1 Variance 2051 Boulder RoadCITY OF
STAFF
REPORT
BOA DATE: 7/22/97
CC DATE'
CASE #: 97-8 VAR
By: Kirchoff:v
PI~OPOSAL:
.
I~OCATION:
APPLICANT:
PRESENT ZONING:
ACREAGE:
DENSITY:
A seven (7) foot variance from the sixty (60) foot wetland setback fbr the
construction of a.deck.
2051 Boulder Road
(Lot 2, Block 6, Stone Creek Fourth Addition)
Tom Goulette (contractor)
3010 Bluffs Lane
Mound, MN' 55364
472-4211
Jonathon Turner (property. owner)
2051 Boulder Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
474-4022
RSF, Single-Family Residential District
Approximately 16,668 sq. ft. (.38 Acres)
N/A
td
/~DJACENT ZONING
AND LAND USES:
WATER AND SEWER:
PHYSICAL CHARACTER:
2000 LAND USE PLAN:
N: RR, Rural Residential
S: A-2, Agricultural Estate District
W: A- 2, Agricultural Estate District
E: PUD, Planned Unit Development
Available to the site
This site contains an existing home and a Type A wetland.
Low Density Residential
N
8700 --
Lyman
Lake D
2~umer Variance
J~ly 15, 1997
P~ge 2
P~PPLICABLE REGULATIONS
S~ection, 20-406, requires that a natural wetland shall have a forty (40) foot setback from the edge
of a twenty (20) foot buffer strip (Attachment 2).
~ACKGROUND
In 1992 Stone Creek subdivision was approved. It was noted in the staff report that two Type A
wetlands are located within this development. Type A wetlands are still in their natural state
at~d typically show little sign of impact from surrounding land usage. The vegetative community
:
of these wetlands are characterized by a diversity of plant species with mixed dominance of
species. Other key factors include: presence of natural indicator species, good wildlife habitat,
and being aesthetically pleasing (Section 20-403). One of the wetlands is located on the subject
p?operty. According to the staff report, this wetland is approximately 2,945 square feet.
Stone Creek Fourth Addition was approved in 1994. Thirty-five of the lots in this addition have
tree conservation easements and 9 have wetland setbacks. Those lots with tree conservation
easements were given a 10 foot front yard setback variance, hence, a residence could be built up
to a 20 foot front yard setback. The subject residence (Lot 2) was only constructed 25 feet from
file front property line. The 60 foot wetland setback is located 5 feet from the rear of the home.
The adjacent lots, Lots 1 and 3, have 30 foot front yard setbacks and a wetland setback.
A~NALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a 7 foot variance from the 60 foot wetland setback to construct a 12
foot by 27 foot (324 sq. ft.) deck on the rear of the home. A tree conservation easement and
Wetland setback are located on the rear of this lot. In 1996, the home was constructed only 25
feet from the front property line, leaving only 5 feet in the rear yard for a future deck. If the
home would have been built at the 20 foot setback, a 10 foot deck could have been constructed
and the variance alleviated. The applicant did mention that the home was not built at the 20 foot
satback because they did not want to be closer to the street than the adjacent homes.
It is important to maintain a balance between the interests of nature and the property owner. The
p~otection of a natural wetland and quality trees (e.g. oak, maple and hickory trees) was of
overwhelming importance when this subdivision was approved, hence the tree preservation
easement and the 60 foot wetland setback. The future property owner's interest was also
considered as the 10 foot front yard setback variance was approved as a condition of this
addition.
Turner Variance
July 15, 1997
Page 3
Staff does not believe that a hardship has been demonstrated and does not recommend approval
of this variance. In addition, staff does not feel that it is appropriate to approve two separate
variances for a parcel that exceeds the lot area requirements for the RSF - Residential Single
Family district.
FINDINGS
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
ao
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue
hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size,
physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a
majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to
allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in
this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of
this variance. The property has been put to reasonable use as a single family home and
attached garage exists on this site. The applicant has an opportunity to use and enjoy their
property without the deck.
bo
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: The condition upon which the application is based, the wetland setback, does
exist on other lots in this subdivision as well as other lots in the City. An additional Type A
wetland is located in Lots 9 - 13, Block 2. These lots have wetland setbacks ranging from
60 feet to 97 feet.
C~
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
Finding: The variation does not appear to be based upon a desire to increase the value or
income potential of the property.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship~
q~u. rner Variance
J~ly 15, 1997
Phge 4
e~
Finding: Staff believes that the hardship is self-created. The home could have been shifted
closer to the street when it was constructed in 1996 without a variance. The additional 5
feet would have allowed for a deck 10 feet in depth.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other improvements in the neighborhood.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood.
Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase
the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair the
neighborhood.
R~COMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustments and Appeals adopt the following motion:
·
".The Board of Adjustments and Appeals denies the request for a 7 foot variance from the 60 foot
wetland setback for the construction of a 12 foot by 27 foot deck based upon the findings presented
irt the staff report and the following:
o
The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship that would warrant the granting of a second
variance.
2. The applicant has an opportunity to enjoy a reasonable use of the property."
A.TTACHMENTS
1. Application
2. Article VI, Wetland Protection
3. Site Plan
4. Property Owners
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
~ECE!VED
J.UN g 6 1997
CHANHA$Sh-J~ ~'~,~u~ dF. PT
¢,PPLICANT: "T-c) ~ ~ c) cL/.. F_--.'TT E:
ADDRESS:. ~ C) I o '~L-L& Fi:: ~J /..AidE.
/
OWNER:
ADDRESS:
~H&N LW~E~
TELEPHONE:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Coaditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
Non-conforming Use Permit
__ Planned Unit Development*
__ Rezoning
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
Variance
Wetland Alteration Permit
__ Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
. Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Notification Sign
Site PJan Review*
Subdivision*
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
($50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/VVAP/Metes
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $ "7 .~'. ~
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
applicalion.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
'"Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy of
Iransparency for each plan sheet.
'~ Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE- When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
].EGAL DE ICRIPTION
-J'OTAL ACREAGE
%NE31.AND$ PRESENT
X YES
NO
PRESENTZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
)=~qESENT ~I.~ND USE DES)GNAT)ON
]::~F_OUF_~ LAND USE DESIGNATION
REASON FOR THIS REQUEST
-~OK~T t~ ADD~TIoAJ
'This applicalion must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans reft. uired by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A d~n'n~nation of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
~ of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
Thi~ is lo ceC~j, that ! am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responSible for complying with
all City requit, ernents with regard to this request. This applicat, ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City shoed contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
,this applicaIi0n and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I ,wa keep myseff informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand ~at additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorkatior~to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
The city hereby notilies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
· equirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension roi' development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensim~s ~e approved by the applicant.
Sf.g ~nature of Applicant
)nature z~f Fee Owner
'~l~DnRel:e~ved on ~ )~"q'¢/qWFee Paid ~'/5'~0
Date
uate
Receipt No. ~~5~
-The appTica~ should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
~r-~ / ~ ,.-,,
'JUN 2 8 1997
CHANH~.~,'~ '~ r~_ ..... ',,,,~ uEPT
ZONING § 20-402
ARTICLE VI. WETLAND PROTECTION*
Sec. 20-401. Findings intent; rules adopted by reference.
{a) Wetlands help maintain water quality, serve to reduce flooding and erosion, act as
sources of food and habitat for a variety of fish and wildlife, and are an integral part of the
community's natural landscape. Wetlands provide the aesthetic benefits of open space and can
be used to provide a natural separation of land uses. It is the intent of this article to establish
a policy of sound stewardship through coordination of regulations which conserve, protect,
enhance, and result in the no net loss of these environmentally sensitive resources. In addi-
tion, it is the intent of the city to promote the restoration of degraded wetlands.
Co) The intent of this article is to avoid alteration and destruction of wetlands. When this
is not feasible, mitigation must be provided to recreate the lost or altered wetlands value and
function.
(c) This article is adopted in part to implement the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991
(Minn. Laws 1991, Chapter 354, as amended), and the accompanying rules of the Minnesota
Board of Water and Soil Resources (Minn. Rules Chapter 8420, as amended).
(d) This article incorporates by reference the Act and the Rules. Terms used in this article
which are defined in the Act or the Rules have the meanings given there.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92; Ord. No. 202, § 1, 4-25-94)
Sec. 20-402. Purpose.
The purpose of this article is to assure the general health, safety, and welfare of the
residents through preservation and conservation of wetlands and sound management of de-
velopment by:
(1) Conducting an inventory and classification of all wetlands within the city and main-
tenance of a comprehensive set of official city maps delineating wetlands.
(2) Establishment of wetland regulations that are coordinated with flood protection and
water quality programs under the Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan.
{3) Requiring sound management practices that will protect, conserve, maintain, en-
hance, and improve the present quality of wetlands within the community.
(4} Requiring measures designed to maintain and improve water quality in streams and
lakes.
(5) Protecting and enhancing the scenic value of wetlands.
*Editor's note-Section I of Ord. No. 180 amended Art. VI in its entirety to read as
herein set out. Prior to amendment, Art. VI contained §§ 20-401-20-409, 20-421-20-424,
20-436-20-441, which pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80,
adopted Dec. 15, 1986; Ord. No. 80C, adopted Oct. 5, 1987; Ord. No. 98, adopted Nov. 28, 1988;
Ord. No. 110, adopted Aug. 28, 1989; Ord. No. 133, adopted Nov. 5, 1990; and Ord. No. 141,
adopted Mar. 11, 1991.
~ ~upp. No. 7
1188.1
§ 20-402
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
(6)
(7)
(9)
(10)
(11)
Restricting and controlling the harmful effects of land development on wetlands.
Allowing only development that is planned to be compatible with wetland protection
and enhancement.
Providing standards for the alteration of wetlands when alteration in allowed,
Mitigating the impact of development adjacent to wetlands.
Educating and informing the public about the numerous benefits and features of
wetlands and the impacts of urbanization.
Obtaining protective easements over or acquiring fee title to wetlands as appropriate.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92)
Sec. 20-403. Delineation of wetlands.
(a) Generally. Wetlands shall be subject to the requirements established herein, as well as
restrictions and requirements established by other applicable city ordinances and regulations.
The Wetland Protection Regulations shall not be construed to allow anything otherwise pro-
hibited in the zoning district where the wetland area is located.
[b) Boundaries; maps. A wetland is land that meets the definition of "wetlands" set forth
in this article. Wetland boundaries and wetland types, as established by officially adopted city
maps, shall be prima facie evidence of the location and type of wetland. The official maps shall
be developed and maintained by the planning department. If an applicant questions whether
s wetland exists or disputes its delineation, the applicant shall have the burden to supply
detailed information for reviews supporting the applicant's position. The applicant shall pro-
vide appropriate technical information, including, but not limited to, topographical survey and
soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact wetland boundary. The planning
director shall make a determination to maintain the officially designated wetland boundary or
if the boundaries need to be corrected on city plans and maps based upon the data that is
supplied. Data for wetland determination shall be certified by a registered engineer, surveyor,
or a qualified wetland consultant. The applicant may appeal the planning director's determi-
nation of the wetland boundary and type to the city council.
(c) Wetland types. This article establishes three (3) wetland types and one body type:
(1) Wetlands, ag/urban. Wetlands that have been influenced by agricultural or urban
(residential, commercial, or industrial) land usage are called ag/urban. Influences
include: over nutrification, soil erosion and sedimentation, and water quality degra-
dation. As a result of these influences there is a loss of plant species diversity, over-
crowding and domination by invasive species such as reed canary grass, and reduction
in wildlife habitat.
(2) Wetlands, natural~ Natural wetlands are still in their natural state and typically
show little sign of impact from surrounding land usage. The vegetative community of
these wetlands are characterized by a diversity of plant species with mixed dominance
of species. Other key factors include: presence of natural indicator species, good wild-
life habitat, and being aesthetically pleasing.
Supp. No. 7 1188.2
ZONING § 20-406
(3)
Wetlands, pristine. Wetlands that exist in a natural state and have special and
unusual qualities worth protecting at a high level are called pristine. These qualities
include: outstanding vegetation' community, native species population, rare or un-
usual species present, and habitat for rare wildlife species.
(4) Utilized. Utilized water bodies created for the specific purpose of surface water runoff
retention and/or water quality improvements. These water bodies are not to be
classified as wetlands even if they take on wetland characteristics. Wetland alteration
permits shall not be required to undertake work on these water bodies.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92)
Sec. 20-404. No net loss.
To achieve no net loss of wetland, except as provided under section 20-416 of this article,
or authorized by a wetland alteration permit issued by the city, a person may not drain, grade,
fill, burn, remove healthy native vegetation, or otherwise alter or destroy a wetland of any size
or type. Any alteration to a wetland, permitted by a wetland alteration permit must be fully
mitigated so that there is no net loss of wetlands.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92; Ord. No. 202, § 2, 4-25-94)
Sec. 20-405. Standards.
The following standards apply to all lands within and abutting a wetland:
(1) Septic and soil absorption system must be a setback minimum ofseventy-five (75) feet
from the ordinary liigh water mark of the wetland.
(2) The lowest ground floor elevation is two (2) feet above ordinary high water mark of the
wetland.
(3) Docks or walkways shall be elevated six (6) to eight (8) inches above the ordinary high
water mark or six (6) to eight (8) inches above the ground level, whichever is greater.
(4) Access across a wetland shall be by means of a boardwalk and only upon approval of
a wetland alteration permit.
(5) The city's Best Management Practices Handbook shall be followed.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92; Ord. No. 202, § 3, 4-25-94; Ord. No. 240, § 11, 7-24-95)
Sec. 20-406. Wetland buffer strips and setbacks.
(a) For lots created after December, 14, 1992, (date of ordinance adoption), a buffer strip
shall be maintained abutting all wetlands. All existing vegetation adjacent to a wetland shall
be left undisturbed and applied toward the buffer strip unless otherwise approved by city
council. Buffer strip vegetation shall be established and maintained in accordance to the
following requirements. If the buffer area is disturbed, plant species shall be selected from
wetland and upland plants to provide habitat for various species of wildlife. Buffer strips shall
,be identified by permanent monumentation acceptable to the city. In residential subdivisions,
a monument is required for each lot. In other situations, a monument is required for each three
u~p. No. 8 1188.3
§ 20-40~
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
hundred (300) feet of wetland edge· The buffer strips and structure setbacks shall meet the
following standards:
·
Wetland Type Pristine Nat,zr.l- Ag/Urban
Principal Struc- 100' 40' measured 40' measured
ture Setback from the out- from the out-
side edge of the side edge of the
buffer strip buffer strip
·
Buffer Strip 20--100' 10--30' 0--20'
Buffer Strip 50' 20' 10'
IvHnimum Aver-
age Width
% of Native Entire Entire Optional
~'egetation in
Buffer Strip
Utilized
O'
Ot
Optional
:31' '~ I El)GE
The dimensions of the buffer strips may be adjusted by the city based upon the quality of the
wetland, local topographic conditions, and the type and design of development being proposed.
The table above provides minimum and maximum dimensions for the buffer strip. The use of
a meandering buffer strip to maintain a natural appearance is encouraged. Where roadways
are constricted next to a wetland, the average buffer strip width for the adjacent wetland shall
Sup;) No. 8 1188.4
ZONING § 2O-4O7
be maintained. Structure setbacks are also described in the table. On single-family subdivi-
sions in the ILSF district, the applicant must demonstrate that each lot provides sufficient area
to accommodate the applicable front yard setback, sixty-foot by forty-foot deep building pad,
and a thirty-foot rear yard area. All of these elements must be provided outside of designated
wetland and buffer strip areas.
(b) For lots of record on December 14, 1992 (date of ordinance adoption) within wetland
areas and for lands abutting a wetland area, the following minimum provisions are applicable
unless alternative plans are approved by the city under a wetland alteration permit:
Setback Princi-
pal Structure
Pristine Natural Ag / Urban Utilized
100' 75' 75' 0'
The city may approve reduced wetland setbacks as outlined in subparagraph (a) above.
(Ord. No. 180, § 1, 12-14-92; Ord. No. 240, § 12, 7-24-95)
Sec. 20-407. Wetland alteration.
(a) An applicant for a wetland alteration permit shall adhere to the following principles in
descending order of priority:
(1) Avoiding the direct or indirect impact of the activity that may destroy or diminish the
wetland;
(2) Minimizing the impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the wetland activity and
its implementation;
(3) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected wetland
activity and its implementation;
(4) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by Preservation and maintenance
operations during the life of the activity; and
(5) Replacing unavoidable impacts to the wetlands by restoring or creating substitute
wetland areas having equal or greater public value as set forth in Minnesota Rules
8420.0530 to 8420.0630.
(b) A wetland alteration permit shall not be issued unless the proposed development
complies within the provisions of the Mitigation Section of this article, as well as the
standards, intent, and purpose of this article.
(c) Chemical treatment of wetlands. The use of algae-controlling chemicals in any stormwater
ponds or wetlands is prohibited.
(d) Nonchemical treatment of wetlands.
(1) Other types of nonchemical algae-controlling treatments include bacteria, aerators,
skimmers, dyes, etc.
(2) The city must be notified prior to the use of any form of treatment.
Supp. No. 9
1188.5
·
~ :F;SF.,",:-H~t~S HAGEN HOMES
.\
PROPORFD FI FVATION%:
GARAGE FLOOR =
TOP OF BLOCK =
LOWEST FLOOR =
TOP OF FOOTING
/
\
t,,
1023x6 ~ENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. L_.t. ,
I~ DENOTES WOOD HUB AT 11 FOOT OFFSET. ,(
¢1025) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION. /
/ DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE. DIA:92x28.3=96.25
Lot 2, Block 6, Stone Creek Fop~' Addition, Carver County, Minnesota.
scol~ ~"= 30' I D~own ~y: dong Book: Pcj.' I Disc: l UGh No.:8442
o Denotes Iron Set}e Denotes Iron Found Beorings shown are on an assumed datu
we hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of
a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the
ifl°cati°nany, from°f allorbUildingS,on soid land,if any, thereon, and all .'~L ~~:~, .,~'. ,
' I
· , ,
. - \
',t:;
' ~ ' __':!"-~'\
.~-"~\ ,,. ~ .--,
\ \ \
~ ~ \ "::J.;'.k
· .
' \ ~ ,'> ~ "
\ , '.;" \ \
-..t,., \ \ ",%- ~ ,,:".",, .¢' x
· . \ ,,:,~.x. \
\ \ \ \
~ % .,...x,, '-\
..,.' \ \ ./ \ '}L.~ \\ I
',_',' " '~ '" \ "::';;'-",
\ '"¢'
..-'%, ~ "%, ',.:, \, ,,
/ x ¢ \ \
~ ,.:, \ ';'.
\ ':i::. \ ";'- ",
,~ ...~ '"', , \ ii'
C,'. 'X'::' x
Il
,k, I I \ ~ '
,,? % ', -
· '~ \\ \\ ',.'~.
1
I !
t
· / I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
Tuesday, July 22, 1997
at 6:00 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
690 Coulter Drive
PRO JEt :T: Variance from the Wetland Setback
DEVELOPER: Tom Goulette
LOCATION: 2051 Boulder Road
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a development proposed in your area. The
applicant, Tom Goulette, is requesting a 7 foot variance from the 60' wetland setback for the construction
of a deck on property zoned RSF and located at 2051 Boulder Road.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting,
the Commission Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. The commission
will thenmake a recommendation to the City Council.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City
Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit
written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting.
Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice Of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on July 17, 1997.
AUDOBON 92
15241 CREEKSIDE CT
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346
RICHARD D & CHRISTINE M BALM
2093 BOULDER RD
CHANRASSEN, MN 55317
STEPHEN PETERS
2000 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
AUDOBON 92
15241 CREEKS11::TE CT
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55348
.
: .
GERALD W & JANICE K CRAWFORD
2079 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
DEAN BUSSEY
2145 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
WILLIAM J & ANGELA J LAWRENCE
2122 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHARLENE GRABOWSKI
8426 STONE CREEK CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
DAVID VERVETTE
2133 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ROBERT J & CHRISTINE P, FINN
2108 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
STEVEN M & MARGARET F EMERSON
8409 STONE CREEK CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PAUL & LINDA SPECKMAN
2121 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MIKE & CYNTHIA PLESK:O
2094 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
TODD GRISOFF
8429 STONE CREEK CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
JOHN LABATT
2109 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN. MN 55317
ALLAN & SUSAN GEBAUER
2081:) BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN. MN 55317
DAVID L & KRISTINA L NASH
2082 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RONALD S & LAURIE A BLUM
2081 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
TIMOTHY J & KATHLEEN C BATTIS
2066 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN. MN 55317
JERRY MURRAY
2066 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID M & LORI J KENDALL
2063 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MICHAEL T & JANET E SNYDER
2127 BOULDER RD
CHAI",IHASSEN MN 55317
JAMES D & JANET L OLSON
2050 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
EUGENE C & JAN M KRUCHOSKI
2030 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHAD M & JILL C HAKE
2115 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN WING
2034 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN. MN 55317
JEFFREY R & EDITH M STEARNS
2052 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
DANIEL J & KAREN O'BRIEN
2103 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
BOB & CINDY EGELSTON
2018 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN. MN 55317
THEO A & TERRY L JENSON
2065 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JONATHAN TUI~NER
SSEN, ?,IN 55317
t
ROBERT POST~N
2037 BOULDERiRD
CHANHASSEN, !V1N 55317
CRAIG FURTN~mY
2023 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
MARVIN & CAR~LE LUECK
2019 STONE CFI~EK DR
CHANHASSEN, I~IN 55317
DANIEL T & LISA A CHUMBLER
2001 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
ROBERT W & ROBERTA L LAWSON
2041 RENAISSAiqCE CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
GERARD E & BONNIE T MURKOWSKI
2051 RENAISSANCE CT
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317