1986 05 06
Park and Recreation Commission
Minutes
May 6, 1986
L
.
A regular meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was
called to order by acting Chairman McKay at 7:40 p.m. Members
present were Sue Boyt, Jim Mady, Curt Robinson, and Wallace
Mckay.
MINUTES
Boyt made a motion to recommend the approval of the minutes of
April 1st and 5th as prepared. The motion, seconded by Mady, was
approved unanimously.
LAKE PARK EXPANSION MASTER PLAN REVIEW
Mark Koegler was present to the discuss the proposed plan for the
Lake Ann Park Expansion area. He said that he was directed to
develop a site plan and grading plan for this area so that the
City would be prepared to move ahead should funding become
available. He said that a sketch plan for the park expansion
area has been submitted and updated for grant proposals in the
past. He found, however, that the sketch plan is not quite as
accurate as the contour lines shown did not coincide with the
current information. The new plan accurately shows that there is
about 100' less on the new plan than originally shown.
Koegler said that the plan that he was presenting would be the
first of three development phases. He explained that the the plan
included a ballfield, soccer field and parking as identified on
the sketch plan. He said that he would need direction as to how
to proceed if the Commission wished to make changes. For
instance, how much parking does the Commission feel will be
necessary looking at the overall picture.
.
Robinson asked if a large amount of grading was necessary for
this plan. Koegler said that the land is presently rolling farm
land and would require extensive grading for ballfields. To give
the Commission an idea of the amount of grading, Koegler said
that the existing ballfield area was nearly identical to the
undeveloped area.
McKay asked if the existing parking areas were expected to serve
the proposed ballfields. Koegler said that although this plan
included parking to serve this area, it was necessary to identify
how much parking the Commission felt was necessary to serve this
area.
Robinson asked if there could be parking along the soccer field.
Mady asked if there could be parking along the road on the east side.
Koegler said that the area along the south side of the plan was
not as spacious as originally determined and therefore it would .
be difficult to put parking in there with the soccer field. He
said that if the soccer field was made smaller it may be
.
.
.
Park and Recreation Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 2
possible. Sietsema said that in order to be consistent with
the existing parking areas within the park, parking should be
limited to parking lots and not along the roads.
Sietsema said that age limitations are incurred if the soccer
field is made smaller. Under 16 and Under 19 soccer leagues can
only play on regulation size soccer fields. She said that the
original intent of including a soccer field in this plan was to
provide a field large enough for all ages to use. Mady indicated
that he felt it important to keep the soccer field at least 120 x
60 yards. Koegler said that this could probably be done in the
area shown.
Koegler said that a specific number of parking spaces should be
identified. Mady said that with two games per night on one
field, at least 60 spaces would be needed to keep people from
parking on the grass. McKay asked how the cost of 60 parking
spaces compared to 40. Koegler indicated that the additional
cost would depend on how it was done. The first phase would
include grading and aggregate, paving being during a future
phase. He said that, done like this, 60 spaces would not be
substantially more than 40.
Robinson said that the City needs a Little League field and that
it should be included in one of the phases. Mady said that it
makes sense to convert existing field #3 to a Little League field
as it is small, and put in three new softball fields. Sietsema
indicated that a Little League field is small and cannot be used
for adult playas the fences and distance between bases is con-
siderably shorter than softball fields.
Robinson made a motion to direct staff to change the presented
plan to include 60 parking spaces and to make the soccer field as
large as space will allow. The motion was seconded by Boyt and
carried unanimously.
Chanhassen vista Sketch Plan Review
Sietsema said that the Chanhassen vista sketch plan had recently
gone before the City Council for review. She said that the Com-
mission's recommendation to acquire the land around the pond to
the ridge line was taken to the Council at that time.
Sietsema explained that staff was proposing that the City acquire
the area around the pond to the 952 contqur line and a restric-
tive easement to the ridgeline. Staff felt that this would
achieve the Commission's purpose of preserving the ridgeline
without eliminating all of the lots along that ridge. She said
the Commission was being asked to consider this proposal before
the preliminary plat process. The Commission asked if this ease-
ment would enforce the preservation of the ridgeline in its
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 3
.
natural state. Sietsema said that if the Commission was in favor
of this proposal they could recommend any restrictions they
deemed necessary to achieve their purpose.
Mady indicated that he would like to maintain the original recom-
mendation of acquisition to the ridgeline. Sietsema said that if
that was the Commission's position an appraisal would be needed
to determine the value of the property. She said that con-
sidering the number of lots lost, the cost of this property could
very well exceed the park dedication fees. Mady said he would
rather authorize an appraisal and determine at that time whether
the property was worth it.
The Commission discussed this proposal further. McKay was con-
cerned that the Commission was asking for more in this develop-
ment than in past plans reviewed and felt that consistency should
be kept in mind. Boyt said that the developer planned to build
houses with walkout basements along the ridge and felt this would
not maintain the park look.
Mady moved to reaffirm the original recommendation of AprilS,
1986 to acquire the land around the pond to the natural ridge-
line, and to authorize staff to proceed with an appraisal of
such.
Bill Boyt asked to address the Commission on this item. He said .
that he was impressed that the Commission took the time to visit
the site to get a first hand look at it. He asked the Commission
to consider requesting a four foot easement along the streets
and conservation easements along the outlots to be used for
trails.
McKay indicated that it was vital for the Commission to stay with
their recommendation as this would be consistent. He added that
the Commission did not want to get carried away with their
requests, lest they loose credibility.
Boyt seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CHAPARRAL HOMEOWNERS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TOTLOT EQUIPMENT AT
MEADOW GREEN PARK: Sietsema said the Commission had reviewed the
Chaparral Homeowners request to upgrade the totlot at Meadow
Green Park. At that time the Commission directed staff to
research timeframes and costs for a new surface and equipment.
Sietsema explained that pea gravel is the optimal type of play
surface available, although it is somewhat more expensive. She
said the area could be filled this summer if staff is directed to
do so. She said she had discussed this item with Park
Superintendent, Dale Gregory, who suggested that the filled area
be enlarged enough to accommodate any future play equipment addi- .
tions. Therefore, the Commission may want to decide at this time
what additions will be made in the future.
.
.
.
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 4
Sietsema said that the staff report outlined a timeframe for the
installation of the pea gravel and possible additional equipment.
She suggested that the play surface be installed this year for
$1300, swings for older children in 1987 for $750, and an addi-
tional play module in 1988 for $2,180. This would meet the
requests the homeowners had.
Boyt asked if the existing equipment needed to be moved for
safety purposes as suggested. Sietsema said as long as any new
equipment was installed away from the ballfield area, there did
not appear to be a safety threat.
Mady suggested cutting a year off the recommended timeframe by
putting in the play surface and the big swings this year and
install the new module next year.
McKay stated that we should look at an overall totlot plan. He
said he did not like the squeaky wheel syndrome.
Robinson moved to replace the play surface with pea gravel and
install big swings in 1986 and consider any additional equipment
in 1987. The motion was seconded by Boyt and carried
unanimously.
McKay asked staff to put an overall totlot plan on a future
agenda for discussion.
FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUEST: Sietsema said that the Chanhassen Fire
Department was requesting the use of all three ballfields at Lake
Ann Park for their annual softball tournament. The request
included waiving the park fees for the weekend as well. Sietsema
stated that the Fire Department has held their tournament for a
number of years and were very responsible.
Robinson moved to recommend approval of the Chanhassen Fire
Department request to use the ballfields at Lake Ann Park and to
waive park fees. The motion was seconded by Mady and carried
unanimously.
PHEASANT HILL SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: Sietsema said the Pheasant
Hill development lies within the edge of the Herman Field and
Minnetonka West Junior High service area. She said it also lies
south of the MUSA line, which the Comprehensive Plan considers a
low priority area for park development.
Sietsema said that considering the size of the development, that
it is considered a low priority area, and is located within the
service area of existing parks, she was recommending that park
dedication fees be accepted in lieu of park land.
Mady made a motion to recommend accepting park dedication fees
in lieu of park land from the Pheasant Hills 3rd Addition. The
motion was seconded by Robinson and carried unanimously.
Park and Recreation Commission Minutes
May 6, 1986
Page 5
MISCELLANEOUS: The Commission requested that staff review the
park financial status and how the budget process works.
MaKay asked staff to check if the open meeting law applied to the
Park and Recreation Commission.
Robinson moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. The motion
was seconded by Boyt and carried unanimously.
Prepared by: Lori Sietsema
Park and Recreation Coordinator
.
.
.