PC Staff Report 11-03-09
CC DATE: 11/23/09
IT]
PC DATE: 11/3/09
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
REVIEW DEADLINE: 12111/09
CASE #: 09-17
BY: AK, AF, JM, TJ
PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, denies an after-the-fact 1.38% hard surface coverage variance for an existing
driveway and future patio, Planning Case #09-17; and adoption of the Findings of Fact And
Action." 0\
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting an after-the-fact 1.38% hardcover variance to construct
a driveway and patio on property zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF).
LOCATION: 2111 Pinehurst Drive, Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition
APPLICANT:
Jim Weaver
US Horne Corporation
935 East Wayzata Boulevard
Wayzata, MN 55391
Todd and Amy Gleason
2111 Pinehurst Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: Single Family Residential (RSF)
2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential- Low Density (Net Density Range 1.2 - 4u/Acre)
ACREAGE: 0.41 (18,000 square feet)
DENSITY: N/A
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a
relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation
from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a 26.38% hard surface coverage. The Zoning
Ordinance allows a maximum of25% hard surface coverage. The property is zoned Single-Family
Residential (RSF). It is located on Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition. Access to the site is
gained off of Pinehurst Drive.
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3, 2009
Page 2 of8
On August 27,2007, the City issued a building permit for the subject site that reflected a 24.88%
hard surface coverage. The plans had adequate area to accommodate a future patio. Following
completion of the building, the builder provided the City with an as-built survey. The as-built
survey showed an increase in the sidewalk and driveway widths which resulted in an increase in
hard surface coverage beyond the maximum 25% permitted by City Code. Staff notified the
builder, who notified the homeowner. The builder stated that the proposed driveway was not
feasible for the position of the garage and was therefore increased. The builder then submitted a
variance request for the subject site.
Staffis recommending denial of the applicant's request based on the fact that the applicant has
reasonable use ofthe property; the approved building permit met the 25% hard surface coverage
requirement, which included a 100-square foot future patio. Alternatives exist that comply with the
hard surface coverage. The total hard surface coverage on the site must be reduced by 148 square
feet. Adequate access can be provided to the garage using less hard surface. Approval of this
application could set a precedent within the Pinehurst subdivision.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20 Division 3. Variances
Section 20-615 (4) RSF District Requirements; Hard Surface Coverage
Sec 20-905 (6) Single-family dwellings
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3, 2009
Page 3 of8
BACKGROUND
The property is located on Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition, which is zoned Single-
Residential Family (RSF). The subject property has an area of 18,000 square feet, frontage of
91.2 feet and approximate depth of 141.30 feet. The minimum lot dimensions in the RSF district
are 15,000 square-foot lot area, 90-foot lot frontage and 125-foot lot depth. The subject site
exceeds the minimum requirements for the RSF district.
The building permit for the proposed home, driveway, and front sidewalk on the site was
approved on August 28,2007. The building permit reflected a hard surface coverage of24.88%.
The maximum impervious surface in the RSF district is 25%. The proposed 24.88% coverage
included a 100-square foot future patio as required by City Code. Based on the building permit
application, there was up to 122 square feet of hard surface in which to accommodate a patio.
/
~""
,~
.~.
0'''
\
HAR(LG9-Y.!'lt~Al.CJ.!brillQt'!~
lOT AREA
House I POF\':;H
ORIVEWA YISlOEl'/ALI<
~OPATIO
TOTAl. HARD C'.oVtR
P'ERCENT Of HAllO COVEll
~ IS.COO SQ. FL
~ 3,453 sa. FT.
: 925 sa. FT.
: 1Q~U,-Q,Et.
- 4,478 sa. FT.
4.478/ ls.aoo - 24.88';4
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3,2009
Page 4 of8
The developer was aware of the limited availability of additional square footage for future
improvements or additions within the Pinehurst Subdivision. In 2006, as part of the approval
process of the Pinehurst Development, staff expressed concern over the potential future hard
surface coverage within the subdivision. The proposed lots were too small to accommodate the
size of homes that were proposed in this development. As a result, Pinehurst was re-platted in
2006 from 43 lots to 41 lots to increase the area of some of the lots.
Also, on July 6, 2006, in an attempt to avoid future hard cover issues due to the increased size of
homes on lots, the City amended Sec. 20-905 of the City Code. This section requires all
applicants requesting a building permit for the construction of a new home to show a minimum
10' x 10' patio area. This section reads as follows:
Single-family dwellings (6) "Where access doors are proposed from a dwelling to the
outdoors, which does not connect directly to a sidewalk or stoop, a minimum ten-feet by
ten-feet hard surface area shall be assumed. Such surface area must be shown to comply
with property lines, lake and wetland setbacks; may not encroach into conservation or
drainage and utility easements; and shall not bring the site's hard surface coverage above
that permitted by ordinance."
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a 1.38% hard surface coverage variance from the 25% maximum
hard surface coverage. This variance would permit the existing size of the driveway and
sidewalk, as well as a 10' x 10' patio. The lot area is 18,000 square feet. Based on the 25%
maximum coverage allowed, the home, driveway, walkway, future patio, etc. may occupy 4,500
square feet. The original building permit showed 4,478 square feet of hard cover. The
remaining impervious surface allowed was 22 square feet.
~u
s<::'
",-fi
Building Permit Survey
As-built Survey
The size of the driveway was increased from the original building permit by 240 square feet and
the sidewalk from the front door to the driveway was increased by 30 square feet. This brought
the site to 25.8% (excess of 148 square feet); this does not include the future 100 square foot
patio as shown in the original approval.
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3,2009
Page 5 of8
In addition to the increased driveway and sidewalk area, the applicant is also requesting a 100
square foot patio in the rear yard. The increased driveway and proposed patio exceed the 25%
hard surface coverage limitation by 1.38% or 248 square feet.
Ordinance Building Permit Existing Proposed Increase
Lot Area 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000
House 3,309 3,309 3,309
Stoop 144 144 144
Driveway 822 1,062 1,062 +240
Sidewalk 103 133 133 +30
Future patio 100 100
HSC 4,500 4,478 4,648 4,748 +248
Percentage 25% 24.9% 25.8% 26.38% +1.38%
A variance from the maximum 25% hard surface coverage may set a precedent in this
neighborhood, as well as other neighborhoods, to apply for variances for hardscape
improvements beyond the restrictions set forth in the City Code, as well as encourage after-the-
fact variance requests.
In 2007 there were two hard surface coverage variance requests within the Pinehurst
Development, one of which was an after-the- fact request. Both variances were denied.
Site Characteristics
The topography of the site slopes
in the rear yard from a high of
elevation of 1045.1 at the back of
the house to 1038 at the rear
property line. There is an outlot
containing a storm water pond
located just south of the site. The
runoff from these lots will run
directly into the storm water
pond.
While increasing the hard surface
coverage for one lot may not
impact the storm water pond
significantly; increasing the hard
surface coverage for a number oflots in this development will significantly impact the storm
water system. The water from this pond eventually runs into the Minnesota River.
According to the Hydrology Guide for Minnesota by the V.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, the
recommended hard surface coverage for a one-half acre (approximately 21,000 square- foot) lot
is 25%. This information is based on the Hydrologic Curve which translates to the amount of
runoff produced from a particular surface. The Hydrologic Curve for the Pinehurst Subdivision
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3, 2009
Page 6 of8
is 72. This is consistent with the U.S.D.A Soil Conservation Service for soil types Band C, soils
containing non-permeable material, such as clay.
Outlot B
South of the subject site is an outlot, platted as part of the Pinehurst Subdivision, which contains
a retaining wall and stormwater pond for the development. Outlot B is owned and maintained by
the City.
Staff researched the possibility of allowing the homeowner to purchase a portion of Outlot B.
However, based on review of the plans and storm water calculations for the development, it is not
recommended to sell a portion of Outlot B. The basis for this conclusion is due to the pond's
modeled high-water level relative to the bottom of the retaining wall.
During a 100-year storm event, the pond is designed to bounce to an elevation of 1027.2 feet.
Under the proposed plan, the toe of the retaining wall was to be at an elevation of 1028 feet
which would have allowed for 0.8 feet of free board. However, the Certificate of Survey for the
grading as-built shows that the base of the wall is at an elevation of 1025.9 feet which is less than
two feet above the normal water level for the pond. Thus, the wall goes under water.
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3,2009
Page 7 of8
In addition, there is a stormwater outlet just south of the subject site directing runoff into the
stormwater pond. Relocating the property line to the south of the structure would put the outlet
on private property, making it difficult to ensure the outlet is functioning and maintained
properly. The outlet is necessary for the runoff of the site and should remain part of Outlot B.
Permitted Use
The site is zoned RSF, Single-Family
Residential. Reasonable use of a property
within the RSF district is a single-family
home with a two-car garage. A single-
family home with a three-car garage is
currently constructed on the property.
The driveway is aligned virtually straight
out from the three car garage. The width is
30 feet at the garage and 24 feet at the
right-of-way. The width could be reduced
on the left side of the two-car garage and
angled inward as it comes in
contact with the right-of-way
and Pinehurst Drive.
The driveways shown to the
right are adjacent to three-car
garages within the RSF district.
The width at the garage ranges
from 26 to 28 feet. The width at
the right-of-way ranges from 17
to 20 feet.
Reduction of the driveway width
will result in an overall
reduction in hard surface
coverage and provide adequate
access to the garage.
RECOMMENDATION
:.:.....;..:;.~.; ...
'_..-...... .-
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, denies an after-
the-fact 1.38% hard surface coverage variance for an existing driveway and future patio, Planning
Case #09-17, and adoption of the findings of fact and action."
Gleason Variance
Planning Case # 09-17
November 3, 2009
Page 8 of 8
A TT ACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Action.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Reduced copy of proposed lot survey.
4. Reduced copy of as-built lot survey.
5. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing.
g:\plan\2009 planning cases\09-17 2111 pinehurst drive variance\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND ACTION
IN RE: Application of US Home Corporation, on behalf of Todd and Amy Gleason, for a 1.38%
hard surface coverage variance for an existing driveway and future patio - Planning Case No. 09-
17.
On November 3,2009, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly
scheduled meeting to consider the application of US Home Corporation, on behalf of Todd and
Amy Gleason, for a 1.38% hard surface coverage variance from the 25% maximum hard surface
coverage limitation for an existing driveway and future patio at 2111 Pinehurst Drive, located in the
Single-Family Residential (RSF) District on Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance that was preceded by
published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested
persons wishing to speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF).
2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential-Low Density (1.2 - 4 units per
acre).
3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 22, Block 1, Pinehurst 2nd Addition.
4. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not
grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship
means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical
surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of
comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a
proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this
neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter does not cause an undue hardship. The
subject site is 18,000 square feet, which is 3,000 square feet larger than the minimum lot
size in the RSF district. The original building permit survey showed a hard surface coverage
of 24.88%, which included a future 10' x 10' patio. Upon receipt of the as-built survey, the
hard surface coverage exceeded the 25% limitation by 0.8%; this increase was due to the
driveway and sidewalk area increasing in size. The builder states the driveway submitted
with the building permit was inadequate for the size and use of the garage, thus it was
increased. In addition to the increased hard surface coverage, the applicant is also
requesting a lO'x 10' patio in the rear yard. In 2006 the Pinehurst subdivision was re-
I
platted due to staff's concerns with the potential hard surface coverage on the lots. The
builder was aware of the 25% hard surface coverage limitation prior to submitting the
building permit. The literal enforcement of the code does not cause an undue hardship
and is a self-created hardship.
b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties
within the Pinehurst 2nd Addition (RSF). The RSF district limits the hard surface coverage
to 25% of the total lot area. In 2007, there were two requests for hard surface coverage
variances within this subdivision, one of which was an after-the-fact variance. Both
requests were denied.
c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
Finding: The intent of the proposed addition is not based on the desire to increase the value
of the home. The intent of the request is to maintain the larger driveway and sidewalk as
well as construct a 100-square foot patio in the rear yard.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The request to exceed the 25% hard surface coverage limitation is a self-created
hardship. The building permit submitted in August 2007 showed the site with 24.88% hard
surface coverage. The proposed hard surface coverage included the house, sidewalk,
driveway, and a 100 square-foot future patio. The driveway increased 240 square feet and
the sidewalk increased 30 square feet during construction. The builder stated the driveway
was inadequate for the size and use of the garage; however, there are alternatives to realign
the driveway and comply with the 25% hard surface coverage requirement.
e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of a variance may be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located, in that
additional storm water runoff is generated from the hard surface on the property.
f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood.
Finding: The proposed increased hard surface coverage will not impair adequate supply of
light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets
or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety; however, it could diminish
property values within the neighborhood.
2
5. The planning report #09-17, dated November 3, 2009, prepared by Angie Kairies, et aI, is
incorporated herein.
ACTION
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, denies
an after-the-fact 1.38% hard surface coverage variance for an existing driveway and future patio,
Planning Case #09-17, and adoption of the findings of fact and action."
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council on this 3rd day of November, 2009.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:
Its Chair
g:\plan\2009 planning cases\09-17 2111 pinehurst drive variance\findings offact.doc
3
Planning Case No. Oq - \1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227-1100
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
SEP 2 4 2009
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
CHANHASSEN PLANNlNG DEPT
Owner Name and Address:
lJ, Y-. ~ N (S . ("" \R{\&,\\,\
A- \ \ \ \=> \ '1\e X\\I... Cf.,+ "Ct.
(' ,~(\hMs,"3-,"eT, 1 ^-A'N "'E:>':::>"6o \
Contact:
Phone~'j8.513. 9, \1-~ Fax:
Email: tecB. ~ \eOS6l\ (C;2 perrt-cU ". U') fY\
fV\
NOTE: Consultation with City staff is reauired prior to submittal, including review of development
plans
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC)
~Variance (VAR) #'Zto
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
Non-conforming Use Permit
Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP)
Planned Unit Development*
Zoning Appeal
Rezoning
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
~ Notification Sign - $200
(City to install and remove)
Site Plan Review (SPR)*
x ~ for Filing Fee~orney Cost**
, UP/SPRlVA~AP/Metes & Bounds
- $450 Minor SUB
TOTAL FEE $ ~ ~ -it.f5D
Subdivision*
An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing.
*Sixteen (16) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11"
reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diaital COpy in TIFF-Group 4 (*.tif) format.
**Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application.
SCANNED
WETLANDS PRESENT:
YES
~
NO
PRESENT ZONING: '0 \~ \.1, ~ lY\.\,--\
REQUESTED ZONING: 1 f:\-
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: 'O~~ \7\ rn,\\ \
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REASON FOR REQUEST: ~f'(1_~. ~R 0.--\:-\0.(' hR ('1 \ Q -H-f'~
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees:
and new employees:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
q bJO<4
Date
9/19/09
Date
G:\PLANIFormsIDevelopment Review Application.DOC
Rev. 1/08
SCANNED
September 11, 2009
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd
Chanhassen, MN 55317
To Whom It May Concern:
We are requesting an impervious surface variance for 2111 Pinehurst Drive on
behalf of the homeowner. The constructed home (include driveway and sidewalk) is
currently over the impervious surface maximum by .8%. The size of the driveway
changed from what was originally proposed in the building permit survey. The
proposed driveway was inadequate to support the size and use of the garage for this
home. The driveway built today is wider, thus causing the slight increase in
impervious surface. In addition, this homeowner would like the ability to build a
small patio offthe back of his home. Ifthis patio is added, it would increase the total
impervious surface to 26.37%.
When reviewing this variance application, we respectfully request the staff and City
Council of Chanhassen to look at the big picture. This particular homesite backs up
to an open outlot, which could be added to the homesite's overall pervious surface
calculation. The homeowner has been living in this home with this larger driveway
and has acquired belongings based on this driveway. To force the homeowner to
change their driveway or way of living at this point would be hardship. With this
variance request, we are requesting to work with the City of Chanhassen to find a
reasonable solution to this minor error.
Below is our point by point narrative for the variance request.
a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship.
Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because
of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes
a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent
of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances but to recognize that
and develop neighborhoods pre-existing standards exist. Variances that blend
with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet
this criteria.
The literal enforcement of the 25% impervious surface prevents this
homeowner from the quiet enjoyment of his home. The driveway that was ultimately
constructed was built to fit the type and intended use of the garage with this home.
This homeowner has purchase items based on this driveway and its intended use. To
take away the driveway would limit his use of his whole home.
The literal enforcement of the 25% impervious surface prevents this
homeowner from the quiet enjoyment of his backyard. Prior to finding out that the
driveway was constructed larger than originally shown, we had always anticipated
on a 10' x 10' patio in the backyard of this home. It would be a hardship to take
away something based on the driveway error.
SCANNED
545 Indian Mound E., Wayzata, MN 55391 · Phone: 952-473-0993 · Fax: 952-476-0194
LENNAR.COM
G2
OPPOll11lNITY
b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not
applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification.
This impervious request is specific to this homeowner due to the fact
that there was an understanding when he purchased the home. He has desired to
build a 10' x 10' patio in his rear yard We had calculated this with the original
survey. However, the original driveway was not sized appropriately, thus putting
him over the 25% maximum coverage. Without a variance, he is unable to have the
patio that he originally desired, nor the driveway that is now sized appropriately for
him home.
c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value
or income potential of the parcel of land.
The purpose of this variance application is not for profit or income.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self created hardship.
This hardship was not created by the homeowner. It was an error on
the builder's part for not having an appropriate sized driveway on the original
survey.
e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the
parcel is located.
The granting of this variance will not be detrimental to the public or
cause injury.
f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion ofthe public streets
or increases the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially
diminish or impair property value within the neighborhood.
The proposed variation will not impair the supply of light or air to
adjacent property. It will not create congestion of the public streets. In fact, by
granting this variance and providing this homeowner with an adequately sized
driveway, they will be less likely to store their vehicles in the street, thus reducing
potential congestion. This proposed variation will also not impair neighboring
property values.
If you have any questions, please contact us at 952-249-3000
Sincerely,
LENNAR CORPORATION
") //~L _~ /' j
,::=""/~~A.~~
l___ / Carole TOtytffi Weaver '
SCANNED
.I~~H
t ~ '1c
lIll
E I ~t
I I
m'
t
<0
I I
~
i~
~I
i!lS
~
~ i
Ii! l';
; I
i'
:I
Ii tt:t:11i .~
g gg g ~
~ lilll! ~ ~
=i., ..,f j!
li llHI.s ~
:<
o
i=
C
o
..
o
z
'"
Iii
a:
'"
'"
W
Z
;;:
,.;
~
"'
.;
..'"
t-')~
l(ll:;
00
""~
g tI.
~ i~
~ COW
o :i
i ~
;;:
o
z
'"
li>
a:
'"
:I:
Ul
Z
;;:
,,;
11
~
~
o
1;;
!
o
I
~ :
~ ~
1;;
..
!. iii
~:i.rn
:1:0
~~
N~
Cl
Z
W
C)
UJ
....I
* ~
e :J :;
~ &:8 .~ j ~
i~hx.'ijc <(
E e;;:;.!! a: 30 8 ':i
j1o."w "'." <(
o-moogc:: 4)' ~2S
.:Eu8t:L.c 8 >-
s:.gg.-i~:S g.F!1LiJx
g~.d:~~~ 0: ~ ~ z
"Sl"""" "lllfi<<
~_+,.Be.s.B .s::E ~ ~
fi5~~i5 ~~z~
QCQQQC ot7i~3'
N ~
..
i.:1 ~
""-= ~
S~ :
2_ N
o
n
f
-
1--
I-
W
W
lL.
2S
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
~
...
Q.
;::
~
.g
...
i-
O.
i~
H
';'S
!i
d
i~
dS
~'I;
.....
i'i~
fl~
.., ~
"5 .
gJl~
~gUl
:.~
j:::~
~b
;;
o
ii
"i
~
~
8
.IJ
'i
'll
g
t1
... :?
~: 1
;J -.
:S So g
'j ~ ~
h~
.8~ 5
,. 8 ..
sf -:
i:s! !
t'! ~
~.l!
~..
:Ii
-;'2
~"
il~
d
aR
CO
,8:
"'"
~"
.5j
.~i
"'a
ill:
0'"
=~
1
..
'"
~
i
s~
U
J!<Il
,s5
8~
~.l1
,."
d
."
iiS
s-g
..,.
..'"
~"
.lJs
h;
:ll-"
....
"go
""
.2..
1;;"
il
...
0"
z-'"
.;.ll
~
L>
"
~
t
f
IJ)
.
ii
..
"
g
o .
lUI
:!,~
...5
.!l!~
~~
..,-
~~
~;
...'"
~a
~)
."
~ "
00
"'8
...
~i
.1
4!
l!
Q.
8
i
"
~
1
e
"
!
..
."
i
l
K ~
~ a
e .,
I .:
" ~
Viti In
'D~ ;
I~ ~
e'O 0
A.S ::t:
uO': ~
~.....
~1:l~
~~~
. , ,
i!
..
..
.0
0;
~
~
li
~:!
~ i~
~ ~;
j. e!
! ~m
: ~i
~ j'l
~ c....!!
c! j!
g ii
~ ~i
.$~
~ ~~
~.... W :o:.'e
~ ~ !< ~3
f ~ ff ;-g
a: ffi ~ oS!
~ ~ ~ !:!
Q f/)~.:c.
~ ~ ~ i:
Ie ; ~. f!
~ s f,l ~!
~ ~
~ ,,);
J ..
" ji
I j
! j
i t
_ IL
" ..
: i
~ ~
!
...
..
..
s=
~
j-;
..~!<
1-<1
:3ii
.!!""
!l~-
:J~8
~ti
!i~
IU
en
Q.Q.Q.
e..'3SVS-l"W""oos\6Ml>\".O'tm\'l>orOld\ "
ett lGSn - wdtt'.t - Jtil)Z 't'L 5nv
"
.s
'"
~
.5
=:
'i'
1
=
t~ ~
~S ,
-g & 'g.
1i~ .r>
HI
ZJl !!
oll 8
i! ~
is'
j
....
~ i
I" '"
J 8
~
~
~
-~
~""
~.~
l~~j
e:l~
~ ~S
~;I!~~
j
11
i
1
~
I
I~
h~
~&'u
:~!
~~ .
.1 H ~ ~
t x x
~
LI
. I
II
-ro" i
, I
I '
I ;(~:
i l
i1.l1:J
II
I I
fl~t
.:f
'"
I~ I
9
~
""..3:
g~~
"",0
ffi
15
no 0
~ ~
~ ~
w
~ ~
..,
n.
;::
o
i(i
I-
'"
rr:
=>
J:
W
z
ii:
ai"
"
o
-
'"
j
..,
"
~~
eo
"-5
15"
E~
.gg
~E
::-g
if
00.
.9.
~~
Xo
"2-
~Gi(Q
QJOl<'!
-.0
:33:10
~-"o
~~~
i~~
-ow
~d
n._
i=~
~~
i.
o
;::
o
o
'"
o
i(i
I-
'"
rr:
=>
J:
w
z
ii:
.;
'"
o
m
.;
>ON
,,":
~~
.3~
:;".
w>
~ ~~
.., ",w
o :i
I ~
ii:
~
o
,
o
"-
l<i
t t~t ~ II
g dlLc;t::a 0
o :g~UJi
~ ~;~~'<t. i
" ..
-
w
>
o
*
i co
:E :
~ ~
i ~
~:Zw
J:O
zi=
"':0
N-~
o
z
w
(:)
W
-.J
~ ~
:J >=
c
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
il.E~~8.=S 5 !-.:'
~~lil@(l:;: u :z
5Q)-gcncg'-g -~
::lE m o.-:g ~~~
8&':S.!::-5a.o:: :I:
5 ~ e'~ g.~ e ~ (f) ..
~~~~~~~~~~
~JJ~2.$$ ~::!~~
oooooooC:::zt=!
~~~~~~ ~~~~
i,j~
w'"
E~
z"': N
N ~
i
'"
o
r<J
I-
W
W
u..
I
-
f-=-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
'-
\:
,
o
-"
-~
o
o
o
,
.
o
o
o
o
..,
.
,
.
"
..,
i
i~
~~
B~
"'0
,so
00
~~
~~
. -
=~
.eg
-g~
~.
02-5
~.~
.m
.-
~~
!~
.0
om
~~
o
.~
"
"
'"
.
~
o m
m 0
~ ~ 1
g e. 0
;5. l:
~.~ Ql
~~ ~
!~ fi
3 en ~p"
~~ ~
>.:5 m
~~ .c
,2
00
00
~;
~-
U
o.e
0"
o.
:';;;0)
":>
E -
,g:g
.5 tlI
fi
.,~
0:=
~~
,
.,
,;.
~
.
-"
~
~
!
~
.~
-E
0:
..,
o
o
~
;;;
~
>,
"
..,
.
o
.
o
o
m
0-
m
o
1
.
-"
~ ~
~ c
o ~
, .
o "
o -
o .
Qui Q'l
-g~ ;
[~ :g
e'O g
~~ ~
..,
o
,
o _
'0
"",
.0
0.
..,,e
~::
13.
:5=
ttS~
"-"
~~
.c.'!:::
;~
~!
.0
,~
00
-;~
:EQ)
~~
'"
0"''''
<<icti16
~~n~ ~
..,
o
-
o
o
;;;
-~
~
o
"
:c,S
>,0
=*
~ ~~
~ ~'O
~ ~~
E"o~ ~ ~
e15
" -.
~ f~
~ ~S
z ~.g
~ f~ ~
! if:
~w~~l
g ~ R ~~ c
n.. .:J iL .!! ~ '0
Ci: ffi i= :Si ~
ffl ~ ~ ~~ ~
a U) ~~ <D
~ g ~ ~~ ~
l~iHi
~ '.1" ~
. /
l-Y"
:~i
~
'"
(;> ~
~~~
rg~g
.!l.9~:!l
i~ J-j
<ll8 Jl '"
o
o
~
..,
.
-"
.
~
-
"0
~i
~~
~~
~Oo
~~::
u. o~
~~~
LLc:I-..J
/
/
'" ,-,
'....' I
(~Y~ ~
v / I
, / /
" ~~y~
5
E
~
.-<~
]~E-<~
JJ:l ,;-
N !l
}~=- ~
il
o
~
if
'"'''
'" !~~~
~ S':l~g
~ ~'i!'J~
i iE'
lif
l ~
~ .
oS !
~
~:I!;I~
~
S
IE:
j
!
6MP"3SVB-llI33iV3Aijns\6H.p\.,t09lN31\~OJd\. =1
ZU lGSO - wtI9t=L - goaz '50 oaa
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
October 22, 2009, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Variances to 2111 Pinehurst Drive - Planning Case 09-17 to the persons named
on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such
owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with
postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing
as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other
appropriate records.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
thi~h.ctay of {x....~~ y- ,2009.
\ ~ I
K\M ,.. MEU\N\SSEN 1
. innesota
Notary PUb~~~~ Jall 31. 2010
M'J commlSSIOll
0)
s::
;
Q)
Q)
:!E
0)5
s::.-
.- tn
Ilo. tn
CIS._
Q) E
J:E
.~ 0
::00
::JO)
o..s::
'Os::
s::
Q) CIS
(J-
;0..
o s::
ZQ)
tn
tn
CIS
J:
s::
CIS
J:
o
0)
s::
i
Q)
:!E
s::
0)0
s::.-
._ tn
a.~
Q) E
J:E
.~ 0
::00
::JO)
0.. .=
-s::
o s::
Q) CIS
(J-
._ 0..
~
o s::
Z~
tn
CIS
J:
s::
CIS
.J::.
o
"'OQ)
Q)0..c en
(5 ..c0- Q)
I: -..c"'O en
>, - ..... co en
ro. :JOQ):J
E~ E.o- u u
Ol I: "'0 co "5,= Q) .~
.f; C]) Q) :J 'CD ~ '0' .po; "'0
m ro 8 0 c .= ..... u Co
~ ~ N >. Q) co 0.. .92.,
U) _"'0 >. E ..c ..c "'0 2 '(j)
~~~t ~.....-o io..ci~
I-~COQ) uEEQ)..oQ)=E
E ~]j e ~ .S 2:S ~ g-:s .0 E
0... 0)..... 0.. -; 0';: ci2 o.C 6.8
.cCOc c.--:Jcen OQ)
0-:2: 0 .Q:5 .~ o..+:: 0> Q) en..c Q)
01: en ~_ CQ)c..cc-..c
" 0 0 "'0 0 0>.- Q) .- - co E -
~ o~ "'O~~CE~~-"'O
-~~c <~.....~ 0 o..oc
co,,~co~ -CO_Q)-~-""'CO
0} 55 en-';:: (/) -g UI Q) .0 ..c (5 Q) c ..-
a:: C\I ~ ..c 0 _ ..- .- Q)"'O "'0
g$~~ -~Uoo>Q)~en~Q)
C\I ~..o ~ _ ~ ~ = - c ..c Q) ~ 'Q)- ~
~ :J ~ .0 "'0 .;:: - > 0.. -
~I:Eco~ ..c~:JC:J..co ~U
..... 'c co ... co Q) Q) ~ 0.. co 0 0> C .- ..... en
Q) 0)> ..co ..cQ) ~ > c:5 en _ :J co ~ Q) .-
.0 .- 'a...- .- en 0 0>
0) -Q) 0..... 1::SQ).po;.....Q)cCtlc
EQ) ~ ~ (j; - ,..: ~ ..- :J ~ :S .e:: co en .;:: .po;
>...- C '::::.f; 0 11.) .- 0 C"'.O' 0) 0).2 ..- (tj c..>
o~o:JCO(/)O-*CIlQ)~.....c=aQ)c..cQ)Q)
to....:L.. .-....., en a.'- .- .
Z$OoroQ)~gEo~enCtl~~Eu2
>..!!! = ::: E E c CO I: 2- c:.c Q):::: Q) E :6
CO~CO!Q)~~~~:Jco-..cS..co:JQ)
~ 5 I :J 32 ...... C\I 'Iii o..,g "5 ,g (/) I- 0 a... :S
O>t O"en(/)"-o80>0..0.o
:J ro ~ Q) Q) ...... -' - ..c o...o:J . . . .
l-ooOa::a::~C\I_~I-COcoo.......C\I~~
Q)
E
i=
~
(I)
....
10
C
enOl
I: I:
(1)._
a.....
a. (I)
10 (I)
:z:::E
....(1)
<<lJ:
J:....
3:10
....
I:
10
.~
>1:
t: .2
(I)....
a. 10
o (J
Ilo. 0
11...J
I:
o
~
10
(J
o
..J
10
en
o
a.
o
...
11.
<C
Q)-g~
(5 ..co- en
I: - ..c "'0 0>
>, - ..... co en
ro. :J0Q) en
E~ "'0 E~= u ~
g> 55 Q) co 0> = Q) .~
.~ ro c :J 'CD ~ "0 .po; "'0
IDO) 0 oc~ .....u C
.c.c . N >'Q) co 0..Q) 0
.511 .:::: ~ >. E ..c ..c "'0"0 '(j)
.co-t ~.....-O Q)o..en
I- Qi CO 2i .2 E E Q) en ~ Q).2 'E
E 1i Q) 2 "0 .S e:s 0.. o....c :g E
. -to.. _1:0';: -22-0..0
0..0) co c.!!!-:JO>eno..c 0
o .,s """ 8 O.l: en o...S 0 Q)
I: ..:: +:: - .- c - 0> Q) en ..c Q)
900en ~~o>-i~:sc-:s
~I:o~ "'O~~cE~..-~E"'O
~~~~~ <~Ctl~ goo..oc
0'> 55 00-';:: (/) -g UI Q).:o ~ (5 ~ c ~ co
00)..... C\I~..cO_..-~Q)"'O",o
0,,0> -~uoo>Q)>enQ)Q)
C\I..o ~>=-c..c~Q)>en
E :J ~ .0 "'0 .;:: - ..... "CD g
~I: ..c~:Jc:J..c60..uu
..... 'c ~ Q)> ~ .l:_~ o..en ~ 0 g> c '5 ~ .~
Q) ~ 0 .-'-.- en 0 co > Q)
.oEO) o.....a...I:..cQ).po;..... _.....0>
C]) _O-~u..cQ)ccoc
Q) .c '(3 _ ..... UI ..- ~ Q) - > co .;::.
> - c en'- 0 0"'0' 0>"5> u en co -
0~:J ~~CIlQ)~.....~-=cQ)~
ZQi 0 - Q)..c OE en 0.......= 0..Q)..c.
- 1il 0 E.~ E Q) 05 0 _en en co ~ ~ E u 2
>'-=-c c l:2-c:.cQ)..- E=
co~coenQ)o~~~:Jco_..c~Q) .0
~5I~"'OI C\I'1iio..Q"5Q_..co:J~
Q)t_O"Q)~Q)~~ogQ)ao~(/)I-Oa...-
:J ro "- . ..... -' - ..c 0...0 :J
l-oooa::a::~C\I-~l-cocoo.......C\I~~
.8 (I)
..c .s:o >
en c <<l~
.~ Q) >. Q) Q) ~ en
:J '5>.0 ~ € :S ~ 5
o c.....-co 0 (l)J:
::-< 01: o..-,al-
=u~~Q)en_(I)
E co c: ~ "'0 .~ = J:
g> _cEEQ)g-==;
+:: ..co ..o:SuE>1:
Q) uC:J 0
Q) ~ Q)en.8Q)(I),a:;:;
E 0'>' i en 0 >.32:!:: 10 m
coen_o..>en E
Q) oQ)coQ)oo.-"O
..c -....c-..cenu.....J:(I)
- o..c 0 0.......... I:
Q) ~ -cooo>-...eno
..... u..c..cc=o::.-
E..>Q)~uo~-(I)m
~ ~ ~ "0'(3 :J Q) ~ t: :!:: "E-
...... en.....@o>~oen
en Q) -.... 0.. >. co (/) a.,a .E
co>enenen..-..c (I)
co ~ =! :.c .~ - 0 ... ~ 0
a c..... .= C\i - 0,= > ()
Q) -g E "5 ~ ~ 'S .s 10 t)
..c ~ c: 0 co ~ c.. Q) 1;) (I) .5
; en Q).g~~ Q5 Q) (1).01:
_en ..cEJ:...1:
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ Q) I- (l)a. ~
o '~..c 0 E' ..c ....
- 2 c Q) Q)C\II.{)~"'" c:J: (I)
-o..CO -..-0....
c en ..c E >. ~ .$ o'(j) I: :S
co_ ~o'OcocQ)enOo
~ c'u en en Q) u '-E (I) _
:JO .0Q)Q)Ec 1:'"
o 0> ~~:s 5 E ~ E::.2
>. >-CO..co"'OOI:...
:=:S ~s~ o..u coO 0
en
.:;
Q)
en
co
Q)
a
~
en.:!
I: I:
0(1)
~E
m E
::s 0
00
o (I)
_ ~ .s:o >
en en - 1010
". c ="0
.:; .;: Q) >. Q) Q) 10 en
Q) :J '-.0 C E ..c > ...
en 0g>.....2t-<<l::s
co >. O-COO(l)J:
0> ..- < .;:: 0.. - ,a I-
a -u~~Q)en_(I)
g' ~ ~ ~ E ~ .~ ~ ;
+:: ..co ..o-UE>I:
i ~u~iiloQ)(I).8:;:;
E -r;-ieno;'32:!::<<lm
O'>coen_o..>en
Q) QQ)~Q)oo.-"OE
:S cac ~ U o.:SS I:
Q) ~ -coOQ)-...eno
..... u..c..cc=O::.-
E".>Q)~uo~-(I)m
Q) ~ ..... '0"(3 :J 0> :::: 1:: :!:: .-
.0 i.....@o>COoenE
enQ)-....o.. >.COU5a.,aE
cO>enenen..-..c (I)
co ~ =! :.c .~ -: 0 .... ~ 00
a c - .- C\I - 0> = >
Q) -g E "5 ~ ~ 'S .s 10 t)
..c ~ C 0 co~c..Q)1;) (1).5
; en Q).g~~ Q5 Q) (1).01:
Q)u gJ Q)=C\I..c EJ: a~
en Q) co c co C\I .~ Q) I- (I) ;:;-
o '~..c 0 E' ..c ....
-2cQ)Q)~~-cJ:(I)
-o..coE -..-0....
c ..c >. 0'> .$ 0.- I: :S
co _en ~ 0 .0 ~ C Q) gJ 0 0
~ C"(3 en en Q) U '-E (I) ....
:J 0'- . 0 Q) Q) E c 1:'"
o ~ -.;:: c E co E.- 0
>. Q) ~ ~ 'co ~ 0 -6 0 i: .;:
:=:s ~S~ o..u coO 0
en ..
I:Ol
(I) (1).5 ~
E a.- en.:!
.... a. (I)
l- I: 10 I: >1: 10 CD I: I:
0 00 10 1::0 :z::2 o CD
~ ~ 0 .~ CD~ ....CD ~E
CD 10 a. a. 10 <<lJ: m E
.... u 0 o (J J:....
10 0 ... ... 0 3:10 :J 0
C ..J 11. <C 11.-' 00
<IJ
~ m ~o .~ID 00 ~
o ~ g~~ c~ 00 ID ~~
~ 0 .- Q) a. ~ = c ~.~ C. <D ~ .9
Q5Q)"O Ctt.~CtS CL~ ~c:.t:.~ o~ e.c:~
~5.~ ~mw ~_ ~ D ~~ ~'~.2
:; ~:s ~ E> ~ ~ ~ ~2 Co ~.~ $:J ~
e,Eg E(ij~CtS>-Z" ctS~~ eQ) IDO:.t::
en Q.) E.c 0 Q.) 1::.C "Q) 0.. ~ Q.) \... \... >-:.j:;:;
1r).c~ 8Q>g-~~.Q.~~Ec -0 ~~g
~gB ~~nE\...~~~8~ 5; ~~~
"'<IJ- 'Co<IJ- .~ CtS Q) Q) -g ~ Q) -5 ~ B t i- :g c e -
(/).c. (/) -g ,6,:: en ~ o.~ 5 ~ ~ .0 ~ ~ 6 a
~uU CtS=:JE.c:.~(ij(/)EQ.) Q.)> .OD
E Q) c.-oQ.)~cn'o>-oo.cCG ->.Q)
.c:g:o g:~.~~CUQ>~Eg ~~ g~E
~~~ ~$7d:5:g~~~~'c n~ ~~~
D~:5 ~~~~E$o.~~~ s= ~~a
i'5~ .~,~~8~~~~m~ aE ~S;
-2"_ 'cQ)-.~EQ)-3:Q)~ U(j) ct::
~~Q)~Q)Q).~D.~E(ij~~_ CtS 6a=
o~$~.~E~~=-g~m$:5 ~! OQ)en
~~8Q)ia~en~Q)~~~'~ .$R ~~m
c E ID E 0...00 Q) 0) ~ E.w U E ~ ~ 0 u:E
ODCQ)-(/).c.c~cuQ)o U a.\... c
oC~:5(ij'E-~'~~Q)\...~~~ o~ Q).~'C
-Q).'t: (/) oQ)Q)"OEQ)xu _.: ~"Oc
~E3:"'OQ)E-..c~8o.cQ)"'O "OQ) kQ)~
Q) c:.t: >- ~ -g 0 D U >-D ~ oo..s Q):5 g-g 0....
._Q.)t=-OID=CtSc(/)-Eo O)rn .c-ID
~-oIDCtSgo>~gECGc(/)o..c ~c cag:5
a: 8 g..9 :::.~ 0.. o..~ Q) Q) 5 ~ (/) 5 E ~.- 13
i'U~-o~~~~~~~~'ffi~ .g& ~~$
-c=ID-CtS.c-O-ocu..cIDO>IDQ) -=c
~CtSCtS~CCL=Q)OCQ)~~g~(/)\... g'~8
~ -E.~.~ ~ ~'~.Q Z:-~_ ~ g.; c. ~ .m"8 ~ a m
(j)Q)~.-.~=EuBwQ)=:JQ)E~~ ..c;CtS
ooEQ)>-o.c:.t:Q)=Q)~wCtS"'O:E-CtS\... -CtSQ)
E'U\...~o.. ~3:..c~:Jw~..c.6E2 ~~-
Q)im~~~~g~2-g.~,Q~5m~ ~~~
~Eg-o~~~~dm~~~e8~~~..cCtSO
B<cu$Ecr..~~~'U~~~>.~c~gIDQ)
Q)c.5~:J~aE:J ,c o..E~!~o~:5\...
a; E1 -e Q> en >. ~ E 0 g CtS ~ g. Q) 0 C: :E e? .~ 0> ~
o~Oc!~~oO~8~Q)~Q)g..cQ)E.5-
=Q)~'--~cO~~5~Ec:5~=o..EE~
c'~u>-c.cQ)Q)ucclDoCtS\...~3:ioCtS'U
..~~ ~0~E.cQ)Q)2$(f)3:.ECI)wt5o~Q)
Q) "0 Q) c t::.(ij E ~ ..c E Q):J ..Q C> ~ ~ Q) 0> I- -g
~~i.Qci&~8~~E~EE~~oEQ>.~~~
-g c a. ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ - 8 g.(j) CtS -;"3 g..9 ~ 2 c.s
oo~E.~'~m~CtSgg~~2~~i~~~~~Q)
oE ww-o~;enwCtSCtSc~O~c~c.c
~oooo.~~tcnCtS~=mt5~~~~CtSwo.9
== g 000 c ~8..~ g"g.Q g CtS.~.~-o ~ s€ E g-
.9! :~ g> g>2 ~ ~ ~.~ ~.~ g ~:6 3: ~ :@ g 3: ~ ~ :E
> .~.c.- ~ Cl.Q) g.w E Eo Q) 85 c W o>ct) :J 0_
~~o~==en~..coE>.c>~:J.ffim.IDCtSO~
g~rn&S~Q)Q)uo~~'(ijQ>~c~~~~o
~(j)a:~CtS(j)~E~~OO~3:~w~roo..mCtSoo
<3.. ...
<IJ
00 -0 C> >
C ~ ot:: ~Q) ~ ~
2 - g~CtS 2~ ~ Q) ~o
m 0 +::l.!E 0.. m - c >.'- 0.. Q) m _
Q>Q)-o mc:<u ~o CtS~g> .Q~ c.c.c
~~Q) -OQ)w Q).2 ~ Q)3: Q).~o
~;~ ~>CtS ~o a.1- ~Q) ~~;
-g .2 ~ E ~ m m ;. ~ g.~ ~ -o'~ ; 6.g
~ ~ Q) ~ -e R~ t.~ (ij ~ n ~ $ ~ Co~:g
Q)O).c ~~ero~.ro:E;8~ 0- oo-c
~~B I-roo..E~E~CI)oE .~ ~~~
~m~ ~~~~~3~~~i ~~ .~~~
~~; ~~~E~t~~:6g. ~~ ~8~
E~.~ C~223:w~~go :6~ a~Q)
~:J~ 2 m.-~roQ)"OEO) ~en c~E
2a.~ CtS1ij~~:a~Eo(ij.e .Ern Cl)O~
~CtSw ~t5~-OCtSEWl-c 13~ ~~c
~~:5 0 -c.~E-o.s:~~ ;g_ "0-0
i'5~ ~.~~B~~~~~~ ~3 ~.9~
-2"- .c<D-.~EQ)-:S:Q)~ U(j) ct
~1-Q)gQ)Q).u-o\...E(ij-o~_ m. ~O=
,Q22~.~E~~~-g~~$S ~! 8~s
:5 i 8 Q) i c aCtS _ Q) <D ~ ~'~ .$ 0 .?:- Q) (f)
c E LO E ~.~ Q) Ol ~ E ~ U E ~ e g. u :6
8-g~~~.~:5~Q>:~~~~ o..~ Q)~'~
~~j;i~~~~~EQ).~~ s~ ~i~
~ ~ >- f5 -g 0 -0 U >--6 ,g ~ Q.~ i:5 g-g ~
'$Q)i~~o~~~cm-Eo ~Ol ~~~
~"8 g. 0 .~ g ~ ~= : ~ g 8 -t5 :;:S m.~ =
cOI--~.coQ)gooE;.~w 8~ ~Q)~
~-g~~:6~~:65~-g~~~~~~ g~c
~CtSm.5c~-Q)OcQ)=-g.~oo\... ~.~o
2 $ ~.5 :8 Q) 3: ~ >.E1 E &.9 0.. <D .m -g 0. C ~
~~.~.~.~~E~Bg:=~~~~~ ~g~
enE<D>-a~Q)=Q)cwCtS~_-CtS\... m<D
c"O\...in ~:S:.c.'E:JCI)~..c'oEB ~.~-
<D~~a.~~~c~2-g.~.Q~~m~ .~~~
KEgi~~~'~~Q)~~~e8~.~~..cmo
B<mt5Err..~g~D@g:5>.a.C~aQ)Q)
Q)c.~Q)~~cE:J.c 0.. -@Q)0'-5\...
aJ ~"E Q> en >- 2 E 0 g (Tj ~ ~ ~ U c :E ~ .~ C> ~
o~oc~n~oO~~mQ)=Q)g~Q)E.~-
-Q)~'--Q)cu~~c~Ec.c.~~o..EE.~
"c .~ t5 ~ c ~ Q) Q) U c 'c ID 0 CtS ~ ~ ~ -g 0 m-o
.. ~ ~ < ~ ~ E..c Q) ~ 2 2 CJ) :s:.E w Q) t5 0 ~ Q)
~DQ)c \...mE~~EQ)~ .Qa~mQ)O)~-g
~~i.Qci&~8~~E~E"E~~oE~.5~~
-g ~ a. ~.E @ Q) ~ ~ - 8 g. (j) ~ :; -5 g. B ~ ~ c .~
Oo~E'~.~m~<ug~!~2c~Q)'U"O>-~~Q)
~ DE woou\...~wQ)CtSm ~OQ)C~CD
~ooO cQ)tca.(Tj~ ffi~5uoomIDoo
~ ~ oo8'~ ~8-~ g-g.Qg ro.~~~~ ~~:5 g.-
.9! :~ g> g>g ~ ~ o'~ ~.~ 5 g = 3: ~ :@ 8 ;: ~ ~ E
~~'~'~~~~~~EEo~~~~~~~~8~
~~~CtS~2~mQ)8~~.5'~~~C!'~~~~
~WOCCL(Tj(j)~==~OO~~o..~~CtSo..mcuoo
<3.. ...
BEN & MARGARET L1AO
3645 FORESTV1EW LN
PLYMOUTH MN 55441-1336
CHARLES R & BEVERLY J JACKSON
2110 CRESTVIEW DR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8009
DOUGLAS G & SARAH P HIPSKIND
2061 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4578
GREGORY S LOHRENZ
2165 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6705
JOHN MARK & JANICE RAE MOBERG
6738 MANCHESTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6700
LARRY A & SUE A MARTY
2117 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6705
OJARS A PAPEDIS TRUSTEE OF 0
PAPEDIS TRUST
2101 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4579
RICHARD & MARIE JENNINGS
2021 EDGEWOOD CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4577
SCOTT D & CYNTHIA L BOEDDEKER
6710 MANCHESTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6700
THOMAS J WOODS
2031 EDGEWOOD CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4577
BRIAN K & JOAN 0 SCHIMKE
2040 HIGHGATE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6704
DANIEL C & JANE A MCKOWN
2171 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4579
DUANE R & SUSAN D MORRIS
343 SYDMOR DR E
BOISE ID 83706-5668
JAYSON C DREHER
2144 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6705
JOSHUA T KRIENKE & CHRISTINA A
KRIENKE
2375 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-7403
LEIGH STOCKER BERGER
2140 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4579
PAUL S TUNGSETH
2051 CRESTVIEW DR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8008
ROBERT A JR & BRENDA KNESS
2121 CRESTVIEW DR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8010
SCOTT D & SONY A B SCHROEDER
2081 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4578
TODD R & AMY A GLEASON
2111 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4579
BRUCE S & HELEN TERESA SMITH
9 HAWKINS DR
NORTHPORT NY 11768-1527
DANIEL J DOHSE & MARIT S LEE-
DOHSE
2058 HIGHGATE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6704
ERIC W & GRETCHEN G LOPER
2076 HIGHGATE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6704
JOHN M & NICOLE L THAYER
2122 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6705
KEITH K & CHRISTINE M CLARK
6620 CHESTNUT LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4580
MICHAEL D & DEBRA H ANDERSON
6681 AMBERWOOD LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4582
PLOWSHARES DEVELOPMENT LLC
1851 WEST LAKE DR #550
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-8567
S R SOMURI & NISHA AGRAWAL
2091 PINEHURST DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-4578
STEVEN S & LORI A ABBLETT
2081 CRESTVIEW DR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8008
TONKA DEVELOPMENT LLC ATTN:
MARY
18001 HIGHWAY 7
MINNETONKA MN 55345-4150
U S HOME CORP
935 EAST WAYZATA BLVD
WAYZATA MN 55391-1849
WILLIAM F & JEANNE A KRAKE
6739 MANCHESTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6700
WILLIAM V & NANCY M
SWEARENGIN TRUSTEES OF
FAMILY TRUST
2080 CRESTVIEW DR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8007
XUEBING FENG & XIAOGUANG
DENG
6724 MANCHESTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6700
YURI FARBER
2135 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317-6705