PRC 2008 10 28
CHANHASSEN PARK AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 28, 2008
Chairman Daniel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Jeff Daniel, Tom Kelly, Glenn Stolar, Thor Smith and Dan Campion
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Steve Scharfenberg and Scott Wendt
STAFF PRESENT:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; and Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation
Superintendent
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:Smith moved, Campion seconded to approve the agenda as
presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Hoffman: I have one. If you have not heard, the City is in the process of constructing a new
public works building and I’ll put up a diagram of that structure in a moment but first there’s a
press release. You received it so our Mayor, Council and our City Manager Todd Gerhardt are
very proud of the fact that in selling the bonds, nearly $8 million, we had 9 bidders from across
the country and we were upgraded by two points to a AA+. The council was discussing that last
evening with the bond consultant. That saved the city approximately $160,000 over the life of
the bond so it was very impressive to see that. I think the statement was 1 of 14 cities in the state
with that rating and probably, I’m not sure if there’s a community that’s our size with that rating
so great news and has to do with the good financial planning that the community undertakes.
The reserves we have. Stability of our community. Good planning… So that was good news.
And here’s the building, or a plan of the building. Are you familiar with the existing location on
Park Road. So if you take Audubon. Take Highway 5 to Prince’s studio. Go south on Audubon
and right there on the corner of Park Road is the public works structure. This new building, I
know it’s hard to tell the scale but it’s 2 ½ times larger than the existing public works building
and this structure will satisfy our public works needs into the future and build out of the
community. So obviously you see a large garage area. The pull through feature is very nice for,
when you’re hooked up for the next day’s job and you have a trailer and a pick-up and then these
are the large stalls for plow trucks and then there’s room for the plows. So the plows come off
all summer. They go on all winter and they’re just stored here during the summer.
Smith: So that’s a garage?
Hoffman: That’s a garage, yep. That’s the garage. For all the trucks and equipment. Right now
lots of our equipment sits outside. If you go out to the public works building right now, all the
plows are sitting outside and you know that’s just tough on equipment not to have it stored
inside. When you’re only using it 4 months out of the year, then we let…outside so here we can
protect it. Reception area and the lunch room. Offices. Men’s and women’s restrooms. Then
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
you move into all the work areas. The shops. Or the work bays and then the wood shop and sign
shop. What else do we have? Utility shop over here. This is the welding bay. And a car wash
and truck wash. This shows the mezzanine level which is above over here. So this project, like
any project, I mean it’s been on the drawing boards for nearly 10 years and this site is a site that
the City has owned since the, since that industrial park was developed some years ago. These
lots had some soil problems. They weren’t the premium lots in the development and so they
were just eventually purchased by the City and put into a holding pattern. So we had to correct
those soils as a part of this but it became a very nice site. If you have a chance, take a drive
down there. It’s on Park Court so it’s directly behind Paisley Park. If you’ve driven Highway 5,
it’s directly behind Paisley Park. You’ve just got to wind your way around. It’s completely
surrounded by a wooded area so it’s very, it’s not exposed. It’s very screened from Highway 5.
From Audubon, which is a good thing for a public works facility. They will open in January of
2010.
Daniel: So access to it, you’ll have to go down.
Hoffman: Park Road.
Daniel: Park Road, okay.
Hoffman: Park Road either from Powers or from Audubon.
Daniel: Gotch ya.
Hoffman: Or I guess you could take a right on Highway 5 and there’s an access there too.
Smith: What will they do with the current building?
Hoffman: Sell it. Market it. The sale price is estimated at about a million eight, and it will help
fund this project.
Daniel: Fantastic. Is there anything from the park and rec department that will benefit off of
there?
Hoffman: Oh absolutely. This will be our, although we have the accessory building over at
Lake Ann. This will be our main headquarters. This is where our parks crews and everybody
will show up on a daily basis. Typically how they operate, all…so utilities, they have a morning
meeting and they get their work plan going. Parks, they have a morning meeting. Streets have a
morning meetings, so they’re either meeting in one particular area if the shop or they’re meeting
in the superintendent’s office to talk about the day’s work briefly and get on from there. And
they’ll pick up equipment at this building, or depending on the piece of equipment, they’ll head
over to the accessory building…
Daniel: Okay, so Lake Ann’s an accessory building. It’s not the park and rec’s building then?
2
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Hoffman: Correct. Accessory building and it has the… Lake Ann maintenance building is
also… Formerly that location was at the west fire station and Ridgeview wanted a better
response time in the main core of our downtown so we worked with them and paid for that
structure. But then in return for that they’re central here in our community so when we get
called out for a Ridgeview…the west fire station was a reasonable location but not the best. If
they had to get downtown they had to go all the way down…which was a challenge, and then
head left on Highway 5, which is a challenge.
Daniel: Even if you have sirens.
Hoffman: There’ll be a tour coming up here next spring or summer so we’ll get you out. Take a
look at the building and talk about the site. If you have any questions, let us know and we’ll try
to answer them.
Daniel: That’s exciting. I mean certainly the City’s going to benefit from it. And in talking to
Todd Gerhardt, he’s excited about it. So are there any other amenities that will help, that are
currently are not in place. I mean you mentioned the wood working. ...upgrades or are the
upgrades in the.
Hoffman: No. There’ll be upgrades in all areas, yeah. Our public works divisions, all of them
will be able to better serve the community in this building. Everything will be upgraded and, our
mechanics, utilities, it’s just going to be a much nicer facility.
Daniel: Fantastic.
Hoffman: Here’s the plans. You can keep one and pass them around. Just wanted to let you
know that that’s ongoing and right now at present there are, this is not out to bid. It’s in the
design phase but we are working in-house mainly through our street division to correct the soils.
So we’re doing that in house to save those dollars and then also have the site ready for spring
construction.
Daniel: That’s exciting.
Hoffman: You may vote here in the future elections. It may be a polling place.
Daniel: Really?
Hoffman: Yeah. It’s being designed to allow a polling in the lunchroom area.
Stolar: Yeah, because you have this multi-purpose room here. It’s a pretty large size.
Hoffman: Yeah.
Stolar: That could be for large city meetings too. Like if you can’t fit in here because it seems
like that’s bigger than here.
3
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Hoffman: Yep.
Stolar: 2,200 square feet.
Hoffman: Yeah, there could be neighborhood meetings there.
Daniel: On the mezzanine, the 5320. That’s just a storage?
Hoffman: Cold storage up above, yep. Well actually heated storage in this structure up above.
Daniel: How amazing.
Hoffman: And that will be accessed by a crane lift out of the shop and then you can also access
it from the garage via forklift.
Daniel: Okay. Well thanks Todd. Is there anything else you want to talk about? Okay.
Hoffman: Public announcement Jerry?
Ruegemer: We can discuss the Halloween party later on in programs. Do a little verbal update.
Daniel: Okay.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS:
Daniel: I see we have some guests here.
Hoffman: I think they’re for the next item unless you want to talk about something else? One at
a time?
Daniel: One at a time, so let’s just go on new business then. We’ll just wait for new business
Todd? I mean as far as.
Hoffman: Yeah.
Daniel: Okay. Great.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:Stolar moved, Campion seconded to approve the verbatim
and summary minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated September
23, 2008.
FUTURE LAKE ANN PARK BALLFIELD CONCESSION BUILDING, REVIEW
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, HOISINGTON-KOEGLER GROUP.
Daniel: Is there somebody here from Hoisington-Koegler, is that correct?
4
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Hoffman: Yep. Chair Daniels, members of the commission. This evening we’re going to have
an introduction to a future proposed project at Lake Ann and it’s the Lake Ann concession
building serving all the ballfields. The ballfields are really laid out 3 on one side. That was the
original construction and then 4, 5 and 6 were added with the later acquisition some, a mere 20
years later. So we have not quite a wheel pattern but a 6 field structure where this current
concession stand situated between Fields 2, 3, 4 and 5. Best viewing obviously is to Fields 4 and
5 at present because you have the first base or the home plate’s right there just outside the
concession stand. It’s always been the concept that as Lake Ann matures we’ll add these new
facilities. Modern restrooms. Better concession areas. Those type of things and so with the
recent lighting addition and then the picnic shelter addition at Parkview picnic area, we want to
move into the next phase of construction at Lake Ann and that includes a concession building
and that future amphitheater on the site. The existing building was donated to the city by the
Legion back in the late 80’s. It actually was kind of placed on site and then there was nobody
around to coordinate the installation or the construction of the structure so it sat out there for a
year and a half to two years. And then I believe it was in ’89 it was, the Legion had a
contractor…so it served the community very well. It still serves as a focal point for that area but
it’s not sized sufficiently to accommodate the type of concession activities that we want to see
happen at that park. Not only for day to day use but then especially for tournaments and those
type of events. Special events. And in the interim, as we’ve progressed through history, we’ve
continued to fill the available concession and storage space with electronics equipment. The
contactors primarily for the lights so that’s been getting smaller and smaller. If you’ve ever been
there when they’re serving concessions, often time they’re outside the concession area. They’re
not actually using the building. They’re more set up outside of the concession windows.
They’re just using the ledge as a serving area. Tonight, well to move this item forward we’ve
retained Hoisington-Koegler Group. Tonight we have Amy, it’s Bower right? Yep, with
Hoisington-Koegler here and she can give us a presentation about the concept plan and they’ve
presented, or they’re prepared for the proposed building.
Amy Bower: Thanks Todd. I have handouts, you might have had a handout in your packet but
we’ve done a little more work since then and… I can start by going through the lines we have
prepared. We have building elevations and a building detail plan. Also have a site plan over an
existing aerial so you can see the existing pavilion. Todd explained where that is now. But the
proposed new plan would place the new concessions on top of the existing. That would take
advantage of the existing mechanical room so it doesn’t have to be located. It also takes
advantage of the great location that the pavilion’s at now. The high point in the park and the
proximity to the ballfields and building to the playground and the ballfields. And also here are
elevations, we tried to add height to the structure with a clear story and a copula. Even maybe a
weather vane or something because really this is going to be a great structure that you’ll be able
to see throughout the park as you drive around and it will create a great focal point and
landmark. If I talk about the structure itself, the plan. This structure is 1,300 square feet. The
old structure was 700 square feet. So it’s expanding it quite a bit. We’re introducing permanent
restrooms. Women’s and men’s. Three stalls are shown here. Concession room. Two different
storage and this storage here with, part of it will be taken up by existing mechanical that’s on
site. And almost half the structure will be a covered picnic area. You can see it best in the
elevation. Imagine picnic tables under here and concessions would open up underneath the
covered part of the pavilion. The clear story on top would allow light into the covered picnic
5
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
area so it won’t be so dark, which will be a great feature, and like I mentioned before, adding this
height to the structure itself. And I draw your attention to the, now the site plan, the way the
structure’s positioned, is the open side of the pavilion would again be pointed toward the
playground and the ballfields. And around the structure we propose a plaza that would help
orchestrate all the trails coming into this site and help organize it and offer kind of a spillover for
the picnic area if you want to be sitting out in the sun. And the plaza area is defined by a short
seat walk. 18 inch high wall that people could sit on casually. Also helps channel traffic to the
trail so people aren’t trafficking over the turf and putting turf damage. There’s a drinking
fountain existing somewhat about here on the site. We’re proposing that would be removed and
the drinking fountain become part of the building. Ease of maintenance and upgrade on the
drinking water feature. We also show some landscaping and additional shade trees to help create
shade for spectators and some shrub buffering shown here and here on either side, and help
buffering the existing utilities that are right out there and highly visible. The parking here might
be expanded in the future to make it more accessible to more people. I know this site is often
used for the playground. There’s no ballfields so it’d be a great amenity for people on non-
ballfield days also. Point to the elevation of the building. Some of the features where stone
work on the lower half to kind of replicate that’s on some of the existing park buildings. We’re
showing the timber built building. The siding. Gatewood or metal. Lower maintenance. We’re
showing a metal roof. Clear story and the copula and weather vane. If you refer to the cost
estimate, we started to list some of the things that would have to happen for this plan to be seen,
and of course we start with the demo and salvage. Demo work of the existing pavilion. The
utility work. The sewer line would have to be brought in. Update of the water line and
electrical, which we don’t have a price on yet but we’ll get some comp to the city staff on that.
Item number 3, the building cost as shown would be estimated at $273,000. We show deducts
for things like the clear story. Needing the stone work or switching the metal roof to a shingled
roof as ways to reduce cost if you’re trying to meet a certain budget. Also the prep kitchen as
budgeted would just be a simple prep kitchen. You bring in food but for another $75,000 you
could bring in a grill and ventilation hood to…concessions. The remaining items are general
earth work and seat walls on the site. Amenities and landscaping. Again the plaza area could be
pavers or we could switch to concrete for a budget cost. We’ve included some architectural and
engineering design fees if this was to go through the typical bidding, design, construction avenue
and we’ve also added a contingency of 15%. The project total comes to $465,754. And again
that doesn’t include the sewer extension and utility updates which we will get some pricing on.
We’ll update our cost estimates to include all that. We’re also taking more input I think and we
can adjust any plans and cost estimates that have a package for people to go out and get some…
If anyone has any questions or input they would like to add.
Daniel: Absolutely. Why don’t we start with Thor.
Smith: What is clear story?
Amy Bower: Clear story, it’s not a usable space. It’s just lifting up a skylight. It’s the lifted
space to allow light in.
Hoffman: It was switched because of an inability to have occupancy.
6
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Smith: Okay, because that’s what I’m looking at this and I’m seeing that there’s a club house
above there and so that’s.
Amy Bower: So yeah in your packet we’ve proposed a club house but then accessibility, it’s far
too expensive to put an elevator in there so it became more of a clear story and maybe not a
usable.
Smith: Oh, so just open with, okay.
Daniel: Is that mandated Todd?
Hoffman: Yes.
Daniel: That we have to have handicap accessibility to the club house?
Hoffman: Yes.
Daniel: Okay. That would make a difference.
Hoffman: If this was a private facility or being built by a private organization, you could have
that club house but not in a municipal building.
Daniel: Okay. Joint venture?
Hoffman: No. Public space. Without an elevator.
Daniel: Okay. I would say that would take out the equation because an elevator would be.
Hoffman: And you know as a public organization it’s only fair…
Daniel: Oh absolutely. Well especially for a club house of that size. I mean you’re looking at,
what was that, 700 square feet or so? I’m just a guess, and that could have potential yeah,
renting with recreation aside and certainly we’d need to have something like that accessible so.
Smith: I don’t get it. I mean where’s the upper level?
Hoffman: Sorry for the confusion. It’s a fast moving concept.
Smith: That’s the only question I have. I think it looks like, I mean as designed it looks like a
great building. Certainly would improve the concession situation at that park, that’s for sure.
Campion: I had a question on the prep kitchen. What does that add that isn’t in the concessions
area?
7
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Amy Bower: The prep kitchen, the $75,000 is you know, I think everything has to be stainless
steel and stainless steel back with a different material on the floor. Total sanitation and the
cooking, it has a dryer, ventilation hood. A sprinkler then because you’ve got grease.
Campion: So that would just be upgrading the concessions area?
Amy Bower: So that would be, yeah. A plus number that didn’t include in the total price.
Hoffman: It would take the concessions area from basically counter tops where you would
import equipment to a prep kitchen.
Campion: A full kitchen.
Daniel: What’s been the feedback Todd that you’ve seen from other organizations with regards
to this particular facility? Do they anticipate, much like Lion’s Park in Victoria which has the
built in grills and the whole works, is that something that they’re looking at? Or are they just.
Hoffman: It’s something we want to talk about. Once you put a prep kitchen in you’re going to
have, if it’s not used enough it’s going to be a whole lot of initial expense and then maintenance,
long term maintenance. And so if you can have some grills in the storage area. You push the
grills outside and cook the hamburgers and serve them up with hot plates and, that works very
well. That’s how the high schools are doing it right now. All high schools.
Stolar: Bennett Park does it that way.
Hoffman: We would really have to have, almost a, either a vendor or really an established
system to be investing that kind of, those kind of dollars in a park kitchen.
Daniel: ...because the image I have, which I think it works out great when the Lion’s in Victoria
do their annual tournament. I mean that’s a well run, well run tournament, but not only that but
the grill that they use, I mean it’s fantastic so I mean, but that’s one or two times a year that they
may be using it so to put that type of expense and I just wanted to get feedback from you, if
that’s working or not.
Hoffman: It’s all in conversation. Again, we’re not here to come up with a complete answer
tonight. We just want to talk, initiate the conversation.
Daniel: But absolutely. That’s what needs to be taken into consideration.
Campion: This is just a question and it might be pretty ridiculous but is there such a thing as
putting like the ability to have temporary walls around the picnic area so that it could be used
maybe as, for some purpose in the winter or off seasons?
Hoffman: There’s been buildings like that. I’m not sure how.
8
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Amy Bower: I know Nicollet Island, you know they’ve got heated tents kind of on patios.
You’ve seen the little heaters or something too you can bring in. Kind of portable heaters.
Daniel: I know Rosemount at their pavilion, Eden Prairie, right next to Costco, they have a
seasonal facility that you can use in the winter with sliding glass doors. It’s actually a beautiful
facility. Well out of our budget but the cost of the glass like that, it’d probably have to be…glass
probably be tremendously expensive but yeah certainly it’s the right idea. That’s why the club
house would have been interesting.
Campion: Right, well and.
Stolar: And I don’t think it’s that crazy of a question because my thought being how do you, you
know if you’re going to invest this money, how do you make it multi-use. As well as maybe
attract new types of events to Lake Ann. I don’t know if this is another ridiculous question but
like do we turn one of the fields into an ice rink in the winter. This is a warming house.
Campion: Yeah, a warming house.
Stolar: We’ve got two lighted areas there and now we’ve got full year use that you know
something like this would be fantastic. I don’t know if that’s something that we could ask them
to at least give us thoughts on, or options. And then that also I think adds to the use of Lake
Ann.
Daniel: Yeah, I mean absolutely. There’s other things that I know we’ve discussed before with
Lake Ann, and Jerry you know with regards to recreation, obviously in summer we have a
budget already set aside for rental equipment such as the canoes and the kayaks, paddle boats.
And I don’t know if we want to get in the business, we’ve talked about this so much like what
Centennial Lakes do with the rental equipment of skates or cross country skis. Again I think it’s
a good point and at least something we should take, if we’re going to have discussion about this,
and it’s going to be a premiere facility, should we just think a little bit outside the box and just
open to questions such as skating rink. Again bringing it into really what would be a premiere
park. The only problem I can think of Glenn is that, if based on the location, to get realistically
with skating and all that stuff and…steps because right now there aren’t steps at all in that place
and your access to it would all be downhill with a fence.
Smith: That’s the fun part of it.
Daniel: I don’t know, I was just looking outside of the box.
Smith: You’re also looking at, you know now you’re enclosing the building. You know the
exterior.
Campion: I was thinking collapsible doors or something like that so it’d be open in the summer
but in the, you know that would be either removable or just open and bolted, open for the
summer.
9
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Stolar: That’s what I was thinking too. …open this in the summer but you’d make it enclosed in
the winter.
Hoffman: That’s possible and then you’d just have to go to why would we do it. Is there a use
there?
Campion: Or we could have, I mean winter activities like yoga classes or I don’t know what, I
mean to utilize the spaces.
Daniel: Extra space from a heating standpoint though. Even those panels like that interlocking.
They are there. I’ve seen them before as mentioned but they’d be a tremendous amount of cost.
Smith: See that was my whole point is, you’re bringing your cost up like, and I have no idea but
I mean it’s a tremendous amount.
Campion: …is it possible as an actual what would it cost, and if it’s just ridiculous, there’s no
good solution, then okay. But at least we could ask.
Daniel: Realistically Lake Ann, once the snow flies, it gets pretty quiet with the exception of a
wonderful day in February. Then it turns riot so I think certainly it would be nice to promote the
activity to the lake. I mean really our premiere park in the city and if there is an option on that.
And I guess you know again, that’s pretty much like an amphitheater. Much like what we’ve got
with the existing pavilion right now that’s down by Lake Ann Beach. I mean there’s just
multiple things that we could certainly take a look at but again, utilizing it 360 days versus just
April through whenever.
Hoffman: And in that conversation we also want to consider that Lake Ann is located almost
exactly between City Center Park and the Rec Center which are two winter use facilities that are
built and managed for winter recreation and so I’m not sure that the economics are going to be
there to say let’s introduce an additional. You know we have a three quarter, $275,000 warming
house at the Rec Center. We have a portable warming house here. We have invested in ice and
lights here. We have invested in ice and lights out there.
Daniel: That’s a good point Todd.
Hoffman: And just the layout of having to flood a ballfield, when you kill the grass and you
have to go downhill.
Stolar: That’s why, yeah. I mean those are the questions but if it doesn’t make sense then it
doesn’t make sense. Just it’s a nice facility to have it only used 6 months of the year.
Daniel: I guess the other question is, and actually I’ll save mine. Glenn, do you have some that
you want? Or Dan.
Campion: That’s it for me.
10
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Stolar: I do have a question playing on this. Are we expecting that if we did something like this
that we would rent it out?
Ruegemer: To individual youth associations to perform concession operations?
Stolar: Well there’s several levels. One is that, right. So is it rental or are we going to run it as a
concession like the other concession stand?
Hoffman: I don’t envision that we would rent this as a pavilion. It would be a concession area
to be operated through a variety of arrangements, both through our youth athletic association, our
volunteer groups in the community, non-profit groups. But day in and day out it’s going to be
very popular for the playground that’s there so there’s also going to be a lot of groups coming in
and activities going on. And with the other 3 shelters or pavilions located at Lake Susan and two
at Lake Ann, obviously there would be some conflicts here for group activities. There may be an
occasion, a date or a time of the week or a time of the season that’s available that we would
move somebody over there for a group and may generate some revenue, but I would not envision
that that would be a big part of this operation.
Stolar: Then I had another question. Part of what we’re doing here, you know adding all the
nice facilities. Do we have a plan to upgrade the facilities that currently exist? The washrooms
and the pavilion, Lakeside pavilion.
Hoffman: Not currently.
Stolar: Because that’s something I think that was, we’ll get to that later at the report that some of
the questions are, I think especially the bathrooms there, to upgrade those.
Hoffman: We have, there have been some upgrades at that facility since the time it was opened.
The building has been completely re-wired and that’s a key in the area. There’s a very high
water table. Significant high water table location. We experienced some significant frost
heaving in that structure the first year so we introduced enough heat to keep the frost out of the
footings at the Lake Ann, the lower Lakeside pavilion. We have some heat in there now and
we’ve re-wired the building. The wiring is all in conduit. That was poured in place concrete and
you asked for us to do that so we could re-wire. As far as a remodel or an update, that has not
been… We replaced a lot of busted up front doors that get kicked in.
Kelly: So I can understand the problem. Glenn’s question. So this facility as is only kind of
will truly be in operation for youth sporting events. The city would not run this like it runs the
concession stand by the lake.
Hoffman: We don’t think so.
Kelly: Okay. So it’d purely be a Saturday-Sunday type of operation.
Hoffman: Or Monday through Friday if they want to operate concessions.
11
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Daniel: Yeah, if softball wants to, if there’s an organization through the softball leagues that
they’re going to bring concessions in.
Campion: Because it could potentially be concessions for parents or children using the
playground.
Smith: Yeah, if there’s Boy Scouts that want to run concessions or something during the
softball, you know during the week.
Stolar: I think what we’re saying is if you’re going to have a bunch of parents just during the
day out there at the playground, they would have to go down to the lakeside pavilion to be able
to get concessions.
Hoffman: Correct.
Daniel: Which is okay.
Campion: You could have maybe vending machines or something like that there as well.
Daniel: The question I have, the existing facility prompted a question. So it sounds like to me
that was a modular or pre-built structure that was located. Is that true or not?
Hoffman: No.
Daniel: Oh it wasn’t?
Hoffman: Custom built.
Daniel: So it was custom built, but it was not, basically you moved it to the existing location
once it got prepped? So it was manufactured. Sat for a while and then they built. They put it on
top, is that correct?
Hoffman: Oh the existing…
Daniel: The old concession stand, yes.
Hoffman: Yeah, it’s a pre-fab structure. Yep.
Daniel: Okay. Is there, would it make sense for us to, if we go down this path, to take that
existing structure, which I’m assuming takes a few bolts, since that’s all probably it took to get
on there, and consider moving it out to like Bandimere temporarily?
Hoffman: It could be.
Daniel: I guess, I mean granted, it’s not the best structure but I know we had some consideration
about putting something out at Bandimere and a short term investment of some footings and I
12
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
guess from an electrical, if that’s all we need since we’re not going to be running to power lights
or anything like that but that’s a short term investment before we make any decision. Why not
give it consideration. I mean it is small. I was out there a couple weeks ago during a football
game and I stopped and looked and go god, that is small. You’re right. We do need something a
little bit bigger, but certainly because Bandimere theoretically has what, 3 fields? So if you’re
generating a smaller crowd. At least we’ll give them something. Give some shelter. If that is
truly “modular” and all it takes is moving it, which is not easy but still.
Hoffman: Yeah. We run it under cost benefit analysis. I’m not sure where we come out.
Daniel: Compared to stick buildings going up.
Hoffman: Well, or buying a new structure and having it delivered to the site. By the time you
tear that thing down to what you need to move it, the value of a 20 year structure is going to
be…so we’ll take a look at that. You’re going to have more cost in moving and rebuilding
obviously than the value of the structure and so you’re going to take a look at that and do you
want to re-purchase that. You know what does that cost so we’re going to want to take a look at
that.
Daniel: Yeah, and that’s exactly you know.
Stolar: It comes in less than the cost to destroy it.
Hoffman: Yeah, if we can find somebody to take it away for less than, all these numbers are, it’s
just an idea so we get to the point…
Stolar: Yeah, but there might be some group that’d say we’ll use it.
Hoffman: Yeah, like our park maintenance division. You tell them we…
Daniel: The second question I have, just so I understand the bidding process. The contingency
of 50%, that’s just plus or minus things that we may not see or.
Hoffman: Yeah. Again I wouldn’t get too.
Daniel: No, but just the whole process. I’m not fixated on a number. Just the big, or…
Hoffman: Yeah, we already talked about a community build. This thing, we’re talking with a
group called Carver-Scott Coop who would provide all the construction labor and so the Carver-
Scott Coop operates out of downtown Chaska. They have a youth build program and they
normally build houses and they have two houses that are constructed on their lot that they cannot
sell because of the economic slow down in housing, so they’re looking for another project and I
met with them out at Lake Ann and they would be willing to do this next year during, put
footings in the ground. In August and September they would want to do all the stick building all
next winter which is the time that they want to use for their classroom time during the winter.
And so that’s one possibility for some community invest that we have members of the
13
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
commission that want to talk about some fundraising opportunities and so we just want to get
you understanding that these things are not inexpensive but these costs are going to be juggled
around and things are going to be shifted and what can get donated and what can we, what will
we have to pay for. What components. What can we do in house?
Stolar: Like these pavers, could those be, you sell the bricks like what Bennett does?
Hoffman: Sure. Absolutely. You know currently in our 2013 budget cycle. If you’re going to
move it forward, you’re going to need to come up with something creative for the council to bite
on that so that’s for another future work session.
Daniel: A couple more questions. Just on the design that we have right here. Are we mandated
by a number of stalls? And the only reason I ask that is, is the concession at 8 feet wide, wide
enough or maybe what we want to do for a longer scale operation such as larger tournaments.
Little League tournaments and things like that, so I mean if we’re going to be looking at
something like this, should we bring or maximize the square footage within there because
obviously we have to take into consideration shelving and storage and displays. I mean those
things, and that’s why I was curious if we’re set on a specific square foot size, which is okay,
because obviously the site can only offer so much. Then where would we have to give and take
and you know is there a regulation or anything that we set forward that says you have to have so
many stalls or anything like that Todd? Or we can make it bigger.
Hoffman: The number of stalls, the pictures are fine.
Daniel: Okay.
Hoffman: And I think you’ve answered some of your own questions on you know how hard you
want to, it fits on the site. Do we need to get it bigger? There’s a narrowness to the site created
by the ballfields on one side and the utilities on the other and the basic premise is we’re building
around those existing utilities that are there and they’re going to sit right in this mechanical
storage area. And then you go from the existing or the new facilities.
Daniel: And that’s why, you know looking at 8 foot by 20, 8 foot by 18. Well actually that’s a
pretty good, that’s a pretty big room.
Amy Bower: Yeah, I think you, the width is kind of constrained because we need, because the
grades and needing to get a trail on either side but definitely coming north, you know the
bathroom could slide and the storage could slide.
Daniel: Just a little, not wider. 26 foot wide by, go for 8 and possibly even 10. It’s the little
things like that that you realize just how small sometimes 8 feet are. Especially when there’s 4
or 5 parents in there working, and they’re jumping all over each other trying to, it just you know,
when we get to, these are little knick knack details that if we ever get to this point, I’d love to
have the conversation on but at least as far as from design standpoint, I think those are the things
at least I want to throw out there at this point so that when, if you go back to the drawing board.
14
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Amy Bower: We also can get the cost, more appropriate to decide more.
Daniel: Yeah and, well I think the design is fantastic. I really do like it and I like it with regards
to the clear story and the extra light that’s going to be brought in there. I’m sold on the idea of a
metal roof to keep a continuation of what we have. I think with the new facility as well as all of
them. The stone work is going to look great. And I think a facility of that height is going to
stand out and you’ll see it from Highway 5. You’ll see it all the way from Target, which I think
is good so we want to have something presentable, if we’re going to, again if we’re going to have
that. I guess for us to take a look at this, I think it’s a great concept and I think you’re right
Todd. We certainly need to find out where the priority lies within our budget for this particular
project and I don’t know if we’ve had any discussions about a work session on this, if it becomes
a priority. I mean I’d like to understand from your perspective you know where you think this
might lie within the budget for the next 2 years. I mean we’ve got a lot of road projects coming
up here. Path projects especially that are eating up our capital. So with building held to a
minimum right now, and I don’t see anything in the near future here, we’ve got to be very careful
about how we spend this money and so I guess again I’m open. I’d like to get some feedback
from yourself as far as where we’re at.
Hoffman: Just briefly my initial position is that we can see a city investment of $100,000 or
under on this project and then you have the rest of the either material cost or labor donated. We
could have this building open by spring of 2010, and so that’s what I would like to sit down with
you in a work session about and talk about well how’s that going to happen. Who’s going to
donate what? There are going to be certain parts of this that we’re going to have to pay for.
Daniel: Absolutely.
Hoffman: And so I think we can get that to $100,000 or less. We present that to the council and
say here, here’s a $465,000 project. We have it down to $100,000 cash investment from the city
and other donations in labor and materials for the remainder of it. We’ll have to work on that
and see where it comes out. If we go that route, things like $40,000 of clear story may or may
not stay in the building. But something that we’ll have to talk about so we’ll go through.
Daniel: Absolutely and I think that’s the right approach and I think…concept it’s needed at
some point and where that is in the future here is certainly going to be the question but I think
it’d be nice for us to have a work session on this to creatively come up with some ideas and get
input from the public as well and other organizations as far as how they’d like to help and
contribute and see what we can do. And I think that number, that $100,000 number is workable,
even within our CIP and I think the City Council will see that as an investment. So I mean a
very smart investment given the cost. So is there anything we need to do on our end Todd?
Hoffman: I’d like to hear from Todd this evening, his initial thoughts.
Daniel: Sure. Todd?
Todd Neils: …but I think a lot of the questions that I had were around sizing and they’ve been
addressed. One of our concerns beyond the size of the concessions and having them available is
15
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
also storage. As we talked about with Mr. Ruegemer, you know during this baseball season,
softball season there’s, has a tendency to be rain and so there’s a need for storage space for rains
and dried off and…storage and so on and so forth. So as long as there’s an opportunity to either
rent the space or have usable space for that, I think it sounds and looks fantastic.
Stolar: Todd, along that line. Once the public works building gets in, do we have extra storage
then in the building down at the end there?
Hoffman: There could be room there but having public access to that facility where you have,
once you get in the building you’re in the whole building.
Stolar: Okay there’s no.
Hoffman: It would be problematic.
Daniel: Yeah, there certainly is, there certainly appears to be a large amount of storage. I mean
at least.
Stolar: But that would be for the concession area.
Daniel: Oh concession and mechanical storage.
Stolar: And I know when, compared to Bennett when I go into their’s, I mean it’s stacked. So
but again, if we aren’t going to be supplying it, and people are bringing their own, then that
becomes available storage. If we aren’t going to have anything there that.
Hoffman: Yeah, we’ll address that. We can talk about it. Will this be big enough? There’s also
another conversation that we’re going to be talking about in November-December and that is
Ballfield #3. Do you remember when we moved the fence back on Ballfield #2? We put a, you
know the batting cage out there and so that’s an accessory structure and we could talk about it as
long as we keep with the architecture. You know this level, an accessory building in either the
outfield of 2 or 3 and once you move those fences up and so we could talk about that at that time.
Stolar: Oh yeah. We could take the building that’s here and move that over there and put it as
storage.
Hoffman: It’s something we want to be cautious of. These are public park facilities and
buildings really need to be kept public. Once you start putting storage sheds in and putting
names on them that this is a storage shed for this use, other people start to look at that and say
well why don’t we have storage. Why doesn’t soccer have storage then? We don’t have storage
either so it’s a complicated question…
Campion: Back to that club house. So that would require an elevator, right?
Hoffman: Yep.
16
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Campion: And the cost of an elevator ballpark is?
Hoffman: About as much as the building.
Campion: Really? Okay.
Daniel: Alright. Is there anything else? Amy, thank you very much. You have a great design.
We don’t have any old business.
Stolar: I’m sorry, can I follow up on one thing here?
Daniel: Oh, absolutely.
Stolar: So Todd your thought is, because Dan and I were talking about whether or not we need a
motion as far as getting a committee together. Your thought is the next step is you probably
should have a more in depth working session as a commission and then figure out how we want
to approach it at that point.
Hoffman: There’s going to need to be some type of an action committee to make this happen.
Similar to the veteran’s monument. You know that started as an idea. Good idea. Let’s do it so
that’s what we these thoughts and drawings are about. Is this a good idea? Is it something the
community wants to rally around? I’m just not sure that the council is ready to invest another
half a million dollars at Lake Ann. They just got done funding the ballfield lights and so I think
as a community we’re going to have to get a little bit more volume on the structure. The bricks
is a great concept. If you can put names out there. You just have another conversation piece out
on your building site. The community build, they were very excited about the project. The
gentleman lives in Chanhassen. They’re familiar with Lake Ann. The timing works out great.
As we talk tonight, you know Lake Ann shuts down. The Lake Ann ballfields shut down
towards the end of the year. You know…put the footings in, and again those are, we need to
look at, we have DayCo Concrete in town. We have lots of trade folks in town that have been
around. Have done very well in our community and you’ve just got to go out and start talking to
those people about, to them, let’s say they’re going to take this on as a job and they’re going to
make $50,000 on it. Well, and then reverse it and say okay, well let’s take this on and the City
has to pay material costs and a fair investment in labor. It’s really something they can show up
and they can have…so you start to look for individual trades. Who do we have contacts with?
Who can we partner with? Do we have to pay for their wire for, or do we have to pay for their
materials? If you pay materials, you get, you can go a long ways and then having that labor
donated. Because going out and getting outright cash to buy things is not always the easiest
thing, but if you leverage materials with labor, I think we can get a long ways towards
completing the project.
Kelly: You think that can accomplish through in $60,000? Just I mean because that’s, I mean
that’s a lot.
Hoffman: Yeah, I think so.
17
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Kelly: Okay.
Hoffman: I think the project costs can come down. The clear story’s nice but if you’re going to
do a community build project, I’m not sure you’re going to see that. You’re probably just going
to erase that off the architectural drawing and you’re going to have a roof line much like you
have over at your shelter. So I think project costs can be reduced. Demo we can do. Utility
work and those type of things can be incorporated into another project. So you understand what
happens, the water service is already here. It runs right underneath the building. The electrical is
already there. You just got to connect it in and you know connect it to electrical service. And
then sewer, there’s a grinder station right down at the turn around at the beach, and that services
the other picnic pavilion concession stand right so you would do a gravity feed line from this,
from these restrooms down to that grinder station, and that is a 4 inch force main that grinds that
sewage and sends it all the way around Lake Ann to another lift station which is in Greenwood
Shores Park. So the complexity of that system has already been put in place.
Kelly: Okay.
Hoffman: There was a great deal of water and sewer work that went into, when we built the
pavilion down there, sewer, water, electrical, it was a long ways away. Water and sewer, or
water was on the other side of Highway 5. Sewer was over at Greenwood Shores. Electrical had
to be brought in and so those expenses were undertaken years ago with the original development
so this is going to be a lot more economical… So we’ll have to juggle those costs. The
monument, the pavers were just donated by Anchor Block. Anchor Block donated all the block
for the pavers for the new monument and also all the block for the retaining wall, and so
community build type of projects, the more people you get behind it. The more people they
know. The more friends they have and you start to build a grass roots effort to get a structure
like this completed. And then in the end you really have a facility, who has ownership in the
picnic pavilion? Not a lot. People are going to enjoy using it, but if this is a community build
project, people are going to have a great deal of ownership out there. Both parents and kids and
you can see that and so I see that as a potential benefit which is, you know a community build
project builds community pride. Ownership in their park. Ownership in what they have and I
think it’d be a great project for it.
Campion: Todd has there been a request or an effort for getting similar plans drawn up for the
amphitheater?
Hoffman: There have not but we have to think about that after the first of the year.
Campion: Okay.
Hoffman: You know this investment, this is, we’re investing approximately $4,000 for
professional services here up to this point. Fairly reasonable to get us to a conversation point
without that investment. We don’t really have a direction. For one thing I really enjoy about this
plan is just the layout that Amy was talking about. This plan here shows all the connections to
all the trails. There are really 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 entrance points into this facility and I think their wing
walls really present a nice framing of this focal point. And so it fits on the site. The existing
18
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
building. Reasonably serviceable but this structure is just…the type of events. The feeling they
will have there when you’re up at a tournament. There’s adequate space for people to mill
around and get their concessions and have conversation and get to the playground and they can
see what’s going on. Right now it’s like okay, there’s 6 of you under there. That’s it. Have you
seen it up here in the rain?
Stolar: That will be a fundraiser for next year. We’ll just rent out that space. Build a new
pavilion. I think it’s a great idea. Having the drawing helps a lot and you know as we go talk to
people or start envisioning what it might be. It’s right there.
Daniel: Especially visualizing the facility. It’s something to start with. Get your teeth on at
least and.
Hoffman: Let’s sit down, we’ll either do a Saturday morning or evening and kind of split it out
and talk about the different components. Then we’ll bring our community groups in. There’s
Lion’s, Rotary. Chamber or business community. All the youth athletic associations. Brick
sale. We kick off the brick sale at the beginning of the season next year. Define the photo.
Define the image. You get that posted. You post it on a board right there. You start listing
what’s being raised. What’s being donated. Who’s doing what. It really builds some
momentum to the project. Brings the community together. There’s really no park that brings the
community together like Lake Ann currently does. The Miracles for Mitch and the beach and all
of the other activities. The sporting events. I’m never afraid to challenge the people of our
community. They really respond.
Daniel: Is there anything else Todd?
RECREATION PROGRAM REPORTS:
2008 RESERVATION PICNIC SITE EVALUATION.
Ruegemer: Thank Chair Daniels. Just wrapped up our 2008 picnic campaign. Our last picnic
th
was scheduled I think the weekend of October 12 so we went about 2 weeks later than we
normally do, but there was interest out there to continue with the nice fall with reservations so
we did certainly accommodate the groups requests for that. We’re just a shade under $10,000 in
revenue for the picnic rentals for the year. Certainly our most popular sites again were Lake
Ann, Lake Susan and with that we did increase a little bit during the week at Lake Susan for
rentals that sort of thing there too so there certainly is, certainly we’re trying to get more
exposure during the week there so we can kind of fill that, kind of the blank spots in the calendar
so to speak so we were pretty busy with that. We increased our programming out at Lake Ann
certainly with another week of Adventure Camp out there and other types of programs that we
had versus the seniors. The seniors went out there from Sue Bill’s program, or our program
through the recreation department here so. They were very popular out there. It’s nice to get out
in the parks. We did house roughly 10,000 people at our picnic sites through the reservations at
Lake Ann and Lake Susan, so that was an increase of about 8,000 people from last year. So
we’re getting certainly to attract some larger groups. Large corporations coming out there and
renting the multiple sites or facilities from Bloomington’s or Edina’s, outside your Chanhassen
19
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
so they certainly is part of our business community as well is going out and utilizing the parks
itself. I did attach just some, the picnic kind of reservation categories from 2008. I also put in
2007 for your review to kind of see where the numbers kind of ended up to be, Monday through
Sunday on that, and we did simplify the, kind of the reservation process this year as far as rental
fees for residents and non-residents, that sort of thing, so that certainly helped out with the
overall, you know for our customers as well. We also, we certainly had everything up on our
city web site as far as information so it certainly did help out people you know kind of have the
picnic pricing and those type of things prior to making the phone call in to our department. We
also had talked about changing the names. I know we’ve talked about that in the past. Certainly
staff has talked about that and to kind of maybe make the picnic sites a little bit more
geographical to Lake Ann itself so the new, currently the Lake Ann Pavilion would, could be
considered a name change. The Lakeside Pavilion or some type of lake you know kind of
proximity to the lake area. The new Parkview Picnic Shelter could be Hilltop Shelter or
something on the lines of you know maybe make it a little bit easier for people to kind of concept
as to where the location of the picnic sites are. So that’s something that the Park and Rec
Commission certainly can discuss tonight and staff is certainly willing and open to any type of
direction or name change that the commission would have at this time so, just general comments.
Certainly people did like the picnic sites. We do get that a lot. That they’re beautiful facilities.
A lot of the amenities are there like phone, bathrooms close and once the Parkview Shelter did
get to the point where we could rent it, certainly the reservations did pick up. People loved the
openness of the new shelter. It’s a beautiful facility. Nice views of the park itself so it really
was a popular area and we’re certainly looking forward to starting a new season next year with
that and going ahead and making those sets of reservations, and in fact we do have 2009
reservations that are being booked for that shelter, as well as Lake Susan and Lake Ann already
at this point so. We’re definitely looking ahead. People are calling ahead for next year already
and looking forward to the start of a new season so. I’ll entertain any questions the commission
may have this evening.
Daniel: Tom?
Kelly: I do like the name, the name changes. It makes sense. Lakeside. You’re by the lake.
Hilltop, you’re up on the hill. And you don’t have any, you’re not going to be, you don’t plan of
neither raising nor lowering the fees for next year. Keep them constant.
Ruegemer: You know we’ll bring that to the commission next month. More than likely
November, early December for that. Probably be in November because then we can kind of get
that set, but you know, in hard economic times, I don’t think that’s going to be my
recommendation at this point so. We kind of went through all of that last year with the Parkview
Shelter and a lot of those type of things kind of switching a lot of those picnic fees around. Kind
of raised and lowered to get, to kind of simplify things so my recommendation at this point
would probably be to keep them the same.
Kelly: The same, okay. Great.
Daniel: Glenn.
20
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Stolar: No. Fine with the name changes. So it makes it easier for people to distinguish. That’s
fine.
Hoffman: People are using geography. The one on the hill. The one by the lake…
Stolar: To pay for this other shelter, we could sell naming rights. Target Lakeside. It will be
much less than the new Twins stadium. …something in the future to think about. Or even as we
build this, you know to say you know get 3 big donors for the new one and say each of you get a
name for one of them. Well I guess we’ll have that discussion in our work session.
Campion: I think the proposed names make sense. Lakeside and Hilltop are good. The
additional stairway addition, was that going to happen in the spring?
Hoffman: In the spring.
Campion: Near the hilltop pavilion?
Hoffman: Yep.
Stolar: Oh, he’s using the new name already.
Hoffman: Right down the center and the erosion, eroded area’s going to be dormant seeded so
they’ll come in and spray down a 3 inch mat of soil and then seed underneath that so we’re going
to get some growth there going in the spring. We really had a sprinkling problem, if you spent
any time behind the beach playground, we’ve had erosion control back there that’s halfway full
so we want to provide people with a stairway and then get some additional vegetation going over
there. And you know it’s just a challenge when operating a public park system, when you have
very high use areas and you have a steep hillside, which is forested, or mostly forested between
and you have no significant plant growth in there. Erosion can occur. But then they leaf up and
the branches and then the soil’s exposed and we have problems here so we’ll have to fix that and
the stairs are programmed for this coming spring.
Stolar: That’s it.
Smith: One of the things that some people said the bathrooms need general painting and
updating. Is that being planned for anything like that or updating?
Hoffman: Something Glenn was talking about. Other than routine or normal maintenance, no.
The restroom.
Smith: Because I don’t think they’re that bad but.
Hoffman: Yeah, they’re not the best. They’re not the worst. They’re functional and you would
have to invest a good amount of money to change the feel or the look or the atmosphere because
they’re really…
21
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Ruegemer: Pretty plain Jane.
Hoffman: For public restrooms, it’s a challenge so we’ll do what we can with painting. The
facilities themselves are pretty well maintained. Some of that, some of those comments come
because of cleanliness. They’re not cleaned during, you know they’re clean in the morning and
they’re used and so some people find them you know they’re not clean.
Smith: Do we need a motion for the name changes?
Hoffman: That’d be great, yeah.
Daniel: I guess a couple questions I have. One, as far as with designation of each facility at
Lake Ann, because obviously there’s no issue at, Lake Susan it’s the only one, but have there
been any confusion amongst those that have gone down to, you know they see Lake Ann and
maybe bypass the Parkview. I’m not too sure if that’s a shelter, and I guess would lead for us to
have signs. They may be there for all I know. Signs within the park just pointing, you know
Hilltop or Lakeview. Whatever the name change may be, and then Lakeside, so we can
designate as people are coming, because again we who are used to going to Lake Ann obviously,
can designate too and being on the commission obviously can do that. I’m just speaking on
behalf of other citizens as well as those coming in from other communities.
Hoffman: Great idea. Right there at the first intersection, yeah.
Daniel: And then when they start going up, just basically Hilltop, Parkview straight. Or
Lakeside straight. So I think that would just help and if we could point to where they’re going
for parking and eliminate any confusion. If there’s going to be, I mean obviously if we’re going
to go with the name change. Was there any suggestion Jerry a name change for Lakeview
instead of Parkview? Versus Hilltop or does pretty much everyone call it Hilltop? Or will there
be some confusion as well with Lakeview, Lakeside? I mean I guess.
Hoffman: I wouldn’t name two lakes.
Daniel: That’s what I wanted to make sure because then also you know, I’d like to see us
promote that park, and if it’s like anything else, you know either you have a lake view or what do
they call that at a hotel? Ocean view or actually ocean side, you know. Whatever it may be.
Obviously I want to make sure that we don’t take away from that particular amenity just based
off the name.
Campion: Lake view and partial lake view.
Stolar: Obstructed lake view.
Daniel: So I guess Hilltop, if everyone’s kind of going with that right now Jerry?
Ruegemer: That was just a suggestion. Certainly staff is open to other discussions.
22
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Daniel: Okay.
Hoffman: It’s the strongest geographic feature there. You know people say it’s the one on the
hill. If you say Parkview, or Lakeview, you could say, people know the one by the lake would
be, you should call that either Lakeview or Lakeside. And then the other one should be
something else.
Stolar: Maybe just call it Something Else.
Hoffman: The one on the hill is what most people call it.
Daniel: And any thoughts as far as, you know we have maple or something as far as, with
regards to, with the Chanhassen and.
Hoffman: Maple shelter and, I mean.
Daniel: Things like that.
Hoffman: Kandiyohi County is Park Number One. Park Number Two. Park Number Three.
Park Number Four. The Arboretum is Picnic Shelter A. Picnic Shelter B.
Daniel: So they didn’t get too creative on that either.
Hoffman: Yeah. I think Hilltop and.
Daniel: Let’s go with, I think Hilltop and Lakeside. Is that seem to be?
Stolar: I do like calling one a pavilion and the other a shelter because there are differences.
Daniel: So it’d be Lakeside Pavilion and the Hilltop Shelter. Gotch ya. Okay. And I guess
what would be the difference between Lake Susan Shelter and it not being a pavilion? …I can
understand that because it’s just basically a covered you know but it has bathrooms and so does
the other one. I just want to make sure we’re all on the same page.
Campion: It should be Lake Susan Pavilion.
Daniel: I mean if we’re going to do that designation, we might as well give it proper
accreditation as well. And would it be Lake Susan Pavilion or Lake Susan Shelter?
Hoffman: There are similarities and there are differences. Again a pavilion is enclosed much
more than the Lake Susan Shelter. The Lake Susan Shelter looks, you know it’s a cross between
what you have at Lake Ann so.
Daniel: Kind of somewhere in the median. Okay, that’s just the way it is. I just want to make
sure.
23
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Hoffman: It’s a fair question.
Stolar: No it is. Consistency.
Hoffman: You’re the appointed officials.
Daniel: Hey, there’s been debates on lot more monotonous…within government so.
Hoffman: Lake Susan Pavilion or Lake Susan Shelter.
Daniel: Alright, well let’s, who wants to make a motion to change the names?
Smith: I would make a motion that we would change the name from Lake Ann Pavilion to
Lakeside Pavilion and from Parkview Picnic Shelter to Hilltop Shelter for the two picnic areas at
Lake Ann.
Stolar: Second.
Smith moved, Stolar seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend to
change the name from Lake Ann Pavilion to Lakeside Pavilion and Parkview Picnic
Shelter to Hilltop Shelter for the two picnic areas at Lake Ann. All voted in favor and the
motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Daniel: Alright. Thank you Thor. And Jerry, the feedback Jerry, just specifically with
Parkview. With Hilltop. We just changed it. With Hilltop. What, I mean it’s first year in
circulation and what type of feedback did you get?
Ruegemer: Just great. The roominess of it. The electrical outlets. You know I think people
loved just kind of the openness of that area. The views. Just really just being all together. Kind
of wanted big to accommodate large groups. Family reunions. Company picnics. You know I
think obviously the, I think they wish there were full blown bathrooms up there, but there isn’t
so.
Daniel: And we didn’t plan for that. I mean the.
Ruegemer: Right. It is what it is and you would certainly look, we did look to upgrade those,
you know could have kind of nicer, upscale portable restrooms but they weren’t available at this
time but we certainly can look into that in the future. People liked, really like the area.
Smith: What was the biggest group you had at that?
Ruegemer: I want to say close to 400.
Daniel: Excellent.
24
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Ruegemer: We’re kind of getting into that, you know Three Rivers Park type of a group that
would normally go to you know Hyland or Cliff French or Baker or any of those type of things,
they can come out to our park now so, there are a lot of people that are looking to have larger
types of groups. Big corporations, that sort of thing so, and that’s only going to increase in the
future so.
Daniel: Especially given the low cost for enjoyment.
Ruegemer: And a lot of people were doing for larger picnics, they did the pavilion and the, or
the Lakeside and the.
Stolar: You still called it the pavilion. It’s the only pavilion.
Ruegemer: I’ve had 18 years of calling that thing the pavilion but I’ll change. So but you know
a lot of people depending on the size of your group will do both, so they now have you know
portable restrooms and the other bathrooms, and they serve people in the other bathrooms as
well.
Daniel: Okay. Great Jerry. Thank you.
2008 TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY.
Ruegemer: Kind of the FYI. Just kind of get it on your calendars at this point. It will be
th
Saturday, December 6. John has a lot of you know kind of information already put together.
He’s met with the Chamber already and so a lot of the same kind of duties and responsibilities
will be the same to the City and the Chamber this year, so the event will start at approximately
you know 5:00 and the tree lighting will actually take place around 5:15 so working on that.
You know most of the details are pretty much ironed out at this point and we’ll certainly get it on
our city web site…so just put it on your calendars and any questions let us know.
Daniel: Now here’s the question. What’s the over under on actually the weather being at least
somewhat amicable? Because I have come to the last 2 years. I think it’s been just absolutely
horrendous.
Hoffman: Cold.
Daniel: Really I can accept cold. Like last year it was just, wasn’t it windy.
Hoffman: Windy. Cold.
Daniel: Cold. I mean it was bad.
Ruegemer: We could sell, by the fire, we could sell seats.
Daniel: There we go. That’s what we should do.
25
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Smith: Raise money for the new concession stand.
Hoffman: There was one night, this was the same night as the Shelter Box Sleep-Out out at the
Rec Center and it was like 27 below that night. I think it was only 20 below when the tree
lighting was on.
Daniel: Well what we may have been stung with with regards to the tree lighting ceremony
we’ve certainly earned this past season for the February Festival. It was easier to tolerate
compared to the year before. Jerry, do you want to comment also on the Halloween Party.
Ruegemer: Yes I would. Just to give kind of a cliff note recap of the event. Had 266 paid, and
about roughly 185 pre-registered and then had walk-up’s that night, so when it was all said and
done, probably around 500 people out at the Rec Center that evening. Had a show, kind of a live
show in the gym versus kind of a skit. The Halloween that Didn’t Happen was the name of the
kind of local theater group that performed that, and it was kind of a fun, a real fun event with
that. Everybody walked away with plenty of candy and treats and that sort of thing. We had
volunteers from the Chaska Key Club, Holy Family and I think Minnetonka as one of the high
schools, so we had 3 different groups representing their organizations out there that night and it
was a great event. Nice, beautiful night out for hayrides and that sort of thing, and John is kind
of in talks right now with possibly do some type of sleigh rides for the Feb Fest with this group
as well, so…maybe do sleigh rides and give you a little, kind of a little teaser on that at this
point. We’re still negotiating here. Working out some of the details on that but other than that
you know everybody had a great time on the hayrides. It was a beautiful night out and we were
cleaned up and out of there by 9:00 so. So we’ll come back with some of the financials and stuff
in November. Kind of a recap of the event. We did get a discount this year at Target for the
candy.
Kelly: This is not the year they were giving out discounts.
Ruegemer: So we had some prior conversations with our local Target here and worked that out
prior to the event. Bought around $1,400 worth of candy prior to the event. Returned I think
close to $700 so we tried to really be fickle with our candy this year and kind of cut back so we
could save some expense on that as well, so everybody still walked away with oodles of candy
and we saved some money on the side so.
Daniel: Commissioners, as far as showed up.
Ruegemer: We did not have any commissioner volunteers this year, but the event went on as
planned and we certainly had Plan B and Plan C in that case so everything was fine.
Daniel: Well I was hoping to get a chance, but I was out of town. I would have loved to have
been there with my son’s voice changing Darth Vader, because that would have been the
opportunity to go, but I sure at least, I will be there next year.
Ruegemer: Yep, no problem. We understand commitments and family and work and play, that
sort of stuff so we always have contingency plans and it worked out just fine.
26
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Daniel: Excellent. Well I’m glad to see that it went off very well. How did the numbers
compare to last year?
Ruegemer: You know down a little bit but we did raise it a dollar, the fee so we came out about
the same.
Daniel: Okay. Great.
COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS.
None.
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS.
None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET.
Daniel: There seems to be a lot of stuff in there Todd that I thought was semi-interesting. Is
there anything you want to highlight?
Hoffman: Fairview Medical Clinic. Medical Specialty Center. On the Tim and Dawn Erhart
parcel. A proposal. Powers Boulevard south of 212. If you flip to the colorful chart with trails,
that’s the primary planning, as far as parks. You see it off the big Fox Woods acquisition, just
off to the north and east. The orange trails are currently on site. On Powers Boulevard. The
north trail will be built as a part of this project as a condition of approval to the property line, and
then the extension all the way north. This extension. Following north will be built with a future
sewer line that will service this area, so as the sewer line goes through we’ll build this trail and
it’s destination or, is over to the intersection of Lyman and 101. That’s the north trail. This
access road trail. This access boulevard will go through and in the future it will go all the way
through the Erhart parcel into the Wilson Nursery parcel and then up and come across, just about
where the access to Bandimere Park is. So this would be a frontage road. Access boulevard and
that trail will go all the way along the north side. And then the east trail follows an existing foot
path to get residents in this area and visitors to this area up into the park. So this trail connection
and this trail connection will start as a part of the trail systems that will eventually lead to the
park. And that’s all surrounding the Fairview Clinic.
Stolar: The east trail’s going to be when the development to the east goes on?
Hoffman: Yes. Or…
Stolar: Because is that the land that we’re.
Hoffman: It’s land that will be dedicated to the city as a conservation easement.
Stolar: Once the rest of the land gets.
Hoffman: It will come with Fairview.
27
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Stolar: Oh we’re getting it with Fairview.
Hoffman: All the way to the pond yeah.
Stolar: Because doesn’t Erhart’s have more land east?
Hoffman: They do. Yep. They’ll develop that, but we think this will come with the Fairview
Clinic site as a preservation outlook.
Stolar: And then we’ll build that trail at that point?
Hoffman: Yes.
Stolar: Okay.
Daniel: Isn’t Fairview already off of Powers? And 5. That’s Ridgeview, oh. So this is
Fairview. Oh, gotch ya.
Hoffman: And then Park Nicollet.
Daniel: Park Nicollet, all the way up. Plenty of, okay.
Smith: So will this be re-platted or something that’s set, the Erhart’s essentially selling a portion
of his property?
Hoffman: Yes.
Smith: Jointly or whatever.
Hoffman: Yes.
Kelly: And then where did you say those two yellow trails off to the left there are going to go?
Hoffman: These?
Kelly: Yep.
Hoffman: Those will go to the access boulevard that goes over to Bluff Creek Boulevard right
now which is over to Audubon in the Ryland development. So right now when you come off of
Audubon and you hit, what are the townhouses over there called, by K. Hovnanian? Liberty at
Bluff Creek.
Daniel: Yep.
Hoffman: So that’s the other end of that road. And these properties are the Fox and Dorsey
properties. This is the proposed lifestyle center site, and Mr. Fox and Mr. Dorsey were in, mini-
28
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
mall. Mega-mall. Outdoor mall. Lifestyle center. Whatever you want to call it. But again the
market is not there right now for that development so they’re in a holding pattern as well.
Kelly: There’s a house right there too isn’t there?
Hoffman: Mr. Dorsey’s house.
Daniel: What do they plan to do with that house?
Hoffman: Don’t know.
Daniel: God it’s a beautiful home.
Smith: It’s vacant.
Daniel: It’s been vacant for what, a year now?
Hoffman: When you’re sitting on 10 or 20 million dollars worth of land.
Daniel: What does a small little house on that really matter?
Smith: That’s a 9,000 square foot house.
Daniel: Put me in that position. Alright. Is there anything that we can, I mean when this
Fairview, does it open up opportunities based on it’s proximity to the park that we’re having
adjacent to it?
Hoffman: For development or?
Daniel: Not necessarily development but for, are there things that we want to do such as natural
trails that we could possibly negotiate based off his proximity and access. I mean is there
anything that they would, that we could benefit.
Hoffman: Yeah, as a sponsor.
Daniel: Sponsor, exactly.
Hoffman: Right now they’re having a challenging time just getting through the site plan process
and accepting our conditions that we’re applying to them right now. I’m not sure they’re.
Daniel: So they’re really not interested at this point talking to Park and Rec Commission about
sponsoring trails?
Hoffman: I don’t think so. You could ask.
Daniel: You never know.
29
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Stolar: Well you know a year from now. They’re settled in… In reality we’re along the lines of
healthful living and all that, natural preserve is right there. Having some nature trails sponsored
by them that are you know natural.
Daniel: I’m not talking paved. I think just a natural.
Stolar: Wood chip.
Daniel: Very similar to like we have at the dog park, because I think that park as designed, much
like at Kerber, it’s going to be a natural trail. It’s going to be dense woods. People could go in.
Go for a nice walk. ...quiet next to a freeway, but at least get something. Some relaxment and.
Hoffman: It’s fairly quiet because of the berming there.
Daniel: Oh yeah. I supposed there are.
Hoffman: Yeah. Especially during the vegetative time.
Daniel: So I mean it’s, I just you know again, given the opportunity and if they’re very excited
about this particular property, then what could we do to help them, have them help us sponsor
that particular facility. And that particular park I should say and turn it into something that can
be of use a lot sooner than later. So just a thought. The other thing I noticed on here from, it
looks like you Todd to Kate Aanenson. Parks and open space plan. I noticed you got disc golf
course, actually Glenn as brought up on a couple occasions and that’s always some excitement.
Is this, is there anything that you’d like to.
Hoffman: These are review comments back to the County on their park and open space system
plan for the 2030 comp plan, so we just wanted to bring the county up to date on our thoughts in
all of these different areas. Primarily, or most notably trail connection between Herman Field
and Minnewashta Regional, which they do not acknowledge on their master plan. They have a,
just no…
Daniel: It wasn’t there.
Hoffman: We want them to upgrade their plan. We feel it’s in the best interest of our neighbors
there to have an identified and public access, so really what that’s about is, there are certain
people that know about that, and there are certain people that don’t know about that, and why
would you want to let somebody live in a neighborhood for 10 or 15 years and all of a sudden
they would say you mean, there’s an access to Lake Minnewashta that I never knew about? And
so that’s the point that I would just hate to see us, be that with a neighbor and so I would like to
see it on the plan. Publicized. Wrote it. Developed so we have an official connection between
the park. The two parks.
Stolar: You mention in the comment on the 101 north trail. What was, I mean we don’t see their
report but what was their.
30
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Hoffman: Their comment is that it’s a type of a trail you should build.
Stolar: Why do they say that?
Hoffman: Because their consultant didn’t like the design. You know pigeoned hole type of a
trail and in some cases that’s the way you have to build trails when you’re fitting them into an
existing alignment or an existing corridor. So we just didn’t feel it was fair that they signaled out
the 101 trail as a bad example for a trail…
Stolar: And so when do we hear back from them on the.
Hoffman: Prior to their publishing of the plan.
Stolar: Is there anything that we need to do like, discuss with them or this is the process and
they’ll either take it or not and there’s not.
Hoffman: Well you could mention it to Commissioner Workman because he worked on a half a
million grant for that trail, and as a commissioner with the county I’m not sure he’s going to take
too fondly to having this trail mentioned…their own comp plan.
Stolar: But I’m thinking more just in the general things so like the disc golf, you know to
support. I guess will you get a version back before they finalize it that says whether or not they
operated these?
Hoffman: I’ll bring any response that they bring to us back to you again. They’re not required
by law. They’re not required to respond. We think they’ll respond.
Daniel: Just good, open communications is what we’re doing now. Todd a quick question on
the, their lack of, or lack of acknowledgement of the access from the park. Or lack to their park.
I can’t remember and I know I asked this before. Is it two fold one concerns on revenue and two
liability. Not necessarily that order.
Hoffman: It think it’s primarily what they tell me is, it’s based on the master plan that this is not
a pedestrian trail access. That’s a cross country ski trail where they’re accessing, but also a
summer walking trail, and I think what they’re considering pedestrian access is asphalt trails in
the future. They have no plans to make this an asphalt trail so I think what they’re shying away
from is inviting walkers onto a winter use trail system. And so in the winter that’s cross country
groomed. Cross country ski trail which they try to reduce or eliminate walking on. So now you
have a neighborhood connection where a majority of your people would come via walking. So
their concern is the trail type.
Daniel: That’s a legitimate concern obviously, especially those who cross country ski.
Hoffman: Here come all the walkers. Knocking down the.
31
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
Kelly: Nice grooves.
Hoffman: Yeah, yeah. The grooves so it’s something to be addressed. And then please take out
your calendar and post it at your home office or work office for the meetings for 2009.
Daniel: Okay. Are there any other discussions or anything Todd that we’ve, or Jerry, to cover.
Hoffman: Preview of November. We’ll be talking about Ballfield #3 at Lake Ann. And
preview to December. That’s our early meeting in the month. We have all staff members here
and then we have our commission social meeting after that, so make sure you have those on your
calendars.
Daniel: Excellent.
Kelly: I do want to say I’ve gotten a lot of very positive comments about the new Arboretum
trail. They really enjoy that, going through the wooded area.
Hoffman: And more to come. The Superdog trail is on tap.
Kelly: The Superdog trail?
Hoffman: I front of the Superdog Hotel. So when you come out of the Arboretum trail, the new
trail, you want to just, you just keep going straight to Holiday. That trail is going to be built
there on that section of roadway.
Kelly: Oh, okay. All the way to 41?
Hoffman: Yep.
Kelly: Okay.
Hoffman: All the way to 41. And then, so then you can cross at a stop light and access the
Arboretum or Chaska’s trails.
Campion: Is that the official name for the trail?
Hoffman: The Superdog trail. It’s the Superdog Hotel. So the official planning name is
Superdog trail.
Smith: What is the date of our November meeting?
Hoffman: This November? It would be.
Ruegemer: November? Or oh, that’s going to be December.
th
Hoffman: Like the 28.
32
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - October 28, 2008
th
Smith: 25?
th
Daniel: 5 I think yeah.
Hoffman: The Tuesday before Thanksgiving.
th
Daniel: The 27 is Thanksgiving, right. Alright. Well I think we can adjourn things here.
Motion to adjourn.
Kelly moved, Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting
was adjourned.
Submitted by Todd Hoffman
Park and Rec Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
33