CC Minutes 07-22-2013Chanhassen City Council – July 22, 2013
Mayor Furlong: I will say too that item number 5 had some, was modified and that has been distributed
to the council members and the effect of that modification was generally to take out irrelevant aspects or
immaterial aspects of those items. Is there anyone that would like any items, items E, 1 through 8 for
separate discussion? Anyone in the chambers? Okay, is there a motion to adopt items E, 1 through 8?
Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to approve the following
consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations:
1. Approval of Minutes:
-City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated June 10, 2013.
-City Council Work Session Minutes dated June 10, 2013.
-City Council Work Session Minutes dated June 24, 2013
Receive Commission Minutes:
-Planning Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated June 18, 2013
-Park and Recreation Commission Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated June 25, 2013
Resolution #2013-36:
4. TH 101 GAP Project (Pioneer Trail to CR 61): Approve Resolution of
Support and Priority Designation.
th
5. The Preserve 5 Addition, Chanhassen Residential Development Partners as amended:
a. Final Plat Approval.
b. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Development Contract.
c. Approve Addendum to Development Contract.
6. St. Hubert Catholic Community, 8201 Main Street: Approve Requests for Temporary On-Sale
Liquor Licenses, August 17 & 18, September 28, and October 11.
th
7. Verizon Wireless: Approve Lease Agreement for Downtown Water Tower, 500 West 76 Street.
Resolution #2013-37:
8. Resolution Approving Decertification of Tax Increment District #8.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS:
Laurie Susla: Hi. My name is Laurie Susla. I live on Dakota Avenue in Chanhassen and I just had a
quick question for council. I noticed an item in the agenda for the working session this evening about the
road reconstruction funds actually being hundred, I believe it was $171,000 over budget and I was
wondering if that was the City portion that was over budget or the, if the citizens were actually slightly
over charged for the road construction that was going on this summer. Or did I read that wrong?
Todd Gerhardt: Under budget.
Laurie Susla: I’m sorry, I misspoke. Under budget. So with the excess funds, are those going to be
returned to the folks who paid for the reconstruction? The homeowner part of that.
Todd Gerhardt: The homeowners were charged based on bids received.
2