5 Site Plan 7901 Great Plains BCITY OF
PC DATE: 8-7-01
CC DATE: 8-27-01
REVIEW DEADLINE: 9-4-01
CASE #: SPR 2001-9
By: RG, JS, MS
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
Request for site plan review to convert ~t~ci-~;Pand a self serve car wash stall to a
touch free car wash and a variance to the impervious surface coverage and lot
area, Brown's Car Wash
-.
7901 Great Plains Blvd.
Ron Brown
8102 Dakota Avenue
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Gary Brown/Brown Properties
1831 Koehnen Circle
Excelsior, MN 55331
PRESENT ZONING:
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
Highway and Business'Services District, BH, and
Highway Corridor District, HC-1
Commercial
ACREAGE: 0.429 acres (18,691 sq. ft.) DENSITY: 0.19 F.A.R.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The developer is requesting site plan approval to convert one stall of a three-stall self-service Car wash
building to a touch free car wash. The site is below the Highway and Business Services district
minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet by 1,339 square feet. Additionally, the proposed site plan
exceeds permitted impervious surface coverage by 8.86 percent or 1,655.8 square feet.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. '
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed
project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets those standards, the City must then
approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
'0
(13
0
('3
0
b,~iida,en Cqu~~
Brown' s Car Wash
August 7,2001
Page 2
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project
meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion
with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in
the ordinance.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The developer is requesting site plan approval to convert one of the self-serve car wash stalls into a touch
free drive through car wash. This expansion adds 660 square feet of building to the site. Of the 660 square
foot building expansion, 341 square feet will be over existing pavement. The balance will be within the
lawn area to the east of the existing self-serve car wash. The existing impervious surface on the site is 70
percent, exceeding the permitted impervious surface by five percent or 996 square feet. The proposed
expansion would bring the impervious surface to 73.8 percent.
The two parcels have been combined previously into one zoning lot so interior lot line setbacks are not
enforced. Previous City Council action pushed the building closer to Great Plains Boulevard resulting in a
10.5 foot setback from the road right-of-way. However, the proposed expansion complies with the required
25 foot setback from West 79th Street.
When the site was originally approved for a car wash under the CBD zoning district, there were no
limitations to the amount of impervious surface permitted on the site. Through the rezoning of the
property to Highway and Business District, BH, the 65 percent impervious surface limitation was
established. As part of the review of the touch free car wash, the property was assumed to have 20,280
square feet due to confusion regarding the property boundary. With the realignment of TH 101 and Great
Plains Boulevard, an additional 14 feet of right-of-way was taken from the property, which equals
approximately 1,610 square feet of lot area, resulting in the lot being reduced below the 20,000 square foot
threshold for BH district properties.
The property to the north consists of West 78th Street, the railroad tracks and the new Burger Building. To
the east are Valvoline Rapid Oil Change and the Gary Brown Building (formerly the Hanus Building).
Brown's Amoco is located south of the site with a small strip retail building west across Great Plains
Boulevard.
With the building of the touch free expansion, the exterior and roof of the self-serve will be resided with
steel siding and the roof will be capped with a sloped metal roofing to match the existing touch free
building. The western elevation, which is constructed of brick, will remain.
Staff has had difficulty bringing the signage on these buildings into compliance with the zoning ordinance.
Specifically, the use of panel signs is prohibited. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending that
the applicant be required to replace the wall signage on both buildings with signs that comply with
ordinance. Such signs shall use individual dimensioned letters. A separate sign permit is required for each
sign.
Staff is recommending approval of the site plan with variances subject to the condition of the staff report.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7,2001
Page 3
BACKGROUND
On February 12, 1996, the City Council approved a variance to permit a second wall mounted sign on
the south elevation of the touch free car wash and denied a request to have painted signs as opposed to
individual dimension letters.
On September 25, 1995, the City Council approved conditional use permit 95-3 to allow two principal
buildings on one lot and site plan 95-13 for a 1,255 square foot drive through car wash.
On February 21, 1993, the City Council approved the Gateway 1st Addition subdivision.
In December 1986, the property was rezoned Highway and Business District (BH) from Central
Business District (CBD).
On December 5, 1983, a conditional Use Permit #83-3 was approved by the City Council for a car wash
on the property.
In February 1974, the property was zoned Central Business District, CBD, as part of the adoption of
Zoning Ordinance 47A.
In February 1972, the property was zoned Service Commercial District, C-3, as part of the adoption of
Zoning Ordinance 47.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 20, Zoning
Division 3, Variances
Division 6, Site Plan Review
Article XVH, "BH" Highway and Business Services District
Article XXIX, Highway Corridor District
GENERAL SITE PLAN/ARCHITECTURE
The proposed building remodel is to a one story building currently being used as a three stall self-serve
car wash. The developer is proposing that the most easterly stall be converted to a touch free, drive
through car wash. As part of the remodeling, the lap siding will be replaced with four inch steel siding.
In addition, a sloped metal roof will be installed. The proposed remodeling will make this building
similar in appearance to the existing touch free car wash. The brick on the western elevation of the
building will remain.
ACCESS
Access to the site is from West 79th Street. Cars exiting the car wash may either exit on to Great Plains
Boulevard or return to West 79th Street. The traffic circulation on the property will not be changed. The
developer is proposing the widening of the driveway on West 79th Street. Staff believes the exiting curb
cut/driveway apron is adequate to accommodate the project and should not be altered.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 4
LANDSCAPING
The applicant shall preserve, to the maximum extent possible, the existing landscape area on the
property. This included maintaining the existing curb line on the north side of the building, and
preserving the green area south of the expanded dumpster/equipment storage area on the south side of
the building.
The new car wash bay will remove approximately 300 square feet of landscape area from the site that -
already is below the minimum required. Since it is not possible to add any new green space to the site, it
is important that the existing landscape area' s use be maximized for the purposes of reducing stormwater
run-off and heat island effects as well as increasing the aesthetics of the site. These goals are best
obtained by landscaping in general and through tree planting specifically. Trees reduce stormwater run-
off by slowing the rate of rain reaching the ground, trapping precipitation in the canopy and utilizing
ground moisture through the root systems. The benefit of trees in reducing temperatures in heat islands
is well documented, as is the visual benefit of a landscape with trees. In light of this, staff recommends
that eight trees be planted on site. Specific locations are:
· Two ornamental trees at the north end of the grass area between the buildings.
· One overstory deciduous tree in the peninsula to the east.
· One ornamental tree in the northeast comer of the property
· Three overstory deciduous trees in the southeast comer of the property.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
The proposed redevelopment of the site will require minimal grading of the property. The developer
should install erosion control measures to contain any sedimentation from the construction activity.
Staff is recommending that the existing curb line on the east side of the entrance to West 78th Street be
maintained to reduce impervious surface coverage.
LIGHTING/SIGNAGE
The applicant is not proposing additional lighting for the property.
The existing panel signs on the building are prohibited. As a condition of approval, staff is recommending
that the applicant be required to replace the wall signage on both buildings with signs that comply with city
ordinance. Such signs shall use individual dimensioned letters. Prior to the issuance of the building permit
for the expansion, the signs on the touch free buildings shall be replaced. New signs on the self-serve car
wash building will be installed after the remodeling. A separate sign permit is required for each sign.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 5
FINDINGS
SITE PLAN
In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the
following:
(1)
Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including
the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted;
(2) Consistency with this division;
(3)
Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and
soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of
the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas;
(4)
Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site
features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the
development;
(5)
Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special
attention to the following:
An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a
desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community;
b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
C,
Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the
design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring
structures and uses; and
do
Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and
parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets,
width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation
of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking.
(6)
Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for
surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and
those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have
substantial effects on neighboring land uses.
Finding: Subject to the revisions contained in the staff report and approval of the variances, the
proposed site plan is consistent with all requirements of the site plan ordinance, the Business and
Highway Services District requirements, the Highway 5 Corridor standards and the
comprehensive plan.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7,2001
Page 6
VARIANCE
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue. hardship means
that the property cannot be put to reasonable use b~ause of its size, physical surroundings, shape or
topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500
feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize
that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-
existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: The literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship since the lot size
was reduced due to city action.
b.
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other
property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is due to city action.
Ce
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of
the parcel of land.
Finding: While the remodeling of the building may increase the income potential of the property,
the purpose of the variation is to overcome previous city action.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The alleged difficulty is due to city action.
eo
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land
or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or
substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger
the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire
or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 7
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan #2001-9, shown on plans prepared by
Peter Curtis Architect, dated July 6, 2001, with an 8.8 percent variance to the lot coverage and a 1,309
square foot variance to the lot area based on the findings of fact and subject to the following conditions:
The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping.
2. Add a benchmark to the plans, which was used for the site survey.
3. Add a legend to the site plan.
4. Show all proposed and existing contour lines.
5.
The proposed addition cannot be built across the property line therefore Tract B and Parcel A
must be combined into one lot.
6. Detailed retail occupancy requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted.
.
The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as
possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
.
The developer shall plant eight trees on site in the following locations: two ornamental trees at
the north end of the grass area between the buildings, one overstory deciduous tree in the
peninsula to the east, one ornamental tree in the northeast corner of the property, three overstory
deciduous trees in the southeast corner of the property.
9. The developer shall submit a landscape plan to the city prior to the building permit.
10.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the expansion, the signs on the touch free buildings
shall be replaced. All nonconforming signs on the self service car wash building shall be removed.
New signs on the self-serve car wash building will be installed after the remodeling. A separate
sign permit is required for each sign.
11.
The developer shall revise the plans to maintain the existing curb line on the eastern side of the
entrance from West 78th Street and maintain the green area south of the storage door on the
building expansion with the exception of the area immediately in front of the door."
ATTACHMENTS
a. Findings of Fact and Recommendation
b. Development Review Application
c. Letter from Ron Brown to Chanhassen Planning Commission and Chanhassen City Council
d. Reduced Copy of Site Plan
e. Reduced Copy of Floor Plan
Brown's Car Wash
August 7,2001
Page 8
f. Reduced Copy of Building Elevations
g. Memo from Matt Saam to Bob Generous dated 7/23/01
h. Memo from Steve Torell to Bob Generous dated 7/20/01
i. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 9
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FA CT
AND RECOMMENDATION
Application of Ron Brown and Gary Brown/Brown Properties for Site Plan,Review and variances to site
coverage and lot size.
On August 7, 2001, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting
to consider the application of Ron Brown and Gary Brown/Brown Property for a site plan review with
variances to lot coverage and lot area for the property located at 7901 Great Plains Boulevard. The
Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan was preceded by published
and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to
speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
The property is currently zoned Highway and Business Service District and Highway
Corridor District, HC-1.
2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for commercial uses.
3. The legal description of the property is: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Gateway East Addition.
4. Section 20-110:
a. Is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including
the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted;
b. Is consistent with this division;
C.
Preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil
removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the
neighboring developed or developing or developing areas;
d. Creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features
and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development;
e. Creates a functional and hmTnonious design for structures and site features, with special
attention to the following:
1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision
of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community;
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 10
2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping;
3. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the
design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring
structures and uses; and
4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives
and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets,-
width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of
pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking.
Protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface
water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those
aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial
effects on neighboring land uses.
go
Section 20-58, A variance may be granted by city council only if all of the following
criteria are met:
1. The literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship since the lot size
was reduced due to city action.
2. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is due to city action.
3. While the remodeling of the building may increase the income potential of the property,
the purpose of the variation is to overcome previous city action.
4. The alleged difficulty is due to city action.
5. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
6. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate SUpply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood.
h. The planning report SPR #2001-9 dated August 7, 2001, prepared by Robert Generous, et
al, is incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site plan
review.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 7th day of August, 2001.
Brown's Car Wash
August 7, 2001
Page 11
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
BY:
Its Chairman
Secretary
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 -...
(612) 937-1900
.
-.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
'3'FI 1=PHONE {Day time)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Cor,~tionai'Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
Variance ¢ '7 ~""'
,Non-conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development'
Rez. ening
Wetland Alteration Permit
Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
i
Sign Plsn Review
, _.~ S~ PI~ Review*
Subdivision*
. ~"-Notification Sign
X Escrow for Filing FeeS/Attorney Cost**
($50 CUPISPRNACNAR/WAPIMetes
and Bounds, $400 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $ --~ ~'~_._.. 'c~
list o! all property owners within 500 feet'of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
Ba~crmg material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
~l'wenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8W' X 11" reduced cOpy of
Zransparency for each plan sheet.
F. scro~ will be required for other applications through the development contract
multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
'WE'D_ANDS PRESENT
YES /.,,--/'NO
~~ZONING
P,F_.QL~STED ZONING
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
au -nm
-Fhis application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
De,pa. r2~er,.t to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made Within ten business days of application submittal. A written
x~atice ~.¢ application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
"Th~'s is to cert~ that I am making application for the described action by the City and that ! am responsible for complying with
-all City requirements with regard to this request. This applica!ion should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
'the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of. Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
Zhis aj:~o]ica.don ar~ the fee owner has also signed this application.
I ~ 'keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
rny knowledge. ,
-Fhe cSty'nereby not, es the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and ac~"~..y review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for deC 3m~t m~w. Development review shall be completed within 120 da~ unless additional review
~~ are ~ pro ~ ~y ~e a~plicant.
Sig~re ~ ~ ~ ~ Date
prmio o ed on Fee Paid ' Receipt No.
"i~ applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not c~ntacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
Chanhassen Planning Commission and
Chanhassen City Council
Browns Car Wash is applying for a variance because, of the issue
with green space. Over the past ten years Great Plains Blvd and
West 79th Street have changed. The roads have been made wider
and lines have shifted. Moving the right of way closer to our
buildings. We now have 28% green space, with the purposed
building remodel we will be at 26% green space. The addition is
700 sq. ft. decreasing bituminous and concrete by 300 sq. ft. We
believe that the planting and buffer zones are correct. If not, we
will be willing to work with the Planning and City Council to
correct this situation. No trees or shrubs will be lost during this
construction. Please call with any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Ron Brown
952-934-2155
612-384-4811
/
./-
\ //';,
/
/
'4/
CITYOF
CHANHASSEN
690 CiO, Cemer Drive
PO Box 147
Cha,hasse,, Mimmota 55317
Phone
952. 93,.7. 1900
General Fax
952.93.~ 5,739
Engineering Department Fax
952.93,~9152
Building Department Fax
952.934.2524
Web Site
ltqt'tl', fi. C/~dllhd$$fil. i?lll,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Bob Generous, Senior Planner
Matt Saam, Project Engineer ]3~
July 23, 2001
SUBJ:
Review of Site Plan for Brown's Car Wash Expansion
Land Use Review File No. 01-15
Upon review of the plans dated July 6, 2001 prepared by Peter Curtis, I offer the
following recommendations:
RECOMMENDED CONDITONS OF APPROVAL
1. Add a benchmark to the plans, which was used for the site survey.
2. Add a legend to the site plan.
3. Show all proposed and existing contour lines.
c: Teresa Burgess, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
g:\eng\matt\memos~staff reports\browns spr.doc
CITYOF
690 CiO, Center Drive
PO Box I47
Cha,hassen, Mi,,esota 55317
Pholle
952.937.1900
General
952.93/.5739
E,gineering Deparoneut
952.93Z9152
Bui/diug Department Fax
952.934.252~
I~3b Site
wu,u ~ ti. cha ~#)asse,. m,.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Bob Generous, Senior planner
Steven Torell, Building Official
July 20, 2001
SUBJ:
Site Plan review for expansion of Brown's Car Wash
7901 Great Plains Blvd.
Planning Case' 2001-9 Site Plan
I have reviewed the plans for the above building and have the following comments,
which should be included as conditions of approval.
1. The proposed addition cannot be built across the property line therefore
Tract B and Parcel A must be combined into one lot.
2. Detailed occupancy retailed requirements cannot be reviewed until complete
plans are submitted.
3. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections
Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.
G/safety/st/memos/plarffBroxvnsCarWashAddition
The Ot3, of Chanhasseu. A g;'owi,g commzmiO, with clea, lakes, qz:a/iO, schooh, a chan,i,~ dow, tow,, th;'ivi,~ busiuesses, a,d beautifid parks, A ~, ;'eat /)/Ace tO/ire, work, a,d plat,.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2001 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
690 CITY CENTER DRIVE
PROPOSAL: Site Plan Review With
Variances for Brown's
Car Wash
APPLICANT: Ron Brown
LOCATION: 7901 Great Plains Blvd.
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant, Ron Brown,
is requesting a site plan review to convert and expand a self car wash stall to a touch free car wash with variances
on property located at 7901 Great Plains Blvd., Brown's Car Wash.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's
request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead
the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during
office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project,
please contact Bob at 937-1900 ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one
copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the' Chanhassen Villager on July 26, 2001.
WILBAR PROPERTIES INC
C/O AL KLINGELHUTZ
8600 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
AMERICAN LEGION-CHAN POST 580
7995 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC
4567 80TH ST W
BLOOMINGTON MN 55437
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BOTCHER
C/OSCO~T~ENTE~...~~X
690 CITY 147
CHANH~ MN 55317
AMOCO AMERICAN OIL CO
PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT
200 EAST RANDOLPH DR M C 2408
CHICAGO IL 60601
MICHAEL E RAMSEY
6362 OXBOW BND
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
CHANHASSEN HRA
690 CITY CENTER DR
147
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHE~
690 CITY CE~--DR- PO BOX 147
CH~..~k, fi'S'EN MN 55317
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHER ~
690 CITY CENT. ER--Dt('" PO BOX 147
CH~ MN 55317
BLOOMBERG COMPANIES INC
PO BOX 730
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHURCH OF ST HUBERT
8201 MAIN ST
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
BLOOMBERG COMPANIES IN.~,C
~,_.~Oq3 OX 730
CHANHAS SE.~"~MN 5 S 317
MICHAEL J SORENSEN
12625 58TH ST
MAYER MN
55360
CHANHASSEN HRA
690 CITY CENTER DR PO BO.X 147
CHANHASSEN ~,...M~ .... 55317
CHANHASSEN HRA
690 CITY CENTER DR PO BOX 147
CHANHASSEN ~.__<MN~'"5~ ~5
CHURCH OF ST HUBERT
8201 MAIN S.T..,,,~,--'''~ ....
C~8SI~ MN 55317
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHER ............
690 CITY CENTE~DR"~'~'PO BOX 147
CHANHASSE~'"'" MN 55317
...
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHER .~.. "
690 CITY CENTER DR.. · ' P~5 BOX 147
CHANHASSEN ...... '"~MN 55317
.*
.
CHANHASSEN lIRA
690 CITY CENTER DR ..,?O-BOX 147
CHANHASSEN ...,._,~:MN 55317
B 4 D LLC
555 3RD AVE NW
HUTCHINSON
MN 55350
RALPH G MOLNAU &
RONALD F DUBBE
3563 1/2 STW
WACONIA MN
55387
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
C/O SCOTT BOTCHER
690 CITY CENTER DR ........ 'PO BOX 147
CHANHASSE..N. ~. - ....... 'MN 55317
GRACE DEVELOPMENT LLC
18202 MINNETONKA BLVD
WAYZATA MN 55391