Loading...
1 VAR 9249 Lake Riley Blvd.PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: CITY OF STAFF REPORT PC DATE: 9/15/99 CC DATE: CASE #: 99-14 VAR By: Kirchoff.'v Request for an 18 foot variance from the 75 foot lakeshore setback for the reconstruction of. an existing detached garage. 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. (Govt. Lot 4) Donald & Kathryn Sitter 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 (445-5728) PRESENT ZONING: ACREAGE: RSF, Single Family Residential 1.4 Acres DENSITY: N/A ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USES: WATER AND SEWER: PHYSICAL CHARACTER: 2000 LAND USE PLAN: S: E: W: PUD-R, Springfield Development RD, Recreational Development Lake, Lake Riley RSF, Single-Family Residential RSF, Single-Family Residential Available to the site The site is a riparian lot with a single family home and detached garage. Low Density Residential C Summerf'eld~ [~r 'ied I~eerfoot ~urt Lake Riley Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 20-481 (a) requires that all structures be setback seventy-five (75) feet from recreational development lakes (Attachment 2). Section 20~72(a) states that there shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, structural change, or relocation of any nonconforming use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the nonconformity (Attachment 3). Section 20-72(b) states that ifa setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements (Attachment 4). BACKGROUND This 1.4 acre site has never been platted. The parcel is 100 feet in width and an average of 405 feet in depth. The existing single family home meets the required 75 foot lakeshore setback, but the detached garage encroaches 16 feet into the setback. According to the applicant, the existing one-story, 22 foot by 28 foot garage was constructed in 1963. It maintains a 59 foot setback. The shoreland management ordinance, which requires a 75 foot setback, was not adopted until 1977, so the existing garage maintains a legal, nonconforming setback. In May 1998, a thunderstorm damaged the garage to the extent it needs to be replaced. The topography limits the location of a new detached garage on the site. Significant excavation would be required to relocate the garage. Furthermore, the detached garage supports the upper driveway. Existing garage at 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 3 The purpose of this application is to permit the reconstruction of the detached garage with a larger footprint at the nonconforming setback. ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting an 18 foot variance from the 75 foot lakeshore setback to reconstruct an existing garage maintaining a nonconforming setback. The garage is approximately 59 feet from the lake. A 75 foot lakeshore setback is required. The new garage is proposed to have two foot eaves. The setback is measured from the edge of the eave, thus the 18 foot variance. The existing one-story garage is 22 feet by 28 feet. The applicant is seeking relief to construct a 28 foot by 28 foot, two-story detached garage. The zoning ordinance permits accessory structures up to 20 feet in height. The proposal indicates the average height of the garage is 21.5 feet. (The average of the north and south elevation determines the height.) The applicant is aware the garage exceeds the height limit. A condition of approval is that the garage not exceed 20 feet in height. The zoning ordinance permits accessory structures up to 1,000 sq. ft. The footprint of the proposal is 784 sq. ft. Site Characteristics The topography of the site and the location of the existing home confines the location of a garage on the site. Excavation would be required to relocate the garage to the required setback. The garage has maintained the existing setback for 36 years. It seems unreasonable to require relocation. Permitted Use/Reasonable Use This site is zoned RSF, Single Family Residential so a single family home can be legally constructed on the site. The zoning ordinance (Section 20-1124 (2) f) requires two parking spaces, both of which shall be completely enclosed, for single family dwellings, The applicant is entitled to construct a 2-stall garage on the site. Currently, a single family dwelling and two covered parking spaces are present on the site. The property owner has a reasonable use. Nonconforming Setback The zoning ordinance states that a nonconforming structure may not be replaced except to lessen the nonconformity. The existing garage maintains a nonconforming 59 foot lakeshore setback. The zoning ordinance also states that ifa setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements. This means that permitting the applicant to increase the depth of the existing garage from 22 feet to 28 feet is increasing the nonconformity. Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 4 Staff believes that allowing the property owner to reconstruct the garage with the same 22 foot by 28 foot footprint in the existing location should be permitted. This recommendation is based upon the following: the owner does have a reasonable use with the existing two-stall garage, it has been in this location for 36 years, the reconstruction is for maintenance purposes (it was damaged in a storm) and most importantly, it will not create a new neighborhood setback along Lake Riley. A variance for the construction of a 28 foot by 28 foot garage is not supported by staffbecause it will expand the nonconformity of the structure; and the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship to warrant a variance for a larger garage. Neighborhood Setbacks The northern Lake Riley area is dotted with variances. The lots in the ShOre Acres subdivision are particularly prone to variance requests because of lot size. The following table summarizes the variances granted on Lake Riley Blvd. TABLE 1 VARIANCES GRANTED ON LAKE RILEY BLVD. Variance # Address Tvl~e of Variance 98-12 9247 Lake Riley Lot 42, Shore Acres 7' lakeshore setback variance for a new home as well as lot area, width and lake access; 3'side yard; 13' front 98-6 9217 Lake Riley Blvd. 7' front yard setback variance for an addition Lots 24 & 25, Shore Acres ' 97-11 9223 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 30 & 31, Shore Acres 7' lakeshore variance w/the condition that only 23 % of the lot be impervious surface 96-9 9225 Lake Riley Blvd. Lot 31 3' east setback variance, 5' west setback variance, a 33' shoreland setback variance and a variance from the hard surface coverage. HOME NEVER CONSTRUCTED 93-10 9119 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 11 and 12 4' shoreland setback variance for garage and home addition Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 5 93-8 9243 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 38 and 39 9' shoreland setback and 8' front yard setback variance for home addition 92-9 9021 Lake Riley Blvd. 36' shoreland setback variance for deck addition 92-2 9221 Lake Riley Blvd. Lot 29 14' front yard, 6.5' side yard, and a 7% hard coverage variance for a detached garage 91-16 9203 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 17, 18, & 19 7.5' side yard variance for a home addition 90-7 9051 Lake Riley Blvd. Lot 1 Rogers Add. 12' shoreland setback variance for a new home 89-13 9131 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 15 & 16 4' side yard variance for home addition 89-1 9247 Lake Riley Blvd. Lot 42 14' front yard, 7' shoreland, and 4.5' side yard set back variances for a new home 87-8 9005 Lake Riley Blvd. 18' shoreland setback and lot area variances 86-1 9235 Lake Riley Blvd. Lots 34 & 35 40' shoreland setback variance for a new home Ten of the 14 variances were from the shoreland setback (Attachment 4). The presentation of the variances granted in this neighborhood intends to show that the reconstruction of the existing garage will not create a new neighborhood setback. Yard Encroachments In cases where a variance is granted, the zoning ordinance does not permit any encroachments into the setback such as eaves or bay windows. If a variance is granted, the setback shall be measured from the edge of the eave of the garage. Staff recommends approval of an 18 foot variance to allow for the reconstruction of an existing accessory structure. However, staff does not support a variance to allow for the expansion of the existing 22 foot by 28 foot footprint. Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 6 FINDINGS The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recormnend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria. Finding: The applicant has a reasonable use of the property, however, the reconstruction of the detached garage will not increase the nonconformity of the setback nor will it create a new neighborhood lakeshore setback. The variance will not depart downward from pre- existing neighborhood standards. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based is applicable to all other properties in the RSF zoning district, but the structure to be rebuilt was constructed prior to a zoning ordinance. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: The purpose of this variance is to reconstruct a structure damaged by a storm. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The hardship is not self-created. The structure has been present on the site for 36 years. The fact that the storm damaged the structure is out of the control of the applicant. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the pamel is located. Sitter Variance September 9, 1999 Page 7 The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: "The Planning Commission approves variance #99-14 for an 18 foot variance from the 75 foot lakeshore setback for the reconstruction of a detached garage with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a drainage and erosion control plan prepared by a professional engineer at the time of building permit application for staff review and approval. 2. The garage's footprint shall be limited to 22 feet by 28 feet. 3. The garage shall meet the 20 foot height requirement." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application and Letter 2. Section 20-480 (2), Shoreland Setback 3. Section 20-72 Non-conforming Uses and Structures 4. Lake Riley Blvd. Variances form Lakeshore Setback 5. Site Plan 6. Property Owners 7. Letters from Neighbors \\cfs I \vol2\plan\ck\boaXsitter 99-14 vat.doc CiTY OF CHANHASSEN 690 COULTER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 937-1900 CITy OF CHANHASSEN AUG 2 0 1999 CHAl~n~r ~ r~l~.~ u6PT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION "'~WNER: ADDRESS: .. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit v" · Non-conforming Use Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements Variance ¢-75 Wetland Alteration Permit Planned Unit Development* __ Rezoning Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment __ Sign Permits , Sign ,P~an Review __ Notification Sign Site Plan Review* Subdivision' X Escrgw48[ Filing Fees/Attorney Cost*' ({~ 5_,Q~ U P/S P RNAC/VAR/WAP/Metes a-fid Bounds, $400 Minor SUB) TOTAL FEE $ Alist of a11 property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the application. :Bi~Idlng'-m~terial -samp~-EEt b-e-~b b mitted .with. site. pl. an..rev.[ews. ?~vtmty;six fu~l 'size.folded copies of the__p..lans must be-submitted, including an81/2 X'11"'re'd~:ed ..copy of ~.4nspar~ncy'for each'plan-~heet. '-'" ' ". "* Escrow will be'required for other applications through the devel_0p__m_e_n.t._.c0ntract 34DTE-'When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. "NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ~'ROJECT NAME LOCATION :LEGAL DESCRIPTION PRESENT ZONING REQUESTED ZONING ~RESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION 'X'~':REASON FOP, THIS REQUEST --/-'~', CY'~O---~_~/h ~"O.-.~_~'.x_~ C..~. ~ ~ ~'"t~.~J.d~ (,',... This applicatii;/n must 1~ completed in full arid be typewritten or clearly primed and n~st be accompanied by all information and 'plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should, confer with the PJanr~ing Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. This is 1o certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible fo~' complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorb, ed person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. 1 w~ll keep mysel! informed of the deadlines for submission of matedal and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate pdor to any authorization to proceed w~th the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ! also understand that after the approval or granting of the permit, such permits shall be Invalid unless they are recorded against the title to the property for which the approval/permit is granted within 120 days with the Carver County Recorder's Off'ice and the original document returned to City Hall Records. -9? Date Signature of F~ Owner Date ~pplbation Received on Fee Paid Receipt No. · The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the CITy OF' CHANHASSEN AUG 24 1999 W]~TTENDFSCR~ION O~ YA_.~ANCE REQUEST: 18 foot lakeside set back variance for rebuilding a garage destroyed by storms. DOnald and Kathryn Sitter, owners of 9249 Lake Riley Blvd., are requesting a variance to rebuild the garage on their property which was destroyed in the May 1998 storms. In order to rebuild the garage where it has existed since 1963, we are requesting an 18 foot lakeside variance. In addition, a second story is being added exactly over the top of the first level, although a variance is not required for this component of the construction. The property topography dictates the location of the garage, which infringes on the lakeside set-backs of current city ordinances. The north wall of the garage is also used as a retaining wall which upholds a major hillside. Therefore, to move the garage away from the lake to adhere to ordinance would entail digging into the hillside. At the top of the hillside is an upper driveway and the home, so to move the garage within set-back would begin to affect the upper structures thus creating a hardship. The upper story of the garage will increase the current two stalls to four stalls, for the purpose of extra car space and lake equipment storage. The upper story entrance would be off'the upper driveway which is close to the house. Currently the lower garage is only accessible by a lower driveway and an outside stairway from the house down to the unattached garage. Submitted August 23, 1999 Donald and Kathryn Sitter 9249 Lake Riley Blvd., Chanhassen 445-5728 (home phone) ZONING § 20-481 Tributary Agricu~ural lToSewer Sewer Triplex 300 200 150 Quad 375 250 190 (4) Additional special provisions. Residential subdivisions with dwelling unit densities exceeding those in the tables in subsections (1), (2) and (3) can only be allowed ff designed and approved as residential planned unit developments. Only land above the ordinary high water level of public waters shall be used to meet lot- area standards, and lot width standards shall be met at both the ordinary high water level and at the building line. The sewer lot area dimensions in subsections (1), (2) and (3) can only be used if publicly owned sewer system service is available to the property. (Ord. No. 217, § 4, 8-22-94; Ord. No. 240, § 13, 7-24-95; Ord. No. 240, § 13, 7-24-95) Sec. 20-481. Placement, design, and height of structure, (a) Placement of structures on lots. When more than one (1) setback applies to a site, Structures and facilities shall be located to meet all setbacks. Structures and onsite sewage treatment systems shall be setback (in feet) from the ordinary high water level as follows: Classes of Public Waters Lakes Natural environment Recreational development Rivers Agricultural and tributary S~wag~ Structures ~reatment Unsewered Sewered System 150 ~ 150 100 75 100 50 75 When a structure exists on a lot on either side, the setback of a proposed structure shall be the greater of the distance set forth in the above table or the setback of the existing structure. One (1) water-oriented accessory structure designed in accordance with section 20-482(e)(2)(b) of this article may be setback a minimum distance often (10) feet from the ordinary high water level. (b) Additional structure setbacks. regardless of the classification of the waterbody. The following additional structure setbacks apply, Setback From: Setback (in feet) (1) Top of bluff; 30 (2) Unplatted cemetery; 50 (J) Right-of-way line of federal, state, 50 or county highway; and Supp. No. 8 1195 20-60 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE Sec. 20-60. Denial. Variances may be deemed by the board of adjustments and appeals and the council, and such denial shall constitute a finding and determination that the conditions required for approval do not exist. (Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 1(3-1-4(6)), 12-15-86) Secs. 20-61--20-70. Reserved. DMSION 4. NONCONFORMING USES* Sec. 20-71. Purpose. The purpose of this division is: (1) To recognize the existence of uses, lots, and structures which were lawful when established, but which no longer meet all ordinance requirements; (2) To prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification, or extension of any noncon- forming use, building, or structure; (3) To encourage the elimination of nonconforming uses, lots, and structures or reduce their impact on adjacent properties. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92) Sec. 20-72. Nonconforming uses and structures. ~/~ (a) There shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, change, or relo- structural cation of any nonconforming use or nonconforming structure except to lessen or eliminate the nonconformity. (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any detached singl~family dwelling that is on a nonconforming lot or that is a nonconforming use or structure ma~, be altered, or expanded provided, however, that the nonconformity may not be increased./_!f a setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirement~ (c) No nonconforming use shall be resumed if normal operation of the use has been discontinued for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the use was in normal operation and shall run continuously thereafter. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, only land uses which are permitted by this ordinance shall be allowed to be established. *Editor's note-Section 2 of Ord. No. 165, adopted Feb. 10, 1992, amended Div. 4 in its entirety to read as set out in §§ 20-71-20-73. Prior to Amendment, Div. 4 contained §§ 20-71-20-78, which pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 5, adopted Dec. 15, 1986; and Ord. No. 163, § 1, adopted Feb. 24, 1992. ~upp. No. 4 1164 ZONING § 20-73 (d) Full use of a nonconforming land use shall not be resumed if the amount of land or floor area dedicated to the use is lessened or if the intensity of the use is in any manner diminished for a period of twelve (12) or more months. Time shall be calculated as beginning on the day following the last day in which the nonconforming land use was in full operation and shall run continuously thereafter.. Following the expiration of twelve (12) months, the nonconforming land use may be used only in the manner or to the extent used during the preceding twelve (12) months. For the purposes of this section, intensity of use shall be mea- sured by hours of operation, traffic, noise, exterior storage, signs, odors, number of employees, and other factors deemed relevant by the city. ~(e) Maintenance and repair of nonconforming structures is permitted. Removal or destruc- tion ora nonconforming structure to the extent of more than fifty (50} percent of its estimated value, excluding land value and as determined by the city, shall terminate the right to con- t/hue the nonconforming structure. (f) Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in the forgoing paragraphs of this section, if approved by the city council a nonconforming land use may be changed to another noncon- forming land use of less intensity if it is in the public interest. In all instances the applicant has the burden of proof regarding the relative intensities of uses. (g) If a nonconforming land use is superseded or replaced by a permitted use, the non- conforming status of the premises and any rights which arise under the provisions of this section shall terminate. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92) sec. 20-73. Nonconforming lots of record. (a) No .variance shall be required to reconstruct a detached single-family dwelling located on a nonconforming lot of record or which is a nonconforming use if it is destroyed by natural disaster so long as the replacement dwelling has a footprint which is no larger than that of the destroyed structure and is substantially the same size in building height and floor area as the destroyed structure. Reconstruction shall commence within two (2) years of the date of the destruction of the original building and reasonable progress shall be made in completing the project. A building permit shall be obtained prior to construction of the new dwelling and the new structure shall be constructed in compliance with all other city codes and regulations. {b) No variance shall be required to construct a detached single.family dwelling on a nonconforming lot provided that it fronts on a public street or approved private street and provided that the width and area measurements are at lest seventy-five (75) percent of the minimum requirements of this chapter. (c) Except as otherwise specifically provided for detached single-family dwellings, ];here shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement, or structural changes of a structure on a nonconforming lot. (d) If two (2) or more contiguous lots are in single ownership and if all or part of the lots do not meet the width and area requirements of this chapter for lots in the district, the Supp. Nb 4 1165 · . 91~ (11 Eq£ i'l '6£1 ~ ) /-Il I~ i f~l--i r-i [-~ '1.----1- .~ E)F)~N irxr-lr-I r~ Ok I1-~ A i'"~r-~l .--.lNg SITE PLAN .~ ~ ' % I £. line of Gov't Lof 4, "~ 4~ > Sec 24, [ 116. R. 2J ~' ~ 1~ ~, ~t ' ., . ,- ~ ~' ~ /'--.z-,-- L~.~ .' Garage to be replaced ~~ ~ / ,.}"', ,~_,. :~f.:;,,..._..~. ~ . 400 teat o! ~k e, Survey Lake Riley ;/tter .~n By: Scale: Checked By: D.N.A. 1 "=50' ~ I hereby certify that this survey, plan. or report was prepared by me that I am 0 duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the i~ 9 Wear D'lvJ. aJ.o State of Minnesota. Buffalo MN. 55 Edward J.Otto // Land Surveyo-'~ ssoCiATE$ Fax: 682-8522 -/(Z/~2//~ ~___Re~. ua. ' ~.~4:~ Engineers and Land Sucveyoc., ,[no. Date ! __~- IJl'ol~.' ; ~ CII'Y OF CHANNASSEN ' SEP 07 1999 ELEVATION OF NEW GARAGE September 6, 1999 Planning Commission City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Steve Burke 9591 Meadowlark Lane Chanlmssen, MN 55317 1999 Subj.: Request for Setback Variance Donald Sitter 9249 Lake Riley Blvd I understand that the Sitter's home does already have an existing two-car detached garage on their property. The garage is located between their house and the lake. If this application is for approval to remove the existing detached garage and replace it with a new structure, which does not encroach any further on the 75-foot setback than the existing garage, then I have n-o opposition to their application. Steven F. Burke NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 'IS, '1999 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS · 9 I C NTER RIVE PROPOSAL: R~i'uest for a Lake Shore APPLICANT: Donald and Kathryn Sitter (./ - Setback Variance / LOCATION: 9249 Lake Riley Blvd, NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal i a. applicants Donald and Kathryn Sitter, are requesting a variance from the 75 foot lake shore setback for the construction of a detached garage on property zoned RSF and located at 9249 Lake P, iiey Blvd. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: DAV~£~ O. HAllSON 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. · 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. 108 P¢OHEE!~ CHANHASS?,!: Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on September 2, 1999. Summerr~ SEP 0 8 1999 ~T¥ OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 AT 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 690 CITY CENTER DRIVE PROPOSAL: Request for a Lake Shore Setback Variance APPLICANT: LOCATION: Donald and Kathryn Sitter 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicants Donald and Kathryn Sitter, are requesting a variance from the 75 foot lake shore setback for the construction of a detached garage on property zoned RSF and located at 9249 Lake Riley Blvd. What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the public hearing through the following steps: 1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project. 2. The Developer will present plans on the project. 3. Comments are received from the public. 4. Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses project. Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project, please contact Cindy at 937-1900 ext. 117. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission. Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on September 2, 1999. Summerre!ldJ-( - ~0< < ~0< mO< ~ z z z · Z ~Z ~0< zO< ~0< Z > Z Z W Z Z-JZ =z w~z ==z 0z O~ w~. w~ w-- O~ ~0~ ~OZ ~0~ <'0~ ~Ow <Ow J w zOw Zo w< ~w< ~w< ~< ZOZ ~Z ~0~ ~w~ ~wz o<~ <Oz ~Oz Oz Z ~0w~ ~0~ x ~z z ~z ~ ~< < z~< LIJ Z ~ W w r~ Z >-mz U=l . '~-~Z 0 -r rr W r~ Itl n- Il_ mz Z w -1- Z -r w -r Z -r ~z -~zo ~wo~ ~-JZ ZO~,~ Zrnz --III ~w~ 0 Z w -1- Z -r 0 I- Z z___ Z w o~ -r Z -i- orr z~-;~ Z .--~m I-->- ZW ~W Z~ o -r Z IJ..I o n-mI m z ~z ~z ~ z ~ zW~ rw W ~W o>_~ n~,z .~-r w,'- ~D-r- W --ID:l= 0 "r o_Oz