12. Utility rate adjustment consider 2nd half increase CITYOF --
CHANHASSEN
qb 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
�r (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Don Ashworth, City Manager
DATE: December 9, 1992
SUBJ: Authorize Second Half of Utility Rate Increase
1
In December 1991, the City Council considered a proposal to increase utility rates by 20 %. In
1 total, 46% would have been necessary to fully fund utility operations - such solely being
attributable to a $265,000 cost increase from MWCC. The Council stated that the 20% increase
was too high and proposed to accomplish the increase over a two year period of time, i.e. a 10%
' increase in sewer rates (5% increase in water rates) in 1991, with the second half 10 %/5%
occurring in 1992. Staff would propose that the second half be implemented at this time.
1 It should be noted that in approving the rate increase, we are still far short of fully funding utility
operations. It is also important to note that state statute requires cities to not operate utility
operations at a deficit or to levy property taxes for utility operations. Unfortunately, we are not
keeping ahead. For 1993, we will again see a major increase from MWCC (from 837,214 to
964,956). These numbers do not include sewer administration or costs of maintaining the system.
1 Assuming that the Council will act to adopt the second half increase, a resolution will be
prepared reflecting the new rate schedule as well as adjusting the 1993 budget to reflect the new
1 revenues.
1 tD/4,-)
4
is
5 �� • PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
II CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1993 BUDGET
( FUND: ENTERPRISE
(,e‘);) e c FUNCTION: #700 - SEWER & WATER UTILITY
REVENUE
II BUDGET ESTIMATED PROPOSED
1992 1992 1993
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
11 700000 3140 Penalties & Interest 600 500 500
'700000 3199 TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 600 500 500
PERMITS
700000 3315 Sewer Permit 3,000 2,000 3,000
'700000 3321 Water Permit 3,000 2,500 3,500
700000 3399 TOTAL PERMITS 6,000 4,500 6,500
1 CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICES
700000 3660 Sewer Customers 820,000 860,000 1,020,000
' 700000 3661 Water Customers 560,000 560,000 630,000
700000 3662 Utility Penalties 26,000 28,000 30,000
700000 3663 Customer Service 1,000 1,200 1,200
700000 3664 Sale of Meters & Parts 24,000 24,000 26,000
I 700000 3665 Hydrant Rental or Repair 1,000 1,000 1,000
700000 3667 Certification Fee 6,000 5,000 5,000
11 700000 3699 TOTAL CURRENT SERVICES 1,438,000 1,479,200 1,713,200
OTHER REVENUE
'700000 3801 Interest Earnings 30,000 90,000 50,000
700000 3899 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 30,000 90,000 50,000
11 700000 3999 TOTAL REVENUE 1,408,700 1,307,700 1,763,200
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,185,150 1,159,600 1,599,100
1 TOTAL REVENUE OVER(UNDER)
EXPENDITURES 223,550 148,100 164,100
1 Fund Balance Forward 973,250 604,600 752,700
Transfers 0 0 0
Less Req. Reserve ** 237,030 231,920 319,820
I TOTAL RESOURCES OVER(UNDER)
LIABILITIES 959,770 520,780 432,880
I
** % -
20o as required reserve City Auditors
1
II
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
SEWER RATES /CHARGES ANALYSIS 1992/1993 1
- - -- CURRENT - - -- - -- PROPOSED - -- II
TYPE COUNT AMOUNT AVERAGE AMOUNT AVERAGE
Single Family Res. 3632 158,083.20 43.53 171,520.28 47.22 ,
Senior Citizen 3 72.00 24.00 78.00 26.00 I
Multiple Dwellings 41 17,148.00 418.24 18,605.58 453.79
Commercial /Industrial 94 48,637.05 517.42 52,771.19 561.40
TOTAL 3,770 223,940.25 * * ** 242,975.05 * * **
The above stated amounts are quarterly amounts using data as of October
31, 1992. Assuming a moderate increase of 5% in our customer base,
the quarterly billing for the same period in 1993 could reach $255,000.
Annualized to $1,020,000, this will at least cover our payment to M.W.C.C.
for 1993 which is now determined to be $964,956. The remaining $55,500
will be applied to the City operations of the Sewer and Water fund.
WATER RATES /CHARGES ANALYSIS 1992/1993
- - -- CURRENT - - -- - -- PROPOSED - --
TYPE COUNT AMOUNT AVERAGE AMOUNT AVERAGE
Single Family Res. 3602 119,526.30 33.18 124,904.98 34.68
Multiple Dwellings 40 5,666.50 141.66 5,921.50 148.04 I
Commercial /Industrial 110 50,384.10 458.04 52,651.38 478.65
TOTAL 3,752 175,576.90 * * ** 183,477.86 * * **
The above stated amounts are quarterly amounts using data as of October 1
31, 1992. Assuming a moderate increase of 5% in our customer base,
the quarterly billing for the same period in 1993 could reach $193,000.
Using historical trend analysis data, the 3rd quarter water usage /billing '
is typically between 31% and 33% of the total year so our annualized
estimate for water collections could reasonably be $603,125.
1
1
1
II M.W.C.C. BILLING COMPARISONS
I YEAR * -- FLOW - -* ** D O L L A R S
EST. ACT. ESTIMATE ACTUAL DIFFERENCE PAYMENT
1988 425 360 419,645 382,875 - 36,770 400,190
I 1989 385 439 394,187 452,052 57,865 374
,248
1 1990 410 550 447,810 571,670 123,860 409,182
1991 465 623 515,881 680,357 164,476 571,888
1 1992 585 676,584 837,214
I 1993 668 802,335 964,956
1 2 YEAR ADJUSTMENT SCHEME:
I 1988 ACTUAL COSTS, DETERMINED IN 1989 AND ADJUSTED IN 1990
EST 1988 419,645
ACT 1988 382.875
I DIFFERENCE - 36,770
EST 1990 447.810
1990 PMT 409,182
1
USING THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, IMAGINE:
1 FLOW COST TOTAL
EST 1991 465 1109 515,881
ACT 1991 623 1092 680.357
I DIFFERENCE 164,476
ADDED TO 1993 PAYMENT
1
THE CYCLE NEVER SEEMS TO CORRECT ITSELF. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION WOULD
I BE FOR THE CITY TO PREPARE IT'S OWN ESTIMATES AND SET RESERVES TO COVER
THE FUTURE VARIANCES.(ie: Bill ourself $1,100,000 in 1993, send $965,000
to M.W.C.C. and reserve the $135,000 difference for subsequent adjustment.)
1 In either event, given the existing rate structure and customer base (with
allowance for moderate growth), we are not going to take in enough dollars
to pay the bill.
1
1
1
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 1
FINAL COST ALLOCATION FOR BUDGET YEAR 1991 1
5028
CHANHASSEN , 1
MILLION
111
GALLONS AMOUNT •
1
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 623 646,939
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 4 623 33,418 1
1
TOTAL CURRENT USE CHARGES 680,357
1
1
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT • (1,858) 1
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 0 1
1989 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 57,865
TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 56,007
1
1
TOTAL ANNUAL ACTUAL CHARGES 736,364
1991 CASH PAYMENTS 571,884 1
NET SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (164.480) 1
•
1
II CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
1 RESOLUTION
1 Date: Resolution No.
Motion By: Seconded By:
1
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL
1 SEWER AND WATER RATES
WHEREAS, this municipality maintains a public sanitary
I sewer system and public water system; and
1 WHEREAS, Chanhassen City Code Chapter 19 provides that
the City Council may from time to time establish revised rate
1 schedules for usage of the public sanitary sewer system and
the public water system.
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen City
1 Council:
1. The following water use rates are hereby established:
1 A. Connected Structures
The following charges are imposed on each
1 structure connected to the municipal water system:
? (1) A minimum charge of #5.5 per dwelling unit
I ../' or per billing statement generated for
quarterly water usage not exceeding 5,000
allons.
1,/ (2) A charge o #1.10 per 1,000 gallons, or
fraction th , for all quarterly water
usage up to 25,000 gallons and,
.(3) A char of per 1,000 gallons, or
1, 3 fraction thereof, for all quarterly water
I usage in excess of 25,000 gallons.
� , � (4) A charge of $8.00 per year for each
connection to the municipal water system
I to support mandated water quality testing
services.
II -,
1
1
B. Unconnected Structures 1
A quarterly charge of $10.00 is hereby imposed on
each single family attached dwelling, each single
family detached dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure which is not
connected to the municipal water system when
municipal water service is available.
2. The following sewer usage rates are hereby established:
A. Structures Connected to Both Sewer and Water
A quarterly charge, based on winter quarter
municipal water usage, is hereby imposed on each
single family dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure, which is connected
to both the municipal water system and the
municipal sewer system as follows:
(1) A separate billing statement shall be 1
generated for each water meter, and
e (2) A charge of $2.40 er 1,000 gallons or
fraction the for all quarterly water usage
provided however that the minimum quarterly
charge shall be $12.00.
6 3,.71; Alternate System of Billing Computation
If water consumption during the winter billing 1
quarter does not accurately approximate actual
sewer usage throughout the entire billing
year, the quarterly sewer charge shall be
based upon water consumption during such other
billing quarter as most accurately reflects
actual sewer usage during the entire billing
year. If water consumption during any
particular billing quarter does not accurately
approximate actual sewer usage, the quarterly
sewer charge shall be based upon average
quarterly water consumption during the entire
billing year, or such other method as in the
opinion of the City Engineer which most
closely approximates actual sewer usage.
-2- 1
1
1
1
1
1 B. Structures Connected to Sewer But Not to Water
(1) Regular Residential Rate
1 A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each
single family detached dwelling which is
connected to the municipal sewer system but
•• • the municipal water system as follows:
$48.08 per dwelling unit.
1 (a) Senior Citizen Discount. Provided,
how- - -, hat the quarterly charge shall
be $24.08 - per quarter if said dwelling
' unit is occupied by no more that two
( ' persons:
i) at least one of whom is at least
65 years of age, and
ii) at least one of whom is the owner
of said dwelling unit.
(b) Alternate System of Billing Computation
' The quarterly sewer charge shall be based
upon actual private source water consump-
tion and upon the rates set forth in
Section A, above, if a water metering
system acceptable to the City has been
installed, through which accurate water
consumption records can be established.
' (2) Non - Residential Rates
' A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is connected to the municipal
sewer system but not to the municipal water
system, at rates set forth in Section A,
above, and on the basis of deemed sewer usage
as estimated by the City Engineer on a
case -by -case basis approximating as closely as
possible actual sewer usage of similar land
uses actually connected to the municipal sewer
and water systems.
' -3
1
1
1
i
C. Structures Not Connected to Sewer 1
(1) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each '
single family detached dwelling, which is not
connected to the municipal sewer system
though connection is required by City
ordinance as follows:
$96.00 per dwelling unit, provided,
1
/ owe that the quarterly charge shall
l (/ be :48.0 per dwelling unit if said
ewe ing unit is occupied by no more than
� two persons, at least one of whom is at
5 least 65 years of age, and at least one
of whom is the owner of said dwelling
unit. ,
(2) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is not connected to the
municipal sewer system though connection is
required by City ordinances, at the rates set
forth in Section A, above, on the basis of
deemed sewer usage as estimated by the City
Engineer on a case-by -case basis approximating
as closely as possible two times actual sewer 11 usage of similar land uses actually connected
to the municipal sewer and water systems.
D. Effective Date
1
15 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these rates shall be
effective in entirety commencing with billings
� 9 112
a fter( 1, 1992' .'77)
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this
1
day of 19 2.
ATTEST:
Don Ashworth, Clerk /Manager Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor
-4-
1
1
1
1 CITYOF
III
1 _4)
1 i CHANHASSEN
0 , , 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
1 (612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
MEMORANDUM
1 DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager / �L�
I FROM: Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator
1 SUBJECT: 1992 Sewer and Water Rates
The 1992 Budget as approved by the City Council on November 25,
1991, included the revised 1992 Budget for the Sewer and Water
II Enterprise Fund. This specific budget contained revenue assump-
tions based upon my proposal of November 4 (attached).
I The attached proposed resolution contains one additional change
regarding the effective date of the rates. This is primarily for
simplification of applying the new rate for sewer in entirety
rather than past practice whereby we did a split of charges between
II previous and current year. This application should realize an
additional $80,000 to $100,000 in revenue and further diminish our
potential shortage for the year.
I The timing for approval of the new rate schedules is critical
because of the preparation work necessary to implement program
1 changes, etc.
Attachments
1 •
1
1
Is
t0 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CITY OF CHANHASSEN i
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 1
Date: Resolution No.
Motion By: Seconded By:
1
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL
SEWER AND WATER RATES
1
WHEREAS, this municipality maintains a public sanitary
sewer system and public water system; and
WHEREAS, Chanhassen City Code Chapter 19 provides that
the City Council may from time to time establish revised rate
schedules for usage of the public sanitary sewer system and
the public water system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen City
Council: '
1. The following water use rates are hereby established:
A. Connected Structures 1
The following quarterly charge is imposed on each
1 structure connected to the municipal water system:
(1) A minimum charge of *5.50 per dwelling unit
or per billing statement generated for
quarterly water usage not exceeding 5,000
gallons.
(2) A charge of *1.10 per 1,000 gallons, or '
fraction thereof, for all quarterly water
usage up to 25,000 gallons and,
(3) A charge of *1.30 per 1,000 gallons, or
fraction thereof, for all quarterly water
usage in excess of 25,000 gallons. 1
1
i
i
1
B. Unconnected Structures
Mi
A quarterly charge of $10.00 is hereby imposed on
each single family attached dwelling, each single
family detached dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure which is not
connected to the municipal water system when
municipal water service is available.
2. The following sewer usage rates are hereby established:
A. Structures Connected to Both Sewer and Water
A quarterly charge, based on winter quarter
' municipal water usage, is hereby imposed on each
single family dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure, which is connected
' to both the municipal water system and the
municipal sewer system as follows:
(1) A separate billing statement shall be
generated for each water meter, and
(2) A charge of $2.60 per 1,000 gallons or
' fraction thereof for all quarterly water usage
provided however, that the minimum quarterly
charge shall be $13.00.
Alternate System of Billing Computation
If water consumption during the winter billing
quarter does not accurately approximate actual
sewer usage throughout the entire billing
year, the quarterly sewer charge shall be
based upon water consumption during such other
billing quarter as most accurately reflects
actual sewer usage during the entire billing
year. If water consumption during any
particular billing quarter does not accurately
approximate actual sewer usage, the quarterly
sewer charge shall be based upon average
quarterly water consumption during the entire
billing year, or such other method as in the
opinion of the City Engineer which most
closely approximates actual sewer usage.
-2-
1
1
1
B. Structures Connected to Sewer But Not to Water
(1) Regular Residential Rate
A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each
single family detached dwelling which is
connected to the municipal sewer system but
not to the municipal water system as follows:
$52.00 per dwelling unit.
(a) Senior Citizen Discount. Provided,
however, that the quarterly charge shall
be $26.00 per quarter if said dwelling
unit is occupied by no more that two
persons:
i) at least one of whom is at least
65 years of age, and 1
ii) at least one of whom is the owner
of said dwelling unit.
(b) Alternate System of Billing Computation
The quarterly sewer charge shall be based
upon actual private source water consump-
tion and upon the rates set forth in
Section A, above, if a water metering
system acceptable to the City has been
installed, through which accurate water
consumption records can be established.
(2) Non - Residential Rates 1
A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is connected to the municipal
sewer system but not to the municipal water
system, at rates set forth in Section A,
above, and on the basis of deemed sewer usage
as estimated by the City Engineer on a
case -by -case basis approximating as closely as
possible actual sewer usage of similar land
uses actually connected to the municipal sewer
and water systems.
1
-3-
1
1
1
1
11
C. Structures Not Connected to Sewer
(1) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each
single family detached dwelling, which is not
connected to the municipal sewer system
though connection is required by City
ordinance as follows:
*104.00 per dwelling unit, provided,
however, that the quarterly charge shall
be *52.00 per dwelling unit if said
dwelling unit is occupied by no more than
two persons, at least one of whom is at
' least 65 years of age, and at least one
of whom is the owner of said dwelling
unit.
(2) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is not connected to the
municipal sewer system though connection is
required by City ordinances, at the rates set
forth in Section A, above, on the basis of
' deemed sewer usage as estimated by the City
Engineer on a case -by -case basis approximating
as closely as possible two times actual sewer
usage of similar land uses actually connected
to the municipal sewer and water systems.
D. Effective Date
HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these rates shall be
effective in entirety for all billings after
January 1, 1992.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this
1 day of , 1991.
ATTEST:
Don Ashworth, Clerk /Manager Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor
•
•
1
-4-
CITYOF
CHANHASSEN
690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Don Ashworth. City Manager
7
FRS',: Tom Chaffee. Data Processing Coordinator 1
DATE: November 4. 1991
SUBJECT: Sarita-y Sewer Rate Proposal 1
As directed. I have investigated possible actions necessary to
cc-rect our dillema of the revenue shortage in our sewer /water
utiii fund for 1992.
My ir,itia' reaction was to raise rates high enough to cover the
snorta9e out... I don't think a 46% increase would be palatable ! '
contacted Don Bluhm at M.W.C.C. to determine whether the flow
estimates versus actual were correct. His response is attached
and confirms my original estimate to be quite close. The bad
nehs. or course is our bill is not going down in the immediate
future. Aod •,y. Charles Folch. City Engineer has been working
w-t Ecnn,estroo arid Associates to determine the nature of our over -all
syste c and some possible corrective actions. Naturally,
this effort is intended for the long -term but, for the immediate,
we need tc adjust rates to at least cover a portion of our impending
s "i crtage.
The attached resolution to establish sewer and water rates contains
thane in water rates (just changed in July 1991) but, an increase
in the sewer rates of approximately 20 %. Searing in mind that the
sewer• rates have not been adjusted since 1986 while the Consumer Price
Index: has shown an annual increase of no less than 4%, this increase
doesn't even cover that !
The proposed rate increase will not heal all of our wounds but should
help to avoid a major crises for the immediate future. In addition to
this. I believe we should pursue other corrective actions as suggested
by Bonestroo & Associates to further reduce our Inflow /Infiltration
problems. Also, a concerted effort to inform the public and solicit
their help could be beneficial to all concerned.
i have attached a summary analysis of sewer charges to help portray
the im: act of the proposed increase. •
1
t PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER •
II '
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES. MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
Date: Resolution No.
111 Motion By: Seconded By:
1 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL
SEWER AND WATER RATES
WHEREAS, this municipality maintains a public sanitary
' sewer system and public water system; and
WHEREAS, Chanhassen City Code Chapter 19 provides that
1 the City Council may from time to time establish revised rate
schedules for usage of the public sanitary sewer system and
the public water system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen City
Council:
1. The following water use rates are hereby established:
A. Connected Structures
' The following quarterly charge is imposed on each
structure connected to the municipal water system:
1 (1) A minimum charge of $5.50 per dwelling unit
or per billing statement generated for
quarterly water usage not exceeding 5,000
1 gallons.
(2) A charge of $1.10 per 1,000 gallons, or
fraction thereof, for all quarterly water
usage up to 25,000 gallons and,
t (3) A charge of $1.30 per 1,000 gallons, or
fraction thereof, for all quarterly water
usage in excess of 25,000 gallons.
1
1
•
1
1
B. Unconnected Structures 1
A quarterly charge of $10.00 is hereby imposed on
each single family attached dwelling, each single
family detached dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure which is not
connected to the municipal water system when
municipal water service is available. '
2. The following sewer usage rates are hereby established:
A. Structures Connected to Both Sewer and Water
A quarterly charge. based on winter quarter
municipal water usage, is hereby imposed on each
single family dwelling, each commercial structure
and each industrial structure, which is connected
to both the municipal water system and the
municipal sewer system as follows:
(1) A separate billing statement shall be
generated for each water meter, and
(2) A charge of $2.60 per 1,000 gallons or
fraction thereo for all quarterly water usage
• provided however that the minimum quarterly
.,. ( charge shall be 1$13.003
/, +�' Alternate System of Billing Computation
If water consumption during the winter billing
quarter does not accurately approximate actual
sewer usage throughout the entire billing
'year, the quarterly sewer charge shall be
based upon water consumption during such other
billing quarter as most accurately reflects
actual sewer usage during the entire billing
year. If water consumption during any
particular billing quarter does not accurately
approximate actual sewer usage, the quarterly
sewer charge shall be based upon average
quarterly water consumption during the entire
billing year, or such other method as in the
opinion of the City Engineer which most
closely approximates actual sewer usage. 1
•
-2-
1
1.
B. Structures Connected to Sewer But Not to Water
(1) Regular Residential Rate
A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each
single family detached dwelling which is
' connected to the municipal sewer system but
the municipal water system as follows:
y d 4 -- $52.00 per dwelling unit.
(a) Senior Citizen Discount. Provided,
how ver, that the quarterly charge shall
be $26. per quarter if said dwelling
,; '» unit is occupied by no more that two
persons:
i) at least one of whom is at least
65 years of age, and
ii) at least one of whom is the owner
of said dwelling unit.
(b) Alternate System of Billing Computation
' The quarterly sewer charge shall be based
upon actual private source water consump-
tion and upon the rates set forth in
Section A, above, if a water metering
system acceptable to the City has been
installed, through which accurate water
consumption records can be established.
i (2) Non - Residential Rates
A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is connected to the municipal
sewer system but not to the municipal water
system, at rates set forth in Section A,
above, and on the basis of deemed sewer usage
as estimated by the City Engineer on a
case -by -case basis approximating as closely as
possible actual sewer usage of similar land
uses actually connected to the municipal sewer
and water systems.
-3-
1
1
1
1
11
C. Structures Not Connected to Sewer 1
(1) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
single family attached dwelling and each
single family detached dwelling, which is not
connected to the municipal sewer system
though connection is required by City
ordinance as follows:
•a $104.00 per dwelling unit, provided,
/ - er that the quarterly charge shall
be $52.00 per dwelling unit if said
-we ng unit is occupied by no more than
N y t�J ' two persons, at least one of whom is at
least 65 years of age, and at least one
of whom is the owner of said dwelling
unit.
(2) A quarterly charge is hereby imposed on each
commercial structure and each industrial
structure, which is not connected to the
municipal sewer system though connection is
required by City ordinances, at the rates set
forth in Section A, above, on the basis of
deemed sewer usage as estimated by the City
Engineer on a case -by -case basis approximating
as closely as possible two times actual sewer
usage of similar land uses actually connected
to the municipal sewer and water systems.
D. Effective Date
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these rates shall be
effective from the first day of
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this
day of , 1991. 1
ATTEST:
Don Ashworth, Clerk /Manager Donald J. Chmiel, Mayor
(Published in the Chanhassen Villager on , 1991) ,
i
_4-
1
i
1 .
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
. SEWER RATES /CHARGES ANALYSIS
1
- - -- CURRENT - - -- - -- PROPOSED - --
1 TYPE COUNT AMOUNT AVERAGE AMOUNT AVERAGE
Single Family Res. 3461 131,137.60 37.89 154,980.78 44.78
Senior Citizen 2 41.70 20.85 52.00 26.00
Multiple Dwellings 43 14,317.00 332.95 16,919.83 393.48
Commercial /Industrial 91 46,172.45 507.39 54,567.43 599.64
TOTAL 3,597 191,668.75 * * ** 226,520.04 * * **
The above stated amounts are quarterly amounts using data as of October
31, 1991. Assuming a moderate increase of 69 in our customer base,
the quarterly billing for the same period in 1992 could reach $240,000.
Annualized to $960,000, this will produce a possible shortage of $170,000
for 1992 which will have to be addressed perhaps by an additional increase
in 1993.
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.
1
1992 BUDGET PROPOSAL
II
FUND 700 - SEWER /WATER UTILITY
ALLOCATION SPLIT FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES 1
•
ITEM DESCRIPTION SEWER WATER TOTAL II
REVENUE:
I
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 300 300 600
PERMITS 3,000 3,000 6,000
CURRENT SERVICES 900,000 560,000 1,460,000 .
PENALTIES (58 %- SEWER, 4296WATER) 13,900 10,100 24,000
II
CERTIFICATION (58 %- SEWER, 4296WATER) 3,500 2,500 6,000
CUSTOMER SERVICE 500 500 1,000
SALE OF METERS & PARTS 0 24,000 24,000 II HYDRANT RENTAL /REPAIR 0 1,000 1,000
INTEREST EARNINGS 15,000 15,000 30,000
TOTAL REVENUE 936,200 616,400 1,552,600
II
EXPENDITURES:
701 ADMINISTRATION 62,750 62,750 125,500 II 702 PERSONAL SERVICES 136,450 136,450 272,900
702 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 22,200 59,700 81,900
702 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 912,925 74,925 987,850
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,134,325 333,825 1,468,150
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (198,125) 282,575 84,450
II
1
ABOVE BUDGET DOES NOT INCLUDE ANNUAL DEPRECIATION WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED!
APPROXIMATELY $600,000 ANNUALY FOR DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
II
ABOVE REVENUE ESTIMATES ASSUME ADOPTION OF PROPOSED SEWER RATE INCREASE !!
11
1
1 •
II
1
.1
1
111 M.W.C.C. BILLINGS COMPARISON
I *-- FLOW - -* ** DOLLARS *
YEAR EST. ACT. ESTIMATE ACTUAL DIFFERENCE PAYMENT •
1988 425 360 , 419,645 382,875 - 36,770 400,190
1989 385 439 394,187 452,052 57,865 374,248
II 1990 410 550 447,810 571,670 123,860 409,182
1991 465 515,881 571,888
II 1992 585 676,584 837,214
* 1993 600 693,600 809,849
II
* 1993 REPRESENTS STAFF ESTIMATE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES
II 2 YEAR ADJUSTMENT SCHEME:
1988 ACTUAL COSTS, DETERMINED IN 1989 AND ADJUSTED IN 1990
EST 1988 419,645
ACT 1988 382.875
II DIFFERENCE - 36,770
EST 1990 447,810
. 1990 PMT 409,182
II USING THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, IMAGINE:
II FLOW COST TOTAL
EST 1991 465 1109 515,881
ACT 1991 570 1109 632.130
II DIFFERENCE 116,249
TO BE ADDED TO 1993 PAYMENT
II THE CYCLE NEVER SEEMS TO CORRECT ITSELF. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION WOULD
BE FOR THE CITY TO PREPARE IT'S OWN ESTIMATES AND SET RESERVES TO COVER
THE FUTURE VARIANCES.(ie: Bill ourself $900,000 in 1992,send $837,000
to M.W.C.C. and reserve the $63,000 difference for subsequent adjustment.) •
1 In either event, given the existing rate structure and customer base (with
allowance for moderate growth), we are not going to take in enough dollars
to pay the bill.
II
II
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 222 -8423
1
October 29, 1991 REC�l�
OCT 3 0 1991 ,
Mr. . Thomas Chaffee
C111 . ut - �>yANnRSSEf�
Data Processing Coordinator
City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
Chanhassen, MN 55317 '
Dear Mr. Chaffee:
This letter is a follow -up to our telephone conversation of October
24, 1991 regarding the projected flow for the City of Chanhassen
for 1991.
The Commission has reviewed the flow data for the City of
Chanhassen through September of 1991. We have assumed that the
unmetered flow for the city has not changed from last year, which
is probably not the case. Based on the current data the Commission
projects the final flow for the city to be approximately 565
million gallons. The Commission in discussions with the city
earlier this year indicated that the flow from our new meter M -415
is higher than the old meter. The Commission has tested the new
meter and believes that it is reading correctly.
If you have any further questions, please call.
Sincerely, 1
a--taPA6,
Donald S. Bluhm
Municipal Services Manager
DSB:jle
L28.DSB
•
• 1
1
Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
CsC — • — 1 TLIE 1 7 _ 5 1 ECSt•IE $.TF :Cs e:: AS...S•C I GiTE c• F Cs�
Ono G. brrsopp ►E KM Gomm. RE astah R Rbfs PE
1 . nil Bones t roo abbey? W b>eAe Ii RtWsc W Roam. RE beer. C Rwsty A —... C ►�.R Apr
Jetey+ C. MOM RE Oonaks C �sPpm Pi Thanks f P 0 As R. Art r
s{ : Rosene Manton t Sorasa RE Jtny A. SWOOP, /.E avowaso A union ' b ho rE
rn ►E
1 in �, Wham E Aura. RE Man A hansom. , P.E. Daniel 1 Eapenon. PC Creak Dwti,
Andertik & , R Cook. P.C. let IC Cm RE Man A f w PE beer. a AI e n ,
of
ril
us E Noel P.E. A4+ue1 T Rautrrm Rhea RE ea 1 Caswt#. Kamm werre L I f
?►on E
been G ienwrcnt RE been R. Ik'7trse. ke atones Maf n ec PI rnc• " Yaoo PE
Associates Essw+ Eatntn. PA. o"HOotosEOa PC. AAarxe waea
Thor s W Nurser P.C. Leo M A Er yky
?NMMS R Mder�n. A f A t[O M IiMt!f ty
1
Engineers & Architects • Mow C ioneh. P.C. airy F. Ry$vn r.. RE ►w,an u o,,,,,,
James R Wand. P.C. Antes 1 Jensen RE
Ir.... n .wew. Pt 4.. moo Law ■. PE
October 29, 1991
1 City of Chanhassen
690 Coulter Drive
1 Chanhassen, MN 55317 .
•
' - Attn: Mr. Charles Folch
1 City Engineer
Re: MUSA Water and Sewer Studies •
1 Our File No. 39303
Dear Charles:
1 We have completed p d the engineering evaluation for the sanitary sewer portion of the MUSA
1 Studies and are in the process of completing the model of the water distribution system for the
water portion. During the course of our investigations two policy issues and several fundamental
questions have been raised. This letter summarizes the policy issues and fundamental questions.
1 POLICY ISSUES
1) Should the MUSA Studies be Expanded to Comprehensive Water and Sanitary Sewer
' Studies?
The MUSA Studies currently include establishing the ultimate water and sewer systems
1 for the Buff Creek & Lake Ann Districts. The sewer portion has been expanded to include the
Riley Lake District and an evaluation of the MWCC system in Eden Prairie. The MUSA
studies have progressed to the point where they could be expanded to Comprehensive Water
1 and Sanitary Sewer Studies. These comprehensive studies would provide an overall guide and
financial program for the completion of the ultimate sanitary sewer and water systems for
I Chanhassen. Combined with the Comprehensive Plan and the Water Resources Management
Plan, they would provide a uniform foundation for the successful completion of Chanhassen
infrastructure. Details of the tasks and costs associated with the comprehensive planning efforts
• are presented in previous submittals to the City.
1 2) . •
Should Chanhassen Accelerate its Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Program?
The City of Chanhassen has been plagued by excessive infiltration and inflow in its
sanitary sewer system. Over the past several years, the City has undertaken projects to reduce
I this extraneous water. These projects have included repair /replacement of sewers in the
Downtown Area and a manhole inspection and repair program. Our analysis of indicates that
wastewater flows have been somewhat reduced.
1 Page 1.
1 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113.612- 636-4600.35th Anniversary
L„: T -- _ — ' 1 TLUE 1 7 - 5 F:�0t1E:S:TF.:0C� Et. i��.5:t =�� =: I iiTE F et 7.
•
1
Recently the MWCC published an Interim Report on Systemwide Infiltration/Inflow. I
This study indicates that Chanhassen still has pelentially excessive infiltration and irfleA.
Pertinent oata rrom the MWCC's study is summarized below:
1
MWCC Ii∎T LTRATIONINFLOW am STUDY
CRANRASSEN DATA SUMMARY
1
Item 1989 12Z2
' Total Flow (MG)* 444 530
1
Base Flow (MG) 329 329
Groundwater Infiltration (MG) 96 172
Rainfall - Dependent I/I (MG) 19 29 1
Average Groundwater Infiltration 33 gallons per capita /day
Peak Day Rainfall - Dependent I/I 215 gallons per capita /day 1
•
Dry Weather Peak Ratio 1.62
Wet Weather Peak Ratio 2.81
I
• million gallons
The designation of potentially excessive I/I means that portions of the extraneous water can be I
cost effectively removed from the sanitary sewer system. The removal of. groundwater
infiltration will reduce annual flows and the billings from the MWCC while the removal of I
rainfall - dependent I/I will reduce peak flows and make more interceptor capacity available.
Chanhassen's best opportunity for flow removal would be to eliminate sump pump connections 1
from the system and thereby reduce the rainfall - dependent I/I. The City could start a program
to inform residents of the problem and to inspect homes. Another option would be a
disincentive program where charges for sump pumps are added to the utility bills. The I
reduction of rainfall dependent I/I would free up MWCC Interceptor capacity in Eden Prairie
for development in the Bluff Creek/Riley Lake Districts. Acceleration of the City's manhole
inspection /televising program could result in a reduction of groundwater infiltration and a 1
reduction in the City's total annual flow.
FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS '
During our investigations, we developed several fundamental questions regarding the design and
financing of Chanhassen's ultimate sewer and water systems. We are prepared to make
technical recommendations on these questions but feel that a discussion between the City
Council, City Staff and oqr staff would be beneficial to the decision making process. The
fundamental questions and a description of the issues are presented below:
I Should Chanhassen
1
hassen build permanent facilities in the Bluff Creek and Riley Creek
Districts to pump wastewater back to the Red Rock Interceptor in Eden Prairie? 1
Page 2.
39303.cnr 1
The MWCC Red Rock Interceptor in Eden Prairie has 13.1 MGD (million gallons per
day) capacity allocated to Chanhassen and an excess capacity of 3 -4 MGD. The MWCC
appears willing to allocate the excess capacity to Chanhassen for flow from the Bluff/Riley
Creek Districts. The MWCC feels that this allocation could eliminate the need for MWCC
' Interceptor facilities to serve the Bluff Creek District. Chanhassen would get sufficient capacity
to serve most and perhaps all of the Bluff/Riley Creek Districts.
' 2) Should Chanhassen develop a funding program using a uniform combination of area
charges and connection charges to finance the completion of the sanitary sewer system?
The City currently uses a connection charge of $650 to fund trunk sanitary sewer
• improvements. This charge was modified for the recent Lake Ann Interceptor Assessments.
The MUSA study defines the facilities, costs and service areas of the Lake Ann, Bluff Creek and
Riley Creek Districts. These data would allow the City to establish uniform area and connection
charges in these developing districts.
3) Should Chanhassen establish dual clustered well fields for water supply?
Chanhassen currently has three wells south of Lotus Lake, a well at Lake Susan, a well
on Galpin Lake Blvd. and a small well near the school. Studies indicate that the South Lotus
Lake Well field could be expanded and that good quality water is available at the Galpin Lake
Blvd. well. It would be possible to develop clustered well fields at both locations. The dual well
field concept would provide a safe water supply with the water drawn from two separate
aquifers but would still provide clustered supply sources in the event treatment was necessary.
' 4) Should Chanhassen look for a water tower she east of T.H. 41 to serve bath the
Minnewashta Lake area and the T.H. 5 area?
The City currently has plans to construct a tower in the area southwest of Minnewashta
Lake. The purpose of this tower is to provide a redundant source of water for the service area
around Lake Minnewashta. The MUSA Study has identified a tower site on east side of T.H.
41 south of T.H. 5. A tower constructed at this site could serve both the T.H. 5 corridor
development and the Lake Minnewashta area with a water main along T.H. 5.
' We would be pleased to meet with the Chanhassen Council and Staff to discuss the MUSA
Studies, the policy questions, or the fundamental design questions.
1 Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
•
Robert G. Schunicht
RGSai
I
39303.cor Page 3.
•
i
1
1
SOME PERSONAL EXAMPLES OF IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED SEWER RATE CHANGE
• 1
1
VOLUME 1991 PROPOSED
CUSTOMER BASIS RATE _?ATE DIFFERENCE 1
Ashworth 17 37.40 44.20 6.80
Chmiel 24 52.80 62.40 9.60 1
Dimler 22 48.40 57.20 8.80
Mason 13 28.60 33.80 5.20 1
Wing 20 44.00 52.00 8.00
Average single family 18 39.60 46.80 7.20
Above rates are quarterly charges as of October 31, 1991.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CITYOF
0
i CHANHASSEN
1 111110
1 1 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317
(612) 937 -1900 • FAX (612) 937 -5739
1
II TO: Don Ashworth, City Manager
FROM: Tom Chaffee, Data Processing Coordinator
1 RE: Sewer /Water Utility Fund
1 The 1992 proposed budget for the sewer /water utility fund shows our
gnterprise Fund operating at a loss of *55,550.00. The primary
factor is the *838,000.00 payment to the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission for sewer treatment. This represents an increase of
1 *265,000.00 or 46.6 per cent. Another example of the painful
reality that outside agencies ( in this case the M.W.C.C.) continue
to severely impact our local government operation in a negative
1 manner while placing the responsibility of gccountability directly on
our shoulders. While we continue to strive for economic prudence on
behalf of our citizenry, uncontrolled outside forces seem to continue
1 undermining our efforts. In this case, we have not just been subjected
to large increases in costs, but also victimized by extremely poor
estimates of sewer flow. ',
1 I have attached the detail billings from M.W.C.C. for 1988 -1992
along with the final. cost- allocations for 1988 -1990. Additionally,
I have summarized estimate versus actual to portray the 2 year delay
I adjustment scheme they use that has put :us in our current dilemma.
Notice the 1991 billing is based on an estimated flow of 465 million
gallons, when the 1990 actual flow was 550 million gallons.
Additionally, consider the extreme rainfall we experienced in 1991 and
II you could conclude that the 1991 actual flow will probably exceed
the estimate by at least 100 million gallons, gleaning another
significant " adjustment" in our 4993 bill.- --4 .bave . ay "guesstimate'
1 as to how this could affect our 1993 billi>iij. :..-:
In summation, we have a ..problem that is not likely to resolve itself
1 without some action on our partl
Any suggestions?
1 cc: Charles Folch, City .Engineer
Paul Krauss, City Planner
1
•
1 ,t
%9 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
1 .
1
II
G PROPOSAL
II BUDGET
FUND 700 — SEWER /WATER UTILITY
II
ALLOCATION SPLIT FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES
II
•
ITEM DESCRIPTION SEWER ,MATER DOTAL , 1
REVENUE:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 300 300 600 '
PERMITS 3,000 3,000 6,000
CURRENT SERVICES 760,000 560,000 1,320,000
PENALTIES (58X— SEWER, 42XWATER) 13,900 10,100 24,000
CERTIFICATION (58X— SEWER, 42%WATER) 3,500 2,500 6,000
CUSTOMER SERVICE 500 500 1,000
SALE OF METERS & PARTS 0 24,000 24,000
HYDRANT RENTAL /REPAIR 0 1,000 1,000
II
INTEREST EARNINGS 15.000 15.000 30.000.
TOTAL REVENUE 796,200 616,400 1,412,600
II
EXPENDITURES:
II
701 ADMINISTRATION 62,750 62,750 125,500
702 PERSONAL SERVICES 136,450 136,450 272,900
702 MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 22,200 59,700 81,900
II
702 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 912.925 74.925 987.850.
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,134,325 333,825 1,468,150
II
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (338,125) 282,575 (55,550) 1
1
ABOVE BUDGET DOES NOT INCLUDE ANNUAL DEPRECIATION WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED:
APPROXIMATELY $600,000 ANNUALY FOR DEPRECIATION EXPENSE.
II
;REAR N • - 4.14' W. a' ;_• . X i ; , I
1
1
1
II
1
M.W.C.C. BILLINGS COMPARISON
1 .
* -- FLOW - -* * * - --- --- DOLLARS --- -*
YEAR EST. ACT. JSTIMATE _ACTUAL DIFFERENCE PAYMENT
II 1988 425 360 419,645 382,875 - 36,770 400,190
II _1989 . 385 439`. 394,187 432,113 37,926 374,248
1990 410 550 447,810 571,670 123,860 . 409,182
II 1991 x .465 ' 515,881 571,888
1992 585 571,670 837,214
II * 1993 610 735,050 857,085
1 * 1993 REPRESENTS STAFF ESTIMATE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES
YEAR ADJUSTMENT_SCHEME:
1 1988 ACTUAL COSTS, DETERMINED IN 1989 AND ADJUSTED IN 1990
I EST 1988
ACT 1988 382.875
DIFFERENCE - 36,770
1 - EST 1990 447.810
1990 PMT 409,182
II USING THE ABOVE EXAMPLE, IMAGINE:
FLOW COST TOTAL
1 EST 1991 465 1109 515,881
ACT 1991 5/5 1109 537.916
DIFFERENCE 122,035
11 TO BE ADDED TO 1993 PAYMENT
1 THE CYCLE NEVER SEEMS TO CORRECT ITSELF. THE ONLY REAL SOLUTION WOULD
BE FOR THE CITY TO PREPARE IT'S OWN ESTIMATES AND SET RESERVES TO COVER
THE FUTURE VARIANCES.(ie: Bill ourself 8900,000 in 1992,send 5837,000
1 to M.W.C.C. and reserve the 863,000 difference for subsequent adjustment.)
In either event, given the existing rate structure and customer base (with
I allowance for moderate growth), we are not going to take in enough dollars
to pay the bill.
1
1
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
STATEMENT OF 1992 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 1
5028
CHANHASSEN -
1
ESTIMATED COST
GALLONAGE FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT 1
CURRENT USE CHARGES: 1
SEWER SERVICE COST 585 1156.55 676,584.42
TOTAL CHARGES 676,584.42 1
1
1
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES:
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT (1,858.00)
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 0.00 1
1990 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 162,488.07
TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES 160 630.07
1
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE - 637,214.49
1
M ONTHLY INSTALLMENT • 69,767.87
Due on the first day of each month. Installments not
received by the 10th of each month In which due shall be
regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest from the _
first day of such month at the rate of 6% per annum. - - 7 • 1
1
IF '
1 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COI+MISSION
• FINAL COST ALLOCATION FOR BUDGET YEAR 1990
I 5028 •
CHANHASSEN
MILLION
GALLONS AMOUNT
•
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 550 546,986.50
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 4 550 63,311.48
1
TOTAL CURRENT USE CHARGES 610,297.98
1 •
1 OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT 1,858.00
1 DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 0.00
1988 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 36,769.67
TOTAL OTHER CHARGES 38,627.67
1
I TOTAL ANNUAL ACTUAL CHARGES 571,670.31
1990 CASH PAYMENTS 409,182.24
NET SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (162,488.07)
1
1
1
1
1
. 1
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION ■
STATEMENT OF 1991 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
112 1
CHANHASSEN
ESTIMATED COST 1
GALLONAGE FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 465 1047.25 $486,973.00 . II
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 465 62.17 28,907.00
11
TOTAL CHARGES $515,881.00
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES 1
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT $ 1,858.00 CR
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT
1989 FINAL COST ALLOCATION (57,865.00) DR
TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES $(56,007.00) DR
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE $571,888.00 1
MONTHLY INSTALLMENT • $ 47,657.00 1
•
1 Due on the first day of each .month. Installments not
received by the 10th day of each month In which due •
shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear Interest
from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per
annum.
I/
•
• 11
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONT ROL COMMISSION
FINAL COST ALLOCATION FOR BUDGET YEAR 1989
112 •
CHANHASSEN
1
MILLION
GALLONS AMOUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 439 385,547.13
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. .4 439 66,504.84
TOTAL CHARGES 452,051.97
•
1
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
1 CURRENT VALUE CREDIT 1,858.00 CR
' DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT
1987 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 18,080.66 CR
TOTAL CHARGES OR CREDITS 19,938.66 CR
1
TOTAL ANNUAL ACTUAL CHARGES 432,113.31
I 19 89 CASH PAYMENTS 374 247.86
•
NET SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) (57,865.45)
1
1
1
1
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
STATEMENT OF 1990 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
112
CHANHASSEN
ESTIMATED COST ,
GALLONAGE FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
1
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 410 971.00 $398,110.29
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 4 410 121.21 $49,699.63 1
TOTAL CHARGES $447,809.91
•
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES •
•
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT $1,858.00 CR
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT • $0.00 CR
1988 FINAL COST ALLOCATION $36,769.67 CR
TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES $38,627.67 CR
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE $409,182.24 1
MONTHLY INSTALLMENT $34,098.52'
•
Due on the first day of each month. Installments not
recieved by the 10th day of each month in which due
shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest
from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per
annum. • 1
•
.
}
11
1
-
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION
•
FINAL COST ALLOCATION FOR BUDGET YEAR 1988
1
112
CHANHASSEN
MILLION
GALLONS AMOUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 360 306,020.85
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 4 360 76,854.48
II TOTAL CHARGES .
382,875.34
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT 1,858.00 CR
1 DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT
1986 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 17,596.49 CR
1
TOTAL CHARGES OR CREDITS 19,454.49 CR
1
•
1 TOTAL ANNUAL ACTUAL CHARGES 363,420.85
1988 CASH PAYMENTS . 400,190.52
NET SURPLUS (OR DEFICIT) 36,769.67
•
•
i
It
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 1
STATEMENT OF 1989 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
•
112
CHANHASSEN
M t%Aowb ESTIMATED COST 1
• GALLONAGE FOR M GALLONS AMOUNT'
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 385 844.7446 $325,226.67 1
•
SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 385 179.1165 68,959.85
TOTAL CHARGES $394,186.52
1
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT $ 1,858.00 CR II
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT
1987 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 18 080.66 CR
TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES II
EDI 0 C E $ 19,938.66 CR
1
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED. NET PAYMENT DUE $374,247.86
MONTHLY INSTALLMENT • $ 31,187.32
Due on the first day of each month. Installments not
received by the 10th day of each month in which due
•
shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest
from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per
annum.
1
1
r'.
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL CoMMIISSION
STATEMENT OF 1988 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
112
CHANHASSEN
ESTD TED COST
GALLONAGE FOR M GALLONS ____ AMOUNT
CURRENT USE CHARGES:
TREATMENT WORK COSTS 425 779.50 $331,287.50
r SEATER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 425 207.90 88,357.50
TOTAL CHARGES $419,645.00
OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES .
CURRENT VALUE CREDIT $ 1,858.00 CR
DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT
' 1986 FINAL COST ALLOCATION •17,596.49 CR
TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES $ 19, 454.49 CR
TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE
$400,190.51
r MONTHLY INSTALLMENT
$ 33,349.21
1
Due on the first day of each month. Installments not
received by the 10th day of each month in which due
shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest
from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per
annum.
1 .
r -