2 Remax 7811 Great Plains Blvd.
W 77th
(iew Chan
78th Rf .~?pose~ Office Building
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 2
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a
relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation
from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting site plan approval for the construction of an 8,450 square foot office
warehouse building. The site is located east of Great Plains Boulevard, South of Old Village Hall,
west of Saint Hubert's cemetery, and north of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad and has an area
of 1.04 acres. It is zoned OI, Office Institutional and office buildings are a permitted use in the
district. Access to the site is gained via a driveway off of Great Plains Boulevard.
The walk-out office building will utilize brick as the main material. Windows are located on all
four elevations. The design of the building provides variation and meets the requirements of the
site plan design standards. Parking will be located north of the building and will require a
setback variance. The ordinance requires a 50 foot setback when an Office Institutional zone is
adjacent to a Residential Single Family zone. Staff is in agreement with the spirit and intent of
this requirement, however, in this case, the parking lot is adjacent to a site occupied by a
cemetery. There are mature trees that separate and buffer the sites. The applicant is adding
additional landscaping within this area and we do not foresee any adverse affects to the adjoining
property. The applicant could reduce the size of the parking lot-to meet the required setback,
however, in an effort to save two 24" oaks, staff is requesting the applicant eliminate two parking
spaces along the sides of the north center island of the parking lot. The applicant has agreed to
this request. This will bring the total number of parking spaces to 38, which is also the number
required by ordinance. Also, the ordinance requires a 15 foot setback along the north property
line. We investigated the option of locating the parking along the railroad track where no
setbacks are required, however, there are two gas mains on this property, one of which is a high-
pressure natural gas main located along the south portion. All structures must maintain a 10 foot
setback from the gas main. If all required setbacks were met, the buildable area on the site would
be limited to an average depth of 75 feet for both building and parking, which would make the
site difficult to develop. We concluded that this was not a viable option. We also note that there
is an existing accessory structure located over the north property line, which the applicant intends
to remove. 'This will reduce the level of nonconformity. In summary, we fmd that approval of
the parking lot setback can be justified since the intent of the ordinance will still be upheld. A
parking lot light plan is required. The plan should incorporate the light style, height, and photo-
metrics. Also, a detailed sign plan which includes the lighting method has to be submitted.
The site plan fails to show the trash enclosure location. Rooftop equipment and mechanical
equipment are not shown on the plans. All equipment must be screened from views.
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 3
In summary, with the incorporation of staff recommendations the proposed site plan application
would meet ordinance requirements, and staff is recommending approval with conditions outlined
in the staff report.
GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE
The proposed office building, with an area of 8,450 square feet, will be situated east of Great
Plains Boulevard. The site is bordered by Historic Saint Hubert's Church to the north, Great
Plains Boulevard to the west, Saint Hubert's cemetery to the east, and Twin Cities and Western
Railroad to the south. The surrounding property is zoned Office Institutional with the exception
of the cemetery site, which is zoned Residential Single Family. Access to the building is
proposed via a driveway off of Great Plains Boulevard. Parking is proposed along the north
portion of the building.
The site falls within the most historic areas of the City of Chanhassen. Saint Hubert's Church,
which is located to the north of the subject site, was constructed in 1887 and is on the National
Historic Registrar. Old Village Hall (located northwest of the subject site) was constructed in
1898. The subject site contains a structure, which was built in 1888 as a carpentry shop. In
1998, the City conducted a study of this area titled "Old Town". This site was included in the
study area. One of the findings concerning the site and its development stated, "If the utility of
the building diminishes and another use is proposed for the site, the building should reflect a
unique historic architectural design that complements the surrounding area to the north." With
this background in mind, the applicant designed a walkout building in a Jeffersonian style of
architecture. The main material on the building is red brick, (reflective of the church building),
and white wood siding projections (reflective of Village Hall). Windows are found on all four
sides ofthe building. Soldier Course, tan in color, with a projection of 1/3 of an inch will be
used above each window. The combination of the color contrast, projection and orientation of
the bricks, accentuate the windows. The design of the building is attractive, provides variation
and detail on the facade of the building.
The site plan fails to show the trash enclosure location. The ordinance requires dumpsters to be
screened by a wing-wall and doors with siding and trim to match the building. Current state
statutes require that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling
space must be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC)
1300.4700 Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in
addition to the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other
solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure.
Rooftop equipment and mechanical equipment are not shown on the plans. All equipment must
be screened from views.
Burger Office Building
May 1,2001
Page 4
The building is located 73 feet from the north, 65 feet from the east, 35 feet from the west and 37
feet from the south property line.
SITE PLAN FINDINGS
In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance
with the following:
(1)
Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides,
including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may
be adopted;
(2) Consistency with this division;
O)
Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing
tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the
general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas;
(4)
Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site
features and with existing and furore buildings having a visual relationship to the
development; .~
(5)
Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with
special attention to the following:
a,
An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and
provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general
community;
b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
Ce
Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of
the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and
neighboring structures and uses; and
de
Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives
and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public
streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior
circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking.
Burger Office Building
May 1,2001
Page 5
(6)
Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision
for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light
and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations
which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan, the
zoning ordinance (if the parking lot setback variance was approved), and the site plan
review requirements. The site design is compatible with the su~ounding development. It
is functional and harmonious with the approved development for this area. Minor
revisions are required and are outlined in the conditions of approval.
WETLANDS
Upon review of the plans, it is concluded that there are no wetlands on this.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL
The current plans show a walk-out office building with a proposed first floor elevation of 974.5.
The plans also show the building and parking area draining towards the east and west to two
proposed catch basins in the parking lot. The parking lot and building drainage is proposed to be
conveyed via two storm sewer lines to the south and then outletting to the railroad ditch.
There is an existing 30-inch diameter oak tree on the west side of the proposed building which
the applicant is trying to save. As such, staff would recommend that grading within the drip-line
of the tree be minimized through the use of a retaining wall on the north side of the tree. Also,
the proposed storm sewer along the west side of the tree should be relocated. This storm sewer
could be rerouted to the west and connect into the existing system in the adjacent City-owned
parking lot or it could be routed to the east and connected with the other proposed storm sewer.
Proposed erosion control consists of silt fence around the perimeter grading limits of the site. A
rock construction entrance will not be required, provided that the contractor utilizes the existing
southerly entrance during construction. Additional erosion control or rip-rap rock may be needed
at the outlet of the eastern storm sewer to prevent a gully from being formed. Also, tree
protection fencing should be installed around all trees in the construction zone that will remain.
UTILITIES
The existing building has a sewer and water service from the west. The plans for the new
building propose on extending new sewer and water services from West 78th Street. Staff
recommends that, if possible, the applicant utilize the existing sewer and water lines to serve the
proposed building. This would alleviate the need to open cut West 78th Street and minimize the
disturbance to traffic.
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 6
Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the
City's Building Department.
STREETS AND PARKING LOT
The plans propose on utilizing the existing southerly access to the site. This access would
require three turning movements to be completed by each vehicle entering the proposed parking
lot. In order to promote better traffic flow and to decrease the number of direct accesses to West
78th Street, staff is recommending that the existing southerly access be removed and that the
applicant utilize the existing access to the north. The shared portion of the access drive, which
goes across the City-owned parking lot, must be contained within a private easement.
The minimum drive aisle width in an office district, which is permitted by ordinance, is 26-feet.
The plans show 24-foot wide drive aisles. These drive aisles shall be revised to meet ordinance
requirements. ._
MISCELLANIOUS
It should be noted that Minnegasco has contacted the City requesting the creation of a 50-foot
wide private easement for the existing gas mains which run just south of the propOsed building.
Staffhas reviewed Minnegasco's request with the city Attorney's office and it has been
determined that this request is not permissible under the site plan review. Itis up to Minnegasco
to negotiate their own easement with the applicant.
The city's parking ordinance requires 4.5 parking stalls per 1,000 square feet of office (33 stalls)
and one stall per 1,000 square feet of warehouse/storage area (2 stalls). The total parking spaces
required by ordinance is 35. The applicant is providing 40 spaces. Staff is requesting two
parking spaces along the north central parking island be eliminated to save two 24 inch oaks.
This will bring the total number of parking spaces down to 38, which still exceeds parking
requirements.
LANDSCAPING
Minimum requirements for landscaping include 1,089 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the
parking lot, 4 trees for the parking lot, and buffer yard plantings along Lake Drive, as well as
neighboring property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for
landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table.
Burger Office Building
May 1,2001
Page 7
Vehicular use landscape area
Trees/parking lot
Islands/parking lot
Required
1,089 sq. ft.
4 overstory trees
2 islands or peninsulas
Proposed
17,668 sq. ft.
4 overstory trees
1 islands/peninsulas
The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for landscape islands/peninsulas in the
parking lot area. Staff recommends that the applicant increase the number islands/peninsulas in
the parking lot to meet minimum landscape requirements.
Of special concern are the five existing, very large, mature bur oaks trees on site. Three are
scheduled to remain, but according to submitted plans they have less than adequate protection
and space for root growth. Two of the trees will be included in a 10' wide peninsula and the
third will be in an open area, however according to the grading plans all three trees will have
grading impacting 75% - 90% of their root area. Trees of this age and species will not survive
that amount of impact on their root structure. Staff recommends the following actions be taken
to preserve these significant trees: enlarge the parking lot peninsula to a minimum width of 30'
(remove parking spaces on either side of the peninsula) and create a 'no grading/no touch' zone
around the 30" oak near the western property line, ideally this area would be at least 30' in
diameter. These trees are a part of the 'Old Town' atmosphere and contribute a significant
aesthetic appeal to the site as well as the downtown area. By following staff' s recommendations
they can be preserved adequately and still allow for the develoiSment of the proposed building
and parking lot.
LIGHTING
Lighting locations have not been illustrated on the plans. Only shielded fixtures are allowed as
required by ordinance. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted.
SIGNAGE
The applicant has not submitted a signage plan. One ground low profile business sign is
permitted per lot. The area of the sign may not exceed 24 square feet and a height of 5 feet.
Also, one wall mounted sign per business shall be permitted per street frontage. The site has one
street frontage along Great Plains Boulevard. The applicant is showing signs along the north and
south elevations. Since the main entrance into the building is along the north elevation, we
would recommend the applicant place their wall mounted sign along the north elevation of the
building, and eliminate the south facing sign. The total display area shall not exceed 15% of the
total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted. No sign may exceed 90 square
feet. Staff is recommending the following criteria be adopted:
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 8
le
All businesses shall share one monument sign per lot. Monument signage shall be
subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance.
2. All signs require a separate permit.
3~
The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an
architectural accent to the building.
4. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights.
Se
No illuminated signs within the development may be viewed from the residential
section south of the site.
6. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted.
o
Only the name and logo of the business occupying the-unit will be permitted on
the sign.
The applicant must Obtain a sign Permit prior to ereCting the signs on site. One stop sign must be
posted on the driveway at the exit point of the site. A detailed sign plan incorporating the
method of lighting, acceptable to staff shall be provided prior to requesting a building permit.
COMPLIANCE TABLE - IOP DISTRICT
Ordinance
Proposed Building
Building Height 2 stories
1½ story
Building Setback
N-15' E-50' N-72' E-65'
S-15' W-35' S-35' W-35'
Parking stalls 35 stalls 38 stalls
Parking Setback
N- 15' E-50' N-5'- E 10'
S-0' W-0' S-75'- W-10'
Hard surface 65% 39%
Coverage
Lot Area 15,000 SF 45,302 SF
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 9
VARIANCE
The Planning Commission shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance
unless they £md the following facts:
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause undue hardship. Undue
hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size,
physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by
a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is
not to allow a proliferation of variances but to recognize that and develop
neighborhoods pre-existing standards exist. Variances that blend with these pre-
existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria.
The nature of this variance is to allow this site to be developed in a reasonable
fashion. The buildable area on the site is limited. There is a high pressure gas line
along the south and west portions of the property. All structures need to maintain
10 feet setbacks from this gas line. Also, a 50 foot setback is required from the
cemetery which is zoned Residential Single Family. We believe that the intent of
the ordinance will be upheld even if this variance was approved.
b.
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable,
generally, to other property within the same zoning classification.
The conditions upon which this petition for a variance is based are not applicable
generally to other properties within the same zoning classification.
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land.
The purpose of this variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or
income potential of the parcel.
d, The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self created hardship.
The difficulty or hardship is not self-created. The applicant owns sufficient area. It
is encumbered by a high-pressure gas line along the south portion of the property.
The Residential Single Family site located east of the subject site is occupied by a
cemetery and is separated from the subject site by mature trees. The applicant could
meet the required setback along the cemetery and lose 4 parking spaces, however,
there are two 24" oaks located within the north center island. Staff wishes to
eliminate the parking spaces along the landscape island to protect these trees. We
believe that promoting the safety of these trees by eliminating these parking spaces
Burger Office Building
May 1,2001
Page 10
is a higher profity than eliminating the parking spaces along the east portion of the
property.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is
located.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of Hght and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increases the
danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of'light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets. It
will not increase the traffic. ~-
RECOMMENDATION ,~
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan 2001-4 for an 8,450 square foot
office building with a parking lot setback variance to allow a 5 foot setback along the north and a
10 foot setback along the east side of the property, as shown on the plans dated received April 4,
2001, subject to the following conditions:
1. Submit storm sewer sizing design data for a 1 O-year, 24-hour storm event.
2. Add detail sheet showing City Detail Plate Nos. 2001, 3101, 3107, 3108, 5203, 5215, 5234,
and 5300.
4.
Prior to building permit issuance, all plans must be signed by a professional civil engineer
registered in the state of Minneso~
Grading within the drip-line of the 30-inch oak tree shall be minimized through the use of a
retaining wall on the north side of the tree
5. Reroute the proposed storm sewer along the west side of the 30-inch oak tree.
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 11
6. The applicant shall, if possible, utilize the existing sanitary sewer and water services for the
new building.
7. Tree protection fencing should be installed around all trees in the construction zone that will
remain;
8. Increase the minimum drive aisle width to 26-feet.
Remove the existing southerly access and utilize the existing access to the north. The shared
portion of the access drive, which goes across the City-owned parking lot, must be contained
within a private easement.
10. Any offsite grading will require temporary easements.
11. On the utility plan:
- Show the existing water and sewer service lines.
- Add a legend.
- Under the Sewer & Water Notes add, "All sanitary sewer services shall be 6" PVC SDR 26.
- Add a storm sewer schedule.
-Show all existing utilities with invert, pipe size, pipe type, etc.
12. On the grading plan:
-Show all existing utilities
-Show all existing and proposed easements
-Add a legend
13. Enlarge the parking lot peninsula to a minimum 30' in width by removing parking spaces on
either side of the peninsula~
14. Establish a tree protection area around the 30" oak near the western property line. The area
should be as large as possible and no grading or other construction activities will be allowed
within it.
15. One ground Iow profile business sign is permitted per lot. The area of the sign may not
exceed 24 square feet and a height of 5 feet. Also, one wall mounted sign per business shall
be permitted per street frontage. The total display area shall not exceed 15% of the total area
of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted. No sign may exceed 90 square feet.
All signage must meet the following criteria:
a. All businesses shall share one monument sign per lot. Monument signage shall be
subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance.
b. All signs require a separate permit.
Burger Office Building
May 1,2001
Page 12
c. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and add an architectural
accent to the building.
d. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights.
e. No illuminated signs within the development may be viewed from the residential section
south of the site.
f. Back-lit individual letter signs are permitted.
g. Only the name and logo of the business occupying the unit will be permitted on the sign.
h, The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. A detailed sign
plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff shall be provided prior to
requesting a building permit.
16. Building Official Conditions:
a. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing the existing structures on the
site.
b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the
State of Minnesota.
_
c. The access, aisle between the accessible parking spots must be a minimum of eight (8)
feet wide.
d. The plans were reviewed for allowable building area, exterior wall protection and basic
exiting only. Detailed building code requirements cannot be reviewed until complete
plans are submitted. .,
e. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as
possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
17. Meet with Fire Marshal prior to building permit submittal.
18. A lighting plan shall be submitted to the City. Only shielded fixtures are allowed as required
by ordinance.
19.The site plan fails to show the trash enclosure location. The dumpsters must be screened by a
wing-wall and doors with siding and trim to match the building. Current state statutes require
that recycling space be provided for all new buildings. The area of the recycling space must
be dedicated at the rate specified in Minnesota State Building Code (MSBC) 1300.4700
Subp. 5. The applicant should demonstrate the required area will be provided in addition to
the space required for other solid waste collection space. Recycling space and other solid
waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure.
20. Rooftop equipment and mechanical equipment are not shown on the plans. All equipment
must be screened from views.
Burger Office Building
May 1, 2001
Page 13
21. The applicant shall enter into a site plan contract with the city and provide the necessary
financial securities as required for landscaping."
ATTACHMENTS
1. Application & Notice of Public Hearing and mailing list.
2. Memo from Matt Saam, Project Engineer and Mahmoud Sweidan, Engineer, dated April 25,
2001.
3. Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal, dated February 2, 2001.
4. Memo from Steve Torell, Building Official, dated April 23,2001.
5. Memo from Minnegasco dated April 19, 2001.
6. Plans dated received April 4, 2001.
g:XplanLqa~urger building.do~
CiTY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
~PPL1CANT:
~DDRESS':
F-PHONE (Day time)
DERRIL BURGER
18001 HIGHWAY 7
MINNETONKA, MN 55345
952-470-7623
OWNER: AL
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
KLINGELHUTZ
8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
952-934-8915
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
lntedm Use Permit
Non-conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development;
Rezoning
.X
variance NORTH
SETBACK
Wetland Alteration Permit
Zoning Appeal
..
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
PARKING LOT
$75.00
Sign Permits
-. Sign Plan Review
Site Plan Review*
250.00 + 90.00
Sul:~lMsion'
= $340.00
X
~ Notification Sign
$150.00
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
($50 CUP/SPRNACNA~AP/Metes
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $ 565.00
A list of ail property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
Budding material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
"Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy of
IJ'ansparency for each plan sheet.
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE- When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
PROJECT NAME BURGER OFFICE BUIT, DING
LOCATION 7811 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
LEGAl_DESCRIPTION SEE SUMMARY
TOTAL AC R EAGE
WETLANDS PRESENT
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
1.04
01
01
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
REASON FOR THIS REQUEST
YES XNO
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that ! am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
'the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
] w~! keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
"'-,~.extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
~,,?ions are approved by the applicant.
S~na~ure o pp ~ Dat
Signature of Fee Ow~r ~ Date
Application Received on ~ ~-¢ / Fee Paid ~ 5~5 Receipt No.
The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting,
If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHANH^SSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2001 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
690 CITY CENTER DRIVE
PROPOSAL: Site Plan Review and
Variance APPLICANT: Derril Burger
LOCATION: 7811 Gmat Plains Blvd.
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Derril Burger,
is requesting Site Plan review for the construction of a two story office building (8,450 square feet) with a parking
setback variance on property zoned Office Institutional, located at 7811 Great Plains Blvd., Burger Office Building.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public headng is to inform you about the applicant's
request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. Dudng the meeting, the Chair will lead
the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during
office houm, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project,
please contact Sharmin at 937-1900 ext. 120. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one
copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public headng has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on Apdl 19, 2001.
_
Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160®
WILBAR PROPERTIES INC
C/O AL KLINGELHUTZ
8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
THOMAS & CHRISTY STODOLA
21101 OAKDALE DR
ROGERS MN 55374
HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC
4567 80TH ST W
BLOOMINGTON MN 55437
BLOOMBERG COMPANIES INc
PO BOX 730
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHRISTOPHER & D ANNA COX
222 78TH ST W
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
G L B PROPERTIES LLC
1831 KOEHNEN CIR PO BOX 474
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JOHN W & PAULA J ATKINS
220 78TH ST W
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
AMOCO AMERICAN OIL CO
PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT
200 EAST RANDOLPH DRM C 2408
CHICAGO IL 60601
ANNA IVERSON
BOX 1
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE
3499 DABNEY DR
LEXINGTON KY 40509
CHANHASSEN REALTY CO
C/O THIES & THALLE MGMT - PAM
PO BOX 250
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHURCH OF ST HUBERT
8201 MAIN ST
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RALPH O MOLNAU &
RONALD F DUBBE
3563 1/2 STW
WACONIA MN 55387
MICHAEL J SORENSEN
12625 58TH ST
MAYER. MN 55360
HEATHER P THOMPSON &
LAURA ANN R FRIDGEN
7720 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY
306 78TH ST W
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
WILLARD & KATHRYN PAULY
7721 FRONTIER TILL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
STEVEN R NELSON
SAUK CENTRE
RR 3 BOX 233
MN56378
KEITH R & LISA KUPCHO
7723 FRONTIER TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PAUL G EIDEM &
ANDREA F GR/FFITH
7727 FRONTIER TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
GARY L BROWN
1831 KOEHNEN CIR W PO BOX 474
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
City of Chanhassen
690 City Center Drive, P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952)937-1900
Date: April 12, 2001
To: Development Plan Referral Agencies
From: Planning Department
By: Sharmin A1-Jaff, Senior Planner
Subject:
Site Plan review for the construction of a two story office building (8,450 square feet) with a
parking setback variance on property zoned Office Institutional, located at 7811 Great Plains
Blvd., Burger Office Building, Derril Burger.
Planning Case:
2001-4 Site Plan
The above described application for approval of a land development proposal was filed with the Chanhassen Planning
Department on April 4, 2001.
In order for us to provide a complete analysis of issues for Planning Commission and City Council review, we would
appreciate your comments and recommendations concerning the impact of this proposal on traffic circulation, existing and
proposed future utility services, storm water drainage, and the need for acquiring public lands or easements for park sites,
street extensions or improvements, and utilities. Where specific needs or problems exist, we would like to have a written
report to this effect from the agency concerned so that we can make a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City
Council.
This. application is scheduled for consideration by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on Tuesday, May 1, 2001 at 7:00
p.ln. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall. We would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than
April 23, 2001. You may also appear at the Planning Commission meeting if you so desire. Your Cooperation and
assistance is greatly appreciated.
1. City Departments
(~ City Engineer
b. City Attorney
c.~.,City Park Director
/'d/Fire Marshal
i~Building Official
:' fi.:' Water Resources Coordinator
· ,-g.~ Forester
2. Watershed District Engineer
~'~. Telepho~. _~. m. pany
"S~__~~ or Sprint)
~Elect~pany
-"~p/br MN Valley)
10. Triax Cable System
11. U. S. Fish and Wildlife
3. Soil Conservation Service
4. MN Dept. of Transportation
12.
Carver County
a. Engineer
b. Environmental Services
5. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
'~ Minnegasco
13.
Other
7. MN Dept. of Natural Resources
-P-AF sc!
:inH
Q,L~.,[~1 fLOOR PI-AN
A1
................................ .m, tue[Tr ¢.~,
.
I SITE DATA
PLAId
[LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE
--
..
A2
J!
DESIGN
h"'YM IY ~,~
A3
Steiner
Development, Inc.
3610 County Road 101
wayzata, MN 55391
(952)473-5650 Fax (952)473-7058
April 18, 2001
Sharmin Al - Jaff
Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
690 City Center Drive
Chanhassen MN 55317
Dear Sharmin:
As a follow up to our recent phone conversation I am Sending you updated information and materials on the Burger
Office Building Project.
Attached is a grading plan Sketch A which incorporates your comments on enlarging the parking island, lowering
grade at the west oak tree and reconfiguring the parking lot on the east property line to save the two Box Elder trees.
We are proposing to project the header course brick and add three arched clehr story windows in the in the gabled
projected area on the south elevation as indicated on drawing Sketch B.
We have also included photographs of a similar building that incorporates dark red brick with white panted wood
siding and trim in a similar style to Jeffersonian architecture. A reprint of Thomas Jefferson's Montecello is also
included for your reference in con junction with brick and roof shingle samples.
Please contact me if you need any additional information for the May 1 Planning Commission Meeting.
Sincerely
~~v i;dee~irC~ i rRichte r ~" Vice President
Copy: Darril Burger
Page 1 of 1
http://www.bc, edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/j effersn/monticl.jpg
4/10/01
Page I of 1
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/jeffersn/montic5.jpg 4/10/01
Monticello Page 1 of 2
Boston College. Color slides copyright Prof. Jeffery Howe.
Table of Contents I Quick Index: 117th century I 18th century I 19th century 1 20th century I Architecture links I
Fine Arts depm~nent home page
18th Century Architecture
Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, Charlottesville, VA
1770-96; 1809
Monticello,
Charlo~esville,
Monticello;
Charlottesville, VA
Monticello,
Charlottesville, VA
Monticello, Monticello,
Charlottesville, VA Charlottesville, VA
°J~ 7 - :
Monticello,
Charlottesville, VA
I'Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 18091
Monticello,
Charlottesville, VA
1. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph.
2. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph
3. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph
4. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph
5. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph
6. Thomas Jefferson: Monticello, 1770-1796; 1809 1990 photograph
http:llwww.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/fa267/18house monticello.html 4/10/01
CITYOF
CHANI SEN
690 GO' Ce, ret Drive
?0 Box I47
Ga,rinse,, 3fi,,esota 55317
~holle
952. 93E 1900
Geno'd F~
952.937.5739
&~gineedng Depa~nent Fax
952.93Z9152
Building Deparo~ t F~'
9~2.93~.2o~
~ Site
wwu~ ci. cha,hasse,, m,. us
MEMORANDUM
TO'
FROM:
Sharmin A1-Jaff, Senior Planner
Mahrnoud Sw¢idan, Engineer~''~
Matt Saam, Project Engineer ,.~
DATE: April 25, 2001
SUBJ:
Review of Site Plan for 7811 Great Plains Boulevard
Burger Office Building - Land Use Review File No. 01-08
Upon review of the plans dated April 4, 2001, prepared by Otto Associates, we
offer the following recommendations:
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL
The current plans show a walk-out office building with a proposed first floor
elevation of 974.5. The plans also show the building and parking area draining
towards the east and west to two proposed catch basins in the parking lot. The
parking lot and building drainage is proposed t9 be conveyed via two storm sewer
lines to the south and then outletting to the railroad ditch.
There is an existing 30-inch diameter oak tree on the west side of the proposed
building which the applicant is trying to save. As such, staff would recommend
that grading within the drip-line of the tree be minimized through the use of a
retaining wall on the north side of the tree. Also, the proposed storm sewer along
the west side of the tree should be relocated. This storm sewer could be rerouted
to the west and connect into the existing system in the adjacent City-owned
parking lot or it could be routed to the east and connected with the other proposed
storm sewer.
Proposed erosion control consists of silt fence around the perimeter grading limits
of the site. A rock construction entrance will not be required, provided that the
contractor utilizes the existing southerly entrance during construction. Additional
erosion control or rip-rap rock may be needed at the outlet of the eastern storm
sewer to prevent a gully from being formed. Also, tree protection fencing should
be installed around all trees in the construction zone that will remain.
UTILITIES
The existing building has a sewer and water service from the west. The plans for
the new building propose on extending new sewer and water services from West
Shamin A1-Jaff
April 25, 2O01
Page 2
78th Street. Staff recommends that, if possible, the applicant utilize the existing
sewer and water lines to serve the proposed building. This would alleviate the
need to open cut West 78th Street and minimize the disturbance to traffic.
Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections
through the City's Building Department.
STREETS AND PARKING LOT
The plans propose on utilizing the existing southerly access to the site. This
access would require three turning movements to be completed by each vehicle
entering the proposed parking lot. In order too promote better traffic flow and to
decrease the number of direct accesses to West 78th Street, staff is recommending
that the existing southerly access be removed and that the applicant utilize the
existing access to the north. The shared portion of the access drive, which goes
across the City-owned parking lot, must be contained within a private easement.
The minimum drive aisle width in an office/industrial district, which is Permitted
by ordinance, is 26-feet. The plans show 24-foot wide drive aisles. These drive
aisles shall be revised to meet ordinance requirements.
MISCELLANIOUS
..
It should be noted that Minnegasco has Contacted the City requesting the creation
of a 50-foot wide private easement for the existing gas mains which run just south
of the proposed building. Staff has reviewed Minnegasco's request with the City
Attorney's office and it has been determined that this request is not permissible
under the site plan review. It is up to Minnegasco to negotiate their own easement
with the applicant.
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Submit storm sewer sizing design data for a 1 O-year, 24-hour storm event.
2. Add detail sheet showing City Detail Plate Nos. 2001, 3101, 3107, 3108,
5203, 5215, 5234, and 5300.
o
,
Prior to building permit issuance, all plans must be signed by a
professional civil engineer registered in the state of Minnesota.
Grading within the drip-line of the 30-inch oak tree shall be minimized
through the use of a retaining wall on the north side of the tree
Shamin A1-Jaff
April 25, 2O01
Page 3
5. Reroute the proposed storm sewer along the west side of the 30-inch oak
tree.
6. The applicant shall, if possible, utilize the existing sanitary sewer and
water services for the new building.
7. Tree protection fencing should be installed around all trees in the
construction zone that will remain.
8. Increase the minimum drive aisle width to 26-feet.
Oo
Remove the existing southerly access and utilize the existing access to the
north. The shared portion of the access drive, which goes across the City-
owned parking lot, must be contained within a private easement.
10. Any offsite grading will require temporary easements.
11. On the utility plan:
- Show the existing water and sewer service lines.
- Add a legend.
- Under the Sewer & Water Notes add, "All sanitary sewer services shall
be 6" PVC SDR 26.
- Add a storm sewer schedule.
- Show all existing utilities with invert, pipe size, pipe type, etc.
12. On the grading plan: - Show all existing utilities.
~ Show all existing and proposed easements
- Add a legend.
Teresa J. Burgess, Public Works Director/City Engineer
g:XengXanahmoudkmemos\7811 great plains bldg sp.doc
CITYOF
690 City Center Drive
PO Box 147
Chanhassen. Min,esota 55317
Phone
952.937.1900
GeneralFax
952.937.5739
£ngineering Depamnent Fax'
952.937.9152
Building Deparonent Fax
952.'934.2524
Web Site
www. ci. cha,hassen, m,.us
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Sharmin AI-Jaff, Senior planner
Steven Torell, Building Official
DATE: April 23, 2001
SUB J:
Site Plan review for an office building located at 7811 Great Plains
Blvd., Burger Office Building, Derril Burger.
Planning Case: 2001-4 Site Plan
I have reviewed the plans for the above building dated: April3 and March 30, 2001
and received by the Planning Department on April 4, 2001. Following are my
comments, which should be included as c0nditio~ns of approval.
.
1. Demolition permits must be obtained before demolishing the existing
structures on the site.
2. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design profesSionals
licensed in the State of Minnesota.
3. The access aisle between the accessible parking spots must be a minimum of
eight (8) feet wide.
4. The plans were reviewed for allowable building area, exterior wall
protection and basic exiting only. Detailed building code requirements
cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted
5. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections
Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
G/safety/st/memos/plan/Burgerofficebuilding
~e City of Chanhassen. A ~o'o~d,~ commu,it~, with clean/aka, atta/it~, schooh, a channin~ downtown, thrivin~ businesses, and beaufifid oarks. A ~reat o/ace to live, work, and
eliant
Enersy ,.,
Minne asco
Sharmin AI-Jaff
Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
690 City Center Drive, P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN. 55317
700 West Linden Avenue
P.O. Box 1165
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-1165
April 19, 2001
RE:
Proposed Development plan
Planning case 2OO1-4
Dear Mr. AI-Jaff:
With reference to the proposed plat for Steiner Development at 7811 Great Plains
Boulevard, Reliant Energy Minnegasco currently has two gas mains in this property.
One of these is a high-pressure natural gas main installed along the old railroad
corridor. This gas main is a large part of our distribution system in this area and utility
easement rights must be maintained.
Most often when the railroads sell property a utility easement is created-Within the
Warranty Deed for all existing utilities. However, please create a general utility
easement to insure this transmission line is protected to insure a constant supply of
natural gas to this area. Because of the size, pressure, and importance of this
tranSmission line a 50.OO-foot easement is necessary. ~
When natural gas service is required please call Minnegasco Resource Management at
61 2-321-5123.
Respectfully,
Reliant Energy Minnegasco
Steven Von Bargen
Right-of-Way Administrator
p.c. Cherie Monson, Sales Associate
RECEIVED
APR 2.3 2001
CiTY OF CHANHASSEN