The URL can be used to link to this page

PC Staff Report 06-05-2012 WITHDRAWNCITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: June 5, 2012 CC DATE: June 25, 2012 2 REVIEW DEADLINE: July 3, 2012. CASE #: 2012 -06 BY: RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS, JS PROPOSED MOTION: Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve an 8,400 square -foot expansion to the approved site plan subject to the conditions of this staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting Site Plan Review for an 8,400 square -foot building expansion of an existing animal kennel for a total of 29,111 square feet of buildings, Superdog 2. LOCATION: 2910 82 Street (Lot 2, Block 1, Arboretum Business Park 3 rd Addition). APPLICANT: Karen Jackson 291082 nd Street Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612) 239 -7024 Karenj752@aol.com PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Office Industrial ACREAGE: 3.08 DENSITY: F.A.R.'0.22 afar Towe Place ' - -fi a ev SU13Jtcr PROPERTY it LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval for an 8,400 square -foot expansion to the approved site plan for an animal kennel/dog daycare. City Code permits staff to review and approve minor expansion of approved site plans, pursuant to Section 20 -108 (2), which states "enlargement of a building by less than ten percent of its gross floor area, provided that there is no variance involved and also provided that the community development director has conducted an administrative review pursuant to Section 20- 113 ". The proposed expansion represents a 38 percent increase from the 21,020 square feet Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 2 of 9 approved in 2009 to the total building area. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article 2, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office - Institutional Developments Arboretum Business Park Development Standards BACKGROUND On June 9, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the amendment to the Planned Unit Development design standards for Arboretum Business Park to permit pet kennels and/or veterinary clinics, and the Site Plan for Superdog Country Club, Planning Case #08 -11, for a 21,020 square -foot, one -story kennel and veterinary clinic. On March 8, 1999, the City Council approved PUD #92 -6 granting final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park 3` Addition creating two lots and right -of -way for TH 41. On July 28, 1997, the City Council approved the ordinance for PUD #92 -6 rezoning approximately 154 acres from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the PUD #92 -6 granting final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park. GENERAL SITE PLAN /ARCHITECTURE The applicant is requested site plan approval for an 8,400 square -foot expansion to the approved site plan for an animal kennel/dog daycare. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Kennel West Elevation Kennel South Elevation Clinic South Elevation Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 5 of 9 LIGHTING /SIGNAGE City code requires that the applicant provide site lighting for the parking lot area. Site lighting is shown at the north and south end of the westerly parking lot and on the building. The light poles are square, ornamental, 20 -foot tall light poles /fixtures. A decorative, shoebox fixture (high pressure sodium vapor lamps or metal halide lights) shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting. All lighting shall be shielded. Decorative lights (Tahoe -12) are proposed flanking the side of the main entrances and on the western and southern elevations, noted as A 1 and A2 lights. Floodpak wall- mounted lights are proposed on the north and east side of the building. Wall- mounted units shall be shielded. The applicant shows areas for signage above the entrances to the veterinary clinic and kennel. Such signage must comply with City Code requirements. A separate sign permit is required for each sign. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The 3.1 -acre site is located in Arboretum Business Park 3rd Addition which is east of Highway 41, north of 82 nd Street and west of Century Boulevard. A 16,700 square -foot building was constructed on the east side of this site in 2008 and is currently named Canine Club and Spa. The applicant had proposed a vet in 2008, but it was not constructed. The west side of the site consists of pasture -type vegetation. A unique feature about this site is the change in elevation. There is 35 feet of elevation change from one side of the site to the other. This elevation change occurs in around 300 feet of horizontal distance. Grading will take place on the site to prepare the building pad and parking areas. No grading is allowed over the existing sanitary sewer along the west side of the property. The runoff from this site will discharge to a regional pond located in the northeast corner of the intersection of Century Boulevard and 82 nd Street. Hydrologic calculations have been provided, but they are not complete. It is unclear at this time whether or not the assumption from the preliminary plat for the drainage area which drains to this pond has remained the same. The applicant must provide additional information. This development is in the Bluff Creek Watershed District. Storm sewer was provided to this site during the construction of the gas station to the west. At the time of development of the gas station, it was determined that the street storm sewer did not have the capacity to carry the runoff to the regional pond. Additional storm sewer was added on the north side of 82 nd Street. This storm sewer was sized for the development of this site. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off -site grading. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 3 of 9 Size Portion Placement Building entrances are highlighted through the use of two -foot, projected building facades with a stepped parapet one foot above the lowest parapet elevation and a canopy over the entrance doors. Stone accents and light sconces also define the entrance areas. Building articulation is provided through the use of three parapet heights, and projecting entrances, systematic window placement and the use of canopies. Material and Detail The main building material is reddish -brown brick veneer. Cumberland stone is incorporated flanking the entrances and at either end of the kennel building framing the window areas. Height and Roof Design The highest parapet is 17.5 feet, with three parapet height levels, each one foot higher than the next. The building is one story. Mechanical equipment shall be screened through the placement on the roof, the use of parapet walls and the use of low - profile equipment. No wooded fences are permitted on the roof. Facade transparency 50 percent of the first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall include transparent windows and or doors. All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation. The applicant must increase the fenestration on the south end of the new kennel by 97 square feet. Site Furnishing The applicant has a partial sidewalk system proposed on the west side of the new building. This sidewalk shall be extended to the south to connect to the rest of the sidewalk for the facility and to the north to the sidewalk along the north side of the building. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, etc. A trash enclosure is proposed on the north side of the new kennel building.. It will be constructed of the same brick veneer as the main building. The trash doors will be constructed of wood on tube steel frames. Landscaping PMMI. M WEST ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE eO V8' . I'•0' ewer ¢.evana� enu,ae e¢tca� The calculations for parking lot landscaping are based on final parking area coverage. Minimum requirements for landscaping include 2,066 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot, 8 trees for the parking lot, and bufferyard plantings along property lines. The applicant's proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 4 of 9 The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. Staff recommends that the applicant increase the number of trees and shrubs in the bufferyards to meet minimum landscape requirements. The applicant is proposing to transplant a number of trees on site. These trees shall be guaranteed for a full growing season and replaced if dead or showing decline. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The building fronts on 82 Street. No more than 50 percent of parking may be located between the building and the primary street frontage. Parking is distributed around the building with 16 new spaces (55 %) to the west of the building and 13 new spaces (45 %) south of the building. COMPLIANCE TABLE Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape 2,066 sq. ft. >2,066 sq. ft. area Building Setback N - 0' E - 0' W - O'S - 30' Trees / parking lot 8 overstory trees 8 overstory trees Islands/ parking lot 4 islands or peninsulas 4 islands/ peninsulas North property line, 140' 2 overstory trees 0 overstory trees Bufferyard C 5 understory trees 4 understory trees 17 stalls 5 shrubs 0 shrubs South property line, 80' 2 overstory trees 3 overstory trees Bufferyard C 5 understory trees 0 understory trees 46.2% 5 shrubs 0 shrubs West property line, 260' 3 overstory trees 0 overstory trees Bufferyard B 5 understory trees 8 understory trees 9 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard areas. Staff recommends that the applicant increase the number of trees and shrubs in the bufferyards to meet minimum landscape requirements. The applicant is proposing to transplant a number of trees on site. These trees shall be guaranteed for a full growing season and replaced if dead or showing decline. Lot Frontage and Parking Location The building fronts on 82 Street. No more than 50 percent of parking may be located between the building and the primary street frontage. Parking is distributed around the building with 16 new spaces (55 %) to the west of the building and 13 new spaces (45 %) south of the building. COMPLIANCE TABLE PUD Superdog 2 Building Height 3 stories 1 story, 17.5 feet Building Setback N - 0' E - 0' W - O'S - 30' N — 71.5'E — 75.4'W — 77'S — 76.3' Parking Stalls: • Animal Hospital 11150 sq. ft. (4,000 sq. ft.) 27 stalls • Office 511,000 sq. ft. (876 sq. ft.) 4 stalls • Warehouse (24,235 sq. ft.) 1 /1,000 sq. ft. up to 10,000 sq. ft., then 1/2,000 sq. ft 17 stalls • Required stalls 48 stalls 48 stalls Parking Setback N- 0'E- 0'W- O'S -20' N - 66'E - 20'W - 22'S -.20' Hard Surface Coverage 70% 46.2% Lot Area 1 acre 3.08 acres Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 6 of 9 RETAINING WALLS The proposed retaining walls are as follows: Location Length (approx.) Maximum Height —(approx.) West side of proposed parking lot 205 feet 6 feet North side of proposed kennel building 135 feet 8 feet Northeast side of proposed kennel building 75 feet 1 5 feet The developer will need to work with staff to minimize the height of the retaining wall on the west side of the proposed parking lot. Currently the finished wall is outside the drainage and utility easement, but the structural support will likely be located within the easement. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. Due to the height of the retaining wall, a fence must be placed on the top for safety at any location that the top of the wall is greater than or equal to 4 feet from the ground in front of it. UTILITIES The developer proposes to extend lateral sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer within the development. Sanitary sewer and water has been stubbed to the property by the City of Chaska. The City of Chanhassen and City of Chaska have a joint sewer and water agreement for servicing this area which was signed in 1992. The City of Chaska provided the sewer and water for the building in 2008. Due to elevations and location of sanitary in the area, sewer is not available from the City of Chanhassen. Approval for the sewer connection and the sewer extension permit must be filed through the City of Chaska. The sanitary sewer along the west property line, storm sewer along the east property line, and storm sewer along the south property line shall be publicly owned and maintained. All other utilities within the property boundary will be privately owned and maintained. Details must be provided for all proposed storm, sanitary, and watermain crossings. Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. Each new building is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. Sanitary sewer and water hookup fees are unknown at this time but will need to be paid to the City of Chaska. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to provide the City with the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of $9,000.00 to guarantee the installation of the storm sewer, erosion control, and seeding. The applicant must also notify the City after installation of the erosion control and 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA and the Dept. of Health. Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 7 of 9 SITE ACCESS Access to the site is provided off of 82 Street. Two access points were constructed with Superdog in 2008 and will not be altered within the right -of -way. MISCELLANEOUS The city has recently received complaints regarding barking from residents to the southwest in Chaska. However, with the construction of this new building, the outdoor dog area will be surrounded by buildings which may act as a sound wall and reduce the amount of off -site noise. Staff will continue monitor this situation. An encroachment agreement will be needed for the fence in the drainage and utility easement. Further, the applicant shall work with staff to make changes to plans according to staff redlines. The buildings are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. Retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire- resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. Detailed occupancy - related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss property line issues as well as plan review and permit procedures. There are utilities buried along the western portion of the site. The affected CenturyLink buried facilities provide service to commercial buildings and also the water tower. Numerous special circuits to the water tower and to the commercial buildings, in addition to regular telephone lines, are within the cables. Any work on these special circuits would have to be coordinated carefully to insure there is no interruption of customer service. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve an 8,400 square -foot expansion for Superdog 2, plans prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., dated May 4, 2012, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Planning Conditions 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. The applicant must increase the fenestration on the south end of the new kennel building by 97 square feet. 3. Mechanical equipment shall be screened through the placement on the roof, the use of parapet walls and the use of low- profile equipment. Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 8 of 9 4. The applicant shall extend the sidewalk on the west side of the building to the south to connect to the sidewalk across the south side of the buildings and to the north to the sidewalk along the north side of the building. 5. A separate sign permit is required for each sign. Natural Resource Specialist Conditions 1. Increase plantings for buffer yard areas in order to meet ordinance requirements. 2. Any transplanted trees shall be guaranteed for a full growing season and replaced if dead or showing decline with city- approved, 2.5" caliper trees. Building Official Conditions 1. The buildings are required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Retaining walls over four high must be designed by a professional engineer and a permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss property line issues as well as plan review and permit procedures. 5. Any work on existing utilities on site will have to be coordinated carefully with the affected utility to insure there is no interruption of customer service. En ineering Conditions 1. No'grading is allowed over the existing sanitary sewer along the west side of the property. 2. Keep a minimum of 2% slope in the grass areas, I% in the pavement areas, and .5% along the curb lines. 3. Additional information and calculations must be submitted to determine if the regional pond can accommodate the proposed additional impervious areas. The applicant shall work with staff on revised calculations. 4. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 5. The developer will need to work with staff to minimize the height of the retaining wall on the west side of the proposed parking lot. Currently the finished will is outside the drainage and utility easement, but the structural support will likely be located within the easement. Planning Commission Superdog Expansion Site Plan Review — Planning Case 2012 -06 June 5, 2012 Page 9 of 9 6. Building permits are required for all retaining walls four feet tall or higher and must be designed by a Structural Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota. A fence must be placed on the top for safety at any location that the top of the wall is greater than or equal to 4 feet from the ground in front of it. A building permit is required for the construction of the retaining wall. 7. The City of Chaska will be providing sewer and water service to this site. Approvals, permits, and fees for sewer and water will be with the City of Chaska. 8. The sanitary sewer along the west property line, storm sewer along the east property line, and storm sewer along the south property line shall be publicly owned and maintained. All other utilities within the property boundary will be privately owned and maintained. 9. Details must be provided for all proposed storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain crossings. Actual elevations of existing utilities shall be verified for accuracy. A minimum vertical separation of 18" is required at all storm, sanitary, and watermain crossings. Contact Gordy Stauff 952 -227- 1166 with the City of Chanhassen Engineering Department 48 hours prior to connecting to the storm. 10. Each new building is subject to sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. Sanitary sewer and water hookup fees are unknown at this time, but will be need to be paid to the City of Chaska. 11. All of the utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. The applicant is also required to provide the City with the necessary financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of $9,000.00 to guarantee the installation of the storm sewer, erosion control, and seeding. The applicant must also notify the City after installation of the erosion control and 48 hours prior to the commencement of grading. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies will be required, including the MPCA and the Dept. of Health. 12. Encroachment agreements will be needed for the fence in the drainage and utility easements. 13. The applicant shall work with staff to make changes to plans according to staff redlines. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Reduced Copy Boundary and Topographic Survey /Existing Conditions. 4. Reduced Copy Final Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan. 5. Reduced Copy Final Utility Plan. 6. Reduced Copy Final Paving & Dimensioning Plan. 7. Reduced Copy Final Landscape Plan. 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -06 canine club & spa expansion spr\staff report superdog 2.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Karen Jackson for Site Plan Review for an 8,400 square -foot building expansion for a total of 29,111 square feet of building area. On June 5, 2022, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Karen Jackson for a site plan review for the property located at 2910 82 Street. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan which was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for office industrial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 2, Block 1, Arboretum Business Park 3` Addition 4. Section 20 -110 (1) The proposed site plan is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) The proposed development is consistent with the site plan review requirements of city code; (3) The proposed site plan preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas; (4) The proposed site plan creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) The proposed site plan creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring. structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) The proposed site plan protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 5. The planning report #2012 -06 dated June 5, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site plan review for Superdog 2. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 5 th day of June, 2012. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION IC -• Its Chairman 2 PLEASE PRINT Planning Case No. a — 0 (° see 6z-t �Sot S - CITY OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED MAY 0 4 2012 CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT _ _ 4r fflw" Email: MI NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non - conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development* Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review ' qoo i4o00 = a,4-on Site Plan Review (SPR)* goo 4 1 aq = ba Subdivision* An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right -of- Way /Easements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign $200 (City to install and r ** X Escrow for Filing Fees /Attorney Cost UP /SPRNACNAR/WAP /Metes & Bounds r50 SUB S TOTAL FEE $ , A , 1 4 N LK 1 a to�1 '_ Mr 1JCG CL hearinq notification area will be invoiced td aDDlicant prior to the public hearing. *Five (5) full -size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8 X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format. * *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227 -1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION SCANNED PROJECT.NAME:_ LOCATION: �` LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: TOTAL ACREAGE: : ::,v CR Y T WETLANDS PRESENT: YES NO PRESENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON FOR REQUEST:9� -� FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees and new employees: p This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate. Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the_fee,o ger also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understan531aat additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any tuthoriza on to roceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of of lie Date wne Fee O Date g:\planVormsWevelopment revkw alication.doc SCANNED '> i •� . � -� •� 284.55 S _ 89 15 57 E ' # N,Y 5i..,, :j DRAINAGE AND UTLITY — \ ` EAS MENT PER PLAT . I Oo A E) �n )r- rl I eI I In I.r La p �)i )r`I n.r�rl 7 110 02 N89 15 5 W \ L \f. 11 L I �� I V I L,'C) I/ v L L . . 20 tier� . ( cox .. ... ...._. rp ...... _.... I ( # i k k , 5 4 I , M1 RE • a lax �� I I .5•t / i V�M p6 PVC FLW Y +.A.Y.,' J � •{� • 0.116 1 �. NV 9aJAf= (� "C 7 T N � { Y •}•�� CB 18 � l � �I 00 Y � i 3 alt` { InNS 1 � T ns1e / 4 I I `n ° ( ' , j IN .04 W l 1 r I [ n sTO 1c l�''S' �' y i ••-'j E v r c.$ "... �, " n 3 I M 1 9 ' B!)OP t 31r ��? �€ i I (.� I I I ZOg: I 9 I °1 . o n I I I �,f `•:� I � I i Jr" '- } �� - k _ I n w l x I I M ai mwns�uaamm r�Am.b�t MIRRmm�nwbaev., bxan.tntlx,�R..we..�.°.P....s,o-m I.mn.YwwarnR..t . o-nn: � _ _ Mbmn.amxamYMA bm�AYIIroI .YaxmrcbRJlnxrxPwrrwwrm� n IuoalwomlxnwaoxnxTlnlwb boabnr. ek aee:men�s.", ur.rrelxaraxslerm,RrnwbawYbran YI fl MIM r�jMSA 1. f A YlYIMMW UnLMISII VW nIEM01UUfYUX *Ir tR lrxbb �vSy�YRVUb.V laCA1RUAYUK teebnbtllAVbTIURrR WxtIIMIMMwYbx MtYMI ItNtt�rV W tYlYY Wt dNanxx CVlaIYALtlitt.TY MLULRYAYIUxaMUUAVa9tW1MLYtt YPgtaWWY1W YIM. CATMTT tl�J AV i�Ikl�Ml�� ULWTFwrrilxwWaWKbltwt9+ItMV wvb.bpxbfYbWt. OVbMLMrxf AbER.IHAtlIPWa AG AIIOPInaoPnroecbn xvou+bJUOr.rYlumMexonwooea w lNMnr•S1aMdO N N SCALE N RR 1 1 1 Inch � 20 hel Z �a N y � 8 01 e W� o� U RENSIONS CAD FILE 22502 -10EXC PROJECT NO. 22502 -10 1.4 N SCNE IN FEET 0 26 W 60 T.N.N. N.W. CORNER OF CERTUNY BLVD. t SM STREET ELEV. 90107 T.N.H. ON PRIVATE PROPERTY N. Of 62ND ST. t EAST OF HAZELRNE BLM. EEE, 986.62 1. DI NOTE SLOPES TO BE STABIUZED PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. 2. CITY MUST BE NOTIFIED AFTER INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL AND A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING, 3. CONCRETE WASH AREA TO BE FIELD LOCATED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP SHALL BE MODIFIED TO ILLUSTRATE THE FIELD LOCATION. 3 _ E � 1 a c o Eg AD 9 9 Q a Q O Ch rn W i jT •Rv i 1 # `- - EN. X99 B6 777! J \ •' .., I /•� ^ �101 • VV// .., •' PROPOSED RETNNING WALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERW6 t CTY APPROVAL REGUIRE6 ,- PRIGR To co+smucnaN C ,RaeTOR ro - —1010 - �PRONOE smucTURAL faVNOAnoN t ENGMEERRIG fOR RETARlNO WAIL ,-- � •' yyy .. � .. ., �� I --.-- .. I ( . �• I x 0 N SCNE IN FEET 0 26 W 60 T.N.N. N.W. CORNER OF CERTUNY BLVD. t SM STREET ELEV. 90107 T.N.H. ON PRIVATE PROPERTY N. Of 62ND ST. t EAST OF HAZELRNE BLM. EEE, 986.62 1. DI NOTE SLOPES TO BE STABIUZED PER LANDSCAPE PLAN. 2. CITY MUST BE NOTIFIED AFTER INSTALLATION OF EROSION CONTROL AND A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING, 3. CONCRETE WASH AREA TO BE FIELD LOCATED AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP SHALL BE MODIFIED TO ILLUSTRATE THE FIELD LOCATION. 3 _ E � 1 a c o Eg AD 9 9 Q a Q O Ch rn W F — j/ .._-------- ......---- " - - - -' —` I/ STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO. BLD. INSIDE DIM. NEENAH CASTING ATMH Ic. 1 639' 1 w• DIA. R -IR47 STMH 1.11 6.1r I 48' DIA. I R -1642 CBMH 1021 5.81' 1 48' IN& 1 R -4342 CP4H iD3 504' 46 CIA R -4342 CtlMH 104 5.81 98 OIP. R -1642 CO 1.5 4.47' 1 27 GA R - 4342 Lfl 106 250' 1 27' DIA. R- 1.141. CBMH 107 643 1 w' CIA. I H -5062V 1 I I I I I I I I .. •�^ �.�� )II`•�--•»— -�--t i ..» .. I i my +' vfis 30 y 11 \-./I \ L_ I j I V I L,. IJ .� I I N L A t: I t_51't n =P� 11 •, / /:" : /, { 4\• �♦ � I ...... x RE Ra]. R9.tlA ROG) I I 1 {e..] }. .1` ' 4• PK ( I I m oo°°• eEx° k h -I o:sR °K w r / v 9aa.00 1.: OT \ 989,2 wLM IM a 6 ts�'li pv✓; ` '' IN, + Y Re3.w V- } ' I 4 K scxw PosER aE 9eaw � T .ri x 4 ?f>� I t ' 9n39e , I� I MpY GRAM W /OPEN MV F./S -1T' m 1tINtt FSI15nN 11 .i^fl O A E k 9p• B w my N -IT' 984 P ow EW P(S A Ma) f" EXISTING BUWN i ""yk I mu ee9.oB - My 4• w.. a cwslRlxT w l9s 4 . FFE 989.2 x' Yf Nv 98800 AE 98T.w e a9Rx rg , • PK OORxEOT TO Ev ROOF DRAIN Mnl - i •', 10 F4 T Mr:xw-TZ {• MNO k (' : T TO EtlSANO k' DIP 1H k O 1 pEIAY Tr IF OP ,' PK Sd 40 I <' x�iv e• w• eErn( REOIOIE SIEEE\E) LsET ExlsTx+R +• PK sww / : 1 3 1 I' - - -� • N LF Y TO MAFY FlO5nN0 4 RSER. 4A1g1 E>aSTMR CRMF. I LO CATION k flE YATIOH. COHTPACTOR 10 VERFY fI94M10 ° sRR T6 • Resx LOCATION k EIEVAlION. 7 I ,' PK 54M0 PoSER � UP I — . f . `� S Roa GRAM w /mv+ a 4s• IfExo . z '� '; —4 PK suuo -u• eExo ye f S NV 9aE.w j S ROOF GRAM N/OPEM '+1 t I I i Id ; 0 r j R[ 90 80 CRATE k MY BEND � t k� � T \\ • 1.TZ ��`� Ts r m K a k p A 1 bV 12 PK i im SOR 2B O 12 5ft �/ K �4I; l`- '. OBBB Z i.........., i a�. ✓/ i W I m4 TM W INV Y ()..... . F 11 {YL I 1 _....g 4Ba wK KHw 4' 6' CI51 ,y R+Y` PK Shc kSFR f �' 46 IF -6' PK SMTa O I.OWi T� I �j• ` T'I" -'4" CEaE mUM wApEN (IN sIMTE As NERESSARr -r / uP x+v « A R . JC LTE ' AM RsP99 a 21 1 6 \ o LF M C iKa O'( a ee.T °K . 54 6•-•A: � .... My aeT.4a s BEND k EIkIx TOT / O � _ (/ /�/ �( �,i' � �� f smc I..,` O i ku+R 9 j y f - '• 4 5 i� � t W) ,, wto ry yf; §S 4 ' I T T nnxc cv m,H I \\ Ry d -• �T } +� !� L " Yr a it BEND. 10/ OAlE LNE ro wOPOSfR RONIRACTRR TO '�+ LOOA I( na+. MNT"TS3Ih)1U 4 y k •� � �4 �� •"�` \�j�� ragr u a IHa91 Ya ocrRlftaErs TAM wE 7R > rAZ W. TALL -i I I mR f EY TW av a +e�_ A ON k IuvAnoN �' e •' wr -zs• R.v k zs+s >._, —> I . _'_' � :�"" .._ — J T Nw E.ITNO' coxslm]cT 24' SidM ��: d W 9M.1) ; (SSE M1OT VFA41E0) SE' 2,' OJT RCP .. ..... k w,Ix lm -,'. ,�' ,� My Raa3T(NS ., +� ": "1s / e,ws —• � -u• NL� ! S. ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER k STORM SEWER RIM e aNn I y k INVERT ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE VERIFIED BY THE _ I ;CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STORM SEWER TO BE PRESSURE TESTED PER T , CITY OF CHANHASSEN REQUIREMENTS, r-q M fNMNRmI < C 1 Eiis 4� - Of 1 qqSS In, ita Tea T -, a i g • I I LI J Y3 ', C I > F— �) (Y ' J I d 1 # U gl� Q g LL II�J� VRAM BY CJK DAIL I Ex, mr N la 4 i ] awl MV Po0.re(aN) 5/4/12 �7 REVISIONS # I fK wMM RE 9m.v M 9]6.HI(Sw) v v6r.o9(xw,0 IN = 0 M 40 BO 1M0 =20 I „! • - +•••"'�� T.N.H. CONNER OF CENTURY BLVD. k 82ND ,STREET EIEV. 961s7 CAD FILE M T, H* ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 22502 -IOU ;- N. OF 82ND ST. k EAST OF HAMLTINE BLVD W4 -° ELEV. 996.62 PROJECT NO. NOTES I I. ALL STORM SEWER INSTALLATION PER CITY OF V V t ; CHANHASSEN SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT GORDY I In B STORMI HSEWER. PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO THE + j j • 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER INSTALLATION k � �_ r IMT +(xY ! ! T I WITH THE CITY OF CHASKA. HYDROSTATIC TESTING FOR r rn ffi r«s WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH 3 MINIMUM DIAMETER HOSE, a a x 3. ALL REAR -11. CATCH BASINS MUST HAVE INLET c x PROTECTION INSTALLED ON THEM IMMEDIATELY AFTER N N �- 4. INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO) MUST BE INSTALLED IN ALL PA LOT CATCH BASINS UPON COMPLETION OF PARKING LOT. � �' 4 a E S. ALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER k STORM SEWER RIM e aNn I y k INVERT ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE VERIFIED BY THE _ I ;CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL STORM SEWER TO BE PRESSURE TESTED PER T , CITY OF CHANHASSEN REQUIREMENTS, r-q M fNMNRmI < C 1 Eiis 4� - Of 1 qqSS In, ita Tea T -, a i g • I I LI J Y3 ', C I > F— �) (Y ' J I d 1 # U gl� Q g LL II�J� VRAM BY CJK DAIL I Ex, mr N la 4 i ] awl MV Po0.re(aN) 5/4/12 �7 REVISIONS # I fK wMM RE 9m.v M 9]6.HI(Sw) v v6r.o9(xw,0 IN = 0 M 40 BO 1M0 =20 I „! • - +•••"'�� T.N.H. CONNER OF CENTURY BLVD. k 82ND ,STREET EIEV. 961s7 CAD FILE M T, H* ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 22502 -IOU ;- N. OF 82ND ST. k EAST OF HAMLTINE BLVD W4 -° ELEV. 996.62 PROJECT NO. w as ® 7 T L' � SITE DATA I EXISTINO/PROPOSED ZONING PLO N SITE AREA 3.08 AC. 134,050 S.F. EXISTING BVILONO COVERAGE KENNEL BUILDING 12.5% 16.711 S.F. i TOTAL OIERALL BUILDING COVERAGE IET. CLLMC k %ENNEL BULOING 21:T 29,111 S.F. ZZa'S W ca EXISTNG PARKING COVERAGE 13.0% 17 ST. i TOTAL GWRALL PARK M0 COVERAGE 19.3% 25.WZ B.F. VII % EXISTING INPERMWS 29.3% 39. "3 S.F. TOTAL OWRALL INPERVIWS 46.2% 61,692 S.F. cc O � � TT PARKING DATA i PARKING STAII RATIOS-. \"J OFFICE (1 STALL PER 200 SF) IET. CLINC (I STALL PER ISO SF) r KENNEL (t STALL PER 1,000 IF - FIRST IGOOD SF) C (1 STALL PER 2,000 SF - REMAINDER) -" L 1 _ PARNINO STALL CALCNLATI0N5: CFNCE : TI1 Sf(ESISMW) + 165 SF(PROPOSED) - 4 STALLS / VET. 01111C : 4,000 SF(PROPOSID) - 27 STALLS KENNEL : 16.000 SF(EXISTAG) + 8,235 SF(PROPSEO) - IZ STALLS 4 gQj s \i BM pFb P aNIN STA I $K y 7 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REWIRED 48 STALLS �a�gTil L - HANDICAP PANKINO STALLS REQUIRED 2 STALLS REGULAR PARKING STALLS REWIRED 46 STALLS`�'�' I _ PROMDEO PARKING STALLS: F TOTAL PARKING PRONGED STALLS 48 STALLS �lJ - HANEIGAP PARKING STALLS FROMOED 3 STALLS � , C - J - REGULAR PARKING STINTS PROVIDED 45 STALLS i [T3 <� p RKIN- OT IS AND Tn ApON• - I -fp' MIRE 19UN0 PER RWp Y Of IMPERMWS PARKING. AIRFACE 25,B.iT SF 4 ISLANDS ►�.y,.E y � ' � .J . M (�� O � L � U$ IJ� � <( V) SS Ca Q:b SEALE N FFE Y�ii i 0 20 40 60 I CJK C IA N.WGpR�NER %E 5 4 12 T.x.H OF .I CENTURY BLVD. k 62ND STREET REMSIONS ELEV. 991.07 T.N.H. ON PRIVATE PROPERTY N. OF 0211 ST. k EAST OF HAZELTINE 111.11, ELEV. 998.62 t DIMENSIONS SHONN ARE TO THE BACK •I OF L11RR UNLESS Ol11ERNISE NOTED. 2. Al PARK M0 STALLS AGAINST WRIT ARE 1 85' X 9' 3. ALL HANDICAPPEO PARKING STALLS ARE 18V X9' II 4. 8612 CONCRETE WRB k GUTTER dl — TT PP Y � 4 _ r , , . CAD FILE ......................... 22502 -10PAV °� �•'• n r��, zzsoz -10 __ .....�. _.... ...82ND STREET Y �_....... _ I. S . WAS MmrM. InNFb.. NnxMMr�ll .sebM.*ry.MrF.nMMMnxM+rM�+n .NwraeAw.». rMNrdFwlewA xNbvp .lxMnp+..1...INywybMw.arpulY6 A. 1Yi.Y r drwtW.. nvx {M.Abf M I Awe.rY F nr+pr.Y. a nw.r eA.++ r» a ..em.+a..nevdb.F�.ex»b..r+..rr` a Anwn�d.FVYfabx re0»...wY.O' »mMEF kM Avtl.nMwror. »eW... N.M�idwW MEmnw� AOb. dwr.m dx.. d dY. m m�e.A � »bAlrpd.RW A. wrYYmdx.Mers+udd.x.rnw deyp»NIe»Fe.M.m AAx » ,» .Mr»bwOle.pleawYAWYb�Mx1a170bVL a m.» YxovYmwa.. MNd.,.. n... rro. e. armwnbMdgarmaa ..eWwv�.w.rc�wFdYe.�.A. e M. peewwb. Y .ercrwdex..F»rYwreYWMdxA.seeo... blmidb..d+w.dxn m.raalme.�p. Mm d...+xlmda.uM'x d pdxr., ery nua 0Aq a ar Mlxcr b M YbM d M bdeop xdlod a dv A pb b w n. cd�. na. xadia. xnn. F. ww. nmadem. r�. e. s ,...wvbndd, »dm,dr�y.x.a.awMau � >.• O �NTbXr'M WMr.0 11Yd MMCT.FtNtbmke uFMr.M. MnVMt aFwaiMa OVe r.. evv.x,aenml ad.vw.d.wn»N b.r. Wn.knwYgm.»An,mr.l .a faWr bbr sr YlFbdpYgn.Mxrndrr.ayFrMwY..YarY Mxnmx.u'.Nwea M.wd..wemda.rp.rYn..x ed.ea•F.nn.Awd.M wrbMrsd.vrdMme.ed. n.aa«a,.wFMOw,..w..ro..wv.,,rn . v4w.A FMe W »Ay.,wAlr.Mdrrx»NwhLL a N aMO�+.W.+!',bM w.}I»d9ewrlw4w Y.. AnnMbbdxMinmar rnp»gA P»HM1aiM�.nM Mp wx.*+r rkA , a�� rwex. �en ud .MwawYdMM.dr,da..v.�bFbnWM«.F«w e»ro»Am.uW.».Mr »da.bngF.nn glmlFbmMtwkMAm.aIAW..,.mlNMdp. n>a.dw Fr.xadtF,a WhFrW vlRnart to mWne..o.mW.w.W» dicta. Ndvtl' a. 1' oW. A.. emrMM,WmB...nn.n,»aNdnMwndm...a .I.M1V W.aptlr..Mb.rlbw.dwMWrMppb W.mrboFMNt +aMY.ddr.rvx»MYIAnMwFO.Wnbryl Rbbb.elo»»a.rrredrMmxredrYY.mW urmmrWq.dWaMen � mdmabpiM.V wMbgwd( AlavoF .dNe.[aunbpedbbMbrsds.Nfr�kr nNw m.{pd.A lbvrtMFp wa wmr » nb.. a.++. awwwnv. b. Maao..+ o.w.a,.n+wF.n�ndwwwnMnF.+rao... ,r., ...x.r.. ,.,..,».. ba... Y...,... d..» W» w. s,xx.,.W..,... >.«�x.a...A�.,..� xinF. �,.M`bn ®: MI�Y TH.,rYaxRb.b. Planting Palette: Landscape Requirements: cA7 dvxerA wwYpe.xeY.a.d dW„o�Fp.. Rube saxrc�dedyMU .eM.NaaonReg�..�xmYa H L%o sEReawdw.n tw.ouo[d.eoY wAe i10.M01SnCa� pmYMxN Il0A0R6x.Cw StiAIE N i£Ef 0 10 60 9D f .,h = 30 feel J $ N I V CI of �aSy� pG i! y 0 �s 5 /� RECISIONS Jo r-•�'� �• . _ . ' Sa tgiER ipLrpy5015R aaa 'SEE '• TO wra,oesnts st[ N �IX a... /..i /iv, y 1 BUILDING -� �Y� r "'. - ,�' n. S,b0E0t RAS YAi •'' — tmn % R lAtgY.ANIC I :.. eosin ro xn mAU. 3 � � _. RiP e . T �r� ML __ .....�. _.... ...82ND STREET Y �_....... _ I. S . WAS MmrM. InNFb.. NnxMMr�ll .sebM.*ry.MrF.nMMMnxM+rM�+n .NwraeAw.». rMNrdFwlewA xNbvp .lxMnp+..1...INywybMw.arpulY6 A. 1Yi.Y r drwtW.. nvx {M.Abf M I Awe.rY F nr+pr.Y. a nw.r eA.++ r» a ..em.+a..nevdb.F�.ex»b..r+..rr` a Anwn�d.FVYfabx re0»...wY.O' »mMEF kM Avtl.nMwror. »eW... N.M�idwW MEmnw� AOb. dwr.m dx.. d dY. m m�e.A � »bAlrpd.RW A. wrYYmdx.Mers+udd.x.rnw deyp»NIe»Fe.M.m AAx » ,» .Mr»bwOle.pleawYAWYb�Mx1a170bVL a m.» YxovYmwa.. MNd.,.. n... rro. e. armwnbMdgarmaa ..eWwv�.w.rc�wFdYe.�.A. e M. peewwb. Y .ercrwdex..F»rYwreYWMdxA.seeo... blmidb..d+w.dxn m.raalme.�p. Mm d...+xlmda.uM'x d pdxr., ery nua 0Aq a ar Mlxcr b M YbM d M bdeop xdlod a dv A pb b w n. cd�. na. xadia. xnn. F. ww. nmadem. r�. e. s ,...wvbndd, »dm,dr�y.x.a.awMau � >.• O �NTbXr'M WMr.0 11Yd MMCT.FtNtbmke uFMr.M. MnVMt aFwaiMa OVe r.. evv.x,aenml ad.vw.d.wn»N b.r. Wn.knwYgm.»An,mr.l .a faWr bbr sr YlFbdpYgn.Mxrndrr.ayFrMwY..YarY Mxnmx.u'.Nwea M.wd..wemda.rp.rYn..x ed.ea•F.nn.Awd.M wrbMrsd.vrdMme.ed. n.aa«a,.wFMOw,..w..ro..wv.,,rn . v4w.A FMe W »Ay.,wAlr.Mdrrx»NwhLL a N aMO�+.W.+!',bM w.}I»d9ewrlw4w Y.. AnnMbbdxMinmar rnp»gA P»HM1aiM�.nM Mp wx.*+r rkA , a�� rwex. �en ud .MwawYdMM.dr,da..v.�bFbnWM«.F«w e»ro»Am.uW.».Mr »da.bngF.nn glmlFbmMtwkMAm.aIAW..,.mlNMdp. n>a.dw Fr.xadtF,a WhFrW vlRnart to mWne..o.mW.w.W» dicta. Ndvtl' a. 1' oW. A.. emrMM,WmB...nn.n,»aNdnMwndm...a .I.M1V W.aptlr..Mb.rlbw.dwMWrMppb W.mrboFMNt +aMY.ddr.rvx»MYIAnMwFO.Wnbryl Rbbb.elo»»a.rrredrMmxredrYY.mW urmmrWq.dWaMen � mdmabpiM.V wMbgwd( AlavoF .dNe.[aunbpedbbMbrsds.Nfr�kr nNw m.{pd.A lbvrtMFp wa wmr » nb.. a.++. awwwnv. b. Maao..+ o.w.a,.n+wF.n�ndwwwnMnF.+rao... ,r., ...x.r.. ,.,..,».. ba... Y...,... d..» W» w. s,xx.,.W..,... >.«�x.a...A�.,..� xinF. �,.M`bn ®: MI�Y TH.,rYaxRb.b. Planting Palette: Landscape Requirements: cA7 dvxerA wwYpe.xeY.a.d dW„o�Fp.. Rube saxrc�dedyMU .eM.NaaonReg�..�xmYa H L%o sEReawdw.n tw.ouo[d.eoY wAe i10.M01SnCa� pmYMxN Il0A0R6x.Cw StiAIE N i£Ef 0 10 60 9D f .,h = 30 feel J $ N I V CI of �aSy� pG i! y 0 �s 5 /� RECISIONS CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 24, 2012, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Site Plan Review for Canine Club Expansion — Planning Case 2012 -06 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Ka n J. n e ardt, eputy Clerk Subscrib d and sworn to before me thi *Aday of , 2612. Notary Publi KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public- Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review to expand an existing facility on Proposal: property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Canine Club &S a Applicant: Karen Jackson Property 291082 nd Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012- 06.html If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous .ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Request for Site Plan Review to expand an existing facility on Proposal: property zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Canine Club &S a Applicant: Karen Jackson Property 291082 nd Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012- 06.html If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. CHASKA BUSINESS CENTER LP COEUR TERRA LLP HOLIDAY STATION STORES INC -371 1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS ST 7801 PARK DR STE F 4567 AMERICAN BLVD W NEW YORK NY 10020 -1180 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9219 BLOOMINGTON MN 55437 -1123 J & J REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES 6641 MINNEWASHTA PKWY EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -9657 MICHAEL D & JANE E SCHLANGEN 1941 MELODY HILL CIR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -8805 NORTHERN STAR CO 301 CARLSON PKWY #400 HOPKINS MN 55305 -5370 PEAVEY PROPERTIES LLC 4300 PEAVEY RD CHASKA MN 55318 -2351 S &P PROPERTIES LLC 4311 PEAVEY RD CHASKA MN 55318 -2351 WATERTOWER PARTNERS LLC PO BOX 713 WATERTOWN MN 55388 -0713 PRAIRIE OAKS LLC 17595 KENWOOD TRL #260 LAKEVILLE MN 55044 -7253 SUPER DOG COUNTRY CLUB LLC 10104 INDIGO DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 -1208 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA 319 15TH AVE SE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55455 -0199 SUSAN L & GENE G O'BRIEN 6471 WHITE DOVE DR EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -9073