Loading...
PC Minutes 05-15-2012 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MAY 15, 2012 Due to technical difficulties, recording of this meeting did not occur. Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Kathleen Thomas, Lisa Hokkanen, Kim Tennyson, Bill Colopoulos, and Kelsey Nelson STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Doug Hansen 11969 No. Shore Drive, Spicer, MN 56288 Lisa Thompson 6780 Lotus Trail Peter Rocheford 6780 Lotus Trail PUBLIC HEARING: ROCHEFORD/THOMPSON VARIANCE: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW TWO DRIVEWAYS ON ONE PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) AND LOCATED AT 6780 LOTUS TRAIL. APPLICANT: PETER ROCHEFORD/LISA THOMPSON, PLANNING CASE 2012-05. Alyson Fauske presented the staff report on this item. Peter Rocheford outlined the reasons for their variance request. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Commission members had no questions or comments. Colopoulos moved, Thomas seconded that the Planning Commission grant the variance to allow two driveways on a property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) lot, located at 6780 Lotus Trail subject to the following conditions and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must obtain a driveway permit and install any necessary erosion control measures prior to proceeding with the driveway installation. 2. Tree protection fencing as approved by the City Forester must be installed around the trees within the right-of-way. No further trees shall be removed with the right-of-way. 3. Demonstrate the recording of the three PID’s (25-1601640, 25-1601580, and 25-1601590) into one zoning lot. 4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the garage, the applicant must demonstrate that it meets the standards of the Residential Single Family zoning district. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD-R) AMENDMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENTS: