Commissioner Schwartz shared all residents are impacting a water resource, whether residents live on a lake or not. The Planning Commission should consider the total impact on water resources from all residents. Mr. Maass stated variances in the past required naturalization of the shoreline as a condition. Commissioner Goff moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends denial of the proposed ordinance amending lot cover standards in the Shoreland Overlay zoning district. The motion carried with a vote of 6 to 1. Commissioner Soller voted Nay. GENERAL BUSINESS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 5, 2023 Commissioner Goff moved, Commissioner Jobe seconded to approve the Chanhassen Planning Commission summary minutes dated December 5, 2023 as presented. All voted in favor, and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. 215 Planning Commission Minutes – January 16, 2024 12 ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Planning Director Maass shared there will be an open house at the Chanhassen Recreation Center on January 17th to share about the improvements to the redevelopment of the Chanhassen Cinema and Country Inn & Suites. Mr. Maass stated January 9th was Bob Generous Day. City staff ate beef jerky in honor of Bob Generous. He noted that Rachel Jeske accepted a full-time role with the city. Mr. Maass announced that Jamie Marsh had accepted the position of Environmental Resource Specialist. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Soller moved, Commissioner Alto seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Submitted by Eric Maass Planning Director 216