The URL can be used to link to this page

3 Family of Christ Lutheran ChuCITY STAFF REPORT PC DATE: March 19, 2002 CC DATE: REVIEW DEADLINE: 4/14/02 CASE #: 2002-2 Var. By: RG I J PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Request for a variance fi.om Section 20-913 (a) to permit the use of spotlights directed skywar.d to illuminate the cross .. 2020 Coulter Blvd., (Lot 1, Block 1, Family of Christ Lutheran Church Addition) William Kryzda, SMSQ Architects 205 S. Water Street Northfield, MN 55057 (507) 645-4461 Family of ChriSt Lutheran Church 2020 Coulter Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 934-8659 PRESENT ZONING: 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Planned Unit Development, PUD Office/Industrial ACREAGE: 5.78 acres DENSITY: NA SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance fi'om the city ordinance to permit. the use-of spotlights directly skyward to illuminate the cross on the top of the steeple. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. Family of Christ Lutheran Church Variance March 19, 2002 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Section 20-913 (a) Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. BACKGROUND On June 14, 1999, City Council approved PUD #97-2 granting Final Plat approval for Family of Christ Lutheran Church Addition. On April 26, 1999, the City Council approved site plan #99-2 for a 17,140 sq. ft. church facility including assembly, classrooms and offices for Family of Christ Lutheran Church. On February 22, 1999, the City of Chanhassen adopted revisions to the lighting ordinance. The intent of the ordinance revision was to reduce or eliminate the amount of light pollution emanating from development in Chanhassen to the night sky. On June 22, 1998, the Chanhassen City Council granted final plat approval for Bluff Creek Corporate Center PUD #97-2 and second reading for rezoning from A2 to PUD. On April 27, 1998, the City Council granted preliminary approval for PUD #97-2, including the first reading of the rezoning of the property from A2 to PUD and preliminary plat approval for five lots, the Wetland Alteration Permit to fill the small wetland located in the northern portion of the site and the Conditional Use Permit for grading and filling in the flood plain. On January 12, 1998, the City Council granted concept approval for PUD #97-2. ANALYSIS Staff believes that the city has the responsibility to protect the safety of its residents by requiring lighting in parking areas for commercial, industrial and multi-family uses. It should also include provisions to protect neighboring properties from glare from site lighting. The church has installed a spot light on the top of one of the parking lot light fixtures directed northward to illuminate the cross on the tower and another spotlight on the building directed southward. In this instance, the use of the spotlight is not necessary for safety concerns, but rather as an aesthetic consideration and as a means for drawing attention to the site. However, in doing so, the lighting also infringes on the ability of others to enjoy the night sky. By directing the spotlight upwards from both the building and the parking lot, the church is creating glare, which is visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. One need only drive down Coulter Boulevard or West 78th Street to see the impacts of these spotlights on the night sky. As part of the site plan review, there was no indication that spotlights were even contemplated as part of the development. The applicant was advised as part of the building permit process that the spotlights were an issue. The applicant was further warned that the spotlights would not be allowed prior to their request for a certificate of occupancy. Family of Christ Lutheran Church Variance March 19, 2002 Page 3 The applicant argues that "...with this variance application the church is merely asking to be allowed to do what many other churches in Chanhassen, as well as assorted businesses, already do." However, it was due to the issues of businesses and churches lighting the night sky that directly lead to the adoption of the ordinance. In fact, the ordinance contemplates that over time, this lighting, which is nonconforming, will be eliminated. Granting of the variance will permit a new source of light pollution in the community. Staff has visited other churches in the community to see how they light their steeples and crosses. Colonial Church (old St. Huberts) on West 78th Street has a lighted star attached to the steeple, but no spotlights are used and the cross on the steeple is not illuminated. St. Hubert Catholic Community on Main Street has a skylight type steeple that allows diffuse light to shine out. In addition, a spotlight is angled upward at the cross on top of the steeple. The sky does not glow beyond. Lutheran Church of the Living Christ on Park Road has a backlite, solid cross on the side of the building. There is, however, a spotlight that is directed at their monument sign on Highway 5. The old Family of Christ Lutheran Church on Lake Drive East has a spotlight directed upward lighting one side of the steeple and cross, which faces Lake Drive. All this goes to show that spotlights are not uniformly used to light church crosses. There are no community standards that would permit the use of spotlights. (Staff will present the slide show of these pictures at the hearing.) The church has a reasonable use of their property without permitting them to use the spotlight directed skyward to light up their cross. There are other means of illuminating the cross that would not create glare in the night sky. Staff suggested that a light be located on the top of the cross, directed downward. The church could have used an internally illuminated cross on the steeple. Since there are other means for the church to achieve their goal without a variance, staff is recommending denial of the variance request. Staff has been requested to'explain the recreation field lighting at Bluff Creek Recreation Center. During the summer, the hours that the lights may be used are until 10:00 p.m. Individuals must press a button every hour to continue the use the lights. During the winter, the lights may be on until 9:00 p.m. However, a rink attendant must manually turn on the lights for use. Unlike the spotlight, these field lights are only on from dusk till 9 or 10:00 p.m. The spotlight is on all night. Recreational field lights are treated differently than the spotlights proposed by Family of Christ. The field lights serve a public purpose, providing lighting for sporting events and making the play area safer. The spotlight on the cross is for private aesthetic purposes and has no public safety value. Additionally, field lights are permitted to be 65 feet tall in order to light a larger area than lights in a parking lot or on a building. Finally, field lights are directed downward, whereas, the cross spotlight is directed toward the sky. FINDINGS The Planning Commission shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of Family of Christ Lutheran Church Variance March 19, 2002 Page 4 comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The ability of the church to light the cross on the steeple is not a hardship. The church can operate as a church without lighting the night sky. Additionally, there are other options to light the cross. bo The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: While most buildings do not have crosses, they all must direct lighting downward as required by ordinance. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of the variance is not based on a desire to increase the value or income potential of the property. It is based on aesthetic considerations. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The hardship is self-created. As part of the site plan review, there was no indication that spotlights were even contemplated as part of the development. The applicant was advised as part of the building permit process that the spotlights were an issue. The applicant was further warned that the spotlights would not be allowed prior to their request for a certificate of occupancy. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will infringe on the rights of others to enjoy the night sky. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion o f the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Family of Christ Lutheran Church Variance March 19, 2002 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission denies the variance request by Family of Christ Lutheran Church to permit the use of spotlights directed skyward to illuminate the cross, based on the findings in the staff report." Attachments 1. Development Review Application 2. Letter from Pepe Kryzda to Robert Generous dated January 15, 2002 3. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List 4. Letter from Pepe Kryzda and Pastor Nate Castens to Robert Generous dated 2/15/02 5. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\bg\bluff creek corporate center\family of christ light variance.doc ~~~~~~// - I 21 BANEBERRY CLOVER WAY W 3 CONEFLOWER CRV N 4 PRIMROSE PLACE 6 CONE FLOWER CRV S 7 BLUEBONNET BLVD -- 8 CHICORYWAY \ / '/'1' / L. '~ ¢, 9 POPPY DR 10 BLUE SAGE LN E 11 WATERLEAF LANE E 12 LADY SLIPPER LANE 13 BUTTER CUP CRT 14 BLUESAGE LN W 15 WATERLEAF LANE W 16 SNAPDRAGON DR Harvest Way % % 3 Autumn Ridge Avert Coulter Blvd, 3d Dr 'ew Court M~Glynn E ! Coulter Blvd Jan,14. 2002 4'19PM Sf~SQ ARCHITECTS No,1536. P, 2/3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPUCATION ADDRESS: .....'z-',,% ~. ~ og-~,u~ TELEPHONE.' (~.%.~"4..~_ ~.%,z,, ... ~.~.~ ~ ,__ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cond~o~l Use Permit lntarim Use Permit Non-conforming Use Permit ... PJarmed Unit.Development* ., Rezonln~ Si~n Permits ... Sign Pb3n Review _.. P/an Review* SubdivL~Jon* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements ._ Wetland Alteration Permit. Zoning_ APpeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment .. _ Notification Sign __X_ Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SP R/VAC/VAR/WAP/MeIes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) . TOTAL FEE $ t 2.eS. ~ list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the appr~cation. material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. "Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of transparency for each plan sheet. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract NDTE-When mult~)]e a~olications are z:)roce,~.~ncl, fhp. :~nnrnnr~t~ f~ ,=hnll h~ ~harna~,,I fnr ~nr, h ~nnli~tinn ' Jan,14, 2002 4'19PM SMSQ ARCHITECTS N0,1536. P, 3/3 PROJECT ~E .I_EGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAl. ACREAGE WETLANDS PRESENT · YES )/- NO '~~2.0NING q' ~ ~ .................. -.., REQU~ ZONING ~'d ~,,,-~-~, 6,.~.~3 ") .............. P~~~DUSEDESIG~TION _ ~~ ~~~_. ~.~ ~~ ~.~~ ~QU~D ~ND USE DESIGNATION ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..... _... 'REASON FOR THIS REQUEST. "]-l~is ~p~cmbn must be completed in full and be t~ewri~ten or dearly printed and must be accompanied by all ]nformatio and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions, Before filing thls applicatlon, ~u should Confer with the Plannin De~c~anmen] m determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements 'appli~ble to your application. A deterrn~n¢on of compteteness of the application shall be made within ten business days of ~pli~tion submittal. A writte r~zbe of applic.,a~bn defldencles shall be mailed tO the applicant within ten business days of application. "fh~ is lo certify that I am making application for ~he described action by the City and tha(! am responsible for complying wlt all City requirements with regard to this request, This applica!bn should be processed in my name and i am the party wh0n · the Cityshould contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (eithe copy of Owner's Duplicate Cert~cate of. Title, AbstraCt of Titre or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to mak~ Zhis aj~lba~n and the fee owner has also signed this application. 1 wTl]. keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I furthe tmderstand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc, with an estimate prior to authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and informatiol'Yl have submitted are true and correct to the best rny ~~g~ , 'The c~'ty hereby ~otifies the applicant that development review ~nnot be completed within 60 days due to public hearin{ requirements and agency review, Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 da', ,extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional reviev extensions are approved by the applicant. Date Date Receipt No.. _ The appTicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting lfx~t cor,Jacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the appllcant's address. SMSQ Architects 205 South Water Street I Box 390 I Northfield Minnesota 55057 I 507-645-4461 FAX 507-645-7682 15 January 2002 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner CITY of CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: FAMILY of CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH SMSQ No. 1915-4C Dear Bob: We received your letter, dated 19 Dec 2001, with your comments regarding the two spotlights for the church cross. In response to that letter, the church has directed me to apply for a variance, so that they may be allowed to light the cross. Herewith is the supporting material for the variance application, following the checklist you kindly sent me: 1. Completed application form. The completed application form was delivered separately to the city today (15 Jan). . Application fee. A check for the application fee was attached to the application (see item (1), above). Also attached was a separate check to cover the $200 security you requested. 3. Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property. Enclosed please find a copy of a Statement of Property Tax Payable in 2001. , Location map showing property within ½ mile of site and noting area within 500 feet of subject property. A Location Map is enclosed. 5. List of property owners and addresses within 500 feet of property boundary. As we agreed, the city will provide the list of property owners and bill the church accordingly. 6~ Property adjacent to a lake or affects usage of a lake, a list of property owners and addresses abutting the lake shall be submitted. Not applicable. w Plot plan showing property lines, existing improvements, proposed improvements with setbacks, lot coverage, building height and requested variances. Building data: Maximum height ~ South side: Maximum height ~ North side: Height to top of church cross 29 feet 41 feet 45 feet Bob Generous 15 Jan 02 Page 2 Enclosed please find the following drawings and data: Site Plan (Drawing Al.0) South, North, West and East Elevations (Drawings A3.1 & A3.2) - I have noted on the East Elevation the approximate angles of incidence for the two spotlights for the cross. * Partial Electrical Site Plan (Drawing E2.1)- Shows the location, in plan, of the two spotlights for the cross. Re: spotlight SP2 - Note (10) on the drawing says the spotlight is mounted on the top of a light pole in the parking lot. That pole is 25 feet high, which is typical for the parking lot. Catalog Cut Sheets for spotlights SP1 & SP2 (3 pages each) - As I described previously in SMSQ letter, dated 17 Dec 01, these fixtures are relatively low in intensity (one is 100W, the other is 400W), and are fitted with concentric-ring louvers to reduce the potential for glare and light overthrow. Written description of variance requested. The church would like to be able to light the cross in the manner illustrated. We therefore request a variance from the requirements of City Ordinance 20-913(a), which states: "Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates." As you explained, Bob, one of the intents of this ordinance is to prohibit light directed skyward. 9. Written justification of how request complies with the findings for granting a variant (pursuant to Section 20-58) as follows: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. "Undue hardship" means the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within five hundred (500) feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that in developed neighborhoods pre-existing standards exist. Variances that blend with these pre- existing standards without departing from them meet this criteria [sic]. Granted, the literal enforcement of the ordinance requirements does not cause "undue hardship" in the sense defined above. The reason for requesting a variance does, however, resonate perfectly with the last two sentences in the text above, describing a suitable finding. First, granting this variance is not likely to lead to a "proliferation of variances." After all, how many new churches can we anticipate being built in the city? I wager there are not many-even assuming all of those wished to deploy a cross with similar lighting. Second, with this variance application the church is merely asking to be allowed to do what many other churches in Chanhassen, as well as assorted businesses, already do. In other words, it appears there were pre-existing standards that allowed, say, a church to light a cross using up lights, meaning the light is directed skyward, and which the new ordinance prohibits. The proposed spotlights for which the church is requesting a variance would merely blend with said pre-existing standards. Bob Generous 15 Jan 02 Page 3 be That the conditions upon which a petition for variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. The church is part of a larger PUD. The balance of the PUD, Bluff Creek Corporate Center, foresees several one-story office/warehouse buildings being developed, together with required parking. There will not, therefore, be another cross, lit or unlit, in the development. In other zoning classifications, churches are typically conditional uses. By definition, therefore, thc conditions that apply to a church don't generally apply to other properties within the same zoning classification. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land I submit that having a lit cross, vs. an unlit one, will likely have no effect on the value of the property; and given that the church is a non-profit entity, it is not customarily motivated by the d. That the alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. As I explained under item (9.a) above, the church is merely seeking to be allowed to do what other churches in the city already do. Thus, one could argue that the "hardship" the church faces consists of NOT being able to aim spotlights on their cross from below. This is a circumstance created, not by the church, but by the new ordinance, and by the fact that other churches-not to mention commercial establishments-that do so have been "grand fathered in." That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located Allowing the two spotlights as proposed would in no way be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties in the neighborhood of the church, or endanger the public safety. I would argue, in fact, that the location-and direction of the spotlights goes a long way toward meeting the letter of the ordinance in question. Consider that, for someone standing anywhere north of the building, SP2, the stronger of the two lights, at 400W (the one directed northward from the top of the light pole), would be shielded from view by the roofline of the Sanctuary. Similarly, for someone standing anywhere south of the building, the other light, SP 1 (at I OOW), directed southward from the roof of the Gathering space, would be shielded from view by the parapet on the south wall of the Gathering space. Thus, from any earthbound vantage point, there would be no glare visible beyond the property line-or within it, for that matter. Glare would only become an issue, possibly, for someone airborne who happens to intersect the cone of light, narrowed by the louvers, emitted by the spotlights. You are right in asserting that, since the spotlights are directed upward, some light will eventually spill beyond the property lines. But take SP2, the worst-case scenario. Given a luminous intensity,/, of 37,400 lumens (from the enclosed data), or 2,976 candelas, and given that SP2 is about 240 feet (call this distance d) from the north property line, the illumination level, E, at the north property line is calculated by the formula E = I/d2. Thus, E = 0.05 footcandles. The equivalent measurement at the south property line, from SP1, would be 0.007 footcandles, or seven times less. Such is the magnitude of the light spillage in question. Bob Generous 15 Jan 02 Page 4 That the proposed variation will not impair the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. See discussion under item (9.e), above. S M S Q Architects Pepe Kryzda, AIA enclosures: Statement of Property Tax Payable in 2001 Location Map Drawing A1.0- Site Plan Drawing A3.1 - Elevations Drawing A3.2 - Elevations Drawing E2.1 - Partial Electrical Site Plan catalog cut sheets for light fixture types SP 1 & SP2 copies: Pastor Nate Castens, FoCLC 9151ttr021.doc SA-N-16-2002 WED. 11'00 AM STATE COPY ENCLOSE T~I$ COPY WITH FORH M-f~-R WHEN FILING FO~. A REFUND FROM THE MINNESOTA O~PART. MI='NT OF REVENUE FAMILY OF CHRIST 69529344250 P..001/001 gTATEM[~N,T OF PROPRRT¥ TAX PAYAIILE IN '~B01 . if this hex is checked, yOU ~ /" owe dgJifl(ltwn[lage.s,1,.....J --- ...... T~xublu M.rk~t Value: R 2~.~t~10 M-IPR Line I Amount: Linu fi Amount: TAXPA. YER FfiHILY OF CJ4R]:ST LUTH CHURCH 275 EAST L~KE DR · PO ~g 3B~ 20OO 75,400' 00t 1,333.62 1, FARH NO~HSTD FARH NON-HSTD ..2 TAXPAYEr: FAHILY OF CttRIST LUTH CHURCH 275 E/~T LAKE DR PO BOX 368 CHANH~,~F,N fin E~;;SlT-OE~e 0se this amou~t-o~ fi~rm M- I.PR tc~ see if you're clisiblc for a property tax rsfund. File by August 15. I£ d~is box is chcckr..~d, you ow.c dclinqueal ~xe3 and are not citable, 2. Use this amount for the spex;M pr¢)peny tax refund un schedule I of form M- i PR., Your Property Tax And How It Is Reduced By The State 3, Your prol'~ny tar bctbrc reduction by state-paid ~dds and credits, 4. Aid paid by d~-. stato nrMinnesom to reduce your property atx. 5. Credit, p~id by the state of M[nnesma 'to'r~Juc~ your property mx: A. ff_.ducs~tlon homc:k'te~vJ t.rcc~it glltJ etJtl¢~tl, lOB agrlculmr'al ct'edit, B. Oth=r cmdi~ 6. Your property tax aRer reduction by stale-paid aids and craait~ Whm'~ YULU- Pcupc.rLy Tax Dullar~ Gu County. Chy or Town. 10. Special q'~xing Districts: 11. N(m-schcgd' voter, uppruvod to[ere/ida lcviu~, 12. Yox~I pro.ny tu~cs be[bl'~ Sl~cial ashc~sJncnts. 1.1, Sp~I As~sments: I~ST 18,098.19 ST~ Z~ 17,560.00 ST~ X~R / PR:I:NCIP,~L 37, 277, 15,62~.26 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 2{~0I CARVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER .. DONALD F. DAHLKE- CARVER COUNTY TREASURER MARK LUNDGREN - CARVER COUNTY AUDITOR ~ ADMINISTRATION BUILJDING CARVER 600 F,,AST4TH STREET · P.O, BOX 69 COUNTY CHASKA, MN 55318-0069 952-361. Igg0 2900 ,%001 -'~ Now [nqprovements: ' ~timatcd Market Value:. ""-' Taxable Murkrt Value: 7S, ~OO g 1, ~ Pmpe~yCiass: FARH ND~TD ' F~ 2, 793;. 72 2, 84.1.07 1,2~b.21 1,311 1&% 69 191,46 I, :L~.82 1~ 337. ~4 413, &1 423, ,t,9 lbT, es 284,. S? 163.68, 112.~ 20.18 21 ,~ 12.4.1 1, ~a.a2 1, 59, 4l~, .18 SS, ~7&, I~ 14, Your togtl properly tl~x laid ~peuial as),c~smcnts. -_ .. ryou pay your rexes late you will be charged u penury. ........... ive d Time:Jan. &fl, 740.00 GL, . . 26, $$7. O0 ,," /,2' k'x __ . ~ property larvest t~ \ tine LOCATION MAP FAMILY OF CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH Chanhassen, Minnesota I ponu I/ II I \ ,CD Imm u6l~oO ~ ~l~UC)ld /,ill,nO i I / / / I I I t % 1 sm, m,--sl~ (zOO) 0 S ~t I i i ,iii'f, I { ,rive · :~ CD CD }-., ® THIS SHEET REFERENCES E2, i I Title' Scale' Sheet No.' /~"/=~.~ ,,, 1":60'-0" __ ADDENDUM .1 Date: '"~'~';, ~'~ ~' ~ ~::,,~,,,;,~, ~,~ FAMILY OF CHRIST 9/2o/o0 E2.1 19~ W Cowry Rd ~ , S~la :~ Ir ~"~" ~"~-" LUTHERAN CHURCH MAH 97.176.00 Large scale floodlights for lOOW Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium lamps. 12 ~ -- 11 ;' ;'- , IAI' I' i-'t J ii ii I I ! ' I I111' ! i i I ! I II II I I i I II II ! I i '- · 4 6 I .5 1 2 P2 2 I 3 · Specifications .- [1] Housing: Two piece die cast a~uminum consisting of a ~:~lector . housing with integral yoke mounting flanges and a. separate cylindrical ballast housing with integral cooling fins. Ballast housing is secured to reflector housing by two (.2) stalnles,~ steel latches which allows easy access to the ballast and lamp focusing screws (see explanation below). [2] Lamp Enclosure: One piece die cast aluminum frame with integral drainage slots. W thick tempered glass (dear on 8329), (spread lens with 14 linear pdsms per inch on 8331). One pieCe, molded, U-channel, high temperature, silicone gasket. Full specular anodized internal reflector. Frame seCured to reflector housing by six (6) captive socket head stainless steel screws threaded into stainless steel inserts in the .reflector housing. [3] Mounting Yoke: =As' thick stainless steel, allows for full vertical adiustment with die cast aluminum aiming angle indicator and two (2) heavy duty, stainless steel locking bolts. -Yoke is pre-drilled for mounting.to various BEGA mounting. accessories, supplied with a ½' I.P.S. threaded, stainless steel nipple with cable seal. Lamp Lumen .. · . [4] Lamp Focusing: Three socket head stalr~less steel screws are provided for precise leveling and focusing of the H.I.D. lamp arc tube within the reflector optical system. This feature ensures perfect beam pattern maintenance by allowing compensation for lamp irregularities. [5] Socket: Medium base porcelain with nickel plated Copper screw shell, high temperature 200°C leads, rated 4KV: [6] Ballast: H!gh power factor rated for -20"F starting. Specify:. 120V or 277V. Finish: Standard finish is an eight step process consisting of two coats of black baked on acrylic enamel, one ~ light texture over powder coat base and chromate conversion coating. Custom Colors: Supplied on special order. U.L listed, suitable for wet locations and any mounting orientation. Accessories: See page 41. 20 BEGA Floodlights BEGA 'Floodlights for building or area illumination, Full specular anodized aluminum reflector, Tempered clear glass or spread lens with 14 linear prisms per inch, Fully adjustable stainless steel yoke/swivel mounting with degree indicator and locking feature, Color: Black, Glass Lamp Lumen A lB C 8328MH Clear 1 70W G12T6 MH 6600 11 133/16 12 8329MH Clear 1 100W'ED-17 MH 8500 11 133/16 12 _.Clear:. ...71-; 1 oow E~I'THPS' .... : :.119500 __ :;.'.;. 1J ... ;..133/1~!~:i'~1!2:? ~' 8330MH Spread I 70W G12T6 MH 6600 11 13aA6 i2 8331MH Spread 1 100WED-17MH 8500 11 133A6 12 83318 Spread 1 100W E-17 HPS 9500 11 133/% 12 435 Mounting bracket "'/splice box for 3"¢ pole top 341 Pole cap for 2%"¢ pole top 342 Pole cap for 3'¢ pole top ~50 Pole mount arm ~ Lamp Beam Field 8328 Clear 10.1° 18.2° 8329 Clear 3.7° 14.1° 8~2~9 Coated 24.4° 68° 8330 Clear 38.8° x 10.5° 76,5° x 18.9° 833~1 Clear 35.1° x 7.3° 78° x 24,1 ° 833~1 Coa~ed 60.!° x 36.5-* 109.1° x 86.3 551 .:: .Wair:rb b u nt:;.~.r nfi-;:¢.:, 553 Pole mount canopy 554 Wall mount canopy ~ COncentric ringilouver, foE11'¢-.'." ' 2H x 2V 665 Concentric ring louver for 1H x 1V 8328,8329,8330 4H x 4V 5H x 2V ///~-'"'%"~. 5H x 2V 556 360° lBulls eye glare shield - // 6H x 5V for 11"¢ 139 Large scale floodlights for 250W and 400W Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium lamps. 6 5 4 I , 2 2 2 2 1 3- Specifications [1] Housing: Two piece die cast aluminum consisting of a reflector housing with integral yoke mounting flanges and a separate cylindrical ballast housing with integral cooling fins: Ballast h.ousing" is secured to reflector housing by two stainless steel latches which allows easy access to the ballast and lamp focusing screws (see explanation below). [2] Lamp Enclosure: One piece die cast aluminum frame with integral. drainage slots. ~A" thick tempered glass (clear on 8393, 8374), - (spread lens with 14 linear pdsrns per inch on 8394, 8373). One piece, molded, U-channel, high temperature, silicone gasket. Full' specular anodized internal reflector. Frame secured to reflector housing by six (6) captive socket head staJnlese steel screws threaded into stainless steel inserts in the reflector housing. [3] Mounting Yoke:SAs· thick stainless steel, allows for full vertical adlustment with die cast aluminum aiming angle indictor and two (2) heavy duty, stainless steel locking bolts. Yoke is pre-drilled for mounting to various BEGA mounting accessories, supplied with a ~,~' I.P.S. threadedstainless steel- nipple with cable seal. Lumen ............... 8393MH Clear 1 250W ED-28 MH 22000 8893S Clear 1 250W E- 18 HPS - 28000 - 8394MH Spread 1 250W ED.28 MH 220130 8394S Spread I 250W E. 18 HPS 8374MH Clear 1 400W ED.28 MH 36000 83'/3MH Spread I 400W ED.28 MH 36000 8373S Spread I 400W E.28 HPS 37400 [4] Lamp Focusing: Three socket head stainless steel screws are provided for precise leveling and focusing df the H.I.D. lamp arc tube within the reflector optical system. This feature ensures perfect'beam pattern maintenance by allowing compensation for lamp irregularities. [5] Socket: Mogul base porcelain with nickel plated copper screw shell, high temperature 200"C leads, rated 4KV. [6] Ballast: High power factor rated for -20"F starting. speclfy: 120V or 277V. Rnish: Standard finish is an eight step process consisting of two coats of black baked on acrylic enamel, one with light texture over powder coat base and chromate conversion coating. Custom Colors: Supplied on special order. U.L. listed, suitable for wet locations and any mounting orientation. Accessories: See page 41. 2~ BEGA Floodlights _~~ ' ~ Floodlights for building or area illumination. Full, specular B anodized aluminum reflector. Tempered clear glass or spread · lens with 14 linear prisms per inch. · ' Fully adjustable stainless steel ~' - C · · A · yoke/swivel mounting'with degree indicator and locking feature. Coior: Black. ." .- . · Glass Lamp Lumen A B C. 8236MH Clear 1 150W G12T6 MH* 14000 133~ 15 129A6 8227'MH Clear 1 175W ED-17 MH* 14000 133/4 15 12g,/16 8337S Clear. 1 150W E-17 HPS" 16000 133~4 15 129A~ 8338MH Spread 1 150W G12T6 MH' 14000 133A 15 12%6 8339MH Spread 1 175W ED-17 MH* 14000 13'3/~, 15 129A6 83395 .Spread 1 150WE-17HPS'~ 16000 13~A 15 8393MH Clear 1 250W ED.28 MH** 22000 17 8393S Clear· 1 250W E-18 HPS** 28000 17 250W ED-28 MH** 22000 17% 20 173,~ 250W E-18 HPS*" 28000 17~/4 20 173/4 400W ED-28 MH* 36000 8394MH Spread 1 . '1~3- 94S Spread 1 ~,.~ ~H Cl----'~ar - 1 8374S' Ciear; 11 400W E-28 HPS~*' '37400__ :' i7 3/,. 20' .~."i .... ":400W ED-28 MH'~ 3'6000 17 3/4 8373MH Spread 1 20 17%" .8~73S Spread 1 400W E-28 HPS" 37400 173A 20 173/4 ~97MH Clear I 1000W BT-37 MH"* 110000 173A 20 17% ~98MH Spread 1 1000WBT-37MH** 110000 173/~ 20 17~4 *Cannot be aimed more than 45° below horizontal **Can be aimed in any direction incl'uding down BEGA ,- .. .'. Lamp 8336 Clear ,. 8_337 Clear Coated 8338 Clear 8339 Clear 8339 Coated 8392 Clear 8893 ' Coated ~9...._~4 Clear 8394 Coated 8397 Clear 8398 Clear .--,-._..._.__. 8374 Clear 8374 Coated ~'7'3 Clear 837~..~.~3 Coated Beam Field Nema 10.1° 18.2° 2H x 2V 4.3° 10.70 1H x 1V 9.8° 32.1 ° 3H x 3V 37.4°x 10.3° 75.6° x 18.5° 5H x 2V 34.1° x 5° 75.8° x 13.3" 5H x 1V 60.4° x 24.7° I03.9° x 58.3° 6H'x.4V 3.9° 10.8° 39.3° 75.3° 435 Mounting bracket ~'/splice box for 3"¢ pole top 341 Pole cap for 2%'¢ pole top 342 Pole cap for 3"¢ pole top 42.1° x 5.5° 59° x 14.8° 62.8° x 36.5° 109.2° x 76.6° 6H x 5V 8.6° x 7.1° 29.3° x 28.3° , 3H x 2V 56° x 13.5° 83.5° x 45.9° 5.2° 15° 50.2° 95.5° 42.8° x 7.4° 64.4° x 19° 75.9° x 47.8° 130.2° x 100.4° ,,--~550' Pole :mount arm: ?" 551 'Wall mo~n{-~Fm'" 553 Pole mount canopy 1H x 1V 554 Wall mount canopy 5H x 5V 431 180° Glare shield for 4H x 1V 432 180° Glare shield for 17~/,"¢ 661 Concentric ring louver for 13~A"¢ 666 Concentric ring louver for 5H'x 3V 8336, 8338 · 1H x 1V'"'-'~662 Concentric ring Iouverfor17.~A~¢ 557' 360° Bulls eye gla~e Shield 5H x 5V. for 133A"4~ 4H x 2V 558 360° Bulls eye glare shield 7H x 6V for 17%"¢ 141 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2002 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7700 MARKET BLVD. PROPOSAL: Variance Request APPLICANT: Family of Christ Lutheran Church LOCATION: Coulter Boulevard NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Family of Christ Lutheran Church, is requesting a variance to the lighting standards. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on February 7, 2002. CHICORY WAY POPPY DR 10 BLUE SAGE LN E 1 WATERLEAF LANE E 12 LADY SLIPPER LANE 13 BU'I-FER CUP CRT 14 BLUESAGE LN W 15 WATERLEAF LANE W 16 SNAPDRAGON DR Coulter BI~, City Review Procedure Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. The staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council. may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® CREEK FIVE ASSOCIATES C/O LAND GROUP INC 123 3RD ST N MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 KEVIN R WRIGHT & MEGAN A ARNOLD 1976 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D / ST PAUL~N 55117 MICHAEl. J GORRA t680 ARBORETUM DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM R B ANDERSON & KATHLEEN M B ANDERSON 1974 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVEN & KATHERINE SCHRAMM 1949 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FAMILY OF CHRIST LUTH CHURCH 275 EAST LAKE DR PO BOX 388 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES H & KATHLEEN PENSYL 1972 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK HANLEY PAINE LEWIS 1967 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BLUFF CREEK PARTNERS C/O LAND GROUP 123 NORTH 3RD ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL MN 55117 PRAMOD & SHILPA TANEJA 1969 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 & CITY OF CHANHASSEN 11 PEAVEY RD CHASKA MN 55318 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL MN 55117 TODD H & MOLLY B sTABER 1971 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN C/O SCOTT BOT,~,ltER 690 CITY~R DR PO BOX 147 MN 17 .~~'~kSSEN 553 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD ST PAUL ...~- MN 55117 TAMRA S ADAMS 1973 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PETER J & JACKIE A NEVA 2230 TIMBERWOOD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL ... ...... MN 55117 _. HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL .._-4Vit,~ 117 MARK J FOSTER & KAREN S OLSSON 8020 ACORN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL -- "MN 55117 THE PILLSBURY COMPANY ATTN: CHRIS MUNTIFERING MSO8X3 200 6TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 RICHARD D & MARY A FRASCH 8000 ACORN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL .... ..._,,--Miki" ~5117 ..- CITY OF CHANHAfi-dg C/O SCOTT_.T. IttSTCHER 690 C,.I.T'Y CENTER DR PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KATHY J ROBILLIARD 1978 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD.D------: ST PAULJ MN 55117 Feb,18, 2002 3'OOPM S ;tSQ ARCHITECTS k o,1903 P, 2/'2 SMSQ Architects Re; 205 South Water Street I Box 390 I Northfield Minnesota 55057 I §07-645-4461 I FAX 507-645-7682 ' 15 February 2002 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner CITY of CHANHASSEN 690 City Center Drive Chaahassen, Mim~esota 55317 FAMILY of CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH SMSQ No. 19154C Dear Bob: As I explained over the telephone earlier today, the church has directed me to fonually request that you table their request for a variance for the cross lighting, scheduled for the February 19 Planning Comrrdssion meeting, and that you place it instead on the agenda for the following P.C. meeting on March 19. The church would simply like to take the extra time to confirm, if they are asking the city for a variance, that they are not proceeding headlong with something that might conceivably knpinge negatively on their ~eighbors. The church understands that tbSs request implies the suspension of the state-legislated 60-day review requirement for the ci~ to act on the request for variance, for a period equal to the requested delay-i.e., one rtlO~lth. S M S Q Architects Pepe Kryzda, AIA Pastor Nate Castens copies: Pastor Nate Castens, FoCLC 9151t~rO23.doe NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 19, 2002 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7700 MARKET BLVD. PROPOSAL: Variance Request APPLICANT: Family of Christ Lutheran Church LOCATION: Coulter Boulevard NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Family of Christ Lutheran Church, is requesting a variance to the lighting standards. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please Stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob at 227-1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the depadment in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on March 7, 2002. 15 WATERLEAF LANE W 16 SNAPDRAGON DR City Review Procedure Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. The staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission wilt close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial. Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Smooth Feed SheetsTM CREEK FIVE ASSOCIATES C/O LAND GROUP INC 123 3RD ST N MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 MARY C BERENDES 2015 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Use template for 5160® LINDA J YOUNG 2057 BLUE SAGE LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL J GORRA 1680 ARBORETUM DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LUTHER T HIPPE 2011 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 STEVE W & SALLY A CARROLL 2051 BLUE SAGE LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FAMILY OF CHRIST LUTH CHURCH 275 EAST LAKE DR PO BOX 388 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KENT J HALVORSON & GRETCHEN K ROGERS 2010 WATERLEAF LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 LAC H TRINH 2050 WATERLEAF LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BLUFF CREEK PARTNERS C/O LAND GROUP 123 NORTH 3RD ST MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 DOUGLAS W LAING & DEBORAH A REICHBERGER 2014 WATERLEAF PL E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MICHAEL J HJERMSTAD 2056 WATERLEAF LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 & CITY OF CHANHASSEN 11 PEAVEY RD CHASKA MN 55318 PAUL C HANSEN 2018 WATERLEAF LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCOTT J & STACY D MISKA 2062 WATERLEAF LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN C/O SCOTT BOTCHER 690 CITY CENTER DI~O BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - TIMOTHY R & ANGELA L DEWAARD 2022 WATERLEAF LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CONNIE L MUNSON 2068 WATERLEAF PL CHANHASSEN MN 55317 FRANCES MAUREEN WISSEL 2031 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN - 55317 ENRIQUE F VIA-REQUE 2026 WATERLEAF LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHAD B ANVARY 7744 BUTTERCUP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCOTT A TAYLOR & TIFFANY J SICILIANO-TAYLOR 2027 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SUSAN K BLAIR 2030 WATERLEAF PL E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JANICE M VANDERZEE 7748 BUTTERCUP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SEAN D & LEANNE M CONNELLY 2023 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ANGELA MARGARET BOBER 2069 BLUE SAGE LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JENNIFER L WUEBKER 7752 BUTTERCUP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARY S SMITH 2019 BLUE SAGE LN E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CHRISTOPHER CHARLSON 2063 BLUE SAGE LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BRADY A JAMESON 7756 BUTTERCUP CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5~.60® LUIS R & IANET M SAHMKOW 7755 LADYSLIPPER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JAMES Iq & KATHLEEN PENSYL 1972 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK HANLEY PAINE LEWIS 1967 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BARBARA L JOHNSON 7751 LADYSLIPPER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL MN 55117 PRAMOD & SHILPA TANEJA 1969 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JANET K BEETY 7747 LADYSLIPPER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL MN 55117 TODD H & MOLLY B STABER 1971 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SCOTT A JOHNSON 7743 LADYSLIPPER LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 PETER J & JACKIE A NEVA 2230 TIMBERWOOD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 MARK J FOSTER & KAREN S OLSSON 8020 ACORN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 RICHARD D & MARY A FRASCH 8000 ACORN LN CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KATHY J ROBILLIARD 1978 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 KEVIN R WRIGHT & MEGAN A ARNOLD 1976 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 WILLIAM R B ANDERSON & KATHLEEN M B ANDERSON 1974 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL~ 55117 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL ..----"~N 55117 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL -~M~~ 55117 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PA 55117 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PAUL ......MN 55117 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT OF MN INC 422 EAST CO RD D ST PA N 55117 STEVEN & KATHERINE SCHRAMM 1949 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 TAMRA S ADAMS 1973 ANDREW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT O~FMMN INC 422 EAST CO RD D~.~.~.-------~ ST PAUL ~ MN 55117 THE PILLSBURY COMPANY ATTN: CHRIS MUNTIFERING MSO8X3 200 6TH ST S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 CITY OF CHANHASSEN C/O ~ B6~-'~G~NEROUS 690 CITY CENTER DIE,._' BOX 147 CHANHASSEN MN 55317