1992 07 28 Agenda
.
e
e
#
AGENDA
PARK AND RECREA nON COMMISSION
TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 690 COULTER DRNE
CALL TO ORDER - 7:30 P.M.
1. Approval of June 23, 1992 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes.
2. Mosquito Control in Lake Ann Park and Lake Susan Park.
3.
Land Development Proposal Review
Oak Ponds, A Rental Community
Oak Hill, A "For Sale" Community
Oaks Community Development
Lotus Realty
470 W 78th Street
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Arvid Elness Architects, Inc.
400 Thresher Square Building
708 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
4. Distribution of the City of Chanhassen Park Inventory, Revised, April 1992.
5.
Second Quarter Park and Trail Fee Revenue Report, ending June 30, 1992.
6. 1992 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program Budget
Amendment, Athletic Field Irrigation - Lake Ann Park.
7. 1993 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program.
8. 1992 4th of July Celebration Evaluation.
9. Commission Member Presentations.
10. Administrative Section and Presentations.
e
e
e
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN
~
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
~
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
July 22, 1992
SUBJ:
Mosquito Control in Lake Ann and Lake Susan Parks
This item was reviewed by the commission on June 23, 1992. Official action taken that evening
was to table this item for further review on July 28, 1992. On the evening of June 23, the
commission heard from representatives of the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD);
Eric Rivkin, resident of Chanhassen; Harold Trende, Carver County Commissioner; AI
Klingelhutz, Carver County Commissioner; and other members of the audience. Information
disseminated that evening was extensive, touching on many issues surrounding mosquito control
and the activities of the MMCD. It is important for the commission to understand that they have
not been asked to judge all activities of the MMCD. The only conclusion that needs to be
reached is whether mosquito control activities should be carried out in city parks. MMCD has
indicated, by designation on a city base map, that Lake Ann and Lake Susan Parks are the only
two parks in Chanhassen in which they have carried out control activities. As such, discussion
is centered on these locations. However, any recommendations made should be applicable to all
city park properties.
NEW INFORMATION
A myriad of additional publications and news articles relating to mosquito control were received
at commission meeting on June 23, with more being received since that time. A news article
which appeared on the front page of the Star Tribune on Monday, July 13 is also attached for
your review. For ease of review, this information has been arranged as follows:
General Mosquito Control and MMCD Information
1.
2.
3.
Metro Mosquito News, Summer 1992
MMCD Program Activities, 1992
Chronological Review of the Environmental Impact Research sponsored by the
MMCD,1985
ft
~ ~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 2
4. Letter from Calvin Blanchard, Pesticide Registration Supervisor, MN Dept. of
Agriculture, June 2, 1992
5. Letter from Lee Wood, Pesticide Registration Secretary, MN Dept. of Agriculture, June
23, 1992
6. MMCD Specifications for 150 gallons Permethrin 57% Oil Soluble Insecticide
7. Letter from Raymond Thron, PhD, PE, Director of Environmental Health, Minnesota
Department of Health, and attachments dated March 16, 1992. .
Other Attachments
1. "Mosquito Control District Stung by Critics", Star Tribune, July 13, 1992
1. Letter from Eric Rivkin, 1695 Steller Court
2. Parks or Municipalities Restriction of Mosquito Control List dated June 22, 1992
3. "Letter to Editor", Star Tribune, July 2, 1992
4. "A Natural Alternative Offered for Mosquito Control", Georgetown Record, March 12,
1992
5. "Letter to Editor", St. Paul Pioneer Press
6. "Minnesota's State Bird: More than a Pest", Minnesota Suburban Newspapers, May 12,
1986
7. "Metropolitan Mosquito Control District Agrees to Pay $1,000 for Improper Spraying at
Lake Ann Park", Chanhassen Villager, Thursday, March 19, 1992
8. "Why Should There be a Law to Prevent Unwanted Exposure to Mosquito Control
Pesticides", Sierra Club, Northstar Chapter, Minnesota Herbicides Coalition, Minnesota
Audubon Council, Isacc Walton League, Minnesota Division, Human Ecology Action
League, March 2, 1991
9. "Mosquito District Admits to Spraying Near Lake, Bills Aimed to Change District's
Operations", Sailor Newspaper, March 25, 1992
10. "Clearing the Air: Facts About Mosquitos, Pesticides and Taxes", The Isacc Walton
League of America, Northstar Chapter, Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Minnesota
Audubon Council
11. "Bats: Why Help Bats?", Bat Conservation International, P.O. Box 162603, Austin,
Texas, 78716-2603
12. "Pesticide Poisoning Surveillance Through Regional Poison Control Centers", Debra K.
Olson, RN, MPH; Lynn Sax, Paul Gunderson, PhD; and Leo Sioris, Fharm D, June 1991
13. Materials Safety Data Sheet for Exxon Aromatic 100 Containing Xylene Range Aromatic
Hydrocarbons Used in Punt 57-OS Insecticide, November 7, 1988.
14. "Toxicology and Environmental Fate of Synthetic Pyrethroids", Journal of Pesticide
Reform, Fall, 1990
15. Average 80s Aedesvexans/Night + Rainfall
16. Letter from Sandra Ives, Board of Animal Health, State of Minnesota, dated June 30,
1992
e
e
e
e
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 3
FAILURE TO NOTIFY CITY OF TREATMENT
e
Over the past six to eight months, many discussions, in person and over the phone, with Ross
Green and other employees of the MMCD have heightened the awareness of mosquito control
concerns in Chanhassen. Throughout these discussions, a clear understanding by all parties as
to the top priority before treatment was carried out was reached. This priority was that the City
of Chanhassen through either myself or the Park and Recreation Department would be notified
prior to any treatment being completed. This agreement was confIrmed in Mr. Green's
presentation to the commission on June 23 (page 29 of the June 23 minutes, 7th paragraph; and
again on page 61, 11 th and 13th paragraphs). During the week of July 13, 1992, the MMCD did
treat Lake Ann Park with the chemical punt without notifying the city. In a phone conversation
with Mr. Ernie Weimerskirchen, Scott and Carver County Supervisor, on July 20, 1992, Mr.
Weimerskirchen stated that Mr. Ross Green, Public Information Coordinator for the MMCD had
informed the Scott and Carver County crew that the aedes triseriatus mosquito level in Lake Ann
Park was high, and that treatment should occur. Mr. Weimerskirchen said that this treatment
occurred on either June 13 or 14. I called Ross Green yesterday (July 21) to inquire whether his
understanding of the failure of notification was the same as mine. Mr. Green stated that the
problem was internal, acknowledged that notifIcation was not given to the city, and contrary to
Mr. Weimerskirchen's statements, stated that as Information OffIcer he did not give direct
authorization for treatment. Mr. Green also discussed the possibility that there may have been
confusion in that this treatment was targeting the aedes triseriatus mosquito, not the nuisance
mosquito; but he also confIrmed that this is irrelevant as the treatment methods and chemicals
used are the same in either case.
RECOMMENDATION
It is widely recognizable that the issues and information surrounding mosquito control are
complex. However, there are no expectations being placed on the commission to ~ome
mosquito control "experts." Such expectations would be unreasonable. However, the Park and
Recreation Commission is the goveming body which makes recommendations to the City Council
on all issues relating to the operations of the city parks. These recommendations include what
capital improvements to pursue, specifIc ordinances and rules to be enacted, etc., and now
whether mosquito control activities should take place in parks. I have elected to provide the
commission a staff recommendation which provides options for the commission to choose from
or disregard in favor of a different recommendation.
In Regard to Larval Control Briauettes
Option 1:
Eliminate their use.
Option 2:
Allow their use to continue providing notification of the treatment areas and times
are provided.
e
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 4
In Regard to Adult MOSQuito Control Chemicals (Cold Fogging)
Option 1:
Eliminate their use.
Option 2:
Eliminate their use for a one year probationary period (the remainder of 1992 and
1993), re-evaluating the control program in the fall of 1993.
Option 3:
Allow their use to continue, providing notification of the treatment areas and times
are provided.
In Regard to the Landing, Take-off, and Loading of an MMCD HeliCOPter or the Mixing of High
Volumes of Control Chemicals at Lake Ann Park or other City Parks
It is recommended that this practice be prohibited.
A IT ACHMENTS
As listed previously
Copy of June 23, 1992, Report Entitled: "Presentations on Mosquito Control
A. Eric Rivkin, Resident
B. Ross Green, MMCD"
e
e
e
Metro
. MOSQUITO
News
Vol. 3 No. 1
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
Summer, 1992
Who "They" Are And What "They" Do
-The Mosquito. Minnesota's State Bird" surface of water; others where the eggs will
proclaim an array of T-shirts worn by some, no eventually: be flooded, such as in the moist earth of
aoubt, itchy people. In reality.t there is probably no shallow depressions, or in tree holes or their
place on earth you could live, trom the tropics to the modern eqUIvalents of discarded tin cans and tires.
arctic, where you wouldn't have to deal with Some have many generations a year, others only
mosquitoes. Across the globe, a few essential things one. Some fly for miles after emergIng from the
are true for all of them. They all need water - still, water, others only: a matter of feet. Some p-refer to
not flowing - for their eggs to hatch and larvae to bite only birds, others only reptiles or amphibians,
develop. Dilly the females bite, and that blood meal others only certain mammals, and others (believe it
is necessary to produce eggs, but flower nectar, not or not) only certain mammals noses.
your blood, is tlieir primary food source. In a sense, Thou~h at times it may be hard to believe, not all
these are the things that make a mosquito a those dIfferent species live in your neighborhood. In
mosquito. fact, o~ly about 50 can be found in the metro area,
Well over 3,400 different species exist worldwide, and MMCD is concerned with only about 15 of
a with more discovered every year. Each species lays those. Only the species that transmit disease or are
. its eggs only in very specific locations: some on the significant human biters are targeted by MMCD.
Who We Are And What We Do
MMCD was established by the State Legislature
in 1958 to control mosquitoes and that is still
our primary task. The emp-hasis of the program is
on larval control, controlling mosquitoes before
they fly from the water as adults. Two
environmentally safe biological control
materials are used for this. Methoprene is a
mimic of a juvenile insect growth hormone. Its
presence in breeding site water, even in minute
amounts, "confuses" the mosquito larvae and keeps
them from ever becoming adults. Bacillus
thuriengensis israelensis (Bti), is a naturally
occurring soil bacteria that kills mosquito larvae
when they feed on it.
At the height of the mosquito season, MMCD also
does some spraying for adults using permethrin
and resmethrinhwhich are related to an Mrican
flower extract wit insecticidal properties.
MMCD was asked to control black flies in
1984. These biting gnats breed in flowing water. As
ppllution in the metro area's streams and rivers has
slowly been cleaned up-, the black fly populations
have been expanding. A.s with mosquitoes, control
efforts are directed at the larvae in the water. Bti,
the same soil bacteria used a~st mosquitoes, is
used to control black flies. MMCD has s~nt a lot of
time and money in a DNR mandated study to
define any environmental impacts of this control.
MMCD was re~ested by the ~gislature in 1989
to begin work on ~e disease. The first step was
to determine the distribution across the metro area
of the deer tick that transmits this disease. MMCD
is now working with the University of Minnesota to
determine the local range and prevalence of the
. disease causin~ bacteria carried by the tick. With
this information the Minnesota Dej>artment of
Health will then be able to rank the Lyme disease
risk throughout the metro area.
And Something You Can Do
a Aedes triseriatus is the mosquito responsible for eI!gaged in the cleanup and disPQsal of waste tires.
. transmitting LaCrosse encephalitis, a serious Removing and properly dis osing of any
viral disease in children. Old aiscarded tires, tin discarded tires, cans, and otIher artificial
cans, and any other refuse capable of holding small breeding sites in your neighborhood, is an
amounts of water, are major breedin~ sites of this effective way you can help limit the numbers
mosquito. For that reason1 MMCD and the of this potentially dangerous mosquito.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency are actively
When You See Us In The Field....
As a government agency charged with controlling
mosquitoes, MMCD has an obligation to do so as
efficIently, effectively, and safely as possible.
Deciding how to use limited resources to best
accom:plish this is one of the most difficult asj>ects
of the Job. Available time, personnel, and funds are
not sufficient to treat the nearly 60,000 metro area
mosquito breeding sites every time it rains.
Therefore, to always insure optimal use of
resources, we rank the mosquito productivity of
breeding sites and treat the most productive ones
first. We also use a timed-release technology that
allows us to treat many of them only once a year
Early in the spring, field personnel apply
methoprene briquets to breeding sites of three
acres or less. These briquets last all season,
releasing methoprene into tbe water whenever the
sites are wet. A site must be able to retain water
for a week or two after a rain to give the mosquito
larvae enough time to develop once the eggs hatch.
After heavy rains in the spring and summer,
helicopters treat breeding sites larger than 3
acres. They spread ground up corncobs that have
been coated with Bti. It must be reapplied soon
after every rain of an inch or more, the amount of
rainfall needed to hatch another brood of eggs.
Methoprene pellets are also being applied by
helicopter this year on a trial basis. These pellets
can be applied before the rain rather than only in
the few days after it, which is an advantage.
If large numbers of mosquitoes do emerge from
breeding sites, limited spraying for mosquitoes
flying in and around park and recreation
areas may take place. Park and recreation staffs
work with MMCD to determine when and where
these treatments are appropriate. When j>ossible .
they are timed to precede holidays, special events,.
or community festivals. .
Permethrm is sprayed along the edges of woods
and other vegetation in the parks; under ideal
conditions its control effects can last up to 2 weeks.
Mosquitoes come into contact with it when they
begin to move out of the vegetation. Notices are
posted at the entrances or along the perimeters
while field personnel are working In a park.
Spraying in the parks is done with small baclt pack
or hand held units during the day.
Mter dark, resmethrin may be sprayed from
truck mounted coldfoggers in areas around the
parks. It has no residual effects; the mosquitoes are
killed only when they come into contact with the
resmethrin fog. Call 491.2850 anytime for
information detailing when and where this
coldfogging will be taking place.
Black fir" treatments are made throughout the
summer i stream and river levels remain high
enough to produce larvae. To monitor this, field
personnel do extensive larval samplin~ in area
streams and rivers, making treatments WIth liquid
Bti when necessary. They are also studying the
effects of the treatments on nontarget organisms.
Quality assurance personnel monitor all these
operations. Through frequent field inspections, they
make sure that correct operational procedures are
followed and all materials are properly applied and
are performing according to specificatIons. Thisa
helps guarantee the most effiCIent, cost effective,.
and environmentally safe control possible.
A Deer Tick/Lyme Disease Reminder
Lyme disease is transmitted by deer ticks commonly found personal protection measures
whIch are much smaller than the common wood are the Dest defense against Lyme disease. Wear
tick. May to July is the peak of the deer tick season, long pants and tuck th.em into your socks or boots.
but they can be found into October. When out in the Apply an insect and tick repellant containing
wooded and brushy areas where deer ticks are most permethrin to your clothes, not your skin.
MetroDolitan MOSQuito Control District
Director Dr. Robert Sjogren
Aecks Program Manager Dr. Susan Palchick
Metro Mosquito News
2380 Wycliff Street
St. Paul, MN 55114
Editors: Dr. S. Pal chick, P. Heller
Bulk Rate
U.S. Postage
PAID
St. Paul, MN
Permit No. 6809
RECEIVED
e
e
e
METROPOLITAN MOSOUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES. 1992
PROGRAM: Floodwater Aedes Mosauito Control
Summary:
The floodwater Aedes mosquito control program suppresses long lived spring snow melt and rain
Aedes species and the prominent summer pest mosquito, Aedes vexans, to reduce annoyance from
these mosquitoes. Emphasis is on control of mosquito larvae. Localized adult mosquito control is
conducted to reduce mosquito annoyance for public events on request Western Equine
Encephalitis mosquito, Culex tarsalis, levels and horse encephalitis cases are monitored to assess
disease transmission risk and need for control measures.
Goals:
1. To rank and apply control treatments to mosquito breeding sites producing the greatest number
of mosquitoes.
2. To conduct adult mosquito control treatments for public events upon request To begin the
exploration of target specific means of controlling adult mosquitoes, such as the use of
attractants to aggregate mosquitoes for localized control
Activity:
Larval control will continue mainly with Altosid briquets and Bti granules. Evaluations of more
cost effective formulations will continue including Altosid liquid, Altosid pellets, Altosid sand
granules. Adult control will use permethrin and resmethrin products.
The A edes program will operate similar to 1991. There will be continued emphasis on achieving
larval control on the most productive sites in the MMCD, (i.e. reach the borders with larval
control). This requires improved control strategies and associated data bases to achieve the
greatest possible control of Aedes mosquitoes in the metropolitan region. Approaches being
considered include:
. Use of higher thresholds in the core area or higher thresholds in the core and even higher in the
outer area. We need to develop a dynamic system for establishing treatment thresholds
throughout the season to reflect changes in site characteristics.
· Reduce the total area of the sites being treated. If the lowest portion of a mosquito breeding site
does not breed up to the threshold level, then there is no reason to treat the portion of the site
which is not breeding.
Investigations will begin on low tech ways to use adult mosquito attractant principles in the field
program operations. Work is continuing on the geographical information system to integrate
mosquito and breeding site data from District records with cartographic data available for wetlands
and other areas.
PROGRAM: Cattail Mosquito
Summary:
The Cattail Program controls the District's most aggressive biting mosquito Coquillettida
penwbans, which develops in cattail marshes throughout the District Coq. pertW'bans mosquitoes
develop over a twelve month period and become adult mosquitoes duri..ng the months of June and
July.
Goals: .
1. To provide control of the most productive breeding sites areas near population centers, due to
the 3-5 mile flight range of the mosquito.
2. To evaluate alternative control formulations are underway to determine the most cost effective
approach.
3. To continue water level management studies to assess the impact of the 1987-89 drought and
draw down and of habitat return for this species.
Activity: ,
Returning water levels in marshes throughout the metro region increased the breeding grounds for
this mosquito in 1991. The program inspects all potential cattail breeding sites in the area served
by the Aedes program and treats sites supporting significant larval populations of Coq. perturbans
mosquitoes.
Crews inspect possible cattail marshes from mid-August to the end of November. Control
applications are made from mid-February through May to sites found breeding in surveys the
previous Fall. During the summer months (June-August), the program monitors efficacy of
treatments and Coq. perturbans populations within the District
PROGRAJ\.f: LaCrosse Encephalitis Prevention
Summary:
The LaCrosse Encephalitis Prevention Program is directed at reducing the number of human cases
of LaCrosse encephalitis within the District
Goals:
1. To rank the relative risk of LaCrosse encephalitis across the District
2. To achieve effective control of the LaCrosse vector Aedes triseriatus, through public information
and removal of breeding sites.
3. To conduct an effective Aedes albopictus (tiger mosquito) surveillance program.
Activity:
The program will continue to assess the risk of LaCrosse encephalitis by sampling wooded areas
across the District with a focused concentration in southern Hennepin County. All past LaCrosse a
encephalitis case location areas will continue to be monitored. ..
An extensive public education program, designed to lower disease risk by increasing public
awareness to the disease and its prevention, will continue to be emphasized.
The program will continue to work closely with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to
stimulate clean-up of waste tire piles found in the District Waste tire piles provide breeding areas
for both Ae.triseriarus and Ae. albopictus.
Surveillance for the Asian tiger mosquito (Ae. albopictus) will continue, as will efforts to make
sure the mosquito has been eliminated at the Scott County tire site (Savage) where they were found
in 1991. This was the :fIrst record of Ae. albopictus in Minnesota.
PROGRAJ\.f: Lyme Tick Surveillance
Summary:
The Lyme Tick Surveillance Program conducts field monitoring work to determine the distribution
of the deer tick and the bacterial causal agent of Lyme disease within the seven county metropolitan
area.
Goals:
1. To map the distribution and relative abundance .of deer ticks (Ixodes dammilU) within the
District
2. To map the distribution of the disease agent (Borrelia burgdorfen) within the District
3. To document changes in deer tick and Borrelia distribution.
e
e
e
e
e
Activity:
In 1992 the program will continue to determine the range and any changes in distribution of deer
ticks in the District As in 1990 and 1991, field work will include a survey of deer ticks' small
mammal hosts (white-footed mice). The program may conduct limited drag cloth sampling (to
catch host-seeking deer ticks), and examine road-killed mammallO for deer ticks.
The program will also continue to investigate the distribution and prevalence of the Lyme disease
agent (Borrelia burgdoifen). All nymph and adult deer ticks collected will be analyzed for the
spirochetes. In addition, the program will be making arrangements to test many of the mice
collected for the spirochetes.
PROGRAM: Black Fly Prowam
Summary:
The black fly or biting gnat control program suppresses biting gnats which develop in rivers and
streams around the metro area. Monitoring and treatment of stretches of the rivers with the
selective control material Bri, an EPA registered soil bacteria. Intensive environmental impact
studies compose half of the cost of the program.
Goals:
1. To monitor larval and adult biting gnat species in and adjacent to the metro area. To conelate
immature population thresholds whi~h reflect the need for control treatments.
2. To control biting gnat species that breed in small streams in the spring. To control repeated
gnats broods which develop every 10 to 14 days in large rivers in the metro area from May
through September.
3. To complete the 5th year of environmental impact studies in the Mississippi River, and the third
year of studies to determine the treatment effects of Bd on secondary insect production. A study
of the toxicity of Bti to mussels has been contracted with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Activity:
In 1990 a three year small stream plan was developed in collaboration with the MDNR. This plan
is detailed in the 1990 permit Bri treatments will be made for control of Simuliwn venurtum
during April and early May. Breeding site survey work will be done in March and April.
In 1990, a three year plan for the large river non-target studies was developed with the MDNR.
This plan is detailed in the 1990 permit application. Bd will be applied to the known breeding sites
on the large rivers as needed in 1992. The larval treatment thresholds that were established a priori
in 1990 will be reviewed this winter and revised if necessa.ry. The third ~d final year of the three
year expanded non-target impact study on the Mississippi River will continue in 1992.
The operational feasibility of spot treating snag and grassy habitats on the Minnesota River will be
evaluated using reduced Bd dosages. A operational boat-based slurry system for applying Bd in
the Minnesota River will be developed to achieve better Bd mixing with the river to improve
downstream carry and control.
PROGRAM: Duality Assurance
Summary:
The Quality Assurance Program establishes standards, tolerances of quality and monitors the
quality of field control applications in the Aedes, Cattail, Black Fly, and LaCrosse-Lyme
Programs.
Goals:
1. To assess field control material and application effectiveness.
2. Monitor control materials for percentage of active ingredient at manufacture and after long term
field exposure.
3. Develop QA methodology for the Cattail, Black Fly, and LaCrosse-Lyme programs.
4. To coordinate the revision of section map standards and the review of section maps that are
updated in the fall/winter.
Activity:
The program will continue to assess the effectiveness of field control materials and applications.
This is achieved by training staff in QA principles, developing measurements of quality,
establishing standards and tolerances of quality, and recommending methods to improve quality.
Methodology is developed for in-house measurement against standards and continuous
improvement toward achieving program goals. To date, briquet and granule application quality
measurements, standards, and tolerances have been developed.
e
PROGRAM: Pro~ram Development
Summary:
The District is committed to data based decision making. Where published scientific literature does
not exist, and information is needed to make operational decisions which have significant cost
ramifications, Program Development staff conduct studies to cbta1, u'lc jh~a.7 research data to
make field program decisions.
Goals:
1. To provide basic information needed to improve the effectiveness of the Aedes control program.
2. To develop baseline information needed to associate public perception studies of mosquito
annoyance with measurements of mosquito numbers.
3. To develop methods and tools to suppon operating division treatment decisions for specific
floodwater Aedes mosquito breeding sites.
Activity: e
Improve understanding of factors contributing to mosquito annoyance (e.g., duration of exposure,
time of day, number of days) to refine District goals. Work this year will begin small-scale
interview or survey projects to test approaches, with concurrent mosquito sampling, and will
continue in the following year as needed. Publication will be completed on previous related work.
Continue development of adult mosquito sampling methods that measure how well the District is
meeting its goals. Evaluate trap designs, trap locations, and geostatistical analysis of trap results.
Finish biological modeling projects and present forreview1i.nd-publication. USCTesults to test
possible control strategies (in conjunction with Director, Aedes Program Manager, Control
Strategies Committee, and other staff). Determine information needs on environmental factors
(temperature, rainfall, water depth) to support strategic decisions.
Improve field larval forecasting model and update division staff on use. Discuss other decision
support needs with field personnel for future work. Continue evaluation of larval and egg sampling
methods and appropriate uses for sampling information.
PROGRAJ\f: Lon~.term Studies!SPRP
Summary:
The Commission resolved to allocate the statutory amount of 2.5% of the District's annual budget
to conduct studies to assess the environmental impact of control materials used by the MMCD.
Since 1986, this work is directed by an independent Scientific Peer Review Panel of scientists, and
conducted under external research contracts, assisted part time by an administrator.
e
e
e
e
Goals:
1. To identify impacts of the District control program on invertebrate aquatic organisms via studies
began in 1987.
Activity:
The Scientific Peer Review Panel (SPRP) anticipates completing an interim report on the studies
completed to date by late fall of 1992. This report will be forwarded to the Minnesota
Environmental Quality Board for their review. Ongoing studies will be conducted as need for
same is determined by the SPRP.
PROGRAM: Administration
Summary:
The District administration serves the Commission by recommending program directio~ and
suggesting policy alternatives. Once the Board sets program direction, administration works with
each Program Leader to establish goals and annual objectives. Employee participation leading to
group consensus is emphasized. Administrative role is that of inquiry to understand staff
recommendations, reaching agreement on direction, and serving line staff by facilitating operating
program to maximize program effectiveness.
Goals:
1. To provide Commission administrative support and follow through to accomplish the Board
policy and program objectives.
2. To identify and implement immediate and long range goals with staff program leadership to
achieve the program mission.
3. To provide logistic support to field staff responsible for accomplishing program goals.
4. To disseminate program information to the public through the media, public presentations and
classroom presentations.
5. To maintain internal controls on fmancing procedures, integrate legislated Targeted Group
Businesses purchasing requirements, and ensure that contractors have approved AffIrmative
Action programs. To continue focus on compliance with the Affirmative Action goals and
related personnel matters.
Activity:
With the increasing amount of information necessary to guide MMCD operations, an on-line
management information system will provide timely information for decision making. The Data
Processing Manager will work with staff to design a system to provide the information needed for
cost effective operations.
The Capital Improvement Plan will continue to be a major focus in 1992. Staff will provide
necessary input during the construction of the new facilities. The major effort will involve
completion of the headquarters facility by late 1992, the completion of the Anoka field
headquarters, and project design and planning for construction of the Dakota field headquarters.
CHRONOLOGICAL REVIEW OF THE El\rvIRONMEl\"TAL ThfPACT RESEARCH e
SPONSORED BY THE METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO COl\"TROL DISTRICT (ItfMCD)
1985
,
May I, 1985 ~ The MJv1CD Technical Advisory Board (TAB) recommends to the MMCD
Commission to: a) update the 1977 EIS; b) fund long-term research at $100-200,000
per year to determine the effects of the program on the aquatic food chain.
August 1, 1985 - The MMCD Budget Committee recommended inclusion of $30,000 to update
the 1977 EIS, $150,000 for research on food chain impacts in 1986, and a commitment
to conduct long term research at a level of $200,000 per year for up to five years.
August I, 1985 - Lawsuit and petition to Environmental Quality Board (EQB) filed by
environmental groups.
September 13, 1985 - Environmental Quality Board Chair Triplett seeks the MMCD as a
responsible governmental unit to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact
statement (SEIS).
September 18, 1985 - At the request of the MMCD Chair, the MMCD negotiating team of
Attorney Opperman, John Genereux, and Director Sjogren begin meetings with plaintiff
attorney O'Neill to seek an out of conn settlement to the lawsuit It was resolved to
establish a Technical Advisory Committee (later renamed Scientific Peer Review Panel - e
SPRP) of independent qualified technical authorities to address environmental concerns
&ld permits environmental groups to appoint two representatives to the nine panel TAB
(SPRP).
September 19, 1985 - The MMCD Commission approves it 1986 budget to include $30,000
to update the 1977 ES,.and $150,000 for 1986 research on the impact of the program
on the .aquatic food chain.
September 30, 1985 - The MMCD receives a letter from the EQB naming the District as the
responsible -government .unit to :JJreparethe -supplemental EIS. This then begins the
process of requiring a EA W, Scoping Document, JlIld SEIS to be completed.
October 21, 1985 - Environmental Assessment WoIbheet (EAW) is completed and distributed
as per EQB requirements.
November 22, 1985 - EA W :Publie :Hearing is held .and comments are received
November 23 - December 20, 1985 --'MMCD -staff 1Works to provide Genereux with the data
.:and ~sists in developing 2'Csponses to EA W ..comments needed in preparing seoping
document
e
1
e
e
e
December 5t 1985 - The fIrst SPRP meeting to review environmental concerns and discuss
options for responses. MMCD staff is assigned to conduct literature searches and
distribute pertinent literature to SPRP members for evaluation in their respective areas
of expertise.
December 19, 1985 - The MMCD Commission approves $10,000 for SPRP expenses to obtain
expert council in each area of environmental concern.
December 23, 1985 - Scoping document is prepared and distributed as required by EQB.
1986
February 20, 1986 - Second SPRP meeting is held to discuss the validity of relevant literature
and focus on research methods which will be used to conduct field studies in areas of
concern not adequately addressed by the literature.
February 27, 1986 - Annual meeting of the MMCD Technical Advisory Board (TAB) meets
with two new members in attendance representing the plaintiff groups.
August 7, 1986 - The SPRP meets to review the preliminary draft and non-target sections of
the SEIS. The SPRP also reviews the protocol options for the lab elements and field
work to be done in the 1987 research.
September 18, 1986 - The MMCD Commission approves in its 1987 budget $200,000 to begin
long-term research studies on the effects of the District program on non-target species.
October 10, 1986 - The SPRP meets to discuss the Draft SEIS and to determine which of the
primary research needs to have the highest priority to accomplish within the
$200,OOO/year appropriation of research funds. The SPRP also begins to establish
research protocols to guide the ~riministration of the :field research contracts. The SPRP
sets research questions for Draft SEIS.
November 1986 - Draft SEIS is distributed to representatives of environmental groups, state
agencies, and other interested parties who submitted comments during the scoping
process.
November 7, 1986 - SPRP meets to define laboratory vS.1ield research requirements; identifies
key qualification criteria.
December 12, 1986 - Public hearing on the Draft SEIS is held .at.the Hennepin County
Government Center.
December 15t 1986 - Notices for Request for .Qualifications '(RFQ)'to interested parties and
research medias are mailed. The RFQ 'Will identify potential bidders ~d help define
Request for Proposals.
2
1987
e
January 12, 1987 - Deadline for 'written comments on the Draft SEIS.
January 12-20, 1987 - Proposal Committee of theSPRP reviews RFQ's.
January 22, 1987 - SPRP meets to review qualifications submitted.
January 26, 1987 - Comment period on Draft SElS ends.
February 18, 1987 - :MMCD mails Request for Proposals for 1987 Laboratory and Field
Studies to prospective bidders.
March 12, 1987 - Annual Meeting of the MMCD's Technical Advisory Board where a update
on long-term studies is discussed with TAB members.
March 25, 1987 - Deadline for Request for Proposals for research proposals.
April 6, 1987 - A five member selection committee of the SPRP meets and awards contractors
to begin 1987 Laboratory and Field studies. The five contractors are:
Laboraton' Research Contracts:
1. Unh'ersit~.. of Wisconsin-Superior; Larry Brooke (Principal Investigator)
- Research on the impacts of mosquito control materials on zooplankton a
(Daphnia pulex). .,
- Research on the exposure of control materials on frog and frog embryo-larval.
- Exposure to targeted and non-targeted species.
- Crayfish feeding study on chemically digested mosquito larvae.
Contract - (1987-1988) $24,648
2. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, (Canada); Oaude Fortin (Principal
Investigator)
- Research with Altosid briquet (Methoprene) on effects on two zooplankton
species; the cladoceran (Daphnia pulex), the copepod (Diaptomus sp.), and
the Imlphipod (Hyale/la azteca)
Contract - (1987-1988) $26,363
3. University of Quebec- Trois-Rivieres, Quebec (Om~da); Raymond LeClair (Principal
Investigators)
- Research on 1:Omplex feeding studies 'With three llpecies of ;amphibians, the
Leopard frog (Rana pipiens), American Toad (Bufo .mnericanus) and Chorus
frog (Rana pseudacris).
Contract - (1987-1989) $6,886
e
3
· The goals for the laboratory tests include the following:
e
A. Measurements of chronic toxicity of methoprene briquet to specific non- target,
aquatic amphibians and invertebrates including
· dose-response studies
· effects on life stages
· effects on reproduction
B. Measurements of chronic toxicity of methoprene briquet to specific non-target
aquatic invertebrates using methoprene formulations used by the :MMCD.
c. Measurements of acute toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis to specific
non-target animals.
Field Research Contracts
e
4. University of 1\finnesota-Duluth; Natural Resource Research Institute (1\1JUU)
Gerald Neimi (Principal Investigator)
- Red Wing Blackbird study/census on site treated and not treated in Wright
County
- Effects of zooplankton on sites treated with Altosid briquets (methoprene) and
Bn
- Three years of data on sites which have not received any mosquito control
treatments; samples for determining baseline effect have been developed so that
when control materials are applied they will be able to determine if there is
an impact
- In 1991, treatment began on the 2/3 of the sites which have been under study.
One-third of the site received Bn. com cob, another one third received Altosid
20 day sand treatment, and the final one third received no treatment and is set-
up as a control site. In 1992, treatment will continue in this pattern, with
continuous research on all of the sites.
- Divided pond studies on the effects of mosquito control materials on
zooplankton methoprene (Altosid) analysis from field waters taken from sites;
methods refinement in determining the presence in parts per billion
ContraCts (1987-1993) $886,283
5. Unh'ersit~' of Minnesota . St. Paul, MN; James Cooper (Principal Investigator)
- A study using ducklings "On divided ponds with segregate mothers to determine
if there is an 1:ffect on duckling ~wth. Divided ponds used a double blind
methoprene (Altosid) treatment A final published repon is still pending.
Contract (1987-1991) $68,703
Summer of 1987 - Field research projects begin -despite a:the drought which lasts into 1988.
September 17, 1987 - The MMCD Commission ~pproves in its 1988 budget $200,000 to
continue year two of long-term I'Csearch studies.
e
4
..
December 10\ 1987 - The MMCD submits the Final SEIS to the EQB. SEIS is distrib~ed
to representatives of environmental groups, state agencies, local libraries, and other
interested parties who submitted comments during the 'writing process.
e
December 10-11, 1987 - The SPRP meets to review the research plan and progress developed
from the 1987 research. Individual c;:ontractors give presentations on research that has
been completed.
1988
January 8, 1988 - RFP's for additional research on birds is issued and mailed to prospecQ.ve
bidders.
February 2'7, 1989 - The SPRP meets for discussion of 1987 results, and basic decisions for
198~ A contract is awarded to begin a new bird study in 1988.
6. Cbnege of St. Thomas. St. Paul, MN; Michael Dejong (Principal Investigator)
- A bird census study conducted in the metropolitan area to see if the control
materials used by the District impact the populations of songbirds in selected
wetlands. The study used both treated and untreated sites.
Contract (1988-1989) $45,665
In 1988, there are three contractors doing research (NRRI, Cooper, Dejong).
March 2, 1988 - Annual meeting of the MMCD's Technical Advisory Board where a update e
on long-term studies is discussed with TAB members.
September 198& - The MMCD Commission approves annual suppon for external research on
Don-tar~t organisms, and that this support should be 2.5% of the District's ann~
budget This allows the research to continue beyond the 5 year, $1,000,000 ca.P
originally set by the MMCD commission.
The MMCD Commission approves in its 1989 budget $214,000 to continue the long-
term research studies.
December 8-9, 1988 - The SPRP meets to discuss the research completed by the three
field contractors (NRRI, Cooper, Dejong). These contractors i:Ontinue -work into the
1989 season.
1989
January 1989 - Dr. Richard Anderson - Acting Chair for the SPRP -prepares a draft summ~
on the 1987 laboratOry studies completed to date.
February 14, 1989 - Annual meeting -of the -MMCO's Technical Advisory Board -where a
!Jpdate ori.long-term .studies is discussed with TAB members.
5
e
e
e
e
September 1989 - The MMCD Commission approves $250,000 for long-term studies research
in 1990.
1990
January 29-30, 1990 - The SPRP meet to discuss additional research for 1990.
The :t\'IRRl continues working on field and lab research. Dr. Cooper is instructed to
publish his duckling study work, and is funded for this project
February 13, 1990 - Annual meeting of the MM CD's Technical Advisory Board. where a
update on long-term studies is discussed with TAB members.
October 1990 - The MMCD Commission approves $250,000 for long-term studies research
in 1991.
October 30, 1990 - A joint meeting between the Scientific Peer Review Panel (SPRP) and the
Technical Advisory Board (TAB) meet to discuss what the research to date has
produced. Presentations from long-tenn studies contractors, as well as outside research
from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife service.
December 14, 1990 - The SPRP meets to discuss the 1990 :t\'IRRl research. The SPRP
discusses the l\'IRRl research, makes recommendations and direction for the research.
The SPRP funds the NRRJ to continue research into 1991.
1991
March 7, 1991 - Annual meeting of the MMCD's Technical Advisory Board where a update
on long-term studies is discussed with TAB members.
November 20, 1991 - The MMCD Commission approves $248,000 for long-term sOldies
research in 1992.
1992
January 25, 1992 - The SPRP meets to discuss the field work complete from NRRI Tesearch
in 1991. The SPRP discusses the NRRI research, makes recommendations and direction
for the research. The SPRP funds the NRRI to continue research into 1992.
It was also Tesolved that the SPRP will produce a interim Tepon on the ~search
completed to date. This repon would we written by the authors of the SEIS
(Genereux) .and is ~xpected 10 be completed in Late Fall of 1992. This Tepon 'Would
be review by SPRP members before distribution.
It was also discuss the possibility of the" SPRP jook into the effects of the District
.ad.ulticiding program.
6
~
March 6, 1992 - Annual meeting of the MMCD's Technical Advisory Board where a update a
on long-term studies is discussed with TAB members. It was also recommended that .,
the SPRP and the TAB meet again to be receive a update.
SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW PANEL MEMBERS
.Dr. Richard Anderson - Research Entomologist, U.S. Environmental Research Laboratory,
United States Environmental Protection Agency - Duluth, MN
· Dr. Judy Helgen - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul
· Dr. Stuart Hurlburt - Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
· Dr. Roger Moon - Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN
· Dr. Robert Naiman - Center for Streamside Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, W A
· Dr. William Schmid - Department of Ecology and Behavioral Biology, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
· Dr. Ken Simmons - Entomology, Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, University of
Massachusens, Amherst, MA
· Dr. Keith Solomon - Associate Director, Education; Canadian Centre for Toxicology,
Guelph, Ontario
e
· Dr. Harrison Tordoff - Department of Ecology and Behavioral Biology, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis
· Dr. Michael Zicus - Waterfowl Research Group, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
Bemidji, MN
7
e
e
e
e
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
(612) 297-2530
June 2, 1992
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
2380 Wycliff Street
St. Paul, MN 55114
~1 g910ji 7;;>_
<,'0 . , :.
t'< ,.,:..
~ )'"
r-/ \r ~ ~ \
... ~ ~.~~
I ~ ~...>~,., -
.0:-:. ~~ ~;........
,r, ~ ~. ,_
\ c ~ " ;-''-'
\t;.: c::~.J'.....-.;.)
\c~_ ":.'"
'"t.>.
- J'#,
Attn: John Thompson
Dear Mr. Thompson:
I am writing in response to Susan Palchick's letter of April 6, 1992 and your letter of May
27, 1992. I contacted Howard Krosch of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
concerning their part in the issues involved. I understand they have no objections to your
interpretation.
I reviewed both the Scourge, EP A Reg. No. 432-716, and Punt 57-OS, EP A Reg. No.
42737-1, labels. I have determined your intended use is consistent with label use directions.
If you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me.
ae(~~O
Calvin E. Blanchard
Pesticide Registration Supervisor
Agronomy Services Division
CEB:lw
cc: Mike Fresvik, MDA
Heidi Fisher, MDA
Howard Krosch, DNR
. 90 West Plato Boulevard · Saint Paul, Minnesota 55107-2094 · (612) 297-2200 · Fax (612) 297-5522 ·
HI equaJ opportunity ~
1t~ .9R!
METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
e
I I
~).< Co< ri
r ~.
I.. :"\)~ ~
'--1 '-\
___. f _.-:-. "-
" ...
I
23EO WYCLIFF STREET ~ ST. PAUL, r.mmESOTA 55114 I 612.E4:-2i~~
Ft.>: 612-6~E<,~.':
L-~
A.D. SJOGREN, Ph.D.
Diret1ay 27, 1992
w.J. CAESAR
Business Admin.
Cal Blanchard
Agronomy Services Division
Minnesota Deparnnent of Agriculture
90 W. Plato Blvd.
St Paul, MN 55107
Dear Cal:
I am re-submitting Susan Palchicks's letter of April 6, 1992 as the official
:MMCD interpretation of label instructions for the use of Scourge and Punt in adult
mosquito control operations.
Thanks
Sincerely,
ope
e
John Thompson
Data Processing Mgr.
cc: R.D. Sjogren, Susan Palchick
e
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
"
e
METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
2380 WYCLIFF STREET ~ ST. Pt..UL, l.mmESOTA 55"4 a 6'2-645-9'49
FAX 612-645-3246
A.D. SJOGREN, Ph.D.
Director
Cal Blanchard
Agronomy Services Division
Minnesota Deparnnent of Agriculture
90 W. Plato Blvd.
S1. Paul, MN 55107
W.J. CAESAR
Business Admin.
May 27, 1992
Dear Cal:
Thank you again for attending our training session in February. Your expertise was quite
helpful in sorting out the issues concerning the use of the adult mosquito control materials
Scourge* Insecticide with SBP-1382/Piperonyl butoxide 4% + 12% (EPA Reg. No. 432-
716) and PUNT 57-OS'" (BPA Reg. No. 42737-1). Based on the information presented we
have compiled our understanding of some of the label wording.
e
As we have discussed, the District uses PUNT'" (permethrin) to treat adult mosquitoes in
known daytime resting or harborage areas. The District applies PUNT'" as a barrier
treatment to the vegetation on the perimeter of these daytime resting areas. Harborage
areas are generally defmed as wooded areas with good ground cover to provide a shaded,
moist area for the mosquito to rest during the daylight areas, but may include other
vegetation that provides the same refuge for mosquitoes.
SCOURGE* (resmethrin) is used by the District to treat adult mosquitoes in known areas
of concentration or nuisance. It is applied from truck mounted Ultra Low Volume (ULV)
machines which produce a fog which contacts the mosquitoes when they are flying. UL V
applications are done either in early morning or at dusk and into the evening when
mosquitoes become more active.
SCOURGE*
LABEL WORDING: Under Environmental hazards, the label states 'Do not apply to
lakes, streams, or ponds." Under Ultra Low Volume Applications, it states "Spray
..swamps, tidal marshes, residential areas...A void direct application over lakes, ponds and
streams. "
e
MMCD INfERPRETATION: MMCD interprets "lakes and streams" to be the same as
"fish bearing waters" on other labels. We follow the interpretation of the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources in that a fish bearing water is defined as having gamefish
or panfish. This definition of "fish bearing water" was developed through joint discussions
of the MDNR with the Department of Agriculture and Division of Fisheries.
A "swamp" would be a body of temporary water including those falling under our wetland
classification types 1, 2, 3, 4.1, and 4.2 (illustration and definition enclosed). A "pond"
would be a permanent water site and would include those falling under our wetland
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
classifications type 4.3, 4.4, and 5.
MMCD would therefore not apply SCOURGE~ to any fish bearing waters and would avoid
direct application over fish bearing waters as well as any permanent water sites where the a
open water might be impacted by treatment. .,
As there is no distance restriction to stay away from bodies of water, MMCD interprets the
label to say that if the wind is blowing towards the east yet there is a wetland on the
west, then the spray can be directed towards the east if there are no lakes, ponds or
streams to the east.
LABEL WORDING: Under precautionary statements it says, A void breathing vapor or
spray mist. Avoid contact with skin, eyes, or clothing.
MMCD INTERPRETATION: It is our understanding that this precaution is primarily
intended for the applicator's safety, however we have taken the following additional
precautions. The spray apparatus is turned off when pedestrians or other people are
outside and visible. They are restarted when out of the reach of direct application to
pedestrians or other people. Fogging is only done when recommended wind is present (2-
8 mph) so the material moves through the treatment area appropriately.
PUl'TT'"
LABEL WORDING: Under Environmental hazards, the PUNT'" label states 'Do not
apply to any body of water or wetlands (swamps, bogs, marshes and potholes)." Under
Where to Use it states "Under no conditions should open water be treated with this
product. Not to be used within 100 ft. of lakes and streams."
MMCD INTERPRETATION: Again, MMCD interprets the definition of "lakes and e
streams" to be fish bearing waters. PUNT"" is applied to the foliage, usually as a barrier
treatment We have extended the 100 ft. barrier to 150 ft to ensure compliance with the
label. We assume that we can treat the vegetation within 100 ft (150 with our increased
barrier) of wetlands, other than lakes and streams, as long as the wetland itself is not
treated.
The PUNT'" label describes use with "UL V portable backpack equipment ... to deliver
UL V particles of SO to 100 microns mass median diameter" and use with "truck mounted
non-thermal UL V equipment ... to deliver spray particles of 8 to 20 microns mass medi~
diameter." We have a hand held ULV machine that delivers particles of true ULV size
(90% of particles are less than 15 microns); we assume that this can be used with the
PUNT"" .
These are the understandings with which we are going into the 1992 field season. Adult
mosquito control operations begin in the last week of May; please let us know as soon as
possible if our interpretations are incorrect Thank you.
Sincerely,
Susan Palchick, Ph.D.
Aedes Program Manager
e
JL".. 23.1992 01: 17Pf1 FROr1
TO 96453246
P.01
e
.;.:tfjj~~~1:"
f#t?~.~;"""f!i.o...
'~ 1:.)
I :__.!Fo
.'. 1:: I,
\ .)...."
. ..
:'. ,....',
r~.H"'.;" ......
"'.:.,~~",,"
Minnesota De}!..artmcnt of Agric}lIture
(612) 297-7083
1une 23, 1992
Post-It... brand fall IrC\nsmittal memo 7671 'of pag... I
To r:::>CI.,., Ber.../c.k... Frem ., ~ 0&1
Co. . Vl n') C. 0 Co. V'h iJ tJ
Depl. Phona - :>1/- 7 r..J j 3
Fu N , '-1-5 _ $ ~ '-I (. F.. , ~ C) ? -;). ~ II
;..'L-'l"'.ti~~...i...lt.:":!"'-i.;!;~'~~.r ~ .~ ~~t:,'."';,;.~' ...!.-~,~ _""~.,<"l i,....,.-':.i~"""~..~-,.t....~~~~~N'
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
2380 Wycliff Street
St. Paul, MN ,55114
Attn: Dan Benick
e Dear Mr. Benick:
This Jetter is to infonn you that the 2 products from the Vectec company, Punt 57-OS
Insecticide, BPA Reg. No. 42737-1, and Oblique with SBP-J382/PBO 1.5" + 4.S~
Formula H, EPA .Reg. No. 432-719-42737, are registered for use in Minnesota for the
calendar year 1992.
If J can be of further service, please do not hesitate to caU me.
Sincerely,
~.'4 ~U t od
Lee A. Wood
Pesticide Re&istration Secretary
Agronomy Services Division
law
e
· ~ WL'lil rlAln Illlllll'Vi\nf . S.,inll'alll. Millll'''''l.. C;C;107.2c...... . (1112) 297.2200 .
Nt to.III wllCW'tu.uty WN'II,..."-'
.-----
7 B
1. INVIT A TJON FOR B. lds will be received at the office of the Metropolitan
Mosquito Control District 2380 Wycliff Street, St. Paul, MN. 55114 until:
e
2:00 P.hl. hfonday
March 23, 1992
for the furnishing of ISO gallons of Punt 57-OS, Pennethrin Oil Soluble Insecticide or
equivalent.
2. SPECIFICATIONS AJ\1> REQUIREMENTS:
A. Insecticide must have been freshly formulated in 1992 or certified as to label potency.
B. The material to be bid must be labeled to be mixed at a ratio of 1 pan Pennethrin
57% to 9 pans solvent. Solvent is mixture of 1 pan soybean oil with 2 pans
non-phytotoxic mineral oil. The mixed material is to be applied with a bacll'ack a
mister at a rate of 0.1 pounds active ingredient per acre. _
C. Product must be delivered in 5 thirty (30) gallon drums of a t)'Pe known to protect
ainst product deterioration.
. material MUST have a current Environmental Protection Agency (EP A)
'so-ation for the product. A EPA Approved label must be included in the bid.
containers must be labeled in accordance with the requirements of the State of
. esota Pesticide Control Law of 1976, Section 18A.22 and products registered with
the State of Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
11 is the responsibility of the bidder to see that the material being bid is registered for
sale in 1992 with the State of Minnesota. Registration must be obtained by the
Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Failure of the bidder to register the material
with the MN Depanment of Agriculture may result in rejection of the bid.
F. Copies of the product label, material safety data sheets, and technical infonnation shall
accompany the bid.
G. The District will be able to reorder at the bid prices quoted. The District may reorder
the material in minimum quantities of 30 gallons up to October 1, 1992.
e
IN T INGREDIENTS: The District's intent is not to purchase any material which
Ontains any of the inen ingredients listed by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as "In ens of Toxicological Concern" (List I), or "Potentially Toxic
InenslHigh Priority for Testing" (List 2), this information must be presented on the product
label, as required by law. Complete listings of both List ] or 2 may be obtained from
the Federal Register, Volume 54, No.224, Wednesday, November 22, ]989, pages 48314-
48316.
e
4. DELIVERY: Product to be delivered between April ]3 - May], ]992. Delivery will be
made upon telephone notice to:
~1etropoJjtan Mosquito Control District
Dakota County Dh'ision
2240 IS2nd Street East, Building IOI.B
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068.
The vendor is to call the District main office (612-645-9149) 24 hours before delivery.
Deliveries will only be accepted Monday through Friday 6:30 A.M. - ]:30 P.M.
The vendor is responsible for the shipment of the product, and assumes all liability
and cost in shipment to the DistricL
5. ~nNNESOT A HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANCE:
A. In accordance with Minnesota Statute 473.144. NO BIDS WILL BE ACCEPTED
e WITHOUT THE FOu..oWING INFORMATION:
YOU MUST HA VE one of the following four (4) items to be submitted to the Metropolitan
Mosquito Control District with your bid proposal if the bid proposal is over $ 50,0'J0.00.
before the bid can be accepted:
1. H the bidder employs or has employed more than 20 full-time in Minnesota within the
last calendar year, the bidder must submit a copy of their certificate of compliance.
issued by the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, with their bid.
Cenificates of Compliance are issued to businesses who have an Aftinnative Action
Plan approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Deparonent of Human Rights
for the employment of minorities. women and disabled individuals.
2. H a person does not employ more than 20 full-time employees in Minnesota they must
submit a signed notarize statement attesting to that fact.
3. A waiver issued by the Department of Human Rights.
4. If your total bid price for 150 gallons.of Permethrin 57% is Jess than $50,000.00.
place a statement in the outside envelope that requirements of compliance do not
apply.
e
H. R. McLANE, INC.
7'210 R&d Road, sune 205 . "'lam!. Fbrfda 33143 . Phone & F;.:x. 305 6611706
ChemloaJ Consuftarrts In EP A Aeguta10ry AAaJra
New FIFAA Fl&Qlstrctlom . Prod~ Supp:>.1.. Reg!straU.on MaIntenance
e
March 23, 1992
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
Dakota County Division
2240 ~S2nd street East, Euil!nq lOl-B
Rosemount, Ninnestoa SS06B
SUbject: MMCD BID REQUIRt1-:tNXS FOR "PUNT 57 OS"
. --
Re: FIFRA/EPA PR NOTICE 90-1 y~y 1, ~990.
INERTS OF.TOXICOLOGICAL CONCERN
To Whom It May Conoernc
lease be 'edvised ~hat we Certit the EPA re istered
.:
'VEC'rEC ~tnn' $7 OS .... "ZPA ..Jlei. .110. -....2737-.1
does not ...contain anv -of -the I'nerts of Tox1eoloc:dcal Concero e
wh~cb ap'oear~d in ~~~~ Ho. ~ ~~.Lts~ No. ~ ~~~~1;bed in the
{ede:e~ :e9'i1ter, V___rne 54_ __. 22_, -.wed_es___ "_ovember 22,
1.969. J:le.ges~eJ14-4e316. . .
Fer ~b:1. reaeon "'4IrRtrnT $7 .:.QS" ~.. ..ftirmat:lve <lont'ormatic%l
"to all -requi1:ementa ~bat .3Day ..be 4ntoroed .by ~!t ~otice S 0-1
e.n~ 'the ~hamiClal-:tor1llul.tton .J1.. .bean ~eeBPXZD by EPA for .all
reqiste%'ed -l2.e. =as Ul1ay be ..et "1'orth ~Y~ha ?ederal .In88otioI~e,
J'unqici\5e ....nd ~oc5entit:l!c!. Act, ....4.menc!ed. "(F%J"M) .J'tTHT $7 OS
...;1Day -:harafcr....oI>a ~..d ..J.awfu11,.... a1ira=te~ -ithin ~b.~PA~CCEPI'.ED
..1abeling. _
-.....-..
:..:1t. -~.~c~ne,..uthorJ.~ed::A9Bnt ~cr .
~r. -~t5aac.s. ~y~l. .-:.1'r.eident
j1ECTEC."INC.
:HRM/nbIAAlPhO/CC/.ISD/VI ..,..ow_
.
e
.::;:.:..::.:":-'....:. .:. .
.......4'\ _
- .--=..... ~.' ~. "'. '.
-. ..._--"..,;~
. . -"'t\l1 . ""=,~I~.1""-'I.,
-~ -1_1
...,., .;.~--..; -;..--
,>~.ti~U$C.-_l'"
~ . .. . (- .
~~ '.: INC.
...~B4 Venture Circle. Orlando. Florida 32807
W"7J 677.0350 800.367.1:299
April 15, 1992
Mr. Daniel Bennek
Administrative Assistant
Metropolitan Mosquito Control Dist.
2380 Wycliff Street
st..Paul, Minn 55114
.-:.. .'
~...
r:-:=, . .
0.,., .
.~...
~ ..- - .
e;:>-:. ,. ...
;..:>- \.'~';o:
T.-
Dear Mr. Bennek:
..
....'
Per your' request and -for the record, PUNT. 57-OS does contain
"Xylene Range Aromatic Solvent" which oefines a qroup of solvents
that have the ability to dissolve and solubilize pestiCides, i.e.,
Permethrin, much like Xylene. All solvents in -PUNT 57-OS .have been
replaced with Xylene replacement solvents, such as Exxon 1.50, which
lIIeet all .current ~PA requirements for list 41 ...and "2 .Inerts of
ToxicOlogical Concerns for a "Xylene" ~ree -pesticide.
I hope this clears ~p ~ny confusionconoerning PUNT 57-OS.
If I can be of Iurther-assistant, do ~eel ~ree to call 1-aOO-367-
1299.
~iZ. ..r-)
~Wa.ke. J ./
saac $. .JJYAlf?J
..:President :/
co: ~:Ms. :$usan 3>alchick, -7iA.edes ~rogra.m~anager
--;Mr. .;.1(evin :Hag-ro ,~"clarke :-.Mosquito :.Control-ProClucts
~SD/bt
:..... ..
e
:..Equipment
-..ch.mi~'s
ZechnQlogy
_._~--~'-.- -.....-.. .~..~_-:
.:. .:-~_. .7'-'~7
~ ;: .--. - .~.
.: -,-. . ._-.-"
.... -".. .----:
." .-i-
-
7 C
1. INVITATION FOR BIDS: Sealed bids will be received at the office of the Metropolitan
Mosquito Control District 2380 Wycliff Street. St Paul, MN. 55114 until:
2:00 P.M. Monday March 23, 1992
for the furnishing of 300 gallons of fonnulated SCOURGE- insecti~de with SBP-1382/
Piperonyl Butoxide 4% + 12% MF Fonnula n. Material shall be the SCOURGE-
(4%+12%) fonnulated by the Roussel Bio Corporation (EPA Registration #432-716) or
equivalent
e
2. SPECIFICATIONS AND REOUIREMENTS:
A. Active ingredients:
Resmethrin
Piperonyl Butoxide Technical
Inen Ingredients
4.14%
12.42%
83.44%
100.00%
B. Cis/trans isomers ratio: Maximum 30% (:t) cis and Minimum 70% (:t) trans.
e
C. All material shall be premixed before shipment to the District .
D. Insecticide must have been freshly fonnulated in 1992 or certified as to label potency.
E. Product must be delivered in a thiny (30) gallon container of a type known to protect
gam product deterioration.
This . roduct MUST have a current Environmental Protection Agency - (EPA)
r' 'on for the product A EPA approved label must be included in the bid.
ntainers must be labeled in accordance with the requirements of lhe State of
esota Pesticide Control Law of 1976. Section J8A.22 and the product must
registered with the State of Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
It is the responsibility of the vendor to see that the materiaIbeing bid isregistcn::d fer
sale in the State of Minnesota by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and is
registered for application by truck-mounted non-thennal ULVequipment. .
H. Copies of the product label. material safety data sheets. and IeChnicalinformation
shall accompany the bid.
1
e
e
1. The District will be able to reorder at the bid price quoted, this material in minimum
quantity of 30 gallons up to October 1, 1992.
,
NER INGREDIENTS: The District's intent is not to purchase any material which
contains any of the inen ingredients listed by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) as "Inens of Toxicological Concern" (List 1), or "Potentially
Toxic Inens/High Priority for Testing" (List 2), this information must be presented on
the product label. as required by law. Complete listings of both List 1 or 2 may be
obtained from the Federal Register, Volume 54, No.224, Wednesday. November 22,
1989, pages 48314-48316.
4. DELIVERY: Product to be delivered between May 1 - May 23, 1992. Delivery will be
made upon telephone notice to:
~fetropolitan Mosquito Control District
Dakota County Division
2240 152nd Street East, Building 101-B
Rosemount, Minnesota 55068
The vendor is to call the District main office (612-645-9149) 24 hours before delivery.
Deliveries will only be accepted Monday through Friday 7:00 A.M. - 1:00 P.M.
The vendor is responsible for the shipment of the product, and assumes all liability and
cost of shipment to the District.
e 5. MIl\TJ\1'f:SOT A HUMAN RIGHTS CO~{PLIANCE:
A. In accordance with Minnesota Statute 473.144, NO BIDS WIll BE ACCEPTED
WITHOUT THE FOllOWING INFORMATION:
YOU MUST HA VE one of the following four (4) items to be subnuned to the Metropolitan
Mosquito Control District with your bid proposal if the bid proposal is over $ 50,000.00,
before the bid can be accepted:
1. If the bidder employs or has employed more than 20 full-time in Minnesota within the last
calendar year, the bidder must submit a copy of their certificate of compliance. issued by
the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. with their bid.
Certificates of Compliance are issued to businesses who have an Affirmative Action Plan
approved by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights for the
employment of minorities, women and disabled individuals.
2. If a person does not employ more than 20 full-time employees in Minnesota, they must
submit a signed notarize statement attesting to that fact. .
3. A waiver issued by the Department of Human Rights.
e
2
J~OUs.sEL 1310
CORPORATION
'--O~J1 -'- .; ','
/f)(\~' .
#tf,)" .......
;ir ',J
:'\ . '...
/!. \ .~ It ~~....::--.:
i <.' .(X ~~--:.", :
II :', ;"'.:;' .:-<":,
......t
TECHNICAL CENTER:
170 BEAVER BROOK ROAD
LINCOLN PARK, NJ 07035 _
v ~.. TELEPHONE: (201) 628.1700 WI'
C0 FAX: (201) 628.9367
e!
-~ Peltlcldel, Envlronmenta',
o Toxicology and
., Reglll.tory Affalrl Department
I ,
," " "
March 13, 1992
TELECOPY
Mr. Kevin Magro
Clark Mosquito Control Products
159 N. Garden Avenue
Roselle, IL 60172
Dear Mr. Magro:
Subject: Scourge Insecticide with SBP-1382/Piperonyl Butoxide 4%
+ 12% - Inert Ingredients
As per our conversation of March 12 1992, I am confirming that the
above named product does not contain any intentionally added inert
ingredients listed on the EPA's list 1; inerts of toxicological ..
concern, or list 2; potentially toxic inerts/high priority for ,.,
testing. See Pesticide Registration Notice 90-1. Should you have
any further questions, please contact me at (201)628-7200.
Sincerely,
. ,/,;?
-'? ~
, // A' /.' . '''-~::7/ t"~~" ~
'- r"''<.d-~ //
Christina M. Lawes
Manager, Federal Registrations
cc: J. Conti
e
HEADOUARTERS: PO BOX 107i. 400 SYLVAN AVENUE, ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, NJ 07632 TEL: (201) 871-0771 TLX: ITT 420839 FAX: (201) 871.9845
.1
e
e
minnesota deP8:rtment of health
717 s.e. deJaware 51.
p.o. box 9441
minneapolis 55440
(612) 623.5000
March 16, 1984
R.D. Sjogren, Ph.D., Director
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District
2380 Wycliff Street
St. Paul, MN 55114
Dear Doctor Sjogren:
As you requested we have evaluated the potential hazards of
human exposure to the chemicals used by MMCD. The enclosed
report includes a review of the scientific literature as well
as the results of discussions with scientists and physicians.
During the course of the evaluation process, additional
comments and suggestions (in areas other than health effects)
were made by the outside experts regarding your proposed
allergy testing program. These comments were not included
in the body of the attached report, but they may be helpful
as you consider the various alternatives regarding public
complaints. The additional comments by those persons con-
tacted are summarized as follows:
1. Offering an allergy testing program may result
in an inundation of requests for allergy tests.
Pyrethroids are generally regarded as one of
the safest known pesticides and offering allergy
testing could create a non-productive controversy.
Costs for testing a large number of people would
be considerable.
2. An allergy testing program would be a "good public
relations tactic" and the data collected would
be interesting, but allergy testing may not be
pertinent to the health effects issues since
the substances under consideration have not
been found to be allergenic.
3. One suggested alternative was to concentrate on
an educational approach since the number of
complaints is small.
4. Another suggestion was to require complainants
to present a physician's request before providing
an allergy test. This approach would probably
not completely prevent the problems described
in item one.
an equal opportunity employer
R.n. Sjogren, Ph.D.
-2-
March 16, 1984
5. The suggestion was also made to retain a con-
sultant allergist(s) to evaluate the validity
and feasibility of the MMCD proposal before go-
ing ahead with the allergy testing program.
The feeling was that this is a new and complex
question and should be studied in detail by an
expert (i.e., allergist).
e
These comments and our hazard evaluation suggest that a
publicly offered allergy testing program would produce a
large number of requests for the testing service with little
resulting public health benefit. We do believe, however,
that involving an allergist in your program will be helpful
in evaluating and resolving complaints.
If you have any questions regarding the enclosed evaluation
and the above comments please call Larry Gust of my staff
at 623-5325.
Sincerely,
(j?~JW.~
Raymond W. Thron, Ph.D., P.E.
Director of Environmental Health
e
e
e
. EVALUATION OF niE HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS
OF
RES~!ETHRIN/PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE INSECTICIDE
BACKGROtmD
Each year,the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) receives
10.15 complaints from citi~ens who claim they are hypersensitive to
insecticide sprays. The MMCD in response to these concerns is consider-
ing a "District policy which would require such citizens to have sensitivity
testing conducted by an allergist retained by the District to verify
sensitivity to District used materials prior to granting special exemptions
to neighborhood treatment...".1 The following report is an evaluation
e
of the potential hazards of human exposure to the chemicals used by MMCD.
This evaluation includes a review of the scient~fic literature as well
as the results of discussions with scientists and physicians including
,
allergists, entomologists~'medical entomologists, and pesticide scientists.
The insecticide of concern is a combination of a synthetic pyrethroid
~.
(resmethrin) and a synergin (piperonyl butoxide). Resmethrin is a mixture
of four sterioisomers L40 percent (+) trans, 40 percent (-) cis, 10 percent
C+) cis and 10 percent (-) trans). The.synergin, piperonyl butoxide. has
no insecticidal activity, bpt when added to pyrethroid formulations it
enhances, i.e., synergizes. the pyrethroid's insecticidal activity. Both
compounds were reviewed and a summary of their toxicology is presented in
the following sections.
e
-,-
~~S~ETHRIN TOXICITY
of jn~~~ticides, the pyrethrins.
Pyrethroids are structural modifications of one of the oldest class
e
fJ~~~r~, are remarkably effective but unstable compounds and for the
..
Pyrethrins, derived from pyrethrum
mg~t p~Tt have been replaced by the newer pyrethroids which have greatly
i d d bOlO 2
mprgy~. potency an 5ta ~ ~ty.
A~~~~ Oral Toxicity
~~veral investigators have studied the acute oral toxicity of
',~m~~hrin. Berteau exposed female mice to resmethrin in soya-bean
P~'. The resulting LDSO was 1390 mg/kg.3 Verschayle exposed female
f.~~ ~o resmethrin using two solvents 35 carriers, dimethyl sulphoxide
(~D) and pOlyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400).4 The LDSOS were 1347 mg/kg
Im~ J99S mg/kg, respectively. Miyamoto exposed both male and female
~~e and rats to racemic resmethrin and to the c.~) trans and (+) cis
~so~ers.S Table I shows the LDso for each combination.
e
Table 1. ..Acute Oral TOxicity of Resmethrin
C9mpOllfl d~
Mice
Male- Female
Rats
Male - Female
~p~~mi~
(!to) ~rans
(po) cis
(po) trans
(!to) ~~s
690
590
152
500
3700
940
800
160
600
5000
>5000(0)* >5000(0)*
-!rgures in parenthesis indicate percentage (\) mortality at the highest
lip~a~e.
Tnese studies point out that resmcthrin toxicity is dependent on the
iiOm~r ~sed and the species exposed.
e
...
-2-
Acute and Subacute. Inhalation Toxicity
Miyamoto exposed mice and rats to aerosolized rcsmethrin.5 The
e
animals were exposed continuously to a mist (particle size 1-2 ~m) of the
compound at different concentrations for four hours. No deaths were
recorded even at the highest concentrations; however, toxic symptoms
like hypersensitivity, motor ataxia~ and urinary incontinence were
observed during heavy exposure. See Table 2 for exposure conditions and
,.esults.
Table 2. Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Resmethrin
e
Compounds
Resmethrin
(...) trans,
cis
Experimental Conditions-
Exposure Airflow
Solvent Hour l/min
Kerosine/ 4 50
xylene (9/1)
. 3
LCc:n mg/m
Rats Mice
(t.1/F) (M/F)
71/500 71/500
Minimum Toxic
Dose mg/m3
Rats Mice
400 400
Miyamoto also conducted subacute inhalation toxicity tests on
resmethrin.5 Groups of mice and rats were exposed to resmethrin at levels
of 27, 47 and 210 mg/m3 for 4 hrs/day, 5 days/wk for four weeks. No
siznificant effects were revealed in any of the examinations including
hematology, clinical biochemistry, and microscopic histopathology of major
oreans and tissues.
Subacute and Chronic Toxicity
Miyamoto assessed the subacute and chronic ~oxicity of ~he (+) ~rans
&nd cis isomers of resmethrin in a rodent feeding study.S Groups of
e
-3-
"20 male nnd female rats were fed 500, 1500 and 5000 ppm in their diet
for 24 weeks. Examinations were made on behavior, morality, growth,
e
food intake and water consumption, and urinalysis during feeding, and
at terminal necropsy, on hematology~ clinical biochemistry, major organ
weight and microscopic histopathology of a number of organs and tissues.
The no-effect level for resmethrin was 1500 ppm. At 5000 ppm a slight
increase in liver weight and the enzyme'A!Pase were observed.
Teratogenicity
Teratogenicity studies were conducted by Miyamoto on mice and rats
. h () d .. f h. 5 F. f t t t
USlng t e + trans an C1S lsomers 0 resmet rln. ~ teen 0 wen y
pregnant mice or rats per dose were used, and for breeding of offspring
7 extra pregnant animals were used. See Table 3 for exposure conditions.
e
Table 3. Teratology Study of Resmetbrin
Compound
Resmethrin (+)
trans, cis
Animal
Mice
Rats
Dose
mg/kg-da~
10/30/50
10/20/50
Route
Oral
Oral
Administration
Days of Gestation
7 - 12
9 - 14
No significant adverse effects were observed.
In a study by Swentzel, no teratologic effects were found in rats
in which up to lethal doses of the chemical were added to lTound feed.6
. MUtagenicity/carcinogenicity
Hutagenetic studies were also reported by Hiyamoto.S At doses of
10 mg/plate of racemic resmethrin and its cis and trans isomers dissolved
e
.~
. -4-
e
in dimethyl sulphoiide,no mutagenic effects were noted in the bacteria
E. coli and s. typhimurium (in terms of revertants compared to controls
and nitroquanidine). Similarly, in the host mediated assay, no signi-
ficant number of revertants were detected. In vitro mutagenic (Ames)
testing by Swent:el did not indicate mutagenic activity~.6.
No reports were found that studied the carcinogenicity of resmethrin.
e
Allergic Reactions and Irritant Toxicity
Pyrethrum flowers are members of the large Compositae family and
thus, are botanically related to ragweed. In the past, humans allergic
to ragweed pollen have developed cross-sensitization allergies when
exposed to pyrethrins.2 Cross-sensitization is defined as sensitization
to a substance induced by exposure to another substance having cross-
reacting antigens. Purification processes were subsequently applied
to pyrethrin production to remove the components responsible for allergic
reactions; however. the question has been raised whether people with
ragweed allergies could develop cross-sensitization reactions when
exposed to the structurally: similar synthetic pyrethroids. No studies
were found examining this '"question.
J.1iyamoto report$ that none of the synthetic pyrethroids, including
resmethrin, are irritants to either rabbit skin or to rabbit eyes.S
Only slight transient congestion of conjunctiva or lacrimation was
produced by massive instillation of pyrethroid compounds. Miyamoto reports
that the Association of Food and Drug Officials of the U.S. found none of
the synthetic pyrethroids to be a skin sensitizer in guinea pigs, when
tested by the prescribed method (intracutaneous administration every other
e
-S-
day for 20 days and one intracutaneous 14 days later for challenging).S
e
Swentzel evaluated the risks associated with the proposed use .of resmethrin
,
as an imp regnant onmiltaryfabrics.6 Acute and repeated applications of
the material to rabbit skin failed to produce irritant or acneform
reactions. Cotton sateen cloth impregnated with resmethrin produced only
8s1ight irritant reaction in 8 24-day wear test with rabbits.
No reports were found which studied human allergic/irritant reactions
to resmethrin.
PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE TOXICITY
Acute Oral Toxicity
Acute oral LDSOs for piperonyl but~xide in rats range from 7960-
10600 mg/kg'b.w.7,S In dogs the LDSO was greater than 7650 mg/kg b.w.
and in cats greater than 10600 mg/kg b.w.7
e
Chronic Toxicity
A two-year study in rats with commercial grade piperonyl butoxide
in the diet at 0, 100, 1000.: 25000 ppm showed reduced weight gain in
. I
aales at 1000 ppm.7 Mortality and a significant increase in the kidney
and liver weight were observed in both sexes at 10000 ppm. The no-effect
level for piperonyl butoxide was determined to be 100 ppm (equivalent to
5 ag/kg b.w./day). Effects of piperonyl butoxide on aixed function
oxidases have also been noted but the significance of these effects has not
been determined.7
~
e
~
-6-
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
e
A gene mutation study in E. coli without metabolic activation showed
no compound-related effects.' A DNA damage test in mice was also negative
and a dominant lethal test in mice was inconclusive.'
An IS-month study in mice with commercial grade piperonyl butoxide
in the diet at 0 and 300 ppm was inconclusive.9 A study in mice in which
commercial grade piperonyl butoxide was ~dministered in the diet.at
,
O. 1036. and 2084 ppm for ll~ weeks revealed no compound-related effects.
A two-year study in mice in which commercial grade piperonyl butoxide was
administered in the diet at 2500 and 5000 ppm for 30 weeks followed by
reduction to SOD and 2000 ppm. respectively, for 82 weeks also showed no
,
compound-related effects.
Allergic Reactions Irritant Toxicity
e
No studies were found examining the allergic potential and irritant
toxicity of piperonyl butoxide in either animals or humans.
CO~ME~7S FROM OUTSIDE SCIENTISTS AND PHYSICIANS
Ten scientists and physicians outside the Department (see list below)
were conducted and asked for their comments on the toxicity of resmethrin
and piperonyl but oxide and on the usefulness of performing allergy tests
for this insecticide.
.
Dave Noetlel
LaVarre Uhlken
University of Minnesota, Entomologist
Region V EPA, Chicago, Pestcide Scientist
e
-,-
Dr. Donald Eliason
Center for Disease Control, Fort Carson, CO
Medical Entomologist
Penick Corp, NJ, Pes~icide Scientist e
Minneapolis, Allergist
Minneapolis, Allergist
Illinois Health Department, Entomologist
Dr. Marte Devries
Dr. Willia~ Schoenwetter
Dr. Joseph Kelley
Harvey Dominic
Dr. Malcolm Blumenthal
Minneapolis, Allergist
University of California, Berkeley, CA
Pesticide Scientist
Dr. John Casida
Dr. Paul Johnson
St. Paul, Occupational Medicine
The pertinent comments of the above individuals are summarized below:
1. Several contacts reported hearing anecdotal reports of adverse responses
in humans exposed to synthetic pyrethroids. Responses included prick-
ling and itching of the skin (i.e., face, tongue, lips, nasal passages,
e
eyes and hands), numbness of face and hands, and lacrimation. These
responses have not been quantified and it is not clear whether the
responses are allergic or toxic irritant reactions.
2. The contacts were not aware of any specific reports of allergicl
irritant reactions to resmethrin or piperonyl butoxide.
3. Allergists stated that people allergic to ragweed could exhibit
cross-sensitization to pyrethrin. They did not know if cross-sensitization
might also occur with synthetic pyrethroids.
4. Allergists stated that when people with an existing disease. e.g..
asthma, other respiratory diseas~, beart disease, etc., were exposed
e
~
-8-
an exacerbation of the disease. This is not an allergi~ response and
PI
'to an inhaled p'cllutant (e. g., ,insecticide spray) they could manifest
e
not necessarily a response to an irritant. Any number of non-toxic
,
agents" e.g., odors, non-toxic mists, cold air, etc., can trigger
an adverse respiratory reaction, particularly asthma. This comment
was made several times and also appears in the literature.IO
s. Infants and elderly are often highly susceptible to various environmental
agents. This reaction is. often not an allergic response.
6. Allergy testing of individuals exposed to insect spraying could give
a false sense of security. That is, an individual could have a
negative allergy test to the insecticide and yet have an adverse
response when exposed (see comments '4 and IS).
7. Skin reactions can be either an allergic or toxic irritant response.
Patch testing will by design exclude allergic contact dermatitis but
e
is of no value in diagnosing irritant dermatitis.
8.
The allergists contacted have not conducted allergy testing on these
compounds and were not aware of other allergists who had. Some felt
it would be difficult ~o interpret the results without more animal
studies being done first.
S~y AND CONCLUSIONS
The literature review indicates that the acute and chronic toxicity
of both resmethrin and piperonyl butoxide is very low. Although the
level of information was limited. there were not studies indicating these
compounds were either allergens or toxic irritants. There are anecdotal
reports of synthetic pyrethroids producing mild irritant reactions but these
e
-9-
have not been detected in scientific studies. Discussions ~ith scientists
and physicians also reveal no indication that resmethrin and piperonyl
butoxide are either allergens or irritants. The consensus of opinion is
that if this insecticide was to produce an adverse effect it would be an
exacerbation of an existing condition induced by an individual's hyper-
susceptability to foreign substances and probably not an allergic or ;'
toxic irritant reaction.
The available scientific literature and the opinion of those
knowledgeable in the area of respiratory allergic and irritant response
do not support the conclusion that exposure to these materials, as they
are typically used in pest control, results in a significant potential for
the occurrence of human health effects.
i
I
~
.
-10-
e
e
e
e
e
e
. .. . .
.
REFERENCES w'.
1. Metropolitan Mosquito Control District, "District Policy, Request
by "Allergic" Citizens", ~983.
2. Casida, J.E., "Pyrethrum Flowers and pyrethroid Insecticides",
Environmental Health Perspectives, 34, 189-202, 19~0.
- ~~ ':'.
3. Berteau, P.E., and Dean, W.A., "A Comparison of 'Oral and Inhalation
Toxicities of Four Insecticides to Mice and Rats", Bulletin of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 19, 113-120r 1978.
. I.- -
~. ,Verschoyle, R.D., and Barnes, J.M., :'ifoxicity of Natural and Synthetic
Pyrethrins to Rats", Pesticide Bi.ochemistry and Physiology, 2, 308-311,
1972. -
s. Miyamoto, J Of "Degradation, Metabolism and Toxicity of Synthetic
Pyrethroids", Environmental Health Perspectives, li, 15-28, 1978.
6. Swentzel. K.C.. Angerhofer. R.~., et aI, "Safety Evaluation of the
Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticide, Resmethrin, as a Clothing Impregnant".
Toxicology and Applied pharmacology, ~, 243. 1978.
7. u.S. Department of Health and Human. Services, "Piperonyl Butoxide",
The FDA, Surveillance Index, Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C.,
1983.
8. Worthing, C.R., The Pesticide Nanual. The British Crop Protection Council,
Nottingham. England, p 429. 1979.
9. Innes, J .R.M., Ulland, B.M., et al, "Bioassay of Pesticides and
Industrial Chemical for Tumigenicity: A Preliminary Note",
Journal of the Na tional Cancer Insti tute, g, 1101-1114, 1969
,
10. Middleton. E., Ree~. C.E., et a1, Allergy Principles and Practice,
C.V. Mosby Co., 120~. pp, 1983.
r _ _....__~ _ _..._ ..'I ~i
r. . .~
--..~
R~OSB~L SIO CORPORA~ION
170 BEl. VER 2ROOX aOAD
LINCOLN PARX, HJ 07035
Emergency Telephone 800-331-28"
... -- -..-..... ... . - ..- ..... . ..-....-.. . - ... .. .......
e
NFFA Designation 704
DEGREE OF HAZARD
4=!XTREME
3-HIGH
2=MODERA'I'E
l-SLIGHT
O-INSIGNIFICANT
~
ACTIVITY
ELLOW)
MATERIAL SAF~~Y DATA SHE~~
ly 1S, 1991
Section I - Product Ident1t
=======~--'====~k====
=====!!!l.....===
----------.-.- -----....-.-..-
----._---------~--------~
---..----
-...~----
Product Name:
SC(jU~5~ J:~~ec.tlc.l0C- S(3fJ -1382/Piperonyl
Bu1:P~'L.a~ Wl.rtJ -t:r LJ+/J
432-716
EPA Req. No:
Chamical Name
Active Ingredient:
(S-8enzl-3-turyl)methyl 2, 2-d1methyl-3-(2-
~ethylpropenYl)cyclcpropanecar~oXYlat.
Resmethrin, SBP-1382
e
CO:tUTlon Name:
Molecular Formula:
Molecular Weiqht:
Chemical Name
Active Inqre~ient:
cuHuO!
338.45
COIDr.\on Name:
a-12-(2-butoxy}ethoxyl-4,s-cmethylenedioXY)_2_
propyl toluene
Piperonyl Butoxide
C19H!OOS
338.45
Molecular Formula:
Molecular Weight:
Page 1 ot 8
e
; . (
e
(
e
.
riA R.q No. 1432-716
Date: 3uly 1S, 11t1
1'"'.;;>
===-----==~-=:-------=;t =====--_____......~________._....__..._____...~
Section II - Warning statement -- ...------- ----
Healthl
===~-=~-~ =-~-----=~--==-._===--::;~===========
....-----
....-....--
CAUTION. Harmful it swallowed, inhaled or ab50rbed through skin
Avoid breathing vapors or sprays. Avoid contact with skin, eyet
or clothing.
Environment: This material is toxic to fish. Do not aischarg.
affluent containing this material into any ~ody of
water or into sewer systems without previously
notitying the proper authorities.
====-_:"--==-. -....t._~~_== . ====-..;==--==- _=====--===~.:::====
Section III - HaEar40ua Ingredients
----~~------~-~-~ -~ ~ ~~--~
--~ ~- ---- ~----~-___~ I
_:::=======
--------...
-.--------..
COMPONENT CAS No. .
SBP-1382 10453-86-8
P1peronyl Butoxide 51-03-6
Petroleum
Solvent
"
'l'WA/CEILIN'Q
None Establiahed
None Established
..
12
83
100 ppm
-_.._---.-~-...---..-.-------_-.------------,.,---------_.....--....__.._-------~
----_.....~------..._-_-.-_----------~_.._------..._~...._---_....-.----.
Seotio~ IV - Physical Properties
-..._----.._-~-----..--------_.._---- --...----.-_---....-...~~-----_-._--
--------~---~~--~----~----~-------~--~-~. ~-------~--
Appearance and odor:
Boiling Point:
Melting Point:
Vapor Pressure:
Specific Gravity:
Octanol/H20 Partition
Coet:
SolUbility:
---------
------
Section V - 'ira an4 Explosion Hazard I~for.matioD
~ ------....--------------.....-----..........----------
----------..-_____~__.__.....______A- ...___
-----..,
----..........
--------
-------
Clear golden liquid with characteristic
chrysanthemate odor.
18S.C
Not available
Not available
0.86
Not available
Insoluble in water
-===== =======-- =========================~===
FlaSh Point:
Flamcable Limits
e% by volume):
Autoiqnition Temperature:
Fire Extinguishing Media:
Fire Control Tactics:
173.C (TCC)
Not available
Not available
Foam, COal Dry Chemical or Halon
Avoid breathing dusts, vapors and lumes trom
burning materials. Wear 8elt-contained,
positive pressure breathing apparatus an4
full fire fighting protective clothing.
Keep unnecessary people away. trae water
spray or fog to cool container.. A 80lid
stream may cause material and contaminate4
water to spread. Cike areA ot tire to
Paqe 2 of 8
r."",
!~A R~q.No., 432-71'
Dater 3Uly 15, 1991
=========--=======--=~,.--~~=========--=========.=====~~---
prevent cr control run-off. Do not allow.
run-off to enter seWer systems or any ba8J
of water. If run does enter aewer syste~
water, contact the appropriate authorities
inune~iately.
Do not decontaminate personnel, equipment,
or handle broken packaill. er containers
wi t.hout wearinq the specified protective
equipment and Clothing. Decontaminate
emerqency personnel with soap anc1 vater
before leav~ng the tire area.
=- ~========...---=====~~-~----:=====~====-
Section ~ - aeactivity Data
stability:
PolYli'lerizaticn:
Conditions to avoid:
Incompatible Materials:
Hazardous Decomposition
Products:
stable
Will not Occur
Extreme heat or sources of ignition.
strong oxidizing and strong reducing agents
Thermal decomposition products may include
carbon monoxide and careon dioxide.
--------..------
------~.....-
------------~-------------~--~--~------~-----------~-------~------
-------~----~---_......._-......._-~-----------_..---.--....-...------.._........._--------
Section VII - Health Bazar4 Intormatioh
========--=========-- ======~~~=:r=============____==
Routes of Exposure:
No data are available for this product. Cata for Scourge Insecticide w~
SBP-1J82 and Piperonyl Eutoxide 18%+54% MF are presented below.
Eye Contact:
Skin Contact:
Skin absorption:
Inhalation:
Ingestion:
Non-irritating to the eye.
Slightly irritating to the akin.
LDSO(rabbit)>2000 mg/kq .
4-Hour LCSO(rats)>2.64 mg/L the Maximum Attainable
Concentration
LOSO(rat)-2.7 ;/kg.
Effects of Overexposure
Acute EXPosure I Exposure levels testecS in animals at or near the
LOSO/LeSO have produced the following aymptomolov.Y:
decreased activity, ~ess of coorcSination, .alivat~cn
and erect body hair. Humans =iqht experience
transient headaChe, dizziness, stUffy or runny nos.,
scratchy threat and loealiz.~ .ensitization.
Page 3 at 8
e
(
e
(
e
.
E~A ~.q NO.1 432-71'
Dati' July 15, 1"1
BuhehroniQ Exposure
No data available for this product.
* 'I'he NOEL establishe~ tor resmethrin in a gO-day
inhalation study with rats ~ras 0.1 cz/m' or 0.1 mq/L.
* The NOEL tor rasmethrin was 10 mq/kg/day in the diet
when ted to dogs tor 180 days.
* Rats tolerated diets containing- SOOO ppm of piperonyl
butoxide without adverse ettects for 17 Weeks.
In Vitro ~e.tinq
No data available for this product.
Mutagenioity.
Resmethrin is not considered to be mutaqenic based on
in vitrQ studies conducted with bacteria and yeast.
Chronio Exposure
No data available tor this pro~uct.
!'eratoqlnicity:
*
Resmethrin is not considered to be teratogenic
based on studies conducted in ra~~1t5 and rats.
Piperonyl Sutox1de was not considered to ~e
fetotoxic nor teratogenic based on a .tudy in
rabbits.
*
Chronic !'oxicityr
Resmethrin did not produce any evidence of toxic
effects when fed to rats at concentrations of up. to
SOO ppm for two years.
Oncoqenicity.
* Resmethrin was not considered to ~. oncogenic
based on chronic teeding studies conducted in
rats and mice.
* Piperonyl Butoxide was not considered to ~e
oncogenic based on chronic feeding .tudies in
rats and mice.
paqe . ct 8
ro....
!~A Req No.:432.711
Datel 3uly 15, 1911
Reproduotive
To~icity:
e
*
A slight increase in the number of pups cast
dead and a decrease in pup weights were cbserve~
when rats wera fed diets containing .500 ppm
(lowest dosage teste~) or higher of resmethrin
over three successive generationa.
Repro~uctive performance and oftspring
development in rats were unaffected when
piperonyl butox1de was fed at ~i.tary
concentrations of up to 1000 ppm OVer two
successive qeneratiens.
..
Neurotoxicity.
Resmethrin is not considered to be a neurotoxin basea
en rat fee~inq studies conducted for up to 32 weeks.
ZM~RGENCY AND rIRS~ 1ID PROCEDURESI
If in eyes:
'lush eyes with plenty of pota~le water for at least
15 minutes. Get medical attention it 1rritation
persists.
Remove all contaminated Clothing. Wash with plenty ~
soap and water. Get medical attention it 1rritat1~
persists.
Remove to tresh air. It breathing il difficult or it
any discomfort persists, obtain medical .ttentio~.
Call a physician or Poison Control Center. DO NQl
induce vomiting. This product cont~ins a petroleum
solvent. Aspiration might ba a hazard.
Wash all contaminated articles thoroughly .
with soap and water betore reusing_
This product contains a pyrethro14 and a petroleum
solvent. Aspiration might be a hazard. It inqested
and vom! tinq has not occurred, eme.i. .houlc1 be
induced with supervision. Keep patient'. head below
hips to prevent aspiration. It eymptoma such as 105.
of qaq retlex; conVUlsions or unconsiouaness occur
betore emesis, qaatric lavage using a cutfee!
endotracheal tube should be considered.
00 ~ aciminister or instill milk, cream or other
substances containing vegetable or animal tats, which
enhance absorption ot lipophilic substances.
If en akin:
If 1nbale,h
It inqeste/1:
~ECONTAMINA'1':rON
PROCEDURE I
NO~ts TO PHYSICIAN:
paqe S of 8
e
I
.
(
.
..
~PA ~eg NO.1 ~32-71'
Date: JUly is, 1"1
KEDIC.u, CONDITION AGGRAVATED :SY OVtREXPOSOR!:
The available toxicological, physical and chamical information tor thi
material indicate that, in g-eneral, overexpoElure to this material i
unlikely to aggravate existing medical conditions.
--.-.......~----~
-----~~-
---~------~~------~--~~--~--~~--~ ~
lllIl ~____....._~______ _________,.. ___
Section VIII - Expolure Control Xetho~.
~=--====~ ~ ==~-
-====::======:A:1IIM~-========--=====______=-==~==: =- "C
*
A NI~SH-approved pesticide respirator should be worn in poorl~
vant1lated areas.
.
Protective rubber apron, long sleeves, pants an~ rubber qlovef
should be worn to prevent contact with akin.
Safety glasses Or 909g1es should be worn to prevent contact witt
eyes.
Wash thoroughly, immediately after exposure. SmOking, eating and
drinking should not ~e permitted betore changing clothing an~
washing after handling.
Contaminated clothing should be removed immediately and washed
thoroughly with soap and water betore reuse.
.
.
.
~-~--------------~~------- -~----~~-------------~
~ -----~---- -------~-~---~ ~-~----
Section IX - Spill or Leak Proce~ur.a
---
--
.._----~--------------------~---------..._...~--~----.....-.-_-_...~---
--------- ~----..._--------~....----------------~-.....~-- h.a___~_-._
*
Wear prescribed safety equipment.
Dike area around spill to contain material.
.
* Absorb spill with an inert material such as clay or .awdust,
etc. and place in approved disposal container.
Waste Dilposal.
Dispose according to local, at&te and tederal
regulations.
= =--=====~:.::.========...-.-.-..====--===================-~====:-----
Section Z - Special Precaution.
---_-._-----_-.-.._---------------.--_--~----------------------- .....-
------ ~---~------__-- I ~____~_______~_______~________~
Kan~linq: Wear qlov8s, goggles and other necessary protective equipment
as indicated. Handle in well ventilated area. Do not .moke, eat
or drink in area where product i. handled or stored.
Do not contaminate water, food or te.dstutt by storaie or
disposal.
Do not store at temperatures ~elow 40.7. It this material has
been exposed to temperatures below .0.', there may ~e
precipitation. Check for crystallization. It evident, warm to
SO. F and thoroughly mix betore using. DO NO'!' VSE NEAR OPEN
FLAME. For Containers One Gallen and Under: store product in
oriqinal container in a locked .tora;e area.
Page 6 ot 8
storage:
- - - - - -- I ."""w__~ _... ........,JJ'.r-
EPA P~q Nos ~32-71'
Date: July is, 11tl
r-. .~
~ ~----~-------------------------------------------------------- ~
-----. --- ------------------------.......----- --- ..
Section XI - A44itional Regulatory Information
==:=--===- =--====-~:-===- .....==== =======----====--=:====~~
Aquatic and .il~lit. ~oxicity Data
No data are available for this product. Data tor Scourge Insecticide wit)
SBP-13B2/P1peronyl Butoxide lBt~S4t MF or Resmethrin ~8chnical ar.
presented below.
Aquatic Orqanismsr
Aquatic Oral-Eir~.:
Subacute Oral-!1rdl:
(
Reproduction-BirdsJ
SARA Title III Data
The 96-Hour LeSO values for Scourge in Rainbow
trout, Bluegill sunfish and Sheepshead minnowr
ares 2.40 ppb, 13.00 ppb .and 8.80 ppb,
respectively. The 48-Hour LCSo tor D8~hnif3 maanE
is 0.10 PP1l1. For Panaeus shrimp anrJ Amer1cal/
oyster, the 96-Hour LeSO for Scourge i. 1.25 ppk
- and approximately 1.79 ppm, respectively.
The acute oral LOS 0 or resmethr1n in male
California quail was in excess of 2000 mg/kq.
The LC~o ot resmethrin ted to Japanese
quail ln their diet was >5000 ppm.
The Leso of resmethrin fed 'to mallard ducks was
also >5000 ppm.
e
Oietary Administration cf resmethr1n at 300 ppm
tor 23 weeks pro~uced no adverse effects en
reproduction in Bobwhite quail and in Mallard
aucks.
Section 311 and 312 Bazar4 categori..
Immediate Health Hazara
Delayed Health Hazard
Tire Hazard
Reactive Hazard
Sudden pressure Release
- N
- N
- N
- N
Hazarc1
- N
Section 302 Extremely Hazardous SUbstances _ Non.
Section 313 Toxic Chemicals - None
CERC~ Reportable Quantity, None
(
Page , of 8
e
e
u
m
c
m
E
a:
e
tn'
U
.-
- .....
..-
...
U
.~
.c
C)
c
::J
.....
tn
.....
U
.-
...
.....
tn
.-
e
~
..
IDCD
>-Ift
...
_ CD
C'oI.c.u
G)-ID
G)O"
... Qc
. ~O::l
(")-en
......
>-....ai
"3"'(")
.., >:.0
>....
.." ID
".c.!!!
C-~
olftC
.."G)::I
.....en
........
...
Q)
.c
...
ca
Q)'
~.c:
en :J
... . fJ)
>-Q)
.ca E
" .-
0-
~<
~o\
..s.,..
.c: A
uit;
..s,g
-son
. ~ r--A
:~
U'.
c::r::
:.2..:
"'u
= it;
;10
.c
U'"
g~
cn,o
E
o
(,).
: 0
-c:a
.. ..
,sa:
8~
,... ....,...
co co co
we
....0
tJi...
-, j
(1)-
N Q) ..
-3 c !!
.5 O.2.c
S,c.5'go
~ a..;::~
J! ~::;
Q) c..2
.... ~uu
........
>C
Q)
".
C
-
.. .
u .
E~
8:&
-
e
.....
c
o
U
o
.....
.-
::Jen
c:TC
tn~
08.
-:E 8-
e
Q)
+-'
"u
en
Q)
"C
'-
C 0
Q) ~
E-
c "~
o 0
"~ c
> ro
c c
Q)~
-1.C'
..s~s e
eA "':':: C
- 8.'.
u..s
~ c: e.~
fI)~t)..
~ u::E'~
"''0 -
II C u.~
co .c: Cl
.~ e'"
8.a~e
~~c; =
C .a.c: 0
.S ~ >. U
::E .'.:: 0
4,) Y.::
u~ ::s
..c"'Ci'
.. :.! o-~
~.:.s ;~.:::
U.... U "'''0 I _ A~
-s~e=ug::st'!uu
_.. u it; ... 0 u,g 111
c'. iiOe U'.~ t:,o c
.. '" C _ C > co &
'O~,g~e5eg.gl<
u ... "''O'OU
c; '" >.... e U'u co u ...
u u,o- ..c.. u'c u
... 0'0 B e -.c.c: - >.
u.'.:: 0'."- _ u ",'ll
'" ::S.ClIle ::s -...
COiClll ClIlOO.Ol<
it; o~.,g CoO ",.g c; S
'oJ U'= =c;=- ~
- e ... .. '" \.0'
co -:!!- ",e'co..s
..c ... ~.. ~ E.. u '"
......c....c....-u -fn
>.!:!!lSol\ue.....u~
gt;;;co:!! g.,g~ec
~Su5eul-it;~C
co '" e C co u '~..c::S
u ~ 8 8. o:s c: .~:;
..c 0\ U o...c ::s ,u :!!..c: '"
I--,c 0 ~ 0.,6.. ~...s
-
-as
+-'
II
.c
::s
N
'"
~t
lI>'c
~~
~l:::
>.co
.=cn
II)
co
-;".!!? a.;,; ;;
o g~G)cu
_ &'0 Cl~
Ji'\ - cu u; ~ l!
~""Os:::..-
"- G) e Cl >
as 'ai ;;: 0
... ~1!'C ~
CO ii -.!!? t::!
CO:: G)
~'" 0 - III X
v, +=.5 C ,
.. cu'C.l!!cu
C'.C-
O ... cu_ C
ID__III
LL :s &.5.g
cCU-=,
::J~E
eID=
"'-111
::J=::J
1IIt::~
.IIICU
~~~
'E gp=
~s:::.3
Cl'C CD
cC'C
CUcuID
.. III a.
€~ a.
G)ccu
CI) cu ....
--
l!'
::s
:@g
~...
S!
WE
C\I::s
~z
... .......
--
.c:X
0.
"CE
~.2
8~
.. ...- "':!!->'
0'-- .u C co;::
E "'u 'E';:!!~ <
o · "'~
.t:: e u- c- \0
u- o.uu ~
.ID :ac. 'Oege
IDC ... B.' 8Oo.u II
-ID co u o...c
a.> &>.8
E= .... u 0 ~ C
.. u- -=5 w.;: en ~ 0
.- =....
. ID' ~e~ CUe... ....- '0
- .c: 0'. u u
'0- =......- ~-s '0 ] ::s
IDID uw '0 C
-" sw.'o . c'O '" co ''::\,
u_
ID- u~~u C
-- '05.'.:: =''''u''' 0
-.0 u
0::1 cc,c ,cua .'"
uo COou uu::S..s 8
'U" .~.;;; c ..c::..=CI)c;;
e.~ 0 - - U'co -
S,g 'S
:.:: e ~ ~ ~-s~ CI'
.!!~ ~e~ :=..2'0 '"
=
OlD ~8 e ~l\:;.s ~
-"
eo
-.c
c- 'O~cc 9 ~~..~
0" . Co u it; ",0'" t;'
Uc CO..c t 0
0" t'!.... lib co .'05
=. u 0'0 '" t:CUClll
~- co
::I a. e"'cco s 0
CT::I e~co..c
"0 '" u..c u
ttl o~ ::s=Euo ,.g~~-5
-- ~~ "'llbcClll
>. 0'0 ... U) ... 0.
-ccu C u'O ::s e:2 ~ B
t'-Sc ..... .&;
_ID f ....~ >. o ~'c
oE cl:: ...0
CU u . u-
a.c .. g :R 5 . u"fl.l" E "-
00
~ ~ Q, .. ClIlC _ ::s.. ~
C;'~ ::s ~ >. co .9 ,c -;::E >.
0'0 f.,g::;: ::s>
~ID o ... '"
ClIlc ~- e 'OC;0:=
.!!' W21"- ..c coec'"
c c.c: ClIl~
S=~ ,g ~ g i5~ e.= ~~
_ou B.ge-ss . u-::s
IDS :--500.
u-
~ _II
~ -~ . ~"'UUU""
-ID -
0'0 8 o co _ ..c oC ">. ::s
.c..c:::......uc.
\(\~c e - t;'~o~ 5 8.
c::l
::lID co .&5Sc,c~S
oE ClIl ClIl'.'O ~ ..
Uo C coco::Scou::S
cuu :a . u i co ..c..c go
-. c g..c 0 I ",I- 0
jll ~ -8e ~.E
-
...c ..s ... ucco];t
0- ... c c..c'. 'U
IDo!:! o u - co.. . 0
..2 -.:: '- = .... "0 = .c
.c:: ~~.. ...-.it '"
-" -
o:a ~ ::s~~ a=E ~
a tU 4.) en en'::;
~ID t'! e ~ e >. I u.~....
~.c u .... M 0_
cuI- c co o~..... >.'5 S
U)-d 0
.;;; e..ct; ... u 0''''
EC .~ Clil uu::suc",c
..c ::S-4:: u 0 ~
=;&. e.5 l-e~<='Eo
g~~..:-cJ, c:~~e'
.. t:'.cn C'cou'.-
&couc..sG.!=,]~8
i7i,c.~'. c...l co 1:: '"
o - 4,). u .-..
E 5 8. ~ ~ ~ -5.~ > .'U--
.,g] ~'~~j g:R] ~
.- CI) au; ~....::: cu:.a
..... cu.- CI).c u.- cu ..: u
o ..c::E ... U 5 e 1:: ~oC
...>. u LL.;':::S"O-'
..cuc'O-o- u::so
.!:!!l c.. c 0 U co .,;-,c'"
uu ::sou...... ~
~ ~.5.~ ~ ~ g, ~ .~ .s
.c: u >''0 i5. '0 u 0 u
--5fcco'" > o.",?
t; .. 5t- tU ~ ~ ~ >" ~ ~_.
c . u uuC
';Oe"'...:-~-c'-
... '" ~::s co 0 "'.- E
" 0 <<S 0 cu cu. .... ..~ --
;,a ~ cl:0.Q., S ~ U S u
~"' 1IJ r.n \0,01
~"E;~t:
::Io..c>.s
2Z.~.9 ""
= C:Q.fl.)
I) '0 t:: 6..c
:: c= u'"
~ cu __ ...
" "" ~ iii '"
~ 5.5 ~]
&):Ei:"Q,_
~ 0'= .- .
::l ... .~ '0
::I Q, U U c.-
~_; a~ ~
~'" .s-u
'y~ ~..c:
;0;=;
c >..- 0 U
t::.5at...>.
en
G>>
o "'1/)
== ~8
::s ~ '5
...~i
.., 1/)0
en ~ E
O .Y~
'Cell
E ~~
.~ lu
O ECI)
/ >-
... I c:;
.., "lj-
:s[
o .!2
CCI)
'A _..c .
WI e ~ =a
- C.-C
a. 818'e
E
::s .g..,;€
~l:~
'A i~ E
WI 0 CI) CI)
G>> :E I/) 'C
O l:~l:
~l:~
~ =0 l:
WI 8. .'-
o18al
C ....91/)
~'3 ell
.- :E i ~
ftI Cl)0~
iii -5 E~
ceo
C ~ oal
G>> aEm
.c I!~
~ .~;:=
.. a: -.5 g
4,,) tJ:; .:. o.~
atc~~8'O
",,'" ""c..c
.- oS u :'It '" ~
tuat"'56
.... - ..~...
"'0"" c:
'" E U u._ C
S <.fl!oS '" u
u at c~ S >
oS g:-s,8
.... .1:;:0
0""'OQ, '0
u.- '" '0 "'3
~~~..c;o
....ccS .at
U fl.)'= ':' U')
..c""""c-c:
E- u ::l u'S 0 .
: oS< >.c'::~
'~.'
...
.x...... --.>:::,;;i;l:
,.. CI).''-
............~.-g. .... $1
CI).'O.81...,
-5),5 CI)< .
'E .50~..('
~ 1/)'0.".
o ~ .~-5,)
lu 0 1/)..8.'.
~I-'-,.I/).ul"
:~-8.ST
~~..ClI~,>
- CD-5 .......
~a.iO (
Cl)s .
al(/)o~>
SaC'iii
lG 5 ~'~..."
CI) ... 'C C'"
E= __o-T
>-o.E
m ell.~ Cll>
.:E ~ ..
~e.eal
,g..g CD lG
.!!l""-~e
~iii I/)U'
0.1= c..!;
8.'a gs
.g ~ ;...8
~'::'I/)
iCD 158.
oE:5.t:.
E:! CI)~
I/)o~.i
CI)- ;;>'0
liE l j.aU
. I/) li
8-E'O-'"->
t:: I/) 5:e. ....'..
.g ~ e.~,
I/)'=,g_.
~ .~ ~:J
<
-
u
ClI
.
Clo
E
.g
"2
::I
.5
-
c:
Q
U
:E;:;e~c
!:'" ~::c 8 5 ~:.
...c c u
llil-:'>.8.6s
c...~gc.u'=-
:.:: ~ 8 ~ 0 > c~
~>'::l"'U"'~
& "".....c u
~ ~.... ~ -.~ IS.
U t:: 0 >..... _
'" 'O'OcU
.c u c.!:S uoS
- ..c.- "" '0 S _
.~_..lC ",'- C '"
-",,>' ~ou
~.- :; u .= ~
~... '0..:>""
u '" '0 C u C'-
;~~~sU..!
u.-uE-'-U::l
> ~:.a'O.~t: Q,
'" C!I u- ;;1,-- 0
..c ~"';'~~:-:Q,
~ ."- -. .7
t:8~'3~~e8Gf5,;~ j>':!se~
.8.5'- c "" ::l-O::le::: t '" ",,'O..c o;C
o",,>u- c C"o....c .S ""
~ .. ~ 6.""..c 8.c:'c "".c - oS "" S >..6
. 0 u c t;'~2 U .c._ = ..8 c;.~ _ g C
c(jt::8c..co;;;",_",_ u .uuQ,
.sa ~._.- u at -..c '" S..c ::c >.~:'"
.';::.- c >c: ClI .~; "".- .... g't c;
""'Ou 'c>' ci OU uc.>
o .- u u S'c u S '.- oo-..c's-
g;."" ~ u oS e Q,oS f'l c at ~ C '" s - u
Og=oSu~""u~~g~ E..85~~
..8 U'O ",,:'2 a..8 a a'~ "" ~ t:'::: E.y ""
... ~ u U'J ~ "'''U en tJ.~ <10 c.::: >- ..
.9 ~ ~ t c c.c.8 >.; '0 Q,;; e"'3 e t
u.8 N "'.5 u.- "" _.c Q, '0 Q U'>'O 51- E
0_"" ....S""u....'Ooc ::ICN_S
C "'oo--oou-'" uO'u....'"
&~..c--~Biu~""~ 3~uo;a
~ ~ti a~.s 113~ li " :..8; ~ 6~
=.~O\ = s.....8 0" ".,!!,....c::~. CII-
.....CJ')""=!~....~us..."9c;._ :'~"'.-t;~.5
. ::' ;. ;: '...~ ...: : :~ ~.:. -:. ~ .:: :- :;:
ca+-'
fn~o~
Q)ca+:i::=
o o.~ CD
.... ~
.- ~ ca c:
~(.).....,o
CTCUJ
~CDQ)ca
..:~ ~:~~~
."
..: "'c- >.: '
o ~._ ..: ~ ~ ~
>'i!5.;;0~0;.:
'" Q,::l >. .::: Q,
S "".....'" '" Q,S
"" 0 .9 s.: 0.-
.. ....c:"'..UGJ
1i! "" - < ..cU ..c ..c
;0 -; c::: .........
at.y Os llil.... ;;; - .
UlE C'- "".
"Q, 0 )<'>. u..lC8~.g .
'" uN"" 8
~>.c"'C- >.
~ g ClI 51- ~ ."" :: ..8
.UC'O"'_. -
:; Clerc u ~ Q ;;;
.:: '" '" ::l '0 .....l ..c
""'O..8.S~ =: at
cl!~ >. c.... 000....
"" - 8 0 .....- 0
i" "" 'y '0 Q, ~ ""
<<I"""'>'cO C
c:J ~ ;;; ; ~ .9..8.g
.J. c; ;; e' c.i = ...,8
'Oc", coe-
'00Q, .a _
as,.::: -5 t;' ~ 8 '"
c "'._ c c;;
-z at ~.8 8'60
vi>'ClI"".._O
~~.= c:.5 r3:g
as '" Q, "" >.'o;l..c
Q,>~ eo",
>'ftI~~ Q,"O ~
... .w c.... en'- =
'0 ~.- 5 o.c ..8
p. u u'O - u u
t: 2 ~ !:: S.';::
..c.-... c U 0 ~
_~ u'- >. "'~
c u~ ~.!!!.~ t-
'-..cc.E .oS u '" .
-0"':'= e-..... ..~ u
~ c.:g:.:: ~..8 '0 ~
c; 0'- 0 ::lE-'-'"
..c .::: ~ Q, 0': ~ ~
~
..
'"
Q,
>.
c
'"
u
>
o
..
Q,
Q,
'"
-
""
::l .
s.g
-
-u
'0 '"
C"E
::l",
8,g
:S e..8~ e's ~
e ~-O\ Q, Q,-o
c- u u
'" 0'- c u 2 >.
... en....:g 4J e
; Q,~~~::c Q,
.!lc~;;;t..c~t:
uu'Og.5t:t~
.g 6 :; e''''' g at u
c;;;-;: >. ""u
8u uUCU'O
= ~ at c._ O'y
!II~" "'.-
-g"B2t:""~~-3
"".- cs '" ~ >'-0 '0
c6o~..-."..'"
o u \0 .::.... :l on ~
._..c:......_ O..J ...
;; u >.U t: ~
c """5 c '" s' c 0
u ::l u'i Q, g t:
oS.gZE- ~ ~u ~
..s!....c.....cu
.!a "'.';:: u 0 S u ~
::lu~CO~.~Q,
t;'.g:,:: ..5 0 ... ""
. 5 ~'ili.5Z:.. ~
oo..c ::l - C ~ lE
"" c"'3.g U'- ~ 0
uo"'c-5c.c'o
-5 == Q.,.- - & c
.- "" '" 0 u u
u sv5.S; 0.8 e
.!::!t"") CU'" en
.~..., c S ~ g ~ t;'.~
'C at'- ~~'O '" c.';::
c.> u 00 "" u ...c B U
c c "" C CO'O '" C
~ ",:.a 8 8.5"'3 >.-
c; co:':: u :g 8..c ~
c ::l > c.- CO"
u.-.,J:Jo... U ::J.. .- U
S :g (j lio.c. ...c..c
.- ~~ 0 u .. u-
~.E ~ ufi5'oS.8oS.s
'C....~O
e.-:.a co u ... ,
..c>'04
oo'OCE-j..lI)~
c u 8 ~-
.- := vi U'O 4
~ Q,- U .. C ~
s-a.9oo"':
"'0 0 =.- C en t'I
8 UO::l;.:u.
c'O.a ll'6,:E't
"'''' 0..lC 4
c..c:;csgU-
t:: ~ ...-s,
"" ~at at "".-.
'" c . u "" at .
at uO\c,::; "'=.
~oo '0 at u ~
- O\u at
~ ~-~ ~.=-;
'O'..c '0 u c ""..
......... c.~u.... ~
Q,,,,,'" coot
Uoo"""'C:;;
utoocu'O"
E uO\.sa..c'-
t""""'U'J-.......-Oa:
~ru &: ~ JJ e:o..!. :s ut:!:.~ t
c oS.g:.a ~ S t g B.'c 8. ~
~ >. ~ c - .5 '0 S.2!l '" -
'" '" .. s CO u u -.- "" u '"
u.... u "" c..c..c"U.. c
..c~~ .1.':::E- - :> 0 "" C C
... ct-liol ="": c... ~'.t=ii'-'-'-
0.-'0 0 ~ vi 0 oc; ",,~'O
-_C--.lo4 ""C'-S u'jj
::: = = U >.;(j VJe: U)"=
o U~..c- ~ "'.- u'- - .
..... 6 .. - C; .... Q, _ c .-
- '" u""s'OOt'l..tc
~ 8 Q., ~'-'>. ~ Q, l::'..c u
gac "".::: 6.';::'-::l u o.~-g
:sg:ac;..8~11~oS_r.z..~
c o...c u..c'60c'O U'O c
..8 c " "".... - 0 u c e!l">'c .
- '" c '" 0.5"0 rl '" s '" & 5
!. u.s at 8 "" U ls. '0 SO ::l lib
"'; ~ '0'::: 8 u "" ~ c: . "" 0
of: "" u ; u.';:: E u 5 c ~ fi5'
~~..c.s1e::lu:'2sC"'!l!o
"'~--Q,o'_u Ou...._
5~B~t~.S: .
~:.a ; ;~~ .9~~
"" ~ 6"" -('S's ~
.- .E ~ ~ g c II ~ ~
t;'g:'= ~'S < sO.9 ::l
co. 0'. Q,.!a
u C.Ucn_...
CO .0COC;",,::l~
"'~:: 0 6'73 &>'00
u u ._ c::: c
oSuS"'set-co
.. >..- '" "'-
oo"'u"'=..cSc.>""
c ..c ~.- u ~ '"
.- ~ - "" 6 c'C !II u
u u _ .- Q, t: >
<.fl!..c.S.!N~ u "':'::
E- u_ ..cO'O
.c ""lE';::o-::c
o .'Oou- ~U'"
..... t s '>. I :; S -
u e!l0'O cN >< u-a
~.5 lib:; ~ '" ~;'c
uo~~c;uooc
-=..c u.- c.>oS >. U
. '" 'i a's ~ g .5 ~
6'0 c;8'- "'.-
'~..8 ~'i u e 6g ~
.~ .~ ~ E- -a ~'> 51- .
"C:C t! u :s ..."= c; u
u S oS~ u ~.2'O
.. ~ ~ c E- S u S'y
4,) 'i)"~ S:o u'::
oS.s ... ; 00 :S.U; -5 :;
o c u c "".- '0
C O~U'- u > "" '"
'" "".- 0 C..c _ - 0
... (U_ ~~ U)"-_
co_ '0:= u c: 0.... ""
.5 ~ ;.. at _'- S 0 8
""-"'00"'00"" 00
"" ..cc..cc' -
~ t;'-:-.>, -'>, ~ 5 ~
''05ue~ee~-o
" '0 00 C Co.. 0. ClIl "" ::l
-:< cu:':::' ~ ~ '" ~. 0..0
e
"'....o-c u .
u 00 ::l '" "" v.
; ""N 0 CO'C ie
0..8 ""'0.8 ",-0
...u"'U
t).s ~ 2 ~.E s:
S\O "'<.fl! c
uc6~~~~
oS"'''''u'''(.;o
_-5 ~~ u.c.c
.- u o..c 0 '"
..c ~'C :> - _
"" 0'" ~ _ c
c 6 e - ~ ....-
.- Q., 8 :; c
eoocc -8~
~S u 0 ~.- s
> > '0 U '0 ~.-
~~wo_",::l
..c - c.';:: ><c COo ~
..- ::l u
C - .. II C'- S
..8~~ou5
~~ at 60S ~.S
c ~ ~..!.-o
"'s..8~~
""_ u
0.- C; ~
... .~ ... u ~
C) .... <<1._ ftI
-.c'~oS;; u
ftI - ":: >
c_ ~~~
::l S-o ""
_cu~U) .
:=u:;ct::s
;;Eb"'~~
",,"'c'Ou.c
'--g~ 8.. e
>'::l U ::l'- Q,
goo;; "'"8..8 0
~u~... ....=
'" E.! Q,'; ='
u-..cll
u~lEo-o
~...0~8E
:;~!l~flJi
..lXl ~_..c '0 _
e
e
.;;;..-......... .
~; :
",
,
~'.:.~:
'..\
.;Q.C
'0""
~ t;;:
.$ g.-=:
~'O ~
,.~;.::
.-]
3l .
j:g--
);00-
. LIJ 0-
:ci:-
;~.=
: e u
~ o.~:.
:... e e,)
. tn Q. CIIl
: c: ~
, 0 cu ...
sO-5 g
. ... .... . ........ . t..,.. e.-
U'" U .... '"'00'''
C "".c'; C~ c_ U
c:~-<;.;Oq,l::l--
....c 0 c '0 ~ "" ~
~-1;::l_0~~.~~
u ~ U').~ .......:.:: c;.o vi
-5 U "" ;>-.=.!l tn z] ~
.Eo ~ g "" 8" .!:: c.:::
'0 U _ u.... q,l::! >'2 ::l
c.c... CIIl 0 Q. "" I ::l ~
::l0'O""-...'" q,l0
~.c.ij~.~c.E..!!!,c E
..:..:~ -u..;>-.'.E'O-
tn ."..~:.c43o-ae
~tt::o .~S~oE
> ,...J.2.c '0 U'" '"c;j ~ 0
;>u......,O~.c::lUlu
. 0 U ._ '" 0'.... _
fr ",.!lE~cgo",,'c
oJ ""e Q. "".- E '" '0 '0
....;:: E ><..:..: t::._;::
-0 Uc ""......
::l Q. 0 "" '-;>-.Q., 0 U
a:I""Vi~~-5~:Ii:~
e
E""'cc~S~OI)=
""~ ~o... ""~ U
lib""q,lU~.!l.c: ~
o Q.~ 0 ...,c - ""
1s..l!l'O'::: ~:g g~--o
_ ..::l .. .- 0._
- OJ: O'!J -'0::0 c lJ!
S Co "'.- "';::- U'J
c "" 0... "" ....E; "" U
uu.!!lEu~","~.c
E c "" > '"c;j .
c.5'u u O;>-'U c."".
o""'E.co u'E- 00 E
....-::;o-o-c -u""
.;; u .c 0- ~ U u lib
c:.c..:..:.-- "".c~~ 0
u"''-- ~-....
... "" ~.5 U!J U ~ Q.
Co Q.", ;>-.-5'- u u-
""... Cu -"'.c::l
......C;oc....cu.......o
~ Go).c'~ cu ~ -5 ~':::.E
...l ~- :g ~- u'O~ CIIl
l:: Coo U-'O > ""_::l
"".- '" 0 c 0 c '" 0
~ E lJ!;o ~ "" Is. "".:;-5
g~~
.~~~
:;:~'"
. . ""
'O-.c
u::l
.~ cu CI)
E Q., .5
... .;>-.
--""
utn ...
... Q.
Oc'"
E'--
.cc:e
CIIlU-
::l":": C
oS8
.c
-co
...;u.-=:
",,~::l
:-:: ~
E"'o
tiS] E
.
~u
,>
,01)
'0'
S]
._ C
::l0
~.~
o::l
Ee
u'"c;j
e'u
oS
~o
c:u
.. C
"go
"l::: .
~E
. u
~[
: 0
E'O S ""';' u.c >'5< C ~ .
u ....- c:._.c CIIl 0 <:5 "".- ""
:9 E &-: g r ~ Q. . c:':; (5
VJ 0 '" .... '" cu Q,) rof"')._ >. VJ
~Uo~:;j-ci'.c'O~5<o~
Q. 0 E;> u'; :;; !J C <:5 ....:
'" .::: '0 ==.c <11._.- "" . e "'"
"" ::l u ::l - U~'O 00._'-::;
'00'...,,,, u.c?;-c "'~.c u
u '" l:S., '-'... 'C "" ~ '0 '0
i: 0 E ccS cO"" ~.- u ~.;;;
~~ o'~~'E:-E- C ~ E.>;
u... u o...""Qo
cncCIJu....u.(;;Q. U "0
]e""Q.,!.'l8-""c",~u
,c.c - u u "" '"
o u .~;>-''"c;j:g ~ lib;.c -5 ::l
.cec--::lO 0 :I
~ 00'" C'- i:i;.~'O - u
. <.~ _..!!! C > 0 tn C C =
C ""_ ",,~-. <<IUO'
U U'- o.c 0 0'. 8.c
lib-5 ~ E g.~ -C;;..2 c ~ ~ ~
0....'" q,lOOuu-to...
Vi' 0 < 8 ~.~ e ~ E lJ! "" cS
.::~:;(f9>::.--..-:
::::::-.
....,.::;:::.;.::-;:.-.....
.....;.;..;.......
C-'"
o.c ""
.~.!!!l~
<<IC_
::l -
.:: ... :
en; .
<<1_ U
C E
... :9 .,g
c:""
<<I"''''
U =
c.-
g51x
;>-.'U c:.
;;; Z ~ 'u
.c ....-
~~.< e
o...."'u
'0 "".-.c
=-5.c ~
ouE'E
>..:..:0""
: :.::c;.c
fm
..
=-
E
!
"8
::I
.5
...
c::
c
U
....cc...~
""UOCu
.c... '" U _
-.c'OE;
'O~::lt:-C;;
U 'X <<I
.~ ~ C Q. ;>-.
(5 g.- c]
C.c '" ""
..:..: ",...
~~~f::'E
- - ='c E
..5'O~ E
t ... cu V).- U
.coe '0
_ C _ U u.-
~ ~'et:~ ~
.....u .-0
c.c.e- u 01)
"g ] : -5i .c .5
<<I-""c--5
<<I U ~ '0 ...
o g C 0'- <<I
-.....l!lr- lJ! ~
~ Q) ~
.2 .~ ~
+-,i
~ C =:
CD -- ~
CD """ ~
C ~~
-- 0 ~
0) +-' e
c en '0
W~
,C
..,32
C :J <
Q) 0 -
-CO
.- c
CJ__
~~
8'u""'c..2:'~
.cu.._.
III .- - "";>-.
60: "c e ~ U
o ~ U ~ ;>-.-5
"'UCI'J"" CI'J
Q.,c ';>-. "" ~ E ~
C 8 g u r-'- ..;
.51 g u ~ . ~ ~
~u~eEuto
.5.c u u.-.c~
8-.c-""-'"
01)- Q."'U- C
;::C....o "'::l
~'uoct'o ~ 51
; .g ..IO!: - ~.:::
uU-ci'Cu_
(5 ... ~.- = '0 ::l
c~:lJ!~E~
e'u ~ C <<1_ ~
. ~ _ ~ '" 0.,.,
u ,o6O::lc....
~ ;._.0 0 0 <<I
: ~ lJ! V5''O '0 8
ill
3
~.
~
.
-fJ7
II'
UJ ~u
Q) Q)
~ .(;
U) Q)
>- F'
ffi 0
~o
.!!!
.;
o
'0
;>-.en
ct::
<<10
uQ.
>~
'60 U
o.~
:"&
;c
-.-
u_
::l0
-c
~~
"'u
;~
u;;;
X-5
;>-.u'O u
]~]-S
.!!! 8. u....
'0 u u
uc.c'O
EO-C
E'" .::l
'0'0
._::l u CIIl
C X .~ .:
""c!:~
Eu""
.cu'O
;;::>uc
."l;;> C ""
L/J . <<I '"
..9- "E ::l
'Ou~o
c.c E'-
",...",~
cc.E c g
0'0 <<I U .
"'u C
'U-'O "'.-
z]1;;~
C- . -- 0
o::l"'ESo
"'lf~ U'--
'0 >sr
~..;>.~o~
... tn L.' .c u
uu ~
00<>0><<1
... ~G,) .
.... :J.- ... >-.1:
CII)'::=uu
]l;l!5~~-5~
-5i S'" 0."..'0 <<I
= C '"c;j - 8,- ~
... ~'s. 'E - lJ! sa
:; .... S"E"'O c"'O
~'O:I:",~""~
c "'UE""
<<I"'u>oe
C ''':'': u
<<ItiiC...",~""
.c...~o"'",,o
~ 's':s! ~ ~ l;l ~
c cg.- U 0 '0
~xO B'o ~~
....u~cc-""...
Otutog'O&
c_~-c;;'O.oc""
51tn u"'''''<<I;O.
'U....,;~~_DO '0
Z o.-.c ~ < 0 "" ~
_ u ~ t:: ~ . '0 ;>-..c
...::l o~C<<I-'"
""'O.;Z o'Og~
U g.!:: '0 ~ ~ U U
,-uSccu::s=coE
~ U "" U X 8..5 ;;
.:"g::l ~......... '" ;.-
OI)"""l<<l~ocuE
C L1JU U~-
u'" ~DO"'E U
.=.... ct:: 'O.c
~.- 0 U ;.:: 30: .c:-:: -
~X C """E '" c.c c
~c<<l'OQ.S~u~
1; u oS ; C 00=.5
u'O '" 0'- UN <<I _
"'" ;"l.o E.c .. E.:::
,c.~WLU.......~Cl'JCI)
o ;>-''0 >>'0 u u'" .-
-<<IUUc~":":c.Et~
~~ -g ~ "".cj'O ;;;.;;;
<<I Q.CIIl.~ u~...
& U u <<I u ~ c.... ~
Q.-g"c8c_l.O:oo
"""'Uo<<l.,g~:-::~;>-.o
~ c of c '" 01)._ '8 c
.~.- .. ~ t].:~~ '"
'C >>...: ~.c c e ;>-. <<I'u
Uu= <<Iouo"
,-.c <<I c :aU.c ~ c_ u
or- Q.,.!2 ~ ~ ~ ~ t:
t ...;'0 '-.. <<I 0: .
~CIIltn""'OO..!lU"'U '.
8.S,- ~ ~ c'1;-5 0 i:: ~
= :;j 0 U <<I:.iOl_ 0 S:.iOl E'~
.. u '::1. '" > c - >-
u !:) g C' sr.-.; '0 :t- ~
.c c <1>.!l Cl:: - u'>. Cl:: u
:'-~"ca~ U Q.8";;; <<1"0-5
u 'C c 2'c c ....; c
>- .8 LIJ <<I _ LIJ 800( srtn 0
II) c: I 1"''''0
g.; ~.: g u
.- E '" ~] C
'OuEC<<lu<<I
~ ....; <<I II> g ~
~...-Cl'JCUU
U C Q..- U ..:..: '
'::1. u 8 u'~: 8.
C' EO... .- .
U U U u'"c;j '"
-... .c ~
'"c;j~~r-euC
>.=...= 055
<<I '" .:: 01) 01)
CIl_=. <<I
.!!! e.-.;: ~C C
<<I'-.co- u'- <<I
'u E --.-
S u'i ~ r; c
O~...:.S <<1'0 ~
- "" .- ..
C", 8'O'O'~O
c."::.- u ~ (.) en
U ct::<<IU'"
~9'E 8.t.5~
~~.*'o~~~~~ "g.~5*,.s"g~~ ~g~.;-=~.BStS
"";'Ot ~.c~- <<I~~__<<I,o.c <<IE>>E...li-c;;~E~
:1- CIIl.c. Q. u ;>-.. E <<I - 0 .c ~ ",.- 0 .-
ce.:(5r;~8u-5 g~.!!lu.;~'O- o~,c-c;;~o.c'O~
u - .- c U u <<I '0 - U ~ - ~ u E E
c~~ 1;:: -c;; u : 0 ~'~.~o!:!"g:E'c 0 '" e ~&: Coo]::: U
8.oe""':S.:;E''''-..; uEe'O~'i:'; .",.;;; <<I~c<<l':::
Q..c 8 ~.;;; c ~ ",~-a -5 b~ c c ~~ ~ ~.9~ C ~]Eo<<l
:E~c~g~~~~~ c::!~:8~~Q. .s.c<<l~-~~~;
.- - Q.,c ~ u .- u ~ - - '" "" - ... -c;; 0 ..; > u '"
1; ~ '0 ~ r; u .'" '0 ~ -5 S.~.c :;j f .; ~ ::l ",.j:!;> '" 9 <<I
'" 0 ~ 0 ... ~ '0.5 C ~ _.l!l ~ "',c >>.c Z ..:..: ~ .=~ -c;; 0 ~ 43 :I
'"c;j.c..!!! E .c; ~ c > ~ ",.c -5 U <<I ;>-. "" j E ~ l:S.,'- - "" "'!
'u ... Q. CIIl.'" u r- ~ 0 CIIl - - 0 u E g c E' - tn Q Q. ::l
c:::: u> '" c ;>-.... ~ ",,"'0. C ~ '" ~:-:: u'", _ 0 . '" .c tn 51 !!!l
co;; "" ,- U U '" U ._ 8 u.c 01) "" u '" . '0 - -..
o O.c ~ c.c o.c u '" -c;; c8.'- > ~.!!! <<I 0 -5 ~ c .'f u Co .".. -'~ eil
u t: u - ... -.c <<I ::l <<I "" "" u.::: 0 . =.c - III !'!
C~ U ~ ~~U-.c 0 Q."'U.c.;.~.c ='0 u.. ~;;:y ti E ~~ "(.5
~l~ (~1d.~~.:'~ 'i;irt~t;~.':~~.~UH
. t~1}i,~:!h.n,1#1 f 't~<j'~~4~~~ ,'f,~)
e
.c~...c...UII) I' '''0
- c.~ O.c <<I ~ 'U e u
iOGll;>-'- ~>> -
.9.<::] g en u'O ~
c u.!2 ~ c '0 -5 ~ -
o > ~ u 'e- 01).: ." '"
u'- .~ C~IO 0 <<I
U '" >>c <<1'- CIIl...c u
c.=~-- ~ ~c:E "'..
Uu -U...OOl) ""
'0 cOO u...:Q.'" c .
.;; 0 u.c = "'.... 0"E.:
cu u'S'" cu 0 CI)._
c- -Q.,'"c;j '" u~ '"
u.- Q.<<I . U.~ c":": c
.c e 01)-'- & 0 U 0
- '" 8 c tn 8 ..!!!.~ en
.... c 0 c u ~~ <<I q,l
0'- .....-.c '" c - 0
.c e -c;; 0 ~ u:q 0'0 6..;
u u::l E'- '0 u 0
::l ... '-'- 0 "'.- '0 Q. 0'
e uo <<1""<<1 cg
'" ~].c _ >>'" ~ '0 e
_ U"SZ u r- u C !9- C s;;;
::S:9~~..;~""o~g~
a:I",~...:tnu~..,..9'9""
";" ~- ~;.,,:.. :'.
"'uc
u.c.-
~-Q.
... c:: =
~;'O
~~8
"'0;;
'0-;>-'
u u- .
=-=5~
::l.~'O u
o..c '0 E
;>-.~::l-
u "'u
.cu'O.c
....c-...
....- '--
:9'0-50
""Uu.!!
CA;;.c"Q
c.s!!r-:9
o,c . E
.!!l :s!
u '0._ u
Zc.c.c
IlIU_
...-=~ CIl
.t.)(J)t.)
u"enCll
.s.! CIl;:
'1'05>
II a.<l: l!!
c....'-
..lien;:,
::sCCIlCD
0.5 3: ii
.t!~,,=
. 0._
5ef/=
.. ii.!" C..
'.'1:1-
.5~'~
'I:I::s
1&10
en
'0.... u'O-'OC
- O.c- :;j c.-
gs-g-<<I~
~oguuc
c'O...u-5~u
.- u "".c 0 .c
f.c.o ;;;'01-
-E~~_'O .
U;:: E'- ::l u.c
-5 u'O 8"cctj :;:
~uu.c .::lu
uX-5c::E'O'"
~ . 0'" ~ c '"
u e c ~ u ] .c::
.c'~ 0 u ~ ;;; ~
'Oc"O.c-gu
.~... 1;.: 0.-' Z
c::8".oo::l .....
o-C;;<<I_Q."go
'" ucoo
'U(5uoouS
Zc-5c::~~o
j
<:
~
1
U' c t ~ ~ '0 ':'0 r..!. ~
'0 O.c _ '0 0 u u._
o'~ - DO.... 0 ~ E-U
.:!l <<I u cor- c u S
Q.~of.- 0 .- U C u
uu,,;>-, .'Ocu.c
~"'f!1J!5oer-
'" ~Q. ....ouc
'c'Ou"'C""U oeil..
:.w c ~ 0 lJ! Q.~-e.!::.: .'
><<10-=-<<1<<1>>>
.- ~ 'S tn C Q. C e!
Cl::~_O'uO"'.!!!UQ.
<<I C ",":":j':: ';>-..!!! ~ '"
o Q.._ 0 u _ U t:
- 8 ..:..:.-c:::: u u
~ _<<IUCO;;>.c
u.'" 0 - - u 0'0 -
=c>':::;u-5 <<I
"0 ~ = ~ c > ...:..:>> E
>> ~'i ~ c 1.0: ; ; ; e
'U.c'O e< '" 8 Q._'"
DO;...Q.U. ='0='"
".cll! .loC;>-'o_o'O
jU.o sj''aX'lJ! ~~
. flU]->>
.8\5-5_]-g
.."'0 u.......,
;>-. .t~... '"
-g]-5<<10~
-C;;c~l!l!Jr-
I.O:-'v C
~u~~uc;>.
_'0 'Oecu
'O;>-.~...- c
.__ 0'- <<I ~ u
lJ!~-5i~~u~
DOO!: u-~u
c <<I ;>-..s!! 0 ",.c
o c 'U ~.::: u -
.... > ='u;>-.
O~';;;'E~&,c
~='O0"''O
.: "'U ~ E...~
~.~ g.c u~ c
, u~u~.c-<El
';: ~ oS.s "::' .'2 ..
.o::lo-;:.:.U<<I
:.;: X e c ~..o -5 ~
''C
~.-
'0
-c
u._
'C":":
-c;;'"
Oe
o
-e;;
Etb
0;
u-
u
o.c
.:::::
::l0
~u
OC
~~
c::
u.-
.c'"
r-E
page 1
June 26. 1992
To:
Todd Hoffman
Chanhassen Park Board Members
e
From: Eric Rivkin
470-9726
Subject Adulticide mosquito controlS used In lake Ann and lake Susan parks
Dear Todd and Members of the Park Board,
Thank you for hearing the case for banning adulticides to control nuISance mosquitos In lake Ann Park and Lake Susan Park.
ThIS letter recaps the position that I share with the Sierra Club. Audubon Society. Izaak Walton League, Human Ecology Action
League, various local city. state, and park officialS. and hundreds of cltltzens around the metro area who have complained and
succeeded in banning nuisance mosquito controlS. We have been carefully scrutinizing the MMCD in the best interest of
public health and welfare and environmental protection, not for political reasons.
Unfortunately Ross Green. information director of the MMCD. used a red herring to distract us in the June 23 presentation.
He may have convinced some of you that controlling nuisance mosquitos with adulticides IS part of the main control strategy for
mosquito borne diseases. This IS not the case. First. the concern is with just two parks, not the whole city or private land.
According to MMCD policy and procedures, adulticlding Js...nQt part of a long term nuisance mosquito control program, nor is it
the preferred method of mosquito disease control. Education and prevention is. As you may conclude from the evidence in this
packet, the MMCD adulticides themselves can be a considerable health risk. Exposure to health-threatening adulticides is far
greater than exposure to diseases from mosquitos, even If spraying is done for just for one event
Ifs only a matter of time before more people put cause and effect together or get sick from adulticldes. I hope you agree it is ...
best to err on the side of caution before it is too late. ..
Pat Kelly, the Dept. of Agrlc. investigator noted in his report on the 1991 illegal adulticiding at lake Ann that what the front
office [of the MMCD) says and what they do In the field are two different things. Ross Green stated In a letter that Punt
treatments were done according to the label at Lake Ann. but I found that was not true. as you can see from the punishment
Imposed on the MMCD in the case file. I hope you alSo view the safety and effectiveness Of the nuisance mosquito control
program with healthy skepticism.
I hope this information paCket will try to objectively clear the air about any misconceptions presented before you.
These findings have been discussed and endorsed with the citizen environmental groups mentioned above.
If you need more information. I will do aliI can to help. Please call me at 470-9726. After you get a chance to review the
material, I would like a chance to speak with each of you before the July 28 meeting.
z~~.~'
Eric Rivkin
cc:
Chanhassen City Council Members
e
e
e
e
page 2
What is the issue?
To my understanding, the iSsue is whether adulticlde spray applications be allowed in Lake Ann Park and Lake Susan Park to
control nuisance mosquitos because the safety and effectiveness of the MMCD's chemicals are In question. Adulticides can
pose a real threat to human health and the environment The MMCD does not warn the public adequately about hazards found
In the labels or studies that suggest or confirms adverse effects. The people of Chanhassen should also be told that safer,
environmental alternatives to control and cope with nuisance mosquitos have worked elsewhere, and could be tried as a
substitute for chemical controls.
A vote for banning adulticldes can be:
1. A vote fQr protecting public health
2. A vote fQr environmental protection
3. A vote fQr trying safer, alternative methods of nuisance mosquito control
Adulticide safety and effectiveness was also the hot topic at the annual meeting of the MMCD's Technical Advisory Board
(T AS), and the MMCCommisslon's policy committee, which I attended. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that
adulticiding of any kind deserves any credit for the low number of encephalitis cases in the metro area, which total 17 in the
entire metro area for the last 10 years, according to MnDOH statistiCs.
Private landowners and municipalities have the right under Statute 473.704 to refuse the MMCD's nuisance mosquito control
program only, not the disease-carrying mosquito program. The park board or city council can recommend going beyond an
adulticide ban to include larvacides, or include other publicly owned land, restrict the use of adulticides, or require the
notification to citizens and mandatory posting of treated areas. Minneapolis, Hennepin parks, DNR parks. the Mn. Valley
Refuge (in Chanhassen, too), and other parks and nature areas have banned or severely restricted nuisance mosquito
chemical controls. So far, few citizens have complained about the removal of mosquito controls because there hasn't been a
noticeable difference.
What is D..Q1 at issue?
A vote for banning adultlcldes in the two parks should not
1. Affect Chanhassen withdrawing from the district, or affect nuisance mosquito control programs on other
public and private land in Chanhassen
2. Affect the disease-bearing mosquito control program
3. Debate the safety and effectiveness of the larvacides used to control nuisance mosquitos in Chanhassen
4. Involve the politics of mosquito control
page 3
Are mosquito-borne diseases a threat in Lake Ann and Lake Susan parks?
Aedes vexans, the largest target of the MMCD's adulticiding and larvaciding program, is a nuisance mosquito and does not
transmit disease. Nuisance mosquitos will always be In abundance depending on the weather, and are not regarded as a
health threat by the State Department of Health (DOH). Adultlcides the MMCD uses such as Punt and Scourge are used as a
temporary control to only suppress, not eradicate, adult mosquitos. Mosquito populations are suppressed for only a few days, e
then rise to normal again after effects wear off. Adulticide spraying is not the MMCD's control strategy for disease-carrying
mosquitos, nor is this strategy endorsed by the DOH, DNR or the TAB. The MMCD does not classify Lake Ann and Lake Susan
parks as risk areas for any mosquitos that may carry diseases to humans, even though Ross Green emphasized LaCrosse
encephalitis existed elsewhere In Chanhassen five times, albeit before 1984.
On LaCrosse encephalitis (LCE):
LCE does not appear a likely threat in these two parks. Aedes triserfatus, the only mosquito that could transmit the LCE virus,
Is rarely found to carry It LCE virus is so rare In Chanhassen. that according to Dave Neitzel of the MMCD, the last LCE case
in Chanhassen was 8 years ago, with only a total of 5 LCE cases from 1970 until 1984. Surveillance of A triserlatus In the LCE
case areas did not start until 1989. Surveillance of Lake Ann Park A. triserfatus did not start until this year. No A triseriatus
mosquitos in Chanhassen were found to have LCE virus since 1984. It may be possible, even though not likely, that those
people who contracted LCE may have done so outside of Chanhassen. Only up to 5% of mosquitos In anyone sample taken
by the MMCD are A. triserfatus. A triseriatus may be found In Lake Ann Park as it can be found commonly In other wooded
areas, but the MMCD does not look for the virus unless someone gets infected. and then the DOH is involved in a control plan.
A. triserfatus is daytime active, does not fly tar from its original wooded habitat, and does not like to fly In sunlight. The
probability that A. triserfatus mosquitos are likely to fly from their isolated areas is very low.
Another reason they are so few is that their breeding sites are so specialized. A trfseriatus breeds only in tree holes, which can
be found and filled, or artificial containers like old tires, pop cans, etc, which can be removed. The most effective control
strategy is to educate citizens and eliminate breeding sites. Adultlcide spraying is only used as a last resort, and has been
going on in only one area In Chanhassen since 1984. To date, A. trfseriatus has not been eradicated using adulticides. Lake
Ann and Lake Susan parks are not classified as LCE risk areas. Please do not be misled to think that adulticiding for nuisance
mosquitos will keep the LCE risk low, because there is little LCE risk in the two parks, and eliminating adulticiding does not
affect disease control. As long as the parks and surrounding areas are free of artificial containers and tree holes, risk of
contracting LCE will be extremely minimal.
e
On Western equine encephalitis (WEE):
Even more rare than LCE is WEE, rarely carried by the cattail mosquito, C. perturbans. According to the DOH and the Board of
Animal Health, there have been no reported cases of WEE in Chanhassen in humans, and no cases of WEE in Carver County
since 1959. I could not find evidence that C. perturbans with WEE virus has ever been found In Chanhassen. There were less
than a handful of human cases of WEE in all of the seven county district, according to the DOH. Every TAB member knows the
program to control cattail mosquitos is primarily for nuisance mosquitos, not for WEE control.
On Heartworm In dogs:
There is no evidence that the MMCD's mosquito control program has reduced heartworm In dogs any where In the metro area.
The State Board of Animal Health (BAH) says that heartworm IS not a reportable disease, so statistics are lacking. Heartworm
originated from Florida, and is spreading westward. The BAH knows that every place that has many mosquitos will probably
have higher heartworm rates, and there IS no proof that reducing the mosquito population reduces heartworm risk. A state
veterinary official said they are certain that heartworm is nearty 1000/0 preventable with over-the-counter medication taken as
directed. The effectivity of mosquito controls to prevent heartworm is probably a tiny fraction of that at best, since mosquitos
are always in abundance.
On Lyme ticks:
Adulticiding for nuisance mosquitos has nothing to do with control of Iyme ticks. The MMCD has only conducted tick monitoring
In the metro area. and no control program exists. Researchers in Connecticut announced recently that a vaccine for Lyme
disease works in mice. Even though a human version is years away, It has the potential of eradicating the disease and make a
chemical control program obsolete and cost-ineffective. e
page 4
Are mosquito control adulticldes really a human health threat?
There are studies which show the hazards and unpredictability of using pyrethroid adulticides, of which the MMCD primarily
uses two. Punt 57-OS is a permethrln, and Scourge (cold-fogging) is a resmethrin. Pyrethroids are synthetically produced
compounds that are chemically similar to pyrethrins extracted from chrysanthemums. Pyrethroids are contact Insecticides that
cause paralysis and death of target and non-target organisms. Punt is sprayed In Lake Ann Park for July 4 events.
e
Potentially hundreds of our citizens face a real health threat from these adulticides because they may be chemically sensitive,
or become so. The attached article in the Journal of Pesticide Reform (1990) cites many studies whiCh confirm these risks.
Here are some highlights from that plus facts from other sources:
_ Health studies have shown that many petroleum hydrocarbons... pose potential human health risks which may vary from
person to person (Material Safety Data Sheet. MSDS - for Punt's solvent xylene)
_ (from Punt's label) Hazards to Humans: Harmful../f absorbed through the skin. Avoid contact with eyes, skin, or clothing.
. (from Scourge's label) Hazards to Humans: Avoid breathing vapor or spray mist Avoid contact with skin eyes or clothing.
_ Carcenogenic studies of permethrin, resmethrin have shown Increases in various kinds of cancers. (6 references In JPR)
_ [Of all the pyrethroids], only permethrin has been determined to be a potential or weak carcinogen by the EPA (EPA, 1979)
_ People, especially children, with a history of allergy or asthma appear to be particularly sensitive... (EPA, 1979)
_ Exposure to pyrethroids can result in allergic contact dermatitis (confirmed) and asthma-like reactions, Including runny nose
and eyes (resmethrin) (Newton et ai, 1983 and Mitchell et aI., 1972).
_ Several .inerts., or secret ingredients in pyrethroid formulations are known or suspected carcinogens, or are chemicals which
depress the central nervous system such as xyIenes. (Journal of Pesticide Reform, 1990)
_ Permethrin... has shown som mutagenic effects. Only in the case of permethrin was the response (changes In mice bone
marrow) found to be signifICant (3 references, JPR)
. Other possible effects include suppression of the immune system, and damage to the nervous system. (6 references in JPR)
_ Effects on reproduction have been observed with several pyrethroids and pyrethrins (5 references in JPR)
_ Pyrethroids may be used with piperonyl butoxide, such as in Scourge, which Increases Its overall acute toxic effects.
_ 15% of our population is hypersenitive to synthetic chemicals in our environment (National Acad. of Sciences, 1992).
. Up to 40% of individuals with ragweed allergies may be particularly sensitive to pyrethrln (Zucker, A. 1965).
_ Four to five percent of the population may be sensitive to pyrethrum extracts (Mass. Audubon Society, 1991 report).
e
Punt 57-OS contains xylene, a neurotoxic cancer-causing solvent, and Is one of the 17 most harmful chemicals on the
governor's environmental task force list. The toxicologist responsible for Punt's formulation, said Punt contains 5% xylene by
mass, and 37% of Punt is xylene range of aromatic hydrocarbon solvents. Astonishingly, Ross Green emphatically denied that
Punt contains xylene, told to the public on June 23.
Susan Palchik, MMCD Aedes Program Manager, denies that adulticides are a human health risk in a letter to the Sierra Club,
-rhey are applied at the label rate, therefore they pose no threat.. This statement contradicts the known hazards stated on the
labels and the studies conducted on adulticide effects. Applicators are required to wear respirators to prevent exposure to the
toxic sprays. Massive use of these airborne toxicants also aggravates air pollution because they contain a high portion of
aromatic petroleum solvents. The EQB, DOH, and the Dept. of Ag. will be reviewing the registration of Punt and Scourge on the
basis of their affect on human health and pollution.
Ross Green tells the public that it is MMCD policy never to spray adultlcides directly on bystanders. But In the Dept. of
Agriculture report on the illegal Punt application at Lake Ann PCirk, the unlicensed operator sprayed around children present at
the beach playground. They were probably exposed to the drift from the spray. Ross Green gave the impression June 23 that
all control materials like Punt are so safe they can be obtained .over the counter-, but Roussel-Blo. manufacturers of Punt and
Scourge said they are too dangerous to be sold that way. They added that Punt should only be applied by licensed, trained
professional agencies as it says on the labels, and were shocked to leam that the MMCD would allow unlicensed seasonal
employees to apply It.
The health hazards of Punt insecticide became more apparent when my son and I became victims of needless exposure to
e this control material illegally sprayed at Lake Ann last summer. We had to su~er mild headeaches and nausea without ever
page 5
being notified of the hazards by the MMCD, who have an ineffective notification system. The health hazards of Scourge
became more apparent when Kate Erickson and her family in St Paul were exposed to the fogging that drifted into their house
when the MMCD sprayed her neighborhood at night without any notification. Kate had severe convulsions from exposure to the
cold fogging and testified in her letter to health officials that she felt -lucky to be alive-. Hundreds of citizens called the e
Minneapolis park board to complain about the adverse health effects of the adulticides when they too became innocent
bystanders when they were directly exposed to MMCD foggers. Result: The Minneapolis Park Board outlawed MMCD
mosquito controls on all 6400 acres of park and city land on June 9, challenging the MMCD's unsupported safety and
effectiveness. The scare tactics we witnessed at the June 23rd meeting employed by the MMCD may have been out of
desperation because of this.
In August 1991, MMCD staff sprayed trails in St Paurs Crosby Farm Park when schoolchildren were present The park's
naturalist with the class refused to lead the children through the toxified area, for fear they would be exposed to the pesticide.
She was also angered there were no warnings and that the MMCD tried to convince her the chemicals weren't harmful. The
children observed, -If it wasn't harmful, then why were the sprayers wearing masks-.
Lack of Sa rely Anurancl. or I Good NOUflcltlon System
Citizens ought to feel secure that mosquito pesticides are tested and safe, yet there is no evidence that all Ingredients have
been fully tested safe for humans. Their hazardous effects have not been revealed. The MMCD boasts that their pesticides
have EPA registration, and therefore should be presumed safe. In fact. EPA registration is not a measure of safety, according
to U.S. congressional testimony by the New York State Attorney General. EPA registration merely means that required tests
were conducted so the product will -perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environmenr.
Registration does not require that full environmental or human health effects studieS be done.
-'nerr ingredients, which may constitute up to 99.8% of the pesticides used by the MMCD, have little or no health testing. The
nature of these inerts are protected by trade secret and need not be disclosed to the EPA or the public. NCAMP reported in
1985 that some inert ingredients in mosquito abatement pesticides may actually be more toxic than the active ingredients.
An adequate notification system does not exist to protect US against needless exposure. To minimize the risk to their health. e
citizens have the right to know in a timely manner when nuisance mosquito pesticides are used in their area if Chanhassen
parks should continue their use. The MMCD has failed repeatedly to give notice to me and other citizens who requested in
writing to be notified In advance of the spraying to avoid exposure. Applications of Punt are virtually impossible to get, since it
was excluded from the MMCD's cold-fogging hotline (491-2850). If adulticldes must be used, posting sprayed areas for the
with signs listing the hazards from the product labels and confirmed studieS should be considered minimum requirement for
notification.
Are adulticldes Punt and Scourge harmful to the environment?
Reading the labels reveal the known environmental hazards - -Highly toxic to fish. birds, bees, etc-. All the MMCD personnel
were ordered to re-educate themselves of the environmental importance of following the label restrictions as part of their
penalty in the Lake Ann incident. StudieS referred to In the Journal of Pesticide Reform, fall 1990 have shown that small
Insect-eating birds are vulnerable to affects by pyrethroids if they substantially change their toocl supply. Pyrethrlns have been
shown to cause birth defects in certain birds and behavioral effects on quail. These adulticldes are sprayed at critically sensitive
times when birds are rearing their young In the same harborage where mosquitos are. There are no environmental studies to
disprove the harmful effects of adulticldes on wildlife. Wildlife experts and park naturalists on the attached list of contacts are
all aware of the potential harmful effects, and therefore ban adulticldes from their parks. Feel free to call some of them.
e
e
e
e
page 6
Are adulticides really effective nuisance mosquito control?
TAB members feel it would be an environmental catastrophe and cost prohibitive to kill all the mosquitos for the sake of
comfort. The director of the MMCD, Robert Sjogren. even agrees it is "not an eradication program". What is the real cost in
terms of our health and environmental effects of adulticides? The MMCD has drastically reduced the adulticiding program from
226,000 acres in 1990 to 22,000 acres projected for 1992. presumably because it Is Ineffective as a long term control, and
because of concern over adverse effects expressed by the TAB.
Ross Green told us that 60.000 breeding sites have been Identified in the district for control treatments for nuisance mosquitos.
What they don't emphasize Is that nuisance mosquitos' favorite breeding spots are 6" deep natural or artificial temporary
water-holding depressions. This means hundreds of thousands of puddles, gutters. containers. kiddie pools, etc. that breed
billions more mosquitos that the MMCD will never "control". Add to that the billions of mosquitos that blow in from outside the
district, and there's no wonder why mosquitos are still so plentiful.
Ross Green also told us that it is policy that adulticlde spraying is not done according to a schedule, but on need. Mosquito
counts are done supposedly to qualify for any adulticide spraying, including special events. If the count is less than 5 bites in 5
minutes. they say they won't spray. Where is the count data that justified spraying at regular intervals at Lake Ann year after
year? In Spring Brook Nature Center, where mosquito controls are now banned. larval counts reported to the Center's director
could not be substantiated with supervised dip tests on several occasions.
Other mosquito districts think that adulticlding is not effective. Dr. Liem. Chicago's Mosquito Abatement District director, states
that" Adulticides are useless. They are harmful to people and the environment, and are not an effective means of control."
Everyone has their own tolerance threshold for mosquito bites, but does the fact that nuisance mosquitos ar~lentiful in
Chanhassen and its parks mean that metropolitan mosquito control isn't working? Evidence only shows thOSY'11I enough to
make a difference. TAB members feel it is unrealistic for the MMCD to set the tolerance goal of 2-bites-ln-5-minutes without
devastating costs to our pocketbooks or the environment
In a May 27 memo, MMCD policy extended the required spray distance near fish-bearing waters from 100' to 150' from the
waters edge. At Lake Ann and Lake Susan Parks. that means a huge portion of the adult mosquito wooded harborage can
never be treated. making it difficult to believe that spraying the remaining foliage in the parks will make a difference in reducing
mosquito populations. Citizens will bring their repellent anyway and use common sense to avoid being there at the mosquito's
active time at dusk.
Scientists agree that mosquito numbers are controlled by the weather, not periodic or season-long chemical control programs.
Peak rain years always have sent out mosquitos at high levels in spite of 32 years of chemical warfare. (see att. chart)
According to the MMCD's own data, overall A. vexans numbers haven't been reduced and there's no scientific proof that
annoyance has been reduced anywhere in the metro area.
page 7
Are there alternative nuisance mosquito control methods?
There are more cost-effective and non-chemical alternatives to mosquito control involving source reduction, personal
protection, and natural predation that work already, or need more research. But efforts to move them forward are thwarted by
an apparent conflict of interest. The director of the MMCD, Robert Sjogren, personally recieves one-third royalty on
timed-release formulations sold outside the district that he co-invented with our tax money. Many attempts have been made In
other parts of the US, with various degrees of success, to control mosquitos without chemical insecticides, including Sjogren's
Inventions. Citizens and cities can control mosquitos in their own backyards with low cost and environmentally benign ways.
Here's a summary adapted from the Massachusetts and South Cook County Mosquito Abatement District publications:
e
Source Reduction
Eliminating places that support mosquitos, without interfering with wetland ecosystems.
Maintain natural drainage patterns, eliminate temporary standing water by designing culverts and ditches better.
Eliminate shallow retention ponds for runoff.
Give predatory fish access to areas where mosquito larvae occur.
Educate people to eliminate standing water in people's own backyards, gutters, small pools.
Landscape, or clean out undesirable underbrush, to minimize harborage.
Protect horses and cattle better to reduce potential blood meals.
Personal protection
Build a screened porch.
Wear light colored clothing.
Don't wear perfumes outdoors.
Stay inside in early morning and evening.
There are non-toxic repellents that are chemical-free or DEET-free, like Safe 'n Free and Bug-Off.
The new citrosa plant was bred to repel mosquitos.
Natural Predators e
Building habitats for tree swallows for thousands of these mosquito-eating machines have been so successful
in Salisbury Massachusetts, that six more nearby towns also are putting up hundreds of swallow habitats and
banned chemical mosquito controls. (See att. article) Chanhassen Parks could co-ordinate a project with
materials and labor donated by local businesses, citizens, and scout troops.
Encourage other natural predators, like bats, dragonflies, and purple martins who all eat a steady diet of
mosquitos, if thafs the food available. Williston, NO and Camp Ripley erected bat houses with plans
recommended by DNRs.
Stock small ponds with fish that eat mosquitos larvae.
Build nesting sites for ducks that eat mosquito larvae like mallards and wood ducks.
Eliminate toxic runoff from lawn chemicals so that salamanders, frogs, and songbirds. can thrive to eat both
larval and adult mosquitos in our wetlands and backyards.
e
e
-
e
page 8
Who Else is concerned?
After exhaustive research over the last several years, local environmental groups and I were able to collect enough facts about
the true safety and effectiveness of the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD's) program that:
1- Convinced the legislature to pass a law this session, authored by Senator Gen Olsen, that put a cap on the
wasteful spending of the MMCD, and made legislators aware of the severe lack of accountability of this agency.
2- Convinced former Senator Don Storm to introduce a bill that tried to stop the MMCD from wasting 3.1 million
dollars on a new headquarters in St. Paul at a time when budgets were supposed to be cut, and there was a
27% unoccupancy rate.
3- Convinced Senator Johnston and Rep. Kelso to sponsor bills for an adequate notification system to
forewarn concerned citizens of the health hazards of mosquito pesticides before they are applied.
4- Convinced the Minneapolis Park Board to unanimously give strong vocal support to outlaw nuisance
mosquito control from all 6400 acres of city land and parks. The MMCD director, Robert Sjogren, infuriated the
park board by challenging their decision on the TV news by calling it a political, rather than a scientifically based
decision. He also failed to show up at the park board meeting he wanted to discuss it.
5- Convinced many other metro area parks, cities, and individual citizens to refuse nuisance mosquito control
chemicals. using rights guaranteed under Minnesota Statute 473.704. Through the county commission, two city
councils in Maplewood and Forest lake. may go beyond a mere ban and consider opting out of the district
altogether, saving their citizens hundreds of thousands in property taxes that could be used to solve real
problems, not wasted killing bugs. Programs like protecting natural resources, improving parks and recreation,
or help for the poor.
June 22,1992
The following twin city metropolitan area scientists, park and public officials have questioned the MMCD's
nuisance mosquito control program's safety and effectivity. Feel free to contact them and educate yourself.
e
Parks or municipalities which ban or severely restrict nuisance mosquito chemical controls:
Park System or Municipality
DNR State Parks. various wildlife
managc::mem areas
Mn. Valley National Wildlife
Refuge, Chanhassen
Minneapolis, Parks and City land
Lilydale Park, St. Paul
Hidden Falls Park, St. Paul
Crosby Farm Park, St. Paul
Hennepin Parks
City of Maplewood
City of Forest Lake
Camp Ripley, Minn.
Salisbury, Mass. + 6 other towns
Spring Brook Nature Center, Fridley
Woodlake Nature Center, Richfield
Carlos Avery Wildlife Center
Dodge Nature Center
Other Good Contacts
Ron Lawrenz, biologist, Science Museum
Jim Cooper, U of M wildlife biologist
Art Hawkins, biologist, USFWS
Michael Dejong, biologist, U of St. Thomas
John Derus, Hennepin County Board Chair
Senator Terry Johnston
Representative Becky Kelso
Senator Gen Olson
Senator John Marty, Roseville
Former Senator Don Storm, Edina
Senator Gene Mirriam, Coon Rapids
Rep. Brad Stanius, White Bear Lake
Senator Pat Pariseau, Farmington
Bob Long, St. Paul City Council
Naomi Loper, Mpls Park Bd
Annie Young, Mpls Park Bd.
Walter Bratt, Mpls Park Bd.
Bob Dunn, Chair of EQB
Joan Galli, DNR non-game bat expert
Contact
lee Pfanmuller. hf'~d of
eCOlogIcal servIceS
Mary Mitchell, biologist
Al Singer, environ. co-ord.
Jeff Lee
4'nn Wolf, St Paul Parks
"
Margie Kline, Park naturalist
Tom McDowell
Gary Bastian, Mayor
Char Brooker, IZAKS
Roger Johnson, DNR
Regional Wildlife Mgr.
N/A
Barbara Thomas,
Selectwoman 508-
Robert Eden 508-
Siah St. Qair
Karen Shanberg
Roger Johnson
Eloise Dietz
Phone
433-5953
624-1223
429-3642
647-5320
445-5340
445-6658
296-1282
296-5645
296-4154
296-5363
463-8496
298-4473
348-2226
348-2226
348-2226
297-2277
Phone
296-07R3
854-5900
348-2226
348-4448
292-7428
"
292-6548
476-4663
770-1786
777-4945
772-7942
462-8860
465-9364
784-3854
861-9365
772-7942
455-4531
Controls Banned
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
All adulticides
All chemical controls
All adulticides, and
larvacides allowed on
basis of dip count
To be determined
To be determined
All chemical controls
replaced with bats
All chemical controls
replaced with tree e
swallows
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
All chemical controls
e
.
.>~ nZ, fJ,..IdC
.Jl.It, Y ~, ,.:j'1'J-
'/
Mosquito control -,,!
.J
The Audubon Chapter of Minneapo-~ '
lis and the Bluebird Recovery PrO-i.
aram of Minnesota wish to commend
the recent decision of the Park Board;
following the recommendations of!'
park biologists, to suspend further.,
mosquito control attempts by the'
Metropolitan Mosquito Control Dis-
trict (MMCD). The Minnesota Val.\.
ley National Wildlife Refuge also'
made the same decision to withhold;
mass chemical controls, to resume"
only if mosquito densities become
extreme or mosquitoes are found to .
be carrying diseases. ~ ,
J\'
e
These important decisions don't
make the all-powerful MMCD hap-"
py, but they reflect increasing doubts .
not only about the effectiveness of I
such applications (weather patterns'.
and water conditions are still the
basic regulators) but also the envi.
ronmental safety on songbirds and
waterfowl. The Mosquito Control
f District has been evasive in publiciz.-
ing the negative potentials of present.
mosquito control measures even:,
though directed by the Legislature to
invest in such research.
.. .
We believe that, until further defini; ;
tive research has been done, and un...:
less human health is 'threatened,..
mass chemical mosquito control ef.....
forts should be not be employed. -
Dorene H. Scriven, board member,'.
Audubon Chapter of MinDeapolis,.
and field representative, Bluebird Re- ,
covery Program of Minnesota. .
"I
A__..I .....___ &_ ft___&_
e
.
Page 2 GeotgelllMl Record March 12. 1992
A natural alternative offered for mosquito control
Are you being bugged by
mosquitos? Or are the cost.<; and
hazards ot the existing methods
ot mosquito control getting
under your skin?
Two brothers in Salisbury
have made an offer to the Town
ot Georgetown because they teel
strongly that the existing method
ot spraying chemicals to eradi-
cate mosquitos has been causing
more harm than good.
Herman and Robert Eaton
have offered 100 tree bird houses
to Georgetown to help alleviate
the mosquito problem in town by
encouraging the return ot tree
swallows.
In the past six years, they have
made and distributed 1,200 bird
houses to the towns of Sea brook,
New Hampshire, and Salisbury,
Massachusett.<;. Last week, they
pve 100 to neighboring Rowley
to use in the marshlands to con-
trol mosquitos and greenheads.
They will give 50 structures,
each with two "apartment.<;". The
town must provide the 50 poles to
hold the houses and must install
them. The poles should be stan-
dard 2 x 3 lumber, eight feet long.
In exchange tor the gift of bird-
houses, the Eatons want the town
to withdraw trom the Essex
County Mosquito Control Pro-
ject.
"There's no sense putting them
in it you're going to keep spray-
ing," Robert Eaton said,
The brothers started with 50
birdhouses in the wooded area
near Salisbury Beach in 1983.
"You couldn't stand to be out-
side in that area when we first
went there. We went back the fol-
lowing year with 50 more houses,
and people came out and hugged
us. They told us they were able to
10 out.<;ide during the greenhead
season for the first time since
they lived there,"Herman said.
"This is the way to go. They
clear up everything. They eat
their weight in flying insects
every day," Robert said.
They went on to describe the
unusual nesting habits ot the
tree swallow.
"They fly right by us now,"
Robert said. "I remember when
they were all over the place here,
but the spraying has driven them
off."
When there is a tavorable envi-
ronment for them, he said, the
birds usually appear on April 5
when they locate the birdhouses
and ny away, presumabl)' back
south where they wintered. At
the end ot June, they return to
the houses and lay eggs.
Between the time the eggs are
laid and the hatching ot the
under the jurisdiction ot the
Massachusetts Department ot
Health.
He said he expect.<; House Bill
lI5OO, submitted by Joseph McIn-
tyre CD, New Bedtord) to be
passed this year.
Last year, Georgetown had an
article on the Town Meeting war-
rant in June advocating the with-
drawal ot the town trom the
Essex County Mosquito Control
Program.
Supporters otthe spraying pro-
gram warned the voters of the
dangers ot equine encephalitis
being transmitted by mosquitos,
and the article was defeated.
An activist in the proposal to
eliminate chemical spraying, Dr.
Theodora F. Capaldo ot West
. Street, said, "Part ot my concern
at the Town Meeting last year
was that both sides ot the issue
were not presented in a tair and
rational way. I teel the town has
been sbort-changed."
She sent the selectmen two
studies citing the huards and
unpredictability otthe use otthe
chemical malathion tor mosquito
control. _
Walter Montgomery, the Ess
County Mosquito Control Distri
representative, said he could
produce a room tull ot studies
showing that malathion is safe
when used properly.
Montgomery emphasized the
dangers ot encephalitis carried
by mosquitos.
Ralph Temperi, Assistant
Commissioner of Massachusetts
Department ot Public Health,
said Essex County is not classi-
fied as a risk area for encephali-
tis, but it is not impossible that
cases may appear here.
He said two cases had been re-
ported in the county but were be-
lieved to have been contracted in
New Hampshire.
Capaldo said, "I have spent a
lot ottime looking into this issue.
I worked with a group (It-advo-
cates, mostly mothers, who were
successtul in eliminating the
program in Newburyport.
"In this environmental age, I
think it's time to stop taking risks
with our children and our own
bealth. I encourage Georgetown
to err on the side ot satety."
Selectman John Olszewski
said, "It's not just a matter otthe
bealth hazard; there's allo a
question otwhether the spraying
works."
Georgetown paid about $20,000
to remain In the Essex County
program this year. The state used
to subsidize this expense, but
now the towns carry the entir.
burden. .,
-r:~J- ~' ~~-fc'/.4"7Vl pa~t J'Yt4iJ/ I C~v..&_~'h6 ~'~~. 4,4 ~A $~
- .. -+' J' .//' L - - . ~. 7'l-t2- ~ _-::r- .>~
u;'~ &4..0:."~"" ~~"t.- .........-1 fVt- ~-r;,.... ~. ~ f'~ ~p ,c~ ~ ,
r. v ~
J
~
-. -,
--
,
~"
- .r:.
-."1:- :., _ ~
.~.
young birds. the parents tee at
high altitudes and great dis-
tances trom their nests. When
the eggs hatch, the parents teed
close to the birdhouse.
Through another quirk otman-
aged ecology, the swallows' bird
houses cannot be located close to .
human dwellings, since that is
where the English sparrows con-
gregate. These small, seemingly
inoffensive sparrows were im-
ported into this area many years
ago.
The birdhouses for theswal-
lows cannot be in the same teed,
ing area as the sparrows, be-'
cause those smaller birds enter
the swallows'birdhouses when
the parents are out gathering
tood, and they kill the youni
birds.
Theretore, the swallow bomes
must be scattered around remote
tields and marshes to protect
them trom the sparrows.
The Eatons have been working
on the sea and in the rural areas
all their lives, and they have
been studying the habits ot the
wildlife through a combined pe-
riod ot 14 decades.
~Years ago, tarmers and
hunters used to cut the marsh
grass, and shoal birds used to
come up through the marshes
and eat the insects," Robert said.
"The hunters went out to shoot
them by the thousands. You
could get 1 IJ2 cents tor a small
bird and 10 cents tor a duck in
those days.
"After the birds were hunted
out, you couldn't got into the
marshes anymore tor the bugs.
"Then the WPA came in during
the '30s and started cutting chan-
nels in the marshes trom Maine
to Florida. They ruined the natu-
ral filtering ability ot the marsh-
es and killed the clams."
He then described how the
government started using DDT to
kill the insects, but the Insecti-
cide killed more than the target
Insects, and tbe birds disap-
peared.
"These people don't under-
.tand nature," Robert nld.
"We've been drivini away the
birds tor 50 years.
"We'd like to get every town
around here to vote out this
spraying prOiram. The Town
Meeting has to vote it out" .
He recommended that a per-
petual care be established simi-
lar to that used at cemeteries.
The interest trom the fUnd would
be used to maintain the bird-
houses.
The Eaton brothers have a let-
ter ot appreciation trom the
Town of Seabrook tor their help
In reducing the greenhead prob-
lem.
Theodore Fyrberg picked up
100 birdhouses trom the Eatons
last week tor the Town Ot Row-
ley.
He agre~ with the Eatons that
natural methods ot insect control
should be used rather than
chemical spraying.
"We have to i1ve up the spray-
ing and get back to nature and
.tart over," he said "I've lived
through the DDT era, but then
along came malathion. They've
done tremendous daJna&e to the
environment"
Fyrberg has been tollowing the
course ot the withdrawal of area
communities trom the Essex
County Mosquito Control Pro-
gram tor years. He watched the
first town. Essex, get out In 1976.
Since then Boxtord, Newbury-
port and AmesbuTI have with-
drawn.
He is enthusiastically In sup-
port ot a bill in the slate legisla-
ture that will put the responsibil-
ity and supervision ot the Insect
control prOiram in the state
3.-4
:) . I>>
~ .>(
-g 5 I
~s- g !
~a.... -.
II SU::l
JSUtDlIQ
- OQ
ir I:T' Ui' -.
.. _. _ c:a.
... -II) CD
~ g. S" I>>
rCl (;I
;Q.g
i~=
"I!!-
;r;a Q.
~ rl
~~ ~
~ t:ra ;:(")"0 Q.tjll)
~~ I'D ~.g~.!!! ill!2.
e
e
t/j 8. rne.-ga~3 ~ Cl s.Q.~ :g ::I ... 'V i:S.Cl'< ....:::.1>> I>> jj; i") <V -':-.J:J. _II) Q. ~
B (1) =n> "'t .... Q.OQ t'D .., - Cl t'D ~~ t'D1ll~Q.~~~Cl--(")O~~Cl~ t'D "
. ~cS"~- ~S"~ f~-~ IOQClI-S- ~Clt'Dqt'Doa8"''''sQ.- S' ,
'0' Cl Cl"Sl2OQ;.t'D --= ;oI"'g.;-;oI"';-~ .
= C:1:T'C>$j Clg: t:rCC'" C:~i;:(")o III 1I)t:r "'-..,.., (") ;- f
(") 0 iClII) ~. . t'D ~ tf '9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -<-< [- =r S"
t'D P ~Ill S" t'D a a ~~ ';'
~-=::;-;: t'D II) ;:~~a;:$3! ~Ui'!2: ~ ~ Q. ~ ~ ~t'D s-;:g::t.J:J. s-a
2C1gt'D_~Jt'Dt:r~0t'D==~_~~~=1~0t'DCI~~II)Clrn!~~-
(") a w a ;;;::;. = "0 a Q~ e:::J II) 6r . 8' g. a OQ = 5 "0 ~ ~ .. c: II) 0 Cl IU
5= = - t'D _ g II) ~ ... g 5.'2 ;: t'D.t'D - Ui' ~ is: ~ rn a Q. ~ ~ '< IU -= g a (") a 5';-
_ _~-.., 0 "" ~..U2 -~. 0 --'-I'D _t'D'" A. ....(") t'D.., _I'D II) 0 II)OQ
.~ -'!ii' 0 = w l!. -. II) 2 c: _ t:r'" : Ill' .., t'D ::. = t'D IU t'D - III N Cl = ""
II) g OQ ~ '< a. ~ (") l)j a. ~ _ $I t'D ~ 0 0':' - Cl:-S _ 5' t;" ~ S" ~
Ili~~~I~f~~~[lill~I~~i~~;ill=~:~f~
,r~~~i a.~a~:=I~ilU[~[II)!~i~!f[;-g~~lo!!
~. .l5t'D ....Q....-o ..,Q. 0"'''''11)<''' OQQ.o"o ..,-=....
n ~!;' ~. ;: ~ t:r "';O? ii go /l) ~ ~o,s. t'D 3 OQ t'D' 0 ~ ~ -. .... ~ g:!i:;: 5. ~
:z: 0 _ t'D II) II) - U2 _ t'D (") II) ~ a I'D t'D;: - CO = 0 II) rn. t'D III ..
~ =~II)- ~<6ra"SlO~~II)~-=~ClS"~ ~$j;:=--t:r~oo
z '" a rn ("). t'D t'D - t'D IU ;01'" = - Ui.,< ~ - a' ~ Ui' .., Q. ~ t'D .... - Cl
~~ o~~a ~ga~ls-~~a..,g~;:i~ ~~; "Slg~~!;:1I)
~c ~=rn~ _-II) ~Q.t'D~~a~II)"'~ ~,,"01I)0~1I)00t'D..,
o ~ g ~ 6 a ~ r~ ~ ~ ~;: ~ ~ 5. ~ 'g :: ~ ~ ! f ~ ~ ~ == ~ 1- a: 2. ~
~~ '~~a ;=a~~~a~~S"a~~;'~ ~~~~a~~~~~a
.Pr~8'5:g.~ 2 ~~ [;;!.iil
~.'g ~ g.S i;:' a ~ q g. t;" ~
:..
~
o
d
~
(1)
~
.....
g:
r.n
~
~.
s
n
o
&
o
~
tJ
~.
s.
$4
~.
~
~
~
.-..+-
~
~
~
4
I I
I.
f)
.1
lI\
~
~~.
1'1~.J\
~~ .
~~o
~F-~
. . . .... . .. l~] p . p it'~~t 1 t; ~uti ~J~~5~.I'S'! ...!! ~s t:5 :i
..... -., . . i.~ ~:e~~~~ ~~ 4) ~ ~ a! 1j 0 !i~ ~. ~:8'~1; ~ 1 ~~;:: 1 t
'. C) . tJ) i ~ 'a.B :'~;! = ~~::c:;::c f ~l i !. ~ ~ t: ~ J .s i li . ~; ~.!a ~.... t 0
_' :. .5 Q) 0 ,'"0 ~:= 5 ~ 'S ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .5 ~ ~ ~ s' -! ~ ~ b S ~ ~ ca ii ~ '::
.. = (5 ~ . ]eij'S ;>> -ii~ ~ ~:j81~'"O'i' iSr~~N le~gt'ii g
!! .0 g -1: 0" 1~1 ~ ~u;:;nt~ .h~U1~ lel"lUt i! t~!~~ ~
~ . C w tJ) ~eb~=: j~ ~!>~ ~ ~J- ~'S~B~S'"O ~~ ~r>> ~ i
.Q. 8 ~ ~ i!I~H~UsUH~hi~.lll~iudh*~~Ui
as
C. "
. . ~"" ."i
. ca'-. (i ''''I'
," .4, :. {.
. . ". ..' I ~
..' , l'
,.. . ~..' gov.,! . '.
..-.. I "~ : -t~... J",~' ·
.... '.
U 511 0 J !~.~11;" ;:
li~'i GJ lJi1i1'"O:::l! A.I
... 5. ~.s.~ t !'.! ~ l ~ 0 I
~ "I 'Iii .: .i's~.s .g I5ll ... ,
'I!}I 0 ~iJ~'li~lU ~.
g ~ JJ~J~~~:a ~~ ~
. <<h '.! QJ!~< ll!
Jl~ r h<h~h51
~JII ...tl.}~]1 !~Il~
III i' ti.5- 11 B,~ !~C
t iti~i~Jl1 !i~!~~
J. ~ J "51! ~.~ . J i 1 ~
.~Jli ~~~J!i: s~~~
fiiic!i Ssll- sPJ.. i~]~
IU~ ~Ji r Efll;;~~gj:S~s~
J )1 1m' Il ~ 'Q ~ ;-.5.5-d
... J Ii e ~ _ ; j ~ .5 .r ~ .~
. . .
S i! ~~j~~ B ~ ~nt$~r ~U!.s Hf!l"B'l1t~1 ~~~
C'CS J~]'il~llo ~;~i8jfe.ll1 J!~si~.!!j"'''~U:~II 11~
.' Q ~ 1- . - . ! ~ rI.l 0 8 _ ..I . t'
. .... " <<S '" . :: ~'f;! ~~ ~ ~ f!.@ 8 ~ . f ~ e -I}-I 8 ~ :I i It;! ~ ~ ~~.!a . ~ : ~
..VI .r::. ~, - ~_-].> :"C ~ .) en t. -If'. ~ '8. ;a'c
.: C\1 ~ CaE'f/) hh~h~~~jlnj~~IJ!!UDln 1J111ull~u
... 0 Q) . ,
, 0 c:;... == .r~i'~ ~ !~'! .i-i~.e . "!i~'~ !.sS'S .:!~ ~1":2.s1'.i l!! 1
. Q) .r::. · - ~ J :i ~ j S j i ~ !; t -8 ii.s ~~ 1_8) 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ t I j ~ ~ -
o. m Q).~ ~ ~jh :h~H~d=i"lI~li' IT~~8,e !j'i~1i8
en. '4-:. ~~~l g, ~i~ ~s:Bl ~ (ll"j!~ ht! 'il~~ U:g.
: Ceo ~ -g ~ j~~s ~~n].e~Jlh~s f5~s!g!"ln~t~~~h!rr
, ~ en +=i e ~.!{.l t ~ ~ -8 oS .8 f ~ Q.~!. .. b-8 ~ e 'e := 8 - ~::c 8 ~. c
.-.. U::s t5~1~ e.!f:'5 ~:5~~I~sSbj!ii~~1 ~;~ ~~S~Cl~~:
. ~ ~ s-!C'I, ~S.~E :I.8ij:l...:S >>82S.!5 -; ~9S~i-o ,Co:
:E ~~.e ~ Ill~t A''''.!!'; !~~ 8 h= i~~ 18~.d }tU~5::~8in.
I'
1"'-
! .
:::l
fIJ'
~
w .
I
e!
-0'
'S
\
11\
'-e
.-
.c
'e
~:J ~B~!~.~l]~~] f1j]~]~~€~~
t- ~ ~ !:E ~ :S OS! i Co ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III .~s ~i5.
= e ~ .!/... ~ ~ E >>ca.t! ~ ~ ! ~ ~ .2 :::21; CI),~ e till ~
CI) i a:l . 8' ~ ~ i c ~ ~ m ~ li :=.!/ CI) a";;l :5 ~ 5:3 9! 5 ~
u~-B&e 8--CI)~5 ~u ~ ~-~
i '~i 'al'In'" en S! (= e ,r!~~ e 'p,~ t~S~.813
~,5 f ~ li" ~!(l l1 ~ ~ li ~ ~ E j ~ ~,~ Q GI f}1 !
.... ~ ii, e .s = !:B's . ~ ~~ CI) ~ f OS ~ ~ ~.s ~ ! ~
~ ~ ~ i ~ "i~ 1 ~ ~.J ~ I ~ ~ J ~ ~ j ~ :5 f}1 ~ ! t i ~ .
t :3 ~S~ 9 ! ~ c5~ JtE~J
.5: ~ f! ~ ~ < Co.g'9 .~:~ g ~i ~ ".3 CQ ; " ~ '8 ,I ~ ~ ~ S ~
E - u..... .... .,..s IJ u >.. .. E '8 5 ".s ~ '" E .. == '8 f ..
::;: ~~f~i1~ lj.!/ ~1 ~ fli ~;!)':~!s,el.&'i~ ~
Q) ~.- III ~ a~ Q CI) ; ! adl ~ .5j 1"0 Ql ~:; 81 ~ =: ~ ~
~le~lil ~ 5~en~~~ !~~~~i~~~~~i
Q) h~....!9i ]~JS;!.~! ;111~;! ~~~~Jj ~
..Q 1;;!i ~] ~ Co'5: ~ ~t! ~ii ib ~CfJ e~ ~..r~i;,~~
... ~~' ~ ~ j j t -5 ! -: " ~ j boE :; ~ ~ i ,~ E ~ ~ B: c ~ Q .
~i ~ ~~~ ~ Sb~i!Jls~~i~lIl~e~~ i
~ .8 ~ ~ I1l ' t ' ~ l5 .s ~ . ~ ~ CI) !' ~ ~. ell
~ lUh]U6) hld~ hUf~ ~f~~h
m ~ ~.~~ :l-i.UI!~ 1~1.!l~t kj;!HH.!~
~ U!;g ~ ~~iii]!JildJi ~n~ j ~ ~i~!
vlj~~' ~~~ ~8~~!lell~>> ~.8I~~iIllS ~
tnell~l! ,~~~~~;~j!JI~~ ~~lli~I~I~~.
.... t ~... .~.~ c: u !l ~ ~ II ~ ,~ ~ Do:s &! u ~
.;:: l~~ ~ f~:8'is~~ ~.~ll:s~~ ki':~~ !~.~~J .8
"2 >.'8.~ ~!r~ Is ~ ~ m .Be,ll E _.s _ll ~-,ll" s ",h
. ~lJlli~llj]~il~~!jjl~i~l~f~l~t
..Q ~~lfi~~ ll~~,~~~ ~!j.il~Rt~ ~~J=:
11\ :: , ~ ~ 18 B 5 s E ~ j ~~ B ! - ~! ] 1I);B....5 'B f .
. Q) I ~.s:;;!d,ll ~~ il.:~ ~.8,ll U I ~~ U~ t g~
Q 1J : i ~ ~ 't 1 i ;B >>'5:e ~; ~ tl- ) ,5 t ~ III 8 b 15 ~
..c: ~. ~ !~E~.ls~ . n~~~iii~,lln ~1 hili
: di .. .ESP s] >.~ aj ~h lis Ii~j li~ -h
e J hUud~juh~lIUn~~~IH
F . H ~ lU,lls,ll ~l fusl~~.,; '8 ~ 1~~'E
.. .. u,e;:; . CI)!~ 8 ~~ ~ 5i~~~~'ii;B ~~~ ~
CI) ~ ~ f}1 ~:; CI),~ ~ . ~ m = J ell ell~:6 ~- ~ m
(I) i.!t ~I ~~f~1a'~il~i'~~15:J.~::g~~~S,
,... ! ~ ~ '2 ~ 1: c: -< j 'i1 i li u ~ , - ~ ~B::g" ca ~
~v ~.. CI)=.51 e ~j , f~~ ~~ '! ~J~. en:=~~'S il
I . CD & ~ '€b! E ~ ~ ~ E ~ .S i ~ e m ~ ~ ell 5 ell ~ q IE :: ~ >.
.fA l ~ ~ 5 ~ 9 ,g ;:~! 2 !.~ ~ ca i ~ ,~) s g '5 ~ CI) is g: ~
~ ~ ~ < 'p, 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 81 ~ ~I i'i I i!s ~ 'P 8 ~ ~
.... "- ~ DS Co.c I1l CoIllC ~ ell == CI) CI) ~ i5.= Q =::t: 11)"
.
e
.~~1tU~~j~S~I~~i5 ~1~1~]~~!~~~ltUlg~
'S ~ .8 tU B ~ tU '=.c 'W 1: , J2'..... CJ - 0 - :S j ~- CI> .... .0
!h~] ~iU'~~H t:8 ~,;;~I ~i ~ ]~ }~j ~::~~
:: G) ~::~~ h.!l t'!l.8.5~id ~ l~~:d.8'" .~s w h ~ ~;~~:!i ...
,,-', I;. :.9=11 'CJ.~~.5B~,~~ ~ ~~~~ f}J 8:; 5'~ E'~~ ~s .!'i's ~E f}J .,
.. ~~. CI>~!d .~:E.o!..SlO~'W~:;a:"(j Ba&js.sa... ~t$tU~
'.,. ~ ~ c: > '8 ~ 3J ~!:= tU Is '5 .8 ~ !(.l ~ ,.!9:~:= e E tlC8~
i ~~l;.I!jS.i~ a!S~:iE~U~l'~.:jj~~~i~f~
~slC~jl~S a~~io~~..~~ r ~~I~III~.Sl~~B
-:,. : 1I!l ~~~~~ ~ !.Q.~aii e~~I~ ~~.8 ~ E~,g fS.Q E Q.,5 ~~~i
'D)'!91'S e~~Jb~~~~_S~' ~.!.i i i~lt! 111b~:si8 ~~
CI).~ ::e ~ 11 .. .... tU ~ ::0; :I ' 19 fB tU ~ 'in tU 'S; f}J ~ ~ 'in
- ~ ::e Qi e e ~ . ~ .. :: >. g . 1 :03 . ..
'.... ~ ~.!{.l. '12 ~ II) ~j ~ ~..s S f' ~ II) II) 0,5 J II:! S oil ~ tU !!l '"
1ft :! i tIC t' .! Cil ~ .t'-8 ,~ ~..] ii:e.(j ~CI> ~] ~.Q 8 ~ ~ 'a ~ ~.5 ..c .rJ
~ ~ f~]~ ~~i'5~ e j ~:i ~j~~!l~.n]~'~~ ~ ~~~ U
VI ~.o;...:! ! .! ~ ~ CI>'in 'S ~ C -5 ~ II) 8. ~ ~ ~ S J:i t' >. i! tU
;ll t'~ J ; oS e i < l . ~ fH~ tIC ~ 'l' tU tU ~ j lEi !.~ tU ~ [ :I II
;:, 1 Jij~ u] l~ t;Ufb!~:J~tUi~ iU~]~D~~
. "...
() ~i 11~~j~~i!~~;~1j~ i~~~~ ~fl~~j~~~~
~ ~ -' fIIIII lI.l ~ ~ ~ . s.8 ;1 tU .c .. C CI> - E!. ~ C CI> ~ '>,
, : "'. ~ ... ft)~" ~ ,~ ~ ~ 'S! 0 f~: .B oS 8 ~ ~ :€ ~ tI t! 1 ~ ~ -- F.! .
... .!;.o~i tU~ls.is...~~o~-d1S"'j~..~:s lot- ~ 8....~ &1E-<~ ·
. tn i~f<nn~U~;i~!l]H~i~H~~bd~hlj
.... CD
;-;-e 4~JJi~!. UH'!li1 n~~~I~l H~;l!~U~ .
ca ~ < l~itf. ..;'~~j:~i ~~~!h~] gJI~UUf! ·
.' CJ ~iJ~ ~~hJ ~h;.s :;~J ~ j!~ll ~ ~if::"r >.l~~: tU.!l tU! ·
. .~! :g ~~S~fllietUi:S as '}~asQ~j~ ~~~ l!l8~'8C1>!.!9
.= ~I i~\;j~d~iU'i~]~~~~H]_~.:si-U~~~i.
. E j J;gh~S~~.b .~~J~h-~"h~!i <0] ~~Il!]UJ9~ ~
If ~i~dJ1 h:SHhbi~!d~;;in~ sij!~d Ii,
". Irs:: f'f' 'fill '.8'Si2~ ">.ss.sj~~tl' "J' as ~tUdI~ I
· · " t ~ if ~ I i ~:~ ~ Cil ~ en ~ ~ :03 .~ i2 ~ I " ~ ~ . ,Iii R J~ fB '
o Is~j! t' .5~.~i~.! ,!~'~~ ~f f e 8.8 ~.~~~~ j~ ~~
... ~ II) CI>..s ! S'8 CI> S rn ~ CI> 'Q.::t.! E S.!{.l" E ~ .!(.l S tU ~ 'ii ~
:~.~S ~!!~~:EtJ;~ll~j~~ tlf~l~~j~~JilO~~~J' a
. . i ....!SG>Qi.8,g ",tUi "'~II)=~ l:::03~itU>'.!.E!"E o==e8 .,
. . ~ ~ 11).5 r: t 1.1; I Q.. ~ 8:~ ~ :e ~~ b .... '5.! ~ E .!(.l i ~ ~II) ~~.! 0 '8 ! tU,
O · ~l~lj; ~:isi:s ~lU~n ,:~,!l..~ ~ ~~.~.5i i!~.' .
A. ~ ~ tU ~ ~ II) ,= ~ J t '8 II) EJ ! C S ~ ~. '5 ~ 1.~ ~ i ~! m Qi.!.Sl .
:-::E .1 : ~l~~~~~'ti~i~i<~~~l~ji~~i]~~r~ c5i~~ t
:5
OQ!)
Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District agrees
to pay $1000 for improper
spraying at Lake Ann Park
.
e
By Thomas Laplc
Iu a resuJt of improperly applied
mosquito pesticide at Lake Ann Park
last June, the Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District (MMCD) has paid a
$1000 fioe and agreed not to commit
the violation again.
On June 12, 1991, after visiting
Lake ADD Park with his two children,
C1anhassen resident Eric Rivkin filed
a confidential complaint with the state
Department of Agriculture alleging
the improper use of pesticides by the
M.\fCD.
The Minnesota Department of
Agriculture (MDA) has enforcement
oversight o"'er the application of pes-
ticides.
On Dec. 6, 1991, after months of
investi~tion and discussions, the
MMCD acknowledged the violations
and agreed to pay a $ 1 000 fine and "to
refrain from committing the viola-
tion" again, according to MDA docu-
ments.
Additionally, a representative of
the MMCD was ordered to speak on
"the importance of complying with
the Mi.noesota Pesticide Law" at the
group's pesticide recertification work-
shop held this last Feb., using the
C1anhassen incident as a case. study.
"I hope they've learned their les-
soo," said Rivkin, 40, a self-employed
business consultant, adding the he
remains skeptical of the MMCD.
The MMCD complied with all
terms and the case was closed 00 Feb.
26, 1992-
"My kids and I were playing Fris-
bee at Lake Ann Park when I noticed
an odor. I started feeling nauseous
and got a headache.l traced the smell
to oily stuff' on leaves. We went home
. an~ showerc~t and w~~ clothes....
Rivkin related. . - . _.
Aa:ording to Rivkin, IUs SOD, Scan,
e
Eric RlTkfa stands amid the prairie
grasses ill his yard last summer,
shonIy after the mosquito. spray-
In& incident at Lake ADD Park left
him IDd his YOUDI SOD feeliDa m.
(FOe photo)
7, suffered from similar symptoms.
"'Sean wu dizzy and had to lie
down,. Rivkin said, notina that the
boy usually doesn't rake naps on
summer days. -
After Rivtin filed his complaint,
Patrick Kelly, an MDA Investigator,
visited !..aU Ann Park OD.JUDe 13,
disccverin& evidcDCC of....)iDg
MOSQ'LTI'O to pile 7
Mosquito,
within a few feet of the shoreline.
"After sampling, my hands were
greasy as if 1 had eaten popcorn,"
Kdly noted in his report. "I washed
my hands after sampling and put on
gloves for the next sample..
After taking samples, Kelly vis-
ited the MMCD and determined that
the pesticide used at the park was
Punt 57-OS, a general.use product
designed to control adult mosquitoes.
Kelly noted that this pesticide is ap-
proved for recreational areas, parks
and woodJands.
However, state pesticide regula.
tions do not allow treatment within
100 feet of water: This regulation is
designed to prevent the pesticide from
draining or drifting into water be-
cause of its potential harmful effect
on fish. The warning label on Punt
57-OS says, "This pesticide is highly
tolOc to fish. Do not apply to any body
of water or wetlands... Drift and run-
off from treated areas may be hazard-
ous to aquatic organisms in treated
areas. ..
Kelly introduced photographic
evidence of a pan fish spawning area
near treated vegetation.
. Based on its determination of the
alJeged facls, the MeA informed the
MMCD that it was prepared to file a
civil suit in Hennepin County District
Court, arguing that the MMCD used
"a pesticide in a manner that is incon-
sistent with a label or labeling.....
However, the MMCD agreed with
the findings in the complaint and the
remedies outlined by the MDA, end-
ing the threat of the civil law suit.
MID essence, what happened is that
a seasonal employee was spraying off
the back of an all-terrain vehicle. He
[throttled down to make a turD but did'
not turn off the sprayer,W explained
Ross Green, public information di-oj
rector of the MMCD. "We didn't do it
correctly. We've since stepped up our
observation so that this won't happen
lpin!'
;
c:
~
III
':c
:!:
III
...
n
::r
...
!;D
...
~
N
I
n
::r
.
::r
~
.
..
..
.
::r
;a
;-
IE)
.
..
I
-:
D
.
~
C-ASE FI LE en - 03} I - D€-f+OKAcx-
ApPL'JcATo~5 AR~~LAIf?~DTlQ-&.. Y~~D
'-U:I
Thursday, March 19, 199* - Chanhassen VlrJager- Page 7
I
I
Bill proposed
requiring advanced
warning of spraying
In a related action, State Rep.
Becky Kelso, . third term DFLer who
represents O1anhassen, Prior Lake,
Shakopee and Savage, has written a
bill that would require the commis-
sioner of agriculture to establish roles
to provide "potentially affected pet-
sons notice of spraying." Her bill
would also require that signs be posted
in IDd around the treated areas warn-
ing against the potential health haz-
ards for people and pets exposed to
the residual pesticides. Currently, there
is no advlDce notification or posting
requirements.
111e bill did not receive a hearing
in the Agriculture Committee," Kelso
said. "However, I am committed to
these provisions because I believe
people have a right to know when
possibly harmful pesticides are being'
used." .
Kelso indicated that she would
either offer a revised version of her
bill as ID amendment to another bill,
or she would reintroduce it next ses-
sion.
"The committee chair said that
this bill might be controversial and
take time to study," Kelso explained.
But she asserted that the bill is reason-
able and would not cause any undue
inconvenience, and consequently
would receive a fair hearing.
"I know that quite a few people
I are sensitive to pesticides. These
provisiOlls would address their needs,"
Kelso noted. -
..
...
.
According to a consortium of
concerned groups, including the Si-
erra Oub, Minnesota Herbicide Coa-
lition and the Izaak Walton League, at
least IS percent of all residents are
chemically sensitive, and many people
can become seriously ill from ~
sure to mosquito pesticides.
These groups have been circulat-
ing information sheets which support
the prior-notification lUle, the posting
of notices and a minimizing of the
use of pesticides in public places.
Without waiting for passage of
Kelso's bill, Todd Hoffman, Chan-
hassen Park IDd Recreation Director,
has contacted the MMCD to disc:uss
advance nOtification before the spray-
ing season begins.
"We want to bow in advance
when they will be spraying in O1m-
hassen, " Hoffman said. "We also WIIlt
signs posted notiJying citizens of the
treated areas."
Hoffman noted that the city does
not have the resources to monitor
treatment in order to guarantee that
all spraying regulations are observed
without prior notification.
"We simply are not in . position
to monitor all the other governmental
agencies active in Qanbassen. But
now that we are aware of these prob-
lems, our ears have been perked up,"
Hoffman observed.
HoffmlD said that with proper,
advance notification, it would be much
easier to have a Community Service
Officer or other city employee visible
wb en mosquitoes are being treated on
public property.
Rivkin has insisted that, reprd-
less of the legislation, he hu informed
the MMCD that he WlDts to be Doti-
fied before treatment is done in 0wI-
hlSSen and parts of the MiaDetoaka
area.
e
, .
--.-
.
.
Why should there be a law to
prevent unwanted exposure to
mosquito control pesticides? 3/2/91
e
The Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) tries to
reduce mosquito annoyance, its main mission, with a chemical
control program costing taxpayers $9-$12 million a year in the
7-county metro area.
The MMCD would like people to believe that
mosquito control is sa~ as well as effective. They carefully
word their stories to avoid giving complete information about
the program. No scientific evidence exists that the nuisance
mosquito control program reduces annoyance. Mosquitos are
not the only victims of such a program.
Some of these victims are citizens are concerned about
massive pesticide spraying around their homes and parks.
Since medical experts say that at least 15% of our population is
chemically sensitive, many people can, or have become
seriously ill from exposure to mosquito pesticides. The State
Department of Natural Resources reports that the 1991 Green
Index ranks our state as the fourth worst in terms of pesticide
use per capita - 10.8 pounds per person. Mosquito control is
part of this toxic brew of pesticides from lawns, houses,
gardens, and agriculture.
An effective notification system does not exist.
In spite of increasing health complaints, innocent bystanders
in our parks, homes, and public waters are at risk of exposure
when notice is not given about the presence of mosquito
pesticides. This includes larvacides spread in the water, but
most worrisome is adulticide "fogging" sprayed in the air.
This problem should be tackled from two fronts:
prevention and management. To prevent exposure to
mosquito pesticides in the first place, the MMCD should
discontinue their use and focus on a more environmentally
benign approach. U pesticides are used, better management
through requirements designed to give adequate notice of the
presence of these pesticides would minimize the risk to
human health. We hope that legislation, HF 1644 & SF 1870,
will be enacted to help solve this problem.
e
What public health threat exists?
It is important to understand that $10 million worth of
pesticides used each year to reduce mosquito nuisance do not
protect us from mosquito-borne diseases. The MMCD
allocates only a very small portion of their funds for a
mosquito disease prevention program by educating people to
remove breeding sites like old tires.
Mosquito annoyance is not a public health threat,
yet the pesticides used to control them seem to be. In 1991
alone, hundreds of people either witnessed, or were directly
exposed to mosquito pesticides applied by the MMCD. Some
became ill. All were concerned enough about health effects to
call and complain to their park boards, the DNR, and other
agencies. This contrasts with only 17 confirmed cases of
mosquito-borne diseases in the last 10 years in the metro area.
Lick .f Slfetr AssurI8CII
Citizens ought to feel secure that mosquito pesticides are tested
and safe, yet there is no evidence that all ingredients have been
fully tested safe for humans. Their hazardous effects have not
been revealed. The MMCD boasts that their pesticides have EPA
registration, and therefore should be presumed safe. In fact, EPA
registration is not a measure of safety, according to U.S.
congressional testimony by the New York State Attorney
General. EP A registration merely means that required tests were
conducted so the product will "perform its intended function
without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment".
Registration does not require that full environmental or human
health effects studies be done.
According to a 1989 EPA ruling which affects
thousands of pesticides, active ingredients have to be reassessed,
then re-registered with the EP A. The ruling stems from the
FIFRA ammendment and from fraudulent tests conducted by
Industrial BiD-test Labs, shut down in 1990. Ingredients in
pesticides used by the MMCD (resmethrin, permethrin, and
piperonyl butoxide) are on the EP A's "B" list requiring
reassessment and re-regisration. Because the test data is suspect,
the MMCD should suspend the use of these pesticides until
re-registration is complete. To do otheJWise may compromise the
health and safety of metro area citizens.
"Inert" ingredients, which may constitute up to
99.8% of the pesticides, have no adequate health testing. The
nature of these inerts are protected by trade secret and need not
be disclosed to the EP A or the public. The National Coalition
Against Misuse of Pesticides <NCAMP) reported in 1985 that
some inert ingredients, including those found in mosquito
abatement pesticides, may actually be as toxic, or more so, than
the active ingredients.
What chemicals used to kill nuisance mosquitos can
be harmful to humans?
Adultlcldes: Resmethrln.Permethrln
Have you ever seen a truck fogging your street or park and
wondered what was in the fog? The MMCD uses Scourge and
Punt 50S, two types of pyrethroids that supposedly kill adult
mosquitos after they've already hatched and become a nuisance.
As much as 57% of total acres treated, or 226,000 acres of our
public parks and neighborhoods, were treated in 1990 with these
for nuisance mosquitos. Massive use of these airborne toxicants
also aggravates air pollution because they contain aromatic
petroleum distillates.
Scourge is used in areas with the highest annoyance
complaints. It is an aerial toxicant with resmethrin that is
supposed to kill mosquitos flying in the toxified air. Punt 50S has
permethrin that is spray-coated on the vegetation at the edges of
wooded areas with killing effects up to 14 days. Mosquitos come
in contact with the residue as they fly from leaf to leaf.
Many other mosquito abatement districts in America as
far back as 1982, including Chicago, recognize that adulticides
are useless. They say they're not good for people, wildlife, and
beneficial insects. As a result, adulticiding has been severely
restricted or eliminated from their abatement programs. With its
inadequate "notify list", our MMCD recognizes allergic reactions
can exist from exposure, but contradicts this by stating
adulticides don't pose a threat to human health.
NCAMP reports that ~Exposure to pyrethroids
can result in contact dermatitis and asthma-like reactions,
including runny nose and eyes (resmethrin). The EP A notes that
-people, especially children, with a history of allergy or asthma
appear to be particularly sensitive...~ There are thousands of
people in the metro area with these conditions.
Labels of pyrethroids also state they are
extremely toxic to fish, birds, and insects and can harm
ornamental plants and painted objects. Some pyrethroids are
suspected carcinogens.
Aerial toxicants can drift into homes with open
windows. At 10 pm on July 5,1990, one person and her family in
the MacAlester-Groveland neighborhood in St. Paul suffered
severe allergic reactions from inhalation exposure to Scourge in
this manner. She was infuriated when the MMCD told her, ~we
can't spray houses~ and the MMCD did not investigate further.
The MMCD did send her fact sheets on Scourge which clearly
state, ~ A void breathing vapor or spray mist. A void contact with
skin, eyes, or clothing. Toxic to fish and birds. ~ In her written
testimony, she ~feels lucky to be alive". MMCD personnel wear
masks to prevent inhaling the toxicant.
Punt 50S sprayed in Lake Ann Park in Chanhassen
early June, 1991 left residues which caused a father and son to
have headaches and nausea in two confirmed cases due to
residue inhalation exposure. The same incident prompted an
investigation from the State Department of Agriculture that
found the MMCD was in violation of the Minnesota Pesticide
Law because they failed to spray according to the label. Punt 50S
was illegally sprayed on foliage overlooking fish spawning
areas, when the label clearly states it is highly toxic to fish. As a
result, the MMCD was fined $1000 and its field staff are being
forced to be re-trained.
In August 1991, masked MMCD staff aerially
toxified the trail area in Sl Paul's Crosby Farm Park at 10 am
when schoolchildren were present. The park's naturalist with
the class refused to lead the children through the toxified area,
for fear they would be exposed to the pesticide. She was also
angered there were no warnings and that the MMCD tried to
convince her the chemicals weren't harmful. The children
observed, "If it wasn't harmful, then why were the sprayers all
wearing masks~.
lIrvacldes: mind methoprene
About 200,000 acres are treated by the MMCD each year with
larvacides to kill mosquitos before they hatch.
One larvacide applied by helicopter or ground crews is a
strain of potent bacteria called bacillus thuringiensis israelensis
(BTI). Methoprene, another larvacide, is the active ingredient in
briquets cast into wetlands by ground crews, releasing slowly in
the water over one summer season.
The BTI formulation contains the highest percentage,
99.8%, of inert ingredients of the four major pesticides the
MMCD uses. This is troubling because, according to NCAMP,
-it is unclear how much of the toxicity (skin sensitization in
animals and eye irritation in animals and people) can be ascribed
to these 'inert' ingredients".
EPA's major environmental concern about some BT
formulations is that they can also kill endangered species of
butterflies along with earthworms and bees. According to NCAMP,
~the EP A has been critical of an apparent lack of standardization in
[BT} product potency... because the percent of active ingredients
cannot correspond to the statement on the label".
Altosid, the methoprene formulation used by the
MMCD, has 95% inert ingredients. Methoprene "can cause
moderate eye irritation~, yet this chemical dissipates over the entire
summer from millions of briquets in thousands of acres of wetlands,
draining into lakes we swim and play in. Data is still incomplete
about adverse effects of methoprene. Overdosing is a potential
problem because undissolved briquets, with ingredients still active,
can keep accunw.lating year after year in the same wetlands.
.
InIdequlte complllnt dItIlnd f8IPOnll
Health-related cases about mosquito pesticide applications are
frequently not reported, recorded, or believed by the responsible
public agencies like the MMCD or the Department of Agriculture.
Citizens who call feel intimidated by MMCD staff into
withdrawing their complaints. MMCD staff sometimes tell
complainants their concerns do not agree with the scientific
literature on file, nor with the advisors of the MMCD. Other tactics
include giving false statements about the nature and number of
health complaints, how and where pesticides are applied, and that
safety is equated with EP A registration. The MMCD imposes a
double standard by telling callers to prove the pesticide is unsafe
well beyond their means to do so, rather than the MMCD provide
assistance or proof to the caller that the pesticide is safe.
The MMCD may not offer to tell concerned citizens
about their ~notify list". Treatment schedules are not publicly
disclosed, nor does the MMCD always comply with individual
requests to be notified for specific properties, neighborhoods, or
parks. Hundreds of people are unable to get on the ~notify list~
because the public lacks the knowledge to contact the MMCD.
The MMCD does not proactively collect data about
health complaints from local park boards, the State Health
Department, and the DNR that usually receive most of those
complaints.
In the Lake Ann Park incident, the Department of
Agriculture refused to believe a confirmed health complaint, even
after the doctor's timely diagnosis of exposure was provided.
It is difficult for legitimate health-related complaints to be
counted and influence the risk to human health.
e
WhIt cen WI do?
We hope legislation will be amended to provide requirements
designed to give adequate notice of the presence of mosquito
pesticides. In order to avoid needless exposure and minimize the
risk to human health, citizens should have the right to know when
mosquito pesticides are used in their area, and have their
complaints taken more seriously.
Sierra Club, North Star Chapter
Minnesota Herbicide Coalition ..
Minnesota Audubon Council .,
lzaak Walton League, MN Div.
Human Ecology Action League
Mosq~itos
From page 1
.
-, Mosquito
district
admits to
.
spraYing
near lake
Bills aim to
change district's
operations
By Matthew Zlatnik
Despite instructions to the
contrary, anti-mosquito
chemicals were sprayed at
water's edge of Lak~ Ann in
Chanhassen last s~er. '
At the threat of going to court,
the Metropolitan Mosquito Con-
trol District (MMCD) admitted
last month that it improperly
applied pesticides ne8! the lake
in northern Chanhassen.
The acknowledgement of the
violation came after the Min-
nesota Department of
Agriculture (MDA) investigated
a June 12, 1991, complaint by a
Chanhassen man. The MMCD
paid a $1,000 fme, and an MMCD
official said the violation was
because of employee error.
Eric Rivken of Chanhassen
said he and his son became sick
after being in Lake Ann Park
after the park was sprayed with
Punt a chemical used by the
MMCo to kill adult mosquitos.
Punt is among the chemicals
used by the MMCD for nuisance-
mosquito control in the seven-
county, 3,ooo-square-mile ~etro
area. Helicopters and vehicles
are . used to spread the
pesticides.
Chemical briquets are also
placed in underwater breeding
areas to kill mosquito larvae,
and the district provides inf?r-
mation about controlling
disease-bearing mosquitos by
destroying their breeding
places. .
The district, created in 1958,15
funded by a meu:owi.de
property-tax levy. A bill m-
troduced by Sen. ,Gen Olsen, IR-
MOSQUITOS: To page 6
District 43, is meant to limit the
district's taxing authority, and
another bill was recently in-
troduced in the House to
reorganize how the district
operates.
At Lake Ann Park, an MDA
investiga tor found that Punt was
sprayed on trees at water's edge
and 80 feet from the lake. Sun-
fish were spotted in water near
the sprayed trees, according to
the investigator's report.
According to instructions on
the Punt label, the pesticide is
. "highly toxic" to r18h. According
to the U.S. Envirorunental Pr0-
tection Agency, Punt should not
be used within 100 feet of water,
said the MDA report on the
incident.
"Basically, he'shouldn't ba!~
been where he was," said RoSs;
Green, public-information coor-
dinator for the MMCD. "We took
steps to make sure it wouldn't
happen again."
As part of the settlement pro-.
posed by the MDA, the Mosquito
Control District paid a $1,<m
fine. 1be employees responsible.
for the misapplication were re-
quired to make. a' training-
session presentation about what
went wrong, the possible en-
virorunental effects, and how to
avoid future mistakes.
The MMCD conducted its own
investigation, Green said, and
found that the employees bad
violated the MMCD's l00-foot
limit set for Using pesticides
near water.
Rivken, who fIled the original
complaint, has been reSearching
the MMCD for about two years,
he said. Last year he ,organized,
a petition asking the district to
stop spraying 81lij~osquito.
chemicals.in his n$gbborhoo<i;-
Rivken ])as also testified before
the district' and the Legislature,
claiming that the district is inef-
fective and violates its own roles
on pesticide application.
He said he and his 7-year-old
son became nauseated and had
headaches after playing Frisbee
in the p4rk on June 12. They
went home, and Rivken called
the Department of Agriculture,
noting that he had seen tree
leaves with a shiny substance on
them. The next day, an in-
vestigator visited the park with
Rivken, who suffered the same
symptoms as thP. nrevious day.
e
e
.-- --.__.-_ . - - r-
'. A doctor - concluded' that
Rivken's illness was because of
pesticide exposure, according to.
the MDA report on the incident.
Tests on leaf samples taken by
.~ the investigator concluded that
Punt had been sprayed on trees
next to the lake and inside the
l00-foot limit the MDA report
'd -.. '.. '} ."",'~.abl.l. ...........
.,,,, '. ~
~ . .
The report said the violati9D
was use of a pesticide in a man-
ner inconsistent with its
labelling.
",.The MMCD has already
started control operations for
1992, said Green. Briquets
designed to kill the marsh-
dwelling cattail mosquitos have
been placed in known breeding
,areas, he said, and training has_
begun for ~tributing briquets
to stop other l!1osquitos. ,
. '. ,.
G /1-1 1-erR.
f1~c:7L
i'~
~if ~r:
/19 Z-
.
Any creature that will eat
3,000 - 7,000 insects per
night, Incruding many mos-
quitoes, is a good neighbor.
flif~lkd*'f~lli)~~iAt
..":.i:U!::":'tO.'Mi.nnesota::::::;"j:
.. -.-..........."..,. . --- .... .. -. ... .
.'... --...
Bat houses have been used
successfully in Europe for a
vari~ty of species. The house
design on the back of this sheet
was developed for conditions in
Minnesota by Earl Johnson of
Detroit Lakes, MN. The ab-
sence of a floor makes this
house less attractive to white-
footed deer mice. which can be
a problem throughout Minne-
sota. The exact size and shape
are not important except that
the entry space(s) should never
be smaller than 3/4 inch or
larger than 1 inch. Regardless
of the plan used. all inner sur-
faces must be rough enough to
allow the bats to climb with
ease.
Young bats grow best when
shelter temperatures are main-
tained in the 80-90 F range.
For this reason maternity colo-
nies most commonly use
houses which provide this
temperature range yet do not
exceed 90 F. Houses should
be tightly constructed or
caulked to prevent undesirable
ventilation. Europeans often
cover bat houses with tar paper
to increase solar energy absorp-
tion and provide insulation in
lower temperatures. Construct-
ing a house two feet tall allows
the bats to move up and down
to find temperatures more to
their liking. A~hough paint or
varnish may increase structure
longevity, bats may be repelled
until the house is well cured.
Bat houses should be se-
curely fastened to a tree or
building roughly 10-15 feet
above ground, preferably open
to the morning sun yet shaded
in the afternoon. Male bats do
not live with the females whlle
young are being reared. The
male bats may be attracted to a
second house placed in a shel-
tered, similar location. Most
bats seem to be attracted to
sites somewhat protected from
wind.
It is important to note that
bats can live only where local
food supplies are adequate.
For this reason, most bat colo-
nies are found near rivers,
lakes, bogs or marshes where
insect populations are high.
The closer bat houses are to
such habitats, the greater the
probability of being occupied.
Those located more than a half
mile from insect producing habi-
tats have a greatly reduced
probability of being occupied.
Sometimes bats will occupy
a bat house within a few weeks.
Often however, bats require a
year or two to find a new house.
Chances of early occupancy
probably will be increased if
houses are hung before the last
week of July when young bats
are starting to fly and explore.
Since the use of bat houses
is quite new in the USA and in
Minnesota, there is much to
learn about local bat prefer-
ences. Reporting your suc-
cesses and failures in attracting
bats to your houses could
greatly add to bat knowledge.
Information can be received by
writing:
BAT CONSERVATION
INTERNATIONAL
P.O. Box 162603
Austin, Texas 7B716-2603
e
For additional Minnesota information
or to report your information, please
write DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES, NONGAME WILDLIFE
PROGRAM, Box 7, 500 Lafayette
Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155.
e
Thla d..lgn h.. bHn developed by DNR
Are. Wildlife M.nag_ Earl John.on, Detroit
Laba, Mlnn,,018.
. .... ',. . . - ",' " .. .".
..........;;:::.:::._.:::;:::;::.;:.:::::>:::;::; -:.:<.'", '::.'.;.;.:-:;:-::.;.::.;.;.;.;c:-> . --: .;.'.. .:::.:......,...-:-:._........:..-::. :":":,::,_",:;:;:::.::-:"::::::::":::::,:-:_,:;:,::;-:, "', _ .
1.1.I.ll.I.I.~B.:.~.'...'..'...".'..'...'.i.:...a.'.'........'.........................'...........1........:i'IB~~e;tilI16m1f~ltmli!m.D~t~.fJ>fa......
. .. :-:-"::-:.;.::-:>;.:::.:;:;:-::::.;:;..;;:.::;.;.:::-:::::::.:-::":':::;:-:::::::::-:.:.:<::::;:;;.;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:::;:::>::::
.
e
e
Recommended Material: Cedar
Roof Dividers
14" (5)
(1 )
Sides 24"
(2)
and
Front
(1 )
~111/4'7
Back
(1 )
32"
Last portion
will be short-
~111/4'7
Spacing Sequence Between Dividers:
1",1",7/8",7/8",3/4",3/4"
~24"-j ~24"-j
Divider Divider Divider Divider Divider
24"
Waste -7
Back
Side
Side
Side
~ 24"-j ~ 24"-j ~ 24" 32"-7
Lumber: Two 1" X 12" X 10'
Rough-sawed or with all interior surfaces roughened.
Note: All external seams and joints should be caulked if not tight fitting.
~
I' ....nmlJ I
~
- .
.~ ,~( fZ;'
----
".' '-"', .' ~
.- ;.,--~' ~f>'~
'~~€A B S}T.;R.A C T
"
The purpose of this study is to . .
describe pesticide c.xposure in the.
population of callers to Minnesota
Regional Poison Centers. Case files.
from 1988 reporting pesticide exp0-
sure to humans were identified in
cooperation with the Minnesota Cen-
ter for Health Statistics. Data analy-
sis was conducted by computer using
SAS statistical package.
Of the 1,428 case files indicating
pesticide as the primary substance of
exposure to Minnesota residents, a
mean age of 5 years (range, one
month to 85 years) was identified; 50
pcra::nt of all cases were below age 3
years. Males accounted for 1.3 times
as many cases as females.
Insecticide was identified in the
largest percentage of case files (74
percent) followed by herbicide (l2
percent), rodenticide (11 percent)
and fungicide-nonmedicinaJ (3 per-
cent). Ingestion was the most com-
mon route of exposure; 8S percent of
all calls originated from a residence.
While insecticides are still the
most common types of pesticide call,
herbicide has surpassed insecticide in
production and sales in the US. In
this study, herbicide type exposure
calls present a much different picture
than other pesticide types.
The usefulness of poison control
centers for examination of pesticide
poisoning is explored. Since report_
ing occurs coincidental with the ex-
posure and its associated symp~
each pesticide poisoning report could
potentially serve as a true sentinel
health cvenL (Am J Public Health.
1991;81:750-753)
750 American JoumaI of Public: Hea1dl
.
Public Health Briefs
.;
.
Pesticide Poisoning SUlVeillance
through Regional Poison
Control Centers
Debra Kay Olson, RN, MPH, Lynn Sa%, Paul Gunderson, PhD,
and Leo Sioris, PhmmD
Introduction
Pesticides represent a Jarge group of
chemicals which in general usage are de-
scribed in tcnns of the organism they are
intended to kill.!-3 As the use of these
chemicals has unfolded, some disquieting
phenomena have been observed. A
1984-85 Nebraska study found an annual
incidence rate of pesticide-related illness
of 1.35 cases per 10,OOJ population.. Lym-
phoma and leukemia have been associ-
ated with higher death rates among Mid-
western farmers in regions of high
pesticide use5.6 and Reeves' reponed 15
children ages 2 to 17 years as having blood
dyscrasias developed shonly after inhala-
tion exposure to household insecticides.
Pesticides account for a small but impor-
tant number of acute human poisonings,
particularly in a state with substantial use
of pesticides in both rural and urban areas,
such as Minnesota.1.9
Methods
The purpose of this study was to de-
scnbe pesticide exposure in the 1988 pap-
ulation of callers to Minnesota Regional
Poison Control Centers located at Henne-
pin County Medical Center and SL Paul-
Ramsey Medical Center. Centers docu-
ment exposure data utilizing tbe
Cooperative Poison Center Repon Form
as designed by the American Association
of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC). Data
from these report forms were processed
through each Center's computer system
and sent to the AAPCC's national data
collection project in Denver, Colorado.
Data tapes containing all of the 1988 data
for each Regional Center were then re-
turned to the Minnesota Center for Health
Statistics (MCiS) for collation, format-
ting, and analysis.
In cooperation with the MCiS all
, Minnesota resident case files from 1988
reporting pesticide exposure to humans
were identified_ All calls regarding human
contact with a chemical coded by the
AAPCC to be a herbicide, insecticide, r0-
denticide, or fungicide (nonmedicinal)
were selected. A total of 2,209 calls were
classified by the AAPCC system as pes-
ticide exposure calls for Minnesota in
1988,4.3 percent of all human exposure
calls to Minnesota. Of these calls, 1,428
identified pesticides as the primary sub-
stance and 31 call files identified pesticides
as a secondary substance of human ~
sure to Minnesota residents. The remain-
ing 750 calls were incomplete data files or
lacked the designation as a Minnesota res-
ident, thus were not available for second-
ary analysis.
The following descriptive analysis
applies to the 1,428 call files indicating pes-
ticide as the primary substance of expc>
sure to Minnesota residents in 1988. These
data were derived from self-reponed in-
formation. The use of poison control caller
files imposes the following limitations
upon the data: an unknown number of
pesticide exposure events may occur for
which no call was made; voluntaIy report-
ing of data via telephone is verified only by
e
Address reprint requests to Debra Kay Olson.
RN, MPH, InstruClOr, Division of Environ-
mental and Ocx:upational Health, School of
Public Health, University of Minnesota, MiD-
aeapolis, MN S54SS. Coauthors: Sax is Re-
search Specialist, and Dr. Gunderson is Direc-
tor, both at MiMe50ta Center for Healtb
Statistics; Dr. Sioris is Director, Minnesota Re.
gional Poison Center and Section of Cinical
Pharmacy at St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center,
and Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy,
University of Minnesota. This paper, submit-
ted to the Journal June 25, 1990, was revised
and acx:epted for publication Juuazy 9, 1991.
e,
I
June 1991, Vol. 81, No.6
.
.-
t
\
I
{
\
!
i
, .. , . A vrl>~'\
i4/;1M.' ./f..Uf!'~ ~ ~ {,~. /i~rt.~ (~~ e..., #V\.. "'r.muc Health Brie6 )
A/-..1?- Nt"l.t" iJ..,.c~" .
~
Ingestion was the most common
route of exposure overall, and for each
pesticide type (60 percent), except herbi-
cide, where ingestion accounted for 39
percent and dennaJ exposure accounted
for 45 percent of calls.
Pesticide exposure calls by two-hour
interval present a bimodal distribution
peaking between 10:00 am and 11:00 am
(190 calls, 13 percent) and 6:00 pm and
7:00 pm (251 calls, 18 percent). Calls by
two-bour interval by pesticide type show
a similar bimodal distnbution for each spe-
cific type of pesticide. The largest percent
of pesticide-related calls occur in the
months of May (16 percent), July (15 per-
cent), and August (13 percent) (Table 3).
Thirty-three percent of the calls (468
calls) were documented as symptomatic.
Two hundred eighty-eight of these were
classified as symptomatic related to the
pesticide exposure. By pesticide type, r0-
denticide calls reported the least number
(3 percent) of calls as symptomatic related
to the exposure.
Ninety-nine percent of all calls were
associated with acute exposures. The ma-
jority of calls were managed at a non-
health care facility (86 percent) while 12
percent were either managed at (107 calls)
or referred to (69 calls) a health care facil-
ity. More fungicide cases (93 percent)
were managed at a non-health care facility
(e.g. managed at home) than any other
pesticide type.
TABLE 1~ckll E)rpoe&n CeIa by PrIrnIry SubDa CIIegory.IIIn........
1. . :
0rgaI1Ophoephale otVy
0rgaJ lOphospha1e it CXlmbI'lalIOI. YI1Ih carb... .
Organophospha1e it c:cmbi l8IioI, YI1Ih chIoItI8I8d hydroc:arbon
OrgaIlOphosphate in CXlI,Ibi .aticI. wlIh cIher pesticide
Ct*Jmated hydrocabon rri'I "~. .
Ct*lflIl8t8d ~ ocMxln In oornbhIIloc. wMh Clhr pesIIcide .
Borat8&b:lric add (peslIcicIe only) ...... ,::....,:.,
Cafb8nate rri'I . .:. !.:~'.
CIrixI,. in CXlI,Ibi ellcl. wIh Clhr pesIIcide.'
Velemary ~icides (fer pets - flee caIIn. etc.)
PIperonyI txADxide ni pynlltrlns it CXlI.tli ellcl. (wlIhout
Clfg&l.ophosphate Clf CIl'b....)
Pyl eltfi ll!l rri'I (alone)
Roblnone
PlperonyI ~ rri'I (alone)
Insect repeIIanls (exckJdilg c:apsIcun CXlItdi_1g procU:ts)
0Iher " .~
UricrvNn
TCCIII
Frequency
Percer4
20.8
8.7
1.4
0.7
1Q.9
0.8.
%.7
17.8
Q.6
4.6
7.5
5.8
0.5
G.2
15.4
2.T
1..3
100.0
SOURCE: Hemepin Regic:n8i PoiIcn Cenler and ~ RegIorIII PoiIcn c... Secclldlil f
..,.. performed by 1hI MiYl8IOla c.. tor HeeItl SIdslics and NlIc:....., ~ lkMrIiIy 01
Mi10 l8IClIL
follow-up phone calls by poison center
specialists; data acquired by telephone are
limited to those who have access to tele-
phones and knowledge of the poison cen-
ter service; and by AAPCC definition ex-
posure relates only to suspected contact
with any substance(s) which, when in-
haled, ingested. applied to, injected into,
or developed within the body, may cause
damage to structure or disturbance of
function to living tissue. An actual poison-
ing event can only be verified through re-
view of medical outcome.
Results
Insecticide was identified in the larg-
est percentage of case files for Minnesota
(1,060 cases, 74 percent) followed by her-
bicide (168 cases, 12 percent), rodenticide
(155 cases, 11 percent), and fungicide-
nonmedicinal (45 cases, 3 percent). Of the
insecticide cases, those containing organo-
phosphates (alone or in combination) were
reported most often (Table 1).
Carbamates were reported in 10
cases of fungicide exposure. Of the re-
maining fungicide cases, 19 were associ-
ated with phthalimide, three with non-
mercurial fungicides, and 13 unknown!
other.
Herbicide cases were most fre-
quently associated with 2,4-0 (2,4-dichlo-
rophenoxyacetic acid) or 2,4,s-T (2,4,5-
trichJorophenoxyacetic acid) (78 cases. 46
percent) and triazine herbicides (10 cases,
June 1991, Vol. 81, No.6
6 percent). Oiquat was associated with 13
cases, carbamate with four cases, and
other or unknown with 63 cases.
Rodenticide exposure calls were pri-
marily associated with anticoagulant
types (128 cases, 83 percent). Sttychnine
was associated with three rodenticide ex-
posure calls and the remaining 24 roden-
ticide cases were other/unknown.
Of the 1,428 cases, a mean age of 5
years (range, one month to 8S years) was
identified; 50 percent of all calls were re-
garding children under the age of 3 years
(Table 2). The 1~17 years category ac-
counted for the least number of cases
overall. The 18+ years old category ac-
counted for 53 percent of all herbicide-
related calls.
Male to female ratio was 1.3:1 :: 0.2
for aU pesticide-related calls. as wen as for
individual pesticide types, except herbi-
cides, where males represented twice the
number of cases as females.
Ninety-nine percent of all pesticide
calls were reported as unintentional poi-
sonings. General calls (not otherwise
specified) accounted for 94 percent (1,323
calls) of the unintentional calls while 0c-
cupational-related exposure made up 4
percent (62 caJls).
Calls originating from a residence ac-
counted for 8S percent of all pesticide poi-
soning calls. Health care facilities ac-
counted for 11 percent and work place for
3 percent.
Discussion
Since 1986, pesticides have ac-
counted for approximately 4.3 percent of
all human exposure caJls reported to Min-
nesota Regional Poison Centers. This is
exmsistent with the percent of calls ~
ciated with pesticides nationally as re-
ported by the AAPCC,I As such, the state
data reported here represent but a Sma11
portion of a much larger national picture.
Over the past 20 years in the US,
organochlorine insecticides have lost fa-
vor because of their long-term health ef-
fects and petSistencc in the environment
and have been surpassed in use by orga-
nophosphates and carbamates.1o Acute
toxicity related to organophosphate pesti-
cides is usually of rapid onset thus symp-
toms can be more readily associated with
acute exposure to this pesticide type. It is
thus not unreasonable that exposure to or-
ganophosphate insecticides make up the
greatest percent of caJls (22 percent) in this
study. This is also consistent with a Ne-
braska study where 25 percent of the
emergency room visits and bospitaliza-
American Journal of Public Health 7St
. .
Public Health Briets
~ ~ u;Uf!~ ~ (~
Jvt~.:..ru e~-'7
TABLE 2-l'tPe of Pmwy ~ Expoel.n c.Is by Age, ~ 1918
. (years)
~
Freq. , '"
<1
1
2
3
4
5
Uricnown c:1*1
2-5
6-12" ~_
1~1T - '
18+
Unknown age'
TCIaI
4 0.3
8 o.s
9' 0.6
4 0.3
1 ,0.1
0:- 0.0
, c'
O'
2:
1~
1s;. '.
11 . ." '
~,
O.o'~
::"',0.1",
,.0.1'"
\~~T
" 3.1':-:::
InWflc:ides
Fteq. '"
U'
13.6
13.1
8.4 ,
2.7.'
2.4;..
Hetbic:ide6
Free;
,.
, RcdentIcidee
Frec;.:" '"
.
16.
ST
39
15, .
':t::'
1 ~;~~~:~.~:.~::~
4.3~ ;:~ :~~
1%';
21.1.":::
1.0';. \'"
74.2~ :
~Y"";":.(..
1.2
4.0
2.7
1:0.. ..
.,0.1,:"
'0.1.,
.. 'e':~~
.." 0.11 '
.. 0.1~:::
., 0.1",-
:'1Jk,
- 0.5. "
1OS'"
SOURCE: ~ RegicnII PaiIcIl c..1I'Id ~AegIcnIlPaiatc:... S<<lOIm"...". ~ br1hlfoA.-... c..tlr.~ s..a.
Irld PI.tlIC.HeeIlh NLnng. \.hI.tIlsty at Mn~, .' \' .
o
11.
17
7-
S;
:5.. .
"'~;":('i>":.~<" .
",,:~;,~~'.;-::.
, : .,:;:~es:~',
,,:.::s
:188;'
0.0
0.7
1.1
0.5
0.4
QA
'.",'11.:,':
:'.::2:'~>
. ~:''':~_i/,-r ~.~'.
--',',.1*;:,
';;- ,r,:~;,
155-'
TABLE. 3-- Type of Primary Peddde Expoeura CaUa'by. Montb"MmMoIa, 1~
Month Fungicides Hertliddes In8ectIddes AodenIicides Row TClCal (%)
Jar1Jary 1 _. 59 7 67 (4.7)
FeI:lrUaI'y 1 - 32 11 44 (3.1)
Marti1 2 2 31 11 46 (3.2)
April 7 11 45 18 81 (5.7)
May 13 58 141 17 229 (16.0)
JU'l8 7 43 176 12 238 (16.7)
U'/ 5 21 182 6 214 (15.0)
August 4- 22 149 14= 189 (13.2)
September 3' 8 99 19 129 (9.0)
0c:l00er 1 2 60 15 7B (5.5)
November - - 49 12 61 (4.3)
December 1 1 ~ 13 52 (3.6)
TOlaI 4S 116 1060 155 1428 (100.0)
SOURCE: Hemel:In AeQIOl'l8I p~ Cerar lII'Id Minnesoca AegicnII Paial eer.. Sea:lndIry ..,. pertmlId by the Mmescxa c....far HeBIh SlBDSllcI
and PucIic Healll'1 NlntIg. urWltllty of MlmeeoaL
tions for pesticide-related illness during
the 19~ crop season were due to or-
ganophosphates. ~
In our study herbicide type exposure
Cllls present :1 much different pictUre than
other pesticide types. They are typiCllly
associ:1ted with the :1dult (18+ years) male
experiencing :1 dermal exposure. With the
growing use of herbicides both in agricul-
tural (175 percent inc:re:1se from =:s years
:18(2) :1nd urban settings the percentage of
Cllls received (0.4 percent of :111 human
c:xposure calls since 1985) in comparison
to exposure potential appem low .11-14
Looking :1t the :1dult environments of
work place (six Cllls) and type of exposure
:1S occup:1tion:1l (18 c:ills). the difference in
exposure for herbicides by :1ge is not ex-
plained. It is still general unintentional res-
idence exposures that :1ccount for the ma-
jority of herbicide Cllls in this study. Why
752 AmeriC1ll Journal of Public H=lth
-
this overrepresentation of :1dults for her-
bicide exposure c:ills occurs is an area for
funher research.
With 50 percent of aU c:ills. examined
in this study, reporting pesticide exposure
to children under the age of three years.
concern arises over long-term effects to
this population group. Several authors
have explored the long-term effeCts of
such exposures on c:hildren.:'1S.16
O1ronic: exposure to fungicides has
been reported by Moscsz as posing the
gre:1te5t risk of Clncer as compared to
other pesticide types. Thus. while repre-
senting only 3 percent of the c:ills in this
study, the cumulative effects of such ex-
posures may have far greater impliCltions.
Blanc and 0lsonl7 suggest that poi-
son centers are iclc:llly suited to occ:upa-
tion:1l disease surveillance :1S used for
emiy detection of disease, for timely iclen-
e
tifieation of individual ClSCS. :md temporal
trends. In this sense, each poison center
report could potentially serve :1S a sentinel
health event. Sentinel health events refer
to a preventable disease. disability, or un-
timely de:1th whose ocx:urrence serves as
a warning signal that the quality of pre-
Ventive :mdlor therapeutic mediCll c:1%'C
may need to be improvcd.11.19
Acute pesticide poisoning reports, as
used in this study, would meet the criteria
used by Blanc, 1ft a/,17:JD in their investi-
gation of the usefulness of poison center
data. Those exposures to pesticides with
rapid onset of symptoms. such as in the
case of organophosphates. :1re ideally
suited for surveillance through such a sys- _
tern. Reponing occurs coincidental with ,.,
the exposure and its associ:1ted symp-
toms, and there are no delays :1S in the
case of retrospective surveys. In this
June 1991. Vol. !II. No.6
:;Ol,'v @I.,.''f
1t,U I'dJ../~ 5"7-0) ~ 5770 or -n::'f~ ,^",hc(~~
.
r
AROMATIC 100
.
E'f<ON COMPANY. U.S.A
. 01'11$1011 0' EXltOll C:OIl'OIU.TION
~
CJtEMCDrmA'
.., CHEMCENTRAUAUanta '
P,O, BOX 47280 !
Allanl&. GA 30382 (404) 448-7123 :
DATE ISSUEC: 11/07/88
SUPERSECES CATE: 05/02/88
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHE-CT
EXXON COMPANY, U.S.A. P.O. BOX 2180 HOUSTON, TX 77252-2180
A IDENTIFICATION AND EMERGENCY INFORMATION
PRODUCT NAME
AROMA TI C 100
.OIEMICAL NAME
Petroleu~ Solvent
SC-100
PRODUCT CDDE
132030 - 00652
CAS NUMBER
64742-95-6
"
PRODUCT APPEARANCE AND DDOR
Clear water-white liQUid
Aro~at1c hydrocar~on odor
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER
(713) 656-3424
B. COMPONENTS AND HAZARD INFORMATION .'
COMPONENTS
CAS NO. DF APPROXIMATE
COMPONENTS CDNCENTRATIDN
contains:
1330-20-7
APproximately 5,mass %
77~ ~~/
fu,J'X- C;1'~':':
~~N.~ -
. ii~tA- ])2. / IU)t?~
~-:r ;Z, ~
; :;;"~/~'"
'7. / . .
.
This prOduct can be defined as:
Light aromatiC solvent naphtna
(petroleum) .
64742-95-6 100%
It consists predominantly of CS-C10 arQmat1c hydrocar~ons,
primarily C9.
See
n ormation.
....
-. ;. ,." ,-
. . . '. ... ~ ., -;. ~ .... t\'
See Section H for additional Enviro"",entaI Information. '"
':~ :.f~."'~
.. ".
.~.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (HMIS)
Health Flamm.~il'ty Reactivity IASIS
1 2 0 Recollllllended by Exxon
. ..
EXPOSURE LIMIT FOR TDTAL PRODUCT IASIS
50 ppm (245 mg/m3) for an Recommended by Exxon
I-hour workday
C. PRIMARY ROUTES OF ENTRY
AND EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES
EYE CONTACT
If splaShed into tne eyes, flUSh w1tn clear water for 15 .1nute. or until irritatiOn
.u~sides. If irritation pers1.ts, call. pnysic1an.
SKIN
In ca.e of skin contact. remove any contaminated clothing and wa.n .k~n thoroughly with aoap
and water.
e'
INHALATION
If overcome by vaoor. remove from exoosure and call a pnysic1an immediately. If ~reatning is
irregular or has stopped. start resuscitation, adlllin1ster oxygen, if .vaila~le.
'."027'7IMWMOO 11
~
AROMATIC 100
E.
HEALTH AND HAZARD INFORMATION
r .
VARIABILITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS .
~ Health studies have shown that many petroleum hydrocarbons and synthetic
~ potential human health ri.ks which NaY vary from person to person. As a
~to liQUidS, vapors, .ists or fumes Should be .ini.ized.
EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE (Signs and symptoms of exposure)
High vapor concentrations (greater than approximately 1000 ppm) are trrttattng to the eyes
and the respiratory tract, may cause headaches and dtzziness, are anesthetic. and .ay have
other central nervous system effects tncludtng death.
. "\
lubrtcants pose )
precaution. exposure
.
"
NATURE O~ HAZARD AND TOXICITY INFORMATION
Product contacting the eyes may cause eye trritation.
ProdUct has a low order of acute oral and dermal toxicity. bUt minute amounts aspirated into
the lungs dUring ingestion or vomiting may cau.e mtld ~o .everepulmonary.injury.and possibly
death. .
This prOdUct is judged to have an acute oral LOSO (rat) greater than S g/kg of bOdy weight,
and an acute dermal LOSO (raeeit) greater than 3.16 g/kg of bOdy weight..
PRE-EXISTING MEDICAL CONDITIONS WHICH MAY IE AGGRAVATED IY EXPOSURE
Petroleu~ Solvents/Petroleum Hydrocarbon. - Skin contact may aggravate an exi.ting dermatitis.
F, PHYSICAL DATA
The following data are approxtlllat. or typtcal valu.s and shoUld not be usacs for preeis.
destgn purpo....
lOlLING RANGE .
Approximately iS2-i68'C (306-335'F)
VAPOR PRESSURE
Les. than 10 .. Hg . 25'C
ASTM 0 2879 . .
VAPOR DENSITY (AIR.. 1)
Approximately.,1
e
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (15,8 C/1!.! C)
0.872
MOLECULAR WEIGHT
120
PERCENT VOLATILE IY VOLUME
100 . 1 atm. and 2S'C (77'F)
pH
E..entially neutral
EVAPORATION RATE. 1 ATM. AND 2! C ('77 ~)
(n-IUTYL ACn ATE · 1)
0.2
POUR, CONGEALING DR MELTING POINT
Less than -18'C (O'F)
Pour Point by ASTM D 87
VISCOSITY
0.78 cP . 2S'C ASTM D 445
SOLUBILITY IN VATER. 1 ATM. AND 25 C ('77 F)
Negligible: ,... than 0.1%
G. REACTIVITY
ThiS prOduct ts stable and will not react violently wtth wat.r, Hazardou. polymerization
wtll not occur, AvOid contact wtth strong oxidant. such a. liqu1d.chlortne. concentrated
oxygen, sodium hYPoChlorite or calcium hYPoChlorite. i
e
....0277lMWMO021
PAGE: 3
DATE ISSUED: 11/07/88
SUPERSEDES DATE: 05/02/88
AROMATIC 100
.
J. TRANSPORT A TION AND OSHA RELATED LABEL INFORMATION
e
TRANSPORTATION INCIDENT INFORMATION
For further information relative to spills resulting from transportation incidents. refer
to latest De~ar~m.nt of Transportation Emergency Response GuideCook for HazardOUS Materials
Incidents. DOT P 5800.3.
."
DOT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
UN 1255
OSHA REQUIRED LABEL INFORMATION
In compliance with hazard and right-to-know ~irements. the following OSHA Hazard warnings
o .hould be found on a label. bill of lading or invoice accompanying thi. sh1pment.
DANGER I
COMBUSTIBLE
Note: Product lacel will contain addittonal non-OSHA related information.
The tnfonnatton and .-.colftllendat10ns contatnect heN1n are. to the best of Exxon" knowledge and
bel ief. accurate and ,.., iable as of the date fssued. Exxon do.s not warrant or guarant.. thetr
accuracy or rei tab t 1 f ty. and Exxon sha 11 not be 11 ab Ie for any loss or daIIlage art s f ng out of
the use thereof.
e
The fnfonnatfon and recormendatfons a,.. offered for the us.r's consfderatton and axUlfnatton.
and it is the user's responstbtlfty to satfsfy ftself that they aN suftabl. and compl.te for
tts parttcular use. If buyer repackages thfs prodUct. l.gal council snould be consulted to
fnsuN proper h.alth. safety and other necessary fnformatfon t. InclUded on the contalne,..
The Environmental Infonnatfon tncluded under Sectfon H hereof.. wall .. the HazardOUS Matertal.
Identiffcation System (HMIS) and National Fire Protectton Assoctatfon (NFPA) ratfngs have been
fncluded by Exxon Company, U.S.A. fn order to provf~ addftfonal health and hazard classtffcatfon
fnformation. The ratings recOlllll8nded are based upon the crfterfa suppl fed by the csavelopers of
thes. rating systems, togethe,. with exxon's fnterpretatfon of the avaflable data.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON HEALTH
EFFECTS CONTACT:
DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
EXXON COMPANY. U.S.A.
P. C. BOX 2180 ROOM 3157
HOUSTON. TX 77252-2180
(713) 656-2443
POR OTHER PRODUCT INFORMATION CONTACT:
MANAGER. MARKETING TECHNICAL SERVICES
EXXON COMPANY. U.S.A.
P. O. BOX 2180 ROOM 2355
HOUSTON. TX 77252-2180
(713) 1!5&-n49
e
''S'0277I101W"002)
PAGE: 5
DATE ISSUED. 11/07/88
SUPERSEDES DATE: 05/02/88
ROU~R~kAQ!9 J,\.
TECHNICAL CENTER
170 BEAVER BROOK ROAD
LINCOLN PARK. NJ 07035
TELEPHONE. (201) 628-1700 A
FAX. (201) 628.9367 _
June 23, 1992
Peltleldel. Envlronmentl'.
Toxicology Ind
Regulltory Atfllrl Deplrtmenl
Mr. Eric Rivken
1695 Stellar Court
Excelsior, Minnesota 55331
Dear Mr. Rivken:
Enclosed is a Material Safety Data Sheet for Exxon
Aromatic 100 containing xylene-range aromatic
hydrocarbons. As we discussed, Roussel purchases this
solvent from Exxon for use in Punt 57-OS Insecticide and
'other products as a solvent. Although this is a very
commonly used sol vent in many industries, the actual
consti tuents are probably known to only the manufacturer,
Exxon Company, USA of Houston, Texas. I would suggest
that you contact them directly regarding the chemical and
toxicological profile of their product.
If I can help you in any other way, please call me at
201-628-7200.
Cordially,
a~PO
Manager, Toxicology Services
e
JRDP/r
RIVKEN.ERI
Enc.
e
HEADQUARTERS PO BOX 1077,400 SYLVAN AVENUE. ENGLEWOOD CUFFS. NJ 07632 TEL: (201) 871-0771 TLX: ITT 420839 FAX (201) 871-9845
,.
''''o(.,~)..J'''.'~''''~.''.-)l~,~.: ,..1' ...},~ t~/'_1. ":~',I..... '. '.'~ ,~.. -<II ""..,' ~~ "... '.. ,.", .ttt ........... ,..)..'N"..,...,...,........"''''...4'y..fl......l.........
Toxicology and Environmental Fate
. of Synthetic Pyrethroids
administration), oral exposure, Inha-
lation, and dermal (s!dn) exposurc,2
Introduction into the brain or blood
vessels Is more toxic than other
routes of exposure as a result of the
metabolic processes in mammals
which rapidly detoxify the poisons
and the slow rate of absorpllon by
By Doria Mue/ler-Beilschmidt
Synthetic pyrethroids are a diverse
class of more than 1000 powerful,
broad-spectrum Insecticides used to
control Insect pests In agriculture,
households. and stored products.
Although they are based on the
chemical structure and biological
activity of pyrethrum, an extract from
plants In the genus Chrysanthemum,
the development of synthetic pyre-
throids has involved extensive
chemical modifications to make
compounds that are more toxic and
less rapidly degraded by light.
"The Chemistry, Development, and
Economics of Synthetic Pyrethroids"
(JPR 10(2):41-44) summarizes their
chemical structures, history of de-
velopment, and usage in the United
States and internationally; this article
describes the pyrethroids' toxicity to
humans and other animals as well as
their residues In food and their per-
sistence in soils and water.
.hat Determines the Toxicity of a
Synthetic Pyrethroid?
Pyrethroid toxicity is highly de-
pendent on stereochemistry, the
three dimensional configuration of
the molecule. Each isomer (mol-
ecules consisting of the same atoms,
but with different stereochemistry)
has its own toxicity. Some pyre-
throids have as many as eight differ-
ent isomers and there are several
different types. For example, maily
pyrethroids have pairs of isomers
with diHerent geometries, referred to
as the cis and the trans isomers. Fig-
ure 1 Illustrates the cis and trans iso-
mers of permethrin. The cis isomer is
generally more toxic than the trans
Doria Mue/ler-Beilschmidt is tile infor.
mation services coordinator at tIle NOl1h
American regional center of the Pesti-
cide Action Network International (PAN).
i North America; 965 Mission Street,
e 514; San Francisco, 0\ 94103;
5) 541-9140.
32
Isomer.
Acute toxicity of a mixture of two
isomers depends on the ratio of the
amounts of the two Isomers In the
formulation. For example. the female
rat acute oral LDSO* of permethrin
increases from 224 milligrams of the
pyrethrold per kilogram of body
weight (mg,lkg) to 6000 mg,lkg as the
proportion of the trans isomer in-
creases from 20 percent to 80 percent
(see Figure 2).
Most commercial formulations
have a fixed Isomeric ratio. Formula-
tions made of a single isomer (delta-
methrln, for example) are likely to
be much more toxic than those with
four to eight isomers.2
Route of exposure is critical in as-
sessing the acute toxic potential of a
pyrethroid. Based on laboratory tests
with experimental animals, introduc-
tion of the compound Into the brain
is most toxic, followed by Introduc-
tion Into the blood vessels, Intro-
ductlonlnto the gut (intraperitoneal
· wso Is the amount of a chemical that will
kill 50 percent of a population of test animals.
Figu re 1
..~:^oJQt)~
o
cis-permcthrln
. ~::~oJQt)gJ
o
trans-permithrln
Figure 2
Acute Toxicity of Mi.~tures of Two Isomers of Permelllr;II
6000
5000
i 4.00
'=-
o
S..,
3000
2000
1000
o
80:20
60:40 30:50 40:60
Cis:trans Ratio
20:80
JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM I VOL. 10. NO.3
30:70
ihe gut, skin, and lung tissue.3
Metabolites can also have an ef-
fect on the toxicity of a pyrethrold.
The mouse Intraperitoneal LDSO of
trans-resmethrln Is greater than 1500
mg/kg of body weight; it Is over ten
times less acutely toxic than three of
Its metabolites wiLh LDsos that range
from 46 to 98 mg/!<g.4 The common
pyrethrold metabolite 3-phenoxy-
benzoic acid may be significantly
more toxic than the parent pyre-
throid.5 Deltamethrin, which Is a pri-
mary metabolite of tralomethrin
(Scout), has a higher acute toxicity
than its parent compound.
Various other factors influence the
toxicity of pyrethrolds. Preexisting
health conditions, such as respira-
tory or skin problems, can exacer-
bate the toxic eClect of some pyre-
throlds In humans.6.8 Also, more
highly halogenated pyrethrolds
(those containing chlorine, bromine,
or flourine), such as flucythrinate and
tefluthrin, tend to be more toxic to
mammals than those that are less
halogenated, such as permethrin and
cyfluthrin. The acute toxicities of
some pyrethroids differ for male and
female rats and mice.2 Diet can also
have an eClect on the toxicity of py_
rethroids.9 DOT and pyrethroids are
some of the few insecticides with
toxicities that increase at lower tem-
peratures.3,IO
"Inert" Ingredients and Synergists
Since the technical (chemically
pure) grade of a pyrethroid is usually
formulated (mixed with carriers, sol-
vents, etc.) for use in commercial
pest control, the toxicity of these
other ingredients must be taken into
consideration when assessing the
toxicity of a formulated product. For
example, fenvalerate is much less
toxic to mice than the formulated
product, Pydrin.ll A ten-fold differ-
ence in toxicity between formulations
with the same active ingredient, but
with different carriers, can be seen
in some cases. Pyrethroid products
formulated as emulsifiable concen-
trates (oil based formulations) usu-
ally have higher acute oral LOS Os (are
less toxic) in rats than wettable
powder (aqueous) formulations.3
"Inert" (secret In redients and
contammants can a so a ect the tox-
icitv of a ovrethroid formulation. e~-
p-ecially since the formulated product
Jften contains more "inert" ingredients
and an oxygen atom. Other synergists
(piperonyl butoxide and sulfoxide)
block the mixed function oxldases,
enzymes which oxidize nnd detoxify
a wide variety of compounds.10,16 Si-
multaneous exposure to pyrcthrolds
and organophosphates has also been
shown to increase the inhibition by
the organophosplHltes of cholinest-
erase, an enzyme In the nervous sys-
temP
Acute Toxicity to Mammals
Acute oral toxicity to mammals
varies widely among the pyrethroids.
In general, they are less acutely toxic
than the organophosphate, carbam-
ate, and organochlorine pesticides.
Exceptions Include the pyrelhrolds
showing the highest acute oral
toxicities: esfenvalerate (Asana),
deltamethrln, blfenthrln, tefluthrln,
f1ucythrinate, cyhnlothrln (Karate),
and fenpropathrln. All of these pes-
ticides belong to the third generation
of pyrethrolds (JPR 10(2):43), those
. containing a cyano group (a carbon
atom and a nitrogen atom bonded
together).
Acute and subacute studies have
shown that the main effecls of pyre-
throlds are neurotoxicity at high
doses and liver hypertrophy (en-
largement of the Iiver).3.l!! If death
does not occur, these changes have
been shown to be reversible. In fact,
the capacity for recovery from the
toxic etlects seems to be a unique
characteristic of pyrethroid poison-
ing in mammals.3
Man of the pyrethroids can be
mildly to severe y Irrltatmg to t le
skin and eyes.3;'20.22 Some pyre-
throids also cause a sensitization of
facial skin which has been observed
to be reverslble.J The dermal (skin)
toxicity of some pyrethroid formula-
tions is greater than that of the tech-
nical grade.23 Adverse skin etlects
were not measured in tests on
nonhuman animals.3.21
Chronic and Subchronic Toxicity
Simultaneous contact with sub- The most notable non-cancerous
stances--that mhibit detoxificatiQn subchronic and chronic etlects of
.J)rocesses. called synerS!ists, can In- pyrethroid insecticides on mammals
crease -the. acute. toxic effects of a__ are signs of acute toxicity which are
_. r.ethroid. .High levels of some syn- usually temporary and di~jnish con-
erglsts organophosphorus and car- siderably if the chronic exposure
bamate compounds) can block es- continues.
terases, enzymes that degrade pyre- Other chronic effects arc reduc-
throids by cleaving the molecule at tion In the growth rate of test alli-
the double bond between a carbon mals, liver enlargement, and an in-
"S
everal 'inerts' in
pyrethroid formulations
used in the U.S. are
known or suspected
carcinogens (such as
silica, trim ethyl-
benzenes, and ethyl
benzene), or are
chemicals which
depress the central
nervous system (such
as xylenes). There are
also hazardous
contaminants, such as
ethylene oxide,
benzene, and arsenic,
in several pyrethroid
formulations. "
b....-~-.:']t."'!n~':!1I
JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM / FAll 1990
e
e
F~.
- frw1.e
ih4cvfij
1111M ,.
/tJtJI!f ~
~f
e
33
. crease In the activity of some en-
. Iyme. In the liver; these chonges are
not fully reverslble.s Chronic expo-
sure studies have also measured ef-
fects on the adrenals, spleen, pitu-
itary and testes.3
.DeDendln~ on tJiuyrethrg}fJ and
je test or~anlsms, other. poSSIBle
effects Include SUDDI.e.s.slon.~
Immune system9,2~ and_dama~e to the
nervous. svstem.~.S.19.26 EHects on' re~
production h~ye been observed with
several pyrethrolds and pyre--
thrlns.;t.~.~m~1 .
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
In a number of separate mutage-
nicity studies (studies of-the ability
to cause genetic damage), cyper-
methrln, allethrin, clsmethrln,
Dermethrln and fenpropathrin have
shown some muta enlc effects.3.25,28
nly In th-e case 0 ermet rm was
e res onse c anges In mice one
marrow un to be sl nlClcant. De-
spite these positive results, the mu-
tagenlc. potelitiill"or-pyiediroids.is
considered to beXeryJQwJLnot non-
existent. .-.-
Mutagenicity studies have also
been done for deltamethrin',
phenothrin, resmethrln, tetramethrin,
and fenvalerate; no positive results
_e found.3 One degradation prod-
.' an epoxlde produced when alle-
thrin and terallethrin are exposed to
light, Is mutagenic.s
Carclno~enlcity studies of per-
methrin. resmethrin. lenvalerate.and
deltamethrin have shown Increases
In Vii'lQ"us-klnds of cancer~tJ.27.2S-J2
91111. p~rJ!l.e!.~rln_,has been dete.r-
mined to be a potential or weak car~
c!~~g~n.: by- J.he__U.S._ El1yi!~? men tal
Protectlo!l.Ag~~y.~9 Carclnogeriicity'
studfeshave also been done on
phenothrln, allethrin, and cyper-
methrln; none were carclnogenic.3
Human Exposure
A study of synthetic pyrethroids'
effects on persons engaged in pack-
aging fen valerate and deltamethrin in
China documented burning sensa-
t!,?nsl!lghtl1~S.~ ,or numbness_on the
tace, sniffles, and .sn.ee.u:s.... Other
.'Y!!lp-toms Included~Qnormal faCial
sensations.. dlz~lness, .1atigue,_and
skin rash.es.26In the five years (1983-
1988) after pyrethroids began to be
Iln China, 573 cases (299 occu-
nal and 344 accidental) of acute
py ethroid poisoning were reported.
34 M;tfU't ~ ,;tJ;..:?:. ~
jt'Yl. ~"
or those, five resulted In death.33 At
the time the study was published,
only one other case of fatal pyre-
throld (cypermethrln) poisoning had
ever been reported In the IIterature.3
The occupational poisonings In China
were attributed to Inappropriate
handling.33
Effects on Other Non-target
Organisms: Birds
ethrold's acute toxicit to birds
Is mo erate, w t most 50 va ues
being greater than 1000 mg/kg. Yet
birds can be Indirectly affected b~
pyrethrolds 11' the pesticides deci-
mate or substantially change theJr
fpod supply. Wateriowl, which ieed
almost excluslvel on a uatlc Inver-
e rates, an sma nsect vorous or
.Youn~ ~ir~s are especi~lJY vulner-
,ble:- ;3 Both Dyrethrln, __and
-delfaiTfethrln have been shown to be
terat9genic(caUSlng blrth:d'deciiJ In
certain birds. Sublethal studies have
lndic-ated behavloral"errects'-'on-
quail.3S" --...-.----.-.-----
-
Effects on Other Non-target
Organisms: Aquatic Organisms
Pyrethrolds have a devastating ef-
fect on aquatic invertebrates with
most LCSO. values less than 1.0 parts
per billion (Ppb). These LeSOs are
similar to those for mosquito, black-
· LCso Is the concentration of a chemical In
water that wlll kill 50 percent of a population
01 aquatic tesl animals.
ny, and tsetse ny larvae, for which
pyrelhrolds are often used In veclor
contro1.35
. The most sensitive organisms are
surface-dwelling Insects, mayfly
nymphs and some of the larger crus-
taceans; zooplankton and benthic
(bottom-dwelllng) organisms are also
significantly affected by pyrethrolds.
Even at low (non-lethal) concentra-
tions, there are significant behavioral
changes In aquatic invertebrates, e.g.,
In their abl1lty to respond to tactile
stimuli, which may affect their sur.
vival. Lobster and shrimp are sus-
ceptible to all pyrethrolds.5.3S
Pyrethroids are hiahly toxic to
most fish; about 40 percent of fne
LeSO values for fish are less than 1.0
ppb. Oeltamethrln Is one of the most
toxic; allethrin Is one of the least
toxic; and cypermelhrln, permethrln
and fenvalerate are Intermediately
toxic. EmulsUiable concentrate for-
mulations. of pyrethrolds are usually
two to nine times more toxic than
the technical grode, most likely due
to synergistic Interactlons.3s Res-
methrin synerglzed with plperonyl
butoxide Is much more toxic to the
white sucker fish than Is the techni-
cal grade product.31 Pyrethrolds are
more toxic to fish allowcr tempera-
tures and appear to be more toxic to
smaller fish than larger fish.37
Field studies Indicate that pyre-
throids are more toxic to fish in
laboratory studies than In natural
waters because pyrethroids adhere
Table I
Bioaccumulation Factors
OrganJam Bloaccumulatlon RcIerence
Facto"-
~.. ~ cp
molluscb. 6302
Daphnlab 334 5
fathead minnow 100-3300 37
f1shb 125 5
molluscb 612 5
Daphnlab 1234 5
f1shb 1148 5
mollusc!' 3338 5
Daphnlab 1160 5
snail 11 6-356 3S
salmon 4G-2oo 3S
carp 24-122 7
minnow 50 3S
crustacean 68-683 35
fathead minnow 3000-5000 35
Pyrelhrold
cypermethrln
lenvalerale
flucythrinate
· The ratlo of the pyrethrold concentratlon In the animal to the concenlratlon In the water In
which the anlmalllves.
b Model predictions.
JOURNAL OF PFSnClDE REFORM I VOL. 10, NO.3
'to suspended organic matter In the
water and bottom sediment.s.3G.37 .
Nevertheless, sublethal effects of
pyrethrolds on fish Include damage
to gills and behavioral changes. Be-
cause they are highly lipophilic (at-
tracted to the non-water soluble
components of cells), pyrethrolds are
likely to be strongly absorbed by the
gl11s, even from water containing low
levels of pyrethroids (see Table 1).35
Pyrethrolds can Indirectly aUect
fish due to diminished and contami-
nated food supplies.5.34.36 Another
indirect effect of pyrethrold con-
tamination of stili waters is massive
increases of a green filamentous alga,
which can lead to a progressi.ye re-
duction of dissolved oxygen.S.38
Though less tolerant than most
mammals, amphibians and molluscs
are much more tolerant of pyre-
throids than fish and crustacea.s
Effects on other Non-target
Organisms: Terrestrial
Invertebrates
Pyrethroids are toxic to insects
wVhether the Insects are beneficials
:>r pests; they Initially cause knock-
jown (the inability of the Insect to
,naintain Its normal position) fol-
(owed by recovery or death. Pyre-
throids can also repell the Insect or
inhibit feeding behavior.37..E.iJ:J..d
.tudies have shown that pyrettlrOTCl's
a(!e~tJ1YJIJg _alld vegetatio!l:J.~h~.bit-
ng' art~rpp'o,d~,1P.r!5!~tory beetles,
r x ni le) mucn morEnl'iarrs'olT-
welling arthropods.s.39 Soil applica-
.ions of pyrethroids have been shown
,0 decre&lse the number of predatory
nites and at high rates pyrethroids
:ause significant reductions in
:arthworm populations.37,4o
~redator~Dr.ev relalionshil?.!.-can
also be '>>'p'set bfp-vrethroids: For
:xampfe, a-bfaC fly preuafOr, the
:addisfly, is susceptible to per-
nethrin at rates lower than those
lecessary to control blackfly. The
ame Is true for a group of spider
nite predators, the phytoseiid mites.
'hese mites have an LDSO 15 times
)wer than the spider mite pest.35
:hronic exposure from residu&ll de-
~rr:~i ~~ ~~~e:~~~~ ~~t~~o~~~e :~
havior and' ohyslology:2.41 -H --
, Pyrethroids are highly toxic to
~ with the exception of flu-
alinate, which Is used to control
lites In bee hives.37,42 The LDSO for
II
Table 2
Acute Effects of Pyrethroids and Pyretl,roid Formulations
. "', on Non-target Organisms3,'l.3.37;S7.f.O
Pyrelhrold ~ ~ ~
pyrethrlns - highly toxic
allethrin 2030 b tuxlc
s-bloallethrln ~blol) 680 h~C
esmethrln 'f toxic
ores met rln , ' hlllh y toxic
tetramethrl' ~Oilll F\"\ ' toxic:
rmethrln ('V'/Jf:,. @35o<> /' Qllgll:Y toXIC..)
env erA e " ',' 9932 b high 'I toxic
d-phenothrln ., "" ~2500 toxic
cypermethrln" extremely toxic
eslenvalerate highly toxic:
bJlenthrln .2150 toxic
lenpropathrln 1089 toxic
telluthrln ! 4190 highly toxic:
cylluthrln ' ..4SO toxic
f1uvallnAte .5620 toxic:
tralomethrln 7716 ' extremely toxic'
deltamethrln >4640 toxic
cyhalothrln .5000 highly toxic
kadethrin toxic toxic:
alphacypermethrln' toxic: toxic:
lambd.1-cyhalothrln ' .3950 toxic: toxic
Amallard oral LDSO (mg pyrethroid/kg body weight), unless otherwise Indicated
bquall orallDso (mg pyrethrold/kg body weight)
the honey bee can be as low as 0.03
micrograms per bee. Field studies
indicate that under natural condi-
tions, the hazard to bees is reduced
because the worker bees are repelled
by pyrethroids; this reduces their
contact with plant surf&lces 'recently
sprayed with pyrethroids and de-
creases their chances of receiving a
lethal dose. rethroid repellenc
can also can reduce oragmg acttvity
of bees.33
"I able 2 summarizes the acute tox-
icity of 21 pyrethroids to some non-
target organisms.
Residues in Food and Water
California and U.S. pesticide moni-
toring programs between 1982 and
1985 found permethrin residues on
cabbage, lettuce, and tomatoes:t3 U:S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
monitoring between 1985 and 1990
consistently found permethrin,
fenvalerate, and cypermethrln resi-
dues in over 45 diUerent vegetable,
fruit, and meat products. Up to 6
parts per million (ppm) permethrin
were regularly found on leafy veg-
et&lbles such as spinach, lettuce, kale,
collards, and turnip greens.41 The
maximum residue level set by the
FDA for permethrin on leafy veg-
etable is 20 ppm.4S Tolerance levels
JOURNAL OF PESTJCIDE REFORM I FAll 1990
toxic
non.toxlc
highly toxic:
highly toxic
Pyrethroid Mode
of Action
Like DOT and many other In-
secticides, naturally occurring py-
rethrins and the synthetic pyre-
throids are nerve poisons. Pyre-
throids' principal mechanism of
action is believed to be disruption
of the permeability of nerve mem-
branes to sodium atoms. The site
of action is not known, but pyre-
throids and DOT probably act on
both the central (the brain and
spinal chord) and the peripheral
nervous system (nerves in other
parts of the body). Other major
groups of Insecticides (carbam-
ates and organophosphates, for
example) are nerve poisons but do
not act on the peripheral nervous
system.3.tS
e
(legal limits) have not yet been es-
tablished for pyrethroid residues on
many of these products.
Recently, FDA has reported levels
of fluvalinate in honey 22 times
higher than tlte established toler-
ances.4G One stydy found that resi-
e
35
,~ dues (10-20 percent oC the amount
· Inlti'ally applied) of cy(Juthrln,
deltamethrln, cypermethrln, fen-
r valerate, and permethrln remain ef-
fective for 11 long period of time In
grains (over 10 months), with' mini-
mal losses even after milling and
baldng.H
_ There is no evidence of pyrethrold
residues In groundwater In the U.S.
or In Europe as a result of agrIcul-
tural use.
Fate in Plants, Soil and Water
In the environment, pyrethroids
are usually degraded by one or more
biotic and abiotic processes: meta-
bolic degradation by pla[lis, animals,
and microorganisms and degradation
by light (photolYSIS). There are three
main routes of degradation by light
In pyrethrolds: ester cleavage (split-
ting the molecule where a carbon
atom and an oxygen atom are con-
nected with a double bond), reduc-
tive dehalogcnatlon (removal of
chlorine, flourine, or bromine atoms),
and isomerization (conversion from
one Isomer to another). A main
product of pyrethroid photolysis Is
3-phenoxybenzoic acid.S
Degradation of pyrethroids In the
soil Is mostly by chemical and mi-
crobial action. The rate of degrada-
tion depends on the pyrethroid, soil
ee, climate, the species of mIcrobes
sent, and the size of their popula-
tions. .
Fenvalerate and deltamethrin are
The most common manifesta~
tlon of pyrethrum poison in is, a
ras on s in exposed to the
chemicals which m y_.b.e_.made.
worse b ex osure to the sun and.
temperatures high enough to
cause sweating. ' 4061 AllerS!ic re-
sponses and asthma followin~ ex-
posure to naturally occurring p..y:
rethrlns have also been re-
ported.~.62 Only two serious poi-
sonmgs caused by pyrethrum, one
fatal, have been recorded in the
literature and both were In the
nineteenth century.3.24
36
the most persistent pyrethrolds In
commercial use, especially In soli
containing a high proportion of or-
ganic matter. Both can accumulate
to levels ten times over the Initial
concentration if they are repeatedly
applied In a single season at rates
higher than the rate at which they
are degraded.s
Since pyrethroids are highly li-
pophilic, they adhere strongly to any
organic matter In water, are easily
absorbed into the waxy layer of
plants, and are strongly adsorbed by
soil particles.s,4s Once adsorbed, py-
rethroids are relatively immobile;
leaching through the soli into
groundwater Is improbable and
translocation through a plant Is un-
common.s Except for tefluthrln, most
pyrethrolds will stay In the top one
to four inches of soil after field appll-
catlons.S,49.SO However, several prin-
cipal pyrethrold degradation prod-
ucts (3-phenoxybenzoic acid and
dichlorovlnyl acid, for example) ieach
readlly.S,25
Pyrethroids are also removed from
the site of application by drift, soli
erosion, and volatilization (evapora-
tion). Spray drift from heayy a~ricul-
t u ~ a} ,J)J.!~~.~~.oi ~Jmp: I ica t.i~[l~_~~n
ca us ~'" ~.2.':l ~~mm!llQ.!.LLll,_l!~,!g!! bcm.n g
s'urface water. Qetectable reSTdues
nave' oeen re orted-'u-""(o-several
monihs'alter -fp'i>liciiflo*:-Erosion'OT
. contamlnated'-solfCbuld be a key
consideration for protecting aquatic
environments; one study found that
pyrethrold runoff from a cotton field
after heavy rains affected inverte-
brates in an adjacent pond.s
The persistence of residues in soil,
water, and plant tissues varies con-
siderably. The half-life (time required
for 50 percent of a compound to de-
grade) of pyrethroids in soils ranges
from 1 day to 16 weeks. Pyrethroids
that are not light-stable usually de-
grade much more quickly than those
that are light-stable, and degradation
is usually much faster In aerobic
(oxygen-cont'ainlng) soils than
anaerobic (not oxygen-containing)
soils.S1
Missing Da.ta
There are sl nlficant data a s for
the 0 er. ess oerslstent ovrethroi ~
such as allethrin, ,esm~thr'n and
phenothrin, as well as for pyrethrins.
The gaps include data on many as.
p'ects of acute and chronic toxic:
JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM I VOL. 10, NO.3
Ity.3.52.SS These are some of the most
. widely used Insecticides In homes
and gardens.
The data profiles on the newer
light-stable pyrethrolds are much
more complete. Yet. the one are~
where there Is slill substantial lack
Ollnlormation orilJiiJIili:kiriJj)e py- ,
rethrolds !oermethrln, fenvalerate,
f1ucyfhrlnate, cypermethrln and
tralomethrln, for example) 1s ~ their
behavior In the environment.
There are also Inadequate data on
Inhalation toxicology of many pyre-
throlds, even though inhalation Is
the most common route of human
exposure.
In Reneral, very little Information
exists on the chronic toxlcl~v. espe-
cially carcinogenicity, 01 pne1hrold
~e radition products and-lDdabo-
es.
e available Information on pyre-
throids Indicates that they may pose
an serious hazard to non-target organ.
Isms, especially aquatic and terrestrial
invertebrates, and possibly fish.
Therefore, the lack of data on the Im-
pact of pyrethroids in the environment
and on wildlife is a critical gap in our
know d e of pyrethroids. .
References
Davies, J. H. 1985. The Pyrethrolds: An
hlstorlc:allntroduc:t1on. 11/ J.I), Leahey (ed.)
Thtl pyrethroiu ifUflcticidt:,. London, U.K.:
, Taylor &: Francis.
(]) Bradbury, Steven p" and Joel It Coati.
1989. Comparative toxicology 01 pyre-
throld Insecticides. Reu. Enuiron. Contam.
~oxicol. 108:13~177.
v~tchlield, M.H. 1985. Toxicity to mammals.
I" J.P. Leahey (ed.) Tire pyf't!throid insecti.
cides, London, U.K.: Taylor & Fr4ncls.
4. Chambers, John. 1980. An Introduction to
the metabolism of pyrethrolds. Residue
~Re/Jiews 73:101-124. .
&Subcommlltl'C Oil Pesticides and Industrl41
Organic Pesticides, Associate Committee
on Sclentlflc Criteria lor Environmental
Quality. National Itesearch Council of
Canada. 1986. Pyrethroids: Their effect on
aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. NRCC
No. 24376. Ottawa. Canada: Environmental
Scretariat, Natlonal Research Council
Canada.
6. E.1. du Pont de Nemollrs & Co.. Inc. 1988.
Material safety data sheet: Pydrin insecti.
cide 2.4 EC. Wilmington. DE: E.I. du Pont
de Nemours & Co., Inc. (No. H~2751).
7. E.1. du Pont de Nemours &: Co.. Inc. 1988.
Material safety data sheet: Asana (R) XL
insecticide. Wilmington, DE: E.I. du Pont
de Nemours &: Co., Inc. (No. H~2752).
8. Leahey, J.P. 1985. Metabolism and envi-
ronmental degradation. In J.P. Leahey (ed.)
The pyrethroid insecticides. London, U.K.:
Taylor & Fr4ncls.
9. I>esl, I.. l>Obronyl, I., and Lea Varg4. 1986.
Immuno-. neuro-, and general toxicologic
anImal studies on a synthetic pyrethrold: bInding 01 the pyrethrolds cJsmethrln.
~rmethrln. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Sofety cypermethrln and dellamethrln to rat liver
12: 220.232. homogenate and mlcro.ome.. Arch.
10. Caslda, John E. 1980. Pyrethrum lIower. @ Toxicol. 63:214.220.
and pyrethrold Insecticides. Environ. . Olllce 01 PesticIde Program.. U.S. Envl.
H.alth P.rs/Hc. 34:189.202. . ronmentaJ Protection AJleney. 1979. Tol.
11. Willlam.on, Emily G., et. al. 1989. A com. erances and exemptions Irom tolerances
paratlve analysis 01 the acute toxicity 01 Jor pesllclde chemicals In or on raw agrl.
technlcal.grade pyrethrold In.ecllcldes cultural commodities: permethrln. Federal
and their commercial lormulatlon.. a Register 44(81): 24287.24288.
Ecotoxlcol. Environ. Salety 18:27-34. ~' Ruzo. Luis 0., ansf John E. Ca. Ida. 1977.
12. fMC Agric:uJtural Chemicals Group. 1989. Dear Metabolism and toxicology 01 pyrethrolds
Call/omla Customer. Letter (October 1). with dlhalovlnyl substituent.. Environ.
13. leI AmerIcas Inc. 1989. Material salety data (C) Health Perspec. 21:28.>292.
shut: Demon (R) TC insecticide. -.w Cabral, J.R.P.. et. al. 1990. CarcinogenIcity
Wilmington. DE: ICI Americas Inc. (No. studies with deltamethrln In mIce and rats.
39453(C)). (3j Cancer Letters 49:147.152.
14. fMCCorporatlon.1989.Materialsafetydata 3 Cabral, J.R.P.. and D. Galendo. 1990. Car.
sheet: Pounce (R) 1.5 G insecticide. Phlla. C:lnogenlclly .tudy 01 the pesticide
delphla. PA: FMC Corporation (MSDS lenvalerate In mice. Cancer LelterJ 49:1~18.
'5264s.s3-1.2). 33. He. F.. et. aI. 1989. ClinIcal manllestatlon.
15. fMC Corporation. 1988. Material,saf(uy data and diagnosIs 01 acute pyrethrold polson.
,heet: Talstar (R) 2 EC insecticide/miticide. @ Ing. Arth. Taxico/. 63:54-58.
Philadelphia. PA: FMC Corpora lion (MSDS 34. Kallajl, M. 1990. MO't/uitolhlaclt 1/)1
'82657-04-3-2). adulticid. (Drand Name Scourge (R)) pro-
16. Gaughan. Lorella C.. Engel. Judith L. and posed far aerial spray applications in the
John E. Caslda. 1980. Pesticide Interac. Adirondack Pork. Memorandum. New York
lions: Ellects 01 organopho.phorus pe.tI. Department 01 Law and Environmental
c:Ides on the metabolism. toxicity, and@'roteCtlOnBureau.MarchI990.['676)
persistence 01 selected pyrethrold Insec. 35. mlth. Tara M., and Glenn W. Stratton.
lIcJdes. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 14:81-85. 1986. Ellects 01 synthetic pyrethrold In-
17. Ablola. F.A.. et. al. 1988. Chollnesterase sec:llcldes on nontarget organisms. Residue
depression among Senegalese crop pro- Reviews 97:93-120.
tectlon workers exposed to organophos. 36. Mulrhead.Thomsom, R.C. 1987. Pesticide
phorus pesticides. Dull. Environ. Contam. impoct on stream (auna with special ~fe,..
Taxieo/. 41 :48J.488. ence to macroinvertebrates. CambrIdge.
18. Soderlund. David M.. and Jeffrey R. U.K.: Cambridge UnIversity Press.
Bloomquist. 1989. Neurotoxic actions 01 37. Hill. I.R. 1985. Ellects on non.target or.
pyrethrold Insecticides. Ann. Reu. Enlomo!. ganlsms In terrestrIal and aquatic envl-
34:77.96. ronments. In J.P. Leahey (ed.) The pyre-
19. Lltchlleld, M.H. 1983. Characterlzallon of throid insecticides. London. U.K.: Taylor &
the principal mammallan toxicological and Francis.
biological acllons 01 synthellC pyrethrolds. 38. Meermann. H. 1988. Anatomie eines
In N. Takahashi. H. Yoshloda. T. Mlsato. Giftunfalls. MPG 17esselnlormallon PRI B9/
and S. Matsunaka (eds.) Pesticide chemis. 88(19). August 17.
try: Human welfare and the environment 39. Shires, S.W. 1985. A comparison 01 the eI.
(Vol. 2), Natural Products. New York NY: lects 01 cypermethrln, paTathlon-methyl and
Pergamon Press. DOT on cereal aphids, predatory beetles.
~FMC Corpora lion. 1988. Materia! safety data earthworms and litter decomposition In
sheet: Pounce (R) technical insecticide. spring wheat. Crop Protection 4(2): 177-193.
Philadelphia. PA: FMC Corporallon (MSDS 40. IngelslieJd, C. 1989. Pyrethrolds and ter.
-St'\ '52645-63.1-50). restrlaf non-target organisms. In The Py.
:.!.:;ICI Americas Inc. 1987. Material safety data rethrold Elflcacy Group (ed.) The pyre.
sheet: Ambush (R) (GFU330). Wilmington, Ihroid insecticides: A scientific adllQnce (or
a"\ DE: ICI Americas Inc. (No. 0106). human welfare. Proceedings of the 1989
~ FMC Corporallon. 1989. Material safety Annual Meeting 01 the American Assocla-
data sheet: Cynoll (R) EC. Philadelphia. PA: tlon lor the Advancement ot Sc:lence. San
fMC Corporation (MSDS '5231S-Q7-8-4). Francisco, January 19. .
23. Uclal. Roussel. 1982. Deltametllrin mono- ~ueller-Bellschmldt. D., and M.A. Hoy.
graph. Avlgnon. France: l'lmprlmerle 1987. Activity levels ot genetically ma-
~ Aubanel Press. nlpulated and wild .tralns oJ Metaseiulus
~!1 Hayes. Jr.. Wayland J. 1982. Pesticides occidentalis (Nesbitt) (AcarIna: Phyto-
studies in man. Balllmore. MD: Williams & .elldae) c:ompared as a method to assay
Wilkins. quality. Hilgardia 55(6): 1.23.
:.5. International Registry 01 Potentially Toxic 42. Waller. G.D., et. al. 1988. ResIdual lIIe and
Chemicals, United Nallons Environment toxicity to honey bees (Hymenoptera:
Programme. 1990. Cypermethrln. IRPTC Apldae) 01 selected pyrethrold lormula-
Bulletin 10(1): 24-27. lions applied to collon In Arizona. J. Econ.
G. He. F., et. aI. 1988. Ellects 01 pyrethrold Entomol. 81(4): 1022.1026.
Insectlc:ldes on subjects engaged In pack- 43. Mott. Lawrie. and Karen Snyder. 1988.
aging pyrethrolds. Brit. J. Indust. Med. Pesticide Alert. San Francisco, CA: Sierra
~ 45:54~51. Club Books.
?J Nallonal Coalition Against the Misuse 01 44. U.S. Food and Drug AdminIstration. 1990.
Pesticides. 1987. Chemical watch: Listings of pesticides, industrial chemicals
Resmethrln. Pesticides and You 7(5):5 and metals data by fiscal )lear, origin,
(December). sample nag and industry/product code 198>
3. Catlnot, R.. et. al. 1989. In vitro covalent 1990: Pyrethroids. Database search (Free-
JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM I FAU 1990
dom of Information Act Request f90.
016087). .
45. E. Gunderson. U.S. Environmental Protec.
lion Agency. Personal communication.
46. -FDA to Tut Honey lor Pesllcldes." Soli
Frvnc;"o Chronicle, August 11, 1990.
47. Dicke, W., Ocker, H.D.. and H.P. Their.
1988. Ruec:kstandsanalyse von Pyrelhrold.
Insektlzlden In Getrelde, Mahlerzeu.:nluen
und Brot. Z. L,bcnsm. UIII,rs. Fursell.
186: 125-129.
48. Briggs. G.G., M. Elliot. and N.F. Janes. 1983.
Pruent .tatus and lutur. prolPKts lor
.ynthellc pyrethrolds.ln N. Takahashi. H.
Yoshloda. T. Minto, and S. Matsunaka
(eds.) Pesticide chemistry: Human welfare
and the environment. Vol. 2 Natura! Prod.
ucts. New York. NY : Pergamon I)ress
49. Reed, W.T.. et. al. 1983. The late and Im-
pact 01 pydrln Insecllclde (Ienvalerate) on
non.target .ystem. loll owing lIeld appll.
cations. In N. Takahashi. 1-1. Yo.hloda. T.
Mlsato and S. Matsunaka (eds.) Pesticide
ch.mi,lr)l: Human "ullfu,. alld II,.
enuironmentfll (Vo!. 2). NO/UN! l'nxJuC/s.
New York, NY: PerQamon Press.
SO. Olllce 01 Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
U.S. Environmental I'rotecllun AlIl:ncy.
1987. Pesticide fact sheet: FelllJUlerute. No.
145. September.
51. Leahey. J.P. 1985. Metabolism and envi-
ronmental degradation. In J.P. Leahey (ed.)
The p)l"!throid insecticides. London, U.K.:
~aYlor & Francis.
~1Iic:e 01 Pestlc:Jdes and Toxic Suustances.
1987. Guidance for the reregislration of
pesticide products containing sumitllrin as
the aclive ingredient. Washington, D.C.: US
Environmental Protection Allency.
€EWee of Pesticide Programs. 1988. Guid.
once for the re-rr!gistration of products con.
taining rf!smet"rin as Ihe actille ingTT!diellt.
Washington. D.C.: U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency.
@Olllce 01 Pestlc:lde Programs. 1988. Guid.
once for the ~-rf!gistration of productJ COfl'
laining allethrin slereoisomen as IlIe actille
ingredient. Washington. D.C.: U.S. Environ.
~ mental Protection Agency.
~ OWce 01 Peltlc:Jdes and Toxic: Sub5tOlllce5.
US EPA. 1988. Pesticide faC't sheet: Alfe/hr;1I
stereo isomers. No. 158, March.
~eorge La Rocca. U.S. Environmental Protec.
Uon Agency Ilght.table pyrethrold product
manager. Personal communlcaUun.
57. Royal Society ol'Chemlstry. 1989. The
agrochemicals handbook. Boca Raton. FL:
Royal Society 01 Chemistry. Database
search (flle 306 Dialog).
58. Sine. Charlolle (ed. dlr.). 1990. The farm
. chemicals handbook. Willoughby. OH:
Meister Publishing Co.
59. WorthIng, Charles R. (ed.) 1983. 77,e pesti.
cide manual. London. U.K.: British Crop
Protection Council.
60. Elliot. M.. Janes. N.F.. and C. "olll'r. 19711.
The luture 01 pyrethrolds In Insect con.
~ trol. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 23:443~9.
~Moore. J.B. 1975. Pyrethrum extract: Part
2. Toxicology and pharmacology 01 pyre-
thrum extract. In RH. Nelson (ed.) Pyre.
thrum /lowers. Minneapolis, MN:
Mclaughlin Gormley King Co.
62. Barthel. W.F. 1973. Toxicity 01 pyrethrum
and Itl constltuellts to mammals. In J.E.
Caslda (ed.) Pyrethrum: 77/e natural illse("
ticide. New York. NY: Academic Press.
'e
e
e
37
~'" i
'i~"l~
.1 I~ } ,.
1~!1il ~ 0
en
en
~
~~ .- ~ I
..J I
~ K~ ~ ..J Ll) . .
~~'-,""~ tntn
I co C:Q)
~ l' (' ~ en 00)
~ ~:::::l
1 - ()co
"i~~~ - Q)O)
ca --
~{~ltI+ .... 00
I r:: ()
~ ~rl- 0 ca .:JJ:
0....
co a: coo
f J ~ I en + ...~
~ --
-Q)
.c:c:
0)
l.~ ~ C/) , =co
>-E
r t ~ Ll) a: - Q)O
I ...... < ~ tn...
C) ...-
tll ~ en w .- Q)Q)
~ >- r:: ""0)
...... ~~
CI)
c:: Q)Q)
.l~ ~ f ~ ~ z>
)( co
0 ~ E>-
, 0-
...... ... ...
en . -co
~ l1J ~ C) Q)Q)
~ lr~ ~ ...>-
COco
~ fl)tn
C::._
(\1_
Ll) )(-
Q,)CO
I ~ \ a: CD ~-
en c:
1 w ~ C1i '(; -
~ . q:a:j
l'
~ ~) .
~ 0 ~ 'i t i r
J ~ CD
.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~ -I}' f ~
~ C\I 0 co <0 ~ C\I
" ,- ,- ,-
<>C!) . q: lLJ . ~lLJ><q:~CI).....z-C!):c~ ~( rwl1
~
J 1 ,!:
.~ 'I ~ it
V) ~ "
l
~
86
-" - -- ~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOARD OF ANIMAL HEALTH
119 AGRICUL TURE BLOG
90 W. PLATO BLVD
5T PAUL. MN 55107
(612) 296.2942
e
June 30, 1992
Mr. Eric Rivkin
1695 Stellar Court
Excelsior, MN 55331
Dear Mr. Rivkin:
Enclosed is the information you requested regarding Equine
Encephalitis. I checked back to 1959 and there were no cases listed
for Carver County but for many of the years the total number of
cases was given and no breakdown by counties.
Both humans and equine are susceptible to the WE virus; however,
(equine cases appear two to three weeks before human cases.
Therefore, the unvaccinated equine population is an excellent
sentinel for human diseases. That is why each year we request that _
veterinary practitioners report to our office any cases of ,.,
suspected encephalitis cases. Acute serum samples should be drawn
immediately and a convalescent serum in 14-21 days. These reports
are then passed on to the Minnesota Department of Health.
A large majority of horseowners have been vaccinating their animals
for a number of years, particularly in heavily populated horse
areas where there is a lot of expensive breeding stock.
Dr. Keith Friendshuh (296-3428) will be back in the office on July
6th so please feel free to contact him if you have any further
questions.
Sincerely, ~
~-r7b~~J
Sandra Ives
Board of Animal Health
si/enc.
e
PRIl\'TED O~ RECYCLED PAPER
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~
e
.-
Z
<t
U
:J
(L
a..
<(
e
~
~
w
.-
-
(/)
e
PRC DATE: July 28, 1992
CC DATE:
HOFFMAN:k
M. KOEGLER, H-G GROUP
3
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
Concept approval of a planned unit development of three 16-unit buildings
(rental), and nine 8-unit buildings (owner occupied) for a total of 240 units and
a club house/office on 25.29 acres of property zoned R-12, High Density
Residential District, Oak Ponds/Oak Hill, Lotus Realty.
LOCATION:
See attached vicinity map.
APPLICANT:
Lotus Realty
470 W. 78th Street
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Arvid Elness Architects, Inc.
400 Thresher Square Building
708 Third street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
PRESENT ZONING:
R -12, High Density Residential District
ADJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USE:
N - RSF, Single Family Residential District
S - BG, General Business District
E - R-12, High Density Residential District
W - R-12, High Density Residential District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
See attached map and park dedication section of the report.
COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN:
See attached map and trail requirements section of report.
Park and Recreation Commission
July 23, 1992
Page 2
,
e
BACKGROUND
Oak Ponds/Oak Hill, Lotus Realty has submitted an application for Concept Review of a Planned
Unit Development involving a total of 240 multi-family units. The project consists of fIfteen unit
buildings which will be renter occupied, and nine buildings of owner occupied housing. The plan
calls for a central clubhouse area including a swimming pool and a small playground area.
This property was the site of a multi-family housing proposal in 1989. At that time, the project
was reviewed on a number of occasions by the Park and Recreation Commission and a number
of park alternatives were addressed including the dedication of a fIve acre neighborhood park.
The project was withdrawn by the developer prior to the fmal plan approval phase.
The proposed development raises several issues that need to be addressed by the Park and
Recreation Commission. They include:
1. Park dedication requirements.
2. Trail requirements.
3.
Park dedication credits for privately supplied recreational facilities.
e
Park Dedication
The first decision involves the question of requiring land dedication versus acceptance of cash
in lieu of land dedication requirements. According to Chanhassen ordinance, neighborhood parks
are to be supplied at the rate of one acre per 75 people. At 240 units, the proposed project
creates a total land demand of 9.6 acres.
The key to addressing the issue of land versus cash dedication is the availability of existing
recreation facilities to meet anticipated needs. According to the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan,
neighborhood parks have a normal service area of 1/4 to 1 mile. In the vicinity of the proposed
project, Chanhassen has fIve existing parks within 2/3 of a mile of the site. They include Lake
Ann Park (3500'), City Center Park (1500'), Chanhassen Pond (2500'), Meadow Green Park
(3,500') and Lake Susan Park (3500'). From the perspective of location, these parks can easily
accommodate the neighborhood park needs of .the proposed project. All of these sites will be
accessible to Oak Ponds/Oak Hill residents via the existing and planned trail system. Therefore,
it is unnecessary to consider the acquisition of additional park land to serve the planned
development.
Chanhassen 's current park dedication requirement is $440 per unit. Therefore, the project's 240
units generate a total park fee of $105,600.
e
r
e
Park and Recreation Commission
July 23, 1992
Page 3
Trail Requirements
The second issue pertains to trails. Chanhassen's trail plan shows an off-street trail along Powers
Boulevard. When the previous project was reviewed in 1989, this trail was to be accommodated
within a new 20 foot easement along Powers Boulevard. Trail construction in this area will be
difficult due to the width of the existing right-of-way and the adjacent topography which drops
sharply to the east. Despite this fact, this segment is an important link in Chanhassen's overall
trail system. Construction of the trail will require close coordination with Carver County. The
developer will be responsible for estimating the cost of this trail segment and for its construction.
Upon submitting a cost estimate, it will be verified and a recommendation will be forwarded to
the City Council to reduce trail dedication fees accordingly.
e
The proposed plan calls for a six foot wide bituminous trail running from Powers Boulevard on
the west to Kerber Boulevard on the east. The trail is located along the north side of the existing
stand of oak trees which will be preserved as part of the development. The construction of this
trail section is not being advocated. Although it would be a beautiful addition to the city's trail
system, the trail dedication requirements of this PUD will likely only provide the necessary
funding for the more important Powers Boulevard trail. The plan also calls for a sidewalk along
the new dedicated street that passes through the central portion of the project. An additional
sidewalk connection is shown linking the rental units on the north side of the street to the
proposed sidewalk.
Oak Ponds/Oak Hill has a trail dedication requirement of $35,280 based on the current fee of
$147 per unit. Since the Powers Boulevard trail is an important part of the overall trail system,
the City should require the developer to construct this trail segment in exchange for the
corresponding reduction in trail dedication fees.
Park Dedication Credits
Park dedication credits involve the issuance of full or partial credit for the construction of private
recreational facilities. To the degree that it is applicable, park dedication fees could be reduced
by an amount representative of expenditures that would otherwise need to have been made by
the City to provide recreational facilities.
Oak Ponds/Oak Hill includes a swimming pool and playground area. Are these facilities worthy
of park credits? In the case of the swimming pool, it is an attractive amenity for the project's
residents. It is not, however, a normal component of a neighborhood park in Chanhassen.
Chanhassen residents currently have the opportunity to swim at a supervised beach at Lake Ann
Park. Therefore, the inclusion of a private swimming pool does not have a direct impact on City
supplied recreational facilities and therefore, is not a likely candidate for park credits.
e
Park and Recreation Commission
July 23, 1992
Page 4
e
A playground is also proposed as part of the site plan. Because of the density of the project, a
playground is appropriate, particularly one which serves the needs of younger children. Since
the playground is located in open space that is required as part of the PUD, a park credit for the
land that it occupies is inappropriate. A credit for supplying the actual equipment also has no
merit.
Play equipment is commonly supplied on a private basis to accommodate the daily needs of
children. Single family homes and multi-family developments commonly have a swing set or
play structure in the back yard. Is Oak Ponds/Oak Hill any different? The developer is to be
commended for including a playground area in the site plan, however, it is not a candidate for
park credit.
Recommendation
Based on the preceding comments, staff recommends that the Chanhassen Park and Recreation
Commission recommend that:
1. The City accept the full park dedication amount of $105,600 in lieu of land dedication.
2.
The developer of Oak Ponds/Oak Hill supply a 20 foot easement along Powers Boulevard
and construct an 8 foot wide bituminous trail. Trail dedication fees should be reduced
to offset the expenditure for the trail construction.
e
3. The inclusion of the private swimming pool and playground area do not diminish the
need for community supplied recreational facilities, therefore, no park credit will be given
for the provision of these items.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity map
2. Park Service Area Map
3. Comprehensive Trail Plan Map
4. Reduced copies of Site Plan Submittals (6)
e
.~ --:-- -- ~-r-- .,~
..,..... .... ..'l~'"
[';:'_' '.,.,-- "'_"'~"'-J>>""l<:'l"'"""~~~"i!*",,"~'~~~~~""'''''V'.''-'~- -.
" ;;;,. .' ' , ,> ':, .,r: ." ':-~~'~~~~_'.>> .>/ ,', ':,J", ":,'f '.... . ,'C -, fJ>
. -~ ."
~ .
- '
w.
, i
f
~.
,.,.,.--.': .-~..
.
..; I ., . 1
/'
T
-
0 - .
--
.. 6
- fit
~ . .
p.
~
I
-~
~;
I
-<:'
e
~"
)>
-0
-- --- ---
...
t
\', - --
, "; ,
."" .
-.... ~.
\ """--
\ --
'\
\,
. I ()oO
~c c
~ <> cO
't
...t:";.
'L~
,r't.
j
..--:,... - -
OV ~llil
~\~' ,/' Yl/, - , .' ".c." I " ~ ~ _" "(_ " / _ !_
-"\' - - ~ r'n/lR~, I-~ _ q /\
~1 l~Cf(~ 'i '''' I~, T ~".
1\ L j h~.;'" 8/ I.. I V,-;, : r-[; ~I~.
L" '('~:"1'~ C]r----:,'~,'W., \ I, -G1' I I r~' _ ~.~:d~Ii'~~I'E;!
tl.. 'lL'\1 \ " ;:1'" " , l' ~'"
j ,,'U /; <? ~ J c~ri-4~~
" I \ _ ~ l,."" ~: 12: - " ~"i~;_1~
l",-~~" -l..., "II hJ! i I ~ '. E ~ .... ' , ~
I I N g: ...' ~ "', ! ~
~- 'HI 7(; I ,'X\t :).~~ \J~lg -- --1._ ~:a. ~ " __.', tJ ~ '~:1~
~ ~ L. ""w ~ ,.. ~, ~ l/"'( , ,~'-....: .~~
- ' lli , h ". , , l, ~ , . ".", ,
, ,"", ~ . ". ' ,V', f.!' ~-, ~ ,,~, ,'I- _ _,"', f"ld' =-<
. . t:l0~; \~ ;:::;,;,~" I '- ~~~~5' 4) '-=: ~ . <:-
-, k; '. ",._ ~ ""~,.., ~ _ ,
. ,- ,CU...~~ ~ ~,~, f'..^.. ~~ ~:~ r~ I I "., _
' I'"~ ; , ,-.-,-, L---'." "~~ ." I L1I .
...:;:-l3FT""~Tp()lnR{:" BLV (<=9/ It y \, \\. t-Lj ~ ~~ \, i i I I 'ii' 1:- r:- _ : " ~. \
.;-- fh ~ """'5.' " .= or ~~)F t,lOp. 'r.",_ ~~
~ '-L >' I r "V, --- --,," Ai:
) < ,"~:":'':::- ~ '\r-1U.: . '~~c= ,t~~;- . . ~'~'mI~!Jj ~-;&:~ ,IJ. ~ ~,'~ ,~
~ q ~ -" ~ c. " ''',k~, "'E:1 [j~ ..~... ~ / ,~
' ~ -"'- '" , , ~ ';f c~! "~ .. Cl--1" ~
iffi ~ ~ "i f-- -~~ ".ol. \ '/111 :~IC>" :<1 .;(~l~~ Vl~ . '\~ ~ 'L't-
r---r--I( ~ ~Q Jf"-" ~{; P K q.;1~ ~i ~,~,t: ,r'.. :~,.... r d ') ~~
\~.~ r=1 ~', - ~ ,,- tjj; ., ~ ,', ~\ ~' ~'~..Y.?'" "", .~ . ..<o<'y,
"--..::if' ~ ~ ~ \ Yf!';; ~ rn CUM '., . ."'" ~ ~WJ~r' ~~ ~~~CI ,J ~~_~
'''--. ~ ' " '~n ,"- '" ~ , ,. ~ '1\ , ' ,.~. V,,- .
,.~ ~~\~~ . ~~ :~.." I ~w-J18liiIui~~ ~ '; ~," I il\" ri ~~/ ~. ~~~ ~
I (~~~-";;:~g' t~\ '. ~.~e~~ ~~~;-. ~ i ~ ~ ~ \J.;~ ~ ~I ~~
. ......#f'(J - ~..!Y" " (l'J1'TT';]~ I" 1 Ih~V .... ,.::::::I "",._.>..~
I .......1 ,,~ , ...i.. '\ ~ z::B:l[I]E" \ \ ('---/.
' )'1-" K~,\\.-;".. . @'~ , "B ~. ~ my< \'0..-'; '"
\: I 'I. A...(:T I \\~ "'"" tD, ~~'f-- _ ""'fl;I;I
\1\ ~ II ." ~~~ q\ ~. 'Qirlf! ~)....Jl ~
\1\,' " . .-' ;' ~ ~ _ ~
\ ~ \ - m II<' ',' \' " '_'-;~!,; ~~H "". , ~
\\ ~\i lj ~ ~ ~'" ~ %:~ -- I 1'/ . =r-'1iL - I I --. .II~ I
is! OF EDEN PRAIRIE .~ it ~ ( ~ i I ..
- -- OF~ I,~~ 'I I I ~. . ,j , I .
1 ~ ":. till ~ ,_ 8' i ,
I 0 ~ ~~~~. ~ , I '....
: i /,'. .oo ~$r 'C ~~~ - i ~ g i i i i i i A !
': .. ~ ' ! III CD; ~ L, ~I~
8 8 0 ...._, ~ '"OO{j ~~
...., D(LL l--. 1_ r:l. ...
OJ I I I I ,
Iii i ~ ~
s'"
-'~~.. ~ ~
II ~~
v--.~~~
,111600"
N
I~
-
e
. . . .
-
"
e
...-
-
-_.
:~
:-L
Walkway/Bikeway
i I
1.,-1
-~
,
----,
=-l
--j
.-
,
...--1
4
e
arr OF
~
Trail Plan
Bas. - 1889
I
5
I
I
6
I
(' -- I
-- 7
--- I
I
I
.e
Nature Traif
Connection Points
.-- !
---j
I
---
:..l
!
l
~
,
-
L,:,' - - - J
I I
-.-
_. ---;
~.--i
I
---I
... - .~
, ,
fl.,.,.
e
r
45
..~ ...
:..~:~.t :I~I~~,--.iii im.
. . 'I . .. , r-.,
.. !: -'. i I "' 0 _f ~ ~ I - ; -
, 0 1 m -, r
to LJll.U~~JIJ 1'1
1- I~J !
;InJ
~.iiJ I
o
~J
"
w I
<...
o
~ i
:E i
.
~ !
0'
.
'" .
- I
~ ; I
j I
u w
i
0 J
i
o . e
!
.4-"
".
. . .
,
.
.
'\ -"
'9-1 U" .".....
. . ..Oo... '.
---................:--
.~
I
t
I
; I
~"..J
J'I
i .
; ! I
: i..
..
e
\
./
../
o ~
(
..
I
1
w.
.:
. .wI
"" '
...... ;,""-
.. - /-
'\-/
" (
....
. .
. .....
.- ........
...-. ..........
.....
c..=..Oo
H" -_... ~.~S
- -- -.. ~ .
---------....---,
.
-~
.,
A./ '
/ / ~;/./ '
, \,'" _ .. ". 'oil ,".... - ''. '
JI>f .~~... ~~: ~ . '..
/ / /~~q."!c ,.~. , ,,' !! :'
,{( '/ / I ~::,~ ..~J>X;-:.,) ~ ,. \ (. .
,.,;7 V #'?J9 0'H:. ~;" ~~ . .~U' I:. . .... ".
j .-:;' ""V/r.' ,~~ ~ / ,,' C~ ,M 0;.::-----.>.. al1
...;~ . ,,' ~'~ .. ~~~. \Ki' - ~ ~J_", t' .' ""'''''. ..I
. :'.: \;" (~~' \ "J"'" I......r - _-..~....1" ,.J :L-~~ ',;,-. ~Ii
/<"v,., M .. /. " " .'" I Or:' · '. 'I.
/'.- '-', ,N " --. . i _"" ~ .-. ~ II' ~ Y b · \ .
\' "'"', "\"=~;...,:; _. .~ "~ '~ ~;;,.~~., "'..;. I ~J~~. '<;7 ''\-:
,", " . .,' _ " '\ .\\,. " ~~' l'
\ , /1'-,;''-,1-,- 0/;;;' , --1 If,," "~-~ '::- '/ It' )' . n ,.:
-; "~ ~I' . .It.~ \)-, . 6~> \o>~~.~-~'~~ ':: ~<;~ '-n,f~: ~
"." ,\ I (~\~'- ,oS g~ ~~.O J' ,~::jJj[f. :~! ,I
,1,\\, . ,..."~ ~\' ~~\. ~T ir'';; O~ ~~~ 4~j :~cit~O.~~~; · vI.. i
. ,.... 'I: . Y ,:..-: I:: :--; ~" ~ ."l ~.. 1-.. h .... \ : .
\ " i . , \-::: I";;. . o. ~. -,.. . I ~ ~ I ~:ll J..l L : n . --: , .
.F 11, l...... .~~ I'=: _ ... .:.~~V-~ I . c~ ..:'
\ "" .-:' ~ I V~.:, ) -J~:t, II ii(.J{[,~ ._""~,.~' .....,. I .,~ 7 -U':(_:__ ~:
" _..:: l"t' k" .., .~:,~~>., =! ~ · ~a-.l!- j..1.n! I: 'I;, (, :-',
\ \ I \'. -_..~~, .~...;",~....",\ '~~ ~~~ lJ ~.L:f .d:' ~ I
I \ \, \ \, ':"-, '- ~~- ~ ~ .. , I II ~ 'f.r-: DOff; ~/; -), \ II I';'" !
\ \ \' ,~1--7.~~,::",hIS . .0 I .' ~I ~ I -, :,1,; I '
'.: ~......_ ~"...,..:~~, :;:;~~ ,~ ~ ~ n s =(l~ ~ . , I;, I I
. \ ~ ~.... ... 1i': _."', ~,:~.q. '1 ~:-.~. it , \ - II,., '~ ;<./
. _ :--"II" I ' , ,_ ~_= HT' ~ I I E
\ ~~..'..~}:,(i:~ ~~':' ,::~ ~ : ~~...u-v .\- ~ 1 U i:.-:.jf r.-
. ':/";"~"'-I.'\::~:~'~'jll!.~:":"~ ..?;-:" \Jl \ ':f':TII~[I"~\)'I\'\L=.:..4~:::"1 Ji'r ·
\ ';;.0"'- '0 "If lo.iz' .,,;1' ~ '\ I .iiI rv- "::I 1 r. I S!
__ 1:::-- _ ,', ",,~!,~:.,~~:~,,~ ..~'" ~ '// 'f'"'l. -- ): -S ': I :.' g
_ _ ___.,', ~" I. . ~'>~:~"S;~'" ,~: ':'-<-. I 'N'-' rr~. - '.: n.-: I I. I I
, ;. " '. ' \~~\,:"\.:..:,,, II 'J\~ n T LL ~ I
"':-; "';:" . \::,::.~,S\ ..~'!.:..::..... ~ ~ I :~ T1 n I II I
.... ,'t;- (~':.:;-':':~*-'~! -fitO."" d 7, - .'C, I
'" _I~ "~'\' :~,::,~.::'s=?:...- ~~-~ ~'TI..., ~l /......:l_11 I
. Q \ \:" 'x.. "'C-' . LIT rJ / /, - '-'"
I: z~.:.I " ~~.::~~--.::. -- -- Q~. J ~ .. -'- .l.I' I
\ i C \ ~ .." .' '. ;;::..;.... "f--o<l:!:::JjU U
\' j . \ " ':'- '~_';';'=~ ~ . . ., .' , I I I
.... .: ~ " :- ' . : '. ''-. ':'........ -:-" "~/ /1";' J?" n n 1
" '.' ~""~ ~-...:.;:. ,0, 'j(, ~ w.~lll.1
I ' I" '. -- 'Ii:-.."lI" -
Ir-~~U" - ,_,~ - - \ - , ),.. , ".::::". .;;" -'- -,.,--.... :.. ::'.' . . _.-:-' I. ."
II '.=/1, i l~~\, ,-, \ I.. . " .......~.'-- -:-.!'I.i "&.{.1..)1 . ~v....:. - ,""---
. IJ I \ " '\ ...,. ---. " '- - ~ ~~~' '/f
~ .H~ :. \ --~,,' ~=':':--. ~e-.! ::'~-,=-~ ~~. ~\\lIIIII~'llr - . (.
i- LJ' \ 1\1" I ~. -:-:-;-:~: '~ ~- - -- /~. ~ I -~ -' : ')
_ iti' '~\ '~_"--=,.:_-.._~-7'-~.,.,,p.-.' '... .'. r""', ' I::::" . r. r-7'-
n' . "".. ,--- - --_, h .~~ ::c,-:--::o" ''''''~ tr~:..,... - i~', . ~ ,~.--",,_,.I
"'::4....,. I . ~ -.......--.-".:-;----...-"!.!'I.....~~- '''''''
Oal +" -~ ~I . -'- ;. - :-.J- 0 -~;: =~~~ .,,:~ :.. ' · ." "''''' ~-=-.
. '\ 'I - · ~^1I SlI3/(Od) --..--..- ,- - --
~"-r! 'N..!::a. '_"";',;;:--..==-"--- _..- . 2..:' ~~.A.H.~I.-3~..:.S A':'~-::: . I
~.I ., .~" !'.. -------- ~-----.---::&.-'::..:-
.. ,..
e
fa I""..~"':"- .~~. .
.,.;'f.....:....-..'" '.
. ~ .--... II
. .:.. ,Iii I ..' ,- - 0 . J :
. = !II 1771-= I-I: m HI 1;,;1 i I
. " r.I.... . 2... 'II' I . ~ 4J"
'1-"-" - _. I 1* ~U a
I, -~U",:: ~ .. . Il)
;. i:iI:'" I ~ ~. t. ~';. H!{ J
:~. 1IJ!1 JJ ~ ~ , II t ., ~uJ 1
---'. -....
.... i
.... 1
- .
::I: i
B
~ ~
<: !
o ~
.
VI
o .
z .
01
a.. e
t
~ i
<: =
0-4
e.
e.. "
r_
~ .... . - .
, ....
,
".
,:-:..~ _.~::~~'.-,'~<'~..:;~, '
%
~
~ ~
>- >- I
. j I
\J Y
~
o
. -
: ;
. a:
e .
(j
.~
,
, -;.
. .... - ....~ o'
- ..
"
- -- ..
- - ..
- - ..
- -, ..
- - ..
.. ~ ..
- Po
- - ..
- ..
- - .....
~
Kr-
....-.... -----
-...-.-.. --~._-
.... .
. .
.
....
....
....
....
....
.
-
. ----'>. .
. \.'
.
..
.,
,
. _-__"____-2
.. ..
--
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
. r.._ ..
...
.
--
-- - - ~ -
'.
. . ,
I
,
\ (..
II 11-_.--" --.___
...,.... ~-- - -.:...: .
....., . ."
;"
~
a
::)
...
.
.
"
c
z
C
c
a
c
.
.-/ ~
.
:I
c
,- - e
I ·
.
a
z
o
..
,., I .:. J !
'I ~
I .. ~
r., - - i
r 1 !
L I' I
1') I
II \
II I
::( \: I
I I' I
) I I
., I, ."- "
:1 -
,(
.:...:>
.----....--... ....-;-.":'.
f
...
~-=-..
......
e
~i~l h
I ;.
~. ;
..
.
~
~
tl
l
e
e
.:;
./
~
.
)
) .,
, "
e
t;' ,
[ :.0;;
:, 1
;: J
I .; II
I I W i
: ; I r I t)
.. I: I . ..
l=I!!,'h
~. ..
~~
JL_
!~]l
! .
'" ,
\
i
e !
I (
\
~
,
/..
.
.
I
.
~
I
.
~~"\
"
~
'" '"I.
:'"t
'--.
'.l_
a:
1M
i
-0
Oz
Zc
Oa:
ILIII
~.
~=
..J>
..Ja:
-c
%Z
~-
C:l
0::;
III
a:
I &.
. 'l
...-----
e
~..lI,..Od
'..
..,.
I"P.
:~ i
'~1 H~.I
. ~Hil
. ~Uj
V'l
o
z
o
Cl..
:><:
<:
o
,
-J ~
-J .
:E ~
!
:><: ::
<: :
o ~
~
. . Z
I g I
I I 0
. . ...J
.J-
.J~
~m
~...J
~<
0
A:
>-
~
,
!
i
!
!
,
ODD
ODD
~~Ii
~ :
:; s
, i~l
o .
v "
'"
"
'"
o
e
e
~
z
.0
i=
o~
&om
~....
C<c:
00
A:
>-
~
e
IJ".
Z
1~1j I V\ !
:;~ glt ~ 0 -' ~
z -' :> ,
0 z ~ I
alIi Q. > I
e : ;hl I :..: . .
:w: < .
< 0 i
, ~u i 0 '" ~
~
..
<
0
. .
; ;
: i
- .
:c ;. ~ ;
~-;~ ~~:? ~ ~ p ~
;" t', :. ~
.. . ~ .: CJ
..,:- lH lH
.-..'.... 1IJ
.. .
e
e
~;. . ;~.~:.~-
- : ,:',,,
I ,f,:?';'
, . ,
.\ ... _ - ,,- C
\ :-' . .
,- ~-.
-- ,,-.
. . .'~
. ,/~..
, -:-;."
.' .;., ,-
. i~ /'
".
). .~;~
. ~~J.~'~ i
'. "., a
>~:1 ~
I::::J / o~
~~
/. ~ ..
........ '
\'.," . ;
"~~~."
\ -Ill -
\-
',,:'; -\ ~
I
-,
I
I
0)1
ZI
01
~
>1
WI
..JI
~
6
~
~
t-1
~I
.
e
e
~
C ITV OF
CHAHHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
11
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
July 22, 1992
SUBJ:
Distribution of City of Chanhassen Park Inventory, Revised, April 1992
The park inventories updated in April of 1992 have been combined with the city's park plans
. to produce the attached "Park Plan and Inventory Manual". This document will be updated
annually and should be kept as a reference for future use. The manual will prove helpful in
establishing the Capital Improvement Program, reviewing land development plans, and addressing
resident inquiries. A city base map has been included inside the back cover. The manual was
prepared, printed and bound in-house.
n
~ ~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-
d
.
C'ITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147 tl CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
-#I
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
July 22, 1992
SUBJ:
Second Quarter Park and Trail Fee Revenue Report, Ending June 30, 1992
e
The second quarter of the year (April, May, June) has passed, leaving the city with $95,644.94
in park and trail fee revenues. This figure represents 65.96% of lhe $145,000 budgeted for park
and trail development in 1992. This puts the 410 Park Acqui.sition and Development Fund
15.96% ahead with 50% of the year expired. Last year at this time, the fund was behind by
10.12%.
At the end of the last quarter, Fund 410 revenues totalled $26,611.00. The significant increase
in revenues realized in the second quarter were the result of the development of the Market
Square Shopping Center, the Americana Bank, Mail Source, and a strong single family housing
market.
In regard to expenditures, the department has been very conservative to date, year to date
expenditures total $8,748.93, representing 6.03% of budgeted expenditures, compared with
71.65% at this time last year. A carry over of equipment from last year allowed expenditures
to be delayed in 1992 until this backlog of work is completed. With that work now nearing
completion, the process of purchasing equipment detailed in the 1992 CIP has begun. However,
as will be discussed in the next report (Item 6), total expected expenditures will be significantly
less than budgeted expenditures.
Detailed Budget Report. Fund 410. Park Acquisition and Development
(Note: This break out addresses park fees and trail fees collecl:ed and expenditures under the
Capital Improvement Program for land or building improvements only. Administrative and other
related expenditures are not addressed.)
e
n
~., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 2
Fund 410, Park Acquisition and Development, June, 1992
Budgeted Collected Collected
Revenue Revenue This Month to Date
Park Development Fees $110,000.00 $ 40,957.50 $ 72,4575/J
Trail Development Fees $ 35.000.00 $ 13.152.44 $ 23.187.44
Total $145,000.00 $ 54,109.94 $ 95,644.94
Budgeted Expended Expended
Expenditures Expenditures This Month Year to Date
Land, Purchase & Improv. $145,000.00 $ 3,561.00 $ 5,196.25
Office Equipment .00 150.00 150.00
Other Equipment .00 224.68 3.402.68
Total $145,000.00 $ 3,935.68 $ 8,748.93
e
e
e
"
,
..
,
.
e
e
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
b
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
1JI
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
July 23, 1992
SUBJ:
1992 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program Budget
Amendment, Athletic Field Irrigation, Lake Ann Park
This report is straight to the point. The new ballfields at Lake Ann Park, Fields 4, 5, and 6 and
the soccer field, are not in reasonable condition for play. This is the second full year of activities
on the fields since they became active. A short chronology of their development follows:
1987- 1988
Referendum passes. Plan for development of fields.
1989
Construction partially complete. Fall seeding of fields occur
(drought year).
Winter, 1989
Very little snow cover. All seed and a high volume of soil is
blown from fields.
Spring, 1990
Erosion occurs.
Summer, 1990
Fields are re-graded and seeded. Drought conditions experienced
and germination does not occur.
Fall, 1990
Fields are seeded for a third time.
Spring, 1991 to Present
Play begins on. all fields. All comments received on field
conditions have been negative.
Over the past two years is was very evident that the new fields were not acceptable for
recreational play. Home and visiting players have been forced to play on the fields as there are
no alternatives. The complaint level has been extreme. Coaches and players routinely call or
stop by the department to discuss the situation. Efforts through over-seeding and slit seeding,
fertilization and aerification have been undertaken in an attempt to remedy the situation. During
ft
\.J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
"f
Park and Recreation Commission
July 23, 1992
Page 2
~
I
,
e
this time period, the fields have had the benefit of two years of very good growing conditions,
but have not responded. Dale Gregory, Park Foreman, and I upon completing these efforts which
included three re-seeding operations since the spring of 1990, realized the situation needed expert
attention.
Two individual turf professionals were summoned to evaluate the field conditions. Both reports
are attached for your review. Mr. Belkengren of Turf Supply Company advocated irrigation the
fust minute he stepped onto the fields. When informed that irrigation was not being considered
at the time, he formulated the recommendation detailed in his report. The annual cost of this
program, excluding of fertilizer, is $7,578.00. As noted in the report, this program provides no
guarantee without an irrigation system. Mr. John Hopko of Professional Turf Specialists and
Renovation was more direct. Without irrigation, he will not recommend any other action as, in
his opinion, the efforts would prove fruitless. Mr. Hopko's reasons for this stance are
documented in his report. Mr. Hopko's credentials are very thorough, and was recommended to
me as one of the top turf management professionals in the state.
As Park and Recreation Commissioners, you may be hearing rumblings about the playing
conditions of the new fields at Lake Ann Park. As a staff member, I hear from coaches, players,
parents, and spectators on a weekly basis. Entire soccer teams and their parents plotted to call
me, or stop by the office on a single day, and most carried through with their plan. The Soccer ..
Association and other individuals involved in sporting activities have volunteered to help in any .,
way in an attempt to improve field conditions. As coordinator of the Park and Recreation
Department, I am disappointed that the initial construction process did not go better,
disappointed that we must now force teams to play on unfit fields, embarrassed because of this,
and worried about our liability. I have not arranged for the Council Chambers to be filled with
players, coaches, parents, spectators, turf specialists, and attorneys from which you could receive
testimonials. However, I encourage all of you to visit the fields and talk to people you know that
use them. This report may come as a shock, but of the alternatives available, irrigation is the
only viable one and the only one with a guarantee.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council
authorize a 1992 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program budget
amendment to fund the installation of an irrigation system at Lake Ann Park for seven ballfields
and spectator areas in an amount not to exceed $60,000.00. This amount is to include all design
and construction contracts. Note: The possibility of irrigating the ballfields is only now
available due to the installation of the water line servicing the park shelter. It is hoped that the
timing of this amendment would allow for fall construction. The attached current expenditure
predictions for the 1992 CIP demonstrate that this project can be carried out under the current
year's CIP. I, too, as some commissioners might agree, would prefer to invest this money in
other ways. But I'm left with no alternatives other than to make this recommendation.
e
~
1
.
.
e
e
Turf Supply Company
Dale Gregory
City of Chanhassen Parks
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
June 12, 1992
Dear Dale,
Here is a program that I feel you should follow to restore
some vigor and relieve some of the compaction at the Lake Ann
Athletic complex. Until I can look at the soil reports, I will not
make any recommendations as to a fertilizer program. As you are
probably aware of, there is a lot of concern for the safety of the
people using park property. Hard, compacted and uneven playing
surfaces are hazardous to players, and can result in all sorts of
legal problems. I have dealt with many problems such as yours, and
have had good success when the program is followed.
The first application that should be made is with Noburn Soil
Wetting agent. This product should be applied at an initial rate of
12 oz. per 1000 sq.ft., and should be followed up in 30 to 45 day
intervals with an application of 6 oz. per 1000 sq. ft. to the
complete complex. The wetting agent will help to relieve surface
tension in the soil profile, and allow water to penetrate deeper
into the soil and promote deeper rooting. The Noburn can be used as
often as necessary, whenever the soil does not seem to be taking
water, and to make more efficient use of the water that is
available.
Iron Roots should also be applied at the rate of 1 gallon per
acre, three times this year, approximately on 30 40 day
intervals. Iron Roots will help establish a more fibrous and deep
root system, plus help give the plants better color. Iron Roots
will give you greater stress tolerance from drought and heat. These
applications should be followed up each year as per the tech sheet
enclosed.
After the first good rain, a good core tine aerification
should be done taking at least 25 plugs per square foot. The
complete field should then be top dressed with Turface soil
amendment. Turface will not compact, and will help to eliminate
some of the compaction and help to interface the top soil and clay
base. Turface should be put down at minimum, 4 tons per acre as a
top dress, and drug into the aerification holes. Turface is
available in bulk truckload quantities of approximately 25 tons or
on pallets of 40 bags or 1 ton each. Bulk orders will be shipped
direct and are cheaper than the bagged product. This should be
followed up each of the next 3 or 4 years with about 2 tons per
acre after core aerifying.
When we get your soil reports back, we can then design a
fertilizer program that will benefit the turf by putting down the
essential nutrients that promote a good stand of turf.
Any program that we establish, would be greatly enhanced with
an irrigation program. All fertilizers and control products will
work better if they are watered into the soil.
I am enclosing sheets that explain the products that I have
mentioned. Please take time to read them over and let me know if
there are any questions that have not been answered. I look forward
to working with you in the future and wish you success in building
a better and safer athletic field.
SUMMARY OF PRODUCTS NEEDED FOR 6 ACRES OF TURF
NoburN @$26.10/gal.
25 gallons
12.5 gallons
12.5 gallons
Iron Roots @$38.00/gal. 6 gallons
6 gallons
6 gallons
Turface Regular
25 ton Bulk
1 ton bagged
1st Application
2nd application
3rd application
Total. . . . $1305.00
1st application
2nd application
3rd application
Tota 1 . . $ 648. 00
$225.00 ton
Total. . . . $5625.00
$260.00 ton
Total. . . . $6500.00
Please call me if you should have any need for further information
or should you want to discuss this program. Thank you for allowing
me to help you resolve this problem. I'll be happy assist you in
any of your other turf related problems.
r
e
e
e
~
.
e
e
PTR
Professional Turf and Renovation
JOHN R. HOPKO
Turf Specialist
24144 172nd Street
Big Lake, MN 55309
July 21, 1992
City of Chanhassen
Attention: ~odd Hoffman
Park and Recreation Coordinator
690 Coulter Drive
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Todd:
The following report is an analysis of my observations concerning the
turf conditions at various park sites. Certain concerns need to be
addressed, and hopefully suggestions can become reality.
Soil:
All good turf and sports turf start with the proper soil conditions.
Yours is less than desirable; it tends to be very compacted, hard when
dry, marginal at best when it comes to drainage. Clay content in the
ground explains these conditions. Ideally, on athletic fields today, we
use high sand content soils. This improves drainage and compaction
problems are less severe. Your turf becomes a liability when it totally
dries out because of hardness, and the field also becomes a liability
when it receives excessive moisture. Playability becomes slippery and
very damaging to the turf.
Soil Nutrition:
This situation compounds the soil problem that you have. After
reviewing the soil test data you sent me, the lack of phosphorus and
potassium was evident, just as we discussed the day I visited. I
suspect that when the fields were constructed, subsoil material was used
with little topsoil being available or used. Subsoils tend to be very
free of nutrients and make growing turf more challenging and expensive.
The soil pH is good for the most part, but nutrition is lacking. This
problem will have to be corrected by fertilization. It will take a much
more aggressive program to help correct this situation. Your current
program will have to increase. We can discuss programs based on budget
dollars in the future.
Irrigation:
After soil, watering on a consistent basis is the key to growing good
turf for heavy traffic. I cannot. emphasize enough how important
automatic irrigation is for turf areas that will be exposed to~q~i~YED
sporting event use. If you ever hope to establish a good dense turf
with your soil type, water is a must. Playing fields always su~~ie3 1992
CIT_V Q~ C".!.~l\!HA:;,SE."
Phone:
(612) 263-2152
Todd Hoffman
Page 2
damage from use. Irrigation not only allows us to establish
but also to reestablish the turf by over-seeding when needed.
athletic fields today without water is like building a home
foundation.
the turf,
Building
without a
.
e
If irrigation cannot be installed in the near future on the soccer sites
and other heavily used areas, I, or no one, can offer you any hope of
establishing and sustaining quality turf on those sites. Even with
irrigation, monitoring use under excessive moisture conditions will be
important because of your poorly drained soils.
Damage to the turf can be quite severe under these conditions.
Aerification and over-seeding become your tools of rejuvenation.
Without water, however, this process becomes less successful, and you do
not get a good return on your dollar invested. You can pay for a new
system on the money you save in reseeding without water, not to mention
how much happier the end user is to play on good turf.
Turf Grasses:
If parks in the future cannot be irrigated or fertilized at the levels
they require, we will need to move toward seed mixtures that require
less fertilizer. The common types of bluegrass and fine fescue will
become the selection of choice. This will develop a turf much like some
of your older fields. However, color and traffic, or the ability to
withstand traffic, become an issue with these grasses. Watering,
mowing, fertility, and weed control practices can all be discussed as
the year progresses. Dale will need some new tools to grow the type of
turf everyone is looking for.
e
Summary:
Todd, this will be blunt. Your soil is very poorly drained, lacks
fertility, becomes hard when dry, and is non-irrigated on many sites
where organized activity takes place. Modification of the soil would be
difficul t and very expen~ive. The only alternative for improved results
would be to install irrigation, apply a more complete and aggressive
fertilizer program to these newer areas, and monitor use and scheduling
of activities on these sites. You and Dale are working with some
difficult conditions that need to be improved or else quality will
decrease and injury will increase. You now enter the time of year when
some of these things we talked about need to occur. I hope you can take
advantage of this report and this timing.
Yours truly,
PROFESSIONAL TURF AND RENOVATION
John R. Hopko
Turf Specialist
e
JH:db
\ PROPqSED 1992 FUNCTION 410 PARK ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
e CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
AUGUST, 1991
Current Estimate
Bandimere Community Park
Bandimere Heights Park
Wood Park Identification Sign $ 250.00 $ 200.00
Bluff Creek Park
Carver Beach Park
Play Area Refurbishment 2,200.00 2,200.00
Carver Beach Playground
Wood Park Identification Sign 250.00 200.00
Replacement of Swing 950.00 950.00
Addition of Two Spring Animals 1,000.00 I,Ol).OO
Border Wood and Pea Gravel 1,400.00 1,400.00
Chanhassen Estates Mini-Park
Wood Park Identification Sign 250.00 200.00
e Chanhassen Hills Park
Wood Park Identification Sign 250.00 200.00
Construction of a Ballfield 1,500.00 1,500.00
Installation of Trees 800.00 00.00
Chanhassen Pond Park
Wood Park Identification Sign for Kerber Blvd. 250.00 200.00
Wheel Chair Accessible Picnic Tabel 500.00 500.00
Picnic Table 450.00 450.00
City Center Park
Play Equipment Expansion (50% Share) 10,000.00 00.00
New Basketball Poles and Standards 1,200.00 00.00
Curry Farms Park
Wood Park Identification Sign 250.00 200.00
Greenwood Shores Park
Herman Field Park
1st Phase Play Area with Border WoodlPea Gravel 13,000.00 1 3,(Xl).00
e Superdeck Boardwalk 6,000.00 6.(Xl).00
Picnic Tables and Play Area Bench
1,500.00
1,500.00
.
e
00.00
00.00
00.00
150.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
00.00
1,<m.00
500.00 e
00.00
00.00
2,200.00
00.00
Lake Ann Park
First Aid Supplies
Lifeguard Room Equipment
Rescue Board
Cash Register
Freezer
Refrigerator
Microwave
Menu Boards
Building Supplies and Equipment
Row Boats
Canoes (2)
Paddle Boats (2)
Life Jackets (20)
Canoe Paddles (10)
Play-Ales (6)
Play-Ale Paddles (8)
Outboard Motor
Shelter Landscaping
Drainage Improvements, Field #6
Supplies for Conversion of Field #2 to
Little League
Bituminous Trail Loop
Basketball Pole
Fencing
Boundary Buoys
400.00
1,500.00
500.00
750.00
400.00
500.00
300.00
300.00
3,000.00
650.00
1,000.00
1,650.00
500.00
200.00
1,800.00
200.00
750.00
1,500.00
1,000.00
500.00
10,500.00
600.00
2,200.00
1,300.00
Lake Susan Park
Trail Link to Chanhassen Hills
Archery Range Targets
Aeration System Installation
Track Ride
21,000.00
300.00
4,000.00
00.00
*21,000.00
300.00
00.00
Meadow Green Park
Installation of Trees
400.00
400.00
Minnewashta Heights
Play Area Expansion
3,000.00
3,<m.00
North Lotus Lake Park
*This proje t wii{:q~;a~d'i't~~im~~1fiFif'ir;~;~~~'t.~~ni~~ Ml6
i9937 ~. ~~:.~,:..-., .4 ""4'~~~~~~~~,~+ _,%l:~~~U,-{t.J.
-fr- ~.~'~=::~~#~~~;~~~
e
() ~ f.. ;;
) t~:,,~
It
. Pheasant Hills Park
e Engineering, Surveying, Staking, Grading
Surfacing and Site Preparation Associated
With Initial Phase of Construction 20,000.00 10,000.00
Power Hill Park
Prairie Knoll Park
Rice Marsh Lake Park
Play Area Expansion 6,000.00 4,000.00
Sunset Ridge Park
Installation of trees 800.00 800.00
Park Rules Sign
50 Signs 3,500.00 3,500.00
Picnic Tables, Benches, Spectator Seating, Signage 5,500.00 3,000.00
Boy Scout Project 1,000.00 00.00
Tree Farm 200.00 200.00
e Contingency 4.500.00 00.00
TOTAL $145,000.00 $79,750.00
DIFFERENCE $65,250.00
e
.
.
e
e
7
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission
//I
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
July 23, 1992
SUBJ:
1993 Park Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program
BACKGROUND
This item was deleted from the June 23, 1992, agenda. The establishment of an annual Park
Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is one of the major
responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Commission. The annual CIP is guided by the
Chanhassen Park and Recreation 5- Y ear Capital Improvement Program. The process simplified
is to pull information from the 5- Y ear CIP for the year 1993, modify it, apply cost estimates, and
package the information as the 1993 Park Acquisition and Development CIP. The updated 5-
Year CIP (attached), the newly distributed Park Plan and Inventory Manual, and the resources
and knowledge of each commissioner and staff will be drawn upon in formulating the new CIP.
The formulation of an annual CIP is a very important and exciting project. City residents rely
on the guidance of the commission to ensure that the CIP will work towards effectively meeting
the recreational and leisure needs of all residents. Upon completion, the proposed CIP will be
forwarded along with other park and recreation budget requests to the City Council. As part of
the budget process, public hearings are held by the City Council to allow for citizen comments
on the proposed 1993 city budget
As eluded to in an earlier report, I have adopted a conservative spending policy relative to all
park and recreation budgets. In particular, Fund 410. This policy is not to say that the city is
not moving forward with the development and improvement of the city's park and trail systems.
The department continues to be committed to working towards the completion and maintenance
of a quality park and trail system. Conservative management more closely describes the
department's position, this is being accomplished through competitive purchasing practices, doing
the job with less, and opting to perform more in-house work in lieu of contracting out. The
current cash on hand in Fund 410 is approximately $250,000.00. This is down from a high of
near $600,000.00 of 2-3 years ago. The purchase of parkland (Pheasant Hill) and a variety of
construction projects, i.e. Lake Susan, Herman Field, Lake Ann, South Lotus Lake, Curry Farms,
n
'-J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Park and Recreation Commission
July 23, 1992
Page 2
e
Sunset Ridge, and other neighborhood park projects resulted in this decline in assets. When
accounting for reserves of $250,000.00; $150,000 for a future land purchase west of Lake
Minnewashta, and a $100,000 general reserve, leaves the fund with little leeway for aggressive
spending. This is not cause for alarm; however, the fund's present balance concurs with the
current conservatism in the department.
FORECASTED 1993 REVENUE
In consultation with the City Manager's office, preliminary indications show a year of similar
or improved park and trail fee revenue totals in 1993. Construction activity is obviously linked
to economic cycles, but if a downturn were to occur, expenditures can be modified at any time
to match revenues. Single family home starts account for a majority of revenue with commercial/
industrial development running a close second. The multi-family dwelling market has accounted
for very little revenue in the past years, but provides more promise for revenue in the future.
With housing starts continuing strong, and with the likelihood that commercial/industrial
development will continue at a steady pace, park and trail revenues in 1993 should again reach
the $150,000 mark.
THE BUDGET PROCESS
I envision that the commission would use an open forum approach to formulate a tentative park
by park 1993 CIP in one or two work sessions. The goal of the CIP is obviously not to spend
$100,000 to $150,000 in revenues, but to effectively work towards meeting the city's park,
recreational and leisure needs. It is recommended that maximum budgeted expenditures,
including any new reserve amounts, not exceed $150,000.00 again in 1993.
e
e
.
.
CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Bandimere Community Park
Address:
9405 Great Plains Blvd (TH 101)
Acres:
30
Class:
Community
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Complete a needs assessment
study in 1992. Proceed with
development of park based on
results of study.
Notes:
Concept Master Park Plan prepared in 1989.
.
e
e
e
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name:
Bandimere Heights Park
Address:
9290 Kiowa Trail
Acres:
3
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Wood Park ID Sign 250.
Play Area 00. 00. 00. 8,000.
Refurbishment
TOTALS: 250. 00. 00. 00. 8,000.
Notes: Extensive regrading and site work was initiated in the fall of 1991. Work ,to be
completed in 1992.
1991 Improvements
Play Area Expansion
Sand Volleyball Court
Paving of Offstreet Parking
$3,500.00
$200.00
$400.00 .'
s
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
e
Park Name:
Address:
Acres:
Class:
Bluff Creek Park
Hesse Farm Road
21
Open Space
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
TOTALS: 00. 00. 00. 00. 00.
e
Notes: To be incorporated into the Bluff Creek Preservation zone.
4
e
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name:
Carver Beach Park
Address:
6891 Lotus Trail
Acres:
8
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Play Area 2,200.
Refurbishment
Grills(2) 400.
Picnic Tables(2) 1,300.
Swimming Bouy's 1,500.
& Signage
(Mini Beach)
Swimming Bouy's
& Signage 1,500.
(Main Beach)
Park Benches 2,000.
TOTALS: 2,200. 3,200. 1,500 00. 2,000.
Notes:
5
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
e
Park Name: Carver Beach Playground
Address: 900 Carver Beach Road
Acres: 3
Class: Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Wood Park ID Sign 250.
Replacement of Swing 950.
Add'n of Two Spring 1,000.
Animals
Board Wood & Pea 1,400.
Gravel
Bleacher 1 ,400.
Skating Rink Electrical 6,000.
Sevice with Light
New Backstop 1,200.
TOTALS: 3,600. 7,400. 00. 00. 1,200.
e
Notes:
1991 Improvements
Play area expansion 5,000.00
6
e
.
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Chanhassen Estates Mini Park
Address: 55 Lake Drive East
Acres: 1
Class: Neighborhood
I
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 I
Wood Park 10 Sign 250.
Picnic Tables(3) 2,000.
Basketball Court 2,500.
Play Area 00.
TOTALS: 250. 2,000. 2,500. 00.
Notes:
y
. FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
e
Park Name: Chanhassen Hills Park
Address:
8579 Chanhassen Hills Drive South
Acres:
8
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Wood Park ID Sign 250.
Construction of a 1,500.
Ballfield
Installation of Trees 800.
Double Tennis Court 30,000.
with Basketball
Hoops
Trees 1,000.
Play Area Expansion 00. 00. 10,000.
TOTALS: 2,550. 31,000. 00. 00. 10,000.
e
Notes:
8
e
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Chanhassen Pond Park
Address:
7500 Laredo Drive
Acres:
16
Class:
Open Space
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Wood Park ID Sign 250.
Wheel Chair 500.
Accessable Picnic
Table
Picnic Table 450.
Wood Park ID Sign 250.
Replace Stai rs 00. 00. 4,000.
TOTALS: 1,200. 250. 00. 00. 4,000.
Notes:
1991 Improvements
Correction of erosion areas
3,000.00
.
!
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
e
Park Name: City Center Park
Address:
710 Coulter Drive
Acres:
10
Class:
Community
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Play Area Expansion 10,000.
(50% share)
New Basketball 1,200.
Poles and Standards
Play Area Expansion 12,000.
(50% Share)
Tennis Courts
Maintenance 4,000.
TOTALS: 11,200. 00. 16,000. 00. 00.
e
Notes: Configuration of park is subject to change dependent on the outcome of Central
Park Master plans.
1991 Improvements
Play area expansions
Tennis Court Refurbishment
Master Plan Development
Warming House
70,000.00
25,000.00
2,000.00
1,000.00
1"0
e
.
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Curry Farms Park
Address:
1300 Stratton Court
Acres:
6
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 I 1993 1994 1995 1996
Wood Park 10 Sign 250.
Trees 500.
Trees 00. 00. 500.
TOTALS: 250. 500. 00. 00. 500.
Notes: 1991 Improvements:
P lay area expansion
Ballfield construction
Trail construction
2,500.00
2,000.00
5,500.00
11
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.
e
Park Name: Greenwood Shores Park
Address:
7110 Utica Lane
Acres:
4
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Picnic Tables(2) 1,300.
Grills(2) 400.
TOTALS: 00. 1,700. 00. 00. 00.
e
Notes: Discussion included possibility of installing a sand volleyball court. Site
constrictons make this installation prohibitive.
1'2
e
.
.
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Herman Field Park
Address:
2591 Forest Avenue
Acres:
13
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
1 st Phase Play Area 13,000.
with Border
Wood/Pea Gravel
Superdeck 6,000.
Boardwalk
Picnic Tables & Play 1,500.
Area Bench
Single Tennis Court 20,000.
with Basketball Hoop
Play Area Expansion Beyond
1996
TOTALS: 20,500. 00. 00. 20,000.
Notes: Construction of trail loops will be completed in 1992 by park maintenance
personnel. Negotiations for a trail connection to Minnewashta Regional Park
are underway.
1991 Improvements:
Grading surfacing, installation of access road
50,000.00
1'3
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Lake Ann Park
Address: 1456 Arboretum Blvd (Hwy 5)
Acres: 98
Class: Community
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
SHELTER
First Aid supplies 400.
Lifeguard Room Equipment 1,500.
Rescue Board 500.
Cash Register 750.
Freezer 400.
Refrigerator 500.
Microwave 300.
Menu Boards 300.
Building Supplies & 3,000.
Equipment
Row Boat 650.
Canoes (2) 1,000.
Paddle Boats (2) 1,650.
Life Jackets (20) 500.
Canoe Paddles (10) 200.
Play-aks (6) 1,800.
Play-ak Paddles (8) 200.
Outboard Motor 750.
Shelter Landscaping 1,500.
Boundary Buoys 1,300.
SUBTOTAL: 17 ,200.
1"'4
e
e
e
.
.
e
e
GENERAL 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Basketball Pole 600.
Drainage Improvements, 1.000.
Field #6
Supplies for Conversion of 500.
Field #2 to Little League
Bituminous Trail Loop 10,500.
Fencing 2,200.
Picnic Shelter (Parkview) 50.000.
Ballfield Restroom & Beyond 1996
Concession Bldg.
SUBTOTAL: 14,800. 00. 00. 00. 50,000.
GRAND TOTAL: 32,000. 00. 00. 00. 50,000.
Notes: Lake Ann Park is entering a stage of final transformation to a "full service"
community park. The installation of services. Le. phone, electric, sewer, water
will allow the future construction of a group reservation picnic shelter at the
parkview area, the construction of a serviceable shelter at the ballfields, and
other improvements.
1991 Improvements
Swimming raft 10,000.00
Player benches 2,500.00
1"5
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
,
e
Park Name: Lake Susan Park
Address:
903 Lake Drive East
Acres:
27
Class:
Community
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Trail Line to 21 ,000.
Chanhassen Hills
Archery Range Targets 300. 500. 1,000.
Aeration system 4,000.
Installation
Track Ride 800.
Ballfield Lights 65,000.
TOTALS: 26,100. 65,500. 00. 1,000. 00.
e
Notes: 1991 Improvements - Completion of Lake Susan Park expansion project and
play area.
1'6
e
.
e
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Meadow Green Park
Address:
921 Pontiac Lane
Acres:
18
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Installation of Trees 400.
Bleacher 1 ,400.
Skating Rink Electrical 6,000.
Service With Light
Play Area 20,000.
Refurbishment
TOTALS: 400. 7,400. 00. 00. 20,000.
Notes:
1-7
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.
e
Park Name: Minnewashta Heights Park
Address:
6220 Dogwood Avenue
Acres:
2
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Play Area Expansion 3,000.
Skating Rink Electrical 6,000.
Service w/Light
Play Area 7,000. 00.
Refurbishment
TOTALS: 3,000. 6,000. 00. 7,000. 00.
e
Notes: 1991 Improvements - Installation of play area border and resilient surfacing
completed.
1'5
e
.
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: North Lotus Lake Park
Address:
295 Pleasant View Road
Acres:
18
Class:
Neighborhood
e
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Skating Rink Electrical 8,000.
Service w/Lights
Hockey Rink with 25,000.
Lights
Play Area Expansion 12,000.
TOTALS: 00. 8,000. 12,000. 25,000. 00.
Notes: Additional wind screen plantings for the tennis courts will occur in 1992.
e 1'9
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
.
e
Park Name: Pheasant Hill Park
Address:
1720 Lake Lucy Lane
Acres:
11
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Engineering, surveying, 20,000.
Staking, Grading,
Surfacing, & Site
Preparation Associated
with Initial Phase of
Construction
Play Area 20,000.
Picnic Tables 3,000.
Park Benches 1,600.
Double Tennis Court Beyond
with Basketball Hoops 1996
Play Area Expansion Beyond
1996
TOTALS: 20,000. 00. 24,600. 00. 00.
e
Notes:
Park Master Plan approved in 1991.
20
e
,
e
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Power Hill Park
Address:
Flamingo Drive
Acres:
18
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Final Grading, Seeding 10,000.
Entrance Road &
Parking
Play Area 18,000.
Trees 2,500.
TOTALS: 00. 10,000. 2,500. 18,000. 00.
Notes:
Boundary of this park is being defined through the development of the 7th and 8th
addition of Lake Susan Hills West. New homes are currently being constructed on the
eastern border of the park.
21
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Prairie Knoll Park
Address:
1124 Dove Court
Acres:
4
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Site Preparation 4,000.
P lay Area
TOTALS: 00. 00. 4,000. 00.
Notes: The access trail to Prairie Knoll Park from Dove Court will be installed by the
developer to the rear of the lots which it bisects.
22
,
e
e
e
.
e
e
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Rice Marsh Lake Park
Address:
8119 Erie Circle
Acres:
30 (90% wetland)
Class:
Neighborhood
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Play Area Expansion 6,000.
Play Area 7,000.
Refurbishment
Picnic Shelter Beyond
Replacement 1996
TOTALS: 6,000. 00. 00. 00. 7,000.
Notes:
1991 Improvements - Completion of half court basketball court, installation of
swing unit and expanded border wood area.
23
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: South Lotus Lake Park
Address:
7610 South Shore
Acres:
7
Class:
Community
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Unsurmountable 10,000.
Curbing
Play Area Expansion 14,000.
TOTALS: 00. 00. 10,000. 00. 14,000.
Notes: 1991 Improvements - Grading, drainage and landscaping improvement project
completed, play area to be installed.
2"4
.
e
e
e
.
e
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Park Name: Sunset Ridge Park
Address:
1364 Lake Susan Hills Drive
Acres:
10
Class:
Neighborhood
e
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Installation of Trees 800.
Single Tennis Court 20,000.
with Basketball Hoop
Trees 1,000.
Play Area Expansion 14,000.
TOTALS: 800. 21,000. 00. 14,000. 00.
Notes: Initial development of park will be completed in 1991, with total expenditures
of $19,000.
e 25
OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Park Rules Signs 3,500.
Picnic Tables, Benches 5,500.
Spectator Seating, Signage
Boy Scout Project 1,000.
Tree Farm 200.
Contingency 4,500.
TOTALS: 14,700.
26
.
e
e
e
.
,
e
CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TOTALS
e YEAR AMOUNT
1992 $145,000.00
1993 $163,950.00
1994 $ 73,100.00
1995 $ 85,000.00
1996 $116,700.00
e ~7
~
.
.
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN
g
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Park and Recreation Commission -?l(
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator -;;!!
Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Supervisor /If
Dawn Lemme, Program Specialist D.~ . /1 )
FROM:
DATE:
July 22, 1992
SUBJ:
Fourth of July Evaluation
FRIDAY, JULY 3
e Adult Fishin2 Contest
Keep registration at a maximum of 50 people. Have flyers out by June 1, and mail flyers direct
to 1992 participants. Sunday: 8:00-11:00 a.m.
A crew (2 people at least) is needed for checking boats for milfoil and coolers. A rule sheet
should be distributed that morning to all participants that indicates weigh-in time and fishing
restrictions. Specify on the flyer that an adult is 18 years old and above.
Kiddie Parade
Have leader of parade (fire truck) at school by 5:00 p.m. Keep it slow. Flag off half of parking
lot for parking. Begin coordinating traffic control for July 4 parade by April, 1993. Need more
traffic control in general. Order 400 popsicles.
Community Picnic
Add more tents, space for food lines, more food. Need more tables and chairs (increase slightly).
Figure out power requirements for 8 electric roasters.
Hand soap good in BFI's - increase by a couple units.
e
n
~ ~ PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 2
.
e
Fire Truck Displav
Same, but block Coulter Drive off by 5:30 p.m. so the truck can get in. Traffic control should
be a separate unit with its own volunteers, chairperson, etc.
Horse Rides
Continue, but have more horses or establish two riding areas. Manure needs to be properly
disposed of and cleaned up.
Entertainment
Have the juggler back, look into other types of entertainment. Definitely have face painters and
caricature artists back. Increase numbers of artists and spread out locations. Lengthen the time
by one-half hour.
Trade Fair - Power
Rotarv Concessions and Beer Garden
Establish a vending contract with the Rotary so a donation is set, cleaning up is performed, etc.
Decide if a fee needs to be established.
e
Dunk Tank
Do again. Get celebrity dunkees.
Carnival Games
Add additional games (3-4) so people don't have to wait in long lines. Volunteers were helpful,
but coordination of games and prizes needs to be better organized.
Square Dancin!!
Fine--have again.
Hot Air Balloons
Had to cancel due to wind, but try to have back again. Quit horse rides a little early and then
have hot air balloons; or have hot air balloons on Sunday at Lake Ann Park prior to the
fireworks.
e
,
.
e
e
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 3
Street Dance
Have the Hi-Tops back again. They were terrific as always.
SATURDAY, JULY 4
Softball Tourney
Get information out early. Try again and work on getting more teams involved. People involved
this year enjoyed it. Keep it local.
Kid's Fishine: Festival
The event was full again, as usual. Keep maximum the same number; shorten the time to 1 ~
hours vs. 2 hours; have barricades well marked. The prizes were great. The kids loved it.
Sand Sculpture
Great space allowed and marked out. Keep two hours allotted for time, give ribbons and prizes
(gift certificates). Most creative and most difficult categories.
Treasure Hunt
Excellent clues! Good hunt and good participation. Have clues posted at the new concession
stand. Have treasure chest filled with approximately $100 worth of stuff again. Playground staff
prepared this event and it was super.
Fire Department Demos
Went well. Participants had a chance to work the fire hoses. Fun for those who participated.
Balloon Launch
Cancelled due to safety reasons (public concern). Try to do it in 1993; however, use research
materials to inform the public of biodegradable balloons (latex). Hand out flyers or post
something in regards to this so that the people who are concerned will be put at ease.
Family Games
Keep to one hour like this year. Have everything organized ahead of time: prizes set aside and
marked (like this year). Continue to hold games in area by the public access. If the licorice
Park and Recreation Commission
July 22, 1992
Page 4
e
eating contest is held again, make sure water is readily available in the event of someone
choking. Otherwise went smoothly--all had fun.
Hula Hoop & Limbo Contest
Went well. Good participation at both events. Have prize for all who participate. Set aside in
advance (like this year). Music is good--adds to the event.
Innertube Relavs
Weather wasn't as nice, so participation numbers were down. Try again with same number of
tubes (10). Use the new tubes. Continue as is--great event.
Music in the Park
Jeff Brooks and Joe Scott both performed this year. It was nice to have entertainment on both
levels. For sure have people on both levels again next year. Nice chance for people to relax
before fIreworks. Make sure concessions stay open until dusk--that was nice.
Fireworks
e
Spectacular show this year. Great grand fInale. Eliminate the Chinese lanterns or any other
fireworks that could cause fIres. All fire codes were adhered to and safety was good. Fireworks
people were cooperative and did a great job. No problems this year. Worked out good blocking
off entrance to the beach and stairway up the hill. People appreciated the flashlights to guide
them up and down the stairs following the fIreworks. TraffIc control was great. Public safety
was a big help.
Other SUl!l!estions for Next Year
1. Continue working with Polar next year for the 4th of July design, artwork, t-shirts and
hats. These went over really well. Sold out almost everything.
2. Continue putting schedule of events in the Villager.
3. Get sponsor letters out earlier, by April 15. Clarify terms of donations. Figure out a
major sponsor incentive, i.e. gold, silver, bronze sponsors.
4. Utilize paid staff again--they are very conscientious.
5.
Layout of flyer and coordination of all PR items was good. Gave celebration an identity
using same artwork on all promotional material.
e
, Park and Recreation Commission
. July 22, 1992
Page 5
6. Sponsor donations were as follows: Cash donations - $3,285.00; and Gift Certificates -
Over $1,200.00.
1993 Proposed Schedule
Friday Night: Picnic and Dance
Saturday: Family Day and Kid's Fishing Contest
Sunday: Softball Tournament, Adult Fishing Contest, and Fireworks
e
e
I
.
ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION
Invitation to Chanhassen Chamber/City Pig Roast
Article on New Policies for Non-Residents, Published in Villager July 16, 1992.
Invoice from Lake Restoration, Inc., dated July 15, 1992.
Letter from Faribault Community Services regarding 1992 Annual Conference, dated July 14,
1992.
Letter from Dr. James A. Cooper, University of Minnesota, dated July 10, 1992.
Memo to Don Ashworth, dated July 9, 1992.
Memo to Jerry Ruegemer and Dawn Lemme, dated June 24, 1992.
Letter from Mike Gorra, dated June 23, 1992.
e Applications for Tree Preservation Board.
Parking Complaints, Lake Susan Park, dated July 1, 1992.
Thank you note from Cindy Myron.
e
'-CJ
. .
/2 11 jJ;f-f' pP 1/ /1,4'e I
{71/1 II . /0,#9 ptldtl/# 11~#(/-
vI! /' 61'" 1611" .A'a II
If' '{C ~
CHANHASSEN
CHAMBER/CITY PIG ROAST
With AU The Trimminl!S!!!!!
THURSDAY, JULY 30, 1992
Lake Susan Park
$11.00 PER PERSON
6:30 p.m. COCKTAILS
7:00 p.m. DINNER
We hope you and your spouse/guest can join us.
I
e
'u.
-_.~-:..:~ J
. l;> '\ I
f - 11/ ldl IJ
- iIN:-l1:1{)P{~Pf .
1TT\11 "(rltIY
Reservations and checks MUST be at the Chamber office by
Wednesday. July 22. 1992.
e
(Detach and mall your reservations TODAY)
or Karen Engelhardt
Name:
---_______________________ ..~_~L _...~
Company:
Phone #
Please make your check payable to the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce and remit to:
Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce a
80 West 78th Street .,
Chanhassen, MN 55317-
# Attending:
times $11.00 = $
Enclosed
~way Park card
.~can Sbon Track- and he was bonored in victory Ian
l' main event, Darrel .,igure Eights .
Savage quickly jumped \ In the Fi.gure ~igbts, the first
~ the pack. Leading the feature saw Rick Keith take the open-
Dengers was Brad Cun-.. ing lap lead andn~ver look back. The
Ibo did a great job of ~ v.:as for secoOO and ~ De~,
g through' traffic and lim Cheever, Brad Miller, Denms
dgedin front of Waltz by Barta ahd Ralph Sager swapped
.ftera'spin, Cunningham positions. Lucky enoug~ for Barta,
finisb line first follwed Keith slowed down for him and went
~ and Dunn. on to collect the checkered well ahead
lOIt Trackers action saw of the second place car of Defrance.
~rwin the dash and one of Barta charged ahead to gra~ ~
ber beat winners included with Paulsrud in founb and Miller m
ams, Taylor Bolton and fifth.
'utz in the Promoter's The second feature was a little
more mellow. Barta grabbed the early
lead looking to pad his point lead in
the title chase. Second place belonged
to Paulsrud and third was Eddie
Bellanger.
......
Goo, Brad Miller started
. and grabbed the early
.red by loe Prusak, Tim
.e Riegert and Dick Bums.
OIl the move was the No.
(eve Murgic, who came
tit with five-consecutive
.iDe on the season. The
Nllching the Murgic ride
ide groove to move up.
ll)iliwhile, did a great
n.., the bard-charging
o eventually passed Pru-
leok. Murgic cruised to
1 in a row and tenth on the
usa finished second,
:1 and Walton founb.
odified Four action saw
~oing to 10hn Elder and
Prusak's win marked his
-victory atRaceway P~
Winged Women on Wheels
The Winged Women on Wheels
crowned another new feature cham-
pion. Mary Twinning of LeCenter.
Twinning held off a late cbarge by
Robin Borchardt to take borne the
feature trophy and complete a sweep
of the W'WOW division.
Twinning won an early action
heat race as did Chaska's Shirley
Sibila.
All of the action continues this
Sunday,luly 19. Some ofthe.hone~
action can always be seen durmg this
series which is in its founb season at
Raceway Parl"- The pit gates open at
4:30, spectator gares at 5:30 and racing
starts at 7.
.uch as flashlight tag. kick the can, and midnigb1" midni~t,
. the ghost tonight Relax with some com on the cob follo~lp~
On SUnday,luly 19, create an o~~in and then try.t9.clean.1t
I "How to Keep Oil Out of Water ;,program. P~cIpants will
nature cleans up spills and bow people .can help. Pro~
will include how and where to properly dispose of waste oil.
. for those age six and up.. .
alion and fees may be required for these programs. Ca1l472-
lither information. .
travels to Europe to play football
High School graduate Nate Lindall is taking part in a Euro-
whicb is exponing football to Norw.ay, as p~ of a. Luther
~otball Norway tour. The tour IS p~vlding an mte~-
'Il..xperience for Luther players and will help NorwegIan
.m more about the spon of American football. Luther com-
ree games at Oslo's Jordal Stadium wi!h teams frol!1 Norw~y,
; Denmark earlier this week. Luther will conclude Its playmg
'ith a luly 18 game against a Norwegian nati.onal team.
amore at Luther College in. Decorah, Iowa, Lindall plays both
ver and kicker. .',
,
8\' La c
Editor
As participation increases, ons on non-
resident participation in its recreation programs. .
At the last Chaska City Council meeting. revisions were adopted to the
youth and adult athletic league participation policy.
In programs administered by the Cbaska recreation department. for adult
. activities that utilize gymnasium space (school or city). all players must live
or work within School District 112 or the City of Chanhassen. The disunctlon
was made regarding Cbanhassen because the city bas two school districts
within its boundaries and some of those Chaska administered recreation
programs may use the Cbanhassen Elementary SchooJ as a program site. .
'Non-residents will pay more to play softball in Chaska leagues. The .non-
resident fee was raisec:i from $20 to $40 per non-resident. Also. an addiuonal
$1.0 fee will be assessed for a second team on which any individual may play.
The new policy also reitepltes a quid pro quo between Chaska and the
school district, saying: "It is the mtent of the City of Chaska to accommodate
School District 112 requests for use of faciH~l;,s...that will .not im~act .cny
regular usage. It is also expected that School Distnct 1-12 faCIlity av 811ablllty
will continue to be accommodating pertaining to (the) extent (of) use by the
City of Otaska. "
Finally, the d::lIand recreation comm~~i?n grappled with the m~ner of
preference in sponsored you~ actlV1U~S gomg .to Chaska resl~nts.
Instead of adopting a dual fee scale. It was deCIded to gtv~ Cha~ka n:sldents
first crack at signing up for city sponsored programs. Regtslrau.on w~ll op:n
to Chaska youth for Chaska sponsored programs first Later, regIstraUon will
open to non-resident youth. . .
Previously adopted policy statements mclude one saymg programs
should accommodate Cbaska residents, and those who are em~lo~ed full,
time in Chaska. Furthermore, youth activities should receive pnonty over
adult activities in scheduling of facilities. . . ..,- . . .
Other policies require adult recreational teams to SUbmit a-51 00 ellgtbil-
ity deposit. And, effective since 19?1, all new teams .must be made up of a
minimum of 75 percent Cbaska reSIdents ~r wo~ers.
,..
~
--
.-
r---'COUPON---..
1 Valid ...uOOI8-1-92 1
I 18801. @I
.1 ~ubli~ ~olf OP I
I' Fac.Ulty 1
1 $lOO0ff Zoo Off I
. I Nine Hole Ei.:htc:en I
I Round Hole Round I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
BEu..E PlAIN2. MN. I
I (61:l) 873...GOLF · I
I2,n~~c:~~~~~~~..
~
risliing
L ine5
For Up to Date
. Fishing
Information Call...
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
620 Hamel Road
Hamel, Minnesota 55340
(612) 478'94~1
l
INVOICE
-- F7-1~-';J~ I
'..-JE I _ER'
,,)~U..:,
TO[lD H8rF I"jA~1
CITY OF CHAt~HA~,SEN
690 COULTER
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RECEIVED
JUL 2 0 1992
CITy 0;- (;MANHA5SEN
r
I
e
(
!
!
LOTUS
Sale: DL
1 - 92 - 3503
This invoice is for the 1st treatment:
Submerged Weed Control
Swimmers Itch Control
Shor~line Alqaa Control
Dt,n:: Permi t F'8d tor the summer
at her
$579.80
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
T01AL FOR 1ST TREATMENT............. $579.80
Credit on Account. .......... ......... $0.00
*PROMPT REMITTANCE IS
e
C;;LAIKE DUE....................... ..
Treatec: 01'1 JulY 14th.
In ord0r tOl us to serve you better, please call our office between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. Mo~d~\' th,'u Friday with your questions or concerns.
A7#~ ~K~
e
. .... FARIBAULT
~~ COMMUNITY
J _F~ SERVICES
e
RECEIYED
JUL 1 5 1992
CITY OF CHA.NHASSEN
16 SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE
FARIBAULT, MINNESOTA 55021
(507) 334-2064
July 14, 1992
/A/ 19;';' ~A/ ,ef~ ~',o#.c~5'
Hall of Ideas Participant: "',lfVPv#~ tCOi'C/;rE,eG&oc
Enclosed you will find the Brochure Copy for
the Hall of Ideas. Please review the
description of your entry, make any needed
changes and return to me by Friday, July 17.
There is still room for nine more ideas to be
exhibited. Encourage your fellow MRPA members
to submit their latest creation for the rest
of us to further enhance our programs.
Thank you,
~~
Kathy SLCk
Hall of Ideas Coordinator
e
e
A Program of School District 656 and the City of Faribault
Brochure Copy
i
i
l
e
1992 Hall of Ideas
HALL OF IDEAS
Discover the exciting programs, projects and ideas that are
happening within our state. Located in the exhibit hall area.
"Who Done It" Vo1ksmarch
South of the River Recreators
A sanctioned Volksmarch with the added twist of a Murder Mystery
for the walkers to solve.
URBAN P.L.A.C.E. Program
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
A unique program utilizing built and natural resources as a
backdrop to provide regular, personally-meaningful, outdoor
environmental experiences.
Lake Ann Park Picnic/Recreation Shelter
Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department
A unique two-story shelter totaling 3,000 sq. ft. which includes e
a concession area, equipment rental, First Aid/Lifeguard station
and restrooms.
star of the North state Games
Cooperative promotional efforts for health, fitness and good
sportsmanship through amateur sport and recreation participation.
"BiFoka1"
Hibbing Parks and Recreation
An interactive audio/visual program presented to older adults in
Senior housing units.
"100 Trees for 100 Years"
Austin Parks and Recreation
Building a living memorial to thank "the hometown company of Hormel.
Community support raised $27,000 to continue the legacy of the Jay
C. Hormel Nature Center.
e
--'
t
e
"Friends of Wood Lake"
City of Richfield
An eleven board member organization that plans fundraising events
and promotes the use of a Nature Center.
Hershey Love Notes
Pipestone Park and Recreation Department
Cupids, Valentines, LOVE DUST and Hershey kisses are all part of
the fun in Pipestone on February 14.
"Youthline and Girls Initiative"
Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board
A program resulting from Minneapolis Mayor Don Fraser's desire to
meet the leisure time needs of the cities yourth. It involves 12-
16 year olds in positive leisure-time activities, introduces them
to community resources and encourages a strong sense of
"belonging". Girls Initiative promotes girls' interests and health
through innovation in recreation programs and investment in
community support programs.
e
South Suburban Adaptive Recreation Program
Edina, Eden Prairie, Richfield, Bloomington Park and Recreation
Departments.
Four communities that coordinate programs that enhances the
opportunity for residents who have disabilities to actively
participate in recreational programs.
Arthritis Aquatic Programs
Arthritis Foundation of Minnesota
Presents how your communities pool can begin such programs.
e
,
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife
College of Natural Resources
200 Hodson Hall. 1980 Folwell Ave.
St. Paul. MN 55108-1036
612-624-3600 Fax: 612-625-5299
I
e
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE FISH AXD WILDUFE
RESEARCH UNIT COOPERATORS:
U.s. Fish and Wildlif, S,,,,lct
Uni\'t'rsit)' ufMi1l1lt'JDtQ
MipuwJOID IHpanm~nr of Natural Rtsowras
Wild/if' MtWJg,_.t Instltwlt
Friday, July 10, 1992
RECEIVED
JUL 2 0 1992
CITY Ot' Lh""I...t"j."\~SH.:
Mr. Todd Hoffman
Park and Recreation
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Dear Todd:
We completed the Canada goose capture and translocation in the
Metropolitan Area on Monday, 6 July. A total of 4,161 geese (1,257 adults
and 2,904 young) were trapped at 59 sites and transported elsewhere. In
1991. we caught 2,822 geese (1,144 adults and 1,683 young) at 56 sites.
Like last year, adult geese were divided between Oklahoma (500) and
Mississippi (757) and released on their wildlife areas. The goslings were
transported to Minnesota sites, mostly in the north and northwest, and e
released.
Goose production this spring was highest in the last 10 years. The early
and cool spring gave the birds plenty of time to nest and kept the grass
green and growing, contributed to an unusually productive year for the
geese. While adults were up by only 113 (10 percent) in 1992, we caught
1,221 (73 percent) more young.
The crew trapped 98% of the geese they attempted to capture, up from
95% last year The cool weather made for less stress on the geese and the
goose capture crews. We lost one adult while trapping, and one gosling
and one adult during transport. This was less that the four expected based
on our estimate of the one death per 1000 geese captured and transported.
All deaths resulted from the stress of the capture combined with an
infirmity or disease. No birds were lost as a result of injury.
The locations, dates, and number of geese captured in your city were:
Location
LAKE ANN
LAKE :MINNEW ASHT A
Date
6/29192
6/29/92
Young
22
70
Adults
12
29
Total
34
99
e
e
LAKE SUSAN
TOTAL
6/29/92 28
120
13
S4
41
174
The cost of the removal was $2,000. Please make the check payable to
The Canada Goose Program and mail to:
The Canada Goose Program
2195 Dudley Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55108.
Thank you.
Attached is a summary of the Twin Cities removal for 1992.
Sincerely yours,
~es A. Cooper
Associate Professor and
Wildlife Extension Specialist
e attachment
e
1992 CANADA GOOSE REMOVALS -JIM COOPER, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA {
I
mE mY DATE ~ ADULTS ~ BP-FEMALES
HYLAND LAKE BLOOMNGTON 6/24/92 33 15 48 e
MARSH LAKE AND NINE MILE CREEK-1 BLOOMNGTON 6/26/92 20 6 26 3
NORMANDALE LAKE BLOOMNGTON 6/24/92 205 86 291 32
PENN LAKE (NORTH AND SOUTH) BLOOMNGTON 6/26/92 25 8 33 4
WANDA MILLER POND BLOOMNGTON 6/26/92 31 13 44 7
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BROOKLYN CENTER 6/17/92 56 10 66 5
NORTH TWIN LAKE BROOKLYN CENTER 6/16/92 71 24 95 12
TWIN LAKE NORTH APARTMENT5-1 BFlOOI<l.. YN CENTER 6/16/92 44 18 62 9
TWIN LAKE NORTH APARTMENT5-2 BROOKLYN CENTER 6/18/92 44 9 53 4
LAKE ANN CHANHASSEN 6/29/92 22 12 34 6
LAKE MINNEWASHTA CHANHASSEN 6/29/92 70 29 99 14
LAKE SUSAN CHANHASSEN 6/29/92 28 13 41 7
CARSON'S BAY-1 DEEPHAVEN 6/23/92 17 22 39 8
CARSON'S BAY-2 DEEPHAVEN 7/6/92 28 12 40 6
DElLWOOD HILLS GOLF COURSE tE.1..WOOO 6/25/92 124 35 159 17
O'lEARY PARK EAGAN 6/30/92 36 15 51 7
VIENNA WOODS PARK AND KETTLE PARK OFF SSE EAGAN 6/30/92 21 10 31 5
BRYANT LAKE EDEN PRAIRIE 6/24/92 47 14 61
Ol. YMPlC HILl.S GOLF COURSE EDEN PRAIRIE 7/2/92 110 39 149 18
6241 KNOLL DRIVE EDINA 6/24/92 13 7 20 3
6400 TRACY AVE. EDINA 6/24/92 14 6 20 3
COLONIAL CI-lIRCH EDINA 6/24/92 12 6 18 3
MERLAC>EN GOLF COURSE EDINA 7/2/92 58 24 82 12
LAKE CORNELIA EDINA 6/26/92 17 10 27 5
LONG BRAKE TRAIL-DELANEY BLVD. EDINA 6/24/92 32 13 45 4
MIll. POND EDINA 6/26/92 40 14 54 7
MOORE LAKE FRIDLEY 6/17/92 77 20 97 9
GENERAl.. MILLS INC GOLDEN VALLEY 6/18/92 26 6 32 3 e
SHADY OAK ROAD-2 HOPKINS 6/29/92 18 20 38 8
LONG LAKE LONG LAKE 7/6/92 42 18 60 10
ELM CREEK PARK RESERVE-5WIMMING BEACH MAPLE GROVE 6/16/92 80 37 117
BAKER PARK RESERVE MEDINA 6/17/92 60 14 74
LAKE OF THE ISLES MINNEAPOLIS 7/1/92 112 62 174. 27
CARLSON TOWERS-GA TES APARTMENTS-1 MINNETONKA 6/20/92 51 5 56 1
CARLSON TOWERS-GATES APARTMENT5-2 MINNETONKA 6/27/92 71 33 104 18
COMMUNITY CENTER MINNETONKA 6/18/92 10 5 15 2
SHADY OAK ROAD-l MINNETONKA 6/19/92 99 22 121 12
GILFILLAN LAKE-l NORTH OAKS 6/15/92 21 1 22 1
GILFILLAN LAKE.2 NORTH OAKS 6/30/92 34 13 47 6
LAKE MINNETONKA-NARROWS BRIDGE AREA-l (KN) 6/22/92 92 74 166 26
LAKE MINNETONKA-NARROWS BRIDGE AREA-2 CH:N:) 7/2/92 40 25 65 11 .
PRUDENTIAL INS1J1ANCE GROUNDS PI.. YMCll.1TH 6/20/92 30 19 49 9
WoaJ LAKE NATURE CENTER RlCHRELD 7/1192 16 6 22 2
SOUTH TWIN LAKE AOBBINSOALE 6/16/92 59 25 84 13
CENTRAL PARK-BENNETT LAKE ROSEVILLE 6/25/92 73 34 107 15
LAKE JOSEPHINE ROSEVILLE 6/25/92 69 29 98 15
LANGTON LAKE ROSEVILLE 6/25/92 28 17 45 8
MCCARRON'S LAKE ROSEVILLE 6/25/92 37 22 59 12
HARSTAD PROPERTY-SILVER THORN ESTATES SHOREVIEW 6/15/92 48 18 66 4
ISLAND LAKE SHOREVIEW 6/15/92 103 37 140 16
OOASSO LAKE SHOREVlEW AND ROSEVlLLE 6/15/92 44 25 69 13
CHRISTMAS LAKE s-a:EWCXD 6/29/92 26 4 30 2
LAKE MINNETONKA.TIMBER LANE AREA OF GIDEON s-a:EWCXD 7/6/92 28 12 40 22
SILVER LAKE ST. ANTHONY VILLAGE AND 6/17/92 36 9 45 4 e
MINNEHAHA CREEK NEAR WEST 34TH STREET-l ST. LOUIS PARK 6/19/92 40 19 59 7
MINNEHAHA CREEK NEAR WEST 34TH STREET.2 ST. LOUIS PARK 7/6/92 65 20 85 10
WAVIATA SWIMMING BEACH WAVZATA 6/23/92 64 59 123 22
e
e
e
WOOOHILL COUNTRY CLUB
SOIJTHVJEW COUNTY CLUB
WAVZATA~D ORONO
WEST ST. PAUL
6/18/92
6/30/92
49
42
17
20
66
62
~
11
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN .
,-
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900 . FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Don Ashworth, City Manager A.//
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator -;tv
FROM:
DATE:
July 9, 1992
SUBJ:
Vehicle Parking Plan, Carver Beach Park
~
Consistent with the adopted Carver Beach Park Master Plan dated January 10, 1992, an area for
vehicle parking will be designated at the north end of Carver Beach Park. The Park and
Recreation Commission reviewed this item attherr,May and June meetings. The Commission
conducted a site visit in May, and held a neighborhood meeting at their June 23 meeting to allow
for citizen comment on this addition to the park. UPc\'I! conclusion of the discussion on June 23,
the Park and Recreation Commission approved the designation of four parallel parking spaces,
with one of the four being for persons:M'ith handicaps. This action is consistent with the
approved Master Park Plan; however, the number of spaces are being increased by one regular
and one handicapped space over the original designation. ,;'Park MaintenancelPublic Works crews
will perform the necessary work associated with this project.
e
. .... .~.
e
~
~ J PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
.
e
e
e
C ITV OF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE. P.O. BOX 147. CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937-1900. FAX (612) 937-5739
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Supervisor
Dawn Lemme, Program Specialist
~
FROM:
Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Coordinator
DATE:
June 24, 1992
SUB}:
New Chanhassen Jaycees
As you are both aware, a new Jaycees Chapter has formed in Chanhassen. The Jaycees
organization maintains active members from age 21-40. Ms. Roberta Johnson, the Jaycees
President, and Mr. Ken Larson met with me last week expressing their desire to become involved
in community activities, with an emphasis being placed on teens. The Jaycees are considering
becoming a member of the upcoming Adopt a Park Program, and are currently coordinating the
dunk tank for the Fourth of July Celebration.
You can both be of assistance to the Jaycees by continuing to inform them of upcoming
community activities which they can become involved with. As a new chapter, their current
resources are mainly in the area of volunteer labor. Ms. Johnson resides at 7473 Saratoga Drive,
and can be reached at 934-2546. Mr. Larson's number is 949-9394. The Jaycees currently meet
every second Thursday at 7:30 p.m. at the American Legion.
pc: Roberta Larson
Administrative Section, July 13, 1992, City Council Packet
Administrative Section, July 28, 1992, Park and Recreation Commission Packet
n
'-., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~~~~nf,o '
CONSTRUCTIO ,.. ~ v.. '" V ""_ I
E N T E R P RN E ~ .(,. r Clr.: 0.:: Cp,;,:: HP.SS!iiiI.
CORPOR 10 ~_ _ . .
323 WEST 59th ST. MINNEAPOLl ,MN 55419 fJJ~__
~~ ~l
,#' -4~.2 ~ ~..#'k: ,
tt' ,q'~/ .er~ P'//~ ~ _ 7..e~#.
arvA -/".- ~~'7- ., ~ 6",/;"~/ ..,.
.~,/ -~ /~,,~
ir/C.- /
Re: 1"'~
.
~: ~ ~ 7S-IOO ~
~ ~ ~ ~ (d.~"-<f3.)~
~ :;l.1.- ~ ~~
~ 0 4- ~ ~8" 1'1'3
-r;~ ~)G~' eN- ~~
~~ <-6- ~
~~)
/h:.l.e. ):}~ <f- '74 - 7/d. 4--
e
e
APPLICATION FOR CBANHASSEN COMMISSION
DATE: ..-:-: /2 /
COMMISSION APPLYING FOR: / ~~!!' / ';e'f~~ c/~//,
ALTERNATE:
NAME: ,-:SAY ~()\}) C-.)( BIR'l'HDATE (optional):
LCfTl.I'5 L~lJ i "'AWe-.'>
ADDRESS: ~ ("J ~4-::l ~, CITY: C HAJJ ZIP: 5'<;3);
HOME PHONE: t-/ L-/3- 'C ~ ~ WORK PHONE: ~ L( Cl ,. C"ld-..t:.
6L1s~~"""'5 s 14~~ F~
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF CBANHASSEN?: ... '(~
HIGHEST LEVEL OP BDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IF ANY:
Bs, - 8)::)1 O~'i rYl5, ~~ "7
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer' brief desoription
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well. )
~ tJG:f2-j ~6 (2... LOTl/5 LA\.-J~ d G~eJ)t5N
e
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Inolude eleotive offioes, honors and
reoognitions reoeived, if any.) f"t'\QI""'.ber- - rn", N~'S/:;,n'1ltL:A.NIJ~cAP€"
A~s "') CI4AM ~^"\l3dL ~ CCJy.'\ft'\eR~ ) Ct-Jf\}..) GAR./.)SV cLU!S
REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS:
..:r;..,.., CO'I""''t''''\ tt.eJ +0 }M';/"t)~ f'\Q"';l g:>l.-~ 5/ oJ e~" l /"'O"v'\~
I - ;'
111 .Jh l vl ~ I, ~ tl,"',J.. ~ -+ k-f p~ f ~ wa:J.t...,J ()o.,~
.fo~st '~.~~1 I~ e~~-('\t:eJ fur "- ~a,(~, e.c.o)~r ~\J"e
~" .r:-IolveJ \~ ~I"j ~(V\\~ 1::> ~\ IS #yfL vC ~:), l.{:;r IlU oP ~
o.dl!\i hfe, .F~( WOiJIJ 1,k.t_1o s~ rv-.'( I~~ ttrJ ~lj\U
t,J;n... ik- r-e:~M~ d Chp^ho.5~V"',
IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OF MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPA ON WILL BB INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION.
r~"::C;.;.IVED
e
JUN (. 1 1992
CITY OF CH/\NHASSEI\I
h Jj If,
APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN COMMISSION
-;;;~, &i!f'5~~A!'/7;~
e
ALTERNATE:
NAME: R'-l/A-rt j \JJ~~
ADDRESS: (, 7\./ ~UII t:~\L
./
HOME PHONE : ~ 1 Lj j-::J ~ !
BIRTBDATE (optional):
CITY: ZIP:
WORK PHONE:
HOW LONG HAVE YOO BEEN A RESIDENT OF CBANBASSEN?:
J-, ~ 'if? S
.,
HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDOCATION ATTAINED, PLOS DEGREES, II' ANY:
lA \) t-" rYl j J
CORRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer' brief description
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well.)
PI~+ rlhff7.
ACTIVITIES AND AFFILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
recognitions received, if any.) e
[,-r-y ~~~t
/
IN FILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COKMITMENT 01' MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED I AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SOCH A COMMITMEfa IN 7 EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION. ~ h/ ./"?'
SI~RE ~ .
\
~.e z:; ~#;-/~9d."z/
~~.4"".d"~ ~AY~ - ~d7" /~ "r-
~* r:tr ./ t" --A
~~~- ~::t'~G#~//tf!k/ ~ /~Pe'4:Y#.:r;;-#/?'e'~
~5?~/$"...--v / 7 ~'.AI'?6;.!F ~ ~t::7"'~O
/4-;.A'..v ~ /9 ~ ~/A7-",--
, $ 7~~,e /~~~611:
e
~ .o~A:- TA!::-" e /A!:6~" A:-t/~t::T."e/
, /~~~t?A/~ -
-- J..v 4t1pt'tje:.-
-- ;/7/,y/5f f2;c;p
-
e
e
I
e
BIRTBDATE (optional):
CITY: O~l'\blt~.~'\ ZIP: S;-S-,=S ii
WOU PHONE: Lj 7d - l( (oS-
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OP CBANBASSEN?: ~ -") '3 ~ .
HIGHEST LEVEL OP EDUCATION ATTAINED, PLUS DEGREES, IP ANY:
8 A.
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT: (State position, employer' brief description
of duties. If with present employer for only a short time, list
previous employment as well.)
L ,'6((i ~ i 4... - k 1\ f'V :->1V\ C D ~
f'rj (> \<- i"I ~ n, \0. - C' ,( n ~
ACTIVITIES AND AFPILIATIONS: (Include elective offices, honors and
recognitions received, if any.)
f'{); 1\\\;;.(.1. -4-<,- e, L'{ U ctlt.e Gucla bf k{.1
A, L-:> I \.(''i\ '- f\~ ( tiC I h v. ( S U', <lc.): I') ({ .'h.......L. (_h,.'l-P rc:{1\1 ~/. tn.J M bAr.
REASONS FOR SEEKING THIS POSITION AND YOUR QUALIFICATIONS:
e
^ "
\ \ \..'/ t I ,_l Y 'i ,u:. u (~ ( ll.!t~Y.l
: 1\ \.; "-I U
\ I ,
tLL~k_,~ U" I i t.~CtLf-Z- .
,.-1 W ~'(l-tdd~ (\.(.L( L +w ~ ~4u\'\ ckvv{\ L:r hULl'.n',.'\. a c,'" (q/t0
~ 1:) .
t\';L~1 1,"--<2_ j b,((?-~-t<, +r'i-tlR1k~ {LJ.;..rv:~"aUIJ L..,"~ (''It'') {.!.:\'\..U'\..I", 6,1,'-
-h~ o.u~iv-\-\( (\>,\[J IJ.4Lth h.I"\,"-t.{.......;:t b ~-(PC;. tiCk) h;;W...M (j,v
Ct-\, <..~'->..~..Q l'Y\tDa'.^^(; 1.('1\--P U~llVt- +0 ~~ Q. t;-L"-J '*t'E.I<." lVlt.{,d~
L)I'J.A,,, l,dilL <'.::,~\.U.u~~. 6'\(~v'\.l/\.i:...'X\f'r'\ ~-:t.:t.Q h...€l-.-:l Ot'\).{~ ~\'k .
C\.u,. Y{VN;"~ N,I\ ~ k wrv.1&' Wu +c h..t1..p {..o 4--\~ ~ 0_J..'-{ CVO h'lA~ Go rc~-'S;bLc.-.~
IN PILING THIS APPLICATION, I UNDERSTAND THAT A COMMITMENT OP MY
TIME, ENERGY, INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION WILL BE INVOLVED, AND I AM
PREPARED TO MAKE SUCH A COMMITMENT IN THE EVENT I AM APPOINTED TO
THE ABOVE COMMISSION. .~
(Yf1,,^f~, RhJ P,.liel ck';l<
SIGNATO~ r .1,; U
{l <...A.... Ct.lIJ (1 ...( \'J;;V.) Lt.,,\. t urylC..e... 1)."\.- tfl(' 0\1... \
e
1
I .
i I
~ !
',-
e
Chanhassen Public Safety
Complaint Form
Date Received 1'- (- 9
- (
Received By '276''7
Review Date
COMPLAI NANT '.
"
Last A/1.e)Y\
,
First
Middle
DaB
Street Number
street Name
APT#
City
state
Zip
Phone
Phone
Location of Complaint Laee
Type of Complaint Par /:::./r7J
50 ?'7.-, ~r k j (' J,c:. ...
,
Animal Debris _ Storage Bldg Code Fire Code Noise
Criminal Complaint ~Parking Traffic Nuisance
Other
,.SUBJECT:
Last First Middle DOB
Street Number Street Name APT#
City State Zip Phone
Phone
Action Taken/Comments (INCLUDE DATE) )-1-72~, ~'( iJe..~ ~
~ ~ .~ ~ :ii4 ~r...J ~ :x4
~~ cd- U ~ f{~/ cd~ #..s,_
~.J~ ~,~;f<~~_
Action Taken:
1. Advisory Letter
2. Certified Letter
3. Certified Notice
.. Phone Call
~'\ In-Person Meeting
~ Warning Issued
1:. Citation Issued
8. Referred to: .~_ Disposi1;,ion: :,,:<.-::-::.~,:,~,>"
--- Carver County Sheriff '~Complaince ;t1~'
, Engineer ing Department ' ..' ' Actlori\:Pen.iii:J,!.g:~.,
--- Utili t :,'0 '~"":><1 'N<~"F'~""~t'n""~:"~Act1:oi
--- ty Departmen .,..,....: , .()'~I'l-~Z1~.l'~;:;::'....,"'r....)~
--- Street Department. .0', ~_,:,'i~~7::~'~~i~~.g.f~,~t.~1fJ}rr'a' ',' ';.
@ Othe~iP:rtt;~:~~ - "'~~;;:},\.~"~~
....'.... . . ..-:. ".
I ~ Chanhassen Public Safety Depertmenf ,^
I. Vi Vlolaflon Warning ~
. ~~~E / 0 ~ D 85 . MN
First Middle Last
Ht.
STATE
Wt.
ZIP
Sex
~61
CorrectIYe~
Required ^
Case Number
.... :\ Cha. nhassen Public Safety Department ~
. f! .l Vlolaflon Warning ~
N~~E I ft ~T~ MN
Flrlt Middle Last
~
ADDRESS
CITY
Birth Date Ht.
Operating License or
other 1.0.
VIOLA~' (J... (
Date:- ~LLrlm~:
Place
ZIP
Sex
STATE
Wt.
Thll II e vlolelion wemlng only. If tile box "Co"eclive Aclion Required" II c ked then you will
/lave 14 daYlto take tile necellary "eplto Co"ecttha vlolalion AND 1) Have eny police officer algn
thll card on the reverse Ilde verifying the correclion If tile vlolalion wal Illegal aulprnant or animal.
2) Hava the building Inlpector or lire Inlpector Ilgn thll card If tha vlolalion WII flrelbldg. Once tile
correclive aclion hal been taken mall or deliver to addraaa on thll card. Fallurato _ply will rMUlt
In lurther legal action.
fA) I A~..>
~ING~
~. um~r
Signature of laaulng OHlcer
'2'>/'(
Correctlv. ~
Required 1t
Case Number
Animal At Large a Fire Hydrant
House Numbers
Collar Too nght 0 Burning. w/o permit/Improper ~ [
Unaanltary Conditions 0 Fireworks [
Inadequate FoodIWater a Smoking [
No Animal LIcense 0 BIclgJZonlng
No Animal Ueense Attached a nres . [
Barking Dog 0 Vehicle e~
Junk/Oebrls
Inadequate Shelter 0 Septic [
No Kennel Ucenae a Bldg. w/o permit [
Other Other
Headlights
Rear Lamps
Tum Signals
Exhaust
Bumpers
Ucenae Plate
Windshield
Other
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Tl'llfflc
ParkIng ~. E- ')
Stop Sign [
Puling T/.J-. [
Speed lK 5(~olP tel [
Signaling I" --; 1. [
D.LExplred ~r1d( '19 [
Semaphore r [
Lane Usage L.a~ [
Other
ADDRESS
CITY
Birth Date
Operating License or
other 1.0. State
VIOLATION: Statuteloldrn;':;ca./ Si"c:..c::.. 12.
Date:! ....,J9- 9'<Tlme: /13 Q Offense" , Illegal equipment
Place U. /. 'iBrakel
Thll II a vlolalion wamlng only. If the box "Co"ectlve Aclion ulred" II checked then you will
/lave 14 daYI to take the necelsary Iteplto co~t the vlolalion AND 1) Have any police officer algn
Ihll card on tile reverse Ilde verifying Iha ~ectlon If lhe vlolalion WII Illegal eulprnanl Of' animal.
2) Have the building Inlpector or fire Inlpeclor Ilgn thll card If the violation WII flralbldg. Once tile
corrective action hal bean laken mall or deliver 10 addr... on tllll card. Failure 10 _ply will raaull
In further legal aCtion.
tJ}f/\ ;-erS
~ING OFF'9jtl'
1A~mbe~~
Signature of laaulng Officer
CPSDOO1ll1E
Animal Fire
Animal At Large 0 Fire Hydrant a
Collar Too Tight a House Numbers 0
Bumlng . w/o permit/Improper a
Unsanitary Conditions a Fireworks 0
Inadequate FoodIWater 0 Smoking a
No Animal LIcense 0 BIclgJZonlng a
No Animal Ueense Attached a nres
Barking Dog 0 Vehicle a
0 Junk/Oebrls a
Inadequate Shelter Septic a
No Kennel Ueen.. a Bldg. w/o permit a
Other Other
ar=::)legal equipment
Headlights
Rear Lamps
Tum Signals
Exhaust
Bumpers
LIcenae Plate
Windshield
Other
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
Tr.fflc
Parking Us e. ~
Stop Sign i' = I .J ~,
Pa,,'ng lc.).? 9fiJ I"\.AlI[ 'W
Speed ~/~ ~ a
Signaling ""-: ~ VI a
D.L expired ~ a
Sem~e a
Lane Usage a
Other
CPSDOO1ll187
e
~
1 .~'~.'.\ l;nannassen Public Safety Department,
> tJ~r:-f:~ Violation Warning ~
r .~~, ~
i J., ---,<:7 L.5 L --
NAM E / 2....:fL
First Middle LaSI
e
ADDRESS
CITY
Birth Date
Operating License or
other 1.0. State
VIO~ON' ~. Statute/~ ~ L /7
Date: "- '2...T1me: / ~?r) Offense: -. J ~ J J.
Place_a,,(~ ~_ A.Yn--/J~~?~~ J'
This Is a vlolallon .amlng only. II the box "Correcllve Action Requlrec:t" la ctJ.kItd then you will
heve 14 days 10 take the necessary slepslo correcl the vlolallon AND 1) Have any police officer algn
this card on the rever.. side verifying lhe correcllon II the vlolallon wu Illegal eulpment or animal.
2) Have the building Inspector or lire Inspector sign thll card If the violation wu Ilrelbldg. Once the
correcllve acllon has been..un mall or deliver to addr... on thla card. Failure to comply will result
Infurtherlegal~
=4~ N.m'" -Z'?,r
STATE
Wt.
ZIP
Sex
Ht.
Corrective ~IT
Required :;'<
Signature 01 Ilsuing Officer
Case Number
,. :~.".'~"\. Chanhassen Public Safety Department ~
~{, Violation Warning ~
N~MEflC ~95 --
Firat Middle Lasl
I
ADDRESS
CITY
Birth Date
Operating License or
other 1.0. State
VIOLA;~} _ L7 Statut~ ~, /"2
Date: -} {~e: Olfpnse: ~ . A
Place 1JL000-^~fJ k1't<-1 '<<I!J
Thll II a vlolltion wamlng only. If the box "Correcllve Acllon Requlrec:t" la checkec:l then you will
heve 14 days to lake lhe necessary Iteps 10 correcllhe viola lion AND 1) Have any pollca ofllcer algn
this card on the reverae Ilde verifying Ihe correcllon II the viola lion was Illegal eulpm.nt or animal.
2) Ha.e the building Inspeclor or lire Inlpector Ilgn thil card II the vlolallon was llrelbldg. Onca the
correcli.e acllon has been taken mail or daliver to add'e.. on this card. Failure to comply will result
In furt(T;:~~ 5
ISSUING OFFICER: , / tJ.
Oep~~f1J~~j
Slgnalure ollsaulng Ollicer
STATE
Wt.
ZIP
Ht.
Sex
eon.ctlve ~
Required )f
Case Number
e
Animal
Animal At Large
Collar Too Tight
Unsanitary Conditions
Inadequate FoodIWater
No Animal LIcen..
No Animal Ween.. Attached
Barking Dog
Inadequate Shelter
No Kennel Ween..
Other
~'~
Headlight.
Rear Lamp.
Tum Signal.
Exhaust
Bumpera
Wcenae Plate
Windshield
Other
Anima'
Anima' At Large
Collar Too Tight
Unaanltary Condition.
Inadequate FoodIWater
No Animal Ween..
No Animal Wcenae Attached
BarkIng Dog
Inadequate Shelter
No Kennel Ween..
Other
IIlega' Equipment
Brakes
Headlight.
Rear Lamps
Turn Signa',
Exhau.t
Bumpers
Ween.. Plate
Windshield
Other
Fire
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Fire Hydrant
Hou.. Numbers
Burning. w/o permit/Improper
Flr_Orks
Smoking
IIdgJZonlng
Tires
Vehicle
Junk/Debris
Septic
Bldg. w/o permit
Other
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Traffic
Parking (}s C
StoPSlgn~c ,
Paaalng .,71'f,)'kt
Speed tJ,c~ l!. ~
Signaling .. _ /
D.L expired L..e ~
Semaphore '?
Lane Uaage
Other
CPSDOO1l118
Fire
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Fire Hydrant
House Numbers .0
Burning. w/o permit/Improper 0
Flr_Orks 0
Smoking 0
IIdgJZonlng
Tlr..
Vehicle
JunklDebrls
Septic
Bldg. w/o permit
Other
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
TUfflc
Parttlng V5 fz.
Stop Sign ~ ~ ,hl1~ fe
Paaalng ~ 1 0
Speed ~r~t-}.,t 0
Signa ling I 0
D.L expIred Ld ~ 0
Semaphore I ( > 0
Lane Uaage 0
Other
CPSDOOl6187
~~~~
en
c;
::I
.
C
i
2.
5"8~~~;! :!! 0 5 2g ~ (') > z e
c;~.~. I) !. 0 ~ 0 >
:TCD ~ 0 ~
:1n<n__ n CD ~ CD"" :T
:r~.!:.... <<>> _. ;'e 0 :ZJ m
~::rQ.:: 0- lD m " 0
.-g,<- t- . .s . en i
ng_~~ 0 en ::r
~gs:5~S' c~ II (jJ .. I
2:r5_:'=- ::I
f:~i~1 ::r
. J~: la ..
~!iil -t "
fO .0 ~3 "
~I:~ <CD
:le:L~~ ~ % I
i~"i: = _::I
~ f~ 2.'1J
_.:I~- I
i 5"~: 5 .c
til~g =0'
_ ~o"
f~ ~ ~ : 0=
-!!.K~f ::In
otgf~K en ('I ~f
f~=ii ~!e!e ~
,--< "!.lD ~ -t
~i2~ (;~ ~ m 3i
ga5~f I I
!J=..g 5"'<
i~f!1 Co
CD
!=l-~!'::i i ~
"=-_::r. ..
!.o =. .
~:fU' CD ~
.:-~K I f N a
0' _!oc IC :0
i ~flf I I CD
::I
'2. Q:::I - -
'<<<>-of ~
.oll:;
=:I.~"C
...s:~""~
: - 3!!..
~l~tg=
~
(')
lD
CD
CD
Z
c:
3 fl
~ lj
c: =
- c
i ·
~
9:ECma'~l:r~
i~!~i3~i
"" - _ ~ c en ; _
~.!!!c .g: ::
· '1l :J _ .
ii. !.j- to
i' . ~
~
c:
is'
SI
.
:I
-
9f:;f
lff:J
i ~ C
~.i
! f
I i
e
ZZ:;i~~
iiflf!
33~i8-f>
!.!.-'i! -
cc. ~f
!!irf'i~
I I ~ ;: -
>.0 SI
.. -:;, .
i It- -
:J"
&
; '0 00:'(
~'ltI8l.~~!i\{~
00000000
000000000
o
~
c
~
~
....
9 (;fro. ~Ien:~l
li3 :J 11:l!!:
c. a'!. :;~:J
:l'!i!.j CcC
'i if! tt~i
~~-- n
~ ~
~~
oooooo~
00000
2!!f~<:!
i~~i-!i
""Enia-
0' gr
I. f
j
l:!!~:r:!!
. ... 0 .
~=-:i:r
j~~i~
-{3!
Oi-
l. 'TI
3 _
c: .
3
~
j
..
00000
e
.~'
\
e
e
llodd N~",~ /4~ (};~a<,
~~~ ~ .J~:t:lt~
15 ~ ~ -+ ~,rw.)~
W-'i' ~ 9M"<"'b.~r.~.' ~..Mt
.JT.u~ add~~ LA. ~~~L~ ~ ~
tJ-u;tJ :dttU!...L ~ ~.
~~
e