Loading...
CC Staff Report 8-25-08 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 952.227.1100 Fax: 952.227.1110 Building Inspections Phone: 952.227.1180 Fax: 952.227.1190 Engineering Phone: 952.2271160 Fax: 952.227.1170 Finance Phone: 952.2271140 Fax: 952.227.1110 Park & Recreation Phone: 952.227.1120 Fax: 952.227.1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone: 952.227.1400 Fax: 952.227.1404 Planning & Natural Resources Phone: 952.227.1130 Fax: 952.227.1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone: 952.227.1300 Fax: 952.227.1310 Senior Center Phone: 952.2271125 Fax: 952.227.1110 Web Site www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us '-+ -- rrJlll"" MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Terrance Jeffery, Water Resources Coordinator DATE: August 25, 2008 6'bj. SUBJ: Gary Schneider Dock Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit Planning Case 08-15 PROPOSED MOTIONS: The Chanhassen City Council approves a Variance from the 10-foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF), which will extend through the lO-foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the lot line extended as shown in plans prepared by Kurt M. Kisch, dated June 30, 2008; And The Chanhassen City Council approves a Wetland Alteration Permit to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values based upon the attached Findings of Fact and subject to conditions shown on page 8 of the staff report. City Council approval of Wetland Alteration Permits and Variances require a simple majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a variance from the 10-foot dock setback to extend his dock through the dock setback and 51 feet over the lot line extended. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Wetland Alteration Permit to extend his dock through a wetland. The wetland crossing would not be considered a wetland impact under the Wetland Conservation Act but would instead be considered a "No Loss". PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 5, 2008 to review the wetland alteration permit and variance for the dock placement. The primary concerns of the public and the Planning Commission with regard to this application included the following: The City of Chanhassen · A growing community with clean lakes, quality schools, a Charming downtown, thriving businesses, winding trails, and beautiful parks. A great place to live, work, and play. Todd Gerhardt Schneider Dock Wetland Alteration Permit & Variance August 25, 2008 Page 2 Issue: Conferring a right to the property owner that would not be shared by others. Response: The original subdivision of Reichert's addition was clear that a dock for up to two boats was a permitted use for Outlot A. Outlot A is a unique situation in that the convergent side lot lines create a lot that could not conform to City Code while still allowing adequate access to the lake. The lot was created prior to the dock ordinance coming into effect. Issue: That the Near Mountain Lake Association was not allowed an additional dock in 2006. Response: The Near Mountain Lake Association's request for an additional dock was denied based on area of the lot. Under Section 20-266 of the Chanhassen City Code, a beach lot must have at least 30,000 square feet of area for the first dock and 20,000 square feet for each additional dock. Outlot B of Reichert's Addition, the Near Mountain Lake Association's beach lot, measures only 40,000 square feet in area. Under the original subdivision, this lot was granted one dock with three slips and the existing conditions met this allowance. Issue: Impact to the floristic diversity of the wetland - impacts to wetland due to use of chemicals. Response: The placement of the dock will not result in dredging of the lake and the uprooting of material nor will the use of any chemical herbicides or other means of vegetation control be allowed. Issue: Impedance of lake access for others, particularly the Near Mountain Lake Association. Response: The dock has been placed with the assistance of the neighbor to the west so that it does not conflict with his dock placement. The Near Mountain Lake Association, under the subdivision, is not allowed to place a dock northerly on Outlot B. Issue: That the developer's contract be changed so that a subsequent owner does not come forward in the future requesting a second overnight slip. Response: The developer's contract was between the original developer and the City and cannot be amended as such. The variance request will be recorded against the property with Carver County and the conditions will be expressly stated there. The Planning Commission added a condition requiring the development contract be amended to allow storage of one overnight boat. This condition would have been consistent with the one overnight dock right allowed by this variance. However, this is a legal document between the original developer and the City of Chanhassen. As such, the City is unable to amend the contract. In order to achieve the Planning Commission's goal, any conditions of approval will be filed against the property with Carver County. Todd Gerhardt Schneider Dock Wetland Alteration Permit & Variance August 25, 2008 Page 3 The Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 to approve the proposed wetland alteration permit and variance. The Planning Commission minutes are item 1a of the August 25, 2008 City Council agenda. RECOMMENDA TION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the amended motions as specified on page 8 of the staff report dated August 5, 2008. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 5, 2008. g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-15 schneider variance & wap\executive summary. doc CC DATE: August 25,2008 [2] PC DATE: August 5, 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: July 25, 2008 CASE #: 08-15 BY: TJ, AA, BG, SA PROPOSED MOTIONS: The Chanhassen Platlfli.ng Commission reeofIlfIlends that City Council approves a Variance from the 10-foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF), which will extend through the 10- foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the lot line extended. And The Chanhassen Planning Commission recollHnoods that City Council approves a Wetland Alteration Permit to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values based upon the attached Findings of Fact and subject to conditions shown on page 8 of the staff report. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit for a determination of No Net Loss of Wetland Value or Function to install a dock. (All proposed setbacks are measured from the edge of the structure) LOCATION: 640 Pleasant View Road Outlot A, Reichert's Addition APPLICANT: Gary Schneider & Cynthia Schneider 640 Pleasant View Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential- Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 - 4u/Acre) ACREAGE: 0.35 acre DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has limited discretion in approving or denying a wetland alteration permit, based on whether or not the proposal meets the wetland alteration permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable wetland alteration permit standards are met, the pennit must be approved. This is a quasi judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Schneider Variance Planning Case # 08-15 August 5, 2008 Page 7 of8 Lotus Lake and should not, therefore, pose a safety hazard or obstruction to normal boat traffic on the Lotus Lake. Near Mountain Lake Association maintains a dock on the southern end of Outlot B. This dock is at least 430 feet south of the applicant's dock and should not be adversely impacted by the proposed alignment. According to the development contract, the placement of a dock on the northerly portion of Outlot B is a prohibited use. Wetland Alteration The applicant will need to place the dock through a Manage 1 Wetland. Under MN Rules Chapter 8420, a wetland impact is defined as: 8420.0110, Subp. 23. Impact. "Impact" means a loss in the quantity, quality, or biological diversity of a wetland caused by draining, filling, or excavating, as described in part 8420.0105. Placement ofthe dock does not preclude the growth of aquatic vegetation. Nor does it require the dredging of any soil materials or the placement of any fill materials within the wetland. Further, by placing the dock per the standards set forth in Chapter 6, Article 2, the dock placement would not result in a loss of biological diversity as it would be far enough above the water surface to allow for adequate sunlight and space for plant growth. The proposed placement of the dock would not result in the removal of vegetation and would not constitute a wetland impact as defined in Minnesota Rules Chapter 8420. Therefore, the dock placement would be considered a No-Loss under 8420.0220 of Minnesota Rules. The installation of the posts for the dock would constitute fill within a wetland. The posts are 3 inches in diameter which equates to 0.1 square feet of impact per post. Minnesota Rules 8420.0155 Subp. 9 De minimis. A. (4)(b) allows for up to 20 square feet of wetland impact regardless of type, inside the building setback zone, as defined in the local shore1and management ordinance. Placement of the dock entirely within the conforming area as shown above would require the removal of additional vegetation to create a route for the boat to navigate in and out of the open water. This vegetation would experience continued disturbance due to the navigation of the boat through the corridor. In staff's opinion, this would be more detrimental to the wetland than extending the dock to navigable waters. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant is responsible for obtaining any permits or approvals from the appropriate regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval. The Carver County SWCD has indicated that they have no issues with the dock as long as no fill is placed in the wetland nor any dredging ofthe lake occurs. The Riley-Purgatory-BluffCreek Watershed District turned back permitting authorities to all municipalities within their jurisdiction as of January 1, 2008. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission City Council adopt the following motion: Schneider Variance Planning Case # 08-15 August 5, 2008 Page 8 of8 "The Planning COnHRission recommends that City Council approves a Variance from the 10- foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF), which will extend through the 10- foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the lot line extended, as shown in plans prepared by Kurt M. Kisch, dated June 30, 2008; And The Planning Commission recommends that City Council approves a Wetland Alteration Permit to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values based upon the attached findings of fact and subject to the following conditions: I. No aquatic vegetation is to be removed by uprooting of the vegetation. Neither shall any Chemicals be applied for the control of aquatic vegetation. The applicant may cut only that vegetation which is necessary for the placement of the dock, the mooring of the boat, and the navigation of the boat to open water. The vegetation shall be cut at a height equal to the bottom of the dock or at a depth of the propeller. 2. The dock shall be installed eight (8) inches above the Ordinary High Water Elevation. 3. The dock shall be no wider than the current three and one-half (3.5) feet as shown on the survey submitted by the applicant. 4. The dock shall be shortened by thirteen (13) feet from what is shown on the survey to allow for a minimum separation between docks of twenty (20) feet. 5. The boat shall be docked as close to the lakeside end of the dock as possible so as to minimize the disturbance of aquatic vegetation for the docking of the boat. 6. No more than one watercraft may be docked on the subject property. 7. No fill or excavation may occur within the jurisdictional wetland boundaries or below the ordinary high water elevation of Lotus Lake except for the fill associated with the minimum number of posts necessary to maintain a safe dock. 8. The applicant shall abide by all applicable provisions of Chapter 6 and Chapter 20 of Chanhassen City Code." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Email from Pete Thielen dated 7/24/08. 4. Registered Land Survey. 5. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List. g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-15 schneider variance & wap\staff report_cc _082508.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION INRE: The application of Mr. Gary Schneider for a Variance from the lO-foot dock setback zone and a Wetland Alteration Permit to request a No-Loss determination for wetlands on site. On August 5, 2008, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Mr. Gary Schneider for variance and wetland alteration approval. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential- Low Density use. 3. The property is Outlot A ofthe Reichert's Addition Plat recorded on January 23, 1978. 4. The Ordinance directs that a variance may be granted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or the City Council only if the following criteria are met. The six (6) criteria and our findings regarding them are: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. For purposes of the definition of undue hardship, reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that in developed neighborhoods preexisting standards exist. Variances that blend with these preexisting standards without departing downward from them meet these criteria. Finding: Of the eleven lots within 500 feet of the subject property with lake frontage, five have docks. It is reasonable, based upon the plat and the development contract, for the property owner to assume they have rights to install a dock. Outlot A has convergent side lot lines which preclude having adequate area to install a dock while meeting current ordinance setback requirements and having the water depth for adequate draft to operate most motorized watercraft. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. 1 Finding: The creation of Outlot A with the Reichert's Addition Plat is a unique situation. Outlot C, which is owned by 608 Pleasant View Road, has a similar situation and has installed a dock. Outlot C does not, however, have the same constraints imposed upon it by the convergent side yard lot lines which create an area which is not conducive to the placement of a dock which conforms to current ordinance setback requirements. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: Although a dock will increase the value of the property, it is not the sole intent for requesting this variance. The property owner wishes to have overnight dockage rights and under the development contract for the outlot, conditions were allocated for the placement of one dock with overnight mooring for up to two boats as part of the subdivision. d. That the alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The lot was created in 1978, prior to Ordinance 073 which set standards for the dimension and placement of docks. The lot was created with divergent side lot lines which does not allow for the placement of a dock which would conform to current ordinance. The development contract for the subdivision allocates one dock with mooring for up to two boats. e. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. Finding: Mr. Schneider has indicated that he has worked with the property owner to the west of the subject site to align the dock in a manner which does not obstruct their access to and from the lake. Mr. Thielen has corroborated this in an email to staff dated 7/24/08. Outlot B (Near Mountain Lake Home Owners Association) has a dock on the southerly portion of the parcel per the 1978 development contract. The placement ofMr. Schneider's dock will not obstruct access to and from Outlot B, nor will it extend into the area of the lake where normal lake traffic operates. Therefore, the dock will not create an obstruction or safety issue to normal lake traffic. f. That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply oflight and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or decrease visibility or site distances, or increases the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The dock will not be located near any homes or public streets and is a typical use of lakefront property. By installing the dock eight inches above the Ordinary high Water elevation, without the placement of any additional fill or the excavation of any materials from the lake/wetland, no impact to the wetland will occur. Further, by extending the dock away from the shoreline, the existing vegetation will be maintained and will not be disturbed as a result of boat traffic to and from the dock. 2 5. Wetland Alteration (follows Conditional Use Permit criteria): a. The proposed project will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning chapter of the City Code. c. The proposed project will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. d. The proposed project will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed project will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed project will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed project will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed project will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. 1. The proposed project will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. J. The proposed project will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed project will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed project will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in the City code. 6. The placement of the dock does not meet the standards for definition as a wetland impact. The placement of the dock would result in no net loss of wetland function or value. 3 7. The placement of posts for the anchoring of the dock would constitute a wetland impact under Minnesota Rules Chapter 8420. However, total impact from these posts would be less than the 20 square feet of impact which is allowed under the De minimis exemption as described in Chapter 8420.0155 and does not require a wetland replacement plan. 8. The planning report #08-15, dated August 5, 2008 prepared by Terrance Jeffery, et ai, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Variance #08-15 from the 10-foot dock setback zone for the placement of a dock on a lot zoned Single Family Residential (RSF), which will extend through the 10- foot dock setback zone and 51 feet past the lot line extended; and approve Wetland Alteration Permit $08-15 to issue a Decision of No Net Loss of Wetland Function and Values subject to the recommended conditions of approval contained within the staff report. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5th day of August 2008. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 4 Planning Case No. 0 ~ - t 5' CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 em OF CHMHASSEN .Ci!~@ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION JUN 1 1 2008 ENGINEf;RING DEPT.. PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Address: J aA~J Sq{^,~1/1fA-461~ ~~ J?:llIAiEl' i{ 0 PUi.I!'5iWr Vt DlAJJHA~W MIl 1J'51t7 Contact: GM--I Phone: 9!'J.. tf7c1/fj"'1/ Fax: Email: SCflNUDe;r~r;'" ,aJ/)\ Owner Name and Address: 8A)1f;.- 6~H r.::r ~~O~ CYJJtHIA ~Ai sultJul)~ Contact: Phone: Email: Fax: NOTE: Consu~tion with City staff is reQuired Rrior to submittal, including review of development plans V /'tt't-r p/ttfI ~~IA SfJp.ur&~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Interim Use Permit (IUP) Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (V AC) ~ Variance (VAR) doa ,..I {A-P11l- t1t€ ~c7'J ~ Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) I So Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Subdivision* ~/ Notification SignQ 1/""/ (City to install and remove) _ IVllrJt.--"f'O M-t;4. tvC/6"h'~J . X Escrow for Filing FeeS/Attorney Cost** _ ~UP/SPRNAC~lIMetes & Bounds lac~ _- $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $11 ,IOs' Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diaital COpy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED Do ct:-- Art ~l.{ [) ..PL/iA-,>M/iVIW #J ,J ut-71i- ~J) oF UY-r () J ~f::..-L LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 5zc,i-8{ TWP-tl& R-M6e;, ~() ~3 R~/(}H{(br6 MtJl.,d1,,1 t(),- {)O~ [jlAJc/::"-(;)OI {2-t1cfi~lbrs {)fl/b~1lv ;-/uJjZ./~r -r tJ/rtorA I !l/U(,U fRf A/JIJ~ PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: TOTAL ACREAGE: ?(4~i~"'l WETLANDS PRESENT: ~ YES ~.p NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: f2z:5ilJ~U REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: MAY /3 t-Pf'rf{e ~MM /{./US"f7J, sPitE: '''r~ .,~ 7PA-;- ,~ ~, -rIfL /JOCk- lW /WI>( Oif>PW'I A Is 1\/0"'/ - ~tJmjJUANT . etlJlJbm J/tr (I,g,j rJ~JIr77JJ 0':' ~CJV{NA,..;rs lis a~7?LJ /;V ~Al4~,&t U5{ R,,&~JJV ~W-+fUl"'- (.,o~ fhi /:)Vfl.Or~ /dt:Id/f./VfS A;;j)~' N1,AfLI\WUJrmjJ Lftt/kk;So{?/~ - {Is M~JvfL) S""fOnd~ 'J- tJeJrWy;iJ I' t)N~ ~j) A-7 4?cI<.. WI rl/ Mt>>k;t6 Fb.d-.;J- {)f/!IL-J()~6,qr &.krr/{ ........ This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my k>>o;vledge. ~~ ~-6-oB Signature of Applicant SiJ~JdjA,-/ Date (p -Go ---08 Date G:\pLAN\forms\Development Review ApplicationDOC SCANNED Rev. 12/05 Jeffery, Terry From: Sent: To: Subject: J. P. Thielen [thieI002@yahoo.com] Thursday, July 24, 2008 12:05 PM Jeffery, Terry Gary Sneider's dock We've talked with and worked with Gary on his dock. Weare in full agreement and urge the city to allow it. Pete & Jan Thielen 665 Pleasant View Road Chan 1 ) \.- Cl) "0 .- Cl) C. "0 I"'" .s:. 0.- O@.~ (() ~ z: 7~ ~.....- -0 5 ~ c.cg~ ._ ~2 "o..c v 00 <t5 ~~ c: ~ (!) ... ... o .- ~ o o J 1; o o '\, "'q, '\, ~\ ~\ ~ ~ \: ~ ~~ ~ 0", e ,~ \- .... 6 Q iZ ':li \: ~ ~ ~'" ~ Eg a ",f, ~ g":;, ft I .0 ,,' ... I,' . ,,- , -r_",,:, , , , '"',, , ,',.... Iv") ~ " ~>, .~- j)~~ ' ' ,. ' ,. , ,.' , ..J / ,~~ ""J '-... . I' .' . / ~ ~ tJ ~ . I' ,.' / 99 lv/ ~ .4>& $<&. ( / / ~ ~ fof ~ ,\x,/ V).' <:5 ^" ~ <) it' .C)" "'- ~p~. ~<o ( o~ ~ ~;; l':'~ ,.,.. ,,.- 0) oS -:SO-z, i~g st::.D :~B ";S VI 1 '8 o~ E Z .,w ~ li~O'8 ~ e~.-e "" a"S o Wi i U1~~i 'i ~6'i / ,~~\ ~~~~~ %% \ %, i~.i-%* ~~;% Z -:;,;J.<a%~ <'l~ . ~ (:I ~s: tlO '0."'. t 1'1' :t\ ~ ~\1~1i &~ ~ z o - '= <(O)-~ g'Ze ...... ~ b "0 Oq>~~ ~\-,:W~ ""'\ " :;:> ~ ..... u.l ~ Q) 0::1:0:- o ~ _ .D '& ~ :;>.. c o ~ i~ 00 ~~ '1b J.~ ~. I 0 gZ ~"U ~ lD ;;: .... ",0 -i. t... "0- ;;, a \ g .... 1!. .~ " (1\')\ "'", ------4Y ~ / ~ ~ f / " '" :;; ,., ,-' .-' Ii..... I I ., I g e o I tJ; 1 '/7 I I /~ ~ :S 0 I ~ ~ I )1, te ~ .f!! o~ ~ ..~.5 " I \ I 7 , -/ - I ,"' , v" , \-:' ,\.> O 'V,~'... ;" - - \ I I _ L -'" '--' C"..I... ," r ,\..) ""'"\ v I --"" c..,)>, o v " (. ;)1 '. J.V'\S3 >-lS1\\'(\ 'JII 3n'i1<I'i'llO-"'," c;v.vy\ -).~------- -- , I", '" co. go ~~ .,.0. :fOO .ot ~ M"or.i1t.zON ,'\ " \,.;1,'\/ ~'\ . / > . , I , ..' \~~ o <0 B u. o ~ -0 .. .. E~ "O'i ~~ ~~.e ~ 0."0 ~ .. .,0" c o ce. ~ ~ C'- ....o~ %:,0 ~2.! ",,;;t.J,g o."lfI a a G) 'O.c::S :;:~o 9ft ....G) -a %,0 ., ., .. .5"ti Z ....G).... o~~ :S~'5 ?;c.... .... .... ~~ .~ c.... ~~ ~ ~....lfI ~o." ~G)a _C.:J ~ ~ .. .... o o ~ ~ . ..........., " ~ .:> '" .S l '" lU II "j t. ~ ,-,.- ~"'''' ...J ~ B ~E (f)~~ ........:to ., ."., g ~ \-::' :t: ';i O~~ .:J~~ ~ o CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 24, 2008, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Schneider Dock Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit - Planning Case 08-15 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope \ addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me thi~ay of -::Iuhf ' 2008. \ . KIM 1. MEUWISSEN \ Notary Public-Minnesota My Commission expires Jan 31, 2010 (ll"o g Q)~ ! _ Q)0Q) .c c~ ..... ~ $1/) .co~ ~ ~ IJ) 0$0 co f/l.S ::: -E -g ~';;'j ~ ~ Q) go.... l B g H~ 1i a ~ 6 ~H ~.~H E iii 'E ~ ~ .0lQ)_ '3 Q) :5 Q) .;: I- 0 0 > E c D- Ol "0.... "0 oJ 'e -ti c 0.. -: '0 IJ) 0 -g E 0 >- CC Q) ~ ~c~ 0.Q) 0 _(ll::sccoQ)Rl .;:::9! 0.. ....... ~Q)~ .......6.;:;, ci) E+-'cc.$.-o":::"O (Ill.:"O .ft E'-~ ....Q). VI C +-' ......+-'_1/1 0> w > C VI ~ , '\ -0.' IJ) .~ .- 0 E .-.... c Q) - ... .c 0> _ 0 1: cD .... ~ '-' IJ) 0 .- Q) ->-: 0:> ~ ::s f/l.cco+- Q).2.2EQ)..0Q):=:E Q) 1.0 c;>Q)E~.tii.c :c 15 CD ~ ~ '0 c 0 .c ~ o..c.o E E '";" ~ Q) :t::: +-' 0 > t- ~~~. ~c-~+-'Q)o+-'::So (I() (llIJ)E....+-'Rl . 0> (ll <( &.! g"5 gin 0. g ~o ~ e ~ ~ .g ~ ~ Q) ! ~ ~ ::;E "0 . =: .'!l. 0. +- 01 Q) IJ) .c Q) +-' ~ 0. ~ IJ) Q) 'o.."g ..... 0. 0> 0 c <i. '0 Ol.S Q) .s:5 c +-' :5 ~ :c ..... (ll 0 "0 0:= ~ ~ o -5 0 jg 15 Gl .S .S Q)E 3 0 ~ Eo "0 .g.. "5: ~ -5 +-'Q) ~ 0 3 0 ~ o c: I'-- '" "C ... '" 0 c '" +-' ..... 'o~' +-' Q) "g .- .. 0 I'-- ':;; -=S'w m15 Q) = 3 C ~ (ll .D (ll Q) ... '0 ~ 0"0 E Rl 1) ~ g en $: 0 Gl .c 0 :S .g.~ Q) -g "0 IJ) 8, ~ 0.. ~ 0 ;,';; ! "0 Q) ~~~~ ...-~gOOl!c:Q)~>~ 5(ll::S~ ~o.eo.~!E '^' C1J.o (ll Q)"O ~ - - c ~ .....- 0 ~ 0. ..... 0 y. 1/1 o~E ~Q)_(llGl.o"O~+-'>o.Q)- 0. c+-,Q)::so-~_c 00> Q) o~::Sc::s.co 00 .oE+-'~o =.....-0 '" -0 ~ g c tx: ~ 0. (ll 0 g> c ~ ~ .'!l. ~ ~ c g :2 >- ~ 3 ... ! 'in ..0 g 0 .~ ~ 3.... .'!l. U) 0 (ll Q) 01 +-' Q) .0 +-' ~ 0 ~ .2 'in .~ U)I-~ CJ)~g:S~-ti~~~~~ $~~:~~Q)>CJ)5~"gE ::s 0> ~>~ooJ~+-'_olJ)~~IJ)Q)(llC~~(ll oQ)E OIic .c+-' iOOlOl:=:cQ)Oo~.coE-.c D.~o ::SCIJg(ll +-'cc.Q)........c=O'Q).c.~+-'....cQ)..- 'Q) <( -5 () 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~IJ) ~'~'3 g. EO' e c 0. ~ E ~ ~ .s .~ ... g <:. ~E_= O(llce~EQ)=Q)E~a~~qo'O"'~Q)i~~ (ll.(ll1J) ~~~::s(ll+-'.cs.cO::sQ);>b~IJ)~,~Q).....e- ~~~~~.~o..~o.g"5gCJ)l-oo..~::so~.gQ)~Q)EI/ID.E Q)=~iol~OOQ)O'O'O ~Q) ~~~.cQ)!Q)Rl ~~6tx:~~~~~iiR~~~~ ~:S ~~~~:5t-5~ 0) c i CI) :i 0)5 c.- .- In .. In ('1$.- CI) E :I:E .g 0 :aU ::so) D-C .... .- o C C 50!! .- D- OC Z<I) In In ('1$ J: C ('1$ J: U 0) C i CI) :i C 0)0 C'- ._ In .. In (IS.- (1)E :I:E .g 0 :aU ::so) D-C -'2 Oc 50!! .-D- oc zCl) In In ('1$ J: C ! o 1/1 .. ct>> CD Q).= oes ., E .;; .. D.G) I/I.!! j:: C 10 c >- c g-Q) c c 0 1/1 3~0 :c:E OQ) oes i 0 .- <I) i ....<1) ~E Q) D. ~D. cu.c SlE '\i U e OU .c..... ::so 0 <(,,"0 0 ..J ~ ~..J ~1\i ao ,," .. "8 .. ~ :g ". ~ g ~ .co~ IJ) ~ IJ) O$o.co _ '" +-'.c..... Q) _.cc co _ ~ +-'..... IJ) 3 3 0.Q)Q)0 ~ g Q '2 g.8Q) ~ Q) ::sC'>-Eg'(j;Q)O ~ ~ 0 .o.c= -ti 0 IJ) o~.oE(llIJ)S~ ~ iii 'E ~ ~ .0lQ)_ '3 Q) :5 m ';:1- 0 0 >'E C D. Ol"O.... "0 oJ 'o~ 0.. -'OlJ)o-gEo>- CC Q) ~ oc~ ...0 C _(ll::sccoQ)cu 'C ~ 0.. ....... >- Q) ~ 0. Q) 0 01 E c c .$ .- 0 :a "tJ ~ (Il ~ c IJ) E :5 0 "0 'e '(j; :5 1: 0 E =c C Q) Rl f! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .2c Eo ~ lIi ~ ~ g .~ $ ~ ~c Q)~Q) E ~ ~ .E :C-Q)~ ~'O ~o.o..c.oE E I IJ) =+-,o>t- ~~~s _c-~ Q)o+-'~ (I()(ll~E~+-'~Q) . CIJ (ll _ Q) f/I g +-' O)+-' 0. C 0.8 Q) e Q) (ll.o 0. IJ) Q) .c E~~<( tx:~IJ)RclJ) OQ) ~ co...c~Q)~"g..... . 0 .e::. "0 _.... .- c +- 01 Q) 1J).c Q) Q) (ll - c: VI "0 0. - Q) 0. 0> 0 C <( '0 g>'- $ .~:S c +-' :S .... -0 '0 (ll 0 Q) 0 == > ~ o -5 0 jg +-' Gl 'C'S E 3 't-- ~ E"O .g. . "S; Q) -5 +- .c 0 ~ 0 ~ o C I'-- Q) .Q:5! '" (ll 0 0 0. 0 C Q) ~ ..... 'o~ . ~ +-' Q) E"g.- "--. ~ 1'-_ $: _ f/I '" +-' Q) -:>.... .0 '" Q) '" VI 0"0 Rl - ,_ '.! .. ::s Q)'O.... '0 ;> +-'c'O- (ll Q) IJ) o..~.... 0 +-,'- ,.. CD +-'clJ) OQ).co....'t--Q)"o IJ) - 0 >",,"OQ) (ll.-...."O ...._~ +-'Q)._Q)Q)"O c2>1J)1J) .c>-o;t:Q)E (I()~Q)c Q)"OGl>g.sg>.cC:~>~ (ll"'::S- 00....1/1..... o ~.o (ll "0 (ll Q) .0 ..... ._ +-' Q) .....0) 0 0.. 0. C ~ Q) ::s 8 0.._ 1/1 C o.EQ) ~o~::s~~.c~o.o~ .oE~~o ~~=o "'_ ~ ~ g c tx: ~ 0. (ll 0 g> c;: ~ IJ) ~ ~ . o'~ >- ~ 3 .... S 'in ,^ ~ () '" .c:>.... IJ) +-' :>.- +-,;> cQ).o ::: ~ 0 ~ 0'- th .., C .~ 0;> :.c IJ) . 0 (ll ;> Q) 01 Q) IJ) IJ) (ll (ll. (ll.... 1/1.- ~-C._~ CJ).Q)_co+-,Q)~~Q)+-'c~c Q)+-'- _Q)+-,-^E 50>>oc>'" > 't--::si~> "'- 1J)0~Q)=~>CJ)""~E 010>_," ~ ~oa-Ol-~IJ)~~ ~.cc(ll_(ll o~ ::s 0> <5 '" .c +-' Co Q) Q) e c Ol:=: C Q) 0 g 0 c 0 E _.c . D. ~ 0 <( -5" 0 E ~\\S e IJ) ~ o.'c ~ 0.0. Q) .c .~o +-' 0. (ll Q)E Q) ~ g g> e u 0 '-' ..- .--= IJ) 0 :;.... IJ) (ll 3 Eo.... c 1J).c >- '" .- - Q) - ~.!: +-' 0 (ll c e c :.c Q) = (ll E:=: 0 (ll - ~ 0 .0 '" ~ CD 10 .- ~ ~.~:cm ~~0..&::S(ll+-,.c~Q) .oQ)3b~IJ)~~~Q).....e- 1J)<Il ::s~.~ ~o.g"5g(j)~8li:s::so~.gQ)I.OQ)EI/ID.E Q);;'?; aQ) 0 (ll 00 Q) 0.0.0 ~Q) ~~~.c Q).cQ) Q) Rl ::s c: _ 0 ..q-.c o..o::s .... ... Q) +-' .... .c- 1-~0~"O~~CI-(ll(ll~~~~~ ~= ~~(ll~~t--~ CD E j:: od ~ o 1/10) C C <1).- D.G) D.Q) !:E -Q) cu.c .c- ~~ od th.!! c c o Q) ~E SlE =' 0 ao c o i U o ..J .. 10 1/1 o D. e ~ .;; .. c >- c 5~.9 = !. 1\i .0. 0 U 1.9 "" 0 "'4,~..J ui ....0 Ol ~ C ~ .0_ ~~ ~-- o _ c;:(;j c,s l!l ~ ~- ~ 0 g.9! 0. lij.... C >.- ~~ lij2 \ii~-o "'c:'" 0::0 l'l~g> .Q,s cs:.,: 5-9! ~~~ ~. ~ ~ I;: J~g ....~!S ~>'" s:.0 o.'~ ~~ m:>- "O~'o E~1O -> o.$:g, -0';;; +>"l'l c~c ",~"'>~ "'. v ~o~ '" v E of! 0 ~ ~.- . Q) 0. ~ ~ ~ ~ >"" 'd; -" ~ 8 Q) g.~ ~ .Q.~ ,s E c g 2 ~ ~ g sg>,g ~~o.EL-~~~8~ .92 ~-:C1) ui'iij. "'vv-oOv-5.2t:: i-~ ~'g,s $~~ ~z,sliji~~~~~ n~ ~~g ~ _ ~~~E~e~~~~ ~> " gg c~ov;:.~~>cO ,s'" ~....~ E-,,~ o;:-"~~,,,e~~o> ~o g~E .~ a~ ~~~~'B ~ ~o-'S ~~ ~0~ 5"'v €.m~oIE~eE ~. 8~c -o!-5 ..g ~Q..cnE o.S~J!! S~ "0-0 c._~ c~cn~~Su~~~ Cro =o~ ~6-~ .:;:;""2go~B~~~ 800 gt'!! m~e~c~o~EE~~~5 ro. ~OU g~;~~E~~~~~~~€ ~m 8~~ 'BQ)O~~co.'" .Q)-ov"';: ';;;0 ~~ cE~Eo.iQ)o>$~~OE~ eg. 65g 8~~!~~5~~~~[~~ ~~ C1)~~ ~_~ EL-m>"OE ._~o~ ~ c ~E'~-o~Eo~~o ~xo _.~ _-0", ~ <( ~ ~ 0;; ~ ~ o,g 0 *-:2 ~,s g;~ 0:: ~Q)~I~O!~~~l!l-E~ iOl ~~~ &! -g g. 0 .S g> ~ a= ~ 5i ~ 8 -li\ ~ ~ $.S :; co~-~~o~g~E""~~ 8~ ~Q)~ ","Oo."O,sc~s:.,,"'-o"'~~ 'Co> .2-"- O::i~'cl~~R~~g51!:~ ~~g Q)~~cg =~~~E!B~.-~ 0.;:0 ~~~~~!~~~~m~~~V~O ~g~ ~~~._g=E~O&~=~!E~2 s~ro ~~~~~CI,~%~~~~~'I ~II ~i$&~~!g~~~~~~S$~.~~~ KE g-o ~ ~I-'~,,; Q).!1! 6-0; e8 ~.~..,s:. III 8 ~<("'.Ea.~g~~~g5~~~~g~Q) OJ c: c: ~ ::1 Q) C E ~ . C ~ a. ~-! G> 0 .- -:6 '- ~.!1! 'E Qj ~ ~.g E 0 g III m Ii ~ 0 c,s ~ .~ Ol~ o~ocQ)-"loo""l~ .~o~vES- _~~._5Q)cO~~C~~ECS~~~E~~ ~Z0~C~Q)~0C~~O"'~~.io"'~ Q;~ .<(~~~FQ)~2~1J)~~~Slgj~W~ ""Q)..cC '0>0 ~E~- .=g>>~E""'C:Q)~ "'c~gg>o."'o~oo-.l!l~~~8. .~o~ ilijo.~",,~~~~~oiIJ)I0-5~2~C~~ go::E'E'~",(;j",gO~~.c~~-g-o>.!1!"O~ ... .8 E c ~ ~ ~ a. ~.~ Q) .l!l ~.S {3 08, lij ~ g 0 ~~ O-~o'" -og=~ ~~~"'s:.10.~ ~ .Q aO g ~ o.t::.~ 5i'~ g .l!l ~.~ ~ 0 ~ ~ $ ~ ~$S~~e~O.E~gg- ~~8_$~~ ~zc~l'l0.Q)iVEEOQ)~g~~co~8~ ~EOC-~0~~ E c>~"Q)Q)~- ~"'..!1!~.l!l~!~IRRil\iiiS~~J~~ ~.~oc~~oo~_~,-~~~~n~~~n~m~ C3e. ... <Ii" ..........0 0> I c ~ o~ ~Q) ~ g _ ,:;:'" c,s ~ ~ "O~ 0; 0 g Q) 0. lij _ C >~ ~ Q) i B Qj~-o ",'~", 0::0 ",.sg>.Q,s cs:.,: _~~ "O~~ ~ g....- Q)~ Q).O <~~ ~>m Q)~ ~.~ ~Q) ~~~ ~o~ E~1O"'~> Ii~:g, "O~ ~"l'l lIl'lii~ E,g~Q)~~ .!~~ 5i~ ~g,!S ~~-" 8Qjg.~~.~~-~c gB ~~g ~~2 ~:a.EoE~~ol I ~~~ ui'~.! ~<DQ)-g Q)"O~gt::: z..co c:g..... $~~ ~z,s"'iaiS!~ n~ ~~g ::) 0 ~ "'~:; E ~ .!; 10 ~ c ~ Q) iii .0"0 E~~ c~o.;:0n~oO,s ~>Q) t~~ g?~'-~~~~Ea ~g c~E .o.~ "'19~!'BQ)Eo-'S -Oi ~o~ 5:~ ~~$~~IE~I~ 1. 8~c ~~= '~~~~l!l8;~0:: c~ :~~ ~~o _~ooOCO._~ 0- o-~ 1Og-C,C.-.!!lE~::;:~~ 01J) ~t::o. c~Q)c~Q)o"O~E"'-o~- "'. oo~ g$~~~E~~~~~2l.l!lB ~10 o~.l!l ""Co~t::c"","'Q)~~>;: :2~ > IJ) ~~gE~i~0l~~~8E~ e% GIg 8~~!~~5~~Q)!K~~ ~~ Q)S~ ~~~;~~o$~-gE~~{3 2~ ,s~lij ~<>~.g8;~;.~.g~~:Q -g:s g;-c5: ~~il~ ~~EC$-E~ iOl ~~~ &! -g g. 0 .S g> ~ a= : ~ ~ 8 -li\ ~ ~ m .S :; co~-.~0Q)g0Eg~~ 8~ ~~i m~~~~cw~~~~m~ID .eQ B~~ O::lij~'~l~~8~5ig51~:~ ~~g v~~c.Q =~ "'Eo.B~~'--o 0.;:0 ""c~~~I;:.Q~~",liQ)o.~~o ~g~ ~V6-_gwE~01~=-5IE~S ,s~'" ~~~~~<(I'~~~~~s:.~'Z ~gl ~i~[~~!C~O~~~~~~~ .a~~ KEg-o~~l-i~~.6-~e8~1..,~"'a .Q<("'I~~,:.g~"O~g,s>ic~g~~ ~i~~i~gE~,:lijm!E~~~gl-~ Q)O::oBQ)~.~Og~~",.~g-Qj~g>5 2~~S6Q)~0~",g>~V~,s~Bo.Ei~ ~Z6~C~Q)~0~~~~",~~;:iO"'-o ..::s~ <(o~EF~Q)2.1J);:.g~.1IiO~~ ~~~c .'5",E ~Ev3 ..QOlJl~Q)Ol~-g iEiir~~U~i~ill~~&~I~~~ u.t.~",~~~g~8.~B~~;~i~~ 2~0~s~~"Oe""~~,,,sg>~-gQ)c~CD ~ ~ 0 o'S ~ t:: lij 0.1 'c = 00 ~:c g ,g i ~ ~ 8. B ~.Q aO g ~ 8.t::.g> ~.~ g .l!l ~.~ ~ 0 ~ 'S ,s $ g ~.sg>""~~oiE.~g-.,,,!8:2l~:c ~i~~10.2l~!EEO!18!I5ig~8. ~~~i~19!vQ)88E~~~lic~~g~i ~1J)~~Ii~I-,s,s~ o~;:o.~<"'o.~"'~ C3.. ... BARBARA L HEDLUND 10014 INDIGO DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347-1206 MICHAEL & KATHRYN SCHWARTZ 469 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9576 ANTHONY G & SALLY A HEARD 510 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 MARK LOREN OLSON & 536 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 JOHN T & RUTH E SCHEVENIUS 570 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 JAHN A DYVIK 610 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 SEAN & MELINDA FITZGERALD 630 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 RONALD D DEJONGH & 6310 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 SUSAN W DAMMEN 6321 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139 JOHN W SCHNEIDER JR 6340 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 DENNIS ZHU & 105 LAKELAND SHORES RD LAKELAND, MN 55043-9601 DAVID FRANKLIN LABADIE & 489 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9576 DOUGLAS J & LANA HABERMAN 520 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 MICHAEL R & JODY SCHEPERS 540 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 THOMAS M & NANCY S SEIFERT 600 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN,MN 55317-8327 NEAR MOUNTAIN LAKE ASSN INC 610 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 MIKEAL G BYSTROM JR 6300 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 BRIAN & JERIL YN D HOOKS 6311 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139 ROBERT M & ANETTE R BARNHART 6330 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 JOHN A & SARAH A WAY 6341 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139 TODD R MAGILL & 20433 CHERYL DR TORRANCE, CA 90503-1815 CURTIS G & CHERI L ANDERSON 500 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9437 ALAN & LINDA K KRAMER 531 INDIAN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9533 TODD L & PATRICIA A FROSTAD 561 INDIAN HILL RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9533 JOHN E NICOLAY JR 608 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 KEVIN A & LEANNE M BENSON 620 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 EUGENE A & KATHLEEN A GAGNON 6306 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 BRUCE H & DEBRA J HOMAN 6320 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 DERRICK J BILDERBEEK & 6331 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9139 MICHAEL & SARAH WENTZIEN 6350 SUMMIT CIR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9138 MICHAEL P JONIKAS & 6368 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9109 DANIEL L ROBBINS & 6375 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 ALEXANDER C & KARENEA LAI 6381 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 ROBERT F & DIANA L DAVIS 6387 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 GARY J SCHNEIDER & 640 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8327 CHRISTIAN G & LISA P OLSEN 6440 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 KEITH M & MARY BETH HOFFMAN 6470 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9279 DAVID R & VALERIE L ROSSBACH 670 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509 CHARLES R & JUDY L PETERSON 708 LAKE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284 EILEEN T KELLY 740 LAKE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284 JOSEPH J & CHRISTINE K STONE 6370 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9109 JOHN P & SUZANNE D BOHN 6377 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 THOMAS F III & KAREN M CONBOY 6383 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 BRENT G & KAREN J BLACKEY 6389 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 CHRISTOPHER S PELLETIER & 6420 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 THOMAS M & SUSAN J HUBERTY 6450 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 SAMUEL G & LAURIE J CURNOW 650 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509 PAUL L & DESTINI MOLITOR 6725 IROQUOIS CIR MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-1014 MICHAEL A & JANET A STANZAK 724 LAKE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284 BEVERLY C THOMAS 745 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509 MICHAEL A & CYNTHIA A COLSON 6373 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 JAMES R & KATHRYN A DREESEN 6379 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 MARK E & KRISTEN 0 HANSBERRY 6385 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 KEVIN & KATHERINE WORMS- LYNCH 6391 OXBOW BND CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9128 CRAIG N HANSEN & 6430 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN .55317-9277 MICHAEL & DEBRA HAYDOCK 6460 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9279 JOHN P & JANE THIELEN 665 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509 GARY M SCHELlTZCHE 680 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9509 DAVID S & DEBRA M TOOLE 732 LAKE PT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9284 CHUNYI UN & 800 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283 Public Hearing Notification Area (500+ feet) Schneider Dock Variance and Wetland Alteration Permit 640 Pleasant View Road (Outlot A, Reichert's Addition) Planning Case 2008-15 Lotus Lake