Wetland Delineation Report 01-08-2013Jerrison Property — Chanhassen, MN
Wetland Delineation Report For:
Lennar Corporation of MN
16305 36'. Ave. N Suite 600
Plymouth, MN. 55446
asw
arrowhead
environmental
c o n s u I t i n
Wetland Consulting Services
Performed by:
Ben Carlson, WDC ( #1125)
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AEC Project # 2012 -062 RECEIVED
MAY 17 2013
January 8, 2013 CHANHASSEN PLANNING OEPT
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
1545 Minnie Avenue
Orono, MN 55364
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Overview:
Summary of Project and Results
Report Body:
Methods - 1
Discussion 2
Data Sources and Literature References 3
Project Figures and Supporting Data:
Figure 1: Map of Project Location (USGS Topo)
Figure 2: Map of Project Location (MN DNR PWI Map)
Figure 3: Carver County Soil Survey
Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 5: Map of Wetland Delineation (Survey Located)
Field Data Collection Forms (Data Sheets)
Photo Log
Project Overview
On November 96, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a
wetland delineation of the Jerrison Property located in Chanhassen, MN.
• One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds; Wetland 1 is a
Seasonally Flooded Basin located throughout the central portion of the parcel.
• Wetland 1 is not indicated on the NWI map.
• Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Public Water Inventory Map (PWI); however, Bluff Creek crosses the property
(which is connected to Wetland 1).
• Wetland 1 is mapped in the Hamel ( Hydric), Houghton ( Hydric), and Lester
(Non - Hydric) soil series.
• Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass and forested species such as
American elm, boxelder, and dogwood species.
• The wetland boundary was generally placed along the vegetative transition from
hydrophytic to non - hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in
topography), the transition from hydric to non - hydric soils, and the presence or
lack of hydrology indicators.
Introduction
On November 9s', 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a
wetland delineation at the Jerrison Property located in Chanhassen, MN. The legal
description of the project location is: A part of the NW '/4 of Section 26, TI 16N, R23W,
Carver County, Chanhassen, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 36 +/- acres (according
to the Carver County Website).
Methods
AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and
Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Shakopee Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources (MIN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the
Carver County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
Map (Figure 4) were reviewed prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process.
The delineated wetland boundary (survey located) is indicated on Figure 5 and is overlaid
on a 2010 aerial image. AEC used the routine delineation method.
Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District;
Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WP'. The Circular
39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants
was determined using the State of Minnesota — 2012 National Wetlands Plant List Final
Ratings provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory.
Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially;
flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample
points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within
representative upland and wetland locations.
Results
Office Results
Wetland 1 is not indicated on the NWI map. Wetland 1 is mapped in the Hamel,
Houghton, and Lester soil series; the Hamel and Houghton soil series are classified as
hydric soils (SCS Hydric Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is not indicated on the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI);
however, Bluff Creek crosses the property (which is connected to Wetland 1).
Field Results
Wetland 1
AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Seasonally Flooded Basin (Type 1 /1L, PEMA/PFOlA)
wetland. Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with a
fringe of boxelder trees (Acer negundo), American ehn (Ulmus Americana), and
dogwood (Corpus) species. The adjacent upland area is dominated by burdock (Arctium
1
minus), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), smooth brome (Bromus inermis), common
buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), and boxelder trees.
The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited a rather abrupt transition (steep slopes) along the
wetland to upland edge; in general there was a defined transition between the reed canary
grass (wetland) and the burdock, smooth brome, and common buckthorn (upland). The
wetland soil borings met the F3 (Depleted Matrix) hydric soil indicator with saturation
near the soil surface, oxidized rhizospheres, geomorphic position, and FAC — Neutral
Test hydrology indicators present. The upland soil borings did not meet a hydric soil
indicator and were lacking hydrology indicators. Wetland 1 is floodplain wetland
adjacent to Bluff Creek, Bluff Creek runs though the center of Wetland 1 for the length of
the property.
Two additional sample points were taken, Sample Points A and B (SP -A & SP -B). SP -A
was taken in the NE corner of the parcel near a mapped PEMCd wetland. The area
sampled was in a planted soybean (Glycine max) field; the beans were not drowned out
and appeared healthy (not stunted). The soil at SP -A was non - hydric and hydrology
indicators were lacking; SP -A did not meet jurisdictional wetland criteria. SP -B was
taken along the western edge of the property also in a soybean field. As with SP -A, the
beans appeared healthy and were not drowned out. The area sampled is mapped as
Houghton muck; the soil observed was a clay loam, non - hydric, and lacking hydrology
indicators. SP -B did not meet jurisdictional wetland criteria.
On Wednesday November 21", 2012, Ben Carlson with AEC met Terry Jeffery with the
City of Chanhassen (Local Government Unit) to review the delineation. The wetland
delineation was reviewed and considered accurate as delineated in the field.
Discussion
One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland
met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic
vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator
or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions.
In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the
Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal).
Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling,
draining, excavating wetlands within your project location.
If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please
feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time (612- 237 - 5996).
//Thank you,
✓1..211.ry l-o� -�
Ben Carlson, WDC
Ecologist/Owner
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
2
Data Sources:
USGS Quadrangle Map — Shakopee 7.5- Minute Quadrangle, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Carver
County 1986 (Revised 1996 data from the Mn DNR Data Deli, online).
Soil Survey of Carver County. U.S.D.A. Data obtained from the NRCS /SSURGO
website.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map — Shakopee
Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs).
Aerial Photos were obtained the Land Management Information Center website (2010).
Literature Referencedfrechnical Documents:
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y -87 -1, US Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. 2007. Regional Supplement to
the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of
Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263pp,
unclassified.
Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
F W S /OB S- 79/31. 103 pp.
Sabine, B. J. 1999. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Region 3 —
North Central (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin).
Resource Management Group, Inc. 77pp.
USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. 2006. Field indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States. A guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils,
Version 6.0
National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States.
USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. Publication Number 1491.
1991.
3
uln
J;
u an
'/-SJOMO
les. ung'..
,_� i '4., M1ah'; \\ .i ♦.' 11. _ `i; \ l . /.yr 116,1( nd�a' , • ":� � '•(':f_e' � ` +`:
2�1
to
f
0
�o
Ujo
- IP
4) u
rsi 02
u
c
0
c
0
Lrx
m
J0
cn
w
a_
(D
W
E
LD CIL
X
CL
.
a
m
0
.,
—C
D Z,
II I
i
: N
us
N
0
i
�l 4 ►ail
N
T
.. - 1" i
i
N
f2 3
j
L
� d
a
sew
LL
'� J
m U
�r.
d
LLI
d
v
C1 z
Q
,E
n
CL o
n
a
$
�
0
� O
(�
o
�r.
co
z y
r`
L
y`V
� d �-
a�n r,
tm
E
^ J
du
W
L
'o
tq Q
p
+r o
N
a
O a
UR
�0
L
CS
U
u
9
V
a`
S
O
z
a
J
O
m
IL
x
a
u
m
m
LL p
n°
V°
N
V�
0
V tZ
U-
p..
Q � r
07,
r.
4
'lv
e„
Y
T.�
�L L-
' R
f,
r
1 N r
L_flcs&
LL 32 J
A
d�
C.
M
U fNilr V
z , rsl
d
�L L-
' R
f,
r
1 N r
L_flcs&
LL 32 J
A
d�
C.
M
d
ai
m
�
c
07
R
�
4
n
N
�
�
o
x
iM�+a
a
l0
0
g
lL1
W
m
4l
o0�
o
Q
W
Z
7C) c�
C3
J
L
0 G
LCJ
0
m a`Hr
ala�d
LL ,� a
d U
c
0
a
d
a
E
0
a
0
[n
c
a
m
a,
m
R
a
c
0
07
N
u
'm
a
d
E
x
0
gu
Q
I
V
d
� g
nLD
fa
G
O
� � v
0 cz :i
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
ProjectlSite Jerrison Property City /County: Chanhassen /Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -1 Wet
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 1 Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) VWI Classification: None
Are climaticthydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed. exDlain anv answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Absolute
% Cover
20
Hydric soil present? Y
Is the sampled area within a wedam Y
Wetland hydrology present? Y
r yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 ulmus americans
Absolute
% Cover
20
Dominan
t Species
Y
Indicator
Staus
FACW
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B)
2
3
4
5
Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15'
1
20
)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet
Total % Cover of.
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 120 x 2 = 240
FAC species 0 x3= 0
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column totals 120 (A) 240 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.00
2
3
4
5
0 =Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Phalads arundinacea 100 Y FACW
2
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
X Dominance test is >5o%
X Prevalence index is =3.0'
Morphogical adaptations` (provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
Problematic hydrophytic vegetation`
(explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
6
?
6
9
10
100 =Total Cover
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
2
Hydrophytic
vegetation
present? Y
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 -1 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Loc **
Texture
Remarks
0 -6
10YR 4/1
100
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Drainage Patterns (810)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Clay loam
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
6 -16
10YR 4/1
90
7.5YR 4/4
10
C
PVM
Clay loam
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
(C6)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (69)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 6
present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM
= Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histisol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (St)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (171)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric soil present? Y
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply) SecondarV Indicators minimum of two required
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Drainage Patterns (810)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (Bt)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
X (C3)
_Crayfish
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (133)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
(C6)
X FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (69)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 6
present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site Jemson Property City /County: Chanhassen /Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -1 Up
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 2 Lat:
Long:
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Hamel (Hydric) 4WI Classification:
Are climaticlhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic?
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
None
Are "normal circumstances"
present? Yes
(If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Absolute
% Cover
30
Hydric soil present? N
Is the sampled area within a wellam N
Wetland hydrology present? N
f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Quercus macrocarpa
Absolute
% Cover
30
Domman
t Species
Y
Indicator
Staus
FAC
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.00% (A/B)
2 Acer negundo 30 Y FACW
3
4
5
Sapling /Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15'
1 Rhamnus cathartica
60
)
25
=Total Cover
Y
FAC
Prevalence Index Worksheet
Total % Cover of:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 30 x2= 60
FAC species 55 x3= 165
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 10 x5= 50
Column totals 95 (A) 275 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.89
2
3
4
5
25 =Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Arctium minus 10 Y UPL
2
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
X Dominance test is >50%
X Prevalence index is =3.0*
Morphogical adaptations* (provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
(explain)
•Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10 =Total Cover
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
2
Hydrophytic
vegetation
present? Y
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 -1 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Loc **
Texture
Remarks
0 -12
10YR 3/1
100
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_True
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1)
Loam
Burrows (C8)
12 -20
10YR 3/2
100
Drift Deposits (83)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
or Stressed Plants (131)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Presence _Stunted
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Clay loam
Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic
(C6)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136)
_Thin
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present.) Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM =
Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Locafion: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histisol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Suede (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (At 0)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric soil present? N
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1)
Fauna (1313)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic
Aquatic Plants (1314) -Drainage
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_True
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1)
_Hydrogen _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Crayfish
(C3)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (83)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
or Stressed Plants (131)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Presence _Stunted
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic
(C6)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136)
_Thin
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present.) Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project(Site Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen /Carver Sampling Date: 11/912012
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -2 Wet
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 1W R23W
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Basin Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 1 Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Lester (Non - Hydric) VWI Classification: None
Are climatic(hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.'.
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Absolute
% Cover
Hydric soil present? Y
Is the sampled area within a wetlan, Y
Wetland hydrology present? Y
f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
Absolute
% Cover
Dominan
t Species
Indicator
Staus
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00% (A/B)
2
3
4
5
Sapling /Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15'
1
0
)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet
Total % Cover of:
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
FACW species 100 x2= 200
FAC species 0 x3= 0
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column totals 110 (A) 210 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.91
2
3
4
5
0 =Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Phalaris arundinacea 100 Y FACW
2 Polygonum amphibium 10 N OBL
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
X Dominance test is >50%
X Prevalence index is =3.0'
Morphogical adaptations' (provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
Problematic hydrophytic vegetation'
(explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be
1 present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
6
?
6
9
10
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'
1
2
110
)
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic
vegetation
present? Y
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 -2 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Lee*
Texture
Remarks
0 -6
10YR 4/1
100
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Clay loam
Water Marks (B1)
6 -16
10YR 4/1
90
7.5YR 4/4
10
C
PL/M
Clay loam
_
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
-7-Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
(C6)
X FAG- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histisol (Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5)
Black Histic (A3) Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
_Stratified Layers (A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Redox Depressions (F8)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
—Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric soil present? Y
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
-Surface Soil Cracks (136)
High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (132)
(C3)
_Crayfish
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (83)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Saturation
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
-7-Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
(C6)
X FAG- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project'Site Jerrison Property City /County: Chanhassen /Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012
Applicant/Owner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point: 1 -2 Up
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, TI 16N, R23W
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 2 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Lester (Non - Hydric) VWI Classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
neeaea, explain any answers In
Hydrophytic vegetation present? N
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlam N
Wetland hydrology present? N f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
Absolute
% Cover
Dominan
t Species
Indicator
Staus
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00% (A/B)
2
3
4
5
Sapling /Shrub straturc (Plot size: 15'
1
0
)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet
Total % Cover of:
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 0 x2= 0
FAC species 80 x3= 240
FACU species 10 x4= 40
UPL species 25 x5= 125
Column totals 115 (A) 405 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
2
3
4
5
0 = Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 Poe pratensis 80 Y FAC
2 Bromus inermis 25 Y UPL
3 Sofidago canadensis
10
N
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
Dominance test is >50%
Prevalence index is =3.0*
Morphogical adaptations* (provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
(explain)
Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
115 =Total Cover
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
2
Hydrophytic
vegetation
present? N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL
Sampling Point: 1 -2 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0 -14
1 OYR 413
100
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
—Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sandy clay loam
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Crayfish
(C3)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (133)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Presence _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic
(C6)
FAG- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No --- 37— Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM =
Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. "Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histisol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sufde (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric soil present? N
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
—Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (131)
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_Crayfish
(C3)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (133)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_Presence _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic
(C6)
FAG- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
Gauge or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No --- 37— Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
ProjectlSite Jerrison Property City/County: Chanhassen/Carver Sampling Date: 11/912012
Applicant/Owner: LennarCorp. State: MN Sampling Point: SP -A
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 114 Sec. 26, T116N, R23W
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope ( %): 2 Let: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Hamel ( Hyddc) VWI Classification: PEMCd
Are climaticthydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (if needed. explain anv answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? N
Absolute
Hydric soil present? N
Is the sampled area within a wetaam N
Wetland hydrology present? N
f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominan Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
t Species Staus
Number of Dominant Species
1
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (A/B)
2
3
4
5
0 =Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
Prevalence Index Worksheet
1
Total % Cover of.
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 0 x2= 0
FAC species 0 x3= 0
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 100 x5= 500
2
3
4
5
0 =Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5'
)
Column totals 100 (A) 500 (B)
1 Glycine max
100
Y UPL
Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00
2
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
—Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
—Dominance test is >50%
index is =3.0•
4
5
6
_Prevalence
Morphogical adaptations' (provide
6
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
9
10
Problematic hydrophytic vegetation'
100
=Total Cover
(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
'Indicators of hytldc soil and wetland hydrology must be
1
present, unless disturbed or problematic
2
y rophytic
vegetation
0 =Total Cover
present? N
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Harvested beans, area not drowned out, beans appeared healty (not stunted)
SOIL
Sampling Point: SP -A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Loc **
Texture
Remarks
0 -6
10YR 4/3
100
Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_True _Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (61)
Loamy sand
Sediment
6 -10
10YR 3/1
100
Drift Deposits (B3)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_Presence _Stunted
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Clay loam
Iron Deposits (B5)
10 -20
10YR 3/2
100
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Loam
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histisol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (Al 0)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric soil present? N
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2)
_Surface
Aquatic Plants (B14)
Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_True _Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Crayfish
(C3)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_Saturation
of Reduced Iron (C4)
or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_Presence _Stunted
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic
(C6)
FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region
Project/Site Jerrison Property City /County: Chanhassen /Carver Sampling Date: 11/9/2012
ApplicantlOwner: Lennar Corp. State: MN Sampling Point SP -B
Investigator(s): BPC (WDC #1125) Section, Township, Range: NW 1/4 Sec. 26, T1 16N, R23W
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Loral relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope (%): 1 Lat Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Hamel ( Hydric) VWI Classification: None
Are climaticthydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no, explain in remarks)
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "normal circumstances"
Are vegetation , soil , or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophylic vegetation present? N
Absolute
% Cover
Hydric soil present? N
Is the sampled area within a wetlam N
Wetland hydrology present? N
f yes, optional wetland site ID:
Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
Absolute
% Cover
Dominan Indicator
t Species Staus
Dominance Test Worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across all Strata: 1 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.00% (A/B)
2
3
4
5
Sapling /Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15'
1
0
)
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index Worksheet
Total % Cover of.
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
FACW species 0 x2= 0
FAC species 0 x3= 0
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 100 x5= 500
Column totals 100 (A) 500 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.00
2
3
4
5
0 =Total Cover
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1 G/ycine max 100 Y UPL
2
3
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
_Dominance test is >50%
Prevalence index is =3.0'
Morphogical adaptations' (provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a
separate sheet)
Problematic hydrophylic vegetation'
(explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be
1 present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
100 =Total Cover
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1
2
Hydrophytic
vegetation
present? N
0 =Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
Harvested beans, area not drowned out, beans appeared healty (not stunted)
SOIL
Sampling Point: SP -B
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(Inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type* Loo"
Texture
Remarks
0 -28
10YR 2l1
100
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
—Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Clay loam
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
28-36
10YR 5l2
100
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Clay loam
Carbonates present
Iron Deposits (B5)
_
(C6)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ _
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No T Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
*Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM
= Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. * *Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_Histisol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L)
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR K, L, R)
Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (explain in remarks)
*Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric soil present? N
Remarks:
Lacking mottles
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
High Water Table (A2)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
—Drainage
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
Burrows (C8)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_Crayfish
(C3)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_
(C6)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ _
Muck Surface (C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_Thin
or Well Data (D9)
Water- Stained Leaves (139)
_Gauge
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Water table present? Yes
No T Depth (inches):
hydrology
Saturation present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Photo 1: View of Wetland 1 edge at transect 1 -1 location facing south.