Loading...
3 SUB 6735 Lakeway DriveCiTY OF STAFF REPORT PC DATE: 2/20/01 CC DATE: 3/12/01 Review Deadline: 4/14/01 CASE#: 00-16 SUB By: A1-Jaff:v Z J n. PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 2.35 Acres into' 2 single family lots with a lakeshore setback variance, Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Southeast of Lakeway Drive and north of Lake Lucy, Lot 6, Block '2, Whitetail Cove. Brian and Nancy Tichy 6240 Cypress Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 831-4171 (952) 975-8176 l.fl PRESENT ZONING' , , , RSF, Residential Single Family District 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential-Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre) ACREAGE: Approximately 2.35 acres DENSITY: 0.8 Units per Acre Net 1.9 Units per Acre Gross SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 2.35 acres into 2 single family lots with a lakeshore setback variance. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City' s discretion in approving or dewing a preliminary plat'is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the propOsed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20, 2001 Page 2 level of discretion with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.35 acres into 2 single family lots. The prope~%~ is zoned RSF, Residential Single Family. The average lot size is 51,188 square feet with a resulting gross density of 0.8 units per acre and a net density of 1.9 units per acre. The site is located southeast of Lakeway Drive and north of Lake Lucy. Access to the lots will be provided via an existing private street off of Lakeway Drive. Both of the proposed lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance however; Section 20-481 (a) requires that all structures be setback seventy-five (75) feet from recreational development lakes. In addition, when a structure exists on a lot on either side of the prope~1y, the setback of a proposed structure shall be the greater of the distance of the 75 foot structure setback or the setback of the neighboring existing structure. The property located to the east of the subject site contains a single family home with a lakeshore setback that exceeds 1,000 feet. The intent of the ordinance is to protect lake view sight lines. The ordinance does not provide a way to account for excessive setbacks. Furthermore, it would restrict the entire Whitetail Cove subdMsion fi'om developing. The single family home (cun'ently under construction) located west of the subject site, is set back approximately 245 feet from the OHW. Maintaining this setback would make development of this lot impossible. Therefore, the applicant has requested variances from the 245-foot lakeshore setback. The proposed lots will not intrude upon the sightlines of the neighboring prope~1y due to the orientation of the home. The intent of the ordinance is being upheld. In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed. Minor revisions will be required. We are recommending that it be approved with conditions outlined in the staff report. PRELIMINARY PLAT The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.35 acres into 2 single family lots. The property is zoned RSF, Residential Single Family. The average lot size is 51,188 square feet with a resulting gross density of 0.8 units per acre and a net density of 1.9 units per acre. The site is located southeast of Lakeway Drive and north of Lake Lucy. Access to the lots will be provided via an existing private street of off Lakeway Drive. Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20.2001 Page 3 Both lots exceed the minimum 20.000 square feet of area (Lot 1 has an area of 58.420 sq. ft. and Lot 2 has an area of 43,956 sq. ft.). Both proposed lots meet the minimum width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. WETLANDS Two natural wetlands exist on-site. Wetlands comprise approximately half of the 2.33-acre proposed development. Basin 1 Basin 1 is a natural wetland located along the no~1hern side of the property. The basin is dominated by cattail, duckweed and sedges. Surface water flov,;s from this basin into the wetlands adjacent to Lake Lucy. No wetland impact is proposed in this basin. The applicant has proposed a 3 O-foot buffer with a 40-foot setback fi'om the wetland buffer edge for this basin. The buffer strip must maintain a width of at least 30 feet because the width allowed the developer to decrease buffer strip widths in other areas of Whitetail Cove 1 ~t Addition. The preliminary plat shows that the proposed driveway encroaches into the required buffer for Basin 1. The driveway should be realigned to preserve the 30-foot buffer. In addition, the proposed 60'x 60' building pads on both Lots 1 and 2 encroach into the 40-foot wetland buffer setback. The proposed building pads should be revised to maintain the 40-foot setback so an additional variance is not necessary. During an on-site inspection, City staff noticed that a retaining ,,,',.'all was installed along a portion of the southwest side of Basin 1. The applicant should be advised that if a retaining wall needs to be extended or added on the north side of the proposed driveway, it must not be located v¢ithin the wetland buffer. Basin 2 Basin 2 is a natural wetland located adjacent to Lake Lucy on the south side of the property. The basin is dominated by cattail, with an abundance of box elder and red osier dogwood. No wetland impact is proposed in this basin. The applicant has proposed a 30-foot buffer with a 40- foot setback from the wetland buffer edge for this basin. The buffer strip must maintain a width of at least 30 feet because the width allowed the developer to decrease buffer strip widths in other areas of Whitetail Cove 1 st Addition. Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20, 2001 Page 4 Other Wetland Issues Silt fence should be provided adjacent to all areas to be preserved as buffer. The applicant will be required to re-seed any disturbed wetland areas with MnDOT see. d mix 25 A, or a similar seed mix which is approved for wetland soil conditions. Existing vegetation within the wetland buffer must be left undisturbed unless otherwise approved. Because both wetland basins are classified as "Natural" in the City's Surface Water Management Plan, if the replanting of buffers is necessary, native vegetation must be planted. Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all existing wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant will install xvetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. Lake Lucy The proposed project is adjacent to Lake Lucy; therefore, each principle structure must maintain a setback fi'om the ordinary high water level (OHW). The standard setback for structures on sewered lots on recreational development lakes is seventy-five (75) feet. However, Chanhassen City Code Section 20-481 states: "When a structure exists on a lot on either side, the setback ora proposed structure shall be the greater of [75 feet] or the setback of the existing structure." In this case, a structure exists on the lot to the west of the proposed lot split. This structure is set back approximately 245 feet from the OHW. Maintaining this setback would make development of this lot impossible. Therefore, the applicant has requested variances from the 245-foot iakeshore setback. The proposed setbacks are listed below: Lot Setback from OHW Lot 1, Block 1 160+feet Lot 2, Block 1 110+feet The proposed setbacks are consistent with the setbacks approved as part of the Whitetail Cove (Lake Lucy Estates) subdivision. In addition, the proposed setbacks are the minimum required to meet the wetland buffer and setback requirements on the north side of the parcel. Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) According to Section 18-63 of Chanhassen's City Code, "Property being subdivided shall be exempt from the water quality and water quantity connection charges imposed by this section if the charges were paid or assessed in conjunction with a previous subdivision of the property and if the prope~ty is not being zoned to a classification with a higher charge." Since connection charges for Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20.2001 Page 5 this parcel were paid together with the Whitetail Cove subdivision, this project is exempt from connection charges. GRADING When initially platted with the Whitetail Cove plat, this site was designated as a custom graded lot. As such. a large amount of the original tree coverage still remains. Care should be taken by the developer to protect as many of the existing trees as possible, especially those on the south half of the site a4jacent to Lake Lucy. The plans propose on filling up to approximately ten feet for the two house pads and private drive areas. Fill will also be necessary to provide adequate cover over the sanitary sewer service for each lot. While some fill is required to create walkout-type dwellings, staff recommends that the applicant's engineer look at lowering the rear walkout elevations to approximately 964.5+. Staff' believes this would better match the existing topography and help minimize the amount of fill, grading, and tree toss in the rear yard area. With the amount of fill proposed, it is anticipated that import material will be required. If fill is imported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route and t,'affic control plan fox' review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The applicant should also be aware that if retaining walls are needed, a separate building permit will be required for any wall over four feet in height. A soils report was previously prepared by Braun Intertec. A surnnlary of the results of the soils evaluation indicated soil borings typically encountered a one to four foot layer of topsoil at the surface. Below the topsoil, most of the borings encountered glacially deposited soils. Layers of alluvial deposits were encountered above the glacial till into the boring. The soil report also supplied recommendations which indicated the topsoil, the alluvial soil, and some soft glacial soils found in the borings are considered unsuitable fbr supporting loads due to high organic content and/or associated compressibility under fill and building loads. To prepare for construction, the report recommended removal of these soils in the building area. The excavations would then be backfilled with engineered fill as needed to achieve the building and/or street subgrade elevation. The report also indicated that the natural clays on the site will be suitable for reuse as fill but will require drying to achieve compaction requirements. The plan shows some proposed offsite grading. The applicant should be aware that any grading outside the property would require temporary grading easements. EROSION CONTROL Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type III Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20. 2001 Page 6 erosion control fence, which is a heavy-duty silt fence, be used for the areas adjacent to the wetlands and Lake Lucy. The final grading plan shall incorporate erosion control fence around the perimeter of the grading limits. In addition, tree preservation fencing should be denoted on the grading and drainage plan as well. DRAINAGE No storm drainage improvements have been proposed with this plat. There is an existing storm pond in the northwest corner of the site which was constructed with the Whitetail Cove plat. However, none of the stormwater runoff from the proposed development will reach the pond. Runoff fi'om the front of the lots will drain to the northerly wetland and runoff from the rear of the lots will drain south to Lake Lucy. The additional impervious surface from this proposed lot split will result in a minimal increase of stormwater runoff fi'om the site. UTILITIES No public utility lines have been proposed with this project. Each of the lots will be serviced with a private sewer and water line from the existing public sanitary sewer and water mains on the westerly property line of the site. Due to the existing sanitary sewer elevation, each lot will require a grinder pump to service the basement level of the homes. This is typically avoided whenever possible; however, there are no other options in this case. A private utility easement will be required for the service lines of Lot 2 which are installed over Lot 1. Detailed utility construction plans and specifications will be required in conjunction with final plat approval. The construction plans and specifications shall be prepared in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Final construction plans and specifications will need to be submitted to the City a minimum of three weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review and City Council approval. As a part of final plat and construction plan approval, the applicant will be required to enter into a development contract and provide the City with financial securities to guarantee the final plat conditions of approval and installation of the public improvements. STREETS The plans are proposing to access each lot via a private drive off of the existing private drive just west of the site. City ordinance allows up to four homes to be serviced by a private driveway. With this proposed lot split, there would be a total of three lots accessing the private drive. The private drive shown on the plans is only ten feet wide. As per ordinance, the private driveway' shall be increased to 20 feet in width and designed to a 7-ton per axle requirement. In addition, a Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20. 2001 Page 7 turnaround acceptable to the City's Fire Marshal will have to be provided along with a 30-foot wide private maintenance and access easement over the shared portion of the private drive. PARK DEDICATION Full park and trail fees be collected in lieu of land dedication. TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING Tree removal calculations for this lot were done as part of the original development proposal for whitetail Cove. A total of thirteen trees are required on this lot. However, that calculation was based on tree removal for one home. The proposed lot split doubles the removal and therefore increases the number of replacement plantings. Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for Whitetail Cove development are as follows: Total upland area Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) Baseline canopy coverage Minimum canopy coverage allowed Proposed tree removal Proposed tree preservation 11.17 ac or 486,565 SF 9.51 ac or 414,256 SF 85% 55% or 6.14 ac/267,610 SF 42% or 4.67 ac/203,425 SF 43% or 4.84 ac/210,830 SF The applicant does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed, therefore the difference is multiplied by 1.2 to calculate the required replacement plantings. Difference in canopy coverage 56,780 SF Multiplier 1.2 Total replacement 68,136 SF Total number of trees to be planted 63 trees A replacement planting plan lnUSt be submitted to the city for approval. Included in the plan shall be location, species and size of replacements. All replacements must meet minimum size requirements. The applicant has requested that replacement plantings vary in size, fi'om seedling to the 2½ minimmn required by ordinance. Staff supports the request for trees planted in excess of the 63 required. Of the 63 trees required, staff recolnmends the minimum required size is upheld. Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20, 2001 Page 8 Ordinance BLOCK 1 Lot 1 COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT Lot Lot Lot Home Area Width Depth Setback Lot 2 20,000 100' 125' 70' front/75'rear 10' sides 58,420 103' 415.55' 70'*/160'* 10' 43,956 103' 305' 30'/110'* 10' The 70 foot setback includes a 30 foot wetland buffer in addition to a 40 foot structure setback. The setback fi'om Lake Lucy's OHW and the natural wetland located on the south side of the site, overlap. SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; . . Findin.~: The subdivision meets ali the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the subdivision ordinance. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20.200 l Page 9 , The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage subject to conditions of approved. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. . The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the ~bllowing exists: Lack of adequate storm water drainage. Lack of adequate roads. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and and existing private driveway. VARiANCE FINDINGS VARIANCE As part of this plat approval, a variance to allow the proposed structures to maintain a 160 foot and 110 foot setbacks from the OHW of Lake Lucy is being requested. Sec. 18-22 of the City Code states. "The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in the subdivision chapter as part of a plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20, 2001 Page 10 . . . The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the land. The condition or conditions upon which the request is based.are unique and not generally applicable to other property. The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: This setback was created to protect lake view sight lines. Granting this variance will uphold the intent of the ordinance. The proposed homes will not be within the sight line of the adjacent homes. PRIVATE STREETS As part of this subdivision, the applicant is requesting the use of private streets to service the site. The subdivision ordinance allows up to four lots to be served by a private street if the city finds the following conditions to exist: The prevailing development pattern makes .it not feasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this deten-nination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and existence of wetlands. . After reviewing the surrounding area it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The use of a private street will pe~rnit enhanced protection of wetlands and mature trees. Finding: The applicant is utilizing an existing private street that will be extended. There is no public benefit nor do we believe it is appropriate to construct a public street to serve one lot. The private street will minimize impact on the vegetation and preserve site grades. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motions: "The Planning Conm~ission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #00-16 for Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition for 2 lots and a lakeshore setback variance as shown on the plans received December 15, 2000, subject to the following conditions: Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20. 2001 Page 11 . . o . . , , 10. While some fill is required to create walkout-type dwellings, staff recommends that the applicant's engineer look at lowering the rear walkout elevations to approximately 964.5+. -- If fill is impo~ted, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route and traffic control plan tbr review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The applicant should be aware that if retaining walls are needed, a separate building permit ,,,,-ill be required lbr any wall over four feet in height. The plan shows some proposed offsite grading. The applicant should be aware that any grading outside the property will require temporary grading easements. Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). A private utility easement ,,,,,ill be required for the service lines of Lot 2 which are installed over Lot 1. Detailed utility construction plans and specifications will be required in conjunction with final plat approval. The construction plans and specifications shall be prepared in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Final construction plans and specifications ,,,,,ill need to be submitted to the City a mininmm of tb2'ee weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review and City Council approval. As a part of final plat and construction plan approval, the applicant will be required to enter into a development contract and provide the City with financial securities to guarantee the final plat conditions of approval and installation of the public improvements. As per ordinance, the private driveway shall be increased to 20 feet in width and designed to a 7-ton per axle requirement. A turnaround acceptable to the City's Fire Marshal will have to be provided along with a 30-foot wide private maintenance and access easement over the shared portion of the private drive. The proposed driveway shall avoid impact to the required 30-foot buffer around Basin 1. 11. The proposed building pads shall maintain 40-foot wetland buffer setbacks. Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20, 2001 Page 12 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Silt fence shall be provided adjacent to all areas to be preserved as buffer. The applicant shall re-seed any disturbed wetland areas with MnDOT seed mix 25 A, or a similar seed mix which is approved for wetland soil conditions. Existing vegetation within the wetland buffer shall be left undisturbed unless otherwise approved. Because both wetland basins are classified as "Natural" in the City's Surface Water Management Plan, if the replanting of buffers is necessary, native vegetation shall be planted. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands. Wetland buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under.the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. Each proposed building pad shall maintain the required setbacks from the ordinau~ high water level (OHW) listed below: Lot Minimum Setback from OHW Lot 1, Block 1 160 feet Lot 2, Block 1 110 feet Building Official conditions: 1. If any soil con'ections are done on the property a final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 2. Address numbers must be posted at the driveway entrance on Lakeway Drive and on each dwelling. 3. Each property must be served by independent sewer and water services. It may be possible to provide an easement for a joint service, however a manhole structure would be required at the service split. Fire Marshal conditions: a. Before any building permits are issued additional address signs will be required at the driveway entrance with the two address numbers on it. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for proposed additional signs for review and approval. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992. Copy enclosed. 20. Park and trail fees shall be paid per ordinance requirements." Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition February 20. 2001 Page 13 ATTACHMENTS , 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Memo from Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator dated February 2, 2001. Memo from Matt Saaln, Project Engineer dated January 5,2001. Memo from Steve Torell. Building Official dated January 5,2001. Memo From Mark Littfin. Fire Marshal dated January 2.2001. Application dated December 11,2000. Letter dated January 25. 2001 to Brian and Nancy Tichy. Public hearing notice and property owners list. Survey of property located to the west of the subject site. Preliminary plat dated received December 28, 2000. g:",ptamsd,Whitetail Cove 2nd.doc CITYOF 690 G9, Ce, ret D~ive PO Ba' I47 C/Ja,h,~sse,. Mi,,esota 55317 Phone 952. 93~ I 900 Ge,erd S~x 952.9325739 E, gi, eeri,g D~partme, t Fax 952.937.9152 Bui/di,g Depar,,e,t 952.934.2524 ltFb Site MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUB.l: Sharmin AI-Jaff, Senior Planner Lori Haak, Water Resources Coordinator~ February 7, 2001 Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Upon review of the preliminary plat prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. dated December 6, 2000, I offer the folloxving comments and recommendations: Wetlands Two natural wetlands exist on-site. Wetlands comprise approximately half of the 2.33-acre proposed development. Basin 1 Basin 1 is a natural wetland located along the northern side of the property. The basin is dominated by cattail, duckweed and sedges. Surface water flows from this basin into the wetlands adjacent to Lake Lucy. No wetland impact is proposed in this basin. The applicant has proposed a 30-foot buffer with a 40-foot setback from the wetland buffer edge for this basin. The buffer strip must maintain a width of at least 30 feet because the width allowed the developer to decrease buffer strip widths in other areas of Whitetail Cove 1 st Addition. The preliminary plat shows that the proposed driveway encroaches into the required buffer for Basin 1. The driveway should be realigned to preserve the 30-foot buffer. In addition, the proposed 60x60 building pads on both Lots 1 and 2 encroach into the 40-foot wetland buffer setback. The proposed building pads should be revised to maintain the 40-foot setback so an additional variance is not necessary. During an on-site inspection, City staff noticed that a retaining wall was installed along a portion of the southwest side of Basin 1. The applicant should be advised that if a retaining wall needs to be extended or added on the north side of the proposed driveway, it must not be located within the wetland buffer. The Otv o/'C/m.hasse,. Sharmin A1-Jaff 02/07/2001 Page 2 Basin 2 Basin 2 is a natural wetland located adjacent to Lake Lucy on the south side of the property. The basin is dominated by cattail, with an abundance of box elder and red osier dogwood. No wetland impact is proposed in this basin. The applicant has proposed a 30- foot buffer with a 40-foot setback from the wetland buffer edge for this basin. The buffer strip must maintain a width of at least 30 feet because the width hllowed the developer to decrease buffer strip widths in other areas of Whitetail Cove 1 st Addition. Other Wetland Issues Silt fence should be provided adjacent to all areas to be preserved as buffer. The applicant will be required to re-seed any disturbed wetland areas with MnDOT seed mix 25 A, or a similar seed mix which is approved for wetland soil conditions. Existing vegetation within the wetland buffer must be left undisturbed unless othetwvise approved. Because both wetland basins are classified as "Natural" in the City's Surface Water Management Plan, if the replanting of buffers is necessary, native vegetation must be planted. Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all existing wetlands. Wetland buffer areas should be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant will install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign. Lake Lucy The proposed project is adjacent to Lake Lucy; therefore, each principle structure must maintain a setback from the ordinary high water level (OHW). The standard setback for structures on sewered lots on recreational development lakes is seventy-five (75) feet. However, Chanhassen City Code Section 20-481 states: "When a structure exists on a lot on either side, the setback of a proposed structure shall be the greater of [75 feet] or the setback of the existing structure." In this case, a structure exists on the lot to the west of the proposed lot split. This structure is set back approximately 245 feet from the OHW. Maintaining this setback would make development of this lot impossible. Therefore, the applicant has requested variances from the 245-foot lakeshore setback. The proposed setbacks are listed below: Lot Setback from OHW Lot 1, Block 1 160 feet Lot 2, Block 1 94 feet The proposed setbacks are consistent with the setbacks approved as part of the Whitetail Cove (Lake Lucy Estates) subdivision. In addition, the proposed setbacks are the minimum required to meet the wetland buffer and setback requirements on the north side of the parcel. Sharmin A1-Jaff 02/07/2001 Page 3 Surface Water Manaeement Plan (SWMP) According to Section 18-63 of Chanhassen's City Code, "Property being subdivided shall be exempt from the water quality and water quantity connection charges imposed by this section if the charges were paid or assessed in conjunction with a previous subdivision of the property and if the property is not being zoned to a classification with a higher charge." Since connection charges for this parcel were paid together with the Whitetail Cove subdivision, this project is exempt from connection charges. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The proposed driveway shall avoid impact to the required 30-foot buffer around Basin 1. 2. The proposed building pads shall maintain 40-foot wetland buffer setbacks. 3. Silt fence shall be provided adjacent to all areas to be preserved as buffer. 4. The applicant shall re-seed any disturbed wetland areas with MnDOT seed mix 25 A, or a similar seed mix which is approved for wetland soil conditions. Se Existing vegetation within the wetland buffer shall be left undisturbed unless otherwise approved. Because both wetland basins are classified as 'Natural" in the City's Surface Water Management Plan, if the replanting of buffers is necessary, native vegetation shall be planted. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided over all existing wetlands. , Wetland buffer areas shall be surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign. ge Each proposed building pad shall maintain the required setbacks from the ordinary high water level (OHW) listed below: Minimum Setback Lot from OHW Lot 1, Block 1 160 feet Lot 2, Block 1 94 feet G:\ENG\LORI'tADMIN~LANNINGWichy Lot Split.doc CITYOF 690 Gr.3' Ceme'r Drive, PO Box i47 Cha,l,asse,, 3limmota 55317 Pho,e 02,937.1900 Ge~e~d ~x 612 F3 2 573~ [~i,e~¥'i,& Fax 612. Q329152 6L.Q:q .... ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Shannin A1-Jaff, Planner II FROM' DATE: SUBJ: Matt Saam, Project Engineer ~ ~ January 5, 2001 Review of Preliminary Plat for Whitetail Cove 2~d Addition Land Use Review No. 01-02 Upon review of the site survey prepared by $choell & Madson, Inc., dated Decelnber 27, 2000, I offer the following comments and recommendations: GRADING When initially platted with the Whitetail Cove plat, this site was designated as a custom graded lot. As such, a large amount of the original tree coverage still rernains. Care should be taken by the developer to protect as many of the existing trees as possible, especially those on the south half of the site adjacent to Lake Lucy. The plans propose on filling up to approximately ten feet for the tWo house pads and private drive areas. Fill will also be necessary to provide adequate cover over the sanitary sewer service for each lot.' While some fill is required to create walkout-type dwellings, staff recommends that the applicant's engineer look at lowering the rear walkout elevations to approximately 964.5_+. Staffbelieves this would better match the existing topography and help minimize the amount of fill, grading, and tree loss in the rearyard area. With the amount of fill proposed, it is anticipated that import material will be required. If fill is imported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route and traffic control plan for review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. The applicant should also be aware that if retaining walls are needed, a separate building pen-nit will be required for any wall over four feet in height. A soils report was previously prepared by Braun Intertec. A summary of the results of the soils evaluation indicated soil borings typically encountered a one- to four-foot layer of topsoil at the surface. Below the topsoil, most of the borings encountered glacially deposited soils. Layers of alluvial deposits were encountered above the glacial till into the boring. The soil report also supplied recommendations which indicated the topsoil, the alluvial soil, and some soft glacial soils found in the borings are considered unsuitable for supporting loads due to high organic content and/or associated compressibility under fill and building loads. To prepare for construction, the report recommended removal of these soils in the building area. The excavations would then be backfilled with engineered fill as needed to achieve the building and/or street subgrade elevation. Thc Citi' o/'(,7~,:;zha, sse,. ,~I g;'oi:'i,~ com,;i:,iti' x'irh c/e,;.;',/ake:, o,,.~fln' schooh. ,.~ c/,,.;;v,'/,,? doz,~'moto,, r/;;'i'H,~, hz:simvses~ ,~.,J /;('az:tiEd /~a;~,.v. ,4 o;'e, Tt /~/..~,'r to/i,e, mo;'k, a,d day : Sharmin A1-Jaff Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Review January 5,2001 Page 2 The report also indicated that the natural clays on the site will be suitable for reuse as fill but will require drying to achieve compaction requirements. The plan shows some proposed offsite grading. The applicant should be aware that any grading outside the property would require t~mporary grading easements. EROSION CONTROL Erosion control measures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Staff recommends that the City's Type III erosion control fence, which is a heavy-duty silt fence, be used for the areas adjacent to the wetlands and Lake Lucy. The final grading plan shall incorporate erosion control fence around the perimeter of the grading limits. In addition, tree preservation fencing should be denoted on the grading and drainage plan as well. DRAINAGE No storm drainage improvements have been proposed with this plat.- There is an existing storm pond in the northwest corner of the site which was constructed with the Whitetail Cove plat. Hoxvever, none of the stormwater runoff from the proposed development will reach the pond. Runoff from the front of the lots will drain to the northerly wetland and runoff from the rear of the lots will drain south to Lake Lucy. The additional impervious surface from this proposed lot split will result in a minimal increase of storm~vater runoff from the site. UTILITIES No public utility lines have been proposed with this project. Each of the lots will be serviced with a private sewer and water line from the existing public sanitary sexver and water mains on the westerly property line of the site. Due to the existing sanitary sewer elevation, each lot will require a grinder pump to service the basement level of the homes. This is typically avoided whenever possible; however, there are no other options in this case. A private utility easement will be required for the service lines of Lot 2 which are installed over Lot 1. Detailed utility construction plans and specifications will be required in conjunction with final plat approval. The construction plans and specifications shall be prepared in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Final construction plans and specifications will need to be submitted to the City a minimum of three weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review and City Council approval. As a part of final plat and construction plan approval, the applicant will be required to enter into a Shannin A1-Jaff Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Preliminm79 Plat Review January 5,2001 Page 3 development contract and provide the City with financial securities to guarantee the final plat conditions of approval and installation of the public improvements. STREETS The plans are proposing to access each lot via a private drive off of the existing private drive just west of the site. City ordinance allows up to four homes to be serviced by a private driveway. With this proposed lot split, there would be a total of tln'ee lots accessing the private drive. The private drive shown on the plans is only ten feet wide. As per ordinance, the private driveway shall be increased to 20 feet in width and designed to a 7-ton per axle requirement, h~ addition, a turnaround acceptable to the City's Fire Marshal will have to be provided along with a 30-foot wide private maintenance and access easement over the shared portion of the private drive. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL While some fill is required to create walkout-type dwellings, staff recommends that the applicant's engineer look at lowering the rear walkout elevations to approxirnately 964.5+. . If fill is imported, the applicant will need to supply the City with a haul route and traffic control plan for review and approval prior to the site grading commencing. . The applicant should be aware that if retaining xvalls are needed, a separate building permit will be required for any wall over four feet in height. . The plan shows some proposed offsite grading. The applicant should be aware that any grading outside the property will require temporary gn'ading easements. , Erosion control n*teasures and site restoration shall be developed in accordance with the City's Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). A private utility easement will be required for the service lines of Lot 2 which are installed over Lot 1. , Detailed utility construction plans and specifications will be required in conjunction with final plat approval. The construction plans and specifications shall be prepared in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Final construction plans and specifications will need to be submitted to the City a minil*num of tin-ce weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review and City Council Sharmin A1-Jaff Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat Review January 5,2001 Page 4 weeks prior to final plat consideration for staff review and City Council approval. As a part of final plat and construction plan approval, the applicant will be required to enter into a development contract and provide the City with financial securities to guarantee the final plat conditions of approval and installation of the public improx;ements. o As per ordinance, the private driveway shall be increased to 20 feet in width and designed to a 7-ton per axle requirement. . A turnaround acceptable to the City's Fire Marshal will have to be provided along with a 30-foot wide private maintenance and access easement over the shared portion of the private drive. g:\eng\projects\whitetail cove 2nd\preliminary plat review.doc CITYOF CHAN EN Ge.end F,~x Public S,?y F,:.v 612.734.2524 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Sharmin Al-Jarl, Senior Planner Steven Torell, Building Official DATE: January 5,2001 SUB J: Review of request for preliminary plat approval to subdivide Lot 6, Block 2, Whitetail Cove. Plam~ing Case: 2000-16 Subdivision I have reviewed the preliminar5, plat for the above request for, and offer the following comments which should be included in the conditions of approval. 1. If any soil corrections are done on the property a final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before pem~its will be issued. 2. Address numbers must be posted at the driveway entrance on Lakeway Drive and on each dwelling. 3. Each property must be served by independent sewer and water services. It may be possible to provide an easement for ajoint sen, ice, however a manhole structure would be required at the service split. G/safety/st/memos/plm~/whitetailcoveL6B2 CITYOF CHANHASSEN 6QO G9, Ce, ter D'~ive. PO Box 147 Cha,hasse,, Mi,,esom 55317 Pt~o ,e 612. ~3 7.1900 Ge,e~Td Fax 612. 93 7. 5739 E, gi, ee~q,g Fax 612.937.9152 P~blic S,~O, Fax 612.934.2524 MEMORANDUM TO: Sharmin A1-Jaff, Senior Planner FROM: Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal DATE: January 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Request for preliminary plat approval to subdivide Lot 6, Block 2, Whitetail Cove into two single-family lots of 58,420 square feet and 43,956 square feet on property zoned RSF, Residential Single Family and located at 6735 Lakeway Drive, Brian Tichy, Whitetail Cove Second Addition Planning Case: 2000-16 Subdivision I have reviewed the subdivision request for the above project. In order to comply with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division I have the following fire code or city ordinance policy requirements. The plan review is based on available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are submitted, the appropriate code or policy items xvill be addressed. Before any building permits are issued additional address signs will be required at the driveway entrance with the two address numbers on it. Contact Chanhassen Fire Marshal and Chanhassen Building Official for proposed additional signs for review and approval. Pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division Policy #29-1992. Copy enclosed. g:\safety\ml\ph-ev2000-16 The Cit~, of Cha,hasse,. A zrowi,¢ co,mm,ia, with c/ca, lakes, m~afin, schooh, a cham~i,¢ dow,tow,, thrh, i,v husi, esses, and heautifu/ a,rhc A a,'e,t ,/,re to fi,e. ,,orb. ,,d ~/~, CITYOF CHANHASSEN O0 CiO, Center D~ive, PO Box 147 Chanhasse~2, Mbmesota 55317 Phone 612,937, I900 General ]ax 6J2,937,5739 E~gineering ]vax' 612,937,9152 P~:blic Safco, Fax 612,)34,2524 Web w~vw, ci, chanhasse;~, CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POI,ICY PREMISES IDENTIFICATION General Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be approved by one of the following- Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, Building Official, Building Inspector. Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers are posted. Other Requirements - General 1. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background. 2. Numbers shall not be in script. If a structure is not visible from the street, additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance. Size and location must be approved. Numbers on mail box at driveway entrance may be a minimum of 4". However, requirement #3 must still be met. 5. Administrative authority may require additional numbers if deemed necessary. Residential Requirements (2 or less dwelling .nit) 1. Minimum height shall be 5 inches. 2. Building permits will not be finaled unless numbers are posted and approved by the Building Department. Commercial Req,irements 1. Minimum height shall be 12". Multi-Tenant Buildings a. Building address range, minimum height of 12 inches. b. Address numbers required on all tenant doors. Minimum height of 6 inches. If address numbers are located on a directoD' entry sign, additional numbers will be required on the buildings main entrance. 4. Signage on overhead/delivery doors will also be required. Chanhassen Fire Department Fire Prevention Policy #29-1992 Date: 06/15/92 Revised: 4/12/00 Ap e Marshal Page 1 of 1 The Oty of Cha~dJmse~z, A growing communiO, with cleaj2 lakes, qt~ality schools, a charmi~g dowmow~, thriving busi~esses, and beaurifu/ pa;'ks, A ~,reat p/ace to live, work, CITY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: __ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit __ Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review ,~. Notification Sign Site PJan Review* : /~, Subdivision' Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CUP/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ ,/-7/d~(~e~--'' A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the propertY must be included with the application. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. *Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2.. X 11" reduced copy of transparency for each plan sheet. Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract NOTE -When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACREAGE WETLANDS PRESENT ~RF_S~ZONING REQUESTED ZONING PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST YES NO -This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning De,Damment to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. 'Thi~ is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for comPlying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This applica!ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of. Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make :this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. ~J w~ keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of ~ny knowledge. The c'rty hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing ~'equirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day ,extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review exterzsions are approved by the applicant. Si_qnatur~e of Applicant Sigrza~re ~f Fe~wner ~'~'~ ' Application Received on Date FeePaid ReceiptNo. ~// C_~-}~ 'J'he applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If nc)t contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 O.ty Ce,ter Drive, PO Box 147 C/_,a,hasse,. Mi,,esota 55317 &o,e 612.937.1900 Ge, em/Fax 612. 937. 5739 E',~gi, eer/,g Fax 612.93Z9152 Public SafeO' Fax 612.93(252./ It% u'~'w, cl. d,,mham,. ,m. ,s January 25,2001 Brian and Nancy Tichy 6240 Cypress Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 Re: Subdivision #2000-16, Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tichy: Due to incomplete data on your original plan, staff did not schedule your application for the January 22, 2001, Planning Commission meeting. Thus the city will be unable to meet the 60 day review deadline of the original submittal (December 15, 2000). This letter is to formally notify you that the City is taking the additional 60 day extension to process this request as permitted under MN STAT. 15.99. This application has been scheduled to be reviewed again by the Planning Commission on February 20, 2001. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952-937-1900, ext. 120. Sincerely, Sharmin A1-Jaff Senior Planner NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2001 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE PROPOSAL: Subdivide Lot 6, Block 1, Whitetail Cove into Two Single Family Lots APPLICANT: Brian Tichy LOCATION' 6735 Lakeway Ddve NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public headng about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Brian Tichy, is requesting preliminary plat approval to subdivide Lot 6, Block 2, Whitetail Cove into two single family lots of 58,420 ft. and 43,956 sq. ft. with lakeshore vadance on property zoned RSF, Residential Single Family and located at 6735 Lakeway Drive, Whitetail Cove 2nd Addition. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public headng is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. Dudng the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Fdday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Sharmin at 937-1900 ex't. 120. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on February 8, 2001. Smooth Feed SheetsTM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN TRUST ' C/O AUDITOR - DNR WITHHELD 600 4TH ST E CHASKA MN 55318 LOSCHEIDER CUSTOM HOMES INC 1607 FLORIDA AVE N GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 _.. Use template for 5160® JOSEPH J & D GAYLE MORIN 1441 LAKE LUCY RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 NANCY L TICHY 6240 CYPRESS DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CHARLES CUDD LLC 275 MARKET ST SUITE 445 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 ALAN ROBERT WEINGART & MARY E WEINGART 1685 STELLER CT EXCELSIOR MN 55331 CRAIG B & MELISSA A MANDERY 6670 POINTE LAKE LUCY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 JOHN B & CAROL C GOODMAN 6686 POINTE LAKE LUCY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROGER M & E ELAINE SAMPSON 6710 POINTE LAKE LUCY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROGER M & E ELAINE SAMPSON 6710 POINTE LAKE LUCY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 BONNIE S MCCOSKEY 6720 POINTE LAKE LUCY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 ROBERT H MASON INC 14201 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS MN 55345 JAMES H & GWEN M WILDERMUTH 7022 DAKOTA CIR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0 ,'z-''~a'l~''d ~,~1 -~1~ 2:)NL~q[.~'~i' °u'l'l Jn°l'u°3 Pa'g°d°Jd ~ ([3SOdOLict oU!'l Jnoluog .... ~ t:losouu.q4 'Xltrnco aot~n'p uo~:l~S uT Palr-'O°l ..(laadoacI