PC Staff Report 06-19-2012PC DATE: June 19, 2012
3
CC DATE:
REVIEW DEADLINE: July 17, 2012
CASE #: 2012 -07
BY: AF, RG, TJ, ML, JM, JS
PROPOSED MOTION:
ti4zs, �. -
"The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves
Planning Case #2012 -07 for a 6.9 percent variance to permit hard cover of 31.9 percent on
property zoned Single Family Residential (RSF) subject to the conditions of approval, and
adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The owner is requesting a hardcover variance to allow the
construction of a screen porch.
LOCATION: 6561 Troendle Circle (Lot 4, Block 2, Troendle
Addition)
APPLICANT: Jay & Laurie Donohue
6561 Troendle Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING: Single - Family Residential (RSF)
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density
ACREAGE: 0.35 acres (15,323 sq. ft.) DENSITY: NA
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING:
... -- v , ._.;� Via:. •� � .
L
ifi� v: s
,
' e �.+'• �• %OAT,.
ff Ali f r� r 3'
Oaf R• ;.a . �tVV 1�s `
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that
they meet the standards in the ordinance.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL /SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting a hard cover variance to allow construction of a screened porch on the
back of his home. The applicant is not the original owner of the property. The existing home was
constructed in 1994. At the time of the building permit issuance, the plan had a hard cover of
approximately 29.9 percent. At that time, the city did not require that the hard cover calculations be
included on the plans. The applicant is proposing to reduce the amount of hard cover on the
property by 117 square feet (0.8 percent) even with the construction of the porch.
Planning Commission
6561 Troendle Circle Variance Request — Planning Case 2012 -07
June 19, 2012
Page 2 of 3
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
• Chapter 20, Division 3, Variances.
• Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single - Family Residential District, section 20 -615, Lot
requirements and setbacks
BACKGROUND
A building permit was issued in 1994 for the construction of the house. Since then, the previous
owner installed a patio at the rear of the house. The city does not have any records of the patio
installation. Prior to May 2004, the City did not require permits for such improvements.
On August 8, 1991, the City approved the final plat for Troendle Addition creating 12 lots for
single - family homes.
ANALYSIS
In non - conforming situations, Section 20 -72 (d) of the ordinance states that: "Notwithstanding
any other provisions of this chapter, any detached single - family dwelling that is on a non-
conforming lot or that is a non - conforming use or structure may be altered, or expanded
provided, however, that the non - conformity may not be increased. If a setback of a dwelling is
non - conforming, no additions may be added to the non - conforming side of the building unless
the addition meets setback requirements." Since the home and improvements were never
conforming, the non - conforming status does not apply. Their only relief is through the variance
process. As part of staff's review, we believe that the principle of reducing the amount of non-
conformity is appropriate and reasonable.
The applicant purchased a property which already exceeded the total allowed hardcover by 4.9%
as a result of the home alone. In addition, the previous owner had installed a patio which
brought the total hardcover to 32.7 %.
The applicant is proposing to remove the patio and construct a porch which will reduce the total
hardcover. This reduction will result in an improved condition compared to what existed when
the current owner purchased the property. A review of the resident concerns' database does not
indicate any anomalous drainage issues or storm sewer capacity issues in the vicinity.
Because the applicant is proposing to improve conditions that were created prior to his taking
ownership of the property, staff recommends approval of the requested variance. Additional
comments may be forthcoming on the building permit plan depending upon the outcome of the
variance request.
A building permit is required for the construction of a screen porch. The structure must comply
with Minnesota State Building Code.
A variance may be granted if all of the following criteria are met:
Planning Commission
6561 Troendle Circle Variance Request — Planning Case 2012 -07
June 19, 2012
Page 3 of 3
(1) Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(2) When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property
owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
(3) That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
(4) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the
landowner.
(5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
(6) Variances shall be granted for earth- sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06,
subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter.
Staff finds that in this instance these criteria have been met.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the hard cover variance subject to the
following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision:
1. The owner shall remove the existing patio surface and stairs at the rear of the home and re-
grade the site to maintain or improve existing drainage patterns.
2. Building permits are required for the construction of the porch and deck.
3. The structure must comply with Minnesota State Building Code.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact and Decision
2. Development Review Application
3. Narrative by Jay Donohue
4. Existing and Proposed Hardcover
5. Reduced Copy Existing Site Survey
6. Picture of Patio Area
7. Reduced Copy Porch and Deck Elevations
8. Reduced Copy Porch and Deck Floor Plan
9. Reduced Copy Foundation Plan
10. Building Permit Survey Dated 6 -17 -94
11. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -07 6561 troendle circle variance\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
IONi'
Application of Jay & Laurie Donohue for a hardcover variance to construct a screen porch on
property zoned Single- Family Residential (RSF) — Planning Case #2012 -07.
On January 3, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and
mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single - Family Residential (RSF).
2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density
use.
3. The legal description of the property is as follows:
Lot 4, Block 2, Troendle Addition
4. Variance Findings — Section 20 -58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the
granting of a variance:
a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Finding: The granting of the variance is in keeping with the purpose and intent of the
zoning ordinance. The construction of a porch is a normal use associated with a single -
family home.
b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical
difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the
property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this
Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct
sunlight for solar energy systems.
Finding: The practical difficulty with the construction of a porch is that the initial
approval of the home as well as later improvements exceed the city code requirements.
The owner is proposing to remove the patio and construct a porch which will reduce the
total hardcover. This reduction will result in an improved condition compared to what
existed when the current owner purchased the property.
c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone.
Finding: The purpose of the variance is not based upon economic considerations, but is
to permit the owner to enjoy the property in a reasonable manner.
d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by
the landowner.
Finding: The owner purchased a property which already exceeded the total allowed
hardcover by 4.9% as a result of the home alone. In addition, the previous owner had
installed a patio which brought the total hardcover to 32.7 %. The owner is proposing to
remove the patio and construct a porch which will reduce the total hardcover. This
reduction will result in an improved condition compared to what existed when the current
owner purchased the property.
e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Finding: The construction of a porch is a normal use associated with a single - family
home and would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood.
f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota
Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter.
Finding: This does not apply to this request.
5. The planning report #2012 -07, dated June 19, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous, et al., is
incorporated herein.
DECISION
"The Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves Planning Case #2012 -07 for a 6.9
percent variance to permit hard cover of 31.9 percent to construct a screen porch on property
zoned Single - Family Residential (RSF)."
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments this 19 day of June,
2012.
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
BY:
Chairman
2
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227 -1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
Planning Case No. a- - 6.7
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
MAY '18 2 012
CHAN HASSEN PLANNING DEPT
Applicant Name and Address:
'� S IA a na v '
C���II Tmer.dlP 0- ii, -ele
Gha�►. h a ��N MW 55317
Contact:
Phone - 3A5amj Fax:
Email: °O_IAQ rents pace . C- nr-,
Property Owner Name and Ad ress:
654n TlrRCrjs e.r cle
MN 553/7
Contact: _ �A� 4
Phone: W- 345 -o/41 Fax:
Email: j°-at lQ rex'�sonce , r��
NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development
plans
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
Non - conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Rezoning
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Site Plan Review (SPR)*
Subdivision*
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements (VAC)
(Additional recording fees may apply)
Variance (VAR) - I- Aar '
Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP)
Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Notification Sign - $200
.(City to install and remove)
X Escrow for Filing Fees Cost **
50 P /SPR/VAC A J 'AP /Metes & Bounds
- $450 Minor SUS (�
TOTAL FEE $ IZ-f' Ci"ecL SS&
An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be Invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing.
*Five (5) full -size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8 %" X 11" reduced
copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format.
"Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract.
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application.
SCANNED
PROJECT NAME _ bonO�u e Sc V--r- -P h
LOCATION: G6 (. ( r vpm c - A,e - C i Ye C
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: 1-0t 2 Vprt.cl I P 4dd Li'e' n # Z
S 8 6, 900 5 0
TOTAL ACREAGE: _ Z
WETLANDS PRESENT: YES X NO
PRESENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REASON FOR REQUEST:
7
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW. Include number of existing employees: and new employees:
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural
nqurcernerhts applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that i am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and 1 am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Idle or purchase agreement), or t am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies with n estimate stirat prior l frther
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and 'reformation I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
Signature of Fee
g. \p)an\f— \development review applicet mdoc
- /7 -1Z
Date
- I- l 7- !Z
Date
SCANt4ED
Jay & Laurie Donohue
Screen Porch project
6561 Troendle Circle, Chanhassen MN 55317
Purchased property November of 2009
There were a number of factors that lead to the purchase of the above home, and one of
those was a perfect setting for building a screen porch. Unfortunately, we did not know at
the time of purchase that the property was encumbered by the fact that the builder was
allowed to exceed the hard cover allowance rules set by the city of Chanhassen. This was
brought to our attention after we had a screen porch designed, bid, a contractor hired, and
applied for a permit.
Much to our surprise, and to the surprise of our contractor, the permit application was
refused after the city planners searched the property records and found the hard cover
percentage looked to exceed the City limit of 25 %. At that time we were told a survey
would be required to properly set the percentage of hard cover.
The survey did show the area of our lot is at 15,323 S.F. It also showed that when the
house was built in 1991 the finished product was 4,574sf, which was 4.9% over the
amount of allowable hard cover at the time of construction; therefore, before anyone had
occupied the house, it was encumbered with a hard cover violation.
I think it's fair to assume that anyone purchasing this house would be unaware of the
encumbrance that is attached to it, and I also think that it is fair to assume that anyone
living in this house would want to use the area in the backyard, just off the kitchen, as a
place to enjoy the outdoors. At some point, after the house was built, one of the owners
did take advantage of this area and had a very nice stone patio installed with a stone
stairway accessing the lower backyard. The addition of the stone patio and stairs has
added 437 more SF to the hard cover of this property giving it a total of 5,011 SF and a
percentage of 32.7 hard cover.
As it stands, we purchased a home that has a 32.7% hard cover in a city that allows 25 %.
The original residence when built, occupied 29.9%, and a previous owner's stone patio
occupies 2.8 %. Let's face it; due to the hard cover encumbrance that came with the
property, we really have nothing to work with except what is currently there. We don't
feel that it is beyond reason to ask that we be allowed to use that area more efficiently.
We would like to remove the stone patio and replace it with a smaller screen porch The
screen porch will be 11 7s smaller and will add up to a reduction of hard cover of 0.8 %.
We have carefully searched our property to see if any other hardcover could be removed
to lower our percentage and there is not I square foot that could be removed that is not
essential to the residence.
Jay Donohue
XI,STIN19 ff- ,4EPC0VZR
DWELLING
CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY
STONE PATIO
2,771 SQ. FT.
306 SQ. FT.
1,497 SQ. FT.
437.SQ. FT.
TOTAL HARDCOVER
AREA OF LOT
% HARDCOVER
5,011 SQ. FT.
15,323 SQ. FT.
32.7%
PROPOSED IIMPCOV R
DWELLING 2 SQ. FT.
CONCRETE 306 SQ. FT.
DRIVEWAY 1,497 SQ. FT.
PROPOSED-PORCH 320 SQ. FT.
TOTAL HARDCOVER 404 SQ. FT.
AREA OF LOT
15 SQ. FT.
% HARDCOVER
31.9%
I,IARM MMEMIN ! " " 1 0 CA
ONAMOstrammuftumm a.fmm�
WAMOM JAY J)OJWHUB
a www�ekw. M L JZ II F1 Ws/seYw ►w*wR
.. �ur�oa�a�nron�l,�r.wrr
aj �o�iadirriplYrdiiiowlwl 'Ifrrawd�rnir�es
y�[YdaiY �iRyww��iaM�iarlr !!ww b �rYr�7yaae�iraia
ar♦uYwlr Yr� Hrragartb�w�tYiam�R Wta4rreaiwoatir3r
w�� 6re�yaaaa�isw�lwai�rdrw.
sYaai...yrrrYafd i�ow�rwrrrr��y�
7. .wrw..rra mw im ad .aarsi do la db
6�i rYirti♦ Yri t rr ri fr s d Ib Y i br it ewiwr d wi
B.IIYYrwia► + ��w��{�i� �Y����� wrtaYk�or�rsiaawawwr
iW�rr warwdrt7awdwlYrrw�
do 60 rpwiwaYr�a i�ta�dwY�YisArgawYp�srtlr/wiwra� law
JidMiNw �7�yrdw apiYtrywawi ry-ow
"rDlrlr UlIDplpawYYyiWe�Y�dylrr fJeMli�elDS,Krl�aytr�YrrW.
a
mdadim
ierl iiw� wrya�ribwawlrgqYurt�erYr
!}� •a�rrdrMLwdbsrratlrwr.
� ( mr �1 j � } , j_
r
EXIS'TINC XAFDCOP6B
PAMOSBD 114"C heR
GRAPHIC SCALE
Is a to m a
( at tBar )
r
Mrig NO. 1,20194
L n li �
iI'�lillllllla .......
pu �i
i I(Ili'IIIi11lII!Il1I [Fri Iii lllitl
EXOTIN6
NOTE... ALL DIMENSIONING IS TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE SHEATHING
REMOVE NEW ROOF TRU m"
EXIETM6 TO "RE ON E(RN6
SCREENED PORCH
VAULTED CEW
E'M PLi NEKW
-
EXI l� CEDAR DECKINN G G
UlIOOW O W-6. 194
� X '
F GEVT OF VAULTW
-- -- CE LNG At 5.0 PR^,.N�
EOREM4 TO BE ATTAC{W TO OUTSCE 6X
OF 6 CEDAR POSTE UY B(6 CEDAR
ATTACHED TO OUTSCE SURFACE
To b9cum ECRILN
EXISTR.6
DOOR 6X6 CEDAIE
POET
(NON EE.6IESIW
W16TSK6
MOM
F AIN FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4' . 1' -0'
• MM 36' HEI6M TO MEET
C07H REOURE , Axm
EX6 CEDAR
OJON BEARING)
MA -seiE of RISERS
epENDE ON FIN mm
GRADE
2 PLY 202 TREAT®
W "LA CONC FOOT9Y..
MSl & Mow GRADE
M660. 24' O.C.
CEDAR POST
CEDAR OVER
EGREDI
. MM B6 mdE TO M'1T
CODE VE MEMEITS
-SXI CEDAR DE0KM6
-2XQ TREATED JOISTS
. 16' O.C.
3 PLY 91f' MIC WUAME
DROPPED NE'ADE!
uuauut�
®
3'O� X 6' -0s 6JC6 C®AIE
6CAEEJ�1 DOOR P09T rMICAL
ATTACHED TO 6X6 -'
�✓
CEDAR POET
ATTAOI$D TO
EXRTIN6 Ho"
CHAR DECK
CMAR *AL N6
.,IN 36' 14EI6HT TO MEET
GODR REOUIREME\TE
I
F AIN FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4' . 1' -0'
• MM 36' HEI6M TO MEET
C07H REOURE , Axm
EX6 CEDAR
OJON BEARING)
MA -seiE of RISERS
epENDE ON FIN mm
GRADE
2 PLY 202 TREAT®
W "LA CONC FOOT9Y..
MSl & Mow GRADE
M660. 24' O.C.
CEDAR POST
CEDAR OVER
EGREDI
. MM B6 mdE TO M'1T
CODE VE MEMEITS
-SXI CEDAR DE0KM6
-2XQ TREATED JOISTS
. 16' O.C.
NOTE... ALL DIMENSIONING IS TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE SHEATHING
i OUNDATION PLAN
a2 SCALE: vac" . V-o"
PLAT OF SURVEY
FOR MICHAEL HOMES
LOT 4, BLOCK 2, TROENDLE
ADD., CARVER COUNTY
(1019.5) N 00*06'52" W 144.00 (1012.6)
5 E — EEASEMENT & UPI o Y 3
°4
46.081021.1) 1 020 _ 76.08 _ _ _
TOP OF IRON - - - - - -- 13P TOP OF' IRON
(1021.44) N 21.17 x (102 1 . 8 ) �' (1017.48)
1 0) 16.17 101
N X W
1 .00y10 1024.0 P ROPOSE D HOUSE v 1021.0 X
(1025.0)
31.67 �y u�
ry e' �.
L O t o GARAGE (,,10.3-3N13 $ N16.67 EX.
18.10 E
J
X18.10 SAX 11 N12N G' 1026.0 3.34 1 5 00 n,° GAR.
EXISTING M — — 23 79.7 0�YfIUN
HOUSE M F025.7
M ,?ye O) I0 (1 23)
c10 2 25)
18.10 (� i O�Q
A °—�73 °21'35" (1024.6)
00 5 Q O� P R 60 0 LIGHT 1 ?b 47
�� /L =,76.623.21)
1021.9 O Pie
APP OVIED
(1021.9) a ® 55 °46'16" CURB DEP
. 021 20) R_— 20.00 _ DATE: G ,'ZG Q't`
25.29 L = 19.47��.� BEPrFIVc
S 0022'16" E �r� DAT
X (1023.51) —,V-9
X (1021.11) �A \��� D ?D
� Q \\ DATEi L Fc(
f
BENCHMARK:
TOP OF NUT HYDRANT AT LOT 6 & LOT 7,
BLOCK 2 ELEV.= 1026.64
LEGEND
0 Iron monuments
( ) existing elevations
proposed elevations
direction of proposed surface drainage
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
1017.2
!o}vest floor im
.1025.0 garage floor
1026.1 top of foundation
❑ set wood stake dli'
Note: Only copies which bear on embossed seal are certified copies
11 Hansen Thorp I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my File No.
1 supervision and that I am a duly registered land surveyor under 94 - 066
Pellinen Olson Inc. Minnesota Statutes Section 326.02 to 326.16.
Book -Page
�l Civil & Survey Engineers
7565 Office Ridge Circle 94-38
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -3644 Scale.
(612) 829 -0700 �l_ �� q " Z '
— _ _ Date: Registration No. 194 � I = J 0
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
June 7, 2012, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota;
that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for
6561 Troendle Circle Variance Request — Planning Case 2012 -07 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner,
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate
records.
a
Ka J. Eng ha t, Depu Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this T day of '�"_jLtT0_' , 2012.
1 AAA
y '_ - , Notary Publi
"' . KIM T. MEUWISSEN
"
Notary Public- Minnesota
i My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at 7:00 P.M. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for hard surface coverage variance to allow
Proposal:
construction of a screen porch on property zoned Residential
Single Family RSF
Applicant:
Jay Donohue
Property
6561 Troendle Circle
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -07 If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at benerous aC).ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have
something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
Notice of Public Hearing
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Date & Time:
Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start
until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda.
Location:
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for hard surface coverage variance to allow
Proposal:
construction of a screen porch on property zoned Residential
Single Family RSF
Applicant:
Jay Donohue
Property
6561 Troendle Circle
Location:
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
What Happens
public hearing through the following steps:
at the Meeting:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The applicant will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit
the City's projects web page at:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -07 If you wish to talk to
someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by
Questions &
email at bgenerous(o)ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at
Comments:
952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is
helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the
meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The
staff report for this item will be available online on the
project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the
Planning Commission meeting.
City Review Procedure:
• Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
• Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial.
• Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
• A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
• Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have
something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
BEDDOR ENTERPRISES LP BRADLEY & KAROL M JOHNSON BRYCE E FIER
PO BOX 489 1001 LAKE LUCY RD 1040 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -0489 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8678 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8677
CHRISTOPHER T KOSVIC CLAUS M CANELL DANIEL J & JANET L SYVERSON
960 LAKE LUCY RD 6531 TROENDLE CIR 921 VINELAND CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8679 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9345 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9336
DANIEL T & PAMELA D O'CONNOR DAVID H & MAREN K REEDER DIRK KOENIG
941 LAKE LUCY RD 6501 TROENDLE CIR 920 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8680 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9345 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8679
DONALD R & CANDACE L DECOSSE DONALD W & CAROL M ZALUSKY DOUGLAS M & DARLENE K OLSEN
860 VINELAND CT 960 WESTERN DR 901 VINELAND CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9335 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9556 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9336
EDWARD & PAMELA A CAPPELLE ERIC C HOPP ERIC R & KATHLEEN M ANDERSON
6560 NEZ PERCE DR 6581 NEZ PERCE DR 6580 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9332 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9334 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344
GRANT YOUNG GREGORY & BARBARA J GREGORY E & PATRICIA A ADAMS
6495 NEZ PERCE DR PEPPERSACK 6520 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 - 9349 940 WESTERN DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9556
HAYLEY A KERR HUGH J & INGRID U ROBERTS JAMES E GALAROWICZ
990 WESTERN DR 6561 NEZ PERCE DR 880 VINELAND CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9556 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9334 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9335
JAMES P & SUSAN M DUCHENE JANET N & JAMES L RICE JAY B DONOHUE
961 LAKE LUCY RD 900 VINELAND CT 6561 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8680 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9335 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9345
JEFFREY N KIFFIN JEROME M & THERESE M MEYER JOHN D BIRD
6520 NEZ PERCE DR 1060 LAKE LUCY RD 6540 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9332 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8677 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9332
JOHN H & BARBARA D HANSEN JOHN MICHAEL NORTON JOSEPH CALDWELL
6511 NEZ PERCE DR 6500 TROENDLE CIR 6590 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9333 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344
JULIA A O'BRIEN MARY F MEUWISSEN MICHAEL J SHOBERG
6661 NEZ PERCE DR 4265 COUNTY ROAD 123 834 LONE EAGLE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9551 MAYER MN 55360 -9631 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9417
MICHAEL P & CYNTHIA K LESAGE
6560 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344
NICOLETTE R RANDALL
6680 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9564
NICOLETTE RANDALL
6680 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9564
PAMELA E LIBBY
6501 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9333
REBECCA K HADRYS
1020 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8677
ROBERT H & PATTI A MANNING
940 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8679
STEPHEN A TORNIO
1021 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8678
STEVEN & GLORIA RAY
920 WESTERN DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9556
THOMAS J & ANNE L TEGEN
6641 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9551
US BANK NA AS TRUSTEE
1675 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD STE
WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 -2122
ZANE CASEY CAMPBELL DETERT
6500 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9332
PHILIP G & LEEANNE LARSEN
6493 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9349
RICHARD G & DENISE C CLARKE
1000 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8677
ROBERT I III & TERESA DRAKE
980 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8679
STEPHEN M & DENISE M NORTON
6581 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9345
STEVEN C & JODIE L GRADY
6540 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9344
TODD J & TERESA JO OWENS
6535 PEACEFUL LN
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9510
VITO & MELANIE QUAGLIA
881 VINELAND CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9336
RANDY & JANET BAUERNFEIND
6481 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9349
ROBERT B PATTERSON JR
6580 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9332
ROBERT J KAHLMEYER
921 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8680
STEPHEN T KUEPPERS
6541 TROENDLE CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9345
THOMAS & FOTINI DONNELLY
6491 NEZ PERCE DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9349
TODD MICHAEL & GAYLE A LANTTO
981 LAKE LUCY RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8680
WILLIAM B & ELIZABETH MANNING
861 VINELAND CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9336