The URL can be used to link to this page

2. Papedis VariancePC DATE: 9/4/07 CITY OF CHANHASSEN STAFF REPORT CC DATE: 9/24/07 REVIEW DEADLINE: CASE #: 07-19 BY: AA 10/2/07 PROPOSAL: Request for an, after the fact, 7.4% variance from the 25% maximum hard surface coverage for the addition of patios and hardscape. LOCATION: 2101 Pinehurst Drive Lot 23, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition 6 APPLICANT: Tim Johnson OWNER: Ojar Papedis Southview Design 2101 Pinehurst Drive 1875 East 50`h Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 PRESENT ZONING: 2020 LAND USE PLAN: ACREAGE: 0.44 acres Residential Single Family (RSF) Residential Low Density DENSITY: NA SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a 7.4% hard surface variance for the addition of patios and hardscape. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi judicial decision. 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 2 of 8 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 32.4% hard surface coverage. The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of 25% hard surface coverage. The property is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF). It is located on Lot 23, Block 1, Pinehurst 2° Addition. Access to the site is gained off of Pinehurst Drive. The City received a building permit for the subject site that reflected a 23.2% hard surface coverage. The plans had adequate area to accommodate a future patio. The contractor received notice by a building inspector on July 30, 2007, that the Zoning Ordinance permits a maximum hard surface coverage of 25% and that all hardscape improvements require a Residential Zoning Permit. At the time the contractor was notified the installation of the deck and patios was nearly complete. The contractor then submitted a variance request for the subject site. Staff is recommending denial of the applicant's request based on the fact that the applicant has reasonable use of the property with adequate outdoor expansion area and approval of this application could set a precedent. 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 3 of 8 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20 Division 3. Variances Section 20-615 (4) RSF District Requirements; Hard Surface Coverage Sec 20-905 (6) Single-family dwellings BACKGROUND The property is located on Lot 23, Block 1, in the Pinehurst 2nd Addition which is zoned Residential Single Family (RSF). The subject property is 19,423 square feet in area. It has a lot frontage of 108 feet and approximately 265 feet in depth. The minimum lot dimensions in the RSF district are 15,000 square -foot lot, 90-foot lot frontage and 125-foot lot depth. This lot exceeds the minimum requirements for the RSF district. The building permit for the proposed home, driveway, and front sidewalk on the property was approved on January 16, 2007. The building permit reflected a hard surface coverage of 23.2%. The maximum impervious surface in the RSF district is 25%. The proposed 23.2% coverage allowed for future improvements, such as a patio. Based on the building permit application, the homeowner would have had an additional 345 square feet of hard surface for future expansion. �•. . '`I:'` Gs' j '',�+�.]sue', -`'" a-' 1 :�sa^z �`,\ ' �� I �'"S}',.f� ' ,�. • % '-A Ds,ln rw N<rrwtl lT T •'' T', G. � �� Dnalw +.r+a c.•.Iss, �<'t 1:., _.s..i i ,P\ A` ,Vj '; ./^ :, "A�' ."; • .� \ 1' � My.�n Dear. :<wo.f D[ru t}w ' 01'IYeWa NN1,�,[/.Nf% / plMf % ; ' ♦ f .\ �.r . `�-- . ' • ,�4.�'.•s .w...w ,<I n,..,..., 2-3, ' is `��.-'�---i `'�'tt" ..a+wr1J ,I T,•..."....i 1�l.l_WlaFf uc.-:.namnl:. ti .{a��- ,—' �nini'i'�•w...•,r.r.:..... n..r, :<,1., v.eRvrlae i •+' / ,• / .1 ..•■moo .YR... ra \ err,: , J// � \�\ •' J '�• �yl � � ..r-,.•.. err .rr:•.c..�,... :-.•..�:: . 1.1,... �i `� ` �� ..Ty »w ...rM"r•.ti.�:r•v, lta xrr.,,l.w.:yll,lc.w.>.r % •�l. J+..r y �!' ,�• �r'u K'/. ,._n.-r.�»•�K •t�t•x `r.».ti,}.wer. ....-. �. Wj !. / i- Q1 � }• t r —� u3T.1.nl. l•l Un-:.nr]D1DM Cr •.:w,., N•�iYl. � a'�.�T�� 'G��r=��.4' •/ ,c+��,�t+ .r< y �, �\Y \ ��t. �` �t� li-,"'.i i1•w. �. �:> M..:M1...ly.•n.a Y;...`..wm...r+..,,.,. d-a:':.;L`'l`S,r� �n':h.°�a,,,, �'- r'ti:. • � �!°� r: t:�F; ... �».r,,.,,,,,;,,,r„,},. ... . ``/�/% / � ,.e�•rrVt4rt•r ...4c: �u,r'v1..4r A. LI:l:EU .�.''•: nGY 157Q n�— �Yl_ � D.(..wb ..`rNr. Dn.r. .�wr '� �I:.Y�/L ✓L C.: etr 41, �" M A n• •t rR kLlvI2\e.iLxRfv L•N'-'�sw �''—a�cTl .. r.wrai>�L".ii lef�rl .YWr.1f 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 4 of 8 At the time the Pinehurst Development was going through the public hearing process in 2006, hard surface coverage was a concern on these lots. The proposed lots were too small to accommodate the size of homes that were proposed in this development. Pinehurst was replatted in 2006 from 43 lots to 41 lots to increase the lot size on some of the lots. Due to the size of the homes proposed by the developer, the developer was aware of the limited availability of additional square footage for any further improvements or additions on these lots. In an attempt to avoid future hard cover issues due to the increased size of homes on lots, on July 6, 2006, the City amended Sec. 20-905: Single-family dwellings (6) "Where access doors are proposed from a dwelling to the outdoors, which does not connect directly to a sidewalk or stoop, a minimum ten -feet by ten -feet hard surface area shall be assumed. Such surface area must be shown to comply with property lines, lake and wetland setbacks; may not encroach into conservation or drainage and utility easements; and shall not bring the site's hard surface coverage above that permitted by ordinance." ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a 7.4% hard surface coverage variance from the 25% maximum hard surface coverage. The lot area is 19,423 square feet. Based on the 25% maximum coverage allowed, the home, driveway, walkway, etc. may occupy 4,858 square feet. The original building permit occupied 4,513 square feet of hard cover, the remaining impervious surface allowed was 345 square feet. The proposed hard cover additions occupy 1,780 square feet, which is 1,435 square feet over what is allowed by ordinance for this parcel. Much of the impervious surface is currently installed on the site. 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 5 of 8 Surface Building Permit Square Feet Proposed Square Feet House/Garage/Porch 3,232 3,232 Driveway 1,281 1,281 Front Sidewalk 170 Upper Patio 445 Fire Pit 225 Fire Pit Boulder Ring 16 Stone Steps 28 Deck 406 Lower Wall 160 Upper Wall 205 Steppers 125 Total 4,513 or 23.2% 6,293 or 32.4% (Note: As a policy staff does not include standard slatted decking as hard cover; however, upon inspection of the site the decking is a composite material that interlocks, leaving only a small drainage opening for rain to flow through. These small drainage holes get blocked with debris and do not allow water to run through. Impervious surface is defined as "any material that substantially reduces or prevents the infiltration of storm water." Due to the lack of drainage permitted by this type of decking, staff is including the decking as hard cover.) Staff informed the developer of the hard cover issues during the subdivision process. Lennar Homes replatted Pinehurst 2nd Addition to eliminate two lots in 2006. It is the developer and real estate agent's duty to inform the prospective homeowner of any and all limitations on the site. Since Lennar Homes is also the builder, they were aware of the constraints on the property. Due to the nature of the homes in this development, the expectation is to improve the exterior of the property with landscaping and hardscaping. Prospective homeowners should have been made aware of the impervious restrictions prior to building on these lots. In addition, all hardscape improvements require approval of a Residential Zoning Permit obtained by the homeowner or contractor. A building inspector was conducting an inspection at a different site and noticed the improvements. He informed the contractor of the 25% hard surface coverage restrictions on the site and that the contractor must discontinue the installation of the deck and patios and obtain a Residential Zoning Permit prior to resuming construction. A residential zoning permit acts as a safety net to identify any potential code violations, such as setback encroachments and hard cover requirements, prior to construction. This permit is at no cost to the homeowner and allows the City and the homeowner an opportunity to correct any encroachments before installation begins. It is the contractor/homeowner's responsibility to 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 6 of 8 contact the City prior to construction and obtain a Residential Zoning Permit to ensure compliance with city code. If a variance is granted from the 25% hard surface maximum, it may set a precedent in this neighborhood, as well as other neighborhoods, to apply for variances for hardscape improvements beyond the restrictions set forth in the City Code. Site Characteristics The topography of the site slopes significantly in the rear yard from a high of elevation of 1051.3 to 1034, which constitutes a 17.3-foot drop in a matter of 70 feet. A storm water pond is located outside of the property lines, just to the west of the rear yard of the property. The runoff from these lots will run directly into the storm water pond. While increasing the hard surface coverage for one lot may not impact the storm water pond significantly; increasing the hard surface coverage for a number of lots in this development will significantly impact the storm water system. The water from this pond eventually runs into the Minnesota River. According to the Hydrology Guide for Minnesota by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, the recommended hard surface coverage for a one-half acre (approximately 21,000 square -foot) lot is 25%. This information is based on the Hydrologic Curve which translates to the amount of runoff produced from a particular surface. The Hydrologic Curve for the Pinehurst Subdivision is 72. This is consistent with the U.S.D.A Soil Conservation Service for soil types B and C, soils containing non -permeable material, such as clay. Permitted Use The site is zoned RSF, Residential Single Family. Reasonable use of a property within the RSF district is a single-family home with a two -car garage. A single-family home with a three -car garage is currently constructed on the property. Even after the initial construction of the home, there was 345 square feet of additional hard cover allowed on the property. FINDINGS The Planning Commission shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 7 of 8 Finding. The literal enforcement of the ordinance does not create a hardship, since a reasonable use of the property, a single-family home, a two -car garage, and the addition of a ten -foot by ten -foot patio could be constructed without a variance. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties in the RSF zoning district. These conditions were discussed at length during the Planning Commission and City Council meetings when the development came in for preliminary and final plat approval. The development was replatted in 2006 and two lots were eliminated to increase the size of the lots. The lots are well over the minimum lot area requirement and have sufficient space to construct the desired home as well as other improvements to the property. C. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of the variation is not directly based on the desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. However, the income potential may be increased as an indirect result. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The alleged hardship of exceeding the maximum hard surface coverage is a self- created hardship. The homes on the lots are very large. However, there was an additional 345 square feet of allowable expansion possible after the initial approval of the building permit. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located, in that additional storm water runoff is generated from the hard surface on the property. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. 2101 Pinehurst Drive Variance Request Planning Case 07-19 September 4, 2007 Page 8 of 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission denies Variance 07-19 for a 7.4% hard surface coverage variance from the 25% maximum hard surface coverage in Pinehurst 2nd Addition, with the following condition: 1. The hard surface coverage of the site shall not exceed 25%." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced copy of lot survey. 4. Reduced copy of hardscape design. 5. Pinehurst Hydrograph Report —Drainage Area 10. 6. Drainage Map for Pinehurst 2nd Addition. 7. Hydrology Guide for Minnesota, figure 3-2. 8. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. gAplan\2007 planning cases\07-19 2101 pinehurst hsc variance staff report.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN . CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Southview Design for a 7.4% hard surface coverage variance for the addition of multiple patios and hardscape — Planning Case No. 07-19. On September 4, 2007, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the Application of Southview Design for a 7.4% hard surface coverage variance for the addition of multiple patios and hardscape at 2101 Pinehurst Drive, located in the Single -Family Residential District (RSF) at Lot 23, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential — Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 — 4u/Acre). 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 23, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition. 4. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. The literal enforcement of the ordinance does not create a hardship, since a reasonable use of the property, a single-family home, a two car garage, and the addition of a ten foot by ten foot patio could be constructed without a variance. b. The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties in the RSF zoning district. These conditions were discussed at length during the Planning Commission and City Council meetings when the development came in for preliminary and final plat approval. The development was replatted in 2006 and two lots were eliminated to increase the size of the lots. The lots are well over the minimum lot area requirement and have sufficient space to construct the desired home as well as other improvements to the property. c. The purpose of the variation is not directly based on the desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. However, the income potential may be increased as an indirect result. d. The alleged hardship of exceeding the maximum hard surface coverage is a self-created hardship. The homes on the lots are very large. However, there was an additional 345 square feet of allowable expansion possible after the initial approval of the building permit. e. The variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located, in that additional storm water runoff is generated from the hard surface on the property. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. 5. The planning report #07-19 Variance dated September 4, 2007, prepared by Angie Auseth, et al, is incorporated herein. ACTION The Planning Commission denies the Variances from the impervious surface restrictions for the construction of multiple patios and hardscape. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on this 4th day of September, 2007. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman g:\plan\2007 planning cases\07-19 2101 pinehurst hsc variance\findings of fact.doc 2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Address: i -t5 E , 5T t ver_-c G V+T-, rJ 5 Z1 Contact: - 1 to t\r,5o�1 Phone: Fax: (PS l ISS 1-134 Email: c�ny\_',c)c cvM Planning Case No. 0R-19 C:ftY®FCHANHASSEN RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2007 5� SSEN PLANNING DEPT Owner Name and Address: aJPV(Z- �•C�Dt S r +4 F M t., S5a1 7 Contact: Phone:6123017-11-1 Fax: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non -conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC) Variance (VAR)-77_ O .06 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign — $200 (City to install and remove) X E U for Filing Fees/e. rney Cost** - $50 UP/SPRNA -O Minor AP/Metes &Boundss TOTAL FEE $ ��, Z b.tVA VISA 0�,,IrWA�- ",-1210-7 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged WAtINEo each application. 0 0 o� H Jul 31 2007 6:07PM OJRRS PRPEDIS 9528449823 p.3 PROJECT NAME: /pcf��GitQl(J C-3 'Fop- (�*sA PPcPC� S LOCATION: Z ty k RP(N%F tA-Az S'T DROJIF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TOTAL ACREAGE: BVI0 5V ►j aT I or-L- of 1J & i�;t-1 r WETLANDS PRESENT: X YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: \�E W f!/WV-11Jb e LeNlet,%P- s 1;2'AC10040 1-6 i' z�m,-- �`*o,--T SekGF, Vvf-- FAM 0 hzG W s (L V fhCMH-Qi 99= R i'AA Coo RAVI Iy ills t UvJ I OME 4 670 s� FAT This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. inPl,tk5 & 70 O v-<--e. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This Is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed In my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed understand that *itional fi authorization to froceed wilt my knowledj of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further es may be --charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any the/thy. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of -7)347 Date Da G:\pLANVorms%0eve1opment Review Application.DOC Rev. 12105 gCAtitiED ` - AFPR VED 06 •... .:' - --- LEGEND of :i— (4 - �� 5.10% Q4o ' Denotes Iron Monument • DATE: - Z- BY: -1b 00 p / 58. — Denotes Surface Drainage Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes x (1214) DEPT; �N q DATE: _ o $� 91 ��y\ — Q 1 Existing Elevation Denotes Top Iron Pipe x 123.4 TP BY: °" c- -p... .` am\ y \ W '.a y,. `�aPOPg1T1 _Denotes 'Oust Retaining Wall - aW t DATE:.•-i6-r7 \ �J Denotes Proposed Contour Lines STORM SEWER 1234 SANITARY SEWER S7)VH ss A# I -- logy - 105&3\\` WATERMAIN, HYDRANT, AND VALVE 30 0 30 •/A ' *f � � .q�• — 1a � / HARD COVER CALQ It •TIONR ' / `d ` :'/;✓� a a , — SCALE IN FEET LOT AREA •19.423 SO. FT. a / ' a � �RlvEwn'vDRCH 3,232 1SOL S R' r OCT, '�`,.'7•. F4 k / •`\`_-`O TOTAL HARD COVER 152 : 4'' `O ,p �p OO. [INN CPS v V� . 4.513 SO. FT. V� ^ tx� 0 0 9e {IO �� PERCENT OF F� nrR .nVFp 4,511119,d23 23.2% \\ O CFCQ,`.�.NOTES: / l� Cb ✓ / ' aj \ 1. Address: 2101 Pinehursl Drive 4 / RJo\ \ / / �GQ 2. Benchmarks: 1. T.N.H. Southwest Corner Lot 3, Block 1, PINEHURST 2ND ADDITION. �U%- sj $ 44i 1050.92 3/ \ aj� Q� ELEV. = 1057.18 .\ y V F x 1050.3 ��y \ ♦��y,• 2 `10508 t0A7'3 / / • �� 2. ADD NiH. I Ing west o1 Manchester Drive at Outlot's A and B. PINEHURST 2ND ELEV. - 1028.88 /) 6 ,O4 • Q\ 7, 1 7 3. TIP on the easterly lot line from the northeasterly extension line of the front of c _ - t _ proposed house. TIP is lying 29.71 feet southeasterly along easterly lot line. \ ej ELEV. - 1059.95 •v / \ 1 `� 3. No elevations, either found in the field or on this certificate, should be used for construction without / .7 +/ ti /11� being checked against the benchmarks shown on this survey. �7 l C 4. No building Information provided by this survey should be used without being checked against architectural plans. Use architectural plans for building construction purposes. �704 5. This house does have a brick ledge around the front face. We are not showing It In the survey, but g' x 1031.6 , have accounted for 6 within the setbacks. x 1 9 y 0}i� \\ 1 6. Proposed contours are per the grading plan created by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. c _ c _ ` / RW TOP R}y4, \ ' dated 2/21105. ��,• /:/ `� 1029.3 �'6 Proposetl top of house foundation r. 1061.3 1027. RW l x 1030 \ ! prop garage floor elevation at overhead door 1061.0 Ijilsl / / .4 W Proposed lowest floor elevation .1051.6 / TOE O•o?7 \ 8� \ Q PROPERTY DESCRIPTION f r4L, �,p f ' // T;%_ 15 el 3= Lot23, Block 1, PINEHURST 2ND ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota CfRTlF) G 4$ $N� FRO / lam' RFA - 241 �3�r 10 \ L O ? SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: g y 5 FxC C4 TF 0 Qk'N $!ON C �€ of ICE �t 1 7 3 �� - a lQ I hereby ce 4 VATr f $ O!! T ONT ' 2` \i w W y rtlfy that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and t EFUj(y CN UR yfy tt'F p Rp(D ! g O that I am a duly Licensed Lend Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ° COAST vFGFTA 1*F,0 '134,4�NT RlQR O 4ND/O / / •',;'i, iL D 7p 64 `` 4.1' `, /� "' y Dated this the 5th day of December, 2006. ng �F t!$ f� UCT10'V J OURlN 4!N UNT! R ,'-� -per i o2e:o� �R>• >` CITY OF C}tAN IASSEN �,! (�fU Op FFHC NG isMOT lS •' �`�T`O2� `` �1,,` 102 . ,/1 y MCCo bs Frank Roos Associates, lnc. Gaa �Ial'v�'i� f�\ JAN 2 2007 �EE 4%Minnesota Lise se'S 11255 ENGINEERING DEPT. This certiflc n Is not valid unless wet signetl In blue Ink. Revisioae M R ra t,ot. h a.ea,a "° De°' M "'"°"e on- ■ �� ll7 fn9Ate.«9,p . vmnnny . So CI1C°t Prom B I c ,.eh A; Sheet'ride tx� �' ,4raa.,uax,,wue Lot 23 Blockl txe. ,z/a/os ,,, �„ , e1i, LENNAR PINEI�IRST ADDITION Certificate of survey 1 1 toe A�.nT/ra wayuteMN lamhassoi,MN �_ a°° cEzwcnTeo FRENCH DRAIN DETAL DRY NET L DE V � T Ak ao , a __sue oa SERVICES DESIGN INFORMATION SCALE at LANDSCAPE DESIGN FOR Pa edls Residence P - LANDSCAPE MASTER PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DESIGN/SALES REP. IF Johnso REVISIONS III = 01 IMVNE°VssdCN1$ ,•�••• 2101 Plnehurst IRRIGATION & WATER FEATURES - PAVER DRIVEWAYS & PAT"s & SHRUBBERY DESIGN/SALES ASST.MED, MCShEFR 5/�/2007 5J24J2ooT°Q�,° 08/OU200 1dfi°B20B SOUTHVIEW .nesicx. Chanhassen, MN 55317 ODDS - OUTDOOR LIGHTING RETAINING waLLs DATE:4/24/2007 17DOEM011 °B Iredrogrooe rer en 13 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Hyd. No. 11 DA-10 Hydrograph type Storm frequency Drainage area Basin Slope Tc method Total precip. Storm duration = SCS Runoff = 100 yrs = 16.66 ac = 3.5 % = LAG = 6.00 in = 24 hrs Hydrograph Discharge Table Time -- Outflow (hrs cfs) 12.10 49.96 << End Wednesday, Jul 6 2005, 9:12 AM Peak discharge = 49.96 cfs Time- interval = 3 min Curve number = 72 Hydraulic length = 1100 ft Time of conc. (Tc) = 23.2 min Distribution = Type II Shape factor = 484 Hydrograph Volume = 4.052 acft ( Printed values >_ 100% of op.) eXlsTwo Westwood ProfessiordSeMces,Inc �` "'�"` Yrpiid�°` Pinehurst Plowshares Development, LLG r...c raa.rrra,r. r.c „r rrrnry 07/65/pS r�,� NBS.I' I rMY� I I Idn W. DNn W.M. SW. SM Clwp..r.4 H]pwrM. MV I ch—h p. Wru,vot. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL i.in Gty .rr. 631-ala-ppp= 4n. fan Ir.r 1-p00-1l2-1i66 X 0' 100 200' !oo o.r 091VI06 0se..eoo' Z•. a v2 Post-Devlopment Drainage Map VI�I.C.`•`\ �1�1� '�� !V` %Vv-.Jo+a" — u &D.4- S61 I C01/56 w:h /lp M-ENG-73 FIGURE 3-2 U. S. DEPAR1MENt OF AGRICULTURE 9-76 (File Code ENG-13) HYDROLOGIC CURVE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE NUMBER COMPUTATION SHEET LAND USE FOR URBAN AREAS ,Present or Future , Watershed Computed by Site Date D.A. Acres Date Checked by Curve Numbers Acres Moisture Condition II A B C D LAND USE DESCRIPTION Per Practice Soils Soils Soils Soils Product Cultivated Land: without conservation treatment 72 81 88 91 with conservation treatment 62 71 78 81 Pasture or range land: poor condition 68 79 86 89 good condition 3Q 61 74 80 Meadow: good condition 30 58 71 78 Wood or Forest land: thin stand, poor cover, no mulch 45 66 77 83 good cover 25 55 70 77 Open Spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, ceme- teries, etc. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 39 61 74 80 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 49 69 79 84 Commercial and.businesa areas (85% impervious) 89 92 94 95 Industrial districts (72% impervious) 81 88 91 93 Residential: Average lot size Average % Impervious 118 acre or less 65 77 85 90 92 1/4 acre 38 61 75 83 87 '113 acre 011,52osj) 30 57 72 81 86 1 /2 acre �21��7805� 25 54 70 80 85 1 acre 20 , 51 68 79 84 Paved parking lots, roofs, drive rays, etc. 98 98 98 98 Streets and roads: Paved with curbs and storm sewers 98 98 98 98 gravel 76 85 89 91 dirt 72 82 87 89 Marsh 5 5 5 Other Total Acres_ Weighted Runoff Curve No, Product Total Total Acres 3-4 Product Total CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on August 23, 2007, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for 2101 Pinehurst Variance — Planning Case 07-19 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. KareA Engel rd , Deput Jerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this,, d day of s - 72007. r Notary Pu is ".... "*. KIM T. MEUWISSEN E —.= ntnt?ni puh'ir-Minnesota 1. ;vmrc.i,,;aor. crNuas Jan 31, 2010 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for a hard surface coverage variance Applicant: Southview Design Property 2101 Pinehurst Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-19.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Angie Questions & Auseth by email at aauseth@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for a hard surface coverage variance Applicant: Southview Design Property 2101 Pinehurst Drive Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/serv/plan/07-19.html. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Angie Questions & Auseth by email at aauseth@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952-227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. wtit CZ res I r Cres I w r �N 3G J� c°r d o Q / e age lU SUBJECT PROPERTY ` t� Highgate Cir <d�e <410y Read Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952.227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided. WILLIAM V & NANCY M SWEARENGIN JUDITH ELAINE ALEXANDER XUEBING FENG & TRUSTEES OF FAMILY TRUST XIAOGUANG DENG 2122 LAKE LUCY RD 2080 CRESTVIEW DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6705 6724 MANCHESTER DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8007 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6700 JAYSON C DREHER WILLIAM F & JEANNE A KRAKE SANDRA L WELLS 2144 LAKE LUCY RD 6739 MANCHESTER DR 2051 HIGHGATE CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6705 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6700 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6704 CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON TIMOTHY P & HEIDI S LARKIN & JOHN MARK & JANICE RAE MOBERG 2110 CRESTVIEW DR LECY BROS CONSTRUCTION 6738 MANCHESTER DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8009 2150 CRESTVIEW DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6700 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8009 SCOTT D & CYNTHIA L BOEDDEKER PAUL S TUNGSETH ERIC W & GRETCHEN G LOPER 6710 MANCHESTER DR 2051 CRESTVIEW DR 2076 HIGHGATE CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6700 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8008 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6704 DUANE R & SUSAN D MORRIS ROBERT A JR & BRENDA K NESS STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT 2151 CRESTVIEW DR 2121 CRESTVIEW DR 2081 CRESTVIEW DR EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8010 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8010 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8008 COURTNEY W & CHRISTINE CLAFLIN JEFFREY A JORGENSEN & DANIEL J DOHSE & 1106 55TH AVE S HELENA B STAFKO MARIT S LEE-DOHSE FARGO , ND 58104 -6456 2028 HIGHGATE CIR 2058 HIGHGATE CIR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6704 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -6704 U S HOME CORP THOMAS J WOODS ANDREW & DANA LUING 935 EAST WAYZATA BLVD 2031 EDGEWOOD CT 2020 EDGEWOOD CT WAYZATA, MN 55391 -1849 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -4577 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -4577 PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC US HOME CORP & OJARS A PAPEDIS 1851 WEST LAKE DR PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC TRUSTEE OF 0 PAPEDIS TRUST STE 550 935 EAST WAYZATA BLVD 2101 PINEHURST DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -8567 WAYZATA, MN 55391 -1849 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -4579 BEN & MARGARET LIAO RICHARD & MARIE JENNINGS TONKA DEVELOPMENT LLC 3645 FORESTVIEW LN 2021 EDGEWOOD CT 21470 EXCELSIOR BLVD PLYMOUTH , MN 55441 -1336 CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -4577 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 -8743 Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet) 2101 Pinehurst Drive City of Chanhassen Planning Case 07-1 9 i est 65th Street x b W It 1.1ke �'a� u re st\ C��