Loading...
PC Staff Report 06-18-2013PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, subdivision and conditional use permit for the Camden Ridge development subject to the conditions of the staff report and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting a Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision into 32 single - family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. CAMDEN RIDGE LOCATION: 1500 Pioneer Trail (PID 25- 0232300) APPLICANT: Applicant: Lennar Attn: Joe Jablonski U.S. Home Corporation 16305 36"' Avenue North, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 (952) 249 -3014 joe.jablonski@Lennar.com PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District, A -2 2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Medium Density (4.0 — 8.0 units per net acre) ACREAGE: 36 acre total, 24 acres developed DENSITY: gross — 3.05; net — 4.03 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION - MAKING: Oq., Owner: Bruce Jeurissen B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC 19450 28155 Street Belle Plaine, MN 56011 -5010 The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs, and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy - making capacity. rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 0 The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits, based on whether or not the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 2 of 31 The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL /SUMMARY The applicant is requesting for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate (A2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD -R); Subdivision of approximately 36 acres into 32 single - family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 9 outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.. The site has a high point elevation of 940' located at the north property line. The site has a low point elevation of 866' adjacent to Bluff Creek which separates the north and south halves of the property. The land south of Bluff Creek is shown on city maps as being entirely with the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone and is proposed as an area to be preserved as open space. To the north of the property is a wooded hill on the Fox parcel that is included in the Bluff Creek Primary Corridor which is intended to be preserved. To the northeast is a ponding and wetland mitigation area for MnDOT and the Highway 212 project. To the south is a future developable area that is guided for office use. The parcel to the south will gain access via Pioneer Trail. The property to the west is Pioneer Pass, a 94 -lot single - family subdivision. As part of that development, the Bluff Creek Corridor was preserved. The initial access to the site will be from the northwest. This roadway crosses two other parcels and, therefore, must be coordinated with the development of those sites. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. As part of this development, we are also requiring that the developer establish a second means of access to the site. This access is shown as Street C in the development plans. Staff recommends that this access be moved as far east as possible to limit its impact on the wooded hill to the north. Since this land is within the shoreland district, the city is requiring that the total open space for all lands within the shoreland district be preserved as part of the first phase of development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 3 of 31 Additionally, the property owner will need to provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary for Outlot C, Jeurissen 1st Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions of the staff report. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 7, Article III, Excavating, Mining, Filling and Grading Chapter 18, Subdivisions Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article IV, Conditional Use Permits Chapter 20, Article V, Floodplain Overlay District Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXXI, Bluff Creek Overlay District Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Regulations BACKGROUND On May 9, 2011, City Council approved a one -year extension until May 22, 2012 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside, Planning Case #05 -24. On April 12, 2010, City Council approved a one -year extension until May 22, 2011 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On June 8, 2009, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one -year extension until May 22, 2010 for the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On April 28, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one -year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 29, 2007, the Chanhassen City Council approved a one year extension to the preliminary plat for Liberty at Creekside. On May 22, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following for Liberty at Creekside- Planning Case #05 -24: Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 4 of 31 A. Rezoning of the property located within the Liberty at Creekside development, with the exception of Outlot A and the Bluff Creek Overlay District Primary Zone ( Outlot D), from Agricultural Estate District (A -2) to Planned Unit Development - Residential (PUD - R) incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report. B. Preliminary Plat for Liberty at Creekside, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, revised April 6, 2006, which may also be revised to incorporate lots around each dwelling unit. C. Site Plan for 146 townhouses, plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., dated June 17, 2005, revised February 3, 2006, and revised April 6, 2006. D. Conditional Use Permit for alterations within the flood plain and development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. • �S r !• f � I Iw- I fy u C ~' �.. Liberty at Creekside Alternative Urban Areawide Review On December 8, 2003, the City approved the 2005 MUSA Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). This document was intended to review and provide mitigation measures for all development within the 2005 MUSA area. At the time of development review, each property within the 2005 MUSA area is required to reimburse the city for their proportional share, based on the land area, of the costs for completion of the AUAR. This property is responsible for 56,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 5 of 31 History of the Alternative Areawide Review (AUAR) In July of 2002, an application was submitted to the City by Town and Country Homes to build 540 townhome units on 88.5 acres in the project area. The property, known as the Bernardi property, is located in the southwest corner of the AUAR project area adjacent to Audubon Road (within the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 27, Township 116, Range 23 West). The proposal by Town and Country Homes met the mandatory requirements for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Over the years, staff has been made aware of other property owners expressing interests in future development. There also was interest in locating a new secondary school within the general area. Rather than just studying the subject property, city staff met with the State Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to discuss the possibility of studying the entire 2005 MUSA area through the AUAR process. The EQB supported this recommendation. How is an AUAR used? An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In December 2003, the City completed an AUAR for 620 acres of property located in the 2005 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). This study provides a framework for making decisions, including budgeting for improvements and providing a base of knowledge for development in this area. An AUAR is authorized under Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 as an alternative form of environmental review for development projects. Generally, the AUAR consists of a most likely development scenario, an inventory of environmental and cultural resources, an assessment of the "cumulative" impacts that the development scenario may have on these resources as well as public infrastructure services, and a set of mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate the potential impacts generated by the development. The AUAR is intended to address the "cumulative" impacts resulting from a sequence of related development projects. An AUAR is used as a tool to help parties interested in development within the project area understand the existing environmental and cultural resources present on a site prior to initiating detailed planning and design. It is also used to identify key initiatives that must or should be undertaken to minimize negative impacts generated by proposed development. Any proposed development in the project area would need to be reviewed for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. If a development plan is not consistent with these documents or other statutory Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 6 of 31 requirements, the developer may need to conduct additional environmental documentation or review or request an amendment to the AUAR. Natural and cultural inventory information in the AUAR and the Mitigation Plan will be used to guide development. Design and construction would proceed only after all approvals and appropriate agreements are complete. In August 2005, the City completed a feasibility study for the 2005 MUSA area. This study identified infrastructure needs to service this area and identify costs to construct this infrastructure. The study also proposed assessments to benefiting property owners for these infrastructure costs. At about this same time, TH 212 was also being designed and eventually constructed. Infrastructure improvements that benefited the 2005 MUSA area were constructed at this time. These infrastructure improvements included turn lanes, signal system improvements, trunk watermain and trunk storm sewer improvements. In 2002 MnDOT and Jeurissen executed a temporary driveway access under the TH 212 land bridge to Pioneer Trail until such time the property develops and permanent access is provided. After the property develops, the temporary MnDOT driveway access was planned to be removed. Many property owner meetings were held for the AUAR, 2005 MUSA feasibility study and TH 212 improvements. Town and Country Homes had title to the Jeurissen property at this time and the City was working with this developer on coordinating future infrastructure improvement needs. ASSESSMENTS In January 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for benefiting infrastructure improvements associated with the TH 212 project constructed by MnDOT. In October 2005, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for trunk watermain, sanitary sewer roadway and bridge improvements for future development of this area. The City took the lead on this project because the infrastructure improvements crossed several properties. In January 2007, the City assessed the 2005 MUSA for construction of the east/west collector roadway and additional trunk watermain and sanitary sewer. Again, the City took the lead on these infrastructure improvements since the improvements crossed several properties. Assessments were levied per parcel acreage less right - of -way and less known wetland areas. This assessment was consistent for parcels in the 2005 MUSA. Sometime after all the infrastructure improvements were made (the Jeurissen property had Town and Country Homes as the title owner), the title was transferred back to Mr. Bruce Jeurissen along with the assessments. Access to the Jeurissen property from the north will need to cross two properties to access Bluff Creek Boulevard. A small outlot was extracted from the 2 a Addition of the Pioneer Pass Development in 2011 to plan for the roadway improvements to the Jeurissen property. The Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 7 of 31 preliminary plat for The Preserve at Bluff Creek also plats the right -of -way for future access to the Jeurissen property. However, the right -of -way needed in the Preserve at Bluff Creek development for access to the Jeurissen property is currently not platted because the developer has chosen not to plat this area right now. The City's development contract for The Preserve at Bluff Creek does state this right -of -way shall be platted to facilitate the future development of the Jeurissen property. The City plans on having the developer plat this area when the next phase of this development is considered for approval. It is anticipated the next phase of The Preserve at Bluff Creek will come in for final plat in the next few months. City staff continues to meet with representatives from MnDOT, the Jeurissen property, and the Preserve at Bluff Creek development to try to resolve access and development timing issues. 2005 MUSA Expansion Proiect No. 04 -05 Original Assessment (Just Jeurissen Property) Road: $ 96,328.76 Water: $ 22,074.96 Sewer: $ 43,374.20 Total: $161,777.92* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12 Trunk Highway iway 101 /Lyman Boulevard — TH 312 /TH 212 Original Assessment Road: $39,232.34 Water: $45,545.84 Total: $84,778.18* *Assessments are fully paid off as of 12/31/12. Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Original Assessment Road: $514,238.68 Water: $ 26,091.64 Sewer: $ 60,882.33 Total: $601,212.65* *No payments have been received because the property has Green Acre status (outstanding amount with interest is: $667,834.02 as of 12/31/12). Total Assessments (For Just the Jeurissen Propert Roads: $649,799.78 Water: $ 93,712.44 Sewer: $104,256.53 Total: $847,768.75* *Does not include interest Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 8 of 31 2005 MUSA Area li- � m J REZONING Justification for Rezoninn. to PUD q / Bluff Creek 0 - Boulevard final alignment not yet P Access required with "The Preserve" preliminary plat not yet acquired Access acquired with the Pioneer Pass Subdivision The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 24 acres from A -2, Agricultural Estate to PUD -R, Planned Unit Development - Residential. The project consists of 58 units in 32 single - family homes and 26 twinhomes. The review criteria are taken from the intent section of the PUD Ordinance. For a property guided Medium Density Residential, zoning consistent with the land use includes RLM, Residential Low and Medium Density District, R -8, Mixed Medium Density Residential Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 9 of 31 District or PUD -R, Planned Unit Development — Residential. Since the developer wanted a development of single - family detached and twinhome units, the R -8 district did not work because it does not permit single - family detached homes. Initially, the developer tried to use the RLM district, however, due to site topography and the location of the Bluff Creek overlay district, the developer could not meet the minimum standards for the lots and many lot width and area variances would have been required. Since the PUD -R district creates its own standards, we were able to accommodate the development while preserving significant environmental features. Since the property is guided medium density residential, the developer must maintain a minimum density of 4.0 units per acre. As proposed, the net density of the project is 4.03 units per acre. Complying with the RLM district regulations would not have permitted the development consistent with the land use plan. Section 20 -501. Intent Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of the PUD in this instance is to allow for lot dimension flexibility and the mixing of housing type. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more - sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the other more standard zoning districts. The proposed development provides a compatible development with the surrounding development and is consistent with the comprehensive plan subject to the conditions of approval. The proposed rezoning assists in the furtherance of the following land use goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • Development will be encouraged within the MUSA line. • The plan should seek to establish sufficient land to provide a full range of housing opportunities. • The city will seek opportunities to provide transitions between different uses of different types. • Development should be phased in accordance with the ability of the city to provide services. The proposed rezoning assist in the furtherance of the following housing goals of the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan: • A balanced housing supply with housing available for people of all income levels. • A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life - cycle. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 10 of 31 • Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. Staff is proposing the following development standards govern the development of the property. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Camden Ridge a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single - family detached and twinbome development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more - sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Camden Ridge development standards, the development must comply with the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to single- family detached houses and twinhomes and their ancillary uses. The type of uses to be provided on common area shall be low- intensity neighborhood - oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, permanent open space, playground equipment and trails. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 25 feet Front Yard (side street) 20 feet Side Yard: garage side and house side 7.5 feet (minimum separation between buildings is 15 feet) Rear Yard 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 35%* Bluff Creek Primary zone bound (BCO) 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Minimum Lot Dimensions Standards Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 11 of 31 Single-family detached (area) 9,000 square feet Single - family detached (lot width ) 70 feet (75 feet in shoreland district) Single-family detached (lot depth) 130 feet Twinhome lot (area per unit) 5,100 square feet Twinhome lot (lot width ) 32 feet Twinhome lot (lot depth) 120 feet * The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The developer is proposing two different subdivisions. The initial plat, Jeurissen I" Addition, will create four outlots. The area north of Bluff Creek (Outlot A) is being preliminary platted into blocks and lots for residential development known as Camden Ridge. The area south of Bluff Creek is being platted into three outlots. One of these outlots (Outlot B) contains areas of wetlands, bluffs and Bluff Creek and is definitely within the Bluff Creek primary zone. The other outlot (Outlot C) is presumed to be located within the primary zone, but additional evaluation is necessary to determine this. This outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. The third outlot (Outlot D) contains the existing driveway access to the property. Staff believes that these outlots should be preserved as permanent open space. 4e�d p A . 3 dy ;7 a a � I' .t• ry, f. ,{� X19 � i The area north of Bluff Creek, Camden Ridge, is being subdivided into 32 single - family lots, 26 twinhome lots, and 7 outlots.l Az n.v ti' 8 1 s i ° font° Y. Planning Commission Camden Ridge – Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 12 of 31 SHORELAND REGULATIONS That portion of the property within 300 feet of Bluff Creek is considered to be within the Shoreland Management District and is subject to the standards and requirements of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and City Code. The intent of the shoreland rules are to protect the habitat, viewscape and water quality of the waters of the state by setting design standards to this end. However, unlike riparian lots for lakes, there are no minimum lot widths or areas for riparian lots of streams/rivers; rather, the lot dimensions are subject to the underlying zoning requirements. Other design standards apply to these lots. Structures must be setback 50 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and low floor elevations must be three (3) feet above the flood of record. If the flood stage elevation is unknown, the stream can either be modeled to predict the flood stage post development or the OHWL may be used. The development must comply with the MN Rules Chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. An adequate stormwater management and erosion/sediment control plan must be provided. These will be addressed under a separate heading. Based on the DNR Residential PUD “Base” Density evaluation (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. A.), 28 17 homes could be located within the shoreland area of the development. Sixteen units are proposed within the shoreland district. This density is calculated by dividing the area within the shoreland district by the single residential lot width standards times the tier depth. The area 758,802 within the shoreland district is 462,000 square feet. The lot width times the tier depth is 27,000. Also within the shoreland district, impervious surface of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot area. The total proposed impervious surface of the land area within the shoreland district is 17.9 percent, which complies with this standard. Additionally, DNR regulations (section 6120.3800, subp. 5. B. (2) (a)) require that “at least 50 percent of the total project area within the shoreland district, which extends 300 feet out from the edge of the creek, must be preserved as open space”. Given that the total property area within 41978.71 the shoreland district is 17.88 acres, 8.9 acres would be required to be preserved as st permanent open space. Outlot B, Jeurissen 1 Addition (7.6 acres), plus part of Outlot B, Outlot C, Outlot F and Outlot G, Camden Ridge, plus the buffer areas of the lots adjacent to the Bluff Creek primary zone provide the required open space. The open space shall be established as part of the first phase of the development. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 13 of 31 WETLANDS A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right -of -way for that connecting road must be acquired. Preserve t Connection Bluff Creek Overlay ��"/ Setback Outlot C Use to be outgo Wnot determined Outlot B PUD required PIONEERenenee;q 501/o open space WETLANDS A wetland delineation was performed, reviewed and approved in the fall of 2012. The existing conditions plan appears to accurately depict the wetland boundary. No wetland impacts are proposed as part of the design. The wetland is contained within the Bluff Creek Overlay District so the buffer protection will be coincidental to the protection of the Primary Zone. EASEMENTS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Camden Ridge development will connect to Bluff Creek Boulevard. The right -of -way for that connecting road must be acquired. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 14 of 31 The proposed "Easement Detail' must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL Note: A development contract is being approved in conjunction with the preliminary plat to permit site grading to commence prior to final plat approval. However, before the developer may proceed with site grading, the access easement or road right -of -way must be in place. Bluff Creek flows through the property from west to east. The existing drainage on the northwest corner of the development drains into an existing retaining pond before discharging to Bluff Creek. The majority of the property's surface water runoff drains to Bluff Creek. The eastern section of the property drains into the TH 212 ditch system, and the northeast corner of the property drains northeast into a wetland. The proposed drainage would divert storm water to the existing retaining pond and three new ponds, before the water leaves the site. Pond 1 and Pond 2 would discharge water to Bluff Creek. Pond 3 would discharge water into the TH 212 ditch system. The developer has provided a storm water report which shows that this storm water management plan will comply with the City's standards. The grading plan shows a steep slope on the proposed trail near Outlot F. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail so that it will meet ADA standards. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7, must be smoothed out. Between lots on the north side of Street B, the current plan shows that water may be flowing laterally from one lot into the adjacent lot. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) to show water will drain away from the structures. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set and note the existing and proposed elevations at the corners of each lot. An escrow totaling $105,376.87 (110% of the estimated erosion control for this development) is required before site grading begins. It is more efficient and cost effective to minimize the number of inlets into a stormwater best management practice. The current plan will result in five inlets into water quality basin #4 and three inlets into water quality basin #2. The applicant or their engineer must make efforts to Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 15 of 31 minimize the number of inlets into each pond to the greatest extent possible. It is preferred that only one inlet into each pond be constructed. If this is not possible, adequate explanation must be provided as to why this cannot happen. Construction costs alone are not adequate as the city will bear the cost of long -term maintenance of all proposed structures. Section 19 -144 requires that storm water ponds which drain directly to Bluff Creek are constructed with a forebay which provides up to 15% of the permanent pool surface area. This forebay shall have a minimum depth of three (3) feet plus sediment storage. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20 -1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identifying the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and /or mitigation plan ". Based upon review of the current plans, access to maintenance of water quality basins #1, #3 and 94 appears problematic. The plans must provide for access to all pond elements that will require maintenance. This includes, among other elements, all inlets, outlets, infiltration benches and associated infrastructure, forebay dredging and main pond dredging. This access must be shown on the plan set. Bluff Creek is impaired for turbidity and fish indices of biologic integrity. It is known, through the Total Maximum Daily Load plan (TMDL) currently being reviewed by the US Environmental Protection Agency, that flow is a significant contributor to both impairments. The flow contributes in two ways. First, as hard surface is increased and the time of concentration is decreased, greater quantities of water are delivered to Bluff Creek in an increasingly compressed time frame. This "flashiness" of flows has significant erosive force and increases to delivery of sediment to and within the channel. The other way flow contributes to the impairment is by an overall reduction in base flows within Bluff Creek which leaves the creek with inadequate water volumes to sustain a healthy population of aquatic flora and fauna. This decrease in base flow is also a result of increasing hardcover, as a decrease in infiltration results in more water running off the sight as the flow flashes, and less water being slow introduced through shallow ground water stream channel interaction. Because of the findings of the TMDL and Section 19 -144, the storm water facilities must be designed to infiltrate or otherwise abstract surface water runoff to the extent practicable and extended detention must be provided. Section 19 -144 also requires that post - development downstream flow conditions are evaluated. The proposed filtration benches are an acceptable storm water best management practice. More detail on the design will be needed but city staff and the applicant or their representative can work together on this design. It may be possible to incorporate iron filings into the filtration benches to aid in the removal of dissolved phosphorous. The city has iron filings which they could make available to the applicant or their contractor. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 16 of 31 RETAINING WALLS The developer proposes three retaining walls on this site. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. Retaining Wall A runs parallel to River Rock Drive and will be located on Outlot A. It is 420 feet long and has a maximum height of 9 feet. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. Retaining Wall B is located between River Rock Drive and Street B. It runs along the back lot lines of the houses that front River Rock Drive. Retaining Wall B is 287 feet long and has a maximum height of 3 feet. This retaining wall must be moved so that it is not in the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. Retaining Wall C runs parallel to the northwestern edge of Pond 3. It is 122 feet long with a maximum height of 2 feet. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. Surface Water Management Fees Surface Water Management trunk storm sewer fees are collected with each subdivision. The fee is based upon buildable land area and is intended to be scalar according to potential surface water runoff contribution. The fee for this development was estimated with the following assumptions. • That outlots C, E and G would not be assessed as they are used expressly for stormwater best management practices. • That the net density of the site is 4.03 units /acre — medium density • That the stormwater best management practices constructed for this project will receive and treat 16.05 acres of watershed. • The assessable land is 17.05 acres. The trunk fee is divided into water quality and water quantity. The fees are calculated as follows: BASE FEE ACRES TOTAL WATER QUANTITY $5590 17.05 $90,309.50 WATER QUALITY $2830 17.05 $58,251.50 TOTAL $143,561.00 Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 17 of 31 Credits are given to water quality at a multiplier of one -half the water quality base fee times the number of acres treated with the facilities constructed. In this case the credit would equal: $2830 /acres(0.5) *16.05acres = $22,710.75 hi addition, a credit of $2500 is given for each skimmer structure installed. It is assumed that three will be constructed granting another $7,500.00 credit bringing the total credit to $30,210.75. The estimated SWMP trunk fee due at the final plat is $113,350.25. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL A Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) will be required as part of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Construction Permit. This SWPPP must be provided to the city for review and comment. Generally speaking, the erosion control plan must be compliant with Chapter 19 of city code and the NPDES permit. City staff will provide redline comments to the applicant or their engineer specific to the plan when the SWPPP and all applicable elements are provided. STREETS The developer proposes to construct 31 -foot wide local streets throughout the development. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right -of -way. Streets A and B will be 90 -foot diameter cul -de -sacs within 120 -foot wide right -of -way. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2 +00 and 4 +00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not exceed 3 %. The existing driveway for this property connects to TH 212. This driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. River Rock Drive will provide access from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer must obtain the right -of -way needed to make that connection. According to City Code § 18- 57(k), a street terminating in a cul -de -sac cannot be longer than 800 feet. This site is bordered by TH 212 and Bluff Creek Boulevard, so an additional street connection is impractical. To comply with §18-57(k), Street C will act as an emergency access in the future. It will provide access to the north of the development in case of an emergency that could block access to Bluff Creek Boulevard via River Rock Drive. Street C is not intended to regularly carry traffic. It is 20 feet wide and is within 30 feet of right -of -way. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 18 of 31 The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC watermain that will connect to the existing 8" DIP watermain that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. SEH's watermain model shows that the watermain pressures would be high enough to cause surge pressures that could damage the system. To lower the water pressure and prevent potential damage by the water hammer effect, the developer's engineer must incorporate pressure reducing valves and surge protection system into the watermain plans. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH -102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. The developer proposes to construct new 8" PVC sanitary sewer that will connect to the existing 8" PVC sanitary sewer that is stubbed out from Bluff Creek Boulevard. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH -102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. ASSESSMENTS An assessment for Bluff Creek Boulevard improvements is outstanding for this property. The principal of $601,212.65 was deferred until development and it has been accruing 6% since 2009. As of June 6, 2013, the assessment amount due was $796,302.31. At the time of the final plat, this assessment plus the additional accrued interest must be paid or reassessed. Water and sewer hook -ups are due at the time of final plat. The hook -up fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PARKS AND OPEN SPACE The quality and number of recreational facilities in a community directly contributes to its quality of life. For this reason, the City of Chanhassen places a strong emphasis on parks and open space. As the City of Chanhassen has developed and increased in population, more pressure and attention has been given to providing recreational opportunities for our residents. Increased leisure time, health awareness, greater mobility, and high disposable incomes have all contributed to the increased demand for recreational activities. The challenge of the next century will be to provide facilities for a growing and diverse population. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 19 of 31 2013 Pioneer Pass Park - Phase 1 Construction $330,0W —Falk Oedcation Furd Rd Package b auremN Berg Created. Phase I I nduces ➢Fuel Cradng ➢Storm Sewer Impeo ements ➢Parking Wt "esketbe ll Court 'Sokball/Easeball Feld ➢Soccer /UCraae Field DTials ➢Pley Areas 'P[pk Shelter 'Seedng xapBcapig A Pioneer Pass Park 1/2 Mile Service Area Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive - oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions: meet physical and psychological needs, enhance and protect the resource base, enhance real estate values, and provide a positive impact on economic development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one -half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Camden Ridge development is located within the park service area of Pioneer Pass Park. Construction of the 8.7 -acre Pioneer Pass Park site is currently underway and Phase 1 of development is expected to be complete in 2014. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN One of the most anticipated trail extensions within the city is the north/south Bluff Creek Corridor Pedestrian Trail that extends from Lyman Boulevard south to Pioneer Trail. The proposed Camden Ridge development is poised to complete this extension. The proposed development will construct a trail starting at the current southern terminus of the Bluff Creek Trail and extending south, stopping at a location north of TH 212. In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail, the city would like to work with the applicant and property owner to extend the trail under the TH 212 bridge to a point connecting with the existing pedestrian trail along Pioneer Trail. �yman Blvtl ICSPH Bf 0 aw5 e B a 15' e ' Irp � w+3+iw r5p it 1 Pau Park Parks can be defined as public areas that provide active or passive - oriented recreational facilities. A significant characteristic of parkland is its accessibility to its users. Open space is any parcel that is not used for buildings or other structures and is left in a natural state. Parks and open space perform diverse functions: meet physical and psychological needs, enhance and protect the resource base, enhance real estate values, and provide a positive impact on economic development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city's comprehensive park plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one -half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Camden Ridge development is located within the park service area of Pioneer Pass Park. Construction of the 8.7 -acre Pioneer Pass Park site is currently underway and Phase 1 of development is expected to be complete in 2014. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN One of the most anticipated trail extensions within the city is the north/south Bluff Creek Corridor Pedestrian Trail that extends from Lyman Boulevard south to Pioneer Trail. The proposed Camden Ridge development is poised to complete this extension. The proposed development will construct a trail starting at the current southern terminus of the Bluff Creek Trail and extending south, stopping at a location north of TH 212. In order to complete a link to Pioneer Trail, the city would like to work with the applicant and property owner to extend the trail under the TH 212 bridge to a point connecting with the existing pedestrian trail along Pioneer Trail. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 20 of 31 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant has provided a tree inventory and landscaping plan for the subdivision. Bufferyard plantings are required for this development along Highway 212. Tree preservation calculations for the development are shown below. The tree preservation plan did not include areas of removal along the southern grading limits. Staff has added this removal to the calculations. Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 25.2 ac. Total canopy area (excluding wetlands) 4.5 ac Baseline canopy coverage 17.9% Minimum canopy coverage allowed 20% or 5 ac Proposed tree preservation 8% or 2.2 ac The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed. Additional plantings will be required to bring the baseline canopy coverage up to the minimum required. Required plantings 130 trees (4.5 ac - 2.2)x1.2 110 trees required (5.0 ac - 4.5) 20 trees required The applicant has proposed a total of 129 trees in the landscape plan. The applicant will be required to plant a minimum of 130. The applicant is required to provide bufferyards along Highway 212. The minimum plantings required and the applicant's proposed quantities are shown in the table below. The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re- vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Required Proposed 19 overstory trees 15 overstory trees East property line - Hwy 212, bufferyard B, 980' 39 understory trees 38 understory trees 58 shrubs 0 shrubs The applicant needs to increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall revise the plant schedule in order to meet ordinance standards that state no one species will comprise of more than one third of the total number of trees. The applicant has proposed that over 37% of the proposed trees be Black Hills spruce. The applicant has not specified on the landscape plan how Outlots A, B and C will be re- vegetated after grading. The applicant shall specify seeding or sodding plans for the outlots. The applicant is proposing to remove trees outside the grading limits. Staff recommends that these trees be preserved and protected during construction. The trees are identified at #1301, 1302, and 1303. All are oaks and are located along the north property line. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 21 of 31 MISCELLANEOUS Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and/or engineer as determined by the Building Official. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. The applicant and or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. A three -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly located and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise that will be generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. COMPLIANCE TABLE Area Width Depth Maximum ( s q. . ) (f.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (s q. ft. Single-Family 9,000 70 130 35%* BCO location and setbacks Ll B1 12,765 90 133 4,606 must be determined #, Shoreland L2 B1 13,129 90 146 4,606 Shoreland L3 B1 10,451 75 132 4,606 L4 B1 10,922 75 133 4,606 Corner lot L5 B1 12,272 90 135 4,606 Shoreland L6 B1 14,049 90 154 4,606 Shoreland L7 B1 15,384 90 156 4,606 Shoreland L8 B1 18,895 90 141 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L9 B1 16,684 90 144 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 22 of 31 Area (s ft.) ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Maximum Hardcover s . ft. Notes L10 B1 20,388 90 138 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Lll B1 14,733 108 132 4,606 Shoreland, Corner lot L12 B1 18,942 93 206 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L13 131 16,207 109 176 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L14 B1 14,286 128 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L1 B2 9,902 75 132 3,984 Corner lot L2 B2 1 10,007 76 133 3,984 L3 B2 10,443 75 138 3,984 L4 B2 10,934 85 141 3,984 L5 B2 11,235 87 145 3,984 L6 B2 11,492 91 148 3,984 L7 B2 11,344 95 144 3,984 L8 B2 10,528 78 140 3,984 L9 B2 10,434 73 135 3,984 L10 B2 10,802 71 132 3,984 L11 B2 10,106 73 130 3,984 L12 B2 10,025 78 134 3,984 L13 B2 10,463 85 133 3,984 Corner lot Ll B5 14,702 124 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L2 B5 13,935 90 143 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L3 B5 14,018 90 145 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L4 B5 13,944 100 150 4,606 Shoreland, BCO L5 B5 Twin Home 16,513 5,100 90 32 181 120 4,606 Shoreland, BCO Ll B3 17,363 77 160 3,051 BCO, Perimeter, Corner lot L2 B3 6,813 43 160 3,051 Perimeter Planning Commission Camden Ridge - Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 23 of 31 Area (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Depth (ft.) Maximum Hardcover (s q. ft. Notes L3 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L4 B3 8,224 35 162 3,051 Perimeter L5 B3 9,716 33 178 3,051 Perimeter L6 B3 10,235 33 180 3,051 Perimeter L7 B3 8,703 32 165 3,051 Perimeter L8 B3 6,813 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L9 B3 6,787 42 160 3,051 Perimeter L10133 7,141 41 160 3,051 Perimeter L11 B3 8,861 33 167 3,051 Perimeter L12 B3 10,751 32 192 3,051 Perimeter L13 B3 11,720 38 217 3,051 Perimeter L14 B3 9,411 43 221 3,051 Perimeter L15 B3 5,584 42 132 3,051 L16 B3 8,783 83 140 3,051 Corner lot Ll B4 5,222 42 124 3,051 L2 B4 5,305 47 124 3,051 L3 B4 6,262 66 128 3,051 L4 B4 7,314 78 138 3,051 L5 B4 8,331 94 134 3,051 L6 B4 5,928 64 126 3,051 L7 B4 7,798 85 127 3,051 L8 B4 5,174 43 126 3,051 L9 B4 5,147 43 125 3,051 1,10 B4 1 Outlot A 7,803 86,064 - 70 122 3,051 Corner lot 1.97 ae., Open s ace Outlot B 16,734 0.38 ac., Open s ace Outlot C 37,317 0.85 ac., Storm water and Outlot D 8,736 0.2 ac., Trail Outlot E 29,787 0.68 ac., Storm water and Outlot F 4,312 0.099 ac., Trail Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 24 of 31 #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Area Width Depth Maximum (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Hardcover Notes (s q. ft. 0.59 ac., Outlot G 25,716 Storm water and ROW 201,204 4.62 ac. 7.63 ac., BCO Outlot B 332,446 Bluff Creek rim zone 5.01 ac., BCO Outlot C 218,301 Bluff Creek Corridor 0.43 ac., BCO Outlot D 18,815 Driveway from Pioneer Trail TOTAL 1,568,388 36.0 acres #The boundaries of the Bluff Creek primary zone must be determined for Lot 1, Block 1. *Hard cover may be averaged over the entire PUD. Individual lots may exceed the hard cover percentage. The developer has calculated the total hard cover for the project including roads, trails, sidewalks and individual lots subject to the maximum hard cover per lot in the above table. Based on this analysis, total hard cover is 34.8 percent over the northern portion of the development, within the guidelines of the PUD -R. Within the shoreland district, the total hardcover is 17.9 percent, which complies with the maximum hard cover in the shoreland district. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A conditional use permit shall be issued by the city for all subdivisions, site plans and prior to the erection or alteration of any building or land within the Bluff Creek Overlay (BCO) district. BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT In 1996, the City completed the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan (BCWNRMP). This plan recognized the unique qualities of this Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 25 of 31 corridor and the opportunities it provided. The intent was to protect a natural corridor from the source to the convergence with the Minnesota River that would allow for wildlife migration, habitat protection, green space preservation, recreational opportunities, educational opportunities, protection of the bluff areas from erosion, and protection of the water quality of Bluff Creek. Site design which is sensitive to the existing natural resources is the primary method for protecting the Bluff Creek corridor. To this end the plan created the Bluff Creek Overlay District through ordinance number 286 in December of 1998 which was codified Article XXXI, Chapter 20. Much of the property lies within the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BOOR). It appears that this is accurately reflected on the existing conditions plan and elsewhere within the plan set. Efforts must be made to avoid grading within the secondary zone where practicable to do so. Where it is not practicable to do so, a detailed restoration plan will be required. Section 20 -1564 requires that all structures be setback from the primary zone of the BCOR a minimum of forty (40) feet. It also stipulates that no disturbance may occur in the first twenty (20) feet of the setback. Portions of Block 1 and Block 5 are counter to this directive. The applicant must evaluate if the end goal can be accomplished without the proposed disturbance. Further, Section 20 -1564 requires that the applicant "submit a detailed plan identifying the resources that will be disturbed and a corresponding restoration and/or mitigation plan ". Section 20 -1561 states that one of the intended purposes of the BCOR is "the creation of a greenway connecting Lake Minnewashta Regional Park and the Minnesota River Valley. The greenway will serve as an uninterrupted pedestrian trail, bikeway system, and wildlife corridor affording opportunities for recreation, education, physical fitness and non - motorized transportation ". This must be balanced with the protection of Bluff Creek and the natural resources within the corridor. To this end, the trail should be aligned such that it maximizes the setback distance from Bluff Creek and the flood plain wetlands and avoids the loss of natural vegetation. By aligning the trail closer to the back lot lines, the trail itself will act to delineate the Bluff Creek Overlay District and protect the area from potential encroachment. Signage must also be placed to demarcate the corridor. The placement shown on the preliminary erosion control plan, and elsewhere throughout the plan set, is adequate. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 26 of 31 The property owner is proposing to hold Outlot C, Jeurissen I" Addition for potential future development. In the interim, the property owner must advise the city of the intended use of the property as well as how it shall be accessed. The City's Bluff Creek Primary Zone map shows this land as being within the primary zone boundaries, which is prima facie evidence of the location and type of watershed zone. The property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary. The community development director shall make a determination to maintain the officially designated watershed zone boundary or if the boundaries need to be corrected on city plans and maps based upon the data that is supplied. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the development subject to the following conditions and adoption of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Building Conditions: 1. Demolition permits are required for the removal of any existing structures. 2. Buildings may be required to be designed by an architect and /or engineer as determined by the Building Official. 3. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits can be issued. 4. Retaining walls over four feet high require a permit and must be designed by a professional engineer. 5. Each lot must be provided with separate sewer and water services. 6. The applicant and/or their agent shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 7. Submit proposed street names to Chanhassen Building Official and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and approval. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 27 of 31 Engineering Conditions: 1. The developer must obtain right -of -way for the part of River Rock Road that connects to Bluff Creek Boulevard. 2. The proposed "Easement Detail" must be revised to include how the easements around the perimeter of the twinhome lots will be platted. 3. The developer's engineer must adjust the grading on the trail near Outlot F so that it will meet ADA standards. 4. The contours near the northwest corner of Pond 2, between Lots 6 and 7 must be smoothed out. Additional information needs to be noted (such as elevation points between the lots) between lots on the north side of Street B to show the grading will allow water to drain away from the structures. 6. The final plans must note the survey benchmark on the plan set. 7. The final plans must note the existing and proposed elevations at the corners of each lot. 8. The grading behind all the retaining walls must be modified so that water will not drain down the face of the wall. 9. Walls taller than 6 feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 10. Retaining Wall B must be moved so that it is outside the drainage and utility easement at the back of the lots. 11. A Homeowners Association must be created to take ownership of all retaining walls and the draintile along the face of Retaining Wall B. 12. Local streets must be within a 60 -foot wide right -of -way. 13. At final plat, the Engineering Department will review the profile of Street A between stations 2 +00 and 4 +00 to ensure the profile meets the minimum length requirements for vertical curves. 14. The proposed centerline grade at the intersection of River Rock Drive and Street A must not be greater than 3 %. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 28 of 31 15. The existing driveway access to TH 212 must be closed. 16. The developer's engineer must design a Street C typical section 17. The development is adjacent to Bluff Creek Boulevard and is therefore subject to the arterial collector fee at the time of final plat. 18. The developer's engineer must incorporate pressure- reducing valves and a surge protection system into the watermain plans. 19. The developer's engineer will ensure that CBMH -102 does not conflict with the nearby watermain. 20. At the time of final plat, the Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements assessment must be paid or reassessed. 21. Water and sewer hook -up fees must be paid at the time of final plat. Fire Conditions: 1. A three -foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants. 2. Temporary street signs must be installed prior to home construction. 3. No burning permits will be issued. Any trees removed must either be chipped on site or removed from site. 4. Water mains shall be made serviceable prior to combustible construction. 5. Posts, fences, utility boxes etc. shall not be placed near fire hydrants which would hinder firefighters to quickly locate and/or operate fire hydrants in a safe manner. Natural Resources Conditions: 1. The applicant shall increase bufferyard plantings to meet minimum requirements. 2. The applicant shall plant a minimum of 130 trees in the development. 3. The applicant shall diversify the plant schedule so that no one species comprises more than one third of the total number of trees. 4. The applicant shall specify vegetation proposed for Outlots A, B and C. Planning Commission Camden Ridge – Planning Case 2013-13 June 18, 2013 Page 29 of 31 5.The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan to the city prior to final approval. 6.The applicant shall preserve trees #1301, 1302, 1303. These trees along with trees #1393- 1398 shall be protected by fencing prior to and during any grading or construction activities. 7.The developer shall install signage at lot lines to demarcate the Bluff Creek Primary Zone. Parks Conditions: 1.Full park dedication fees shall be collected per city ordinance in lieu of requiring parkland dedication. 2.Construction of Bluff Creek Trail from its current southerly terminus, extending between the new homes and Bluff Creek to a terminus point at TH 212. The developer shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing services required of the “Bluff Creek Trail.” All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of each phase of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet in width, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all city specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base, asphalt surfacing, and storm water systems utilized to construct the trail. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. Planning Conditions: 1.The developer shall pay $6,285.00 as its portion of the 2005 AUAR prior to recording the final plat. 2.The developer shall prepare a noise analysis for noise generated by traffic on Highway 212. The analysis shall identify appropriate noise mitigation measures to meet noise standards for residential homes as specified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which shall be implemented by the developer. 3.Dedication of the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone shall be made to the city or a preservation conservation easement shall be established over said outlot(s). 4.The property owner shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city st to determine the exact watershed zone boundary on Outlot C, Jeurissen 1 Addition. Data for watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 30 of 31 5. The property owner must advise the city of the intended use of Outlot C, Jeurissen 1 s` Addition, and how it shall be accessed. This Outlot may not be developable or accessible in the future. 6. Final plat approval will be contingent on the developer resolving the access issue. Either an access easement or right -of -way must be in place prior to any site development. 7. Individual lots may not exceed the maximum hard cover per lot established in the compliance table. Water Resources Conditions: 1. Land disturbance within the first twenty feet of the Bluff Creek Overlay District setback shall not be allowed unless the applicant can demonstrate that the goal cannot be achieved without the proposed disturbance. 2. A mitigation/restoration plan must be provided for any disturbance within the Bluff Creek Overlay District or setback from the BCOR. 3. Trail must be aligned to minimize the encroachment into the BCOR primary zone and minimize loss of natural vegetation and habitat. 4. Efforts must be made to minimize the number of inlets into each pond. 5. The proposed ponds must be designed with a forebay. 6. The plans must demonstrate how water quality basin #1 and water quality basin #3 will be accessed. This includes all inlets, outlets and filtration benches as well as sediment removal from forebay and water quality volume. 7. The stormwater design shall, to the greatest extent practicable, seek to maximize infiltration, extend detention times and protect Bluff Creek from scour and other erosive conditions. 8. The applicant must evaluate downstream flow conditions as indicated in Section 19 -144. 9. A Surface Water Pollution Plan and all required elements must be provided to the city for review. This plan must be compliant with NPDES requirements as well as the requirements of Chapter 19 of city code. 10. SWMP trunk fees due at final plat are estimated to be $113,350.25. Planning Commission Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 June 18, 2013 Page 31 of 31 11. The development must comply with the MN Rules chapter 6120 and the DNR must issue their concurrence to this effect. 12. No alterations are allowed within the primary corridor or within the first 20 feet of the setback from the primary corridor. Grading activities have been observed within this area along the south side of Bluff Creek. The applicant should submit a plan for the revegetation of this area that incorporates native plants and is consistent with the City's Bluff Creek Natural Resources Management Plan Appendix C. Any such areas that have been disturbed through the removal or addition of soils material prior to approval shall be addressed prior to commencement of other grading activities but no later than seven (7) days from approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation. 2. Ordinance Rezoning to PUD -R for Camden Ridge. 3. Development Review Application. 4. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Cover Sheet. 5. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Existing Conditions. 6. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Plat. 7. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Site Plan. 8. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Overall Grading. 9. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 10. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Grading Plan. 11. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Erosion Control. 12. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 13. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Sanitary Sewer & Water. 14. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 15. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary Storm Water. 16. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Landscape Plan. 17. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan. 18. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Tree Preservation Plan, 19. Reduced Copy Jeurissen lst Addition. 20. Reduced Copy Jeurissen Parcel Preliminary PUD Impervious Coverage. 21. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Final Assessment Roll. 22. City of Chanhassen Bluff Creek Boulevard Improvements Exhibit 1. 23. Letter from Michael J. Corbett (MnDOT) to Robert Generous dated June 7, 2013. 24. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List. gAplan\2013 planning cases\2013 -13 camden ridge\staff report eamden ridge.doe CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC — Camden Ridge On June 18, 2013, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of U.S. Home Corporation and B. Elmer Family Farms, LLC for a Planned Unit Development which includes the Rezoning of the property from Agricultural Estate District to Planned Unit Development — Residential, Subdivision into 32 single - family lots, 26 twinhome lots, public right -of -way and outlots; and a Conditional Use Permit to allow development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Planned Unit Development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District, A -2. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential Medium Density. 3. The legal description of the property is shown in the attached Exhibit A. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse affects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. C) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; C. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development; d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant adverse environmental damage; The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. Adequate infrastructure is in place or proposed with the development. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: (1) Lack of adequate storm water drainage. (2) Lack of adequate roads. (3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. (4) Lack of adequate off -site public improvements or support systems. 6. When approving a conditional use permit, the City must determine the capability of a proposed development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the conditional use Section 20 -232, include the following 12 items: a. The proposed development will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. b. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives of the city's comprehensive plan and this chapter. c. The proposed development will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 2 d. The proposed development will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned neighboring uses. e. The proposed development will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. f. The proposed development will not create excessive requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. g. The proposed development will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. h. The proposed development will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. i. The proposed development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. j. The proposed development will be aesthetically compatible with the area. k. The proposed development will not depreciate surrounding property values. 1. The proposed development will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided in Chapter 20, Articles IV, V and VI of the Chanhassen City Code. The planning report #2013 -13 dated June 18, 2013, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 18`h day of June, 2013. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION Its Chairman EXHIBIT A The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, Range 23 (referred to herein as Tract A) ALSO: Commencing of the Southwest corner of Section 23, Township 116, Range 23; thence running North on Section Line 30 feet; thence in a straight line to a point on the South Section line of said Section, 30 feet East of the Southwest corner of sold Section; thence West 30 feet to said Southwest corner of said Section and place of beginning. Being a three— comared piece In Southwest corner of said Section 23, Township 116, Range 23, ALSO: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Township 116, North of Range 23 West; thence south clone the quarter — quarter section line o distance of 800 feet to Carver County Road No. 14; thence east long the north line of said Carver County Road No. 14 a distance of 26 feet; thence north parallel to the aforementioned quarter —quarter section 827 feet to a point 26 feet north of the east —west quarter— quarter section line of the Northwest Quarter of saitl Section 26, thence West a distance of 26 feet to the quarter— quarter section line; thence south a distance of 26 feet to place of begfnning (referred to herein as Tract B). EXCEPT: that part of Tract A which lies Easterly of LINE 1 described below: LINE 1. Commencing at the north quarter corner of sold Section 26; thence run wW on an azimuth of 271 degrees 56 minutes 13 seconds along the north line of saitl section 1634.23 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence an an azimuth of 124 degrees 59 minutes 41 seconds for 366.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 179 degrees 51 minutes 07 seconds for 47828 feet; thence on an azimuth of 225 degrees 16 minutes 10 seconds for 201.73 feet; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 08 minutes 53 seconds for 606.64 feet to a point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and there terminating; and EXCEPT that part of Tract 8 which lies Northwesterly and Southwesterly of LINE 2 described below: LINE 2. Commencing at the point of termination of Line 1 described above; thence run east on an azimuth of 91 degrees 23 minutes 44 seconds along the south line of the North half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 55616 feet to the point of beginning of Line 2 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 218 degrees 00 minutes 59 seconds for 446.73 feet: thence on an azimuth of 200 degrees 42 minutes 57 seconds far 323.97 feet; thence on an azimuth at 105 degrees 08 minutes 31 seconds for 351.75 feet; thence on an azimuth of 99 degrees 25 minutes 54 seconds for 510.00 feet and there terminating; Together with right of access retained In Quit Claim Deed Document No. 310751 pursuant to Access Drlveway Permit dated August 26, 2012. M AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property within Camden Ridge to Planned Unit Development - Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this property incorporates the following development design standards: DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS Camden Ridge a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD for a single - family detached and twinhome development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more - sensitive proposal. The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. Except as modified by the Camden Ridge development standards, the development must comply with the Residential Low and Medium Density District, RLM. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone shall be limited to single- family detached houses and twinhomes and their ancillary uses. The type of uses to be provided on common area shall be low- intensity neighborhood - oriented accessory structures to meet daily needs of residents. Such uses may include a bus shelter, development signage, garden, gazebo, maintenance shed, picnic shelter, permanent open space, playground equipment and trails. C. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Setback Standards Highway 212 50 feet Exterior (Perimeter) Lot Lines 50 feet Front Yard 25 feet Front Yard (side street) 20 feet Side Yard: garage side and house side 7.5 feet (minimum separation between buildings is 15 feet) *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Setback Standards Rear Yard 25 feet Hard Surface Coverage 35 % * Bluff Creek Primary zone boundary (BCO) 40 feet with the first 20 feet as buffer Minimum Lot Dimensions Standards Single - family detached (area) 9,000 square feet Single - family detached (lot width) 70 feet (75 feet in shoreland district) Single-family detached lot depth) 130 feet Twinhome lot (area per unit) 5,100 square feet Twinhome lot (lot width) 32 feet Twinhome lot (lot depth) 120 feet *The entire development, including the public and private streets and Outlots, may not exceed 35 percent hard coverage. Individual lots may exceed the 35 percent site coverage. Lots within the shoreland district may not exceed 25 percent site coverage. Lot coverage may not exceed those established in the compliance table. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 20_, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on Thomas A. Furlong, Mayor Planning CaseNo.,_ -Xi 3 -1.3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard — P.O. Box 147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Chanhassen, MN 55317 — (952) 227 -1100 RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION MAY "17 2013 CHANHGCCen, o auu.o. ..�� Phone: 9SZ zay 3or4 Fax: Email: row. Tv Property Owner Name and Phone: Email: NOTE: Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal, including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 144500 Interim Use Permit (IUP) Non - conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development' Rezoning r)!5 ' Sign Permits Sign Plan Review Site Plan Review (SPR)* i _ZSubdivision *400 t015XLo) A;lO,0 Temporary Sales Permit Vacation of Right -of -Way /Easements (VAC) (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Zoning Appeal Zoning Ordinance Amendment Notification Sign -$200 (City to install and remove) X Escro Filing Fees/Attomey Cost - j(' - $SO U SPRNAC/VAR/WAP /Metes & Bounds $450 Minor SUB TOTAL FEE $ `?a, ` - 9 An additional fee of $3.00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing. *Five (5) ful"ize folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2' X 11" reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a digital copy in TIFF -Group 4 ( *.tif) format. * *Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract. Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews. NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. ,,A r0.i..:l PROJECT NAME: _ C i1 lj e n t Q q'e- LOCATION: go�a�T S tlurr Creel Z.p LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PID: ZSO Z 3 1.3 o4;:1 TOTAL ACREAGE: WETLANDS PRESENT:_ YES NO PRESENT ZONING: A a REQUESTED ZONING: i PUD °iZl PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION: REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: REASON / FOR REQUEST//: 19 �Q'lAN%W h v QlCnw FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW: Include number of existing employees: and new employees This application must be completed In full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowiedae. glplenlf6rm3rdeve10pmatt rwimapplicadmclac --/ %' :--,a/ -5 S- lo-- /3 Date SCANNED a 3 z¢ 3 $ OF d jooago oc y z R p� �jjp��'woozo W zz .• ...e &xz�a��zaoo�� wQ 4 Wy °' O(nti •� wo�ta��a�azox °aaz z¢ Nuwatiaavwwwa Ha ~A4 Fa w in o CD = W Z xw OCE WW I I �f 8 i i r4 � z x _ - aU ui i LIJ Z!2 a. =. tit j W9 LU 4ggx ;a: �zN da;m ?�$a�m =�e qq yy ae Y sms:b'�"$g�a3a'Erv.eWs &o Tats F5- .3333.b Y €$w•`,w'a3tl E S'�EY' X Y 3 e e �'a€re sgeao�e m '§a�F €a;�3e as atx.; � s' n a : Wx §a c 3Wns3e sc eW_ eeecae�We4ee0 t.€ .e=e8cz oa a.K $ >=N r � w1xc=�ci 5c .W ne ae� e"eW FW`�: ➢�9 -5- A�se w = ga c w W W � 4 s m- y Ws a a g n .m51 €a —d.. za € .6r - " �.� L�:. 1•.••.; 1 � !! 'I` 1111111 Hill If IIM! IS1®.. ... ».. I..... ®. ®.. ®.. s l l I :!i II II €: 11111111 M �a� w z z U U S V vvvvv y r ' y,'. s ,• i / � v � fey � v. : '� .0 � y 1 win ,v ryl vow y r. r `\ \ \ \�n r, a / / / 1 v {d <tIYC •R � ^,> \ \� ...i°�.f - y' lfx• { 1 // - !' ti �. as �I �; /// , t .x �sr'oso- .l /!� IN now \. r / is L 1 IS J r _ I• r \ -% PRO ��mw Foot Y { r.t F/- .x! i el mid MIX—= 'lot ' 'S a <l 2i -ru °a2 t�'f �>��- x�•��i� 1 20<3 -vz c,_z��' �'� � � . F'- ✓ a '" '� •��y�f X�>r���w} 'f .. r. ��Ek a\ \ C .' tr TT l W fY ,(r ^x y3` {� i Y j' T /f• �%. /' �g 59 z z U CO f e F & 4 g s = 8 c -Q e a i.$ S V vvvvv y r ' y,'. s ,• i / � v � fey � v. : '� .0 � y 1 win ,v ryl vow y r. r `\ \ \ \�n r, a / / / 1 v {d <tIYC •R � ^,> \ \� ...i°�.f - y' lfx• { 1 // - !' ti �. as �I �; /// , t .x �sr'oso- .l /!� IN now \. r / is L 1 IS J r _ I• r \ -% PRO ��mw Foot Y { r.t F/- .x! i el mid MIX—= 'lot ' 'S a <l 2i -ru °a2 t�'f �>��- x�•��i� 1 20<3 -vz c,_z��' �'� � � . F'- ✓ a '" '� •��y�f X�>r���w} 'f .. r. ��Ek a\ \ C .' tr TT l W fY ,(r ^x y3` {� i Y j' T /f• �%. /' �g 59 z z U CO t d i Y i �f a� I \ \ \ i \ \ I \ F i c h:s �tl �` a 5� � d s, ^ o� �•.p b;� S h.MN voN tO rc p `•f Ip er�0 - cF,4 > n5d ^ a z � a ,wN sa � r •( \ I 3 41 �3 rc algg `l_;,w _5 „ zs I �xW7 i w I zj €�qg t �EzB i W Z U — ._ -`. ------ bf cJ gabs` °w 1 SAPS _T_I_ 2 0 - R _ nu 1 p•8= _ 3 $a4 �Q R & ° s t d i Y i �f a� I \ \ \ i \ \ I \ F i c h:s �tl �` a 5� � d s, ^ o� �•.p b;� S h.MN voN tO rc p `•f Ip er�0 - cF,4 > n5d ^ a z � a ,wN sa � r •( \ I 3 41 �3 rc algg `l_;,w _5 „ zs I �xW7 i w I zj €�qg t �EzB i W Z U 2 0 3 3 e ° g llfl t d i Y i �f a� I \ \ \ i \ \ I \ F i c h:s �tl �` a 5� � d s, ^ o� �•.p b;� S h.MN voN tO rc p `•f Ip er�0 - cF,4 > n5d ^ a z � a ,wN sa � r •( \ I 3 41 �3 rc algg `l_;,w _5 „ zs I �xW7 i w I zj €�qg t �EzB i W Z U ° N V B W ,] UKI aOjV � b ° N V1a O�pJ NON R: J K^ S �j wti P W Q Y L SO < LLLL i-V� W W �r p FVi < y �2 Zrc >O ZZ Z 0 w F Q > Za0 W Q Zf W U LL ° h*z NO K¢JQ O LL K4^pl T � m w nnrroa i w0 s arc t < ciz j n T D m < zryo S" Ty.J ob = a y a 9 tiah nNNN o "1OV gvw wa n N ee 53 zzrc° �b ° - °oy �b °orvy u u° �inbow Fi m °r°I °i zm'Oiau�'o i'p�l`m's$zo opt° app' or�pcm a° § § < wo . mW � p0000aao a n NW We osn °°iF oa oa w nm o`¢ az t Ha o1 o rcmn No o ° 9�£ s f`b I � ® "° _3S iS gv P: a.9 e� t . _!s .� .. �l a ♦}�� a �b i� is y Q i sa- 9 ° jj 0 W Z Z 6 1 $�a a� o <d < � a jall 0 w U 6 �v. $�a a� o <d < � a jall 0 w U �Fv icy -k Hr rL. 0 uj Z z . ...... .. . �Fv icy -k Hr rL. 0 uj Z z min V L 4r, IN 0 LU Z Z MIMI MAN Ilk 0101,11 RIO, ifolliffig'T U� kilo MW NOW.. vc wAft go woonda 0 LU Z Z 1 ;1' i " lit it aaa m 11 J ev Ml V- H g? 9! Meg N;h 12s w z a �z8 m el m _2my e, R _ y6 m sa -- y�s. n .. 2„ aa; - w z a O W Z 2 Q U y � d \ 2 / ! + w Will/2^ Q \� \ . ; INN �§ !4 |f|)| z % Z .RX tl�'6z h8 ktli= — �i sun m° WHIP•a � j fa U 2115 gilms :; ^ July I 1 1 _ 2 _ _ R�8s 'e P8 [i v CO � _ FV c 9 s W a fa U W z uT n jj o G lfr�Ppip PPy Q8e IQ E 3 v9Fg}g Q i Q x d€ pE W e P V 3 S� < = . nl „ zi °��`�yY` ° 'Q9x' j E fe9 13 i o -e__ • JO a } Id ! } Q "} �I b°G Q F m3� ma Eel G i3ijp! sE ! yid g�• jy � � a � F6'€ Y � }•Q } � `q`994kGfrF 9Q }QgilE��!9!�.;gxg :e} °d e s S� } P iq ( Y• G BS gdgi t qqB Hp ys6;� j E pFtP N �F} S? < 5 X� E,rYie Y.1 �IPi�!!°PSQSGlP S3 y D qqa Z" a Pi °P p Is QQ A o Ins w ° Qfrse€ e� gg gs19`6j9§ zx 6op� ?z gg x:43} a�:�i ::} y0refi iYP33� �i� w m 2 mm Alan, � �'rvv '� ' - � i T1G'r t ��r l �y ! ' ' Si /r l �/� / v v v r {E;� ✓Sf _ [! i / �* 'R% � 1 �Hl �3�[y�'✓9"., �� yf �' X. y i :.p �/ i go z / MY 6 Y Yr jj W z uT 0 W Z Q JUT vI a a f o �5 9 � a a n tt E x v 5 o i r a 0 1 \ e r4 ' 1 J � \,` �`y 1 rr� / `mil �\ `'. \. r ` ✓ 1 i 1 ! \ u� '1 j �'�/ ;iii v jai' pv g r' - "� `✓li� /i 1 0 W Z Q JUT vI a� AAA z0.z N 3S �e 0 a \� / `�. Yrl /. !� \ ♦t \ \ \ \\n \mow..' �°i. \ ` \\ \\\ c \; ' ,T h i \ \ � �� \ �. ire � � /, /'/S �� ��( •. �.� ., � 'Y � dam.' k'�✓� Y a°' /�� '� i(- 'I � a - 9r16. � 016a✓� Y � / _ A. '. i'i} r yzx� / /'i /.�A t r ri /7 rl'�� �i � r // ai l/i � .._ •?n�ci p � €£££y'y� ��££�& �'���£� � €££6 €gip•p �� € €°a�•p•p��E££4�£gg £££££�[[�� % €££ €�[[ �Ffr�a ££££ "F�££E ' as:sa Sa =assay �asssaa �mamm aaa9��sssaa�Sas siiias`5���:asaaa §sss sxa3m%�maaa5 �ssss��smisa �9��yn Wmam Y•- vymmW -yA y9a 9999]mn mnmpa99 ^mGnmmgA99nq.y9mmm� 99m99ny99Y.q G.m. .^.ypW•Jn9W9ygnnmm. -nqa gg 9{p4 5 g e gg g [[ AFsi zE���fi�P E�2 S3Eim•3S &PE93 2 @EEm FA'�SE �3S � € €S S::€�a E�Ee'fiEfiEEi $295 €9 :E2P ° -75 `EEf ,3 €a$$95oi °o °'oss5s34 %§� apaz4238Bf az as °s sa'�3S S$m osSSS :x�:x$ss "sas 5aaae 5:s aa_as :'saE `s °� �`°%ssafr;PxSsSSaIli sSS:SiSS9SS4 s'SSSISSSSSSS :Sas4SSSSS r?�SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS9SSSSSS $SSSSE.SS 989AS # §S�Hs�`x_3Sd9�3? ?"39583 ��i °a 3933,399 °a_vlS$S£is77933 § §6£%5m R^_`I eE sa`a ".' €�aaS m9�yyA 5��5 FEfr£ y9p�S :SSaSSSSS ^n SSaSSSS e.m. n.y° mmy.^•g9ymm9mnmyy9ynggA.J.me •�`aza� FFfr >•£££€ °S6SSza:i 'aEFF's 'sj°A£FF£i� € §i €` .`- Aye9yymna9yn ea4� £F£fr € == F£ SSa Pay SSS` yy 90-J �S.'aSS .^.n R90 €€9A.n.n EE -' �4£eeS 4���� °9 BEE22 665 EsB �..�53E ��iS'�Sfi EES�2 ° s, &��99z 2E 2E 69Efi�l999l 9lifii6i9 '<' L ° S °ei:oFbs'S5`em gmm baaa3<SSsa5a�5e 6`535 E sa es E °53y5a3SEfi F 6563 `::: °ed<ae F s ::-xx:e::e SSS35.33s5353. °55SSSSSSSSsiS SSiS$S3S PSSSaSSSSSSSSsS3i$ §S�SSs'Ss`s SSSSS SSSSSSSSSiSSaS AAS�955�SS9S�SS$SSSi §SS�Sa S�3g y?39�49 "353?3'ASS33's @3:'a�Si$S��S3S 33�3+si9S "a .ai2SSYSSS� 0 w Z U 5 0 w Z U \� a i/ \e« . / ( ( / G t \ ( © < « .2 § _ � \ a / (� F z . \(� / s � , \ ( © < « .2 § _ \ � , y - -- 5 » w Kw <d « �\ � ) \ \§ &: \ &� / Q: y: 3• yn \ ` � Gam)|} F z . \(� ®� \ H" \ � , y - -- 5 » w Kw <d « �\ � ) \ \§ &: \ &� / Q: y: 3• yn \ ` � `/% n� 3 8 U 9 v w �. tR rc 3 ace a A' t.' - •i O� .I II Dy1�, rY: \\Skk W ry V U Vo o Na yQj N y2jN OoU j < 0 pU K K OWOaPn S w W[V OO OON Q N UU V ww W000�0 OZ m 3N;E Q O 3 YJ NW T} m�H p 3 � Wp R O.. FQ Z N w w � ✓� OFYJ �� Q N .1 WW wwo3w? 3wpK6K� NV�F� F� iN �� O a FO Z FOry N K�0 . OF -N5- .0 �. `/% n� 3 8 11 �3 �. tR 3 A' t.' - •i .I II Dy1�, rY: \\Skk 11 �3 r z g W O Z J a o y N 0 p D 2 z a a W >> N UJO W 0 7 y N N � a < Y Ne U a o W rL `° U LL 6l "� "ryery n m �wN E _ � � 3 E�Z �a9 6 Y R�F 8g a =i 3 ° a; as E °Po � ffi w E ° £ £ u 8w n m ffi Eta E`u Eb_o �a �v �ffi m Tyw> oaf m� w C3 mNYY E�C LF qA N QRIi N6 2'I _Nm °• B ffi ry o `° 2 v m m a N a y W la y N ffi Y6 ~ y T6 N N fV ry ry' d 6 - NO i 19 ryO ] Vi NO y qO y O 8 8 a � a ;8 m Z � e a a r � c E a 2 $ w f w 12 n o w ter^ w w w w a N 4 } Yrcom°O- ¢ow8�gCvo y o Li °o $wrm��ryjoo����N32 �°o�s°$3��$�$J84o<� 31 NS�3rvF`o 3�sv3m a wsN ^s_ pow o yy � U F dLL IL FS N c 6 0 ~ 8g a =i 3 ° a; as E °Po � ffi w E ° £ £ u 8w n m ffi Eta E`u Eb_o �a �v �ffi m Tyw> oaf m� w C3 mNYY E�C LF qA N QRIi N6 2'I _Nm °• B I � 2M m `waZW W Ugk7U w oa x n i l z I a ; IW I � I o a 0 � 11 �I I /,. � I �l� I C � f Iz JLR=NnsroEi na ao z H /�i G W _ 0 % ow A P. x wl �I MI f I 11 U� UO�U� w z fit I U U a � � a I I` oa W ox ow J I I � •row -m r+r�a••rmra-f.mwwa *�wrni•mvams.wienu gli E- FOF~ i# a tnz I zc� o � a2 0o0 o IF � Ez U aE.,a � � oAOa jz x wl �I MI f I 11 U� UO�U� w z fit I U U a � � a I I` oa W ox ow J I I � •row -m r+r�a••rmra-f.mwwa *�wrni•mvams.wienu +� Minnesota Department of Transportation � Metropolitan District Vy, /. Waters Edge Building °`4" 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 June 7, 2013 Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner 7700 Market Blvd City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, MN 55317 SUBJECT: Camden Ridge MnDOT Review # P13 -025 North of US 212, west of Powers Blvd Chanhassen, Carver County Control Section 1013 Dear Mr. Generous, Thank you for the opportunity to review the above referenced plat. MnDOT has reviewed the plat and has the following comment: Water Resources: MnDOT does not allow an increase in storm water discharge to MnDOT right -of -way. Please submit documents specified below with a drainage permit application: 1. Final drainage plan showing storm sewer plan, storm sewer and culvert profiles and pond contours 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows 3. Existing and proposed drainage /pond computations for the 2, 10, and 100 year rainfall events Please direct any questions regarding water resources to Hailu Shekur (651- 234 -7521 or hailu.shekurna state.mn.us of MnDOT Metro District's Water Resources Section. Permits: As previously stated, a drainage permit is required. Additionally, any use of or work within or affecting MnDOT Right -of -way and /or utilities requires a permit. A short form permit is required for the utilities that are connected within MnDOT Right -of -way. Permit forms are available from MnDOT's permit website at hi!p://www.dot.state.mn.us/permits/. Please include one 11 x 17 plan set and one full size plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651- 234 -7911 or buck.craig2state.mn.us) of MnDOT's Metro Permits Section. Review Submittal Options: MnDOT's goal is to complete the review of plans within 30 days. Submittals sent in electronically can usually be turned around faster. There are four submittal options. Please submit either: 1. One (1) electronic pdf. version of the plans. MnDOT can accept the plans via e -mail at metrodevreviews.dotkstate.mn.us provided that each separate e- mail is under 20 megabytes. 2. Three (3) sets of full size plans. Although submitting seven sets of full size plans will expedite the review process. Plans can be sent to: MnDOT — Metro District Planning Section Development Reviews Coordinator 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 3. One (1) compact disc. 4. Plans can also be submitted to MnDOT's External FTP Site. Please send files to: ftp: / /ftp2.dot.state.mn.us/ pub /incominy/MetroWatersEdge /Planning Internet Explorer doesn't work using ftp so please use an FTP Client or your Windows Explorer (My Computer). Also, please send a note to metrodevreviews.dotkstate.mn.us indicating that the plans have been submitted on the FTP site. If you have any questions concerning this review, please feel free to contact me at (651) 234 -7793. Sincerely, Michael J. Corbett, PE Senior Planner Copy sent via E -Mail: Diane Langenbach, Area Engineer Hailu Shekur, Water Resources Nancy Jacobson, Design Buck Craig, Permits Becky Parzyck, Right -of -Way Dave Torfin, Survey David Sheen, Traffic Engineering Clare Lackey, Traffic Engineering Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on June 6, 2013, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Camden Ridge — Planning Case 2013 -13 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A ", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. K en J. gelh dt, Deputy Clerk d and sworn to before me day of;Tilt1 1,9 , 2013. KIM T. MEUWISSEN Notary Public- Minnesota Notary P he I W�l "',;;;,�'�' My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 0) C d d C C.0 @ N d E U O B 7 IL c C C C "a Z a> tl> y A s c @ S Im C d d 2 00 C y d E _ E �? O U rn CL c p C C 0 R va Z N R S C l0 L U '0 E a N >1 c z `or my R m N C L -i >O t L r U fn y L di m mmo .mm� R0 oo,> mo @ j `O N 0 _ > � 0 Co •N• O~ aL+•L„ -So avm a v �¢5 v'" vLo o c 2C a O L @ 0 S U N N Y Q) C N 0 C C 0 c0 d a v o `° 5> n ai m a>> m 3 v m°>w m 0000 @m= N 3 . N SOLE 0t @ =`v° En ov>'Z a°cm RT� *6 Ea ON N y O Q) O O C o.N c O nE fA 0 O �. U >, O->p V! C'C Sa>om $om «E� 3F8 v> my R00 v v p>C c 0.6 m m> •o ` ¢•] 0 y N TQ) f6 O L N 2 .0 m LSD U @ E O. c ) 0` C C nE y y�v RvyaoE ° v OE as 5_b =, v y ° >« m -'• a.ac_ — w E. a> m Q> a >.a d E E U n y C E A 3m o W. O@ O vvi E c �L w.m o cn R X00 9ELEm w CO @d. N O E 0) v �j' O E a) o N' E O U y `. C U d a u0 Cv v> .Ua E n a co'� n° _? 3'm .- m O O 6 0 o T v w L O Y W y (r6 y t6 o C 0 E.. d p j E E O@? 3 N O d .� n y m y v .z• d v a E `o `-a ° U E m N N c O N c C O.O c E w 7 -Rm ENm$oRE�o Nc um vmc 'O Eo�w (0 " > mc0 u> �yawady�Q C W d 0 oU O E' r 'q L °Ca @O >~ a d« o -no E-o5> m :°._ a° =o @' So E = "�o�o «ya oA -off dR p 7� C OY o O)c a) C.L.. c r N y N 0 y@ d C c mvo>o>c a°i«- €Emax£ �wR 4:o o O UZ)0 d C 0' w@ c 3 E•° E O ao � my �yL O M@ y '0. �.+ c RN c cvvub on�k o��ac aftav OBE vm R =� Ud- o�'m- 1� Q(600U v md)S 0'c O c y o@ o o do y S @N 'a -C «U ->N �=ove� "dd T am E n.- mOVmv E' °E'a r m=o C6 E c s L 03Cw@ ° N d N _ o)w �@ o m 3a of ao U «F 12 . FE -m >m aR-, on m ='= co 0.00(D 0 CU >� CL.04). -0 0 E @dc N °L T.>E RE -0-- Ej,ya E-.- oa.a ar o,aa O 9 @ O) y V C@ ` 0 C j L O n o 0 °..Q E Q U 0 0 0 m O o w m u U c m E_ =) « E o N L Ca. @ @... N y @Q �C'� y .+O_' w 3r C y 0 U ny 0•N a>> KU0 °o'�c- „cnn.�00 p VL^ oo Lc« W cU O CN �L .L+ _ C y O Q) d 0) N y fan w 0 >T C r N 3 !?aE mC =d"'Ra« oaac aRR> N> U ��yy NM GI O F m 7° w >@ N y O O' �0)�U (6 N V y 0, r= 0 L r y y@ 7 N '.G N@ E .urmmwd wa =yU =v no oa m �3 o �'y3d�. «v mE n- a n 3o = E 0 a) O n m ° c N A U N C= n N L L O y c S N M N w d O c -m RL -R m0 mo c v y E° �. - E u 0 rn y m 9 E °> Uo�i�0 a) NE yy 0-.c. n O O 3@ E U `O d@@ �Lc t'dU c �j 5 #Ca@wnna+= 3t�ovRLOCO mu- =Rnm a- c 0 w N > E E a c ° c y@ C- r 4) L .0 O @ y U Q> _ O i f� O)O'a+C v «vcF Oa vcwc va R m N L C” O O L O n o.E °caOvF ° °'�oo`>��L °w @ .0 m m= min Q). N X c p 0 @ p d •- (U (D 0@ @ L 0 0 0 n U UtAHUdL 3 U O@ N c U' -vm m o¢ R d Q umi .� a s W_ 0 N U. o.yj C O j r 0(� N —N.r 4) C 25Z @N >_9m Nv oEocmw nE'_ vvo 2E a) _, _ > c O o N aoz o E 0-N va m >. -=E o w mE c5 i". rn o>•�t F §U �� @ x'00 J �Q F @ @ 0.r-N P') V' w.L-. S N N0) E V) O.E O> uU>.a �� E EES N U c m U c= o n; v O m a O c ¢ o m E F v v H v (n 3° m y y U- v c H �U n-- Q)d� d'D @ 2'O J -Ln.o° H @ d N !0 w.L.. 330E�om 0"- E U) Ra'm o o o v =s >_- �v °cU�mwwE tw? aE- y C @ �Nfh V ` W. C w> o c m m n R E 2D O E �O_ Q Om EOwo wv)3°n�vU o>v rEvS v m3 v a ma0 cv c _ G a EU O O d u c a v .a CL 0 w E a EL pa a a N d w a1S om o ~ @C O d 6d O 0) - aO d °`m? dido Y(O C E w «3 d O tl) N CL a y di EEU c >w'o ai ry vtnm 10 O O (L O. O 0 U vq@um.m °C °a.< a6 «EUUM3 i am d@ Q. O _5 O N j U E N O Y �. S N d c z `or my R m C L 3 L a @ N i6 `� L d d mmo .mm� R0 oo,> mo @ c ° 0 @ N Vi > r0 O d G ° ~."' aL+ �m�°� dLBj �mm �m u¢D v yN o -o o c dw �> o @ OS 0 L_ N Y a) N y N c 0 U C C w aEw v> m L n > m 3— ao0 E-76 > adR a> 5° u m 000o .o U @O1= N y 4) �°a)= OOa_ m`a>E Ea Rwrc Mae dE E9_c p>c N y U O C 3 O U d Sig > y C_'OC �co v> QE o.mmmoy« R =Oc m •o ui Q .> r0 C '� C >. Q) M fl. N p >,O L S S O N E' 6 -'� d R y d a o E m o E an 56.5 M m> N N y a >. E.wL.L -0.— .y U c Mn O C C E C m o c O T m cc C 'v'c.. ='a.. o °c °tn "m ° ttm ��@S' 0_ ai v O 0 dU ui E 4) yr_ 0 d'@p OUO =0-� "_E>OE m i._6 t m .Uv EB >+@'e Ow 0>.m m"- s o N y7Ed Li W@ y@ O CO�y O N' nnLY.0 4) CU y 0 (o 3 N Na E o3a.. R o mny m my vva E R cU E - i- N Nm c O"' d O 0 0 �y d N w c c r E.L-. � 0 E' -'C '10 c R V €�''"E`°�°c iiw dm ° oL c > 0)a0 � w nc W n'.C-. ° a) O L ° E @ O F a2E o nm E'3 c vR 'E E mu`oc ao i°n E o� w? i 0Y 01N @ c+L•' " M c > N y N d m5o o�uvia o�° ;5Em'• °y cC v nLp O 70 y U N 0 d pC C r..L.. C c N 3.r @ E I 0 y@ O y y N d L @ y a. r mm0p 0 Rc c R mS V V._ Emas.. m o gi 0.. ..0 cEa�m�� vA« O CImo' O 1� dN N M a .? f6 E 0 0 n 0 -6 _,M d N@ 0 0 O. d d> C vw C) .= c o v w c a R v v u> T'3 .> O (n ac 1� C6 Q l0 O OU - 0L0 NS y O 3 `� @ wN c .0 @O O.L w O= > "' dN - C N U d 0(> >+d V EOE no..W Ea v Rs on r oac '^ c m E E0 ( U.-c w a Co V 0 E c C0 � a N 'O 0 O 0) d 2 y N N w @y C 0)y U O N @ S O -0 Uc'- LR'-^- Tv v«, -. R>v n.r on vc'c E o v va E x u E;- c MN.O 0 N Co y m V=:4 �a m > `a.°.0 CL O >0 Q> m o n O y @ @n UO>�._E a c'o. L d> (D .0 c O` v '�E3ca E -0 $ea a>a at mvm vaTR�oa�Ta �n5 v.. as p O)y U C@ U@@ N C OL o o (� °. a E nU U O d O U ma Rm c rn =a Em•' R oc° e Rot R J C N 'L C aL.r � @ �_ N y O C' , w >i O U n Y 3 C y 0 y fq y O n 0-= Uo.. «._nnONmo 0. a L °vc CU N.c C N 0 C .t.. O @ (D0) N y N— L y °aa c c 0E 'mw m vm 10c= mi"ma«ooaac N — U OC t(`cwN coo N Cl) O V�NC @C w= U Q)yy=OTC aL„ yUy Ow p>i d•� L L v «v a,y o� ,v_a� aRR. >ca =v cv- 0c apCo N O o U n O Q 5 N 0 5 0. °> 0 E> 0 3 ~ n° > 'o m'0) 0 y `m .0 o o L 0 c > m° y E N R= R u .; s 3 = E" d° R> 0 0 o ON O v - 0 O.� c `p 0 N m Q°) L) O c� c C a) y O' c- noL C S Q)M @ S 0 @ `-LIn V N uiE yT -« E -U rnNmaL E=. «'mv r naa -ac >.L..0 c @O Q> N ° E C y O y@ 3 n O E n @ y c L O 1° 0a « m0- v= m m.: v�LE w c�c a a- 6 >�. @dip > E a E t5 O C O0 d c Q) @ .i-') NEa @ _y (� Q) n 3�._C(6� O)yr C_ E N u N L O~ H C r 0 'J J L O 2 i aEcmg > ~._ =vR Qm oU v'yw Lmo N m2 jo O@ N C R @,L„L nU5=05=6 U O O.0 0 ° d N w'.c- -. d C m< a> NgEE 0. 2.2E m n -y y =c cL0 C nvi > C O O o N a o.0 a r E @N cL T O !CO va om EUoo>rn maE° E«@ yrnv c H �U n-- Q)d� d'D @ 2'O J -Ln.o° H @ d N !0 w.L.. 330E�om 0"- E U) Ra'm o o o v =s >_- �v °cU�mwwE tw? aE- c-< @ �Nfh V w 0)M CO. Q Om EOwo wv)3°n�vU o>v rEvS w'mE 5w0,e rn2a 2.7 d1 d 6d av m a n 2 E d a"> a °u y, �a; o c G c :a EE; RRa Qa mmt a�a y uEiw OM woE O tl) N L' O =� O d ✓+UC Ram mw�ouy RN RL NL «n-- u °c ocvuRi 0 «3 �a O'; E rn° ani0 ONE a0 d@ Q. O a O O N j d = =cuaN E EU mam>omrnc0 �oL Ei•c mv'.4 =N° R O C J O. Q O O. J L` iy 0 dU D °� =6�L 0 me E M65 E;:S 0U)M 3 nma R nm m m VyKF ARTHUR B & MARY ANN JOHNSON B ELMER FAMILY FARMS LLC BRADY CLEMONS 10676 JACKSON DR 19450 281 ST ST 1655 HEMLOCK WAY EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 -4425 BELLE PLAINE MN 56011 -5010 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 BROCK JUSTIN FLUEGGE 1671 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 DANIEL J GANTZER 1670 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 ERIC M ENGLUND 1660 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 GLEN H SCHOENBERG 1665 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 JENNIFER J PENTTINEN 1575 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 KELSEY PEYTON 1565 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4543 PETER H ZUBERT 1680 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 RYAN G BARETTE 1651 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 YUCHING WONG 1674 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317- BRYAN CROES 1595 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4543 DAVID B LEFEVRE 1650 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 FOX PROPERTIES LP 27990 SMITHTOWN RD EXCELSIOR MN 55331 -7911 HOLLY A SCHULTZ 1661 MAYAPPLE PASS CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -5001 JOHN T SANTINI JR 1625 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 KORY L GROSKREUTZ 1615 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 PETERSON- JACQUES FARM LAND CO 15900 FLYING CLOUD DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 -4047 STATE OF MINNESOTA - DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN ST PAUL MN 55155 -1801 JOE JABLONSKI 16305 36TH AVE N STE 600 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 CASSANDRA K KRAUS 1605 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 DEGLER LAND COMPANY LLC 541 PINEVIEW CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -8697 G &M LAURENT FAMILY LTD PTRSHP 14096 CLEARVIEW DR SHAKOPEE MN 55379 -9645 JEFFREY H HABERMAIER 1664 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 JOSEPH FELIU JR 1645 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 NANCY W DRAHOZAL 1585 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 553174543 RUSSELL J HOLMES 1635 HEMLOCK WAY CHANHASSEN MN 55317 -4516 THE RYLAND GROUP INC 7599 ANAGRAM DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 -7399