Loading...
Application Planning Case No. ~ CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION JUN 2 4 2009 CHANHASSEN PLANNlNG DEPT PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Address: Owner Name and Address:' e.R'-'~o 51 L \ K.o~ ~ 1<:'-1 ~~ 3~J5 ~ J (? (0,...;) L"j N ~LY~U7H , W\~ S-~L.{L{b . Contact: ~~ Contact: Pl1one: bfJ. SSD 831&, Fax: Phone: Fax: Email: b51LIJ<. o~S.ILI <i"AVTCMOTO<R.PlEK, CO'f'-"-. Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is reQuired prior to submittal, including review ot development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAG) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Variance (V AR) Non-conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits '{. Notification Sign ~ (City to install and remove) ,If..-J; /'l C-rt' \0\ Sign Plan Review ~ SRe Plan Review (SpRy i!;;DU < Subdivision* x ~. w for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** $ UP/SPRNACNARlWAP/Metes & Bounds - 450 Minor SUB , TOTAL FEE $ 7 C:;!) cjJL ct:~ lDl7 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies otthe plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF-Group 4 (* .tit) format. **Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME: A U'To V\J\. a-rcvcP LGk LOCATION: ~~ Au bU f'-JDN R "0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: d5-Dl5/;}..lD ""t-' dS - CJ~' 000' TOTAL ACREAGE: A../ ( 0 WETLANDS PRESENT: ~.< /. YES NO PRESENT ZONING: lOP REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST: .5c~ ;4 (7Ae~ FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: ()) and new employees: -0 This application must be completed irrfull and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party who~ the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to (his application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownershil1i (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 7M if leY! ( Date 7/X/crr . Date G:\PLAN\Forms\Development Review Application.DOC Rev. 1/08 The purpose of this document is to request a clarification/small addition to the site plan. To give you a short background... we currently are permitted by the City to install balconies onto our buildings and plan to continue to add them to create architectural features and views of the complex and natural landscape given the large wetland that is part of this property. This request is to clarify the ability to add decks in a few locations (which differ only in size from the balconies which have been permitted; as a point of reference, the City also approved a deck as part of the original site plan) to the buildings within the Auto MotorPlex Campus. As you are likely aware, the Auto MotorPlex Campus has grown quickly with a quality look, feel and presence and we continue to attract an affluent group of people who have been accretive to the City. Our clients tend to be conservative and on the wealthier side. They enjoy the quality and security that has been constructed at the MotorPlex and commensurately have added finishing to their garage so they can enjoy their motorsports passion as well as hanging out with like minded enthusiasts in a pleasant surrounding and natural beauty. Currently, we have 6 balconies (ranging 3'x10' to 3'x16') and 1 observation deck (12'x30) constructed on our buildings, please see the attached pictures for examples. The construction of these balconies and deck has been permitted and approved by the City. They have added accretive architectural features to the buildings and additional functionality that has helped sales. Given the economic times, this is important... it has been a buyer decision factor. All of these structures are guided in our architectural guidelines section of our association bylaws. The bylaws govern the look and finish of these balconies and decks to ensure the quality and integrity of the Auto MotorPlex Campus. The City does continue to allow for the construction of the balconies but wants the input of the Planning Commission to support the decision of allowing 5 observation decks (identified as "0", ranging from 8'-14'W x 10'-20'L), see site plan below, as well as 6'W x 10'-16'L balconies (identified as "B") on the north side of two future buildings. I am requesting that we be permitted to construct the additional observation decks and balconies on remote parts of our buildings providing a scenic view of the property. This is a feature that, in at least two cases, clients have purchased their private garage with the belief that a deck can be constructed, given that a permitted one already existed on the campus. I request your approval of this clarification to the site plan. Please see the pictures below, they show the site plan, balconies and deck already built, two pictures of the view of where the proposed decks would be located and a picture of what the balconies would likely resemble for two future buildings (A & B on the site plan).