Loading...
PC Staff Report 09-21-2010PC DATE: September 21, 2010 1 1 CC DATE: October 11, 2010 REVIEW DEADLINE: October 19, 2010 CASE #: 10 -11 BY: AF, RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the site plan for a 39,000 square -foot, one -story warehouse expansion, plans prepared by Phillip D. Johnson, dated May 12, 2010, subject to the conditions of the staff report. And, Adoption of the findings of fact and recommendation." CITY OF CHANHASSEN SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting Site Plan Review for a 39,000 square -foot warehouse expansion — M.A. GEDNEY 6 1W , LOCATION: APPLICANT: 2100 Stoughton Avenue (PID: 25- 0030700) Phillip D. Johnson 911634 th Avenue North New Hope, MN 55427 (763) 545 -1072 phillipdjohnson(a,,comcast.net PRESENT ZONING: 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Industrial Office Park (IOP) Office Industrial ACREAGE: 24.19 acres DENSITY: 0.17 F.A.R. Thompson Avenue Ventures, LLC 102 Jonathan Boulevard North, #200 Chaska, MN 55318 (952) 368 -9009 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi judicial decision. PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The developer is proposing an approximately 39,000 square -foot warehouse expansion to the M.A. Gedney pickle manufacturing facility located in southern Chanhassen. North of the site is vacant land in the City of Chaska and County Road 61. To the east is an electrical substation for Minnesota Valley Electric and a cemetery. South across Stoughton Avenue is Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 2 of 10 the Riverview Terrace mobile home park. To the west across Audubon Road are commercial businesses. Sewer service, at least for the office portion of the building, is provided by the City of Chaska. The processing waste water is treated in holding ponds constructed for the facility southeast of the site in the Minnesota River valley on property owned by M.A. Gedney on the south side of Stoughton Avenue. M.A. Gedney has its own well for water service. The site has been in operation as a pickle factory for several decades. The majority of the site has been previously altered. The building expansion is proposed in an area used for the storage of material and equipment. The proposed expansion continues the use of material from the existing building. In the future if urban services are available for the entire area, the vacant land on the north side of the building will develop, creating a visual barrier to the north side of the building. Prior to the development of the property, the City will have to undertake a feasibility study to determine the cost effectiveness of the extension of utilities to the property, and at that time determine whether the City of Chanhassen or Chaska should provide sewer service to the property. In anticipation of the redevelopment of this area, staff has also had discussions with the City of Chaska about extending Engler Boulevard as a connection to the north. Staff is recommending approval of the expansion subject to the conditions of the staff report. APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXII, "IOP" Industrial Office Park District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments BACKGROUND October 18, 1982, City Council approves Industrial Revenue Bond resolution for M.A. Gedney ( #82 -64) November 1979, City Council approves a sign variance to permit two signs on the industrial site. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 3 of 10 May 1979, City Council approves 41,500 square -foot warehouse expansion, 6,000 square -foot sauerkraut manufacturing and 1,200 square -foot refrigeration storage (Planning Case P -125/ SPR #71 -1). May 1972, Chaska - Chanhassen - Metropolitan Sewer Board enter into agreement to permit M.A. Gedney to continue to use Chaska sanitary sewer system. June 1968, City of Chaska and Village of Chanhassen enter into agreement to annex to Chanhassen and de -annex from Chaska land being purchased by M.A. Gedney for the plant operations. April 1, 1963, City of Chaska and M.A. Gedney enter into a sewer connection agreement. GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The proposed 39,000 square -foot, one -story, 26- foot high expansion would extend the building to the east. The picture shows the area of expansion on the east end of the building. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size Portion Placement The developer is proposing two overhead doors and two entry doors on the south elevation of the building as the initial phase of the expansion. Knock -out panels for an additional five overhead doors are shown on the plans for this elevation. There are two entry doors proposed on the east Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 4 of 10 side of the building and two on the north side of the building. The north elevation also has six knock -out panels for possible future openings, which could accommodate office space. Such conversion would require that sewer service be available for the offices. The developer should investigate the use of clerestory windows around the building expansion. These upper level windows would permit natural lighting within the storage area. Material and detail The developer is proposing the continuation of the white concrete masonry rock face block as the primary material for the building expansion. Bands of smooth face block are located at the top and bottom of the existing building and should be continued on the expansion. The building color is white. To avoid long unbroken expanses, buildings of more than 40 feet in width shall be divided into smaller increments (between 20 and 40 feet) through articulation of the facade. The expansion should investigate the use of columns to help break up the building elevations at approximately 40 -foot intervals. Height and Roof Design The building height is 25 feet to the roof with a one -foot parapet around the building. The roof is flat. At the present time, only a unit heater exhaust pipe is proposed. Mechanical equipment shall be screened if any is installed. No wooden fences shall be used on the roof for screening. Fagade Transparency For buildings that were built prior to September 24, 2001, the city will encourage the use of transparent windows or doors as part of any building expansion. However, provided the expansion, at a minimum, maintains the existing patterns and details of the existing building architecture, the proposed expansion would not be required to meet the 50 percent transparency requirement. The proposed expansion could contain significantly more openings should all the overhead doors and accesses be installed. Site Furnishing The developer will be required to provide at a minimum additional site landscaping. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 5of10 Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. Access to the site is via Stoughton Avenue through existing curb cuts. The site is enclosed in its entirety by a chain link fence. Due to the existing configuration of the building, it is unfeasible to locate loading docks that are not visible by the public. Landscaping In calculating the planting requirement along the south property line, the developer excluded the driveway and electric easement widths. However, City requirement includes these linear distances in calculating the minimum requirement. Buffer yard requirements: The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for buffer plantings. The developer shall increase the number of overstory trees by four. Staff recommends that the blue spruce and Redbud species be replaced from the City's approved list of landscape material. The developer shall submit a revised landscape plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant needs to confirm Red Blaze maple means the same as Autumn Blaze maple. Blue spruce should be changed to a white spruce variety, such as Black Hills. Redbud is marginally hardy. Staff recommends a crabapple variety, Japanese tree lilac or hawthorn for the understory trees. All ornamental trees must be at least one inch in diameter, not two feet tall. Lot Frontage and Parking location The parcel fronts on Stoughton Avenue and Audubon Road. The parking is distributed around the building to the northwest and south side of the existing structure. While additional spaces are shown just to the southeast of the expansion, these are proposed as proof of parking. No additional stalls are shown between the warehouse expansion and Stoughton Avenue. The number of additional parking stalls attributable to the expansion is 20 spaces. Lighting and Signage The proposed expansion installs two wall pac with cut -off shield lighting fixtures on the south side of the building. Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard B — east prop. Line, 250' 2 Overstory trees 1 Overstory trees 4 Understory trees 6 Understory trees 6 Shrubs 3 Conifers 8 Shrubs Bufferyard C — south prop. Line, 218' 4 Overstory trees 1 Overstory trees 8 Understory trees 3 Understory trees 12 Shrubs 11 Shrubs The applicant does not meet the minimum requirements for buffer plantings. The developer shall increase the number of overstory trees by four. Staff recommends that the blue spruce and Redbud species be replaced from the City's approved list of landscape material. The developer shall submit a revised landscape plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant needs to confirm Red Blaze maple means the same as Autumn Blaze maple. Blue spruce should be changed to a white spruce variety, such as Black Hills. Redbud is marginally hardy. Staff recommends a crabapple variety, Japanese tree lilac or hawthorn for the understory trees. All ornamental trees must be at least one inch in diameter, not two feet tall. Lot Frontage and Parking location The parcel fronts on Stoughton Avenue and Audubon Road. The parking is distributed around the building to the northwest and south side of the existing structure. While additional spaces are shown just to the southeast of the expansion, these are proposed as proof of parking. No additional stalls are shown between the warehouse expansion and Stoughton Avenue. The number of additional parking stalls attributable to the expansion is 20 spaces. Lighting and Signage The proposed expansion installs two wall pac with cut -off shield lighting fixtures on the south side of the building. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 6of10 No additional signage is proposed with the expansion. However, on -site directional signage may be required in the future. COMPLIANCE TABLE IOP Gedney Expansion Building Height 4 stories 1 story 50 feet 26 feet Building Setback N - 10'E - 10' N — 238' E - 27' W- 30'S -30' W -33TS -195' Parking Stalls 213 stalls 211 stalls shown@ (Office 511,000 with 8,122 sq. ft. of office equals 41 stalls. Warehouse 1 /1,000 for first 10,000, then 1/ 2,000 thereafter with 123,545 sq. ft. of warehouse equals 67 stalls. Manufacturing 1 /employee on largest shift with 105 employees equals 105 stalls.) Hard Surface Coverage 70% 48.6% Lot Area 1 acre 24.2 acres @ The developer shall show that 213 parking stalls can be accommodated on site in compliance with City Code. MISCELLANEOUS The applicant shall provide information of the product commodity per 2007 Minnesota Fire Code Section 2303 and the proposed storage height in order to determine if fire apparatus access is required to parts of the building. If apparatus access is required but not practical due to topography, power lines, railways or similar conditions, the fire code will accept additional fire protection in lieu of apparatus access. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for additional information. The entire facility must have an automatic fire extinguishing system for consideration as an "unlimited" size building (Ref. 2006 IBC Sec. 507); if any portion of the facility is not sprinkled, fire -wall separations may be required. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Compliance with Minnesota Accessibility Code (MSBC 1341) required. Detailed occupancy and building area- related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further information is provided. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 7of10 The addition encroaches into the electric transmission easement. Staff recommends that the applicant verify with the utility company that the proposed addition is acceptable. A demolition permit is required for building removals that take place before the building permit for the addition is issued. There are wooden bollards around the existing electrical tower. Any bollards damaged or removed with construction must be replaced. DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Chanhassen City Code § 19 -141 states: "These development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." Because of this, the developer must provide for treatment of runoff from the site including rate control and water quality treatment. In an effort to work with the developer in consideration of the existing site constraints, the developer was asked to provide this treatment for only an area equal to the size of the expansion. The consulting engineer suggests that they are considering not employing any stormwater treatment facilities. This would not be an acceptable alternative. A facility must be identified and preserved for the express purpose of treating stormwater runoff water quality per § 19- 144(3) a and b. "Newly constructed or modified detention basins shall provide storage volume below the outlet (dead storage) to allow for water quality treatment in accordance with the following, whichever is most restrictive: a. Water quality features meeting the MPCA NPDES construction permit for permanent stormwater management systems; b. Water quality treatment consistent with NURP criteria (90 percent removal of TSS and 60 percent removal of TP for a standard NURP particle size distribution); and/or" Further, this watershed discharges to an Outstanding Resource Value Water in Assumption Creek and must take steps to provide temperature control BMPs per the same section as well as per the City's MS4 permit and the NPDES Construction Permit. The less costly way to perform this would be to have an infiltration area with a discharge into a grass swale or other non- structural best management practice. Because of this need for a stormwater treatment facility, the total size of the disturbance is unknown but will exceed the footprint of the new addition. If this exceeds one acre, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit will be required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Even if it does not exceed this threshold, a detailed erosion and sediment control plan is required by Chanhassen City Code. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 8of10 Another consideration is that this discharge will leave the City of Chanhassen and enter into the City of Chaska. As a regulated MS4, we are required to account for all discharge points leaving our jurisdiction to assure that we are not contributing to a downstream problem as a result of this connection. It has been communicated by the City of Chaska that while the current stormwater design is not acceptable, an acceptable design on the site is achievable and can be addressed before a building permit is granted for the site plan design. Staff agrees with this assertion. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed 39,000 square -foot, one- story warehouse expansion and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation subject to the following conditions: Fire Marshal: 1. The applicant shall provide information of the product commodity per 2007 Minnesota Fire Code Section 2303 and the proposed storage height in order to determine if fire apparatus access is required to parts of the building. If apparatus access is required but not practical due to topography, power lines, railways or similar conditions, the fire code will accept additional fire protection in lieu of apparatus access. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal for additional information. City of Chaska: 2. A Metropolitan Council SAC determination will still be required and Chaska shall be reimbursed at a rate of $1,157 per SAC unit for providing trunk service to the building expansion. Building Official: 1. The entire facility must have an automatic fire extinguishing system for consideration as an "unlimited" size building (Ref. 2006 IBC Sec. 507); if any portion of the facility is not sprinkled, fire -wall separations may be required. 2. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Compliance with Minnesota Accessibility Code (MSBC 1341) is required. 4. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 9 of 10 5. A demolition permit is required for building removals that take place before the building permit for the addition is issued. Environmental Resource Specialist: 1. The applicant shall increase the number of overstory trees by four. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The blue spruce and Redbud species shall be replaced from the City's approved list of landscape material. 3. All ornamental trees must be at least one inch in diameter. Planner: Mechanical equipment shall be screened if any is installed. No wooden fences shall be used on the roof for screening. 2. The developer shall show that 213 parking stalls can be accommodated on site. 3. The developer should investigate the use of clerestory windows around the building expansion. 4. The expansion should investigate the use of columns to help break up the building elevations at approximately 40 -foot intervals. 5. The addition encroaches into the electric transmission easement. Staff recommends that the applicant verify with the utility company that the proposed addition is acceptable. 6. There are wooden bollards around the existing electrical tower. Any bollards damaged or removed with construction must be replaced. 7. Prior to the development of the vacant property north of the existing building, the City will have to undertake a feasibility study to determine the cost effectiveness of the extension of utilities to the property. Water Resource Coordinator: 1. The developer must provide rate control for an area equal to the addition. 2. The developer must provide water quality treatment for the same area. Gedney Expansion September 21, 2010 Page 10 of 10 3. The developer must comply with any requirements for discharging to an Outstanding Resource Value water. This can be accomplished through infiltration and discharge through non - structural BMPs at a relatively low cost. 4. The developer will need to apply for and receive an NPDES Small Site Construction permit in the event that one acre or more of disturbance results on the entire site. The developer must provide a detailed grading and erosion control plan compliant with City Code. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Site and Project Tabulations. 4. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey. 5. Reduced Copy Site Plan Dated May 12, 2010. 6. Reduced Copy Site Plan with Proposed Plan for Parking and Lighting. 7. Reduced Copy Building Elevations. 8. Reduced Copy Floor Plan. 9. Reduced Copy Grading & Drainage Plan. 10. Proposed Plan for Site Plantings dated 9/9/10. 11. Proposed Planting Schedule for Site Plantings dated 9/9/10. 12. Affidavit of Mailing Public Hearing Notice. gAplan\2010 planning cases \10 -11 gedney site plan\staff report gedney expansion.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION II ' Application of Phillip D. Johnson and Thompson Avenue Ventures, LLC, for Site Plan Review for a 39,000 square -foot, one -story warehouse expansion in the Industrial Office Park District (IOP). On September 21, 2010, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Phillip D. Johnson and Thompson Avenue Ventures, LLC, for Site plan review for a 39,000 square -foot, one -story warehouse expansion for property located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the site plan which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. The property is currently zoned Industrial Office Park District (IOP). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial use. 3. The legal description of the property is: See attached Exhibit A 4. Site Plan Findings: a. The proposed development is consistent with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; Finding: The development of the site is consistent with the City's development guides and comprehensive plan. b. The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements; Finding: The site is consistent with the site plan review requirements. c. The proposed development preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; Finding: The propose expansion extends above a previously altered area enclosing a storage and parking area. The proposed development is in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas. d. The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Finding: The development will be harmonious with the existing site buildings and features. e. The proposed development creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1) An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; Finding: The proposed expansion is in a logical and practical location on the site. 2) The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Finding: The proposed expansion to the building only brings the building coverage of the site to 17 percent. Total hard cover is at 49 percent of the site. Additional landscaping shall be provided. 3) Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and Finding: The proposed expansion continues the use of the existing building material. 4) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. Finding: Access to the site shall remain as exists. Parking areas and circulation comply with code requirements. 5) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: Surface water is being directed to a storm water swale system. The building expansion is toward the electrical substation to the east. 5. The planning report, Planning Case #10 -11 dated September 21, 2010, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. 2 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Case #2010 -11 for Site Plan approval for a 39,000 square -foot, one -story warehouse building expansion located at 2100 Stoughton Avenue. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 20 day of September, 2010. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman 3 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet due South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad; thence running Northeasterly along said right of way line 997.8 feet; thence running due South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point in the centerline of the industry spur track, said point being the actual point of beginning of the tract of land to be described, said point also being in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East, 694.69 feet from said actual point of beginning; thence running Northeasterly along the centerline of said industry spur track and along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left and along the centerline of said industry spur track, a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve and along the centerline of said industry spur track, 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right and along the centerline of said industry spur track 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right of way line of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right of way line; thence running Northeasterly along said Southeasterly right of way line 48.93 feet to a point in the North line of said Section 3; thence running East along said North line 146.4 feet, more or less to the Northwest corner of the parcel of land conveyed to St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Church as recorded in Book 46 Deeds, Page 19, filed August 23, 1950; thence running South at right angles 593.85 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the right and running Southwesterly parallel with the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road, 150 feet; thence deflecting 53 degrees 47 minutes to the left and running Southerly 175 feet to a point in the Northerly right of way line of the Chaska and Shakopee Road; thence running Southwesterly along said Northerly right of way line 1676.9 feet, more or less, to a point in a line drawn parallel with the West line of said Section 3 from the actual point of beginning; thence running North along said parallel line 367.62 feet, more or less, to the actual point of beginning. For the purpose of this description the West line of Section 3, Township 115, Range 23 is considered to be a due North and South line. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve concave to the 11 West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.26 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. E Excepting therefrom the following described tract: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West of the 5"' Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; thence on an assumed bearing of South 88 degrees 52 minutes 27 seconds East along the north line of said Northwest Quarter a distance of 2286.69 feet; thence South 01 degree 21 minutes 25 seconds West a distance of 195.90 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 412.15 feet; thence South 34 degrees 48 minutes 12 seconds East to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to Northern States Power Company by the document recorded in Book 61 of Deeds, page 58, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said westerly line to the northwesterly line of said conveyed parcel; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line to the intersection with the westerly line of the parcel conveyed to St. John's Evangelical Lutheran Church by the document recorded in Book 46 of Deeds, page 19, in the office of the Carver County Recorder; thence northerly along said west line to the intersection with a line bearing North 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 52 degrees 44 minutes 44 seconds West to the point of beginning. (Abstract Property) Parcel 2: That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 115 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 3 distant 1795.7 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof, said point being in the Southeasterly right -of -way line of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Company; thence running Northeasterly along said right -of -way line 997.8 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to American Sugar Company as described in Book 44 of Deeds at Page 8 thereof), which point is the true point of beginning of the tract conveyed; thence running South parallel with the West line of said Section 3, 272.18 feet to a point (which point is the Northwest corner of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof) in a curve having a radius of 694.69 feet, the radius point of said curve being South 46 degrees 57 minutes East 694.69 feet from said point; thence running Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of the tract previously conveyed to M. A. Gedney Company as described in Book 61 of Deeds at Page 251 thereof and along the arc of said curve to the right a 5 distance of 89.72 feet to the end of said curve•, thence running North 50 degrees 27 minutes East tangent to said curve 1270.56 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 599.39 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the left a distance of 307.21 feet to the end of said curve; thence running North 21 degrees 05 minutes East tangent to said curve 151.69 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 532.18 feet; thence running Northeasterly along the arc of said curve to the right 142.42 feet to its intersection with the Southeasterly right -of -way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad, said point being 48.93 feet Southwesterly from the North line of said Section 3 as measured along said Southeasterly right -of -way line; thence running Southwesterly along said Southeasterly right -of -way line of Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company railroad to the point of beginning. Except that part lying West of the following described Line A: Commencing at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 1655.37 feet Southerly from the Northwest corner thereof, said West line has an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 33 minutes 32 seconds West, said point being on the Northerly line of the Chicago and North Western Railroad Company right of way; thence North 51 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds East along said right of way line 1218.17 feet to the actual point of beginning of Line A to be described; thence South 23 degrees 43 minutes 37 seconds East 8.72 feet; thence Southerly 228.75 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 510.00 feet and a central angle of 25 degrees 41 minutes 55 seconds; thence North 88 degrees 01 minutes 42 seconds West and not tangent to said curve 5.00 feet; thence Southerly 96.91 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 505.00 feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds and a chord bearing of South 07 degrees 28 minutes 09 seconds West; thence South 12 degrees 57 minutes 59 seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 143.07 feet; thence Southerly 330.2 feet along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 420.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 03 minutes 13 seconds, and there terminating. (Abstract Property) on Planning Case No. 2 `'t CY - � � CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.Q. Box 147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227 -1100 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION AUG 2 0 2010 PI FAAF PRINT CHANHASSEN PLAVNaNG DEPT •• licant Name and Addre .. ' yr • �r r �r r • r1 r � • Property Owner Name and Address: hh�uW SAWEy+FE�s- L" I J vH0EM�_i3k .id �. &9(** c, Contact:. v'& 6Ltri'vw F-r /,64ld Phone: 37B -9otyg Fax: 952.34$ -9oto Email: NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (lUP) Non - conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review _ Site Plan Review (SPR)* Subdivision* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right -o#- Way /Easements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment _X Notification Sign — $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow for Filing Fees /Attorney Cost ** - $50 CUP /SPRNACNAR/WAP /Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ D 0-4 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Five (5) full -size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8'/2" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format. * *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: C 0t2i.: -le MT 412121_'r I'yQ LOCATION: Off' �i76P Uca L-41�0 0 AVC� 6.0 h knkt 5i r ; ,- ' ?7 195 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: Azt - T . . o En t t2 TOTAL ACREAGE: 2e4 I && A r- fiS WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REAS • - • /I / ✓sue:.+ �2 W21 Ll •_ FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: -L V16e and new employees: D This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and 1 am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 0 1 Y/1 -�Z_ IM /M/ Xr -k L! Cam► �°�; 2� I ey Signature of #icant Date' /'-� "✓/ -v /E-G.awT Izln w> -, III Sign ure of Fee Owner Date g:lplan%fonms development reriew application.doc SCANNED GEDNEY PLANT STOUGHTON AVENUE CHANHASSEN, MN SITE AND PROJECT TABULATIONS a. Size of parcel 1,053, 533 square feet, 24.186 Acres b. Gross floor area, 178,349 sq. ft. main level, includes 2010 const. 440 sq. ft. - service buildings (3) (12,121 sq. ft. covered loading dock) (4,195 sq. ft. second level off.) Total buildings covering site (enclosed space) 178,789 sq. ft. c. Percent and area of site 178,789 sq. ft. of enclosed bldg., includes 2010 const. covered by building. 16.97% building coverage d. Percent and area of site pavement 192,741 sq .ft. covered by impervious surface. other impervious, ie gravel 140,400 sq .ft. Total impervious 333,141 sq ft (no enclosed space) 31.43% surface impervious, pvmt & gravel e. Percent and area of site parking /truck circulation, paved area 1 92,741 sq A. covered by parking area. 18.29% f. Projected number of employees. 105 employees average. As high as 135 employees g. Number of seats if intended - -- use is a restaurant or place of assembly. h. Number of parking spaces 15 -25% of employees walk from the residences to the Employees required. south of the property. normally Zoning ordinance parking requirement; on site office 5/1000 sq ft. - 5 X 8122/1000 = 41 off. 25 manufacturing; employees max shift = 105 mfg. 70 warehouse 10 for first 10,000 sf = 10 whse. 4 1/2000 sf for remainder 113,545/2000 = 57 total required parking spaces = 208 TOTAL 104 i. Number of parking spaces handicap parking spaces of 208 spaces 7 provided including handicapped. Total parking shown = 211 j. Height of all buildings and Buildings are 1 story at between 18' and 25' to the number of stories. rooftop. 4061 sq ft of the building has two stories of office space. k. Breakdown of buildng area: Building areas: office, manufacturing, office 8,122 sq. ft. 2 floors warehouse manufacturing 50,743 some related mfg off. (no retail or showroom area) warehouse 123,545 includes 2010 const. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY 100 0 to ine . ter Nx. Crtmtrp or un ixemium 'fo ST. WIM'd tNA-VILIMAL ED. 4F 1AY ORD A 110'.11A. 17 7": 'N 401 , , , "' , 1. 1113, R. 2.1 K Salim =86-60 0419D . ....... 7 ... .. ...... ... i N .[ /!8 LIFE: ly DEW MI. Cr- UAL �V%M.1.111 N 1 4 MER SEC. 3 T 11. WAT IMMM YirM.0116M LISCA flix VM. NO. 41WS2 df, Lee DRUIL-A "0 $CALF 1 20 < 0 4 Wy tv:, 4 Ed • 16.13 4� / 'IX ep IvCt - ------- 0 0 le A Ile 91- or_ gq - F . 2e . .., V , - Ar. . ..... 1A "'To � g.. . . .......... E � v e�o ... L ,,, . , , '�& ;.w . . ...... ---------- R.510.00 OQ 4 v cg 4 : t 'W, 14, 61 k- OF " v Y'll COKE% 4 4.9 . .. ............ . . .. . . .................. so �a SCAU I' POWT . . .. .... ... . ....... .... 0 A, A v ! 1 rC N j p ar—r w' ♦ ♦ /w» i V ♦ �P gy 2 g t 0, 6 OIL 3 i 2 y 'v% P ' Oe— e l KEY 9R mw 0 4 O _ Z �- 0 s.a O � earsrm• w Q a�� —.� SITE PLAN = Sol-o 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 .11011, 11000' , 6 yS y , ♦/ / i ♦ /,♦ 9$ �aq r o. io 1 osw WALL PAC W/ CUT - 1 50,783.7 s4-ft ABOVE GRADE. S, .......... �•11- �i.l.i.Ll.' +�`�� -LL111 I.Ll1E•1.Li.I.LI.LL1.� 30 s.,lgs0 e• -6-- zes• -o- 34 - - - - - - +pees io 1 osw WALL PAC W/ CUT - 1 50,783.7 s4-ft ABOVE GRADE. I SIDE OF BUILDING M'IgOF '"• + + + N 50,182.5 sq ft STORAGE 1,R + + +� I ♦ '� ., /'lqu.tl 1 OPEN DOCK W1 CANOPY n 4 4- W ' • . ' . 201.85' w ,65PACES. -6 �� I l I I. I i.l l 1"1.1.1.1.1.1 d 1 ' .1.l 27 SPIMS 0 8'-6` - 230 - -0" � 8 2 . SP S *S l -1 ? l.l.� 20 SD S.6 -6 - 170' -0 43 I I 30 SPACES • e' -6 - 266' -0" I T 1 -1 f 11` rt 1 I f I 11' pa1kg ' 1 °f 1 f fi°r9°fi I I' '. • `r .IJ,o►- J.I -J -I- I -i- I.I. �`• r -fir -- _ f l 1 f f r`°(. -f -f t * ACES �f 12SPA.6�•_,6��• ID 10 f �af - -1' rlrl�l,Ir'Ir.�: E taw 756 _- MDIM7G AM MON 20 10 �� 1' Fm \ \ 42,244 sq ft PROPOSED WALL 1 4102.7 sq ft PARKING LK*f NG I.1.1. [] r 2e0amryeR• \� \ \ P\4t I I I 121M 11M6 ''. �► i4 1' - O' SEE GVIL ENGI r N #Tw N m r r 1 r e 6 �cp 13-4911 .� R . 11425.71 L. 61154 - ---.._ . S T TEN A ' N:'U •;.:; sv ,�:.. ::::<, SITE PLAN 1 " 50' - 100 ..... s too ISO 20 0 2 30 0 PARKING 143 PARKNG SPACES ARE SHOWN PROVIDED AT THE EXISTING PARKING AREA. THE DRAWING SHOWS THE PARKING ROUGHLY AS IS PRESENTLY USED. ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE SHOWN NEAR THE NEW ADDITION (38) AND TO THE WEST (30) ON EXISTING PAVED AREAS AS PROOF OF PARKING IF NEEDED. A 2007 AERIAL PHOTO BY MAPQUEST APPEARING TO BE TAKEN IN THE SUMMER AT ABOUT 9:OOAM SHOWS 72 CARS IN THE PARKING AREA. mium D. jouli , @Mkftct 9M 34tr move ■e tre ■ uesAsalk slame:su. 55427. 763 545 -1012 e r LIGHTING 4061.0 sq R WALL PAC W/ CUT OFF SHIELD AT 20' 50,783.7 s4-ft ABOVE GRADE. 2 THUS AT SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING 107'-7 '"• : :479 �- • ♦ .try � I ♦ '� ., /'lqu.tl 121M 11M6 ''. �► i4 1' - O' SEE GVIL ENGI r N #Tw N m r r 1 r e 6 �cp 13-4911 .� R . 11425.71 L. 61154 - ---.._ . S T TEN A ' N:'U •;.:; sv ,�:.. ::::<, SITE PLAN 1 " 50' - 100 ..... s too ISO 20 0 2 30 0 PARKING 143 PARKNG SPACES ARE SHOWN PROVIDED AT THE EXISTING PARKING AREA. THE DRAWING SHOWS THE PARKING ROUGHLY AS IS PRESENTLY USED. ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE SHOWN NEAR THE NEW ADDITION (38) AND TO THE WEST (30) ON EXISTING PAVED AREAS AS PROOF OF PARKING IF NEEDED. A 2007 AERIAL PHOTO BY MAPQUEST APPEARING TO BE TAKEN IN THE SUMMER AT ABOUT 9:OOAM SHOWS 72 CARS IN THE PARKING AREA. mium D. jouli , @Mkftct 9M 34tr move ■e tre ■ uesAsalk slame:su. 55427. 763 545 -1012 e r LIGHTING WALL PAC W/ CUT OFF SHIELD AT 20' ABOVE GRADE. 2 THUS AT SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING M.A. GEDNEY EXPANSION PROPOSED PLAN FOR PARKING AND LIGHTING �, - - -, aYERELaw nEr,qusww _ ovmnowsa,PREn RW�PdI ,. .. e%ie vbLaATEa `Fill W W �_ W MTAL i W FAD OOERS� K¢Ea NrwE WYT•wn%ISI XTBaiquif roc <r�aTO - MriPKUA1EOS ( xvlEE a %loox oaalroaP vw x WQAw m4nq� r • _ r Tm we%ISwen r Fl ll�l STFE SIAIRI L _____ ____ _e' %II•Ne'BaT MF KJ.ipNRPENA fW NNRE I 8¢OOHa0IXa0aP__ Hn R6ME '{`LY c �- - 1 Iz%I. mIVE Ha i IsK 4EnlvEw sEPVIEE aaa st£oE I roux I aacq t cr I I oEr. I I I I I I I t I SrEEL Srzq+. s II sEE I q I I y IfE I I i I� O - I� -- _ I . t ' _ -- -- -- --- --- ---- ----- - - -- -- - - - --I ----- - - - - - _ - - - - - ----- - - � - a - - -- - - - -- � -- d= I p/�/� `Y -- �Aaml wYSS AVe0aCK 0.NOE11'Y• _ EIOM PLAN - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -� —_ _ _ rwsuNREeraLa••.rna M j— ADDRbN T� ea. _ +J BUILDING SOM ElEYATM TwIUI O - 2T -f3• ® 34' -8' O 34' -EI` © 34' -N• O 34.9 © 34' -6' ® 38 -9 ® ny � L lCVOiQL -a' roves au lv'-o- �l �d $v i AIST eFAAklGLMI _ _ , - -,.% _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4J1SreE —cm NJRTN6 SOUM WALL 0.EV IIY-P PaaP W W W ... METAL W W W —T aSJl1iN— 6EV 124' -e• VTiVTi�� X ,' -�;' •� �'' dtAINdRIET� 1 � • � aPA1VW11Fi� NV.INEt4AlEa 9EgVKE 101 Is11NG bx2?B -EIDaRM I I I I I NORTH ELEVATION oowAw fA/J4t ssa siA 1 ` ADDRION ' - BUIL"G NnIwuATEO Swvve J Naort ElfVlar -a• I`s1�i ° � A ' O FAA � aamELEV IOV -r W ________________ ___ ______________________________ _______- ______ _ __ _ _ ____ _ _____________________ f l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I I _ 1 L_ _� _ +_ EAST ELEVATION �/8 ° � -0w nnraExlsnwxrogANx U © _ _ O ® RASIIXIGELEVAi1gIT� QQ - I a , - -,.% ,IMEx JR PaaP � �' ,' '.' ." ''� NITFPUM PaaF �' 1 INlERIOIi ROaE I ARAM JLRIEi ,aPAIN% X ,' -�;' •� �'' dtAINdRIET� 1 � • � aPA1VW11Fi� ------------------------------------- bx2?B -EIDaRM I I I I I NORTH ELEVATION EXISIING ADDRION ' - BUIL"G I a O O J i p§ �i' g ® g O f 5 e 6 S2 © 4 • i � � � STFEt STAIR .. ., :- Gl � 9ifFL BTAR -� � �1� is r CJ � �� � � f 23 &, •. YOM T- OINBUL ltH DR i WNn iRA1EUXMOR ' .. _ 163 d'r�236i0' WXn iPAif - ; 3F3T2.6 /6Q FT. YQU WT SRFEARmr— M . t ' � � � T J3" OC.MO UDOg1 iYFE XORIIWiAt REING Ai EVERY • � � � ' , • REORMdOFWNMTION � iwrn< l vAil °E � ..._.._....l.. .. __... _•.. _______. ___ ____________ - - _____ _ ______ r .. ... .. ......... .............. ...... ........ ....... I lOP.90GT 0EFTl .... ....... ............ -._. __� - _ � � TRYICAL • 3 %RX ITV' ^aTAH.'O31 = - - ; .. ..... :---- - - - - -- --- 1 - - - - -- CON PEOF RG �... - g • SAW mmOCONC0.FTF ! (. f , . FOR OYRROI,KlV1S BEE OET , 6 p � ®j , MIRE RAWAHIdiIVE INDOOR _ � ....................................................................................................................... � ......................!- _...._. ' NME'ILrmWG ABTE[JNIERNIR IO.O' %Ib-O' fgR3 i01LETP00ns KA OV RMEI I _� _ , • •� �,__.. �_ WASTEIINETo NORIN I ! nxEOWG WA. 1 • 10`o'X 10'-0• %A uw b urEl f 1 '------- b ..-a..... .. ..... ...........'- ---'----._,._....... -- ---._.....--------- .-.............. ------ ---------- -._...------------' ._. § $ � � � S' • Fxrsra.v Je'mc`' JoxT -0IEauNn WIIIMETAWING VALL AFA' WHtt fNAW Q � RAW i0fAA0EASNE0E36Ah ........ . .... - .- _.__.__ __..___ - - - +_ __ e a te.. _._.._.. ..____ _. Gfl..___.... .. _ _. _._ .. __..........._._ .. i ... __.. SiEA' STAIR -a aglRiRtlq towct `t . `Y � y ROOK PLAN } J �A oav �a zE• -aw p /8� _ -0 :S i >< S �� S S j� �£ �p I AJGV• -IAmu Jd'•4 � 3W4 BWB 3(-R' �x 318 3fg• �% ,�03b'T<I.1.6av � Id'w , 3 M � irf d 0 32 �g� r i� i 0P 0 P PP 0 PP PP *� 0 0 Z / PP i GRAPHIC so,ua J!"m w 2111111" Adam �. Powerllne Easement AM tnuto • M OI 11111111 /YM a i° ' `• " "°` w" n.. w«uw.u.. .oane.s ,w Iv aid btI~ AN OLY MVVIO1111IML M OWN MO vswr nT. w ww T sa Aw V&*Y a«+ ww.++a..w nW w++ a ay Moab SIRN�11q • El1gY1M111Q, kH:.�M1=�S71 {OG►11O1 MO MIIV 6 VAm K apn..o v e+.wr+r u+aww waw aw iK OOMIRIOIOL p7fa O7YRt 599 Hawthorn Road 4 -1 MY cm NO R 2wL S VK ro xe.a .7 L �,1�.4 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 �� n. snwru I a 1N9 oOORACM A apM W LOCATM K aICR. .a c ee+uw (612) 763 -0300 d+�w uoo uremo nr o++uno n MOKED s '• , • t' =50' 1 1 ij )2.7 sq ft story off @ ;1.0 sq ft "83.7 sq ft 107'-7" 1 988 STEEL? ME SPRINKLE D , ?1' ROOF 42,244 sq ft PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION 2010 39,200 1 n a 1 PROPOSED WALL PAC PARKING LIGHTING 24' ABOVE PVMT 0 121.90' 1 1-01 No a 2. 1 -RB Ma 5-DwAM ea 0 F1 , IA202 AL �StiFC�T ��F lot Im -- ' 7- �'5WEun S 55 - 0 S 3-BSp ;� 1 3-Rdbd 3 -WEun — co etL 0 if JON -RBMap % . - -Rdbd �0 tK A o or5-DwAM WNW EN A VENUE "Wk PARTIAL SITE PLAN an 1 50 - 0 " so [ I I I I 0 I 51 100 1 2 0 250 300 --- M.A. GEDNEY EXPANSION MUM I JIMIK ardOM PROPOSED PLAN FOR SEPT 9, 10 IMI 34M wan nm ■imm"ll, mdmsft 55427, X3 M-1872 SITE PLANTINGS 1 OF 2 r: NOTIE: Buf f er requirement C.6 -Off /Ind to Road includes two existing drive entrances of 50' and 20'. This; length also includes a length of about 18 feet that is inside the Excel transmission tower clear zone (no change of grade within 25' of the tower). The remainig lengthof property to lant within is reduced to 130 lineal feet. Buffer requirement B.6 -Off /Ind to Off /Ind is adhajacent to an Excel power station. I have used the distance of 250 feet back to the building line for the tabulation of plantings. This will screen the building face and driving area from traffic on Stoughton Avenue as effectively as can be done. The portion of the property to the north is yet to be developed and I do not think should be included in the planting requirement at this time. MIWF 11'MI1, l11i 1 S4t5a W left F PLANTINGS SYMBOL A BREV COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY nopy tree deciduous RBMao RED BLAZE MAPLE 2 1 /2" 2 TRUNK w c onifer BSp BLUE SPRUCE 6 FEET 3 understory deciduous Rdbd REDB D 2 FEET 9 shrubbe WEun WINGED EUONYMUS 2 FEET 8 DwAM DWARF AMUR MAPLE 2 FEET 11 other BLEND PEAT MOSS INTO SOILS AT PLANTING ROOT BALDEEP WOOD MULCH OVER PLANT City of Chanhassen TABLE OF BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS Off/ Ind to Off /Ind. (Sideyard) BUFFERYARD; B.4 (30' depth, 250 LINEAR FEET) SHRUB UNDERSTORY TREE CANOPY TREE CONIFER REQUIRED 2/100' - 5 2/100' - 5 1/100' - 2.5 TOTAL PLANTINGS 12.5 SHOWN 8 6 1 3 TOTAL PLANTINGS 18 Off /Ind to Road (Frontyard w/T.ransmission tower and drive entranc(. BUFFERYARD; C'6 (30' depth, 130 LINEAR FEET) SHRUB UNDERSTORY TREE CANOPY TREE CONIFER REQUIRED 5/100' - 7 5/100' - 7 2/100' - 2.6.. TOTAL PLANTINGS 16.6 SHOWN 11 3 1 - TOTAL PLANTINGS 15 M.A. (EDNEY EXPANSION PROPOSED PLAN FOR SEPT 9, 10 N111NOS1�Nli, �1 NW, X8 545 -1612 - SITE PLANTINGS 2 OF 2 City of Chaska Memorandum To: Bob Generous - Chanhassen From: Bill Monk — City Engineer Date: September 7, 2010 Subject: Gedney Warehouse Expansion Chaska does service the Gedney administrative offices with sanitary sewer. I am not aware that service has been extended into the existing warehouse and according to the plans, service is not intended to be provided to the proposed addition. A Met Council SAC determination will still be required and Chaska reimbursed at a rate of $1,157 per SAC unit for providing trunk service to the building expansion. I must admit, I am not aware of the parking situation at Gedney's but on -site parking of trucks and vehicles must be required and on- street parking prohibited. As noted in an email I received from Terry Jeffrey, the stormwater management plan needs work, however, treatment requirements can be achieved on -site. Please let me know if you have any questions. WM:ms ONE CITY HALL PLAZA/CHASKA, MN 55318- 1962/PH: (952) 448 -2851/ FX: (952) 448 -9300 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 9, 2010, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for the Gedney Warehouse Expansion — Planning Case 2010 -11 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. en J. En el ardt, Dcoty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this L3 day of So D 6-r , 2010. Notary. P KIM T. MEUWISSEN Q� Notary Public- Minnesota MY Commission ''s: Expires Jan 31. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review for a 39,000 square -foot Proposal: warehouse expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park IOP — M.A. Gedne Applicant: Phillip D. Johnson, Architect Property 2100 Stoughton Avenue Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /sery /plan /10- 11.html If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952 - 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday p rior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review for a 39,000 square -foot Proposal: warehouse expansion on property zoned Industrial Office Park IOP — M.A. Gedne Applicant: Phillip D. Johnson, Architect Property 2100 Stoughton Avenue Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens Public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /sere /plan /10- 11.html If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Robert Questions & Generous by email at bgenerous @ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by Comments: phone at 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday p rior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. ALL STEEL PRODUCTS CO ALLEN L BRAKEMEIER BRECONWOOD VILLAGE LLC PO BOX 73 450 LAKE VIRGINIA TRL 6500 CITY WEST PKWY #315 CHASKA MN 55318 -0073 EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -9772 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 -7732 CHASKA CITY CHASKA ECONOMIC DEV AUTH CHASKA GATEWAY LLC 1 CITY HALL PLAZA 1 CITY HALL PLZ 401 ROBERT ST N #225 CHASKA MN 55318 -1962 CHASKA MN 55318 -1962 ST PAUL MN 55101 -2008 CONNIE K PHILLIPS COSSETTE FAMILY LP NO 1 DEAN R & ELEANOR J WEST 1180 STOUGHTON AVE 2170 MIDLAND VIEW CT 1160 STOUGHTON AVE CHASKA MN 55318 -2150 ROSEVILLE MN 55113 -5304 CHASKA MN 55318 -2150 DOCTORS PARK PARTNERSHIP FAYETTE FUNDING LTD PTRSHP FERRELLGAS LP 8500 TIGUA LN PO BOX 14000 ONE LIBERTY PLAZA CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9615 LEXINGTON KY 40512 -4000 LIBERTY MO 64068 -2970 GARY W DUNGEY HARRI J RINTA KENNETH J SCHULTZ 1910 STOUGHTON AVE 18025 KELLY LAKE RD 1026 SUNNY RIDGE DR CHASKA MN 55318 -2218 CARVER MN 55315 -9667 CARVER MN 55315 -9355 LEE J LAMPHEAR MINNESOTA VALLEY ELEC CO -OP MRS PROPERTIES LLC 1260 STOUGHTON AVE 125 MINNESOTA VALLEY DR 1312 CREST DR CHASKA MN 55318 -2153 JORDAN MN 55352 -9369 CHASKA MN 5531 8 -1 71 0 RETIRE II LLC REGAL CAR WASH XXXII ASSOC LLC RENEE JEAN OAKLEY 8500 COUNTY ROAD 42 8698 E SAN ALBERTO DR 1170 STOUGHTON AVE SAVAGE MN 55378 -2249 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 -4306 CHASKA MN 55318 -2150 RONALD R OLSON SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC ST JOHNS EVANG LUTH CHURCH 6970 INWOOD RD 539 MAIN ST S 300 4TH ST E COLOGNE MN 55322 -9167 FINDLAY OH 45840 -3229 CHASKA MN 55318 -1830 STAR GROUP LLC STONE ARCH I - CHASKA LLC THOMAS A & STACY L DERNER 200 HIGHWAY 4 S 275 MARKET ST #439 4460 QUAAS AVE SLEEPY EYE MN 56085 -1324 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 -1658 WATERTOWN MN 55388 -9347 TOM A & S C L DERNER PHILLIP D. JOHNSON ARCHITECT JOEL BUTTENHOFF - THOMPSON 4460 QUAAS VE 9116 34TH AVE AVE VENTURES LLC WATERTO N 55388 -9347 NEW HOPE MN 55427 CH JONATHAN BLVD N #200 CHASKA MN 55318