Wetland Delineation Report 05-24-2011 GES Project No. 2011.009 Chanhassen Site Wetland Delineation Report May 24, 2011 Looking West Across the Site From Wetland C
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota May 24, 2011 Background Graham Environmental Services, Inc. (GES) was retained to complete a site evaluation for jurisdictional wetl ands on a parcel located in part of the NW ¼ NE ¼ and part of the NE ¼ NS W ¼ of Section 24, T116N, R23W, Carver County. The site lies immedi ately north of Highway 212 and south of W. 86 th Street in the City of Chanhassen (Figure 1 ). As shown on the U.S.G.S. Quadrangle map (Figure 2 ), the topography on the site is rolling. On April 28 and May 4, 2011, GES conducted an evaluation of the site and delineated five wetlands within the project vicinity as shown on a recent aerial photograph in Figure 3 . Methodologies The site was assessed for wetlands using the on-site methods contained in the “Routine Determinations” sect ion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “Wetlands Delineation Manual ” (Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987), as well as “Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual: Midwest Region” (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2010). This is the methodology currently used to determine wetlands by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and by Local Government Units under the Wetland Conservation Act. GES classified the wetlands under t he U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Cowardin system, Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed methodologies. Soil colors descri bed herein follow Munsell Soil Color Charts. Hydric soil pr operties described follow Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (Untied States Departm ent of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States , Version 7.0. L.M. Vasili as, G.W. Hurt and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooper ation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils).
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 2 of 7 Results GES identified five wetlands within the property boundaries as discussed below. Wetland A Wetland A is located across much of t he northern portion of the site. The wetland is bounded by relatively gradual grades on all sides except the west which is defined by a constructed berm. The upland/wetland boundary was investigated along a single transect on the southern boundary. A drainage ditch drains the wetland and flows to the east. Dominant vegetation in the wetl and includes reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea ) and sandbar willow (Salix interior ). Upland vegetation is dominated by Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis ) and Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis ). Soils were evaluated by digging soil pits along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary and examining the profile ’s texture, color, and redoximorphic characteristics. So ils in the wetland in Transect 1 are described as 10 YR 3/2 loam over 10YR 5/1 silt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles over 10YR 3/1 silt loam with 10Y R 4/6 mottles over N 2/0 silt loam. Surface water measured approximately three inches in depth. Upland soils at Transect 1 are described as 10YR 3/2 sandy loam over 10YR 4/3 sandy loam. No free water or satu ration was observed in the upland soil pit. The jurisdictional boundary was estab lished where the soil profile in the upland soils demonstrates a lighter matr ix tone, there is a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators are absent in the upland and a change in topography occurs. The National Wetlands Inventory map (Figure 4 ) is generally consistent with our wetland delineation. Like the NWI, we would classify the wetland as seasonally flooded palustrine em ergent drained (PEMCd) under the Cowardin system which would equat e to Type 3 inland shallow fresh marsh under the Circular 39 system and Shallow Marsh (13B) under the Eggers and Reed system. The Carver County Soil Survey (Figure 5 ) shows the soils in the vicinity of Wetland A to be Glencoe clay loam and Hamel loam. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6 ) does not map Wetland A as a protected water or wetland.
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 3 of 7 Wetland B Wetland B is in the eastern portion of the site and was examined along a single transect in its western boundar y. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes box elder (Acer negundo ), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica ), common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica ) and lake sedge (Carex lacustris ). Dominant upland vegetation includes green ash and Kentucky bluegrass. Soils were evaluated by digging soil pi ts along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary and examining the profile ’s texture, color, and redoximorphic characteristics. Soils in the wetland are described as 10YR 2/1 silt loam over 10YR 5/1 clay loam. Surface water was estimated to be approximately two inches in dept h. Upland soils at Transect 1 are described as 10YR 3/2 silt loam. No free water or saturation was observed in the upland soil pit. The jurisdictional boundary was estab lished where the soil profile in the upland soils demonstrates a lighter matr ix tone, there is a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators are absent in the upland and a relatively abrupt change in topography occurs. The National Wetlands Inventory map (Figure 4) is generally consistent with our wetland delineation. Like the NWI, we would classify the wetland as seasonally flooded palustrine em ergent (PEMC) under the Cowardin system which would equate to Type 3 inland shallow fresh marsh under the Circular 39 system and Shallow Marsh (13B) under the Eggers and Reed system. The Carver County Soil Survey (Figure 5) shows the soils in the vicinity of Wetland B Transect 1 to be Hamel l oam. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6) does not map Wetland B. Wetland C Wetland C is a small wetland in the southeastern part of the site. Dominant vegetation in the wetland in cludes reed canary grass. Upland vegetation is dominated by green ash, smooth brome (Bromus inermis ) and Canada goldenrod. Soils were evaluated by digging soil pits along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary and examining the profile ’s texture, color, and redoximorphic characteristics. Soils in the wetland are described as 10YR 2/1 silt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles over N 2/0 silt loam over 10YR 4/1 clay loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles. Surface water was estimated to be
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 4 of 7 approximately two inches in depth. Upland soils at Transect 1 are described as 10YR 3/2 silt loam over N 2/0 silt loam. No free water or saturation was observed in the upland soil pit. The jurisdictional boundary was estab lished where the soil profile in the upland soils demonstrates a lighter matr ix tone, there is a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators are absent in the upland and a change in topography occurs. The National Wetlands Inventory map (Figure 4) is generally consistent with our wetland delineation. We would classify the wetland as saturated palustrine emergent drained (PEMBd) under the Cowardin system which would equate to Type 2 inland fresh meadow under the Cir cular 39 system and Fresh (Wet) Meadow (15B) under the Eggers and Reed system. The Carver County Soil Survey (Figure 5) shows the soils in the vicinity of Wetland C Transect 1 to be Hamel l oam. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6) does not map Wetland C. Wetland D Wetland D is a small wetland in the southern part of the site which drains to Wetland C via a shallow, excavat ed drainageway. Dominant vegetation in the wetland includes reed canary grass, box elder and staghorn sumac (Rhus hirta ). Upland vegetation is dominat ed by staghorn sumac, smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis ). Soils were evaluated by digging soil pits along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary and examining the profile ’s texture, color, and redoximorphic characteristics. Soils in the wetland are described as 10YR 3/1 silt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottl es over 10YR 4/2 silt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles over 10YR 5/1 silt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles. Free water was observed approximately eight inches below the surface in the wetland soil pit. Upland soils at Trans ect 1 are described as 10YR 3/2 silt loam over 10YR 4/2 silt loam with 10Y R 4/6 mottles. No free water or saturation was observed in the upland soil pit. The jurisdictional boundary was estab lished where the soil profile in the upland soils demonstrates a lighter matr ix tone, there is a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators are absent in the upland and a change in topography occurs. The National Wetlands Inventory map (Figure 4) is generally consistent with our wetland delineation. We would classify the wetland as saturated
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 5 of 7 palustrine emergent drained (PEMBd) under the Cowardin system which would equate to Type 2 inland fresh meadow under the Cir cular 39 system and Fresh (Wet) Meadow (15B) under the Eggers and Reed system. The Carver County Soil Survey (Figure 5) shows the soils in the vicinity of Wetland D Transect 1 to be Hamel l oam. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6) does not map Wetland D. Wetland E Wetland E is a very small wetland in t he northwestern part of the site. The wetland appears to have been historically connected to Wetland A but is not separated by an upland berm. Do minant vegetation in the wetland includes American elm (Ulmus americana ), eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides ), and box elder. Up land vegetation is dominated by box elder and common buckthorn. Soils were evaluated by digging soil pits along a transect perpendicular to the wetland/upland boundary and examining the profile ’s texture, color, and redoximorphic characteristics. Soils in the wetland are described as 10YR 2/1 silt loam over 10YR 4/1 s ilt loam with 10YR 4/6 mottles. Surface water was estimated to be approximately two inches in depth. Upland soils at Transect 1 are described as 10YR 2/1 silt loam over 10YR 5/4 clay loam fill. No free water or saturation was observed in the upland soil pit. The jurisdictional boundary was estab lished where the soil profile in the upland soils demonstrates a lighter matr ix tone, there is a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators are absent in the upland and a change in topography occurs. The National Wetlands Inventory map (Figure 4) does not appear to map Wetland E. We would classify the wetland as saturated palustrine deciduous forested (PFO1B) under the Cowardin system which would equate to Type 1 lowland hardwoods under the Circular 39 system and floodplain forest (3A) under the Eggers and Reed system. The Carver County Soil Survey (Figure 5) shows the soils in the vicinity of Wetland E Transect 1 to be Hamel l oam. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (Figure 6) does not map Wetland E.
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 6 of 7 Ground photos of each wetland are included in Figures 7 – 11 . Detailed information regarding each wetland’s vegetation, soils and hydrology is included in the attached data forms (Appendix A ). Regulatory Jurisdiction Minnesota DNR Public Waters The Minnesota DNR Protected Waters and Wetlands inventory (Figure 6) does not map any protected waters or wetlands within the site. The Minnesota DNR is represented on the Wetland Conservation Act Technical Evaluation Pane l and, as such, would have input regarding any WCA actions on the on-site wetlands. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act The jurisdictional wetlands that we re identified on the subject parcel are subject to the Wetland Conservati on Act Rules Chapter 8420. Under these rules, an approved replacement pl an is required for activities that would fill or drain wetlands. Federal Regulatory Jurisdiction Several of the wetlands on the site appear to have surficial hydrologic connections to federal navigable waters . Therefore, we would anticipate that these basins are within the juri sdictional reach of the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. We would recommend obtaining a jurisdictional fi nding from the Corps prior to commencement of any activities near the wetlands. Delineation Concurrence Concurrence with our findings shoul d be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (if they assert jurisdiction) and City of Chanhassen before any earthwork is undertaken which could affect the delineated wetlands or other waters on the site.
Wetland Delineation Report Chanhassen Site – Chanhassen, MN May 24, 2011 Page 7 of 7 The information contained herein repr esents our findings during wetland delineation activities conducted on April 28 and May 4, 2011 at the referenced site. Respectfully submitted, Graham Environmental Services, Inc. Mike Graham Professional Wetland Scientist No. 365 Minnesota Wetland Delineator Certified No. 1179 Enclosures
Figure 1. Site Location Map Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale Approximate Site Location
Figure 2. U.S.G.S. Shakopee Quadrangle Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale Approximate Site Location
Figure 3. Aerial Photograph With Approximate Wetland Boundaries Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale Approximate Site Wetland A Wetland E Wetland A Wetland C Wetland D Wetland B Approximate Transect Location
Figure 4. National Wetlands Inventory Map Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale
Figure 5. Carver County Soil Survey Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale HM Legend CW Cordova-Webster complex EX Essexville sandy loam GL Glencoe clay loam HM Hamel loam KB Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes KB2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded KC Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes KC2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded KD Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes KD2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded KE2 Lester-Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded KF Lester-Kilkenny loams, 25 to 40 percent slopes MK Houghton and Muskego soils MP Klossner and Muskego soils, ponded PM Klossner muck YC Rasset-Lester-Kilkenny comp lex, 6 to 12 percent slopes YD Rasset-Lester-Kilkenny complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes
Figure 6. Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Map Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 N Not to Scale Approximate Site Location
Figure 7. Ground Photo Wetland A Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 Wetland A Looking North at Transect Location
Figure 8. Ground Photo Wetland B Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 Wetland B Looking East at Transect Location
Figure 9. Ground Photo Wetland C Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 Wetland C Looking North From Wetland. Note Ditch That Drains Toward Wetland A
Figure 10. Ground Photo Wetland D Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 Wetland D Looking Southwest Toward Upland at Transect Location
Figure 11. Ground Photo Wetland E Chanhassen Site Chanhassen, Minnesota GES Project No. 2011.009 Wetland E Looking South
Appendix A
Wetland A ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:concave (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)PEMCd , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Wetland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):100.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:0 Y 2 2 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Salixexiguasubspinterior 15 Y OBL Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover f yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Y Y Soil Map Unit Nam e GL - Glencoe clay loam N WI Classification:5Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Depression S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 1560 NI 90180 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:120 Y 0 Solidago canadensis 15NFACU Carex sp.15N Phalaris arundinacea 90YFACW (Plot size:5-ft. radius 15 2.13 120255 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 00 1515 Salix exigua subsp . interior 15 Y OBL US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland A ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data X *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)11-2010YR 3/110YR 4/610CMsilt loam Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):SOIL 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)20-24N 2/0silt loam loam 8-1110YR 5/110YR 4/65CMsilt loam %Type*Loc**0-810YR 3/2 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Wetla n Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region X Aquatic Fauna (B13)X True Aquatic Plants (B14)X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Saturation present?Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)3 YesX 6 (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesXNoDepth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?YesXNoDepth (inches):7 Depth (inches):Field Observations:No Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland A ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:rolling topography (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Upland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):50.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:2 N 2 1 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Acernegundo 3 FACW Acer negundo 2 FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover 30-ft. radius f yes, optional wetland site ID:N N N Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:5Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Hillslope S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50%6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 30120 FACW 1020 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:115 N 0 Solidago canadensis 30YFACU Phalaris arundinacea 5N Poa pratensis 80YFAC (Plot size:5-ft. radius 3 3.17 120380 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 80240 00 Acer negundo 3 FACW US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland A ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):SOIL 2 cm Muck (A10)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)N Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)sandy loam 10-2410YR 4/3sandy loam %Type*Loc**0-1010YR 3/2 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Uplan d Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation present?Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesNoXDepth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):Depth (inches):Field Observations:NoX Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland B ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:concave (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)PEMC , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Wetland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):100.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:65 Y 4 4 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Rhamnuscathartica 25 Y FAC Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15YFACW Acer negundo 50YFACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover 30-ft. radius f yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Y Y Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:5Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Depression S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 416 FAC 85170 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:113 Y 0 Solidago canadensis 3NFACU Phalaris arundinacea 20NFACW Poa pratensis 20N Carex lacustris 70YOBL (Plot size:5-ft. radius 26 1.92 204391 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 45135 7070 Rhamnus cathartica 25 Y FAC Lonicera tatarica 1NFACU US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland B ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data X 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)SOIL 2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depth (inches):Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)silt loam 24-2610YR 5/1clay loam %Type*Loc**0-2410YR 2/1 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Wetla n Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region X Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)2 YesX 10 (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesXNo Saturation present?Depth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):Depth (inches):Field Observations:No Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland B ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:rolling topography (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Upland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):100.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:0 N 2 2 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Fraxinuspennsylvanica 20 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover f yes, optional wetland site ID:N Y Y Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:5Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Hillslope S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 520 FACU 2550 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:110 Y 0 Phalaris arundinacea 5NFACW Solidago canadensis 5N Poa pratensis 100YFAC (Plot size:5-ft. radius 20 2.85 130370 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 100300 00 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland B ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)SOIL 2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Depth (inches):Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)silt loam %Type*Loc**0-2410YR 3/2 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Uplan d Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesNo Saturation present?Depth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?YesNoDepth (inches):Depth (inches):Field Observations:No Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland C ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Depression S ection, Township, Range:Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover f yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Chanhassen (Plot size:Tree Stratum (Plot size:Y 1 1 100.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Wetland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)PEMB , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 00 00 0 2.10 105220 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 Phalaris arundinacea 100YFACW (Plot size:5-ft. radius Solidago canadensis 5NFACU Y 0 Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:105 100200 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)520 *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland C ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data X X Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Wetla n Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc**0-2010YR 2/110YR 4/610CMsilt loam 20-24N 2/0silt loam Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Depth (inches):Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)Depth (inches):Field Observations:Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):YesXNo Saturation present?Depth (inches):Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)2 YesX 10 (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)24-3010YR 4/110YR 4/610C Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)Mclay loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland C ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:gently rising slope S ection, Township, Range:Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover f yes, optional wetland site ID:N Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Fraxinuspennsylvanica 10 Y FACW Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:N 3 1 33.33%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Upland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):rolling topography (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50%6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Y FACW 00 00 10 4.36 140610 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)90450 Bromus inermis 90YUPL (Plot size:5-ft. radius Solidago canadensis 30YFACU Phalaris arundinacea 10N N 0 Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:130 FACW 2040 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)30120 *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland C ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Uplan d Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc**0-2010YR 3/2silt loam 20-24N 2/0silt loam Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)N Hydric soil present?Depth (inches):SOIL 2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)High Water Table (A2)Depth (inches):Field Observations:NoX Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):YesNo Saturation present?XDepth (inches):Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland D ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:concave (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)PEMB , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Wetland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):75.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:30 Y 4 3 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Rhushirta 10 Y UPL Acer negundo 30YFACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover 30-ft. radius f yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Y Y Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Depression S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 520 120240 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:85 Y 0 Solidago canadensis 5NFACU Phalaris arundinacea 80YFACW (Plot size:5-ft. radius 20 2.30 135310 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)1050 00 00 Rhus hirta 10 Y UPL Acer negundo 10YFACW US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland D ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data X 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)Msilt loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)10-2410YR 5/110YR 4/620C Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):SOIL Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)silt loam 7-1010YR 4/210YR 4/610CMsilt loam %Type*Loc**0-710YR 3/110YR 4/610CM Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Wetla n Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)X True Aquatic Plants (B14)X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes 6 (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesXNo Saturation present?Depth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?YesXNoDepth (inches):8 Depth (inches):Field Observations:NoX Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)High Water Table (A2)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland D ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:rolling topography (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:4/28/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Upland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):33.33%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:0 N 3 1 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Rhushirta 60 Y UPL Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover f yes, optional wetland site ID:N N N Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Hillslope S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50%6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 1040 00 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:115 N 0 Bromus inermis 25YUPL Poa pratensis 90YFAC (Plot size:5-ft. radius 70 3.97 185735 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)85425 90270 00 Rhus hirta 60 Y UPL Lonicera tatarica 10NFACU US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland D ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesNo Saturation present?XDepth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):Depth (inches):Field Observations:Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)NoX Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)N Hydric soil present?FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)High Water Table (A2)Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)silt loam 18-2410YR 4/210YR 4/410CMsilt loam %Type*Loc**0-1810YR 3/2 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Uplan d Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland E ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Depression S ection, Township, Range:Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover 30-ft. radius f yes, optional wetland site ID:Y Ulmus americana 50YFACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10NFACW Populus deltoides 40YFAC Chanhassen (Plot size:Tree Stratum (Plot size:Y 3 3 100.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:100 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:5/4/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Wetland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) 00 40120 0 2.39 112268 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 Acer negundo 10YFACW (Plot size:5-ft. radius Taraxacum officinale 2NFACU Y 0 Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:12 70140 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)28 *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland E ‐ Transect 1 Wetland Data X Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Wetla n Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)%Type*Loc**0-1810YR 2/1silt loam 18-2410YR 4/110YR 4/610CMsilt loam Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:SOIL Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)X True Aquatic Plants (B14)X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)High Water Table (A2)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Depth (inches):Field Observations:No Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?Y Water table present?YesXNoDepth (inches):2 YesXNo Saturation present?Depth (inches):Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)2 YesX 0 (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region
Wetland E ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data Project/Site Slope (%):Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks)Are vegetation, soilsignificantly disturbed?Are vegetation, soilnaturally problematic?SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present?Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetlan d Wetland hydrology present?Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)Dominance Test Worksheet )1 (A)2 3 (B)4 5 (A/B)=Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratu m )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Coverof:rolling topography (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)NA , or hydrology , or hydrology Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County:Chanhassen/CarverSampling Date:5/4/11 Sampling Point:Transect 1-Upland MN Local relief (concave, convex, none):75.00%Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata:Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC:30 N 4 3 Chanhassen (Plot size:15-ft. radius Tree Stratum (Plot size:Rhamnuscathartica 40 Y FAC Acer negundo 30YFACW Dominan t Species Indicator Staus VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.Absolute % Cover 30-ft. radius f yes, optional wetland site ID:N Y Y Soil Map Unit Nam e HM - Hamel loam N WI Classification:3Lat:Long:Datum:Investigator(s):MJG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):Applicant/Owner:State:Hillslope S ection, Township, Range:US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1 Total % Cover of:2 OBL speciesx 1 =3 FACW speciesx 2 =4 FAC speciesx 3 = 5 FACU speciesx 4 ==Total CoverUPL speciesx 5 =Herb stratum )Column totals(A)(B)1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 XDominance test is >50%6 XPrevalence index is ≤3.0*7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum )1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 25100 55110 Morphogical adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)Hydrophytic vegetation present?(Plot size:10 Y 0 Taraxacum officinale 10YFACU (Plot size:5-ft. radius 80 2.75 120330 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain)00 40120 Lonicera tatarica 15NFACU 00 Rhamnus cathartica 40 Y FAC Acer negundo 25YFACW US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region
Wetland E ‐ Transect 1 Upland Data 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R )Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)Sandy Redox (S5)Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:Stripped Matrix (S6)*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R )Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)Histisol (A1)Histic Epipedon (A2)Redox Dark Surface (F6)Depleted Dark Surface (F7)Redox Depressions (F8)Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)Thick Dark Surface (A12)Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)2 cm Muck (A10)Restrictive Layer (if observed):Black Histic (A3)Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)Depth (inches):Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)Depleted Matrix (F3)SOIL Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)Y Hydric soil present?Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R )Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)Other (explain in remarks)Hydric Soil Indicators:*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks:Type:Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)silt loam 4-1810YR 5/4clay loam %Type*Loc**0-410YR 2/1 Sampling Point:T ransect 1-Uplan d Depth (Inches)Matrix Redox Features TextureRemarks Color (moist)%Color (moist)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region Aquatic Fauna (B13)True Aquatic Plants (B14)Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)Yes (includes capillary fringe)Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)Surface water present?YesNo Saturation present?XDepth (inches):Thin Muck Surface (C7) Wetland hydrology present?N Water table present?YesNoXDepth (inches):Depth (inches):Field Observations:NoX Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Sediment Deposits (B2)Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Saturation (A3)HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Dry-Season Water Table (C2)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5)Drift Deposits (B3)Algal Mat or Crust (B4)Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)Geomorphic Position (D2)Gauge or Well Data (D9)Other (Explain in Remarks) Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:Remarks:Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10)Water Marks (B1)Crayfish Burrows (C8)Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)High Water Table (A2)US Army Corps of EngineersMidwest Region