1998 08 04 AGENDA
CHANHASSEN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 1998 AT 6:00 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Call to Order
Old Business
A request for an 11.5 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction
of an addition located at 7201 Juniper Avenue, Lot 7 & 8, Block 5, Red Cedar Point, Greg
and Joan Datillo
2. Approval of Minutes.
Adjournment
CITY OF
BOA DATE: 8/4/98
CCI)ATE:
CASE #: 98-7 VAR
. By:. Kirehoff:v
STAFF
REPORT
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
A request for an 11.5 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback for
the construction, of an addition ..
7201 Juniper Avenue
(Lot 7 & 8, Block 5, Red Cedar Point)
Greg and Joan Datillo
7201 Juniper Avenue
Excelsior, MN 55331
474-5935
Ill
PRESENT ZONING:
ACREAGE:
DENSITY:
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USES:
WATER AND SEWER:
PHYSICAL CHARACTER:
2000 LAND USE PLAN:
RSF, Single Family Residential
Approximately 8,800 sq. ~
N/A
N-'
S:
E:
W:
RSF, Single Family Residential
RSF, Single Family Residential
RSF, Single Family Residential
RSF, Single Family Residential
Available to the site
A single family home with a detached garage exists on the
site. The site slopes to the east.
Low Density Residential
6300
6400
6500
6600
6700
6800
6900
7000
7100
7200
7300
7400~('
7500
7600
7700
7800
L~ke
..
St ~oe
PROPOSED VARIANCE
Dattilo Variance
August 4, 1998
Page 2
APPLICABLE REGULATION
Section 20-615 states that in single family residential districts the minimum front yard setback is
30 feet (Attachment 2).
BACKGROUND
The Red Cedar Point subdivision was platted in 1913. The original lots were 40 feet in width
and between I 10 and 160 feet in depth. As in the cases of Carver Beach and Shore Acres (Lake
Riley Boulevard), lots in Red Cedar Point have been assembled for the construction of single
family homes. In order for many of the single family homes to be built or for additions to be
constructed onto existing cabins, variances were granted so that the applicant can have a
reasonable use of the property.
The original home on the subject property was a cabin constructed about 50 years ago. It was
relocated to this location from a riparian lot during the 1950s. In 1984, the applicant was granted
a variance from the 30 foot setback for the construction of a 20 foot by 35 foot living space
addition on the northern end of the home. The current application is a request for a variance
from the 30 foot front yard setback for the construction of an 8 foot by 13 foot addition on the
southern portion of the existing home.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a 11.5 foot variance for the construction of a laundry room. The
setback from the addition is measured from the edge of the cave. Encroachments, such as eaves,
are not permitted into required setbacks that have received variances. The 104 sq. ft. addition
will be constructed in the area of an existing deck. This addition is proposed to be attached to the
existing kitchen. It will be located 3 feet from the existing garage. In conjunction with this
addition, the applicant is proposing to relocate the existing detached garage to the 15 foot setback
to increase the length of the driveway. Currently, the garage maintains a 10 foot setback from the
property line abutting Juniper Avenue. This does not require a variance because staff believes
that this will lessen the non-conformity of the situation.
Staff believes that all new construction should meet the current required setbacks, however, this
addition earmot be placed at the 30 foot setback due to the interior layout of the home. Most
importantly, it would force the removal of the only window in aa existing bedroom. The laundry
room addition will not depart downward from the existing standards because it will maintain the
same setback as the existing home. The home setback is 20.5 feet, which is still greater than the
garage setback even after it is relocated.
Dattilo Variance
August 4, 1998
Page 3
Property Line Setbacks and Exterior Wall Protection
The applicant has stated that the proposed addition and garage will maintain a 3 foot separation.
The building code does regulate the separation of structures. It requires different levels of exterior
wall and opening protection based on the distance of a building from the property line. Being the
home and the garage are of dissimilar occupancies, a property line must be assumed between the
two buildings. The property line can be assumed at the most advantageous location for the two
buildings. The existing house and garage are far enough away from the assumed property line so
that no opening protection is required. The proposed addition will require the protection of one or
both adjacent walls of the addition and/or garage and the overhangs.
To be able to be constructed without protection, the buildings must be 6 feet apart with no
overhangs. If the buildings are less than 6 feet apart, but greater than 3 feet apart, the addition or
garage wall must be of one-hour tire-resistive construction with no openings. Extensions of the
overhangs would vary depending on existing and proposed conditions. If the buildings are less than
3' apart, the addition and the garage wall must be of one-hour fire-resistive construction with no
openings. No overhangs would be permitted. Staff recommends that the applicant meet with the
Inspections Division prior to submitting an application for a building permit.
Staff recommends approval of the variance request because it will not create a new front yard
setback.
FINDINGS
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
a.
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue
hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size,
physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a
majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to
allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in
this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding:. This property is only 8,800 sq. fi, rather than the 15,000 sq. i~. required by in the
RSF district. Although a single family home does exist on the property, area for additions is
limited. The interior layout of the existing home restricts where additions may be placed.
Furthenuore, this variance will blend with pre-existing standards in the Red Cedar Point
neighborhood. It will not create a new front yard setback along Jun/per Avenue.
Dattilo Variance
August 4, 1998
Page 4
be
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification-
Finding: Most properties in the RSF zoning district meet the required setbacks when the
home was built. This home was built before the zoning ordinance and therefore, does not
meet current standards.
C.
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
Finding: This variance is not based upon a desire to increase the value of the property but
to construct a laundry room addition on the main floor.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The hardship is not self-created. The home was relocated to the subject property
before the zoning ordinance was adopted.
e.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in' the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of the will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other properties in the Red Cedar Point subdivision-
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or ~crease the
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood.
Finding: The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
neighboring properties or endanger the public safety or impair property values within Red
Cedar Point.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals adopt the following motion:
"The Board of Adjustments and Appeals approves request #98-7 for an 11.5 foot variance from the
30 front yard setback for the construction of an addition based upon the findings presented in the
staff report with the following conditions:
Dattilo Variance
August 4, 1998
Page 5
1. The garage shall be moved 5 feet east so that a 15 foot front yard setback is maintained.
2. Type I erosion control shall be maintained until the vegetation has been reestablished.
3. The proposed addition and/or the existing garage must be altered and/or constructed to comply
with building code provisions for wall and opening protection at property lines."
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application and Letter
2. Section 20-615, Lot Requirements and Setbacks
3. Site Plan
4. Memorandum from Steve Kirchman to Cindy Kirchoff dated July 28, 1998
5. Property Owners List
g:'.planXck',boa"aatillo 98-7 var.doc
GiTY OF
8S0 GOULTER DR/VE
C)HANHASIEN, MN
(el~) flT.10oo
C .rT'Y. OF CHANHASSEN
!
JUL 0 S 1998
~.t, Ar~.-~oo~ r~,,,,,,,,,qa OF. PI
DBVELOPMENT REVIEW APPL,IG~TION
__ Oomprehenelve Plan Anmndrnent
,
·
~ NOn, eonfom'dng U# Pein'dr
·
~ Plinned Unl~ D~'ek~r
,
, m ~_~: -
_,
.--
· 81On Pe~
m
....-. 81gn Plen Review
; 81ts plan Review"
·
. ,.. m,l,m
_ -
-- Tempormy 6alee Pemdt
i ii
V~Uon of ROW/Elmml'lerlts
___
...... -~
....
We'dand A/ierltiofl Peri'nit
_ _ -- --- _ ---___.
·
- -r - --, m -~
,,. -- . i_ _
__ Notmoat~ 8~n
.... i _. m~--
x
~ CUP~P~~~~S
l~ ~m, ~ ~ 8~)
__~ ~- .._ ., -. mi m ....
_
8ubd~' TOTAl. FEE $ ___ ' "
..... Jill I _. I II ---- . ·
A fist of all proper owners within I00 feet of the boundmrle~ of the propeity murat be Included wtth the
appllodtlon.
Building mate~! iimp~l muir be lubmltted w~h elt~ plen rovlewt.
'TwvnW4M full mm~ folded oople8 of the plane muet be eubmltted, Inoludtng an 61~" X ti" redLmed oop,/of
tr~nmparenoy for eeoh pbn ebeet. ,
; '
"Eecrow wi11 be required ~or other epptlcetlono throuoh the development
NOTE - When multiple applioatlone ere prooeeeed, the eppmpflmte fee ~edi be charged for each appitoa6on,
&
i
·
WETLANDS PREBENT _.__._YE8 ~ NO
PRE, SENT ZONINCi
·
REQUESTED ZONING
PRI~$ENT LAND USE DI.~$1GNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE DE$1ONATION .... _:: ,
, ..................
~la. a~l~on ~et ~ ~m~e~ In ~11 end ~ ~p~n or ~afl~ pdn~d I~ ~t ~ .~m~nl~ by .11 h~on
and ~lan. ~aul~ ~ .p~e C~ O~lnan~ p~l.~a. Be~m ~11~ the appl~, y~ ~hou~ ~n~r ~ ~e Pannl~
~pa~nt to dateline ~ e~flo o~l~n~ end pm~duml mqulmmen~ mp~13ble ~ your
A dqte~na~on of ~~neee of me epp~tl~ a~ll be ~de ~ln ~n buslne~ days of appl~n aub~l. A ~en
no~ of ap~on de~en~e~ ~!1 be ~l~d ~ ~e appl~nt wl~ln ten business days
Th~ Il ~ ~ ~t I em ~k~g e~l~n ~ ~e de~b~ aoUon by ~a CIW end mat I am msp~lble
all ~ ~ul~en~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~le requeaL This appll~U~ ,hould ~ p~l~d In my ne~ ,~ I am ~e ~ ~om
~e p~ should ~n~ ~a~lng ang ~r pe~lnl~g ~ ~1~ eppl~on. I ~ve a~ e ~W of proof of ~emhlp
(e~er ~W of ~fe Dupll=~ Ce~ifl=~ of ~e. Ab~ of ~Ue or pumhaee ~memenO. or I
~ ~a~ ~le eppll~n end the ~e ~ner ha~ a]eo signed ~ls applicon.
I wl(I k~p ~ee~ Info~ ¢f t~ datUMs ~r eubmlaa~n o[ ~1 end ~ ~e of
und~raand ~at .ddl~nef ~e~ may ~ ~e~ ~r ~neulU~ fees, mael~l~ .~d~e, em, ~ an eeUmete ~r ~ any
eut~o~U~ to p~ed ~ ~e e~dy. ~e do~mena and In~rmad~ i he~ eubml~ed am ~e end'~ to ~e ~ot of
~ kn~.. . " .
,
~e o1~ hereby noUfl~ ~l appll~nt ~t devo~p~nt mvl~ ~nnot be ~p~d ~n 60 days due ~. public headn9
mqQl~ l~ a~ m~e~,~ ¢1~ II ~U~lng ~e ep~nt ~gt ~o ~ req~me
I~ll~ ~ develo~nt ~/~.__ ~/~nt ~ shaft ~ ~ted wl~ln ~20 d~e un~ll ldd~o~l ~v~
'
Apl:dt~Uon Received on Fee Paid ,.__ _ Reoelpt No. ~_ ___
Tho ipplloent ihould oontaot staff for a copy of the staff report whloh will be available on Friday prior to the meeting,
if riot c=ontected, a oep'/of the report will be mailed to the appllce~'p ,eddrete.
,
i
. ,. ~ ,~, il i~, ..-I ~ ---4
***END*e*
June 24, 1998
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen MN 55317
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
"JUL 0 998
~H~l~n~o...~,:, .~ .... ~,,,~. ~t:,PT
RE: Variance for Greg and Joan Dattilo
7201 Juniper Avenue
Chanhassen MN
474-5935
We are requesting a variance to move the garage back 5'. This will extend the driveway
to 20' from 15'. We have three vehicles and four drivers in our family. Only two
vehicles fit in the garage and no vehicles can be parked safely in the driveway due to the
vehicles extending into the road. This hardship is more evident in the winter with the
snowplows. All of my neighbors are able to park a vehicle in their driveway. Therefore,
we are asking for the same usage our neighbors have. Cm'rently, the garage is 2' off the
south lot line. The other property owner next to the garage is Rie Anding. The enclosed
letter from Ric Anding states that he has no problem with us moving the garage.
Currently, the front of our home is 25 ~6' from the road, 20 ½' from the property line.
We would like the south end of our home to extend 8 feet to the south and 12' feet to the
east for my wife's laundry room. Due to my wife Joan's arthritis in her hands, we would
like the laundry room to be on the top floor in the area described.
Granting this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
land or improvements in the neighborhood next to 7201 Juniper Avenue. Granting this
variance will not impair an adequate supply of light or air to the vacant lots adjacent.
Neither will it increase congestion on the public streets and increase danger of fire.
Finally, it will not endanger public safety or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
Thank you for your immediate attention to our request.
Sincerely, ~~~gDattilo ~
Joan Dattilo
P.S. Enclosed: video for your viewing,
list of all property owners within 500 feet,
building material samples
copies of plans
§ 20-595
CHAN~SEN CITY CODE
b. For accessory structures, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet.
(7) The minimum driveway separation is as follows:
a. If the driveway is on a collector street, four hundred (400) feet.
b. If the driveway is on an arterial street, one thousand two hundred f'~y (1,250)
feet.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 4(5-4-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 127, § 2, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 170, § 2, 6-8-92;
Ord. No. 194, § 2, 10-11-93)
Sec. 20-598. Interim uses.
The following are interim uses in the "RR" District:
(1) Commercial kennels and stables.
(Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90)
Editor's note--Inasmuch as there exists a § 20-595, the provisions added by § 3 of Ord. No.
120 as § 20-595 have been redesignated as § 20-596.
Secs. 20-597--20.610. Reserved.
ART[CT.~ XII. '~SI~' SR~TGT.F..FAlV~.Y RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 20-611. Intent.
The intent of the "RSF" District is to provide for single-family residential subdivisions.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-1), 12-15-86)
Sec. 20-612. Permitted uses.
The following uses are permitted in an "RSF" District:
(1) Single-family dwellings.
(2) Public and private open space.
(3) State-licensed day care center for twelve (12) or fewer children.
(4) State-licensed group home serving six (6) or fewer persons.
(5) Utility services.
(6) Temporary real estate office and model home.
(7) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-2), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 259, § 11, 11-12-96)
Sec. 20-613. Permitted accessory uses.
The following are permitted accessory uses in an "RSF" District:
(1) Garage.
Supp. No. 9 1210
ZONING § 20-615
(2) Storage building.
(3) Swimming pool.
(4) Tennis court.
(5) Signs.
(6) Home occupations.
(7) One (1) dock.
(8) Private kennel.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-3), 12-15-86)
Sec. 20-614. Conditional uses.
The following are conditional uses in an "RSF" District:
(1) Churches.
(2) Reserved.
(3) Recreational beach lots.
(4) Towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5.4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 120, § 4(4), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 12,
11-12-96)
State law reference--Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595.
Sec. 20-615. Lot requirements and setbacks.
The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" District subject to
additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter and chapter 18:
(1)
The minimum lot area is fl.Pceen thousand (15,000) square feet. For neck or flag lots,
the lot area requirements shall be met after the area contained within the "neck" has
been excluded from consideration.
(2)
The minimum lot frontage is ninety (90) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac
"bubble" or along the outside curve of curvilinear street sections shall be ninety (90)
feet in width at the building setback line. The location of this lot is conceptually
Supp. No. 9 1211
·
§ ~.0-615 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
illustrated below.
Lore Where Frontage la
Measured At 8etbiok Line
(3)
The minimum lot depth is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. The location of these lots
is conceptually illustrated below. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by
private driveways shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured at the front building
setback line.
Neck I Flag iota
Fron Lot Line
100#Lot Width
(4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is twenty-five (25)
percent.
(5) The setbacks are as follows:
a. For front yards, thirty (30) feet.
b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet.
Supp. No. 9 1212
ZONING § 2o-6a2
(6)
c. For side yards, ten (10) feet"
The setbacks for lots served by private driveways and/or neck lots are as follows:
a. For front yard, thirty (30) feet. The front yard shall be the lot line nearest the
public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. The rear yard lot line is to
be located opposite from the front lot line with the rexnaining exposures treated
as side lot lines. On neck lots the front yard setback shall be measured at the
point nearest the front lot l/ne where the lot achieves a one-hundred-foot
l~inlmum width.
b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet.
c. For side yards, ten (10) feet.
(7) The maximum height is as follows:
a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet.
b. For accessory structures, twenty (20) feet.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 90, § 1, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 127, § 3, 3-26-90;
Ord. No. 145, § 2, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 240, § 18, 7-24-95)
Editor's note~Secfion 2 of Ord. No. 145 purported to amend § 20-615(6)b. pertaining to
accessory structures; such prevision were contained in § 20-615(7)b., subsequent to Amend-
ment of the section by Ord. No. 127. Hence, the previsions of Ord. No. 145, § 2, were included
as amending § 20-615(7)b.
Sec. 20-616. Interim uses.
The following are interim uses in the "RSF" District:
(1) Private stables subject to provisions of chapter 5, article IV.
(2) Commercial stables with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres.
(Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90)
Secs. 20-617--20.630. Reserved.
ARTICT.~ ]/'TIT. 5l-4" ~ LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Sec. 20.631. Intent.
The intent of the "R-4" District is to provide for single-fAmily and attached residential
development at a maximum net density of four (4) dwelling units per acre.
(Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 6(5-6-1), 12-15-86)
Sec. 20.632. Permitted uses.
The following uses are permitted in an "R-4" District:
(1) Single-family dwellings.
(2) Two-family dwellings.
Supp. No. 9 1213
rl'l
-cz
ITl
CITYOF
CHANH SEN
690 Ci~. Ce.ter Dri,~, PO lb.x' 1'47
Gu.hasm~, Mi..esot,~ 5531-'
Pl~,e 61293,-.. 1900
General ~a' 612. 93.-.'. 5;'39
Ei:.,4mvd,g l:,,tr 612. 93.-. 9152
l~tl~!i; S!fa.:' ~;t.x' 612. 934.252.~
Il';& ICli'll:Ci. Clt. l;ll',liit';l.$ilil, tls
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Cindy Kirchoff, Planner I
FROM: Steve A. Kirchman, Building Official '~t-' (~' [~'
DATE: July 28, 1998
SUBJECT: 98-7 VAR (7201 JuniperAvenue Mr. Greg Dattilo)
I was asked to review the variance proposal stamped -cxe,t o~, emmm~$m¢, mm~zv~, G1J'L,
0 2 '1 ~ 9 8 · caumm~ss~ pz,~m-~e Dmz?.' for thc above referenced project.
Analysis:
Property Line Setbacks and exterior wall protection. The building code requires different
levels of exterior svall and opening protection based on the distance of a building from the
property line. Because the home and the garage of dissimilar occupancies, a property line must bc
assumed between the two buildings. The property line can be assumed at the most advantageous
location for the two buildings. The existing house and garage are far enough away from the
assumed property line so that no opening protection is required. The proposed addition will
required protection of one or both adjacent ~valls of the addition and/or garage and the overhangs.
To be able to be constructed without protection the buildings must be 6' apart with no overhangs.
If the buildings are less than 6' apart, but greater than 3' apart, the addition or garage wall must
be of one-hour fire-resistive construction with no openings. Extensions of the overhangs would
vary depending on existing and proposed conditions. If the buildings are less than 3' apart, the
addition and the garage wall must be of one-hour fire-resistiveconstmction with no openings. No
overhangs would be permitted.
There may be other methods of providing required protection. It's not possible to list all thc
possibilities. I have explored the most practical least expensive scenarios. If the variance is
approved, the applicant may wish to explore other possibilities with the Inspections Division
before making the building permit application.
Recommendations:
The following requirement should be added to the conditions of approval.
1. The proposed addition and/or the existing garage must be altered and/or constructed to
comply with building code provisions for wall and opening protection at property lines.
8 :~safet~ak~memos'91m' daailo I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Tuesday, August 4, 1998
at 6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers Lake
Minnewashta
690 City Center Drive ~%
PROJECT: Front Yard Setback Variance
APPLICANT: Greg Dattllo
LOCATION: 7201 Juniper Avenue
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area.
The applicant, Greg Dattilo, is requesting a 9.5 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard
setback for the construction of an addition on property zoned RSF and located at 7201 Juniper Avenue.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting,
the Board of Adjustments Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Board discusses project. The Board will then make a decision.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit
written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting.
Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 23, 1998.
tSTATE OF MN - DNR
500 LAFAYE'I-rE ROAD
PAUL, MN 551 55
ED PETERSON
2219 ARTHUR ST NE
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418
WILLIAM BRINK
4017 QUEEN AVE SO.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410
PAMELA ANN SMITH
3720 RED CEDAR POINT DRIVE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GREG BOHRER
3706 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
SAMUEL POTTS
3628 HICKORY ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GREGORY & JOAN DATTILO
7201 JUNIPER AVENUE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ALFRED SMITH
3714 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
BRENDA BLAHA
3733 HICKORY ROAD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
THOMAS & K PARADISE
3755 RED CEDAR POINT
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
TIMOTHY RAIDT
3715 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
ROGER DOWNING
P.O. BOX 551
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
NICHOLAS HAWLEY
14431 WELLINGTON ROAD
WAYZATA. MN 55391
MARVIN YORK
3716 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
GREGORY G DATTILO
7201 JUNIPER AVENUE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CHAS & ADA ANDING
3631 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
TIMOTHY NELSON
3724 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
ELIZABETH NOVAK
7210 JUNIPER AVENUE
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD & M. ANDING
3717 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
JOAN E RASK
3728 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
KATHLEEN LOCKHART
3618 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
PAMELA D LINDQUIST
3902 COLGATE AVE
MINNETONKA, MN 55345
LOUIS PARSONS
3732 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
STEVE KEUSEMAN
3622 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY & KAREN PETERSON
1769 20TH AVE NE
ST PAUL, MN 55112
SUSAN MORGAN
3734 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ERIC BAUER
3624 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
J MOORE
363O HICKORY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KEVlN GU'I~KE
3735 HICKORY
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BIRUTA M. DUNDURS
3627 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
LINDA JOHNSON
3629 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
HEIDI REIGLEMAN
3755 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD COMER
3800 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JON B. FOGELBERG
3821 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
ARTHUR E. ALLERMAN
711 RIVERWOOD DRIVE
LI'I-I'LE FALLS, MN 56432
BERNARD LEACH
3830 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JAMES GULSTRAND
3831 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KENNETH SMITH
3837 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KEVIN CLARK
3841 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GARY COBB
3859 RED CEDAR POINT DR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
PAM SMITH
3720 RED CEDAR POINT RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
ARLENE HERNDON
3750 RED CEDAR POINT RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
MICHAEL & CYNTHIA WENNER
3801 RED CEDAR POINT RD
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CHARLES ANDING
3631 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
HELEN M ANDING
1708 EAST 57TH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
CHESTER LOBITZ
3637 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
EVELYN BEGLEY
3701 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
GEORGE/MELANIE WERL
10 ACORN DRIVE
SUNFISH LAKE, MN 55077
JAMES JASIN
3705 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JILL HEMPEL
3707 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
BLAKE HORTON
3711 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CLIFF PEDERSEN
3713 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
RICHARD ANDING
3715 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
KEVIN & ANN EIDE
3719 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
TAB ERICKSON
3720 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
JIM & SUSAN ROSS
3725 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR. MN 55331
WILLIAM HAUGH
3727 SOUTH CEDAR
EXCELSIOR, MN 55331
CHANHASSEN BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENTS AND APPPEALS
REGULAR MEETING
JULY 22, 1998
Chairperson Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Willard John.qon, Steven Berquist and Carol Watson
STAFF PRESENT: Cynthia Kirchoff, Planner I
A REQUEST FOR A 7 FOOT VARIANCE FROM THE 30 FOOT FRONT YARD
SETBACK FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A576 SQ. FT. ADDITION~ LOTS 24 AND
25~ SHORE ACRES~ 9217 LAKE RII,EY BOULEVARD~ GREG AND KELLY
HASTINGS.
Cynthia Kirchoffpresented the staff report on this item.
Kelly Hastings stated that they bought the home 11 years ago and intend to stay. She explained
how the addition would make the house more comfortable for their growing family.
Steve Berquist asked if the garage meets the side yard setback.
Kirchoff responded that it does not.
Watson moved, Berquist seconded the motion to approve a 7 foot variance from the 30 foot front
yard setback for the construction of an addition. All voted in favor and the motion carded.
Watson moved, Johnson seconded the motion to close the public hearing.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Watson moved, Berquist seconded the motion to approve the
minutes of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals Meeting dated July 14, 1998. All voted in
favor and the motion carded.
Watson moved, Berquist seconded the motion to adjourn.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
Prepared and Submitted by C~thia Kirchoff
Planner I