Loading...
Wetland Delineation Report (November 2010)l TH 41 Underpass Trail Carver County, Chanhassen Minnesota WETLAND DELINEATION f;3 g01111I .A-1 Prepared by: Jeffrey Olson and Matthew Meyer (November 2010) SRF #: 7068 ® �JSY CJlL!JJ,1l1J �JU!1;J,�l1C, Jll� Curl:,vnY]tSiJB /,�!lii�'13D �• h`Ih'JS'LiflGpJliJ)SJJI! .SJJJJ 1'1SSllt1: -iI,J JSl it 1111 S J7- }= } /-= r•'};r:i J Table of Contents Listof Tables ................................................................................................................... ..............................2 Listof Figures .................................................................................................................. ..............................2 1.0 Introduction and Background ................................................................................... ..............................3 2.0 Methods .................................................................................................................... ..............................3 2.1 Routine On -Site Wetland Delineation .................................................................. ..............................3 2.2 Definition of "Areas" vs. "Delineated Wetlands" ................................................ ..............................3 3.0 Review of Published Sources ................................................................................... .............................10 3.1 Soils and NWI (National Wetland Inventory Mapping) ....................................... .............................10 3.2 Public Waters and Public Waters Wetlands Mapping ........................................ .............................11 3.3 Rainfall Data and Antecedent Moisture .............................................................. .............................11 4.0 Results ...................................................................................................................... .............................12 5.0 Conclusions .............................................................................................................. .............................16 Listof References ........................................................................................................... .............................20 Appendix A: Routine On -Site Wetland Delineation Forms Appendix B: NRCS Mapped Soils List of Tables Page Table 1 Summary of Characteristics of Soils Mapped Near Delineated Wetlands .............. 10 Table 2 Summary of Antecedent Precipitation .............. 12 Table 3 Summary of Potential Jurisdiction and Impacts for "Delineated .............. 16 Wetlands" and "Areas" List of Figures Page Figure 1 General Location Map ............•. 5 Figure 2a Field- Delineated Wetland Areas (with aerial imagery) ... I.......... 6 Figure 2b Field- Delineated Wetland Areas (with aerial imagery) ..•..•••.••••• 7 Figure 3a Field- Delineated Wetland Areas (with aerial imagery) .............. 8 Figure 31b Field- Delineated Wetland Areas (with aerial imagery) .............. 9 TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 2 1.0 Introduction and Background A recreational trail is proposed along the east side of TH 41 (Chanhassen) from approximately Highway 7 south to Longacre Drive. Another leg of the trail would extend into Lake Minnewashta Park (see Figure 1 on page 5). In preparation for trail construction wetlands were delineated in late September 2010 along the entirety of both trail legs. An on -site Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) was convened on October 14, 2010 to determine the adequacy of the delineation effort. This report and associated graphics reflect recommendations made by the TEP prior to and during the field visit. Appendix A presents Routine On -site Wetland Delineation Forms. Appendix B shows NRCS- mapped soils in the project area. 2.0 Methods 2.1 Routine On -Site Wetland Delineation Wetlands in the project area were delineated with the 3- parameter method prescribed in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, specifically, the Midwest Regional Supplement. Soils, hydrology, and vegetation were described in two sampling pits; one clearly within the wetland and one sampling pit that was clearly on the upland side of the wetland boundary. The wetland boundary was the uppermost extent at which indicators of all three wetland parameters (vegetation, soils, and hydrology) were present. Areas upslope from the delineated wetland line were lacking in one or more of the 3 wetland parameters. Data collected at each sampling pit are summarized in the Wetland Determination. Data Forms in Appendix A. Fluorescent pink pin flags, numbered sequentially (wl -1 start, wl -2, w1- 2 .... wl- 13end) were placed at the wetland edge. The wetland edge is defined as the point, moving upslope, where indicators of one or more of the 3 parameters are not observed. Additionally, pin flags were placed at locations of sampling pits and labeled "w1 -tl -wet, and wl- tl -up ". Locations of each of the wetland perimeter flags and sampling pit flags were recorded with sub -foot accurate GPS. The locations of surveyed boundary flags are depicted in Figures 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b of this report. 2.2 Definition of " Areas" vs. "Delineated Wetlands" Figures in this report depict 11 "Areas" (Areas A -K). Delineated wetlands within the project limits are numbered W -1 through W -13 and W -20 through W -22. There are no wetlands W -14 through W -19. Delineated wetlands show no evidence of having been constructed in uplands or used as stormponds or roadside ditches. For purposes of this report, we define "Areas" generally as wet roadside ditches. "Areas" have a predominance of hydrophytes (commonly Typha spp. and Phalaris arundinacea), typically are inundated or saturated to the soil surface for a long or very long duration during the growing season, and as such are considered hydric soils per USDA hydric criteria 3 (ponded) or 4 (flooded). Thus, these "Areas" meet the 3 parameters of wetlands; however, they were excavated in uplands and wet conditions are caused TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 3 by impoundment of the road embankment. Jurisdictionally, these "Areas" are outside the scope of the Wetland Conservation Act. Whether the Corps of Engineers exerts jurisdiction over "Areas" will be determined during the permitting phase of this project; however, none of these "Areas" drain adjacent wetlands. Three areas depicted on report figures as "Wetlands" were confirmed by the TEP to be either "Areas" or storm ponds constructed in uplands. These are: • W -3. Found to be a wider portion of a roadside ditch and impounded by the TH 41 road embankment and continuous with the more narrow "Area F" (roadside ditch) to the south. • W-4. The southernmost cell of what is depicted as W -4 is a stormpond constructed in uplands. The northernmost cell of W -4 is wetland. • W -6. Determined to be a stormpond constructed in uplands. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 4 Noble Rd ?� u° Wild Rose ° c ca*St 3 `3° ° r z ' Rdr f Smithtown Rd Smithtown Gillette 01 u Echo Rd ?� 02 Aodemy AVe y Shorewood s Park St MINNESOTA ea Yellowstone it 0 Ftea Carver County ° � 0 aBaP C Rd M -354 C `°" Minnet ka West Middlfic ool Project Location / / Proposed C`im', \_`i Retaining Walls Lake Prop000ONX destrian Minnewashta Underpass Lake Minnewashta dp 'Regional Park M.S0 � o E ps a� 0 u GentlMt� � . ER COUNTY a'Aassc P ianaaoona 0. `o °daore50< w Ha'M1OZ G` 0 0 �a tr 3 Q 1i000 2r00e O Proposed Trail Alignment Proposed Retaining Wall Existing Trail Feet Project Area Carver County TH41 Underpass and Trail Project SP 10- 090-30 Carver County, Minnesota Figure 1 a N d m LL N H � q 2 H g ZZ O U U v i r s m N N U LL s F A �� � .� as �' U Uv Y N E ®Delineated Wetland Boundary Carver County TH41 Underpass and Trail Project Figure 3A Carverewnty Mnnnaa .mow ®Delineated Wetland Boundary Carver Cowry TH41 Underpass and Trail Project Figure 36 Carver Canty. Minnesota 3.0 Review of Published Sources 3.1 Soils and NWI (National Wetland Inventory Mapping) Table 1 summarizes soils mapped in and near the project area by the Carver County Soil Survey. Those soils in bold are considered hydric per the Carver County Hydric Soils List. See Appendix B for additional data. Table 1 Summary of Characteristics of Soils Mapped Near Delineated Wetlands and Areas Wetland # Map Unit Name (bold Map Unit Mapped Hydric? NWI Mapping indicates hydric) Symbol W -1 See "Area A" below. W -2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, KE2 No (except None 18 -25% slopes inclusions) W -3 Lester - Kilkenny loams, KE2 No (except None 18 -25% slopes inclusions) W-4 Hamel Loam HM Yes None W -S Houghton and Muskego MK Yes PUBG Soils W -6 Terril Loam, 0 -6% slopes/ TB /KC2 No (except None Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- inclusions) 12% slopes, eroded W -7 Cordova - Webster CW Yes None Complex W -8 Kilkenny- Lester loams, 2- KB /TB No (except None 6% slopes/Terril Loam, inclusions) 0 -6% slopes W -9 Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- KC/ TB No (except Portions as PEMCcl 12% slopes/ Terril Loam, inclusions) 0 -6% slopes W -10 Lester- Kilkenny Loams, 6- KC No (except PEMC 12% slopes inclusions) W -11 Water/ Essexville sandy W/ EX Yes PEM /FO1C loam W -12 Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- KD No (except PEMC 12 -18% slopes inclusions) W -13 Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- KD No (except None 12 -18% slopes inclusions) W -20 Essexville sandy loam/ EX/ GL Yes Portions as PEMF Glencoe Clay Loam W -, 1 Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- KC /HM Yes (Hamel None 12% slopes/ Hamel Loam Loam) W -22 Lester - Kilkenny Loams, 6- KC/ KE2 No (except PEMC 12% slopes /Lester- inclusions) Kilkenny loams, 18 -25% slopes TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 10 [4 Table 1 Summary of Characteristics of Soils Mapped Near Delineated Wetlands and Areas Wetland # Map Unit Name (bold Map Unit Mapped Hydric? NWI Mapping indicates hydric) Symbol Area A Kilkenny- Lester loams, 2- KB No (except None 6% slopes inclusions) Area B Terril Loam, 0 -6% slopes TB No (except None inclusions) Area C Area D Area E Lester - Kilkenny loams, KE2 No (except None 18 -25% slopes inclusions) Area F Lester - Kilkenny loams, KE2 No (except None 18 -25% slopes inclusions) Area G Lester - Kilkenny loams, KD2 No (except None 12-18% slopes, eroded inclusions) Area H Lester - Kilkenny loams, 6- KC No (except None 12% slopes inclusions) Area I Lester - Kilkenny learns, KD No (except None 12 -18% slopes inclusions) Area J Lester - Kilkenny learns, KE2 No (except None 18 -25% slopes inclusions) Area K Lester - Kilkenny Complex, L41C2 No (except None 6-12% slopes, eroded- inclusions) 3.2 Public Waters and Public Waters Wetlands Mapping The Minnesota DNR has mapped wetland W -5 as Protected Water Wetland 132W and wetland W -21 (Lake Minnewashta) as Protected Water 10 -913. The DNR has jurisdiction of areas below the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) for Public Waters and Public Waters Wetlands. The OHW for 132W is elevation 995.8 feet (NGVD 1929) and for 10 -9P it is 944.5 feet (NGVD 1929). 3.3 Rainfall Data and Antecedent Moisture Data from The Minnesota Climatology Working Group were examined in order to determine the normalcy of the precipitation in the days and three months antecedent to the September 17, 2010 fieldwork. Table 2 summarizes precipitation data from a gridded database comprised of the average of several weather stations close to Twp116N, R23W, Section 9 (roughly the middle of the project area). August 2010 rainfall data had not yet been entered into the gridded database at the time this report was written so daily rainfall data from weather station "212676 Excelsior" were used for August. Ranges of normalcy are based on a 30 year average (1971- 2000). Precrjiitation below a 30th percentile of 30 -year average is considered abnormally dry. Precipitation above a 70th percentile of 30 -year average is considered abnormally wet. Based on Table 2 we conclude that August was exceptionally wet, and precipitation in July and June was normal. Two days prior to the September 17, 2010 fieldwork, approximately 1.05 inches of rain fell. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 11 Review of longer term climate datasets ( >180 days) such as the Vegetation Drought Response Index and the 180 day departure from mean (Midwestern Regional Climate Center) show Carver County to be normal to wet during the period from May 2, 2010 to October 28, 2010. Table 2 Summary of Antecedent Precipitation 4.a Results Potential WCA, DNR, and Corps jurisdictions (assuming Corps Final Jurisdictional Determination) for each "Delineated Wetland" and "Area" are summarized in Table 4. Each "Delineated Wetland" and "Area" is described in more detail below. Information in (parentheses) indicates the corresponding City of Chanhassen Wetland Identification Number and Management Type for wetlands that have been delineated by the City of Chanhassen. Not all wetlands identified in this report of been surveyed by the City of Chanhassen. W -1 See Area A, below. W -2 W -2 is located along the east side of TH 41 near the intersection with Ches Mar Farm Road. W -2 is a vdisturbed, partially forested/ emergent wetland which conveys road runoff through a culvert under TH 41. Surface hydrology does not remain long within W -2; the culvert under TH 41 conveys water efficiently away from this site. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 12 Precipitation* Normalcy August 2010 (inches) ** July 2010 (inches) June 2010 (inches) Lower Bound of 3.02 2.85 2.83 Normal (30'h %ile) Upper Bound of 4.77 5.14 5.14 Normal (70'h %ile) Actual Precipitation 8.28 * 4.06 4.37 Conclusion wet normal normal Note: *2.42 inches of precipitation fell at weather station "212676 Excelsior" during the first 17 days of September 2010; approx. normal based on the 30 -year average for the first half of September. * *Daily precipitation data from weather station "212676 Excelsior". 4.a Results Potential WCA, DNR, and Corps jurisdictions (assuming Corps Final Jurisdictional Determination) for each "Delineated Wetland" and "Area" are summarized in Table 4. Each "Delineated Wetland" and "Area" is described in more detail below. Information in (parentheses) indicates the corresponding City of Chanhassen Wetland Identification Number and Management Type for wetlands that have been delineated by the City of Chanhassen. Not all wetlands identified in this report of been surveyed by the City of Chanhassen. W -1 See Area A, below. W -2 W -2 is located along the east side of TH 41 near the intersection with Ches Mar Farm Road. W -2 is a vdisturbed, partially forested/ emergent wetland which conveys road runoff through a culvert under TH 41. Surface hydrology does not remain long within W -2; the culvert under TH 41 conveys water efficiently away from this site. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 12 11d &J W -3 is a wider portion of a roadside ditch, located just east of the intersection of TH 41 and the Minnewashta Regional Park entrance. W -3 is a continuation of Area F (ditch) to the south all constructed in uplands. Dominant species are Typha spp., Phalaris arundinacea, and Salix exigua. W -4 The southern cell of W -4 is, according to Terry Jeffery (City of Chanhassen), a storm pond constructed in uplands. The northernmost cell of W -4 is a wetland dominated by Phalaris arundinacea, Typha spp., and Solidago canodensis. W -5 (10- 116- 23 -04- 012 -A, Manage 2) W -5 is located along the east side of TH 41 at the toe -of -slope of the TH 41 embankment. W -5 is at the edge of an unnamed open water basin (Public Water Wetland 132W). W -6 W -6 is located in the northeast corner of the intersection of TH 41 and the Minnetonka Middle School Road. According to Terry Jeffery (City of Chanhassen), W -6 is a stormpond constructed in uplands. Dominant vegetation in W -6 is Phalaris arundinacea and Salix exigua. W -7 (10- 116- 23 -03- 027 -A, Manage 2) W -7 is a forested/ emergent wetland located along the east side of TH 41 just south of the northern project area terminus (Hwy 7). Dominant vegetation in W -7 is Acer negundo and Phalaris arundinacea. W -8 W -8 is an isolated wet meadow located just west of Ches Mar Farm Road. Dominant vegetation W -8 is Phalaris arundinacea. W -9 (10- 116- 23 -04- 014 -A, Manage 1) W -9 is located within Minnewashta Regional Park north of the Park entrance road. W -9 is at the perimeter of an open water wetland. Dominant vegetation in W -9 is Phalaris arundinacea, Poo pratensis, Salix nigro, and Cornus ammomum. W -10 W -10 is a disturbed, isolated wet meadow within the Park, dominated by Phalaris arundinacea. This small wetland is surrounded on three sides by gravel roads. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 13 W- 11(30- 116- 23- 04 -016 -A, Preserve) W -11 is a wet meadow on the fringe of a lobe of Lake Minnewashta. Dominant vegetation in W -11 is Phalaris arundinacea and Cirsium arvense. P. arundinacea formed a dense mat upslope from the delineated wetland boundary as did hydric soils; however, only one secondary hydrology indicator (FAC Neutral Test) was observed upslope from the wetland boundary, whereas 2 hydrology indicators (1 Primary and 1 secondary) were observed below the line (FAC Neutral Test and oxidized rhizospheres). Also, dense growth of Cirsium arvense was observed amid the Phalaris arundinacea upslope from the wetland boundary - an indicator of drier conditions. W -12 W -12 is a small disturbed hillside herbaceous seep within a forested area of the Park. Dominant vegetation in W -12 is Calamagrostis canadensis, Phalaris arundinacea, and Rhamnus cathartica. Lobelia cardinalis (cardinal flower), Onoclea sensibilis (sensitive fern) are present. A few small Juniperus virginiona (eastern red - cedar) have become established in the seep - perhaps indicative of starved hydrology. W -13 W -13 is an isolated depression within a forested area of the Park. Dominant vegetation is eoehmeria cylindrica and Pilea pumilo. W- 20(10- 116- 23 -05- 004 -A, Preserve) W -20 is a forested /scrub shrub/ emergent wetland at the fringe of Lake Minnewashta. Dominant vegetation in W -20 includes Carex lacustris, Typha spp., Corpus foemina, Rhamnus catharticus, and Rhamnus frangula. W -20 extends into the turf trial in several low spots; these areas are dominated by Poo pratensis. Areas devoid of vegetation indicative of standing water in the early growing season and tire ruts are evident in low spots along the turf trail. W- 21(10- 116- 23 -04- 023 -A, Manage 1) W -21 is located within the Park and receives road runoff via a ditch and culvert. Standing water is present in the southeasternmost extent of W -21. Bare areas, devoid of vegetation, are present in the northwesternmost extent of W -21. Calamagrostis Canadensis and Salix exigua are dominant. W -22 W -22 is an herbaceous seep within the Park, north of the main park road. Hydrology enters this site from under the gravel road bed and derives from the hillside to the south of the road. Hummocks are present throughout much of W -22, indicative of a degraded sedge meadow. Dominant vegetation includes Eleocharis acicularis, Poo pratensis, Calamagrostis Canadensis, and Solidago canadensis. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 14 Hydrology exits W -22 at its western end down an arrow eroding ravine which runs into Lake Minnewashta below. Area A Area A is located along the east side of TH 41 near the southern terminus of the project area (just north of Longacres Drive). Area is a low -lying forested area dominated by Acer negundo, Rhamnus catharticus, Glechoma hederacea, Solanum dulcomara, and Alliaria petiolata. Soils were found to be hydric; however, no evidence of wetland hydrology was found. The lowest point of this forested area is at the same elevation as backyards of residences to the east and south. Thus, if this site were inundated, basements of neighboring residences would likely flood. Area B Area B was a sample point taken in the sloping forest that lies west of TH 41 and east of Ches Mar Farm Road. Neither a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, nor wetland hydrology were found at this sampling pit. Area C [There is no Area C.] Area D [There is no Area D.] Areas E through K Areas E through K are roadside ditches constructed in uplands. All contain a predominance of hydrophytes including Typha spp., Phalaris arundinacea, Salix exigua, Solidago canadensis, and Solidago gigantea. All ditch bottoms were saturated to the soil surface and are likely wet for a long or very long duration during the growing season. Based on the long periods of inundation we conclude that conditions are conducive to the formation of hydric soils. None of these Areas (ditches) drain wetlands and we therefore assert that they are outside the scope of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). We also assert that based on hydrologic isolation, these ditches would not be Corps jurisdictional. More clarity concerning state and federal jurisdiction of these Areas will be sought during the permitting process. TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 15 5.0 Conclusions We conclude that during the field delineation effort conditions were on the wet side of normal based on analysis of three months of antecedent precipitation data and longer data sets ( -180 days antecedent). Table 3, below, summarizes our assertions concerning potential jurisdiction of WCA, DNR (Public Waters and Public Waters Wetlands), and the Army Corps (Section 404 of the Clean Water Act). Confirmed jurisdictions will be verified during the permitting process. Table 3 Summary of Potential Jurisdiction and Impacts for "Delineated Wetlands" and "Areas" Wetland # Likely Corps DNR Within Scope Meets criteria Wetland (Wetland Jurisdictional? Jurisdiction? of WCA? for 3 wetland footprint Type *) (Assumes Final parameters? Impacts (ac) Corps Jurisdictional Determination) W -1 See "Area A" below. W -2 Yes No Yes Yes (Type 1L/ (hydrologically PF01A and connected to PEMA/ W -9 and Floodplain ultimately to `Forest and-- Lake Seasonally Minnewashta Flooded Basin) via surface water conveyances) W -3 No (isolated No No (ditch Yes hydrologically, constructed in ditch uplands) constructed in uplands) W -4 No (isolated No Yes(northern Yes (Type 3 /PEMC/ hydrologically) cell); No Shallow (southern cell - Marsh) stormpond constructed in uplands) W -5 Yes (fringe of Yes, below Yes Yes (Type 6/ small l Ody of OHW elevation PSS1C /Shrub- open water) of 995.8 feet Carr) (NGVD 1929) W -6 No (stormpond No No (stormpond Yes constructed in constructed in uplands) uplands) W -7 No (isolated No Yes Yes TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 16 Table 3 Summary of Potential Jurisdiction and Impacts for "Delineated Wetlands" and "Areas" Wetland # Likely Corps DNR Within Scope Meets criteria Wetland (Wetland Jurisdictional? Jurisdiction? of WCA? for 3 wetland footprint Type *) (Assumes Final parameters? Impacts (ac) Corps Jurisdictional Determination) (Type 1L and hydrologically) 2/ PFO1A and PEMB/ Floodplain Forest and Wet Meadow) W -8 No (isolated No Yes Yes (Type 2/ hydrologically) PEMB/ Wet Meadow) W -9 Yes No Yes Yes (Type 6/ (hydrologically PSS1A/ Shrub- connected to Carr) Lake M innewashta via surface water conveyances) W -10 No (isolated No Yes Yes (Type 2/ hydrologically) PEMB/ Wet Meadow) W -11 Yes No Yes Yes (Type 2/ (hydrologically PEMB/ Wet connected to Meadow) Lake Minnewashta via surface water conveyances) W -12 No (isolated No Yes Yes (Type 2/ hydrologically) PEMB? Wet Meadow) W -13 No (isolated No Yes Yes (Type 2/ hydrologically) PEMB? Wet Meadow) W -20 Yes (fringe of Yes, below Yes Yes TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 17 Table 3 Summary of Potential Jurisdiction and Impacts for "Delineated Wetlands" and "Areas" Wetland # Likely Corps DNR Within Scope Meets criteria Wetland (Wetland Jurisdictional? Jurisdiction? of WCA? for 3 wetland footprint Type *) (Assumes Final parameters? impacts (ac) Corps Jurisdictional Determination) (Type 1L and Lake OHW elevation 1/ PF01A and Minnewashta) of 944.5 feet PEMA/ (NGVD 1929) Floodplain Forest and Seasonally flooded basin) W -21 No (isolated No Yes Yes (Type 6/ hydrologically) PS51C/ Shrub - Carr) W -22 Yes No Yes Yes (Type 2/ PEMB/ wet meadow) Area A No (ditch No No (created in No created in uplands) uplands) Area B No (ditch No No (created in No created in uplands) uplands) Area C No (ditch No No (created in No created in uplands) uplands) Area D No (ditch No No (created in No created in uplands)s uplands) Area E No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Area F No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Area G No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Area H No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 18 Table 3 Summary of Potential Jurisdiction and Impacts for "Delineated Wetlands" and "Areas" Wetland # Likely Corps DNR Within Scope Meets criteria Wetland (Wetland Jurisdictional? Jurisdiction? of WCA? for 3 wetland footprint Type *) (Assumes Final parameters? Impacts (ac) Corps Jurisdictional Determination) Area I No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Area J No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Area K No (ditch No No (created in Yes created in uplands) uplands) Wetland Type: (Circular 39/ Cowardin/ Eggers and Reed) TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 19 List of References Clean Water Act, Section 401. Water Quality Certification. 33 USC 1341. Clean Water Act, Section 404. Permits for the Discharge of Dredged and Fill Material. 33 USC 1344. Cowardin, LM, V. Carter, FC Golet, and ET LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. FWS /OBS- 79 -31. Executive Order 11990. Protection of Wetlands. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Protected Waters and Protected Waters Wetland Map of Carver County. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Protected Waters Work Permit Program. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Various years. SSURGO soils database. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Various years. Carver County Hydric Soils List. Shaw, SP, and CG Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States ('Circular 39'). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. USACOE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 1987. The 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and Associated Regulatory Guidance Letters (RGLs), and Midwest Supplement. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). Various years. National Wetland Inventory (NWI). USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands. USGS (US Geological Survey) 7.5- minute quadrangle maps (various). TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 20 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Certified Wetland Delineator under the Wetland Delineator Certification Program for the State of Minnesota. Jeffrey W. Olson, MnCWP Certified Wetland Delineator #1089 Wetland Delineator Certification Program TH 41 Underpass Trail Page 21 Appendix A: Routine On -Site Wetland Delineation Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region /G 4Prolecitsu: T$H 1 I!a,t CityiCounty: Z l4m�� _---� — S nNOvmer. � State t mpling Date: 'esti gator(s): hy—Jr. GB sampling Point: A1r& 7 Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Lak Long: Soil Map Unit Name: Datum: —_ NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? 9 Y /f% Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes, e No Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? . �t N" (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes— No Hyddc Soil Present? YeS _ No Lt/= Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No —'°r— within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use Scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: �ildA / Absolute o o Cover Dominant Indicator Soecles, Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. °r �. q �7'2�(fG1lA�irl/.6 {}4�g Number of Dominant Spaces That 2 ����1 -� HR nmtfiV�[a+trtia.�G _LtGtSY`', r5 tr�K Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �_ (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: (B) 3. Percent of Dominant Species rlJ n That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �.0 / 0 (A!B) S lin /Shrub Strat = Total Cover u I (Plot size: ) t.�Pi %'-sL- rcLrlra G _tfaS �k 2. 3. 5. Herb turn (Plot size:. = Total Cover 30 2. Nhgqrnas e "I w! c'� yy r��i))�� 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Total % Cover oP OBL species FACW species _ FAC species _ FACU species _ UPL species Multiply b x I = __ x2= x3= _ X4- _ x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A _ Dominance Testis >50% _ Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10. 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover 1, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes __ No = Total Cover or on a separate sheet) �lra,Qtmm /NYCVIhe.c� N / Gt,(,r(�.9�4° �7�'� ✓1 Q� "�L'�°✓J -�l.vT US Army Corps of Engineers SOIL Sampling Point: r Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) C for m �- _� Color m : Lo -' Texture Remarks — S^O / 3 cG/ S'fv'✓�L e ='�f -y�e �j�/Yt�s NI� O✓1.1� Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one is mauire& check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS) 'Type: C= Concentration, D--Depletion, RM= Reduced Matra CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M =Matra. Hydric Soil Indicators: Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis': _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Water Table Present? Yes_ _ 2 an Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Saturation Present? Yes _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Includes capillary fringe) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) _ Redox Depressions (FB) Wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Past or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: `iy SL�es fn w 0,VV HYDROLOGY Weiland Hydrology Indicators: Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one is mauire& check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CS) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic POSNOn (D2) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAG - Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) _ Other (Fxplain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth Water Table Present? Yes_ _ (inches): No Depth (inches): - Saturation Present? Yes _ No �[y, Depth (inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM /— Midwest Region Project/Site: L h I ¢yt f City/County: Sampling Date: �� 6 G 14Nplieent/Owner, L r lj' Y State:i! Sampling Point ;nvestigator(s): L - '{ O 04 Section, Township, Range: � eGC� .AJ • .r .J Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: Datum: or WWI classification: Are dimatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes / No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? AN Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V/ No _ Are Vegetation— Soil or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? A (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing samolina point Incatinns tranL.r .: .__. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes,,_ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VI IJICInS. Tree nr`... tratum (Plot size: ) -- Absolute ° Cov r Dominant Indicator S d 7 to t Dominance Test worksheet 1. ��-- P I` if i 5 A) SOIL .)...., . ...... Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color fmoistl % Color (moist) % Type, L Texture Remadcs ;Cap rDylk -3 A6 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repulred• check all that apply) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils": _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A78) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Shipped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) , _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) 2 cm Muck (Al 0) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Other (Explain in Remarks) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): r T�_ Depth (inches): Depth (inches): � �/ Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1 � No Remarks: AXy��,� (includes capillary fringe) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repulred• check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguirad) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High WaterTabfe (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True AquaUc Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Deposits (133) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) Algal rust _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) -rte FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Visible _ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) . _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No — Water Table Depth (inches): r T�_ Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): � Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): / rr Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No eP ( ) i— Yd 9Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: .Remarks: ✓( L , IJGt 1''t, ,VPL� G4 tie 1 ri a cW 5v! ace US Army Corps of Engineers . Midwest Region – Interim Version Projecvstte: WE DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region /I�T/.fIIL City/County: rJ rk/�i�� gampling Date: �II�'Id vestignUOvmer. n / � �q� i, State: Sampling Point- U�vS' le nvestigator(s): J < wf !��� Section, Township, Range: Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): L Slope ( %): Let Soil Map Unit Name:. ___1 relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: NWI or WWI classification: . Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeah Yes _ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) � /' Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology_si nificantl disturbed? /V© significantly �✓� Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? /{%Ci (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X' No. Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area x Welland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No within a Wetland? Yes` No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. 1, r r Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet Tree ratum (Plot size: :� ] °° Cover Specie s? Status 1 rrs.XlydrAp �d,.NK L.r �Ildtyt l`[' -'S , r Number of Dominant Species 2. �7 i — That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: '� (A) ' 3. Total Numberof Dominant -n 4. Species Across All Strata: (B) 'S Percent of Dominant Species y That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB) Saolinc /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: (7 = Total Cover ] Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: d' I = Total Cover ) � 2. toS pPr'f'$�y)tf"dna,l`Lti, v _ r n�a a. at»ra cn4la�k t� i� �V l— FGu 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 4: , = Total Cover i + — or on a US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover Total °y Coverof. Multioly by, OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species _ X5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index =B/A= _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation `/ Present? Yes /� No MIrIWPGr Runinn _ In,nA,,. v...a.... I SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix inches Color !mots!!!} Qom , _(�, 100 Redox Features Colorfmoist) TVpe Lou Texture Remarks 7-71—.:- _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ _ r . � • .� tit , .�_�`^� _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ � J .b � �' G l , c r t S` Crayfish Burrows (C8) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Fj 5i.11y, cimtjr ,0,VV-" (Lr+ _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ �" Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphlc Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (DS) inundation Visibie on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (09) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) �— R J� 0 P �— 'Type: C= Concentration, D =De lelion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Linin M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: ,{,r Yes_ No f - Depth (inches): - , Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Saturation Present? _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Includes ca ilia frin e _ Sandy Redox (35) _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) f4,74f4f A d-n W_e ` C1 _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) - _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): 1y, Hydric Soil Present? Yes /' No Remarks: t+f; f� Car CF° <,a i - HYDROLOGY UROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repulred- check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minim m of two reouired) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — �.,,iC^d Crayfish Burrows (C8) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg) _ Drift Deposits (83) (Lr+ _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ �" Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphlc Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (DS) inundation Visibie on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (09) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? ,{,r Yes_ No f - Depth (inches): - Water Table Present? 11 Yes _ No Depth (inches): RtCu l� Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): ).rte �R Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Includes ca ilia frin e - — Descdbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: 'emarks: f4,74f4f A d-n W_e ` C1 US Army Corps of Engineers /` WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Al7I ```Project/Site: - "%1ArL City/County:_ rlfHtV plicant(owner: Sa pling Date: D --r-- ",nvestigator(s): �. D �5's'� �/ %�%Q.(�.(2 State: .Sampling Point iN .�`n "" T' "taj Section, Township, Range: Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _ Slope (%): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: Long:" ca l relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes - _� No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? d%D Are `Normal Circumstances` present? Yes_ No Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology_ naturally problematic. !✓O (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No y Hyddc Soil Present? Yes NoIs the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. 2. 3. j. size: >`"" a'__...... "� °� °. ° "11O1 Ior uommance Test worksheet: Cover S es? Status R N,�� � Number of Dominant Species Q / That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A) Total Number of Dominant Spades Across All Strata: (B) t = Total Cover S�ap�nnyS�hrub S— tratu -m, (Pot size: �' ) i•_ll_C:GIt'i!"..I.YS / . =`a 2. 3. 4. 5. Her S turn (Plot size: r) %' , ) =Total Cover 1. :d(Md1t1U �fl+ Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Q D (A/B) Total %Cover of• Multioly by OEL species x t = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x6= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = BA = 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 5. _ Dominance Testis >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 5. _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting ?. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) B• _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hyddc'Soil and wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover t. �1- ) " Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation Total Cover Present? Yes _ No ' = Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers MidwestRegion – Interim Version SOIL Point- �zte� °gyp _ .......... Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix inches Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) ip True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (07 ) nisi _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck. Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. HYdric Soil Indicators: Field Observations: Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils': _ Histosol (Al) Depth (inches): - _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (Ara) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Sulfide r _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Stratified Layers (AS) S) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cal _ Depleted Matrix (F3) ' _ Depleted Depleted low Dark Surface (A11) _ _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) k Surf _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. /1 (JA'yJ Depth (inches): Hydric Soli Present? Yes No Remarks: _ "[UK Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (07 ) nisi _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck. Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): - Water Table Present? Yes _ No k- Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes— No includes ca ilia frin e Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: .Remarks: r US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: L City /County: . mpling (AA�'ir l6 /O Sa Date: plicant/Owner. Slate: /i ._ Sampling Point: we f 4nvestigator(s): l7L SJ' /'.% /Mr'. rtr;^ Section, Township, Range: Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: � - ---- -_ NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? A/ti Are "Normal Circumstances` present? Yes V Are Vegetation _ No e9 ,Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? ND (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. =SoIlPresent? Present? Yes No Yes y Is the Sampled Area No _ ient? Yes __�+ No within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot 1. 2._ 4. Saplinc/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. %Cover Species? Status .mina.,,, Species Number of Dominant Speces That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) = Total Cover H rb S ratum (Plot size: = Total Cover 2. s E ln ire 3. �r 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plolsize: ) 1. m pnoto numoers here or on a separate a r� US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover = Total Cover Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:_ (B) Percent of Dominant Species ij That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ��i (i (-D (AIB) Total %Cover of: MUltioly br OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species .5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >So % _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Y SOIL Sampling Point: V�J �1 Wt rofile Deseriptioh: (Describe to the depth needed to document the intlleator or confine the absence f idirs.) ;Depth r Redox Feature 'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS-Covered or Coated Sand Gralns. 2 Location: PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Stratified Layers (A5) _ _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) _ _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) t tr Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and X Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches): H Hydric Soil Present? Yes _X_ No Remarks: � ��h�y/,�� -tom — f7TUKVL(jGY C Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators fminimum of one is required, check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (Bg) _Surface Soil Cracks (Be) ? High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation ter Ma (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks Deposits _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits r _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (BS) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutraf Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Be) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No_ Depth (inches): <i Water Table Present? Yes= No_ Depth (inches): �( Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ Depth (inches): Wetlantl Hydrology Present? Yes y \ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: lemarks: k4l t. g 7 US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Reninn — voFi, US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Reninn — voFi, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region lI 11 Project/Site: r 14( F. (69 L Ciry /County:;`" / (A �. O - �lr�i�)- 't`�Sampling Date: � 6 plicant/Owner. f �, d Sta e: % °i;l. Sampling Point It ,nvestigator(s): ` U °" n �.�— Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %)., Lat Long. - Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Sdil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? A,JD Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No _ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? ,JD (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing samolina point Inrntinna fl.n.s - ....a.a�aul.uNVngplIW4Lures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes .,L�/� No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No within a Welland? Yes No Remarks: �i' /�r+Q VEGIPTOTIr1N – I I.- —;- -+:r... Absolute Dominant Tr a to (plot size: ) o Cover Species? ES 2. 3. Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: ,4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species / That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _66 D (A/B) Sa lin hrub Stratum (Plot size: =Total Cover 2. 1 • 4 ! tt r tt 3. 4. 5. Herb St(r -a+tum (�P^lot size: ) /'q = Total Covert ti 40 eS t–� v1t- 2. eQ f r`n 7 t'.r r 5-2 f 3. —= 4. 5. 6. T. 6. 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) = Total Cover 1. _ = Total Cover Total %Cover oP Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW spades x 2 = PAC species x 3 = - FACU species X4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _, Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No puauue pnolo numoers nere or o a separate sheet.) 501,42 t ^tl�:fet4) at��j ,i / ��/ %I% —t c�'t�r Jl� M/ lt�+� U( ✓�e5 e`" � "O /o r't..� -I cE<%V'Ti /7 "'7 fLr� t=2 r'�i�i � -e''2 J/11L.'�`F US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version SOIL 1.. IAl 2 -f .,,, — _...,...., .....,,... , . „ V. Profile Description: (Oescrfbe to the ;: depth neetled to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (minimum of one is renuired, inches Color m is % r^ Color (moist) % T Lo Texture Remarks ✓. K'I' ii-�� _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) /r'4 _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) - True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment eposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Vsible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) nisi 8 — Algal Mat or Crust (4) 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Locati on: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soft Indicators: — Iron Deposits (B5) for P blem Indicators for Problematic Hydrfc Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Coast (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) - _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain a Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) - _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (At 0) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox ' Remarks: ^ Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) „Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches); Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: F-1 r Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is renuired, check all that apply) Secondary Indic itdrs (minimum of two reauir dl _ Surface Water (At) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (813) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) - True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment eposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Vsible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) nisi 8 — Algal Mat or Crust (4) — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) — Iron Deposits (B5) — Thin Muck Surface (C7) — FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes — No Depth (inches): -L - Water Table Present? Yes_ No Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ (includes capillary hinge) No � Depth (inches): �,� 4- Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No k Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Veminn '{' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM( � Midwest Region Project/Site: f 'l � CitylCounty: wvt.tv�a. + q IIcanVOvner. !� {may/ , T- G ( ,,,,�.� ampling Date: 6 b State: 1 1 Sampling Point: W v T (- W t nvesti etc or(s). Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope ( %): Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: Section, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Long: Datum: NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remadcs.) // Are Vegetation Soll or Hydrology,_ significantly disturbed? Pit Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes r1 No _ Are Vegetation Sop _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? f,/0 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes % No Hyddc Soil Present? Yes K Is the Sampled Area No _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No within a Wetiand7 Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use Scientific names of plants. `'� •' Absolute Dominant cator Dominance Test worksha0L• T tretum (Plots e: �- ) Cov r S ecles Status 1. I�]YrY", f%`3r:h�a it/gn,�LiES i`1jD. AC Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FqC: (A) 2. 4. 'S. r = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: St � Total Cover ) 2. 3. 4. 5. H Stratum (Plot size:' rr ) = Total Cover 1. 6L a :til 1� 7j, tJ 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Wood . Vine Stratum Total Cover 1. ' s or on as US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species � �/7, That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: --6 6L (A/13) _ Total %Cover of.- _ Mulboly by, OBL species x1= FACW species x 2 = FAC species z 3 = FACU species z 4 = UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index =B /A= -L- Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophylk: Vegetation Present? Yes No 5 SOIL Q Point., VVLI " —T/- - a,, - P... �.r,,,.y rofile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features aches Color ( moist) % �C, o10 Er molist % Tvoe� Loc Texture , Remarks Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required* check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (139) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) Water Marks (131) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) j(C9) 'T e: C--Concentration, D =De lebon, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Unin , M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (A1) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) _ Black Histic (A3) _ _ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _Other (Explain a Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sufide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) — Iron Deposits (65) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Dark surface (F6) Field Observattons: _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, Restrictive Layer (If observed): unless disturbed or problematic. Type: yt,� 9,r� Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: . '.emarks: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No i✓rJ t rs,.r�a:I e\ tut 4k. uvnn�, .a+v nr Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required* check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (139) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) Water Marks (131) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) j(C9) _ _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Ima — Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) rust — Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) — Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) — FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observattons: t I C" Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No _ Depth (inches): ra -' Saturation Present? Yes No Includes capilla fringe) _ Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / \ No yt,� 9,r� Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: . '.emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Reninn - Infedm ve.eo... WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: / / City /County: ClyiAM �,,, /� Sampling Date: �1e I iU 4NpltcanVOwner. State: '' ,,Af�. Sampling Point %'"�"! �•L+t; . ,nvestigator(s): I1 'V e) TP G �5 =.�. Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope ( %): Let Soil Map Unit Name: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No NWI or WWI classification: (if no, explain in Remarks.) i Are Vegetation _, Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? f f4 Are'Nonnal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓_ _, No- _ Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? If needed. ( explain any answers in Remarks.) . SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hyddc Soil Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area No No within a Wetland? VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. t Ym Cover ecies? Status SaDIInq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ! = Total Cover 1. 2. — 3. 5. 'J. 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plotsize: �� ) 1. R n� oere or on a /✓d /r = Total Cover Yes No /— Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (g) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (p,/g) Total ° Cover of., = Total Cover .v xt= P� x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x q = UPL species x5= ri 1* *W_ 1f = Total Cover Yes No /— Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (g) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (p,/g) Total ° Cover of., MUItlDIy by, OBL species xt= FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x q = UPL species x5= Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is 53.0' - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophydc Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? _ = Total Cover Yes_ No US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minim gm of two reouir ) inch Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture _, Remarks _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season water Table (C2) P �..F.> `y >".. /�c:L� (�",�'l;', (q`�_'" _ Drift Deposits (63) - _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) ( _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck. Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Linin M=Matriz. Hydric Soil Indicators: Surface Water Presefat2.. Yes _ Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Hisfic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F72) _ Black Hisfi c (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) a _ Other (Explain Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sufde (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) ( _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 50,75 A5,r 6 Q „✓ Sf� fit,✓` �. t1TUKULUU7 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primm Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minim gm of two reouir ) _ Surface Water (At) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _, Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (63) - _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck. Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Presefat2.. Yes _ No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): i / 2- (( Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ea illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: . Remarks: ( US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Midwest R �ion ,�/✓ '7 Projwvslte: %n W 7-2-91L CwCounty: CWAdy,9?A I [j,�(/� Sampling Date: °L Applicant/Owner. Stater Sampfing Point: ✓�� We7 Investigator(s): a5--h pq{ 04Y.4fe4 Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope (%): Let: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: _ Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No _ (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _Soil_ or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? A%0 Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes 1/ No Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? AM (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No_ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No_ 2. fic Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? No Remarks: 6�( f' - 1 `_ rtes .Slaw -l•/ e4� ! VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. US Army Corps of Engineer; Midwest Region – Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Cover Species? Statu - / r� ,, 1. Ul�'iii/.S !.>rf%12YiY /�r4//222 � Yp i Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:_ (A) 2. fic cv sue- Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) 3 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) -- S. -- = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet Total %Cover of Multiply by: li t j (Plot size: ) e —fJ CpWA /h44e4CGa� y� e< Aw OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4- UPL species x 5 = � � 2. 3 r 4,15 e 3. 4. S Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Column Totals: (A) (B) 1. Prevalence Index = B/A= 2. 3. Hydrophytic, Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test Is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. 5. S. 7, 8. 9. 10• = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plotsize: ) t. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No 2 = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineer; Midwest Region – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: tv S -/ I!'° 6� Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Radox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loci Texture Remarks , Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soo Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ s la 2 Y v o S"M S/ o C Aq1v— o Ef C° L ! d a PL �. tr _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen SuKde Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) 'T : C= Concentration, D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Sol] Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Loamy Gleyed Matdx (F2) _ 2 an Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Field Observations: _ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Depth (inches): 7 . Type: _ Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ Depth (inches): Depth finches): v Present? Yes ✓t No Hydric Soil Present? Yes if No_ " "' ,/ Remarks: '1&u CX cG �Gp�+;.,�£ f /%u'L �•--- "sfi�,) �(,,.1�-_IGQFi,� -�C` HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soo Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen SuKde Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) 7: FAC- Neutral Test (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: v Surface Water Present? Yes_ No-4 Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No_ Depth (inches): 7 _ Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology v Present? Yes ✓t No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region�� ProjecgSite: city /county: 9 /? -Azo(D Sampling Date: ApplicantlOwner. State: Al Sampling Point: LV up Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope CA): Let: Soil Map Unit Name: _ Long: Local relief (concave, convex, Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No_ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? WO Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _ No Ara Vegetation Soil or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? NA (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No r 2. . c cv-/ rLP-I U � � f°7i� ✓✓ - Hyddc Soil Present? Yes_ No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes— No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: 3. 4. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stmlum (Plot size: ��l'LLK5 4W ei)vy Absolute Dominant Indicator -) vv S Status dgiU C U (o - &W ` Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species 2 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / (A) - Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species �Q /? That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l a/ (A/B) r 2. . c cv-/ rLP-I U � � f°7i� ✓✓ - 3' 4. S. - Saolina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. =Total Cover ) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of- Multiply by., 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species X3= FACU species x4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratu (Plot size: ) / ,, . � !e— 2. 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test Is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or an a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and we0and hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. 5. 6. ? - 6 9. 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. = Total Cover ) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes, No 2. = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) / US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region- Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (Inches) Color (moist) 'L Redox Features Z Color (drJ<' Texture Remarks -i OLu -tti. y_,6 !o �QO - — — s,/ _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C6) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rh¢ospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) 'Type: C= Concentration, D =De letion RM =Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matra. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (07) _ indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls': _ Hlstosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matra (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) Saturation Present? Yes _ No_ _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) includes capillary Trio e _ 2 cm Muck (At 0) _ Depleted Matra (F3) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous [inspections), if available: _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (176) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (FB) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (inches): H ydric Soil Present? Yes_ No Remarks: . IO gyp- /d / A / 4 ,ejC/A " .-�- rte t�G(/�rGC ✓�^•d 6 .. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Pdmary Indicators (minimum of one is reauked: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (139) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C6) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rh¢ospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (65) — Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (07) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _No !\ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): 7G b e( rr Saturation Present? Yes _ No_ Depth (inches): //z Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes— No includes capillary Trio e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous [inspections), if available: / Remarks: A/o lniGdDtS /L(1L'TIUit�lj� US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version II WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM( - Midwest Region p Z Project/Site: 14 41 I T fQ; I biro PC I City/County:.. �/1�1 v..,j_�' ampling Date: �estigator(s): plicanUOwner. rn A 94e Y ,- O S State: M%% Sampling Point: lui-I f )p e;tti. S Landform (hillslope, terrace etc ): ecbon, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Lak Long: Soil Map Unit Nam Datum: e: - ---�_ NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? ka Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Are Vegetation Soil Yes No _ ti _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? N1 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach Site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hyddc Soil Present? Yes V No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes,_ No _ within a wetland? Yes , No VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stre (Plot sizei Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: t� ) %Cover Species? S;us 1. irto5 %�fl S15y vin CAS aC1 �(! �! Number of Dominant Species 2. -� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (q) 4.. Saolinc/Shrub Straturn (Plot size: = Total Cover 1. 3. 4. 5. Herb S r` to t (Plot size: — t— ��--Z— - [J =Total Covers 1. 9'1/ 2. �Y i .t�o Ca.nA Pn5r5 (a —r Q 3, 4 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. Wood Vi ne Stratu (Plot size: 157-t = Total Cover AA FACW or on a separate US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata :_ (B) Percent of Dominant Species ��© That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ?' (A/B) Total % Cover of OBL species ._ FACW species _ FAC species _ FACU species _ UPL species Column Totals: Multiply by: x1= x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric so(I and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes__ No -SOIL . .. .1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) tlln th Matrix inches C for m ist % -a �o a loo Redox Features Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc — — --T3-2e-'-- — Texture Remarks 5, r t�ft� IoYi�3 ofiL a^/ �da� Sg Cay High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) .5 s a- c Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (BI) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits B2 — P ( ) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Unin , M= Matrix. Hyddc Soil Indicators: _ Drift Deposits (B3) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol 1ped H(stic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ _ Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) _Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) _ 2 rm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) - _ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegeta8on and _ _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (33) / _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, Restrictive Layer (if observed): ! unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Rm earks ( — V s O W Prime A ft / CpC(!S HYDROLOGY NA Surface Water Present ?. Yes — No Depth (inches):� Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No. Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes" No includes ca ilia fine Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial phows, orevious msoamnnsl If 6y\15 Nn \hI io gVt US Army Corps of Engineers Primary indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that aooiv) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (Bg) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (BI) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Crayfish Burrows (C8) Sediment Deposits B2 — P ( ) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) Geomorphic Position (02) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) - Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Surface Water Present ?. Yes — No Depth (inches):� Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No. Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes" No includes ca ilia fine Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial phows, orevious msoamnnsl If 6y\15 Nn \hI io gVt US Army Corps of Engineers I I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Projecbsite: Tµ N' TfcA J I� (a `PG City/County: plipnVOwner. � —� ry �"/�''l�` "" " " "" / Sampling Date: q �� /U State: M Sampling Point: %� a 'T -V nvesfigator(s): G Oleyt°( i Y O Sch - Section, Township, Range: Landfonn (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, wnvex, none): Slope ( %): Lat: Long: —_ Soil Map Unit Name: ' Datum: / NWI or WWI classification: Are dimatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this. time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? A/o Are "NOnnal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation _, Soil _ or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? 4/D (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. L rophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No ric Soil Present? yes _ No Is the Sampled Area tland Hydrology Present? yes_ No within a Wetland? Yes No._.._. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Treeii--Stratum (Plot size: ,C7 r r t. ot {� - .t �5 � -o �Gali n ` 2. JUr4(ou95 Araadat %Cover S eC1 sv Status Number O 2Dominant Spades That Are BL, FACW, or FAG: L/ (q) - Total Total Number of Dominant 4• Species Across All Strata: (B) i5• Percent of Dominant Spedes II in / h b SVa _ (7 Total Cover q7 ThatAre OBL,. FACW, or FAC: t/. �0 (qfB) L Are Plot Cori /riS � size: ) v �(lttp /vumm �m K Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 _ _ Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 3. OBI-species x t = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = '2, FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: —\ A f = Total Cover UPL species x 5 = I. 6Arlie v 4(d, Itl ofrA pP id(A 1�0� 16 f*- Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. � V 5 3. fA (IeJC 5•'' G�ju PP✓iPy XgC1U Prevalencelndex =B/A= A t� Uq Po {Cr.�_, .� _ ydrophytie Vegetation Indicators: 5. / Dominance Test is >50% 6. Prevalence Index Is <_3.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting ?• data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) B' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetaton' (E 9. xplain) 10• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover ) 1. _ Hydrophytic _ Vegetation Total Cover Present? Yes _ N = Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) _ US Army Corps of Engineers SOIL Matrix Color oist %, 1�YR 3 � hod Redox Features Colorlmoist %_ T Loc Sampling Point: W? - -r(–( Texture Remarks 5 , CgIW� T` a —Son r -A rl ydric Sofl Indicators; „a „u .,,ams. - Location: PL =Pore Lining, M =M: Histosoi (A1) _ High Water Table (A2) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil: — _ Histic Epipedon (AZ) _ Sandy Gleyed S5) (S4) Redox (SS) � _ Coast Prairie Redox (A76) _ Black Histic (A3) — Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _Sandy — Stripped Matrix (S6) — Iron-Manganese Masses (Fl 2) —Other (Explain in Remarks) — Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) — Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) — Redox Dark Surface (F6) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) — Thick Dark Surface (Al2) — Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and — 5 an Mucky peat or Peat (S3) — Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problampf, Type: Depth (inches): HYDROLOGY Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ Nw%> Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- the Y all that apply) — Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (B9) _ High Water Table (A2) — Aquatic Fauna (B13) — Saturation (A3) — True Aquatic Plants (B14) — Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Sediment Deposits (82) — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (04) Algal Mat or Crust (84) — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (67) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) — Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Drainage Patterns (Bill) — Dry- Season Water Table (C2) — Crayfish Burrows (C8) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) — Geomorphic Position (D2) FAC- Neutral Test IDS) Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): A n Water Table Presets? Yes _ No Depth (inches): iI }d a y Saturation Present? Yes _ No � Depth (inches): /b � a V, Wetland Hydrology present? Yes _ includes ca ilia frin e _ N Descdbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aedal photos nre.,lq „� :.....,,,..:..__.:r ___,. �, _ _ US Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: T 1' tT I( T a I City/County: n,Ctht;�ri,{lnd / mjU Q plicanVOwner. ampling Date: /I /o State: Sampling Point Wffi cU nvestigator(s): Yt'tG /'texo( f Sr 5G/� Section, Township, Range: Landform (hilWope, terrace, etc.): _ L I Slope ( %): Long: Soil Map Unit Name: ' oca relief (concave, convex, none): NWI or WWI classification: Are dimatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soll —,or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? AM Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No _ Are Vegetation_ Soil—, or Hydrology naturally problematic? PD (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hyddc Soil Present? Is the Sampled Area Yes No _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 2. Cf�— 3. �-- C Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. IN, N 4. 5. Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species / That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ (A) Total Number of Dominant 1 Species Across All Strata: 1 (g) Percent of Dominant Species Q That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �0 ?O (A/B) =Total Cover Ira m (Plot size: L yN� ) . x t = = Total Cover Herb J /7,6 . FACU species x 4 = sl.. cgn1a ✓ A/D 3. Clf,IU^ 1r/A2,A r=_ 4. B. 7. 8. 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover 1. n ) on a separate US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover Total °y Cover oP Multiply br OBL species x t = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Dominance Testis >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No SOIL Sampling Point: wFj- -1 ( W¢ - Depth -- . - ­ • -- Matrix •• •- - -v ­=,. w ovwrnenr me moicaror or confine the absence of indreators.) nches Redox Features Collor (moist) o _(� Colot (moist) % Twe Loc Texture Remarks _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) 5'r+vk — Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Drift Deposits w Algal Mat or Crust st (64) — 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) — Iron Deposits _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) 9•S s to L � � y rrc or indicators: -- - ---- - -.._ _._...... ..,,,ate.,,,. �� -rare unm . m= rvlatnx. Indicators for Problematic Hydrtc Soils': — Hisl'So' (A1) Histic E,f,,don (A2) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) — — Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Other (Explain in Remarks) — Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Drift Deposits w Algal Mat or Crust st (64) — 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) — Iron Deposits _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) — Visible _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) — Sandy do Dark Surface al (SI Sandy Mudky Mineral (St) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and — 5 ctrl Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) — Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, e unless disturbed or ernhtemaflo Type: Depth HYDROLOGY Hydrlc Sofl Present? Yes X No Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required' check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) — Surface Water (Al) — Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Sol Cracks (B6) — High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) — Aquatic Fauna (B13) — Drainage Patterns (B 10) — — Water Marks (B1) — True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) at rTa — Dry-Season Water Table (C2) — Sediment Deposits (62) — — Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) — Crayfish Burrows — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) — Drift Deposits w Algal Mat or Crust st (64) — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _, Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) — Iron Deposits — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (02) — Visible _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) — Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) — Other (Explain in Remarks) Surface Water Present? _ Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No _ Depth (Inches): IO r( Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 1y Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ca ilia fri e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial ohoms. nrcv�nue rgc..n..e....�� u,. _:,_�,_. US Army Corps of Engineers AMA—. Project/Site: TH 41 jV nvesti4plicantl w" : gator(s): M Lit Landform (hillslope, terrace, e Slope ( %): Let Soil Map Unit Name: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM II — Midwest Region y� City/County: v�•� Sampling Date: % I 1 l t a State: M_ Sampling Point: W$ -Y_ 1- L, p - 4 I ° C' SOS Section, wnship To, Range:_ —i Long: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No NWI or WWI classification: (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology _ significant) disturbed? Y 0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ No Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology _ natural) --- y prohlematic? lV a (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. M!5 tion Present? Yes No Yes No Is the Sampled Area (� resent? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No /�, VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree �S;-rat —um (Plot size: �J' a o osorute Dominant 1._l/It4g/5 g rf��G��c, ) Cover S des? 2. G 3. 4. Sa ri Shrub Stra (Pldt size: I� = Total Cover 1. '^n afE�c ro0 ycs'� 2. �-on cera � -rt 3 Orr A t%CS FHGV1� 5. HeM7�. tratum (Plot size: z J = Total Cover 1, r MAVS Carta rgC, ) `"IG yes• FAcr�f. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. Woo Vi a Str tum (Plot size: Photo numbers here or on a US Army Corps of Engineers Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, n FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across x 2 = All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species x 4 = That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: C 0 (A18) Total °/ Cover of• Multiply by OBL species x1= FACW Species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species • X5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test Is >50% — Prevalence Index is 53.01 _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or probiematit..` = Total Cover r 40 I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yeses No =Total Cover 0 SOIL Samnl'nn Pninr• ir18— I � –U,'� Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required" i es Color moist) % O-a to R 3 kxy Color(moist) % e Loc — — — -PL Te ure Remarks a r Gat Gat GoAtM _ Water - Stained Leaves (89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (813) _Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks 'T e: C= Concentradw, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Sediment Deposits (82) Deposits Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At) - _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Ai6) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (55) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Hisfic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Field Observations: _ 2 cm Muck (A70) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Surface Water Present? Yes ------- -----777777``````-------- _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Water Table Present? Yes Saturation Present? Yes includes ca ilia fringe) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present. _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type. Depth (inches): H Soil Present? Yes & No '— Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required" check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (Al) High _ Water - Stained Leaves (89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (813) _Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Crayfish Burrows (Ce) _ Sediment Deposits (82) Deposits _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) rust _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Positron (D2) - _ Iron Deposits _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Visible _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (07) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: �[ Surface Water Present? Yes ------- -----777777``````-------- Not Depth (inches): - Water Table Present? Yes Saturation Present? Yes includes ca ilia fringe) No Depth (inches): `X/ No Depth (inches): �_ Wetland Hydrology Present? Ye� ` No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: lemarks: US Army Corps of Engineers AMA—. WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: TW VI ?2A /), City/County: ����///wmi1 N{9�St--/ �/Z.tI vSa Z �pllcanUOwner. � (,(� L„'7--- - - =�.� Sampling Date: pl0 State: f'l h% Sampling Point _Lt/!'� nvestigator(s): Section, Township, Range: - --r Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local r I' f Slope ( %): Let Soil Map Unit Name: e ie (concave, convex, none): Datum: _ .., or W Wl classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No , (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? /1/tl Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Are Vegetation _ No 9 ,Soil or Hydrology _naturally problematic? Na (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No Hyddc Soil Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Y within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: --`�- VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: f Cover Species? S tus Number of Dominant Species 2. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ::�� 7(A) 4. Saplino /Shrub Stratum (Plotsize: ) = .Total Cover 1. 2. — 3. I'll Herb�Stratuu (Plolt size: = Total Cover 6. Prevalence Index is 53.0' 2. _ Morphological Adaptation,' (Provide supporting 3. jZ,t�frGU+ G�i- i1�P�74 �`�xia p 4, _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 3- 0/ 2 That OBL; FACW, or FAC. - -- -3 f4 ---(AA Total % Cover of OBL species ._ FACW species FAC species _ FACU species _ UPL species _ Column Totals: Multioly by: x1= x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 5, _ Dominance Test is >50% 6. Prevalence Index is 53.0' ? _ Morphological Adaptation,' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8• _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 9. , 10. - `Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sae: = Total Cover 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation - Present? Yes_ No - = Total Cover Remarks: (InUude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet 1 -. US Army Corps of Engineers Ar1i.l..we1 0....: , � •. . SOIL ._7,(P_ /&'n __...r.,..y..,,,,...�.i r Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confine the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Inches Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) _L Type' Loc T—extu7r Remarks _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ High Water Table (A2) -e�-� _ Drainage Patterns (B1o) _ Saturation (A3) r _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3) 'ape: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS--Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matdx. Hydric Soil Indicators: - Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils°: _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (At 2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): - Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: r yp -r��S ` ✓I fi�` � afF^B C Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B1o) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (814) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes _ No R Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No 4 Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No inGudes p ilia fri e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). if availabie- Al) l h tS -iGzt �C v f � w �i,4l US Army Corps of Engineers ll// WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/site. Tii�7/ 7 -,eg,,;' y C' ny /Count : Gf�A4/if Sampling Dale: ! 2Ei18 �plicanUOwner: ,/ State: Sampling Point %—t' WE nvestigator(s): . 1 . D�$�r It'{t +%'t G[. y Section, Township, Range: Landforn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ! Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: 7_ NWI or WWI GassiflpM' �� Are climatic / hydrologic mnditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no• explain in Remarks.)"'; �// Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? ^!0 Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes v Are Vegetation - No __ 9 Soil _, or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? A(p (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? _ Yes J( No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Number of Dominant Species 2 That Are OBL, 2. FACW, or FAC: J (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant 4_ Species Across All Strata: (g) i 5 Percent of Dominant Species a� That - -- -Total Arg OBL, FACW, or _(AIE S-- Im /S_�q hrubgraWm (Plot size: 'Sh Cover 1 ��.0 EJU ui ) Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. e � 013E Total %Cover oP Multioly by: 3. OBL species x1= 4 FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: Total Cover UPL species XS= 1. ?.,' q= D (n C3 Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Yu ` fH �a �'� JL� yCSGi�t� Prevalence Index = B /A= 3. rophyBc Vegetation Indicators: 4 Dominance Test Is >50 °,6 FPrevalence 5. 8. Index is 53.01 �• °_ _Morphological Adaptations '(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. - _ Pro blematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 9. 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must -' be present. unless disturbed or problematic. W04y Yne S6tum': (Plot size: .. = Total Cover 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers SOIL r✓ 9 —i ,.,PL .,o,nymry rmra r- s . - -ter Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix I has Color moist %_ Redox Features Color /moist l % Type' Lo Texture Remarks f2 t r D r1l't S _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) a 74-1 _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) r Table _ d _ Crayfish Burrows _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crrust ust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) il indicators: 'FStratiflied Conoentratlon, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix. _ Iron Deposits _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soii53: ol (A1) Epipedon (A2) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Ai6) Histtc (A3) _ Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) a gen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Other (Explain Remarks) ed Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) uck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, Restrictive Layer (if observed): unless disturbed or problematic. Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: O. Mr QGGVH'+ulgt _ C—Q"er uvnnr�r r�ry Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired• check all that aoolv) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reeuired) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (89) _Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) r Table _ _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crrust ust (134) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Visible _ Inundation Ysible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Surface.Water Pcsent? Yes _ No —2— Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yesk No_ Depth (inches):_�_ Saturation Present? Yes J_ No_ Depth (inches): — 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ca ilia fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mo))n_�ito_ring well, aerial photos, previous inpe sctions), if available: 'emarks: C. ll-e,.L In Wc` US Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region ProjecUSite: T 7f-�; 1 x C ty /County: r , +f r ✓ t piicanUOwne Sampling Date: I IG r. hh State: M N Sampling Point W1G — — nvestigator(s): PHG# Ml yey i t J+' Sc r` --i Section. Township, Range: Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %): Lat: Long: Soil Map Unit Name: Datum: —_ NWI or WWI classification: —_ Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yeaR Yes No l Circumstances" explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation __, Soil , or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? (f(% Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes t// No _ Are Vegetation _, Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? /.ni (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No— Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: ° f Aosoiute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: 1. S eces. Status Number Of Dominant Species 2 / That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: �_ (q) 3• Total Number of Dominant 4_ Species Across All Strata:_ (B) �5• I Percent of Dominant Species dj _------- .I(.-That- Are0B6: fACV✓,- or-FAC.— �— �� {o -_ Sa If Shrub S to (Plot size: % =Total Cover l ) y �F 1. �AJ(rn UZI JrnASy pan C ^1C^ `I 2. 3. A 5. Herbs tum (Plot size: t =Total �Cover ��.�j 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1101 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. or on a separate Army Corps of Engineers Total % Cover of OBL species ._ FACW species _ FAC species _ FACU species UPL species Column Totals: Mulfioly bw x1= x2= X3= x4= X5= (A) (B; Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >So% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. = Total Cover Hydrophytic I— US vegetation Present? Yes No =Total Cover SOIL w�, Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repuired- check all that apply) inches Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc —,T Lure Remarks l0 Ica Y a l ja L rL }������( ___�r� C, o' _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) ter M _ Water Marks _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Deposits Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits Drift Deposits — Algal Mat Crust Presence of Reduced Iron (04) 'T e: C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Linin , M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ or rust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iran- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) ... _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetiand hydrology must be present, _ 5 crn Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or prcblematic, Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (Inches): J` (/ Hydric Soil Present? Yey \ No Remarks: Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is repuired- check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recuired) _ Surface Water (At) _ Water - Stained Leaves (89) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) ter M _ Water Marks _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Deposits Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits Drift Deposits — Algal Mat Crust Presence of Reduced Iron (04) Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) _ or rust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 'Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (BS) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAG- Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)' _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches):�p--�— Water Table Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches):/ l'� ... Saturation Present? Yes _ No Includes ca ills fringe) �*E Depth (inches): pn (f Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes, No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: 'emarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region ProjectlSlte: �� �(q t( t ll T ( °f e[ ( city /County: �..,._, l CNtinw / �plicanVOwner. t Sampling Date: � � �" State: M� Sampling Point: k/ — —U nvestigator(s): k p o �' e . C �,� Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope( %): Lot Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: ' Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No NWI or WWI Gassification: (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes — No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology —naturally problematic? KM (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes � � — Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology present? Yes_ N0,�_ within Wetland? Yes No __� VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 70 1. 2, f trj 3. J° c 4.. Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Pldt size:_ ) 1. n 2. _ � K q-5 3. 4. 5. ov r Species? Status = Total Cover Herb S (Plot size: WI Z =Total Cover 1. 4AtI a clCg!n TGG .CS z.�ea Pot n5. 4 SO as 3. 4 5. — 7. 8. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1 J — 1. ers nere or on a 64-^441' US Army Corps of Engineers Number of Dominant Species .PI That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:!/ (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:. (B) Percent of Dominant Species Total % Cover of OBL species ._ FACW species _ FAC species _ FACU species _ UPL species Column Totals: Multiply by x1= x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index Is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No = Total Cover ee ) W, 3 � e ''V� SOIL Samnlinn Pnw-v) 10-71-0 P Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) —� Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply) Inches Color (moist) % Color(moisU % Type' Loc Texture Remarks _ Surface Soll Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (Bto) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C I) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solls (C6) 'T e: C= Concentrat on, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Linin M= Matrix. Hyddc Soil Indicators: Thin Muck Surface (C7) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (At) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) –Depth (inches): _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Water Table Present? Yes_ No _ 2 cm Muck (At 0) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Thick Dark Surface (Al2) - — Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Welland hydrology must be present _ 5 an Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): H Soil Present? Yes No Remarks; — HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: _ Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soll Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (Bto) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C I) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (82) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solls (C6) _[ Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (BS) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) �)\FAGNeutml Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (09) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No –Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): )ta Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): y // _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes p ilia fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), ft available: lemarks: US Army Corps of Engineers o__:__ - -_. -- .. 11 I' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region ProjectfSite:Tlt4 I Tfor� I �(o�r fir- City/County: '�• 4"44�JCLEAIV — plicanVOwner. y��� Sampling Date: w/iI -1 I'WC I State: '='lam Sampling Point: nvestigator(s): Mt p % ,�s .'�. Section, Township, Range: Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope ( %); Let Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: ' Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site NWI or W WI classification: typical for this time of year? Yes � No __ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? 0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes Are Vegetation Soil " r/� No _, or Hydrology _ naturally /y v naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r \ No _ Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No -- Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tre tri u (Plot size: '!G f ) 1, 2. 3. % Cover Species? Status. I — ....._.._� °'Oinee[: I, Number of Dominant Species � That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) a yin hrub Sine (P size; I ,r' / = Total Cover �. P4CCd !1 Uri a 2. 3. 4. 5. H m (Plot size- Total Cover t. D e fi5 Alt,n �• tC �e� ). IGG_ 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 9, 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. or on a US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover = Total Cover Total Number of Dominant g species Across All Strata.. /L (B) Percent of Dominant Species Tota N Cover of OBL species _- FACW spedes FAC species FACU species _ UPL species Column Totals: Multiply bv, x1= x2= x3= x4= x5= (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence index is 93.01 _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be preseM, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic . I Vegetation /1\/ Present? Yes_ No__ SOIL — Hydrogen Sul Flde (A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F7) ,_, rcnyimn m nemarxs) _ Stratified Layers (AS) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — 2 an Muck (A10) Depleted Matrix (F3) — Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) %�� Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sand Muck Mineral (St Y Y ) Depleted Dark Surface F7 ( ) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and — _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) /(JJ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, Restrictive Layer (if observed): _ High Water Table (A2) unless disturbed or problematic. Type: _ Saturation (A3) Water Marks (81) — True Aquatic Plants (B14) Depth (inches): — 4 _ Sediment Deposits (B2) 91 b Hydric Soil Present? Yes, Remarks: — Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (84) No IIG:F_ r ArbK aS° Nt eR. 1° W 64,1 �r'f Er 2 a ei rr:S t ( f, -;^k, HYDROLOGY Wetland HYdrologyindicatore: Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is recluired• check all that aoolvl Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required, _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) — Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) Water Marks (81) — True Aquatic Plants (B14) — Dry- Season Water Table (C2) — 4 _ Sediment Deposits (B2) 91 b Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) — Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) — Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI) Deposits (85) — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Thin _ Geomorphic Position (D2) —Iron — Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Muck Surface (C7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) :XAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) — Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: ... Surface Water Present? Yes= No Depth (inches):�r� Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): t 7�q 1d ah' Saturation Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes includes ca ilia fringe) No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, ae lal photos. orevious insnecrinnel .r e.r�a�ras US Army Corps of Engineers l I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: 7� 1�J r 1 fist l City /County: plicanvOwner: <= A 1� ��� Sampling Date: 'I State: Sampling Point: 01 —T( —Up nvestigator(s):IT r JP gc.1, Section, Township. Range: �— Landfonn (hil(slope, terrace, etc.): Slope N: Lat _ Soil Map Unit Name: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, Datum: _ or WWI dassili cation• Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil , or Hydrology _significantly disturbed? p%0 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No _ Are Vegetation Soil ­or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? AID (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showina samnlinn nninr Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X— No Hydric Soil Present? Yes Is the Sampled Area No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No within.a Wetland? Yes No ✓EGFTATIn1J _ t toe �..:...•«s;_ ....... __ _ nosoiute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (plot size: over Species? Status 1. Number of Dominant Species / 2 ' ^iA That Are OBL. FACW, or FAQ (A) 3. Total Number of Dominant ,Z 4. Species Across Ail Strata. (B) SanItrm /Shrub Stratum (Plot ze: ) =Totaover t" f.Sgu�[aCVS LRatt 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb tratum (Plot size: 1� =Total Cover 1. LrlS;c.wt alvalt C ) 2. f15 dlt; n4C✓q �CcS ;1A% 3. 4. S. 6. 7. 6. 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Total Cover 1.. ) or on a separate US Army Corps of Engineers = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species Total 1 Cover of Multiply by OBL species x 1 = FACW species �_ X2= j2 4r FAC species x 3 = FACU species x4= (%. D UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = ? e in _ Dominance Test is >50% ,l Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No C SOIL Sampling Pnim- I.(7 /I-T), /p Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that aooly) inches Color moist _/y-_ n_a, v 3 -- l� Color (moisU °/ Twe Loc -- -- — Te t re Remarks ��1C«µ1 _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ 5 _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) 'T e: C= Concentralion. D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Thin Muck Surface (C7) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) _ Hislic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Stratified Layers (AS) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mondonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic Vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Redox Depressions (F8) . wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (ff observed): Type: Depth (inches): x/ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No \ Remarks: Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or. Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observat(ons: 'X/ Surface Water Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches): rC% T9 Water Table Present? Yes_ NO Y: Depth (inches): h� Saturation Present? Yes_ No includes capillary frig e /�'y \/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Ne Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, mondonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: lemarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Project/Site: T N q 1 16 R L. City/County: C Fi PW49SdEN / q � Sampling Date: I i' ZO ( O AppficanUOwner. Stater Sampling Point W12-- Vl�ei Investigator(s): 120 Oat Al 'e r action, Township, Range: Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope ( %): Let: _ Soil Map Unit Name: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic 7 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes A . No (it no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _, Soil — or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? A(0 Are 'Normal Circumstances° present? Yes —4— No Are Vegetation_ Soil or Hydrology _ naturaly problematic? 14 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes A No Dominant Indicator Species; 31ah s+ Hydric Soil Present? Yes._ No- Is the sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Welland Yes No Wetland? Yes No Remarks: 4. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tres Stratum (Plot size: ) 0 U h o Absolute s Cover Dominant Indicator Species; 31ah s+ Dominance Testworksheat: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or PAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) 3. 4. Percent of Dominant Speces C� That Are OBL FACW or FAQ O 0 [ a AA3 5' SaoenclShrub Stratum (Plotsize: ) = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. MuldoN by'. 2. OBL species x 1 = 3. FACW species x2= 4. FAC species X3= FACU species X4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: .(A) (B) Prevalence Index =B /A= 5. Herb Stratum (Plotsize: ) / 1. f,&ZarK g2=g9%7J C�YLQ(X'Gh3 /S 2. /- 0 c �s�i% 3. 04 a 5 po�� ly —J 6µ10 = Total Cover `, itS FRGK/ _ �ye5 0 y;K f t/ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4.. _ _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrio wil and welland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. S. 6. 7. B 9. 10. Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) = Total Cover 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No_ 2. = Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here oron a separate sheet.) US Amry Cprps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: VV 12' ( we r Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix finches) Color (moist) %_ Redox Feature Color (moist) % Tie Loe Texture Remarks Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (61) _ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drill Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 'Type: C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduosd Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix, Hydric Sol] Indicators: Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls': _ Histosol (At) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A161 _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (At 0) _ Depleted Matrix (173) Depth Cinches): Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Redox Dark Surface (176) Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ _ _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S7) _ Redox Depressions (178) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: unless disturbed of problematic. Restrictive Layer (H observed): `e,+ y,// e �° r a ✓Yrfn i tries �' f' Type: /1 .4,r E,,•f.,, ate, a+l.,ii Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: IA SAV %�l.ref: �t f`h C"d 4( �OU/ / /h4 / Nos HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reaulred, check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (61) _ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drill Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) /- Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _V_ FAGNeutrel Test (D5) _ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) ,4 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: ' Yes No Depth (inches): Surface Water Present? _ —X— Water Table Present? ' 'Yes _ No_ Depth Cinches): Saturation Present? Yes _ No _ Depth (Indies): 9 13 ? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: /well, Remarks: �H Ovr /3r r0 {G°SSr dY'K fUQ41 `e,+ y,// e �° r a ✓Yrfn i tries �' f' r( //t /1 .4,r E,,•f.,, ate, a+l.,ii US Amry Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Projectlsite: %f� 7 �� / L c ty�county GC✓ AlFi E /L[^(( "semoling Date: //? d �D Applicant/Omer. �,1 ,,� / State: /t� /�1 Sampling Point: V/12'f ✓� Investigator(,): !�! IvrGt f . 1, Section, Township, Range: Landform (hiilslope, terrace, E Slope ( %): Let Soil Map Unit Name: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X— No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation _ Soil _, or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? 44 Am 'Normal Circumstances present? Yes X No Are Vegetation _, Sal _ or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? N&l (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No /— Dominance Test worksheet: Number or That Am OBL, FACW, FAC: � (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Spades That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: D AIB /s X Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: Prevalence Index worksheet Total % Cover of Multiply by: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) e �t I1� Absolute Dominant Indicator g6�CovRL Species? Status d p %p C S �/lLk/ Dominance Test worksheet: Number or That Am OBL, FACW, FAC: � (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Spades That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: D AIB /s 3. 4. 5' Sa lin IShrS Stratu (Plotsizee: 1, /ry�9n tj 4,,Z/Xit^ ACA = Total Cover ) d'fJ r°',i FO'1cu Prevalence Index worksheet Total % Cover of Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4- UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. - Total Cover H S Plot s (ize: ) h.nnr�. r Ga- t. 2. _ 3. Hydmphytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test Is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. S. 8. 7. 8 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plotsize: ) 1. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No 2' = Total Cover Remarks: (Includes photo numbers here or on a separate /sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: (Al (/` Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) 0-3 n Wp It, /oo Redox Feat s Color (moist) % - Texture Remarks -/ Secondary Indicators !minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) 'Type: C= Concentmfion D =De lation, RM= Reduced Matrix CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: _ Drift Deposits (83) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Cloyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Surface Water Present? Yes _ No _ Depleted Beim Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (FS) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restricfive Layer (H observed): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: Type: Depth (inches): FHydriSWIPresent? Yes— No Remarks: Alp -� Vl �k-✓>� j _ f '� ` f G�1^eG f.�B f j r HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators !minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Suffide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Cmst (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test (135) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No v Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No K Depth (inches): 71 t ,.. Saturation Present? Yes_ No Depth (inches): >/ tt Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No ncludes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region Projecf/Ske: �� / �i2. / (— City /County: CdAa/}1RF3 �a 'sampling Date: I of O Applicent/Owner. �r � State: Sampling Point W /.I We Invesfigator(s): ./• 6Ap'/ Section, Township, Range: Landform (htiislope, terrace, e Slope ( %): Let: Soil Map Unit Name: Long: Local relief (concave, eomv , none): Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil _ or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes �/ No Are Vegetation _ Soil or Hydrology _ naturally problematic? iVO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �t No Absolute Dominant Indicator %Cover Soecies? Status Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ No_ Is the Sampled Area Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes _X_ No within a Wetland? Yes _,X�__ No Remarks: Stratum (Plot size: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plotsize: ) 1 Absolute Dominant Indicator %Cover Soecies? Status Dominance Test worksheet. .Number of Dominant Species rt That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species J7 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC kA/B) 2. 3• 5. Sapling /Shrub 1. Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover ) _ Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Mul idly by, 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence index =S /A= 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb S (Plot size: s R i 2. �/ It QU✓Y/i `/%p �S T&JAI 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index Is 53.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and we0and hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6 9. 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Piotsize: 1. ) = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation A� Present? Yes ' \ No _ 2 Total Cover Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region— Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: to t 3 —( V /o,/- Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Radox Features caman, Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: (inches) Color (moist) 6-3 % Color (moist\ Twe L °c� . ,Texture Remarks o YR IA 840 S" le _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) /oyrP 5z to ?. D _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (BID) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09) _ Drift Deposits (139) _ Presence of Reduced Icon (C4) 'T e: Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. "Location: PL =Pore Unin , M= Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: - _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) - _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (94) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Surface Water Present? Yes _ _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) Redox Dark Surface (F6) No_ Depth (inches)<2R _ _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 crrr Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes A No_ ,s��x Remarks: �CLU✓H LGiG " Jam/ Brp /c ^ / '"e'r^'r.a —14 CW-rLjVFri-- �t HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: caman, Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (BID) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (CB) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (09) _ Drift Deposits (139) _ Presence of Reduced Icon (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes _ No is Depth (Inches): Water Table Present? Yes_ No De _ pih (incheB):� y Saturation Present? Yes _ No_ Depth (inches)<2R Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Any Corps of Engineers Midwest Region - Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region Pro)ectlShe: T(2 Ai L CWCoum GNRJR See m� ling Date: /y 1 10 Applicant(Owner: State: Sampling Point: 14//37/- P/P Investigator(s): O(S-.m TAJ, V4 fu$ ^ Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope (%): Let: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ No _ (If no; explain in Remarks.) / Are Vegetation _ Soil _ or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? A16 Are "NormafCircumstances" present? Yes 4/ No Are Vegetation _, Soil _ or Hydrology_ naturally problematic? ND (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NoT Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soli Present? Yes_ No 7� within a Wetland? Yes No,_,� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No S I' ISSN 1. Remarks: = ota( over 1/ / ! rf I & K VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stm 1. (Plot size: ) G Y Art/ Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover S ecias? Status � a CS LW Dominance Testworksheet Number of Dominant Spades (A) That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: WB) 2. i,k JYS 3. Ace-t- ✓)1.} J in (D 7u YJ55_ PW- 4 5. S I' ISSN 1. b Stratum (Plot size: ) A'/ /7 C'& = ota( over 1/ / ! rf I & K Prevalence Index worksheet Total % Cover of Multioly by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x2= FAC species x3= FACU species x4= UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover He (Plot stze: ) ^^? 2. 3, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence Index is 9.0' _ Morphological Adaptatlons' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4• 5, S, 7. 9. - -- 10• Woody Vine 1. Stratum (Plotsize: ) - =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No 2 = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers hem or on a" separate sheet.) )e US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region — Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Vi/ /l -1 a? Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix finches) Color moist % Redox Features Color (moist) T Remarks 6 -3 0 /Q L 00 — n .r. . . 3 — _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift DeposfGs (63) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (DS) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Blain in Remarks) Field Observations:. 'Type: C--Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix Hydrlc Soil Indicators: - Wateejable Present? Yes_ No_ Depth(lnches): indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils : _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Ft) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 an Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (lf observed): Type: Depth Cinches): Hydrae 15,11 Present? Yes— No Remarks: Nya�F� s -6, /JDt,�»ry� HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Saturation (A3) _ True Aquatic Plants (614) _ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift DeposfGs (63) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D7) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Iron Deposits (85) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ FAC- Neutral Test (DS) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Gauge or Well Data (D9) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Blain in Remarks) Field Observations:. Surface Water Present? Yes _ No-X— Depth (inches): - Wateejable Present? Yes_ No_ Depth(lnches): Saturation Present? Yes_ No_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No-�— includes capillary hinge) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region- Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region ��/' Project/Site: �� ` 1 (�9 • i City /County: ,fit ,'- 1Ve%$"k-`�1��(,Yt`'t/ " ' �rplicant/Owner. Sampling Date: .'T! State: /ti1i Sampling Point nvestigator(s): J' ��"� e bcJvt Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope ( %): Lat Soil Map Unit Name: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No Are NWI or WWI classification: (If no, explain in Remarks.) Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology _ significantly disturbed? AJ/D Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes Are Vegetafion _, Soil or H drolo No — SUMMARY Hydrology— naturally problematic? /�/b (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydd _ c Soil Present? Yes —;7 }— No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No _ within a Wetland? Yes VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Absolute Dominant °°Cover �Sp /ecles? 2. 3. 4. Saolinc/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover 2- 3. 4. S. Herb Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover t. 2 2. G{!! 5 C yr r�A6CL� W 3. ' Ga.✓i C QY'v..t2d ,.cSd.e.. �O X25 4. S. 6. 7. 8. 10. " Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover 1. ) = Total Cover' ,ere or on a separate sheet) US Army Corps of Engineers Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (fj (B) Total °/, Cover f-, Mullioly by- OBL species x t = FACW species x 2 = PAC species x3= FACU specles x 4 = UPL species x5= Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ Dominance Testis >50°/ — Prevalence Index is 553.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytio Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation �I Present? Yes � V No SOIL Sampling Point:,)NZ/1p' Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color (moist % Color (moistl °h Tvoe Lo Texture I`.•�w`, tot, — — Remarks t , ch— �=1 � k a�v t VkQekj SA too -- — — �' - Hydric or Indicators; -- ".._ — � .- ...... . UUIr. , M= Matrix. rL =rore Liming, Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis': _ Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) _ _ Black Histic (A3) _ Sandy Redox (55) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F72) Iron-Manganese e e Masses ( _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ _Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _Other _ Stratified Layers (AS) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic Vegetation and _ 5 CM Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) _ Redox Depressions (F8) t Wetland hydrology must be present, R.d ff e r - ru ���_� -. p�✓Vrc p, S unless disturbed or problematic: Type: Depth (inches): A 7 /`% / jtr? HYDROLOGY Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required' check all that ao I ) Surface Water (Al) _ Water- Stained Leaves (89) _ High Water Table (AZ) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Saturation (A3.) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Water 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Sedimennt t Deposits (62) Drift D _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) eposits (83) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Iron Deposits (65) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Gauge or Well Data (139) Hydric Soil Present? Yes _Y No _ Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Dry - Season Water Table (C2) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Dl) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: A ` Surface Water Present? Yes No _ Depth (inches): O- ,SVI, Water Table Present? Yes No _ Depth (Inches): Rl - Saturdtion Present? Yes No _ D¢pth (finches): C.l. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes ce ilia fin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial r hgtne eravin 1e .: 111�'eA6 u' US Army Corps of Engineers tt WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Midwest Region ProjecUSite: L City/county: CRAoV1j4ZM s CA"r (1­61 3]plicanUOwner. i Sampling Date: .'T9 O/ State: �/ N_ Sampling Point nvestigator(s): Ole i'bi t-._ Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _ Slope M: Let Soil Map Unit Name: Long: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Datum: NWI or WWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_, Soil ­or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? A/b Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes // _ Are Vegetation v No e9 Soil—, or Hydroogy _naturally problematic? /.fi) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hyddc Soil Present? Ye _ X Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_ within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: Absolute Dominant Cover Species? 2. 3. 4. Saolinn/Shmb Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover ) —J4) er7 PA t CAL 2. K o (nmhyz 1 do V�1G� 3. 94 Herb Stratum (Plot size: = Total Cover I. ; k t uvyt inY]Il eat�Jw �D �e5 FWuJ 3. — %ar u 4. 6. 7. - 8. 9. - 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size-. t =Total Cover 1 = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _. (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant -Species Total %Cover of OBL species FACW species FAC species _ FACU species _ UPL species _ Column Totals: Multiply by, x,= x2= x3= x4= X5= (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2— Dominance Test is >5o% _ Prevalence Index Is 53.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No s nere or on a separate sheet) �Y-Lr%71�fpt a � - � US Army Corps of Engineers SOIL Sampling Point _/( J�' 1 LV Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features in s _ Colorfmoist) % Color !moist) % Twe Loc Texture ©_ l7 3 n— —� Remarks J Hydric soil Indicators: _ Histosol(Al) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Type: Depth (inches): Ctiw �- HYDROLOGY _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydd< _ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) _ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic- Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes _ No, S¢k saw le �¢ ` 'M1.'t IZtf Primary Indicators (minlmum of one is reeuirect check all that acol Secondary Indicators !minimum of two ree fired) Surface Water ter _ High Water Table (A2) Table le ( _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Saturation _ _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Drainage Patterns (Bto) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Water Marks s ( _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Sediment Deposits s (B2) Drift Deposits _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ _ Algal Mat or Crrust (84) Crust _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic _ Iron Deposits _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Position (D2) _ FACONeutral Test (D5) Visible Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) _ Gauge or Well Data (09) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Surface Water Present? Yes ._'r . No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes _ No . Depth (inches).. Saturation Present? Yes _ No N Depth (inches): �� 12 Wetland Hroi mGUdes ca ilia fringe) Yd ogy Present? Yes _ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: emarks: ,vt "itd,�.¢,y� �yd "177 ohs, US Army Corps of Engineers Appendix B: NRCS Mapped Soils 44° 53' 3P 44° 52'41" Soil Map — Carver County, Minnesota, and Hennepin County, Minnesota (TH 41 Trail (North)) Map Scale: 1:7,840 R pmn on Mva (8.5' x 11') sheet. _ N Meters m p 0 50 100 200 300 m N Feet 0 300 600 1.200 1,800 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/2612010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 44" 53'35" 44° 52'41" 0 c U c a d CZ m N ~ c a �H c v° Y2 6 z O Q O LL z a CQ L G z w cD w J CL Q O m N N_ > Y d m u Z m a L n m d N w y a m J i m° ° ? w E m m e N I[J d N y ? 0 Z of 3 0 c L m o m Q d O E U- y N o p d J 2 d o<< C T C O d C d N ° = d Z g r+ d m y m rE iN m c O- C g b d J B�'o ad n d m m 3 a a m> y m D) d m d N C N d d 9 N (p 3 c oy p o o Si Q d d N C N PG N N d O E 9 gN y'N EE a @ -D m h`do G m �Q UQ vadia n°—' m°nd ooi r Ja,_,mn " E2•md Uo .ao i?im EE Z� cE 0 ��o a`r BQmE mj dj QE O O SmoEy ov NB Q� Q Tcyc m ova an4yd aTi �' `oZm= o it !qd p1d Nvdi� d � °c m °'nom d'm° J m tEmE yU Wm Y�m o _ c m a a Z o A y 9 B E Z a 8 LL Q O LL O oo d > > m E e m m U 0 c$ 0 -9 m!9 g a a y m in "ui m g$ in g� a %� • x > + III H ov 0 0 N N � d N � O m o. T Z J y m 'a zN Jd !/1 3 N d a o° 0 o 3U 0 0 z N Z d d h O c 0 y o rc a.r y N_ L' m O Z U 81,1 Soil Map -Carver County, Minnesota, and Hennepin County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend TH 41 Trail (North) Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) ymbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Cordova - Webster complex 1.6 0.8% P Glencoe clay loam 3.2 1.6% Hamel loam 10.8 5.5% Kilkenny - Lester hams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 14.2 7.3% Lester - Kilkenny hams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded 7.1 3.7% KC Lester - Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 40.6 20.8% KC2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 14.5 7.4% KD Lester - Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes 8.3 4.2% KO2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 13.8 7.1% KE2 Lester - Kilkenny hams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 29.5 15.1% MK Houghton and Muskego sods 7.7 4.0% MP Klossner and Muskego soils, ponded 1.8 0.9% ND3 Lester- Kilkenny clay loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded 6.7 3.4% NE3 Lester- Kilkenny clay loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 3.2 1.6% PM Klossner muck - -..: 0.1 - 0.0% TB Terril loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 1.2 0.6% TC Ternl loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 2.7 1.4% YB Rassel- Lester - Kilkenny complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 12.2 6.2% YD Rasset- Lester- Kilkenny complex, 12 to 18 percent slopes 3.9 2.0% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 183.1 93.7% Totals for Area of Interest 195.4 100.0% Hennepin County, Minnesota (MN053) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L22D2 Lester loam, morainic, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 0.2 0.1% L22E Lester loam, morainic, 18 to 25 percent slopes 0.6 0.3% L24A Glencoe loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 0.3 0.2 %' L36A Hamel, overwash -Hemel complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes 0.1 0.1% L41C2 Lester - Kilkenny complex, 6 to f2 percents1opes, eroded 1. 10.5 5.4% U1A Urban land- Udorthents, wet substratum, complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.2 0.1% U3B Udorthents (cut and fill land), 0 to 6 percent slopes 0.4 0.2% Subtotals for So(I Survey Area 12.3 6.3% Totals for Area of Interest 195.4 100.0% � Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/262010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 44° 5Y 56, M° 52' 11' Soil Mapp--Carver County, Minnesota (TH41Trail (South) Soils) Map Scale: 1:6,470 Y "W on As¢e M.5' a 11'1 sheet. _ N Meters w 0 50 100 200 700 m Feet 0 200 400 600 1,200 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 44° 52' 56' a° 52 11' i \\ \/ &\ ! q k � § } « ■ w 0 -i a � /| /,)k0(2 ` �). ; k� E &` ƒk 0 ! 0 iL ! t, m- x•n¥4- e, > +x,, »!mom F! \ \\ /) \0 \0 q > ] ± \ ) § §(k 52[ 22 tee! } ! ! U) )% { \ �\2 §A -, E f J Rm ! / w_4N O` \ |f!! , _ ¥,_,)� 0 \ \� ; ®J� )k /( ] - ` ®k( i{ 7 - \ f(} \ { t{ )7;; _ ! ° ■ |§,E ƒ !§ //4 3 3 «6 In ;B,! /| /,)k0(2 ` �). ; k� E &` ƒk 0 ! 0 iL ! t, m- x•n¥4- e, > +x,, »!mom F! \ \\ /) \0 \0 q Soil Map -Carver County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend TH41TraII (South) Soils Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI I Percent of AOI CO Cordova day loam 2.0 0.8% CW Cordova - Webster complex 4.3 1.8% EX Essexville sandy loam 0.9 0.4% HM Hamel loam 20.4 8.4% KB Kilkenny - Lester foams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 37.2 15.3% KB2 Lester - Kilkenny foams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded 9.0 3.7% KC Lester- Kilkenny foams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 18.3 7.5% KC2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 40.8 16.8% KID Lester - Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes 8.7 3.6% KD2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 11.5 4.7% KE2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 25.7 10.6% LA Le Sueur - Lester hams, 1 to 4 percent slopes 22 0.9% MK Houghton and Muskego soils 4.7 1.9% NC3 - Lester- Kilkenny day loams, 6 to 12 percent - slopes, severely eroded 6.0 2.5% ND3 Lester - Kilkenny clay loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, severely eroded 16.3 6.7% NO Lester - Kilkenny Gay loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 12.8 5.3% PM Klossner muck 1.3 0.5% TB Terrill loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 18.5 7.6% W Water 2.4 1.0% Totals for Area of Interest 243.1 100.0% UU Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/262010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 N C= =N U� v'm Im~ h� m F- � v Q to .94.4E .E6 LZ 9E.E6 O M ..96.6E .Efi 0 0 N � V) � N � O m �a v u k i Z� .92.9E.E6 T N Z N � O Z N 3m Na m �v N o no wo :u ?�U 0 m Z y U_ U N pC N m O 2U ��I 2 \\ )( \} !r q � § } « ■ § 3 § t | \ )) { \ \ / / / \f \\ ƒk\! { / {] e f . , ) ({ f # \!% =)!):- , }k, {!~ ` �j��j``�f)(f \)i|ƒ!]!]!|!`! :�$$!_ °!! }\# f»2 *,x•ow4we / > +x4,�l,� \ \\ /) \\ \\ q \ ` ]$ )§ ) \ \k !mE $; k\\ \ § ( \ \ \t \\ \ \\ E � {!/ / ( /] | ®it �\ ( \kfJ id ! {$] f) )) \)\ }} \) } } \ \\ t | \ )) { \ \ / / / \f \\ ƒk\! { / {] e f . , ) ({ f # \!% =)!):- , }k, {!~ ` �j��j``�f)(f \)i|ƒ!]!]!|!`! :�$$!_ °!! }\# f»2 *,x•ow4we / > +x4,�l,� \ \\ /) \\ \\ q Soil Map -Carver County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend TH 41 Trail (West) Soils Carver County, Minnesota (MN019) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI EX Essexville sandy loam 24.8 5.3% GL Glencoe clay loam 3.5 0.7% HM Hamel loam 38.9 8.3% KB Kilkenny- Lester loams, 2 to 6 percent slopes 27.6 5.9% KB2 Lester - Kilkenny hams, 2 to 6 percent slopes, eroded 8.3 1.8% KC Lester - Kilkenny foams, 6 to 12 percent slopes 57.3 12.1% KC2 Lester - Kilkenny foams, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded 41.5 8.8% KD Lester- Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes 29.4 6.2% KD2 Lester - Kilkenny loams, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded 32.4 6.9% KE2 Lester- Kilkenny foams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 51.4 10.9% LA Le Susur- Lester foams, 1 to 4 percent slopes 2.4 0.5% MK Houghton and Muskego soils 13.8 2.9% MP Klossner and Muskego soils, ponded 19.5 4.1% NC3 - Lester- Kilkenny clay loams, 6 to 12 percent slopest, severely eroded - 2.6 0.6% NO3 Lester - Kilkenny clay foams, 1210 18 percent slopes, severely eroded 14.0 3.0% NE3 Lester - Kilkenny day loams, 18 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 6.7 1.4% PM Klossner muck 3.1 0.7% TB Terrill loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 23.8 5.0% TC Terril loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 2.2 0.5% W Water 68.3 14.5% Totals for Area of Interest 471.6 100.0% ir ,�N- Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/26/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Hydric Soils Carver County, Minnesota Map symbol and Component Percent of map Landform Hydric Hydric e map unit name Blue Earth unit Depressions, Flood rating criteria BH: Blue Earth mucky silt loam Blue Earth 85 Depressions, Flood Yes 283, 3, 4 plains. Moraines BY: Biscay loam Biscay 85 Drainageways, Stream Yes 2B3 terraces CL: Coland day loam, occasionally flooded Coland, occasionally 85 Flats, Flood plains Yes 2B3 flooded CO: Cordova clay loam Cordova 85 Drainageways, Yes 2B3 Moraines CS: Canisteo silty clay loam, depressional Canisteo, depressions[ 85 Depressions, Moraines Yes 2B3, 3 CT: Canisteo clay loam Canisteo 85 Flats, Moraines Yes 283 CU: Coland clay loam, frequently flooded Coland, frequently flooded 85 Flats, Flood plains Yes 2B3.4 C W: Cordova - Webster complex Cordova 70 Drainageways, Yes 2B3 Moraines Webster 30 Drainageways, Yes 2B3 Moraines EX: Essexville sandy loam Essexville 85 Beaches Yes 283 GL: Glencoe clay loam Glencoe 85 Depressions, Moraines Yes 2B3,3 HM Hamel loam Hamel 85 Drainageways, Yes 283 Moraines KU Hanlon- Kalmarville complex, frequently Kalmarville, frequently 45 Flats, Flood plains Yes 283,4 flooded flooded KM: Minneiska- Kalmarville complex, Kalmarville, frequently 40 Flats, Flood plains Yes 2B3,4 frequently flooded flooded USjDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Tabular Data Version: 6 Tabular Data Version Date: 08/2112008 Page 1 of 2 Hydric Soils Carver County, Minnesota Map symbol and Component Percent of map Landform Hydric Hydric map unit name Depressions, Moraines unit 1,3 rating criteria MK: Houghton and Muskego soils MP. Klossner and Muskego soils, ponded MY: Mayer loam OS: Oshawa silty clay loam PM: Klossner muck PS: Klossner muck, sandy substratum TT: Talcot silty clay loam Houghton 50 Depressions, Moraines Yes 1.3 Muskego 50 Depressions, Moraines Yes 1,3 Klossner, ponded 50 Marshes, Moraines Yes 1,3 Muskego, ponded 50 Marshes, Moraines Yes 1,3 Mayer 85 Stream terraces, Yes 283 Swales Oshawa, frequently flooded 85 Flood plains, Oxbows Yes 263, 3,4 Klossner 85 Depressions, Moraines Yes 1,3 Klossner, sandy substratum 85 Depressions, Stream Yes 1.3 terraces Talcot 85 Depressions, Stream Yes 2133 terraces Explanation of hydric criteria codes: 1. All Histels except for Folistels, and Histosols except for Folists. 2. Soils in Aquic suborders, great groups, or subgroups, Albolls suborder, Historthels great group, Histoturbels great group, Pachic subgroups, or Cumulic subgroups that: A. are somewhat poorly drained and have a water table at the surface (0.0 feet) during the growing season, or B. are poorly drained or very poorly drained and have either: 1.) a water table at the surface (0.0 feet) during the growing season if textures are coarse sand, sand, or fine sand in all layers within a depth of 20 inches, or 2.) a water table at a depth of 0.5 foot or less during the growing season if permeability is equal to or greater than 6.0 in /hr in all layers within a depth of 20 inches, or 3.) a water table at a depth of 1.0 foot or less during the growing season if permeability is less than 6.0 in/hr in any layer within a depth of 20 inches. ' 3. Soils that are frequently ponded for long or very long duration during the growing season. 4. Soils that are frequently flooded for long or very long duration during the growing season. USDA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version: 6 Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 08/2112008 Page 2 of 2