Loading...
Findings of Fact and Recommendation 6q -0 '-I CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION INRE: Application of Michael Schlangen for Conditional Use Permit approval for an electronic message center and Sign Variance approval from the individual dimension lettering, minimum Yz-inch depth, to allow flat cabinet lettering as part of a monument sign in Arboretum Business Park, PUD. On April 21, 2009, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Michael Schlangen for a conditional use permit and sign variance for the property located at 8175 Hazeltine Boulevard. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Sign Variance which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office/Industrial. 3. The legal description of the property is described in Exhibit A. 4. Conditional Use Findings a. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city. Finding: The LED message center sign is permitted as a conditional use and meets the criteria as outlined in the sign ordinance for electronic message center signs. It will not endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or city b. Will be consistent with the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and this chapter. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and complies with Chanhassen City Code. 1 c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. Finding: The sign meets the zoning district requirements and the design standards of the Arboretum Business Park Planned Unit Development. The monument sign will be constructed of black steel and will mimic the design of the windows on the building. It is architecturally compatible with the development. The LED message center area meets the sign ordinance requirements and design standards as outlined in the City Code. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. Finding: The surrounding uses are the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum (A2) and Office/Industrial uses as part of the Arboretum Business Park (PUD). The message center sign meets the requirements as outlined in the City Code and will not be hazardous or disturb existing or planned neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. Finding: The site is currently serviced by municipal services, which are adequate for the development. f. Will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Finding: The site is currently serviced by adequate municipal services and shall complement the existing uses in the area. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. Finding: The use is consistent with the standards of the sign ordinance as well as the Arboretum Business Park development standards and will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. 2 Finding: Access to the site and all parking requirements were implemented during construction of Arboretum Tire and Auto in 2001. Access to the site will not be impaired with the addition of the electronic message center sign. 1. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. Finding: The electronic message center is part of a monument sign and will not be detrimental to surrounding solar, natural, scenic, historic features. J. Will be aesthetically compatible with the area. Finding: The proposed sign will be architecturally compatible with the existing building and complies with the sign ordinance and design standards of the Arboretum Business Park development. k. Will not depreciate surrounding property values. Finding: The use will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. Will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in this article. Finding: The use is consistent with the Arboretum Business Park development and complies with the standards for electronic message center signs as outlined in Section 20-1259(2): 1. No electronic message center sign may be erected that, by reason of position, shape, movement or color interferes with the proper functioning of a traffic sign, signal or which otherwise constitutes a traffic hazard. The nearest traffic signal is approximately 500 feet south of the monument sign. The applicant's intent for the electronic message center sign is to advertise specials and promotional events to attracting motorists and direct traffic into the site. The electronic message center sign will not use animation, flashing, scrolling, or other special effects that will create a traffic hazard. 2. Electronic message center displays shall not exceed 5,000 Nits between the hours of civil sunrise and civil sunset and shall not exceed 500 Nits between the hours of civil sunset and civil sunrise. The sign will comply with this condition. 3. Electronic message center signs shall not cause direct glare nor become a distraction due to excessive brightness. The brightness of the message center will comply with the maximum Nits allowed by ordinance. 3 4. The lamp wattage and luminance level in candelas per square meter (Nits) shall be provided at the time of permit applications. The applicant submitted the wattage which shall comply with this ordinance. 5. There shall be no electronic message center signs in the front setback area within 50 feet of a street intersection (as measured from intersecting right-of- way lines) or within 125 feet of a residential district, except where lighting for such sign is indirect or diffused and in no way constitutes a traffic hazard. The nearest intersection is approximately 500 feet south of the proposed sign. There are not any residential districts within 125 feet of the proposed sign. 6. Electronic and non-electronic message center space used on a sign shall not exceed a total of 40 square feet or 25 percent of the allowable sign area, whichever is less. The message displayed on electronic message center signs shall be depicted in one statement and not a continuing sentence or flow of information. Flashing, scrolling, special effects or animated scenes on electronic reader boards shall be prohibited. The electronic message center occupies 19.5 square feet or 25% of the sign display area. The sign will not use animation, flashing, scrolling or other special effects that will cause a traffic hazard. 7. Electronic message center signs shall not be located in agricultural or residential zoning districts. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and is guided Office/Industrial in the 2030 Land Use Plan. 8. Electronic message center sign LED display use for signs within 500 feet of single-family residential homes shall be limited to the hours between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The sign is not located within 500 feet of a single- family dwelling. 5. Sign Variance Findings: a. The City Council, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant a variance from the requirement of this ordinance where it is shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance with the requirements of this ordinance would cause a hardship; provided that a variance may be granted only if the variance does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of this ordinance. Finding: The monument sign is located on a berm along Highway 41. The sign is visible to motorists and provides a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise the name and service. The intent of the individual dimension lettering, minimum Yz-inch depth, is to provide uniform signage throughout the development and variation in detail and form provides visual interest. Granting a variance from the required Y:z-inch depth will not increase the businesses visibility 4 and opportunity to advertise. This request is a self-created hardship. Granting of the variance may create a precedent to grant similar requests in the future. 6. The planning report, Planning Case #09-04 dated April 21, 2009, prepared by Angie Auseth, et aI, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Case #09-04 for a conditional use permit for an electronic message center and deny the sign variance request. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21st day of April, 2009. LANNING COMMISSION 5