Loading...
PC Staff Report 07-17-2012PC DATE: July 17, 2012 1 CC DATE: REVIEW DEADLINE: August 14, 2012 CASE #: 2012 -03 (variance) BY: RG, JS 0 4� PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, approves Planning Case #2012 -07 for a 10 -foot parking lot setback variance to permit parking at the right - of -way easement as shown on the plans prepared by MFRA dated July 6, 2012, subject to the conditions of approval, and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a 10 -foot parking lot setback variance to permit parking at the right -of -way easement. LOCATION: 80 West 78 Street RLS 59, Tracts A and B APPLICANT: Ben Merriman , 80 West 78�' Street, LLC .� � � � cit.u.D • h 2025 Coulter Blvd, Suite 215 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952- 474 -4828 E i F bmerriman@centercompanies.com PRESENT ZONING: Highway and Business Services District (BIT). 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 2.79 acres DENSITY: 0.17 F.A.R. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. CITY OF CHANHASSEN Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Planning Commission 80 West 78 Street Parking Variance — Planning Case 2012 -03 July 17, 2012 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a 10 -foot setback variance to permit the easterly seven parking stalls in the southern parking area to encroach into the parking setback from the right -of -way easement. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Division 3, Variances. Chapter 20, Article XVII, `BH" Highway and Business Services District. - --------- • Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Off - Street Parking and Loading BACKGROUND On October 5, 1973, Registered Land Survey 59 for the subject site was recorded. On February 27, 2012, the Chanhassen City Council approved the Site Plan for a 20,600 square -foot, one -story retail building. ANALYSIS In reviewing the building permit application for the project, staff discovered that a right -of -way easement was recorded over the Site Plan I k A W �� southern portion of the property. While reviewing the site plan, the property line was shown approximately 12 feet south of the right -of -way easement. The practical difficulty with the construction of the parking lot is due to the shape of the property and the city standards for parking lot layout, which requires a rectangular shape with a 62 -foot wide area for two rows of parking and a two -way drive aisle, and the need to distribute parking around the building. The property is trapezoidal in shape. The building envelope becomes narrower on the east due to a stormwater area and a wetland complex. Due to the property shape, a portion of the parking area just west of the site entrance encroaches into the setback area. Only the most easterly seven parking stalls of the southern parking area encroach into the setback from the right -of -way easement. From a practical standpoint, the parking setback deviation will not be noticeable due to the green space between the easement line and the sidewalk. The original site plan included the parking stalls shown in this variance. MFRA interpreted the parking setbacks from the property line when it should have been from the right -of -way. City Code states "Setback means the minimum horizontal distance between a structure and the nearest property line or right -of- way ". Staff noticed the issue when the plans were in for building permit. The parking stalls within the setback were removed for approval of the building permit. Planning Commission 80 West 78 Street Parking Variance — Planning Case 2012 -03 July 17, 2012 Page 3 of 4 The applicant proposed two options to accommodate the 7 stalls which were removed with the building permit. One option was to vacate the right -of -way and the other was to apply for a variance from the parking setback. Staff reviewed both options. Vacating the right -of -way was not chosen because staff believes that this area may be utilized with future utilities or road reconstruction of West 78 Street. Engineering has reviewed the variance for the 10 -foot parking setback variance and is satisfied with that option. In order to accommodate the proposed stalls, the grading plan must be revised to show the proposed grades. Also, the plans must be updated to show the proposed stalls. The applicant shall work with staff to make changes to plans according to staff redlines. The applicant shall also obtain an encroachment agreement for installing the parking lot within the watermain easement. A variance may be granted if all of the following criteria are met: (1) Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. (3) That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. (4) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. (6) Variances shall be granted for earth- sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. Staff finds that in this instance these criteria have been met. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the parking setback variance as shown on the plans prepared by MFRA dated July 6, 2012, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Planning Commission 80 West 78 Street Parking Variance — Planning Case 2012 -03 July 17, 2012 Page 4 of 4 1. The monument sign must comply with City Code and the required setback and may not encroach into any easements. 2. The applicant shall update the plans to show the proposed parking stalls and make changes to plans according to staff redlines. 3. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment agreement with the City to construct the parking lot within the City watermain easement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Right -of -way Variance Plan prepared by MFRA dated 07/06/2012. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing. gAplan\2012 planning cases\2012 -03 80 west 78th street \variance\staff report pkg setback var.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION IN RE: Application of 80 West 78` Street, LLC for a parking setback variance on property zoned Business and Highway Services District (BH) — Planning Case # 2012 -03. On July 17, 2012, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Business and Highway Services District (BH). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Commercial use. 3. The legal description of the property is as follows: Registered Land Survey 59, Tracts A and B. 4. Variance Findings — Section 20 -58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of the variance is in keeping with the purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The construction of a parking lot is a normal accessory use for commercial buildings. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The practical difficulty with the construction of the parking lot is due to the shape of the property and the city standards for parking lot layout, which requires a 62- foot wide area for two rows of parking and a two -way drive aisle. Only the most easterly portion of the southern parking area encroaches into the setback from the right -of -way easement. In reviewing the site plan, the property line was shown approximately 12 feet south of the right -of -way easement. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The purpose of the variance is not based upon economic considerations, but is to permit the owner to utilize the property in a reasonable manner. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is trapezoidal in shape becoming narrower on the east end. To the north are a stormwater area and a wetland complex. Due to the property shape, a portion of the parking area just west of the site entrance encroaches into the setback area. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The construction of the parking lot is a normal use associated with a commercial site and would be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2012 -03, dated July 17, 2012, prepared by Robert Generous, et al., is incorporated herein. DECISION "The Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves Planning Case #2012 -03 for a 10 -foot parking lot setback variance to construct a parking lot on property zoned Business and Highway Services District (BH)." ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments this 17 day of July, 2012. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Chairman 2 Planning Case No. ok'o C) CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard - P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 - (952) 227 -1100 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION PLEASE PRINT Applicant Name and Addr ss: Property Owner Name and Address: q j Contact: h eyer Man Contact: vN CV- P ;w%cX%n Phone: 1 /74f L/e A it Fax: it 9LZI y8' .Z b Phone: 1 4 - V4 4g2.T Fax: 14 4 ysAQ Email: jllr�er� :w�a ►�•e4co Email : �rrtevw•Cw►c.h�Cev.�crcowl��, �•�s.c NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non - conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development" Rezoning Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)" Subdivision" Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right -of- Way /Easements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) p0 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign — $200 (City to install and remove) X Escrow for Filing Fees /Attorney Cost"* - $50 CUP /SPR/VACNAR/WAP /Metes & Bounds - $450 Minor SUB 1 TOTAL FEE $ Z".5 �D Pd � ° i An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Five (5) full -size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8 %" X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format. * *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. SCANNED PROJECT NAME: _ _ C� t s'� �-�" �•- ��V'G�.'�' LOCATION: q0 (mac s-� g' Sc, � '�•' LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: _ R k S SR, l yo-r— cm6 TOTAL ACREAGE: a' '44? WETLANDS PRESENT: YES X NO PRESENT ZONING: " �a N-rsWG.v a-v -,d, Se-..-Q Zc-w• ��'4. .�e..� `C3• �. REQUESTED ZONING: N . C— . PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: Q • �. REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: �. . REASON FOR REQUEST: FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees: This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ig licant ` Date Si f Fee Owner Date SCANNED gAplan\forms\development review application.doc I I � PROPOSED BUILDING I I I 20,600 S.F. I i FFE = 940.1 I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I 12.5 l j I i fl 25' BUILDING SETBACK 'OF - - - - -- -- / / 10' PARKING SETBACK _ J 25' BUILDING SETBACK 10' PARKING SETBACK _ _ - -� - ��— _ _ - _ J - I- - - - - - --- -- �pOC -__- 12.5' 2,5 11 ` � N R.O.W. EASEMENT EN T -- �� PER ` 1 1"✓ ` " — - -- "j N VARIANCE AREA - -- ---------------------- _ o --tt R.O.W. EASEMENT � �� - - w 78TH STREY No 5) ISTATE HAG � ,.f — NORTH 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 07/06/2012 1.106,2012 2:12pm -Us, :2371: \PROJECTS \FEN19169 \dwg\ Temp\ R. O .W.VARIANCE \19169C3.01 -SITE.dwg Wf ra enpineeenpeuneylnp plennlnp erlerpP 14800 281h INe K Sta 140 Pyn oA AB ea0A 65147 M 478.11010 WW WI CBS 478.8592 bWff pa WL.MWOM Client FENDLER PATTERSON Project 80 W. 78TH STREET Location CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Certification Summary Approved: MCB Drawn: SEG Revision History No. Date By Submittal/Rev. Sheet Title R.O.W. VARIANCE Sheet No. Revision V1 Project No. FEN 19169 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on July 5, 2012, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for 80 West 78 Street (Goodwill) Parking Lot Setback Variance — Planning Case 2012 -02 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2012. Notary Public KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public- Minnesota +';; My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for parking lot setback variance on property zoned Highway and Business Services District BH Applicant: Ben Merriman, 80 West 78 th Street, LLC Property 80 West 78 Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -03 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at bgenerous(cb-ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date & Time: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. This hearing may not start until later in the evening, depending on the order of the agenda. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd. Proposal: Request for parking lot setback variance on property zoned Hi hwa y and Business Services District BH Applicant: Ben Merriman, 80 West 78 Street, LLC Property 80 West 78 Street Location: A location map is on the reverse side of this notice. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps: at the Meeting: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The applicant will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the project. If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please visit the City's projects web page at: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us /2012 -03 If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Bob Generous by Questions & email at b generous(a)- ci.chanhassen.mn.us or by phone at Comments: 952- 227 -1131. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday prior to the Planning Commission meeting. City Review Procedure: • Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations, Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting. • Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation. These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial /industrial. • Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting. • A neighborhood spokesperson /representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person(s). • Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have something to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification. ABRA CHANHASSEN REAL ESTATE CLIFFORD L WHITEHILL CLS PROPERTIES II LLC CO 5320 W HARBOR VILLAGE DR APT 2 4711 SHADY OAK RD 6322 TIMBER TRL VERO BEACH FL 32967 -7416 HOPKINS MN 55343 -8840 EDINA MN 55439 -1049 CRB FAMILY LP 18930 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9347 DANIELLE WATERHOUSE 7719 S SHORE DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9327 DORN BUILDERS INC 2303 WATERS DR MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120 -1163 DYS PROPERTIES 4711 SHADY OAK RD HOPKINS MN 55343 -8840 MCDONALD'S CORP (22 -157) 15455 110TH ST NYA MN 55397 -9453 PEGGY M KRONICK 8575 TELLERS RD CHASKA MN 55318 -9265 JBJ WINE HOLDINGS LLP 19900 WEST 78TH STREET CHANHASSEN MN 55317 I C JOHN LLC 301 OAK GROVE ST UNIT 411 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 -4015 MJR MANAGEMENT LLC 18001 STATE HIGHWAY 7 MINNETONKA MN 55345 -4150 SOUTH LOTUS VILLAS TOWNHOMES 7737 SOUTH SHORE DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9327 TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD 723 11TH ST EAST GLENCOE MN 55336 KAHNKE BROS INC PO BOX 7 VICTORIA MN 55386 -0007 PAULETTE M LAMERE 7779 SOUTH SHORE DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9237 TARA L SJULSTAD 7761 SOUTH SHORE DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -9327 VLADIMIR Z GALEYEV 19153 TWILIGHT TRAIL EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 ROSIE SHMYEL CSM CORP BEN MERRIMAN 19157 TWILIGHT TRAIL 500 WASHINGTON AVE SO #3000 PO BOX 687 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 CHANHASSEN MN 55317