1994 08 09 Agenda
'.
.
,
FILE
AGENDA
CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
TUESDAY, AUGUST 9,1994,
6:00 p.m. Site Visits - 7:30 p.m. Meeting
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 COULTER DRIVE
6:00 p.m. Site Visits (Assemble at City Hall, Lower East Parking Lot)
1. South Lotus Lake Boat Access
2. Heritage First Addition
3. New Elementary School/Recreation Center
4. Minnewashta Regional Park Play Structure
5. The Meadows at Longacres
6. Brenden Pond
7. Herman Field Park
7:30 p.m. Call Meeting to Order (City Council Chambers)
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Commissioners may add or delete items at this time.)
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
1.
Visitor Presentations: Commission Procedures allow for presentations from the audience
at this time. If a motion is required, the item will be forwarded to the next available
agenda to allow for publication and review prior to consideration.
2. Land Development Proposal:
Rezoning of 39 acres of property zoned A2 to RSF, preliminary plat to create 50
single family lots and 7 outlots, wetland alteration permit for mitigation of
ponding areas, and conditional use permit for alteration of areas within a flood
plain on property located north of Twin Cities & Western Railroad tracks west of
Bluff Creek and east of Timberwood Estates and Stone Creek, Heritage First
Addition, Heritage Development Company.
3. Land Development Proposal:
Rezoning of 25.85 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential to RSF,
Residential Single Family and preliminary plat to subdivide 25.85 acres into 21
single family lots and 3 outlots located in the SW IA of Section 3, T 116, R 23,
north of Hwy. 5 and east of Hwy. 41, Brenden Pond, Gestach and Paulson
Construction.
4. Land Development Proposal:
Preliminary plat and fmal plat for Chanhassen Retail 2nd Addition creating 2
outlots and Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition platting Outlot B into 3 lots and one
outlot, site plan review of a 5,000 square foot building for Perkins Restaurant, a
site plan review for a 1,800 square foot building for Taco Bell, located on the
corner of Hwy. 5, Powers Blvd. and West 78th Street, Chanhassen Retail Center
(Target site), Ryan Companies and RLK Associates.
5. Selection of Vendor; Pheasant Hill Play Structure.
6. Conclude 1995 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program
Development.
7. Discuss Future Park/Open Space Acquisition and Development Referendum.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. Land Development Proposal:
Preliminary plat to subdivide 46.5 acres into 36 rural single family lots and one
outlot, Halla's Great Plains Golf Estates, located south of County Road 14
(Pioneer Trail), and west and east of Highway 101 (Great Plains Blvd.).
Adjournment.
.
.
,
I
.
.
.
:~~[;E~\:::J
, r~4bL- /~p5~~/ //'//f/V
r .' "HRn" ~
tJ/?A-y ""'Y~",,~J -L
,'1994 ~_.",..,
; ! . _! ~~: 1994
July 28, 199'4 ,~~?~~!tl
To:
('I"'v' ('}... {"P,'~r:A,::c;E~
; 1 I ~.! ~,., \ i 'o,,)v
Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission Members
,
James Andrews, Janet Lash, Fred Berg, James Manders,
Ron Roeser, Jane Meger, Dave Huffman
From:
Jack Melby
40 Hill Street
Chanhassen MN, 55317
I have been a resident of Chanhassen and have lived at this
location since June, 1976.
During the planning process for the public access and park, the
city said it would accomplish the following.
. Build a park that was more attractive than the existing
property and cabin.
. The city said it would monitor the use of the park, in that
it would not allow alcoholic beverages, no dogs without
leashes, wild parties overuse of the parking and launch
facilities, control parking and control park and access
hours.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED:
The park is used for people to walk their dogs, most of
which are not on a leash, and do their toilet in the
park and my yard.
On occasions the park is used by party goers, mostly
teenage drinkers. When calls are placed to the sheriffs
office by residents, they usually respond quickly.
Citizens are expected to monitor the park and call when
perceived abuses occur. If the park had more controls,
there may be fewer nuisance calls to the Sheriff
Park hours are not being enforced. (10:00 PM - 6:30
AM). A gate at the top of the access used to be locked
during those hours. The park access is being used year
round by fishermen, ATV users, snowmobilers and in the
summer months, jet ski operators, fisherman and
recreational boaters. We are constantly being awakened
at all hours of the night by fisherman and recreational
boaters (between 10:00 PM and 6:30 AM.) In the winter
time, fishermen use the access round the clock, 7 days
a week. There is no relief from the noise trucks and
cars. There are city ordinances that state residents of
Chanhassen cannot mow their lawns until after 9:00 AM
and not at all on Sundays, but it is ok to rev up
marine, truck, snowmobile, jetski, ATV and car motors
all hours of the day and night. The South Lotus Lake
Park and boat access in the middle of a neighborhood.
The people in that neighborhood need some quiet time.
I
.
Many times a weekend, I have to ask trespassers to
leave my property. In doing so, I expose myself and my
property to potential angry retribution.
The City Of Chanhassen must do more to protect my
privacy and my property. I would like to buy a newer
boat and dock but will not until there is some
assurance that it will be more difficult for people
using the park to get to my property. There have been
attempts to steal my motor from my boat, attempts to
set my boat on fire, large bric-a-brac rocks thrown at
my boat and dock and constant trespassing by park and
access users.
The park now consists of very little green space, an 80
yard drainage ditch, a pump, a picnic table, a dock and
an outdoor toilet. I donlt believe the city met its
objectives when it said it would make this an
attractive park and access. The park and boat access
are not, by any stretch of the imagination, friendly to
the neighborhood.
The monitoring of the park is almost non existent.
There is a park and recreation employee on duty during .
most weekends. I stopped and talked to a gate monitor
on the 16 or 17 of July. That person was checking boats
for Eurasian Millfoil before entering Lotus lake. The
lake is now infested with Millfoil and the attendant
should have been checking boats leaving Lotus Lake to
avoid spreading Millfoil from Lotus Lake to other
lakes.
The park is now the- repository for major city surface
water drainage system from both Chanhassen and Eden
Prairie. Surface contaminates of all kinds are being
drained into the south end of Lotus Lake and directly
to my beach. I and my family are afraid to swim and use
the lake because of those run off contaminates and the
infestation of Eurasian Millfoil. The lake bottom has
turned to muck from run off silt and the water is
fouled by stagnant water and contaminates from surface
filth.
The access has allowed a large number of people to have
access to Lotus Lake. During weekends, traffic is too
heavy. When the weather is favorable, there is a
constant stream of people waiting to get on to Lotus
Lake and a constant stream of people leaving the
access. The pressure on the lake is relentless and the .
access users don't follow safety rules. I believe you
,
.
must reduce the traffic allowed through the access.
Those of us that live on the lake have a right to use
Lotus Lake and to use it in relative safety. The lake
is too small (only 240 acres) to permit the kind of
traffic the access allows.
You have done Too much to Me and my family with the
noise from the park, trespassers, filthy water run off,
ruining my privacy and exposing myself and my property
to unnecessary harm. The city needs to fix these
problems.
I don't know what your plans are to correct the
Millfoil or over use problems, but I suggest you
effectively control the access by locking the access at
night, (year round) and charge an access fee to all
users of the park access, after all, they brought
Millfoil to the lake and they should contribute to the
solution of that problem as well as the maintenance and
policing of the park.
.
,~II~
.
.
I-
Z
ex
u
-
-J
0.
a..
<(
.
~
~
IJ.J
I-
-
(/)
.
PRC DATE: March 22, 1994 .. ~
PC DATE: April 20, 1994
CCDATE: #//
HOFFMAN:k -;1y
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Concept Planned Unit Development to Rezone 39. Acres from A2, Agricultural
Estate to PUD for 56 Single Family Lots
LOCA TION:
Located south of Highway 5, East of Timberwood Estates. .
APPLICANT:
RLK Associates
922 Main Street
Hopkins, MN 55343
Heritage Development
450 East County Road D
Little Canada. MN 55117
Note: Both the Chanhassen Corporate Center and the Heritage single family conceptual plan are in the
same zone of influence in regard to parks and trails. In addition, both concepts affect/include the Bluff
Corridor. As such, the information presented is nearly identical in both reports.
PRESENT ZONING:
A2, Agricultural Estate
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
N . The Concept Chanhassen Corporate Center PUD
S - A2, Agricultural Estate
E - lOP, Industrial Office Park
W - Timberwood Estates
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Recreation Section of the Comprehensive Plan identifies this site as lying within Park Deficient
Zone 7. The plan states, "Chanhassen's 2000 Land Use Plan calls for Zone 7 to be developed in a mix
of residential and office/industrial uses. As future development occurs in this area, neighborhood park
property will need to be acquired. Development proposals in this area should accommodate the ttail
corridors identified in the Trail Plan." Since the writing of this te?tt, the city. has acquired an 8+ acre
. .
Heritage Development
March 22, 1994
Page 2
"
.
neighborhood park in the Stone Creek development and is participating in creating the 40+ acre
schooVrecreation center/park site west of the project area.
It is staff's opinion that these two sites, in addition to other community and special use parks
throughout the city, satisfy the "public" sporting and active play needs of this proposed
development. However, recognizing the densities being proposed, this opinion should not deter
the applicant from developing on-site recreational amenities for the future tenants of the property.
Preservation of the Bluff Creek Corridor and the trees, vegetation, wetlands, etc., found within
these areas is discussed in the next section.
COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN:
The Recreation Section of the City's Comprehensive Plan identifies a trail corridor paralleling
Bluff Creek. In addition to developing this trail network, the establishment of a linear park
encumbering the entire corridor including adjacent wetlands, trees and other features of
significance has been identified as a top priority of the city. The Planning Department, in concen
with other city departments, is preparing to commission a design charette from the University of
Minnesota Design Center for American Urban Landscape. This charette will encompass the
corridor and its adjacent lands from Lyman Boulevard north to Highway 41. This study, in
addition to direction given by the Park and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission and
City Council, will guide the remaining development in the corridor. The trail is currently .
envisioned on the west bank of the creek, being located in a 30 ft easement/buffer strip above
the wetland delineation. Construction of said trail will be a public improvement installed by the
applicant with the costs being reimbursed through the abatement of trail fees. The trail will
"daylight" at the new east/west collector road, bisect its sidewalk, and continue north to terminus
points in the proposed residential and industrial office park developments.
The applicant and residents of the area have been contacted to inform them of the commission's
review of the application. Again, we are at the conceptual level allowing for input from all
interested parties prior to the preparation of any preliminary and final plat documents, should
those come forth. I have spoken with Mr. Steve Swanke and Mr. 10hn Dietrich of RLK
Associates in regard to this application. A representative for the applicant will be in attendance
at your meeting next Tuesday.
ACTION REQUIRED
Conceptual plans are brought before the city to allow communication to begin between the
applicant, their representatives, and the city's elected and appointed officials and staff. This is
your opponunity to give your input on what you like/dislike about the concept in regard to parks
and trails. The applicant can then respond to your input as plans funher develop.
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
.
.
.
.
Heritage Development
March 22, 1994
Page 3
PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE
On March 16, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the conceptual PUD
because it was too preliminary in nature. Additionally, they wanted the Bluff Creek Corridor
charette to be completed and the design issues for that corridor incorporated within this plat.
ATTACHMENTS
Notice of Public Meeting
Project Location Map
Narrative Document
Memo to Bob Generous dated March 10, 1994
Concept Plan Set
pc:
Bob Generous, Planner IT
Kate Aanenson, Senior Planner
Applicants
UPDATE (AUGUST 4, 1994)
-:1/
The Park and Recreation Commission last reviewed this proposal as a concept planned unit
development on March 22, 1994. At that meeting, RLK Associates requested on behalf of
Heritage Development that the commission consider accepting a 20 ft. wide trail easement in lieu
of a 30 ft. wide trail easement and that Heritage Development be compensated for costs incurred
in constructing the trail within this easement. The commission upheld the 30 ft. wide easement
and confirmed that the applicant would be reimbursed for trail construction costs. Since March
22, I have been party to the following meetings whereat this concept proposal has been discussed.
May 26, 1994:
Bluff Creek Corridor Design Charrette: Commissioner Huffman
summarized the outcome of this meeting at the June 28, 1994 Park and
Recreation Commission meeting (see attached minutes). An important
outcome of this meeting was the evolution of the concept to create a
"parkway" on the Heritage plat and elsewhere in the corridor as an
alternative to the road design being offered by the applicant. It is staff's
desire to see the road shifted to the east aligning and exposing it to the
creek corridor. This change in design would create an open space which
is much more public due to its visibility from the road. A trail generally
paralleling the creek remains intact under either scenario; however, the
visual experience that is gained in the parkway concept is lost in the
applicant's proposed preliminary plat
May 31, 1994:
Site Visit: Kate Aanenson, Planning Director; Bob Generous, Planner II;
and I met John Dobbs, Heritage Development; and John Dietrich of RLK
Heritage Development
March 22, 1994
Page 4
.
to walk the site. The primary intent of this site visit was to formalize the
parkway concept with Mr. Dobbs and Mr. Dietrich and to discuss the
impacts, both negative and positive, that execution of this design would
hold. RLK and Associates prepared a concept plan depicting the parkway
road to facilitate this discussion. The primary concerns of the applicant
included:
1) Loss of lots would result;
2) Who would be responsible for any additional road costs?;
3) What would be the effects on road design?
At Mr. Dobb's admission, his primary concern is what would be lost from
his bottom line. During that visit, we also discussed the city's desire to
acquire a wooded portion of the plat located in its southern extremities and
generally bound by Bluff Creek on the east, the railroad on the south, the
proposed extension of Stone Creek Drive to the west, and an arm of Bluff
Creek to the north. I left this meeting with the opinion that Heritage
Development would prefer not to operate under these constraints, but that
they would explore the possibilities of doing so.
June 17, 1994:
Staff/Applicant Meeting: Those present included Kate Aanenson, Planning
Director; Bob Generous, Planner II; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Todd
Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director; Steve Swanke of RLK; and John
Dobbs, Heritage Development. This meeting was scheduled at the request
of the applicant to allow essentially one question to be answered. Will the
city uphold its position in regard to the parkway concept on the road? The
answer was yes. Discussion in regard to the purchase of the parkland
described previously were also entertained and it was agreed that the city
would initiate an appraisal process.
.
Approximately one month later, on July 19, 1994, the attached preliminary
plat was filed with the Chanhassen Planning Department. This plat does
meet one of the conditions desired by the city in regard to parks, trails,
and open space; specifically, the trail is identified on the preliminary
landscape plan. *Note: However, this trail is shown as lying in a long
narrow strip of park dedication land instead of the 30 ft trail easement
requested by the commission. Conditions desired by the city in regard to
parks, trails and open space which have not been met include:
1)
The land generally described as Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, Block 2 and Outlot
E is not shown as park;
.
2)
The open space corridor along the creek does not lie adjacent to
the road at any point.
.
.
.
Heritage Development
March 22, 1994
Page 5
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend the city council approve
the Heritage First Addition preliminary plat subject to the following conditions in regard to parks,
trail, and open space:
1. The land bound by Bluff Creek on the east, the railroad on the south, the extension of
Stone Creek Drive on the west, and the arm of Bluff Creek on the north be shown as
parkland. Said property to be purchased through a combination of park dedication fee
credit and cash.
2. The open space corridor along the creek shall lie adjacent to the road. Note: This office
originally proposed a compromise where a portion of the road lying approximately at the
center of the plat would have exposure to the creek corridor, and this office remains open
to compromise in this regard. Compensation for any open space lying between the
wetland and the subject road's right of way would be made under this scenario.
3.
The alignment of the 8 ft. bituminous trail be amended to reflect the direction given the
applicant by staff specifically that the trail shall depart the creek corridor enter the
parkland and meet the road extension at the southern wetland prior to its connection with
the railroad underpass. Said trail to be constructed with the first phase of improvements
completed by the applicant with a lump sum cost for the trail being reimbursed by the
city. Note: The applicant shall supply the city with three quotes for the construction of
said trail with the final alignment being staked for approval by the City's Park and
Recreation and Engineering Departments prior to construction.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, March 22, 1994
7:30 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
690 Coulter Drive
Proposal: Heritage Development
(This item will be reviewed
at approximately 8: 15 p.m.)
Applicant: RLK Associates
Location: So. of Hwy. 5 and East of
Timberwood Estates
Notice: You are invited to attend a public meeting about the Concept Planned Unit
Development to rezone 39 acres from A2, Agricultural Estate to PUD and preliminary plat of
56 single family lots located south of Hwy. 5, east of Timberwood Estates, Heritage
Development.
.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public meeting is to inform
you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the residents about this proposal.
The Park and Recreation Commission Chair will lead the public meeting through the
following steps:
1. Staff will give an over view of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present their position on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. The Commission will discuss the proposal and give direction to the applicant
and staff.
Questions or Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please
stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you
wish to talk to someone about this proposal, please contact Todd at 937-1900, ext 121. If
you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the Park and
Recreation Department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the
Commission.
Notice of this public meeting has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on March 17,
1994.
.
-Over-
'-1,. . .i, .":~: 1 ~ / to - 9<} ~l)
McGlynn Bakeries, Inc.
c/o Grand Met Tax Dept.
MS: 1843
200 S. 6th St.
. flinneapolis, MN 55402
Conway T. Lars
4952 Emerson Ave. So.
Minneapolis, MN 55409
Betty O'Shaughnessy
1000 Hesse Farm Rd.
Chaska, MN 55318
Merle D. & Jane Yolk.
16925 Co. Rd. 40
Carver, MN 55315
Jay C. Dolejsi
6961 CHaparral Ln.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Anes L. & Linda J. Leirdahl
~50 Timberwood Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Curtis & Janice Olson
1961 BOth Ln.
Coon Rapids, MN 55448
Richard D. & Marry Frasch
8000 Acorn Ln.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
James & Debra Ann Lano
2060 Oakwood Rdg.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Alva Bruce & Kristina Johnson
&1 Oakwood Rdg.
~anhassen, MN 55317
Shamrock Property Partners
7350 Commerce Lane
Fridley, MN 55432
Michael 1. Gorra
1680 Arboretum Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dale F. & Marcia Wanninger
8170 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Richard Hartung & Wallace Otto
400 Oak St. S.
Waconia, MN 55387
Audobon I Limited Partnership
c/o Lars Akerberg
P.O. Box 158
Chaska, MN 55318
Mark & J. Taintor
7481 Saratoga Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gregory & J. Maaxum
7480 Longview Cir.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
David Gestach
800 1 Acorn Ln.
Chanhassen, MN 55317-9662
Stephen McCurry &
Bridget Haefner
16780 North Manor Rd.
Eden Prairie, MN 55345
James & Colleen Dockendorf
2061 Oakwood Rdg.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
J.P.'s Links Inc.
c/o John Przymus
642 Santa Vera Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Chan-Land Partners
200 Hwy. 13 W.
Bumsville, MN 55337
Lawrence & F. Raser
82.10 Galpin Blvd.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Larry & Elizabeth Vandeveire
4890 C. Rd. 10 E.
Chaska, MN 55318
Mitchel & Mary Krause
2380 Timberwood Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Layton & Linda Zellman
2290 Timberwood Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mark J. Foster & Karen S. Olsson
8020 Acorn Ln.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Richard M. Czeck
8011 Acorn Ln.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Sracey R. Rickert &
Michelle Rheault
2040 Oakwood Rdg.
Chanhassen, Mn 55317
James & Joann Jancik
19000 Stratford Rd. #301
Minnetonka, MN 55345
David & Gail McCollum
2048 Timberwood Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Stanley & Christine Rud
2030 Renaissance Ct.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Agha Thir Khan &
Patricia Khan
2040 Renaissance Ct.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Robert & Roberta Lawson
2041 Renaissance Ct.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gerard & Bonnie Murkpwski
2051 Renaissance Ct.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
William & Lana Miller
8121 Pinewood Cir.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
James & Bonita Roeder
8108 Pinewood Cir.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Craig & Mary Harrington
8140 Maplewood Ter.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gregory & Jill Perrill
2102 Timberwood Dr.
Chanhassen, MN 55317
.
.
1._.
.
.
NARRATIVE DOCUMENT
39:1: Acre
Heritage Development
Single Family Subdivision
CONCEPT P.U.D. SUBMISSION
February 16, 1994
Prepared For:
.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA
Developer:
HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Prepared By:
.
RLK Associates, Ltd.
922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
(612) 933-0972
CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SUBMITTAL FOR THE 39 ACRE
HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT
S6 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION
.
February 16, 1994
Introduction
In the western pan of the City of Chanhassen on the south side of Highway 5 and east of the
Timberwood Estates subdivision is a 39:t acre parcel referred to as the Heritage Single Family
Subdivision. The general boundaries for this property are the west tributary of Bluff Creek to
the north, the main channel of Bluff Creek to the east, the Twin City and Western railroad to
the south and the Hans Hagen single family subdivision known as Stone Creek and
Timberwood Estates to the west. Directly to the north and northeast is the property known as
the Chanhassen Corporate Center. The 39:t acre parcel being submitted by Heritage
Development at this time was formerly contained in the December 6, 1993 Concept PUD
submission for the Chanhassen Corporate Center. The single family proposed for this 39 acre
parcel is consistent with the comprehensive guide plan and zoning ordinance. Due to this
Heritage Development began the review process ahead of the Chanhassen Corporate Center. It
is anticipated the CCC will be resubmitting the concept PUD plan within the next month.
Goals of the Proiect
.
Heritage Development's decision to submit this Concept PUD proposal will allow the City and
developer the opportunity to review the proposal prior to a preliminary plat submission. This
area of Chanhassen is guided for single family residential and with the Bluff Creek, a protected
waterway, it is imponant to identify the critical issues of land use, for both the public and
private interests. It is Heritages desire to create a pleasing and site sensitive development.
Through the PUD process the issues of park dedication, trail placement, ponding locations and
subdivision layout will be resolved prior to the preliminary plat submission.
This PUD has the following objectives:
1. To create a subdivision development with an average lot size of 20,138 square feet that are
compatible with adjacent properties and land uses;
2. To protect Bluff Creek and its tributaries as open space and landscape corridors within the
development;
3. To create a public utility, ponding, roadway and trail system within the 39 acres that works
and is integrated with adjacent properties;
4. Coordinate the grading of the site with the trunk line sanitary sewer extension for
implementation in 1994.
.
PUD Submittal
.
This submittal is for a (general) Concept PUD review. Pursuant to Sec. 20-517 of the City's
ordinance the "general concept plan for a PUD" allows a developer to submit a plan to the City
showing the basic intent and the general nature of the entire development.
This submittal includes the following information:
1. Application for development review (concept PUD);
2. Written consent of all fee title property owners within the PUD;
3. Narrative;
4. Legal description of property proposed for PUD designation;
5. Twenty-six plan sheets showing the overall development plan and area specific development
plans showing the following information:
a. identification of each lot size and lot width;
b. general location of major streets;
c. general location and extent of public and common open space;
6. Fee of $750 for the PUD submittal.
.
7. Reduced plan at 81h" x 11 with transparencies.
The property owner list and legal description to be utilized for this PUD submittal have
previously been submitted in the December 6, 1993 Chanhassen Corporate Center
Development.
Heritage Development Company will be the principal developer for the 39 acre site. Mr. John
Dobbs will serve as the principal contact with the City of Chanhassen on this development.
Heritage Development and Me. Dobbs have extensive experience in producing quality single
family residential development throughout the Twin Cities area.
Site planning, surveying, civil engineering and landscape architecture services will be provided
by RLK Associates, Ltd. John Dietrich and Jeannene Krone will serve as the principal contacts
for these issues.
Project Descriotion
The project area is located south and west of Bluff Creek is oriented on a north/south axis and
occupies approximately 39 acres. Currently the north and east property line is the center line
of Bluff Creek. The property is currently in an agricultural state for the majority of the site
with a wooded area on the south central portion and a lowland/future ponding area on the
southern most portion of the site adjacent to the Twin Cities and western railroad.
.
2
North of the 39 acre site is an 8 acre site identified as an outlot on the attached drawing. The
outlot is not proposed to be developed at this time. Eventually the roadway servicing the 39
acre residential subdivision will connect to the East/West Frontage Road north of the 8 acre
outlot and initially with the Hans Hagen development.
.
The PUD process offers an opportunity to design a site in a manner that achieves a more
creative use of the land while easing the constraints and restrictions of normal zoning district
standards. The result is that the development plan may be more sensitive to the specific
features of the site and more responsive to adjacent land uses. The following section describes
some of the more important design features associated with the Heritage subdivision and how
the proposed PUD is consistent with the City's review criteria.
1. Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive
environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creek, wetlands, lakes
and scenic views.
It is anticipated that grading will be completed to achieve an earthwork balance (cut and fill)
arrangement on the site. There are some steep slopes, and mature trees along portions of the
creek. These areas will be protected during the grading and development processes. The intent
of the development is to incorporate the existing vegetation and open space corridors for the
creeks and steep slopes into a high visibility and integral landscape component of the site
design. The wetland areas, both the 100 year flood plain and National Wetland inventory map
areas are identitied.
The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies the Bluff Creek Main Channel as protected
open space. The proposed development plan identifies a 100 foot open space corridor on each
side of Bluff Creek (total of 200 feet). This corridor will also include a public trail system.
The first 50 feet adjacent to the creek are proposed to be dedicated to the City for park
dedication purposes. Additionally the seasonal creek flowing from the Timberwood Estates will
be preserved in its natural condition.
.
2. More efficient and effective use of land, open space, and public facilities through
mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels.
The development proposal will allow for the more efficient use of the land and provide the City
with a more logical and cost efficient approach for the timing and phasing of public
improvements. For example, the development site is sufficiently large to allow for the planning
of a single, comprehensive stormwater drainage system that will maximize the effectiveness of
nutrient removal while reducing the City's long-term maintenance costs.
The proposed development will also assist the City in the timing and phasing of trunk utilities
and the east\west collector roadway system to serve the proposed development and the
development proposals of adjacent properties.
3. High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including
both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should
reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community.
.
3
.
Prior to City approval, a final set of Preliminary and Final Plat documents will be submitted to
the City. As they are developed, each lot and subarea of the property will be submitted to the
City of Chanhassen for formal review of building plans, landscaping, signage, and lighting in
order to be in compliance with the City guidelines. The approved PUD documents will
establish firm guidelines to ensure that the site is developed in a consistent and well planned
manner.
The Heritage site design is meant to complement the characteristics of the existing property.
The design will be commensurate with a residential development. Impervious surface coverage
and building densities are below the minimum standards established as part of the City's
development code. The average lot square footage, open space corridors, landscape areas,
ponding access and lowland protection areas exceed typical zoning regulatjons and standards.
The single-family residential area will be designed to complement the Timberwood Addition
and enhance the Bluff Creek area. The City of Chanhassen is proposing a recreational trail to
run the entire length of Bluff Creek from T.H. 5 to Lyman Blvd. The trail would be a
combination of bituminous and\or crushed aggregate.
4. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and
along significant corridors within the City.
The single-family residential development has been designed to complement the existing
Timberwood Estates and the Hans Hagen Development.
.
Bluff Creek is being treated as a protected water course on both the main channel and its
tributary. In order to protect the stream banks and promote water quality, grading activities are
anticipated to be restricted.
5. Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The comprehensive plan has guided this areal for single family residential development. The
current zoning of A2 also is consistent with the proposed development.
6. Parks and open space.
Bluff Creek is proposed to be a linear park with a City maintained trail system. The first SO'
from the creek centerline is proposed to be dedicated to the City for park purposes. Wetland
areas identified will also remain in open space. The creation of additional public open space
will be consistent with the park and open, and trail plans.
7. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate within the PUD.
The proposed housing subdivision will be offered for sale at market rate prices, consistent with
the single family homes currently selling within Chanhassen.
8. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sightings
and the clustering of buildings and land uses.
.
The proposed design has minimized the number of cul-de-sacs while maintaining the natural
features of the site. All homes will be constructed to meet City Standards for insulation and R
Value.
4
9. Use oC traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential Cor traffic
conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as
appropriate.
The internal road system will connect the Stone Creek Development and Heritage to the future
east/west collector. The roadway system is an integral component to the residential collector
street system in Chanhassen.
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bob Generous, Planner n
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director T Ii I k."
March 10, 1994
DATE:
SUBJ:
Concept PUD Submission, Heritage Development Single Family Subdivision
The above referenced concept plan was filed with the Planning Department on February 17, 1994.
The timing of this submission did not allow this item to be scheduled for review by the Park and
Recreation Commission on February 22, 1994. The commission will fonnally review this
concept PUD on Tuesday, March 22, 1994. I can preface this review with some brief comments
in regard to the Bluff Creek Corridor.
The establishment of a linear park encumbering the entire Bluff Creek Corridor including
adjacent wetlands and areasllands of significance to the corridor has been identified as a
top priority of the City's Comprehensive Recreation Plan.
A trail will be a part of this park.
The trail will pass under the Twin Cities and Western Railroad at a viaduct located at the
southern terminus of this concept plat.
Public ownership of the entire creek canidor, including lands required for trail
construction, is desired.
In that I have not had the opportunity to meet with the applicant, I will not comment specifically .
on the c~mccpt. plan. Formal comments will be forwarded to you upon meeting with the applicant
and after-Park and Recreation Commission review.
pc:
Kate Aanenson, Senior Planner
Park dd Recreation Commission
-- Heritage Development
RLK I~ssociates
. .:;~: ;
, Ia .'
. ,
.'
j --~ /.~ rf'\.\~(
,:' ;~k /,~\ \\\~\"V
~~~\~ \\ ~
h-'-d1J) ./1 J" '\ 1{::
\ \ (~~~ IJIIl ,)-1 .~.j ~~'~~i
. 'je 111~~~~~:/~::.1L1 ~-
'., J Iii \ ,I c;~- /'~/? rc. .
I; (i\,' ~ ~ ~1)~Ii7~: ~'K (l~ \
!il[ I''f~~, r~~I~~l~~,.: :
!! I · A I ?f~~~~~~
I.h I I / ? ~.'1~1~,{FJ:'~~~~ ,! ~
, /1.;'\;;' 1 )f)) \\~1~~~ " '
iLJ{/// TL, ~:J_~ " :
I .... '\ ~~~\.' r~fl~~~~ ~ Ii \
.li. ':\7-;' ~ ,,~~r. m ~ IY ill
I'R \~. ~" ........~" ~ ~\" ~~~~'fl~' l;;~l: J ~ Ill~1
,~ IV II t'-- " \.. 0. ; bl ..,11-" II ,,~.... Iii!
- . Ire I "..-'.) ~\ ?l=~e- ti.. ... .
,,~ib~i ~ ~;~\;i~ /iiir~5= !i~.,) I.'
....... ..1.. lJ U Iff \:--.. : ' . ! J~ : II :t.7!'!'" ~ ~ ~ -ill JI t'~
· ..... -~ ~ 1fT:=-!' ..~ \\" \T ~"Jb ~ k:' U ffi!' III U] I h II
I ~, I I i #' /' -- ~ '-....J ) . \ ! I ~ _........... MI'. I It I. .
~ ~ . I/,I ~ "'," 'r: I I'" 'I!I I
~ Iii 7 X\ ,/ I I.. \ \' \~5 j' _ I ...... . I
~ ,~.. ~ '" ~ - / L I .- lJ JI>"luz. ) ,~h0,.5.;: ~ 'Iiiii! , ; iJ' ,.-J.
- --> '- +-- J \~.. ~q7Xf' 1d ~~k . ~
,----:-.---.../~ - V .'.z 11~ ~~' "'""V Inll ; '~~l~~I1~-~'
r-_ J "-'i-_ n; I" ~~..J (ill- .11111111111111
::::--..-: - !t'--".. "........ , I '"
~.. ~\ \\ J t\~.. I - ,~. '. ~o~ ~ '~n III ~r.~_
7 ~ I) 'If I '7-\,{~ I~"-~ ~~1 ~ n I tw~!M~
\ (~ / " ~,e;~~l~ -- ~ ~~: :--:;../ I -, , riii
~,~ \.. "'. '~I"i~ I ~~1-~A:( ,~t!., illl m I ,m~~
~~ '., '- '\' "I 11~/m ....~..~:l~ ~\i ~ ~ 111ITlm ! I I I iiriijir
~ ~~ J \, \ /(~~.i.'~~~~ E:-~t ~.~ \
~~~~ " ~\~~~+':;:;I::..~ ~ ..
"~'.~ ~"'~ ';i~",,:::'i;l1;_--
--""""',\'1 I~ _~~,,\~ ~W~~~-~-K~.
~\'\\~"'" I ~\.~m~~c'~ ~--
I~ W ~, ~-..::::.........:--:. "
~ .- 1\ .. ~~ N ~~j
~~' ~'--........., v~ ~l /' . ~ I .(.t '
\~/ ._\...--~ ((\ \ ~~';\ ~\ : . ,.... 'I;; Ii It......../\.
s ~-_ ~ ,'\1 --"i~\ ~~ ; II, ~
~ ~,.. \~ --,
~.\"\~~ ~~~~t-' ~~, ~
1/ I .... 'A~ \,,~ ~~ ~
f(;~~:-- ~\(. ~t~j\S~~
~t[Ji1~\V- 0/ ~~
( -11\\ \\~~ ') '-::JA~ '. ' f& ~~\\\~~
\)))~\~~ . :~~~ ==:
L ) ~~ " ~ ~!JIr/V
'\
'\
rn~ ·
~
r:
.1:
:J..
I I
! I
rJl)l
~
I'i H
J "i
!l H
J
I
!
.
.
.
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - June 28, 1994
B. GROUP PICNIC RESERVATIONS, INTRODUCTION OF "SCHOOL" RATE.
Andrews: This is an FYI?
Ruegemer: This is more of a.
Hoffman: We need action.
Andrews: Okay, we need to approve, okay.
Hoffman: Do you want to do it or not?
Lash: I look at it and it's not proportional to me and I'm a very concrete kind of person. I
looked at the proportion between the residents and non-residents rental on the next page...3
times so I just kind of think that maybe it should be 3 times the amount for resident school
districts and non-resident school districts so that our...
Andrews: That makes sense.
Lash: I mean you want our school district to be able to have first crack. And I think that
helps them to have a greater...so I would move that we adopt a picnic rate for schools per
staff reconunendation except by having the other school districts be 3 times the amount of the
resident school districts.
Lash moved, Andrews seconded tbat tbe Park and Recreation Commission recommend
to charge a group picnic rate for scbools per tbe staff report witb tbe non-resident
school districts at 3 times tbe resident school districts. All voted in favor and tbe motion
carried unanimously.
C. REQUEST FOR CANOE RACK, GREENWOOD SHORES PARK.
Hoffman: We received a call from a resident inquiring about a canoe rack in Greenwood
Shores. I said it's not in our 1994 CIP. She asked that I put the question to the commission.
Whether or not you'd like to see one there. If so...
Roeser: We'll see one there when we can park cars.
Andrews: That's what I was going to say. When I can park my cars.
Lash: Well they have it at Lake Ann.
71
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - June 28, 1994
.
Roeser: They've got their own little private park as it is down there.
Hoffman: Okay, no problem there.
COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS:
A. BLUFF CREEK CORRIDOR DESIGN CHARRETTE, COMMISSIONER
HUFFMAN.
Huffman: Do you want to do this one later? I can give you the 30 second show or you can
go home.
Andrews: Let's do it. Hit it. Go.
Huffman: Alright. The committee graciously allowed me to join the Bluff Creek charrette,
which was a great honor and I thank you very much for that, Commissioner Andrews. If you
will turn to the fIrst page, here was the agenda. We did the agenda. Second page. Back of
the first page. Basically our drawings on how to use current designs versus designs taken
through consideration of environment and everything else. The second page on the front
side. When you are looking at the ideas of building parkways, how to bridge the community, .
becoming involved in the community using the sense of layout space. If you flip to the back
of the second page. The public building going through the corridor. Obviously as you read
down you can see what things are involved. Traditional parks. Upland habitat. Recreated
wetlands, etc, etc. The next page it goes on and talks about the prairie waterways,
transforming storm water structures into new viewing areas. How you can take existing areas
and transform them using new technology. The most part or the biggest part of our
discussion, Todd you can step in at any time in the way and correct me but it was on the
back of the third page. What you're looking at, from the top down is the entire Bluff Creek
corridor. University of Minnesota design team has come up with a new concept, they've
been working on a concept for a long time where you view natural settings as a room. As
Chanhassen is setting it's entrance into the city into three different areas, the oaks, the maples
and the other one. We have three different. And which one?
Hoffman: The wetlands.
Huffman: The wetlands, okay. You view rooms in this Bluff Creek corridor in exactly the
same way. On the right hand side you will see, okay it says room. Headwaters, upland
meadows. You take and align then, follow the top part. That is viewed as a room. The
features in that area are the headwaters of the two creeks. There are two, the slogan we sort
of came up with was from the Minnewashta to the Minnesota. The creek comes down out of
72
.
,
.
.
.
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - June 28, 1994
the Minnewashta, flows down all the way to the Minnesota. The headwaters and the upland
meadows area are most prominent. This is also where the school will be. We talked about
using in that room active use areas also in that room. Things like, with the new elementary
school coming in, a scientific area. Maybe having an outdoor biology science station where
they could study the wetland. Migratory habits of frogs, fish, fowl, whatever. But use that
area. Room 2 became very heavily the wetland chains where you see active swamps and
marshes and all the other areas in there. Big problem with that area right now is
encroachment of development. There was a concern Todd, that you said I think it was the
Heritage project that has already backed away. We'll talk about some of the concerns about
doing this area but using that, narrowing there. The third area room coming down is the
canyon corridor where you actually have many open spaces. You have use of the bluffs.
You come out into an agricultural area. I think where they were saying, you could actually
have just a big open space coming down. The golf course encompasses the back side of that
I believe. And then it comes down into the Minnesota River area. The concept of the Bluff
Creek is then put into rooms. If you can categorize it in those 3 rooms and conceptualize
that. That is how the design team came up and said here are your biggest features. Here are
your biggest advantages. Within each room many designs. Whatever strikes your fancy in
that area. That is the basic and essence of the way they are looking at that full view.
Concerns of this whole charrette area. One is just knowledge of the area. We saw tonight
people are concerned about Carver Beach. They're concerned about things of that nature.
How do we get them to buy into the Minnewashta to the Minnesota? The idea was
somebody said, well the big trees in Eden Prairie. We were talking about that, it was back
yard conversation if I'm not mistaken for an entire year. We're either going to lose it or use
it. And therefore it became...for discussion. As I've told people before, I've lived here for 6
years. I had no clue this was in existence. How do we make people aware of this? Public
awareness is a huge problem for this. How do you do it? Through pamphlets. Through
newspapers. Through models. Through conversations. This is a year's conversation piece.
Biggest problem with that right now is the acquisition of certain areas in here, especially I
think they said in room 2 in the wetland change there are developments coming out of that
immediately that can squeeze that down into 12-15 feet corridors already. Because of the
trail systems. Because of potential development. Because of high density housing. There are
some areas of concern already. We're behind the fact of acquiring some of these properties.
Along with that also came out the idea that maybe you want to think of two things. One,
boulevard type corridors as opposed to trails on this system. If I'm not mistaken, we talked
about that. Putting it on the front of roads as opposed to in everybody's back yard because
then you're squeezing certain development areas here. One trail down the middle. Land size
and lot size I know has been a topic of discussion. That was something that we were talking
about. The amount of space put on each individual lot in Chanhassen. You're going to have
to explain that further down the road. Acquisition. Public awareness. The use of this. Do
you use it all for active. Do you take different rooms and have overnight camping? You
73
Park and Rec Commission Meeting - June 28, 1994
t
.
mentioned that. Do you put accessible trails in the whole thing? Are there certain areas that
maintain more wildness? It's a really beautiful area when they put the whole thing up on a
sheet of paper. It's really phenomenal. They were saying it is one of the only, in one city,
the University of Minnesota said that it is one of the only areas they have ever seen located
entirely in one city and really a treasure. The problem with this is like everything else.
You've got Bandimere. You've got neighborhood parks. You've got everything. The amount
of money to acquire some of these areas is going to be a lot. And it's going to require a lot
the public's going to require an incredible amount of public awareness and to me, out of the
entire discussion, that was the one thing that seemed to be most dominant. People don't
know it's there. They're going to lose it before they're ever aware that it existed and that in
a nutshell was the essence of our 3 hour meeting and there were some really neat people
there.
Andrews: Thank you.
Hoffman: Good job Dave. ...commission at a future time...alternative sources of revenue.
Directly through the Watershed District and some other things to look at You all know the
LCMR grant issue failed but we're looking at...
Andrews: Any other commission member presentations tonight?
Lash: I had a request for some garbage cans on Lotus. Not Lotus, Carver Beach mini beach. .
They said there were no garbage cans down there. And then I guess I want to revert back to
the traiL.conversation. I don't know how we generally handle that. I've never had a split
before on a recommendation to go to City Council. So we supply them, I don't want it to
just go with the normal park packet. I think it needs to be pointed out. That it was a divided
vote.
Hoffman: It will be forwarded to the City Council and I'll discuss it with Roger Knutson, the
City Attorney, whether or not at that point..I'd like to congratulate the commission. You got
through a very difficult packet You did the right things. We either moved it forward to the
City Council or you tackled it and made a motion. So as you know t if you continue things
that you had to do in one instance. In fact that was a visitor presentation. I would
recommend at any point that you feel that a visitor presentation is going to necessitate a
future action, simply close the presentations and say we'll put this on a future agenda.
You're going to hear the same things... Other than that, super job tonight
Manders: I only have one comment and that falls along the Carver Beach, and it was a
comment that Jane made that I really liked. And that was the discussion about the beach
front I think you were eluding to the entry fee to get into Lake Ann to use the lake.
74
.
.
CITY OF
CHAHHASSEN
PRC DATE: August 9, 1994 .3
PC DATE:
CC DATE: 21'//
HOFFMAN:k /'lV
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Rezoning of 25.85 acres of property zoned RR,. Rural Residential to RSF,
Residential Single Family and Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 25.85 acres into 21
Single Family Lots and 3 Outlots, Brenden Pond
~ LOCATION:
<(
U
-
...I
0- APPLICANT:
a..
<t
Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 116, Range 23 North, South of
Highway 7 and East of Highway 41
Gestach and Paulson Construction William R. Engelhardt & Associates
200 North Chestnut Street 1107 Hazeltine Blvd., Suite 480
Chaska, MN 55318 Chaska, MN 55318
.
PRESENT ZONING:
RR, Rural Residential
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
N . 01, Office and Institutional, Minnetonka Intermediate School
S - RR, Rural Residential, Minnetonka Intermediate School
E - RR, Rural Residential, Minnetonka Intermediate School
W - RR, Rural Residential, Pond
~
~
LLJ
t-
-
(I)
.
COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN:
The Recreation Section of the Comprehensive Plan identifies this site as lying within the park service
area of Herman Field Park and the Minnetonka Intermediate School campus.
COMPREHENSIVE TRAn.. PLAN:
A trail is identified running east/west along the extension of Lake Lucy Road and will be constructed
as a part of this future road project.
Brenden Pond
August 9, 1994
Page 2
ACCESS TO THE MINNETONKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL CAMPUS
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend the Planning
Commission require a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk on one side of Pondview Court extending
north to the school property be incorporated into the construction plans for Brenden Pond. The
applicant is to construct this sidewalk and convey any and all easements required by its alignment
to the city.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council
require the following condition of approval in regard to park and trails for Brenden Pond:
1. Full park and trail fees be collected per city ordinance in lieu of land acquisition and/or
trail construction.
.
.
.
I-
z
<t
(.)
:J
Q.
Q..
<t
.
~
~
IJ.I
I-
-
(I)
.
.,-
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
PRC DATE: Aug. 9,1994
PC DATE: Aug. 17, 1994
CC DATE: pf"
HOFFMAN:k "/71
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Preliminary Plat to Replat Outlot B into 3 Lots and One Outlot; Site Plan Review
of a 5,000 sq. ft. Building for a Perkins Restaurant; Site Plan Review for an 1,800
sq. ft. Building for Taco Bell
LOCATION:
Intersection of Highway 5, Powers Boulevard and West 78th Street; Chanhassen
Retail Center (Target Site)
APPLICANT:
RLK Associates
Attn: Mr. John Dietrich
922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
Ryan Companies
Attn: Mr. William McHale
700 International Centre
900 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
PRESENT ZONING: BG, General Business District
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
N -West 78th Street
S - Highway 5
E - Target Lane
W - Powers Boulevard
COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN:
These sites lie within the pm service areas of Lake Ann, Lake Susan, Chanhassen Pond and City Center Partes.
COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN:
These sites will be serviced by the Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard trails and by downtown sidewalks.
Connections from the existing sidewalk network. to the "front doors" of these new establislnnents shall be made.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend the City Council collect full park. and
trail dedication fees for Perkins and Taco Bell, to be collected at the time of building pennit issuance at the rate
then in force.
.
.
.
CITY OF
CHAHHASSEH
6
---
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
;1(
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director
DATE:
August 3, 1994
SUBJ:
Selection of Vendor, Pheasant Hill Park Play Equipment
On July 18, 1994, I solicited proposals from thrc:iplay equipment suppliers for the provision
of play equipment to be installed at Pheasant HjUPark. Earl F. Anderson and Associates and
Value Recreation submitted proposals. Minne~ta~Wisconsin Playground chose not to bid. I
called Mr. Todd Layman of Minnesota- Wiscoijsin PJ.~yground after the submittal deadline to
make an inquiry. Mr. Layman felt that their~hancesof being awarded the job did not
warrant the effort necessary to submit a prqposal. Td~ssist the commission in selecting a
vendor, I have dissected the proposals, focijSing on twqpiteria: 1) Does the proposal meet
the specified standard requirements?; af!d2) How muc\.equipment is offered in each
proposal?
Park and Recreation Commission
August 3, 1994
Page 2
STANDARD SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS
Value
Description of Requirement EFA Recreation
All equipment must meet requirements of Phase I and n are Phase I accessible;
the Americans with Disabilities Act accessible Phase II not
(ADA), the 1991 U.S. Consumer Product accessible 1
Safety Commission guidelines (CPSC), and
the 1993 American Society of Testing and
Materials Standards (ASTM). Suppliers (both vendors supplied a statement
must provide a written statement of
compliance in this regard to enable their of compliance with ADA, CPSC, and
proposal to be considered. Proposals ASTM)
received without this letter of compliance
will be rejected.
It is understood that quote proposals may On time On time
not be withdrawn within 60 days of
submission and the City of Chanhassen
reserves the right to reject any or all
quotes and waive all formalities.
Proposals will be accepted through 12:00
p.m. Monday, August 1, 1994. The
project shall be awarded to the selected
vendor on August 10, 1994.
Delivery of all equipment must be Specified 8 week Specified 4-6 week
guaranteed by Monday, September 26, deliveryl delivery
1994 at 12:00 p.m.
One play structure, Phase I of two phases. Meets specification Meets specification
Please show both phases
Location: Pheasant Hill Park, 1720 Lake Meets specification Meets specification
Lucy Road
Acceptable materials: Aluminum or Meets specification Meets specification
galvanized steel posts, 5" diameter, powder (aluminum posts) (galvanized steel
coated. Decks shall be coated metal. posts)
Alternative materials may be submitted at
vendor's discretion
.
.
.
.
Park and Recreation Commission
August 3, 1994
Page 3
Area available: Approximately 70' x 90'.
Area could be expanded to the south and
east; however, retaining walls would be
required.
Border material: A playground border
capable of containing 12" of pea gravel
shall be specified and included as a
component of this proposal. Border shall
encompass both Phase I and Phase II.
70' x 90'
Meets specification
(Triple stacked
6' x 6' border
including hardware)
Meets specification
Targeted Users: Phase I, ages 5-12; Phase
II, ages 2-5
Required Play Experiences: Phase I - Meets specification
swings, and multiple slides and decks.
Phase II - crawl tubes, multiple slides and
decks, spring animals and additional
swmgs. The final design decision is at the
vendor's discretion and may include
individual play components in addition to
continuous play apparatus.
.
Proposals to include all drawings and Meets specification
detailed specifications of proposed
equipment, i.e. deck heights, slide widths,
colors, etc. Vendors are solely responsible
for determining the level of detail, i.e.
quality of drawings and specifications
which are being submitted.
Vendor may prepare one or more ------------------------
proposals using different product lines or
materials if desired
City to install border, resilient surfacing ------------------------
and equipment per specifications of
supplier.
.
70' x 110'.
Meets specification
with grading
modifications (double
stacked 6' x 6' wood
border excluding
hardware2
Does not meet
specifications3
Does not meet
specification4
Generally meets
specificationS
Park and Recreation Commission
August 3, 1994
Page 4
.
Total available funds to purchase Phase I Meets specification Meets specification
play structure and Phase II border material
is $20,000 or less. For design purposes,
Phase II play equipment can be considered
to have a purchase price of $15,000.
EFA Footnotes:
Cannot meet delivery specification.
Value Recreation Footnotes:
2
Phase II, Ages 2-5 is not accessible. CPSC guidelines recommend only short spiral
slides for pre-school age children. The phases are not separated (see attached Pages 3
and 13 of CPSC manual)
Specified border totals 11" in height. To accommodate 12" of pea gravel. The area
inside the border would have to be dished out.
3
See Item No.1.
.
4
5
Phase II, pre-school structure does not include crawl tubes.
The phasing of the play structure was not shown. The inclusion of "fall zone" and
"safety zone" demarcations was only used for the swings making it difficult to
determine compliance with these guidelines/standards.
EQUIPMENT OFFERED
Phase I EFA Value Recreation
Transfer module Yes Yes
Approximate square feet of 100 ft. 100ft.
deck area
Number of play structure 20 26
poles (Note: Heights vary)
.
.
.
.
Park and Recreation Commission
August 3, 1994
Page 5
Slides 3 total: 2 total:
1 slide winder, 72" deck 1 curved, 36" deck
1 tube "L" slide, 52" deck 1 jet slide, 60" deck
1 spiral slide, 72" deck
Swings 4 total: 2 total:
1 accessible bucket 2 standard bucket
1 standard bucket
2 belt
Track Rides 1 2
Climbers 2 total: 3 total:
1 loop arch 2 pipe climbing rungs
1 chain ladder 1 chain ladder
"Deck Connector" Horizontal ladder Swinging Bridge
Other Equipment Fire pole Hand over hand horizontal
Driver Panel ladder
2 Deck ladders 2 steering wheel panels
Tic Tac Toe Panel
Clock panel
ChinningfTuming Bar
Crawl tube
Stegosaurus climber
Phase n EFA Value Recreation
Transfer Module Yes No
Approximate square feet of 65 ft. 65 ft.
deck
Number of poles 10 12
Slides 3 total: 3 total:
1 accessible curved slide, 1 oval tube slide, 72" deck
40" deck 1 spiral slide, 72" deck
1 accessible double poly 1 "s" tube slide, 60" deck
slide, 40" deck
1 accessible tunnel slide,
40" deck
Park and Recreation Commission
August 3, 1994
Page 6
.
Swings 1 tire swing 3 total:
2 belt
1 tire
Climbers 2 total: 5 total:
1 step ladder 1 spiral climber
1 loop arch 1 Tree climber
2 arch climbers
1 chain ladder
Other Equipment 2-900 crawl tubes 1 steering wheel
1 talk tube set 1 horizontal loop ladder
2 super scoop diggers 2 spring animals
1 accessible spring 1 junior spin-around
platform with hand hold
2 age appropriate signs
2 spring animals
Rubber Matting including
adhesive: 140 sq. ft 196 sq. ft
Phase I -22. sq. ft. ---.ll
Phase II 235 sq. ft 196 sq. ft.
Total
Wood Border 640 lineal feet, treated pine 360 feet, 6 x 6 treated pine
320 lineal feet, redwood 360 feet, redwood
(both: 6 x 6) Size unspecified
Including hardware Exclusive of hardware
Sale Tax Included Included
Delivery Included Included
.
The Park and Recreation Commission is charged with selecting one of these two proposals for
Pheasant Hill Park.
.
~
~
.
The design and scale of equipment should make the
intended user group obvious. Some playgrounds, often
referred to as "tot lots," are designed only for younger
children, so separation Is not an Issue.
_-- ___L____.,
In playgrounds intended to serve children of all ages the
layout of pathways and the landscaping of the playground
should show the two distinct areas for the two age groups.
The areas should be separated at least a buffer zone of
amp e p yslca s~ce. gns posted in the playground
area can be used to give some guidance to adults as to the
age appropriateness of the equipment.
5. INSTAllATION AND MAINTENANCE
OF EQUIPMENT
5.1 Assembly and Installation
Proper assembly and installation of playground
equipment are crucial for structural integrity,
stability, and overall safety. The people who
assemble and install playground equipment should not
deviate from the manufacturer's Instructions. After
assembly, equipment should be thoroughly inspected
before Its first use.
As a precaution, the manufacturer's assembly and installa-
tion instructions, and all other materials collected concern-
Ing the equipment should be kept In a permanent file.
5.1.1 StabUlty
When properly installed as directed by the manufacturer's
instructions and specifications, equipment should with-
stand the maximum anticipated forces generated by active
use which might cause It to overturn, tip, slide, or move In
any way. Secure anchoring Is a key factor to stable
installation, and because the required footing sizes and
depths may vary according to equipment type, the
anchoring process should be completed In strict accor-
dance with the manufacturer's specifications.
5.2 Maintenance
Inadequate maintenance of equipment can lead to injuries
on the playground. Because the safety of playground
equipment and Its suitability for use depend on good
inspection and maintenance, the manufacturer's mainte-
nance instructions and recommended inspection schedules
should be strictly followed.
A comprehensive maintenance program should be
developed for each playground as a whole. Generally, all
equipment should be Inspected frequently for any poten-
Handbook for Public Playground Safety
tiaI hazards, for corrosion or deterioration from rot,
Insects, or weathering. The playground area should also
be checked frequently for broken glass or other dangerous
debris.
For each piece of equipment, the frequency of thorough
inspections will depend on the type of equipment, the
amount of use, and the local climate. Based on the
manufacturer's recommendations regarding maintenance
schedules for each piece of equipment, a maintenance
schedule for the entire playground can be created. The
detalled Inspections should give special attention to
moving parts and other components which can be
expected to wear. Inspections should be carried out in a
systematic manner by trained personnel.
One possible procedure Is the use of checklists. Some
manufacturers supply checklists, for general or detailed
inspections, with their maintenance instructions. These
can be used to ensure that inspections are In compliance
with the manufacturer's specifications. Inspections alone
do not constitute a comprehensive maintenance program.
AU hazards or defects identified during inspections should
be repaired promptly. AU repairs and replacements of
equipment parts should be completed in accordance with
the manufacturer's instructions. A general checklist that
may be used as a guide for frequent routine inspections of
public playgrounds Is included at Appendix A.
In addition to this general maintenance inspection, more
detailed inspections should be conducted on a regular
basis. The procedures and schedules for these detailed
inspections will depend on the types and amount of
equipment on the playground, the Ieve1 of use, and the
local climate, as well as the maintenance instructions
provided by equipment manufacturers. Therefore, this
checklist Is only one of many elements which should be
considered in the development of a comprehensive
inspection schedule and system of maintenance. Any
damage or hazards detected during inspections should be
repaired immediately, In accordance with the manufac-
turer's instructions for repair and replacement of parts.
The checklist at Appendix A Is Intended to address only
general maintenance concerns. It does not provide a
complete safety evaluation of equipment design and
layout. For example, It does not address the risk of falls
from equipment, moving Impact incidents, or head
entrapment. Therefore, It Is essential to use this checklist
only for general maintenance purposes. The detailed
design recommendations contained in the Handbook
should t>e used to evaluate the safety of each piece of
equipment and the playground as a whole.
3
HllIldbook for Public Playground Safety
c
Metal slides should either be in shaded areas or face north
to prevent bums and glare problems caused by direct sun .
on the slide chute.
9.1.5 Exit Region
All slides should have an exit region to help children
maintain their balance and facilitate a smooth transition
from sitting to standing when exiting.
The exit region should be essentially horizontal and
parallel to the ground and have a minimum length of 11
inches.
For slides that are no more than 4 feet in height, the
height of the exit region should be no more than 11
inches from the protective surface.
For slides that are over four feet in height the exit region
should be at least 7 inches but not more than 15 inches
above the protective surface.
Slide exit edges should be rounded or curved, to prevent
lacerations or other injuries which could result from
impact with a sharp or straight edge.
.
All slide exits should be located in uncongested areas of
the playground.
9.1.6 Embankment Slides
The design of embankment slides basically eliminates the
hazard of falls from height. Embankment slides should
follow all of the recommendations given for straight slides
(where applicable). It is Important that some means be
provided at the slide chute entrance to minimize the
likelihood that they will be used by children riding skate-
boards or bicycles.
~ Spiral sn0
It is recommended that spiral slides follow the recommen-
dations for straight slides (where applicable), with special
attention given to design features which may present
~;oblems uni ue to spiral slides, such as lateral discharge
eschool-Age Children: use younger children
have Jess . . . ance and postural control,
only short spiral slides are recommended for this age
group.
9.1.8 Tube SUdes
. Tube slides should meet all the applicable requirements
lor other slides. .
Barriers should be provided or surfaces treated to prevent .
sliding on the top of the tube.
The minimum internal diameter of the tube should be no
less than 23 inches.
It should be noted that children using tube slides are not
visible to a supervisor. Consideration should be given to
extra supervision on playgrounds having tube slides.
9.1.9 RoUer Slides
These are not recommended for public playgrounds
unless frequent maintenance can be guaranteed.
9.2 Swings
9.2.1 General
Children of all ages generally enjoy the sensations created
while swinging. Most often, they sit on the swings, and it
is common to see children jumping off swings. Younger
children tend to also swing on their stomachs, and older
children may stand on the seats.
Swings may be divided into two distinct types, single axis
of motion and multiple axes of motion. A single axis
swing Is intended to swing back-and-forth in a single plane
and generally consists of a seat supported by at least two
suspending members each of which is connected to a
separate pivot on an overhead structure. A multiple-axis
swing consists of a seat (generally a tire) suspended from a
single pivot that permits it to swing in any direction.
.
Hardware used to secure the suspending elements to the
swing seat and to the supporting structure should not be
removable without the use of tools. 5-hooks are often
part of a swing's suspension system, either attaching the
suspending elements to the overhead support bar or to
the swing seat. Open 5-hooks are hazardous because
they can catch a chUd's clothing and result in strangula-
tion. 5-hooks should be pinched closed as tightly as
possible.
Swings should be suspended from support structures that
discourage climbing. A-frame support structures should
not have horizontal cross-bars.
9.2.2 Single AxI. Swings
To help prevent young children from inadvertently
running .into the path of moving swings, swing structures
should be located away from other eqUipment or activi-
ties. Additional protection can be provided by means of a
low barrier, such as a fence or hedge. Such barriers
.
13
..
.
.
.
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
July 18, 1994
c I I 11-"v Se.A^f 1-0:
~imi &\.y -l..-1'T~S
V tt It.( e. R e.,c Y" e#..;t i 0"
Ead F AvJas.on "" A~soc .
Mr. Todd Lehman
Minnesota Playground, Inc.
P. O. Box 27328
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Mr. Lehman:
The City of Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission is seeking proposals for the
provision of play equipment to be installed at Pheasant Hill Park. Pheasant Hill Park is a
new 12 acre neighborhood park located at 1720 Lake Lucy Road. A park plan showing the
proposed location of the play structure is attached. A summary description of the play
equipment desired is also attached for your information. Equipment you specify may vary
from these descriptions. The commission's decision in selecting a vendor will ultimately be
based on compliance with CPSC guidelines, ASTM standards, and the ADA, product
integrity, value, reliability, and material among other things. If you have questions in this
regard, please do not hesitate to call me for further explanation.
All proposals must meet the following standard requirements:
1. All equipment must meet requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
the 1991 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission guidelines (CPSC) and the 1993
American Society of Testing and Materials Standards (ASTM). Suppliers must
provide a written statement of compliance in this regard to enable their proposal to be
considered. Proposals received without this letter of compliance will be rejected.
2. It is understood that quote proposals may not be withdrawn within 60 days of
submission and the City of Chanhassen reserves the right to reject any or all quotes
and waive all formalities. Proposals will be accepted through 12:00 p.rn. Monday,
August 1, 1994. The project shall be awarded to the selected vendor on August 10,
1994.
July 18, 1994
Page 2
3. Delivery of all equipment must be guaranteed by Monday, September 26, 1994 at
12:00 p.m.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. I look forward to receiving your proposal.
Sincerely,
'~;%1L
Todd Hoffman
Park and Recreation Director
~
TH:v
pc: Park and Recreation Commission
Don Ashworth, City Manager
.
.
.
.
"
I...~...
,
,
#"
.
I . I
; i
c
~
I
f
r i ~
t . t
I ~ :
I
...'
...'
1.1'
,."
",-
.."
,,"
...,
ltt.
-,.'
.' .-
-# /
/" ""," ~1
/' 7L
I
I
I \ "," /'" f ,.,,--- .', /
I \ ( / .- /_ ..' V d,
> \_) // /"1 / ,,', :' \
I ri{~\\"'\
! ! I ,,..,,,.. J L ~
- --_J l I I r I: \
\ I I
/) ,-) /
/" , I
./ /
/
"
\ ,
\ ,
,
,
I
,
Hoislnlton Kottler GrM' I.c.
.300 104.". Ilw' . So"o 525
\1,....,01... ..Ii 5,.J9 . Itl211~S.9960
PHEASANT tILL PARK
NORTH HALF
CHANHAlKN .....OTA
-
I
r
i
II
..... "............ .,...,. 'Dtll'
PHEASANT HILL PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
.
One (I) play structure, Phase I of two phases. Please show both phases in drawings.
· Location: Pheasant Hill Park (see attached map), 1720 Lake Lucy Road,
Chanhassen, MN 55317
· Acceptable materials: Aluminum or galvanized steel posts,S" diameter, powder
coated. Decks shall be coated metal. Alternative materials may be submitted at
vendor's discretion.
· Area available: Approximately 70' x 90' Area could be expanded to the south
and east; however, retaining walls would be required.
· Border Material: A playground border capable of containing 12" of pea gravel
shall be specified and included as a component of this proposal. Border shall
encompass both Phase I and Phase IT.
.
Targeted Users:
Phase I ages 5 -12; Phase IT ages 2-5.
.
Required Play Experiences: Phase I - swings, and multiple slides and decks. Phase IT
- crawl tubes, multiple slides and decks, spring animals and additional swings. The
final design decision is at the vendor's discretion and may include individual play
components in addition to continuous play apparatus.
.
· Proposal to include all drawings and detailed specifications of proposed equipment, i.e.
deck heights, slide widths, colors, etc. Vendors are solely responsible for determining
the level of detail, i.e. quality of drawings and specifications which are being
submitted.
· Vendor may prepare one or more proposals using different product lines or materials if
desired.
· City to install border, resilient surfacing and equipment per specifications of supplier.
· Total available funds to purchase Phase I play structure and Phase I and in Phase IT
border material is $20,000 or less. For design purposes, Phase n play equipment canobe considered to have a purchase price of $15,000.
.
QUOTATION
" (VALUE).
-RECREATION
INC.
RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT
PROJECT PHEASANT HILL PARK
LOCATION Chanhassen
P.O. Box 607 . Chanhossen, MN 55317
Chonhossen (612) 937-8192
Fax (612) 937-5')31
CUSTOMER
Mr. Todd Hoffman Dir.
CONSULTANT
Bill J.
DATE
8-1-94
CONTACT
PHONE
We are pleased to offer the following quotation:
Playground design with Playworld Playmakers
Phase one $20,000
includes' ,the following':.'
ADA section of playstructurerup to break point
Two rubber pathways
Stegosaurus climber
One of three swing sets
Landscape timbers
-
Phase two $15,000
includes the following
Tire swing
Swing set 2 swings
Spin around whirl
Sprin~ animals of your choice - 2
Remainder of Playrnaker playstructure
Total price delivered
$35,000
It is the opinion of Playworld Systems that the above mentioned
equipment meets all ADA, CPSC, and ASTM guidelines.
Accepted by
Date
-
Prices are firm for 60 days, subject to review thereafter.
Our terms are .Net 30 ' .
Please allow ~ to 6 weeks for delivery after receipt of order and architectural
approval should it be required.
Standard manufactured design, specifica1ions, and construction apply unless
noted otherwise.
If we can be of other assistance, please feeJ"tree to contact us.
ASTM Points hot Specified in CPSC
(VALUE)
REcREATION
INC.
RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT
P.O. Box 607 Chantiassen, MN 55317
(612) 937-8192 Fax 937-5031
Protrusions that fit within any of the three specified protrusion gages a~d project
upwards.from a horizontal plane, cannot project upwards from the honzontal
plane more than 1/8".
.
Maximum height of take-off and landing surfaces for upperbody devices for 2-5
year aIds shall be no higher than' 8 inches. Maximum heIght of take-off and
landing surfaces for upperbody devices for 5-12 year aids shall be no higher
than 36 inches above protective suriacing.
Maximum height of upperbody device for 2-5 year aIds shall be no higher than
60 inchGs. Maximum height of upperbody device for 5-12.year olds shall be no
higher than 84 inches above the protective surfacing.
A clear area free of any obstruction for a width of 21 inches (wilen measured
from the inside face of the slide sidewall) and 60 inches (when.!T1easUred from
the bedway surface) shall extend through the exit region of the:slide. .
... Exceptions to the 60 inch free area are slide barriers, hoods, or other devices .
to channel user into a seated position.
Tire Swings are not to be attaclled to composite structures.
Swinging doors are not recommended for public playground equipment.
The use zones of two stationary play structures or components that have a
designated play surface of 30 inches or less above the protective surfacing may
overlap.
The use zones for two or more stationary play structures or components that cUP.
not pllysically attached but are play functionally linked. are to be determined as
if they were part of a composite play structure. Example: Logs for Worldfit Log
Hop, step up discs for Steel World Trail Step-Up Station and bars for Parallel
Bars. Note: Professional 'judgment to be used to eliminate any hazards in
circulation or use patterns.
Wheelchair ramps shall not have a slope greater than 1 :12.
Wheelchair ramps shall have a level landing with a 60 Inch diameter for turniny
at the bottom and top of each run.
Wheelchair ramps with the highest point being greater than 30 inches for 2-5 .
year olds or greater than 48 inches for 5- 12 year olds shall have a protective
barrier on either side. These protective barriers shall also have a handrail
located between 26 inches and 28 inches on either side of the ramp.
A WARNING label shall be provided for all play structures. The word message
on this label shaH read: Installation over a hard surface such as concrete,
.
.
.
PLAYGROUND
ACCESSIBILITY
SIMPLIFIED
(VALUE)
RECREATION
INC.
RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT
P.O. Box 607 Chanhassen, MN 55317
(612) 937-8192 Fax 937-5031
1. An accessible playground is one that offers "like" play opportunities
to children of varying abilities.
2. The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) offers no specific information on
what constitutes an accessible playground. Industry experts say that
a common sense approach is best, understanding that the intent of ADA
is mainstreaming. .
3. ACCESS PATH - an access pathway is the first step in designing or updating a
play area. This path must be 51 wide and provide access to all equipment
intended to be accessible. A transfer space of 5' square should be provided
adjacent to transfer stations.
4. PARKING SPACES - A 30" X 48" parking space should be provided near the
transfer station but clear from play activity.
5. TRANSFER STATIONS - Since 60% of wheel chair bound children typically
have the ability to transfer out of the chair, transfer stations would be logical
in most situations. Depending on age, transfer stations heights from 15 -
18" high would be appropriate. Steps measuring a minimum of 12 x 24"
from the station to the platform are necessary. Slides exiting from the
platfonn should be no higher than 8". The steps leading up from the transfer
station should be no higher than 8" and be fully enclosed with kick plates.
6. CONSIDER RAlv1PING - Depending on the quantity of wheel chair bound
children and their ability levels, ramping may be the answer. The ramp must
be 36" wide with curbing and hand rails and utilize a slope no greater than 12
to 1. Shorter ramps may be used in conjunction with birms for cost savings
and a more interesting landscape. Avoid using long' straight ramps sections
(use elbows with platforms). The platfonn accessed by a wheel chair should
be 5' in diameter.
USE ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE PRODUCTS
FROM PLA YWORLD SYSTEMS
.
SPRING MATES AND POST CAPS -100% recycled aluminum
STEEL TUBING - (posts and climbers) 70-90% recycled steel
95% recyclable
EXPANDED METAL STEEL PLATFORMS - 90-95% recycled steel
ALMAG CLAMPS (alu. blended with magnesium) aluminum is 100% recycled
ALUMINUM POSTS - 90% recycled material
CUSHIONED DECKS - rubber is 100% recycled tires, frame is 90% recycled steel
PLASTIC WALLS - use 100% recycled high density poly (4 x 6s)
PLASTIC PLATFORMS - use 100% recycled plastic planking on 90% recycled steel
frame
.
PACKAGING - 100% of all cardboard used is recycled
PALLETS - 100% :recycled
PEANUTS - 100% biodegradable - melt with moisture
WOOD - all new growth from commercial tree farms - no old growth Redwood
SAFETY SURFACING - 80-100 % recycled rubber tires depending on which style
WITH THE ABOVE MENTIONED PRODUCTS IT IS POSSmLE TO DESIGN A
PLA YSTRUCTURE THAT IS FABRICATED FROM 80-90% RECYCLED MATERIALS
WITHOUT RISKING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY - Full warranties still apply!!
PLAYWORLD
~~~~~M,S 9
New Berlin, PA 17855
1-800-233-8404
.
I
tl.
,
r
'"
l'
f
.
,
i
.,
f-
i.
t
f
i
I
J'
~
..
"'.TOr.~; :'~~'f,!<~,~~_,.,_~~:~~_~,"O_~":~~~,~'- - '7..~:~:~i:'?~,~:~~"~;"':
. ' - ':'--~;--- ,>"~, .' - -'
. >i'~~0;;:,~~;lf~~ .
YOUR FULLSERVICEDElLER'. 0 .'.
-. :- ..... ~~<"7./,~{?:~f./r;!;~~i~~~~~~~~:~~~.f~p:,.: ~:'
SPECIALIZING IN PLAYGROUNDS' ::::;;.' .~;~:.:..,
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
-Certified Installations
-Landscaping .:- '.~. ." -:\';~~'"
",;i >~ ':. ~:: ,.:: . .; "~';'\"""j" '
-Supervised Installations . ~~'~!~.~~f~~t~~='"~:.. .
'. . ,- ',,,, '. '~~~t~~>,~;,.;~;i~:-
',', ~MXJE"" .)' . -".'0" '.~b:~~4~~~:r~~}'::~,:T"
........ ~,....,....,.N,. . .~<1 '.,
; " .;, ' _ t"'. " '~: :':~ o!'",~~~. " '~::__'~.-:'
D....,';::; ~ T ~':1iBranCh -office
.IV.A...:REATIOl ~ ';. 'D~i~tb:~).1N.'
I NC . ,:;..~::' :.:;>;,-: 0 .... }.,"::.;.'.;.
. - ':'''::~)J'c:--~ ~~~~~'~:i:. ",..: _.~ -~;~"...
RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT,.~f~'t~~(':~~. ;>:~r'
. . ..}.}'~i~~,,;:~' .
OUR WORK IS CHILD'S PLA Y'~~i~,?.:~:;;~.'''~:'~
, ,~;., )~>~:i;z:'~~<<;"':Et::~'3
~\'JZ.f~i![~!j;' "'0
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
FREE
Home Office
P.O. Box 607
Chanhassen, MN. 55317
(612)9378192
(612)9375031 fax
. - -. .
. , 0 :>~<ii'~~(":1~~ .
On site Evaluation .
Layout Assistance '.'
. . ',,;~~' . ;'.':""
Personalized Design Help . ..; .~~t ,J+:r".~>" .
~,-> ~'-i'~~.~i;'>>-'..::.;;-,-~' '
Master Plans - with phaSes. ...' :.:;t !;~,~:.~ ': .' '
,~Consultation on CPSC Guideljri~s~':' - ..
. ". .'. JI'" ",. - . .,.,:'
Safety zone and ground covet }lSsessment '., ';
-}' .. :~~~-;;"-:" -" .-~' ~
Consultation on A.D.A. cgmpli~ce~~' .
Playground Supervision Seminar & video" .'
(with purchase)
Post installation inspections
Safety Seminars
":~:~?~~.~_~r~~~'~~~:' .:
~ i1/jj.':~;~~-':. '~.~;:;Li:i.~~~ ~L~~~..~ _;';'_"
I
1
i
t
~
i
i~
',.''"/-' ro,-,' '~'~~~~'-~~~~!r. ~:-..~~~ : '.~~''''-J'-~~'~.'7,~.~:~'~:r~~F;'~::/'-''-::--:-:7'-:-;~~~'- OH-'- - ~-- ".'
J~,,_: ..t:i;".'" ".-.
'w.'~'..
.
PLA YGROUNDRELATEDPRODUCTS
Playstructures
-Redwood
-Southern Yellow Pine
-Steel uprights
-Aluminum uprights
. Site Amenities
-Wood Benches'& iable"s
-Steel Benches & Tables .
.- Steel Benches & Tables
(plastic coated)
-Recycled Plastic Benches &
Tables
. Landscaping
-Treated Southern Pine Timbers
-Cedar Timbers
-Redwood Timbers
-Recycled Plastic Timbers
-Concrete Sidewalk
-Bituminous Pathways
-Drain Tile
-Filter Cloth
Recycled Playstructures
-Recycled Steel
-Recycled aluminum
-Recycled plastic
-Recycled rubber
.
':;i!t
"\' ~_ ,',',_ 0'
}...,;...:.
-.., - ~,
Safety Surfacing Materials
-Coarse washed sand
-Pea gravel
-Buck shot
-Accessible wood chips
-Rubber tiles (recycled tires)
-Poured in place rubber (recycled tires)
.
. .
-.-, , - ,........"
".;:., , .'j.;;.;.;': ;,ic.'';; ~.
"
. ;. .~ -', ",
'"'
:; If'l _ _ C\J ru _
C\J
" ::::
:> :>
1.0 1.0
Z Z
:; :;
III III
~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~ If'l If'l If'l If'l If'l ~
~ ~ I r I r I Z I
~ U U U U U U ~ U
I '
-1-1
I
z
<:
I
U
~I
..
o
U
..J
>-
Z
;;
"
:>
~ _ ~ M . If'l ~ ~ m ~ ~I
~
I
I
\
.
I
~
~
~
~
"
..,
,----------------------------,
: 1
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I.
,:I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I I i
I ~ I
~_____________J______________J
~
~
i
(!!)i)
~@D
~I
~~
~WJ
@)dJ
~~
~db
~~
~
:::G
0::
<
o..li
2S
...:l Z1'-~
...:l 00
::;:p::~c::1'- e
...... ~ >< ~.... ~
~c15~i;5
E-< ~ ,..c: Il'l
Z ~O~
--" r.; Cl.. ..c:
......:::> U
~~
~
::t::
0..
~
~
....
~
~~~
,- "'....
z
:>
..
2!S
~
C
~
11 ~ ~
~ :x:
.... ~ U
j :;
.. ..
!;l ~
'0
,
...:
III
~
ti ~
~ ~
.... ~
Vl '"
t:l :0
Cl.. !!l
...:
'"
~
~
'"
0-
!:l
...:
'"
s:
~
"'W
~~
",'"
:z~
!~
"''''
....>-
......
~~
>
o
M
.~
""
N
....
~
~
'"
a,
2
M
.~
(Q
-
O@EB
III 5:
'"
~~~W ~ WQ
~~~i!: z ;!:~W
u
a~g~ ~ ~~~ t
~< l:::~~ si
~~..:8 CD o III
l--UI- W ~
oi3<~ 0 O:.:l:)
~~ L..ll-3;:
l-l.&JV')::> ~Vl~
CQ:~O W::>
.....WI-LaJ 8~
i3:':~'" :!!:i3
v;~h '" 8~~ 8
~WO"" ~~ ~-
~,,~ '"
z~i:~ g~ 5
=>>frlll. ~
~ei~ w~ ~o:!
~~~tl ~ 2w..J i
1Il~ bi:~
~5ffi~ffi ~~ b..J
t:: < W
.. ::>l'i~~e z'" ~
" ::>~~
VlI \!lwwlIl~ " '"
(,) . ~~~ ::>
~ i!:ll;i!:~(,) >110 III
O~ N' ;;;- ..
Z -
g~~
i3~
~~~
~~~
......-
~>~~
~t:;
~ 3
~
,..:
~ ~ ~ . _ _ ~ M _ N _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ M _ N _ _ N _ N _ _
Q
u
w
'"
>- Q
..J U
'" >- W
% ...J ~ Q
w '" w
~ x z ~ ~ ~ Q
: i ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < a ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ M > I ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B : ~ ~ ~: : go: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~;..J ; ~ ! ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : g : ; ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ : ;
~ ~ ~ ; : ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
..J ..J
W W
~ ~
=- =-
~ 0 ~ g ~ ~
o 0 0 ...... '<J)
~ i i i i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~
~ i i f! ~ ~
Q. Q. Q. Cl.. Q. Q.
~ 8 @ ~ ~
f i i i i
~ ~
o t\J
Z :I:
::l ~
~ ~
~ ~
:I: Z
~ ::l
~ ~ ~ ~
~ f f ~
~ Si! 8
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
..
~ - C\J M
,..:
....
co - -
co f1' 9
= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !::: !
~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"' '" '"
_ _ N _ _ _
^
'"
~ 8 8 ~ Q
w w w Q
g ...J ~ ~ N ~ ~
~ < w < ~ 0 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c
~ g : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~
~ z ~ ~ ~ = ~ 0 ~ -
~ ~ ~ ~ d d ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
; ~ ~ i i ~ ~ G ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 I I ~ m ~ ; = ~
~ 8 w ~ ~ d j ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~> i d d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5
~ ~ > > ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~
^ ^
'" '"
u u
~ IS
Vl ::= w
:Ewc.!l
1--<(
>0..
~Zc.!l
z5~
::=0..::=
owo
:r:r ::J
Vll-O
>- .l.L..
....Jww
....IN:r
<(Vi....
~
O:::oz
owo
Z....J
<(
VlUZ
-Vl::=
o
c.!lo:r
~I-Vl
::=WVl
<( => -
:So
....J
::= .... <(
w=>>
_00 oi
> to
Z .0
<( Z r-.
....JO~
0..;:::0..
<(
wuo:::
:rOO
1-....Jl.L..
~
~
~
~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ '<J) '<J) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ :I: :I: :I: :I: :I: :I: :I: :I: :I:
~ Q. Q. ~ Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. Q.
~ ~
'" C1-
:I: :I:
~ ~
..
~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~
~
is
'"
..:
..J
(1:)i)
~
~I
~~
@j
~~
~
g
~
~
0:::
<:
0-.-.)
2E
j~'l'-~
- ~ii5 - w
h-<~ C:l'-~
~~k~~~
~ci5~f6
E-<~o~ll)
Zt..1o.:~
<:0 to)
U):;;l
<:~
~
::r:
0..
,...:
~
o
~
>- ~
w ~
~ 5:
~
..... :l
Vl '"
o :0
Cl ~
,...:
~
~
~
~
::l
'"
'"
~
II II n
O@EB
(.:J
'" cs
~ ~
~ ~ 2!
Z
:>
..:
~
'"
W
...J
<::
u
~
-.l
~
oi
~ '0
~ DO
z ~
'i Cl
5
<::
~
'"
-
,...:
~
c
~
~
~
~
c
~
~
:l
~
~
t;
o
~
~
l.Q
><
to
l.Q
Q,
!:
-:--
~ ..;
I~=
~-
~~
l!!-'-'
...e~
~~~
>~~
z z
:5 -
Q.
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
9808 James Circle
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone: 612-884-7300
MN WATS: 1-800-862-6026
FAX: 612-884-5619
Complete consulting, design, layout and inslallation services.
. Park and Playground Equipment
. Resilient Safety Surfacing
. Site Fumishings
. Bleacher and Stadium Seating
. Scoreboards
. Floating Docks
. Nature/Boardwalks
. Traffic Control Signs and Products
. Custom Signs and Markings
. Traffic Marking Products
. Sign Post Mounting Systems
. Architectural Signage
. Interior/Exterior Custom Signs
QUOTATION
City of Chanhassen
Parks and Recreation Dept.
Attn: Todd Hoffman
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Date August 1. 1994
Your Ref. No. Pheasant Hill Park
Playground Phase I
Plan #G3441D
.
.
TERMS: Net 30 Days ~
To Be Arranged 0
.
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE EACH TOTAL
Phase I Playeround Equipment
320 Ln Ft 3 High Timber border to include: 2 - 6" x 6" treated pine 9.05/ft $2,896.00
timber; 1 - 6" x 6" construction grade redwood timber
and hardware.
1 4 Belt Swing unit, 8' height, heavy duty 5000 series with $984.00
2 belt seats; 1 tot full bucket; 1 molded bucket seat
for accessibility.
1 Tuff turf Tiles for accessible swing unit, includes: $1,360.00
8 - 3-1/2" tiles, beveled edges, corners and adhesive.
1 PlayBooster Play Structure Phase I, 5-12 year olds $13,030.00
Aluminum Posts, Tenderdecks .
1 Tufffurf Tiles for accessible play structure, includes: $499.00
4 - 2-1/2" tiles, beveled edges, corners and adhesive.
Installation prices based on prevailing wages. SUBTOTAL $18,769.00
SALES TAX $1,219.99
DYES
o NO FREIGHTS Paid by. EF A
INST ALLA TION Not Included
TOTAL $19,988.99
. F.O.B. Factory 0 Destination (J WE ARE ANuAL O~P RTUNITY EMPLOYER
Shipment approx. 8 Weeks after receipt of order., r- ~
NOTE: This quotation valid for 30 days. /J J J J
Please write for confirmation after that date. By ~1/~
David Owen
.
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
9808 James Circle
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone: 612-884-7300
MN WATS: 1-800-862-6026
FAX: 612-884-5619
Complete consulting, design, layout and installation services.
. Traffic Control Signs and Products
. Custom Signs and Markings
. Traffic Marking Products
. Sign Post Mounting Systems
. Architectural Signage
. Interior/Exterior Custom Signs
. Park and Playground Equipment
. Resilient Safety Surfacing
. Site Fumishings
. Bleacher and Stadium Seating
. Scoreboards
. Floating Docks
. Nature/Boardwalks
.
QUOTATION
Date August 1. 1994
Your Ref. No. Pheasant Hill Park
Playground Phase IT
Plan #G3441D
City of Chanhassen
Parks and Recreation Dept.
Attn: Todd Hoffman
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
SUBTOTAL
SALES TAX
FREIGHTS
INSTALLATION
TOTAL
F.O.B. Factory 0 Destination IKI WE ARE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Shipment approx. 8 Weeks after receipt of order. ~a
NOTE: This quotation valid for 30 days. ' / I J .......
Please write for confirmation after that date. By ~ """"-
David Owen
.
QUANTITY
1
1
5
1
2
TERMS: Net 30 Days il
To Be Arranged 0
DESCRIPTION
PRICE EACH TOTAL
Phase IT Playeround Equipment
Playbooster Playstructure, 2-5 age appropriate
Tufffurf Tiles for accessible spring platform and play structure
includes: 2-1/2" and 1-1/2" thick tiles, beveled edges,
corners and adhesive.
$8,965.00
$1,070.00
Independent Play Items including: Horse Tuffrider,
Turtle Tuffrider, Wheelchair Accessible Superscoop,
Superscoop and Spring Platform.
Tire Swing Unit
$2,195.00
Age Appropriate Signs
$1,242.00
$506.00
Installation prices based on prevailing wages.
$13,978.00
$908.57
Paid by EF A
Not Included
$14,886.57
DYES
o NO
. Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
August 1, 1994
To:
From:
Re:
City of Chanhassen
Parks and Recreation Department
Todd Hoffman, Director
David Owen 'P'?O
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
Pheasant Hill Park Playground
Proposal Attachment
Please note the following items regarding our playground proposal:
1)
.
Compliance with CPSC Guidelines, ASTM Standards and ADA: It is our opinion that
this proposal conforms to the CPSC Guidelines, the ASTM Standards on Accessibility
and the ADA. We believe we "go the extra mile" by offering accessibility to the
rocking, swinging, sliding, and climbing sensations to those with disabilities, as well as
a talk tube that is accessible. Both playstructures provide accessibility. CPSC
recommends age appropriate equipment, as well as signs stating age appropriateness,
which are included. A maintenance manual shall be provided as well.
2) Delivery: We can not guarantee delivery of equipment by September 26, 1994. The
manufacturer has generally been needing 8 weeks to deliver most items.
3) Product integrity, value, reliability: The City of Chanhassen has a long and successful
track record with both EF A and Landscape Structures, Inc. and should know that these
criteria will be satisfied.
Thank y:u. 0 f\ .
~ft::~\~
.
9808 James Circle. Bloomington, MN 55431 · Phone: 612-884-7300 · MN Wats: 1-800-862-6026 · Fax: 612-884-5619
"Equal Opportunity Employer"
.
()
c:
~
c
0)1:J
(/)0)
Q3c:
'CO)
c(/)
<0>
.a:
LL(/)
--
...,c
CUc:n
W.-
>.a:
.0=
~<
C)
C)
.,..
@
~~
::;)t-
00
Ll.JZ
e:::O
Q
I
I
j
;..
>-
~ ... -....0 a..D ..... - '.. JIIIl&IIO-..
(xl- [JOII I J.... *4'1
II" [I.. 00... _.-.._
---'l__"'-P.l
11- [I... 00.... ___'l_~
II" [I.. 00... [100__--.,__,,_
...... ~.............. __ ....1
~
@S
~
@b
d
d ..J
= 'O!
~ p;
VI
2
~ :z
~
~ 1Il
u
Z
F=
~ III
tl
&JJ
~
lli!:!l
~
@b
~
+
IOiO )I.'IlI :1.1 DeQO
HlIO ;/,1 *YllCI
<<1-1- r:mJli
tNl 'l!/: ! ll' :]1'10
1M1WJ61M~~~WIHl~WIHlO
~MWdl i1i1DIHI .J1.IHIW8W:mlHlcll
Ilts-tII ..." OO('L-tII-~I' .
K~MR~" 0 '
'f'JIl__ ~
'"W.~ ~
j'
-, '''--T ....,
I ",
I I""
l....... / "-
,/ \
\., / III i \
, I \
, I I
\ --,
\ I \ /
\ j \ /
'.... ,..",.1
-r..., '" 1" )/------ \ 1 /
, "'"1 r.... r '........_ _....,,1'
: : : II ,- - --.......
1111/ L_____ _______J II ," 1 -',
-/<i~"'\ /i;T-"'\ I J ( 'I ~ ) 11/'11
\ .fill/I I~ IIII ! ; ,.-- /.1-.. -l
:;";:~ Ix l..." -ft-' III ,.....,
~ I 1 ~~ " y !!~ .. "
: I 1111 'I.. \ , ~~ I \
i f II I I \ I~ I -1
III J'~ ./
1-/
IIIII Hi ; 1111 ,,/ C'.....__..../
::II " " \
IIIII '''II ,,/ '11111 /" '-....
I1IIII \\, i 1111 /1'/---"", /<-.. '\
----... I" II \ =. ,
,,/-T--"', II 1=1.. t y~1
I "II..'~ 1
.~' Ill} \\ ~ III'
I h' hJ\ if I
" 1\ 1 .. I I
: \,,_ __ i....,.I/\'........l....~.I/ '''- ...."'......-1-..."/ II
i
I
~
.
,
I
1111 I
~.
1=-
~ '
::l~
~~
..,
..
.......-...
~ ~~l~ 1
..c~;:p.~~1l ~
"-ct, ,!/ii ,,~i-l tfi
j '* Ii:::l, "i';: · 0 111
8~!~-f$tl:? ~
::I,'!., 11 l"~.!
II ~;!!l~ i~!.f
!ciId':~lt:ll
-z.; ~ .. II '" J ".. E
~ .Ui:~~ .li!'!
'I .....:U :;
& !j68 II:
~
",.
~~
"
~i
i5
I
.
j
I
"
I
.
I
.
o
-'
~-
W II
5.
CD
Z"'
<1"1
-.J
o...w
...J
<
U
VI
)'
..:
.
to
I' WDE
A~SSlIl.E
PA'ttIl PATH
~SQ.n.
G3441D 7/29/94
SCALE: 1" - 10'-0"
PHEASANT HILL PARK
CHANHASSEN, MN
I
EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL
o'V~
ACCDSIIL[
PA-.el PATH
Ntw
0' wa:
ACCESSlII.E
PA'ttIl PAlM
100t
AREA 50 50. n.
B.l sa. n,
13 sa. FT.
PAm> tlSllE IICIlDER
4 so. FT.
-'2
-~ t,..
... 1U'''
...-.. ...-.,.
-II
/..... ~ PHASE" ", -'I I I I i:X--AREA 45 so. FT.
/ II I I II' / I:: : ..}r "
I II I I II -. -' 1+ -'- -'- -'-' -
1I---'---r--'--if....J,,~ aD \ ..... '='..' II - ;,~- -II ...... " /
, II I II .1-"" I //.-.......- II .IOIIl. II " I ~,..t-
I II I II .,.-- II ;oar II
'I ~=r=~=rJl 7---,1 I It j;I r '\' ':.'
I (PHASE II \--
I ) IS' 1\...
PHASE II -- -.. -.~
\ ,...- I m = -~-.:
-:r.::::" I \ _ IIIJ( .... .... ......
, / \
, /,
........... - ---...:"--...... \
-- - '-'" ......,-
/..... PHASE II \~ /
/ \,
I _~ 0\
r--e.-* JlI J '......
\ _ __ u I 1 -. / \\
\ PHASE II 6' S' tal / ......
'L L / "PHASE II / ,
...... _ /' ./ """ :/,SNtTY ZCH: eMe
I;; :A;~~--~~ ;~n>~:'~ \
6' '" I F~ 5-12 YEAR OlDS \.
re' "\,.)...... ..::~ '\ RES
) I .....t r--
I r ~
I
{ r
I
\
\ I' /1......
..... L 1/ I "........
" ...... /;i.-....: I
- " " I 'I
/ t......! II
I ... /1
I l;
I? /
.........-...,.../
/'--,
PLA YBOOSTER STRUCllJR!
FOR 2-5 YEAR OlDS
(-
1114'1
--
.....
,----
I
..... I
or ....
PH
r----j
I /
/ (
\
\
"'B
--
PA\{J) AAEJ.
IlSIJ( BalOOl
H sa. FT.
-41_- '
6' 11_
,---
/ III.II....CII
\ " .::':.....
I ""~... CI)
\ ~ /
" 1 ,/
"...... ...../
NIE.A 45 so. FT.
@ 1994 by Eorl F. Andersen, Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
II I I! !~AREA 4.:l 50. Fl. \
II I '...l-r '\. /"--......}...... '-t"-j
rr-l~Ln "t--......" I ~.~\\~ /
:t jJ J \ I ..... , '_..-" "
" .,1,.00::.,.. J /
1, / /
6'-" / I
L ......-- ...J
~ --.......... r--
... ,
-as " I
PLA YBOOSlER STRUClURE \ I
FOR 2-5 YEAR OlDS , I
6' --11
II
II
/ I
/ I
"
'\. ~~ ,---- I
" I I
''"''''...... PHASE II ,,/ /wtTY ZlK: (1'IPICAlJ :
......--- ../ I
1{~;O:R~lRU~~ \ L__"
Fffi 5-12 YEAA 0lD5 6'
I ~~ \. " RESlJENT SURfACE \\ <'
'+ \ (BY l7llIO) ,
r-- '\ I
6' -, \ 6' /
" "1 /
6' 6' \ ,_ _"
,
11,----1
I
I
PHASE I )
6' /
r1----.../
6'-4
\ ;/
\ t /
" 1 /
'...... ....."
I
(
.~
;
.. - ~
BITUMINOUS TRAIL
Ntw
I' wa:
AC({SSl!l.E
PA\IIl PI. lH
10't
IJ 5Q. FT.
PAvm NSIlE IKRlEII
4 sa. Fl.
.
...."""
1I\J22
fIT ....r
-"'"
no.
ft ......
"_
--
11_
" - .....
.....1) "'.1'1
,,-
rr._
....4....'.l
~
.
I€W
6' \lIlE
ACCESSIllE
PA\IIl PAlH
!illSQ.rT.
IoEW
5'1lIlE
Aca:ssIIl.f:
PA~ PAtH
CQlC. P MJ
10 sa. rr.
!ill SO, FT.
PA\€D NSlOC IlOllOCR
5 sa. FT.
,,-
/
I
..J
" '"
II N\
t-t---YAREA 115 sa. FT.
II II
II t I
II I ,
" I --- I I "
// I II \
{:.,~T LT-~ \
II I '" L
'" '" --,
-.t e>c;t:t1-... T-"'-r: I
,-, I II ..,., I
...:F_ I I I -:--.:::
lj-- 1:::11 ' I
- I
NJ.,r' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r---.J
I
/
/
"
II'
-
. .......
..-
PHASE I
(2) 6" I 6" ~lED
PINE 9CRlER
(I) 6".6"
QjTOP
PHASE I
;,~--'"'"'-.......
..... .....
".. ,
/ "-
../ '-..
" ,
/ 12' "
/ \
I \
I I
1--6' 6'--/
I 11_ I
\ nUI& I
\ PHASE H /
" It /
...... ,..
'" /"
" /
'- "
..... ,.-
'------.,-~
G3441D 7/29/94.
SCALE: 1" = 1 0' -0"
PHEASANT HILL PARK
CHANHASSEN, MN
@ 1994 by Earl F. Andersen, Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
.
.
.
CITY OF
CHARHASSER
b
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612') 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
~
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director
DATE:
August 4, 1994
SUBJ:
Conclude 1995 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement
Program Development
A complete listing of the program initiated by t:JJt~ommission on July 26, 1994 including
staff additions/deletions and comments, will ~\tiis 'buted next Tuesday evening.
'.
,.
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park and Recreation Commission
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director IN lit-
FROM:
DATE:
August 4, 1994
SUBJ:
Discuss Future Park/Open Space Acquisition and Development Referendum
The attached newspaper ad dated October 29, 1
the first park referendum held in the City of
the referendum passing by a wide majority,
Lake Ann Park. It is the opinion of this offi<
1969, and on several other occasions since
for park acquisition and development. I q this pOSl
commission are aware, and which I willxpound on T
from the Chanhassen Maverick promoted
sen. A total of 802 votes were cast with
ting the acquisition and development of
same kind of commitment made in
needed to pursue a 1995 referendum
n for a variety of reasons which the
day night.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the
authorize a 1995 Park
and proceed to
d Recreation Commissi recommend the City Council
and Development Refere urn of a scope yet undetermined
force to expedite the
THE MAVERICK
October 29, 1969
. Ji~ge B-4
Cha.ri.h~8.~,~Jlk' ~$iqents:
. . ..I'.a".~''''~' ~;<I'~~;iL~'''''~'
~..... -..... . ""
011J
VQ1l1Y~$[ F~~~'T~"{Rk~-]QV:4
~
..
'y/4____
Too many cllmmunities have 10s1 Cor.
":,:vcr the pnle",l;alilie~ that lift:. >~I avat!
able 10 Chanha"en.
It therefore becomes imponanl that
SOffil' of Chanha.iscn's Il:!lt'ra,l ,.r;C~9f~.G.~$::.
be Immcdl~lcly preserved: ~J$ ilhlsc:'
village also sellles into the cil>gm~ of,")uoi
.nother community".
This hond issue will nf(W~e funds for
..
II';::: i.....,,}.....;ili..'. \)1' our OWi"I park 'ystem:
recreational facilities for fainilies. adults
& senior cilizens as well as neighborhood
play ;.H~ia..:.etld facilit'\u':;fM-'\\fim,"J,ii'l&
t. 'l"nl~, basc~;jll. picnici,fil._hildtli. sial;n!
h/,ckey" skiing and sliding.' ,r C I
?:r. 7 L).II:~~:l .:"'.' -:: ..Ie
WE SUPPORT THE PARK BONO tSSUE!
(~_ ',:r.I:JOlt)
".:
t ':1
i.,lA".
Mf. and ~rs ~<t~.' ~lOe1t.-
~tr. and Mrs. H~llr~ \101in/~
Mr. find Mrs. Mnrisoll RI.dJ
M1. and Mrs. Ray Sch nllll
Mr. and Mrs. Maurice Bleed
Rev. and Mrs. J. Orville ~ar1in
Mr. and Mo;., Conroy Webster
Mr. and Mrs. Slen Thompson
Mr. and Mrs. Marv M u;~6 r
Mr. and Mrs. D. C. Prillaman
Mr. and Mrs. E. C. Seim
Mr. and Mrs. P. Larson
MY. and Mrs. Albert Barnacle
Mr. Mod Mrs. Daniel Herbs.
H," .!li:ha,d'.elf""'"'''''' --,.
Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth Sotherlund
Mr ~.,d MrJ.~,i_~'"n:-,in"..,!-" i
Mr. and M". Richard Pike
M,. and Mrs. Gerald Soderlind
Mr. and Mrs. Dick Pearson
Mr and Mrs, Russell H. Larson
Mr. and Mrs Dean Scheff
Mr. Tom Klingelhutz
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Gleason
M.. and Mrs. 8erk Rodge"
~r,:t'r~, ~:ard l~\,~rJ ':"4.. ,;j l~' .(~'r. ~,~KI: M'tf)~'~frts."1un~'}:;;'l'}:)':i ,'r; f)Cll~; L.H..orepz '..I':
Mr :snJ \11~ l((:"ry Nt'lI~ Mr. and Mrs. Ted H. deLl~I"') Mr.' and Mr~. ClSf weKfmin
M, and ~l..s. A. W. Owen. Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Thnl1l.YLL "1 Wand M"..(~nraiJ;'FItr.:j,~i
Mr. i.llld Mrs. Gkl\n Malison Mrs. Oara Bacon M.. Jnd : Us. Ro....Casey
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Beckstrom Mr. and Mrs. E. W. McCary Mr. and Mrs. Genold Hekkinen
Mr. and Mrs. CI.rke Nicholson Mr. and Mrs. R. A. Roberts Mr. and Mrs. Walter Paulson
Mr. and Mrsl~ilfl.Lord Mr. and Mrs. Stan Tilly Mr. anrl Mrs. Harley Rnbinson
Mr. and Mrs. 'S"'"M: Osgood 'lr. Mr. and Mrs. Paol Thompson Mr. and Mrs. AI Sinnen
-, . =1
Mr. and Mrs:.)iin'l{.elly Mr. and Mrs. Michael Ro,JI",," Mr. and M.... <;;..er. Vlolf
~,:r. anrl Mrs. Willis KI,in Mr. and Mrs. Hibbert Hill ,', 'M.. and ~1". ,\j Harvey
Mr. 'and Mrs. Howard Viken' Mr. and Mrs. Jerry Pope (, .. Mr. and Mrs. Don SIalhar
Mrs. Loraine Roeser Dr. and Mrs. Jim Bennyho(( Mr. and Mrs. Joe Glaccum
Mr. and Mrs. Richa,d H. Comer Mr, and Mrs. Ronald Roeser Mr. and Mrs. Terry O'Brien
Mr. and Mrs. Erik Doodors Mr. and Mrs. Dean Montaonlery Mr. and Mrs. Lyle Ricklef;
'W 'iWd~trf7'.to;II"'o~,j"'-' "lllf."lliif'W't:I~Mf"itlIt..tle' .. "--.Mr."a~1J'M.:~itr,bert &~er
Mr. and Mrs. Ray Jezierski Mr and Mrs. Robert Reichert Mr. and Mrs. Waller J. Reutiman
\,.. u;d ~t;:. {)av~PatteAnn M. .~t:1 Mrs. .\:ndcl Weimerskirch Mr, and Mrs, f;lewton BriiJey
Mr. and Mrs. Rodger Brown Mr. and Mrs. James Cranston Mr. and Mrs. John Nevelux
Mr. and Mrs. Ron Mielke Mr and Mrs. Giles Co~rtney Mr. and Mrs. Joseph N. Boyer
Mr. and Mrs. Dick Mingo Mr. and Mrs. HWf'Vey Will "AT sod Mrs. Gene Coulter
Mr. and Mrs. James Payseno Mr. and Mrs. Herb De Vaan Mr. and Mrs. AI Klineelhutz
Mr. and Mrs Ralph Kant Mr. and Mrs. Elmer Kunerth Mr, and Mrs. Roy Roeser
Mr. and Mrs. Bob Broderson Mr. Richard Lyman Mr, and Mrs. Ray Dietz
. _ Mt. ;~~~~.rlIo.n .~Iayton (' ( i"~i' a~,~ts;. Geral~ ,Vani,"" Mr. an<l Mrs. Nel Brellineen
., c'Mr:and MysI'Robert,.-Ptrillips " . Mr'.and' Mrs-,' Ed H~t.d'
.
~
:I
For Further
rrormation
"'aU'. +. "1"1'1
~ . '., .~I.\J',~
~newaShla Park .;e~~:J
Ie Welmersklrch
4745733
S nen H1I1 area
rvey Will
474.8168
IUS Lake area
stlly ptLang I ~:
,,,474.7214
~~e'%J~f~le,. lit
~47;tJ~i nl
C~.. onial Grove area
G~dYs McCary
, 74-4471
nhassen Estates area
r
Lake Susan area
Don Slather
474.7590
r--+......................................,
i+ The Question On The Blue Ballot Will Be- .
QUESTION NO. I
". .i"~~ '~~."~~ Shall~'thc Village'(~f Cha;Jha~~n borro~..mone/bY'i;;Uin& ittJ., Il"~'
)- ," ,,_~ rt~J \ c' 2e~e:alohligfat~h ~ond-s i~ th'~ .~f!l:)i.,Int.:qt:'.S,2SQ ,000 ',h, :prcYidt '1
. funds for Ihe acquisition and bellerment of parks'
. I~~
i I Chanha...n residents IiYing
i' What ~: Th~:.~:.::.::::.~.w..t.? ~:~:.~=:::'::~::.
., (2) A community picnic'mI aa<! swimming beach. . Rd. 117 vole at We.t Junior
. ..;, (3) Neighborhood lot lolsand ilall f..lds : Higl: School, located on Stale
t (4) Preserving the beauty and character of the villa,e _. ~ . Hwy 41
· ... -.. w', ~.. -.." "'....." IxEsl ~
l~~. ~.r.!~. ~~~. !.~.~~~~.~.~
,~
Where Do
~
Prep,~ .nd paid ror by the Volunteer Committee rOf 'arb In Oanhauen.
...
I-
Z
<(
U
-
...J
Q.
a..
<t
.
~
3
LLI
I-
-
(f)
.
~., .~ ~:' .
PRC DATE: 7.;26-94
PC DATE: 8-3-94
CC DATE: 8-22-94
"'j<;--"
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
HOFFMA"N:k.i\ i't.
, _ .J..
.1'-
'_ '.; l..,.
, ... -,.;..
STAFff,REPO'RT:
J,J
ill .1;';1
PROPOSAL:
_ ~~. ," '. ~ .~ I;' 1\\ "'j fj"~" ~-' .t;~ ,'*fJ' I ;t~ IJiI;f
, ~~" ,.'~' .-~'~ ~)' .~! . f,' . .,.~ .......... . ..~. I ! ."~' .
~eL~~~rat to':ulxtf~i~~s1cres"'irit~~36 ~ai'~gi~'f~y ~ts~ anci one
outlot, Halla's Great Plains Golf Estates
~~.~1"2r .~~t ~,~ l_~.r(1 ~;.1~lI{i~ 1~
LOCATION:
S8H9i" of ~otinty Road ~,~'q,o~~ Trail) and west, and '~st of' Highway lo.~
(Gteat Plams Boulevard)i'", ,,' b ,
,./
I', ,:1"
! ,/;
{:.'i /.vl.
);'1,' )
APPLICANT:
Donald' Halla
10095 Great Plains Blvd.
Chas.ka~MN 55318
~. . ..:'.~ '. . ..;,
Roger A. Anp~sbn: "I",.
7415 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 107 '
,'_" ":, , Minneapolis" MN : .55426
- j
,! ,-,'.,
t,~,
'~ \.' , I " !' , . / ')'"1 ' iJii ( ." .' .1 !
'-:;/-,
:)1;..,
;' .f ; '; r t, :. _ . ~
- d, "i~
':JI<" !'r '1-' " .... "';
:'W tA
,<.~ .1;
" 'i. i, . ",
PRESENT ZONING:
A2, Agricultural Estate
f; t.'
'1, tl'.. "
lilt; '1"-
I '1'-,"'q >i'lH.. 1. tnrl',,"
r;~; A .H /'lti )):1;; [Ii
u:
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
,.,r.' '~.i
"'-'.1. j , '''', "I,~
N . A2, Agricul.tUral"F;staU"and RR,RUral'Residctltlal
S - A2, Agricultural Estate
E - RR, Rural Residential
W - A2, Agricultural Estate
, j-..,.
,;.....:,.".....".,..
....." ""
COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN:
r '~:,~i..:J}U~~ ~n.
..
: :'Ol~f.nnol! ':
..."'. ;:! J" .
~. :.1')1
This site does not lie within the park service area of any city park. The closest acce~s to a park :i&r
approximately 3/4 miles to either Bandimere Park, or . ~ future access to. the Bluff Creek trail.
': ,( -; ,. ' ,',~:~ )Ilt,;'i' fl"~L..
COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN:
.
~
"'0:
,,' ".' j
The Comprehensive Trail Plan identifies future trails along both Pioneer Trail and Highway 101. B()~_ ,;
of these trails are becoming increasingly important as development continues to add new destinatio,n,:, ~
in this area of the city, i.e. new high school to be located on Pioneer Trail, trail connections to ~en,.: ,.
Prairie, and the new Hennepin Parks Southwest Regional Trail. ',<i~"
. .,
. '. "
: -:''';<:,t>:' )
"q '.. )
~.,>':'...
,;~:.c ill>.2U~ ~X&J
l(~.~~,JZ :ic'l
: .~ '"' ....,,'" ..........'f
Halla's Great Plains Golf Estates
July 26, 1994
Page 2
~
BACKGROUND
The easterly portion of this proposed plat+ the 30+ acres south of Pioneer Trail and east of
Highway 101, has been consitrered as possible parkland. Speci:fically~ the commission is
considering the 'merits of acqumng this'property for future development an athletic field complex.
A similar complex which comes to mind is Dred Scott Field in Bloomington. During the
commission's" search to identify future parJdands in Chanhassen, this comer was identified as one
possible location for ballfield use. The Park Acquisition and Development budget; however, does
not allow the commission to court every owner of property the city would like to acquire. We
are more often than not forced to playa waiting game, trying to outlast development, while
acquiring property in a prioritized fashion. Once again the commission is faced with these
circumstances. Mr. Halla has shown his interest in developing his property by f1ling a
preliminary plat with the city. We have two alternatives, allow the plat to be processed or
initiate negotiations to acquire the property.
RECOMMENDATION
The Park and Recreation Commission will be meeting to discuss, among other things. the
potential of a future open space referendum on August 9, 1994. It is recommended that the
commission table this item until that evening allowing sufficient opportunity for commission
members to review the 7uences of their actions.
UPDATE (8-4..94) 711
.
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend approval of the Halla
Great Plains Golf Estates. This approval will be subject to conditions of approval in regard to
parks and trails which will be mailed under separate cover.
."1>"" .
.