The URL can be used to link to this page

PC Staff Report 10-7-08 PC DATE: 10/7/08 IT] CC DATE: 10/27/08 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE: 11/4/08 CASE #: 08-19 BY: AA, JM, JS, ML PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission denies Planning Case #08-19 for a IS-foot shoreland setback variance to convert an existing deck into a porch and construct a new deck on Lot 12, Block 1, Sunrise Hills Addition, based on the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a IS-foot variance from the 75-foot shoreland setback for the conversion of an existing 15 x 20 foot deck into a porch and the construction of an additional deck within the shoreland setback. LOCATION: 7301 Laredo Drive Lot 12, Block 1, Sunset Hills Addition APPLICANT: Richard and Eunice Peters 7301 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ~~ PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential-Low Density (1.5 - 4 units per acre) ACREAGE: 0.58 acres DENSITY: N/ A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL SUMMARY In 1996 the applicant received a IS-foot variance from the 75-foot shoreland setback to construct a 15 x 20 foot deck on the lake side of the home, as well as a 25- foot bluff setback variance. The applicant is requesting a variance to convert the existing deck to a three-season porch, which intensifies the use, and construct an additional deck on the lake side of the home. The proposed deck would be71 feet from the ordinary high water mark and would lead to the incremental encroachment of the stairs and landing toward the lake, which is set back 67 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The proposed structures will not decrease the distance to the lake. The property is zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). Peters Variance Request Planning Case 08-19 October 7,2008 Page 2 of6 The existing nonconforming deck was approved in 1996 to allow a reasonable use of the property. While the conversion of the deck to a porch and the addition of the deck will have minimal impact to the site, from a site coverage standpoint, enclosing the deck increases the nonconformity. Since the applicant currently has reasonable use of the property, including the existing outdoor living areas, this request is a self-created hardship, as defined by the City Code. The proposed porch enclosure increases the habitable space which is proposed to be located closer to the lake than would be permitted in other circumstances. Staff is recommending denial ofthe variance request. ADJACENT ZONING: The property to the north is zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). The properties to the south are zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). The lake is located to the east and the cul-de-sac is located to west. WATER AND SEWER: Water and sewer service is available to the site. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS . Chapter 20, Division 3, Variances. . Chapter 20, Article XII, Shoreland Management District. · Chapter 20, Article XII, Single Family Residential (RSF) District. Peters Variance Request Planning Case 08-19 October 7,2008 Page 3 of6 BACKGROUND The property is located on Lot 12, Block I, Sunrise Hills Addition, which is zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). Sunrise Hills Addition was created in 1956 and consists of 28 lots. The subject property was developed in 1960 prior to the adoption of the Shoreland District Regulations and does not meet the current standards for a riparian lot. The lot has an area of 23,701 square feet (0.58 acres). Minimum lot area for a riparian lot in the RSF district is 40,000 square feet. The applicant received approval for a IS-foot shoreland setback variance in 1996 to allow a 60-foot shoreland setback to construct the existing IS x 20 foot deck. The deck was built over an existing patio; therefore, it did not increase the hard surface coverage on the property. The applicant is proposing to convert the existing deck into a porch and maintain the existing footprint. The intent of the applicant's proposal is to use the deck area more months out of the year and to create more livable space. The property has space available within the required setbacks in which to create more livable space in the side or front yard, and would be limited only by the site coverage on the property. According to the calculations on the certificate of survey (house, driveway, sidewalks, patio, and cement stairs), the site has the potential for additional site coverage on the lot. From a lakeview standpoint, the proposed 8 x 31 foot deck and stairs within the shoreland setback (to be located over a portion of an existing paver patio) will increase the projection of the structure to the lake from that area of the structure. While the proposed deck will not increase the hard surface coverage on the site; it is an additional structure within the setback which increases the nonconformity on the lot. ANAL YSIS The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of a variance. Reasonable use within the RSF district is defined as a single-family home and a two-car garage; according to criteria outlined in the City Code for granting a variance. As such, the applicant has Peters Variance Request Planning Case 08-19 October 7,2008 Page 4 of6 a reasonable us of the property with the existing home and garage. In addition, in 1996 the applicant was granted a IS-foot variance to the 75-foot shoreland setback and a 25-foot variance from the bluff setback for the construction of a 15 x 20 foot deck on the lake side of the home. The applicant would like to convert this deck into a sun room so they can enjoy the lake view and additional space more months out ofthe year. The applicant is also proposing to add an additional deck along the lake side of the house that will maintain a greater setback to the lake than the existing deck, but will bring that portion of the structure closer to the lake. /"" The applicants' proposal for the porch and deck will not change the distance from the existing structures to Lotus Lake. The original deck was built over an existing patio, therefore, the impervious coverage will not be affected; however, enclosing the deck and adding the new 8 x 31 foot deck increases the nonconformity and therefore requires variance approval. The City Code states that a variance may be granted if the literal enforcement causes undue hardship and the property owner does not have reasonable use of the property, which includes comparable properties within 500 feet. Reasonable use within the Single Family Residential (RSF) District is described as a single- family home with a two-car garage, which is currently constructed on the property. The property was granted a variance to construct the existing deck in 1996, which is consistent with the neighborhood. There is also a paver patio on the lake side of the home. Peters Variance Request Planning Case 08-19 October 7, 2008 Page 5 of6 Staff surveyed the neighboring properties within 500 feet of the subject site to determine if there were preexisting conditions throughout the neighborhood that would warrant granting of a variance to enclose the deck and add a new deck. There have been four variance requests, which include three lakeshore setback variances and one non-lakeshore variance. There are two variances to construct outdoor living areas on the lake side of the home (one of which is the subject property). The third request was to construct an addition on the lake side of the property. Case # Address Riparian Request Action 25- foot shoreland setback 85-15 7300 Laredo Drive YES variance for the Approved construction of a 32 x 20 foot deck and porch 21- foot front yard setback 89-3 7307 Laredo Drive NO variance for the Denied construction of a garage and deck 8- foot shoreland setback 95-9 7343 Frontier Trail YES and a 16-foot bluff setback Approved for the construction of an addition 15-foot shoreland setback 7301 Laredo Drive variance and a 25- foot 96-2 (subject site) YES bluff setback variance to Approved construct a 15 x 20 foot deck Of the lakeshore lots within 500 feet of the subject property, with and without a variance, the subject site is the second closest to the lake at 60 feet. The applicant was granted a variance for the deck which provided an outdoor area in which to enjoy the lake. This is consistent with the previous variance requests. There is also an existing 320 square-foot patio on the lake side of the property, which provides an outdoor living area and reasonable use of the property. While the proposed additions will not increase the impervious coverage on the property or decrease the distance to the lake; the hardships listed by the applicant are inconsistent with the criteria specified in the Zoning Peters Variance Request Planning Case 08-19 October 7, 2008 Page 6 of6 Ordinance for granting a variance. Staff, therefore, is recommending denial of the variance. If the Planning Commission feels that this variance request is a reasonable request and does not adversely affect the surrounding properties, as they are not increasing the impervious coverage or decreasing the distance to the lake, the Planning Commission may decide to approve the application. Should the Planning Commission decide to approve the variance request, they would need to amend the findings of fact consistent with such approval. Staff would further recommend that, as a condition of such approval, the Planning Commission adopt the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit prior to construction. 2. Erosion control, as required by City Code, must be installed prior to construction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion and the adoption of the attached findings of fact and action: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission denies Planning Case #08-19 for a 15- foot shoreland setback variance to convert an existing deck into a porch and construct a new deck on Lot 12, Block 1, Sunrise Hills Addition, based on adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action." ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Action. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced copy oflot survey. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-19 peters variance\staff report. doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND ACTION IN RE: Application of Richard and Eunice Peters for a IS-foot shoreland setback variance to convert a 15 x 20 foot deck into a porch and construct a new deck - Planning Case No. 08-19. On October 7,2008, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Richard and Eunice Peters for a IS-foot shoreland setback variance from the 75-foot shoreland setback to convert a 15 x 20 foot deck into a porch and construct a new deck at 7301 Laredo Drive, located in the Single Family Residential District (RSF) on Lot 12, Block 1, Sunset Hills Addition. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential (RSF). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential-Low Density (1.5 - 4 units per acre). 3. The legal description ofthe property is: Lot 12, Block 1, Sunset Hills Addition. 4. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The parcel predates the shoreland zoning ordinance, as it was platted in 1956. Of the properties within 500 feet of the parcel, four do not meet the 75-foot structure setback, three of which were granted variance approval for the encroachment, including the subject property. The applicant has reasonable use of the property as there is a single-family home and a two-car garage and an existing deck located on the property. The conversion of the deck into a porch and the addition of the new deck is a self-created hardship as defined in the city code. 1 b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties that lie within the Single Family Residential District. The applicant was granted a IS-foot lakeshore variance in 1996 to construct the existing deck on the lake side of the home. While conversion to the porch and the new deck will not change the setback to the lake or increase the impervious coverage, the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship with which to grant a variance. The applicant currently has reasonable use ofthe property. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The intent of the proposed porch and deck is not based on the desire to increase the value of the home. The property owner's intent is to increase the livable area of the home and enjoy the lake view more months out ofthe year. The property has space available within the required setbacks in which to create more livable space in the side or front yard, and would be limited only by the site coverage on the property. According to the calculations on the certificate of survey (house, driveway, sidewalks, patio, and cement stairs), the site has the potential for additional site coverage on the lot. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The alleged hardship is self-created as the applicant has reasonable use of the property and was granted a variance in 1996 to construct the existing deck. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of a variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. The applicant's proposal will not increase the amount of hard surface coverage on the site, nor will it decrease the current shoreland setback. However, it would be an additional structure within the shoreland setback f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply oflight and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed home will not impair an adequate supply oflight or air to the adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values within the neighborhood. 5. The planning report #08-19, dated October 7,2008, prepared by Angie Auseth, et aI, is incorporated herein. 2 ACTION "The Board of Adjustments and Appeals denies Planning Case #08-19 for a 15- foot variance from the 75- foot shoreland setback for the conversion of a deck to a porch and construction if a new deck on Lot 12, Block 1, Sunset Hills Addition, based on these findings of fact" ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on this 7th day of October, 2008. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman g:\plan\2008 planning cases\08-19 peters variance\findings of fact.doc 3 Planning Case No. () 8"-)9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market BOulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 ~ (952) 227-1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION "Owner Name~~ress: Contact Phone: Email: Fax: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, Including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED Sign Plan Review SEP 0 5 Z008 Site Plan Review (~NHASSEN PLANNING !)EP" Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements tyAC) +- Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment X Notification Sign - $200 (City to Install and remove) X Escrow for FUing Fees/Attorney Cost" - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARlWAPJMetes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB CK:=" St..' 60 g::J US ex> L~51.o:>181 2Ji:> TOTAL FEE $ r ()=- (.~ Sl<> I8Z zc,b An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. '*Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduc d copy for each plan sheet.along with a diaital COpy in TIFF-Group 4 ("'.tif) format. """Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. " Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for ach application. SCANNED LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PIO: ~/J,;6lW? A~~j./DN J r~/tOctY'e. d~cJL /""30 I ~cy/'e..I2u LJr, Lof /~ A/tJc/c:: I,' rV/7/'/k ~/Is / d;(/eltl;~tJA.J. PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: TOTAL ACREAGE: WETlANDS PRESENT: PRESENT ZONING: ,,67 )( YES . R-/ NO REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: ~J~ ~f/eP'~.I7ee.. .. . REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: Re~~1lfh~ (d:?/'''';A<!'e -h k/1.&t/'/YJ ?Uf"AI- '!f!: ~~ ~r:z~ ~ :';edC. ~ ~~~j;;9i<i~/vp Me d~~ ~~S-I;/I= 71h /'-et5UJr~jJ -?~I r-,dAo<k ') - $e.e.. F!Q.,).1S fo,<<-- ~.Jd\. .H'\e-It!>. FOR sITe PLAN REViEW: include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in fuB and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural. requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. ThIs application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom . the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of own rship (either copy of Owners Duplicate CertifICate of Title, Abstract otTilie or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this appflCation. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additIonal fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The doctJments and information I have submitted are tnJe and correct to the best of my knowledge. Cs~m Signature of F 'o/~A0tlf Date Cfis/2.cJfJ 'b lopment Review Application.DOC Rev. 1/08 SCANNED sttH:Lr~ :XV:l ~.~t-tLrZS6 :3NOHd 9StSS NIII '3)jV1 9N01 3J\RIO M0111M 'N st1' SH3NNYld lINVl'SlIOA3JIllIlS lINVl 'SH33N10N3 1w:l ':lNI 'S3.L VI:lOSSV 'll ~H3BNOH~ ~~ ~ ~t:o O~ v !...~. ..... z . 0 0 i= 0 is 0 Z c( a: I- ~ 0 0 U) II.. ~ 0 >- t= U) U) W ..J W ~ 0 ..J Z :i: z I- :J w :J W i -=+ w U) 0:: U) "- II.. l- ii: ~ ~ 0 z z w U) :J :J w I- U) ...J c( Z 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 '" u: ~ a: ~ 0 0 w 0 ~ w ~ ..J In c( 0 ii2 0 N ~ :J l- N 0 ..J C II.. 0 f.ra HDWIN~"" 'Pa7/...{.3I.YlJ ~~~== H",d ~~NIltBONl1HG"'NJCDWd3IWsw. JlIGd3lI.tIO~'Nv1d$IUJ.lIM1M1llB:)~1 ~ '" a I ~. t;: "llU :l~ h~ 8~. .lii "V' hi i';~ z in ~ !Ji iti~ :~J unii ~;:: ~U)::I- I!t .... 'li~. ~x l:i ~~ : ~f ~~ 5~~ 5~ I~h ~I nl~~ ~:; =: 1 ~::l i'.~i i ~ ~ j r ~\ I ~\ I il ..."N. .- :\ e\ 1<\ 1\ ~\ \ "I \ \\ \ ~\ \ 5 . \ \ \ \ \ 18 ';:,\ \~ !:: r fi\ \ z\ \ ~\ \ ~\ \ ,\ \ ~\ \ ~\ \ Is\ ,,(> oQ ~ e> S>Rf\l"3H SN I I^ E ~ 'll E ~ = Ii & i~ ,,~o j;Gi "h h.s ~~: --Ii .",0 '" Gi .il'tlOcu..o'"IO....COC'f.......1 "....0"......."'"" C'4.....11) ~:;;"C'>>_.... " III o !l! ~ ~ :I ::l ~:I:S 0 9 :s ~~~ -I :!: ~ ~ f"llI..I 8 CD ffi at ~w:lSl5~ ::: Ih 8 ~w! !:5:gmD~ = ~ t;~~~~~~2:1~~~~~ ;! 13~~~~li:l::l~g.g~li AB JUO ~ ~ "';! Gi"#. 'II! h ig ..~ OM -'3 ..I1!i ~ ~;:\ ::I e~ 10 ... ... ~ '" () CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 25, 2008, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Peters Variance - Planning Case 08-19 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this~5-tkday of Serp.\em be,... ,2008. ~m\:-r.~ - Notary ~ I KIM T. MEUWISSEN I Notary Public-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31,2010 0) c :;: a> := 0)5 .5 'Ci) ... U) as._ a> E :l:E .2 0 :00 ::JO) I1.c -'2 o c as 0- :;:0. o c Za> U) U) as .c c as .c o := c 0)0 c'- ,_ U) ... U) as.- a> E :l:E .2 0 :00 ::JO) 0..5 -c o c a> as 0- ,_ a. .... o c za> U) U) as .c c as .c o t:: <ll 1ii 15 c >- <ll E ' O)<ll oS: -g t5 .c a> (ij Cll . CIl 0- Cll <ll -0 .0 0 .~ .c Cll ..2: Ci5 0.CJ) Gi .!!l .c co C/) CIl _ U ~::::Ci5-oo:m :g o~c_c I: E.(jj.....~ca> 111 "CCIla> -0 .- ci. l5 ~ 0 t5 'en :5 oQ)o.c~a> '0 0-60C/) a: Q) "cl"-a>Cl-o 't:l I"- 0 I"- .c .~ a> 'iii ~ --EC ""'S:~E""'o :ll <<>-ga>o.8N lii gCll.o~Ct::~ a; ~~~~?a>$ ;p 1"--.cCCoa> .s: ..... c 0 .~ 0 ..... 0.. a>>:: a>.-_.....c a> - .0 55'0 CIl - C 0 .- 0 .8 iD C > ~ 0 'c (5.!!! OQ):JCIla>~:J 01:1. o.co.....-ow-oIllE _:::0.8 o>a>_" a> >>.: _ .~ -0 VU ..... I: co(jj<<i ~Cii CD"E j.!:! "E 1il I :J'x.c CIl 'l;j a>;;_ CTa>O-t 08 :J "E'- a> C C .- C")- I-::lOa:CIl CIla: 1"-<( E i= ~ 0) .... ctS C c o :,;:; ctS U o ..J iij UI o 0. o ... D. 0) c :;: ~ -oCl en c:.~ 15 CIl-o c ~~= 1a' a> -0 E E. 0 C CIl O)<ll -CIlL!.. c"C ~.ca> '~55 .~o- ~ <ll ~ :8 0 .~ (f) Cll co a> a. CJ) :c-6 C/)CIl- 1-'QCi5-oo:m .--t@cc E ~ CIl CD .::; ~ ci. l5 ~ 0 U 'en OCllO.c~a> 0-60C/)'-'a: "cl"-a>O>-O I"- 0 I"- .c .~ a> ~ --EC '''.S: ~ E ..... 0 <<>-ga>o.8N gCll.o~C C/) C\ICllS a>8a5 CD _"'0 \,u C,) I Q5 I"- -.ccco ..... c 0 .~ 0 ..... 0.. a>.-_.....c a> .0 55'0 CIl - C 0 .8 iD C > ~ 0 'c OCll:JCIla>~:J o.co.....-ow -0.8 Cla>_" :>"S: = _ .~ -0 VU CIl-CIlC/)Ci5.....-O -0 2 I a>.- a> Ca C/)..!!! :JX-S.c a>=.....0-a>00 :J "E'- a> C C .- I-::lOa:CIlClla: Q) E i= ~ 0) - ctS C c o :,;:; CO U o ..J ctS UI o 0. o ... D. .;.; c >-c '_~ i :8 o.ctS 2 g oCtD...J - c >-c ctS1::O .~ 0):';:; o.ctS 2 g oCtD...J a>-g~ C/) .co- a> -.c-o C/) -.....CIl C/) :J0a> :J 0.0_ ~ 0 .o.c_ 0 C/) CIl Cl= a> '5 :J 'CD s: '0' ~ ..... 0 C o C .!:: o..~ 0 >> a> CIl--. E .c .c -0 e 'en ..... - 0 ~ a. cS .!Q OEa> oa>=E 'E o.c C/) o..c .0 E .- ..... - a. 0 - ;;! 0 0..... -a>.....c...... - "5 g>Ci5 a. 0 a> 0 .!Q a. +=- Cl a> C/) .c a> Cl'~ a> c -S c - .c c c a>'~ ..... ~ E -0 .;:: .- E 0 0 a. 0 c ffi~a>Os:c~CIl .c 0 -S ..... .~ a> -0 -0 OOCla>2:C/)~a> = - c.c a> ~ 'CD ~ .g -0 .;:::;; 6 a. 0 U C:J -a> a. CIl 0 g> C = ..... .!Q .!Q - 0 CIl s: a> Cl -S ~ t5..c a> c Ca .~ .....:Ja>->CIl ...... o 0-'0' Cl'O.5:2 .e? ffi U a>a>.....c-o.c a> C/) ..... a..;:: :s; a. a> .c '0 O_C/) C/)CIl > CIlE 0..... 2-c:.c a> ~ a> E is :Jco-.cCO.cO:JQ) o.,g"5,gCi5l-oc..-s a> 0.0.0 .c 0..0 :J I- CIl CIl 0...- C\I C") """ UlC) C C 0).- 0.'G) 0.0) ~~ -0) ctS.c .c- 3:m Gi .9 '0 I: 111 :c - - o Q) 't:l 'iii Q) 111 ... Q) > Q) ... Q) .s: a>-;::; .~ 0 .....111 0.- 01:1. -0 III a>E .....1: CIlo .....J:;:: ..-1lI OU C")..5! 1"-<( a>-g~ .c0- C/) -.c-o a> -..... CIl C/) :J 0 a> C/) ..8~= ~ G CIl Cl= ~ C/) :J 'CD s: "Q ~ '5 o C.!:: ..... 0 c >>a> CIl a. a> 0 E .c .c -o"Q 'en ..... - 0 a>..... C/) o E C/) a. cS .- 'Eo~Ctioa>=E .- ..... _ a. o..c .0 E 0::: ci)$ e ~ 5. 0 -:JcC/)o.oQ)O .!Q g.+=- Cl a> C/) .c a> 0>.- ~.~ -S c - -S 'E .~ E s: 0 ~ E -0 CIl~ .2 o.ec a>.o~oS:c""'CIl .c 0 _ ..... .~ a> -0 -0 OOCla>>C/)a>a> =-c.c.....a>>C/) .0 -0 .- - a> ..... 'CD 0 :Jc::;.c60.0u o.CIlO g>c== ~ C/) .!Q Ci5 . 0 CIl s: a> .- -Sa>u..ca>cCag> ..... :J a> - > CIl .- o o-'~ Cl'- C/) Ca ~ a> a> 0 C Cl.5:2 - a> 0 C/) ..... a..;:: == 0. a5 .c .a> O-C/)C/)CIls:o.E"O a. - .- a> CIl .:!..... ::;@-S.c~a>E:C 0.0_0~.c0:Ja> a> '5.. 5 iSCJ) 1-0 c..-S .c 0..0 :J I- CIl CIl 0...- e\i M -<<i UlC) C C 0).- 0.- 0.0) ctS 0) :I:~ -0) ctS.c .c- 3:m .8 0) :!:.c .~:o >- C/) C/) c ctSctS .:; .~ a>>> a> a> ~ ~ a> :J .oCE.c>'" C/) OCl.....a>t::_ctS::s CIl >>~O;;;CIlOO)t= ~ :!::_~~g.-;;;.o 0> E ~ C :!: -0 .~ :: .c c -:=:cEE~g-;:- +=- ~8c.g""'oE>C ~ 0>a>~C/).8a>.S!.8:; E :;::C/)C/)o>>:52.-ctSO) "'-'CIlCll-o.>UI E a> f2a>.ca>00:c"C -S co.C ~ 0 a.-.S! c a> CIl _CIloa>-"'UlO ..... -u13.cc=O::'Cij o .. > a>.~ 0 0 s: - 0) UI Q5 CO CD "Q 0 :J a>:;;; 1:: :t:: .- .oa>C/)a.@)o~~oUlE C/) Clcn C/) -S ~.c CJ) ~.o E @ CIl :J .- a> - ... 0) 0 0. a. c -S C/) e\i .8 0>= ;: 0 a> ~ E "5 ~ C") "S.~ ctS '0 .c s: c 0 CIl ;:: a. Ci5 'Zi 0) .5 ~ C/) a> .g co.r-:. CD a> 0) '0 c a>u ~ a>=C\I.c E.c a~ C/) a> CIl c CIl C\I.!Q a> I- .." ^ o '~.c 0 E' .c - .... -eca>a>f?!:!:-c.cO) c a. 1! E >>0> en 0 .Q -;; .c CIl_C/) ~ o.ococ a> ~ o~ :s: ~'o C/) .c Q) () '-E 0) _ :J 0'- '.8 Ci5 a> E c c... o s: cECIl E'- 0 >>O);::?f~O >oc';: :!::-ss:~<(-a.8~00 ~ UI~ C C o 0) :';:;E l<< E ::s 0 00 o 0) :;; c:o>- C/) c ctSctS .~ a>>> a> a> ~ ~ :J .-.0 C E .c > ... og>.....a>t::-ctS::s _>> <( 0 ;;; CIl 0 O).c.... C/).....o.-.o --:JS:a>C/)_0) -E' ~ C :!:: -0 .~ = .c cEEa>o.;:- .Eo ..o.cO 0) ~oc:J-oE>c ~a>~C/).8a>.S!.8:; I C/) C/) 0 >>:52.- ctS 0) <<>CIlCll-o.>UI E o a>.c a> 0 O'-"C c:-cC/)o......cO) ...o.CIlO o.__c a> "" - Oa>-...UlO ..... -u13.cc=O::'Cij .8 .. > a> .~ 0 0 s: - 0) UI a> CO ..... '0' 0 :J a> ~ 1:: :t:: .- .0 ~""'@)o>CIloUlE C/) ~-- o..c >>CIl Ci5 0..0 E c'-',C/)C/)_......c 0)0) ~~=!:.c~--:o .="';:8 a. C-:JC\I-Cl 0) ~ E "5 CIl C") "S .~ ctS '0 .c ::> C 0 CIl ;:: a. Ci5 'Zi 0).5 ->0).0_ '-a> '-c a>c/)C/)CIlCllI"-a>E0)2c a>u C/) -C\I.c .c 0. C/) a> CIl ~'ca C\I.!Q a>"" .... .p- o '~.c 0 E' .c - .... _eca>a>f?!:!:-c.c0) c a. 1! E >>0> en 0 .Q -;; .c CIlC/)OO.o-- C/) - -. CIlca>C/)Oo s: ~'o C/) .c a> 0 'E- 0) _ :J 0'- '.8 Ci5 a> E c c... o s: C/) cECIl E.- 0 >> a> s: :?f :J ~ 0 -6 0 C .;: :!::-S s: ~<( 0.0 CIlO 0 :!: C/) .:; a> C/) CIl a> 0. Cl C +=- a> a> E a> -S ~ UI~ C C o 0) :';:;E l<< E ::s 0 00 00 ID -0 ~ ~ g s ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ 1U 0 g .~ ~ ~:: c ,....- ~ Q) ~ .9 Q:;Q)-o ro(:m 0::0 ro~g .2:5 c"Cc ~SQ) "'OIDw $ ~ .- Q)~ Q)~o <(m:S ~~~ ~~ ~ai~ a;.9? 7d:::1ii ~~g E~~ro~~ ro~g ~~ ;5g ro (J) E..o 0 (J) t.- . (J) a.. I.... (J) 10... "- >+= ~D~ oIDa..~roo~~E- -0 ro_o (J)Q) ~>eroa...(ij':E-;'oa5 0- en-e ~.~g "-roa..EoE~enoE .~ ~~! ooro2 mIDID~ IDU~gt:: ~m ec- ~~~ ~"~Sro~a.5g~R ~~ ~~8 ~ou ro~~E~E~en-ID ID> Ou E=.~ c::s;o~3:"OO.C3~5o sm "E>-ID .- D .c .Q > .0._ >- rn I.... u E 0> "- 0 c: ."!::: E $~~ (;i1ij~1?:gQ)~o-.~.E~ enO~ EmID ~~m-o~EID~~ U.~ ~1?c u~:5 0 _&~E-o.s~m g~ u-o e.-_ ~O>en~,,-~OSID~ Cm ~o~ ~ g 2 . ~ ~ g .~ 0 ai .9 "~ ~ ~ 8 w g t ID roI....IDgIDIDouEEmu~_ ro. ~O~ ~~S~.SE~~~~~~gs ~~ 8~s :a a5 8 ID i e i5. ro ~ ID ID ~ ~.~ .S; 0 ~ CD en CEll) E a.,Q Q) 0> ~ E ~ <.> E -'" 0 g- 0 ~ 8~~1?~.~S~ID:~K~~ ~~ CD~~ oo~j;~~~~~~EID.~~ S~ ~i~ ~ <( >- a5 -g 0"0 (.) >-b g ~ a.~ ~:5 g>-g c.. 3CDi~TIO~~~c~-Eo ~O> .~TI~ ~ -g g. 0 .s g> & 5.== ~ &5 g 8 ~ ~:5 m.s = cOI....-~.~oCDgwE+=~en 8~ ~CD~ ~~~~:5@~:55~~~~~cia5~ g~c ~::~~~~~o~ID~~~i~~ !.~8 ~E~"-~~~~~~~~CDo..$CDO eCD enID~~.Q=E(.)G&ID=~~E~~ ~8~ ooECD>-a.~ID~CDCenmU_-rolo... -roCD Eu"-to.. ~~~~~en!~.C3EB ~g- CD&5~R~~~g~2~~.Qg~~~.~R~ [Eg"O~~~.ffi~CD~~~e8!~~~roo ~<rn~E~.$g~u~gS>-~c~5ID(J) IDc.~~~~gE~.c a.. ~~Q)O"~S"- a> ~"E ID en >+= E 0 g co ~ g. ~ 0 c:5 ~ .~ C)~ oc..o~~~~oO~~~ID~Q)~~Q)E~- ~~~._-~cO~~~~Ec:5,,-~a..EE.5 e"-B>-c..o(J)Q)Bcc~oro,,-&~io~"O u=>! ~o~E~ Q)2!?CI)~.Een1DwogQ) CDu ID c t"@ E~ ~ E ID ~ ..2 O>~ Q) Q) c>>,,--g ~~~~~&~B~~~~EE~~&E!"~~TI "2 ~ a.."~;e ~ ~ ~ ~ - 0 g. en ~ 0 ~ en.s.S c c.5 uo~EE~cocorogg~~!?C~IDUU>-~~~ ~ oE enenu"-+=wQ)cococ~oQ)cc..c ~~Oo~~tea..ro~=~~~~~~mQ)oS ~ g 00 0 e R & ~ g> -g .2 g ro.~.~ U (; 5 E S g. ~:~g~8~~o.~~~~~:53:@~8~$~~ ii ,2: 'c ,- ~ a.Q) g-Q) E Eo Q) ~ C '" o>c t5 '" 0_ ~E2~=~~"-~oE~~.~~2'ffiID"~~~~ ~~~~~m~~~~8B~~~~~~K~~~ 5 . Q) ~ ID ~~ .~~ ~ ~ o :5 g;:~ C:~ ~ "O~ ~ 0 "- ~ a.. @;::: c ~.o, ~ ~ ~.9 :m~-g rn"2:CO o:~ ~<(.5: ~i e~c <(Q)~ ~~~ ~a ~~~ ~ID i.;~ ~~~ E~~m~~ ro~g ~.~ ;gg ~ ~ ~ ~ e 8.~ t 'g cij ~ ~ I.... ~ .9 <<i ~~ ::> 0> ~ ~ e E ~.Cif:S -;, 0 ~ 0 Q) en - c: >cB "-roo.. "-EenenoE _ *~~_Q) "'Q)~ .mQ)- ~ ctI Q) Q) -g ~ QJ -5 ~ .2 1:: ~~ c c en~W ~.~:5ro=a.~genro ~~ ~5~ =>.Q uQ) co~"5 E ~.~ ~ ~ ~ oar ~ ~ . ()"O E~"- e.50Q)>en~roo - a>-Q) ~..o g.::.g::_>-"'~Q)"OEO>c ~o_g c."!:::E '_-Q)~ "'a. "'~ -....... 0 co roco~~~Q)Eo-.- -co enQ)_c Cro E-ro-o~EID~C Uen ~ ;~~ ~~&~ESo~~~ ~~ ~sg @.5~ .~.~~ao~~~~~ g~ ~g; - g - . E 1D -.~ E 4> - ~ Q) ~ 0 f.J) c 1:: ~,,-Q)g(J)Q)"Qu.=E~"O~_ CO.....: ~o~ "Q~~~.~E~-g=~~$S5 Q)~ 8~s :a a5 8 Q) "55 g 5. co ~ ID ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ Q) en cE~Ea.~Q)o>~E~<'>E-'" eg- oS 8~~!~.~5"~~:~~>~ a..~ Q)c~ oo~j;~~~m~~EQ)~~ .s~ S~~ ~ <( >- ~ -g 0:; ~ ;'-6 g ~ o.~ ~:5 g>~ 0: "S;~i~TIO~~~c$-Eo ~O> '~TI! ~ -g g. 0 .s g ~ a= : &5 g B ~ ~:5 ~.s = cOI....-rn.2oIDg~E~.~en Bm ~Q)~ ~-g~jS~~5g~~"~~~cia5g ~~E ~ ~ :.~ g c.. == ~ 0 ~ Q) a..8 e :S .!a ~ 5. ~ 8 ~E.='-~~;:g~~~g.IDa..~Q)O CQ) ~Q)~.!a.~=E~0w(J)=~4>E~B !8~ enEW~a.<(Q)=Q)g>encou:5-rol.... -roQ) EU~~o.. ~3:~'E~en~~.C3EB ~g- Q)&5~o..~~~c~o~~.Q~g~~ ~R~ [Egu~~~~~~~~rne8~~~~roo g<(coSEcr..~gocu~g:5>QC~gQ)4> Q)~.~~~~gE~.c ~E~~(J)o~:5"- a;!2 -e ~ en >+= E 0 g ro ~ ~ Q) 0 c:5 ~ "~ O>~ o~o~Q)..o~oO~&~ ~~O~Q)E.S- ~~~.-5~cO~~.5:~~cS~~a..EE~ c.-6~c..o(J)Q)0ce~oCOI....~~iorou ..:J ~ ~ 0.ll1 E~ Q) Q) 2 2C/) >:~ "'Q;u; 0 gQ) ei~~ '~.~~~SE~2~gg>~~~g>"-Q)~ ~cID.Qo~cooenoE_S~o._oEQ)._u(.) -g ~ c.~i ~ Q) ~ ~- B ~en~~~ g..9.~ ~ &5.s 8~E.~.~co~cogg~~2c~Q)uu>~u~ ~~8Ec~~~c.~~Q)mm.5:Eg&~~go , e 00 8.c ~ 0 ro 0> ~ .2 13 ro.~ ~ ~ -E ~ :5 :5 g.- > 0 0> 0 a.. a.. t e Q) en C - ~ .3: C .,g ~ .;: Q) C ~:~cg~~~o.~E~~g- co~8 m~~ ~.~.E.E~o..Q)~Q)EEOQ)~gen.~cU~B~ ~~oc=~oo"-~oE~c>en~Q)Q).ID~ E ~~COa..S~IDQ)OO~~.~~~e~~Q)~o ~OOOC~~oo~SS~OO~>:a.u;~"'a.m",,,, 0. . . Print Labels Page I of 2 MATTHEW J VALEN 7208 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9782 JOSEPH & KATHELEEN WITKEWICS TRUSTEES OF TRUST 7210 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9782 JACK R & KARLENE M MIKESELL 7207 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 ROBERT A & CELlNE R SCHOLER 7212 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9782 WILLIAM L HEIMAN & MARY C BIELSKI HEIMAN 7209 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9605 WILLIAM D & SHERRI L MALONEY 7211 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 JAMES R & LINDA D KRAFT 7213 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 BRUCE K & SUSAN C SAVIK 7215 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 JOEL SCOTT JENKINS 7305 FRONTIER TRL PO BOX 158 CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -0158 ERIC WALETSKI 7333 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 RICHARD & GWENDOLYN J PEARSON 7307 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -7904 ROBERT L & GLORY D WILSON 7336 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9778 JAMES J & RITA M WALETSKI 7334 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9778 MICAH THEIS 7332 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9778 ROLF G ENGSTROM & LAWRENCE P LEEBENS 7201 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 ARCHIE D & EVELYN L GLASER 7200 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9782 PATRICK F & KATHRYN A PAVELKO 7203 FRONTIER TAL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9605 JON H & JANET B HOLLER 7206 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9782 SUNRISE HILLS C/O CHARLES ROBBINS 7340 LONGVIEW CIR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9797 RICHARD J & EUNICE M PETERS 7301 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 STEPHEN T & REBECCA L CHEPOKAS 7304 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 JOHN J & JULIE C BUTCHER 7299 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -4600 ALEX N CASTERTON 7301 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9704 RONALD V & ANN L KLEVE 7307 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 DAVID J & SUSAN K WOLLAN 7303 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -7904 DAWNA MCKENNA MILLER 7331 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 DENNIS W & LINDA A LANDSMAN 7329 FRONTIER TAL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 -9796 ROBERT H & SALLY S HORSTMAN 7343 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 ALAN & ANNABEL FOX 7300 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 RICHARD & DEBORAH LLOYD 7302 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 http://carvergiswebI.co.carver.mn . us/ arcims/ gis/government! general/parceLbuffer/princlabels. asp 9/1712008 Print Labels DAVID M & JOANNA POINAR 7303 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 GERALD & JANET D PAULSEN 7305 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9608 JOHN C LEE 7337 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 FELIX & LOIS WHITE 7306 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9608 ARLlS A BOVY TRUSTEE OF A BOVY REV TRUST 7339 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 FRED L CUNEO JR 7335 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9796 JAMES & LINDA MADY 7338 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9778 MICHAEL R & DORTHEA F SHAY 7230 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9778 THOMAS R & SHIRLEY J PZYNSKI 7340 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN . MN 55317 -9778 STEVEN A & CAROL K DONEN 7341 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN , MN 55317 -9796 http://carvergisweb1.co .carver .mn. us/ arcims/ gi s/ government! general/parcel_buffer/prinClabels.asp Page 2 of2 9/1712008