Loading...
PC Minutes 2-19-08 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 2008 Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry McDonald, Kurt Papke, Kevin Dillon, Kathleen Thomas, Debbie Larson, Mark Undestad and Dan Keefe STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; Angie Auseth, Planner I; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer JIMMY JOHN’S: REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR A 1,650 SQUARE FOOT, ONE STORY RESTAURANT BUILDING; AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A FREE STANDING FAST FOOD RESTAURANT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MARKET STREET STATION (7851 MARKET BOULEVARD), PLANNING CASE 08-02. Public Present: Name Address Craig Mertz 600 Market Street Bill Miller 600 Market Street Angie Auseth presented the staff report on this item. McDonald: Thank you very much. Kathleen, we’ll start down with you. Do you have any? Thomas: I guess the only question I do have is we feel like…architectural design of the buildings that are surrounding it? Auseth: It will. It’s using the same materials as the existing Market Street Station. McDonald: Okay. Kurt. Papke: Yeah, what’s the variance? Auseth: The variance, we weren’t sure if it would need a sign variance or not, and it ended up not needing one. Papke: Okay. So the, in the proposal description we can strike the with variances? Auseth: Correct. Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 Papke: That’s all I have. McDonald: Is that it? Okay. Dillon: So who’s the developer of the area just to the south? Auseth: Kraus Anderson. Dillon: So it’s the same company? Auseth: (Yes). Dillon: Okay. And then like so, in terms of they can share the parking I take it and all that, that’s not an issue? So then, the applicant here is Kraus Anderson but I don’t suppose they’re going to be the ones running the restaurant? Auseth: Correct. Jimmy John’s will be running the restaurant. Dillon: Okay. Is it a franchise restaurant? Auseth: Yes. Dillon: So what, there’s a Jimmy John’s a mile or 2 miles or so to the west. I mean do they care or do they like this idea or do they not like this idea? Aanenson: Mr. Chair, I can answer that question. McDonald: Yes. Aanenson: Typically we don’t get into that. We have a number of similar franchises, whether it be Caribou or Starbuck’s or something like that. We have similar franchises. We leave that up to the individual owner, but I do want to just go back to the parking because that has come up earlier regarding parking. We believe there’s adequate parking on this site, but it may need to be identified and maybe reallocated. To this point, there were two restaurant pads approved. This original site, if you look on your compliance table, was for I believe approximately 3,000 square feet. I’m on page 6 of your staff report. So there was 3,000 allocated for that site, but this restaurant’s a little bit smaller. It’s a little hard to see at that scale. But so, there is adequate parking. You can see, more would have been desired if there was two, and originally they looked at putting two in there so I think what needs to be done there is just, and since Kraus Anderson is the underlying property owner, maybe restructure work with the tenants to employees park in one area. That they free that space so that’s designated more for Jimmy John’s, because right now some of the people in that building are parking, some of the employees are parking up there. Just to make sure that we have, there is adequate parking. That just needs to be allocated or signed appropriately. I think it’s convenient to park there because the entrance is closer to the, coming into the main entrance here. So it’s maybe more convenient to park here to come in to that site, and just making sure that that’s, you can see that. Adequately 2 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 signed or posted for those uses. It’s similar to the existing Jimmy John’s, there’s a retail or office building and similar to what you have sometimes at Chipotle or Buffalo Wild Wings where you may have to check to find a spot, but we believe there’s overall parking. Just to make sure those employees are parking in an area that’s not designated for that restaurant, and we have spoken to the property owners about that and they, if we want to add it as a condition, they’re willing to do that. McDonald: Okay. Dillon: So my question with the franchise, I understand that that’s, as a planning commission we should, that’s not part of anything we really look at. But if there’s already an existing restaurant in, you know not too far away and it’s just kind of like you know we don’t want one going. I don’t know if there’s insatiable demand for Jimmy John's restaurants in the area or not. So then the other question that I had is, if they’re not able to work out the trash coverage thing with the hotel to the north, and it’s put on the west side of the building, that’s going to be, will that be in view of the road that goes? Auseth: It will be architecturally compatible with the building. That is the trash enclosure right there. That piece. So it matches the façade. Dillon: That’s all the questions I have. McDonald: Okay. Dan. Keefe: Yeah, I have just a couple. Just following up on that last comment on the trash enclosure. I just had a concern on the northwest corner, kind of what it would look like. I mean there are some trees along the boulevard there, aren’t there? You know, because it’s sort of like you come down for that. Aanenson: The hotel is immediately to the other side and I don’t think we want, you know when we went out and looked at that. Auseth: It would end up being just below the windows. Keefe: Yeah. Aanenson: So we thought the best way, which we’ve done in other projects, is actually try to combine the dumpsters, so you have less, because otherwise if it’s attached. th Keefe: I’m just saying what is the view? I mean a lot of people come across 78 and then take a right down. Aanenson: Yep. It’s on Market. And actually. Keefe: You come down Market and you’re looking right at it, and what is that going to kind of look like? 3 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 Aanenson: Right now you’re seeing the wooden one that matches the architecture, which they’re re-siding. Country Suites is getting, is being remodeled. But that is currently partially screened by that one. It’s larger, you can see it on the picture there so. Keefe: Were there any, it doesn’t look like there are any additional plantings or landscaping required for this? Because it’s overall as a part of the original. I guess a couple trees but it doesn’t really say. Yeah. I’m just, you know I mean, my concern is that you know kind of what it looks like. I mean is it just going to be kind of a you know clad corner, because that is, I mean there’s a lot of traffic which kind of goes by there. Aanenson: Yeah, so there will be additional landscaping. Keefe: Additional plantings. Particularly where that, yeah. Okay. And then the other question I had is, is in relation to, is that a sidewalk which kind of goes along the south side of the restaurant? Auseth: Right here? Keefe: Yeah. Auseth: Yes. Keefe: Does that then tie into the sidewalk that goes up and, because there’s a sidewalk that goes along, where does that tie into? Because it’s a curb cut where you’re pointing, right? Auseth: Right, along Market. Market’s over here, and then they’ll tie in on this side. With this existing sidewalk. Keefe: I’m just thinking of people walking there you know, you know how do they safely get to the restaurant and if you have a fair amount of traffic going in and out of there, I mean is this, you know. I guess they have to go across the street really is that where, yeah. Aanenson: You can come down Market and go across. Otherwise you come out of the existing building. What you’re looking at is the bank which is over here, and then the sidewalk along, it’s like going underneath that cantilever so there is a sidewalk. Keefe: Yeah. Aanenson: Which is, you have to cross at this location. Cross the road. Keefe: Yeah, okay. th Aanenson: But you could take the sidewalk all the way up Market to West 78. Keefe: Okay, so that sort of northwest corner you can go up to the corner from there? 4 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 Aanenson: Yeah. Keefe: Okay, or even, so. Okay. Aanenson: And it is anticipated, because of the proximity, that there probably would be a lot more walking in this general area. Keefe: Right, and you know that’s just my concern is just, is that kind of isolated and does it work with the traffic because there’s going to be a fair amount of traffic going in and out of there. Just make sure that we’ve got it designed safely so that’s well sort of laid out so people know where to go and so. Alright. McDonald: Debbie. Larson: Well, just, this is hard for me to see just because I’m going blind in my fifties. The parking area that would be next to the hotel, so would you call that the north lot that goes adjacent out. Yeah. Is there a way, if you were to go, if you were to turn right, to go into that parking lot? Can you get out the other side? I just don’t remember. Aanenson: Yeah. Larson: Okay. That’s all I have. McDonald: Mark? Undestad: Nothing. McDonald: Nothing. Okay. I’ll just reserve any questions I have until later. I just want to see what comes up but I have no further questions, and if no one else does, is the applicant present to make a presentation? Jack Appert: Mr. Chair and members of the commission. I’d like to thank you all for being here tonight initially and my name is Jack Appert. I’m with Kraus Anderson and I’m here with Steven Bend from Pope Architects. Chuck from LanDeCon, landscaper, and Cindy, the property manager. So hopefully between myself and all them we can answer all the questions that you have. McDonald: Okay. Kathleen? Thomas: I don’t have any questions. Papke: It’s stated in the report that you won’t have a drive up and there’s nothing on the drawings obviously. Do you plan to do deliveries from this location because that can sometimes impact traffic? 5 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 Jack Appert: Well Scott Pager, who is the franchisee, is here to, and I assume that’s the plan there. Scott Pager: Hello. For deliveries, are you talking about us. Papke: Deliveries to offices or homes or whatever. Deliveries originating from Jimmy John's. Scott Pager: Yes. Papke: So you do plan to do deliveries? Scott Pager: Yes. Yes. Papke: Okay. Do you have a full time delivery person? I mean what kind of volume of deliveries do you expect to be in and out of there? Scott Pager: Well I’m also the owner of the Jimmy John's on the west end of town. Papke: So you’re competing with yourself? Scott Pager: Right. Yes. We do a fair amount of deliveries, yeah. It’s a significant amount of deliveries I would say. Papke: Okay. Do you reserve a parking place for your delivery vehicle? How do you work the parking for your delivery person? Scott Pager: We don’t at our current restaurant. We actually have our, all of our employees park further away so the people that come in shop have the closest parking spots. This is set up a bit differently. We haven’t talked about setting aside any specific spaces for our drivers so I don’t think we’ll need to do that. Papke: Okay. McDonald: Okay. Kevin? Dillon: I don’t have any questions. Keefe: I’m good. McDonald: Debbie? Larson: No. McDonald: Well I’ve got a question for Kraus Anderson and you heard about the parking issue and everything, and one of the things, I did go over and view the lot and it is crowded up where you’re talking about putting a restaurant. Then you go to the east and it’s totally vacant, and the 6 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 problem is access from that far corner. Anyone that parks over there is going to have quite a walk, and that’s probably why they don’t want to park there. However if something were done about that median, and put some stairs in there or some kind of access so that you could cut across the lot and then walk down, that would make it a lot more convenient and that would probably relieve some of the parking issues. Are you open to doing something such as that? Cindy McDonald: Yes we are. We have noticed that customers and employees have come from that back lot and walked through the landscaping and then into the building, so that is something that we are looking at. McDonald: Okay. Because I am one of your customers on delivery for Jimmy John's. I know that there are a lot of people that will want to have that done and I know you’re quite busy because I have a lot of trouble finding parking spaces at your current spot so, it will be quite the mess if we don’t manage it now and part of that is going to be how do you accommodate all of the other tenants in the building with their clientele so I just want to make sure you’re aware of the problem and you are willing to do something about it. Okay. All the questions I had. Anyone else? Okay. Is there anything else you would want to tell us about this that you think we ought to hear about in consideration of anything? Cindy McDonald: I guess one question and comment that has come up is parking and you know we do have the rights within the leases to allocate where the employees park. We’ll enforce that and whatever it takes, we’ll make it work. McDonald: Okay, thank you very much. At this point I would open up the podium to anyone from the audience that wishes to come up and make comment on this project. Please come up. Address the commissioners and state your name and address. Craig Mertz: I’m Craig Mertz. I’m one of the commercial tenants in the existing building. The building to the immediate south of this. Specifically the law office that’s in that building. We are skeptical that this parking is going to work out. I’m looking at the staff report and it indicates that approximately 26 of the spaces are going to be absorbed on a daytime basis by the restaurant. Typically there’s not 22 empty spaces on that side of the building to be used. We’re already getting complaints from our clients that they can’t park on that side of the building, yet that’s the side of the building where the public access is. That’s where the elevator lobby is and the stairwell to get to the upper floor of the building and part of the law practice revolves around estate planning and we have older folks that are coming up for that and hence the concern about the parking. We’re also wondering about the number of left turn movements that are going to be coming out of this parking lot with the traffic count. Take left turns for people trying to get down to Highway 5. It seems like there’s going to be lots of competing movements to get out onto Market Boulevard. McDonald: Thank you very much. Staff, that does bring up an interesting issue of that particular corner with the Cub and all of that. Is this going to be a problem? Have we looked at this as far as traffic volumes? 7 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 Aanenson: I’ll address the number of parking stalls first, and then if Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer wants to comment on the traffic. This entire project was reviewed when it was originally approved regarding the total square footage in development regarding parking ratios and such, and I just want to clarify again, back to the staff report. That originally we anticipated that this site could be a 3,000 square foot building. It’s under that. We’re anticipating maximum of 17. This actually has more parking than the other site has. The other Jimmy John's franchise has more allocated to it and again we believe it’s, how that’s being allocated. We agree people are parking at that convenient side right now because there is nothing there and they need to work through, and I would suggest that we make that a condition. That there needs to be the access between that or permanent striping, but again the number I think that Mr. Mertz cited was different than the number we have in the staff report, which we allocated 17 during the day, 9 at night. We believe that’s in that immediate vicinity and then regarding turning movements, if Alyson wants to address that. Fauske: Certainly. I don’t have the counts off the top of my head. What we could do is take a look at what the counts are on Market Boulevard. In order to put any kind of traffic control device up there, there has to be a certain volume of traffic to meet a criteria for a stop sign and I would doubt that there’s the high enough volume at this intersection to warrant that but we could certainly look into that further. McDonald: Okay, thank you very much. Does anyone else wish to come up? Come on up sir. Bill Miller: Hi, I’m Bill Miller and I’m a tenant in the building as well. Don’t want to sound like a broken record but I might. There’s a couple issues and they revolve around parking. The first one is the allocation of spots to employees. That’s been in place for the past year and obviously it doesn’t work so, it hasn’t worked before. I don’t know how it would work in the future. The second thing is, is that if you take a look at the parking, there’s only part of the story here because if you go to the building, which comes down here. I don’t know how to work this thing. But if you take a look at the building, there’s a coffee shop in this spot. There is a proposed pad here. There’s an empty retail space here. And the building is configured as such that it can take the count of parking spots. The building is configured so that it’s in the way of all the parking spots. It’s like trying to get to the other side of a peninsula. So if the restaurant is here, and currently at least half of this parking spot is occupied every day, all of the spaces that are here and down this line, are all occupied by the restaurant, the dress shop and people that patronize the salon. The building then is structured so that if these spaces get used up, the only place where a person can park is here or over here. To access the building entrance, you would either have to go out to the sidewalk, come up here, go down the road, and into the only upstairs entry, or you would have to go around the building, up the sidewalk, across and down. The parking spaces that are counted are parking spaces that are here, which are very few. There are more spaces here then there are spaces over here. Not any of those spaces, although they end up in your numbers, are convenient to the access to the tenants of the building which the only entrance is there. So that doesn’t really work. Hasn’t worked in the past and I don’t think it’s going to work in the future if we have more demand for parking. The other comment I’d just like to make is that, that there’s not only an issue, let your statistics determine whether there’s enough traffic on here, but one of the issues is that the traffic operates at quite a high speed and basically they come off of 5, which is a highway. Or up 101, which is a pretty, travels pretty 8 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 fast, and then there’s a curve here. So the curve reduces the sight line and with the speed of traffic, it’s probably going to be an issue. I just throw that out. The most important issue is the parking in my opinion. Thank you. McDonald: Thank you very much. Aanenson: Mr. Chair if I could just again address that. There is 526 parking spaces allocated to that site. The question is, is everybody going to be able to park by the front door, and that was never how it was set up so I think the question is for the owner of the building to decide how that parking’s going to be allocated. But there was 526 that was allocated for that building and not everybody can park behind so that’s going to be the challenge for them to figure out where the employees are going to go. Competing with the ultimate, that’s where we’re trying to get the other park and ride lot further down along Great Plains Boulevard with Southwest Transit. Parking. That’s further down so. McDonald: Okay. Could someone explain the comment about, if you park on the south side, why does it take so far to go around? Isn’t there an easier way to get to the upstairs? Cindy McDonald: This is the main entrance to get into the office and it is also adjacent to several of the retail spaces, but you can get in here through CJ’s and you can get in over in this area and then through to the atrium to take either the elevator or the stairwell. McDonald: Okay, but you’re going through CJ’s in order to do that? Cindy McDonald: Correct. From this side of the building. McDonald: Okay. Thank you. Cindy McDonald: We do have one other…they also have a common access at the front of the building that once you access that, you’re also in this common rotunda area. McDonald: Okay, is there anything that could be done there to give a south entrance so that you could get into the atrium area? Reconfigure the building anyway? Cindy McDonald: That can be looked at. I know we did once before to go in through here. It was cost prohibitive at that time. McDonald: Okay. Cindy McDonald: But we do, when we’re talking about parking, where the parking, when it’s full back here, we’ve got some open areas back here and again that’s kind of the employee parking. We could redesignate it here. We do have this turn around area as well where we have some of the bank employees are parking, and then Spalon and others are over here so we can redirect it to areas to make the premiere parking available for our customers. 9 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 McDonald: Well I think the thing is from the city standpoint, I mean we want this to be successful and at the same time you know it’s in your best interest and our’s if you have happy tenants and one of the things that again I am a fan of Jimmy John's and I know that it will draw and it will be a good addition for the area but I think some of these other problems have got to be looked at. That’s probably in your all’s ballpark. Cindy McDonald: Right. We want happy tenants and we’re committed to making it work. McDonald: Okay. Thank you. Does anyone else wish to make any comments on this project? Scott Joynt: Hi. I’m Scott Joynt. Just a consumer of CJ’s, and it’s real uncomfortable when you do have to walk through there to get to that entrance, if you don’t buy something. Just to access, and it is a mess back there. If you go and everybody’s getting their hair done and buying coffee, so it will be a lot of cars. The other idea, I like your idea with the, going through that inside out I think or what, the Wine Styles. You could almost make that another entrance. That was a good idea. McDonald: Thank you. Yes, Mr. Mertz. Craig Mertz: When staff says 526 spaces, aren’t we counting spaces at the Dinner Theater? Is that how you come up with that number? Aanenson: No, that’s how much was provided for the site. Craig Mertz: You put that cross parking agreement in the packet so I assumed that that was the signal that some of the 526 were actually on the back side of the Dinner Theater complex. Aanenson: They’re all allocated to Kraus Anderson for their parking stalls. McDonald: Does anyone else wish to make comment on this issue? Well seeing no one else come up, I will close the public meeting and at this point I will bring it back up to the commissioners for discussion on this application. Mark, we’ll start down with you. Undestad: I think you know the restaurant itself, the pad site, everything was, we looked at this you know back when it all came in. It does make sense. It does fit in there. The parking is an issue for some but you know as staff said, not everybody can park at the front door, and that is something more of Kraus Anderson’s issue to get that resolved so. Overall I think it’s a good idea. It’s a good spot. McDonald: Debbie. Larson: Yeah, I agree. I think it’s, we need more restaurants and I’m glad that Jimmy John's is putting one there because I think it will bring more business to everybody in the buildings as well. I really would like to see on this, I know it’s not our issue tonight but if we could see some sort of entrance on that south side. I just think it would make life easier for pretty much everybody. It would open up and maybe possibly too even more business wanting to lease from 10 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 there, knowing that they could have more access and everything so I’m hoping that Kraus Anderson will have a chance to look at that idea. McDonald: Okay, Dan. Keefe: I’m in support of Jimmy John's going in there. You know we definitely need to have another look at the parking and potentially allocating it amongst the tenants. I’m also have concern around the, you know just the walking access to it and this is going to have a tremendous number of cars going in and out of that location right adjacent to this restaurant and you know at dinner time when people are leaving work and you know people are accessing some of these businesses here so I want to just make sure that staff adequately looks at the walking ways to this particular restaurant. McDonald: Okay, thank you. Kevin. Dillon: I too am in favor of the project. I think it will be great if the staff could work with the applicant to sort out some of the parking issues. I think the idea of taking part of a retail space and dedicating that to an entrance, you know I mean that doesn’t seem like it, I mean in theory maybe it sounds good but then there’s a lot of lost revenue I would think from that spot. Gets chopped up so that I’m the type that doesn’t need to park at the closest spot. I usually go to the far end of the lot and walk myself so it wouldn’t be an issue for me but I think you know just for the success of the project and the whole complex, it’d be great if we could maybe, there was a couple of suggestions with the steps and all that. If that could be followed through on, maybe that would be a part of the solution. McDonald: Okay, thank you. Kurt. Papke: Yeah, I think it’s a great project. Memory serves me correctly, I think the first time this whole thing came before us it was going to be a bagel restaurant or something so this isn’t that far off. I think it’s a real good fit with the theater. I see a lot of foot traffic coming from the theater. Kids going to see a movie and then going to have a sandwich afterwards so I think that fits in well there. And I’m kind of scratching my head to try to figure out why we ended up with such a traffic problem here. It almost seems like the businesses on the south side of the building just haven’t developed the way some of the ones that have on the second floor and the ones that are coming in on the front entrance, so it seems like we have a, maybe a temporary imbalance. Maybe not but either through striping, signing, or an alternative entrance, I think I could maybe arrest this over the short term. Although at some point if those businesses on the south side start to prosper, that could become an issue too there but I think it’s a good project. McDonald: Thank you. Kathleen. Thomas: Well I think everyone else said it really well and appropriately so I’ll just say I enjoy Jimmy John's as well and I’m very happy for that restaurant. McDonald: I guess the only comments, I would just echo what everybody has said. I guess I’m not so sure we can do anything about the interior of the building. I would encourage you to look 11 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 at that because it does seem to solve the problems but on the exterior you know, I might be inclined to put one of the conditions in there that they do something about that back northeast corner to make it more accessible to maybe to help encourage people to park back there so that it’s not such a hike around because as I said, it’s totally empty back there and I think the reason’s got to be in the winter people just don’t want to walk. And they’re not going to walk down that slope because that’s when people get hurt so, I think there’s room to do something back there. Other than that, yeah I’m in full support of it too so I guess next step is, are we ready for a motion? Undestad: I’ll make a motion. Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan, Planning Case #08-02 for a 1,650 square foot, one story stand alone restaurant building, plans prepared by Pope Architects, dated received January 25, 2008, subject to conditions 1 through 17. Thomas: Second. McDonald: Do I have a second? And at this point. Papke: Mr. Chair. McDonald: Yes. Papke: I’d like to propose a friendly amendment, if I may. McDonald: Yes. Papke: I’d like to propose an additional condition in number 18 that the developer work with city staff to make any traffic and parking mitigation possible under the circumstances. So Mr. Undestad, agreeable to that? Undestad: Yes I am. McDonald: Okay, at this point it’s been seconded and the friendly amendment’s been accepted. Undestad moved, Thomas seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan – Planning Case #08-02 for a 1,650 square-foot, one-story, stand-alone restaurant building, plans prepared by Pope Architects, dated received January 25, 2008, subject to the following conditions: 1.The south elevation shall be revised to meet the 50 percent façade transparency requirement. 2.The applicant shall continue to pursue the option of a shared trash enclosure with Country Suites Hotel. 3.The applicant shall install self-latching hardware on the door located on the west elevation of the building. 12 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 4.All roof-top equipment shall be screened. 5.The existing trees shall be protected during construction; the applicant will be responsible for replacing any damaged or killed trees. 6.The applicant shall provide erosion and sediment perimeter control. 7.All silt fence that is not laid parallel to the contours shall have J Hooks installed every 50 -75 feet. This shall be noted on the plans and discussed at the preconstruction meeting. 8.Energy dissipation shall be provided at the inlet to the proposed pond and at the end of the discharge pipe that outlets to the wetland within 24 hours of pipe installation. The discharge location for the outlet of the proposed pond shall be evaluated to ensure that the proposed discharge will not cause erosion issues. Reinforced erosion control matting may be required. 9.Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 10.Inlet protection may be needed prior to installation of the castings for the curbside catch basins. In that case, all storm sewer inlets shall be protected by at least fabric draped over the manhole with a steel plate holding the fabric in place. 11.The plans shall be revised to show a rock construction entrance (minimum 75 feet in length although site constraints may require alternative length) wherever construction traffic will access the site. The rock construction entrance shall be constructed in accordance with Chanhassen’s Standard Detail 5301. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as needed. 12.The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering)) and comply with their conditions of approval. 13.If off-site hauling is required, the developer must work with City staff to determine an appropriate haul route. 13 Planning Commission Meeting - February 19, 2008 14.The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 15.The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system (Chanhassen has adopted MN Rules Chapter 1306, Subp. 2). 16.Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 17.Sign permits are required for all signs prior to the installation, to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations. 18. The developer work with city staff to make any traffic and parking mitigation possible under the circumstances. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: CROSSROADS OF CHANHASSEN: REQUEST FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT; VARIANCES; PRELIMINARY PLAT TO SUBDIVIDE 14.90 ACRES INTO 5 LOTS AND 1 OUTLOT; AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 8 BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TH 101 AND LYMAN BOULEVARD, PLANNING CASE 08-01. Public Present: Name Address Mark Korsh Kraus Anderson Kathy Anderson Architectural Consortium Dan Parks Westwood Engineering Chuck Klinefelter LanDeCon Jim Sommers 8683 Chanhassen Hills Drive No. Scott Joynt 9113 Sunnyvale Drive Tony Nuss 9140 Springfield Drive Todd Strand 8557 Chanhassen Hills Drive So. Tony Denucci 287 Greenleaf Court John and Jacqueline Meyers 1011 Barbara Court Sam Van Tassel Kwik Trip Dan Sherred 525 Summerfield Drive Frank Whaley 851 Lyman Boulevard Kate Aanenson provided background information regarding the zoning and history of this parcel, and what is proposed in the 2008 comprehensive plan update. 14