The URL can be used to link to this page

Traffic Impact Analysis 05-20-2011Traffic Impact Analysis Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota ©Kimley -Hom and Associates, Inc. May 2011 116199062 CITY O zrrIANNASSEN MNf 2 6 2011 ENGINES NG DEPT. C � � Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Impact Analysis Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Chanhassen, Minnesota Prepared for: Walmart Stores, Inc. Bentonville, Arkansas Prepared by: Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my r r( ofess ' ect supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed ional Engineer under the laws of the State Minnesota. By. Brian R. Smalk ci, P.E. License No. 47531 Date: S 7- L Kimley -Horn Walmart (store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota I Introduction May 2011 1 Walmart Stores, Inc. is proposing the construction of a new store, number 5949 -00, near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard (Trunk Highway 5) and Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota (see Figure 1). The project ' is anticipated to be completed by the year 2013, and will include retail and grocery land uses on a vacant industrial parcel. The proposed development site plan is shown in Figure 2. The purpose of this report is to document the anticipated traffic impacts that the change in land use at the proposed Walmart site will have on the surrounding roadway network intersections. ' This traffic impact analysis (TIA) represents a review of traffic impacts of the project, based on land use and site plan information, and is intended to identify the key traffic ' issues associated with the project. This TIA documents the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, estimates the traffic anticipated to be generated by the project, distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluates the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. In order to have a basis of comparison, a "no- build" analysis was completed for ' each future scenario that includes the general background growth on the adjacent roadways as well as traffic generated by other possible development adjacent to the project. ' Based on the analysis, the TIA evaluates roadway and/or traffic control mitigation measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system and whether these mitigation ' measures are triggered by background growth or the proposed project. May 2011 1 jjv x j; 7 A, 2p L 4 A '2 . 4A Fj J P, Walmart Store 4, M K 44 J ; Ell 1- '99 N FIGURE 1: Site Location 0 100 200 400 Feet M J I Kimley-Horn I / and Associates, Inc. I , o t ° } I. Walmart t � Store O � 0 o 0 0 0 0 r N FIGURE 2: Site Plan ` o so 100 200 PP M n Kimley -Horn Feet \ = and Associates, Inc. Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Y Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, In c. Chanhassen, Minnesota Study Area The project site is bounded by Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) on the north, Powers Boulevard on the east, and Park Road on the south. The proposed development will include an up to 120,209 square -foot Walmart store. Current nearby land uses are a mix of office and industrial. Access to the site will be provided via the two existing driveways on Park Road, with a southbound turn lane constructed on the west driveway. The segment of Park Road between Powers Boulevard and the west driveway will be reconfigured to accommodate westbound right turn lanes at the driveways as well as an eastbound left turn lane at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard and a westbound left turn lane at the west driveway. A center median will divide the two directions of travel. Data Collection PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 and Wednesday, February 9, 2011 for the following study intersections: • Arboretum Boulevard (TH 5) & Powers Boulevard • Park Road & Powers Boulevard (12 -hour count) • Park Road & East Driveway • Park Road & West Driveway Figure 3 displays the existing lane geometry and traffic control for the intersections in the study area. Figure 4 summarizes the existing turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour conditions; volumes were balanced among the four intersections. See Appendix A for the raw turning movement count data. E May 2011 4 7 41 v R _ Iles J, C 7 ' g SITE 4 I f 0 jr 4 . Park _ J - - Park Road 4 , Road r �.. t. i r i ll N FIGURE 3: Existing Lane Geometry 0 120 240 380 OPP" KimleyHorn Feet \ ® and Associates, Inc. Arboretum boulevard „0 � �}ryI f � 1 - 530 r -. R _ Iles J, C 7 ' g SITE 4 I f 0 jr 4 . Park _ J - - Park Road 4 , Road r �.. t. i r i ll N FIGURE 3: Existing Lane Geometry 0 120 240 380 OPP" KimleyHorn Feet \ ® and Associates, Inc. 269 \ Vii. �68 o .' 1242 t'1..- l: + - . •_. o _ 6 ~ 141 ;: er 36 Park �. Arboretum Road Boulevard M _� „� ;�; t n ' �7 r 220 715 _ - i ` T .. 4 7S . 14 etAll AkA OF J {. SITEt 3 31 V t .:�'h• 'far:. `,y �� , � ,y � : t ,. r . . J' IL t I 0 a �1 107 to t o 32 Park p * Road ! Park 0+ 41 t Road 3 } i a o ry 116w# � mil t / A7 N FIGURE 4: 2011 Existing Turning Movement Counts 0 100 200 400 �%"' -mj Kimley -Horn f { l• and Associates Inc. Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes f Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota I Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 8` Edition, was used to calculate the anticipated net new external project trips for the proposed development. A 120,209 square -foot free - standing discount superstore (land use code 813) was used to ' determine the total number of trips generated by the site. Total pass -by trip reduction was determined to be 28 %. Of the total calculated pass -by trips, 70 percent, 20 percent, and 10 percent were assumed to originate on Arboretum Boulevard, Powers Boulevard, and Park Road, respectively. Existing non - vehicular travel was examined in the TMCs and determined to be negligible; therefore, no reductions were made for transit use or pedestrian travel. The trip generation for the proposed project with adjustments for pass -by trips is shown in Table 1. The proposed site is anticipated to generate 554 trips (271 entering, 283 exiting) for the PM peak hour. i May 2011 7 Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) I Y Traffic Impact Analysis r and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen Minnesota May 2011 1 Y C Z L Z �ct F E., M a � F W p L G a 1O 6. a n. a. o � ap N � M W L d C GL N C 7 � V c� F a� ca X E `O � L - C � N x y N cD O O N F 7 � d � V t 9 Q io C d r May 2011 1 Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) t Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Future Traffic Projections ' Project buildout is expected to be in 2013. Linear growth of 1.8 percent per year was applied to the counts to obtain background traffic for the year 2013. This growth is based on historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) on Powers Boulevard and Arboretum ' Boulevard since 2001. The 2013 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. To obtain background traffic estimates for 2030, however, it was determined that 1.8 percent linear growth per year was an unreasonable estimate over a 17 year period. Instead, average annual growth on Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard was obtained from the Carver County Travel Demand Model over the 30 year period from 2000 to 2030 due to its basis in census data, local comprehensive plans, and established estimates. A linear growth of 0.5 percent per year was determined and then applied to the balanced 2013 estimates to establish a baseline estimate for 2030. Growth from demand model largely represents long term regional trends, however, and does not provide reliable estimates for traffic growth at individual intersections due to the development of specific parcels. Based on discussions with the City of Chanhassen, it was determined that traffic from five nearby parcels, using square- footage and development type estimates, would be added to the 2030 baseline estimate to establish a final estimate for 2030 background traffic. One development, located near the Powers Boulevard / TH 212 interchange, represents a revision to the original estimates used within the Carver County Travel Demand Model. The assumed PM peak period trips based on single family residential were subtracted from the total trips calculated based on the revised land use scenario (commercial and office), to represent a land use change from the regional demand model rather than an entirely new development. Peak trip generation estimates for each parcel is provided in Table 2, with the location of each site shown in Figure 6. The net trips anticipated to be generated in the PM peak hour by the surrounding development were calculated and distributed onto the roadway network (discussed below), and added to the 0.5% per year background growth from 2013 to 2030. The resultant total background growth in the study area therefore varies by intersection, ranging from 1.6 percent per year linearly on Arboretum Boulevard up to 4.1 percent per year linearly on Powers Boulevard. Total off -site trips are shown in Figure 7. The 2030 no build peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8. May 2011 I %m §- om Alm�(ts m gm y Traffic Impact Ana�,, bib— and Associates, In. Chanhassen, Minnesota May 2011 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ]g$§2REll ■2 \\�' � < 4 J r- 1 2 � — m — _ ƒ ƒ]________ i L , 9 .9 ¥ a = CD C> CD ° ° £ ]@a§ ) Q 4Cq'D 2ft @� � 2 § 4« / $� 2 } }/ + §\E \j\j� « \ §��2\/ ] aaV)p2 )j)kk22)) R §§a �N enr�1'�\ / ]� �) \\ aa\ / \jƒ _ ■ea Q Cn Cn ] - -\ »=C, j)Q2 =GRg3/ May 2011 m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I y/ 1� 279 \ - .. 70 ^ " 1287 146 6 37 }I _ - r Arboretum � �• � r .� � � ♦ Park • Boulevard 228 r * �,. -, ,i t s ° 63 J I! , 741 ^ T _ 4 - 31 / \ 781 lop - -. � i� } Y��4 � t'i; ` L k w'c, _ �: ..c -�' Y` sk. ,,•.'� ��';_-L .�T'� 3 • \ / `' o ' o 81 `` , - - o 0 0 111 Park A * I Poad �� 0 d! r, ■ Road lzoo* } „ ijp 0; N FIGURE 5: 2013 No Build Turning Movement Counts o ioo 200 400 PP Kimley -Horn } Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 1111111h, and Associates Inc. f d 6 Y •� <` ;nom �,. . ~ ---�- �", - � �+�` LU 814 22,350 sq. ft. :,►, -'' -, LU 630 \ i 28,0 sca ft LU 814 s ;r• 32,800 sq ft. x LU 110 f 221,000 sq. t. 1 �, ri it Flip- Apff �\ t, d ICS • i• . � i.� \,,. g � g . - � �..,' _ � j° �+r1 sA T' .ee'P` J .'4• F..:..r t,� ... t L , .7, r " c o , 7 -0�iR�`a�a ti, t t � Ap` ♦ = a "� i `•-!ry ` '_ �F / w;f � ��w 5 �`i•'� Mks. .I.� v..I"i$. J _ - ,�, .' y' he �,' ��'�; 55.. -'F � �` ,a,C,, 1 >��Y , IPA r:• _ r - l LU 710 948,000 sq. ft REMOVED' (LU 210) r r r } (132 Acres) r LU 220 ' 406,000 sq. ft. 0 :66 j • 118 1 f. Arboretum * Park Boulevard 8 /1 ' _ 49 r t Road 15 � .A ry / Yr m � ! .... c � F x p - j 17 22 c { ' } _. Y ► - _ - ; - d/a_ '' y ew `� '9� - ' - 1`llt3* a - rte• n '" .! -- SITE'- s s "�'' '� "� . - �=1 == - � , _ mil• �� yl I \ •6 r 4 t � 0 IRR 4 t Park ir � Road 0 .�'' �'� z " 4- 71 , ii .y Goad 1 71 71 y o 0 C 01 1 j 1. N FIGURE 7: 2030 Off -Site Development Trips 0 112.5 225 aso / KimleyHom Feel xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ` and Associates Inc. (A 303 142 r 1396 • ' "' v $ 7 V ♦ 27., 62 levard 255 J IF> Road 319 51i I it T A ':� +: `�- +ISM f -'�-+ •. �+. - - � • � N wN .,, SITE e. �,) f f. NLr 180 �� l Park 36 Perk .. 2 tt Road oid r => /I d 201 / s K N FIGURE 8: 2030 No Build Turning Movement Counts 0 100 200 400 / Kimley -Horn y Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes � 1 and Associates Inc. I Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949.00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Project Trip Distribution The project trip distribution is based on selected zone analysis from the Carver County Travel Demand Model, which represents a refined version of the Metropolitan Council's demand model for the Twin Cities region. I t As shown in Figure 9, the proposed site is located in TAZ 142.3, which includes a region bounded by Hazeltine Boulevard on the west, Arboretum Boulevard on the north, and Powers Boulevard on the east. After assigning trips to the network, vehicles originating from or heading to the TAZ on each of the 10 roadways (or centroid connectors) shown in the figure were measured to calculate a daily distribution for both the 2000 and 2030 analysis years. Results were then interpolated between the two base years to estimate distribution for the 2013 analysis year. By adding trips to and from the north (lines 1, 2, 9, and 10), to and from the east (line 3), to and from the south (lines 4, 5, and 6), and to and from the west (lines 7 and 8), the final directional distribution was established for the site. Figure 10 shows the final assumed trip distribution for the project, with 35 percent to the east, 20 percent to the north, 20 percent to the west, and 25 percent to the south. 10 percent of the trips to the west and 10 percent of the trips to the south were assumed to use Park Road west of the site. Trip distribution for the four surrounding off -site parcels contained within TAZ 142.3 was assumed the same as for the Walmart site, with slight assignment modifications based on location. For the modified parcel located near TH 212, trip distribution was analyzed for TAZ 146, which contains the proposed development, showing that approximately 11% of the trips to and from the development utilized Powers Boulevard. Estimated project trips, shown in Figure 11, were then added to 2013 and 2030 no build traffic conditions, along with corrections for pass -by trips, as shown in Figure 12. The final traffic estimates for the build condition are shown in Figures 13 and 14 for 2013 and 2030, respectively. Vl 2') 1s z r � r r f 41 t 10 + • II 142.3 142.1 142.E r I I Ile / r 1 N 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet mI FIGURE 9: Selected Zone Analysis -� - -- raz Boundary � ! � Kimley�Horn -- Centroid Connector and Associates Inc. ._Arboretum Boulevard _ T• J. rr o ; v xf Yi • t Walmart Store A t t . 63% Park ■ Road lit FIGURE 10: Site Trip Distribution o 100 200 400 PPI M Kimley -Horn ' ti Feet xx Trip Distribution Percentage ` and Associates, Inc. t� FIGURE 11: Project Trips xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Road i 194 M# o� F i Klmley -Horn tii� and Associates, Inc. `o 0 0 0 0 -30 3� 0 JJ' (. 0 - Arboretum Park . Boulevard 0 • * 1 p ft.i u! ' -23 23 • i 3 1 `��'�kr � � r.n ��r•r7 ��/ � 1� � I _ }' yr i.. f!•.:.ir ti Yi l �.} `` � > �{ W Store • d+{'" a - Store 1 r: . "." y} I • -'3g 6 �-• y � � gi; g. �... _ _ V y � _ • � � .t ,� l'- q � ISO vPr r, f 24 _ 48 -t 4111111111 21 Park 0 t S e f<; - d ! Park Road * Road o 4r r= + 0.) ■ O O OSC.ir i �. 4 -- K' Yr�a• . } _ 71 => 0 0 0 TL FIGURE 12: Pass -By Trips 0 100 200 s00 Kimley -Horn Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates Inc. ,S t . 279 l 70 ry v' r 1257 lv 6 pp 37 ■ ~ �2a» _i ev, 4t°-4 G r Park ' Arboretum r * Road. Boulevard 228 at a '�'" *t+, 275 j ■ 718 m ;v ` „-; r 4 .-1 m '. 89. \ 131 El t d w Walmart ��• lGrt � � ,� i I Store t < Or wt � ��.� fit• a -p �.. l , 171 # a o 0 227 :i .l Park q p I to 0 Park Road p T` Road tl i• 93 � } `y 385 :, r . Ripmrp-mxw Mill N FIGURE 13: 2013 Build Turning Movement Counts ` 0 100 200 400 PP = Kimley -Horn t Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Associates, Inc. / IL 303 ' 142 1,366 7 ? _ 374 J r 62 arboretum _ { , Park ' Boulevard 379 t Road r � 160 Nt as o o o r ' _ l ' t + it Y L t �1 l� T1,' ei = Walmart Store l Al IN •te 86 - _ i 171 0 0 n 144 �� v o 0 299 73 0 Park Park Road 14 � Road -qtr 172 ^ _ - ^, 966 b 4 d Q eT "� FIGURE 14: 2030 r Build Turning Movement Counts f 0 100 200 400 P ® Kimley -Horn t Feet xx PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes `� and Associates, Inc. Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) y Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Level of Service Analyses Intersection level of service (LOS) analyses were performed for each of the intersections within the study area using the signalized analysis methodology found in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM and Trafficware's Synchro /SimTraffic version 7. Each intersection was analyzed for PM peak hours for the following scenarios: • 2011 existing traffic conditions, • 2013 no build (without project trips) conditions, • 2013 build (with project trips added) conditions, • 2030 no build (without project trips) conditions, and • 2030 build (with project trips added) conditions. One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic operations, as defined in the HCM, is level of service (LOS) --a qualitative letter grade (A through F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high- quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). This study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of satisfactory traffic operations. Figure 15 displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Figure IS. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria. 100 90 80 d 70 t m v 60 R O u 50 T d 40 d A > 30 Q 20 10 0 ■ May 2011 22 Si gnalized Unsig nalized Klmley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis t and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota It was assumed that for the future scenarios an intersection with unsatisfactory operations should be addressed through signal timing modifications, or if that was not possible, through implementation of an intersection or roadway improvement. In order to determine the impacts of the project on the transportation network, a traffic operations analysis was performed on the internal and surrounding roadway network. The analysis process included determining level of service and queue lengths at each of the study intersections for existing, no build and build conditions. Supporting SimTraffic reports are included in Appendix C. For each scenario, five one -hour simulations were conducted in SimTraffic. ' In each of the following sections, a description of potentially unsatisfactory operational characteristics is summarized for each scenario modeled. For each scenario a table is included where the intersection level of service and delay is summarized. The SimTraffic ' reports were reviewed to identify individual movements that experience unsatisfactory level of service and delay or queue lengths that are anticipated to extend beyond available ' storage lengths. Only in instances where an individual movement experiences an unsatisfactory the information be measure of effectiveness will movement summarized. 1 it t 1 2011 Existing Operations Table 3 provides 2011 level of service (LOS) results for the existing conditions. All intersections within the study area operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 63 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 75 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 73 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 66 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the signal is timed such that the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are contained within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated wit operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. May 2011 23 " :J Y'A Kimley -Horn =3 and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota Table 3 - 2011 Existing Conditions 2011 PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection Left Through Right Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile (sec/-h) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB 310' 63.0 21.9 C 4.4 A 30.2 C Arboretum Wa 225' 75.0 34.8 C 3.9 A 33.0 C 36.0 D Blvd & Signal NB 130' 73,8 68.1 3.2 A 50.4 D Powers Blvd 58 100' 1 73.1 66.3 249 A 41.6 D EB 0' 1 9.8 A 11.5 B 541 A 7.2 A Park Rd& WB 0' 1 10.4 B 13.1 B 5.1 A 7.3 A 37 A Powers Blvd TWSC NB 40' 7.5 A 009 A 5.1 A 1.9 A 4.6 A 3.1 A 3.6 A 3.3 A - - 0.6 A 0.1 A 0.6 A Park Rd & 1.6 A 0.4 A - 0.7 A 0.9 A East TWSC 5.7 A 30 A 3.3 A Driveway F - - - - - - 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.2 A Park Rd & 2.0 A 0.5 A - - 0.9 A 1.0 A West TWSC 5.5 A 7.9 A 2.6 A 3.4 A Driveway 7.1 A 71 A 2013 No Build Operations Table 4 provides 2013 level of service (LOS) results for the 2013 no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2011 to 2013 of 1.8 percent per year. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS A. A total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 68 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 70 seconds At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. All left turn queues are accommodated within the available storage lengths and no blocking by queues in adjacent lanes is expected. The delays associated with the LOS E movements are not representative of operational problems the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycle lengths. May 2011 24 t 11 t r --. Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Table 4 - 2013 No Build 2013 No Build - PM Peak Hour • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 74 seconds Lek Turn Operations by Movement ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds Intersection Control Approach Queues Approach Overall Intersection Lek • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 55 seconds Throu h Ri ht 95th Delay 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left Delay movements. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot Delay Delay Delay 2011 25 Percentile (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (s LOS LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS EB 305' 6405 22.4 C 4.6 A 31.5 C Arboretum WB 265' 75.8 37.8 D 4.1 A 35.5 D Blvd& Signal 37.5 D Powers Blvd NB 145' 74.2 68.1 3.3 q 488 D SB 120' 73.6 69.8 3.0 A 42.9 D EB 0' 11.0 B 10.0 A 502 A 7.9 A Park Rd& WB 0' 9.7 A 11.5 B 5.3 A 7.1 A Powers Blvd TWSC NB 35' 73 A 1.0 A 5.5 A 2.0 A 3.7 A SB 30' S.4 A 32 A 3.6 A 3.4 A EB 0' - 0.6 A 0.1 A 0.6 A Park Rd & WB 0' 1.7 A 0.5 A - - 0.8 A East TWSC NB 0' 6.7 A 3.0 A 3.5 A 1.0 A Driveway 58 0' - - EB 0' - 0.3 A - - 0.3 A Park Rd & WB 0' 2.2 A 0.4 A - 0.9 A West TWSC NB 0' 5.2 A 6.7 A 2.7 A 3.2 A 0.9 A Drivew ay SB 0' 1 4.9 A 4.9 A 2013 Build Operations Table 5 provides 2013 LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, based on background traffic plus trips associated with the Walmart parcel. The simulation assumes the same signal timing plan at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard as under existing conditions. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of eight movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 74 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 75 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario: ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 174 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 260 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 55 seconds ' • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 494 seconds Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the westbound left and northbound left movements. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to extend beyond the 230 foot t May 2011 25 Kimle -Horn Wa art (Store Traffic t Analysis y Trfic Impact Malysis and Associates Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota left turn lane, with a 95` percentile queue of 396 feet. The adjacent through lane will also block access to the left turn lane, with a 95` percentile queue of 563 feet. The westbound left turn queue is expected to fit within the turn lane; however, with a 95 percentile queue of 598 feet and 630 feet of storage length, and a posted speed of 55 mph, left turning vehicles will need to begin decelerating in the adjacent through lane, delaying vehicles making the westbound through movement. At the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, the eastbound left turn movement is expected to operate at LOS F, due to increased volumes during the PM peak hour. Queuing from this movement is expected to block vehicles exiting the east driveway from the south, leading to LOS F on the northbound approach. As a low volume side street approach, it is likely that most vehicles will reroute and utilize the west driveway during the PM peak hour. No turn lane spillback or lane blocking is anticipated from any of the left turn lanes at the intersection. Table 5 - 2013 Build 2013 Build - PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection Lek Through Right Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB 320' 65.6 25.5 C 5.0 A 3109 C Arboretum W 600' 174.4 37.1 D 4.0 A 49.3 D Blvd & Signal NB 395' 260.1 73.6 3.8 A 85.5 51.4 D Powers Blvd SB 105' 74.7 74.9 3.2 A 48.4 D EB 220' 55.3 16.5 C 4.2 A 39.0 WB 0' 20.4 C 22.7 C Park Rd& 11.0 B 14.4 B 13.4 B Powers Blvd TWSC NB 65' 11.0 B 1.5 A 5.3 A 3.8 A 58 40' 7.0 A 3.6 A 5.3 A 4.6 A EB 0' 23.5 C 1.3 A 23.4 C Park Rd & W 0' 0.6 A A 0.7 A East TWSC NB 0' 493.93. 5 493.5 24.6 C Driveway q7 A 47 A SB 0' EB 0' 3.2 A 2.7 A 1.9 A 2.7 A Park Rd& W 25' 2.1 A 0.2 A 0.5 A 8.6 A Wes[ TWSC NB 0' 6.1 A 8.9 A 6.4 A 6.4 A _J Driveway SB 200' 18.9 C 3.4 A 1 18.4 C 2013 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Optimization Table 6 provides LOS results for the 2013 build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as well as optimization of splits at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80- second cycle length, half that of the 160 - second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. Although signal optimization removes approximately 6 seconds from the major street approaches, the signal remains coordinated along the TH 5 corridor, with minimal increases in delay. May 2011 26 1 �I I t t PP P- Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis r and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 69 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 62 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 71 seconds The following movement is expected to operate at LOS F under the 2013 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 87 seconds Operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2013 no build levels, with increased delay to the southbound through movement. With the signal timing modified, queuing and blocking issues are eliminated. The 95`" percentile queue for both the northbound left turn and through movements is reduced to 232 feet, which is easily accommodated within the taper of the 230 foot storage length. The 95` percentile westbound left turn queue is reduced to 340 feet, which leaves nearly 300 feet in the turn lane for vehicles to decelerate. At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues are anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right -turn movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. The delays associated with the LOS E or F movements are not associated with operational problems at the signal, but are due to relatively low demand and long cycl lengths. No geometric improvements are recommended, and the cycle length at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is expected to remain at 160 seconds to maximize the coordinated westbound and eastbound through movements. May 2011 27 Kimle -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) y Traffic Impact Analysis _ d and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Table 6 - 2013 Build with Imorovements 2013 Build with Signal • PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Queues Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection Lek Through Right Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS (sec/veh) LOS EB 315' 70.8 30.6 C 5.1 A 36.4 D Arboretum WEI 340' 71.3 41.4 D 4.1 A 39.2 D Blvd & Signal NB 230' 68.7 62.1 4.4 A 43.2 D 41.2 0 Powers Blvd 58 105' 71.0 87.1 3.3 A 52.8 D EB 195' 27.3 C 27.3 C 3.7 A 2000 B Park Rd& WB 0' 40.2 D 3704 D 12.2 8 21.2 C 13,2 B NB 115' 27.0 C 9.6 A 6.0 A 13.4 8 Powers Blvd Signal SB 50' 133 B 6.8 A 6.0 A 6.8 A EB 0' - 2.3 A 0.5 A 2.3 A Park Rd& W 0 - 0.6 A 0.6 A 006 A 1.7 A East TWSC NB 0' - - 8.6 A 8.6 A Driveway 58 0' 2.3 A 2.3 A EB 0' 2.9 A 0.6 A 0.2 A 0.9 A Park Rd & WB 25' 2.1 A 0.2 A 0.6 A 0.9 A 4.1 A West TWSC NB 0' 5 .9 A 7.4 A 3.9 A 4.7 A Driveway SB 1 95' 8.5 A 2.5 A 8.3 A Improsement A: Optimization or Signal Splits CO Amorelum and rowers Improvement B Signal Installation @ Park and P-rs 2030 No Build Operations Split optimization was assumed under the 2030 no build scenario due to the significant increase in volume from surrounding off -site development, although the cycle length was assumed to remain at 160 seconds. Without split optimization, the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS F, with queues propagating throughout the network. Table 7 provides 2030 LOS results for the no build scenario, using background linear growth from 2013 to 2030 of 0.5 percent per year, plus additional traffic associated with five parcels within the study area. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak period, with the three unsignalized intersections operating at LOS C or better. A total of 13 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E movements summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 66 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 71 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 43 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard eastbound through: 37 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 48 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound right: 41 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 no build scenario: May 2011 28 1 Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota r� J f At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from the 230' left turn lane with a 95" percentile queue of 332 feet. Access to the left turn lane is also anticipated to be blocked, with a 95 percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent through lane. Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach, with a 630 foot left turn lane and a 673 foot 95"' percentile queue in the adjacent through lane. The 95` percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet, compared to a storage length of 550 feet. While the 95'" percentile queue is contained within the storage length, there is little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate. This results in left turning vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane, causing additional delay. Table 7 - 2030 No Build 2030 No Build - PM Peak Hour • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 96 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 116 seconds ' • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 96 seconds • Park Road & Powers Boulevard westbound through: 61 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound left: 115 seconds • Park Road & East Driveway northbound through: 102 seconds ' • Park Road & East Driveway northbound right: 100 seconds r� J f At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, the through movements on Arboretum Boulevard are maintained at LOS D or C, with lower LOS on Powers Boulevard, the lower volume side street. The northbound left turn queue is anticipated to spillback from the 230' left turn lane with a 95" percentile queue of 332 feet. Access to the left turn lane is also anticipated to be blocked, with a 95 percentile queue of 394 feet in the adjacent through lane. Lane blocking may also occur on the westbound approach, with a 630 foot left turn lane and a 673 foot 95"' percentile queue in the adjacent through lane. The 95` percentile queue for the eastbound left turn is 470 feet, compared to a storage length of 550 feet. While the 95'" percentile queue is contained within the storage length, there is little length remaining in which vehicles can decelerate. This results in left turning vehicles decelerating in the adjacent through lane, causing additional delay. Table 7 - 2030 No Build 2030 No Build - PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Operations by Movement Queues Approach Overall Intersection Lek Through Ril ht Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile sec veh ( / ) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS EB 470' 95.6 35.9 D 4.9 A 48.5 D Arboretum WB 370' 65.9 44.1 D 4.4 A 41.1 D Blvd & Signal 47.4 0 Powers Blvd NB 330' 115.7 71.0 4.6 A 50.7 D SB 120' 76.3 95.5 3.4 A 58.8 EB 0' 42.6 36.8 30.6 D 36.8 Park Rd& WB 0' 47.7 60.5 40.5 43.1 Powers Blvd TWSC TSC NB 45' 8.6 A 1.9 A 5.2 A 2.7 A 11.6 8 SB 60' 8.4 A 3.3 A 3.7 A 4.1 A EB 0' - - 2505 D 161 C 25.3 D Park Rd & W8 0' 1.9 A 0.5 A . - 0.7 A East TWSC NB 0' 115.4 - - 102.0 100.3 18.6 C Driveway SB 0' - Park Rd & EB 0' - - 2.6 A - - 2.6 A West TWSC WB 0' 2.6 A 0.5 A - - 0.9 A NB 0' 6.4 A 3.5 A 7.2 A 6.9 A Driveway SB 0' 6.2 A 6.2 A -provem -, vpum.zan.n or >,gnar �pnrs Los Hm orerum ano -xe 2030 Build Operations Table 8 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, using the previously calculated 2030 background traffic volumes plus trips associated with the Walmart site. As with the 2030 no build scenario, split optimization was assumed at the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, with coordination maintained using a 160 - second cycle. 3 May 2011 29 PPP' Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota While the intersection of Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard is anticipated to operate at LOS D, as under the 2030 no build scenario, both of the driveways on Park Road are expected to operate at LOS F. This is the result of queuing on the eastbound approach at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, as in the 2013 build scenario. With the increase in traffic volumes between 2013 and 2030, the eastbound Park Road queue at Powers Boulevard is anticipated to block both the east and west driveways on Park Road. At the Arboretum Boulevard intersection, LOS is maintained at a similar level to the 2030 no build scenario, but the travel demand at this intersection is, in effect, metered by the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. A total of 20 movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F. Table 8 - 2030 Build 2030 Build - PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Operations by Movement Approach Overall Intersection Lek Throu h R ht Queues Intersection Control Approach 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile (sec/veh) LOS ( sec/veh) LOS ( sec/veh) LOS LOS ( sec/veh) ( sec/veh) LOS ER 490' 105.0 47.1 D 5.5 A 55.6 Arboretum WB 635' 75.6 56.3 5.0 A 52.3 D Blvd & Signal NO 325' 86.0 59.0 4.5 A 40.8 D 51.4 D Powers Blvd 58 115' 76.6 91.4 3.5 A 57.7 ES 190' 191.3 26.5 D 9.4 A 127.9 Park Rd& W8 0' 155.1 173.1 129.6 138.4 29.3 D Powers Blvd TWSC NB 80' 12.7 B 2.4 A 5.5 A 4.0 A 5B 70' 10.1 B 3.4 A 5.2 A 4.8 A EB 0' - 186.2 40.5 185.5 Park Rd & W8 0. 0.6 A 1.1 A 0.7 A 125.7 Ea TWSC NO 0' 5729.1 _ 5092.5 Driveway 5B 0' - 9.2 n 9.2 A Ell 0' 283.7 253.9 298.9 - i 255.1 Park Rd & WB 20' 2.2 A 0.2 A 0.S A 0.8 A 251.2 West TWSC NB 0' 677.3 965.0 899.1 Driveway SB 500' 1468.9 ; - - 2.0 A 1436.3 Impmusmenl A: Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Powers 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation Table 9 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the installation of a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard. The simulation assumes an optimized timing plan at Park Road and Powers Boulevard, with the signal operating with an 80- second cycle length, half that of the 160 - second cycle at Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard, to allow for coordination with the optimized splits at the major intersection. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to the 2030 no build scenario, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E or F, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: May 2011 30 LI J Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 72 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 65 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 79 seconds The following movements are expected to operate at LOS F under the 2030 build scenario with signal installation: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 104 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 122 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 113 seconds As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback is anticipated on the northbound approach, where the 95` percentile queue is 395 feet. The left turn lane will also be blocked by the 479 foot queue in the adjacent northbound through lane. Some blocking will also occur on the westbound approach, which has a 630 -foot left turn lane but the 95 percentile queue in the adjacent lane is 795 feet. Also, there is little space for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. The 95 1t ' percentile queues for the westbound and eastbound left turns are 605 feet and 465 feet, respectively, compared to storage lengths of 630 feet and 550 feet, respectively. At the signalized intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard, all movements are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better. With the signal in place, queues are anticipated to clear during most cycles, allowing the northbound right -turn movement at the east driveway to operate at LOS A. Table 9 - 2030 Build 2030 Build with Signal • PM Peak Hour Lek Turn Operations by Movement Intersection Control Approach Queues Approach Overall Intersection LeIt Through Ril ht 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile (sec/-h) LOS LOS LOS (sec veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh) LOS EB 465' 1040 48.0 D 5.5 A 55.7 Arboretum WB 605' 72.0 52.6 D 4.9 A 49.0 D Blvd Bl Signal NO 395' 122.1 64.5 6.6 A 50.2 D 53.3 D Powers Blvd SB 120' 78.5 112.9 5.0 A 68.3 EB 200' 30.6 C 19.2 B 4.2 A 21.2 C Park Rd & WB 0' 45.0 D 50.8 D 26.4 C 32.6 C Powers Blvd Signal NO 140' 35.2 D 15.7 B 6.5 A 1802 B 17.2 8 SB 100' 29.0 C 7.3 A 6.5 A 93 A EB 0' 2.6 A 0.9 A 2.6 A Park Rd & WB 0' 0.7 A 0.6 A 0.6 A Ea TWSC NB 0' 18.1 C 18.1 C 2.1 A Driveway SB D' - - - - 5.0 A 5.0 A EB 0' 2.7 A 0.7 A 1.4 A 0.9 A Park Rd& WB 40' 2.5 A 0.3 A 0.5 A 0.9 A Wes[ TWSC NB 0' 7.2 A 6.5 A 5.0 A 5.8 A 5.1 A Dri vewa y 58 145' 12.8 8 3.0 A 12.4 B Improvement A: Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Pursers Improvement B. Signal Installation @ Park and Po-s May 2011 31 �P' ; Kimley -Horn and Associates. Inc. Walmart (Store #5949.00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2030 Build Operations with Signal Installation and Dual Left Turn Lanes Table 10 provides 2030 LOS results for the build scenario, assuming the signal installation, split optimization, and the construction of double left turn lanes on both the eastbound and westbound approaches on Arboretum Boulevard. All intersections within the study area are anticipated to operate at LOS D or better during PM peak period, with the two unsignalized intersections on Park Road operating at LOS A. Similar to existing conditions, a total of six movements are expected to operate at LOS E, with average delays per vehicle for the LOS E intersections summarized as follows: • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard eastbound left: 80 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard westbound left: 67 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound left: 77 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard northbound through: 57 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound left: 76 seconds • Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard southbound through: 76 seconds As with the 2030 build scenario, operations at the Arboretum Boulevard intersection are expected to remain around the 2030 no build levels. Left turn lane spillback and blocking is still anticipated on the northbound approach, with a 95`" percentile queue of 347 feet for the left turn movement and 333 feet for the through movement. The left turn lane is 230 feet long and could not be lengthened without shortening the southbound left turn lane at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection. Lane blocking is also anticipated on the westbound approach where the left turn lane is 630 feet long and the 95`" percentile queue in the adjacent through lane is 709 feet. With the addition of the turn lanes, approximately 300 feet of storage length is available for deceleration in the eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. May 2011 32 1 Kimley -Horn ( and Associates, Inc. Table 10 - 2030 Build with Improvements Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis Chanhassen, Minnesota 2030 Build with Signal • PM Peak Hour Left Turn Operations by Movement Intersection Control Approach Queues Approach Overall Intersection Left Throu h Rl ht 95th Delay Delay Delay Delay Delay Percentile ( sec /veh) LOS (sec /veh LOS (sec /veh LOS (sec veh) LOS (se4veh) LOS EB 190' 79.5 39.8 D 5.4 A 45.0 D Arboretum WB 340' 66.7 43.8 D 4.6 A 42.1 D Blvd & Powers Blvd Signal NB 345' 76.7 57.2 6.4 A 38.9 D 43.0 D 58 120' 76.2 76.4 3.3 A 50.4 D EB 200' 31.1 C 18.7 B 4.1 A 21.6 C Park Rd& WB 0' 43.6 D 49.5 D 25.1 C 31.3 C Powers Btvd Signal NB 135' 34.8 C 16.0 B 6.6 A 184 8 17.3 8 SB 105' 27.6 C 7.6 A 7.3 A 9.7 A EB 0' - 2.8 A 1.1 A 2.8 A Park Rd & WB 0' - - 0.7 A 0.6 A 007 A East TWSC NB 0' 21.9 C 21.9 C 2.2 A Driveway SB 0' - 4.3 A 4.3 A EB 0' 2.9 A 0.7 A 0.5 A 0.9 A ParkRd& WB 35' 1 2.4 A 0.3 A 0.6 A 0.9 A West TWSC NB 0' 6.6 A 7.2 A 5.0 A 5.6 A 47 A Driveway SB 130' 11.4 B 2.6 A 11.1 B Improvement A: Optimization of Signal Splits @ Arboretum and Powers Improvement B Signal Installation @ Park and Powers Improvement C Eastbound Double Left @ Arboretum and Powers Improvement D: Westbound Double Left @ Arboretum and Powers 33 �- 7 1 Kimle Y -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis .�.�' ✓ and Associates Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Signal Warrant Analysis As demonstrated in the previous section, signal installation has the potential to significantly improve operations on Park Road, and the following section discusses signal warrant analysis methodology using the 13 -hour count conducted at Park Road and Powers Boulevard. Under the 2013 build scenario, which includes background traffic plus Walmart trips, a total of six hours are met for Warrant I and two hours are met for Warrant 1B. Additionally, two analysis hours are within 20 vehicles of satisfying Warrant IA. In all cases, the heaviest side street approach is the eastbound approach to the intersection, excluding right- turning vehicles. Table 11 presents the results for Warrants I and 1B. Table 11— 2013 Signal Warrant Analysis Time Period Powers Blvd NB * S11 Traffic (Major Approach. s) Park Road ® Traffic (Minor Approach) Warrant t Warren l2 Warrant 3 1A 18 Major Vol. I Minor Vol. Met? Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Minor Vol. Met? Minor Vol. Met? 600-700 400 81 600 1 200 900 100 517 - 7:00 - 8:00 869 59 600 1 200 900 100 274 482 8:00 - 9:00 761 84 600 200 900 100 326 540 900-10:00 526 98 600 200 900 100 447 - 1000-11,00 496 157 600 200 900 100 - 11:00 - 12:00 1 631 222 600 200 YES 900 100 604 12:00 - 13:00 804 218 600 200 YES 900 100 274 482 1300 649 160 600 200 900 100 604 14:00 - 15:00 682 180 600 200 900 100 604 15.00-1600 882 230 600 200 YF$ 900 100 - 482 16:00 - 17:00 916 258 600 200 YE5 900 100 YES - 427 17:00 -18:00 1107 273 600 1 200 1 YES 900 100 YES 332 18:00 - 19:00 654 235 500 1 200 1 YES 900 1 100 - 604 Hours Met Hours Required Condition Met? 6 2 0 0 8 8 4 4 NO NO NO NO In order to add in the additional trips associated with the surrounding parcels, daily trip generation values were calculated based on each site's anticipated ITE Land Use code, as shown in Table 12. Hourly distribution assumptions were then applied to each rate, and the calculated trips were then added to the appropriate approach at the Park Road and Powers Boulevard intersection based on the trip distribution values previously discussed. By 2030, including all background traffic associated with general regional growth as well as the five parcels identified, both Warrants IA and 1 B are anticipated to be met, as shown in Table 13. May 2011 34 1 r t r Kimley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) ' Traffic Impact Analysis and Associates, Inc. Chanhassen Minnesota i t May 2011 35 O d Z cL F' N 7 r n V n a _ O, [� • 00000 000 0 a F. IL L y O O O O O O O O O �aF�7 H a T a Q Q Q 4 Q o a v C O � • y p W Vl to W r�+i _ G• �'1 � V � Q t"� lz� OR d cV N ri vj Xs CS O E L S .9 . 9 � c O II II F F H II II F-• F It F S 55 i o 8 0 0 0 0 g o ° o g ° o, N M N N O M 0 5 0 F u a 7 u v ej o a U � C t; � d `-dd_A 0 oq � ro � U C V_ .� xa� b4 t 7 O oo A @ a 0 .? O ai ci C C O wrnrAUUC�GoV) C m � vv00000 00 00 00 h W N May 2011 35 ";P d `� Kimle "'; I -Horn W a lm art (Store t Analysis °-�•` � Y TrafficlmpactAnalysis and Associates Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota Table 13 — 2030 Signal Warrant Analysis Time Period Powers Blvd NB + SB Traffic (Major Approaches) Park Road EB Traffic (Minor Approach) Warrant 1 1A 1B Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? 6:00 - 7:00 480 93 600 200 Met? 900 100 89 7:00 - 8:00 1090 73 600 200 900 100 8:00 - 9:00 1176 105 600 200 200 900 100 YES 9:00 - 10:00 841 126 600 200 8:00 - 9:00 900 100 600 10:00 - 11:00 856 198 600 1 200 900 100 11:00 - 12:00 1060 279 600 200 YES 900 100 1 YES 12:00 - 13:00 1309 273 600 200 YES 900 100 1 YES 13:00 - 14:00 1129 229 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 14:00 - 15:00 1098 231 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 15:00 - 16:00 1322 292 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 16:00 - 17:00 1353 327 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 17:00 - 18:00 1672 1 345 600 1 200 YES 900 100 YES 18:00 - 19:00 1034 1 291 600 1 200 YES 900 100 YES Hours Met Hours Required Condition Met? 8 9 8 8 YES YES In order to identify the sensitivity of the signal warrants to the timeline of surrounding development, a 2015 analysis was conducted including all traffic associated with the two additional parcels on Park Road (Land Use Code 814). By adding the trips associated with these parcels to the trips generated by the Walmart site and general background growth of 0.5 percent between 2013 and 2015, it is anticipated that Warrant IA will be met, as shown in Table 14. Table 14 — 2015 Signal Warrant Analysis Time Period Powers BWd NB+ SB Traffic Major Approaches) Park Road EB Traffic Minor Approach) Warrant 1 Warrant 2 Warrant 3 1A I 18 Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Major Vol. Minor Vol. Met? Minor Vol. Met? I Minor Vol. Met? 6.00 - 7:00 415 89 600 200 900 100 7:00 - 8:00 902 72 600 200 900 100 8:00 - 9:00 804 104 600 200 900 100 9:00 - 10:00 578 125 600 200 900 100 10:00 - 11:00 570 196 600 200 900 100 11.00-1200 706 275 600 200 YES 900 100 12:00 - 13+00 881 269 600 200 YES 900 100 1300-1400 718 226 600 200 1 YES 900 1 100 14,00- 1500 770 228 600 200 YES 900 100 15:00 - 16:00 977 288 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 16:00 - 17:00 1013 323 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 17:00 - 18:00 1213 341 600 200 YES 900 100 YES 18:00 - 1900 728 286 600 200 YES 900 100 Hours Met Hours Required Condition Met? 8 3 8 8 4 4 YES NO Given that trips associated with the Walmart site will nearly satisfy Warrant I in 2013, that additional development on Park Road will likely generate sufficient traffic to satisfy Warrant IA in the short term, and that a signal at the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard will significantly improve local operations with additional traffic on Park Road, signal installation is recommended as part of the development of the Walmart site. May 2011 36 1 t I Klmley -Horn Walmart (Store #5949 -00) Traffic Impact Analysis ,... i and Associates. Inc. Chanhassen, Minnesota RECOMMENDATIONS With the construction of Walmart Store #5949 -00 near the southwest quadrant of the Arboretum Boulevard (Trunk Highway 5) /Powers Boulevard (CSAH 17) intersection in Chanhassen, Minnesota, it is recommended that the intersection of Park Road and Powers Boulevard be converted from side street stop control to signal control. Without stopping the northbound and southbound traffic on Powers Boulevard, there will not be enough gaps for the eastbound traffic on Park Road to enter the intersection. Queues on Park Road will, in turn, prevent vehicles from exiting from the east driveway onto Park Road. In addition, the splits at the signal for the Arboretum Boulevard and Powers Boulevard intersection should be retimed to efficiently serve the new turning movement distribution. By incorporating the recommended modifications, the street network will operate at similar levels to existing conditions. In the long term, the City should monitor the growth of the surrounding area. If the area develops as anticipated by the City, consideration should be given to adding a second left turn lane on the eastbound and westbound Arboretum Boulevard approaches to Powers Boulevard. Queues for these movements are not expected to spill out of the turn lane, but with the forecasted growth and development, would result in left turning drivers decelerating in the adjacent through lane and causing delays for through movements. Dual left turn lanes would shorten queues as well as delays. �,1ay 20 11 1 37 t t APPENDIX t t Appendix A Raw Turning Movement Volume Counts L @ LO V �mN � L M r O '�mMN O r m M MCi O) O m M N m aD m LDM O It M f-- (o CO ^ O LL C 0 6 ip v m Mr a) N O(Dr R m0(! v W N E NNN co NNNNQI N�� d Q L O 000000 0000o 00000 0 > a L Q m C E 0 0 r OMm m NLON LD (DR LO N m r r r 7 J N (D r L O L D M r L� L O r a D r C7 C) r N M N M m 7 -- -r-- O o m ��N -2 w IT 00 Q o ov br aooMOrn tDmr- wm r N N �rncDaov� N��o� �(oor-r fnN�m ('4 N r Or N(ow mm LO N W M(D N Lb L Q W L a N M Lo N C, u.) 0 co Ea+' m M 0 N O NLO -It r N00� co co rO <f co ��(D It a r - Z m F- n M me m r LLC/5Cnd �0000ao 0o0oo o00oo O 2� a > c m O ON MNM LO 'tm(o V m �}(o MMN m ` J r �� DLO N O Z Ud '` L Om V m (n(D m OLO ' LD r(O(DC 00 a0 M(0 It O mm v O CD L -(D(o N LO r It > CO LO > LO N N L _ O N 0 N V M 0 LO (D m m LO (M N N m m (D N E o o a 0 z = rn N V M c,4 m m M <� N u) N m V(D N M (0 O LO oO 04 m O LOO V t co tD u) r- [{ M O C 6 m F- M M M M V M V' a V to O O H O n U ` d M m V 5 (n '� n Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O L co U) O E O O r a c - M m0rM (Dr V 0 L LO (n J N N N M O M N N M M r (,.) N M r N m N O j fl > L Q O (DMLO M r m v (fl v r v r M D LO LO W oD�v m"r M�O (O M M N N N r M c) m ON V rrO 00O 'It 04 V It r LO7 V (D L p) r LO LO LO w r (D(o W N a0 N L O r t O O m L O N (D a O N r M M O m m r M r r LO :� �2 :1 N V O -mom c0 •- rLO O Li Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N d > C M m W 0 0(DNm� W W LOr00 co W m LO LO LO L �� N J � r NNMMN � m�Nm6 O 3 m 0 0 d� ` O OLOmm M M r Lo u') LO LO o M LO Y _ O M C) r r 6 C6 M w m L N Cl) Cl) � n L. LC-6 � m Z v ' O M O N a0 M m M O M N M O M r L LO (D LO LO (fl V LO N M m M O N N � m CO @ ti CD N 02 222 2 ¢ E f/1 F C$ Ud dd d 0 dd dd O O L- N N U U � m O L2OLO F- O LOO LO i F-- F � N N L m V - ll.O M� O - M V "O OQFUU > > 0 O 0 0 0 0 LO LO LO LO 0 0 0 0 C O- Q c > > ti m @ m U N 2 cc L- U o Q U ^ 2 W J //'' LL 0 6 L W L O L r r !� c') CO r- O N � CN 0D N N � N N a) O Z U p Z O N M LL C/5 (n a_ V � 7 (C) O LOO CV LO C Z M > Q � Y 00- a) X 0 H CO �_ L (D Un L N r m 70 Arboretum Blvd CID Un ^ 2 W J //' IN ^ LL W > 1 Iti W I1C�\ W 1903 3084 4987 �C � ►- L Q U Arboretum Blvd Out In Total 1851 3045 4896 52 39 91 1903 3084 4987 511 2304 230 0 3 30 6 0 5141 23341 2361 0 Rght Thru Left Peds 00 U') f") fOMN0 OOO y y d y 000 y O 3 1 . M O N N H . 7 ntom W W ��' �� d d mom m W M �J L N �I- tt ` C 10- „— �f Ott oo pp� W C 3 1n z m rn o O c� r r� > 4 F tr .n d W N O��`r ~ _ Q�tt _ N N y N w co (�N U= t� r tt �N N N N 10.00 l N41 14 SPad 9 9141• ZS 0 8£ Z 0 I SLIZI,OS ZL£ 0 t 8L t�4 V£ LS94 0081 LS8Z WWI ul ln0 PN8 wnlajogjy L Q > � ^^ a _ W E +- L O L Q r r r CO CO O N N N 00 N N � N co a� a� o (B 0Mz Z U a) m m }. ca LE 0 d. V O U LO LO _ C z > Y cl O (6 ' + o a_ ' W 7 O J M . L (O (n N M • � V Q Q I ) � (OVVO)N 00 0)Mm N(O O 00 O 0O (D 0) M ' 07 NOOn r W v M O 1- NNNNO co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (l. O O M r ( O N N r, : aO w MO 41 (00 r- �(ON M N I- n M O O LO N N 00 L� co co m v I, OO00000 0 0 v(ncDVrnOOrn 000 � 1-00(0<7 00 (O co 0) AM U7 M N N V' to cov(- v rn0 (O0 (D M IV v v co 000010 0)(O r- Cl) Cl) N N M 00 V 0) It N M( M N N 00 OIRtNv r (D (0 00 co N M MOO)(O �E � :,! N V r LL7 a 00o00 0 0 LO O 00 (O r O O N N M M N N C N m co LO �) (O O N U N N N u7(D`7(LoN C N N EL n.aa E o o n o O M V 0 (O (O (O (O = O O O O Y O (0 (D a. G lel L a) a ) O n W Z M � W E :D U) N � 0 \ZJ L 04 0.7 � M Q� cc O 0 C 0 6 jp 0WL cA(n��m v O r N 00 E r CL a N N L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Q > a Q m c E o oN. -oOM 000 vr�n r r r M M E 7 m y J O M O o m N w 2 Q 9 c r�LO NN u) c) u)ce)CO N 00�(O M(DC) N N � `- co 000000 O N OON N(n 0D L Q (D a) r (B M U Z 3§ NMco�m '- mm -N 0 a) m H �..L vJ VJ LL C � + 'CI 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 d r > c Co N O4z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O Q) N � J cf) O 30 O 0�� c- O M OO NO N cf7' �t 2 N� p r U a !E LO O (f) > �0rn fr p G (6 > O N r O ch ch V (n V ch N ❑ Q Y = cD rn u) M O (0 F- c v/ n N p N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w� Op +� 2 2 7 0 a L N(n �m c M E p o CD . -om (ovc - ) J f [ N V) 0 0 ? > 2 Q 0 1- V( 7 d' N M M M c' 7 N O 6) v) r (O CO 1-- N 00� —N O OO CO 1- r t r 1- N �p (n V N 0 0 0 N M � O F Q U_ a 00000 000 0g00000 N v� a) -o -a a. �+ > > m 0 0' OO m OOOOO m 1- J r N N 4/ w 3 :3 ° 0 � ` L O C7 r N O r CO O — 0 0 �- f- CO N c°) 6 a) F- LO Z 0 —. N — 000— c`) 7 f- L ^^0 2 LL _ -. a) — N N 06 C a) f6 2 C E (n N 10 0 U) �an.n.a o a�aa o ot C6 mo(no1nF 0LOC,0l i o T;- ~ ,+�z.�sY,y,� C U �' 0000 0000 LO a m Q U ^ W ^^ _ W E L- 0 L r r r M M = = O T — r (I1 04 (N 00 N N � r r N N O N W O Z U Z O ■ V o O (0 � 0) u7 :3 LO C Z Q ,+ 00- X O N F- M O Arboretum Blvd U_ L Q1 Out In Total 52 39 91 (6 31 301 61 0 L U o Z 2 n ' Q � Q � � U) c - O L f, 4 - CC Q U Arboretum Blvd Out In Total 52 39 91 31 301 61 0 Rght Thru Left Peds N N F 0 a N N a M f6 �F c) m S o o Z= Fn C) C J O 7 0 V C 3 r Z a ° — � 00 — � N � � O OY, N N NN = r J � �O �l U 3 H sPad IV I 8E 8L b4 ti£ lelol ul lno PNg wnlajogjy L (D O n W E a) L O L Q r r r CO CO �- O r r N CN � 00 N N � N N M O Z ZU� a) LL Un 0 a_ V � M O LO LO LO _ C Z 5 2i Q - O c6 > O a_ N X O 0 L CO C) H N M Iowa 4 4 �l v LL Q C U) U_ L N T W 1 L Z ^ O L 0 6 C Q� N N C O QU NN��tO IO O 00 LO NIO N CE OOO OIO OI O N. -O Min �Ir co co r- cO" N coco 000OCO01O 0 N Mf7� 01 �O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 - O OI— � N 11 Lo co h N- 1 Lo to L , N io t0 rcomr - In N coc0 O O O OIO OIO O O r c+� I-- v co ao c7 m � co O— O N I-- O U'l V N O i- a 0000O 0 0 v 0 (N OOco N C N m c7�N to C O U N N ` O O N C N W E aaaa E —0 o OO�c°�v 0vvvv? =OOOOB Y O N 4) a L W ^ O a_ W L ^ m n N N T M M T- CD N d' N 0\O N N � r r N r ai a) o M O Z ZU� a) m LZ U) U) a_ w V 0— Ln LO C _ C Z Q L O f0 Oa 3 � X O M a L (O U) N M 2 0 N r O O M O O O O O O O N r M r r O r M N O O M CO O O N M r r N M f- F , r t OCOV NNM N V CM rM NNNM CO r NMr C- NO V Mm Mr- M V (0 CO 00M iA r N rrM N K ip (O V NN V C) 0 N ON CO W 0NO CO 000mN NM f�Ilm mNm o00 r V• st n n I - O r O 0 00 (0 00 V• V to v N M N N V' V' (O CO f0 r- LO I- w CO 4' N r r oa Q 0 0 0 0— O -- O r.- M U O O N N M I- r LO r N 0 O M O V• I-- C O r M N N M r r N I- N a o_ r > a m� _ O K O V 0 m(V V M NN V V V NhI- OrO CON V 0 (O MN00 rLO O OtO `� J N V r Nr M00 NN rr h rr M rrN N t 0 0 O O d Z 2 00N(OOm CO V Orr COOm00 (O mr m V' mr N tOONh�t hm0: I r MN V 0 COI' W m W CO CO N COO MNtO MO Mr NMO MCO 00 CO CO (0 V N N N 0 Or MCOOm (D V rMO MM r- (0 N r V M0 NOMI- N rr NMr mMNO CO 0 L r Cl) r M cm r 7 (0 0 t07�N�(j NMOMM V r- t- t0 (O�aO� h OON I-o0t0(co NCO NCM0 = F r r r r r 0 Q 3 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 O O O CO 0 O O O O O Ih r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O (D CL a a� o O t 0 I- O N V r r O r M O N N N (O r r O r M O C M r N O N M- N M m r N V CD Cp N d � @ C 000U N CO MOO) (Om r r V 0) 00 0 0)N Om CC)N V r r r N 00 N m CDr W N r r r V V OCO m 00 M m000N0 V r O V N M m 0 V V OMtO �O Cl) r r r r) N c0 MMCo 01�000M 0 r r N r i0 Nm V r MOON ^ O n O 01-00 h (l0 V CO(O 0 O IBM fn f M a c m N r N r( D a. U 2 0 N r O O M O O O O O O O N r M r r O r M N O O M CO O O N M r r N M f- F , r t OCOV NNM N V CM rM NNNM CO r NMr C- NO V Mm Mr- M V (0 CO 00M iA r N rrM N K ip (O V NN V C) 0 N ON CO W 0NO CO 000mN NM f�Ilm mNm o00 r V• st n n I - O r O 0 00 (0 00 V• V to v N M N N V' V' (O CO f0 r- LO I- w CO 4' N r r oa Q 0 0 0 0— O -- O r.- M U O O N N M I- r LO r N 0 O M O V• I-- C O r M N N M r r N I- N a o_ r > a m� _ O K O V 0 m(V V M NN V V V NhI- OrO CON V 0 (O MN00 rLO O OtO `� J N V r Nr M00 NN rr h rr M rrN N t 0 0 O O d Z 2 00N(OOm CO V Orr COOm00 (O mr m V' mr N tOONh�t hm0: I r MN V 0 COI' W m W CO CO N COO MNtO MO Mr NMO MCO 00 CO CO (0 V N N N 0 Or MCOOm (D V rMO MM r- (0 N r V M0 NOMI- N rr NMr mMNO CO 0 L r Cl) r M cm r 7 (0 0 t07�N�(j NMOMM V r- t- t0 (O�aO� h OON I-o0t0(co NCO NCM0 = F r r r r r 0 Q 3 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 O O O CO 0 O O O O O Ih r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O (D CL a a� o O t 0 I- O N V r r O r M O N N N (O r r O r M O C M r N O N M- N M m r N V CD Cp N d � @ C 000U N CO MOO) (Om r r V 0) 00 0 0)N Om CC)N V r r r N 00 N m CDr W N r r r V V OCO N Cl) V 1� Cl N Or 07 I r r r r 00 M m000N0 V r O V N M m 0 V V OMtO �O Cl) r r r r) N c0 MMCo 01�000M 0 r r N r i0 Nm V r MOON V CO M W COO O 01-00 h (l0 V CO(O C O r (D r r M r r M N r r r V N N N m N r N r( D in (O CO (D F- N M N N r r (1 r roo cM ON CL Q m cm Lo CoN V OCOOmM M000 co M N V c> co t M U7(O �) v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O r O r O O O O O O O r O r 0? I--co m 1-m d r a a c :3 (C OCO MN CO Cn r(OM CO CO (ON (ON (0 V OM MO O V I-O Cn (0 C) tC') V 0 000 f� C00 Y J r M r CO r r N N r r to N r O t0 N CL 2 0 N r O O M O O O O O O O N r M r r O r M N O O M CO O O N M r r N M f- F , r t OCOV NNM N V CM rM NNNM CO r NMr C- NO V Mm Mr- M V (0 CO 00M iA r N rrM N K ip (O V NN V C) 0 N ON CO W 0NO CO 000mN NM f�Ilm mNm o00 r V• st n n I - O r O 0 00 (0 00 V• V to v N M N N V' V' (O CO f0 r- LO I- w CO 4' N r r oa Q 0 0 0 0— O -- O r.- M U O O N N M I- r LO r N 0 O M O V• I-- C O r M N N M r r N I- N a o_ r > a m� _ O K O V 0 m(V V M NN V V V NhI- OrO CON V 0 (O MN00 rLO O OtO `� J N V r Nr M00 NN rr h rr M rrN N t 0 0 O O d Z 2 00N(OOm CO V Orr COOm00 (O mr m V' mr N tOONh�t hm0: I r MN V 0 COI' W m W CO CO N COO MNtO MO Mr NMO MCO 00 CO CO (0 V N N N 0 Or MCOOm (D V rMO MM r- (0 N r V M0 NOMI- N rr NMr mMNO CO 0 L r Cl) r M cm r 7 (0 0 t07�N�(j NMOMM V r- t- t0 (O�aO� h OON I-o0t0(co NCO NCM0 = F r r r r r 0 Q 3 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 O O O CO 0 O O O O O Ih r N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O (D CL a a� o O t 0 I- O N V r r O r M O N N N (O r r O r M O C M r N O N M- N M m r N V CD Cp N d � N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � r a n m 3 oovv(oM mCO(D N O a in ` o m" m V V V co co L r M N M C O V V (O C O = ON V oO M N I O � r r N O 0 0 0 OI O 0 Cl 0 0 00 �N m min m (OM m M V r-- W C) m M D V M o C O C b I� W V V V N m N .-- N N c0 0 W N m O 0 N co CO N O OOOMIM m M001 0 0 000010 N (n W (O MIN N M v Oi0 N to m "IN (O r0 I MIO I CO (OIV M M 1) OI O NMNNO N NM MN V (D M(l')M h OMmrN mcor 000 L2M CA00 O r M r co N N r I- �� QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQ¢Q o aado o (:> (no(oF ou)o(oF o(nc)Lo o(oc)oF o(nop ounc>mF c)mo(nF o r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V CO(OCO(O I- tir- r 0000M W 0)0)0) CF) OOOO NNNN O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O — r r r r r r r r 2 0 0 0 o r r 0 0 0 r r Orr M O O M O M M O r M r r r O O�(V .-- O CO M m F- OMVNNr ONONV M(n V V (0 (O m w r r- co co r-0 V V OMr in (O CO (D L N M N N r r M r M r roo cM ON m cm Lo CoN V OCOOmM M000 co M N V c> co t M U7(O Nm(O(OM o M M V r CO rt`t` (oN �m I-(Ov m V M MOD M V V V O V MCO u0 0? I--co m 1-m F N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � r a n m 3 oovv(oM mCO(D N O a in ` o m" m V V V co co L r M N M C O V V (O C O = ON V oO M N I O � r r N O 0 0 0 OI O 0 Cl 0 0 00 �N m min m (OM m M V r-- W C) m M D V M o C O C b I� W V V V N m N .-- N N c0 0 W N m O 0 N co CO N O OOOMIM m M001 0 0 000010 N (n W (O MIN N M v Oi0 N to m "IN (O r0 I MIO I CO (OIV M M 1) OI O NMNNO N NM MN V (D M(l')M h OMmrN mcor 000 L2M CA00 O r M r co N N r I- �� QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQQQ o QQ¢Q o aado o (:> (no(oF ou)o(oF o(nc)Lo o(oc)oF o(nop ounc>mF c)mo(nF o r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V O r M V CO(OCO(O I- tir- r 0000M W 0)0)0) CF) OOOO NNNN O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O — r r r r r r r r L O n W Y L LL N N �-- C") C'') - � � O � � N N N � r N N o ca O Z Z U Q) (1) (� _ r - nn om C6 LL v J w a- V O , CO � Ln _ C Z c Q Q M O CO 00- _ N a� L co U) N Il aft U 13zt zt A o "Y cC A re Ln 3 Q 5z O Q) N � N f6 � U N OM V'Nr0 r OMN CO rOOM V' N OON 'Ir OO — O — OOr Or '0'r O N r n N 0 a a c m O tC O V'OOOM tO Nttn tO to COMOMN tO CD noo CO V•r 04 r- NN LO CM �m J r r N r N N r r N r n r N �� N � 0 0 o d OOM CO NO N V NMnM M OCO tO W to co MCDN CAMCONCA 0000 um) r V' V'M MCD ��'V'MCO OncOnM ncD O)O� t0 W m OtO et ION 000)M r N n M L O C+) CM r N C) r r r n r M r N n V N N r CA N V Co v C0 O N r r V• to CA r r r V N jp n V CO�r Ma)0 N00 �NaD 00N COONS n V CO tON NCO COM CA r c N r M r M r r N (O co co r r 0 t O r n O ti r 0 t00 coo COQ "t (D OM V 00 t0 MN�CA 00 V•00 M CO CO tO Lo n M to M M N O n MMCA r r sY NN�TMN O r r r r (:l W n M t t) N r r r On MN n N r N N OtO 0D0� 0 0 M N N N to ?NM O N r r r to N C O U) Cl) MO N V- J r t6 to C N OMO M CA CA i0 Or Or 0NtO n Cl) C) � N V M V O r LO COr N r r t o r r Cl) r r N co M N Cl) M r s 1' M N N N N N r r M 04 O H W LO n v co CO LO Co r- o 04 r CL CL Q 0 O r 0 0 0 r O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O co M O ° m r o a � a � o O OMm w) cO Of vcv 00 t04) V tO mrnM r0) M V n OO rn 'N V n m r-- v t.- 1 N r r r t M ��r C� r 00C�t0 t4 N aW 2 Or MC) r V MICA Nrr V CO Or OrN NOr OM M CO H r ` Cno 00 LO V NO V CD V rt0 V n00 c0� MMnCOM NtOn V'n r V Mto L r r r r r r r MMr r co t0 M N �0 0)0 n co V W n cONM 0) Go V'Lo CO OCO V'CAM MCA CO CA r V M C F LOCO V MO V V N O) On000 r C0 CO n O?m(0 Cl) r MONO Cl) '- r r Un r h Lo V' 0 V N M N OM V'Nr0 r OMN CO rOOM V' N OON 'Ir OO — O — OOr Or '0'r O N r n N 0 a a c m O tC O V'OOOM tO Nttn tO to COMOMN tO CD noo CO V•r 04 r- NN LO CM �m J r r N r N N r r N r n r N �� N � 0 0 o d OOM CO NO N V NMnM M OCO tO W to co MCDN CAMCONCA 0000 um) r V' V'M MCD ��'V'MCO OncOnM ncD O)O� t0 W m OtO et ION 000)M r N n M L O C+) CM r N C) r r r n r M r N n V N N r CA N V Co v C0 O N r r V• to CA r r r V N jp n V CO�r Ma)0 N00 �NaD 00N COONS n V CO tON NCO COM CA r c N r M r M r r N (O co co r r 0 t O r n O ti r 000010 0000 co O V' — Lot0 M V to LD i — r O — — O N CD 000010 000010 rn - N (n C) N M 0 n r 0 O O r O O r O O r 0 M O r dr a M N a M M N to N M Or CD 0 c N tO O CO O O Orr NO"t Cl) MO N V- J r t6 to F r t(') CO CO CO cm LY r i0 O in t0 Ul 'cp' O n N M. W LO n v co CO LO Co r- o 04 000010 0000 co O V' — Lot0 M V to LD i — r O — — O N CD 000010 000010 rn - N (n C) N M 0 n r CO O 0 M r 0 M O r N M N Cl) M M N to N M Or CD 00 N tO O CO LO O N N M r N N M N M M n 4 t0 N n0��t0 W V 001.0 t0 V nrON N n OOM V O N t0 OOCO aON OeO 7 V V OO O O r M co 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M a r r 0 0 N m _ 0 tC Or toOCON CO t0N00 M t0 rO COM Lo CO V V u7 (fl O co nM n NQ N r M N rr co C;yOM 0 0 0 dLO 7 v) P- tbCOCOt0t0 co V CotOM Nc0Mt00 m V MOO NM Co 00 CD n'o- L NCO V'to MO -, t V'10 t00 '7 t0 C0 t0 t0 t0 to COM nco nt00 V' V V' V' W OMO N N N N N n N L On0)t0�a (oO V'ON co V NN Om co co tOONCO(nD V MN�N CO nt� c r r r r LO CO Co E t ,aaaa o aaaa O O add o aaaa O L1 dLld o aaaa O O 0 0 th O F- O o 0 L 0 F- oto o0 F- 0 t 0 L O O F- F- L LL rc) V' OrM� (P M t OrM� Or C`MV OrM V' 0 r rrr NNNN MMMM v V'� V' t0 i0 t0 LO OOCO CO c cL O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 Q (6 C7 Cl) ^ W ^^ a _ W L /gy LL N N M CO O � � N d 00 N N � N M O O Q O O p Z Z U � LL Cn CA 0- ■ V � O U d) � c cLO Z m Q2 Q 7 O (B V 3a N 7 `V OD a L cfl cn L ( r M Park Rd m Out In Total ' ? O C 546 1157 e C,6 C/) Z551 352 63 19 a a_ U Park Rd Out In Total 546 1157 Z551 352 63 19 Rght Thru Le Pads f6 O 6;Z N a N d N l0 F a ¢a m Z EE Q J L Z O o N L - � o0 /�� 7N \ L OD a- N F-- Q r N n O tl1 to Or N N N N ao ao m N N U C) � t7 O � jql ual 3U�a -Pad L9t 199 48£ £ LZOZ 6Z6 8601 lelol ul tno P2! Ted U) L Q 0 n W L n N N V M CO T O CN V 00 N N � C14 114 a) CV "- O M 0 Z ZU aD O (6 LL Cn C/) � \ L V � � O _ CO LO C U LO Z Q� O CO V d � N � �. oo } L L (D U) I� N (h U Q ti R R CD 0 O m N ;' W m CO N r r r N a D n MO (oN (D 0 000 OIO OIO 0 r(o M (O in d; (O r W N v CO 0000000 0 0 Nr co r- (D �U� , r Or (OO d norr0 n r r l o c o ' Or r °'l (D NI r � W Nld I(D N (h W N (O (D (OV LO nr NW (n n Co (o ; 0 N N n 00 cD V'n c70(On C') n n Lq 04m cD co co n oo00I00Ia 0 a r r O r co (O a n m M r r 0 0 0 r (O O N Lp r N O N Cl NI V of O O (O m O co n rn n (0 00 r co Q 0 0 0 0 0 O O r 0 C �m uO(Dmco r co v, C CD 0 m a(D(Dr P- C `7(O UI n p r N U 0) N �nv�0co C r N (D N w2222i m <<<<E 0 Lo O Lo -:, O M V O 0 rrrn> =0000 s o a cn Q� ^ O LL N 06 U) L.L � C m [i U ovLO rnco coVoOrnr- LO @ LO my co a) n to0Lir� � Q� ~ L C - E jp C C co C) CA N N M co W) O O O M N N r co r- CD 0 O M F N m C1 LU CL Q 06 OOOOr OOOOO N D ,C a 0 0 L � a p p�000000 00000 000 c r : 9 J r c') d m C) w 2 gLOVWMM (0u)cOaoLO Mrr- OC) r N O) Cl) N N r 0 O o f N cV N N O O � N � t O O r O W N o Cl 0 r CO C D Q) a) r r O 4- O co M 0 z Z U CO COM 0(0 0004 CN F 00 W m d U- U) u) a- Q y O r O O N M O O O O O M CL C p N r Ln O >. a � 3 c > 3 >0 49 O r O O r N r r r r C OU� Cl? O J o Li co Z -- W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 rLF-- r 0— C C/) T — ra �' LO :3 N t OK�M(D W O)��rM Mf r N It c6 Z 2 ' r N Q) Cb }, N U �V ❑ w CD C) CD CAS OMr- NN co O O ca d F N v V N U Q y� N o X 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O �V 00 + U a r L co Cn p C p J M O Y Q Or Cl M M N 0) COQ) CO LO CO CC1 M V O D) N N CL CD 1 5 O CU O M CD r- CO 1' M M N r M" V' N CO O f� O M H n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 t co c r 00000 00000 0 Cl F > a w L Q 00oCD00 00000 000 N `- c6 3 LLJ Q 0000o0 00000 000 _0 j O Y` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O L L r L 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 2 CJ CD r is 0 C W V) o �aaaa aaaao oL — to OEM N � N LL L� I.LO�M� ~ r V Q F 0000 0000 N Q 0 ,, - a- U C/) m a> . in m W 06 Y i m a_ CO M � M M � r r O � � N N N 00 �—�NN O N � O M O p Z Z U m t- m m LL U) U) 0- V 7 D O ( � U) ;T LO Z m > O + O 0- a) 4— x L co cn L N r Cl) Park Rd N L 01 1711 451 0 (II LU N ry Y L O N F° r � I..L Z o °� Q M ttv a 06 N J O L O N r O R O Z R N C 2 I U Park Rd Out In Total 246J 1 2161 1 462 01 1711 451 0 R ht Thru Left Peds N D d d O N F° �°- O d� a_ CL M ttv O C J O L O N r O R O Z R N C 2 O O� ~ O N N co 00 tol Z� U N p co co �J )lal ru41 34xa sPad l F FFE7 LOZ LLl le)ol u )nO M Ted O r t n 00 co W O f C L N CD CL) CO CO C)C)N N r ++ O (� n L U Q w C) 0 CD �C a L c C: = 0 = � 00000 MME Y9 M CO CO m O w r r N 2 m (D CO CD CD N N 00 L ~ N CO N N . T— N M L rn O O O r o M 0 M z Z U ° o`°�o ca a LLC)Cn Q a N O O O N ar a m c 3 � m 0 > o 9 J 0 O � m mZ W C) 0 C) 0 0 + V ^ 2 CO F O i. ) LO a) LO L cDrnLnvv N C W c Z c > G Q m 7 0 0 O C) W) M NMN CO C) O m V O U o_ d (1) 7 Q p 00000 V C, w a L (D U) a a c F M D O - C)N 0) 00N Y ) r C) M N a L (D 00 v rn n N N E m CO I- L CT O O O O O O O O O O F- O > CL Q @ L N � Q N Q- a O O O O O U N Cn U) 7 0 C O Lo 11 O tf W 0 "t 0 0 0 0 0 7 O _ O 7 m N m 0 0 0 0 0 Y L L CD O O a_ O Cn E 0 0 0 0 0 z � C ) � � � T- N ti a^)` W N C W cn N c �aaa E 70 C==0000 m a. U a_ a_ I S O M > M � It d' (0 cD �n LO N N CD QD � C L N CD W ln�r 00 O r rON N M I � 6) N N N r (D CL W O O O C D O O O O O O O O L r L 'O O 1 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Q J r C a m ( 7 M C) O w L r N o1ci� a2 N M r 0 0 ooOrn co N N r rcl h cc N r O m N N � O r O r c V O O M O M I n r t} O M A N u V c 0 � f J 1— N Q Z " (0 m Z 0 C ) , 0 F O ^` C W Q '—^'^ ^^� LL V/ vI LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O T ca -° c N I r 3 i C > O O N 0 0 CO M N O (D O In U� J r N N N O N 2 000000 �00O m N O U) � v J �' r LO y L O r( `M C-4 n r u N u (D N N N f6 m r C-� r �Z U >� a Q < Y 0- C M O rr r O W I- V LO Lo N N M r U[ V N 0 c D I O m F v O 0- d N a (n Q � 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O g r a 00 L co U) ° C N p co C 000 V tt of cDONNO c+oN�n M M M O a� 2 OMc2 O�n M� NN'ct N V N N r r N p-t r co 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O r r (D M L r O O 0 0 0 0 0 O r 0 0 r r c+ 0 0 L Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f / 1 N U) d C O Q 0 0 C. 0 0 0 O r O O r r O M . 7 O ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 2 0 � O � — — X �� x Q C O2 222 m W(n c <n E tiaa (L a o aaaa o Ot ° ct OLnOLnF- H 2: n/ u orcov orMV ic) if) LO -o o , C a ~ 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 m Q ti (6 0 U) _. U m a� r) m C-6 Y L ^^ L.1_ MM'T / CO � " `O T r� r� C) o � � N N N � c6 Z N m m V 7 O LO LO c Q� Y O m V 3a X o ( � L co U) 1— N ch Ca N L 0 Q) Rght Thru Left Peds M ov Y L D rn_ Co Fa a� LL Z n� _ O ' 1 C) !+ W � Ift � O � O 11 Q M C . 3 Z 00 •� CL Park Rd Out In Total 184 164 348 11 1251 381 0 Rght Thru Left Peds M ov D rn_ Co Fa a� n� r a.. a_ LAN C J o O � O M C . 3 Z 00 ~~ H� N O j .... N 0 0 y N y 01 m N N C� r J M 0 N4l jtI sPad 4 96Z Z91. 4EL loi ul 1� PH Ted �� u7 M r N N N r(D r cl M F r (1 9 (� L a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o <6 M N(D � o J+ O Lr) N W O tc) W oo.-o- /1\ o F ~ N L �L Y f6 C N n- 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 �-+ M a � (n v �v o o mC> r p y--� > � (n o v o o � o � o F N N N (D co 0 N 0 O N 7 O C N LL O s O a Q 0 0 0 Y L 0 6 O C O H OOOOOOO O ^� LL Z i` Y t O d E �5 0000000 � � z O � a m o o 0 O C of LL 0 _0 Q r N C 06 N 0 = 0 E�a C) (D 0 00 C) C) �Q c °(no�o Y 9 J 0 O = =000(D r Q CO y cu cc �o a U M CO T- a w �- r r O N t 000 or� N N r N N �r NM M z Z U Q (nm(nrN r �_ f6 Q LL0U)a_ v OOOOOOO O a- a -0 3 m :3 > O mf O M N (D V O -, J N O U? e (n O V o Z O o o v O D L ~ N O c 7 L O L to OHO z cc > a rn O Q Y 6 rn m r v N N M (U F O a a (D _ 4- Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 c X J a c L (D U) N cr c p Y Q 4f J RCoOD ` "t r 6CC O N a� �� u7 M r N N N r(D r cl M F r (1 9 L a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o � o J+ a O tc) (� oo.-o- /1\ o F O N L Q Y f6 - `o N n- 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 �-+ c a � (n v �v o o a > > � (n o v o o � o � o t J co 0 N 0 O N 7 O C N LL O — p N O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y L t O C O ~ O .0 O ^� LL Z i` t O d E �5 0000000 � � z O m ° � o 0 O C of LL 0 Q r N C 06 N mw�� a E n d E�a �, cn 7 0 �Q c °(no�o 0 W = =000(D Q Q cu cc �o a U C/)aa_ t Appendix B Volume Development Sheets 1 1 t O z ' 3 ° =3 B 3 i ~ 3 N 0 O N C M M O �7 O 0 O o FM N 0 9 F _ Oa ° `D a 9 'e� S O C y O O � •--• 9 7 �! N eF �� O VJ N O N O kl a N y O O Q p - rn M C N 8 C C O S J 8 C y - 1 C f G p N y p o ry 8 0 N N c ry - y o C O 1 Z N O G N m b z � O N C P _ a � z F � i y F U y 9 m f O O y O O Y W K 6 v g r o r o o = °- R Ll Y a m m m A a R O z ' =3 B M O 0 W F _ 'e� S O C y O O � •--• 9 N eF �� O VJ N O N O kl a N y O O Q - rn M C N 8 C C O S J 8 C y - 1 C - 1 1 1 N - _ a � z F l i tY r� a R 4 2 A rz I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I � I I f 3 ! ! ) r , leer \. ,ft ` } }j § G : � - 6�]]. 2 >2!z = °=2! (e§ ` )^ � d 1 - 1 - 2 _ - �)) ( $ /_: - =,7■:! 1 : -= e& ` f �q;�=:a#:,�=�..�,- - �\} ®,f�a. = ! r =l :•� § = f.�E l2z::la2! I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I � I I f ! ) r , \. ,ft } }j G � - 6�]]. ` )^ d 1 - 1 - - �)) ( \( /_: - =,7■:! 1 : -= e& �q;�=:a#:,�=�..�,- __;e=99e-m- I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I _.] I r� I I I I I I j I I I I k� §may, = \e == \ y _ °,(® °a k d I I e: =f& 5 � \ - ��} §/ =7f: E!! ` - /) ®) °] - - ®f $� ;: - \k §7 / d I I -- ;� ® § \:°! \/) : _ , , 1 ,7 1 , I \z } \\ »f \ _ (s `\! }! §/3;22alz£zZ±2!!22/} (, } \\ \f�\ ;\!a� /z!)j\}a» >a 6 ?f:\ § ±542=§l 2 2 2 Z2222! \I I §may, = \e == \ 5 § - ��} cc =7f: /) ®) - / d I I -- } \\ »f \ _ (s `\! }! §/3;22alz£zZ±2!!22/} I ►"1 II �J F1 C] L� J i m - 1 1 , l n V e m _ 3 - L C�x7 LL - E.. 4i I F m - 0 c � - - R U @ F i N - Fy � N • i [y m V _ x % m _ n - � n z 7. 7 L 7. cs — 7_ Z m m m m �? ' E E = o f ►"1 II �J F1 C] L� J i m - 1 1 , l n V e C�x7 LL - E.. z � d o m - 0 F i N x in % m _ % 7. cs Z m m m m �? ►"1 II �J F1 C] L� J 1 �I t Appendix C Sim Traffic Reports SimTraffic Performance Report Delay / Veh (s) 3.7 Vehicles Entered 1101 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement I SimTraffic Report Page 1 I Delay / Veh (s) 63.0 21.9 4.4 75.0 34.8 3.9 73.8 68.0 3.2 73.1 66.3 2.9 Vehicles Entered 209 730 30 135 1225 274 74 293 148 106 210 223 ' Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 1 .n 'f ? - . t Yi�£R 1, ➢� l- overnent I . ;: r .. . ,, . a n ... f ""Wi1%5 Delay / Veh (s) 36.0 Vehicles Entered 3657 Denied Entry Before 0 I Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ' `= IUloyerne"6 EBT : ' EWR , : 1�1tb,L` ` WBT NBI NbT ' NBR. SBI . Delay / Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 2.0 0.5 5.5 7.9 2.6 7.1 1.0 Vehicles Entered 96 4 33 81 7 1 24 2 248 ' Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement , .EBR�WBL,� `NBR Iovernett WBT ` 1kt1 -BT _�, Delay 1 Veh (s) 0.6 0.1 1.6 0.4 5.7 3.0 0.9 ' Vehicles Entered 122 1 34 112 3 21 293 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I SimTraffic Report Page 1 I SimTraffic Performance Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/201 Total Network Performance SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Delay / Veh (s) Vehicles Entered Denied Entry Before 44.5 3884 0 SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served LTR LTR L T L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 86 83 48 4 39 3 23 Average Queue (ft) 35 35 13 0 7 0 1 95th Queue (ft) 67 65 38 3 26 2 9 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 340 1152 2 674 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 48 60 95th Queue (ft) 309 220 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 492 512 33 130 187 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 90 102 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) 871 871 674 674 Queuing Penalty (veh) Upstream Bilk Time ( %) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L T T L T T R L T T L L Maximum Queue (ft) 337 270 296 274 550 578 36 160 201 217 112 119 Average Queue (ft) 183 129 156 128 340 358 2 69 127 139 48 60 95th Queue (ft) 309 220 253 225 492 512 33 130 187 209 90 102 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 674 674 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard SimTraffic Report Page 3 W Directions Served T T Maximum Queue' (ft) 198 183 Average Queue (ft) 88 104 95th Queue (ft) 149 158 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2011 Existing - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewa Movement TYB NB $6 Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 29 39 30 Average Queue (ft) 2 19 2 95th Queue (ft) 14 43 15 Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream Bilk Time ( %) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Drivewa Movement B NB Directions Served LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 45 Average Queue (ft) 5 19 95th Queue (ft) 26 45 Link Distance (ft) 99 387 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 t SimTraffic Report I Page 4 t SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL _ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay / Veh (s) 11.0 10.0 5.2 9.7 11.5 5.2 7.3 1.0 5.5 5.5 3.2 3.6 Vehicles Entered 57 4 76 36 8 73 66 413 14 28 288 79 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All :.,EBR ._ Delay / Veh (s) 3.7 'NBT Vehicles Entered 1142 Delay / Veh (s) Denied Entry Before 0 2.2 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 5.2 M veiiie ,EBL,, ' EBT EBR ., WBt_:. 1 IBT .:M�BR .`' NBL. , NBT :' NBR'.. ' SB Si3R Delay / Veh (s) 64.5 22.4 4.6 75.9 37.8 4.1 74.2 68.4 3.3 73.6 69.5 3.0 Vehicles Entered 226 740 28 138 1298 273 79 295 171 112 221 239 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 0 Movement All 0 Delay / Veh (s) 37.5 0 0 Vehicles Entered 3820 Denied Entry Before 0 I Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement IVlvveierif .. ��.,,� ':EBT. EBT :.,EBR ._ WBL ". VUBT AIBI "` . 'NBT NBR SBL All Delay / Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.4 5.2 6.7 2.7 4.9 0.9 Vehicles Entered 91 4 32 88 4 1 24 1 245 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement IVlvveierif .. ��.,,� ':EBT. NBR = WBt_ . `INBT' NBL NBR All Delay / Veh (s) 0.6 0.1 1.7 0.5 6.7 3.0 1.0 Vehicles Entered 114 2 37 117 4 22 296 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 No Build - PM 4 /6/201 1 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 46.6 Vehicles Entered 4050 Denied Entry Before 0 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection 1 Park Road & Powers Boulevard 45 „Mfl 4 L�t�e':'WF: , a�✓ wx A,,,Y, - - „ra, r dr Directions Served LTR LTR L T L R Maximum Queue (ft) 101 94 48 4 50` ` 12 Average Queue (ft) 38 34 11 0 7 1 95th Queue (ft) 71 64 37 4 29 5 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 1152 314 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 672 686 - Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 156 225 235 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 193 145 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) 393 14 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 132 139 95th Queue (ft) 307 Intersection: 2: Arboretum 268 Boulevard & Powers Boulevard M E B,....' ;wB = wBiB <. -. B4' ; B4 L L E3 Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 314 330 347 672 686 209 16 34 156 225 235 Average Queue (ft) 193 145 171 132 368 393 14 1 1 77 132 139 95th Queue (ft) 307 242 268 264 598 624, 184 11 25 143 207 207 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time ( % °) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 3 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard M ,v6 SB . 513 .. ' SB Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 123 142 186 199 Average Queue (ft) 52 65 95 111 95th Queue (ft) 108 118 160 174 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 1 2013 No Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: I Park Road & West Drivewa Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 35 12 Average Queue (ft) 3 19 1 95th Queue (ft) 17 43 9 Link Distance (ft) 292 412 357 Upstream Blk Time �m Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) " Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Drivew Movement " I I WB NB =' Directions Served LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 62 36 Average Queue (ft) 7 17 95th Queue (ft) 34 42 Link Distance (ft) 99 387 Upstream Bilk Time ( %)� Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) �u Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh)s' Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 1 n SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 9iYiG if31 I 3' ^ EO � i :E131" ) 1 " ;. YVB Delay / Veh (s) 13.4 Vehicles Entered Delay/ Veh (s) 55.3 16.5 4.2 20.4 22.7 11.0 11.0 1.5 5.3 7.0 3.6 5.3 Vehicles Entered 276 5 125 31 7 77 121 406 17 34 285 282 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 13.4 Vehicles Entered 1666 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement . °' EBt " EBT "' EBR VYBt titST VtIBR ' .:I BL 1VBT .; ,.,', - NW SBL" : :SST=-:. ° SBR Delay / Veh (s) 65.6 25.5 5.0 174.4 37.1 4.0 260.1 73.6 3.8 74.7 74.9 3.2 Vehicles Entered 214 715 100 227 1275 287 149 343 263 108 265 222 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 51 4 Vehicles Entered 4168 Denied Entry Before 0 Performance by movement 1.9 2.1 0.2 0.5 6.1 6 65 85 88 12 0 0 0 0 0 8.9 6.4 18.9 3.4 8.6 1 22 267 10 674 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Moverl�nt.. EBT .. ;" rBR" ,. UUBT.. : VtSR.... SBR All Delay/ Veh (s) 23.5 1.3 0.6 0.8 493.5 4.7 24.6 Vehicles Entered 389 1 234 175 24 2 825 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 67.7 Vehicles Entered 4538 Denied Entry Before 0 SimTraffic Report Page 2 � I � I Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/ Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 189 94 103 92 _ 6 25 4 Average Queue (ft) 144 33 44 30 0 1 0 95th Queue (ft) 218 62 88 64 4 7 3 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 260 1147 1147 226 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 55 0 0 533 541 20 152 Queuing Penalty (veh) 112 0 0 Link Distance (ft) 0 2014 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 871 871 1035 350 350 Storage Blk Time ( %) Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard L T R 56 4 46 12 0 3 41 3 24 T 669 345 225 225 ,wB �. , B B1 R AN 41, Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 345 266 296 593 596 601 27 208 207 336 507 452 Average Queue (ft) 187 155 179 367 360 377 1 7 7 260 272 226 95th Queue (ft) 318 248 275 598 533 541 20 152 151 396 563 456 Link Distance (ft) 0 2014 2014 871 871 1035 1035 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0' 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 0 0 40 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 0 66 2 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard M Yir3I�54 .� 3 Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 114 123 187 262 Average Queue (ft) 50 61 98 151 95th Queue (ft) 93 103 164 229 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 I SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build - PM 4/6/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewa Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway € ovement EB EB WB WB NB Directions Served T TR T TR R R Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R T T 2 Maximum Queue (ft) 73 30 8 55 219 88 26 26s' '^ Average Queue (ft) 8 7 0 21 82 10 3 2 95th Queue (ft) 42 27 4 48 202 75 34 27 Queuing Penalty Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 116 116 Upstream Blk Time 3 0 1 0 P Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway € ovement EB EB WB WB NB Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 140 227 27 56 232 30 Average Queue (ft) 65 71 1 4 82 2 95th Queue (ft) 176 271 14 32 247 14 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 5 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 19 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 �Y ...e ., WNW o, xC ° . - :. 0 . 201 "'I� r. O Storage Blk Time ( %) 29 Queuing Penalty 55 (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 267 e SimTraffc Report ' Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2013 Build (Improvements A -B) - PM 5/6/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement SimTraffic Report Page 1 fovea ent NBT NBR` #t 4. SBT .'„i S)3R ' Delay / Veh (s) 27.3 27.3 3.7 40.2 37.4 12.2 27.0 9.6 6.0 13.3 6.8 6.0 Vehicles Entered 279 5 129 30 7 77 121 406 17 34 280 277 r 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement Delay / Veh (s) 13.2 Vehicles Entered 1662 2 Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement ' Delay / Veh (s) 70.8 30.6 5.1 71.3 41.4 4.1 68.7 62.1 4.4 Vehicles Entered 215 713 99 224 1265 287 150 344 265 71.0 87.1 3.3 107 269 223 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 41.2 Vehicles Entered 4161 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 2.9 0.6 0.2 2.1 0.2 0.6 5.9 7.4 3.9 8.5 2.5 4.1 ' Vehicles Entered 13 105 5 63 85 91 11 1 22 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement 266 10 672 Movement .: EBT Ebg ,; WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 2.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 8.6 2.3 1.7 Vehicles Entered 391 1 235 175 23 3 828 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 53.7 Vehicles Entered 4522 SimTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A -B) - PM i S$. B Directions Served L 5/6/2011 L T Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard L T T L L T Maximum Queue (ft) 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197 Directions Served L TR LTR L T T R L T T R 63 Maximum Queue (ft) 185 105 136 134 98 136 28 66 90 95 75 97 Average Queue (ft) 129 32 53 57 43 62 4 17 16 26 35 669 95th Queue (ft) 195 68 103 114 85 115 21 48 55 68 69 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 1147 1147 Queuing Penalty (veh) 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 18 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 Queuing Penalty (veh) 38 1 0 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 2 1 350 225 225 ' Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 2 3 1 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Queuing Penalty (veh) r,. fo3rmen SB, aY F , Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard T SimTraffic Report ' Page 2 i S$. B Directions Served L T T L T T L T T L L T Maximum Queue (ft) 376 304 318 387 689 700 263 257 268 106 123 197 Average Queue (ft) 185 173 192 208 404 423 140 149 155 50 63 104 95th Queue (ft) 313 270 292 340 590 602 232 232 239 97 106 176 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 669 669 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 230 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 1 2 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 3 1 0 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard r,. fo3rmen SB, aY F Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 288 Average Queue (ft) 166 95th Queue (ft) 248 Link Distance (ft) 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 SimTraffic Report ' Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2013 Build (Improvements A -B) - PM 51612011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway • � �q.`a�;fr �¢; 'us�..�t$�r:� •.?... ��'�., ^�?' x ''� ..� ";. � %..F � s 1 ` �, _x �czfi: YC.�.3:.:��,. ., `�'',�- .a.x�^s x Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 26 37 7 51 118 22 -, Average Queue (ft) 2 5 0 21 58 6 95th Queue (ft) 14 25 4 47 97 22 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 103 42 14 39 52 30 Average Queue (ft) 12 2 1 2 18 2 95th Queue (ft) 55 28 11 18 45 15 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 51 I SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report L� 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement I 0 w n $' � S Delay / Veh (s) 42.6 36.8 30.6 47.7 60.5 40.5 8.6 1.9 5.2 8.4 3.3 3.7 Vehicles Entered 113 5 105 64 6 151 87 767 30 86 415 122 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 11.6 Vehicles Entered 1951 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement PS Delay I Veh (s) 47.4 Vehicles Entered 4742 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement ,Bl tB Bt ' °.` All Delay / Veh (s) 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.5 6.4 3.5 7.2 6.2 Delay / Veh (s) 95.6 35.9 4.9 65.9 44.1 4.4 115.7 71.0 4.6 76.3 95.5 3.4 Vehicles Entered 261 803 51 267 1390 292 164 437 427 120 294 236 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement PS Delay I Veh (s) 47.4 Vehicles Entered 4742 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Itsle 6ment ,Bl tB Bt ' °.` All Delay / Veh (s) 2.6 0.0 2.6 0.5 6.4 3.5 7.2 6.2 2.2 Vehicles Entered 171 4 36 147 7 1 25 2 393 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Itsle 6ment EBT EBR WBL WBT ` NBL NBR... ! All Delay / Veh (s) 25.5 16.2 1.9 0.5 115.4 102.0 18.6 Vehicles Entered 198 1 34 178 4 25 440 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SirnTraffic Report ' Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 61.7 Vehicles Entered 5065 Denied Entry Before 0 SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boul >., 3 3a p �7' n � ■Y ��, g ,, � R E �py - � _- (y'�� 5'.,�'�.r !�!Yy �.�'� p ° � Y}!{ ,�.0 'a*€'s�� ,� �+,7 �3 - ��ry\ ,. Directions Served LTR LTR T L T R L R Maximum Queue (ft) 119 237 54 57 20 14 69 22 Average Queue (ft) 90 116 3 18 1 0 28 3 95th Queue (ft) 135 218 23 43 7 8 62 14 Link Distance (ft) 99 166 223 1152 726 728 209 Upstream Blk Time 27 10 408 402 Average Queue (ft) 279 215 Queuing Penalty (veh) 63 0 467 21 4 5 187 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 226 95th Queue (ft) 469 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Pow Boulevard r Billetlt Directions Served L z wB B . WBFi'' ?VB , * " 4' Maximum Queue (ft) 130 135 282 301 Average Queue (ft) 61 69 152 , 95th Queue (ft) 111 119 247 Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 498 369 409 412 726 728 209 81 94 320 408 402 Average Queue (ft) 279 215 239 238 442 467 21 4 5 187 234 226 95th Queue (ft) 469 335 358 370 673 697 228 61 72 332 394 350 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 674 674 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 2 2 14 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4` 7 30 7 3 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Pow Boulevard r Billetlt Directions Served L L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 130 135 282 301 Average Queue (ft) 61 69 152 170 95th Queue (ft) 111 119 247 265 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 8 I 1 1 SimTraffic Report Page 3 1 t 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build (Improvement A) - PM 5/4/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway 4 C , £ d ..e„ � L3l�lir� �� >..+,st .. ,,§ r� � .;.. : .. ,.. �. Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 60- 47 49 31 Average Queue (ft) 7 7 21 2 95th Queue (ft) 54 31 46 14 Link Distance (ft) 894 292 412 357 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 387 Upstream Blk Time ( %} 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Dri Mc�rnett rX Directions Served LTR LTR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 217 63 136 Average Queue (ft) 63 7 39 95th Queue (ft) 212 37 117 Link Distance (ft) 292 99 387 Upstream Blk Time ( %} 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summa Network wide Queuing Penalty: 133 SimTraffic Report Page 4 I SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM EBT� BR tBt .u:..:M 5/5/2011 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement .: Denied Entry Before N 40.5 0.6 Delay / Veh (s) 191.3 26.5 9.4 155.1 173.1 129.6 12.7 2.4 5.5 10.1 3.4 5.2 Vehicles Entered 144 4 74 56 8 136 137 764 33 84 403 318 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement e 1 r EBT� BR tBt .u:..:M [ - NBT I BR � 56t= F3 SCR .: Denied Entry Before Delay / Veh (s) 29.3 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729 1 9.2 Vehicles Entered 2161 Delay 1 Veh (s) 105.0 47.1 5.5 75.6 Denied Entry Before 0 86.0 59.0 4.5 76.6 91.4 3.5 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement e 1 X 1 2 EBT� BR tBt .u:..:M [ - NBT I BR � 56t= F3 SCR .: Denied Entry Before 0 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729 1 9.2 125.7 Delay 1 Veh (s) 105.0 47.1 5.5 75.6 56.3 5.0 86.0 59.0 4.5 76.6 91.4 3.5 Vehicles Entered 246 782 108 378 1395 304 192 405 444 121 307 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Movement All Delay / Veh (s) 51.4 Vehicles Entered 4917 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 186.2 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729 1 9.2 125.7 Vehicles Entered 222 Delay / Veh (s) 283.7 253.9 298.9 2.2 0.2 0.5 677.3 965.0 1468.9 2.0 251.2 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 73 136 88 13 1 24 47 1 564 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT EBR WBT WBR NBR SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 186.2 40.5 0.6 1.1 5729 1 9.2 125.7 Vehicles Entered 222 1 295 166 17 3 704 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SimTraffic Report Page 1 J SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance Delay / Veh (s) 199.1 Vehicles Entered 5317 Denied Entry Before 4 SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard EB,t Directions Served L TR LTR T L T R L T R Maximum Queue (ft) 206 115 253 225 107 8 13 91 4 57 Average Queue (ft) 178 38 207 119 36 0 1 35 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 190 89 304 295 81 4 7 71 3 30 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 832 1147 430 174 669 323 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 99 1 69 30 2014 15 871 871 2220 Queuing Penalty (veh) 244 1 0 0 1 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 Queuing Penalty (veh) 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard EB,t Directions Served L Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 486 405 419 779 864 874 690 312 342 330 347 363 Average Queue (ft) 280 255 277 374 530 550 64 20 27 195 180 185 95th Queue (ft) 488 370 390 635 832 852 430 174 226 323 316 310 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 15 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 0 1 5 7 10 2 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 0 7 19 21 23 4 3 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Bouleva & Powers Boulevard Cl 1 1 C] t SimTraffic Report ' Page 3 Directions Served L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 124 138 260 308 219 Average Queue (ft) 57 67 141 188 16 95th Queue (ft) 107 117 234 299 137 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 Cl 1 1 C] t SimTraffic Report ' Page 3 ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 914 1 SimTraffic Report Page 4 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway ' Directions Served LTR T L R LTR T LT R T T Maximum Queue (ft) 592 54 35 9 359 58 420 82 136 131 Average Queue (ft) 355 95th Queue (ft) 862 26 149 5 22 0 6 190 424 17 119 389 500 19 149 117 168 91 181 Link Distance (ft) 883 257 291 406 277 339 339 116 116 Upstream Blk Time ( ° 10) 12 6 10 4 94 0 93 63 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Nloveraent . Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 370 ' Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 194 Link Distance ft 871 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 1 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway °ES, . EB .;. IVB :BNB N87 " .'. , 61£}..." 6! Directions Served T TR T TR R T R ' Maximum Queue (ft) 150 Average Queue (ft) 149 307 290 12 0 75 4 447 293 180 34 30 2 95th Queue (ft) 154 363 6 30 526 138 15' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 291 74 104 104 0 376 45 257 0 339 Queuing Penalty (veh) 344 1 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 ' Storage Blk Time ( %) 97 Queuing Penalty (veh) 226 ' Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 914 1 SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -B) - PM r,)3 �L �.SB _ All Delay I Veh (s) 2.7 SBA BIR 5/5/2011 104.0 48.0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 52.6 4.9 122.1 64.5 6.6 r 112.9 5.0 t ..S T, S a 243 787 Delay / Veh (s) 30.6 19.2 4.2 45.0 50.8 26.4 35.2 15.7 6.5 29.0 7.3 6.5 ' Vehicles Entered 310 5 168 63 8 146 136 769 32 85 399 314 0 0 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay / Veh (s) 17.2 Vehicles Entered 2435 Denied Entry Before 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 53.3 Vehicles Entered 5101 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement N.�. _ NIBT r,)3 �L �.SB _ All Delay I Veh (s) 2.7 SBA BIR Delay / Veh (s) 104.0 48.0 5.5 72.0 52.6 4.9 122.1 64.5 6.6 78.5 112.9 5.0 Vehicles Entered 243 787 108 372 1385 311 224 476 526 119 312 238 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Delay I Veh (s) 53.3 Vehicles Entered 5101 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement MMment ,.:' N.�. _ NIBT r,)3 �L �.SB _ All Delay I Veh (s) 2.7 0.7 1.4 2.5 0.3 0.5 7.2 6.5 5.0 12.8 3.0 5.1 Vehicles Entered 11 169 3 73 138 88 12 1 26 267 10 798 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement MMment ,.:' B .. EBR , : ""UVBT : "WBR NBR .. 4 ". ,... 3..... dA _ :... IMIM Delay / Veh (s) 2.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 18.1 5.0 2.1 Vehicles Entered 459 2 297 165 24 2 949 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Ci SirnTraffic Report Page 1 ' SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -B) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance t J 11 SirnTraffic Report Page 2 3 .�� , �aw!�_ .. ��; e - 24� -ae� -= n _ Z_• 4.� .aka_ . L..9 a : mss,° � c,bs "�-a� _ € i Delay / Veh (s) 69.3 Vehicles Entered 5551 Denied Entry Before 0 t J 11 SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -B) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 182 92 225 25 158 190 273 45 134 314 78 107 Average Queue (ft) 143 38 109 1 72 90 140 11 52 25 30 52 95th' Queue (ft) 199 71 196 13 142 162 223" 35 101 164 66 93 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 1147 0 0 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 26 0 3 250 250 0 Storage Blk Time ( %) Penalty Queuing Penalty (veh) 65 0 0 ' Queuing (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 350 350 225 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Bou & Powers B 1 o �y ulev yy{} a ar� rd Directions Served L T T L T T R T T L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 500 398 420 758 873 882 423 84 132 350 522 492 Average Queue (ft) 267 255 277 368 518 545 22 3 7 265 268 250 95th Queue (ft) 463 360 382 605 795 832 229 37 62 395 479 435 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 871 871 2220 2220 669 669 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 0 4 6 30 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 15 18 72 10 6 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard fi� , 38..... SB ..: SB .. SB , , ". B6 66 `1 Directions Served R L L T T R T T Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 82 3 123 57 148 66 355 170 382 222 148 24 39 1 64 3 , 95th Queue (ft) 60 107 119 31,1 369 172 16 40 Link Distance (ft) 473 473 1834 1834 Upstream Blk Time ( %) 1 1 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 300 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %) Penalty 3 3 13 32 ' Queuing (veh) I � I � I i SimTraffic Report , Page 3 A ' Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -B) - PM 5/5/2011 1 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Driveway Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 32 34 9 54 195 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 95th Queue (ft) 16 13 38 0 24 6 50 75 146 6 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend ' Movement %.: EB Directions Served T Maximum Queue (ft) 372 ' Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 195 Link Distance (ft) 871 ' Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) ' Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Movemenf d Directions Served T T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 110 Average Queue (ft) 17 10 1 22 63 1 20 30 2 95th Queue (ft) 71 9 9 51 16 ' Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 104 104 376 339 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 ' Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 225 I SimTraffic Report Page 4 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -D) - PM ,,.w EBB u it R Delay / Veh (s) 79.5 39.8 5/5/2011 43.8 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 76.7 57.2 6.4 76.2 ' Vehicles Entered 244 :1NBL WBT WBR' NBT NBR SBL' SB'T SBR 120 , Delay / Veh (s) 31.1 18.7 4.1 43.6 49.5 25.1 34.8 16.0 6.6 27.6 7.6 7.3 ' Vehicles Entered , 308 5 167 62 9 146 138 765 32 86 397 315 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement Sj@ EO&A NM 13 t�� F .. .E3, a YY,$__.��,, ,,.w EBB u it R Delay / Veh (s) 79.5 39.8 5.4 66.7 43.8 4.6 76.7 57.2 6.4 76.2 76.4 3.3 Vehicles Entered 244 787 106 373 1385 311 223 471 525 120 , 312 235 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Performance by movement .� :a. Delay / Veh (s) 43.0 Vehicles Entered 5092 Denied Entry Before 0 3: Park Road & West Driveway Performance by movement laysriiei�t EL ,,.w EBB BR TiyBF' IB! r JBT ' rW Et. ,SBA. SB12 ,4�I Delay / Veh (s) 2.9 0.7 0.5 2.4 0.3 0.6 6.6 7.2 5.0 11.4 2.6 4.7 Vehicles Entered 11 167 3 74 137 88 12 1 26 266 10 795 Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: Park Road & East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT Delay 1 Veh (s) 2.8 Vehicles Entered 456 Denied Entry Before 0 i 1.1 0.7 0.6 21.9 4.3 2 297 166 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 All 2.2 947 0 1 t SimTraffic Report , Page 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -D) - PM 5/5/2011 Total Network Performance 1 u SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Delay / Veh (s) 59.6 Vehicles Entered 5542 Denied Entry Before 0 1 u SirnTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -D) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 1: Park Road & Powers Boulevard Directions Served L TR LTR T L T T R L T T SB R Maximum Queue (ft) 187 86 223 17 157 212 274 44 124 78 112 109 Average Queue (ft) 147 37 106 0 71 94 144 11 53 17 32 47 95th Queue (ft) 198 69 193 6 133 174 233 35 104 56 77 93 Link Distance (ft) 104 104 166 223 1147 1147 29 1 669 669 95th Queue (ft) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 27 0 3 338 709 744 269 16 19 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 0 0 2014 250 870 870 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 2220 Storage Blk Time ( %°) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 350 350 225 0 225 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 397 Directions Served L L T T L L T T R T T L Maximum Queue (ft) 201 220 359 383 257 500 775 835 728 22 27 349 Average Queue (ft) 115 118 234 259 148 194 457 482 29 1 1 218 95th Queue (ft) 183 192 337 356 226 338 709 744 269 16 19 347 Link Distance (ft) 2014 2014 250 870 870 2220 2220 Storage Blk Time ( %°) Upstream Blk Time ( %) 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7 0 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 550 550 630 630 600 230 Storage Blk Time ( %) 2 3 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 9 24 Intersection: 2: Arboretum Boulevard & Powers Boulevard Directions Served T T L L T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 397 374 126 139 241 307 143 Average Queue (ft) 202 202 59 70 128 175 5 95th Queue (ft) 333 317 113 119 207 270 75 Link Distance (ft) 669 669 473 473 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 250 250 250 Storage Blk Time ( %°) 3 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 2 0 7 t SimTraffic Report ' Page 3 1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build (Mitigation A -D) - PM 5/5/2011 Intersection: 3: Park Road & West Drivewa Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T TR T TR R Directions Served LTR L R LTR LT R Maximum Queue (ft) 27 34 4 61 166 22 Average Queue (ft) 2 10 0 24 70 6 95th Queue (ft) 13 34 3 51 130 21 Link Distance (ft) 883 1 291 406 339 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bend Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Park Road & East Driveway Directions Served T TR T TR R R Maximum Queue (ft) 124 35 23 42 75 30 Average Queue (ft) 20 1 1 1 21 2 95th Queue (ft) 81 26 9 16 55 16 Link Distance (ft) 291 104 104 376 339 Upstream Blk Time ( %) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time ( %) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 127 SimTraffic Report Page 4