4 SUB LaHaye AdditionCITY OF
STAFF REPORT
PC DATE: 9~2~03
CC DATE: 9~22~03
Review Deadline: 10/14/03
CASE#: 03-3 SUB 03-1 VAC
By: A1-Jaff:v
Z
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
Preliminary Plat to Subdivide 1.56 Acres into 2 single family lots with a
Variance to allow a double frontage lot and Vacation of a portion of Santa
Fe Trail, La Haye Addition
West of Frontier Trail and northeast comer of the intersection of Great
Plains Boulevard and Santa Fe Trail.
Ernest Pivec
5060 Meadville Street
Greenwood, MN 55331
(952)474-2828
PRESENT ZONING:
RSF, Single Family Residential District
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential-Low Density (Net Density 1.2 - 4.0 units per acre)
ACREAGE: 1.56 acres DENSITY: 1.28 Units per Acre
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 1.56 acres into 2 single family lots, vacation of a
portion of Santa Fe Trail, and a variance to allow a double frontage lot. Notice of this public
hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Staff is recommending approval of
the request.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in
approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the Proposed plat meets the
standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these
standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a
relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation
from established standards. This is a quasi judicial decision.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The applicant is proposing to subdivide 1.56 acres into 2 single family lots. The property is zoned
RSF, Single Family Residential District. The site contained a single family home which has been
demolished. Access to the site is gained via an existing private street off of Great Plains Boulevard.
77TH ST W
An abandoned right-of-way is located south of the subject s~te. The applicant is requesting vacation
of the right-of-way. Staff is recommending approval of the vacation with the condition that a
drainage and utility easement be maintained over the vacated portion (the vacation of the right-of-
way requires City Council action only). Approval of the subdivision will be contingent upon
approval of the vacation.
The variance in this application is to allow proposed Lot 2 to have two street frontages, which is
prohibited by ordinance. This variance will allow this parcel to gain access off of Great Plains
Boulevard rather than Frontier Trail. Staff is recommending approval of the variance. This issue is
discussed in detail later in the report.
The average lot size is 34,145 square feet with a resulting density of 1.28 units per acre. The site is
located west of Frontier Trail and at the northeast comer of the intersection of Great Plains
Boulevard and Santa Fe Trail. Both lots meet the minimum area, width, and depth requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance. The site contains a bluff along the northeast comer. The required setbacks
will be maintained from the edge of the bluff. The site has mature trees which the applicant is
making an effort to preserve.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 3
In reviewing this plat, staff worked with the applicant to correct the street system in the area. The
current turnaround area, which the private street comes off of, is a convoluted mix of multiple
driveways and irregular shaped pavement. In an effort to correct this non-standard turnaround
area, the applicant is proposing to create a hammer head turn around.
In summary, staff believes that the proposed subdivision is well designed. Minor revisions will be
required. We are recommending that it be approved with a variance to allow a double frontage lot
with conditions outlined in the staff report.
BACKGROUND
On April 15, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a preliminary plat with a
variance and a street vacation on the subject site for a two lot subdivision. The layout consisted of
two lots. Lot 1 faced the private street and lot 2 faced Frontier Trail. After reexamining the
proposal and layout, the applicant withdrew the application.
Original Layout approved April 15, 2003
Proposed new layout
PRELIMINARY PLAT
The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 1.56 acre site into 2 single family lots. The density of the
proposed subdivision is 1.28 units per acre. Both lots exceed the minimum 15,000 square feet of
area, with an average lot size of 34,154 square feet.
Both proposed lots meet the minimum width, and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. A
bluff occupies the east portion of proposed Lot 1. The ordinance requires all structures to maintain
a 30 foot setback from the top of the bluff. The plans indicate that this setback can be
accommodated and no grading is proposed within that area.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 4
Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent
with the Zoning Ordinance.
WETLANDS
There are no wetlands on this site.
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP)
Based on the proposed developed area of 1.57 acres, the water quality fees associated with this
project are estimated at $1,490 and the water quantity fees associated with this project are
estimated at $3,686. The applicant will not be assessed for areas that are dedicated outlots. No
credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due
payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is $5,176.
There is no storm water infrastructure installed or proposed on the subject property or within the
Frontier Trail fight of way. For this reason, this property and the properties downstream are not
capable of accommodate increased runoff rates and volumes. Storm water calculations should be
submitted to demonstrate that the proposed subdivision maintains existing runoff rates and
volumes.
Impervious surfaces should be minimized to the greatest extent possible due to the lack of storm
water infrastructure. This includes the construction of Alternate A (Hammerhead Turnaround)
instead of Alternate B (Complete Circle).
The applicant should dedicate a drainage and utility easement at least 10 feet wide either side of
the southern property line so storm water infrastructure can be installed at a future date, if
necessary.
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL
There is one house on the existing site which will be demolished as a part of the site grading.
Each of the proposed house pads are shown as walk-out type structures. The site lends itself
to these types of houses due to the natural slope of the site. As a result, minimal grading will
be required, outside of the housepad area, to prepare each of the lots for building.
If grading material will need to be imported or exported to construct the lots and streets, the
applicant and/or contractor must supply the City Engineer with a haul route for review and
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 5
approval prior to grading activities commencing. Also, the applicant should be aware that
any grading outside of the property limits or right-of-way will require a temporary easement.
Staff would like to see more detail concerning the proposed drainage in the turnaround area.
Specifically, how the applicant is planning on routing the stormwater from the turnaround to
the east. Staff is recommending that a catchbasin be installed at the low point in the
turnaround with a storm sewer that discharges just east of the proposed driveway for Lot 2.
The stormwater from the cul-de-sac would then flow in the existing swale along the south lot
line of the plat to Frontier Trail.
Erosion control measures and site restoration must be developed in accordance with the City's
Best Management Practice Handbook (BMPH). Silt fence is shown along the grading limits
of the site where stormwater and sediment can run off. In addition, tree preservation fencing
needs to be added around any and all trees to be saved.
UTILITIES
The plans propose to connect the new house to "possible" sanitary and water mains along the
south property line of the plat. There is an existing sanitary main in this area; however, there
is no water main. As such, water service for Lot 2 will have to be obtained from the existing
main in Frontier Trail.
According to the City's Finance Department records, there are no assessments due for the
existing lot. The site will be subject to one sanitary sewer and water connection charge;
however, for the benefit of the lateral mains to the new lot. The 2003 connection charges for
both sanitary sewer and water are $4,513. The property is also subject to sanitary sewer and
water hook-up charges for the new lot. The 2003 trunk utility hook-up charges are $1,440
per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per
unit. These charges are collected prior to the building permit issuance.
STREETS
The applicant is proposing to upgrade the private street to meet current City standards and to
remove one of the existing driveway accesses on the private street. In order to save the two
existing Oak trees on each side of the private street near the proposed cul-de-sac, staff would
like the flexibility to narrow or keep the same street width in this area. The proposed private
street upgrades must also include a 30-foot wide private easement dedicated to the benefiting
property owners.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 6
Following the upgrades to the private street off of Great Plains Blvd., there will be three
homes accessing off of it. One of the existing lots (Manarin lot at 7552 Great Plains Blvd.)
off the private street has the potential to subdivide in the future. If this happened, there
would be a total of four homes served by the private street. The City Code allows a
maximum of four homes off a private street. Therefore, Lot 2 should not use the same
driveway access off of Great Plains Blvd. as the private street. Staff recommends that the
two driveway accesses be separated by a minimum of five feet.
While either of the proposed turnarounds (alternates A or B) will work, staff is
recommending that the applicant install alternate B. This would provide the City with the
same accessibility and maintenance benefits as a cul-de-sac with a median island in the
center.
The City has an existing 60-foot area of right-of-way just south of the existing site's property.
The applicant is requesting that the City vacate the right-of-way which would allow the
abutting property owners along the north and south to each gain half (30-feet) of the vacated
land. A 30-foot wide area has been shown on the applicant's preliminary plat drawing. Staff
has no problem with this vacation since the existing topography within the right-of-way is
very steep and would require retaining walls to incorporate a public street.
Detailed street construction plans and specifications in accordance with the City's latest
edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates will be required for review and approval
by the City Council at the time of final plat consideration. Since the street improvements will
become owned and maintained by the City, the applicant must enter into a development
contract with the City and provide financial security in the form of a letter of credit or cash
escrow to guarantee construction of the public improvements. Permits form the appropriate
regulatory agency will be required, including but not limited to: Watershed District, MPCA,
etc.
VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
Staff received an application from property owners adjacent to the shaded area of Santa Fe Trail.
The applicants are requesting to vacate a portion of Santa Fe Trail. Currently, no street exists in
that area. The grades in the area are steep making a street connection unlikely. Staff is
recommending approval of the vacation since the right-of-way is not needed. The City will
retain a drainage and utility easement over the sanitary sewer line.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 7
Santa Fe Trail
West l~th Street
La Haye Addition
PARK DEDICATION
Full park and trail fees will be collected in lieu of land dedication for the newly created lot in the
amount of $2,400.
TREE PRESERVATION/LANDSCAPING
The developer for the Lahaye Addition has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation
calculations. The applicant has proposed no tree removal.
Total upland area (excluding wetlands)
Baseline canopy coverage
Minimum canopy coverage allowed
Proposed tree preservation
1.56 ac.
65% or 1.01 ac.
46% or .72 ac.
65% or 1.01 ac.
The developer does meet minimum canopy coverage allowed.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 8
There are no buffer yard requirements for this subdivision. However, the applicant has proposed
planting between Lots 1 and 2 and Lot 2 and the lot to the south as well as plantings on other
private properties in the neighborhood. A total of 10 deciduous trees and 30 evergreens are
proposed.
The construction of a hammerhead turnaround is preferred for tree preservation. Extending the
existing pavement to create a circular turnaround would have a detrimental effect on the existing
trees within the right-of-way.
COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE - RSF DISTRICT
Lot Lot Lot Home
Area Width Depth Setback
Ordinance 15,000 90' 125'
BLOCK 1
Lot 1 34,850 145' 284'
Lot 2 24,430 107' 305'
30' front/rear
10' sides
30'/30'*
10'
30'/30'
10'
The 30 foot bluff setback includes a 20 foot bluff impact zone.
SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance;
Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential
Single Family District and the zoning ordinance if the double frontage variance is
approved.
The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans
including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan and
subdivision ordinance.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 9
o
The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm
water drainage are suitable for the proposed development;
Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions
specified in this report
The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage,
sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this
chapter;
Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure.
5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage;
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental
damage subject to conditions of approved. The proposed subdivision contains
adequate open areas to accommodate house pads.
6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record.
Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but
rather will expand and provide all necessary easements.
The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
following exists:
Lack of adequate storm water drainage.
Lack of adequate roads.
Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets.
VARIANCE
Section 18-60. Lots. (g) states "Double frontage lots with frontage on two (2)parallel streets or
reverse frontage shall not be permitted except where lots back on an arterial or collector street.
Such lots shall have an additional depth of at least ten (lO)feet to accommodate vegetative
screening along the back lot line. Wherever possible, structures on double frontage lots should
face the front of existing structures across the street. If this cannot be achieved, then such lots
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 10
shall have an additional depth often (lO)feet to accommodate vegetation screening along the
back lot line."
Staff is recommending Lot 2 be permitted as a double frontage lot since Frontier Trail acts as a
collector street.
VARIANCE FINDINGS
Sec. 18-22. Variances.
The city council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the
plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist:
(2)
(3)
(4)
The hardship is not a mere inconvenience;
The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical
conditions of the land;
The condition or conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally
applicable to other property;
The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and
is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and
comprehensive plan.
Finding: The applicant has demonstrated in previous proposals that it is possible to
create parcels that meet the letter of the ordinance. However, by doing so, site grading
and tree removal increases. The applicant's request is fairly reasonable. The ordinance
allows double frontage lots if one of the roads is a collector. Frontier Trail is not
classified is a collector street, however, it possesses many of the characteristics of one.
Based upon these findings, staff is recommending approval of this variance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motions:
VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY (Only City Council approval is required on this portion
of the application. It is shown under the recommendation as an informational item.)
"The City Council approves the vacation (2003-1) for the partial vacation of Santa Fe Trail as shown
on attachment with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide the city with the legal description of the vacated right-of-way.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 11
2. The applicant shall dedicate a 30 foot wide drainage and utility easement, centered on the
sanitary sewer line.
3. Approval of the vacation is contingent upon approval of Subdivision #03-3."
PRELIMINARY PLAT
"The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Subdivision #03-3 for
LaHaye Addition for 2 lots and a variance to allow a double frontage lot as shown on the plans
received August 15, 2003, subject to the following conditions:
1. Install sod in all of the pavement removal areas.
o
If grading material will need to be imported or exported to construct the lots and streets.
The applicant and/or contractor must supply the City Engineer with a detailed haul route
for review and approval prior to site grading.
The new turnaround on Great Plains Boulevard shall be constructed to current City design
standards with 28-foot wide pavement, B-618 curb and gutter, and concrete driveway
aprons.
°
A minimum 30-foot wide drainage and utility easement is required over the public
sanitary sewer line in the vacated road area.
o
Any grading or utility work outside of the property limits or right-of-way will require a
temporary easement.
6. Revise the grading plan as follows:
C°
Show the proposed grades for the private street and turnaround upgrades.
Add a benchmark and legend to the plan. The legend should define all of the
different line types, easements, silt fence, etc.
Show all existing and proposed easements on the plans.
Add tree preservation fencing around any and all trees to be saved.
Show the existing storm sewer and culverts under the existing driveways.
7. Revise the utility plan as follows:
ao
Show the existing sanitary sewer line in Great Plains Blvd.
Show the existing watermains in Great Plains Blvd. & Frontier Trl.
Add a legend to the plan.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 12
Label the existing size and type of pipe for both the sanitary and watermains.
Show the existing storm sewer and culverts under the existing driveways.
Add a catchbasin at the low point in the turnaround with a storm sewer line that
discharges just east of the proposed driveway for Lot 2.
The water service for Lot 2 will have to be obtained from the existing main in Frontier
Trail.
10.
The proposed private street upgrades shall include a 20-foot wide pavement, built to a 7-
ton design, and a 30-foot wide private easement dedicated to the benefiting property
owners. In order to save the two existing Oak trees on each side of the private street, the
street width may be narrowed in this area.
11.
Lot 2 cannot use the same driveway access off of Great Plains Blvd. as the private street.
The two driveway accesses shall be separated by a minimum of five feet.
12.
Detailed street construction plans and specifications in accordance with the City's latest
edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates will be required for review and
approval by the City Council at the time of final plat consideration. Since the street
improvements will become owned and maintained by the City, the applicant must enter
into a development contract with the City and provide financial security in the form of a
letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee construction of the public improvements.
Permits form the appropriate regulatory agency will be required, including but not limited
to: Watershed District, MPCA, etc.
13.
The site will be subject to one sanitary sewer and water connection charge for the new lot.
The 2003 connection charges for both sanitary sewer and water are $4,513. The property
is also subject to sanitary sewer and water hook-up charges for the new lot. The 2003
trunk utility hook-up charges are $1,440 per unit for sanitary sewer and $1,876 per unit
for water. The 2003 SAC charge is $1,275 per unit. These charges are collected prior to
the building permit issuance.
14.
Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any
construction.
15. Building Official conditions:
Final grading plans and soil reports must be submitted to the Inspections Division
before building permits will be issued.
Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services.
La Haye Addition
September 2, 2003
Page 13
Co
Retaining walls over 4' high require a permit and must be designed by an engineer
licensed in the State of Minnesota.
16.
Fire Marshal Condition:
a. An address monument sign shall be installed at the common driveway entrance
where they split. Plans must be submitted to the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and
approval. Also if the address numbers installed on the houses are not visible from the
common driveway, additional numbers will be required at the driveway entrances. These
requirements are pursuant to Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention division Policy
#29-1992. Copy enclosed.
17.
Storm water calculations should be submitted to demonstrate that the proposed
subdivision maintains existing runoff rates and volumes.
18.
Impervious surfaces should be minimized to the greatest extent possible due to the lack of
storm water infrastructure. This includes the construction of Alternate A (Hammerhead
Turnaround) instead of Alternate B (Complete Circle).
19. The bluff impact zone and bluff setback should be shown and labeled on the grading plan.
20.
Based on the proposed developed area of 1.57 acres, the water quality fees associated
with this project are estimated at $1,490 and the water quantity fees associated with this
project are estimated at $3,686. The applicant will not be assessed for areas that are
dedicated outlots. No credit will be given for temporary pond areas. At this time, the
estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording, is
$5,176.
21.
Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the City Council approving the vacation of
the right-of-way.
22.
Full park and trail fees will be collected in lieu of land dedication for the newly created lot in
the amount of $2,400.
23. Access to Lot 2 shall be prohibited off of Frontier Trail."
ATTACHMENTS
Application and Public Hearing Notice.
Memo from Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal dated August 27, 2003.
Preliminary plat dated received August 15, 2003.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
APPLICANT: ~ r~ ,~ P._.. 5 "~ "~' ~ ~ C~
ADDRESS: .~-~0 ~D V~ /~ ~'~
TELEPHONE(Daytime) ~' ~d - Z ~ ~
OWNER:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
__ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
__ Non-conforming Use Permit
__ Planned Unit Development*
__ Rezoning
__ Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Site Plan Review*
__ Subdivision*
__ Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
Variance
Wetland Alteration Permit
Zoning Appeal
__ Zoning Ordinance Amendment
__ Notification Sign
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attomey Cost**
($50 CUPISPRIVACNARIW APIMetes
and Bounds,,$400 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $ ~ C~O
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
:Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
*Twenty-six full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy
for each plan sheet.
** Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
PROJECT NAME
LOCATION
TOTAL ACREAGE I-
WETLANDS PRESENT YES
PRESENT ZONING ~'7") ~-----'
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION []2% t Q,
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION ~ r
R~SON FOR THIS REQUEST
./~ NO
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard tothis request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions are approved by the applicant.
Signature of Applicant ~
Signature of Fee Owner
Application Received on ~'/~¥)-~ Fee Paid
Date
Date
Receipt No.
The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant'S address.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 MARKET BLVD
CHANHASSEN
Payee: ERNEST PIVEC
Date: 08/18/2003
Receipt Number: EE
Clerk: BETTY
DEV REVIEW APPLICATION
ITEH REFERENCE
DEVAP
USE & VARIANCE
Check
MN
55312
Total:
5855
Change:
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PAYHENT!
Time: 10:49am
4004
AMOUNT
800.00
800.00
800.00
0.00
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sharmin Al-Jaff, Senior Planner
FROM:
Mark Littfin, Fire Marshal
DATE:
August 27, 2003
SUB J:
Request for subdivision of 1.56 acres into two single-family lots with
variances and vacation of a portion of Santa Fe Trail, Ernest Pivec.
Planning Case: 2003-3 SUB/2003-1 VAC
I have reviewed the request for a subdivision for the above project. In order to comply
with the Chanhassen Fire Department/Fire Prevention Division, I have the following
fire code or city ordinance/policy requirements. The subdivision plan review is based
on the available information submitted at this time. If additional plans or changes are
submitted, the appropriate code or policy items will be addressed.
An address monument sign shall be installed at the common driveway entrance
where they split. Plans must be submitted to the Chanhassen Fire Marshal for
review and approval. Also if the address numbers installed on the houses are
not visible from the common driveway, additional numbers will be required at
the driveway entrances. These requirements are pursuant to Chanhassen Fire
Department/Fire Prevention division Policy #29-1992. Copy enclosed.
g:\safety~ml\plrev2003 -3
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
7700 Market Blvd BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(952) 227-1150
FAX: (952) 227-1190
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT POI,ICY
PREMISES IDENTIFICATION
Revised 6/10/02
General
Numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position
as to be plainly visible and legible kom the street or road fronting the property. Said
numbers shall contrast with their background. Size and location of numbers shall be
approved by one of the following - Fire Marshal, Fire Inspector, Building Official,
Building Inspector·
Requirements are for new construction and existing buildings where no address numbers
are posted.
Other Re¢luiremenl,; - General
I. Numbers shall be a contrasting color from the background.
2. Numbers shall not he in script.
3. If a stn~cture is not visible from thc street, additional numbers are required at the driveway entrance.
Size and location must be approved.
4. Numhcrs on nn~il hox at driveway entrance nuty be a nlininlnnl of 4". llowcver, rcqnircmcn! #3 nmst still
be met.
5. Administrative authority nn~y require additional numhers if deemed necessary.
Rc~idcmial Requirement~ (2 or le~ dwcllin~ unit)
1, Minimum height shall be $ inches,
2. Building pernfits will not he finaled nnless ntnnhers are posted and approved hy the Building l)cpartment.
Commercial Reqnircmenl,;
1. Minimnm height shall be 12".
2. Multi-Tenant Buildings
a. Building address range, nfinimum height of 12 inches.
b. Address numhers required on all tenant doors. Minimum height of 6 inches.
3. If address ntnnbers arc located on a directory entry sign, additional numbers will he required on the
buildings main entrauce.
4. Signage ou overhead/delivery doors will also be required.
Pr~mi,'~¢ lrbnlificq6nn 9c~-1t)91 Paoe ~_ of