Loading...
3 St. Hubert Church ExpansionPROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: CITY OF PC DATE: March 5, 2002 CC DATE: April 8, 2002 REVIEW DEADLINE: 4/2/02 Extended to June 1, 2002 CASE #: SPR 96-11 File 2 Rv-RG M'T. ST T,H..TS STAFF rEPORT Request for an amendment to the Villages on the Ponds PUD to increase the maximum allowable institutional building area and site plan review for a 41,522 sq. ft. exlSansion to the existing building, St. Hubert Catholic Community. Lot 1, Block 2, Villages on the Ponds, 8201 Main Street Opus Northwest Construction Corp. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 656-4457 St. Hubert Catholic Community 8201 Main Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 PRESENT ZONING: PUD, Planned Unit Development 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 9.28 acres of land DENSITY: NA SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development to permit up to 135,000 square feet of institutional uses within the Villages on the Ponds. The current design standards specify that the PUD must be amended if institutional uses exceed 127,000 square feet. This amendment would require the reallocation of 10,150 square feet of retail square footage to the institutional use. The applicant is also requesting site plan review for a 41,522 square foot expansion that would extend the school to the south as well create a fellowship hall and miscellaneous space on the north side of the church and gymnasium. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. / Market BIv6 .iii St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 2 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUD's, and amendments to PUD's because the City is acting in its legislative or policy making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets those standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting an amendment to the PUD standards which require that the standards be amended if more than 127,000 square feet of institutional use is proposed within the development. The applicant is requesting a total of 135,000 square feet of institutional use, an increase of 8,000 square feet. Staff has had meetings with the representatives from Villages on the Ponds to determine if this proposed change will still permit the type and quantity of development that was originally approved. Based on the analysis of the potential build out of the project, the reallocation to institutional uses would still allow the remainder of the development to proceed as originally envisioned. Staff has prepared an amendment to section d. 5. of the design standards incorporating these changes. The proposed institutional expansion will require the reallocation of 10,150 square feet of commercial square footage to institutional use. The applicant is also requesting site plan review for a 41,522 square foot expansion that would extend the school to the south as well as create a fellowship hall and miscellaneous space on the north side of the church and gymnasium. The proposed expansion will bring the total building area to 133,574 square feet. The school expansion would be two stories, adding 18 additional classrooms. The exterior elevation would continue the use of reddish brown brick as the primary color with sandy brick accent bands, squares and window headers. The roof over the school would be flat with a parapet wall surrounding the edge. The top of the parapet would be covered with copper colored metal coping. Window frames would be grayish silver aluminum. The connection between the existing school and the new wing would be a glass curtain wall atrium area. Outside of the expansion to the east would be a small outdoor seating area. The church expansion extends the building to the north as one story with a wood shake roof. The expansion includes additional worship space, narthex, a small library, a fellowship hall/dining room expansion, toilet facilities, and additional storage space. An aluminum-framed canopy is being extended over a car drop off area at the northerly entrance. The building material will use reddish brown brick as the primary color with sandy brick accents patterns and window and door headers. The roof will be sloped up to the existing gymnasium wall and a parapet extension to the entrance area. The top of the parapet would be covered with copper colored metal coping. Window frames would be grayish silver aluminum. Entrance accents will be provided at all building entrances through the use of dormer extensions above the doors. A chimney will be St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 3 located on the north end of the fellowship hall for the fireplace. The proposed expansion will provide significant architectural detailing. On the eastern elevation, a garage and receiviflg area is being extended out from the building. This expansion will have a fiat roof with the reddish brown brick as the building material. Two overhead doors will be located on the east side and one overhead door on the north side. Staff recommends that these doors be similar in color to surrounding bricks. Staff is recommending approval of the site plan for the church and school expansion subject to the recommended conditions of approval. BACKGROUND On November 26, 2001, the Chanhassen City Council approved an amendment to the Villages on the Ponds Design Standards, section d. Development Site Coverage and Building Height, o The maximum building height shall be Sector I - four stories (residential with street level commercial or office/50 ft.), (retail and office buildings without residences above shall be limited to three stories/40 ft.) except for the lot on the corner of Promenade Pond and Great Plains Boulevard shall be limited to two stories and 30 feet, Sector II - three stories/40 ft., Sector III - three stories/40 ft., and Sector IV - four stories/50 feet. Building height limitations are exclusive of steeples, towers, and other architectural and roof accents. And, , The following table shall govern the amount of building area for the different uses' Commercial/ Office/Service Institutional Dwelling TOTAL Retail (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Units sq. ft. Sector I 114,500 83,500 0 160 198,000 Sector Il 60,000 * 14,000 0 0 74,000 Sector IH 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 Sector IV 0 0 0 162 0 TOTAL 174,500 97,500 100,000 322 372,000 * Includes 47,200 square foot, 106-unit motel. Building square footages may be reallocated between sectors and between uses subject to approval by the Planning Director, with the intent not to increase the total traffic load. The following factors shall be used in calculating the reallocation of building square footages between uses: 1 Residential apartment unit = 3 congregate care (assisted living or dementia) unit. 1 Residential apartment unit = 2 elderly (independent) unit. St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 4 1 Residential apartment unit = 360 square feet of office/service. 1 Residential apartment unit = 90 square feet of retail. 1 Residential apartment unit = 440 square feet of institutional. 950 square feet of office/service = 1,000 square feet of institutional. 300 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of office/service. 290 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of institutional. In no instance shall more than 27,000 square feet of addition institutional building square footage be reallocated without an amendment to the PUD. 6. Buildings adjacent to pedestrian sidewalks must have commercial/office on the majority of the street frontage. On August 13, 2001, the City Council approved an amendment to PUD 95-2, Villages on the Ponds, to permit a drive through window on Lot 1, Block 1, Villages on the Ponds 2nd Addition, as a conditional use. On September 23, 1996, the City Council approved PUD 95-2, Villages on the Ponds, including a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment from Office/industrial, Institutional, Residential Medium Density, Residential Low Density to Mixed Use-Commercial, High Density Residential, Institutional and Office; Preliminary planned unit development for up to 291,000 sq. ft. of commercial/office buildings, 100,000 sq. ft. of institutional buildings, and 322 dwelling units; rezoning from IOP and RSF to PUD, Planned Unit Development (final reading); and final plat dated "Received September 19, 1996" for two lots and ten outlots and public right-of-way. On September 9, 1996, the City Council approved Site Plan 96-11 for a 96,288 square foot school church facility for St. Hubert Catholic Community on Lot 1, Block 2, Villages on the Ponds. On August 12, 1996, the City Council granted preliminary approval of PUD #92-1 including a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment from Office/industrial, Institutional, Residential Medium Density, Residential Low Density to Mixed Use-Commercial, High Density Residential, Institutional and Office; Preliminary planned unit development for up to 291,000 sq. ft. of commercial/office buildings, 100,000 sq. ft. of institutional buildings, and 322 dwelling units; Rezoning from lOP and RSF to PUD, Planned Unit Development (first reading); Preliminary plat for 13 lots and 3 outlots and public right-of-way; Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and excavate wetlands on site; vacation of right-of-way and easements; Environmental assessment Worksheet (EAW) findings of Negative Declaration of the need for additional environmental investigation; and Indirect Source Permit Review for the Villages on the Ponds project. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 20-106 through 20-122, Site Plan Review Villages on the Ponds Development Design Standards St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 5 ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL BUILD OUT Project Commercial Office/Service (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Permitted 174,500 97,500 Lake Susan Apartments Peddler Cyclery 5,018. 6,077 Foss Swim School 9,800 Houlihan's 7,362 81 Culvers 4,768 Building 4 7,425 7,425 Building 17 30,000 Americlnn 44,013 1,492 Americlnn (expansion) 6,870 St. Huberts Presbyterian Homes 4,500 4,500 Retail E 24,980 50,914 Retail C 15,500 15,500 Retail C-1 24,000 520 Retail G 8,000 8,000 St. Hubert Expansion TOTALS 152,436 134,309 Balance 22,064 (36,809) Balance Equivalents Conversion to Commercial Residential (units) 322 Balances after conversion and exchanges 162 69 5O 4O Institutional (sq, ft,) 100,000 Date Approved 6/28/1999 6/28/1999 6/14/1999 5/11/1998 9/24/2001 9/22/1997 8/11/1997 2/24/1997 96,288 12/9/1996 11/26/2001 38,712 321 135,OOO 1 (35,000) 22,064 (11,043) 90 (10,150) square feet 871 sq. ft. - 1 unit 0 Bldg Sq Ft C/O/Ins. 11 095 9 800 7 443 4 768 14 850 30000 45.505 6 87O 96.288 9 000 75 894 31 000 24,520 16,000 38,712 421,745 The above table begins with the approved square footages for each type of use in the design standards. The table then goes through all the approved and potential development within the project, subtracting each building's square footage from the total square footage for that use. The bottom five building square footages are based on estimates of the potential development for each remaining site based on parking, market conditions and site area. The balance in each use is shown at the bottom of the table (negative numbers show that the initial square footage has been exceeded). We then convert all the uses to a common factor, in this case commercial. The converted office (11,043 sq. ft. of commercial) and institutional (10,150 sq. ft. of commercial) are subtracted from the commercial balance, leaving a balance of 871 square feet of commercial. Based on the analysis of the potential build out of the project, the reallocation to institutional uses would still allow the remainder of the development to proceed as originally envisioned (a mixed use project). Staff has prepared an amendment to section d. 5. of the design standards incorporating these changes. The proposed institutional expansion will require the reallocation of 10,150 square feet of commercial square footage to institutional use. The table will be amended to show this. However, we are recommending that no additional institutional square footage be permitted without and amendment to the PUD. The overall goal is to maintain the trip generation rates under those that were originally approved as part of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the concept plan. The conversion factors St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 6 adopted at the previous PUD amendment would maintain these ratios even though the projected total square footages may be larger. GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE The exterior elevation would continue the use of reddish brown brick as the primary color with sandy brick accent bands, squares, patterns and window headers. The roof over the school would be flat with a parapet wall surrounding the edge. The top of the parapet would be covered with copper colored metal coping. Window frames would be grayish silver aluminum. The roof over the church expansion would be sloped, with cedar shake shingles. Entrance accents will be provided at all building entrances through the use of dormer extensions above the doors. A chimney will be located on the north end of the fellowship hall for the fireplace. The proposed expansion will provide significant architectural detailing. The following setbacks shall apply: Market Blvd.: Buffer yard & Setback Interior Side Lot Line: Buffer yard & setback East Perimeter Side Lot Line (adjacent to residential): Buffer yard & setback Building/Parking Proposed 50', 20' 525', 300' 0',0' 12',0' 50', 50' 60', 20' The proposed expansion meets or exceeds the requirement for architectural detailing required in both the Villages on the Ponds design standards as well as the city's overall design standards. LANDSCAPING The applicant meets required landscaping standards. Staff proposes that an additional overstory tree be added to the northerly landscape boulevard island. The applicant shall guarantee the survival of all transplanted material similar to the requirements for landscaping installation on other projects, e.g., for one year past date of acceptance of landscaping. GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL Minimal grading will be required for this project to elevate the proposed building pad to 925. The proposed grading will include filling on the southeast corner. A maximum slope of 3:1 is allowed where it is applicable or a retaining wall must be used. The applicant should be aware that any retaining walls over 4-feet need to be designed by a registered engineer. Retaining walls are not allowed in public easements. The extent of the grading will be the digging and filling of trenches for the sanitary sewer pipe. The plans do propose erosion control fencing around the perimeter of the site. Type 11I silt fence must be used and extended around the excavated area to prevent any migration of the excavated material and an erosion control blanket should be installed within two weeks of completion on the sloped area. ' ' St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 7 No drainage or storm sewer improvements are proposed with this project. The plan is not clear as to if the proposed building's roof drain will be connected to the existing roof drain then conveyed via the existing storm sewer system and finally discharge into the existing pond located in the southwest comer of the lot or how the roof will drain. Design calculations will need to be submitted for the additional site drainage. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading would require an easement from the appropriate property owner. UTILITIES The plans propose to abandon a portion of an existing public sewer line and reroute it around the proposed building expansion area. A new sewer line will replace the existing line. The applicant is also proposing that the end of the watermain be realigned. The proposed water and sanitary sewer lines must be centered within a 20-foot wide utility easement. This easement will be required to be signed and submitted to the City prior to beginning construction. The applicant will also be required to provide the necessary financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit to guarantee installation of the public utilities. Utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. STREETS No major street improvements have been proposed with this project. Five parking spaces will be eliminated, however, due to the building expansion. LI GHTING/SI GNA GE While no lighting is proposed on the plans, any lighting would have to follow the following standards. Lighting for the interior of the villages should be consistent throughout the development. A shoe box fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps) with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. The maximum height of light fixtures in the parking lot is 30 feet. All fixtures must be shielded with a total cutoff angle of 90 degrees or less. Wall pack units, if used, shall be shielded and directed downward so that no direct glare is visible off site. No additional signage is proposed for the development. On-site traffic control signage may be required. MISCELLANEOUS Detailed occupancy requirements have been reviewed with the applicant but cannot be completed until complete plans are submitted. The owner and or their representative shall continue meeting with the Inspections Division to discuss plan review and permit procedures. St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 8 SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: ao An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Co Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d° Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: Subject to the revisions contained in the staff report, the proposed site plan is consistent with all plans and specifications and development design standards for the St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 9 Villages on the Ponds Planned Unit Development and meets site plan findings 1 through 6 enumerated above. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Planned Unit Development Standards for Villages on the Ponds amending section d. as follows: 1. Development Site Coverage and Building Height 1. The following table shall govern the amount of building area for the different uses: Commercial/ Office/Service Institutional Dwelling TOTAL Retail (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) Units sq. ft. Sector I 104,350 83,500 0 160 187,850 Sector II 60,000 14,000 0 0 74,000 Sector 111 0 0 135,000 0 135,000 Sector IV 0 0 0 162 0 -- TOTAL 164,350 97,500 135,000 322 396,850 Building square footages may be reallocated between sectors and between uses subject to approval by the Planning Director, with the intent not to increase the total traffic load. The following factors shall be' used in calculating the reallocation of building square footages between uses: 1 Residential apartment unit = 3 congregate care (assisted living or dementia) units. 1 Residential apartment unit = 2 elderly (independent) units. 1 Residential apartment unit = 360 square feet of office/service. 1 Residential apartment unit = 90 square feet of retail. 1 Residential apartment unit = 440 square feet of institutional. 950 square feet of office/service = 1,000 square feet of institutional. 300 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of office/service. 290 square feet of retail = 1,000 square feet of institutional. In no instance shall additional institutional building square footage be reallocated without an amendment to the PUD." "The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #96-11 File 2, plans prepared by Opus Architects & Engineers, Inc., dated 1/30/02, subject to the following conditions: o A 20-foot wide utility easement over the proposed sewer line and watermain shall be prepared and submitted to the City prior to beginning construction. St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 10 o The applicant will also be required to provide the necessary financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit to guarantee installation of the public utilities. o Provide the City with a copy of the MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit and Department of Health watermain permit. 4. Add the latest City standard detail plate nos. 1002, 2101, 2109, 2202, 2203, 5300. 5. Show all existing utilities. 6. Show the proposed sewer pipe type, class, slope, invert and rim elevations. 7. Silt fence type m must be used and removed when construction is completed. 8. Revise the north sign arrow to point in the correct direction. 9. Vacate existing utility easements. 10. Add a benchmark to the plans. 11. Type 111 silt fence must be used and extended around the excavated area to prevent any migration of the excavated material and an erosion control blanket should be installed within two weeks of completion on the sloped area. 12. Slope should be 3:1 maximum or a retaining wall built. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Design calculations will need to be submitted for the additional site drainage. Eliminate proposed manhole no. 101 and connect to existing manhole no. 6 as shown on the City's as-builts. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. The overhead doors shall be similar in color to the surrounding brick. The standpipe connections in the existing school portion of the building must be extended into the new school addition. The standpipes were an accepted alternate means of protection in lieu of providing access roads around the building. 18. 19. The additions are required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 11 20. The proposed Fellowship Hall must be a minimum of Type II-I HR construction and must be separated from existing Buildings A & B by area separation walls. 21. The roof/canopy at the drop off area on the north side of the building must be constructed of noncombustible materials. 22. An addition overstory tree shall be added to the northerly landscape boulevard island. 23. The applicant shall guarantee the survival of all transplanted material for one year past the date of installation final acceptance of site landscaping. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Overall Site Plan - Villages on the Ponds 3. Development Review Applications 4. Letter from David F. Bangasser and Jeffrey L. Walker to Bob Generous dated 2/1/02 5. Reduced Copy of Site Plan 6. Reduced Copy of Floor Plans 7. Reduced Copy of Building Elevations 8. Memo fi'om Greg Hayes to Robert Generous dated 2/11/02 9. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 12 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION Application of Opus and St. Hubert Catholic Community for Site Plan Review and an amendment to the development design standards for Villages on the Ponds. On March 5, 2002, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of St. Hubert Catholic Community for a site plan review for the property located at 8201 Main Street and an amendment to the design standards for Villages on the Ponds. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan and amendment preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development, PUD. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 2, Villages on the Ponds 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 13 b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. Section 20-110: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; Is consistent with this division; Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: ao An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and St. Hubert Catholic Community March 5, 2002 Page 14 do Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. o The planning report #96-11 File 2 dated March 5, 2002, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION plan review. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5th day of March, 2002. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Its Chairman ATTEST: Secretary g:\plan\bg\villageskst, hubert's expansion.doc .00~ ,OO& ,OS e::losouuuAI 'uossequeq3 ; OIIIIU -- -- ,~o,~,~ :::-"~IIIIIIIIRIIIIIIIIIIIII .i-o. 11V~3~ -- 0 o o CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ' TELEPHONE (Day time) . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Interim Use Permit Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign ~ l ~'~ Site Plan Review* SubdMsion* X. Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CU P/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ 3cc~ '"' A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. · :augcrmg material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. 'Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of /~-~r~.n~.y [or each plan sheet. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract ND'DE- When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. TOTAL ACREAGE ~/. YES '/- NO I:rFL~SIENT ZONING .P~EQ~ ZONING PRF_SIENT LAND USE DESIGNATION REQUF_STED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or cleady printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning I::)ep~ent to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A Written z'zetice of apjalJcaUon deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of applrcation. Thi~, is to cert~ that I am making application for the descried action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This applicat, ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of-Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make ~is application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I W~ll keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of matedal and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of rny kn~dge. . 'The city hereby notities the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review exte~i~ns are approved by the applicant. si~n'azur~'lf,~o~licant Date S~gnature of Fee Own/er Date .At:~l'~aIion Receivecl on Fee Paid Receipt No. -I'he applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If rmt c~r~tacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPUCATION ' ,~PPJJCANT: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE(Daytime) ~-~5'z ~c- · ~S'Z- ~50 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Interim Use Permit · variance Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal , ~ Rezoning .Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign I¢ l ~"~ i '/- Site Plan Review* Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SPR/VACNAR/WAP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) Subdivision* TOTAL FEE $ ~,~:,0 - A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. Bugcrmg material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. ~rwenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of tr,-~-~,,y [-o~ each plan sheet. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract :NDTE-When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME lEGAL DESCRIPTION W'ET!_AN~S PRESENT YES v- NO ]=3=.ESENT ZONING P,~EQU~ I J~D ZONING LAND USE DESIGNATION REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST ?<<~,; ~.~-r, ~.~ -J'his application must be completed in full and be typewritten or cleady printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A Written nDtice of ap. PlJcation deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. q'hi~ is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that ! am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This applicat, ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of-Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this applJca~ and the fee owner has also signed this application. ~ W~'I1 keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of matedal and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information i have submitted are true and correct to the best of The cTty hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public headng requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review exter~bns are approved by the applicant. Date Date Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. :if rmt contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S CONTRACTORS D E V E L O P E R S February 1, 2002 OPUS NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone 952-656-4444 Fax 952-656-4529 www. opuscorp.com Mr. Bob Generous City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: PROPOSED EXPANSION ST. HUBERT CATHOLIC COMMUNITY CHURCH & SCHOOL Dear Bob' On behalf of St. Hubert Catholic Community, we are pleased to submit the following applications pertaining to the proposed additions to the existing St. Hubert Catholic Community facility: · Site Plan Review application, including a check in the amount of $860 and all associated plans and renderings, for the proposed additions to the existing facility. Vacation of Easement Application, including a check in the amount of $300 for the proposed re-alignment of an existing sanitary sewer line on the south side of the existing facility. Planned Unit Development Amendment application, including a check in the amount of $300 for the proposed change to the maximum allowable institutional area included in the P.U.D. for the Villages on the Ponds development. We request the City of Chanhassen review these applications in order for consideration by the Planning Commission at the public hearing on March 5, 2002 and by the City Council at the council meeting on March 25, 2002. St. Hubert Catholic Community has continued to grow since the existing facility was completed in 1997. The Parish leadership has determined that construction of a fellowship hall addition and the construction of additional classrooms is necessary to continue to meet the needs of the parish. The Parish is currently in the process of raising funds for the planned construction. It may be decided to phase construction with up to eight class rooms being built at a later date. The length of the classroom addition will be approximately 60 feet shorter than what is shown on the attached site plan if the eight class rooms were delayed. The Parish leadership anticipates resolving this issue prior to the March 5, 2002 Planning Commission hearing. Allentown · Atlanta · Austin · Chicago · Columbus · Dallas ' Denver · Fort Lauderdale · Houston - Indianapolis · Kansas City · Los Angeles · Miami · Milwaukee · Minneapolis Ol'allQ. e CotllllV ° Orlando · Pensacola · Philadelphia · Phoenix · Portland · Sacramento · San Francisco · San Jose · Seattle · St. Louis · Tampa · X~,ashinlaton, D.C. OPUS, Mr. Bob Generous February 1, 2002 Page 2 of 2 The fellowship hall and classroom additions shown on the attached site plan will increase the size of the St. Hubert Catholic Community facility to approximately 133,000 square feet of floor area. The previous agreement between St. Hubert Catholic Community and AUSMAR allowed for a minimum expansion of 108,000 square feet of floor area. The Parish leadership has reached a verbal agreement with Lotus Realty to allow up to a maximum of 135,000 square feet of floor area. We understand that the maximum allowable institutional area included in the P.U.D. for the Villages on the Ponds development is 127,000 square feet of floor area. We are requesting an amendment to the P.U.D., increasing the allowable institutional area for the development to include 135,000 square feet of floor area for St. Hubert Catholic Community. Thank you for your consideration in reviewing this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please call either Dave Bangasser at 952-656-4457 or Jeff Walker at 952-656-4524 Sincerely, OPUS NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION David F. Bangasser Senior Project Manager · ~' ~ ':1 ,...~ .'-\ ,~-.'~' ~. [~ ................. Jeffrey L. Walker Project Manager attachments JW~FI~ ! i '~JI '~Jee~J!bJ3 <> o 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] L CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 City Center D;ive PO Box i47 Cha,hasse,, Mimzesota 553 ] 7 Photle 952.937. I900 General Fax 952,937,5739 ~,gin ee~'i,g Dgm 'tm e, t Fax 9fiZ 93 Z 9152 B,i/di,g Depart,tent Fax 952.934.2524 ~3b Site tvw~ ci. cha,hasse,, m,. ~cs MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Generous, Senior Planner FROM: Greg Hayes, Fire Inspector/Training Coordinator DATE: February 11,2002 SUBJECT: Request for an amendment to Villages on the Ponds PUD to increase the maximum allowable institutional building area and site plan review for a 41,522 square foot expansion to the existing building on 9.2 acres of land zoned PUD, located on Lot 1, Block 2, Villages on the Ponds, 8201 Main Street, OPUS Northwest Construction Corp, St. Hubert's Catholic Community Church Planning Case: 96-11 Site Plan - File 2 (60 day review 4/3/02) I have reviewed the site plan review for the above project. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The site plan is based on the available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed. Tile standpipe connections in tile existing school portion of the building must be extended into the new school addition. The standpipes were an accepted alternate means of protection in lieu of providing access roads around tile building. If you have an), questions, feel free to give me a call. GH/be g:\safe~'\gh\plrev96- ] 1 The City of Chauhasseu. A growi~ly, commtmity with ctea, lakes, c~a/ia' school,,', a cha;vni,¢ dow,tow,, t/,'ivi,¢ bmi, esses, a,d bemaifid oat'ks. A ~reat o/ace to live. work.