PC Staff Report 8-5-08 PC DATE:
August 5, 2008
2
CC DATE:
August 25, 2008
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
REVIEW DEADLINE:
July 25, 2008
CASE #:
08-15
BY:
TJ, AA, BG, SA
PROPOSED MOTIONS:
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Variance from
the 10-foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family
Residential (RSF), which will extend through the 10-foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past
the lot line extended.
And
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Wetland
Alteration Permit to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values based
upon the attached Findings of Fact and subject to conditions shown on page 8 of the staff report.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a Variance and Wetland Alteration
(All
Permit for a determination of No Net Loss of Wetland Value or Function to install a dock.
proposed setbacks are measured from the edge of the structure)
LOCATION:
640 Pleasant View Road
Outlot A, Reichert’s Addition
APPLICANT:
Gary Schneider & Cynthia Schneider
640 Pleasant View Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING:
Single Family Residential (RSF)
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
Residential – Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 – 4u/Acre)
ACREAGE:DENSITY:
0.35 acre N/A
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City’s discretion in
approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the
standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of
discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
The City has limited discretion in approving or denying a wetland alteration permit, based on
whether or not the proposal meets the wetland alteration permit standards outlined in the Zoning
Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable wetland alteration permit standards are met,
the permit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 2 of8
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
The subject property (Outlot A) is located on the north end of Lotus Lake in an area zoned Single
Family Residential District (RSF). The outlot is owned by Gary and Cynthia Schneider and is
combined with the parcel across Pleasant View Road with both parcels having the address of 640
Pleasant View Road. The outlot is noncontiguous with their residence due to the presence of
Pleasant View Road. The applicant is requesting a variance from the 10-foot dock setback to
install a wooden dock for the purpose of overnight docking of a watercraft. A dock is currently
installed on the property.
"
''''-,
"
V.
~&
S's ~A ~
? . v),.
<9oso>- /'
'a~..
V <f'
'"
\
/
'-\,
- .
. '.
.
"
",
''-.
~
:3~. .:~"::~: /):,~'.
~-\\"'\\ \'-'
-\, J \
.. \ J'"
'" < ~,.,
""
',-
"
~<l
.:-~:' .
~-H
00
~o
'<t .
r-O
~'"
0_
<:
OUTLOT -<' '-:'
A ...., \.
,<' ... ~\ ...
\. A't' ,
,_ y ,\00"
(' \ '-' \.
c'lV':...' , '\;JO//...... ...-t
'", ... ,.--Appro)llfTlote foC) / .......__-:-....."
I todlJe uf / "'--' "
I w~tlord / / t'\.~ ""' :
~ ...'" ~~.,
~'l-&
-- '" ~.;~ ~
~'/s ~....
6'<9 -?.>;.> ~p.-
., 0.5'
o <S>..
'\
""
I",'t
", .
-1>0
~<)
""
(:~ ~.
~
~J)
1
l
LOTUS LAKE
,
..._'; .;).5
o 30
I
SCALE IN
60
I
FEET
ORCINARY riGH WMF'l nrv. = 89fi.l
(pr.r Ui!"".ne"Oolo CN'1)
,\ ' i:---~.'}
,~
I hereby certify that this survey. plan or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supef"\Oision and that I om 0 duly R~istered
lO!ld Sur under the 0 of the Stote of Lfinn..soto.
\
,
F.l~l""9 Dock.-I
June 30. 2008
Dote
The dock is approximately 120 feet in length and extends beyond the lot line encroaching into
the waterfront for Outlot B by a length of 62 feet (see above drawing). The dock originates from
a point on the property approximately halfway between the southeast and southwest property
comers. The applicant has indicated that the adjoining property owner to the west assisted in the
placement of the dock to avoid conflicts with the existing dock on their property. The property
to the southeast is a beach lot owned by the Near Mountain Lake Association. The dock for this
beach lot is located southerly on the Outlot approximately 400 feet from the Schneider parcel.
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 3 of8
According to the development contract, the placement of a dock northerly on Outlot B is a
prohibited use.
The dock will cross 109 feet of wetland at a width of3.5 feet. In total, 381.5 square feet of
wetland will be affected by the dock placement. The applicant is requesting a No-Loss
determination for the placement of the dock.
The applicant is proposing to use the current placement but has indicated a willingness to modify
as necessary per recommendations by City Staff and Planning Commission. Staff is
recommending approval of the variance request for the dock as shown on the attached Exhibit
entitled Dock Location Sketch with the following change: The dock is to be shortened 13 feet to
allow for a minimum separation of at least 20 feet between the nearest point of the dock on the
adjoining property to the west and the applicant's dock. Further, staffhas determined that the
installation of a dock is not a wetland impact as defined by Minnesota Rules 8420 and that the
placement ofthe dock will result in no net loss of wetland function or value.
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
· Chapter 6, Article II, Structures. In summary, Article II allows for the placement of one
dock which may extend into the lake for a length of 100 feet or to that point where the water
is four feet in depth and with a maximum width of eight feet. The dock shall not encroach
upon any dock setback zone (variance request) and must be elevated above the ordinary high
water elevation between six and eight inches. Council may grant a variance from the dock
requirements from this article if it is shown that by reason of topography or other physical
characteristics of the lakeshore site, strict compliance with the dock requirements could cause
an exceptional or undue hardship to the enjoyment of the use of the lakeshore site; provided
that a variance may be granted only ifthe variance does not adversely affect the purpose and
intent ofthis chapter. (Note: Approval of the variance request requires a 4/5 vote of City
Council)
· Chapter 20, Article IV, CUP - Wetland Alteration Permits follow the Conditional Use
Permit criteria. This is addressed in the attached Findings of Fact.
· Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetlands. - No person may drain, fill or excavate in the permanent
or semi permanent flooded areas of open water wetlands. The installation of a dock is listed
as an activity which requires a Wetland Alteration Permit.
· Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single-Family Residential District - One dock is a
permitted accessory use in an "RSF" district.
BACKGROUND
The subject site consists of two lots bisected by Pleasant View Road; staff will be referring to the
northerly lot as the residence and the riparian lot as Outlot A.
'd Variance
SchneI er # 08-15
Planning Case
5 2008
August ,
Page 4 of 8
Lotoi'; L ~/f'"
. IV Rood "
640 Pleosant Vie ''''
ded on January
: .. which was recor at 640
.-..-. R 'chert's AddItIOn. 'th the residence I t A
' rt ofthe <1 rshlP WI .. to Out 0 ,
. ro erty was platted ~ ~:main under private ~e~~ number. [n ad~~~o~ B, C, and D
~,e t:;~ec~~t1~~~d::t~~~~e:~t~e:~i~e~~;d~~:~. s*!e~e;e:~:o:~t:~~e~:k~~:::~a~~~e said
Pleasant Vlewl ts were created WI Outlot B (indIcate a d enjoyment of the or more ofthe
hree other out 0 Lotus Lake. mmon use an . ted as "any two f a dock
~oving southerly a;:;~10 be devoted to th:: association is desl~s: was the Placement':g of up
above) was deslgna lion". The homeown" Part ofthe commo~ for the overnight moo
owners' aSSOCla r's assocIation. Th's dock allowe
home . d homeowne , Outlot B. I
members of Sa! d to as "southerly' t 0 boats as
on what is referee . t mooring for up to w dock for one
to three boats. nt of one dock with o~=~oad and is allo~:~:d has been
allocated the plac~me part 0 f 608 Pleasant hased the property m
Outlot A was d' 'sion. Outlot IS Mr Schneider purc
f the sub IVI ment...
part 0 h development a~ee h' understandmg,
boat per t e . 2005 wIth t IS
. the dock smce
usmg
l!o:I"H:
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 5 of8
REICHERT'S
SfARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED
-OENOTES IRON 1l0NUIlENT
SCALE: I INCH EQUALS ~ FEET
ADDITION " i t. ..' ,: A /., T
~.~~...: ,~c-;u; - _-1""!.~ -.-___ ..-..-~
EGAN, FIELD II NOWAK, IHe.
SURV[YORS
("":' ;'~ :-<':,,"~', .L. ... .~~..:~".~.~~:~'.1~i:(:.(
'''---,
'.
..l.-
",.': '" ,,"", "ill "C':" ,... '...;-.
.. ...., to
_I_____.J L ____ I.__
I .
t:i ~=: ~=:":::~::"'=:':~:'~~~'r
z
~. r ',.
.;,'>
...
()
"
Near Mountain
Lake Association
,........- ~.... ......
_...._......_..~.
t
\. '.
\-;~o;,\
\"'-; \
\\
\. \
/
\
~~,';,.::..~.""'" ............
DISCUSSION
Variance Request
The development contract allowed for the placement of one dock with occupancy for two (2)
moorings. On July 20, 1983, subsequent to the platting of Reichert's Addition, City Ordinance
073 went into affect which set standards for the placement and dimensions of docks on
residential lake front properties. This was amended by Ordinance 356 on December 8,2003.
These ordinances specified that a 10-foot setback must be maintained from the lot lines extended
into the lake.
Outlot A was platted in 1978 prior to current City ordinance. Outlot A was platted such that the
side lot lines are convergent. These side lot lines converge approximately 48 to 80 feet from the
ordinary high water water level (OHW). When the 10-foot setbacks are deducted from the area
where the dock may be placed, the distance is reduced to between 43 and 70 feet.
Under the development contract and the recorded plat for Reichert's Addition, it is reasonable for
the property owner to assume that the placement of a dock was an allowed use for the parcel. The
dock, as is located, not only encroaches into the 1 O-foot dock setback but continues beyond the
extended lot lines and into that area of the lake which is ancillary to Outlot B. Mr. Schneider has
approximately 630 square feet of area within the 10- foot setbacks to place a dock which would
conform to the ordinance.
_~___~J
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 6 of8
It is apparent that a dock could not be placed such that it does not encroach upon the 10-foot setback
requirements while still providing lake access. A conforming placement would allow for a dock 30
feet in length as measured from the water's edge. The depth of water at this point would be less
than 2 feet during normal water conditions and would restrict the navigation of the boat. Further,
operation of a motor at this water depth would disturb the lake substrate and re-suspend sediment,
further degrading water quality. This placement would require that any watercraft be navigated
through the aquatic vegetation. This activity would be, in staffs opinion, more disturbing to the
wetland habitat than the actual placement of the dock.
640 Pleasant View Road
10 Foot Setbacks
"
'"
Mr. Schneider has indicated that he has worked with his neighbor to the west at 665 Pleasant
View Road (Mr. Thielen) to align the dock so that the neighbor has adequate access to his dock.
Mr. Thielen has contacted staff via email indicating his support for this alignment. A copy of
this email is included. The proposed dock alignment would not protrude into the open water of
Lotus Lake and should not, therefore, pose a safety hazard or obstruction to normal boat traffic
on the Lotus Lake.
Near Mountain Lake Association maintains a dock on the southern end of Outlot B. This dock is at
least 430 feet south of the applicant's dock and should not be adversely impacted by the proposed
alignment. According to the development contract, the placement of a dock on the northerly portion
of Outlot B is a prohibited use.
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 7 of8
Wetland Alteration
The applicant will need to place the dock through a Manage 1 Wetland. Under MN Rules Chapter
8420, a wetland impact is defined as:
8420.0110, Subp. 23. Impact. "Impact" means a loss in the quantity, quality, or biological
diversity of a wetland caused by draining, filling, or excavating, as described in part
8420.0105.
Placement of the dock does not preclude the growth of aquatic vegetation. Nor does it require the
dredging of any soil materials or the placement of any fill materials within the wetland. Further, by
placing the dock per the standards set forth in Chapter 6, Article 2, the dock placement would not
result in a loss of biological diversity as it would be far enough above the water surface to allow for
adequate sunlight and space for plant growth.
The proposed placement of the dock would not result in the removal of vegetation and would not
constitute a wetland impact as defined in Minnesota Rules Chapter 8420. Therefore, the dock
placement would be considered a No-Loss under 8420.0220 of Minnesota Rules. The installation
of the posts for the dock would constitute fill within a wetland. The posts are 3 inches in diameter
which equates to 0.1 square feet of impact per post. Minnesota Rules 8420.0155 Subp. 9 De
minimis. A. (4)(b) allows for up to 20 square feet of wetland impact regardless oftype, inside the
building setback zone, as defined in the local shoreland management ordinance.
Placement of the dock entirely within the conforming area as shown above would require the
removal of additional vegetation to create a route for the boat to navigate in and out of the open
water. This vegetation would experience continued disturbance due to the navigation of the boat
through the corridor. In staff's opinion, this would be more detrimental to the wetland than
extending the dock to navigable waters.
OTHER AGENCIES
The applicant is responsible for obtaining any permits or approvals from the appropriate
regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval. The Carver County SWCD
has indicated that they have no issues with the dock as long as no fill is placed in the wetland nor
any dredging ofthe lake occurs. The Riley-Purgatory-BluffCreek Watershed District turned
back permitting authorities to all municipalities within their jurisdiction as of January 1, 2008.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Variance from the 10-
foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family Residential
(RSF), which will extend through the lO-foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the lot line
extended;
And
Schneider Variance
Planning Case # 08-15
August 5, 2008
Page 8 of 8
The Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve a Wetland Alteration
Permit to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values based upon the
attached findings of fact and subject to the following conditions:
1. No aquatic vegetation is to be removed by uprooting of the vegetation. The applicant may
cut only that vegetation which is necessary for the placement of the dock, the mooring of the
boat, and the navigation of the boat to open water. The vegetation shall be cut at a height
equal to the bottom of the dock or at a depth of the propeller.
2. The dock shall be installed eight (8) inches above the Ordinary High Water Elevation.
3. The dock shall be no wider than the current three and one-half (3.5) feet as shown on the
survey submitted by the applicant.
4. The dock shall be shortened by thirteen (13) feet from what is shown on the survey to allow
for a minimum separation between docks of twenty (20) feet.
5. The boat shall be docked as close to the lakeside end of the dock as possible so as to
minimize the disturbance of aquatic vegetation for the docking of the boat.
6. No more than one watercraft may be docked on the subject property.
7. No fill or excavation may occur within the jurisdictional wetland boundaries or below the
ordinary high water elevation of Lotus Lake except for the fill associated with the minimum
number of posts necessary to maintain a safe dock.
8. The applicant shall abide by all applicable provisions of Chapter 6 and Chapter 20 of
Chanhassen City Code."
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Email from Pete Thielen dated 7/24/08.
4. Registered Land Survey.
5. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List.
g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-15 schneider variance & wap\staffreport.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
INRE:
The application of Mr. Gary Schneider for a Variance from the lO-foot dock setback zone and a
Wetland Alteration Permit to request a No-Loss determination for wetlands on site.
On August 5, 2008, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting
to consider the application of Mr. Gary Schneider for variance and wetland alteration approval.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development preceded by
published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested
persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential, RSF.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential- Low Density use.
3. The property is Outlot A ofthe Reichert's Addition Plat recorded on January 23, 1978.
4. The Ordinance directs that a variance may be granted by the Board of Adjustment and
Appeals or the City Council only if the following criteria are met. The six (6) criteria and
our findings regarding them are:
a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. For purposes of
the definition of undue hardship, reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of
comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a
proliferation of variances, but to recognize that in developed neighborhoods preexisting
standards exist. Variances that blend with these preexisting standards without departing
downward from them meet these criteria.
Finding: Ofthe eleven lots within 500 feet ofthe subject property with lake frontage,
five have docks. It is reasonable, based upon the plat and the development contract, for
the property owner to assume they have rights to install a dock. Outlot A has convergent
side lot lines which preclude having adequate area to install a dock while meeting current
ordinance setback requirements and having the water depth for adequate draft to operate
most motorized watercraft.
b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable,
generally, to other property within the same zoning classification.
1
Finding: The creation of Outlot A with the Reichert's Addition Plat is a unique
situation. Outlot C, which is owned by 608 Pleasant View Road, has a similar situation
and has installed a dock. Outlot C does not, however, have the same constraints imposed
upon it by the convergent side yard lot lines which create an area which is not conducive
to the placement of a dock which conforms to current ordinance setback requirements.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or
income potential of the parcel of land.
Finding: Although a dock will increase the value of the property, it is not the sole intent
for requesting this variance. The property owner wishes to have overnight dockage
rights and under the development contract for the outlot, conditions were allocated for
the placement of one dock with overnight mooring for up to two boats as part of the
subdivision.
d. That the alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The lot was created in 1978, prior to Ordinance 073 which set standards for the
dimension and placement of docks. The lot was created with divergent side lot lines which
does not allow for the placement of a dock which would conform to current ordinance. The
development contract for the subdivision allocates one dock with mooring for up to two
boats.
e. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel ofland is located.
Finding: Mr. Schneider has indicated that he has worked with the property owner to the
west of the subject site to align the dock in a manner which does not obstruct their access
to and from the lake. Mr. Thielen has corroborated this in an email to staff dated
7/24/08. Outlot B (Near Mountain Lake Home Owners Association) has a dock on the
southerly portion of the parcel per the 1978 development contract. The placement of Mr.
Schneider's dock will not obstruct access to and from Outlot B, nor will it extend into the
area of the lake where normal lake traffic operates. Therefore, the dock will not create an
obstruction or safety issue to normal lake traffic.
f. That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply oflight and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or decrease
visibility or site distances, or increases the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety or
substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
Finding: The dock will not be located near any homes or public streets and is a typical
use of lakefront property. By installing the dock eight inches above the Ordinary high
Water elevation, without the placement of any additional fill or the excavation of any
materials from the lake/wetland, no impact to the wetland will occur. Further, by extending
the dock away from the shoreline, the existing vegetation will be maintained and will not be
disturbed as a result of boat traffic to and from the dock.
2
5. Wetland Alteration (follows Conditional Use Permit criteria):
a. The proposed project will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,
comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city.
b. The proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive
plan and the zoning chapter of the City Code.
c. The proposed project will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be
compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity
and will not change the essential character of that area.
d. The proposed project will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned
neighboring uses.
e. The proposed project will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water
and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and
services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the
proposed use.
f. The proposed project will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
g. The proposed project will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment
and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the
general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare,
odors, rodents, or trash.
h. The proposed project will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create
traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares.
1. The proposed project will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access,
natural, scenic or historic features of major significance.
J. The proposed project will be aesthetically compatible with the area.
k. The proposed project will not depreciate surrounding property values.
1. The proposed project will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in the
City code.
6. The placement of the dock does not meet the standards for definition as a wetland impact.
The placement ofthe dock would result in no net loss ofwetIand function or value.
3
7. The placement of posts for the anchoring of the dock would constitute a wetland impact
under Minnesota Rules Chapter 8420. However, total impact from these posts would be less
than the 20 square feet of impact which is allowed under the De minimis exemption as
described in Chapter 8420.0155 and does not require a wetland replacement plan.
8. The planning report #08-15, dated August 5, 2008 prepared by Terrance Jeffery, et aI, is
incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Variance #08-15
from the lO-foot dock setback zone for the placement ofa dock on a lot zoned Single Family
Residential (RSF), which will extend through the 10- foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the
lot line extended; and approve Wetland Alteration Permit $08-15 to issue a Decision of No Net
Loss of Wetland Function and Values subject to the recommended conditions of approval
contained within the staff report.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5th day of August 2008.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:
Its Chairman
4
Planning Case No. O?J - \ S
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100
CiTY OF c:~nlHASSEN
G::!CJ!70'T~~
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
JUN 1 1 Z008
J;NGIN!;(;AING PEPT..
PLEASE PRINT
Applicant Name and Address: J Owner Name and Address:
QAjj J SmtJf:.'tJ~a.. 4 ClJlrltIA- ~ .Jl:HvJu'W ~ 5Mf-- - <5 A-fl-t c:::r- ~/^, :YIO-J?4
'10 Pf-ti4SAN,VtiiJ CitJ-rI-/lA&W-t-#J!tJ 5C11J./u/}~/L
CJltvJ HA5SftJ MtI -;)'$3/7
Contact: GM-I
Phone: 9~J- Cf7.:f /[3;"1/ Fax:
Email: SCf/rJUD(3;{"e!vl'i:,J ICOt1l
Contact:
Phone:
Email:
Fax:
NOTE: Consu~tion with City staff is reQuired Rrior to submittal, including review of development
plans V jl1~-r tl/tdI ~Srn SfJ/<.UI&12.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (V AC)
)( Variance (VAR) dOO ,\
,J (APrrR- 11i~ P;1c7J
~ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) I So
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
Non-conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Zoning Appeal
Rezoning
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Site Plan Review (SPR)*
!Jet) / Notification SignQ
1/"'/ (City to install and remove)
_ tt1AI'-'r'> Ai-fA toIC/6,1;';J;A;5
. X Escrow for Filing FeeS/Attorney Cost**
-~UP/SPRNAC~LMetes & Bounds 100
_- ~50 Minor SUB
TOTAL FEE$J' '110#
Sign Plan Review
Subdivision*
An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing.
*Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11"
reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diQital copy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format.
**Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application.
SCANNED
PROJECT NAME:
Do Cf:..- Ki ~t.{ D PL- <iA-SMII" Vtw #J
N ot-T1f- ~D oF ltJ"'ruJ LA~L
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~1Z0/-{)l TUlP-I/l:, f2,AN6~ ~O}3 R~/eH{:(br6 A!J{)/;iJd
L(),- ~o5j !3UJ(j::..-oof ~t1CI-t&~rS ()(2f&~Au J.I{)J5z"/~y- -r {)!.JTtorA
. I ~'ilGH ~ A/JlJtTl1*J
LOCATION:
TOTAL ACREAGE: ra.tJA.JJi. lirr
WETLANDS PRESENT: "f... YES
~~
NO
PRESENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING:
12 z5 iD~'Tl Ad/
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REASON FOR REQUEST: MAY 13 1.--v'1{1ie ~MM 1t../UsrA sPilt: 1'/4t .5'7A~ 71iAr-
,~ 'I
-riff /JoCk- DtJ /WI>( Oiftrl.Oi A Is Nod - ~[)/YlILlAvr .
1!.t.,6)(/tSTlA/6- (1,9tJYl;';JA77JJ 0-'; CCJV"tN'A,JTS 11 r oT/f-7VJ /'# cav'4~.&/
Uff.. !d&t!Il-fA9t&l10 BZA4lltJr Lo~ oJ 0U'rt..6r8 ;2J:;fM~/s Aoj)~'
tJi-A(LMeu~ L,AiJ-~~soe/A-7up/ - f/s M~Jv0 :)~ti;tJ ~ 6dl7..0r;4
l'tJt/t.--- 1tJ.J,ki &c(<. Wilt! MtEJ;t;~ Ff;;t-;1- OV~J()16R'T &~/I
-
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my k~o:ledge.
)::J~ (p-{, -08
Signature of Applicant
Si~r~Jd~.
Date
b -(, ---08
Date
G:\pLAN\forms\Development Review ApplicationDOC
SCMHlED
Rev. 12/05
Jeffery, Terry
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
J. P. Thielen [thieI002@yahoo.com]
Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:05 PM
Jeffery, Terry
Gary Sneider's dock
We've talked with and worked with Gary on his dock. Weare in full agreement and urge the city to allow it.
Pete & Jan Thielen
665 Pleasant View Road
Chan
1
fTl
)(
iii'
...
S'
.0
o
o
n
l'
I '"
...'"
o
;0
o
~~r
C1l ;0 0
., -<
~ I -I
~ C) C
C1l I
~ ::E en
..... l>
c ~
fTl
~;o r
;0 fTl )>
'--' r
~^
11m
(Xl
lO
IE
\
\
o
,~--r
" "-......,'
O'O~ L ,')...
,'-~
l'LL
t'OS
trl
"
r3-
O~::T
:J ~
0.0"",
u>""'~
Cc'<
.., :J
0.0
~~
..,"'"
~
.., -.
c3-<'
:J'<~
0.0.::T
~ -.0
..,~~
s:~s:
~ -.
UlUl
OCUl
"Oc
CD..,
<<
o _.~
. - !!?~
o
~:J"O
::T -
~OO
:J:J
~o.o
0....."'"
(i) ::T .,
OCD
o ~"O
_-0
..,
~o~
:r 3 ~
:J 0
~OUl
Ul
o 0:0
.....c..,
o -~
.,<"0
::o~
~~
~o.
[0-
~'<
"'"
~
0.
o
o
.....
~
c....
C
:J
~
VI
P
~
o
o
0)
0\
.....
.....
o
t:O
Z"
(1)
()
~.
n
0'
tl
0,
<:
(1)
.
U'J
E.
~
C1l
.....
o
o
.
t'
o
S
m
o
~
5
C1l "'C
8 "T1::r'
::3 ~ g
gr ~.. ~ ~:I:
~ ~ ~~ ~A ~s tJ
Z :;;:~~ a..g C"'rca
5'~~ ~~5'1>l s::
tJ1 n ~~ 0 r.>()q Fre-
tJ1. .....oW"WWW
~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~
"_- I U'
I
I
r....
-'0
fTl ~ .
~. (II 0
... 0
5' ~
.0
,
o g> ,
~ [/
1',
I
l~
I 5
/ t
I
I
(
\
\
r--J
J
r"6
/ ?=
::E
r
5'
(/) 0 (1)
~
r
fTI
~~I) /
z --
"
rrl
~ 0)
0
o
.,
o
"0 !.
., ::J
010
CD' ~
(') ~
ro+N
zg
o .....
. 1
(;01
1\)0
O~
or
...,jl
I '::::1
WN
01
I\)~
r~
o
~
(/)
C
0"
'--.
CD
n
,.....
;u
m
-
()
ffiO
;oC
-I,.-ta
- -
en
)>
o
o
-
-I
-
o
z
,.....
o
CD
o
en
CD
3
CD
:J
~
en
o
-...
(')
)>
:::0
<
rr1
:;0
(")
o
c
Z
-I
-<
.,
CD
n
o
.,
a.
-.
-...
o
:J
':<
,.
I.. ,
, ,..
I
,
I
(
\ \
'':
4
,'1,' _
~ I ,
1_'
"0'"
-':J
~c.
0'"
-00
C1l :J
::l I
I
/
N02014'30"W
170. aoz
, -<:J 0
'.(' C
(' \ '
'/;... )>-;
" r
"',,<' 0
).'
, ,<"
(' ,'I -;
, -<'"
, ,...J
, ,
,,.'"'"
r-T'
..,..,
/
~/
.CO 4\
~ \ 'tJo \f
/ ~~~\
~v}~ ~~
~
'"
I ' ,
....'
/
/ 0-0
/
~
/
6'6'
,..,
/ 'J ,
J
o
,.-ta
3:0'" CD
5' co>
::J !::.., tJ)
~~s:v;
~ >n 0
o. 'tl ."
-. ;0 ~ CD
(II !:! 'tl fTl
0(')0>
(II J: (II ;0
(IIfTln -
c;oo~
3-t-tJ)
lDtJ)....
c. ::T
> -.
.... a (II
o alii
CT - C
lD ~ ..,
00<
.., Z n
. '<
Z(')....
Oo::T
~..,n
....<
~nlE
-.., n
~(')!e.
'0
=ec=
. ::l::l
....n
~o
-
D II
!. a ::0
S:::J ~
= 3 3:
goo
::J ~ Z
en 3 c
lD 3:
z~ fTl
O"'Z
. III -l
Nn ."
(;01'" 0
l.Co c
en::J Z
pi c. a
3
o
..,
l'
n
c.
o .
:t>
1
" -
<
,
<
/
-
/
-f;)Q, 1J~~
f;)f;) 'b~.
1J~ ~
/ '?~~
/
~
(\0
~~
~Cj
f
6'6'
/
z
())
-....J~
NUl
'0)
VI \ ' ~o
~ fr" -":
I " rT1
'I -----,
'-v/ I 1
-- , \ ----I ~ ~ ;,.
0) "\ ,r ,'C ~ ~.g-:g
'" /" ::l c: 0 C1l ..,
"/~"'::l 0
., 1 < a. 0 x
/, ~ - 3'
--,-, ~
"0'" / ,'(1)
~. ~ / S'\.i; ~~ " 6'0
g( \9~ -a ,'00
~.. ~ '
)"c9..X< l', ''I
o ~" 0)"
~ ' I
(/~..,~ ./ '..........
</1' "1G', , "
;.. ~ "
~&i_~, /1
~:~ ~"''l' ......1./
,--
,--
I
--i
..--
I
,-,
'-'
__J
I
/
/
, "
'J .
"'T,
,,.,,
,..--
I
,-,
'- ,
, -,
-,/~ ' /
, '" -):-
< J ,,'
....'" '"
(:~" ~
...',
,
,
r
m
G)
m
z
o
G)
Q)
~
() 0) Qo
:T~
o 0 ()
:J lJ
:J"-
o CD -.
Ul 0 ...,
Ul Ul ..J
CD 0 C.
:J :J
.,.....'(
5:<
z -.
(J1 ~ (fJ
(J1;o (")
VI 0 ::r
--"0
-.....Ie.
::J
CD
-.
C.
CD
..,
'"
, ",'"
, -1- ~ ,
......"....<if "
, I ,
,.'
'\
-0
...
'\
o
o
(")
^
r
o
C')
Q)
.....
-.
o
::J
(fJ
^
CD
.....
(")
:r
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July
24, 2008, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that
on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for
Schneider Dock Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit - Planning Case 08-15 to the
persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope
addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United
States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were
those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and
by other appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
thi~ay of :::Iu1i ' 2008.
\ ~tJ::.ut~~~ KIM 1. M~UW~SSEN )
~/i Notary Public-Minnesota
#~/...............~"$ My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2010
./UI
C)
c
;0
0)
0)
:e
C)S
c.-
.- I/)
- I/)
CU._
0) e
:I:e
.~ 0
:cO
:JC)
c..c
.... .-
o c
c
0) cu
u-
;oc..
o c
ZO)
I/)
I/)
cu
.r::
c
cu
.r::
o
C)
c
;0
0)
0)
:e
c
C)o
c'-
._ I/)
- I/)
CU.-
0) e
:I:e
.~ 0
:cO
:JC)
c..c
....c
o c
0) CU
u-
.- c..
-
o c
zO)
I/)
I/)
CU
.r::
c
CU
.r::
()
Cll
1:: 19
~ rJ)
(5 .~
;, .9
co ~
E cO E
g>-g Q)
'1:: l!! a.
III ro ~ c
..c: Q) - 0
(/):Em.,.
.- +-' Cll
r= '0 ~ Ci>
.0:> ro ~
E"E,<::<(
.00::::; "C
o.Q)OC
0:E 0 Cll
~ 6~ ~
~gui~
Cll'-L."C L.
GO -g Q) C Q)
OQ).oCll "C
o 2 E Q) 'CD
N"Orou C
_,.;..c C ..c
10 C U .~ U
liP:.- ro CJ)
:J ~ g > .~
g>~:JCll fi
<(:EOL. E
u.g ~
>;.5 _ +-' U
~2Cll~ cd
OO~:r: 5-..l<: ~
Q):a~Q)UCll
~5C3~.g(9
CD
E
i=
~
Q)
.....
CU
C
c
o
+:
III
CJ
o
...J
'jij
1II
o
a.
e
CL
.;.; ..
c >- c
CUt: 0
CJ Gl'-
:a a. 10
aeg
<(CL...J
-
C
o
:e
"C
"C
<(
00
1::Gi
Q).!:!
-fie
._ r:::
Q)1Il
~:2
--
<('0
~~
'5 Ow
Q,~
"CG)
Cll~
0"
~~
3:-
.~ g
>.!!!
'Ego
~E
Cllr:::
Q)O
a::~
OU
."..9
CO<
"C .9 Q):::: Gl
Q)O~ 00 _ ..c Cui_ ;
..c 0 - Q)'en.!a,g ~ 0 . c 0
-..c"C 00 ~ ~ O'Q)-Q)CO.....
~~ro rJ) ~~ 0
:JOQ) ~ :J Q) :J~>-Eg~Gl~
~~= U ~ ~ ~Ci>~ECllooS~
~~~ f~ ~ ~ ~~~8~~~:
OC.~ ~.~ 0 ~ro~cco~~
~~~ "Ce 'en g; .sCC~:;::U:a~
L.-U ~a.d~ .,. ..cOE~cQ)cu~
_OEQ).,oQ)=E Q) IOUc3:Q)..c==
000..0 Q)...-Q) _E-Ill..c
.s e fi a. 0 fi :J E E '00 Q) .- 0 > I-
0- -Q)L.Co.O GOCll~E1ij-IllGl
-'5 g'ii) 0.0 Q)U Q) e Q) Cll.o 0.00 Gl.c
000. Q) Q) fi C~..coo:JQ)~~"'"
.- .,. Ol ~ oo..c Q) Cll _ C or. a. _ Gl
OlCQ)C~C-..c ....
c-Q)~_CllE- L.o ~U~.9Q)Ou~>o~
.- C E .; 0 - "C _. 0 ":> Q) U Q) ..c ... c'
L. 'co 0 a. 0 C Q) 1ii L..'O" - Q) E ~ ._
m~Q)=3:c~Cll .0 ~L.~~O"C Ill~
..c 0 fi .g.~ Q)"C"C 00 Q) __ a.. ~ 0 -'S; Gl 1J Gl
U Q)":>ooQ)Q) cOlOOoo ..c>-O~GlE
00l L..Q)>OO _Cll:J- UO'L._.....
--c..cQ) -0 -o.-o.~~Q):Joo.~lIIc
15 "C .;:: - > a. Q) - - - U
:J~:J..co UQ)U .oE-:t::o ~.c=o
0.- Ol Q)Q) :JQ)>-Q)~""'Gl-
CllO:JC~L.~ ..c~cO~ C...-.....lII
00 Cll;>Q) -;> .o_~o-O-lII
.- ii) 0 0 _ L. Ol Q) 00 Q) Cll Cll. 10.... 1II._
fiQ)U~Q)CCllE _00 GOQ)-.....~E
_:JQ)_2CllooL._.Q)UOOQ)= >CJ)-
o U Cll OOQ)CllcCllCOCll OGlE
Q) g'e' g' ~~ c Q) ~ .9 'O'-E 0 E ;:..c . a.Gl 3: 0
00 L. 0.'- = Q) ..c .= L. Cll Q) Q) , 0 Ol ..... 0
o ~ 00 ro 3: g. E .2 e c :;..c E >. ~ ~ :E - ~ ...
e-c:C Q):t:: Q) E:o 5 Cll. ~ OoON:J Q);;;.....c'
:JCll-..cCll..co:JQ)3:b~OO>"~Q).....e_
a. U +-' U en- I- f' a...c :J;' . 0 L.: N - E 1II a. c
=:J= ~ +-' ~i-Q)IOQ) c
Q)o.o.o ~Q) ..l<::t::m..cQ)~GlCU
~g.i~~~~~ ~fi 19~1ii~fil-;~
Cll"CQ) .9 Q):::: ~
1:: -_Cll Q)0..c :::: ..c 600- .....
ro ..c 0 - 00 00 .!a ..c CO. c 0
1ii.~ :::: of ~ ~'S; 3: a. Q) Q) 6 0 .....
~ 0 ~ ~~Q) ~ Q) :J~>-Eg~Gl~
>- +-' 0.0 ..c = ~ .~_ ~ ~ Ci> ~ E Cll 00 .!: .;::
E cO 'E ;e Cll:J 'Q)_0l~ Q) Q) _ I- 0 0 ~ 'E c a.
lJ) "0 L."C '0' ~ "C ~ - U 00 U Cll E 0 >-
r::: ai ~ ~ ~ C 'ill a. ~ 6 cl E Cll :J 53 C 0 Gl ~
J!~6 ~GiE~B"C~ j :E ~~~~~~~~:J
(/) :E m .,. L. 0 E ~ a. U .- Q) Lri U c 3: Q)..c ==
~ -Cll ~~co~~oQ)=E Q) ...-Q)Q)_E-CU,c
f- '0 ~ Ci> U 0 .- L. - a. o...c .0 EE' 00 00 'E- -e 0 > I-
o li> ro ::: 'CD ~ .9::: cl 2 e ~ ~ 0 Q) GO Cll 00 Cll - cu Gl
E"E '<:: <( ~:2 00 o.:J C 00 a. 0 Q) U ..c ~ ~~ -g 0.Q) ~ ,g ;
o 0 0::::; "C - .- ~ .,. Ol Q) oo..c Q) - Cll - 00 .-
a. CI) 0 C <(-....0 Ol - Q) c..c ..c Q) -;; - C "C a. - Gl
o:EoCll c-Q)~_c-_ ~ ~U~.9Q)8~0>~
Oc~~ ~~~EE;>-~E"C -Q)~~~~Q)fiQ)"'~S
.. 0 ~ Q) - 0- Cll Cll 0 0 a. 0 C .0 Cll Q) e '(3 00 0"C E III .....
~ g ui ~ :J III Q) ~ ~ '6 3: C ~ Cll 00 Q) ~ a.. ~ g -'S; Gl 1J ~
Cll'- L. "C Q, ~ ..c 0 - - .~ Q)"C "C C Ol 00 00 ..c >- 0 ~ Gl E
"OQ)~ L.Q) -UOOlQ)":>ooQ)Q) Cll:J 0.L.
GO I:: - "CG)=_c..cL..Q)>00 Cll :c U 0.1II.....
o!.oCll "CCll~.oor.--Q)L.~O ~o.c-Q):J8 -lIIc
o~EQ) ~o":J~~..c~o.u~ .oE'5:t::o ~;=o
~ ~ ~ g c ~ ~ a. Cll 0 g> c ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ . 0 ~ >- ~ 3: _ .! 'iij
10 :=:c' f' .Cll_ ..c ~ - .!a +-'00 . 0 _ 3: Q) .- -;> 53 .0 +-' ~ o:t:: 0'- 1II
~ U ;>r:::..c - Ol Q)OOooCllCll 0 Cll....lII.-
ii)~-ro CJ)~o-Q)U~Q)croc Q)Uoo GOQ)-t:~E
:J~g> ~>IIl-:JQ)->Cll - OOQ)CllQ)=CO>CJ)OGlE
Ol Q) _ ..c _'- 0 O"Q) "0' 0l'5>.2 2 ro tS 0 'o~..c 6 CllE...- ~ . a. 3: 0
:JCI):J- -C~Q)L.L.C_-CQ)Q)_L.CQ)"'- Gl 0
<(..c: 0 L. E Cll CIl 00 a..;:: = a. Q) ..c .= _ a. Cll E Q) ~ 0 Ol _ t)
- ~ U .g ~ 00 E 0 _00 00 Cll 3: a. E U e C oo..c >- N ::: .s:t: Gl ...
>-- - UCllr:::e-c:cQ)_CllE=6Cll~~O.oN:J~_~~
Cll"CllOO -~R:JCll_..c-Q) .0 3:--OO>"_Q)-O_
"C 2:r: Q) ....., a. - a. U +-' U Cll..c 0 :J Q) :::: U 0 L.." N a. Ui - c
oo~ :J..l<:~ ~ =:J=Wl-ua.fi:JUi'-Q)IO~E ~c
Q)=~gu~ooQ)o.o.o ~Q) ..l<::t::m..cQ)~GlIll
~~C3~.g(9~~~g.i~~~~~ ~fi !~1ii~fil-;~
a;
E
i=
~
Gl
.....
cu
C
c
o
+:
III
(,)
o
...J
'jij
1II
o
a.
e
CL
.e...; ..
c >- c
CUt: 0
.~ Gl +:
Q g. ~
q - 0
<(CL...J
1IIC)
C C
Gl._
a......
a.Gl
III Gl
:I::E
.....Gl
Ill,c
,c.....
=:10
~..
1IIJ!!
l: c
o CIl
+:E
~ E
:J 0
ao
1IIC)
C C
Gl._
a......
~Gl
cu Gl
:I::E
.....Gl
Ill,c
,c .....
=:10
~..
1IIJ!!
c c
o Gl
+:E
~ E
:J 0
ao
w ~ -0 ~ ~
~ ~ ~;i ~~ ~ ~ ~!
~ '0 g.S! Co ffi - c >-~ 8. IV ~ .9
Q>a>-c ca~ca 0:0 COCg' .Q:5 c.cc
=5~ ~Q)~ Q) ~<.- Q)~ Q)~o
<~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~
~~g Ero~ca>-~ ro~o ~~ ;5~
.!2 Q) Q) E -e 0 Q) t "C -= Q) a. ~ ~ '- Co >.~
Q}.Q .Q 8 Q) g.~ ~ .Q..~ :5 E C (5.9 (1):= g
~~.9 ~~~E~E~~8E ~ ~~Q)
u;'~.!! caQ)Q)-g~Cl)-a~.st:: ~~ ~'g-5
~!~ -g~~ca~~~~~~ u~ ~5~
=>,g~ ~;:g~~.~.!'l~"E~ ~~ ..;u~
~nE o~n~~~e~Eo~ ~o gbE
C~~ ~~caQ)~. Q)'C C o~ 0
.!!a.(I) coS~5~Q)Eo-.- -co (I) ~
~:! ~(I)m(l)~~E~~~ ~~ 8!c
~~= ~ci~~,-~8~~a: ~~ ~~g
~ g ~ . E ~ .9.~ 0 ~ .9 "3 ~ Q) 8 en 'g ~ .8
~...Q)~Q)Q)u"O~E(ij"O~5 m. :JOtS::
O(l)~~CE~'C~"OEQ)~.c Q)(ij 8~ca
~~g~~c~~~~~~~j ~~ ~~~
CE~E~i~~~E~OE~ e~ G~~
8-g~!~~:5~Gi:~K~~ a.~ Q)~~
a>--(I)E,-CO>"OE ._-c 0,- r C
~E~~~EO~~o ~xo -~ ~~~
~ < >- ai -g 0 ~ ~ ~-6.g ~ ~~ ~:5 g)-g a:
~Q)t::=-UQ)=roc(l)-Eo 00 ~_Q)
Q)"U8.rogC)~.gEnsc(l)o.c: ~c rog-:5
~8oS=5a.a.~Q)Q)5~(I) 5~ !-u
c '- rocOQ)c(l)E~.-(I) urn Q)~
~-g~~5~Q)5~:J"O~!~~cC) g~c
~ca(ij~ca:~Q)8~~=-g~:~ ~~o
Q)(I)Q)c:.Q:;;;(I) (UEa.S'--.-""C a. 0
~~~~~~~~~~(U~Q)a.~Q)O Q)~~
oo~a_o EOG~~-~~E2.cO .c-~
~E~>=-Q)= rn(l)ro""C~ ro'- -rom
-E ""C ~ t 8:<C."t:'i ~'2 ::J (I) U);; 13 c ~ ~ ~-o
CD ~:G ~~e;;~ c:1- o-g.~.~ g's~.c ."0 ~t
KEg""C~~~~d~~~roe8~~~~m~
~<CmS~u.~g~""CQ)~5~a.c:~gQ)~
Q)C~~::JQ)CE::J .c:'-a. -~Q)O._~'-
>~""C'-U)~2Eocmma.Eu~.cU)~rnQ)
~~~SQ)~moo8a~mjQ)O;;~~.5~
_Q)b.5~Q)~Ubmc~Q)c:~~~a.E~C:
~,~._>C:~Q)Q).-""C~~Em~Q)~""Com'-
..=> ~u~~..!'l EEt=~ ~E 22~~.E g-Qj,* U g>~
~ -g ~ g . 0 .~ 0 . -5 ~ .a -ri g ~~ Q) ~ ~:u j
~c:~~~a.mo(l)o~_S,-s=&ES~o~
~~a.en~~Q)~~~o~oo~o~CI)S~c:ti~
g~~~"~m~mg~~~SC:~Q)~""C>l""C!
Q: enU E c::C~"2 a.ro.~ Q) 35 ~.~-5 0 ~ffi Q) a 0
c ~O'-'-omCJ)"Oo13 CI)~U)-E~~~a.-
~g~U~!~c~~~cSEi~o~i-~g
~~~~~~~o~E~~g- m~8_~~~
~~~~~a.~~!EEu~:Ca~g~~~8~
~nNC~=~ oE~c2~_~ -o~E
~~~~~~t=~~~85~~~~~*K~~g
u.. ...
en '- CJ) ~
cv '00 c (U
a ~ c~; ~~ (I) ~ "O~
~ '0 8.~a. ffi-5 ~~.~ ~~ ~g
~~i ~~: ~s ~<C~ ~- c:~~
<C~!E ~i5~.sg 8:~~ ~~ ~.~8
"2sg Ero~ro~b ro~~ ~~ -::J~
~! cv ~ -e &~ ~.g <5! a. ~ Q) 0 ~ ~~
~ ~n ~ ~ e ~ ~'ro:S -;;; 5 ~ <5; ~ - C
>~cg '-ma.E'-oE~CI)oE .~ S~cv
- Q) ro Q) "0 oJ Q) 0 ~ - c~ "oc- ~
~~~ "O~~c:~~~~-i ~.m '-::JC
en ~ ~ C 'OJ::: m (5 a.s ::J ~ a. "0 ~ :E 0 0
=>00 ~_~E.cE~~_~ ~> U
E=~ C=O~~"iij"o~5Cl ~~ <5~~
.c:.g:g ~:.g'~~m Q;~ E ~ ~~ c~ E
~a.(I) rom.::L.-.C""CQ)Eo-,- -m (l)UCO
sroQ) E~m~o~E~~E 0(1) 8~~
"O~5 0 .a.(I)E~o.~~ro s~ "0-0
~.5~ ~~~~~-E~~~~ as 13S~
c;;g-c,"E'ai-"!!!s::~::~~1! 000 cc~
c:,-Q)C:Q)Q)o""C~Eco""C.::L._ ro ~&~
~n2i~E~~e-g~~S5 Q)ro OQ)m
=a ti8 Q) ai c g,m ~ Q)~ ~ ~.~ :E ~ >:UUi
C E ~ E ~"~ ~ ~ 5l E'iij 0 E ~ e ~ 5 ~ ~c
O""CC:Q)=en~F~mQ)e 0 0.'-
~ti~~ro~~~~~,-a.~~ o~ Q)~~
;E.~-g!ES!~8~BJ~ ;~ ~i~
.~~~~.28ig~-g:;SE~ 8,5 .~~~
Q)"'CQ)mgCJ)~.gEmcCl)o~ ~~ (QO~
~ 0 8" 0 .- c: a. 0.= Q) Q) C 0 CI) 5 ~ cv.f: :::
cU'--~~oQ)g(l)Eg~CI) Om ~Q)~
~~~-g5~~~::J::J"'C~~~~c:CJ) g~~
~m~~a~~Q)8~~a~g~:~ ~~8
~ -E.~'~ ~ ~"~ ~ ~~ ~ ~; a ~.O; ~ ~ 5 ~
~Q)~'-~:::E~uaQ)=j~E~2 5~m
~~~~~<C~~!~~:~;;~~~ ~~~
~ti~a.~~~c:~o~~~~~~~ .(5~~
KEgi~~~~d~~~~e8~~~~roQ
~<Cro-~u..~g~"'CQ)~~>a.C:c5Q)m
Q)c.s:CjcvC:E:J .c:'-o. -~~O._~'-
~~~~~~gEOa(Qmo.~U~5~~CJ)~
c~0~m~~ou~a~m~~0~Q)Es5
~~b-~~cUb~s-E~c~~~~E~S
c.~.- >c.a Q) CU'-~ c:1l) m",- Q) ~""C 0 m
.. :J ~ U ~ 0 ~ E ~ () Q) 2 Q) ~ ~ oS ~~ '* 0 ~ ~
! i ~ c: . 15'~ 5 ~ .s E ~ 2 . g ~~ Q) ~ ~....-g
~C:Q)~~a.roo~0~-s~s=&E~~8~
~~~~~~Q)~~-o~~~O~(I)S~c:~~
g~E~jm~mg~~~SC:~Q)""C"'C>~"O!
Q:en8Ec:~~~~~~Q)~m~tig~~Q)ao
c: .O'-~omO)"Oo13 (I)~CI)-E~.fi~a.:::
~g~U~!~C~~~cSEt~o~~-~!
~~~~~~~o~E~~g- ro~8~~~~
~~a~~a.~~~EEu~~a~g~~~8~
~~~~~~~Q)Q)8~~~~~ro~~~~~~
~oo~~~~~~~~uu~~~~<~~~~~
u.. ...
ll._I- ~; ~ l~t~1
;~ ..~
: ~~
l
~r - -,' I .'f;~
" . -'\:
'.' :. ~
J.... '_
'----
BARBARA L HEDLUND
10014 INDIGO DR
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1206
MICHAEL & KATHRYN SCHWARTZ
469 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9576
ANTHONY G & SALLY A HEARD
510 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
MARK LOREN OLSON &
536 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
JOHN T & RUTH E SCHEVENIUS
570 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
JAHN A DYVIK
610 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
SEAN & MELINDA FITZGERALD
630 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
RONALD D DEJONGH &
6310 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
SUSAN W DAMMEN
6321 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139
JOHN W SCHNEIDER JR
6340 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
DENNIS ZHU &
105 LAKELAND SHORES RD
LAKELAND, MN 55043-9601
DAVID FRANKLIN LABADIE &
489 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9576
DOUGLAS J & LANA HABERMAN
520 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
MICHAEL R & JODY SCHEPERS
540 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
THOMAS M & NANCY S SEIFERT
600 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN,MN 55317-8327
NEAR MOUNTAIN LAKE ASSN INC
610 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
MIKEAL G BYSTROM JR
6300 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
BRIAN & JERIL YN D HOOKS
6311 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139
ROBERT M & ANETTE R BARNHART
6330 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
JOHN A & SARAH A WAY
6341 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139
TODD R MAGILL &
20433 CHERYL DR
TORRANCE, CA 90503-1815
CURTIS G & CHERI L ANDERSON
500 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437
ALAN & LINDA K KRAMER
531 INDIAN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9533
TODD L & PATRICIA A FROSTAD
561 INDIAN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9533
JOHN E NICOLAY JR
608 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
KEVIN A & LEANNE M BENSON
620 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
EUGENE A & KATHLEEN A GAGNON
6306 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
BRUCE H & DEBRA J HOMAN
6320 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
DERRICK J BILDERBEEK &
6331 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139
MICHAEL & SARAH WENTZIEN
6350 SUMMIT CIR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138
MICHAEL P JONIKAS &
6368 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9109
DANIEL L ROBBINS &
6375 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
ALEXANDER C & KARENEA LAI
6381 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
ROBERT F & DIANA L DAVIS
6387 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
GARY J SCHNEIDER &
640 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327
CHRISTIAN G & LISA P OLSEN
6440 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277
KEITH M & MARY BETH HOFFMAN
6470 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9279
DAVID R & VALERIE L ROSSBACH
670 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509
CHARLES R & JUDY L PETERSON
708 LAKE PT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284
EILEEN T KELLY
740 LAKE PT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284
JOSEPH J & CHRISTINE K STONE
6370 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9109
JOHN P & SUZANNE D BOHN
6377 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
THOMAS F III & KAREN M CONBOY
6383 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
BRENT G & KAREN J BLACKEY
6389 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
CHRISTOPHER S PELLETIER &
6420 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277
THOMAS M & SUSAN J HUBERTY
6450 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277
SAMUEL G & LAURIE J CURNOW
650 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509
PAUL L & DESTINI MOLITOR
6725 IROQUOIS CIR
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-1014
MICHAEL A & JANET A STANZAK
724 LAKE PT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284
BEVERLY C THOMAS
745 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509
MICHAEL A & CYNTHIA A COLSON
6373 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
JAMES R & KATHRYN A DREESEN
6379 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
MARK E & KRISTEN 0 HANSBERRY
6385 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
KEVIN & KATHERINE WORMS-
LYNCH
6391 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128
CRAIG N HANSEN &
6430 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277
MICHAEL & DEBRA HAYDOCK
6460 FOX PATH
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9279
JOHN P & JANE THIELEN
665 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509
GARY M SCHELlTZCHE
680 PLEASANT VIEW RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509
DAVID S & DEBRA M TOOLE
732 LAKE PT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284
CHUNYI L1N &
800 FOX CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283
Public Hearing Notification Area (500+ feet)
Schneider Dock Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit
640 Pleasant View Road (Outlot A, Reichert's Addition)
Planning Case 2008-15
Lotus Lake