Tour PacketRP sk
♦ r
,
- ♦ `i:. � � v ii � s _ - '' * '� �i< l � ' 1 r., � 't y .M•�
•. �~ r. ''� •_;� r R "� View .,�=` •` v � = � I •
• ,E _
�' L` s - ' ,.... nt.q - • �R - JI
t
7
O ♦ 1
I A
A y t
AT
a� � Perk .w � � • ' '�''" � � �.� I � � n_ ., t• � , � 4 �
♦,.
s ! wr ► C N.- Prbirnmn'
State Hwy �
N OILR`J AO ' m
4,
I Lake Brtv n is
^...
n
r ,
� �
p 1 ..zd
_ �o =o
o
CO
:J rf 4 Z i Lam: m✓.i `°
ZA 4k
♦ . "� :lL..S7 On i
Y A I F
T '
v
CttYOF
CmSIX
Q)
L
Q
C)
cn
J
�
I
j n
W ()
r
Q
0 �
Q
- R= 199.86
d= 4177 "GB /
Ch
8r9= N89'40'OB - W /
t
GRADING NOTES ! 1
p
�,—
c s.lE ox ..,, xr ceaDlm : -I la, .e xws xxrox )D nwn o. � ggg
v[rnu ° �ccs ) rr ° [m x41tl1 Exlx.icn swl. � .xonorn n, FU+ °�
e. wxm.c)D�D . o W, « � ) rova DxxxnE x[wm ox sm «, wi Iwri
. wxw.wx DEmEOmxG. .xo vinsxn nwu� rw san c �� .
ALLIANT
m snE o[swx cxn[xu sccn0« W xaWEa ,uxuu rax MMIDxLL NOWSSPJNU, WC.
Duvwu nMnxD coxsm M�CartxMM swu e< PESPpWBtf N WNNSAPOLIe ADVNt1. RV,TCfm
xr«F BD?[ oelw+[D. xD x[Intl )ee.wm
I uS le,L teYSOW
EROSION CONTROL SCHEDULE:
„x m«elxDD,�« Dx D[wDxDD«, 9
xDS� Dx M w — e w 9DU. m a D a wwx rz
5
s< tx,ax sl«I..x .wxD�m.M x«DD, .Exx � I,,. DE[o rDx mow, a
J
. T � O
✓rzx M[ vs! wWx n M[ xaw nocxvxR uusi xsD 9E 5[xw¢D. ¢.
W F
Z
w nwum.n „<xDwm .s uwun «wsuD Z O
owt ,awes ME slrt wsl W U
m«a m[ns U Z
Ir
N N
Dc N>W oE,wlcx mw „ Mc co9x,E,n« a coxs,xDnw« °[°pA1m �” W O
Z
W
GRADNG LEGEND m o
ExsnxD W Q
— 59— MmvO �cOMOUx �
cc
x.s Row -E o Z
873.0 ew -1 D wwi Y g z Q
• xOVO5E0 G)Cx PwGxS J U �.
.xOxOSED SiDRU SEWER
—E CMDF I n.nev n «IIY m«I Ini. x�en.
�YL UNECigx DE OR.,x[,DE
fiE � s'r Raon ntv Inn
C l£i RRD,Etlgx • Lal. s,
SL[ rENC[ xx[sOr,
ou— 499URWCF /co—
mn ISSUE un
N
O Y �
—IM 0 TEM1 1.
PSk
4c� kal xD
Pa ��1 ^O �U
T QOR o 95 50 100 re9.cn C_2 1DDxD
scuE x+ EECr wl[n 5 of 9
City 36 inch Stormwater Pipe runs through site.
.e" ice.' j-Y" �+� �w .11r°" y,T � y.�•_, dl,�' J ' \ _
n3
ns
.yr•v . +- . ''� ' d _ _ SFr' _ — � �-� / 97L-01
Tvr
x°
9C .0 I.I tll :llll :l `t' � llflllfv Pa5PIY1Pllt
+ j S+ 937. Q ��
,am i tocg�'" Ai F y 1 9�,]. { �� — 6 - ' - -- c Qtl 2
4. r ` s r I I j � •�� +f-�- _ .�s�e $i eq�e. is i � ¢, '� �---' - Yf- r ;12 RW
own
camp
171• i. �
r
�. al - -�- 91 a. 9
irt' o.e tY to , }0 +: p� calf
t~ 1 f o t6�52� p010
a -' i ` aE
N j
`j.. �' ' ��^ 911.4"
917_(1
910.5 1W 1 91 Q,,
905.7 BW a := - rx�` IW
9105 TVti' -
{� 9C4 -9 B%% 90 .S TirY
r' - rr"' �'' . + 1 � l 9'74. 1 d
910.5 Tn'
T_' 9C 1`
-- ��
Stormwater Issues and Green Infrastructure
2 Trees and Stormwater:
Communities have done nearly as much as they can to control and manage stormwater through
grey infrastructure. Green infrastructure offers new opportunities to meet the challenges of
handling stormwater in urban and suburban areas where space and solutions are limited. The
current trend for minimum impact development has resulted in increased interest in rate
reduction and infiltration strategies. The stormwater benefits of trees are being documented
and incorporated into community stormwater management. The future may hold increased
reliance on trees as tools for stormwater volume and pollutant reduction.
How do trees help with runoff and stormwater? Trees provide stormwater reduction by
intercepting rainfall. Rain collects on leaves, is held temporarily and then released down the
branches to the trunk. The greatest interception happens with lighter rains which allow the
trees to capture the maximum amount. The average precipitation for MN is 20" per year. An
average tree will intercept 23% of the precipitation that falls on it, over the course of a year
about 4.5" of rain. For a community, increased canopy coverage = increased stormwater
management. The greatest stormwater benefits come from mature deciduous trees. It should
be every community's goal to grow healthy, mature trees throughout the town.
Grey and Green Infrastructure —
Grey infrastructure — roads, utilities, drainage systems
Green infrastructure — trees, rain gardens, green roofs, wetlands, etc.
Trees as green infrastructure —they provide multiple environmental and community benefits.
Stormwater runoff reduction
Pollutant removal —water and ground
Heat island reduction
Air quality improvement
Human health
Crime reduction
Increase in property value
Wildlife habitat
Aesthetics
Wind protection and buffer
Points to remember
R AINF:ILL INTERCEPTION is influenced
hy:
W Intensity and duration of the
rainfall event
9 Tree species — deciduous,
broadleaf evergreen, or conifer
W Tree architecture—size, number
of leaves, and arrangement of
leaves and branches
W Weather — temperature, relative
humidity, net solar radiation,
and wind speed
TRFFS STORE MORE WATER during a f-
inch rainfall event that lasts two
days versus one that lasts only two
hours. Therefore:
1F As compared to flood events,
small storms are responsible for
most of the annual pollutant
loading of receiving waters
W Trees are most effective in
intercepting rainfall during small
events
ig Urban forests are likely to
produce more benefits through
water quality protection than
flood control.
n \E OF ouR STUDIES FOUND that a
typical medium -sized tree can
intercept as much as 2380 gallons of
rainfall per year.
BROADLEAF EVERGREENS AND CONIFERS
intercept more rainfall than
deciduous species where winter
rainfall patterns prevail.
t�
7 .
! tJ'
street
JV
#4
porous pavers grass pavers •
sidewalk
Reitdo - biks byAlun A. Loomis, http: /Avwu+. del iriouslu.iiet 441 1
Redesign streets where trees work in combination with grass and porous
pavers to retain water on site.
TREES WORK IN COMBINATION with Other
stormwater controls to produce a
comprehensive solution to rainfall
interception, runoff and landscape
water use:
ig Backyard cisterns capture roof
runoff, and provide supple-
mental irrigation
1F Swales hold overflow
iF Bermed lawn -area retention
basins facilitate infiltration
@; Grates/drywells capture
driveway runoff
STRATEGIES TO ENHANCE the urban
forest and improve the control of
stormwater runoff:
tF Plant more trees in appropriate
places
ig Improve the maintenance of
existing trees
iF Plant species with a higher rate
of growth where appropriate
W Plant species with architectural
features that maximize
interception
9 Match trees (deciduous,
evergreen) to rainfall patterns
ig Plant trees in groves where
possible
W Plant low water -use species
W Plant broadleaf evergreens
where appropriate and avoid
south- facing windows
ig Use native plants, which, once
established, can easily withstand
summer dry seasons and reduce
the need for supplemental
irrigation.
L Oakla r nd, omia, the continuous tree
ted to i ntercept 4 inches of
re in a typical year— about
.
NOTE: In looking for solutions to stormwater runoff it is important to consider an integrated approach that uses other water
conservation, water retention, flood management, and pollution control strategies. Community solutions include but are not
limited to: porous pavement, vegetated swales and filter strips, recharge areas under parking lots, holding tanks and cisterns
under playfields, surface area holding ponds, turf grass filters, and riparian retention and treatment areas. For more
information on these solutions see the TreePeople website at http:// www. treepeople .org/trees/charrette.htm, and their book,
Second Nature: Adapting Los Angeles' Landscape for Sustainable Living, edited by Patrick Condon and Stacy Moriarity.
For more information, refer to the following publications:
Chang, G.; J. Parrish; and C. Souer.
1990. The first flush of runoff and its
effect on control structure design.
Environmental Resource
Management Division. Department
of Environmental and Conservation
Services. City of Austin, Austin, TX.
36 pp.
Claytor, R. A.; and T. R. Schueler.
1996. Design of stormwater filtering
systems. The Center for Watershed
Protection, Silver Spring, MD.
McPherson, E. G. 1998. Structure
and sustainability of Sacramento's
urban forest. J. Arbor. 24(4): 174-
190.
McPherson, E. G., et. al. 2000. Tree
guidelines for coastal Southern
California communities. Local
Government Commission,
Sacramento, CA. 97p.
McPherson, E. G., et. al. 1999
Benefit -cost anlysis of Modesto's
municipal urban forest. J. Arbor.
25(5): 235 -248.
Mao, Q. F., et. al. 2000. Winter
rainfall interception by two mature
open -grown trees in Davis,
California. Hydrol. Process. 14: 763-
784.
Mao, Q. F., et. al. 2000. A new
approach to modeling tree rainfall
interception. J. of Geophysical
Research. 105(D23): 29, 173 -29,
188.
Mao, Q. F., et. al. 1998. Rainfall
interception by Sacramento's urban
forest. J. Arbor. 24(4): 235 -244.
Trees protect water and soil
resources.
A healthy urban forest can
reduce the amount of runoff and
pollutant loading in receiving
waters in four primary ways:
1) Through evapotranspiration,
trees draw moisture from the soil
ground surface, thereby
increasing soil water storage
potential.
2) Leaves, branch surfaces, and
trunk bark intercept and store
rainfall, thereby reducing runoff
volumes and delaying the onset
of peak flows.
3) Root growth and
decomposition increase the
capacity and rate of soil
infiltration by rainfall and reduce
overland flow.
4) Tree canopies reduce soil
erosion by diminishing the
impact of raindrops on barren
surfaces.
Urban forests can dispose of
waste water
Urban forests can provide other
hydrologic benefits. For example,
irrigated tree plantations or
nurseries can be a safe and
productive means of wastewater
treatment and disposal. Reused
wastewater can recharge
aquifers, reduce stormwater
treatment loads, and create
income through sales of nursery
or wood products. Recycling
urban wastewater into green -
space areas can be an economical
means of treatment and disposal,
while at the same time providing
other environmental benefits.
This fact sheet is provided for you to copy and distribute. Please credit the Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific Southwest Research
Station, USDA Forest Service, Davis, California. July 2002.
., o
3 4i v
h m y = <o co Zn
Incorporate storniwater treatment hIto street design by
adding trees and swales. Prom Green Neighborhoods, a publication
(If NeighborhoodLAB, ht tp : / /neighborhoocl.t�orego ».edz ✓.
Lake Drive Business Center /Lake Susan
y 1 ,
The Preserve
S
sa�n
�..� r•srw� � -���s �: t fit:. � �
.1
r
,� R' 'ri n'S
vl NTH.•
Cur red p—emee BUNCreek P6kney -id., ,
C i1r ff
S
.
401
p r "
Y
Y k-
FIR
y�nclhl. (10 H 18)
The Preserve at Bluff Creek, 3rd Addition
NPDES Compliance Monitoring
ad^
1 �2
S 4 Y }
l ,SA;; fi 1 � n �~ fa
r I a
a
Yh
d
N *Violations
SC4_j SC1 M2 M3
-!'� SC3 - M1 EC1 Preserve 3rd
9/14/2011 G: /ENG /krista/JVPDES 11/2011 Inspection Reports & Letters1Preserve3rdNPDES.mxd
* Violations correspond to NPDES Permit requirements
as listed in the NPDES Compliance Monitoring Program
Report dated July, 28, 2011.
NPDES COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
Authority:
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Stormwater Division NPDES Permit Inspection
City of Chanhassen
Project Name:
The Perserve at Bluff Creek Lot 1 Block 1
Location:
City of Chanhassen
City:
Chanhassen
County:
Carver
Preferred ID:
SUB0029936
Water Project:
Inspection Date:
7/27/2011
Inspector:
Chip Hentges, Carver SWCD, 952.466 -5263
Weather Conditions:
sunny
Site Conditions:
DRY CONDTIONS
Submit a written response to all non - compliant or under review items noted in this inspection report within 7
Comments: business days of receipt. Include copies of inspection and maintenance records from 1 -1 -2011 through 7 -27-
2011. Please call meat the number above if you have questions
Carver SWCD, 11360 Hwy 212 Suite 6, Cologne, MN 55322 Attn. Chip Hentges
INSPECTION CHECKLIST
Status
7J28J201 I
Pagel of 4
Permit Coverage: (Minn. R. 7090.2010): A General Construction Stormwater Permit is required for
Requirement construction activity that disturbs land of qual to or greater than 1 acre (or less than 1 acre but part of a compliant
Common Plan of Development greater than I acre).
Inspection Result:
Corrective Action: (None)
EC I: Exposed Soils (Permit Part IV.B.2): Exposed, unworked soils (including pond slopes & temporary
Requirement stockpiles) must be stabilized with temporary or permanent stabilization BMPs according the timeframes in noncompliant
the permit.
Inspection Result: dirt piles on curb, and exposed soils behind curb lines
Corrective Action: Remove dirt piles along curbs on a daily basis. Temporary stabilize all exposed soils
EC2: Ditch Bottoms (Permit Part 1V.B.3): Ditch and swale bottoms must be stabilized 200 feet back from
Requirement the property edge or from the point of discharge to surface waters within 24 hours (beyond 200 feet within not inspected
1 14 days after completion of work in the ditch).
Inspection Result:
Corrective Action:
I Requirement (EC3: Energy Dissipation (Permit Part 1V.B.4): Pipe outlets must have energy dissipation within 24 hours I not inspected I
after connection to a surface water.
Inspection Result: (None)
Corrective Action: (None)
NPDES COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
7/28/2011
Page 2 of 4
SCI: Perimeter Control (Permit Part IV.C.2); Perimeter control must be properly installed and maintained at
down gradient perimeters of the project and where land slopes to surface waters (including stormwater
Requirement conveyance systems). non compliant
M1: Perimeter Control Maintenance (Permit Part IV.E.4.a): Perimeter control BMPs must
be maintained when sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the device or repaired/replaced
when BMPs becomes nonfunctional.
Perimeter controls were knocked down on several active contruction sites. Need to find a new place to park
Inspection Result: dumpster as contractors has to go through perimeter control to get there. No perimeter controls in front of
homes along Degler Circle.
Corrective Action: Install perimeter controls as defined in the permit and your SWPPP
SC2: Inlet Protection (Permit Part IV.C.4): Storm drain inlets must be protected by devices that capture
Requirement sediment. non compliant
M2: Inlet Maintenance (Permit Part IV.E.4): Inlet control BMPs must be maintained or replaced when
rendered ineffective (e.g. filled with sediment, damaged, or device is otherwise compromised)_
Insnectinn Result: Maintain all inlet controls inlet nrotection devices are full
Corrective Action: Clean out all inlet protective devices - in writing explain how this was accomplished
SC3: Vehicle Tracking (Permit Part IV.C.6): Vehicle tracking of sediment from the construction site (or
Requirement onto streets within the site) must be controlled by rock pads or other effective BMPs. non compliant
M3: Sediment Tracking (Permit Part IV,EA.d): Tracked sediment must be removed from all
paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery.
Inspection Result: Tracking was observed, and sediment was on the street
Corrective Action: Streets need to be swept daily
Requirement SC4: Stock Piles (Permit Part IV.C.6): Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective under review
sediment controls at the base of the pile.
Inspection Result: Temporary stabilize all stockpiles
Corrective Action:
SC5: Dewatering (Permit Part IV.D): Dewatering or basin draining (e.g. pumped discharges, trench/ditch
Requirement cuts for drainage) related to the construction activity must not adversely affect the receiving water or not inspected
downstream landowners.
Inspection Result: No dewatering was observed.
Corrective Action:
Requirement SC6: Temporary Sediment Ponds (Pennit Part III.B): Temporary sediment basins are required during r
c.�r - , li2nt
construction where 10 or more acres drain to a common location.
Corrective Action: (None)
Requirement PP
SC 7: Infiltration Areas (Permit Part IV.E.5): Infiltration areas must be protected from compaction and not applicable
sedimentation during construction activities. Please notify the S WCD prior to construction (952.442.5101).
Inspection Result:
Corrective Action:
SC8: Other Sediment Controls (Permit Part IV.C.1): Sediment control practices must minimize sediment
Requirement from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and stone sewer inlets. Sediment control not inspected
practices require maintenance when ineffective.
Inspection Result:
NPDES COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
7/28/2011
Page 3 of 4
Corrective Action:
NPDES COMPLIANCE MONITORING PROGRAM
7/28/2011
Page 4 of 4
Requirement
P1: Solid Waste (Permit Part IVY. I ): Solid wastes resulting from construction activities must be disposed of�
properly. under review
Inspection Result: Construction material spread on pads that are not being built
Corrective Action: Sites need to be cleaned up
Requirement P2: Hazardous Materials (Permit Part IV.F.2): Hazardous materials (such as fuels, lubricants, solvents) must not inspected
T he properly stored, including secondary containment.
Inspection Result: (None)
Corrective Action: (None)
P3: Concrete Washout (Permit Part IV.F.4): All liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout
Requirement operations must be contained in a leak -proof containment facility or impermeable liner. All washout areas under review
must be identified, including trucks and masonry mixing stations.
Inspection Result: Report on how contractor is handling concrete wash.
Corrective Action:
Requirement SW I: Discharges to Surface Waters (Minn. R. 7050.0210): Discharges of stonnwater from the site to not inspected
surface waters may not cause nuisance conditions such as discoloration, sediment plumes, or deltas.
Inspection Result:
Corrective Action:
Requirement SW2: Removal of Sediment from Surface Waters (Permit Part IV.E.4.e.): Sediment deposited in surface not inspected
waters (including drainage systems, catch basins) must be removed within 7 days of discovery.
Inspection Result:
Corrective Action:
Requirement
�D 1: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Permit Part III.D): The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan non compliant '
must be retained at the site during construction. --- '���-
Inspection Result: SWPPP Box not observed
Corrective Action: Install S W PPP Box and have every contractor sign off that they aware of the storinwater issues
Requirement D2: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Permit Part III,A): The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan non compliant
conforms to all applicable items outlined in Part III.A of the permit.
Inspection Result: (None)
Corrective Action: (None)
Ds: Inspection and Maintenance Records (Permit Parts III.D & IV,E): Site inspections and maintenance
Requirement activities must be recorded and retained at the site. The inspector must be trained according to permit non compliant
specifications.
Insnection Result: IJnder review
Corrective Action: Submit inspection reports as stated.
Requirement AR: Additional requirements or conditions not identified as checklist items. not ins ected
Inspection Result: (None)
Corrective Action: (None)
Non - Compliant Requirements.
• M1: Perimeter Control Maintenance(Permit Part IV.E,4.a.):
Perimeter control BMPs (Best Management Practices) must
be maintained when sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of
the device or repaired /replace when BMPs becomes
nonfunctio.
r k Pal ,�� • .�� lr�
" 0.
Non - Compliant Requirements:
SCI Vehicl Tracking (Permit I
1 jftjg,tracking of
ii a ago " o ld
me
19 191
Litt L IOIL
v
y
- �. :s- �. ��.�i� rr�. ,;.��" -• * ti.. � _ a�.�• . " ,- wed _ �.� � - _w
E
y t^' � yyp •a , `+� t .9 S�F �;';� A _ i,,jrd 9 ''!'rrx � �' 3 r��' �
r r l� 'f y '' r r� x b _ ` �.— `"
FA A
;O v
PON
r ' �` R : .
f . rte .�.�� � ;ii� ;'D��.• r.1 �
'�. '- `�p� fi ' � l s - •' ,
q
.�,. .
T-
Ikon- Compliant Requirements:
SC1: Perimeter Control (Permit Part IV.C.2): Perimeter control must be properly
installed and maintained at down gradient perimeters of the project and where land
slopes to surface waters (including stormwater conveyance systems).
1 � t� r1' 91 J I v_:J4j_:�J,
Ad
Imo"' .� .. - , _ F i ..d ��' .•_ � "�'®NM'
dome& s t. ...rte
,OWL ® ,_✓ ,:
I1�
� c
1�1
e -
S
, -� ._ �� c�jJltlJ •1 ^ rt�� . ;''11�''
• o .�-, ��!' �•r}Jtf I'rJ�.}'' F��III �tl }���i�� J�F15'flJllr�.EPr�'c
f � a Sti, ,.. -:� 3 �� �� .i}� -� �4wer. �.' ��` :►~ "G,`".F.. y M -.M►r - V
e t D �r�r! w ��-� . c. . L ����M�'! Y. f►G t '~ R AM TM` r .• �� � � ,I
nsfrw MA
t o rJrt -'
to 0
^• f r —
_ r yl�_wS���
- � - :z -" - �?!�'Di .- r�s' ►' - -_ . `' � /rf 'tom � -."s .'..
J
. - r.
Non - Compliant Requirements:
• EC1: Exposed Soils (Permit Part IV.B.2 ':1. ;� °;er, rked soils most be stabilized
with temporary or permanen tabiliz t the timeframes in the
w
W %-
fie--
i`r 'rJ ft
t a
k
��F� �-� . - ► .. _ _ - yea V '�t� .. , ',� .y:- � 3
�� al ��� K - •V �- � ♦ ^ •�Pr. may.. '* .`"� .. .tea. �^y ..
_ak' ,i 1 `Cf _ �Y^ Y .; . i Y /Y�'� ^ti �► ��y� J _ _ ' , f ,{ 4
'"` y`... e � .. .i[u .�._• .a � ... `�ry_t. ^1-.�l tom. 'JVL - � I � r
�' -�
":
.�,
i y
L =- : 1
�-- _ =v- �� .
o omplianf Re kr6eotsi
• l�2�. IV�a�r�ten��ce � ' 1 t
qui e
t;w
: mu* maintained. or
I air
D'elow: Sediment- removed f r
properly d'ispo3*d of.
Contra
3t 1
4L
A 1 -40
.7 'e
.e to
7t.
pliant Requirements:
`- Piles (Permit Part IV•C•6): Temporary
It
I l ....
L. '-• ��''�'.. it <�"- �" � - -,o a[� -��- r r � �� �"F �1:rR - St- � �� ,Y/
�► - � � �.,' it cam _ �- s- . ��� - _ s =�� " 4. = �.�•'�. - - � + ." .�'.'� ��, v
s.. y roy� }� f� o �• Q ' r J
'A - f•!+ -- - is '/'r.��
- '�",`� - '� ,�. #•. � 'l'T...d.,, t *� f . � �• •ti �- max. .
y► _ _
_Y
�.t .. < }�TC�� � ✓_,• �.� ��1 �+. K"C .�� ^t - _•.+ �.y` '.� _. _ � �e��D_ } a r. '• " � � - r-.F •, _ � .may.`
'�►. . '- C �.�hy .� Y��
' �i = � c � s.�fis' � ► �.: '• - _ •h�;�_��� m-�a -.`�
2 _r_ - .. _•f�y;+✓- ���v`1- Y - -- s 4 .i �— .aC _ �` -• �. it
Wit! _: ?,�• � � - _ ., .- _ Y _ r - ` •r �;�o�}`�.` .a. ' -�
_.. � .4... /. ���r \G' iR. r 1 _ .. �„�,.� .: - � � Z+i.' -Y Gam .- ��c�S � ��'� � •2
x
1
•i ' Ida
f l
a �
f
Y .
r
A � p
i r
- s
� ."•.'°fix �°`" - r
# < t
n r
4
NO
011
77 M It-
4 & RP
OWN �^ Sa•Y l�'}�
HI
s°
K
+. T i
5
R
.7t I TT
�� 11 191 i
8�b888
3
v
r
a
0
0
z
0
n.
0
1
00
U
1-
4
m
w
z
a
/
3
i
H
w �
to �
C'
CN
P N
W 00
v1 °
°
Q N
z C'
z
Q
U C
d �
i.
v
U r
/ I
/ I
L - ----------- - - - -I- --.
I
I II
1 1 I ! IFES 81
I I 132LF - 15 RCP Q I I TA:2 +01,45, 11.69 LT
I 0 1 9% I I AE 988.50
I j l 12" PERF. PVC
L - - - - -- _- - -J I L _ -' L_ DRAIN TILE
I j l l j j
II I I (
I I L. —,- 220 - - 1 RCP —
t i l
, I I I 1 ^_ --
0 0.50%
! { FES 78
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
LAWS OF T}IE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Amy
�i
CA
""'""
'23+37.27. 49.19 LT
CITY PROJECT OS - 01
SHEET N0.
3-3
3 -6
IE 985.99
FES 191 I 5
1 1 I 11 1 - J
I I I STA:6+28.22,
28.01 LIT 12" PERF. PVC
1 1 1 1{ 1
4 1 1 1 1 1
I, 1
IE 989.OA I DRAIN TILE
I
I I I I I I
1 1 75LF - 12" RCP
I I 00.50%
{ I
{ 1
12" PERF. PVC
1 1 1 FES 80
j l
1 1 1 1 1 1 DRAIN TILE
1
STA: 5 +R ,5.213. 25.71 LT
I I I iE 988.62
1 1 _
I I I 1
6
6/27/08
IM
KR8
DATE: 02/25/2006
CHARD B. LARSON. P.E.
DATE 02/25/2008 MN UC. NO. 41864
S . P .
o -:n
GRADE 8' GRASS
TRAIL (TRAIL GRADING
IS INCIDENTAL TO POND
GRADING)
28LF - 24" RCP 0 1.002
FES 8
IE 952.7
RIP RAP
21LF - 24" RCP 0
EMERGENCY'
OVERFLOW
ELEV. 959.25 /
CL -3 J
RIP RAP
\___FES 82
IE 950.00
OUTLET CONTROL 83
RE 954.70
1E IN 950.00
IE OUT 953.00
SUMP IE 946.50
� Y 8' BITUMINOUS 1
TRAIL 1 N
1 H73
t:N
n 1 I
�\\ 1
4 1 I N
+ 1 f a
1 _ ( ti
a `� a -- - -'
r ' II
\ AA r ,,, , TOGA - /- SARA - -
I
1
I
i
1 -
1
1
f
t
l
1
1
V
I
I
1
I _
1
I
t
0 15 3D 60
HORIZONTAL
SCALE IN FEET
�y
y�0\
/ ^ - - - - - - -
MH 23A (WEIR RAH j
�i J
1
1
1
I I
I �
1 r
4 I
` I
- -1 I
� 1
� 5
....... ..
.;.
... DEPTH;
EOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC, TYPE V
(HIGH FLOW RATE, PROPEX 4553
r OR APPROVED EQUAL)
GENERAL NOTES:
1) GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING
LOW - COMPACTION EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF
UNDERLYING SOILS.
2) ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE B(ORETENTION DEPTH SHALL BE
UNDLSTUR8EO.
3) EXCAVATION REQUIRED FOR PLACEMENT OF PLANTING MEDIUM AND 1 -1.5"
DOUBLE WASHED STONE SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE DRAINAGE SCALE
PLANTING MEDIUM AND 1 -1,5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE PAY ITEMS.
DRAINAGE SWALE
CROSS SECTION
No.
I Date
I Revisions
App.
DRAWING NAME
CP08- D1- PONDDI-ALT3.DWG
_ ❑ Kimiey.Horn
J 1 1Vi Il
and Associates, Inc,
2350 DMVEnTY AVE WEST. SUITE 34% TEL. NO. (651) g16 -4147
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55114 FAX No. (731) ws -5117
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION
OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
LAWS OF T}IE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Amy
�i
CA
""'""
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
2008 STREET RFCO� ISTRUCTION
CITY PROJECT OMI
BIDALTERNATE3
ADING PLAN
GRADING P
CITY PROJECT OS - 01
SHEET N0.
3-3
3 -6
2
5/21/08
REVISED STORM SEWER
KRB
3
5/27/08
REVISED STORM SEWER
KR8
DESIGNED BY: RJG
COUNTY PROJECT
DRAWN BY: RJG
S
L
6/12/08
REVISED POND GRADING
KRB
CHECKED BY: KRB
S.A.P.
6
6/27/08
REVISED POND GRADING
KR8
DATE: 02/25/2006
CHARD B. LARSON. P.E.
DATE 02/25/2008 MN UC. NO. 41864
S . P .
PRO JECT N0. 1 6 0511 01 7
PLANTING MEDIUM -
(BY VOLUME):
50 -60% HOMOGENOUS
CONSTRUCTION SAND
20 -307. ORGANIC LEAF
COMPOST
20 -307. NATIVE TOPSOIL
12" PERF. PVC DRAIN TILE -
1-1.5" DOUBLE WASHED STONE
/ \ I / i \ / \ -�
�j
X O I II
LL LL-
------------------------ F -- -- - - - - --
--- - - - - -J
7 --------------
i
1
1
I
I
I Ln �
I :3 Q
I O
1 +-
11
4J
X
11 W V)
I
,
Z C)
1
1 I I
z
I I -
- - - - --
I
\
- - j - - - I -- I r -- _ - - - - - -- I r- - - -
- -- I-- r-- I-
t1 I
III Ijl Ijl I11 III 11�
III III III 111 II 11 '
I III III III I I X1 1
III III III 111 1 III �
III III III III I I X1 1
I III 111 III III __ -JI
III III 111 III II I
-------------- L - -- ----- 1 L
Ji
/ C i
ro a••+
� C
I i U LU
I� I C Q QJ
1 1 � m O �
� Q
I --
N
I i cN6 (-
I
I I
` I
� 1
1
1
1
3
� �
I
Q)
z
I I -
- - - - --
I
\
- - j - - - I -- I r -- _ - - - - - -- I r- - - -
- -- I-- r-- I-
t1 I
I
�--)
QJ i I I I I
I I I + Z) Fn i I I I LL - 0 O
I
QO I I I I
I I I M 0-- I I I ODC
I I I
i I r>3 i
I
kn I I I
Q I I I 1 1 I I
I I I z 0 C QJ I I (>3
_� I I I —� N
f0 i i t I I I
ra Z3 r
I I I Q) C I I f6 O
O
�m j l j -- I
-- I V)C)Qd j V)CC V)
m0
III Ijl Ijl I11 III 11�
III III III 111 II 11 '
I III III III I I X1 1
III III III 111 1 III �
III III III III I I X1 1
I III 111 III III __ -JI
III III 111 III II I
-------------- L - -- ----- 1 L
Ji
/ C i
ro a••+
� C
I i U LU
I� I C Q QJ
1 1 � m O �
� Q
I --
N
I i cN6 (-
I
I I
` I
� 1
1
1
0
. x
O Q1
V)
1 _0
1 0
N
m
m
1
a-
II Q N
1 C � O
I G LL
1
C O
G w-
O i
Z H
1
/
I � I
I I 1
I I
1 I 1
I I
I -1_-
1
I 1 I
C
(V i
QJ LL
> QJ
Z w
1
3
� �
I
Q)
z
K_.,
I
II \\
I
�
I
I
I
V)
Q LL I
I
I I
I
I
1
I I
I I
I I
0
. x
O Q1
V)
1 _0
1 0
N
m
m
1
a-
II Q N
1 C � O
I G LL
1
C O
G w-
O i
Z H
1
/
I � I
I I 1
I I
1 I 1
I I
I -1_-
1
I 1 I
C
(V i
QJ LL
> QJ
Z w
o
L
I..L
L
�4-J
0 `"
^ L
W
-00
W 4-j
^ W
W
c
EAR
23 Y m
O pp-
11
Q
Q
� �
I
I
I
II \\
I
�
I
I
I
I I
I
I I I
I
o
L
I..L
L
�4-J
0 `"
^ L
W
-00
W 4-j
^ W
W
c
EAR
23 Y m
O pp-
11
Q
Q