2 VAR 110 Sandy Hook RoadCITY OF
STAFF
REPORT
PC DATE: 09/05/00
CC DATE:
REVIEW
DEADLINE: 10/17/00
Z
<1:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPLICANT:
Request for a 15 foot variance from the 75 foot required lake. shore setback for the
construction of a single family home.
110 Sandy Hook Road (Lot 5, Block 1, Colonial Grove at Lotus Lake)
Mark & Nancy Engasser
7000 Dakota Avenue
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(934-5070)
PRESENT ZONING:
RSF, Single Family Residential
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential, Low Density
ACREAGE:
1.03 acres (45,139.789 sq. ft.)
DENSITY: N/A
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant would like to construct a single-family home 15 feet into
the required lakeshore setback.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving
or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets th'e standards in the
Zoning Ordinance for variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance
because of the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the
ordinance.
00~
~ 6
DO~
00~
00~
009
0
U
Engasser Variance
September 5, 2000
Page 2
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
Section 20-615(5) a. requires a minimum 30 foot front yard setback on properties zoned RSF.
Section 20-481 (a) requires structures to be a minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high water level of
recreational development lakes.
Section 20-481 (f) permits structures to be up to 35 feet in height on lakeshore property.
Section 20-481 (e) (1) requires the lowest floor ora structure to be at least 3 feet above the ordinary high
water level of a lake.
BACKGROUND
The plat for Colonial Grove at Lotus Lake was approved in 1956. The subject site, a 1.03-acre lot, is
vacant. The house to the west was built in 1979 and the house to the east in 1968, according to the
county's records.
At minimum, the buildable area of the site measures 165 feet in width and 53 feet in depth. This area is
limited by the 75-foot lakeshore setback (measured from the ordinary high water level, thus it is not a
straight line), a 30-foot front yard setback and two, 10-foot side yard setbacks.
The applicant would like to construct a single family home that is 15 feet into a required setback in order
to appear to be at the same front yard setback as the two adjacent homes.
ANALYSIS
The home is proposed to be 60 feet from the ordinary high water level of Lotus Lake at its closest point
and approximately 44 feet from the property line that abuts Sandy Hook Road. The ordinance requires a
75-foot lakeshore setback and a minimum 30-foot front yard setback.
The proposed home is to be approximately 5,000 sq. ft. in area, 117 feet in length and 37 to 55 feet in
depth and two-stories in height. The zoning ordinance requires at least 600 sq. ft. of living area on the
first floor for a two-story design and limits the height to 35 feet for lakeshore properties.
The site is relatively flat. Numerous significant Maple, Ash, and Oak trees are present on the northern
and eastern portion of the site, as the following photographs indicate.
Engasser Variance
September 5, 2000
Page 3
Subject site from the east
...~om the west
...and from the south
A reasonable use of this site is a single-family home with a two-stall garage. The proposed home has a
four-stall garage and approximately 3,500 sq. ft. of living area on the main floor. This is a large house
pad, yet the applicant has shown that the proposed home can meet all required setbacks (see plan "B" ~n
Attactm~tent 3). There is no compelling reason to support this variance request.
The applicant contends that a variance should be granted for the following reasons: (1) the adjacent
homes are set back more that the required 30 feet front yard setback and (2) the proposed placement will
preserve trees. Staff does not believe that the neighbors' front yard setbacks justify this variance
request. The setbacks range from 40 to 90 feet (see Attachment 4). (Note: One of the homes is
approximately 35 feet from the ordinary high water level of the lake.) According to the City's aerial
photographs, placing the proposed home at the required setbacks will be consistent with the location of
the existing adjacent homes because of the curve in the street (see Attachment 5). The required
lakeshore setback intends to protect the water quality; so maintaining this is of foremost concern to staff.
Ensuring that the home is placed at the same setback as adjacent structures is not a compelling reason
to support a variance from an environmental requirement.
The survey submitted by the applicant shows numerous significant trees (12 inches or larger in caliper)
grouped on the eastern and northern portions of the lot. It has been stated by the applicant that
permitting the encroachment into the required lakeshore setback will preserve trees. Typically, trees
Engasser Variance
September 5, 2000
Page 4
within 15 feet of a building pad will not survive construction activity (i.e., truck traffic). It is doubtful
that the Ash and Maple trees in the front yard will live after the home construction is completed because
of the heavy equipment driving over their roots. The ideal situation is to construct a smaller home and
driveway on the western portion of the property and keep 20 feet away from the significant trees.
Staff believes that the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship to warrant the granting of a variance
from the lakeshore setback.
FINDINGS
The Planning Commission shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless
they find the following facts:
go
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship
means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical
surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of
comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a
proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this
neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: The literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance does not create an undue hardship. A
reasonable use of the property can be made without any variances. The proposed home can be
constructed on the property within the buildable area without any variances.
bo
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: All properties that abut Lotus Lake must comply with the required 75-foot lakeshore
setback. Therefore, this property is not unusual in that sense.
C°
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential
of the parcel of land.
Finding: Staff does not believe the sole intent of the request is to increase the value of the
parcel.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The applicant created the hardship. The proposed home can meet all required
setbacks, however, the applicant has opted to shift it into the lakeshore setback.
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Engasser Variance
September 5, 2000
Page 5
Finding: Although the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare, it
will allow a structure to be placed closer to the ordinary high water level of Lotus Lake that
would normally be found on other lakeShore properties, thus negatively impacting water quality.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or
substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or
endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
Finding: Although the granting of this variance will not endanger the public safety, it will allow
a structure to be placed closer to the ordinary high water level of Lotus Lake that would
normally be found on other lakeshore properties.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission denies the request for a 15 foot variance fi'om the required 75 foot
lakeshore setback for the construction of a single family home on Lot 5, Blockl, Colonial Grove at
Lotus Lake, based upon the following:
The applicant can construct a single-family home within the required setbacks without a
variance."
Attachments
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Application
Applicable regulations
Site Plans and Preliminary House Elevations
Neighborhood Setbacks
Aerial Photograph
Public Hearing Notice
. g:\plan\ck\boa\engasscr 2000-11.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(612) 937-1900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE (Daytime)
)WNER:
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AU G 1 7 2000
CH^~ ..................... ~ uEPT
?.$V SO 70
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
Non-conforming Use Permit
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation of ROW/Easements
'~Variance
Wetland Alteration Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Zoning Appeal
__ Rezoning
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
__ Notification Sign
Site Plan Review*
Subdivision*
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
($50 CU P/SP R/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes
and Bounds, .$~40/_5 Minor SUB)
TOTAL FEE $
A list of all property owners within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included with the
application.
~ Buildln~l material '~amples must be submittod with-siteptarH'eviews,----.
*TWenty_~_~_full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2" X 11" reduced copy of
transparency for each ptartsheeL. --
**,%E-serow-wi~r~ for other applir, ations through the development contract
NOTE - When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. -
TOTAL AC R EAG E
WETLANDS PRESENT YES NO
PRESENT ZONING
REQUESTED ZONING
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
X.REASON FOR THIS REQUEST .;f -~/ c J', ~ c./'~
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be-accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning
Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either
copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make
this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. -
] will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review. Therefore, the city is notifying the applicant that the city requires an automatic 60 day
extension for development review. Development review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions~are approved .b.y the applicant.
Signat~of AppOint ~ U~~
....
Date
Date
Receipt No. ~(
The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the meeting.
If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
ATTACHMENT TO VARIANCE REOUEST
Nancy and Mark Engasser
110 Sandy }took Road
Lot 5, Block 1
Colonial Grove at Lotus Lake
Chanhassen, Minnesota
CITy OF CHANHA,'~EN
AUG 1 7 2000
Written description of variance:
The request for variance is respectfully submitted to include a (0 to 15 feet at maximum)
variance to the lakeshore set back of 75 feet. This is due to trying to respect the aligmnent
with adjacent structures and to save as many large trees as possible at the east side of the lot.
Comply with findings for variance request.
A. Literal enforcement/unique hardship. (See Exhibit "A".)
The two adjacent lots are 248' and 216' deep from the shoreline to the street. The subject
property is 188' deep due to the street being closest to the water at this point. Although
the shoreline is not very irregular, the 75' setback defined on the survey is very irregular
and due to contour elevation, varies as shown from actual dimensions of 75' to as much
as 100' at acute angle "pinch points" (see exhibit B). The results pushes the 'required"
placement of the proposed structure perceptibly well ahead of the two adjacent homes
(see exhibit C).
If the "required" structure location is literally enforced, 8 large trees between 16" and 20"
will be removed. If the variance is granted as proposed, 4 of these trees will be spared.
All 4 trees allowed to remain are in the from yard area. The other 4 trees to be removed
are in the side yard area. No trees lakeside will be removed by granting this variance.
Finally if this variance is granted as proposed, the three homes at 112, 110 and 108, will
appear to be more "in line" from both the lake and street perspective.
B. Conditions not applicable to other property.
The size and shape of this property, the street pinch point compared to the adjacent lots,
the irregular setback line defined on the survey dated 12/20/99 and the size and locations
of the large trees, are all unique to this property and this property only.
C. Increased value or income.
It is not the desire or intent of the Engasser's to increase value or income. The sole
purpose is to respect the ambiance and massing of the existing homes and street scope,
and to create a more sympathetic placement of their home in lieu of a placement that
seems an aberration to the norm.
D. Hardship not self-created.
The Engassers had nothing to do with:
1. The subdivision or lot signing.
2. The location of either the lakeshore line or the street.
3. The definition of lakeshore setback lines which is not parallel or 75' from the
lakeshore edge.
4. The location of the adjacent homes.
5. The size and location of the existing trees.
E. Granting of variance detrimental to public.
The goal of the Engasser family is dramatically opposed to this detrimental possibility.
The request for variance is intended to not detract but enhance public welfare, other land
improvements and neighborhood ambiance,
Not impair light and ventilation or increase structural congestion, or increase fire risk or
impair property values.
Again, the Engasser's request for variance will ensure adequate light and ventilation, not
increase structural congestion, fire risk and will likely maintain or improve property
values in the neighborhood as proposed.
August 18, 2000
C~'f'VOFCHANHASSEN
2000
....................... o:PT
Bill and Marge Spliethoff
113 Sandy Hook Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re:
Engasser Variance
110 Sandy Hook Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
To the City of Chanhassen:
I have reviewed the proposed Engasser request for a variance, and agree in principle that the proposed
home would be best located to be most sympathetic with the existing adjacent home locations, and in the
position proposed on their lot to preserve as many large trees as is possible.
We support their request for a variance to the 100-year flood elevation setback in order to ensure preserving
the ambiance of the neighborhood and existing streetscape.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Bill and Iv~ge Spliethoff
August 18, 2000
CiTY OF CHMqHASSEN
AUG 1 7 21100
Tom and Madlyn Palmby
114 Sandy Hook Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Re:
Engasser Variance
110 Sandy Hook Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
To the City of Chanhassen:
I have reviewed the proposed Engasser request for a variance, and agree in principle that the proposed
home would be best located to be most sympathetic with the existing adjacent home locations, and in the
position proposed on their lot to preserve as many large trees as is possible.
We support their request for a variance to the 100-year flood elevation setback in order to ensure preserving
the ambiance of the neighborhood and existing streetscape.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Tom and Marilyn Palmby ~
§ 20-615 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
illustrated beloTM.
Loto Whore Frontege le
I,~oasured At 8otbiok
(3)
The minimum lot depth is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. The location of these lots
is conceptually illustrated below. Lot width on neck or flag lots and lots accessed by
private driveways shall be one hundred (100) feet as measured at the front building
setback line.
Heck I Flag Lota
Fro7 Lot Llno
/
I ' /il I
I
· ' I I I
! I I I'
lo0/Lot Width~t " I II II
~ I I I
L -- L._._I_ ...J
(4) The maximum lot coverage for all structures and paved surfaces is ~enty-five (25)
percent.
(5)//the setbacks are as follows:
V/ a. For front yards, thirty (30) feet.
b. For rear yards, thirty (30) feet.
Supp. No. 9 1212
ZONING § 20-481
Tributary
Agricultural No Sewer Sewer
Triplex 300 200 150
Quad 375 250 190
(4) Additional special provisions. Residential subdivisions with dwelling unit densities
exceeding those in the tables in subsections (1), (2) and (3) can only be allowed if
designed and approved as residential planned unit developments. Only land above
the ordinary high water level of public waters shall be used to meet lot area
standards, and lot width standards shall be met at both the ordinary high water level
and at the building line. The sewer lot area dimensions in subsections (1), (2) and (3)
can only be used if publicly owned sewer system service is available to the property.
(Ord. No. 217, § 4, 8-22-94; Ord. No. 240, § 13, 7-24-95; Ord. No. 240, § 13, 7-24-95)
Sec. 20-481. Placement, design, and height of structure.
(a) Placement of structures on lots. When more than one (1) setback applies to a site,
structures and facilities shall be located to meet all setbacks. Structures and onsite sewage
treatment systems shall be setback (in feet) from the ordinary high water level as follows:
Classes of Public Waters
Lakes
RNatural environment
ecreational development
Rivers
Agricultural and tributary
Sewage
Structures Treatment
Unsewered Sewered System
150 150 150
100 75 75
100 50 75
When a structure exists on a lot on either side, the setback of a proposed structure shall be the
greater of the distance set forth in the above table or the setback of the existing structure.
One (1) water-oriented accessory structure designed in accordance with section 20-482(e)(2)(b)
of this article may be setback a minimum distance often (10) feet from the ordinary high water
level.
(b) Additional structure
regardless of the classification of the waterbody.
setbacks. The following additional structure setbacks apply,
Setback From: Setback (in feet)
(1) Top of bluff; 30
(2) Unplatted cemetery; 50
(~) Right-of-way line of federal, state, 50
or county highway; and
Supp. No. 8 1195
§ 20-481 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on
steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to issued
permits to prevent erosion and to preserve existing vegetation screening of structures,
vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming
summer, leaf-on vegetation.
(f) Height of structures. All structures in residential districts, except churches and nonres-
idential agricultural structures, shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height.
(Ord. No. 217, § 4, 8-22-94)
Sec. 20.482. Shoreland alterations.
(a) Generally. Alterations of vegetation and topography shall be regulated to prevent
erosion into public waters, fix nutrients, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic
values, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat.
(b) Vegetation alterations.
(1) Vegetation alteration necessary for the construction of Structures and sewage treat-
ment systems and the construction of roads and parking areas regulated by section
20-484 of this article are exempt from the following vegetation alteration standards.
(2) Removal or alteration of vegetation is allowed subject to the following standards:
a. Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore and bluff impact zones and on
steep slopes is not allowed. Intensive vegetation clearing for forest land conver-
_ sion to another use outside of these areas is allowable if permitted as part of a
development approved by the city council as a conditional use if an erosion control
and sedimentation plan is developed and approved by the soil and water
conservation diStrict in which the property is located.
b. In shore and bluffimpact zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing of trees and
shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees is allowed to provide a view
of the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement
of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraf~ access
areas, and permitted water-oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided
that:
1. The screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the
water, assuming leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced;
2.Along rivers, existing shading of water surfaces is preserved;
3. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or
branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards; and
4. The clearing be limited to a strip thirty (30) percent of lot width or thirty
(30) feet, whichever is lesser, parallel to the shoreline and extending inward
within the shore and bluff impact zones.
(Ord. No. 217, § 4, 8-22-94; Ord. No. 251, § 1, 4-8-96)
Supp. No. 9 1196.2
§ 20-481 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
Setback From: Setback (in feet)
(4) Right-of-way line of town road, pub- 20
lic streets, or other roads or streets
not classified.
(c) Bluff impact zones. Structures ~nd accessory facilities, except stairways and landings,
shall not be placed within bluff impact zones.
(d) Nonresidential uses without water-oriented needs. Uses without water-oriented needs
shall be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels
with ~ublic waters frontage, shall either be set back double the normal ordinary l~gh water
level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or
topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions.
(e) Design criteria for structures.
(1) High water elevations. Structures shall be placed in accordance with any flood plain
regulations applicable to the site. Where these controls do not exist, the elevation to
which the lowest floor, including basement, is placed or floodproofed shall be
/a etermined as follows:
· For lakes, by placing the lowest floor at a level at least three (8) feet above the
highest, known water level, or three (8) feet above the ordinary high water level,
whichever is higher;
b. For rivers and streams, by placing the lowest floor at least three (8) feet above the
flood of record, if data are available. If data are not available, by placing the
lowest floor at least three (8) feet above the ordinary high water level, or by
conducting a technical evaluation to determine effects of proposed construction
upon flood stages and flood flaws and to establish a flood protection elevation.
Under all three (8) approaches, technical evaluations shall be done by a qualified
engineer or hydrologist consistent with parts 6120.5000 to 6120.6200 governing
the management of flood plain areas. If more than one (1) approach is used, the
highest flood protection elevation determined shall be used for placing structures
and other facilities; and
c. Water-oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than
the elevation determined in this item if the structure is construed of flood-
resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is
placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the
structure is built to withstand ice action and wind-driven waves and debris.
(2) Water-oriented accessory structures. Each lot may have one (1) water-oriented
accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in section 20-481(a) if
this water-oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions:
a. The structure or facility shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height, exclusive of safety
rails, and cannot occupy an area greater than two hundred fifty (250) square feet.
Detached decks shall not exceed eight (8) feet above grade at any point.
Supp. No. 8 1196
SNOIIlQNO0 rONI1SlX:l
/
o (lold g9'§L) '~
/
/
/
/
1_q_~£ Og = HDNI L
S2IOq
/
/
/
-I}~M §u]u!OlaU
Fq3£ O~ = HDNI L
S~07
O00Z o 8 ~N1/
'ON asu~-=!l qll~
/
~ G¥O~
o (~ld zg'gL)
oou
/
/
g
Sfl&O'l
NOI.LYA~3'~.LNOU:I AUYNII/~ilq3Ud
- -_
Neighborhood Front Yard Setbacks
55'
80' 110
11
112
90'
60'
75'
11 111
Vacan' 1
109
-OSlVHM ~3NNYN'XN¥ NI Q33NOOWd3W
WO aBsfl 38 XYN 1N3NQDOQ SIHI
JO IUYd ON '03A~3S3~ SIHgI~ 99V
~906 x
~loeq~,as lOO~ OC }e asnoH
9'006
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2000 AT 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
690 CITY CENTER DRIVE
PROPOSAL: Lake Shore Setback Variance APPLICANT: Nancy Engasser
LOCATION: tt0 Sandy Hook Road
NOTICE: You are invited to attend a public hearing about a proposal in your area. The applicant,
Nancy Engasser, is requesting a variance from the 75' lakeshore setback for the construction of a single
family home located on Lot 5, Block 1, Colonial Grove at Lotus Lake, 110 Sandy Hook Road.
What Happens at the Meeting: The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the developer's
request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead
the public hearing through the following steps:
1. Staff will give an overview of the proposed project.
2. The Developer will present plans on the project.
3. Comments are received from the public.
4. Public hearing is dosed and the Commission discusses project.
Questions and Comments: If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop by City Hall during
office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about this project,
please contact Bob at 937-1900 ext. 141. If you choose to submit written comments, it is helpful to have one
copy to the department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide copies to the Commission.
Notice of this public hearing has been published in the Chanhassen Villager on August 24 2000.
S~mooti~ Feed SheetsTM ~_~ Use template for 5160®
STATE OF MINNESOTA-DNR
TAX SPEC. - BUREAU OF R E M
500 LAFAYETTE RD
ST PAUL MN 55155
ROBERT B & SUE MIDNESS
112 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PETER A MOSCATELLI
102 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
THOMAS & MARILYN PALMBY
114 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DANIEL A & MARILYN BOECKER
104 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
WILLIAM & MARJORIE SPLIETHOF
4041GULFSHOREBLV #312
NAPLES FL 34103
SCOTT D NELSON &
CATHY HULL NELSON
106 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
ROBERT B & SUE MIDN-ESS
112 SAN DY~OOK~D .
C~EN MN 55.~ 17
THOMAS V & DARLEEN TURCOTT
108 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN S & MARIE F KERN
109 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
MARK C & NANCY A ENGASSER
7000 DAKOTA AVE
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DONALD C JR & MAUREEN A KVA
105 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
NANCY A ENGASSER
7000 DAKOTA AVE
CHANHASSEN ~.~...MN'-'-55317
DENNIS J & TONIE FLAHERTY
7004 DAKOTA TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DENNIS & MARLIES OTMASKIN
C/O BYRON REED CO INC-TRA
209 19TH ST S SUITE 600
OMAHA NE 68102
BRIAN H & JEANNE M BATZLI
100 SANDY HOOK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SCOTT D & KIMBERLY A CURREN
7001 DAKOTA AVE
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
KENTON D KELLY
6539 GRAY FOX CRV
CHANHASSEN MN
55317
RICHARD C & SANDRA K ERICKSO
7003 DAKOTA AVE
CttANHASSEN MN 55317
Smooth Fp.~d .~h~fcTM Use template for 5160®
Mr. Bill Kirkvold
Colonial Point Homeowner's
Association
201 Frontier Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mr. Herb LaPlatt
Lotus Lake Betterment Association
at Colonial Grove
7012 Cheyenne Trail
Chanhassen, MN 55317-9504
Mrs. Peg Kirkvold
Frontier Trail Homeowner's
Association
201 Frontier Court
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Kurvers Point Homeowner's
Association
7241 Kurvers Pt. Road
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Mr. Steven Bloom
Lotus Lake Estates HOA
Association
6781 Brule Circle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Cner' s
Mr. Steven Erickson
Pleasant Acres Homeowner's
Association
3850 Leslee Curve
Exclesior, MN 55331
Chanhassen, MN 55317