Loading...
Narrative1 Introduction This variance is requested on behalf of Steve and Peggy Emerson at 8409 Stone Creek Court, Chanhassen, Minnesota. Additional supporting material can be found in Exhibits 1 -3 at the back: • Exhibit 1: Chanhassen City Code, Sec. 20 -58. - General conditions for granting. • Exhibit 2: Chanhassen City Code, Chapter 20 — Zoning, Article XXIII — General Supplemental Regulations, Division 1. Documents previous city code allowances which support the grant of this variance. • Exhibit 3: Photographs of current front elevation showing location of proposed addition • Exhibit 4: Letter from Neighbors in support of project 2 Description of Variance Request The proposed project for which a variance is being requested is the addition of a covered (but not enclosed) front porch. The addition of the front porch consists of 3 separate parts: 1) Extension of existing front stoop out to the edge of the garage. The current stoop extends from the house a distance of 4' -4 ". 2) Addition of a small roof to cover the existing stoop. 3) Addition of a small roof to cover the stoop extension. The new roof covering the existing stoop and the new roof to cover the new stoop extension would be supported by pillars so as to be architecturally consistent with the existing house design. Figure 1 and Figure 2 below show the existing front elevation design without the front porch and; the proposed (added) front porch. Figure 2 also shows additional remodel of the garage which is not part of this variance request. A variance is required because the existing stoop extends into the 30' setback area as does the proposed front porch and covering roof. Figure 2 -1. Existing Front Elevation of House F - -- Figure 2 -2. Figure 2. Proposed Front Elevation of House (with covered, but not enclosed front entrance) 3 Design Details of Proposed Front Porch Addition Several pictures are shown below of the proposed front porch addition. Figure 3 -1 below shows the overhead view of the 1st floor of the existing house. You can see the area labeled "Existing Entry" which is where the new porch will be attached. The existing stoop will not be modified in any way, however the front edge will be extended straight towards the garage. Figure 3 -1. Top level view of current house Figure 3 -2 below shows the same overhead view of the 1st floor of the existing house with the addition of the "New Covered Entry". You can see from this picture that the existing stoop is still as previous and has only been extended toward the garage. You can also see 3 posts that will be used to support the overhead roof line covering both the existing stoop and the new covered entry area. IU _1 u -�;JVr DINING DE, ir___________________� � I � I i i i x � � E!IST +JS �1Tri`� u.s. �V1 R< Figure 3 -1. Top level view of current house Figure 3 -2 below shows the same overhead view of the 1st floor of the existing house with the addition of the "New Covered Entry". You can see from this picture that the existing stoop is still as previous and has only been extended toward the garage. You can also see 3 posts that will be used to support the overhead roof line covering both the existing stoop and the new covered entry area. Figure 3 -2. Top level view of proposed front porch Figure 3 -3 below shows the front elevation of the completed front porch entry. You can see from this picture that the existing stoop and stoop extension has now been covered with a small roof. From the side of the garage you can see the new roofline extends only a few feet beyond the front edge of the garage. Figure 3 -4, 3 -5, and 3 -6 below have the dimension details of the existing stoop, covered stoop extension and side view. Figure 3 -3. Front Elevation of proposed addition. 101-8= Figure 3 -4. Existing Entry Detail SP-01 Figure 3 -5. New Covered Entry Detail 5 {' Figure 3 -6. Side view details of front porch 4 Supporting Reasons for Granting Variance The Emerson's are the original owners of the property and had the house built in 1992. The table below shows a summary of the conditions for granting a variance and the reasons why, for this project, these conditions are met. Moreover, Exhibit 2, Chanhassen City Code 20 -908, section 5.f.1 provides an allowance for homes built prior to 1987 "to add an open porch as an architectural feature ", in the exact way that is proposed as part of this variance request. Although the full city code for 20 -908 is listed in Exhibit 2, the portion of code (5.f.1) applicable here is listed below. f. The intent of this section is to a/ /ow homes built Prior to February 19 1987 to add an open uorch as an architectural feature to define the entrance into a residence or uodate a front elevation 1. Homes built prior to February 19 1987 may have open Porches and /or balconies that encroach into the reouired front yard a distance not exceeding ten feet provided they maintain a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet The ten feet shall include the roof line support columns and steps. This area sha8 not be enclosed nor screened with mesh o /ass or other similar material Homes that are on the national register listing or have been considered eligible for listing on the national register shall be excluded from this ordinance unless approved by the national historical reoistrar's ofFce The homeowner believes the conditions for granting the variance have been met. Conditions for Grantinu Variance Emerson Project Request Section 20 -58 (1) Variances shall only be permitted when they Criteria Met. The variance request of the addition are in harmony with the general purposes and of a front porch is in harmony with the general intent of this chapter and when the variances are purposes and consistent with the comprehensive consistent with the comprehensive plan. plan. (2) When there are practical difficulties in Criteria Met. There are no other options to complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical adding a front porch (except to build into the difficulties," as used in connection with the setback area) which would otherwise comply granting of a variance, means that the property with the zoning ordinance. owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. (3) That the purpose of the variation is not based Criteria Met. The purpose for the variance upon economic considerations alone. request is improve the safety of the front entrance from ice build -up by covering the existing stoop and to improve the front entrance by adding a covered stoop from the edge of the driveway. The proposed addition also improves the aesthetics of the house in making it more visually appealing from the street. (4) The plight of the landowner is due to Criteria Met. The property upon which the house circumstances unique to the property not created was built is unique in that it is adjacent to a by the landowner. wetland and drainage area and a tree conversation area (see plot). The location of the drainage area and the tree conservation caused the entire house to be positioned to the front - right corner of the lot (towards the southwest corner of the lot) at the time it was built. The drainage on the northside of the property was such that during the home construction, the city chose to capture a stream which was flowing on the northside and direct into a storm sewer under the street. (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the Criteria Met. The front porch addition will not essential character of the locality. alter the character of the locality. The homeowner has obtained signatures from existing neighbors that they are in agreement with and accepting of the variance request. see separate attached signed letter and Exhibit 3. (6) Variances shall be granted for earth - sheltered Criteria Met. This property is not an earth - construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. sheltered construction. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. Exhibit 1 Sec. 20 -58. - General conditions for granting. A variance may be granted if all of the following criteria are met: (1) Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. (3) That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. (4) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. (5) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. (6) Variances shall be granted for earth- sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. Exhibit 2 Chanhassen City Code, Chapter 20- Zoning, Article XXIII - GeneralSupplemental Regulations, Division 1 Sec. 10 -908. - Yard regulations. The following requirements qualify or supplement district regulations. Yard measurements shall be taken from the nearest point of the wall of a building to the lot fine in question, subject to the following qualifications: (1) Every part of a required yard or court shall be open and unobstructed. (1) A yard, court, or other open space of one building used to comply with the provisions of this chapter shall not again be used as a yard, court or other open space for another building. (3) Except as provided in the business, industrial and office districts, the front yard setback requirements shall be observed on each street side of a corner lot; provided, however, that the remaining two yards will meet the side yard setbacks. (4) On double frontage lots, the required front yard shall be provided on both streets. Whenever possible, structures should face the existing street. (5) The following shall not be considered to be obstructions (variances granted from a required setback are not entitled to the following additional encroachments): a. Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, cornices, canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may project a distance not exceeding two feet six inches, fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four feet, six inches, an uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not to exceed six feet provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building; bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding three feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding rive feet. Other canopies may be permitted by conditional use permit Li. The above -named features may project into any required yard adjoining an interior lot line, subject to the limitations cited above. C Porches that encroach into the required front yard and which were in existence on February 19, 1987, may be enclosed or completely rebuilt in the same location provided that any porch that is to be completely rebuilt must have at least a ten -foot minimum front yard. d. Subject to the setback requirements in section 10 -904, the following are permitted in the rear yard: Enclosed or open off street parking spaces, accessory structures, toolrooms, and similar buildings or structures for domestic storage. Balconies, breezeways and open porches, unenclosed decks and patios, and one -story bay windows may project into the rear yard a distance not to exceed rive feet. e. Into any required front, rear, or side yard: driveways, sidewalks, fences and retaining walls. f. The intent of this section is to allow homes built prior to February 19, 1987, to add an open porch as an architectural feature to define the entrance into a residence or update a front elevation. 1. Homes built prior to February 19, 1987, may have open porches and /or balconies that encroach into the required front yard a distance not exceeding ten feet, provided they maintain a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet. The ten feet shall include the roof line supoort columns and steps This area shall not be enclosed nor screened with mesh glass, or other similar material. Homes that are on the national register //sdno or have been considered eligible for listing on the national register shall be excluded from this ordinance unless approved by the national historical registrar's office. (6) The placement of any structure within easements is prohibited, except for those structures specified herein. Fences, retaining walls, nonstructural fire pits, sidewalks, pathways, and patios not integral to the principal structure (the first ten feet adjacent to the principal structure shall be considered integral), and other encroachments may be allowed within an easement with an encroachment agreement if they do not alter the intended use of the easement and at the discretion of the community development director or designee. A driveway or sidewalk from the street to the house crossing drainage and utility easements at the front of the property are exempt from this requirement. (7) Buildings shall not encroach in to any gas transmission pipeline easement Additionally, all buildings shall maintain a minimum 20 -foot setback from the gas transmission pipeline easement. Exhibit 3 See pictures below of several angles of the current house front elevation where the proposed front porch is to be added. Figure 4 -1. Angled View showing location of proposed porch addition. Figure 4-2. Current View of Front Elevation Figure 4 -3. Street view of front elevation Figure 4 -4. View from Current Front Stoop. ti 1 To: Chanhassen Planning Commission Date: July 7, 2013 Re: Variance Request for Emerson Remodeling As neighbors of Steve and Peggy Emerson at 8409 Stone Creek Court, Chanhassen, MN, we understand they are requesting a variance on their property to add on a front porch. We have reviewed their plans, understand the request and are in support of the city planning commission granting their variance request Proposed Proiect The proposed project for which a variance is being requested is the addition of a covered (but not enclosed) front porch. The addition of the front porch consists of 3 separate parts: 1) Extension of the existing front stoop out to the left edge of the garage. The current stoop extends from the house a distance of 4'-4 ". The forward edge of the extension would be even with the existing stoop. 2) Addition of a small roof to cover the existing stoop. 3) Addition of a small roof to cover the stoop extension. The new roof covering the existing stoop and the new roof to cover the new stoop extension would be supported by pillars so as to be architecturally consistent with the existing house design as well as houses in the immediate neighborhood. Figure 1 and Figure 2 below show the existing front elevation design without the front porch and the proposed (added) front porch. A variance is required because the existing stoop extends into the 30' setback area from the street. Figure 1. Existing Front Elevation of House Figure 2. Proposed Front Elevation of House (with covered, but not enclosed front entrance) There are additional improvements to be made to the existing property that are not part of this variance request and will not require a variance (see garage addition in figure 2). A separate permit request will cover those additions. Please feel free to contact us if needed to help support this variance request. Sincerely, Jared and Kim Gehle 8410 Stone Creek Court Chanha en, Mn, 55317 Tom and Jessica Thompson 8429 Stone Creek Court Chanhassen, Mn, 55317 Ralph and Cathy Cadmus 8426 Stone Creek Court Chanhassen, Mn, 55317