The URL can be used to link to this page

1. 2030 Comprehensive Plan CITY OF CHANIlASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.227.1160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.227.1140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.227.1125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site WI1W.ci .chan hassen.mn. us OJ MEMORANDUM TO: . Planning Commission FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DA TE: ~~ January 15,2008 SUBJ: 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Bring your copy of the Draft Plan) BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held public hearings over the past three months to review the draft 2030 Comprehensive Plan (Plan). The Planning Commission reviewed the following: . Parks and Open Space and Natural Resources chapters on October 2,2007 . Transportation, Sewer and Water chapters on October 16, 2007 . Housing and Historic Preservation chapters on November 6, 2007 . Land Use chapter and proposed land use map amendments on November 20 and December 4, 2007 During this period, the Plan was distributed to all adjacent governments for their review and comment. After the recommendation from the Planning Commission, City staff will make a presentation to City Council at their work session on January 28, 2008. The Comprehensive Plan comment period is open until April 1, 2008 for jurisdictional review. Following that date City Council will make their motion to submit the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review. Only after the Metropolitan Council finds the plan consistent with the regional plan can the City officially adopt the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. ANAL YSIS Staff has advised the Planning Commission that as part of the process, we would track and address comments or concerns that were raised in reviewing the individual chapters. Following are a summary of the chapter contents, the comments received and staff's responses. Land Use - Chapter 2 Synopsis: The goal of the City is to create a mixture of land uses that provides a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. We have a very successful downtown and there is additional opportunity for retail; however, there is very little vacant commercial land. A major paradigm shift is being recommended to provide for a lifestyle or regional mall as well as community commercial (big box) retail opportunities. The City 01 Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a channing downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 2 of 11 2020 Land Use 2030 Land Use Change Land Use Plan Plan 2020-2030 Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 212 1.4% 328 2.2% 116 Office/Industrial 1,208 8.2% 883 6.0% (325) Office 117 0.8% 339 2.3% 222 Parks & Open Space 1,466 9.9% 1,391 9.4% (75) Public/Semi-Public 1,242 8.4% 1,213 8.2% (29) Residential Large Lot 2,247 15.2% 971 6.6% (1,276) Residential Low Density 5,515 37.4% 4,702 31.9% (813) Residential Medium Density 648 4.4% 400 2.7% (248) Residential High Density 398 2.7% 218 1.5% (180) Mixed Use 134 0.9% 115 0.8% (19) Undevelopable 1,573 10.7% 4,200 28.5% 2,627 TOTAL 14,760 14,760 0 Issue: Parcel 4a. Access. Neighbors purchased with knowledge that the land was guided residentially and want it to remain. Response: Access to the site would be limited to either the north, through the 7/41 center, or via a joint access across from the Minnetonka Middle School access. Any developer of the property would have to work with the property to the north or wait until the property owner to the south is ready to develop; and that would all be dependent on those two parties working together to make that happen. Development of the site for single-family residential is not realistic. The site is topographically isolated from the properties to the west and there is no road extension from Oriole Avenue or from 64th Street. It is a difficult parcel to develop due to its proximity to Highway 41. An office or townhouse use would provide a transition and buffer between the commercial and new residents that are there and for noise attenuation from Highway 41. The challenge for the development review process is to create a development that provides the appropriate transition to the neighborhoods to the west. Issue: Parcel #14, 7750 West 78th Street. Access and traffic. Berming on the northwest comer of the site (December 4, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 8-9). The property owner is requesting that we amend the land use to permit a small percentage of retail incorporated within the office development on the south side of West 78th Street and to include a daycare/preschool on the north side of West 78th Street. (December 4,2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 18-22) Response: Staff does not support commercial development at every site at the intersection of arterial roadways. As stated previously, the development of the area should be limited to the property south of West 78th Street with pervious surface concentrated north of the road. An office use in this area would provide the least intrusive use due to its hours of operation and design opportunities (see attached staff report dated September 28,2007 and updated response from Epic dated January 4, 2008). Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 3 of 11 Issue: Parcels 33, 34 and 36. How do we permit a regional mall without detracting from the downtown? Have we looked at the economic impact of the other retail businesses in Chanhassen if this property goes forward? An additional approximately 60,000 square feet of retail and that would be of the upscale lifestyle type tenants that we want to help in attracting to that development, south downtown. That's probably more vulnerable than all of the other areas of downtown with the possible exception of the Market Street Station which would be terribly vulnerable to a lifestyle type development elsewhere. (November 20, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 36-39) A resolution was developed and adopted by the Chamber Board of Directors on June 26th and published in July of 2007: "Now therefore it is hereby resolved that the Chanhassen Area Chamber of Commerce supports efforts by the City of Chanhassen to conduct further research into the expansion of additional commercial retail developments within the city limits to provide not only for the daily needs of it's residents, but to create additional regional commercial retail draw elements to the area without diminishing the viability of the downtown business service center area." (December 4, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 17-18) Response: Attached are numerous emails and letters of support of and opposition to the regional mall. Staff continues to support the recommendation of the dual guiding of the property (commercial and office). If approved, staff will work on an appropriate zoning classification that would permit the development of a lifestyle site that would compliment the downtown commercial area. However, should no acceptable retail commercial development be proposed, the site could also be developed with a corporate office complex. Issue: Parcel #42, southeast comer of Highway 312 and Powers Boulevard. Tim Erhart has requested that the City add office as a secondary designation to encompass approximately two- thirds of the site to permit the potential development of a corporate headquarter site (December 4,2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 8-15). He wants the City to look at some kind of flexible zoning [land use] that allows Chanhassen to meet the market. Tax capacity is the critical issue. (December 4,2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 14) Response: Area topography and woodlands make the majority of the site isolated and separated from the high visibility and easy access represented by the property immediately adjacent to Highway 312 and Powers Boulevard. The majority of the site is in the middle of a residentially developed area. Properties in the area are guided or recommended for office uses, which have better access and greater visibility, without encroaching further into this area. Access to this site from Highway 101 would encourage non-residential traffic on residential streets. Staff continues to recommend that the office land use be limited to the approximately 10 acres adjacent to Powers Boulevard. The City's financial advisors, Ehlers & Associates, has revied a comparative tax analysis. While high-end office would generate more tax, this should be one of the factors in determining the land use. Issue: Mike Wardle, Brighton Corporation, Boise, Idaho: Southwest comer of Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard. Mixed use designation to permit a neighborhood business zone Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 4 of 11 consistent with what has already been approved north of Lyman. (November 20, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 40-43) Response: Staff does not support commercial development at every site at the intersection of arterial roadways. The properties north of Lyman Boulevard are being developed with neighborhood commercial uses. This site transitions into the natural area which contributes to the Bluff Creek primary zone. Residential uses on this parcel would be in greater harmony with the City's vision for the development of the area. The majority of residents to the east are opposed to the development of additional commercial in the area. Issue: Don Halla: On the comer of Pioneer Trail and Highway 101 it's always been suggested that that would be a very good area for a small strip mall or convenience store and a high-rise retirement home in the southeast comer of the parcel. (December 4 2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 18) Response: The City is currently recommending support of commercial areas within one mile of this site. Staff does not support commercial development at every site at the intersection of arterial roadways. Access to the site is problematic. The residential development may be clustered depending on the future zoning of the property. Staff continues to recommend re- guiding of the property to Residential - Low Density. Historic Preservation - Chapter 3 Synopsis: Our goal is to promote the preservation and protection of valuable historic and cultural resources through community partnerships and collaborations with citizens, and non- profit state, federal, public and private entities. The City will identify where all of the historic properties in Chanhassen are located and the age of the structures and their significance, and encourage the preservation of these structures and development of buildings that compliment historic buildings. Issue: What is the role of the City in all of this? I think the City can bring more pressure to get the place preserved and they can do that through the ordinance process and inspections. What's the criteria? There isn't a lot of teeth in this right now. There's not a lot of commitment. (November 6,2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 29-34) Response: The City will identify historic property to evaluate the impact of development in the vicinity of such structures. The City will not own nor manage these properties. The City of Chanhassen will rely on Carver County to be the Historic Preservation Organization. Properties requesting a historic designation or funding will be directed to Carver County Historic Society. Between December 3, 1997 and April 27, 1998, the City undertook a study of "Old Town" and attempted to create a historic overlay district. Property owners opposed restrictions on their properties that would impose limitations on exterior improvements and remodeling. They welcomed guidelines but not ordinances. Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 5 of 11 Housing - Chapter 4 Synopsis: Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan analyzes the existing and projected housing needs of the City. The City has adopted the Metropolitan Council's Systems Statement, which includes population, households and employment projects. Additionally, the City has included data from the Comprehensive Housing Needs Assessment for Carver County prepared by Maxfield Research, Inc. Issue: What are the benefits for participation in the Livable Communities Act, LCA? (November 6, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 38-39) Response: Participation in the LCA permits the City to apply for grants from the Metropolitan Council. Through the annual review of the City's efforts at providing housing, we are scored on the achievement of our goals. The LCA goals and policies provide the City with targets on owner/rental housing, affordable and market rate and housing diversity. These targets and attempts provide the City with an opportunity to meet the full range of housing demand in a healthy community. Issue: Prices are rising because there's the demand for it in this community. (November 6, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 40) Response: Rising prices and demand are in response to market conditions. Since the downturn in the housing market, we have experienced a slowdown in development. Housing prices are often cyclical and dependent on the overall economy. During periods of rapid expansion, the mid to low-range housing prices tend to lead the demand. High housing values and rapid appreciation are not sustainable over the long term. Natural Resources - Chapter 5 Synopsis: The natural resources section identifies the important environmental amenities and attributes in the City and their corresponding issues. The main goals encompass identifying and preserving natural resources, protecting and improving surface water quality and wetlands, and increasing overall tree cover and maintaining the urban forest. Proper management of public natural resources is the overarching issue and critical to the success of Chanhassen retaining it's natural resources identity. It is recommended that a Natural Resources Management Plan be developed that would encompass the management strategies for all natural resources in the City, complement the Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan, and guide the City with the decision-making process for each issue. Issue: The goal to maintain a healthy and diverse forest and increase overall tree coverage. Is there more definition around those and direction for what we want to do? (October 2, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 14) Response: At the end of the chapter there are goals and then supporting the goals are policies which are more specific as how to get to that goal. So where you see increase tree cover, that is Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 6 of 11 where as a part of a public project we are going to increase boulevard plantings as part of a road improvement project or we are going to require increased plantings in subdivisions. Issue: Are we looking at new committees or new commissions? (October 2, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 14) Response: The Natural Resources Management Plan is envisioned like the development of the Bluff Creek Natural Resource Management Plan. Major stakeholders will be invited to participate in the development of that plan so that it becomes a wellspring of ideas from the residents and the businesses and the members of this community. Issue: We need to be much more comprehensive in terms of what we're thinking about relative to how we're dealing with surface water runoff. (December 4, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 16) Response: The City of Chanhassen realizes the importance of storm water management and has been actively implementing policies and practices to deal with the increases in storm water volume as land is developed or redeveloped within the City. In August of 2006 the City adopted the Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP). In addition to those goals specified in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the SWMP identifies seven goals ranging from Public Education to Water Quantity and each goal has a variety of policies associated with it. The City has enacted several policies which focus on larger geographic regions rather than site- specific considerations. One example of this is the Bluff Creek Overlay District. As Chanhassen completes their Nondegradation Plan, additional measures will be identified to address overall volume of storm water runoff within the City. Finally, the City will continue to work with Lake Associations, Homeowners Associations, other government agencies and local water authorities to address storm water volume issues within specific watersheds and the City of Chanhassen as a whole. This may include a hydrologic model for the entire Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed, developing standards for infiltration, wetland restoration and other best management practices to obtain an overall reduction in storm water volume. Issue: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has questioned whether the City's surface water management plan was incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan. Response: The City's Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan, SWMp2, was completed in August 2006 and adopted by the City Council. SWMP2 is referenced within the Comprehensive Plan, but is not incorporated in its entirety. Park & Recreation - Chapter 6 Synopsis: The Park and Recreation chapter of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan provides an overview and an analysis of the City's existing system. It identifies objectives and policies that will guide park and recreation decision making through the year 2030 as well as identifying key initiatives that will be completed to enhance the current park and trail systems. In our community, we have numerous non-city recreational facilities that play an integral role in fulfilling residents' recreational needs. Minnewashta Regional Park, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge, Raguet Wildlife Management Area, golf Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 7 of 11 courses and Camp Tanadoona are all important recreation destinations. Two regional trails owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority and managed primarily by Three Rivers Park District can be found in both the southern and northern tiers of the city. In addition, regional trails are located along State Highway 101 and State Highway 5. Issue: Carver County has provided the City with comments regarding the Parks & Open Space Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. (See attached email) Response: Staff believes that the draft Comprehensive Plan is appropriate and should be approved. Transportation - Chapter 7 Synopsis: The transportation chapter identifies the density and distribution of land uses in the community and their relationship to our transportation system. It provides a functional hierarchy of roadways for our community. It looks at system improvements that will be required within the community and looks at transit services that will be available, and finally it looks at an implementation program. The chapter is divided into six sections: the goals and policies, the land use, MUSA staging and projections, the existing systems, the forecast, alternate modes of transportation or transit, and implementation of goals and policies. Issue: Would it be possible to explain what is involved in a specific project and how it relates to the other infrastructure improvements contained in the Plan? (October 16, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 7-8) Response: The individual chapters describe the proposed improvements. Staff could expand the spreadsheet in Chapter 10, Capital Improvement Program (CIP), of the Plan to link the various improvements contained within a specific project. For example, the 2009 Lyman Boulevard Transportation project consists of widening Lyman Boulevard to four lanes and would include the 2009 Surface Water management street improvements, the 2008 Water Lyman Boulevard loop and the Parks & Open Space Lyman Boulevard trail improvement projects. The City annually prepares a five-year CIP, which goes into great detail about a specific project. That document has greater accuracy and more detail then is appropriate in a comprehensive plan. Staff has provided copies of corresponding projects in the 2008-2012 CIP. Issue: With bridges faIling being in the news, it might behoove us to put a paragraph in there about that our bridges are in satisfactory condition. Response: Bridges meeting the State of Minnesota definition are inspected according to the National Bridge Inspection Standard and are typically inspected everyone to two years depending on their condition. Issue: Straightening Highway 101. Response: The City is in the process of investigating funding for the required studies to realign Highway 101 south. Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 8 of 11 Sanitary Sewer - Chapter 8 Synopsis: Chapter 8 of the comprehensive plan is Sanitary Sewer. The sanitary sewer plan presents the existing sanitary infrastructure and the general location and size of future sanitary sewer infrastructure under fully-developed conditions. Issue: The revised Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) phasing map represents a significant change from the MUSA phasing plan contained in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Additional narrative should be included within the Plan explaining the basis for the change. (October 16, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 12-15) Response: A lift station on the Powers Boulevard extension south of Lyman Boulevard and forcemain from this lift station along the Highway 212 corridor was identified during the last Comprehensive Plan update. During the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update it was determined that timely development of the area directly south of the 2010 MUSA would be necessary to provide financial payback for the considerable cost to install the infrastructure. Secondly, the alignment of the forcemain along the old Highway 212 corridor has been shifted. Originally, the forcemain and sewer would run north through the Bluff Creek Drive corridor to the lift station on the Powers Boulevard extension. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan update shows the forcemain necessary to service this area within the Highway 101 corridor. This change was presented to reduce the depth of the trunk sanitary sewer. There is not enough developable land in the 2020 Comprehensive Plan for the 2010 MUSA to carry us for five years. There is a significant City investment required to extend urban services and there is a need to expand the service area that may connect to the system in a timely manner. Additionally, there are failing septic systems that should be replaced with a centralized sewer system. The Planning Commission requested that staff have an additional neighborhood meeting to discuss the MUSA phasing, land use and Highway 101. Approximately 220 notices were mailed to property owners of the meeting, which was held on November 5, 2007 in the Fountain conference room in City Hall. The meeting was well attended and it appeared that residents' questions were being addressed. Issue: When we design for capacity are we going to be okay if our land use were to change? (October 16,2007 Planning Commission Minutes page 20) Response: The capacity for sanitary sewer and water was analyzed for that area (the proposed regional mall location), and it was determined that medium density development would produce higher sewer flows than a regional mall based on the preliminary information. In addition, sanitary sewers are designed for peak flows, not average flows, so there is a factor of safety intrinsic to the sewer design. Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 9 of 11 Water - Chapter 9 Synopsis: Chapter 9 of the Comprehensive Plan is Water. The water plan identifies the existing trunk and lateral watermain and wells within the City. The general alignment and size of future trunk watermain and the general location of future well sites and future water towers is also shown. Issue: The City has experienced water supply drying up and we have had two wells go dry and the aquifer's dropping. Does the Plan address the state of the aquifer? How are we going to encourage future conservation or what kind of guidelines are we going to put in place? (October 16, 2007 Planning Commission Minutes pages 17-19) We need to educate the public that you've got to get these numbers down, which means you may not be watering your lawns as much anymore. Response: The two wells that went dry were in a drift aquifer. Drift aquifers are not as deep as the main aquifer. Future wells are not proposed within drift aquifers. Staff is working with the City Council to determine which conservation practices are most suitable for our community. Council adopted a tiered water rate, meaning that the more water a customer uses, the higher the rate. The City has an emergency management and conservation plan that the DNR is reviewing. The Plan consists of three parts: water supply, emergency response and water conservation. Attached is the water conservation plan being reviewed as well as the DNR response. We are applying for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Educational Grant funds related to water conservation. Capital Improvements - Chapter 10 Synopsis: The Capital Improvement program (CIP) Chapter provides a systematic assessment of the timing and magnitude of improvements that will be required to implement the comprehensive plan. Based on the Chanhassen City Council's approval of the 2008-2012 CIP, staff has prepared a revision to the CIP incorporating the changes. Additionally, staff has revised the table to link projects to show the interrelated nature of the CIP. However, detailed descriptions of the potential projects are not appropriate within the Comprehensive Plan since they are dealt with in the City's five-year CIP. Jurisdictional Review To date, the City has received waivers of future comments on the City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan from the following jurisdictions: Eden Prairie, Independent School District 276, Minnetonka, and Shakopee. Planning Commission January 15,2008 Page 10 of 11 RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as modified with the revisions to Chapter 7, Water, to incorporate additional language on water conservation; Sanitary Sewer, Chapter 8, to incorporate language regarding the reason for the changes to the MUSA phasing plan; and Capital Improvements, Chapter 10, incorporating the revised CIP table and authorize submittal of the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review." A TT ACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 2, 2007, pages 9-24. 2. Planning Commission Minutes dated October 16, 2007, pages 3-20. 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated November 6,2007, pages 27-43. 4. Planning Commission Minutes dated November 20,2007, pages 16-43. 5. Planning Commission Minutes dated December 4,2007, pages 1-24. Land Use Attachments 1. Land Use Amendment Map and Narrative. 2. Parcel # 14 Aerial Photograph. 3. Epic Development Comments dated Received January 4,2008. 4. Site Plan for Galpin Crossing. 5. Thibault Associates Comments dated September 28, 2007 for Galpin Crossing. 6. Parcels 33, 34 and 36 "Mall" Site Aerial Photography. 7. Email from Jay Seltun dated 08/01/07 (against). 8. Email from Kelly Seltun dated 07/30/07 (against). 9. Email from Eric Swanson dated 11/30/07 (for with concerns). 10. L.D. Martin & Associates, Ltd. Dated 11/16/07 (for). 11. Email from Bev Fiedler dated 11/30/07 (for). 12. Letter from Sharlene Downs, State Farm Agent, dated 11/27/07 (for). 13. Letter from Becky Clauson dated 11/30/07 (for). 14. Letter from Rick Dorsey (for). 15. Letter from Maxfield Research, Inc. dated 12/03/07. 16. Letter from Senior Housing Partners dated 12/04/07 (against). 17. Petition dated Received 11/19/07 (for). 18. Parcel #42 Memorandum from SRF Consulting Group dated 08120/07. 19. Aerial Photograph from Westwood: Macro Context/Land Use Plan. 20. Aerial Photograph from Westwood: Site Analysis Plan. 21. Aerial Photograph from Westwood: Concept Plan - Corporate Campus Mixed Use. 22. Tax Capacity Analysis. 23. Letter and Power Point Slides from Brighton Corporation dated 11/20/07. 24. Email from Dan and Sally Ryan dated 12/04/07 (against). 25. Email from Tiffany and Pete McIntosh dated 12/05/07 (against). 26. Email from Don Halla to Kate Aanenson dated December 13, 2007. Planning Commission January 15, 2008 Page 11 of 11 27. Email from Peter Moe with the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum dated 11/12/07 (for). Natural Resources Attachments 1. Email from Mike Wyatt (MCWD) to Kate Aanenson dated 10/12/07. Parks & Open Space Attachments 1. Email from Todd Hoffman to Todd Gerhardt, et aI, dated 01/03/08. 2. Email from C.J. Woodrow to Kate Aanenson dated 10/14/07. Transportation Attachments 1. Email from Mary Ann White to Kate Aanenson dated 11/21/07. Water Attachments 1. DNR Grant Application 2. Letter to Kelly Janes from Julie Ekman (DNR) dated June 12,2007. 3. Water Emergency and Conservation Plan. Capital Improvement Program Attachments 1. Revised City of Chanhassen Capital Improvement Program 2030 Comprehensive Plan. 2. 2008-2012 CIP selected projects. g:\plan\2008 comp plan\pc memo OI-15-08.doc . F- /I8f'-'-'-'-'~:~~r~-';:';~--'-:~-:~~--.:.~'-':~~::-'-'~'-.7'-.-7---.-j-.-.1-------:::.:=:--:::-;~~--.~c;__--.-.-;:;-=.-~. . :-I7"-'-.----::--T::-;-"":;".'j. I.. ~"'2 "'\-.' 'O.i 0........ - . .- o. ~ '.'" .- ~... I .. i . .. .... !--.-- i.' ',' . ....... w.. / """'l' ....."'...... '. ........""'. .-.", ~-~~ /..~ '. ,g.; ~';---i~.li,J{~. <;l .-..- -~ ~",...:~.~.\:::{'~\. ':,;Ia ." < 0.. :_!.:/ ~-:'?~..:;~.;:."---.i~ ~1 ~.1 . :..;~~:~':". \.'- .--':~~.~1 J/ }' t.J.. "<.I..r':~-.",~.-..~t::~~ ~~~j.~< '.;....:~:t~~i ~ .._. L_",.t- I .' ..r.., . -4" A. :I .. .....t'~.,,-..,.'''''''....,o:J'''s, _ c.r..~~"_J;.~;,t;:~ /c.<I' ~. ~Q'''' ._...'t:'~ eo..". ,t.,\.,...;.." c......1 / ,:.--..~i~";;:5~~.~i~~?~ ~- :irL:~".J p~f;:I':::-;:- " a J-:;' :L~Jjij~;:'~~'5 '.' r;~' ~~~\i' ;~. ~I i', ,~..~(: ;:"l;;~~,~t.""'~):~~,~;;:;~;~";;ft -~~i:r / .:'-. 'i' oi '.' ..! 4b"" :';.. 1!.........J,.~' k......"......,.. I',' .~.",..\ "'-..:' "'. 'I'r'-f'~ """'''''; ~ . :f."".,....~! ;''t " ( ----- . .4l.,.......I.-. j t.,' . ~.,D ...... '.~......' ;',1\ . ~'\. 0#0 NonII ..~. .:' i'. /~ ~c:::.::;;:,~_~ \ ';"" '<.~'" /"'-~i j,ij';";_-:.~-~y/t\;,~~,';y ~ "...<"tr= tt~J 'I~~;rt"l ~"..:. 0 -t7 t~,~" \)'~i-it~~\B?~;>-' (~! ~~;tl-~~\ OHW'H' <_,hM 8, ':.\\~ ?~~ a';:~::'~'~" \ ":~f> .~;f,;~~'~:\~~l~:\V.~ ~ ~,,3~:;~;! II " -- /~~ r. ' .~'L.:.-9 "099, 1.0.."", , i l:' 't. \.,. ~~-". """, ... ,( - ...~....." ! .fw.. "'.'1"" ~ ,/-'1 --- . I '"" " OHW ,,,. , -<'~" 1 I .;i,:,'" .,:' j,~. ." _ '0""-. ') \1 J -0 i i1fl..'''~~;~1.-7;t:~.- -..- ,/- ~,~ ",:.,~.:~.'-'~~~.:.~r.5~~~~:?':_~ .:i7. ~,~~~ I. 7'~='\-~.:'~.'-i, I -.~ OHW t -- --' l'):;~ r -:!",..~.-.~.:,);~.~o,~'> ,~- .. '0;;'" o._~~:","', ... '. " . ,~" '>_~' 94'2'.....g~'-:-...._'Y '"' _ '-'V' \ Gru__d ,.~."_'..J.~ -'.~~i.:-J"'-'r-'_~. L ~"~-.7":.'~' I . ,,~ (,;.,>.~. ? r .. 12 "...--... ~~"""-;' (f.. "."'..,-.. ~.'~ ;;..., .(. "".."! L..:::-' ':!~~: .4i6.1- l---".;"-=-':I' ~~Q.'O' 'f' -;_~~O. w~ ~~\;;~t'''~~,f.T:.POi~; l:;~ ~ ! -.S~:~~ ..... .,:=::-:'-_::3 C\oo.. ~ ~\"...:... ~ ..,:~ Ann ~ -,. _.:1:" ~.Y)I,-{,_Jo,._..~"". .<....... .i '..' ....:t-:-', " .. 1:1 -,., .....to:'w OHW955,5 ~ \~;""~} ,~I'1."'/'~"'::.-::':::;~)\ ~ -~;~_<:. I J~'" ,i'lo" ,~. '~'~~'.::::~:.;i'2'! '\ ~ :: _':^''- . "0' '_, ! ''',\;-'' '"" OHW""f i ^~"'_/jtl~~ ~~ . ).~-~:'.~~~ ;=~. 1~~~'/']; ".r::.~:..'.':::~~o'Er~\- v./ r~~.~ ;~'~'~~<'~~~~i "~"~~l ':.."",,. 'f, == !!:t. t ~tl;U."..-:. 14 "",,", ....~..-., ".J::rnY~J-1 I~:"":~.~i{:-:-d'-"'} .1,'~~-'~~'~ ~ .,{ :~~~:..." ~v "....~15.:' t.J :::~::-.:.. ..A~:~!fn.o' i illi'!':"." ::'~. ..... i ...~---..~. A"'~,"m'oo~~~..,~~_ ._~~ .. 21 ,<':T.\.--.....:...A::.r';~~~f'.-TP., '......; mo. ! 18 . ':..r. :::::: .:J=:~."".:;~~ :;::::~:..;~';'.I.. ~"."..{; ....". w .~....~ '" .. -;::- 281 i '- ~~....., ,.,iI.... .'" ,.~. ~'...o..., .. 0- '! .f"-., .' . ;;-..- "0 I" - '-.'-:1'~ .'. -- . - ~2i7 .'7:1:__ <::=.- . I -~' .... ~ n-- >114' ~,~ . ~ I :\1inn('~:tJ.Llnd~'dP(,Arbor(,lum. i m.t' o.w. _ ~I'. \'''''_~O'. ..'.:.'...... _.~~~!-f. -,:- . ':.'J~_i_:'}?""'iFf----- J & ...... N.no_ ;1 \ /........ ',", '''1... .....r'.---.-..~c. ..... ~.,.. ~~ t ...; I Wa2nd~ ,,"~..,;n,"',,,,,,, .' -,'~.J oj, _\.I~ 25 \',~: f ) ...... 'f ~; I ,.---- .----------;..........~~ "'.., 0,-, "<;> g.t ""lM.":"~' " . '0"'" ....'_~~" ./(..t1.!" ',",I:, ~_',O<" f \ ' ~ ;:=~ P.k \ v' t' - h.... ;..!J I I> "," 'C:'-' , , '. - ...._. '- . ._,,' t./.1 / I- - "'...1'-... '1 . "'''"'''" '~'_(H ~._ - ;J-"'-"'':.r"" -'. " i --,.. ......~~::::' ..-~-t_;_' . 'b: ,-,,, ~.~.'e:g 7' .. I' .c~.;,~ ~~ ! i:..:::>~~. co, uj.lli~.. ..;).,,; 1 -----,.- . \'"' -., ... ~. --_/ . ~ ,,'" .<', ,..,. .~'V. ."" ';:-"1- I > L ~ .... I II l ~,~i"~ '-. 'l j,,~;lti~.!/!.l\t.~~j~I'~~...:.'.~~t.~ OHIN88U ~!-':.... ''-ld<. .... 3 ...~...o_ i i "":t',...,,...:" -;''-(~:~_h'''-'''~:\ .....-~~~-J> :.::;:.:!.., 1 i :: ~. ~-",,: 1i':~'jTt'~~>t~-~i{~' ::./ /, ".;..:-:':~L~L.__' t t' - ~-I"! .. . '.< ."," ,'~ [" ......,. .,', '3~ ~,.".--.. I I ^ 'j '.. ......~. ',." >,. .' .t '. - t"::; t_ .f::.. ....-..."'_.. ,~ 'U .' J .1. .\",,,,. .'- '. ,'. " , _ '," '. ......, .. " I I I~:", --:~;-'~~ fr ',\, c ~.~'s....."..~~- l' . ,f ~~\,.\j;.f -",:'''::'.!~~}':' --:.' ; 1/// .If' ?" :ii{ ;]I i .~~V~' ',V l. ...~~'~'. }:=;:::L-:; !~'f~t.l;l .'~.'~ , ~ P' (1" . ,l ."" '.'.;t ._..~. """,,", " ~ : ..i T., "'f<-" ~, 1.. L.r r, ............ '.,.... II .. , Q~<f,;* ~ ~/:::_~'i . "r1 " I ! . '. ,.,. . ' __~:}".;{{~:7:?; ,,::'4::1,] 3 8 2/ - Innl~:r. -~ :...L.. '-'.) \ M .;~~"':~:' l City of Chanhassen '.<::Om.,.... I':L.~.~: I ,/ ! , i ......__e.t 1~-04~" Land Use Amendments . November . December i I .....""U,.- I I I i i I i i i i /) /~ , ~12 /,/,/ /-r-, t--I" // I I ,/ ,/// ~~'(>\()'" ~// I //"" t....,/ II] Removed * Potential Fi re Station . Potential Support Commerical -+. November 13, 2007 s G:\EngVolccnlPlanning\BobILU IssucsIMap2 ..... ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. ~ -- ... ,... .. f · ......:. ~ BLUFF CR.CCK 901 North Th',d Street Suile 220 612-43&4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612~92-9960 u ,.;,", ...... " --...... . . ~~...~" - \" Mark Revision / Issue Date ....... -... ....... 2 I .....0, '-'tJPlj that :PIs ~lO\. IJPe'lflc..Ctlorl. Q(' report - pr.pcr~ bj ~ 0<" ~ "'J dlrec.t ~ior\ t7'd tfIot I Q'Ol 0 Gtil~ l~ HcJo,~t ..,-der- the IcMs du-..~cf~. ~tod~,~l...~ ~"".:- Dote, l..k.-""U ., GALPIN CROSSING CHANHASSEN, MN ::_- SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" - - ~ PRO..!:" T HJM6E.R 1s.$;~O DA TE, ~B"r", GHEoc:.eo 6"', 01-10i3-G"1 11-8-07 BLD -" ~ ~ KA -~ TRuNK HIGHWA Y No. 5 A1-D Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2006 EXCERPT FROM CHANHASSEN COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES MAP June 25, 2007 i .. - - rol) \.. tt... .... ..... ~ -1..~. - ,- 1;<. ....) t'! r' t", ''t. .,.-s...c.,4 . .. . .. . . . . , .. "' !:I '~ "'("" ''''.,l..>:t.''.I......... 'll ....N \>li/ :k~, IF ('!."'h"t./ ~"'r.\n" 1\, (!;; j "\,'$i.~ lif _i ;;i.i~';" ~i :.; ~. : ":{~'~I . . ~' .....I.'iI,*. "'.f .' .M ~ +.ii~,~ ~'i .. II m.. w A - Central Business District B - Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial r'1 C - Community Commercial I!! D - Regional/lifestyle Center 'Thibault 1'I",llIU1" ',",,"Iulllu'nt ASSOCIATES '" 1-4-08 . A - Central Business District B B - Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial t-, C - Community Commercial II D - Regional/Lifestyle Center .... .., EXCERPT FROM MAP 1 CHANHASSEN RETAIL, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL McComb Group, Ltd. - June 2006 .~" ,fh,. , . Shopping Areas D 0.5 1 1.5 2 ~ . N Scale: 1.. 1.3E. mlle-s EPIC SUGGESTION September 2007 . \. "'t, . . .. .. . .. ,,;lI\!l .... EPIC REQUEST January 2008 Based on review and consideration after the Planning Commission meeting of December 4, 2007 ,..u~~W t :.~1 .. "';'4jIl( -. Ii' - ! , ~. 10 . . .......3'), ;; .'..... ,-",... 1 ~.~. ,. . I t \.~ ~ -.. , \~ , '''.:t. ~ , ~4rt ~,., ~ " - ~.. "'.: .... COUNTY 19 -, ~ ~ ') Il .. Q- Thibault Plannin~ J)c\'clllpment ASSOCIATES LLC. GALPIN CROSSING NW Corner of State Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard To: Perry Ryan, Rich Ragatz and Gary Collyard Epic Development XVI, LLC Bill Thibault, AICP September 28, 2007 Response to Kate Aaneson's letter to Perry Ryan dated August 8, 2007 From: Date: Re: I REQUEST You have asked for our comments to Kate's response to matters we covered in our report dated July 9, 2007. Our comments are based on further research of City data, additional field inspections of the site and other areas (including the developments Kate refers to) and analysis of the conditions and sound land use practices. Attachment 1 Overview and Analysis, depicts many of the relevant factors and characteristics related to the analysis and responses. I REVIEW AND RESPONSE 1. ISLAND PLANNING CONSULTANT July 9, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 1. Island- This site is an island (8 acres) located between State Highway 5, Galpin Boulevard and West 78th Street. 1. Island - The fact that the site is an island is moot in that directly across Highway 5 is a residential development (Autumn Ridge) adjacent to a state Highway and a collector road, and also Arboretum Village located on the northeast comer of Highways 5 and 41. 1. Island - This remains to be a critical consideration because of its size coupled with the way that West 78th Street wraps around it, creating the island. Autumn Ridge and Arboretum Village have relevant differences. Autumn RidQe Autumn Ridge differs in several relevant respects. · Coulter Boulevard does not wrap around it. · Chanhassen Nature Preserve abuts it to the west, a highly complimentary use to residential. · Shape and size- Autumn Ridge is slightly larger with more 1 usable space. · Road and traffic are more residential. · Bluff Creek Elementary School and Recreation Center Park are across the street to the east. These uses are significantly more favorable for residential on the south side of Highway 5 than are the uses on the north side of Highway 5 where, for example, the use is commercial on the east. Arboretum Villaqe · Arboretum Village is 360% larger than Galpin Crossings, counting just that part south of 78th Street West. · University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum is to the west and southwest. · Only a small percent of the units are relatively close to the highway and a large mature woods (over 5.6 acres) is preserved. 2. TRANSPORTATION PLAN PLANNING 2. Transportation Plan- This plan designates State Highway 5 as an CONSULTANT arterial and Galpin Boulevard and West 78th Street are designated as July 9, 2007 collectors, adding to the island and detachment characteristics of this area. 2. Transportation Plan - Same response as above. CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 2. Transportation Plan - Consider that: West 78th Street, a frontage road, is not the same as Coulter Blvd, the collector on the south which is more like a residential related collector. Substantial differences are: Street Len~ · West 78 Street extends from west of County Road 41 to east Highway 101 and runs through downtown Chanhassen. Length of continuity: More than 3.6 miles. · Coulter Boulevard extends from Century Boulevard to Audobon Road, passing through the Nature Center and going along the public school site and public park. Length of continuity: 1.4 miles. Street Width · West 78th Street width of roadway at Galpin Crossings = 54 feet at median and 41 feet west of median. · Coulter Boulevard width of roadway at Autumn Ridge = 36 feet Street Character · West 78th Street - Very commercial look; flat road, broad concrete median extends 340 feet west of intersection. · Coulter Boulevard - Residential road, narrow, dips with topography, no median. 2 3. WEST 78th STREET PLANNING 3. West 78th Street- This street functions as a frontage road. The south CONSULTANT parcel being a relatively small pocket of property located between the July 9, 2007 frontage road and a signalized intersection with State Highway 5 is more appropriate for a Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial use than it is for a Residential Low-Density use. CITY- KATEAANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 4. NOISE PLANNING CONSULTANT July 9, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 3. West 78th Street - While this is a col/ector road, there are other residential developments on this frontage road including Walnut Grove, Arboretum Village, and Highlands on Bluff Creek. Also, Autumn Ridge is located on the southern frontage road on Highway 5 (Coulter Boulevard). 3. West 78th Street - a. Autumn Ridoe - See response under item 1 above. b. Walnut Grove - · The frontage road does not wrap around it. · The entire development (over 30 acres) is located on the outside of the frontage road - not between the frontage road and Highway 5. · Site is about 10 feet higher than is Highway 5. · Landscape berm (about 40 feet) and a local road are located between the townhouses and West 78th Street, and Highway 5 is beyond the frontage road. · Doesn't have an overhead high voltage line. · Closest distance from townhouses to Highway 5 is about 150 feet. The average distance is over 800 feet. c. Arboretum Villaoe - West 78th Street steps back a distance of about 1,200 feet from Highway 5 in one stretch compared to a maximum of about 800 feet for Galpin Crossing. The resultant land area is 360% larger. d. Hiohlands on Bluff Creek -- · The frontage road does not wrap around it. · The development is on a hill with many mature trees between the highway and the development. · Although the development is small, it has residential and open space around it. It appears and functions much like being a part of Arboretum Village. 4. Noise- Noise associated with traffic volumes and speeds of automobiles and trucks on Highway 5 support commercial use and rule against a residential use given the size and location of the site. 4. Noise - Construction techniques were used in aI/ of the above projects to provide noise attenuation. '3 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 4. Noise- The City and developer have done a good job in using berms, landscaping, setbacks and in some case preserving existing mature trees to reduce noise impacts. Significant points and differences when comparing the developments in Kate's letter with Galpin Crossings are: Autumn Ridqe Only about 9% of the development units are close to Highway 5. No doubt noise is an issue for some of these units. Arboretum Villaqe · Only a small portion of the development is relatively close to the highway. · Closest units are about 150 feet from Highway 5. · Development is on a hill with many mature trees between the townhouses and Highway 5. Arboretum Village CommerCial ~:.....,.;~. .~~.~. '-$';;.';';~"l:_':;';. ,,;;,;:.;.. ,-,;., .~ _ .,:,,~ II .. - ~.~"" -~~...~J:~.:.ii '. . -= "rE.. ..,... ~ .~I -.- .- Walnut Grove · Only a small proportion of the development is relatively close to the highway. · Closest units are about 150 feet from Highway 5. · Development is on a hill with a landscape berm which reduces nOise. Berm West 78th Street ROW State Highway 5 Walnut Grove 4 Hiqhlands on Bluff Creek · The 2006 MDT on Highway 41 is about half (17,000) of the volume on Highway 5 (32,000). To the east Highway 5 has a volume of 50,000 west of Highway 101. · Site on a hill with mature trees between the townhouse and the highway preserved. ~, 5f\~'.... ~ t;~1""'" 1...:- r='-\t~~.d'~:;'" "',..,..~~~><:"'1:1''' , . lL1-}!. ", . ,6,.,......:.~ ":."'" r-- 'H: '1 r..-- . ~ ~ "7~~'"~' T' .~, .Of -~..... ~J.A~r __ .,.,.- =-- - Galpin Crossing Galpin Crossing is a flat site, no stand of mature trees (a few trees exist), and, of course, it has all the other non-residential attributes identified in this report. Creating a similar hill and berm similar to the other sites would leave insufficient area for development. 5. HIGH VOLTAGE UTILITY PLANNING 5. High Voltage Utility- The location and presence of above ground CONSULTANT high voltage electrical service lines along the south and west property July 9, 2007 lines tend to support a commercial use and rule against a residential use given the size and location of the site. CITY- KATE MNESON August8,2007 5. High Voltage Utility - There is high tension power line that runs throughout the city. There are numerous subdivisions that abut this line. 5 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 5. High Voltage Utility - The overhead high voltage line (about 70 feet high) runs along the entire west and south sides of the site. Commercial is not suggested everywhere there is high voltage. Perhaps setbacks and open space can ameliorate impacts at some locations. On the subject property, it's the cumulative impact of all the factors which support a non-residential use. Given its flatness, shape and small size, the space necessary to ameliorate impacts would result in insufficient remaining critical mass for establishing a viable residential or non- commercial use. \ \\ ~, ;' I ~1! - - I Y--'I , ~~-~. I r 6. HISTORICAL USE PLANNING 6. Historical Use- Historically the site has had recreational/commercial CONSULTANT uses. A concept plan for a family activity center was approved in 2003. July 9,2007 In 2005, a concept plan for bank and office uses was approved. CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSUL TANT September 28, 2007 6. Historical Use - This site did have a driving range and a miniature golf course but that use no longer exists. The site was a given the conditional use because it was agriculturally zoned and did not have municipal utilities. The land use designation has either been agricultural or residential. Commercial land use designation has never been approved on this site. 6. Historical Use - We realize only remnants of the former driving range and miniature golf course remain. During the time these two uses operated as a commercial business, the then existing land use can fairly be described as commercial. Previously existing land use has some relevance and is a separate matter from the designation on the comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance. (As known, the approved Concept Plan includes bank and office uses.) 7. COMMERCIAL (BANK/OFFICE) CONCEPT PLAN PLANNING 7. Commercial (Bank/Office) Concept Plan- On November 15, 2005 CONSULTANT the Planning Commission conducted a hearing on the concept plan for July 9, 2007 bank and office uses and unanimously adopted Findings of Fact and 6 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 Recommendation for approval. On December 12, 2005 the City Council approved (4-0 vote) the concept plan for bank and office uses. 7. Commercial (Bank/Office Plan) Concept Plan - Your conceptual approval in December of 2005 has no legal standing. As stated in the city code "Approval of the concept statement shall not obligate the city to approve the final plan or any part thereof or to zone the property to a planned unit development district". (See 20-517(c)). 7. Commercial (Bank/Office Plan) Concept Plan -- We are aware of the wording in Section 20-517(c). The City Council's approval of the concept plan is what it is. We believe the City Council's approval was a rational action taken after: · Submission of an application and plan by EPIC Development XVI. · City staff recommended the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Concept. · A public hearing by the Planning Commission. · Findings of Fact and a recommendation of approval by the Planning Commission · Consideration and approval (4-0) by the City Council. At the time the Council approved the Concept, it was known that submitting a PUD plan would involve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change. 8. COMMERCIAL CENTER TO EAST PLANNING CONSULTANT July 9, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 8. Commercial Center to East- The conditions and rationale for the commercial area at the northeast corner (CVS Pharmacy, Kwik Trip service station, car wash and convenience store) mirrors the subject property. Thus, the subject property meets the applicable rationale for commercial use. In fact, the Market Study treats both sides of Galpin as a single shopping area. (Market Study: Map 1, page 4, Table 1, page 5, page 6, and last paragraph on page 52.) On page 52 of the Market Study it states: · "Retail development at the two retail locations west of downtown along TH-5 are likely to fill in with either convenience or destination retail and services that cannot be accommodated in Downtown Chanhassen. The development opportunities in these two areas are limited by available land for retail or service uses." 8. Commercial Center to the East - Since the conclusion of the market study, SRF Consulting was hired to review the city's commercial zoning. As part of the study it is clear that this city does not want to create strip highway commercial in the city. Specific sites were identified to provide for additional commercial zoning (Galpin and Arboretum). 8. Commercial Center to the East- · The SRF study results made available seem to be the commercial matrix of definitions and commercial examples. The map of 7 various commercial areas revised June 25, 2007 is from staff and not yet acted on or approved by the Planning Commission. (This is my understanding based on review and discussion with Kate Aanenson.) · The east and west sides of Galpin north of Highway 5 should be considered as a single neighborhood commercial area as outlined in the McComb report and as shown on Map 1 of the report. (An excerpt is on page 8 of this report.) · The commercial area can be contained to prevent strip commercial zoning along the north side of Highway 5 because of the already developed property and city/state owned land to the east and west. · The two sites at Galpin only amount to a total of 11.61 acres (3.76 acres on the east (Lot 1 = 1.86, Lot 2 = 1.9 acre), and 7.85 acres (Galpin Crossing) on the west). No additional commercial is likely or possible to the east because the city owns the property, nor to the west because of the public right-of-way, Arboretum Village and preserved open space, and the U of M property. · The total lineal distances from the east end of the existing shopping area to the west end of Galpin Crossing including Galpin Boulevard is only 1,120 lineal feet - not enough in a suburban setting to be called strip commercial zoning when public property abutting the site to the east and west prevent any further commercial. In fact, between downtown and the west City limits, there is no other opportunity for commercial development between the north side of Highway 5 and the frontage road, except for Galpin Crossing. All other vacant property is right-of- way or publicly owned. (See Attachment 1.) EXCERPT FROM CHANHASSEN COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORIES MAP .. }".., . A, Central Business District . B, Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial . C' Community Commercial . D - Regional/Lifestyle Center EXCERPT FROM MAP 1 CHANHASSEN RETAil, OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL McComb Group, Ltd. - June 2006 ...l> -i~.l L ',~ T7~c.',_ f..' c 'll~ ) -.... -_.- ...../.,.( iii' ~ ~ T'!: J. I --~." .4 r y t ~___ ._.l/. \J<i.i--. I',~II L! ';',~;c ~J--t1"]' ~ (-..... --.". ..A'.__ ~, ':=- --:;:~]-. ;s: l~L;::.. ~'-"" ." C> '-'- /, ~ t '0,,7<"' l"" ...._. _ .._a.... I 1 If'''- L__ -.l._ -' /" :.\.1 ;-...' ~f' j I~, ;::'+'!.-.J ~ T3 ~ ... ,-. ~_ .. I,' oW. _ I I ~ -;..;<,. 1 ':a. I ". ,-,,c;...,, ...r, " ..,-;' .:JI _ '"' ~L 1_'" ~ '" .. ( :=1, '.',.~ , -"'oo1i ;;:'~ Xllr:~/r~ W:1Bth ~ 1- ~tp,:. T";-~ 3. 8a!pn. 1 =-'l~{; . -""'"J=: -'_) r ~ j "'.. ~;'.- ;'f~'-.~ . .~::. ~~~. 'f - -'- ,.-L ~.~ rr j'o( ..... f I ". /. \, c.,j" _ ~~~\-OIlJ:UJ.s~e}l/c \', , 130Llh Do<mlo,'m I,>'" III I ,~. _./ 'i,'j.\..~41j )~, I ~.)!- _ \. 1,._ ._,__~ ./ ~~ '!-~-" J ,{ ~ 4~,........., r--- "-., . Shopping Ar~~ ~ C O.~ 1 1 ; 2 I:' ~ ~':;'3 €: ~.. - 1.,): nilE:; 8 9. MARKET STUDY PLANNING CONSULTANT July 9, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August8,2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 9. Market Study- The Chanhassen Retail, Office and Residential Market Analysis and Development Potential (Market Study) designates the intersection of Galpin Boulevard on the north side of Highway 5 as a commercial area (Map 1, page 4) and describes it on page 6 as copied below: · "TH-5 and Galpin, two miles west of Downtown Chanhassen, presently has only a Kwik Trip gas/convenience store and CVS Pharmacy in the northeast quadrant of the intersection. The northwest quadrant has 15 acres that is undeveloped. This area may attract future commercial development." (Emphasis added.) 9. Market Study - The McComb Study identified the other side of the street as commercial. The McComb study does recommend adding office development along the Highway 5 corridor. 9. Market Study -- · The McComb study identifies the intersection of Galpin and Highway 5 as a single commercial area (See Map 1, Table 1, page 6). · McComb describes both sides of Galpin in their description (page 6). · The McComb Group makes the statement that "This area may attract future commercial development.". (Emphasis added.) KATE'S ADDITIONS CITY - KATE'S ADDITIONS KATE AANESON 1. The Highway 5 Corridor Study Land Use recommendations have August 8, 2007 several guiding principals, one of which was that "the central business district should remain compact and well defined. Retail uses are to be largely confined to this part of the city." Development scenarios were created for those properties along the corridor. Attached is a scenario for this site. PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 1. Highway 5 Corridor Study Land Use Review of the principles on page 17 also includes the following: · "The physical and natural resource characteristics of each property are important considerations in determining its most suitable use. This last premise also figured heavily in the parcel site analysis found within this chapter." The above principle and statement are important because the scenario (Concept B) shows golf related or single family in a 1 Q-acre space at Galpin Crossing. However, consider: 9 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 · The private property is only 7.85 acres - not large enough for single family or residential use, given the site conditions. (The Concept shows 10 acres.) · The attached scenario Kate refers to is dated 1993. · If golf driving range and miniature golf with outdoor lighting is an option, then neighborhood commercial with a quality design is reasonable - especially given all the characteristics of the site. Th 1 Sd . Selected Sites North Side of HiQhway 5 From e 993 tu j~ USE IN CONCEPT EXISTING LOCATION 1993 USE 2007 1. The northeast quadrant of Highway 5 A - Multifamily and Highway 41 B - Office Townhouses C - MFR/Office Max 2. Northwest quadrant of Century and A - Office Highway 5 B -Institutional Ponding and C - Neighborhood Open Space Commercial 3. Northeast quadrant of Century and Concept A Highway 5 Office or Institutional -------------------------- Concept B Retail A - Low profile office B - Institutional 4. Subject property - Northwest Concept B quadrant of Highway 5 and Galpin A - Golf related No active use B - Single Family Residential 2. As a part of the most recent commercial land use study by SRF Consulting, strip commercial was also recommend against along major transportation corridors. The city's goals should be to provide additional commercial in or adjacent to the central business district or the potential regional mall/lifestyle center. 2. A fair statement regarding strip commercial zoning as a general matter to avoid. In discussing this with Kate today, there isn't a published study but there is the commercial matrix with definitions and examples. There is also a map showing commercial locations which I believe the staff provided but which has not been acted on and approved by the Planning Commission or City Council. The question here is the size and shape of a commercial area at Galpin. See comments under Commercial Center to the East. 3. To the west is a residential development. A commercial development on this site would have noise and visual impacts on these homes. The commercial on the east side dedicated the wooded area north of Highway 5 to create a natural buffer. That is why this site was selected for the commercial zoning. 10 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August 8, 2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 CITY- KATE AANESON August8,2007 PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 3. Residential to west - · The existing neighborhood commercial at the northeast corner of Century Boulevard and West 78th Street already abuts the residential neighborhood. What about its noise and visual impacts? You have stated noise abatement provided for other developments. On the Galpin Crossing site, good site planning can address visual impacts. The noise from Highway 5 will likely trump the noise from the Galpin Crossing site. 4. The two areas of commercial zoning along Highway 5 outside of the central business district were selected because they provide the opportunity for "neighborhood commercial." Neighborhood Commercial is defined in the city code as intended to provide limited low-intensity neighborhood retail and service establishments to meet the daily needs of the residents. 4. Generally agree - There is only one neighborhood commercial location on the north side of Highway 5 at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard - 11-acres with a length of only 1,165 feet including the width of Galpin Boulevard and no future extension possible to the east or west because the property is public. (See the maps on page 8.) 5. The only access to the site is via West 71Jh Street, not off of Galpin boulevard. This makes it less desirable for commercial development. 4. Access - The site currently has: · Access is currently provided by a 3D-foot wide curb cut off Galpin Boulevard. · A 60-foot wide designated access, Mn/DOT Plat No. 10-14 (see sheet CP-1 Galpin Crossing). · The approved concept plan has a local road 30 feet wide intersecting with Galpin Boulevard at approximately the same location as the Mn/DOT access described above.. KATE'S "HOWEVER" PARAGRAPH CITY - However, I would be willing to recommend office or medium density on KATE AANESON the land south of West 7ffh Street. I would further encourage you to use August 8, 2007 the area north of West 7Eih for pervious surface or for residential density transfer, similar to other projects in the area. I will present this recommendation as well as your request as a part of the land use element. These hearing will be held later this fall. PLANNING CONSULTANT September 28, 2007 Kate's "However" Paragraph - I believe a well-designed PUD for office and some neighborhood commercial can be developed with neighborhood commercial on the east side with exposure to Highway 5 and which provides a soft transitional screen along the northwest side of the property. 11 I SUMMARY - CONCLUSION Field inspections, a review of City data including the approved concept for Galpin Crossing, analysis of the area, and applying sound planning principles support use of the site for neighborhood shopping and non-residential use. Its small size (7.85 acres), its island shape, ringing of the site by a combination of State Highway 5 (32,000 vehicles in 2006 and rising sharply to 50,000 to the east) and West 78th Street, a collector, the traffic signal, noise levels, the flatness of the site, absence of any significant on-site amenities, the 70-feet-tall overhead high voltage lines on the west and south sides of the site, adjacent neighborhood retail to the east, market factors, and the character of West 78th Street make this site suitable for office - neighborhood retail. This 7.85 acre island site constitutes the other half of the neighborhood commercial area at the north side of Highway 5 at Galpin Boulevard and as shown on Map 1 of the McComb report and as described on page 6 of the McComb report. A carefully thought-out PUD is recommended for the site - one with neighborhood retail on the east side with exposure to Highway 5 and Galpin Boulevard and which provides a soft transitional screen along the northwest side of the property. Zoning changes allowing neighborhood commercial on a portion of Galpin Crossing can be achieved while reducing the total lineal footage and total acres of neighborhood commercial. 12 ATTACHMENT 1 OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS UofM Apple/Pear Orchard Highlands on Bluff Creek R.O.W. Vacant Neighborhood Commercial Southwest Metro Transit Lake Ann Park Subject Property Galpin Crossing Gorra Eckankar Property Bytirlys R.O.W. ~ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Chanhassen Nature Preserve Bluff Creek Elementary School Autumn Ridge Thibault PI:lnnin~. l)l'n.'lupmCIII ASSOCIATES LI.t: 13 September 13, 2007 ! ------- Minor Arterial -------- Minor Collector I I I Street Connection 0' 300' 600' -------- N ....................................... Trail ----> View Corridor m c-...-c-.,bc. Plan A: Connected Erhart Properly Conceptual Site Plans City of Chanhassen, MN Figure 1 Job # 5978 Date 08{17107 ~ l~ en o c ~tI1 ::c~ g~ ~> ~~ ~~ ~~ z~ ~O tI1~ >tI1 ~~ >~ ~r-< ~ z o -':z m ~ ~ N o n o Z ~ tT1 X ~ ---- ~ ~ Z U C m tT1 I-tj ~ ~ Z 14 l~ m o c ~tI1 ::r:1d g~ >> ~Id 6;~ ~~ zld ~O tT1~ >tI1 ~Id >~ ~~ ~ Z o . en J--( f--j tT1 > ~ ~ en J--( en r-o r > Z CONCEPT PLAN - CORPORATE CAMPUS MIXED USE '" ERHART PROPERTY SOUTH CHANHASSEN AREA PLANNING N Westwood w-+-' . EHLERS .. .. S SO C.., T (S IN C Tax Estimates for Corporate Office/Retail Project CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Watershed 558 School District 112 TAX ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS New Abatement Project I District County District # Total Local Tax Rate City of Chanhassen Tax Rate Carver County Tax Rate School District 112 Tax Rate (excludes 2006 referendum) Other Taxing Jurisdictions Fiscal Disparities Year Development Initiated Assumes First Year Taxes Payable of Full Value Assumes First Abatement For Dev Years of Tax Abatement Assumes Last Year of Tax Abatement Fiscal Disparities Ratio Fiscal Disparities Metro Wide Tax Rate Local Tax Rate - Current State Wide Property Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) Market Value Tax Rate (City) Market Value Tax Rate (County) Commercial Industrial Class Rate First 150,000 Over 150,000 Rental Class Rate Residental Class Rate Under $500,000 Over $500,000 102.2590% 23.7090% 37.6060% 35.9910% 4.9530% Inside 34.7916% 115.7820% 102.2590% 46.0000% 0.0271 % 0.1922% 1.5%-2.0% 1.50% 2.00% 1.25% 1.0%-1.25% 1.00% 1.25% Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 2008 2010 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Prepared by Ehlers tax estimates corporate office project . EHLERS .. ASSOCIATES IHe PROJECT INFORMATION - POST DEVELOPMENT Total Bldg Market Value Total Total Mkt Class Total New Local Date Option Use Sq.Ft. Description Bldg Sq Ft Taxes Value Rate Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Payable 1 45 Acre Office 550,000 Office w/surface parking 135.00 2,433,226 74,250,000 1.5%-2.0% 1,484,250 967,856 2010 2 45 Acre Office 850,000 Office wi ramp 135.00 3,761,066 114,750,000 1.5%-2.0% 2,294,250 1,496,044 2010 3 45 Acre Retail 450,000 Retail w/surface parking 100.00 1,474,231 45,000,000 1.5%-2.0% 899,250 586,387 2010 4 45 Acre Retail 600,000 Retail wi ramp 100.00 1,966,023 60,000,000 1.5%-2.0% 1,199,250 782,012 2010 5 40 Acre Bus Park 334,153 80.00 875,301 26,732,240 1.5%-2.0% 533,895 348,144 2010 6 40 Acre Comm. tbd $750klacre 982,438 30,000,000 1.5%-2.0% 599,250 390,761 2010 PROPERTY TAX ESTIMATES Total Local Fiscal City School Other Total Fiscal State-wide Option Tax Tax Disparities Taxes Taxes County Local Local Disparities Property Total Capacity Capacity Tax Capacity (inc. MV tax) (inc. MV taxI Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes 1 1,484,250 967,856 516,394 249,613 491,057 363,972 47,938 1,152,579 597,892 682,755 3,585,806 2 2,294,250 1,496,044 798,206 385,829 759,002 562,602 74,099 1,781,532 924,179 1,055,355 5,542,598 3 899,250 586,387 312,863 151,235 297,541 220,517 29,044 698,336 362,240 413,655 2,172,567 4 1,199,250 782,012 417 ,238 201,685 396,780 294,083 38,733 931,281 483,087 551,655 2,897,305 5 533,895 348,144 185,751 89,794 176,683 130,923 17,244 414,643 215,066 245,592 1,289,944 6 599,250 390,761 208,489 100,785 198,302 146,950 19,354 465,391 241,392 275,655 1,447,829 Prepared by Ehlers tax estimates corporate office project . EHLERS to ASSOCIATES IHe Tax Estimates for 40 Acre Residential Project CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Watershed 558 School District 112 TAX ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS New Abatement Project I District County District # Total Local Tax Rate City of Chanhassen Tax Rate Carver County Tax Rate School District 112 Tax Rate Other Taxing Jurisdictions Fiscal Disparities Year Development Initiated Assumes First Year Taxes Payable of Full Value Assumes First Abatement For Dev Years of Tax Abatement Assumes Last Year of Tax Abatement Fiscal Disparities Ratio Fiscal Disparities Metro Wide Tax Rate Local Tax Rate - Current State Wide Property Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) Market Value Tax Rate (City) Market Value Tax Rate (School District) Commercial Industrial Class Rate First 150,000 Over 150,000 Rental Class Rate Residental Class Rate Under $500,000 Over $500,000 102.2590% 23.7090% 37.6060% 35.9910% 4.9530% Inside 2008 2010 34.7916% 115.7820% 102.2590% 46.0000% 0.02713% 0.1922% 1.5%-2.0% 1.50% 2.00% 1.25% 1.0%-1.25% 1.00% 1.25% Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Pay 2008 Prepared by Ehlers tax estimates corporate office project . EHLERS to A$SOCIAl'[S .He PROJECT INFORMATION - POST DEVELOPMENT Total Market Value Total Total Mkt Class Total New Local Date Option Use Units Description Per Unit Taxes Value Rate Tax Capacity Tax Capacity Payable 1 Single Family 80 400,000 397,418 32,000,000 1.00% 320,000 320,000 2010 2 Single Family 80 600,000 616,578 48,000,000 1.0-1.25% 500,000 326,042 2010 3 Townhomes 240 250,000 745,158 60,000,000 1.00% 600,000 600,000 2010 4 Apartments 640 70,000 670,915 44,800,000 1.25% 560,000 365,167 2010 PROPERTY TAX ESTIMATES Total Local Fiscal City School Other Fiscal State-wide Option Tax Tax Disparities Taxes Taxes County Local Disparities Property Total Capacity Capacity Tax Capacity (inc. MV tax) line. MV tax) Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes 1 320,000 320,000 0 84,550 176,678 120,339 15,850 0 0 397,418 2 500,000 326,042 0 131,567 272,216 188,030 24,765 0 0 616,578 3 600,000 600,000 0 158,532 331,272 225,636 29,718 0 0 745,158 4 560,000 365,167 0 144,925 287,660 210,594 27,737 0 0 670,915 Prepared by Ehlers tax estimates corporate office project .~. , BRIG HTON CORPORATION November 20, 2007 To: Chanhassen Planning Commission From: Michael D. Wardle Brighton Corporation Director of Planning Subject: 2030 Comprehensive Plan Up-Date Brighton Corporation is in the process of acquiring property (The Site) at the southwest corner of the newly-improved intersection of Lyman Blvd. and Minnesota Highway 101 in Chanhassen. Given.. . ~ That the property immediately north of The Site is designated "Mixed Use" in the current Comprehensive Plan and in the proposed 2030 Comprehensive Plan Up-date; ~ That the above-noted property has been zoned and approved for Neighborhood Business; ~ That The Site has a "face-to-face" relationship with the Neighborhood Business property but is buffered from near-by residential development: . East: Springfield Subdivision, which "backs" to both Lyman Blvd. and Highway 1 0 1, is buffered by substantial berms and landscape. . West: Three single-family dwellings are buffered from both, The Site and Lyman Blvd., by topography, and mature trees and landscape. . South: The Bluff Creek wetlands buffers-isolates, in reality-The Site from existing or potential residential development to the south. ... The Site is no longer an appropriately designated "Residential Low Density" land use area, nor will it develop as "Agricultural Estate" as currently zoned. Therefore, on behalf of Brighton Corporation, I request that the Planning Commission modify The Site's land use designation in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Up-date from "Residential Low Density" to "Mixed Use" for consistency with the Neighborhood Business property to the north, and acknowledgement of the parcel's isolation from other residential uses in the vicinity. The attached presentation is provided to support this request. Brightoll C0I1JOratioll 12601 W. Explorer Drive, Suite 200, Boise, Idaho 83713 1V1V1V.hriJ!htollcorp.col1l Tel. (208) 378-4000 Fax (208) 377-8962 I ----~ Proposal for Modification City of Chanhassen 2030 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Brighton Corporation 1 City Of Chanhassen Base Map ~ Proposed Rj\V .. ~ .... ~... "'- _,j i -, \' I :] I Il 1 \' ....\ ... I " --~ ._1 , Lake Riley OHW 865.3 2 I _ _______________n__J 3 4 Proposal. . . That the southwest corner of Lyman Blvd. and SH-l0l be designated ".Mixed Use" in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Up-date 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2030 land Use Plan LJ COMMERCIAL ~ OFFICE GJ AGRICULTURE CJ RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT [@ RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY LJ RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LJ RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY [JffiI OFFICE INDUSTRIAL LJ PARKS OPEN SPACE LJ PUBLIC SEMI PUBLIC LJ MIXED 2020 Land Use Plan Excerpt 6 ... ~ ..... J . ......... .... ~..... .., /---i :'"I . . '" ~. " II A - Centra I Business Distrfct II B - Neigh borhood/Convenience Commercial II C - COllllTlunity Commercial II D - Regional/LIfestyle Center I Source: 2030 Comprehensive Plan Draft Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories . .,. '. '-.J r.. ..... .. "'-L B r- 7 The '~ixed Use" designation. . . . . . will allow consideration of a Neighbor- hood Business Zone consistent with the approved use of the property north of LY1I1an Blvd. . . .recognizes the site's use li1I1itations caused by the Bluff Creek Overlay and the i1I1pact of highway i1I1prove1I1ents 8 City of Chanhassen ZOllillg Map o RR - Ruml Resid~lIlialDistrkl o RSF - Sillgl~ Family Ri:!\il1:ntial Di>l.rict ~ R4 - Mi~,,1 Low D~lIsit)' R\:$idenlial Di~li~1 o RLI\1 - R\:'Si(~ntiaII.L'w :UlJ MoJilllll Densily Disllict . R 12 - lIi~h INII,ity Residmlial Dislrict o I'UDR -1'1;lI1l1uILJllilINwl./Residential District ~ I'UD - 1'1.!llllloJ LJnitlNvd District o 1\2 -.\J!fiCUltUr.ll ESIaI~ Districl . CIID - Cculml Husiue;s District m III I -llighwar :l1l.llIusiness Sm'ices District ~ IIG - G~I~ml lIusill~s Di51ricl . Ill' - Friuge Husiu\:$' District o IIN - ~i.!!hrorhoud 1I11sine,.,. Di,tricl !Ill 101' - InJlIstrial Ol1ic~ Park District o 01 - om", & hl>liluliornl m'lriet o NE - Naluml Em'imnlllcnll.akc . RD - RL'Cl\:ation:d IN",k'rmclIl Lake o lie-I 1I1111TCrcek I'rimary();wlayDi'lricll o BC-2 Bluff Creek Soeoondary Overlay District 2 ~ . .. : II C I - 11\\)' 5 ();-crla r Dislrict I .: : i lie 2 - 11\\)' 5 ();-crlay Dislrili 2 9 City of Chanhassen Zoning Map excerpt ISite r. /) ~ ~., ;':'~~;.\;. il ~~., w ~~~:~;- '\;~~(:: '. 5)t -_./~:'t;~-:~1;.'~ _~\..-,,,, ":.,;;,...- "~ - "':"';""""~(~ii ~ . r...~~V<f"4..,<~ 10 1.tIfl. :\1 . I ~ ~~~ !QJIJN~\ r\' ~a ~ ~ · "' "7 ^" rZ>l7: I ~'!l /' ~ City II '^ "~ '" '>-fIl ~ mm l.. ~ ~ 111 ~ t= ~ = ~~~ m= ~ gi,~ ~ IIIII ~ 'f( fIj I~ j."'- ~ lff ~ ~~\lll1'''' IS> ~ ----- of Fi "y, '" II ' ~"\-'~ I- J c:\ I ~ _ '~ i::: -- v x.. l-\c::;\ 7m W ----- ~~ 'i(iy"/;~~ ~~ ~ / Chanhassen ~ t::j \-- b ,y ~ ell > >'V 2 - / }- ~ i ~/~ry/ f Li ffi\ ) Bluff Overlay yman Blvd (C.F .18) L ,r; LI .- J4~ District . ~ .. .. l I ~ .... IT I \ \ Y 'II- I~ ." ( ~ lllilllJ - .... ~ ..1V1 ~ ~ t----"----j JI ... / - .. .. .. .. . I Site r .. 50' Buffer Secondary Corridor W Primary Corridor ...rv-- Bluff Creek 11 Chanhassen Neighborhood Business Site Southwest corner' , of Lyman Blvd. and State Highway 101 / Easterly to SH-101 from new intersection at northwest corner of site (1) Lyman Blvd. westerly toward SH-212 overpass from new intersection to site ~/ Southeasterly from new intersection at northwest corner of site (2) 12 ./ /' ,..,....../// Chanhassen Neighborhood Business Site (1) 13 Chanhassen Neighborhood Business Site (2) 14 Proposal Re-stated... ... that The Site be designated '~ixed Use"in the Comprehensive Plan Up-date for consideration of Neighborhood Business consistent with the project north of Lyman Blvd. SH-101 , ~:I .'-.-;"'" -; '..... ""'" ~..".~ . ,.. ,....... .....~ _ c.'. ,..... . ..,....;. ......~1. .~~ .IIi;., I The Site from the north I 15 1_-' New Water Tr~ PLant u Now OperatWnaL Allhough Chanhlssen~ w~er has always rr6 all Primary Dlln~ng Waler S1arn1ards sel by lhe Federal and Slale regulalory "leneies, I has had problems wlh iroo and mangone..le",ls, These are two natu- rally occurring minerals IhaI are not heallh concerns. tut cause colored waler that can slain hoosehold Ii,lures, clolhing, and can produce undesirable tastes and odors. The City flushes all hydranlS and walermairrs twice a yea 10 remove tie minerals tram the syslem. bullhe wells oontinue 10 replace lhe malerials lhaI are lIushed ool Chanhas- sen has wel~ lhal produoe Ihree limes !he iron. .n::I seven limes lhe ffiCflganese levels deemed acceplable by !he Federal EPA's Seoondary Drin~ng Waler Slandards, a meesuremen! 01 desired w~er quality lor municipal systems. How the new treatment plant works: The process is designed 10 remove iron and mangane.. by gravity lillation. Specialized media will remove lhe minerals by allaching 10 lhe minerals as water passes through iii. sand lilers. AA addliooal bene" 01 Ih. process Is IhaI oilier nalural~ OCQJr- ling cooslilt.<!nlS lik. ra:lium will also be rerro\\!d during lhe lillralion c)Cle. Wells on Ihe ea~ side d lhe City are pumperJ direct~ 10 IIie new llea1ment plar1t 10< IillIalion and chemical iljection belor. being pumped irlo!he di~ribl1ion syslem. Chlorine (lor disintection)and lIuorill! (lor dental prolection) are added al!he same rales thai 'Here used beCore lhe IreabTlenl piarll. The.. are !he same chemicals ltal have been used in Cha1hassen~ waler since ils '"~ well begar> pumping in 1965 and are r"lUired by !he Minnesota Depallment 01 Heafth. The Ire_nl planl will be able 10 produoe appro~ma~ly 8.6 million gal- lons 01 liftered waler per day during peak demand. This would ..r'" more lharl hali 01 lhe cily~ residenlS. Does my hOIJ$8 have treated water? More lhen hall 01 Chanhassen users are rea!ivlng trealed water on a1 average pwnp- ing daJ. ResidenlS in !he high lJessure zone are not receiving lhe Ir..led waler, The tigh pressure zone ar.. is !)eneraliy localed wesl of Galpin Blvd.. ~ 01 TH 41 and north 01 Wesl7B1h Slle~. The Pheasant Hills neighborhoods are .Iso inlhe high zone. A map showing lhe dillerenl pressure zroes can be loond on lhe City d Chanha...n websile al WWN cl chanhassen mn uslserv/maos hlml City ollicials are planning 00 ,,"ilding a sec- ond tr..tment to:ility 00 lhe west ~de 01 lown in 201210 treat Ihe Olher hall d!he user~ in a:ldilion 10 m"'ling lhe Plojecled uIlimale n"'ds 01 the communly. The ~cililies will be linanced ald paid tor Ihroogh user and 00ll- nection lees incapor~ed into !he city~ waler rates. To find out more about the west water Irealmenl planl, pl..se relerence Ihe lollowing website: WYI'N d charilaSSM mn us/servl ~ Will the treatment plant s.lten tile water? The Irealmenl plant is nol desig>ed 10 sollen !he waler. ~ communilies in lhe melro irea do nd sonen !he w~er SiOO! it is a very exp,",sive and Il1e degree 01 sonered water Isa perSOM preference. Howewer. tile traall1lell pl..t 1Ia. .lIglrtJ, I... ered IIIe liard.... .1 Ill. waler. Some resident...., uporleocea blul/gr... bulllklp OIl water ftxtures. ThI. may be 811IDIUcatJOD ,our water uftner Is ..w set t.. hlgb lor tbe treated wale,. Wbea..ost IOlte.... were Installed. the, wer. sel at 26 grains .r hardness DI hlgher. WIthout the presenee ot the Ilea., loading .11'00 and manga...... 1lI.I_ed waler Is aaw O3I.olaled at 23 gralll .1 liard.... wIIl.b Is wllal ".IOIIe.... .....Id be adjllStld 10 _.... 1lIe C", Is '.....meodlllll ,.. contact ,our _he.... senlcl center Ir ....tact.rer tl lullle 'au Ulrlulb lllIj.stl.gllla 11111011I. a, bill Ill... 10 perfDIIIlbl. ....Ice. CUaglllll tlla setting .1 'OU, 101t.... ...Id _n- tlall, reduce the ...11II1.1 salt and w.ter IIIId and .... 'OU 1I1OIlOJ. . City 01 Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Bo' 147 Ch.nh.ssen, MN 55317 @ Presort Stand.:Jd USPost<fJe Paid ChantQssen, MN Permit No. 14 To: Chanhassen Resident ~ ~ -'1 f'Z- ~ ~. V b.,L ~ Flx luky laue.ts and IIltll"n C~ation The City ot Chanhass,", observes an odd- even sprinkling schedule from May 1 until Seplember 30 01 each year. This schedule also includes car waShing and any type of ir. rigaUon. Pennits for new sod and seed. Vrtlich allow watering e~ry day. are a\Gilable at 00 oosllrom the City~ Erqineerirq Department. By conserving water, residents help improve overall watsr quality. II is imperative that the city balance our growing community's need for more 'MIter Mth the reQuirement that we praecl our water resources from overuse. La'NTl watering is lhe sing~ biwe~ resid"'Ii.1 use of waler in Ihe U.S. and MinneSOIa. You can h.ve a green la"" .nd conserve by using waler elliei",lIy: II your grass springs back when you s1ep on II. it doesn' need walering. It it rains an inch or more. wail at least live days 10 waler ag~n. Use a sprinkler setting \h.J: delivers large drops, rather than a line misl. Mow your grass 10 a I,",glli 01210 3", and lellhe clippings lie on lhe grolJ1d. \ I '~\"II/ SpJlnkUag Is r.commend.d before 8:00 AM or an. 5:00 PM D~ Water Q,uertirJ-ru City Hotline For up-to-date information on water outages or watermain repairs, call the Utility Hotline at 952-227-1317. @ lIonOOl 3:02:33PU I 1_"".....' Water sm & Co-ftfad Info ... .. The Cily of CharIlassen operales len ..lis that cilN water from urdergourd aquifers. The wells range in depth from 210 to 500 foot and are dnlled into two diff"ent aQuit...: the IJoat"IlO'Y Buried Artesian Aquiter arnd the Prairie Du Chien-J>rdan AQuiler. Buri~ artesian aquilers are com- posOO of w~er-saturated sand and gravel deposited by gtaci"s. with a confining ~Y" 01 day on lop. The waler in a confined iKjuiler is unoor pressure. WOOn a 'lWll is installed, the ..t" t",,1 in the..1I casing ri",s abo... the t~ 01 the allliler. These shallow aquif"s are tOll1d throughout Minnesota. The sources 01 drinking ..ter (both ~ water and oonled water) include riyers.lakes, str~. ponds. reservoirs. springs crld wells. As 'Natar travels OlJef If)e surt.n 01 the Jand or through lhe goull:1, it dissolves rnlufally- occurring mirerals and. in some cases, radioac- live malerial. The water can also pick up sub- stMces resulllng Irom the presence of animals or hullWls. Belen a waler source is used lor a supply. iI is tesled lor contamilmts and other water Quality parameters. wtlich include: Mlcro-organlsms, sucb as '''uses lad Yc&.Ia, IlhldllA3Y WlD8 1101I sewage traal_at p1.a8~ Slpa, spl... .,11'11I- hu1Il....allDas. .4 wUdU1t. InorganlG corrtamlnarrts, $UCla as sads u4 _tall. ....cll '-II lCeur utunuy or co. IroII.ba. stunnat. IlIloft, ....strIaI or dHMSIk wast.W3t. dJKbalges, oUlAd ps preduellDa, lllailg, lI' I...ilg. PasUctdas aad herblctdas, _ldI may ~ InNI agrtcultw1, urtt.u $fonnwa_ nm"I, and resld.atlalllSlS. Organic chemicals, ta~ucUn. 'yllUaltlC aad vobllll. organic cll.ml"ls., wbIcb are "'-prod.cts or ildu5lrlal......... aod p.lrol.u. producUoQ and taD atso to... IreND gas stations, urll.1a stonawat., nasa", ud septic systems. Radioactive eonlalTVnants, wblcb CI. Geeur ulUl1lltw or result 111m oil and gas pro*&ell. aad lllalng activities. Drinking Wal:er, including bc(tled water, may reason<i>1y be "'!looted to contain ~ least small amourts 01 some conla11inants. The presence at contamirmts does not necessarily indicae thal..t" poses a heallh nsk. More informalion abotJ contaminants and potent~1 health effects can beob~lned bycaJling the EPA's SaleDnnk- Ing Waler Holine aI8Ol>426-4791. Are Contaminants a Concern for Me? Some people ImY be more vulnerable to oonlaminants lound In ctlnking waler than the general PD!l<Jlalion. mmuno.rompro- mised persons, sum as persons with ca'lCer unoorgoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ lIansplan~, people .;th H1V/AlOS a other Immune syslem disorders, SOIre elderly. ancl iriants can be plftiOJlarly at risk !rom inloctions. These people should sook advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/Centers for Disease Control guidelines on appropriate means 10 lessen the nsk 01 inlection by Cryptosporidium MId other miaotial conla11- inants can be obtained by calling the EPA's Safe Dnnking Waler Hotline aI8OO-426-4791. Radon: This radioaaiw gas natlJally oc",rs in some Minnesota grouOONater. Recent moriloring r",eaIed I....is of radon belween 44-287 pCik Radon gas poses a lung canee! risk when released tram water into air (as octUrs during show"ing, balhing. or ..shing dishes or dolhes) and a sl","",h cancer risk when it is ingested. 8&:ause radon in indoor air poses a much greater health risk. than radon in drinking water, an Alternative MaxJmum Contaminant Lev~ (AMCLI ot 4,000 pCVL may apply in stales thalhav, ijjopted <r1lndoOl' Air Program, 'Mlich compels citizens, homeowners, schools and oommunities to reduce the radon ttreatlrom indoor air. For states without such a ~ogram, lhe MCL 01300 pCiA. may apply. Minnesota plans to adopt an Indoor Air ProgrilTl once tl1e Radon Rule is Iinalized. A/1enlc: While your dnnking water mee~ the EPA standard lor arsenic. iI does contain low le...ls of <rsenic The new 10 ppb stall- dard has boon established to protect people 'MIO drink water containing OI'senic in excess 01 the standard over many years from skin damage. possiblecircu~kJry problems aoo an elevated cancer risk. Sources of inlormation: If ~u have Questions about the Chanhassen waler supply syslem. piease conta;t Kelley Janes a k}a.nesCcLchanhassenmn.us or 952-227-1300. Other good sources 01 drinldng water information ~e: www.l.chalha$$.lmlUS www IDa aovlsal.water www hullh slal. mn lIS/dmJIhlwat.rl wwwdlrstatlll1l usJarouldwalw Public participation: 11 you would Iik, op~rtunities lor pUblic participation in ded- sions 1hal may <ttecl the Qualily 01 the ..ter. ~ease allend Cily Council meeMgs held the second arnd fourth Mondays ollhe month at 7 pm. at Cily Hall. @ 2006 Drinking Water Test Results Laboralory test resulls for Chanhassen drinking ..ter dur- ing 2006 are shown below. Oa~ la some subslances lisied was o~ined pnor to 2006. Amual lesling for Ihese subslances Is 00 required and the test date 01 tre last analysis is listed. In order to ensure lhal ~p waler is safe to drink.lhe EPA pre- xribes regulations that Iimil lhe aMunl 01 certain contaminants In wal" pro~d'd by public ..ter systems. Food and Drug Admlll- iSralion regulations estabflsh Iirri~ for contaninan~ in bottled ..ter thet must provide the same protEd:ion for public healttl Minnesota Department of Health Information The Minnestta Department Of Heallh has delermined thai 000 or more soun::es 01 your drinking water are susceptible to contamlna(ion. II yoo wish 10 ot1ain the entire drinking water source assessment please call 651.201-4670durlng normal business hours. Expllol~olS loci IIennlllons tor the Test Data: The A_ Found Is some- times the h1(jlest ,,"ount lournI and somelimes the av"age ot all samples analyzect depeooing on the regu~lion. Regulated substanCIS ha... Maximum Contaminart levels (MCLs) set by the Sale Drinking W~er I<L This is the tighest I",el allowed in dnnking ..Ier. Some contaminants also ha... MCL goals (MCUsJ_ This is the level 01 a subslance where thEre is no known or expected health nsk. MCLGs allow lor a maJgin of salety. MCLs are sel as close 10 MClGs as leasible using the besl avai~bl, w~er lI_nt processes. fII\Dl: Maximum Residl.Ol OisinloctantL",el. M11IU: Maximum Residual Oisintec~nt L",el Goal. Urvegulated substances do n~ ha... MCLs. They..e assessed by comparing the de- lected amount to stal, standards known as health nsk limil. II an unaccep~ble amount 01 any substance is ever found in our ..Ier. the Cily 01 Chanhassen ..II nolily residen~ immedial~y and lake corrective adion 10 eliminate the problem. The MCL lor lead and C<Wer is known as the Action Le.e!. This is the concenlr<tion which. If e>Ceeded. tnggers trealment a other reqLirement a water system must follow. Ninely percent rJ all samples tested must be below this concentr<tion. Lead aad copper gel into lap water via corrosion of horre plumbing systems. Minne- so~ Department of Health lab tess show Chanhassen is In comliiance for lead and toppE<. You should know that infants aoo young ch~dren are Iypi- cally more wlnerable 10 lead in dr~king ..t" than !he general population. II is possible that lead levels at your home may be tigher lhan aI olher homes in thecommunily as a result of materials used in your hane's plumbing. II you are concerned aboLl elevated lead le...ls in your home's waler. you may wish 10 have your ..I" lested and flush your tap tor 30 seconds to two ml/1(Jtes belore using tap w~er. Additional information is availalie from the EPAS Sale Drinking Wat" Holllne at 801>426-4791. Untts of Measurement: ppb is parrs per billion or micrograms per liter. ppm is parts per million or mil- Jjgrams~rliter. pCliI. is picocuries per liler. a measure 01 radio;:divily. nd is no li!tedioo. 1lO1Il percentile is the v~ue o~ined aller diSlegarding 10 percent 01 the samples ~ken Ihal had the highest I",~s. Special note: Arsenic compli- ance is based on the average 01 lour Quarrerly samples. Only two sa"llles 'Here taken aI: the encl 01 2006 and therefore. a violalion was not issued. As a preCClJl:ion. the dly..1I only use the..1I with the highest arsenic le...ls as an emergency back-up well. The follOW'II' dlat COllallS all required molllorlng r...ltI. Thts data was coll,ct.d dur-'. 2006 (before tblllwtreat~ ..t plait WII operatlag). Unitsa' UIlf1l Amounl . Ra..i.it~ tOtltdlll s......" MU&IIr1 Ila. IIClG ftllnd D.llCti... : T''1iul burel in Drinking Wllar ~fmiIIn pCi,l 15.4 0 3. ocH.6 ErQlionol"naUafde(lo.W. F_ """ .. '0 , 1.17 1.1-1.3 Additiw: b Qen~ heaItl, a11J1Tlinum irld IertilillJ 1a::I0l'y dOOIa"ge. TcGlTriIlaIorrefhns ... III 0 1.1 - By--~ociId oIliinkilg 'Alet ibniedion. &.illlll "m 2.0 2. ~1 o.031~(IIi: Erosioodrralulal~l!;rrelalrelire-yanddritlirY;lwasledxharga. Loo4(&'1fi041 "" ""'01-'" - "'%" 101.tof:J:) Corrosionolllllnepluntlil1ll~'.eros.l::lnotnahlaldeposb. .muslbe<15pe:tl samples d.O 'hlInes >15 ptlb ~(&'1fi041 "m molSl/llllIs - ""'" Ooot0l3O Corrosion 01 t'ome pllJlltil1Q ~.etosi::Jnotnat1nl deposb. llll3It.<1.3"", .......'0.\3 }IOfnes>1.3ppn Sodium(5J2711XJJ 1 "m No esublisbed EM_Is ., 4.7-9.3 Enaloool nakJral deposits. SuI1m (0/211031 "m No t*llishcd ~ Iirib "' 1.83-11.8 ErcsionolnatJtaldepoSls Arllnie ppb 10 0 11.5' 0<1-12 ElWood natural tEposits; MdI lromorcha.rtb: rurdf lromolward , productil;Jlw;u!C$. c__ pC",- s.. 0 Uil i 1.1.2.9~ Erasion ofnalural depo:i15. , O.l.(1.8~1 ChIorirc "m lIO. . 11IO.&. .48rn:ll'llhlylVg. ... Waeraddjtiveu~tooonllolmiaabe3. .Qu.,,$iqM$...lIQllldtl.....~~~.b.isCOl&in..l-'l..tldol2OO&.0I"laoo$ilr(llllS~r-WIIl1I..CM.... TM.........~ir.ltIlC~sislw:lz.aNr.:>.O.,OIIr 1.r..d1l_'Ilfq1l....1Ol'6 n-.no..U~l(JIIfOUlSSI.8d @ . . I~ .... lnfl!;:w & Iiijittration What Is innow and innltration? The Cily 01 Chanhassen is working on a ~clear water- redJdion program lor the sanila'y S8\Wr syslem. The goal 01 this program ~ to reduce the amount rJ clear water (wtlich includes soon wata-. ground water ald surtace runonl. also known as inflow and infiltration (III). trnt enters the sanitary sewer collection system. Clear water entering the sanitary sewer system is a problem lor tM:l reasons: First. it conSlllles 5j'stem capa:ily. For example. during a heavy ranstorm, it is not urx::ommon tor Nows to triple or mre.lnflow dlJing Imjor rain~lIs may also e>Ceo:! ",rrent capacily, ca~ng system backups into hcrnes and over-tlows into local lakes and nv.... These OCOJrrences put publiC health aI nsk and ~olate ~te and led"aI regulations Second, Chanhassen's sewage is lleated by tl1e MelroPDIilan Council Errviroomen~1 So'vices (MCES). MCES plans to incorporate surCharges in 2007 lor communities lt1.:4 exceed peak flow llmils. Chanhassen falls somewhere in the top ten percent 01 communllies identir~ by MCES 1hal appear to haw high peak 110.,. The result is thai Chanhas",n residen~ will pay higher costs for use oll1le sanncry sewer collection syslem. The Cily has been working on reducing inlkJw and inlillralion inlo tie """,r syslem 111 tiring pipes and tixing bro." joints thai have allowed groundwater to enter the system. Residents are tho sotutlon: A major..y lhat ~ can be reduced is Ihrough the elimina- tion 01 sump pumps thai may be connected 10 the sarulary ",..r system. Sump pump systems are desil}"led to ~rure surl.n! or ground water that enters basements or aiMl spaces and PllTlP it away lrom the house. Any drain in YClJr hwse thai leads to the sanitary Stwer system "'entually ends up at a waste..ler lI~ment planl. where it is Irealed. SumP PtJIlp w~er should NOT be discharged inlo lhe sanitary sewer system as this will resun in higher sewer charges. Tbe failure of our comnunlty to reduce clear water from entering the sanitary sewer system will resutt In future sur. charges and penalties from MCES. With the City and Its residents worklog t.. gether, future penalties can be avoided. Remember, this Is a direct cost to you. For Information, please refer 10 the rol~ lowing websltes: www cl chanhassen ~orwww metrocauncll ora ~~ : -~ .-~ ..~ ~ ;" ~ -~ ...1 ~t~ .~._.-. '1::-- ,'( .~ "~/' :f'. t::. j~ ~ -" Sl1M:l73:02:.""1 l- I. :' . ~.., . J~ I: '. ~l' ... "I ;. ':.' . .' ", ~ ~ ....,.n .... ~ ""''f! ". -J ,~ . ,!". !,\.'ocl ,.;... f]'t;;-L ~ !!-/.,. ,\to'I: " - .,. l .. j.. ,~1 I., " t Ii ., ~" Jf ! "c .. . le !. '" ... . . tit- 1 . ,:" 'L:'" I~ -.,J '. .:.. __',.-t, . ...~I f,t ;;c'l".. .,' !fr' ('j. , ~." ~ 1Jf"~ # '. . City of Chanhassen Capital Improvement Program 2030 Com prehensive Plan TRANS"'ORTATION m -- - -- - _2008 ___2009_ - _2010 ___ 2011 2012 __2013 - _2014 _2015 _2016 _2017 Total 2008 . 2017 Proiect Associated Pro'ects ST-012, Annual Street Im----;:;-rovement SW-019. S5-014. W-024 $ 1.600.000 $ 3.500.000 $ 2.200.000 $ 1,200.000 $ 1.500.000 $ 1.285.000 $ 1.400.000 $ 1.380.000 S 1.425.000 $ 1.475.000 S 16.965.000 ST-003. Lvman Boulevard CSAH 18) SW-Lvman. W-039, P-081 "$ 7.900.000 _$---!.~.ooo .s---p.~,ooo S 17.850.000 ST-017. TH 101 Corridor Planninn .$~ooo $ 7.100.000 $ 20.000,000 $ 27.300.000 ST-018, Pavement Manaaement $ 385.000 $ 385.000 $ 385,000 $ 385,000 $ 385.000 $ 385.000 $ 385.000 $ 385,000 $ 385.000 $ 385.000 $ 3.850.000 ST-019TH 5 Corridor Studv TH 41-TH 212 -$- - - 10.000- $ 10.000 Total S 10.085.000 $ 3.895.000 $ 14,285,000 $ 1.585.000 $ 7.235.000 $ 1.670.000 $ 1.785.000 $ 21,765.000 $ 1.810.000 $ 1,860,000 $ 65.975.000 S.URFACE V{A T!,R MANAGEMENT (W 2008 - _ ,2009 _20J.O _ _2011 . __20,12 _2013 _201.4 _2015 _20,16 _20g Pro'ect SW-012. SWMP Imnlementation $ 350.000 S 300.000 S 300.000 S 300.000 $ 300.000 $ 300.000 S 300,000 S 300.000 $ 300.000 $ 300.000 $ 3,050,000 SW-014. Prooertv Acauisition $ 250.000 _S~OO.OOO $ 200.000 _~OO.OOO $ 200.000 $ 200.000 S 200.000 $ 200.000 $ 200.000 $ 200.000 $ 1.950.000 SW-019, Street Improvements ST-0l9. SW-014. W-029 $ 400.000 $---:iOO-:-600 $ --460,000 s 128.500 S 140.000 S 600.000 S 142.500 S 147.500 $ 2.258.500 Lyman Blvd. (SW-"Lym.li)- ST-003. W-039. P-081 .$_800.000. $ 450.000 $_250.000> SW-026. Lake Minnewashta Outlet I .$ 30,000 SW-Q29, Landi!)9s Court Storm Water Pond I c$-70~000 SW-030, Lake Susan Shoreline Restoration $ 90.000 SW-031, W, Lotus Lake Drainaae Jmnrovements $ 4OO,Q!lQ.. .$ 400~000- SW-024, Bluff Creek Resources Momt Plan $ 150.000 $ 150.000 $ 150,000 $ 150.000 $ 150.000 $ 150.000 S 150.000 $ 150.000 $ 150.000 $ 150,000 S 1.500.000 SW-027, Natural Resources Stewardshin Plan $ 50.000 $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 20.000 $ 20.000 $ 20.000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 S 230.000 Total $ 2.560.000 $ 970.000 $ 1.450.000 $ 670.000 $ 1.320,000 $ 798.500 $ 810.000 $ 1,270.000 $ 812.500 $ 817.500 $ 11.478.500 ~~~!TARY S_~(~) _ _2Q08 _ __,2009 _2010 _20,11 _20j2 _20.13 _201j1 __2015 _2016 _2017 Pro"ect S5-012, Inflow and Infllltration S 200.000 S 200.000 $ 200.000 $ 200.000 S 75,000 $ 75.000 S 62.500 S 62.500 $ 62.500 $ 1.137.500 S5-014. Sewer Reolacement ST-012. SW-019. W-024 $ 250.000 S 250.000 $ 250.000 S 250.000 S 1.000.000 55-017. Uft Station Maintenance $-"40~000- $ 76.000 ~$_26(j.000 .$_105.000 $_100.000. $ 38.500 $ 77.600 $ 65.000 $ 65.000 $ 65.000 $ 992.100 s~02'i:Lift"StatiOfi#3.StandbyGenerator .$_Il9.9QQ.. --- S5-018, Dell Roadl77th St Forcemaln Replacement .$-.!25,0QIl. _ S5-020, North Part Sub District LB-5 Trunk Lift Station and Forcemain $ -l,2.Q9,000 S 2.200.000 South Part Sub District LB-5 Trunk Sanitarv Sewer $ 75.000 S 75.000 S 75.000 S 225.000 Total $ 670.000 $ 401.000 $ 2,910,000 $ 305.000 $ 100.000 $ 113.500 $ 402.600 $ 202.500 $ 452,500 $ 202.500 S 5.759.600 WATER~(W) -- -- _ _2008 _ _2009 ___2010 _ _ _2011 _ __2012 _2013 __201j1 _2015 _201~ -1Q1J Proiect - --- W-015. W, 76th Street Tower Paintinn $ 80,000 $ 80.000 W-041. Lake Lucv Water Storace Stand Pioe Paintine . $-2!jQ,Q!lO- $ 550,000 W-040, Melorlv Hill Water Tower Paintinn .s~,OOO $ 300,000 W-020, Arboretum Watennain $ 220.000 $ 220.000 W-039. Audution Watermain Loon ILvman Blvd, - Bluff Creek ST-003. SW-019. P-081 S 150.000 $ 150.000 W-024, Watermain Reolacement with street oro"ects ST-012, SW-019. S5-014 $ 660.000 S 700.000 $ 700.000 $ 700.000 S 700,000 S 3.460.000 W-025, Well 4 Imnrovement $ 350.000 $ 350.000 W-27, Pressure Reducing Stations S 65.000 $ 150.000 $ 215.000 'tt.-o30.Jj8yi...Vjater.<a~.q,,"-S~tem J~.oOO' W-032. Well Rehabilitation S 80,000 $ 40,000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 $ 45.000 S 50.000 $ 50.000 S 50.000 $ 50.000 S 50.000 S 505.000 TH 101/2010 MUSA Trunk Watermain $ S--~ X- $ 179,000 $ 179,000 S 358.000 W-039. L=an Boulevard Loon (Audubon (S) to Audubon (N)) ST-003. SW.Lvman. P-08 S 250.000 .$~~,Q9Q.. $ 500.000 W-037, West Water Treatment Plant $ 11,000.000 $ 11.000.000 W-038. Standbv Generator $ 120.000 $ 120,000 W-045. School Welllmorovements $ 715.000 $ 715,000 W-047, Well 12 $ 940.000 $ 940.000 W-044. Well 13 $ 1.200,000 $ 1.200.000 W-043. Well 14 $ 1.200,000 $ 1.200,000 Well 15 $ 1,200.000 $ 1.200.000 Well 16 S 1,200,000 $ 1.200.000 W-042, 750,000 oal Elevated Storace Tank Hiah Zone "$-1,850:000: $ 1,850,000 W.046, 1 Million nal Elevated Storooe Tank Low Zone S 2.500.000 $ 2,500.000 2015 MUSA Area Trunk Watermain (12- -16-) $ 68.000 S 68,000 $ 68,000 $ 204.000 Total $ 4.180,000 $ 770.000 $ 3.765.000 $ 3.745.000 $ 12.245.000 S 1.429.000 S 929.000 S 118.000 S 2.018.000 S 118.000 S 29.317.000 PARKS & OPEN SPACE PI 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 9:lplan\2008 camp planldraft camp planlciplcip City of Chanhassen Capital Improvement Program 2030 Comprehensive Plan Proiect i;;029.J;IighwaY.101 North Tail Connection .$ 114.QQO S 114,000 P-081Lvman Blvd. Traillmorovements ST-003, SW-Lvman, W-039- S 500.000 S 500,000 P-082. Carver Beach FiShinq Dock Extension S 3,000 S 3,000 P-083. Bluff Creek Drive Gao Trail S 350.000 S 350,000 P-Q84, Pioneer Blvd. Gap Trail S 300.000 S 300.000 P-047. Arboretum Business Park Trail $ 317,000 $ 317.000 Athletic Field Lighting S ~er Hill Trail $ Lake Ann Park Picnic Shelter $ P-086. Lake Ann Ball Field Shelter/Restrooms $ 750,000 S 750,000 Lake Ann Boat Access Dock $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Lake Susan Boat Access Dock $ 10,000 S 10,000 P-069, Hwv 41 Pedestrian Underoass $ 125,000 $ 125,000 P-072, Tennis Court Reoair $ 50,000 S 50,000 Rice Marsh lake Trail $ 375,000 S 375,000 P~075, UbertY at Creekside Trail $ 275.000 S 275.000 P-076, The Preserve Trail & BridQe S 250,000 $ 250.000 P-077, Lakeside Trail $ 60,000 S 60.000 Downtown Railroad Trail $ 250,000 $ 250.000 Skate Park Ramp Reolacement $ 75,000 $ 75.000 Bandimere Park Ballfield Safetv Nettin<1 $ 40.000 S 40.000 Bandimere Park ShelterfRestroom S 750,000 S 750.000 Picnic Shelter [morovements $ 100,000 $ , 00.000 P-07B. 2005 MUSA Park Acquisition & Development S 400,000 S 400.000 P-085. Disc Golf Course Contribution $ 20,000 $ 20.000 P-079. Recreation Center Fitness Equipment S 10,000 S 10,000 S 10,000 S 10,000 $ 40,000 P-080. Recreation Center Lobbv Furniture )-18,600. $ 18,600 Picnic T ableslBenchesfT rees $ 11.000 S 11.000 S 11.000 S 11.000 $ 11,000 S 11.000 $ 11.000 S 11.000 S 11,000 S 11.000 S 110.000 Total S 669,800 S 1,171,000 S 216,000 S 771.000 $ 686,000 S 301.000 $ 111.000 S 406,000 S 761.000 $ 86.000 S 5.178.800 TOTAL $ 18,164,800 $ 7,207,000 $ 22,626,000 $ 7,076,000 $ 21,586,000 $ 4,312,000 $ 4,037,800 $ 23,761,500 $ 5,854,000 $ 3,084,000 $ 117,708,900 g:\plan\2oo8 camp plan\draft camp plan\cip\cip