Loading...
PC 2010 02 16 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 16, 2010 Acting Chair Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Undestad, Kathleen Thomas, Tom Doll and Denny Laufenburger MEMBERS ABSENT: Debbie Larson, Dan Keefe and Kevin Dillon STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Angie Kairies, Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Bobby Jensen 7568 Arbor Lane, Savage Andrew Aller 460 Trapline Lane Jim Schaffran 845 Creekwood Drive Jessie Bent 2779 Century Circle Colleen Dockendorf 2061 Oakwood Ridge Whaley 851 Lyman Boulevard Jack Appert K.A. PUBLIC HEARING: SCHAFFRAN VARIANCE: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL WITHIN THE BLUFF IMPACT ZONE ON PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT (A2) AND LOCATED AT 845 CREEKWOOD DRIVE. APPLICANT: BOBBY JENSEN’S LANDSCAPE JUNCTION. OWNER: JAMES SCHAFFRAN, PLANNING CASE 10-05. Kairies: Good evening Chair Laufenburger, members of the Planning Commission. The application before you this evening is for 845 Creekwood Drive, Lot 1, Block 1 in the Vogel Addition. The property is zoned A2, Agricultural Estate. It’s bordered by, or it’s located south of Pioneer Trail and west of Highway 101 and is bordered by the Bluff Creek Golf Course. The site was platted and the home on the property was constructed in 1985. Much of this site is encompassed by the Bluff Creek Overlay District boundaries as well as the bluff located over much of the site. The Bluff Creek Overlay District was adopted in 1998. Typically a conditional use permit would be required to do any construction within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. However the City Code does have an exemption for properties who’s principal structure was constructed prior to 1998, which again this was constructed in 1985. Therefore no conditional use permit is required. A variance however is required due to the location of the bluff on the site. There is a bluff located on much of the property. The variance is to construct a retaining wall within the bluff impact zone which is the bluff itself and the land located 20 feet from the top of the bluff. There’s an additional setback from the top of the bluff so there’s a total of 30 feet for any structure to be located. The reason for the retaining wall is due to the erosion and runoff problems inherited by the current property owner who purchased the home in 2007. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 Much of the vegetation as you can see from the photograph was removed and has caused severe erosion problems into Bluff Creek. The intent of the wall is to mitigate the erosion problems and runoff. In addition to the construction of the retaining wall the applicant is proposing to revegetate portions of the bluff to further stabilize the land. The second wall is a supporting wall. The wall shown in the red color is a wall that currently exists and was replaced. The wall further down, which is the blue dotted line which follows the 915 contour, will be supporting that wall. In the area between the two walls there is a 3 to 1 slope. The idea of this wall is not to create a yard in the rear of the property but to maintain the natural features of the bluff. It’s staff’s opinion that this wall will be a benefit to the natural bluff, therefore staff is recommending approval and at this time I’ll take any questions. Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Angie. Any questions for staff? Mark? Undestad: No. Laufenburger: Kathleen, how about you? Thomas: Nothing. Laufenburger: Okay, Tom any questions? Doll: Just the item number 10. Zoning permit will be, shall be applied. Kairies: A zoning permit is a permit that is required when a building permit is not required. A building permit’s required for any wall over 4 feet. The proposed wall is estimated to be about 3 feet tall. Doll: That’s all I had. Laufenburger: Okay, thank you. Is there an applicant or an owner that would like to speak to the commission? If not, stand at the podium. State your name please. Bobby Jensen: My name is Bobby Jensen and I am the applicant. Laufenburger: Alright, welcome. Bobby Jensen: It’s a really pretty simple project. It’s a retaining wall. We will revegetate. We did speak with the township, Angie help me? Terry. Kairies: Water Resource. Bobby Jensen: Water Resource to work in conjunction with him for what we can use on the lower side. Actually he thinks we can get some DNR maybe down the line to revegetate and get some money from them to do it. If you could tell from the pictures, it’s got a gully. It’s getting worse and worse and we replaced the top wall and we would like to replace the second wall to mitigate the problem. To protect Bluff Creek pretty much is what we want to do and it’s a pretty 2 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 simple deal. It’s not complicated at all. The wall, I think except for that one point where it meets the two is probably no more than 3 1/2 to 4 feet high. That’s about it in it’s simplicity. Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Jensen. Any questions? Mark. Bobby Jensen: Any questions? Undestad: Just one. The area between the two walls, is that entire area going to get the 3 inches of mulch and? Bobby Jensen: It will be mulch. The whole thing will be mulch and there is a landscape plan on here that we will use which was talked about with staff and approved by staff prior. Basically the vegetation that’s going in is all stuff that will hold on a hillside. Undestad: Okay, thank you. Bobby Jensen: Thank you. Laufenburger: Ah just a moment. Any other questions? Kathleen? Thomas: Thank you. Laufenburger: Tom, I’ll ask you. Doll: No. Laufenburger: I do have a question. Bobby Jensen: Yes. Laufenburger: In the material that the staff provided, we had a picture of the previous retaining wall that looked to be a timber. Bobby Jensen: That’s gone. Laufenburger: Yeah. No, that’s gone and that’s been replaced by a rock? Bobby Jensen: Boulder wall. It’ll be matching. Laufenburger: Boulder wall, okay. Bobby Jensen: It’s a boulder wall and the lower one will be a matching boulder wall. So it’s all natural. Thomas: Yeah, they’ll hold up better too. 3 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 Bobby Jensen: Alright? Laufenburger: Alright. Thank you very much. Bobby Jensen: Thank you. Laufenburger: At this time I’d like to open the public hearing for the Schaffran variance. If there’s anybody in attendance this evening who would like to speak or comment on this, you’re welcome to do so. Stand up to the podium and state your name and address. Not at this time. I will close the public hearing. Okay. Folks, what do you think? Undestad: Looks good to me. Thomas: Makes sense to me. It’s probably the only way that’s going to keep the property in good proportion and not lose more of it to runoff and a boulder wall will be great because I’ve seen timber walls you know explode. Laufenburger: Yeah, as this one apparently did. Thomas: Yes, that’s the you know 20 years or so and they just blow apart. Laufenburger: How about you Tom, any comments? Doll: No. Looks good to me. Laufenburger: I think it’s good stewardship on the part of the new owner. Obviously they inherited something when they purchased the property that wasn’t suitable and wanted to take steps to prevent any further erosion and silt and sediment going into Bluff Creek so I’ll entertain a motion. Thomas: Sure I’ll move. I’ll make a motion. The Chanhassen Planning Commission as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to construct a retaining wall within the bluff impact zone subject to conditions 1 through 10 in the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action. Laufenburger: Okay we have a motion. Is there a second? Doll: Second. Laufenburger: Any further discussion? Thomas moved, Doll seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves a Variance to construct a retaining wall within the Bluff Impact Zone as shown in plans dated Received January 14, 2010 and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Action, subject to the following conditions: 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 1. Erosion control measures are to be installed on the slope and maintained until final stabilization is achieved. These measures should include staggered silt fence with J- hooks or staggered bio-rolls with J-hooks. 2. The applicant shall vegetate the bluff in accordance with the Landscape Plan submitted by Bobby Jensen’s Landscape Junction, stamped “Received January 14, 2010”. 3. No area within the bluff impact zone and below the more upslope retaining wall is to be maintained as yard. 4. No mowing shall occur within the Bluff Impact Zone except as needed per an approved vegetation management plan to control noxious weeds or to establish native vegetation consistent with the surrounding plant community. 5. Recruitment of seedlings from the surrounding seed source trees shall be allowed in the area below the second retaining wall. No efforts shall be taken to control the growth of trees in this area unless they are considered invasive, such as common buckthorn or black locust. 6. Imported soil materials need to be granular with no greater than 10% clay content to allow for infiltration. 7. Location of drain tile outlets shall be such that it does not create a nuisance condition nor promote erosion. Stabilization BMP’s shall be placed at the discharge point and shall be inspected by the Water Resources Coordinator. 8. The applicant shall work with staff to determine the height of the step when connecting the proposed wall to the easterly portion of the existing wall. 9. The retaining wall shall be located no lower than the existing 915’ contour. 10. A zoning permit shall be applied for and approved prior to construction. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: PUD AMENDMENTS: REQUEST TO AMEND THE FOLLOWING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 212, AT THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST INTERSECTIONS OF LYMAN BOULEVARD AND HIGHWAY 101: SOUTHWEST VILLAGE AND CHANHASSEN GATEWAY. APPLICANT: CITY OF CHANHASSEN, PLANNING CASE 10-03. Al-Jaff: Chairman Laufenburger, members of the Planning Commission. On December 1, 2009 staff presented an issue paper to the Planning Commission explaining the need to amend various planned unit development ordinances governing developments within the city. Staff is proposing that in the event the PUD is silent on an issue that we reference the city code. For example the 5 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 city code has been amended to allow LED lights in addition to high pressure sodium’s. If a planned unit development ordinance does not reference the city code, then we would have to amend the planned unit development itself and we have multiple planned unit developments within the city. What staff is recommending is that we amend the planned unit development ordinance to reference the city code. This way the different PUD’s stay current with the city code that’s in effect at this time. The two planned unit development ordinances that we are bringing before you govern the Chanhassen Gateway or Crossroads of Chanhassen development as well as the Southwest Village. The sites are located northeast and northwest of the intersection of Highway 101 and Lyman Boulevard and south of Highway 212. Both sites are guided mixed use. They permit high density residential as well as neighborhood business district type of uses. Staff is recommending that the planned unit development ordinance for Southwest Village be amended to reference the neighborhood business and the high density residential district regulations and permit LED lights as stated on page 4 of the staff report. Staff is also recommending that the planned unit ordinance for Gateway be amended to reference the neighborhood business district to allow LED lights and reference the Neighborhood Business District as stated on page 4 of the staff report and I’d be happy to answer any questions you might have. Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Sharmeen. Any questions? We are not creating any non- conformance with this, is that correct? Al-Jaff: No. If anything we are bringing everything up to current ordinances and just being current with what the city code requires us to do. Laufenburger: I’m wondering if, I know that we’ve had discussion over the last few months regarding LED, adding LED to the lighting possibilities to the, I believe it’s up to the developer’s discretion, is that correct? Al-Jaff: Correct. Laufenburger: Have you, the developers of either of these, will either of these sites, either Gateway or Southwest Village approached you on the LED lighting? Al-Jaff: I have to admit that when Kwik Trip was being constructed they approached the City and they wanted to do LED lights. Unfortunately the ordinance for this development did not reference the city code so we would have to wait 60 days between publication, bringing this ordinance before the Planning Commission. From staff initiating the process til the end, it takes approximately 60 days and they couldn’t wait that long. Laufenburger: Okay. Good. Alright at this time I’ll open the public hearing on the PUD amendments as presented by the staff. Anybody present would like to make a comment or ask a question about this. Please step to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Alright, thank you. There being no comment I’ll close the public hearing. Well folks, thoughts. Comments. Doll: I think sounds good to me. 6 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 Laufenburger: Kathleen, good clean-up I think. Thomas: Yeah, I think good clean-up and the inclusion of LED lights will be helpful for anyone going forward because I know Kwik Trip was very adamant about wanting to put those in but just couldn’t. Laufenburger: Absolutely. Alright. I’ll entertain a motion. Doll: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following motions. One, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Southwest Village amending Sections a and j(l) as stated in the attached ordinance, and adopts the Findings of Fact. Two, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway amending Sections a and k(l) as stated in the attached ordinance and adopts the Findings of Fact. Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. We have a valid motion Tom. Is there a second? Undestad: Second. Thomas: Second. Laufenburger: Alright. Thanks. Thomas: Before we do it can I just change the l to a one? Laufenburger: Sure make note of that. Thomas: That they are j.one and k.one. Laufenburger: That it’s j.one versus j.l and k.one versus k.l. I think Nann will pick that up. Thomas: Thank you. Doll: Glasses need a little adjusting. Thomas: Do you accept my? Doll: I do. Sorry. Thomas: Alright. Doll: I was wondering why it was an L. Laufenburger: Any further discussion? 7 Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 16, 2010 Doll moved, Thomas seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for SouthWest Village, amending Sections a and j.1 as stated in the attached ordinance; and adopts the Findings of Fact. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Doll moved, Thomas seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway, amending Sections a and k.1 as stated in the attached ordinance; and adopts the Findings of Fact. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Undestad noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated February 2, 2010 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS: None. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE. None. Acting Chair Laufenburger adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 7:15 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 8