Loading...
1 Variance 220 West 78th StreetCITY OF PC DATE: 3/6/01 CC DATE: 3/26/01 REVIEW DEADLINE: 4/10/01 CASE #: 2001-01 By: Hoium STAFF PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: REPORT Request fbr a 21 fbot variance Irom the reqmreo _~u foot fi'urn yard setback for the construction of a 14 square foot addition and 35 square foot entryway overhang. 220 West 78th Street Jack & Paula Atkins 220 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 W PRESENT ZONING: RSF, Single Fmnily Residential 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential, Low Density ACREAGE: 8,500 square feet (.2 acres) DENSITY: N/A SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAI~NG: The citY's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the Proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The CitY has a relatively high level of discreti, on with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. -/ Atkins Variance March 6, 2001 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGUATIONS Section 20-615 (5) a. requires a 30 foot front yard setback on properties zoned RSF. Section 20-908 (3) states the front yard setback requirements shall be bbserved on each street side of a corner lot. Section 20-72 (a) states that nonconfmrning structures shall not be expanded except to lessen or eliminate the nonconfmTnity. BACKGROUND This site was platted in 1887, as part of the St. Hubert's subdivision, one of the oldest plats in Chanhassen. Ka~own as "Old Town", this neighborhood maintains a small town atmosphere consisting of homes that were built in the early and mid 1900's. A majority of the homes are on narrow rectangular lots that average 10,000 square feet. A significant number of homes in this neighborhood do not meet setback requirements, which is not uncommon for a settlement dating back to the 1900's. A few variances have been granted in this neighborhood for home additions. The applicant's existing home was built in 1953 and is located on the corner of West 78th Street and Erie Avenue, and is a nonconforming lot of record. The following table illustrates the existing nonconformities on the existing property. Table 1 Nonconformities for 220 West 78th Street Lot Area Lot Frontage Front Yard Setback (78th St) FrOnt Yard Setback (Erie Ave) Side Yard Setback (West Boundary) Ordinance Existing Lot Requirements 15,000 sq ft 8500 sq ft 90 sq ft 60 sq fl 30 feet 28 feet 30 feet 14 feet 10 feet 8 feet ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a 21 foot variance from the 30 foot front yard setback along Erie Avenue for the construction of an entryvvay and a kitchen addition. Currently, the area of the home is 1316 square feet. The proposed addition will add 14 square feet, plus an entryway overhang of 35 square feet, part of which will be over the addition (See Attachment 5). The proposed landing for the entryway is approximately 2 feet 5 ½ inches. Building code requires a minimum of 36 inches (3 feet) for landings, therefore staff is adding an additional 6½ inches to the request. The lot coverage for all structures Atkins Variance March 6, 2001 Page 3 including the proposed addition and overhang will be approximately 25%, which is the maximum amount the ordinance permits. At this time the existing home maintains a 14 foot setback from the property line at Erie Avenue. Hardship The applicant has indicated that the reasons for this variance request ii to mitigate water seepage into the basement, eliminate a conflict between two doorways, minimize problems caused by the weather, and to make this entry the primm¥ entrance to the home. A detailed description of the above can be found in the letter dated February 9, 2001, part of Attachment 1. Reasonable Use A hardship occurs when the owner does not have a reasonable use of the property. A reasonable use is defined as the use made by a majority of comparable prope~xy within 500 feet. A "use" can be defined as "the purpose or activity for which land or buildings are designed, an'anged or intended or for which land or buildings are occupied or maintained." In this case. because it is in a RSF zoning district, a reasonable use is a single family home with two covered parking spaces. A single family home with an attached two car garage is present on the site. A variance is granted when a hardship is present. That is, the property owner cannot make a reasonable use of the site without relief from the ordinance. In this instance, the owner carmot construct an addition that would fit within the buildable area since the existing home is currently outside that area. The home was constructed on a small lot. in 1953, prior to the ordinance regulations. It currently does not meet the fl'ont yard setbacks or the side yard setback to the west. There are other alternatives available to the applicant. There are no alternative locations to construct an addition that would not also require a variance. Yard Encroaclnnents In cases where a variance is granted, the zoning ordinance does not permit any encroachments such as eaves into the required setback. Should this variance be approved, the setback would be measured from the cave to the property line. Neighborhood setbacks Staff surveyed city records to determine if variances had been granted in the area. This survey turned up 3 cases where variances were granted from yard setbacks on nonconforming lots. The following table provides a summary. Table 2 Variances for "Old Town" File Number Property Location Variance Construction 99-6 226 Chart View Front yard variances: 18 ft & 10 fi Garage 88-10 7725 Frontier Trail Side yard variance: 10 ft Garage 86-10 7791 Erie Ave. Front yard variances: 10 fi & 10 ft Single Family Home Atkins Variance March 6, 2001 Page 4 In addition, staff performed a visual survey of the surrounding prope~xies and found a significant number of homes that do not meet the required setbacks. In some instances structures are built on the property line, or over it and encroach into the city's right of way. This is not unusual as this area was settled in the early 1900' s. The addition and new ent~3~Tay will not create a new neighborhood setback. Staff recommends approval of a 20 foot 51/2 inch variance for the construction of an addition and entryway. FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the propelS' cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical sun'oundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to reco=onize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing down, ward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The literal enforcement of the ordinance does create a har&hip. The location of the existing home and the size of the property limit the construction of an addition. Many of the homes in the neighborhood do not meet the required setbacks. This variance will not create a precedent for the existing standards. bo The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties in the RSF zoning district. However,; this neighborhood, "old town", was platted in 1887prior to the adoption of the current regulations and a majority of the properties do not comply with code requirements. Ce The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The addition and entryway will increase the value of the property, however, staff does not believe that is the sole reason for the request. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: This lot was platted in 1887prior to the ordinance; therefore the hardship is not self- created. The home was constructed prior to the current ordinance and does not meet the Atkins Variance March 6, 2001 Page 5 required fi'ont yard setbacks. The intent of the variance is to allow the existing home to pro¥ide a safe, energy eJficient, Cl~?d strzwn,'ally SOllnd entrance that is compatible ~,ith the neighborhood. eo The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance ~'ill not be detrimental to the public ¥~'e/fare or injurious to o~her land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel h' located. A mc~oriO; of single~mfily lots ~vithin 300 feet of the site are less than ] O, 000 square tier in size and at least eight properties encroach into the required setbacks. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed Yariation ~'ill not impair an adeq~ate supply of light and air to a4/acentproperO, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Plmming Commission approves the request Ibra 20 foot 51/_o inch variance fron2 the 30 foot fl'Chi yard setback, for the cor~stl'uction of a 14 square foot addition and a 35 square foot entr?way ovel'hang based upon the plans received February 9, 2001. and subject the following condition: 1. The landing outside the door shall be a minimuln of 36 inches deep as required by building code. Attachments 1. Application and Letter 2. Section 20-615; Lot Requirements and Setbacks 3. Section 20-908, Yard Regulations 4. Section 20-72. Nonconforming Uses 5. Site Plans 6. Public hearing notice and property owners g:' plan~j h',projects',variance~,atkins01 - 1 .doc CiTY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION APPUCANT: ~ Ofvt c- OuJ ADDRESS: TELEPHONE (Day time) Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit interim Use Permit __ Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* OWNER: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements variance Wetland Alteration Permit Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Notification Sign ' Site Plan Review* X Subdivision* Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** ($50 CU P/SPRNACNAR/WAP/Metes and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the propertY must be included with the application. ;Budding material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. 'Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8~Y~'~,X 11" reduced copy of ~ransparency for each plan sheet. ~2001 CIT'),' Oi: o ..... .~ , ** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract ' NOTE-When multiple applications are p~'ocessed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. PROJECT NAME LOCATION 7._-'Z- O LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL ACREAGE WETLANDS PRESENT PRESENT ZONING ~ REQUESTED ZONING ~ PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION YES ,~ NO REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR THIS REQUEST k,//k¢_ k ~,%¢J,q% This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by the applicant. Signature Cf ~plicant['l, Signature of'Fee ,~wner . .",\ ~ o_©[ Application Receiv,e,~l on ~ - t , Fee Paid% \ ;~ ~)' oo Date ~'E'/;' Date Cl~'y OF C.,HANH~¢8£iV Receipt No. The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address. Jack and Paula Atkins 220 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 February 9, 2001 To: City of Chanhassen Planning Commission Subject: Justification for Variance As the legal homeowners residing in Chanhassen at 220 W. 78th Street (Lot 5, Block 1, PID# 25-0500090) we respectfully request a variance to allow the addition of approximately 14 square feet to the kitchen/basement entryway on the East side of our residence plus an overhang over the stoop. The existing entry layout presents an undue hardship for several reasons: 1) Water seepage into basement. The existing stoop (about 5' wide x 4'-6" out from house) permits water to drain around and into the block wall, and subsequently, into the basement despite the installation of a new stoop and improvements to grading in 1997. There is visible mold growth on the interior of the block wall beneath the stoop. 2) Conflict between doorways. The existing exterior door swings against the same wall as the basement stairway door with an overlap of about 23". Consequently, the doors constantly smack in to each other resulting in disfigurement to both doors as well as the occasional finger being pinched. We removed the'basement door for a time, however, with the arrival of our first grandchild, this is no longer an option for safety reasons. Additionally, removing the door caused problems with the forced air heating and air-conditioning system. Cold air from the entire house wants to roll down the basement stairs resulting in excessive cold in the basement and on the kitchen floor, year around. 3) Kitchen entryway is primary entrance to the home. Because of excessive traffic, it is difficult and dangerous to park on West 78th Street (which is the traditional "front-of-the-house"). Also, being a corner lot and with the mailbox located on West 78th there is, at most, one (barely) viable parking spot on this side of the house. As a result, the main entrance facing West 78th St. is not used at all and the kitchen entry has become the "de facto" main entrance to the house where guests enter, deliveries are made, etc. For this reason, problems with the present entryway design become even more of a hardship. 4) Weather problems. Because heat escapes from the basement through the stoop, snow accumulation often melts and re-freezes causing a serious safety concern. With no overhead protection, rain and snow blow against the door and onto the kitchen floor. Additionally, guests arriving at our house must stand out in the elements. Jack and Paula Atkins 220 West 78th Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 The issuance of a variance would not set a new precedent and is harmony with pre- existing standards for the neighborhood. Our home is located in the original "old town" of Chanhassen on a 60 foot lot. Virtually every home in our neighborhood exceeds existing property set-back requirements. Because my variance request (on a corner lot) is towards the city property line, I've concentrated on documenting the numerous instances of homes with shorter set backs from city property then my requested variance for homes within 500' of our address. 1) 206 West 78th Street. This home is situated about 3' from the city property line. 2) 222 West 78th Street. This home is immediately next door to us (to our West). The main structure is located within inches of the city property line and is about 20 feet closer to the street then our property. 3) 225 West 78th Street (Schlenk property). Less than 10' from city property. 4) 7'727 Frontier Trail. Located within a foot of city property. 5) 7'725 Frontier Trail. Located about 6' over the city property line. 6) 7'721 Frontier Trail. Located less than 10' from city property line. 7) 226 Chart View. Located on the city property line. 8) 220 Chart View. Located a few feet from city property line. Note that I am adding only enough space to the kitchen entry to mitigate the hardship. It is only about 14 square feet of living space. Also note that the addition is over an existing foundation where the stoop is located and will have no impact on the city regarding snow removal or future (and highly unlikely) widening of the street. The requested variance is also a benefit to the community at large. We are located on one of the busiest streets in Chanhassen and our home is one of the first seen as visitors enter our community. We feel that the appearance of our home has an impact on peoples' perception of Chanhassen, particularly the "old town" with which we are deeply connected (our children are fourth generation residents.) We have made tremendous efforts in the past to make a good first impression for our community with Christmas lights in the winter and wild flowers along main street every summer. We feel that a variance is justified. Please feel free to call us or stop by the house to have a look. Sincerely, Jack and Paula Atkins L ZONING § 20-615 (2) Storage building. (3i'~'-, Swimming pool. (4) Tennis court. (5) Signs...,' (6) Home occupations. (7) One (1) dock. / ./ /' /, / /' · ,, (8) Private kennel. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-3), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-614. Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "RSF" DistrSct: (1) Churches. (2) Reserved. (3) Recreational beach lots. (4) Towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5.4), 12~15-86; Ord. No. 120, § 4(4), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 12, 11-12-96) State law reference~Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20.615. Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "RSF" District subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter and chapter 18: (1) The minimum lot area is fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet. For neck or flag lots, the lot area requirements shall be met after the area contained within the "neck" has been excluded from consideration. (2) The minimum lot frontage is ninety (90) feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac "bubble" or along the outside curve of curvilinear street sections shall be ninety (90) feet in width at the building setback line. The location of this lot is conceptually Supp. No. 9 1211 ZONING § 20-632 c. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (6) The setbacks for lots served by private driveways and/or neck lots are as follows: a. For front yard, thirty (30) feet. The front yard shall be the lot line nearest the public right-of-way that provides access to the parcel. The rear yard lot line is to be located opposite from the front lot line with the remaining exposures treated as side lot lines. On neck lots the front yard setback shall be measured at the point nearest the front lot line where the lot achieves a one-hundred-foot minimum width. b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet. c. For side yards, ten (10) feet. (7) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, three (3) stories/forty (40) feet. b. For accessory structures, twenty (20) feet. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 5(5-5-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 90, § 1, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 127, § 3, 3-26-90; Ord. No. 145, § 2, 4-8-91; Ord. No. 240, § 18, 7-24-95) Editor's note--Section 2 of Ord. No. 145 purported to amend § 20-615(6)b. pertaining to accessory structures; such provision were contained in § 20-615(7)b., subsequent to amend- ment of the section by Ord. No. 127. Hence, the provisions of Ord. No. 145, § 2, were included as amending § 20-615(7)b. Sec. 20-616. Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "RSF" District: (1) Private stables subject to provisions of chapter 5, article IV. (2) Commercial stables with a minimum lot size of five (5) acres. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-617--20-630. Reserved. ARTICI,E XIII. 'qt-4" IVIIXED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -,~. Sec. 20-631. Intent. The intent of the'"R-4" District is to provide for Single-family and attached residential development at a maximum net density of four (4) dwelling units per acre. ~.. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 6(5-6-1);'--1.2-15-86) Sec. 20-632. Permitted uses. ~.~. The following uses are permitted in an "R-4" District: (1) Sjngl~,family dwellings. (2) Two-family dwellings. Supp. No. 9 1213 ZONING § 20-908 increased in width or depth by an additional foot over the side and rear yards required for the highest building otherwise permitted in the district. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, § 10, 12-15-86) Sec. 20-908. Yard regulations. The following requirements qualify or supplement district regulations. Yard measurements shall be taken from the nearest point of the wall of a building to the lot line in question, subject to the following qualifications: (1) Every part of a required yard or court shall be open and unobstructed. (2) A yard, court, or other open space of one (1) building used to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall not again be used as a yard, court, or other open space for another building. (3) Except as provided in the business, industrial, and office districts, the front yard setback requirements shall be observed on each street side of a corner lot; provided, however, that the remaining two (2) yards will meet the side yard setbacks. (4) On double frontage lots, the required front yard shall be provided on both streets. Whenever possible, structures should face the existing street. (5) The following shall not be considered to be obstructions (variances granted from a required setback are not entitled to the following additional encroachments): a. Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, cornices, canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may Project a distance not exceeding two (2) feet, six (6) inches; fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four (4) feet, six (6) inches; an uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not to exceed six (6) feet, provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building; bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding three (3) feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding five (5) feet and shall not be located in a drainage and utility easement. Other canopies may be permitted by conditional use permit. b. The above-named features may project into any required yard adjoining an interior lot line, subject to the limitations cited above. c. Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence on February 19, 1987 may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location provided that any porch that is to be completely rebuilt must have at least a ten-foot minimum front yard. d. Subject to the setback requirements in section 20-904, the following are permitted in the rear yard: enclosed or open off-street parking spaces; accessory structures, toolr°oms, and similar buildings or structures for domestic storage. Balconies, breezeways and open porches, unenclosed decks and patios, and one-story bay windows may project into the rear yard a distance not to exceed five (5) feet. Supp. No. 10 1233 § 20-60 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-60. Denial. Variances may be deemed by .the.~_ board of ad0ustments and appeals and the council, and such denial shall constitute a findingS'and, determination~_ that the conditions required for approval do not exist. (Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 1(3-1-4(6)), 12-15-86) Secs. 20-61--20-70. Reserved. DIVISION 4. NONCONFORMING USES* Sec. 20-71. Purpose. The purpose of this division is: (1) To recognize the existence of uses, lots, and structures which were lawful when established, but which no longer meet all ordinance requirements; (2) To prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification, or extension of any noncon- forming use, building, or structure; (3) To encourage the elimination of nonconforming uses, lots, and structures or reduce their impact on adjacent properties. (Ord. No. 165, 8 2, 2-10-92) Sec. 20-72. Nonconforming uses and structures. (a) There shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, structural change, or relo- cation of any nonconforming use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the nonconformity. (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any detached single-family dwelling that is on a nonconforming lot or that is a nonconforming use or structure may be altered, or expanded provided, however, that the nonconformity may not be increased. If a setback of a dwelling is nonconform{ng, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements. _ (c) No nonconform{ng use shall be resumed if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the use was in normal operation and shall run continuously thereafter. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, only land uses which are permitted by this ordinance shall be allowed to be established. *Editor's note-Section 2 of Ord. No. 165, adopted Feb. 10, 1992, amended Div. 4 in its entirety to read as set out in 88 20-71-20-73. Prior to amendment, Div. 4 contained §8 20-71-20-78, which pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. III, 8 5, adopted Dec. 15, 1986; and Ord. No. 163, 8 1, adopted Feb. 24, 1992. Supp. No. 4 1164 ChicagO ifle Insurance Company LOCATION REPORT (TH~ I$ NOT A SURVEY) INSPECTION DATE gLlI~e 20, 1986 FILE NO. 3059 LF_C] AL DF-~CRIPTIOIq Lot 5, Block 1, Village of Chanhassen, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Carver County, Minnesota. ,2,0 $c.~ le. No Plaffe_z:~ Eow, m'~-ff-s th;s exhibit are based tlDOn Ihe recolded plat or mad in the counly rncord~. The location of improve- not based en m88Btlr~f~mrlts. Th8 liahilitv of issuin~ agent and the ('ornpang as to information con- uP. Id-~OOlzI 2u!ls!x~ :, i... ~"i 1'7 .':- (: . ... ~ k,~kS'-'~ .: .. ...' ff ....  . ~ : (lst;~q) uo!lu^¢13 p~sodo.M · . .. (tllnos) uo!lt~^o[a posodmd t u~[d ;~ooIg posodo.~d NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2001 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE PROPOSAL: Variances for the Construction of an Addition APPLICANT: Jack and Paula Atkins LOCATION' 220 West 78th Street NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicants, Jack and Paula Atldns, are requesting variances for the construction of an addition to a single family home located 220 West 78th Street. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. Dudng the meeting, the Chair will lead the public headng through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall dudng office houm, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Fdday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Julie at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on February 22, 2001. CITY Ot;' CttANHASSENC/O SCOTT BOTCHER 6911 CITY CENTER DR PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 ROBERT & ADELINE F KAHL 203 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-97 KERMIT M &/xtJDI(E A S'I'AKI( 2{15 77'1'1t ST W CHANItASSEN, MN 55317-9711 JEROME L KERBER 207 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9711 JEROME & HAZEL J WENDT 7701 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9703 BERNARD & HELEN KERBER 221 77TH ST W CHANItASSEN, MN 55317-97 DANIEL J & JEANNE M BURKE 225 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9709 RICHARD & KATHY GAVERT 77{)1 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9712 BLANCHE M SCHU'I'ROP 302 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9714 CRAIG M LARSON 200 CHAN VIEW C}IANttASSEN, MN 55317-9707 NICHOLAS & PATRICiA PEKAREK 202 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN. MN 55317-9707 WAYNE R & SUSAN KAY ANI)I:.RS()N 204 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9707 DEAN C & JANET M BURDICK 2(16 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 553 i 7-9707 JOItN E & KAREN M KRAEMER 7703 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9612 DONAIJ) A & JUDITtt M SC}tMIEG PO BOX 397 C}tAN}IASSEN, MN 55317-0397 RONALD & ELAINE ROESER 222 CttAN VIEW CHANItASSEN, MN 55317-9613 BARBARA A HAIVIILTON 224 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9613 XCR SYSTEMS INC 13016 GIRARD AVE S BURNSVILLE, MN 55337-2406 LARRY A & KATHLEEN A SCItROEDER 7720 FRONTIER TRL CHAN}tASSEN, MN 55317-9'153 CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY 306 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9734 CITY OF CttANHASSENC/O SCOTT BOTCHER 690 CITY CENTER DR PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 THOMAS C & CHERYL W MACFARLANE 2{)1 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9701 CHRISTINE A TAILLON 203 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9701 TODD W PER'FTU 2{_)3 1/2 CHAN VIEW CHANHA,~;SEN, MN 55317-97111 TROY P KIMPTON 205 CHAN VIEW CIIAN}tASSEN, MN 55317-9701 MARK A PEARSON 207 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9701 RICHARD A & ELIZABETH M NUSTAD 7721 ERIE AVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-971 MARY E JANSEN ETAL 7720 ERIE AVE CttANHASSEN, MN 55317-9713 GREGORY J & KAREN J ODASH 221 CHAN VIEW CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9750 ANNA IVERSON BOX 1 CIiANHASSEN, MN 55317-00() Address Labels WIIJLARI) & KATHRYN PAIJI2I' 1721 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9712 KEITtI 1~. & IASA KUPC[tO 7723 FRONI IER TRI. CHANHASSI~N, MN 55317-9712 S'I'I~VIiN R RR 3 B()X 2t3 SAUK(?EN'I'RJ{,MN 5(;37B-9316 VEP. I)ELL BORTH 202 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9755 VIOLA BLISCItKOWS KY 206 78'I'}t ST W C}tANHASSEN, BIN 55317-9755 BRIAN P & COLLEEN S NUSTAD 7791 ERIE AVE CHANIIASSEN, MN 55317-9713 JOHN W & PAULA J ATKINS 22O 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9755 CttRISTOP}tt!R & 1) ANNA COX 222 781'tt ST W CHANHASSEN, NIN 55317-()755 TItOMAS & C[tl{ISTY STOI)OI.A 21101 OAKI)ALE DR RO(iERS, MN 55374-8905 PAUL G EIDEM &ANDRE.'& F GR1FiqTH 7727 FRONTIER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9712 CITY OF C}-tANI-tASSENC/O SCOTT BOTC}IER 690 CITY CENTER DR PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-13147 GERAI.D W & I.C)IS A SC}tl_I';NK 225 78TH ST W CHANItASSEN, MN 55317-9755 GERAIA) SCHLENK, JEAN VON BANK& MARY GOETZ 225 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9755 C}IURCtt OF ST ttUBERT 8201 MAIN ST C}tANHASSEN, MN 55317-9647 CITY OF CIIANHASSENC/O SC()'I'T BOTCIIER 690 CI'IT CI!NTER DR PO B()X 147 CttANItASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CITY OF CHANttASSENC/O SCOTT B OTC H E R 690 CITY CENTER I)R PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CITY OF C}tANttASSENC/O SCOTT BOTCHER 690 CITY CEN'I'I~R I)R PO BOX 147 CHANttASSEN, MN 55317-0147 A~lti~ess Labels