2 Sub 6665 Mulberry Circle EastCITY OF
PC DATE: 5~7~02
CC DATE: 5/28/02
REVIEW DEADLINE: 6/4~02
CASE #: 2002-7 Sub
By: RG, MS, TH, ST, ML
STAFF
REPORT
l
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
Request for an amendment to the Willow Ridge PUD to permit one additional lot
and subdivision approval to create two lots, Willow Ridge 3rd Addition. "
6665 Mulberry Circle East
David Smith
1341 Ashton Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(95% 474-fi99.5
Dick Ersbo
6665 Mulberry Circle East
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development- Residential, PUD-R
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential - Low Density
ACREAGE: 2.09 acres
1.d
DENSITY: 0.96 units per acre gross and net (Willow Ridge overall 2.06 unit per acre net)
SUMMARY OF RE.QUEST: Request for an amendment to the Willow Ridge PUD to permit one
additional lot, from 37 to 38 lots, and subdivision approval to replat one lot in to two lots.
Notice of this public heating has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it
meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Ch~p
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 2
BACKGROUND
On March 1, 1993, City Council approved the final plat for Willowridge 2nd Addition creating 12
lots.
On March 23, 1992, City Council approved the final plat for Willowridge 1st Addition creating 25
lots and five outlots.
On October 28, 1991, City Council approved the preliminary plat for Willowridge for 37 single
family lots on 30.3 acres, a rezoning from RSF and RR to PUD-R, and a wetland alteration permit.
May 1991, the city approved a MUSA expansion that included this property.
On Mm'ch 26, 1990, City Council approved a final plat for Ersbo 2nd Addition replatting the first
addition into seven lots.
On November 20, 1989, City Council approved a wetland alteration permit for the site as part of the
preliminm3, plat approval for Ersbo 2nd Addition.
On June 13, 1988, the City Council approved a final plat for Ersbo Addition creating five lots on
5.03 acres. The plat was not developed due to the infrastructure costs.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is replatting one lot within the Willow Ridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) in to
two lots. The lots will be 60,984 and 30,491 square feet in size. Within a PUD, individual lots are
approved as part of the whole development, since the PUD permits lot sizes down to 11,000 square
feet so long as the average lot size within the project maintains 15,000 square feet. Thus, the
creation of another lot requires an amendment to the PUD and must be evaluated to determine that
the net average lot size is still maintained. The current net average lot size is 21,702 square feet.
With the proposed subdivision, the net average lot size is 21,131 square feet. Since the average
exceeds the minimum required, staff is recommending approval of the amendment to the Willow
Ridge PUD and the replatting of the lot in to two lots.
(It should be noted thai it was acknowledged by Lundgren Bros., the original developer, within their
covenants, that an additional lot could be platted on the "Ersbo" property.)
LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION
Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the Willowridge 3rd Addition are as
follows:
Total upland area (including outlots) 2.09 ac or 91,040 SF
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 3
Total canopy area (excluding wetlands)
Baseline canopy coverage
Minimum canopy coverage allowed
Proposed tree preservation
1.48 ac or 64,638 SF
71%
46% or .96 ac.
57% or 1.19 ac.
Developer does meet minimum canopy coverage allowed. No buffer yard plantings are required
since land uses on each side are the same.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
The property contains a variety of trees and vegetation on the north and east hillsides with
approximately a 40% to 50% slope to the west and north. There is an approximate 24-foot
elevation change between Mulberry Circle and the easterly property line that makes the site
rather difficult to develop. While the slope is very steep, it does not meet the definition of a bluff
which requires both a slope of 30% or greater and an elevation change of 25 feet or more.
Additionally, this steep slope adjacent to Mulberry Circle was created as part of the Willowridge
development when the street was extended around the wetland to Lake Lucy Road. At that time,
the slope extended out to the wetland to the west.
The~aradin°~ plan proposes to ~arade approximately 70% to 75% of the site to develop a house
pad, driveway, and utility extensions. The plans propose on cutting/lowering approximately six'
feet of the existing grades for the one rambler house pad. If importing or exporting material for
development of the site is necessary, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route
for review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The plans show retaining walls
along the new private access. The applicant should be aware that a separate building permit will
be required for any retaining wall over four feet in height.
The site sheet drains to the north and west and then drains west towards Mulberry Circle. The
addition of the home site will not require any additional storm water management improvements
and will not result in any increase of stormwater runoff from the site to the north neighbor.
Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's
Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type II
erosion control fence be used. The final grading plan shall incorporate erosion control fence
around the perimeter of the grading limits. In addition, tree preservation fencing should be
denoted on the gradin~ and drainage plan as well.
UTILITIES
No public utility lines have been proposed with this project. The lot will be serviced with a
private sewer and water line from the existing public sanitary sewer and water services on the
westerly property line of the site from Mulberry Circle.
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 4
The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for Lot 2. The 2002 trunk
sanitary sewer hookup charge is $1,383 and the trunk watermain hookup charge is $1,802.
Sanitary sewer and water hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of
building permit issuance.
STREETS/ACCESS
The site is to be accessed via an existing drive access to Lot 1 and a new private drive access to
Lot 2 off of Mulberry Circle. The new private access shown on the plan is 16 feet in width and
10% in grade that complies with city ordinance
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
In lieu of land dedication for parks and open space, the developer shall pay full park and trail fees
for the one additional lot being created by this development. One-third of the park and trail fees are
due at the time of final plat recording, the balance of the fees shall be paid at the time of building
permit issuance.
COMPLIANCE TABLE
Lot Are (sq. ft.)
Code 15,000
Lot 1 60,984
Lot 2 30,491
Average 45,737
Total 91,475
Frontage (ft.) Depth (ft.) Setback: Front,
Rear, Side (ft.)
90 125 30, 30, 10
276 257 30, 30, 10
177 195 30, 30, 10
The existing subdivision has an average net lot size of 21,702 square feet. The addition of one lot
will reduce the average net lot size to 21,131 square feet. The PUD ordinance permits lot sizes in
single-family detached developments down to 11,000 square feet provided an average lot size of
15,000 square feet.
SUBDIVISION FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development -
Residential, PUD-R District.
.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans
including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 5
Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable plans.
Be
The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water
drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified
in this report.
.
The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this
chapter;
Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure.
5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to
conditions if approved.
6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will
expand and provide all necessary easements.
.
The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
following exists:
a.
Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
Lack of adequate roads.
Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
Finding: The proposed subdivision is provided with adequate urban infrastructure.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motions:
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Willowridge Planned
Unit Development to increase the plat from 37 to 38 lots."
And,
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 6
'~rhe Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Willowridge 3rd
Addition, as shown on plans prepared by Otto Associates, dated 4/4/02, subject to the following
conditions:
Lot 2 shall have a minimum of one overstory deciduous tree planted in the front yard
setback area.
2.
Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around any trees to be saved located near the
grading limits. This shall be done prior to grading and maintained until construction is
completed.
3. Add the following note: "Sanitary sewer services shall be 6" PVC SDR 26."
o
Extend silt fence along the south side toward the east and remove all silt fence when
development is completed.
5. Show City Detail Plate Nos. 5300 and 5301.
6. Add a 75-foot minimum rock construction entrance.
7. Revise the grading on the east side to comply with 3:1 slope per City standard.
o
All disturbed areas shall be re-sodded or re-seeded within two weeks of grading
completion.
9. The driveway must be installed with a paved surface.
10.
Any retaining wall over four feet in height must be designed by a registered civil
engineer. The applicant should be aware that a separate building permit would be
required.
11.
If fill is imported or exported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route
and traffic control plan.
12. All plans must be signed by a registered engineer.
13.
The retaining walls must be designed by an engineer and a permit must be obtained
before beginning construction of the walls.
14.
The determination as to the bearing capacity of the soils is the responsibility of the owner,
a soil investigation may be required upon field inspection of the foundation excavation.
15.
The developer shall pay full park and trail fees for one additional lot pursuant to city
ordinance.
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 7
ATTACHMENTS
o
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Findings of Fact and Recommendation
Development Review Application
Reduced Copy of Preliminary Plat
Reduced Copy of Grading Plan
Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
Memo from David and Colleen Ronnei to Bob and Matt
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 8
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE:
Application of David Smith for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development for Willow
Ridge to permit one additional lot and subdivision approval to replat one lot in to two lots.
On May 7, 2002, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule
meeting to consider the application of David Smith for an amendment to a Planned Unit
Development to create one additional lot and preliminary plat approval to replat one lot in to two
lots. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit
Development and subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning
Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R.
5. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density.
6. The legal description of the property is' Lot 3, Block 1, Willow Ridge Addition
,
The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6)
possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our
findings regarding them are:
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 9
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies
and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land
uses of the area.
The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance.
The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which
it is proposed.
The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and
will not overburden the city's service capacity.
Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets
serving the property.
.
The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven
possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our
findings regarding them are:
(1) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
(2) The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and
regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
(3)
The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography,
soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to
flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
(4)
The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm
drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements
required by this chapter;
(5) The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
(6) The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and
Willow Ridge 3rd Addition
May 7, 2002
Page 10
(7) The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any
of the following exists:
ao
Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
Lack of adequate roads.
Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
o
The planning report #2002-7 Subdivision dated May 7, 2002, prepared by Robert
Generous, et al, is incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
amendment to the Planned Unit Development and the preliminary plat for Willow Ridge 3rd
Addition.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this .]th day of May, 2002.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:
Its Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
G:\plan\bg\development review\Willow Ridge 3rd
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
,ADDRESS: i ~_ 'q t /:~rS'~TO r,.) ('o ¢'O-T'-
-J-Fi T:PHONE [Daytime) ct%"~- H'"71'- % "~ '2. %"
OWNER: 'D l 6.~ ~ 'P~__.~ o
ADDRESS: 4',(,.-,G ~- iN.u/.-b~b'-P4'by' ~'('.¢_czZD
TELEPHONE: O~ .~'~. ---_ ~"/L/ - ~"2--~'
Comjorehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit
interim Use Permit
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
Variance
Non-conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Rezoning
Wetland Alteration Permit
Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Site PJan Review*
! 2( Subdivision'
._
Notification Sign
X Escrow for Filing Fees/AttorneyCost**
($50 CUP/SPRIVACIVAR/WAP/Metes
and Bounds, $400 Minor. SUB)
_ .
TOTAL FEE $ ~ ~/¢J~O
,R ~ist of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
~u~Iding material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews,
~Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each plan sheet.
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
..?qOTE- When multiple applications are processed, the aBoro~rintn fn.n .~hnll hn nhnrnnri fnr nnnh 2nnlinatinn.
3'OTAL ACREA, G E
W.ETLANDS ,PRESENT
~.R.ESENT ZONING
:P,E_QUESTED ZONING
:PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
YES ~ NO
:P~EQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
~__.ASON FOR THIS REQUEST
q'h'is application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
.De. padme~ to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
"Tffi-s is 'to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that ! am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This applica!ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
'the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
Ibis application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I wD 'keep myseff informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
~nderstand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
rny .knowledge. ,
'The c'~ hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
,ezte~ions are acproved by the applicant.
·
Signature of Applicant
"") , /? ./ C~." / .----
x-./;' ~,~¢ <~. 7:¢/:¢' ~r'"'~-/
Si..or~:¢ sf Fee Owner
A.pplication Received on ~ ~/~)~
Fee Pai/~:¢). ¢rp
Date
Date
Receipt No.
'The appTicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
l~ not contacted, a copy o~ the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
·
ctVIAI AZINIOIA
N O I J. I C1C1V C1Lt 8 .~ O (21~ M O -I -I l M
~o leld XJeu!tu!lOJd
./
\
\
;'/J~H5' ~ 30 E 1__,:~H5'
I m.,U ,~q I:>oJodaJd ~:O,~ ~,Jodoj Jo 'uold I
'~(O&Jn~ t~!q'1 I,O~ ~,J!'lJOO ,,(qOJOq II
'303H3Hl .1 V'ld O~JOD3H 3HI OJ ONIQHOD3V 'VIOS3NNI~
'XJNr~03 H3AHV3 '3901HA~077~ '1 ~307g 'l 107
:NOII V307 XJ H3dOgd
33N3J l-IlS $':11ON30-- .:IS,----- :IS
qlVl::IC! ::ION:ia 1-115
.J_
'I
ION3~L[ 3O¥~3OH:.)NV 31~8V3-- ~ 30 NO~O3~IO
OI~SV..~ :Fill X~030/._i
gNl::)VdS 'XVI~ ,t~
ISOd FIION:] 1 'NIPI ,CS
~ II
@ O~
,/
~.o.b.,~J UO UOld ou!poJ,f)
"- ~ ' ....~' ..'~
/
/
/
I , "x,,:,,
'"1~,..) / ' -""
i ~'~...~ol
"-. Wo. ol
,
\
~ "~_~-~ --
'%..
--_ -.-
'N 'N '/
I
/,
,/
\ \
x("3xy
\
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 7, 2002 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7700 MARKET BLVD.
PROPOSAL: Subdivide Property into
2 Single Family Lots
APPLICANT: David Smith
LOCATION' 6665 Mulberry Circle East
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant,
David Smith, is requesting an amendment to the Willow Ridge PUD to permit one additional lot and
subdivision approval to create two lots on 2.09 acres zoned PUD-R located at 6665 Mulberry Circle
East, Willow Ridge 3rd Addition.
What Happens at the Meeting' The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's
request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead
the public hearing through the following steps'
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during
office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project,
please contact Sharmeen at 227-1134. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one
copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on April 23, 2002.
City Review Procedure
Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim
Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Code
Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City
ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
The staff prepares a report on the subject application. This report includes all pertinent
information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the
Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a
recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal
as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and
discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council
may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's
recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority
vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to
commercial/industrial.
Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days
unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity
may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through
the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and
scheduling for the City Council meeting.
A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for
the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding
their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested
person(s).
Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not.
Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in
the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the
report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
Smooth Feed SheetsTM
Use template for 5160® ,
RUSSELL G KOHMAN
6730 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317 9548
MARY ELIZABETH MARTIN
6620 ARLINGTON CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7506
HELEN JACQUES
C/O A SUZETTE LEIZINGER
16010 EXCELSIOR BLVD
MINNETONKA MN 55345
LAWRENCE & KATHI. EEN KERBER
6420 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9434
JOHN P & BARBARA J SPIESS
6610 ARLINGTON CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7506
RICHARD C ERSBO
6665 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN
55317 8409
ROBERT E & DIANE L MARTINKA
6650 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9513
SYLVESTER & MARY ROERICK
6600 ARLINGTON CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7506
ERIC D & LISA KLEVEN LEI-iRER
TRUSTEES OF TRUSTS
6601 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
ROBERT R & ETHELYN CHRISTENSEN
664.8 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9513
BRIAN LEROY NELSON &
LINDA DOWDEN NELSON
6551 DEVONSHIRE DR
CttANHASSEN MN 55317 7541
RANDY M & LISA M SIEVE
6619 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
JON G & LAURIE P STECKMAN
1215 LAKE LUCY RD
Clt.-\Ni-I,ASSEN MN 55317 9433
SCOTT R & KAREN J DEWING
6541 DEVONSIIlRE DR
CHANttASSEN MN 55317 7541
STEVEN B & ANGELA B LEE
6637 MULBERRY CIR
CH.~NHASSEN MN 55317 8409
C]tRISTOPHER S EIMAN
1206 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317 9433
CAROL J EGYHAZI
6720 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317 9548
THOMAS H & MARY J KUHN
6655 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
SCOTT A WOITASZEWSKI &
CHRISTINE M WOITASZEWSKI
1180 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8675
MICHAEL J CUCCIA &
MARGARET J CUCCIA
6722 POWERS BLVD
CH~NHASSEN MN
55317 9548
LESTER W & STEPHANIE A MORROW
6673 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
JEFFTxE'x' ROBERT SMITH &
CAROLYN WELDON SMITH
6601 ARLINGTON CT
CttANHASSEN MN 55317 7506
DAVID P SMITH &
JLrLIA A SIMENSON-SMITIt
6724 POWERS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9548
DOUGLAS H VOLKMEIER &
SANDRA L BLAIR
6691 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
TODD W & TERESA E DECKARD
6611 ARLINGTON CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7506
KATHY LANG
6460 THORNBERRY CRV
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 7507
KEVIN J & KATHLEEN C DILLON
6701 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8407
E SAMUEL CHASE III
6621 AP~LINGTON CT
CH.4.NI-I:x.S SEN ~'x i .N
55317 -500
NICHOLAS 154 & JUDY A JACQUES
1214 LAKE LUCY RD
CH.qNHASSEN MN 55317 9433
GERALYN M GRUSS
6715 MULBERRY CIR
CHA2qHASSEN MN
55317 8407
Smooth Feed SheetsTM
Use template for 5160®
MICHAEL J & HEATHER H MOOTZ
6729 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8407
MATTHEW G & LISA L KLING
6683 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
STEVEN C & SHARON S VENO
6730 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8406
STEVEN J & DEBORAH MANNING
6687 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
CHRISTOPHER J VANDERPLOEG &
JEAN L VANDERPLOEG
6719 MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8407
BRUCE & JULIE MAYER
6693 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN
55317 8409
MARK A & PAMELA H WAGNER
6735MULBERRY CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8407
ROY R & JACQUELINE B ANDERSON
6695 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
GREG A & MARTHA K POMERANTZ
1321 tt]EATItER CT
CH.&NHA$SEN MN 55317 8410
ANDREW B & SUSAN L AKINS
6699 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
RITA CRA\VFORD
5728 MULBERRY CIR
2HANHASSEN MN
55317 8400
RUSSELL J & BONNIE G SIAKEL
6703 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8407
3OUGLAS R & MICHELLE L HOUSER
5714 MULBERRY CIR
2HANHASSEN MN 55317 8400
JEFFREY N & MELISSA A ELDER
6696 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8408
,COTT R & TRACY E CLARK
~700 MULBERRY CIR
'.HANHASSEN MN 55317 84013
DAVID M & COLLEEN B RONNEI
6666 MULBERRY CIR E
l'
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8408
ETER J & CYNTHIA L MILLER
505 MULBERRY CIR E
HANHASSEN MN 55317 8409
DUANE H & MONA R UDSTUEN
6636 MULBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8408
2kUL D & ANNE M KAPSNER
535 MULBERRY CIR E
51.~NHASSEN MN 55317 S409
KEVIN L ANDVIK &
TONETTE F CLINE-ANDVIK
6606 ML~LBERRY CIR E
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8408
Page 1 of 1
Generous, Bob
From: dronnei@de[taenv.com
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 2:00 PM
To: chpln3 @ ci.chanhassen.mn.us; msaam @ ci.chanhassen.mn.us
Subject: Proposed subdivision - Lot 1, Block 1, Willowridge Third Addition
Good Day Bob and Matt -
We are David & Colleen Ronnei and we live at 6666 Mulberry Circle East, Chanhassen, directly across the
street from the proposed lot development/subdivision.
We are unable to attend the meeting on May 7 regarding the proposed subdivision - so we are providing our
comments in written format directly to your attention (for public record).
Concerns we ask the Planning Commission and Engineer Department to consider:
- Does this lot and subdivision fall within a "Bluff Protection" zone or can and should it be considered a "Bluff".
It would seem to meet the criteria listed in Chapter 20, Article XXVIII, Sections 20-1400-1407.
- We have a concern about the position and aesthetics of the driveway for the lot. The driveway will cut across
the bluff face which of course presents several engineering challenges. We are concerned that proper and
sound engineer practices be used to ensure that no erosion or other instability occurs. We are also very
concerned about the aesthetics of this driveway project.
- Due to the elevation of this home and position of the driveway, we have a serious concern about headlights
shining in and on our home as cars exit the driveway.
- We also have a safety concern over the placement of the entry point onto the street (of the driveway). This is
a blind entry on a hill as proposed.
- We have a concern regarding the elevation of this proposed structure relative to our existing home. Mr.
Smith, the developer of this lot, has discussed his plans and has been sensitive to this issue... I am not sure
what, if anything can be done about this.
Best Regards
David & Colleen Ronnei
Phone: 800.477.7411 or 612.867.4641 (direct)
e-maih dronnei ~' deltaenv.com
web site: vc,¥w, deltaenv.com