CC Packet 2007 03 26AGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2007
CHANHASSEN MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
5:30 P.M. - CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION, FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
Note: If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the
remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda.
A. Commission Interviews:
- 5:30 p.m. – Thor Smith, Planning Commission
- 5:45 p.m. – Dan Keefe, Incumbent, Planning Commission
- 6:00 p.m. – Jack Spizale, Incumbent, Park & Recreation Commission
- 6:15 p.m. – Curt Robinson, Incumbent, Senior Commission
B. New Programming at the Chanhassen Recreation Center.
7:00 P.M. – REGULAR MEETING, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
C. Invitation to Easter Egg Candy Hunt.
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and
will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If
discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the
council packet for each staff report.
1. a. Approval of Minutes:
- City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 12, 2007
- City Council Summary Minutes dated March 12, 2007
- City Council Verbatim Minutes dated March 12, 2007
Receive Commission Minutes:
- Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated March 6, 2007
- Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes dated March 6, 2007
b. Koehnen Area Street Reconstruction Project 07-01: Call Assessment Hearing.
1
c. Tanadoona Drive/Dogwood Road Reconstruction Project 06-06: Approve Plans
& Specifications; Authorize Ad for Bid.
d. Approval of 2007 Liquor License Renewals.
e. 2007 CIP Light Duty Vehicle Purchases - PW016MMM.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE
2 a. Chief Gregg Geske, Chanhassen Fire Department
(Sgt. Gullickson was unable to attend tonight’s meeting and his monthly report is
in the Correspondence Section.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
3. Heartland Building Expansion; 7975 Century Boulevard; Lot 1, Block 1,
Arboretum Business Park; Applicant: Martin Woody Architects: Consider Site
Plan Approval for a 31,200 sq. ft. Office/Warehouse Expansion to an Existing 101,600
sq. ft. Building; and Request for a Variance for Fenestration.
4. Chanhassen High School; North of Lyman Boulevard, South of the Twin Cities and
Western Railroad, and West of Bluff Creek; Applicant: Anderson-Johnson
Associates, Inc. and Independent School District 112:
- Request for Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to Office Institutional District (OI);
- Consider Site Plan Approval with Variances for a High School Campus including
an approximately 406,000 sq. ft., 3-Story Building, Athletic Fields, Concession
Building, Stadium, Storage/Maintenance Building and Parking Lots.
- Request for a Conditional Use Permit with Variances for Development within the
Bluff Creek Overlay District; and
- Request for a Wetland Alteration Permit for the Grading and Filling of Wetlands
on Site.
5. Appointments to Planning Commission.
2
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION
ADJOURNMENT
A copy of the staff report and supporting documentation being sent to the city council will be
available after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday. Please contact city hall at 952-227-1100 to verify that
your item has not been deleted from the agenda any time after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday.
GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City
Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at
every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.
1. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor.
When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City
Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City
Council.
2. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson
that can summarize the issue.
3. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If
you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council.
4. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.
Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding
of your concern, suggestion or request.
5. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual
either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City
Manager.
Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan’s Restaurant & Bar, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen
immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome.
3
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
11
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor City Council
FROM Todd Gerhardt City Manager
DA TE oMarch162007
SUBJ Commission Interviews
During Monday night s work session we will interview 4 applicants for City
Commissions Attached are their application orms
1
2
3
4
5 30 p m Thor Smith Planning Commission
5 45 p m Dan Keefe Incumbent Planning Commission
6 00 p m Jack Spizale Incumbent Park Recreation Commission
6 15 p m Curt Robinson Incumbent Senior Commission
Council members Ernst and Peterson will interview Kevin Dillon Incumbent
Planning Commissioner on Tuesday March 20 at 6 30 p m Mr Dillon s
application is attached Following our work session on Monday March 26 the
Council will have interviewed all applicants for the Planning Commission and
therefore staff recommends that you make the appointments on the regular
agenda There are 3 three year terms available
Attached is a memo from Karen Engelhardt summarizing the vacancies and
applications received for all commissions Sample questions and a scoring sheet
are also included in this packet
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a channing downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play4
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Sile
www cLchanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Karen Engelhardt Office Manager
DA TE March 1 2007
SUBJ Commission Vacancies
This memo is to update you on applications received for the various commission
vacancies An ad was placed in the Chanhassen Villager on February 1 8 an
article appeared in the Chanhassen Connection which was mailed to all residents
on February 5 and ran on our cable access channel and the city s web site for the
month of February Applications were accepted through February 28
The following positions are available
Planning Commission Three 3 year positions
Park Recreation Commission One 2 year position created by Anne
Murphy s resignation and two 3 year positions
Environmental Commission Two 3 year positions
Senior Commission Two 3 year positions
Applications were received from
Name Address Term Served Commission Alternate
Jerry A McDonald 88 Olympic Circle January 2005 Planning None
Incumbent A ril 2007
Kevin Dillon 6701 Mulberry Circle April 2006 Planning Park Rec
Incumbent A ril 2007
Dan Keefe 6670 Mulberry Circle April 2004 Planning
Incumbent A ril 2007
Phili P DeNucci 9186 S rin field Drive Plannin SouthWest Metro
Thomas Koehnen 795 Ponderosa Drive Plannin Park Recreation
Richard Simmons 530 Summerfield Drive Plannin None
Core Ber man 6791 Redwin Lane Plannin None
Thor Smith 2139 Boulder Road Plannin None
Dennis Hansen 6450 Pleasant View Circle Environmental Park Recreation
Jack Spizale 8141 Maplewood Terrace May 2001 Park Recreation None
Incumbent A ril 2007
Rose Kircher 6820 Redwin Lane Park Recreation Environmental
Curt Robinson 202 West 77 1 Street April 2004 Senior
Incumbent A ril 2007
Charlie Robbins 7340 Lon view Circle Senior None
Carol Bues ens 2754 Centu Trail Senior None
The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play
G user KAREN Commission VacanciesMemo to Todd doc
5
APPLICATIONFOR CHANHASSEN CITY COMMISSION Date J J 07
Name
COMMISSION DESIRED PI flM j j ALTERNATE
RECEIVED
City ofChanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
I I S FEB 1 3 2007
t10r t 1V th
d r3 Q EOd Ide r 2oad CITY OF CHANHASSEN
Address
Home Phone 110 6 S Work
Ph 71b f 3 d Cell
Ph J3t g167
Emai fkreSJtk l vaLx CO Vl No of Years in Chanhassen L 76
Highest Level ofEducation Attained Plus Degrees ifany SOW Lo IcJ It 4ar e
Employment History Stateposition employer and brief description of duties
elf 12 p l1aI t4S4e E ter LZ J Ik I
b c clte Lt Ie I tJ J
Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received if any
C aV kcU5eyt f o avy MeW ber
lk rJ Mew her lfIek e r SOrtlite
fI y I2JL 4rJ tl jg pl1 tt t1C v je72cdcer5 tk l1ler
ReasonsforSeeking this Position C Iv Ie y lI 1e le c fej It LaUreSSuef4thytoeI10fkA1a1e eI
d dt 1 D pW2hi 0f cLa Q 5eh J
J ak V iee5 fed 0 Ite r tC I Iv c a fr
1M 2 10 lie 21 lv L OUh el
bt
C7r
c
SIGNATURE
6
p
t
Z
Z
o
E
CI
p
E
Z
p
o
o
U
o
00
CIl
s
E
o
U
8
ro
Ci
c
s
I
o
c
E
l
E
ro
Z
l
c
o
01
s
c
0
3
o
o
0
CIl
a
3
0
Ca
u 9
l CIl
0
CIl E
Ec0
u
l
c
o
01
0
I
8
CIl
s
o
CIl
ro
l
I
S C
o s
9
l CIl
ro E
Ec0
u
Cl
l
l
CIl
8
3
C
l
CIl I
E E
2
0 l
8c
0 s
CIl
O1 CIl
CIl0ro
l c
5 a
l c
I Uro
01
c u
CIl
8
3
E
E
o
u
l
c
l
Q
o
3 QoCIl
CIl
o ro
Ot
l
ro
c ro
i
ro
3
u
ro
0
3
o
l
I
ro
CIl
l
3
C
5
0
0
ro
O
ro l
P E
l
ro u
c 8
V
CIl
l
01
01
E
l C
5
l 0
1 0
roc
l
l
l
1 3
0 0
3 040
o CIl
0 E
1
ro u
c 8
0
C
CIl
1
o
0
s
o
00
CIl
s
E
o
U
l
c
l
Q
0
3
o
o0
ro
c
r
8
3
E
E
o
U
I
1
c
o
s
ro
c
0
1
C
CIlos
0s
o
1 ro
I et0
00
CIl
s 01
E
Os CEEEoco
uUc
1 1
E 5c4 1
1 00cIro
1 t000
Es1EE0
1 ro u
0 1 3
o 03
3 0 1
o I
CIlro
0 O
o s a
u
o
0
1i
c
c
g
U
l
0
U
tU
5
c
o
u
c
s
0
3
bb0
7
APPLICA TION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COMMISSION
COMMISSION DESIRED P k r ALTERNA TE
Date z z i 07
Citof Challhassen 77 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 CulIlhassen MN 55317
Name 7 K K
Address 670 11v I h AJf7 C Co
Home PllOne tj z I oS57 Work Phone Cell PllOne 6 2 ICJ 9 10
Email 1k reE1 @ 11ffS I con No of Years in CulIlhassen i
Highest Level of Educatioll Attained Plus Degrees if an
Employment HistorState positioll employer and brief description 0 duties
V c P u s R I T1 l4
Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices IIollors and recognitions received if allY
Reasom Ior Seeking tltis Position
Specific Qualifications or the Positioll CurJ 11 b cr t PIAI tj sS c
5 1 o otLu 5 r f CJoo
1 d
SIGNA
8
c2
APPUCATlON FOR CllANHASSEN CITY COMMISSION Date Z 3 df
COMMISSION DESIRED P ol l 5 ALTERNATE
City ofChanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen MN 55317
Name Do JLee
Address 6070 I1vl6r LftLe c ka V I1AJ 5 S 7
Home Phone 5l lffiJo s7 Work Phone 61Z lq m No of Years in Chanhassen 7 0 he
162Z61 ltl62HighestLevelofEducationAttainedPlusDegreesifany 11 B A I hr o S Ue
7 Vv Ui unoEmploymentHistoryStatepositionemployerandbriefdescriptionofduties
6 Ac R c I PCJ Z cc fe Cr vt CtiS r1C fJ E r fis
re fJ prO ecS ojti lk cJ cpdc doHftfr ire J CWIC S
u r LcIJ
Activities and Affdiations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received ifanyfeivfTbtU1ldk1EkCIJRlfrfItYlvufLtfIfI4VJrz5
Reasons for Seeking this Position
JuJ I j tvJ tb 4 Jcrt T 4v Jv J vuttJ11Iv1e7oVJl
I J PbJVl j r s z 7 h 9 6 Cc h
to v r
SpecifIC Qualificationsfor the Position
r klc rh 0 i f f r00J J
rr ftf 1 J h LJor A r r uhd
e rpv J M 4 10 7 e f1oA a c s
r 0 tkeC v l I lj ac4 S
l 1
SIG ATURE
RECEIVED
FEf3 1 2 2004
CITY OF CHANHASSEN9
Daniel J Keefe
6670 Mulberry Circle Chanhassen Minnesota 55317
Home 952 449 0557 Cell 612 819 8190 dckeefe@mchsi com
Profile
Results oriented driven and analytical finance and operations management professional with 10 years of managementexperienceEntrepreneurialhandsonandmultidisciplinedstyleConsistenttrackrecordoftangibleresultsandincreasinglevelsoffinancialoperationsandprojectresponsibilityProvenabilitytobuildleadandmanageeffectivemultifunctionaltearns
Kev Skills
Strategic Planning
Project Management
Process Reengineering and Improvement
Operations Management
Financial Budgeting Forecasting Analysis and ReportingPersonnelManagementDevelopmentandTeamBuilding
Performance and Profit Improvement
Investment and Acquisitions Analysis and Management
Professional Experience
GMAC RFC Division of 189 billion Fortune 2 GM Bloomington MN 2 02 Present
2 00 1 01ContractDirectorofFinanceoncontractwithRHIManagementResources
Reported to the CFO
Contributed with other members of the management team to the establishment and organizational development oftheaccountingfinancialmanagementandbusinessriskteamwithinIBillionassetbackedsecuritizationoperationCreatedandestablishednewfmancialanalysisandmanagementreportingprocessandteamRecruitednewmanageroffinancialanalysisandreporting
Improved the process for analyzing product and client margins and profitabilityDirectedthedevelopmentandmanagementofnewstrategicplanningprocess
Recruited and hired 22 fmancial managers accountants analysts and consultants
Contract Controller for E Commerce Business
Created economic model for successful launch ofGMAC RFC s E Commerce business
Managed 30 million LT budget for E Commerce Financial activities included forecasting financial analysisproformadevelopmentreportingandresourceplanning
Project Manager for Business Continuity
Managed the Business Continuity process for all functions and operations throughout the organizationImplemented2projectphasesincludingBusinessImpactAnalysisandBusinessRecoveryPlanningprocesses
Project Manager for Patriot Act Compliance
Implemented externally purchased software system to facilitate the scanning of 8 million records in 22 databases
Managed and facilitated project team of32 operation managers attorneys and IT personnel
Project Manager for Data Security
Currently managing the implementation of the data security program for ICG division ofGMAC RFC
10
NRG ENERGY Unregulated power division of Xcel Energy Minneapolis MN 2 01 12 01
Contract VP ofFinancefor NEO NRG s renewable energy subsidiary on contract with RHI Management ResourcesReportedtothePresidentresponsibleforresearchinitiationvaluationnegotiationandduediligenceforkeyacquisitionsandgreenfieldprojects
Coordinated assumption gathering with construction development operations treasury and pricing ValuationactivitiesincludeddevelopmentofsophisticatedExcelmodels
Managed due diligence activities by coordinating internal teams from power marketing business development legaloperationstreasuryandaccountingfunctions
Negotiated 2 acquisition agreements in coordination with Goldman Sachs and SG Cowen
MERRILL CORPORATION City Business Top 25 Private Company St Paul MN 3 96 1 00
Vice President of Operations Document Management Services
Reported to the President Responsible for leading and managing the strategic and economic turnaround of a 100millionbusinessin18monthsLedalloperationsandadministrationforMerrillsinternationaldocumentmanagementservicesdivisionManagedfunctionsincludedoperationsstrategicplanningpricingsourcingadministrationrealestateandsystems
Improved operational margins by 50
Improved operational margin run rate by 20 million
Motivated operations managers to improve product quality from good customer rating to excellent customer ratingManagedreorganizedandstreamlineda1200employeeserviceorientedbusinessoperatingthroughouttheUnitedStates
Outsourced a portion of the operations to India outsourcing providers to improve quality and marginsStrategizedwithPresidentSalesandOperationstodrivetransformationofbusinessfromlowtechnology serviceofferingstohightechnologydocumentandinformationservicesproviderNegotiatedandintegrated2acquisitions
Supervised reengineering of strategic sourcing processes that lowered overall expenses by a run rate 15 millionDirectedallrealestatestrategyleasedesignbuildoutandcapitalimprovementactivitiesnationallyRedefinedrewrotestrategicplaninconjunctionwithmanagementandpresentedtoandapprovedbyBoardofDirectors
Chief Financial Officer Vice President Document Management Services
Reported to the President Responsible for management of all fmancial operations information systems and divisionalinvestorrelationsfunctionsActivitiesincludedstrategicplanningfinancialandoperationalanalysisbudgetingandforecastingandmonitoringaccountingcontrolsPlayedakeyroleindevelopingthecompanysfiveyearplanandoverallbusinessstrategy
Directed the areas of accounting finance and administration including AlP AIR project accounting collectionsbillingfmancialanalysisstrategicplanningfinancialsystemsandrealestate
Reorganized recruited and directed professional finance accounting and sourcing staff
Created financial statements established budgets proformas operating and business goalsAnalyzedrecommendedandimplementednewsalescompensationsystemEstablishedcriticalmasstargetsshutdownnonperformingoperationsandopenednewsites
Prioritized strategic and economic objectives goals and targetsCommunicatedinformationtoappropriatedecisionmakers
Managed and led all real estate matters on a national basis including leasing buildout and design
TOWLE FINANCIAL SERVICES City Business Top 25 Real Estate Company Minneapolis MN 9 933 96
Commercial Real Estate Finance Consultant
Advised clients on debt and equity transactions restructuring debt and real estate portfoliosExecuteddebtandequityfundingactivitiesforsmallbusinessesandrealestateclients
Analyzed numerous real estate deals utilizing Excel and Argus
11
Arranged and secured financing from numerous sources including Piper Capital Fleet Financial Freddie Mac LehmanBrothersNomuraSecuritiesMorganStanleyEquitableCenturyFortisandAmericanGeneral
WALT DISNEY COMPANY Fortune 32 Orlando FL 5 89 9 93
Project Manager
Managed the feasibility strategic planning facility design operations programming and business development fornewlyconceptualizedlOOMannualrevenueDisneyprojectDisneyInstitutePlannedanddesignedtheresourcestructureandstaffingsalesmarketingfinancesystemsandhumanresourcedepartments
Project Coordinator 1991 1992
Managed and worked with 20 member design and consulting team created program assembled investment budgetsexecutedcontractdocumentsanddevelopedprojectproformaincludingoperatingandleasedbusinessesfor200McapitalretailrestaurantentertainmentandlodgingfestivalmarketplaceDisneysBoardwalk
Project Financial Operational Analyst 1989 1991
Evaluated leases deal structures budgets design documents for Disney s Crossroads ofLake Buena VistaCreatedfinancialvaluationmodelforDisneyDepartmentStoreofDisneysCelebrationMallEvaluatedeconomicscenariosformultipleEuroDisneyvenues
Education
Master of Business Administration MBA 1990
Indiana University Bloomington IN Concentration in Finance and General ManagementBachelorofScienceBSBinBusiness1985
Carlson School of Business University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN
12
p
z
z
o
E
iZl
g5
CI
p
p
o
iZl
iZl
o
u
o
C3
en
s
6o
u
2
ro
0
Cl
Cl
ro
Q
Cl
6
ro
Z
Cl
c
o
01
C
0
l
o
o0
en
l
cr
c
3 2
Cl en
0
en 66c0
u
Cl
c
o
01
0
0ro
l
8
en
o
en
ro
Cl
l
3 c
o 2
Cl en
6
ro 6c0
U
Cl
Cl
Cl
en
8
l
c
Clenl
6 B
2
0 Cl
Ocl5
en
01 en
en
0 ro
Cl c
5 a
c
u
01
ro
c 3
en
2
l
6
6
o
u
Cl
c
Cl
l
ro
Cl
Q
o
l Qoen
en
o ro
Otn
Cl
ro
c
01
T
C
ro
3
u
ro
0
l
o
ro
en
Cl
l
c
01 l
0
0
ro
0
ro Cl
0 8
Cl
ro u
c 8
J
en
Cl
01
01
0
Cl c
c en
o
rob
Q 3
0 0
l o0
o en
0 8
Cl
ro u
c 8
0
c
en
Cl
o0
o
C3
en
s
6
o
u
Cl
c
Cl
Q
0
l
o
o0
ro
c
r
2
l
6
6
o
U
l
Cl
c
o
ro
c
0
Cl
0
l
o
00
c
en
2
ro
N
2ro
01l
o
tl ci
Cl 26
s
60 8u
Cl Cl
5 5
Cl
ClO OclroClt000
6sCl660
Cl ro u
0 lCl0lo
l 0 Cl
o l
en ro
0 0
Q s a
oo
0
g
Vl
I
r
t
5
o
s
E
o
o
E
2
s
0
on0
13
APPUCA110N FOR CHANHASSEN aTY COMMISSION Date 2 6G
COMMISSION DESIRED fL 4NN IN ALTERNATE PhI f S IR e c
City ofChanhassen 7700Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 5531 ECE VED
Name KG vIAl D It C N rES 9 2 07
Address p 7 I lit V t 75 WfC Y IRe L i CI1Y OF CHIINHIISSEN
Home Phone 47tOq31 WorkPhone q 351 537 CeUPhone 5 755 D3
Emoil Kr I t d rJ Srm C OIV No of Years in Chanhassen J 3
HighestLevelofEdllcotionAttained PusDegrees ifany m g A
Employment History Stateposition employer and brief description of duties
SS rJlo1b fQ cro e Of rvz r rl rJG 51 r U lg YVUD felL
CJY E LE dJU2SH I P FJf A1l h1 fCKE 7 6 ACt V TrgS
Pff2 TH2 AT IAL F Bf2 IL tPriIOrJ p V OrJ
Activities andAffiliations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received ifany
I f ul effJ l J AtSO VE CfJ HE l tJ4lVce CauNC L
FrJ1e fiE dr y C Ii 2 A P Me ISf CAT DL C c Hv f C H r
CZO F tC ArE N r t C l ND l ADutT
S lG ACt f O Aw 1 Y1AR rlN6
L Rr t ri1tJ Ae @ S1 u DE VIUb lt L
ReasonsforSeeki1 gthisPositWn I anol VL
40 r
hi
O A 1n L JV
l OI
e 6RL I r OAA
Spedfic Qualifications for the Position
eup oA ofo
J
ol212 s
S4v OVta
A r10J
SI A
14
F
O
ouJf2J
A tn
I r
k
T
4 0
V
MA
15
Ei
00
o
z
o
u
00
Q
IIEizc
bJ
zo IItijll
00
o
u
z
tIl
eo
0 cf
5 5
5o0
5u
eo tIlo
CJltll
ll tIl
a
0 eo
05
s
S
o 0
u
a
a
ll
io 0
u
eo
o
u
0Cl
bb
0
p
1
1
ctIl
00
C
0
U
tIl
1
tIl l
1l150
S
1 0
OS 0Ci
tIl
Os10
0 u
1 S S0l
S l 0 0
g u u
l Sl tIluE050l
o Cl 8 811
1 p
1 Q
o ol Os
ClCI8EQE6
5
ll
eo
tlc
tIl
a eo
eo c
u
I1
0
S
l
u
5 tIl 5
eo
Z Cl 10
S u c S05l10Z000 cQlCIi11OsuQtIlEECIi9Scl
l 0 0u2c0c1pEUE
16
City ofChanhassen 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen MN 55317
Date 3Idol l
I oJ
RA J
APPLICATION FOR CHAl I iASSEN CITY COMMISSION
COMMISSION DESIRED PfJ IL 9 ALTERNATE
Name J Ac c SJ 2 ALe
Address L I lPLecuooeRR Ace C 01 A
95 2 d
Home Phone I 63 JL Work Phone 9 Ir60 No of Years in Chanhassen
Highest Level of Education Attained Plus Degrees ifany b S cCJL
Employment History State position employer and brief description of duties
JJ0vll nC2l C IJISc A SeLF Eh OL67f2 0 L OCVJ
9 2 tr i fl z Tr Ccm OI 1 AU CeY cAn
IJeS 9 L A70U
Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received ifany
I co1 S c r CuA 7 OM 6 L 8 7 elA
Ceiv C 7 e1
OJ
2 L c Y V4i dc 1J l 6 Jc oV OI OfJO A
CCO PIlA 1 e
I Yc J S ecflAL V OJIAJ q 9 C h IvIv C lc
Reasonsfor Seeking this Position
VCCL e CeI
fl 4cPLA AJA0
Gu 0 Z L I C e 7Ci
Y7 7 Y1Ab
S0 A
A JL AO 1
Specific Qualifications for the Position
J25 AC J CJGtAJ G6eJJ cuz OeQV 2
er A L Ae Lj 01 e J2 O9AT o C YAA A lJL7Aesr51cuhSoJLAJscJVj
REeElVED
MAR 21 l001
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
17
z
zo
CI
CI
o
CI
CI
E
E
o
U
I
S
S
s
o
U
I
o
ro
u
Q
ct6
1a
0
Q
@
CI
u
ro
Q
S
ro
Z
Q
c
o
OI
I
1
D
j
o
o
0
@
j
01
@ I
13 S
Q
0
s
ro Ec0
U
Q
c
o
OI
I
a
0ro
lo
c8
I
o
ro
Q
lo
ti 1
o I
S
Q
1a S
ro Ec0
U
N
Q
Q
c8
j
I
E j
2
D Q
Oclo
1
5
OI
D ro
Q c
5 8
Q c
loU
OI
ro
c u
2
j
S
S
o
u
Q
c
ro
Q
d 1D
j
o
o
ro
Oti
Q
ro
c
OI
lo
ro
3
u
ro
0
j
o
Q
lo
ro
Q
j
1
0I j
I 0
D
I ro
1 0
ro Q
aE
Q
ro u
c 8
Ir
Q
OI
OI
0
Q 1
c 5
D
ro
Q
Q I
lodj
D 0
j 00
o0 E
Q
ro u
c
8
10
1
Q
o
0
I
o
w
s
s
o
U
Q
c
Q
Q
D
j
o
o
0
ro
c
r
2
j
S
E
o
U
lo
Q
c
o
ro
c
0
Q
0
j
o
00
1
I
o
ro
N
2
ro
OI
lo
o
i I
Q SS
S 1SSEoco
uUc
Q Q
E 5
tI OJ
0
lo
Q tODo
I E 40
s Q ES0
Q ro u
0 jIQ0jD
j 0 Q
o lo
ro
0 O
Cl s 8
g
0
a
c
c
OJ
l
0
OJ
OJ5
c1
o
u
g
c
Ej
0
biJ0
18
00
z
o
u
00
Z 0
lZIIocooet00
o
u
Z
o
u
23
0
Eo
cu
5
cu 5
5
o 06u
0
cu
I J
tl
0
cu 0
5
5
5o 0u
ecuS1
o 0U
eo
o
S
tl cu
cu tIl
tIl
r
J
r
cuU
cu E53
uZI
Q
N
os
U
uro
I
s
8
CI
o
ro
E
I
I
s
o
ro
S
oo 0ss
u
u
o
q
u
od
0
s
CI
OJ
I
01o
u
CI
u
00
s
u
ro
E
0
I
I
I
Sl
CI
CI
s
s
o
3
CI
E
8
I
Os
0
ro
o
I
CI
Iro
r
CI
oa
I
Cl
19
APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COMMISSION
COMMISSION DESIRED Se n i r mh1l 5S ItALTERNATE
Date cR 0 7
City ofChanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317
Name CUrl b Yls6YL
Address O 0 uJ I
77 Sf
qsJ
HomePhone 93P o J Work Phone
9s
CellPhone S 6b9
Email furrfn tt YLro h @fbl eo J1t No of Years in Chanhassen 3lf
Highest Level ofEducation Atoined Plus Degrees ifany B lLcJeJDrs p e Ilusi he
Employment History State osition employer and brief description of duties
coo Cc M
y i llll 5 a ccbu2 L m a l18 e11 ekrd LLI ies fe
D YetLctrver Co r Ve e Vo fx jT nc
Activities and Affiliations Indude elective offices honors and recognitions received if any
Cu rrel1TmewLher Ch n Senior oi11 mi5S o h Seexr Ie 4pplli1fJrI
mem he r 7 ja VI L D h s e ub R JreSLl rCr
P6S J11F yYl be 1 oh n Rec d mm S5itJ Yla e L T1td d
Reasonsfor Seeking this Position
eu r reh11j D tie C5 en 1 G1J rr1 is5 jto h fenJ OQ f
Specific Qualifications for the Position
Pasr Senior CDm rn 1 5 iDYl ereyiel1 c e
Uud V
SIGNATURE
20
z
zo
CI
CI
o
CI
CI
o
u
s
o
j
Cfl
S
s
o
U
10
o
2
CI
CI
s
o
Cfl
s
E
o
t
3
U
CI
S
ro
Z
CI
s
o
0
s
C
0
3
o
o0
Cfl
@
3
0C
@ s
0u
CI Cfl
0
s
ro Ss0
u
CI
s
o
0
s
a
0ro
10
8
Cfl
s
o
Cfl
ro
S C
o s
2
CI Cfl
s
ro Ss0
u
Cl
CI
CI
Cfl
8
3
C
CI
Cfl 10
S B
2
0 CI
8s
0 s
Cfl
CI sOCI
O Cfl
Cfl
0 ro
CI s
s sro
CI s
IoU
ro 0
s
s u
Cfl
2
3
S
S
o
u
CI
s
ro
CI
Q C0Cfl
3
o
Cfl
o ro
Oti
CI
ro
s ro
t
i
ro
3
u
ro
0
3
o
ro
Cfl
CI
3
i2 C
3
s 0
s
s O
ro CI
aE
CI
ro u
s s
B
Vl
Cfl
CI
0
0
E
CI C
s Cfl
S
o
rofo
Q
s
Q S
0 0
3 00
o Cfl
0 E
CI
ro u
s sB
0
C
Cfl
CI
o0
s
2
Cfl
Cfl
S
So
U
CI
s
CI
Q
0
3
o
o0
ro
s
r
2
3
S
S
o
U
10
CI
s
o
s
ro
s
0
CI
0
5
3
o
00
C
Cfl
s
2
ro
N
2
ro
010
o
ds0CI
S i2
S
S 0 Bu
CI CI
5 5
CI
Cl oos10ro
CI t000
s S 4
s CI SS0
CI ro u
0 CI 3s03
3 0 CI
o 10
Cfl ro
0 O
Cl s
g
oj
03
c
c
g
Vl
OJ
0
OJ
OJ
5
c1
o
u
E
c
s
J
bll0
21
t
rrJ
Z
o
U
rrJ
Q
II
z
tZII
Olll
rrJ
o
u
o
Z
rrJ
I Is
oEo
SflJ
S
flJ S
S
0 0
6u
o flJ
flJ
0
0 flJ
o
flJ 0s
S
So 0
u
S
ll
io 0u
0
5
0 flJ
flJ
eu
2
eu
Cl
u
l1l
D
8
flJ 1Su
S CIleuZ
l1l00Il0
CIlCIlDa010al0
a
C 0tCIll
c CIl1
U UU
g
tl
2
1l
5l
OJ
c
Co
5
c
Vl
s
e
o
E
2d
s
tl
3
o
22
23
24
25
INVITATION TO EASTER EGG CANDY HUNT
With springtime here the City of Chanhassen in cooperation with
our local business community is proud to announce the second
event in our year round special event series The event The
Easter Egg Candy Hunt will be held on Saturday April 7th At
this time I invite all area residents their families and friends to
join me at the Chanhassen Recreation Center for this event The
event will begin at 9 00 AM starting off with children s musical
entertainment performed by J Shawn Sweeney Immediately to
follow will be the Easter Egg Candy Hunt divided into three age
groups Each age group will search for a GOLDEN EGG with
the locater of the egg receiving a prize I also invite children ages
4 12 to participate in the annual coloring contest Prizes will be
awarded to the winner in each category Coloring contest entry
forms may be picked up and dropped off at City Hall or the
Chanhassen Recreation Center or may be found on the city
website This event has a minimal registration fee of 3 for
participants ages 18 months 12 years and pre registration can
also be done at City Hall or the Chanhassen Recreation Center I
look forward to seeing everyone there
c
o
26
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
MARCH 12, 2007
Mayor Furlong called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman
Ernst, Councilwoman Tjornhom, and Councilman Peterson
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd
Hoffman, Jerry Ruegemer, and City Attorney Roger Knutson.
OTHERS PRESENT: Glenn Stolar, Chair of the Park & Recreation Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS: The City Council interviewed the following
people for positions on the Planning Commission: Jerry McDonald, Philip DeNucci, Thomas
Koehnen, and Corey Bergman.
CONTINUE DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE CONCERNING
WATER RESOURCES: Staff provided a summary of the proposed wetland ordinance,
including the revised wetland classification system based on the Minnesota Routine Assessment
Method (MnRAM), version 3.0. Staff also reviewed the proposed wetland buffer and setback
requirements, as well as the examples of how the proposed requirements could be applied to
existing structures. Council recommended an additional wetland classification category with the
highest level of protection be developed for any wetlands that are considered exceptional.
Council directed staff to prepare recommended buffer width ranges for each wetland
classification category and bring the proposed ordinance revision before the City Council for
consideration and further discussion.
Mayor Furlong recessed the work session at 7:00 p.m. The work session was reconvened at
8:15 p.m.
LAKE ANN PARK SHELTER AND BALL FIELD LIGHTING: PROJECT SCOPE AND
BUDGET AMENDMENTS: Park and Recreation Chair Glenn Stolar, Recreation
Superintendent Jerry Ruegemer, and Park and Recreation Director Todd Hoffman were present
to discuss proposed changes in the project scope and budgets for the Lake Ann Park shelter and
ball field lighting projects. Director Hoffman presented an overview of both projects to the City
Council. The lighting project is proposed to expand from two fields to four with the project
budget increasing from $150,000 to $400,000. The group shelter project is proposed to increase
from $90,000 to $175,000. Staff distributed a number of documents supporting the proposed
amendments including a site map, ball field scheduling spreadsheet, and group reservation
facility use spreadsheet. Commission Chair Stolar and Recreation Superintendent Ruegemer
presented their reasons for supporting the newly proposed level of investment in these two
projects. As a growing community, the city’s ability to keep up with the demand on recreation
facilities is continually being stretched. These projects add additional carrying capacity in our
system without the need to acquire and develop new parklands. Council members presented
27
City Council Work Session Minutes
March 12, 2007
Page 2
their viewpoints on the projects and on the proposed changes in scope and budget. Staff
responded to questions from the Council, often referring to the supporting documents that had
been distributed. Both these projects are being funded through proceeds deposited in the city’s
park dedication fund. This portion of the work session concluded with the City Council
supporting the proposed changes and new budget amounts for both projects.
Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
28
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
MARCH 12, 2007
Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.. The meeting was opened with the
Pledge to the Flag.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman
Ernst, Councilwoman Tjornhom, and Councilman Peterson
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd
Hoffman, and City Attorney Roger Knutson.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to
approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's
recommendation:
a. Approval of Minutes:
-City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 26, 2007
-City Council Summary & Verbatim Minutes dated February 26, 2007
Receive Commission Minutes:
-Park and Recreation Commission Summary & Verbatim Minutes dated February 27,
2007
b. Award of Bid, Performance Stage, City Center Park.
c. Resolution #2007-18: TH 101 Watermain Improvement Project 07-07: Accept Bids and
Award Contract.
d. Resolution #2007-19: 2007 Sealcoat Project 07-04: Accept Bids and Award Contract.
f. Accept Donation from General Mills for Safety Camp.
g. Southwest Metro Transit: Approval of Joint Powers Agreement.
h. Approval of 2007 Fourth of July Fireworks Contract.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None.
29
City Council Summary - March 12, 2007
TANADOONA DRIVE/DOGWOOD ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 06-06:
PUBLIC HEARING AND AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
Public Present:
Name Address
Deanna Brandt 7570 Dogwood Road
Paul Oehme introduced Jon Horn with Kimley-Horn and Associates who presented the proposed
improvements, estimated costs, proposed financing plan and assessments for the project. Mayor
Furlong opened the public hearing. Deanna Brandt, 7570 Dogwood Road, Excelsior asked one
last time to reduce the roadway width to 24 or 26 foot. Mayor Furlong closed the public hearing.
Paul Oehme commented on the issues of elevation change, right-of-way width, and on street
parking. The council asked about the possibility of future subdivision in the area, the numbers
of lots that would be accessing onto Dogwood Road and discussed the different roadway widths
being recommended by staff.
Resolution #2007-20: Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded
that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and
specifications for Tanadoona Drive/Dogwood Road Reconstruction Project #06-06. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Todd Gerhardt provided an update on snow
removal with the last snowfall and thanked Kate Aanenson for the great job she did representing
the City of Chanhassen in speaking at the Sensible Land Use Coalition.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None.
Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to adjourn the meeting. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council
meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m..
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
2
30
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 12, 2007
Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.. The meeting was opened with the
Pledge to the Flag.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman
Ernst, Councilwoman Tjornhom, and Councilman Peterson
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd
Hoffman, and City Attorney Roger Knutson.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Mayor Furlong: Thank you and welcome to those here in the council chambers this evening and
those watching at home as well. We're glad that you joined us. At this time I would ask
members of the council if there are any modifications or additions to the agenda that was
distributed. If not, without objection we'll proceed with the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to
approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager's
recommendation:
a. Approval of Minutes:
-City Council Work Session Minutes dated February 26, 2007
-City Council Summary & Verbatim Minutes dated February 26, 2007
Receive Commission Minutes:
-Park and Recreation Commission Summary & Verbatim Minutes dated February 27,
2007
b. Award of Bid, Performance Stage, City Center Park.
c. Resolution #2007-18: TH 101 Watermain Improvement Project 07-07: Accept Bids and
Award Contract.
d. Resolution #2007-19: 2007 Sealcoat Project 07-04: Accept Bids and Award Contract.
f. Accept Donation from General Mills for Safety Camp.
g. Southwest Metro Transit: Approval of Joint Powers Agreement.
h. Approval of 2007 Fourth of July Fireworks Contract.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
31
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS:
Deanna Brandt: I'm Deanna Brandt. 7570 Dogwood Road. Excelsior.
Mayor Furlong: Are you here to talk about that project?
Deanna Brandt: I'm here to talk about this project. This is the Dogwood Road project.
Mayor Furlong: Okay. Well, we're at visitor presentations. That will be the next item on our
agenda so if we could wait and hold your comments so they're consistent with the presentation.
Very good. So if anybody is interested in talking about something other than the Dogwood Road
project, we'll pick that up and there will be a public hearing so everybody will have an
opportunity to talk. Okay, we'll move on now.
TANADOONA DRIVE/DOGWOOD ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 06-06:
PUBLIC HEARING AND AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
Public Present:
Name Address
Deanna Brandt 7570 Dogwood Road
Paul Oehme: Thank you Mayor, City Council members. Staff has been working on this, on the
Dogwood Road/Tanadoona project for over a year now with the property owners in this area.
Staff feels that the feasibility report that has been drafted for the project is fair and equitable to
the benefiting property owners in this area and the project is feasible and necessary and cost
effective as well. At this time I'd like to invite Jon Horn with Kimley-Horn and Associates to
give a brief presentation on the project and after the presentation we'd request that if there's any
questions arise by the council, be more than happy to answer at that time. And we also request
that a public hearing be opened after that. So at this time.
Jon Horn: Mayor and council good evening. My name is Jon Horn. I'm Kimley-Horn and
Associates. As Mr. Oehme mentioned, we've been working with him for about the last year
developing the Dogwood Road improvements project and just wanted to take a brief minute
tonight to walk you through the project. Talk a little bit about the proposed improvements, the
estimated costs, the proposed financing plan and we'll touch some, a little bit on the assessments
for the project. To review the project is the reconstruction of Tanadoona Drive and Dogwood at
this location. Basically in the northwest corner of the Highway 41 and Highway 5 intersection.
The purpose of the project is really to serve the existing properties in the area, as well as to meet
the needs of the proposed 19 lot residential subdivision in the Arbors development. The existing
roadways in the area are minimal. About 17 feet wide. They're constructed with millings and
aggregate base. It's a maintenance issue for city staff. There's also limited sanitary sewer service
in the area, and no water service in the area, so that's really the purpose for the project and what
we're trying to accomplish by this improvement project. A little larger view of the proposed
2
32
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
improvement project. In yellow it shows the reconstruction of the roadway. Highway 41 is over
in this location. It really takes Tanadoona Drive from it's current end at about this location.
Extend it to the west and then extends Dogwood Road down to the south. This is the proposed
area of the Arbors development at that location. And again improvements are reconstruction of
the roadway. Construction of some storm water improvements as well as sanitary sewer and
watermain. Just walk you through some of the key design issues for the project. The nature of
this area is very much environmental. A lot of trees. Lake Minnewashta's right there. It's a very
difficult area to try to squeeze a roadway into just because of the nature of the project area. One
of the key challenges that we've working through on this project is how best to fit that roadway
through the location. Also do we construct a rural section roadway with ditches or do we
construct an urban section with curb and gutter, which is the city standards and we looked at
those, that issue. We also looked at the issue of how wide should this roadway be. City standard
roadway width is 31 feet for new developments. Because of the nature of the roadway, of the
project area, we looked at a narrower roadway width. 24 to 26 feet wide as a part of the
development project. Right-of-way acquisition is an issue. There's not adequate right-of-way in
the area to build the proposed improvements. We need to acquire right-of-way through this area,
through the Peterson Trust property to allow the roadway improvements to occur. Also from the
Westwood Church property at this location. As well as an easement for a stormwater pond on
the Camp Tanadoona property. All those right-of-way acquisitions are in various stages of
progress. Appraisals have been done. Staff has had initial conversation with those property
owners in terms of what the value of that land is and how best to acquire that land. However
until the project is authorized to proceed forward tonight, maybe that's kind of the next step in
the acquisition of those easements. There are some issues with the trust property. The Peterson
Trust property in terms of screening. Some concerns about the widening of the roadway
improvements, eliminating some of their existing buffer between the roadway and their home,
and that has been one of the issues that we've been working through as a part of development
project. Stormwater detention treatment is also an issue just because of the fact that Lake
Minnewashta's right there. Apparently today there's really no means of stormwater treatment as
a part of this project. We've been looking for ways to try to treat that stormwater prior to it's
discharge to the lake. And then the sanitary sewer and watermain, as I mentioned, is an issue.
There's currently 3 properties in this location that have sanitary sewer service. Otherwise
nobody else does. They're operating off of individual septic systems, and again environmental
issues associated with the close proximity to the lake. There's also no watermain in this area. So
no service and no fire protection for the project area. Briefly talk through the two design options
that are presented in the feasibility report. As I mentioned we looked at both a rural section
roadway as well as an urban section roadway. One option is to reconstruct Tanadoona Drive up
to the location of the proposed development to a 24 foot width with ditches. And then the
construction of this piece of Dogwood to a 31 foot width with curb and gutter. So that's really
the first option that we looked at. Second option was all curb and gutter along the entire
roadway segment, 26 feet wide through this area and 31 feet wide through that area. A couple
benefits of the storm sewer system and the curb and gutter. …for a little longer roadway life is
that curb and gutter protects the edges of the roadway. Provides for a better means to collect and
treat the stormwater. And really it's consistent with city standards. The city tries to build urban
section roadways with curb and gutter whenever possible, so from a staff perspective we're
recommending that the roadway be constructed with curb and gutter to an urban section
roadway. There's been a lot of discussion about what happens with this segment of Dogwood
3
33
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Road. As I mentioned, an overlay be constructed to a 31 foot width. I know a number of the
property owners in the area would prefer to see that constructed to a narrower width, maybe 26
feet wide instead of 31. We're proposing a 31 foot width for a couple of reasons. One, it does
provide parking on both sides. We would not be able to maintain parking on both sides for a 26
foot width. You also notice that the roadway through this area is really getting pulled further to
the east. We're opening up quite a bit of space, existing right-of-way to the west side of the
roadway so it really does provide more of a buffer from those existing properties on the west side
of the roadway. We're proposing a 31 foot width through this area. Cost wise. Got a summary
of the proposed costs for the project. We're presenting costs for both options. Option 1 is a rural
section option. Option 2 is an urban section roadway with curb and gutter. Shows that the total
project cost for the option without curb and gutter is a little over $2.1 million dollars. With curb
and gutter it's a little over $2.3, so it's a little more expensive to build the curb and gutter. Really
just the cost for the curb and gutter and the storm sewer itself. Sanitary sewer and watermain
improvements are the same for both options. In terms of financing how the project is proposed
to be funded. A majority of the project costs proposed to be funded through assessments to
benefiting property owners, depending upon the option. A little over $1.5 million dollars will be
funded with assessments. Some of the project costs will be funded through the city's revolving
assessment fund. Depending upon the option a little over $400,000. And then the storm
drainage improvements, a majority of those are proposed to be funded through the city's
stormwater utility fund, and that's really the biggest difference between Option 1 and Option 2.
Just because Option 2 has that additional storm sewer. It's a little more expensive for the storm
water utility fund. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 250 to 365, depending upon the option
that's constructed. Briefly walk you through the proposed assessment methodology. This exhibit
basically shows all the properties within the project area. Again in yellow is the proposed
roadway improvements. There's a segment of the project area that's proposed to be assessed.
The lighter brown color would be assessed 100% for the cost of the roadway improvements.
Basically consistent with development policy. Developments typically pay for 100% of the cost
of the roadway. The existing properties that are shown in brown would be assessed at a 40%
rate, which again is consistent with the city's assessment policy for reconstruction of existing
streets, so just to kind of walk you through how we calculated the proposed assessments for the
streets. Maybe zoom in a little bit on that. The overall costs to be assessed is a little over a
million dollars. There's 44 properties in the project area that would be assessed. 18 would be
assessed at the 100% rate. Those are the new development properties. 26 at the 40% rate.
Those properties would be assessed at the 100% rate would be assessed for a little over $23,000
per unit. Those properties that are assessed at the 40% rate, a little over $9,400 a unit. The other
60% in reconstruction area would be funded by the city through that revolving assessment fund.
A little bit about the watermain assessments. Again yellow shows the roadway. Blue shows all
the properties that would be assessed for watermain. The light blue, the Westwood Church
property has already been assessed for watermain improvements. As a part of this project they
would only be assessed for the cost of the services that would get extended to their property.
The remainder of the dark blue area would get assessed 100% of the watermain costs. Just to
walk you through that. The estimated costs for the watermain is a little over $260,000. The
entire cost of which would be assessed. Four units would get assessed only the cost of the
services. The remaining 4 units would get assessed for the cost of the watermain at about $6,400
a unit for watermain assessments. And then the last but not least is sanitary sewer. Similar
exercise. Again in the green, light green shows the areas that would get assessed 100% of the
4
34
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
cost of the sanitary sewer. Westwood Church is also, already paid some sanitary sewer
assessments. They would only pay for the service costs. The remainder of the properties would
pay for 100% of the sanitary sewer costs. These 3 properties that are not in color have already
paid sanitary sewer assessments. They have existing lift station that provides for their needs.
They would not be assessed as a part of this project. And similar to the watermain, just walk you
through those numbers. A little over $474,000 would get assessed. Four units would pay a
service. The other 37 would pay for the rest of the project costs at a little over $12,600 per unit
for that. And the feasibility report does include a detailed assessment roll, identifying the
assessment amounts for all individual properties within the project area. And then very quickly
just to mention the proposed schedule for the project. Tonight's the public hearing and to
authorize preparation of plans and specifications. We would hope to approve the plans and specs
on March 26th. If council wants to proceed forward, we'd then have a bid opening in late April.
Award a contract and assessment hearing in late May. The construction start in June and the
project because of it's size would take a majority of 2007 for construction. We'd have
construction complete in August of, October. I'm sorry, of 2007. So that's really kind of a brief
overview of the project. Proposed improvements. The cost. The funding and the schedule. I
guess with that I'll open it up to any council questions.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for staff. At this point. Nothing at this time? Okay.
Very good. Then at this time we will open up the public hearing and invite interested parties to
come forward and address the council with their opinions or have questions that they might have
answered by staff.
Deanna Brandt: I'm Deanna Brandt, 7570 Dogwood Road, Excelsior. Just wanted to hand
this… Mr. Mayor and City Council members and city staff. I just wanted to do my last pitch
and effort in regards to the width of Dogwood Road. The green line on your map shows the
proposed Dogwood Road at a 24 or 26 with curb and gutter, foot width. And the orange part
shows the segment that would be, that is proposed currently to be 31 foot wide. Paul explained
to me thoroughly that the reason for the orange part to be 31 foot wide is because that's the city's
rules and guidelines to be within new development. On the second piece of paper I've got the
reasons to keep the proposed, and I suppose nobody can see that one. Reasons to keep the
proposed Dogwood Road a consistent 24 foot wide or 26 foot wide with curb and gutter.
Whatever it's ended up being. Now referring to the paved portion, not the portion that's all
cleared out but we understand that in some of the areas, on both sides of the paved section it may
vary in width due to utility issues. So direct discussion with Chanhassen's consultant at Kimley-
Horn. I forgot the gentleman's name that I talked to there. Was his name Pat? Jed. Jed, that's
how it was. Verified that there are no elevation issues that would make the 31 foot wide road
necessary. That was a potential issue that came up last time, that the elevation in that specific
section might warrant a wider road and since I don't know anything about elevations, I talked to
Jed and he said, no. There are none. Number 2. Developer, Carlson Custom Homes said that
for the 3 new homes to be built on Dogwood Road they would give up their on street parking, so
they do have 3 homes proposed to be on Dogwood Road. And then as verified in the meeting for
the pre-plat of this development Paul stated that the Fire Marshal verified that the 24 foot wide
road is safe. The minimum width he would like to see. My point there is that the 24 foot wide is
safe for the rest of Dogwood. Why isn't it safe for that little section? Allyson has in her
possession a signed petition from all of the owners on Dogwood Road stating that we do desire a
5
35
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
single road width all the way through to the West 78th Street extension. The homeowners have
never had on street parking. That was, you just don't when some places there's, it's only about
one car width, and we've creatively dealt with several wedding receptions, parties, using shuttles.
We've talked to neighbors. We get to park in their driveways. We kind of pull together on that.
We've always dealt with it. The proposed 31 foot wide section is only bordered by new
development on the east side. On the west side it's old property. Existing property. So only half
of it, it's not completely contained within the development. We are trying to maintain the
Dogwood Road experience that, I love it that Kate said that so many years ago when we were
first looking at this, and even a small savings in mature trees is beneficial. Even if it's you know
1 or 2. I believe Allyson brought up to me that they were kind of looking and she said you
know, maybe just a few, a small handful of trees would be saved if we went from a 31 to a 26 or
24. You know we'll take the mature trees. As long as you know it's safe. According to the Fire
Marshal. It's navigable. We all want it this way. Only half of it's in the new development so I'll
just, I'll leave it up to you guys to make your decisions.
Mayor Furlong: Okay, very good. Thank you.
Deanna Brandt: Thank you.
Mayor Furlong: Anyone else who would like to address the council on this matter? No? Okay.
This has been a public hearing so if anybody else is interested in commenting to the council, this
is your time. Otherwise without objection we'll close the public hearing and bring it back to
council. I guess the first question I would have Mr. Oehme would be to perhaps comment on
some of the issues that Ms. Brandt brought up.
Paul Oehme: Sure. Thank you Mayor. The, just kind of run down the list of Mrs. Brandt's
outline here. The elevation change, number one, there is a slight elevation change. I believe it's
between 1 and 2 feet, but no significant elevation change in that area but the issue in terms of the
60 foot wide roadway width, right-of-way that is needed here is for constructability of the road
as it's laid out here. There's approximately, in the new development section it's highlighted in
orange here on her sheet. The sewer in that area is going to be approximately 20 feet deep. For
constructability issues and for safety issues, to construct the side slopes of the excavation for the
trench of the sewer has to be at least a 1 to 1 slope. You know dirt's going to be stack piled on
either side of the excavation as well. I mean for constructability purposes, more or less all those
trees in that corridor will have to be, have to come down. We had looked at potential savings of
trees in this corridor but you know in our estimation it's potentially there could be a couple trees
that will be saved but we don't really know until we get out there and have a contractor look at
how he wants to stage it and where he can put the dirt and how he wants to construct it. The
issue with on street parking, yes if the roadway is narrowed down to the preferred 26 foot road
that I think some of the property owners out here would like, the parking would be eliminated.
Especially in the new development area. It's always been City's, the City's been pretty consistent
in terms of where, when new developments are platted and new roadway areas, or new roads are
being constructed, we try to get 60 foot wide roadway widths there. Right-of-way roadway
widths have always been 31 foot wide, and the road is shifting from it's current location to the
east onto the development site. Thereby basically eliminating the existing right-of-way and that
right-of-way is currently platted out there would potentially be vacated back to the existing
6
36
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
property owners. Staff just feels that you know with the new plat that's coming in there, we
think it's kind of a detriment to the new property owners that would be out here purchasing these
lots, if we would limit the parking in this area, especially since the roads are, or the property is,
the houses where they would build are much closer to the road than existing properties because
there'd be less area for the new property owners to park on their property and just try to allow
them as much flexibility in terms of where they can park out here in the future as we can. So just
trying to be consistent with other projects that the City of Chanhassen has approved in the past.
For those reasons you know we are recommending the 31 foot wide road width in the
development area. We are, have some constraints with Dogwood Road north of here so we are
recommending the 26 foot wide urban section at that location, but we feel that the 31 foot wide
roadway width in this area is the, is our recommendation.
Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any questions for staff? Follow-up questions.
Councilman Peterson: Either for Kate or Paul. As you look at the larger lots, the Brandt's.
Scale of your lots. 15 and 16. How much of those lots are developable? I know there's some
wetlands in there. Can you give me a ballpark? I mean is it substantial? Potential subdivision in
there.
Kate Aanenson: 16 is the back of the church, Westwood Church property. They'll be sharing
their future master plan at the Planning Commission at their next meeting so I'm not sure if they
intend to put residential units back there or not. But 15 certainly can be subdivided.
Paul Oehme: And in the feasibility study we are offering Lot 15 four services that they
potentially can subdivide along the east side of Dogwood at that location, and likewise the
church property. We are stubbing out some services to that property as well for them to
subdivide in the future as well.
Councilman Peterson: So we could potentially, well we could potentially get dozens of more
homes depending upon, depending upon who and when they do it, if they do it. Right?
Kate Aanenson: That's correct. Well the goal is always to plan for the ultimate development and
that's what the feasibility study shows. Now whether the church would choose to do subdivision
or find some other use that would need a sewer connection. But it could be subdivided, both
pieces.
Councilman Peterson: Yeah.
Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any other questions?
Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah Kate. On Lot 16, when they come through, are they going to
have access to Dogwood?
Kate Aanenson: Not necessarily. You know it's steep back there. Right now the church doesn't
have plans to subdivide. But as we know, we always have to provide those opportunities if they
chose to sell it off. Certainly.
7
37
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Todd Gerhardt: I think to answer your question, I think half of that site, you know maybe a third
of it would access off of Dogwood. The other two-thirds could go through the Westwood
development where they have a driveway to the internal size of their lot.
Mayor Furlong: But there would be access from, or likely access from Lot 15 onto Dogwood?
Paul Oehme: Correct. Yep there would be. And depending on, if they would subdivide that,
how would it lay out. We don't know exactly how many direct accesses there would be. There
might be a public street off of that lot.
Mayor Furlong: And then also down on the southern, southwestern part or lower left corner of
this, from 14 towards the lake, there are 3, two lines. Three potential lots there, even though
that's a single one but that's obviously, that was part of the potential subdivision and the right-of-
way was dedicated to the east of that parcel as well.
Paul Oehme: That's correct, yeah.
Mayor Furlong: …with the Arbors a few weeks ago.
Paul Oehme: We, one of the requirements for the development was to plat a roadway to the
south property on there.
Mayor Furlong: Okay. Other questions? Councilman Litsey?
Councilman Litsey: Yeah, had a question. Potentially the scenario for Lots 15 and 16 could be
similar to Arbors development in the sense there could be some new development going in there,
right?
Kate Aanenson: Correct.
Councilman Litsey: And if that occurs, they'll be using the roadway that's now being proposed
to be reconstructed at 26? Potentially.
Paul Oehme: Potentially. We don't know exactly how it will lay out. 16 might come through
the church site so depending upon how many trips that would be generated back there, we
wouldn't allow full access depending upon how that develops.
Councilman Litsey: But 15 might be…
Paul Oehme: Yeah, and we looked at potentially how many future parcels would be back there
and between 4 and 5 maybe.
Councilman Litsey: So if we did the road the same for that 26 feet all the way through,
potentially it could be consistent with what's happening with the Arbors and the future
development, I mean in terms of how the road handles that? Does that make sense?
8
38
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Paul Oehme: Yes. We'd handled that development the same way with the Arbors.
Councilman Litsey: Except we wouldn't be going back on the newer developments so like Lot
15 to widen the road though, right?
Paul Oehme: Not necessarily, no. Depending upon what, how the, you wanted to develop that
piece of property.
Councilman Litsey: I guess what I'm getting at is because potentially at 26 feet throughout the
whole length of the roadway, that could be consistency with future projects.
Paul Oehme: Could be, yes.
Councilman Litsey: Okay.
Todd Gerhardt: …in neighborhoods like this, we always try to get to the city standard and some
of you've heard this in the existing neighborhoods that we've gone in and done reconstruction.
Koehnen and the older part of downtown, you know there was always the request to try to reduce
the size of the road and you know it plays into feeling safe as you drive out there. There may not
be a car parked out there but when 2 cars pass, you want to have a wider road. When you're
traveling 15-20 miles an hour, you know 24 feet, I'll use a parking stall as an example. Those are
typically 9 feet. And that gives you 18 if you use 2 parking stalls. You want a wider width than
that just to feel safe when you're passing somebody on the road. And then in the wintertime you
usually have snow along the curb or something like that so that will even narrow up your road,
like the last snowfall we had so you know. When we come in and redevelop these
neighborhoods, we try to get it to the city standard and in this case, the existing right-of-way, you
know trying to get a project that fits into our budget and the neighborhood's budget without
having to go in and buy existing right-of-way would have drove this project probably outside the
realm of seeing this project move ahead. So I think the 26 is something that we can live with.
Going less than that I think you're really getting into a situation where people are going to not
feel safe as they bypass somebody on the road.
Councilman Litsey: Thank you.
Mayor Furlong: Any other questions or discussion? Thoughts on the overall project. We've had
some questions on width in one section. Staff is recommending, well their recommendation's in
the staff report. It's also the issue between a rural and an urban roadway. Any comments on the
assessments or overall thoughts, comments?
Councilman Peterson: Mr. Mayor I think as far as the assessments, the numbers seem to play it
out reasonably and they pretty much parallel what we've done in the past, so that part I think is
really… I think the real issue is 24 versus 26. And as I listen and as I look, and what the
potential development, potential use and activity of that road might be, I guess I'd be biased,
even though I empathize greatly with the residents, we also are obliged to think about how many
more residents will be using that road, which will make it more difficult and more active and
9
39
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
more dangerous. The Fire Marshal has consistently said you know that the bigger the road, the
safer. There's always minimums but when we have an opportunity to make something safer,
we've also been obliged as a council to do that. So as far as my perspective on it, you know I
think that the 26 is going to be safer. I think it's going to meet the needs of the area better long
term than the 24. You know I'd like to be able to go less, but I can't really see a compelling
reason to do so. So you know, as far as the other issues, I think there really hasn't been a… on
any of other issues. I offer that as my respective opinion.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other comments.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor I have a question for Mr. Oehme.
Mayor Furlong: Sure.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: When we talk about safety and obviously speed in neighborhoods is
a safety issue we face in Chanhassen. Do you think it is safer to have a 24 foot road? Would
that slow cars down? Because it is a smaller area of surface to be driving on or is that not
exactly the way that these cars.
Paul Oehme: I don't think it's the exact way I would think about it. 31 foot roads give you more
opportunity for driving. For reacting to potential issues that may arise. Balls running in front of
your car or bikes. Bicycles on the road. I think the narrow road does give you a little bit more of
a channel effect. Maybe it does maybe feel like you should drive a little bit slower even though
people potentially wouldn't drive slow on a narrow roadway. You know this 31 foot road,
depending upon the topography of the area and the curves that are in the area, it can drive similar
to a narrower road, and especially in this area there is a hill. We have a steep curve at the north
end of Tanadoona. And then also a stop condition down at 78th Street and Dogwood so in terms
of speeding in this area, I don't think it's going to be an issue just because of the restraints in this
area. So based upon narrowing a roadway down, especially in this area, I don't think it's really
going to have any effect in terms of speeding or feeling of safety versus a 31 foot road. Does
that answer your question?
Councilwoman Tjornhom: And offhand do you know what the size is of Pleasant View Road
that goes along Lotus Lake?
Paul Oehme: Oh boy.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: That's a really narrow road too.
Paul Oehme: Yeah, that is very narrow. I do think it's down to 17 feet in some areas, especially
by, one of those curves that has a stop condition up there does neck down I think to 17 or 16 feet.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: When you meet other cars in certain spots.
Paul Oehme: Right. It's a dangerous little intersection out there, and there especially, I mean we
don't have no right-of-way to improve that area. There are houses right directly on that road and
10
40
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
we've struggled with what we can do there to improve that situation and to this point we really
haven't had any opportunities to improve that street so, we just don't want to limit ourselves with
new developments.
Todd Gerhardt: And that's one that we don't want to duplicate you know.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: Right.
Todd Gerhardt: We've got the opportunity here to enhance a situation from what it is today. Not
to meet our standards but also to find a project that is doable. I think we tried 4 or 5 times, you
know I think we had 4 or 5 feasibility studies that we've looked at in the past and we haven't
found a project that we could do. This time we have and so we just don't want to duplicate that
and try to make a situation better.
Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah I think that's where I'm coming from. Unfortunately there aren't
a lot of do over's in projects like this. Once the curb and gutter is in, it's kind of there for a long
time and you have the potential of a new development coming onto that road at some point and
putting that experience, which is wonderful for the neighborhood, onto other people who
probably don't want that experience for you know, they don't understand where they're coming
from. So I empathize with the neighbors wanting to keep their road and the trees, but at the same
time because of safety and because of just consistency of what we do do in this town, I think I
too am leaning towards the 26 foot roadway.
Councilwoman Ernst: Mr. Mayor, I just have one question. When we were talking about the 24
versus the 26. Was it 24 versus the 26 or the 26 versus a 31?
Paul Oehme: Yeah, I was going to clarify that.
Mayor Furlong: Yeah I think you should clarify that.
Paul Oehme: Yeah.
Councilman Litsey: That was going to be my question too.
Paul Oehme: Yeah, if you look on the map here. What staff is recommending, and it's in the
background, is a 26 foot wide roadway width along Dogwood and Tanadoona basically from the
north end of the development site. The project area here. We have limited right-of-way along
this section of roadway here. We're trying to maximize the roadway width in that area as much
as we can, but still keep in consideration the cost and the right-of-way constraints that we have
out here. In a new development area, which is shown here in orange, we are proposing to stick
to our 31 foot wide roadway width in the new development just being consistent with past
projects of our roadway width for the city in new developments. 78th Street will be 31 foot wide
road. The cul-de-sac in the new development is proposed to be 31 foot wide, and 78th Street is,
that is currently built is all 31 foot wide as well. And again, 31 foot is recommended in the
development. Because we do have the right-of-way and just being consistent with our standards.
11
41
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Councilwoman Ernst: So the proposal is to go 31 feet?
Paul Oehme: Correct. 31 foot in the orange here.
Councilwoman Ernst: In the orange.
Paul Oehme: And 26 along Dogwood out to Tanadoona in the rest of the project area.
Mayor Furlong: 26 foot curb and gutter.
Paul Oehme: With curb and gutter, correct. Yeah the curb and gutter, we're proposing that.
Again it's an urban section. It's our standard. We want to treat the water before it runs into
Minnewashta. There are two ponds that are proposed to be constructed. One in the development
site, co-located at the southern part of the development, and then we are working with Camp
Tanadoona in acquiring an additional easement on their property to construct another pond in the
northwest corner of the project site to treat the runoff from Dogwood and Tanadoona before it
runs into the lake. So we need the curb and gutter to direct the water into storm water pipes and
then into ponds. If we aren't able to acquire the property on Camp Tanadoona for a pond, we
would look at environmental manholes to at least capture some of the sediment before it runs
into the creek…
Councilwoman Ernst: Thank you for the clarification.
Councilman Litsey: Paul, a question on the, between the 24 and 26. You pick up an extra 2 feet
by putting in the curb?
Paul Oehme: That's basically it. It is just the curb. The curb.
Councilman Litsey: So the perception is a little larger roadway on 26, or at least curb and
gutter?
Paul Oehme: Yes. If we want, this drawing here shows the option 1 with the rural section from,
out along Tanadoona and Dogwood Road basically outside of the development site. If we went
with the 24 foot wide road, we'd basically have two 12 lanes, travel ways but we'd also need
about 12 feet of ditch section to capture that water to direct it into ditch sections into where we
want the water to go, so we're not really saving width or trees in this area if we went with the
rural section. It'd just be based upon, we still need to direct that water someplace. Away from
the roadway from the properties.
Councilman Litsey: But the 26, being it's curbed and guttered and has a way to channel the
water would not need such a large cut?
Paul Oehme: A little bit less of a cut, right. Here's the urban section road. This is the Option 2.
With the urban section. So basically we have, we still have about 13 foot wide roadway width
there. We don't have the ditch section anymore. The road, there's no ditch section again but to
build a road, there is some topography out here. There is a pretty substantial hill. Do we cut into
12
42
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
that roadway and grade back? Back of the curb to make the grades tie back into existing
topography so we are still serving some of the property out here. It's not shown. It's not, it's
probably not as extensive as with the ditch section but we still are you know, the footprint of the
road, the urban section versus a rural section is virtually the same.
Councilman Litsey: Thanks. That's all.
Mayor Furlong: Any other thoughts or comments?
Councilwoman Ernst: The only thing I would like to say really is that I too empathize and I
think if the scenario was that everything was going to be the same way that it is today, the same
people were going to be there, but I would have a tendency to lean that direction but based on the
fact that things aren't going to remain the same forever as they are today, so taking that into
consideration. We know that there's going to be new development coming in and not knowing
how the new neighbors would feel in that situation, I would lean more towards building to city
standards. 31 foot.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilman Litsey, thoughts.
Councilman Litsey: I guess where I'm troubled a little bit and I'm struggling with is there's some
future development that's going to probably…Lot 15, potentially 16 and they're going to expect
the 26 foot road to handle that. And it's really going to parallel what's going to happen with
Arbors. I understand you want to be consistent with standards but also maybe we need to be
consistent with road type and how long is that where you want to do the 31 feet? How long is
that section? Roughly how many feet is that?
Paul Oehme: 500 feet.
Councilman Litsey: So block and a half. City block and a half. 300 feet to a block. You know I
just think perhaps with consistency throughout that whole area that it makes more sense to stay
with the 26. I'm not in favor of the 24. I mean the rural. And I know how the neighbors, you're
accepting of the 26.
Deanna Brandt: Oh absolutely.
Councilman Litsey: I guess that's my thoughts.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you.
Todd Gerhardt: Mayor can I just add one point?
Mayor Furlong: Certainly.
Todd Gerhardt: Just for clarification. The reason we're able to put the 31 on the Arbors
development is that they've come in with a subdivision and when somebody comes in with a
subdivision the city has the authority to take excess right-of-way for city standard streets. When
13
43
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Lots 15 and 16 come in and subdivide, you would have the same capability and odds are we
would make it a recommendation to take excess right-of-way there for if and when Dogwood
should be reconstructed in 35-45 years from now, we could potentially upgrade that road to a 31.
You know that's something that we would consider as you go through but at the time of
subdivision is the time to take that excess right-of-way. So that's why staff is recommending 31
at this point, so I just wanted to make sure that everybody on the council understood that and
clarified that.
Councilman Litsey: Are we going to be faced with a situation if that happens though, we're
going to be going back and forth between 31 and 26 because you take it where the new
subdivision's going in but there's going to be existing property in there so are we going to be
alternating back and forth?
Todd Gerhardt: It will not be a clean you know reconstruction. It's something that the
neighborhood and the council would talk about. Those are things we talk about in some of our
older neighborhoods. Should we at that time make the road to city standard when they've also
used the 28 or 30 foot. So I'm just telling you that down the line you have the capability of
upgrading Dogwood to a 31 when and if they come in and subdivide and the time to do that
would be 35-40 years when Dogwood would come in for a reconstruction. Staff would look at
upgrading that 26 to a 31.
Councilwoman Ernst: So would it then be fair to say that we're calling this somewhat of a
compromise where we're making this 26 feet today to try and accommodate the existing
residents in that area and making this a 31 and eventually coming back and, depending on what
that looks like.
Mayor Furlong: I guess my reaction is, it's difficult to predict what's going to happen in 30 or 35
years. This road has been in need of reconstruction for a very long time and I think what I'm
hearing Mr. Gerhardt say is, is in the area of the Arbor development, because the city has a
standard roadway and we have right-of-way being granted to the city as a part of that plat, that
building, staff is recommending to build your standard road there. There's no restriction on not
building a standard road there. In the section to the north of that along Dogwood however there
are restrictions in terms of lack of existing right-of-way and so the ability to build a standard
road there is limited. That's your restricting factor in that section to the north. If, I don't want to
put words in your mouth. If there was complete right-of-way there, would you be
recommending a standard road? If the right-of-way existed.
Paul Oehme: I would, yeah.
Mayor Furlong: Okay. So that's kind of what I assumed because what I've been hearing here, in
reading the staff report is, where we have the opportunity to build a standard road without
restrictions, such as lack of right-of-way, staff is saying we should do that. For the other section
it is a compromise I guess on staff's part, to answer your question Councilwoman Ernst, with
regard to we lack right-of-way there. To acquire that right-of-way may make the project
economically unfeasible and so let's accommodate or get what we can here now and that's
upgrade a road that's in significant need of upgrading. Get the utilities. Get the water and sewer
14
44
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
in place. Get the curb and gutter in place so we can start doing some better management of
storm water in this area, both in terms of managing the quality of that storm water by working it
through the ponds, and the rate that that storm water falls off, so we get to do a lot of things, not
just for the residents but for the city and lake quality and anybody that has property on that lake,
you measure lake quality. The compromise here, I don't see as should we take the 31. Take an
area where we can put a standard road in and reduce that to a sub-standard road. The
compromise is on the city's part from staff's part saying, with all the other things that we could
get done here, to hold out for a standard road throughout the whole stretch isn't reasonable. That
by allowing a narrower road in that section to the north, that's workable given all the other good
things that are getting done, both for the residents along the road. For the public interest. For
even making it possible for this Arbor development to go in, and the economics of that through
the assessment as well. So I mean as I look at it and recognize the desires of the residents along
here, in terms of trying to balance everything out and looking at the information and thought for
reasoning that I saw in the staff report, I think going with staff's recommendation does make
sense. Is it perfect in everyone's mind? No. But now I'm going to back up to a comment made
by Mr. Gerhardt. This is the fourth or fifth time that something has tried to be done here and
we're that close to getting it done and I think if the only issue that we're dealing with is a section
of an orange marker this big on my map that says should it be 31 or 24 or, you know we've hit
the ball out of the park here and I think where we can meet city standards, we should do it for a
variety of reasons that exist with that. Where there is a restriction because of the right-of-way in
that section, staff's willingness to compromise to a narrower road, I think we should support that
as well. So those are my thoughts and gathering thoughts and so from my standpoint,
recognizing the comments made about a desire for something a little bit narrower in that section,
that we can do a city standard, I recognize the desire but I think where we can build a city
standard road for all the reasons that we do it everywhere else in the city and we should certainly
do that. Any other thoughts?
Councilman Litsey: Well I think the potential exists that we would come back and widen it just
to standards that are being recommended all along that roadway, then that does make some sense
but I just want to make sure that we would look at going back and doing that if the opportunity
came up. Otherwise it's going to go, it's going to be piecemeal.
Mayor Furlong: We have throughout the city, and this often happens that I've seen it and I'm
sure Ms. Aanenson you've seen it too where we have a new neighborhood being developed next
to an existing neighborhood. You have different street widths. We've got it all over the city and
there's a funneling action with the curb coming down. I know that we've seen that too and you
minimize that channel so you make it smooth. I mean it's not a step function, but we do that
throughout the city where we can, in exactly these types of situations where you have a newer
development coming in next to an existing. So this isn't unique in terms of the difference there.
Councilman Litsey: Yeah I just wanted to be clear in my mind that we would work towards
making it consistent all the way down to the next connection if we had the opportunity and you
helped me to make it clear so. Thank you.
Mayor Furlong: Sure. Any other comments? If not is there a motion?
15
45
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Councilman Peterson: Mr. Mayor I'd move that the City Project 06-06 wherein we adopt the
resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specs for the improvements.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you, is there a second?
Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second.
Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any discussion on the motion? Just confirm that motion's
consistent with staff's recommendation in the report Mr. Peterson?
Councilman Peterson: That's affirmative.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any discussion on the motion? If not we'll proceed with the vote.
Resolution #2007-20: Councilman Peterson moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded
that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and
specifications for Tanadoona Drive/Dogwood Road Reconstruction Project #06-06. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS:
Todd Gerhardt: For the big snow, I think our crews did a great job. You may have gotten a few
calls in neighborhoods where you had high traffic, where they compacted the snow and we didn't
get in there in a timely manner to get it up before everybody started to do their weekend errands
so, probably Chaparral neighborhood was one that I went out and investigated. I want to thank
Mike and his crews. They got the grader out and scraped off as much as they could as it warmed
up. The 20 degree weather early last week didn't help so, other than that I think the crews did a
great job. We had a truck that kind of tipped over in an area. Kind of went off on the soft part of
the road and tipped over but we got that back up and moving. That didn't help. That slowed
down a little bit of the snow removal. But other than that I think the crews did a great job. One
other thing I'd like to note, Kate spoke at the Sensible Land Use Coalition this past week, or two
weeks ago, and again representing the city. Talked about the 2005 MUSA area. Developments
along the 312, the process that we went through on that. Talked about the market study that we
did so again, thank you Kate for representing the city with those. We're trying to get the word
out that Chanhassen's on the map and Kate did a great job from the feedback I've got from
people that attended the Sensible Land Use Coalition so I wanted to thank her publicly on that.
That's all I have so a pretty quiet week.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for Mr. Gerhardt. Okay. Did you have one?
Councilwoman Ernst: Yeah I just had one quick comment. As far as the snow removal goes. I
have to say that Chanhassen was probably one of the better cities around because I know half the
people couldn't make it into work because they couldn't get out of their garages and into work so,
I could get into work and I can thank our crews for that.
16
46
City Council Meeting - March 12, 2007
Councilman Peterson: And you took the bus.
Councilwoman Ernst: Yes I did.
Mayor Furlong: Very good.
Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, the crews do a great job. I think that's one of the big perks that we give
back to the residents here. I think based on Paul's surveys I think neighboring communities, we
get our roads open a couple hours earlier than most and so, we have the luxury of doing that and
experienced drivers so, I think that's a great job on their behalf.
Councilman Litsey: You're taking away one excuse Todd to get to work.
Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Gerhardt? Seeing none, correspondence
packet.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None.
Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilman Litsey seconded to adjourn the meeting. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council
meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m..
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
17
47
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
MARCH 6, 2007
Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry McDonald, Kathleen Thomas, Kurt Papke, Kevin Dillon and
Debbie Larson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Dan Keefe
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior
Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer
PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS:
Thor Smith 2139 Boulder Road
Phil DeNucci 9186 Springfield Drive
Richard Simmons 530 Summerhill Drive
Corey Bergman 6791 Redwing Lane
Tom Koehnen 795 Ponderosa Drive
PUBLIC HEARING:
HEARTLAND BUILDING EXPANSION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 31,200
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE WAREHOUSE EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 101,600
SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH A VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY ZONED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 7975 CENTURY BOULEVARD
(LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK), MARTIN WOODY
ARCHITECTS, PLANNING CASE 07-05.
Public Present:
Name Address
Peter Kordonowy 810 Ramsey Avenue
Martin Woody 4048 Spruce Road
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Dillon asked staff to
elaborate on the safety concern with the windows. Commissioner Papke asked staff to explain
the 50% transparency requirement and the variance request. Chairman McDonald asked for
further clarification on the variance request. Peter Kordonowy, Summerhill Commercial Real
Estate, property manager for the building and representing Heartland America, provided
background information on the building and why they cannot meet the 50% transparency
requirement. Martin Woody, elaborated on the architectural detailing of the building and the
process of converting the knock out panels to windows. Chairman McDonald opened the public
48
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Chairman McDonald suggested the
Planning Commission revisit the ordinance requiring 50% transparency at a future meeting.
After commission comments and discussion, the following motion was made.
Papke moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve Planning Case 07-05 for a 31,200 square-foot office warehouse expansion to
an existing 101,600 square-foot building with a variance to permit only 10 percent building
transparency on the northern building elevation, plans prepared by Martin Woody
Architects, dated February 2, 2007, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping.
2. The developer shall incorporate a gathering space in the northeast corner of the site including
benches and or tables overlooking the natural areas to the east.
3. If the interior of the north end of the building is converted to offices, windows shall be
installed along that area of the building.
4. The developer shall extend a sidewalk from the building to the sidewalk on Water Tower
Place and include pedestrian ramps at all curbs.
5. The applicant shall have a minimum of 9 canopy trees, 23 understory trees and 23 shrubs
along Water Tower Place.
6. The applicant shall replace the evergreens located in the northwest parking lot peninsula with
overstory, deciduous trees.
7. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted before building permit issuance which specifies
size, quantity and species of proposed plantings.
8. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system.
9. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of
Minnesota.
10. Inlet protection shall be installed around all catch basins after installation and maintained
until final stabilization occurs.
11. The plans shall be revised to address issues that could arise as the result of run-on in the
northwest corner of the site.
12. Silt fences shall be installed with J-hooks to prevent runoff from running around the end of
the silt fences.
2
49
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
13. Until building construction begins, the rock construction entrance shall be 75 feet in length in
accordance with the City’s standard detail.
14. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round,
according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed
soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter
system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man
made systems that discharge to a surface water.
15. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street
sweeping as needed.
16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
(e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval.
17. Provide drainage area maps and calculations to ensure that they are the same as what was
previously accepted.
18. Provide rational method calculations for the storm sewer.
19. Ground (i.e. non-paved) surface grades shall not be less than 2%. Paved grades shall not be
less than 1%. Grades along curb line must not be less than .5%.
20. Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan.
21. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off-site grading.
22. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will
be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes.
23. Areas disturbed areas in City right of way must be sodded.
24. Show heavy duty and light duty pavement sections on the plans.
25. Access for tractor trailers shall be limited to 82nd Street.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
3
50
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
PUBLIC HEARING:
CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL: REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE
DISTRICT, A2 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD TO OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT, OI; SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR
A HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS INCLUDING AN APPROXIMATELY 406,000 SQUARE
FOOT, THREE STORY BUILDING, ATHLETIC FIELDS, CONCESSION BUILDING,
STADIUM, STORAGE/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOTS;
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND WETLAND ALTERATION
PERMIT FOR THE GRADING AND FILLING OF WETLANDS ON SITE. THE
PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF LYMAN BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF THE
TWIN CITIES AND WESTERN RAILROAD, AND WEST OF BLUFF CREEK.
APPLICANT, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC., AND INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT 112, PLANNING CASE 07-06.
Public Present:
Name Address
Mark Bosch 1709 Windsor Drive South, Shakopee
Steve Miller 244 1st Avenue No., Minneapolis
Todd Iverson 14329 Rutgers Street, Prior Lake
Jonathan Duesman 3349 Irving Avenue So., Minneapolis
Jay Pomeroy 7575 Golden Valley Road, Minneapolis
Paul Schlueter 11 Peavey Road, Chaska
Steve Pumper 11 Peavey Road, Chaska
Thor Smith 2139 Boulder Road
Jeff Moody 1800 Sunridge Court
Dennis Chadderdon 8900 Audubon Road
Barbara & Andy Kayati 8715 Valley View Place
Al Gomez 8748 Valley View Place
Joel Lehrke 2329 Boulder Road
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Kate Aanenson added that an
environmental assessment was done on this site for the grading permit and all plans are
consistent with the recommendations of that Environmental Assessment. Also a reminder that
the comments received from the neighborhood meeting held on January 18th with the school
district and city staff were also included in the packet. Alyson Fauske elaborated on the number
and location of retaining walls on the site. Commissioner Papke asked for clarification on the
appearance of the gas pipeline, the design of the bus entrance, traffic flow and safety concerns
with locating the school on a gas pipeline, and next to a railroad tracks and electrical substation.
Chairman McDonald asked about the trade off for granting of the variance for development in
the Bluff Creek primary zone. Steve Pumper, Director of Finance and Operations for District
112 introduced Jay Pomeroy, the civil engineer with Anderson-Johnson Associates who
reviewed the layout of the site, parking, and retaining walls. Steve Miller with Rozeboom Miller
Architects explained the layout of the school and showed renderings of exterior elevations.
4
51
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
Chairman McDonald opened the public hearing. Andy Kayati, 8715 Valley View Place asked
for clarification on the construction and materials being used in the retaining walls, especially
those facing his neighborhood. He asked staff to consider signage to address the possibility of
students using their streets for parking during school hours and special events. He requested that
the windows be of non-reflective material, additional landscaping be used to break up the large
expanse of the school building, and that the school address the issue of trash possibly blowing
into his neighborhood. Al Gomez, 8748 Valley View Place had concern with the variance and
grading requests. He supported the addition of a third traffic light, protection of the wetland
buffer, and expressed concern with the pipeline grading and drainage into the wetlands. Thor
Smith, 2139 Boulder Road expressed concern with students crossing the railroad tracks and
asked the city to work with the County to create a safe pedestrian crossing. Joel Lehrke, 2329
Boulder Road asked that the commission consider a fence along the railroad tracks, the
additional stop light and that the City do whatever can be done to make sure Lyman Boulevard
gets expanded on time and not 4 years after the school opens. Dennis Chadderdon, 8900
Audubon Road expressed concern with the erosion control within the wetland. Kate Aanenson
explained that erosion control was associated with a MnDot project. Chairman McDonald closed
the public hearing. After commission comments and discussion, the following motions were
made.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate
District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek
Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary
zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc.,
dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions:
1. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the
easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project.
2. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the
restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along
the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species
consistent with the City’s Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Site Plan with Variance for a three-story building and up lighting for a
High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square-foot building, athletic fields,
concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, plans prepared
by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions:
5
52
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
1. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas
and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site.
2. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building
entrance.
3. The building façade flood lights shall be allowed during school events and activities.
4. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect.
5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school:
• Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection.
• Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for
the addition of a north leg to the intersection.
• Construct the following turn lanes:
Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North
School Access
Bypass lane
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North
School Access
200 feet
Westbound North School Access at
Lyman Boulevard
Through lane becomes
turn lane
300 feet
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake
Hazeltine Drive
200 feet
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake
Hazeltine Drive
200 feet
Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at
Lyman Boulevard
100 feet
Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at
Lyman Boulevard
300 feet Build
through/right
Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon
Road South
200 feet
Westbound Lyman Boulevard at
Audubon Road South
200 feet
Northbound Audubon Road South at
Lyman Boulevard
Build to add through
lane
Southbound Audubon Road South at
Lyman Boulevard
200 feet Build
through/right
6. Building Official Conditions:
a. The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems.
6
53
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the
State of Minnesota.
c. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage
buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls).
d. Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the
State of Minnesota.
7. Fire Marshal Conditions:
a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees,
shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure
that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to
Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1.
b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed.
Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of
construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided.
c. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load
of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3.
d. Yellow curbing and “No Parking Fire Lane” signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen
Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed.
e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either
be removed from site or chipped.
f. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and
approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4.
8. Forester Conditions:
a. Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156
trees.
b. Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce.
c. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees
prior to grading.
d. Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees.
7
54
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
e. The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping.
f. All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and
removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting.
g. All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species.
h. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east
property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in
addition to trees.
i. The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as
Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species.
9. Engineer Conditions:
a. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to
Lyman Boulevard.
b. ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the
access through the substation property.
c. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman
Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event.
d. Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman
Boulevard will be treated in the ponds.
e. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access
point must be maintained.
f. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting.
g. The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of
softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher’s mound.
h. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner.
i. Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must
be approved by the appropriate private utilities.
j. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan.
k. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer.
l. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands.
8
55
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
m. The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City
standard detail plates.
n. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine
if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary
sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required
to televise the line after construction is complete.
o. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between
the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain.
p. Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access
Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued.
q. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do
not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds.
r. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required.
s. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities
and existing gas pipelines.
t. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver
County coordinates.
10. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions:
a. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project’s Wetland
Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
(MR 8420).
b. The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for
Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.
c. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required
by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer.
d. Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The
emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The
emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re-enforcement mat or fabric and
riprap.
e. The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The
timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow
9
56
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre,
disc anchored).
f. All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end
section installation.
g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year
round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a
curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other
natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water.
h. Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet.
i. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The
areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or
permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared
End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a
temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as
a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet
structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details
should be provided.
j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering
methods from the City’s project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior
to conducting any and all dewatering on-site.
k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets.
l. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen’s standard details for erosion and
sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A).
m. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area.
n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and
street sweeping as-needed.
10
57
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
(i.e., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends
that City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of
wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle
Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions:
1. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be
maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be
protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and
staked in accordance with the City’s wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland
buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay
the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the
wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans.
2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420).
3. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and
hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established.
4. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement
monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species,
particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo
monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of
recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland.
5. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation
(including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland
are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of
final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including
grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of
credit.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Dillon moved, Papke seconded to note the verbatim and
summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 16, 2007 as
presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9:30 p.m.
11
58
Planning Commission Summary - March 6, 2007
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
12
59
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 6, 2007
Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry McDonald, Kathleen Thomas, Kurt Papke, Kevin Dillon and
Debbie Larson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Dan Keefe
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior
Planner; and Alyson Fauske, Assistant City Engineer
PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS:
Thor Smith 2139 Boulder Road
Phil DeNucci 9186 Springfield Drive
Richard Simmons 530 Summerhill Drive
Corey Bergman 6791 Redwing Lane
Tom Koehnen 795 Ponderosa Drive
PUBLIC HEARING:
HEARTLAND BUILDING EXPANSION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 31,200
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE WAREHOUSE EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 101,600
SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH A VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY ZONED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 7975 CENTURY BOULEVARD
(LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK), MARTIN WOODY
ARCHITECTS, PLANNING CASE 07-05.
Public Present:
Name Address
Peter Kordonowy 810 Ramsey Avenue
Martin Woody 4048 Spruce Road
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item.
McDonald: Kevin, do you want to start?
Dillon: You mentioned there would be a safety concern if windows were put in there. What's
the safety concern?
60
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Generous: Well just, the warehouse space they have, the equipment that they use in there, they
can run into that. It's really pushing, storing things up against it and pushing against the window,
you could run into. Cracking it.
Dillon: And who's the tenant going to be?
Generous: It's Heartland.
Dillon: And what's the nature of their business?
Generous: The applicant would probably be better to talk about that.
Dillon: Okay, I'll ask that when they get up. Those are the only questions I had right now.
Larson: I didn't have any.
Thomas: No, I do not.
McDonald: Kurt?
Papke: What's the spirit of the transparency? The 50% transparency. Just to remind everybody,
why do we require that?
Generous: That's to provide a vision to the community, some night time light if you will from
buildings out to the street so that people can look in and see activity. In this instance they
wouldn't be able to see activity back there really.
Papke: Isn't that true of a lot of office industrial type buildings?
Generous: Well office space you'll see people working at night and you can see life in it, but in
the warehouse space really is not conducive to that.
Papke: I'm just struggling a little bit with the rationale behind this one. I certainly understand
the safety concerns and I certainly understand the applicant's desire to do it, but I'm not fully
grasping what, you know what our rationale is.
Aanenson: When we put this PUD together, it falls in line with the highway corridor study that
we wanted those buildings that had presence along collector roads, that would be more
articulated. As Bob said, sometimes it's the light spilling out of a building, but you can see light
in a building so you don't look at an expanses of dark walls. So in this instance the fact that it
still has some articulation and has lighting underneath those panels that Bob showed you, that's
another way to get, so the building has some life to it. You're not just in a cold space when so
you're driving along that road. This does face a road that in some day in the future will be
connected to 41. Right now it's not. As Bob Generous indicated, that this building, if it were to
become office building could be modified to meet that requirement. Unfortunately, as the
building was laid out, it now has frontage on two streets.
2
61
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Generous: Three streets.
Aanenson: Three streets, and that's a little bit more, for an office warehouse, a little bit more
onerous to try to meet that requirement, because typically what we say is when your street
frontage should be the most articulated. In this circumstance it's three sided. So it's a little bit.
Papke: And how big of a variance are we allowing on this? It wasn't clear from the verbiage.
Generous: It's varied 10% rather than 50%.
Aanenson: On a small segment of that building, yeah.
Generous: Yeah, just on the north elevation.
Papke: Okay. And if the usage were to change, the building were to change hands, what would
be our mechanism at that point in time to revert to the 50% transparency.
Generous: As part of the remodeling process, they would have to come in for a building permit.
McDonald: I guess I'd like to pick up on that too because I'm having a problem with this. We do
not like to grant variances. We like to make sure that if there's a reason for it, we should
probably relook at our regulations to begin with. This makes sense from the standpoint of it's a
warehouse. I understand that. But if we're going to say it's 50% as far as going to have
windows, should we be looking at maybe something that says usage instead of just building by
itself because otherwise the other problem I have with this is, they're putting the knock out's in
there. It' in there for the windows. You know we're making them go almost to the step of the
windows. You know do those knock out's and you should be able to meet it. And yet in their
letter, what they're saying is is that, it becomes burdensome to put the windows in, but they're
doing the knock out's. I'm having a little bit of a problem. Are we going to create a problem for
ourselves with anybody else that comes in, again with warehouse and those things. It does make
sense not to have all the windows. I understand that. But should we be looking at something a
little bit deeper than this? I mean what, as you said, what was the intent of having the windows
and what you've articulated to us is, yeah it's for office space and for you know people being able
to see in, but we're applying it very broadly here and now all of a sudden we've taken a
warehouse, which why shouldn't they have windows?
Generous: And I believe that's part of the reason we have the variance process to look at those
unique circumstances. We like to put the onus on them, or developers to meet our standards and
then justify why they shouldn't.
McDonald: Okay. And again I'll ask the applicant when they come up but I don't see where this
is a big burden. So okay. With that I guess I would ask the applicant to come forward and add
anything that you wish to add.
3
62
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Peter Kordonowy: Chairman McDonald, commissioners. Peter Kordonowy with Summerhill
Commercial Real Estate. I'm the property manager of the building, the Heartland America
building and I represent the owner. Appreciate the opportunity to discuss the building expansion
and looking forward to moving forward on this project. This is the architect Martin Woody, and
he can speak to the specific façade transparency issue. I think what he'll say is, even if we
continue the punch out's on that north elevation, we will still need a variance. We're not going to
be able to hit the 50% with the design. The building was designed in 1997 under those design
criteria, and we actually can't hit the 50%. Now if we do continue the glass along the north end,
we'll still be inadequate but I think from an ownership perspective, I'm not an owner. If they had
to do that they would continue the glass on the north end, but it was in the design criteria of the
building when it was built in 1997, and actually exceed those criteria by having continuous glass.
The building does not have glass on the east side currently. And a good portion of the east side,
there's not glass. But we could do as much glass on the north side as you'd like, as is on the east
side. But we'd still be inadequate for the requirement.
Martin Woody: Just to kind of reiterate what Peter had mentioned was, continuing the existing
fenestration along the addition and along the north side. If we kept the same window pattern,
even adding all the windows along the north side, we'd still be quite shy of the 50% requirement
with the façade. The transparency requirement, which was adopted in 2001 and this building
was built in '97 so. And then they do have a problem on the inside with storage up against
windows because they utilize racking up against, of the exterior walls since they're loading and
unloading the rack and comes in conflict with the windows on that side. We agree that you
know should the building even become converted to office on that side, we'd be willing to add
the windows at that point.
Papke: Just to clarify, the fenestration, 50% transparency was enacted after this building was
originally approved and built?
Generous: Correct.
Papke: So to some extent there's a grandfathering issue here. Also from a continuity and
symmetry perspective, as you mentioned, it would certainly from an aesthetic goal, you'd like to
continue the same patterning of the windows probably at most rather than all of a sudden coming
up with a solid strip of windows there, just to meet this new code requirement.
Martin Woody: Sure, there's some economies here as well. The pre-cast panels that are utilized
in this construction, they're 8 feet wide so it's easy to punch a 4 foot window in a panel like that.
If we say wanted to add a band of windows it would, one it wouldn't you know be consistent
with the rest of the façade and it would add cost to the building because we'd have to run beams
and what not to make that happen.
Peter Kordonowy: Just to touch on that, I think it would create an unusual building because
you'd have a strange addition look and then the existing building, and it would have a hybrid
design that would not be complimentary to the park.
4
63
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Martin Woody: There's some, the existing south side of the building, where it is warehouse
again existing now, there's reveals that mimic windows on the north side but there's not windows
so, we're just trying to create that same appearance on the north side as well. A majority of the
building frontages to the east so.
McDonald: Anything else Kurt? Okay.
Thomas: I think I'm okay, understanding a little bit better about the continuity of the building
and trying to stay within the same look and feel of the building so that helps.
Larson: Seems pretty straight forward to me.
McDonald: Okay. Kevin.
Dillon: So what is the business at the north end of the building?
Peter Kordonowy: Yes, it's Heartland America. They are a mail order, home goods, or not home
goods. Electronics, company. And they have computers, electronics, knick knacks. Globes, if
you will. Just things people like to buy across the country. And so they're a mail order
company. Heartland America and they're a catalog ordering business.
Dillon: Do they take up the entire building?
Peter Kordonowy: They're in 90,000 feet of the 100,000 square foot building. And so they
would fully occupy this expansion, and so the good news is they're a local employer. Obviously
increases the tax base in Chanhassen and being in Chanhassen's been a good thing for them and
so this will be, this is an expansion for them.
Dillon: I don't have any other questions.
McDonald: You're going to have to understand a little bit about where I'm coming from on this
because I really, we deal with a lot of variances and I have a real problem granting variances
because if you grant them too easily, at that point why have them. It's real easy for people to
come up here and say well you granted a variance to so and so. My problem with all of this is,
again within your letter we talk about a hardship. I don't see a hardship. I see this based upon
more or less usage instead of what the ordinance may have been pointed out to start with but I
hear what you say about the grandfathering, the design criteria and those things. And I can buy
into that. I'm okay. It's just you know one of the things that I probably want to talk to staff a
little bit more about is, I think we need to relook at this. That there needs to be something that
talks about usage. Warehouse, I would agree does not need windows, but at the same time I
don't want someone else coming in here later on using you guys as an example and saying that
we don't need windows either because we're going to store stuff in this particular part of the
building. So I am going to go through this in some detail because I do want to create some kind
of a record here that there's a reason for all of this. Now one of the things on the knock outs, you
had mentioned something about those and that would be a requirement going forward, but what I
visualized is that, I mean a knock out's kind of pre-cut into an area and you just kind of knock it
5
64
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
out and it breaks at that point. That's not what I heard you say. What you're saying is that if we
have to put windows in in the future, someone's going to have to go through a big effort it sounds
like to put those windows in from the cut out panels. So this isn't just an easy, knock out that
you would expect from furniture you buy that's already pre-cut and hit it and a piece falls out.
Am I correct in that?
Martin Woody: It's a little easier process with masonry construction versus pre-cast.
McDonald: Okay. And then you mentioned things about other beams and everything. Yet what
happens to the structural integrity of the walls? Is something going to have to be done there to
shore those up if someone comes in and does something?
Martin Woody: No, not in a pre-cast panel. They're structural panels that are 8 feet wide and the
windows in this building, they're 4 feet wide. They fit in the center of the panel, so it's as easy as
coming back. The manufacturer comes back with a saw and actually cuts the opening.
McDonald: Okay, so if this gets converted then to an office space, this is not an extraordinary
cost that's going to really, it's going to be a cost but I mean it's not something that someone can
come back to us and claim, yeah because of this it's creating a hardship. This is not something
that's extra ordinary as far as having to redo the building. Putting in new supports. I mean you're
just putting in windows and the grouting and anything that would go around those.
Martin Woody: Right. There'd be no special, or extra structural items needed to put windows in
the panels, no.
McDonald: And again if I'm understanding, the main reason why you want the variance is
because structurally the rest of the building, the way it's built, this architecturally fits into that
pattern.
Martin Woody: It does. If you look at the building as a whole, actually the building, all the
buildings in the development there, they're all real similar construction. Window types. What
not. You know each panel has a window in it and structurally that's about what you can do with
these panels. Putting in a strip of windows or a ribbon window system, not only would it you
know destroy the character of the entire building but it would cost quite a bit more to make that
happen.
McDonald: Well from that point, the building wouldn't match the existing building.
Martin Woody: Right.
McDonald: Then the other thing, this entire building will be used for storage and for warehouse
usage, is that correct?
Martin Woody: Correct.
6
65
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
McDonald: That is the primary purpose in doing this, so that the company that's moving in there
can store things that they're selling. They need the extra space for that.
Martin Woody: It's storage and distribution.
McDonald: Okay. I guess other than that, I mean that's the only questions I've got about this
really was dealing with this variance that we're looking at granting here tonight. I just want to
make sure that we do it for the right reasons.
Martin Woody: Yeah, I guess we wouldn't be asking for a variance if we didn't really need it.
McDonald: Well I understand that. Even, or one of the things you said was, even if it meant that
you'd still have to get a variance on the north side. Could you explain what you meant by that,
because even at that you wouldn't be able to meet the 50%.
Martin Woody: Right. We wouldn't be able to meet the intent of the ordinance the way it's
written if we put windows in every panel along the north side.
McDonald: Okay.
Martin Woody: Along the north side and the addition side. We'd still be short. I think we'd
only make it up to 30%.
McDonald: Okay. I have no further questions, unless someone else wants to come back with
something. Then I guess at this point I would open it up to the public and thank you all very
much.
Martin Woody: Thank you.
McDonald: If anyone wishes to come forward and speak on this matter, please do so now. Well,
seeing no one come forward, I will close the public meeting and I'll bring it back up for the
council for deliberation and Kevin, do you want to start?
Dillon: Yeah. You know I'm inclined to vote to grant the variance. I think that kind of given
you know, it's either this or there's some other variance that we may be granting, or we wouldn't
do anything at all and that would be harmful to the business and therefore present a hardship. I
think that it makes sense. You know it's the right thing to do for this property. So your point
Jerry about you know every we kind of straight down I'll say slippery slope of granting too many
variances. I don't think we do that. I mean I think you know when these requests come before
us, I mean there's always questions and challenge and properly considered and every one's a
unique circumstance and by granting this one, I don't, it's not, and I don't want to mischaracterize
what you said but I don't think we opened the flood gates to more or anything like that. There's
going to be unique situations all the time. We just have to deal with those as they come.
McDonald: Okay, fair enough.
7
66
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Larson: I'll agree with what Kevin just said regarding that. I won't repeat it. But also to the fact
that it was grandfathered in in '97 and you know the fact that the city changed their views on it
you know just a few years later, I'm all for keeping the style the same. You don't want to mess
with the integrity of the structure you know and I think it's a nice design. It's an industrial
design. Why mess with it. I mean if it's not really hurting anybody, I am inclined to go ahead
and vote for the variance.
Thomas: I'm going to also agree with the other two. I do agree that staff did a good job of
bringing together the proposal and working with the applicant as to how the building will need to
look and with it being that the ordinance was the way it was in '97, and now asking for
additional, everyone's saying the same thing. We would have had to grant a variance no matter
what so, I'm inclined to vote the same as well.
Papke: I'm wondering if there isn't an opportunity here for a compromise, given that the street
on the north side is eventually going to run out to 41. It's going to be reasonably high traffic.
They're already putting in the knock out's for the windows. I guess one idea I'd float for
discussion here is, if we had them put in the windows on the north side and they hit the 30%, that
to me doesn't sound quite as ugly as 10%. And I don't think it would be over burdensome and
again, I think it would give the building a uniform look to it. I think just to have no windows in
the addition is going to make it look a bit odd, and to put in a strip window to meet the code is
going to make it look odd. So I'm wondering if meeting the applicant halfway doesn't have some
merit. Any thoughts?
Larson: Is there any way that we could do it, have it be a condition as to the point where that
road does open up, then it would have to be changed, or something like that.
Papke: But then would you have them just, are you talking about putting in the windows or
putting, or meeting code when the street goes through?
Larson: Meeting code. Well no.
Papke: But then they'd have to change the whole north side. They're not going to be able to
meet it you know without ripping up the whole.
Larson: …changing the windows at that point, but why do it now, you know what I mean? If
it's not an issue at this point but at some point where it becomes an issue.
Dillon: It's an aesthetic issue.
Papke: It's an aesthetic issue now, and in the future, they're proposing putting in only a 10%
transparency on the north side right now which means punch out's but no windows. Why not put
in the windows, why not stipulate the windows now so at least it's uniform on the north side?
Larson: It's an industrial building.
Papke: It already is.
8
67
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Larson: I know but.
McDonald: That's my point about the variance to begin with. Maybe the variance, maybe the
regulation is wrong. Maybe it shouldn't be 50%. That's the whole point of looking at this is that,
if we're going to have warehouses and industrial buildings come into town, we can't look at each
one and be granting variances. We need to decide what it should be. What is appropriate for the
use. We should not put burdens upon people that they cannot meet, and that's my point in all of
this was to bring that up is that, 50% does sound like a rather high number and again, if it's based
upon usage of the building, that should be factored into it. And it's not in this case.
Papke: As you stated when we opened, we're not, we can't change the rules here tonight.
McDonald: Right, and I'm not proposing that we do. What I again stated was that's probably
something we need to go back and ask staff to look at.
Aanenson: Mr. Chair if I could just add something too. We did include for you findings of fact
of why we supported the variance and I just, while they're embedded in there, I want to make
sure it's clear what our rationale was on that. The fenestration requirement is any street frontage,
so because this is a 3 sided lot, and it's, the use of the building is predominantly warehouse
storage, it's an anomaly in that respect. It should eliminate it from that requirement but the
requirement did change. That would be one, some of the rationale. And the other one is,
keeping in mind that this is a 25% expansion of a building that doesn't meet code, so while we're
talking about 50%, it's 50% of that 25% expansion. So we were looking at that incremental
change. Because our non-conforming says that if it's over 50%, then if you look at just a non-
conforming building, because this was a smaller percentage, I just want to keep that in
perspective. It's not a brand new building where we, you know it's following a prevailing pattern
that they've already set in place, so it's trying to find that, what's the best way to get to the desired
goal, and that's where we struggled and did recommend what we did in the staff report.
McDonald: Well then part of what you're saying there is, that gets back to the grandfathering
clause that what was there as existing must have met code at the time it was put up.
Generous: Yes.
Aanenson: Yes, so they don't have the 50% currently on the existing street, so when you're
going beyond that on that extra 25%, so that's when we went back and said, is that onerous?
Does that seem rationale? What's the nexus for that and that's where we struggled and kind of
said, if we can provide that in the future the changes, but the way it's set up with that high of a
building, it's set up to be office, excuse me, storage, warehousing with shelving and, could it be
converted in the future? Sure, as any building in the city could. But that would probably involve
a lot more structural stuff which I think Chairman McDonald, went back to your question. How
much detail would be involved or how much work would be involved in changing that use.
McDonald: Yeah, I guess with all of that, as Kurt has said, you know we're not here to change
rules. I think what we're…this particular applicant because of the other things, it's just the way
9
68
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
that it initially comes through. Any time you're going to grant 40% variance, I think we need to
look at why are we doing that much.
Papke: The only thing I'm kind of stuck on here is, if we're going to grant this, and why would
we not at least have the applicant put in the same number of windows in you know, the same
ratio of windows in the addition that they have in the base building? If we're going to grant a
variance, why would we allow the applicant to go backwards in the fenestration ratio. You know
it should at least maintain parity with what they already have. That's kind of what I'm getting
stuck on. You know if we're going to grant the variance, why should we go backwards? That's
one thing we try not to do with all of our variances.
Larson: Is it all on the same side? I mean maybe I read this wrong. But isn't there a side of the
building currently that doesn't have windows, or no?
Generous: Yeah, the south elevation doesn't have windows either.
Martin Woody: And the east elevation doesn't have windows as well.
Papke: What we're kind of stuck on is, what I'm kind of stuck on is the north side.
Larson: Why not extend it conforming with what they've already done?
Papke: That's what I'm proposing, right. Are you, does the north side have windows all the way
along or does the north side just have the punch out's? Right, and what the proposed addition
has how many?
Martin Woody: Well the east side.
Papke: On the north side.
Martin Woody: On the east side there's, part of it is windows and part of it is just reveal. So a
lot of it on the east doesn't have windows as well. On the south side, most of it is reveals.
Doesn't have windows. So there isn't a string of windows along the whole entire front of the
building.
Papke: What about the north side?
Martin Woody: The north side there's 6 windows existing on the north side.
Papke: Maybe I'm, do I have my bearings backwards or are you pointing at the west side?
Martin Woody: This is north.
Generous: So that's how this is sitting.
Martin Woody: North is this way. Along this east wall it's not a continuous band of windows.
10
69
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Larson: So am I understanding it correctly or no? What you're adding, where you're adding,
you're not putting new windows on the north edge, correct?
Martin Woody: Correct.
Larson: And then what about that little clip box corner? What's that?
Martin Woody: There's 2 windows and an entrance on that. You can look here, it's an oblique
angle here. There's 2 windows on each side of the entry. This is the, facing north and east. And
this is the entire east elevation from here on. And this is the north. So this is, we're using this
entire area as warehouse.
Larson: Okay.
Martin Woody: And on the south side of the building, it mimics this. There's just reveals here
where there's no, the entrances are there. The entrance façade detail is there but there aren't any
windows along there.
Larson: So really the only windows are on the east side?
Martin Woody: Right, and this is where the, this is the office area contains about this much, so
this is actually open warehouse with the windows on the east side so.
Larson: Okay. And does it pose a problem currently?
Martin Woody: I think there is, that's a different function…part of the warehouse.
Peter Kordonowy: The south side of the building actually has some windows come down part
way about a quarter. Currently Heartland America does not have any windows in their
warehouse and they have about 75,000 square feet of warehouse. So the east side, the long side
of the building where the warehouse starts, doesn't have any windows.
Martin Woody: Along the east side.
Peter Kordonowy: On the east side, the current site. But currently Heartland does not have any
windows in their warehouse area.
Martin Woody: So it's not continuous with windows all the way along the east face of the
building. There's reveals where windows could be.
Peter Kordonowy: It stops right where the office, their office is about like this and so this entire
length is non-windows until you get actually about the middle 50% is revealed edge on the
existing building.
Larson: Okay.
11
70
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Dillon: So anyways Kurt, to your comment about should we try to ask for a compromise, I think
it's probably worth asking, but then the safety concern with the glass in the warehouse and all
that stuff so, it's something that maybe we should pose to the developer just to get their reaction.
McDonald: If you wouldn't mind getting coming back up there and addressing that.
Peter Kordonowy: Sure. Well I do know that Heartland, we want to work with the City of
Chanhassen and maintain the integrity of the look of the building and they don't have any glass
in their current warehouse. Would they prefer to maintain that? They probably would strongly
prefer it. Like to reach some kind of an equitable compromise. Still have the building look nice
and uniform. It would add windows to their warehouse. They currently do not have that. If it's
necessary they'd have to live with it. They probably would end up blocking it or something like
that or screening it or plywood or something, but it could be done.
Larson: Which means there's still no light coming out of those windows.
Papke: You're not accomplishing the goal if you block the windows. Okay.
McDonald: Okay, any other comment? Then at this point I would open it up for a
recommendation.
Papke: Mr. Chair, I'll make a motion that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve Planning Case 07-05 for a 31,200 square foot office warehouse expansion to an
existing 101,600 square foot building with a variance to permit only 10% building transparency
on the northern building elevation. Plans prepared by Martin Woody Architects dated February
2, 2007, subject to conditions 1 through 25 as stated in the staff report.
McDonald: Can I have a second?
Larson: I'll second.
Papke moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve Planning Case 07-05 for a 31,200 square-foot office warehouse expansion to
an existing 101,600 square-foot building with a variance to permit only 10 percent building
transparency on the northern building elevation, plans prepared by Martin Woody
Architects, dated February 2, 2007, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping.
2. The developer shall incorporate a gathering space in the northeast corner of the site including
benches and or tables overlooking the natural areas to the east.
3. If the interior of the north end of the building is converted to offices, windows shall be
installed along that area of the building.
12
71
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
4. The developer shall extend a sidewalk from the building to the sidewalk on Water Tower
Place and include pedestrian ramps at all curbs.
5. The applicant shall have a minimum of 9 canopy trees, 23 understory trees and 23 shrubs
along Water Tower Place.
6. The applicant shall replace the evergreens located in the northwest parking lot peninsula with
overstory, deciduous trees.
7. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted before building permit issuance which specifies
size, quantity and species of proposed plantings.
8. The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system.
9. All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of
Minnesota.
10. Inlet protection shall be installed around all catch basins after installation and maintained
until final stabilization occurs.
11. The plans shall be revised to address issues that could arise as the result of run-on in the
northwest corner of the site.
12. Silt fences shall be installed with J-hooks to prevent runoff from running around the end of
the silt fences.
13. Until building construction begins, the rock construction entrance shall be 75 feet in length in
accordance with the City’s standard detail.
14. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round,
according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed
soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter
system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man
made systems that discharge to a surface water.
15. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street
sweeping as needed.
13
72
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
16. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
(e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit)) and comply with their conditions of approval.
17. Provide drainage area maps and calculations to ensure that they are the same as what was
previously accepted.
18. Provide rational method calculations for the storm sewer.
19. Ground (i.e. non-paved) surface grades shall not be less than 2%. Paved grades shall not be
less than 1%. Grades along curb line must not be less than .5%.
20. Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan.
21. An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off-site grading.
22. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will
be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes.
23. Areas disturbed areas in City right of way must be sodded.
24. Show heavy duty and light duty pavement sections on the plans.
25. Access for tractor trailers shall be limited to 82nd Street.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL: REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL ESTATE
DISTRICT, A2 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD TO OFFICE AND
INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT, OI; SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR
A HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS INCLUDING AN APPROXIMATELY 406,000 SQUARE
FOOT, THREE STORY BUILDING, ATHLETIC FIELDS, CONCESSION BUILDING,
STADIUM, STORAGE/MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOTS;
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH VARIANCES FOR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN
THE BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND WETLAND ALTERATION
PERMIT FOR THE GRADING AND FILLING OF WETLANDS ON SITE. THE
PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTH OF LYMAN BOULEVARD, SOUTH OF THE
TWIN CITIES AND WESTERN RAILROAD, AND WEST OF BLUFF CREEK.
APPLICANT, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC., AND INDEPENDENT
SCHOOL DISTRICT 112, PLANNING CASE 07-06.
14
73
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Public Present:
Name Address
Mark Bosch 1709 Windsor Drive South, Shakopee
Steve Miller 244 1st Avenue No., Minneapolis
Todd Iverson 14329 Rutgers Street, Prior Lake
Jonathan Duesman 3349 Irving Avenue So., Minneapolis
Jay Pomeroy 7575 Golden Valley Road, Minneapolis
Paul Schlueter 11 Peavey Road, Chaska
Steve Pumper 11 Peavey Road, Chaska
Thor Smith 2139 Boulder Road
Jeff Moody 1800 Sunridge Court
Dennis Chadderdon 8900 Audubon Road
Barbara & Andy Kayati 8715 Valley View Place
Al Gomez 8748 Valley View Place
Joel Lehrke 2329 Boulder Road
Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item.
Aanenson: Mr. Chair, if I could just add a couple things. There's a lot to cover on this. On page
19, the Assistant City Engineer did point out the number of retaining walls, and I think it might
be helpful just to talk about those for a minute. The second thing is, I did want to point out that
an environmental assessment was done on this site for the grading permit, and all the plans that
you see before you today are consistent with the recommendations of that Environmental
Assessment, and then just a reminder that there was a neighborhood meeting that the school
district put together on January, and we had staff represented from the city too. That was on
January 18th so we included the comments that were, that came from that meeting too. Just
wanted you to be aware of that, but if it's alright I would like Alyson Fauske to maybe just take a
minute to talk about the, there is a significant amount of retaining walls. Just take a minute to
talk about that.
Fauske: Thanks Kate. Planning Commissioners, when we looked at this site and we looked at
the number of retaining walls, we kind of took a step back to take a look at it, if there was a way
to reduce or eliminate some of these retaining walls and the site is very challenging from a
grading standpoint. One, just looking at the existing grades that fall throughout the site, from
Lyman Boulevard down to the creek, with some high points inbetween. And second of all is, the
100 foot swath where the gas line easement lies, and the school district has been working with
the gas company to get permission for some grading within that easement, but they are limited to
the amount of fill that they can place over that pipe, so on the eastern side of that easement you
will see some proposed grading. On the west side I believe it would be a cut situation, which
they would not be able to accomplish, so that drives a lot of the retaining walls on the site and
the topography, Bluff Creek, the electric substation, wetlands have all contributed to the height
and number of retaining walls there.
McDonald: Does anyone have any questions concerning retaining walls?
15
74
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Papke: What type of retaining walls are we talking about here? Obviously not boulders.
Fauske: They would certainly be engineered retaining walls because they are over 5 feet and
perhaps the applicant could answer the question as far as materials.
Papke: It'd be nice to know if they're the smaller, are they the monster blocks that we see in
some developments now, or smaller blocks or what are we talking about here?
Fauske: Again I think the applicant has a plan together for that.
McDonald: If I could just follow up on that because we went through this, didn't we about
retaining walls and didn't we come down some types and material and everything?
Aanenson: Correct, and that is in the city code and they will be required to follow that, and it's
really just the tying back of the wall itself. The integrity of that.
McDonald: I know we looked at a lot of things with fencing on the top and safety issues.
Aanenson: And that's included too. On some of these areas where they're around ballfields and
active areas and the school district's incorporated, the fencing requirement on top of those walls
too.
Fauske: I believe, sorry Kate, I believe all walls are proposed to have a fence at the top.
Larson: I was going to say, some of these are quite high. So high would a fence be?
Fauske: They're proposing a 4 foot high chain link fence.
Larson: 4 feet over a 28 foot drop? Or 29 foot drop.
Fauske: To provide the separation from the top of the wall and any.
Larson: And is there any, from where the fence would be, would it be directly above it or would
there be some space behind it.
Fauske: I don't recall the detail plate at the top of my head. I believe the applicant could
probably give you a good indication.
Larson: I would hate for that to be an issue…
Fauske: Certainly.
Papke: So with the gas pipeline and the retaining walls, what does the topography end up
looking like? Is this, does the gas pipeline end up looking like a hump? A hole? What do we
have as a result of this? I'm a little concerned with some of the practicality of people walking
16
75
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
through there getting to the ballfield and the aesthetics and you know, it's kind of an odd siting
here with a pipeline going right through the middle of a school site.
Fauske: It certainly is. I apologize for having to bring out the grading plan…off the top of my
head. If we look at, and I apologize I don't have this really in a presentable form but, if we look
at the grades, this is Lyman Boulevard right here, and we have the railroad tracks here. And this
swath here is where the easement lies. We go from an elevation of about 945 here at the
roadway. Come up to 55, a 60. We go up to about 70 actually is the highest, so we have about a
25 foot rise in elevation. And then we start going down of course to the creek, and that drop is
proposed at, let's see here. Boy, an 80 foot fall. So it's a significant rise and fall throughout that.
Papke: So does the pipeline, on the western side where you have the retaining walls, is it
sunken? Is it elevated? What does it?
Fauske: The pipeline, as far as I understand, is about 4 to 6 feet deep if I'm correct on that. The
pipeline does follow the existing terrain, so the issue on the section closer to Lyman is that they
would be in a cut situation where they're doing a steady rise and they would want to cut down
that elevation but they cannot cut over that pipeline.
Papke: So the pipeline is going to look like a hump, looking at it from Lyman.
Fauske: Oh I understand the question. Okay.
Papke: There's retaining walls on both sides of the pipeline. Are they going to be holding up
dirt over the pipeline or are they going to, are we going to be looking at a tunnel?
Fauske: Okay. If you want to look at it for example here along Lyman. We're looking at the
retaining wall, this location is high, and then low down to the softball fields.
Aanenson: Can you just like maybe read the elevations or point it onto the green?
Larson: It's a hump or a slope? I think it's a slope. That's how I read into it anyway. Yeah, we
need the colored one.
Fauske: Okay, and I'd also ask that the school district engineer can also jump in here at any time.
Jay Pomeroy: The pipeline does, it comes up and then it goes down. We are trying as much as
possible to not draw attention to the pipeline. We don't want it to look like an alley or an aircraft
landing.
Papke: And do you also have issues, I mean as the students go out to hit the ballfields and so on,
you know it's typically a stampede. Is this going to limit access where they're going to have to
take the walkways or what, how's that going to work?
Jay Pomeroy: Somewhat. Yeah the, the west end between the softball fields and soccer fields,
this is direct access. You will come up a little bit and down. Where the walls are in this
17
76
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
corridor, or this portion of the corridor, the gas main is higher than the softball field, then the
soccer field. So there is this elevation above the play fields, and it all ties back together though
at the entrance to the stadium. The building is at about a 950. It slopes up to the spectator
entrance and the plaza. It comes directly across, right over that pipeline. Everything's wide open
and then we're transitioning down because it is an 80 foot drop, but it's the pipeline and the field,
the entire site drops off there. The facility drops as the gas main drops. Now in this portion of
the gas main we've actually filled over the main in order to transition, artificially anyway, some
of that slope. So we can minimize retaining walls along the corner of the parking lot and off the
corners and then the tennis courts, so that those match in a little bit better. So that there is
another connection, not only paved but just wide open grass. Keep in mind though it is
dropping…
Larson: Is it paved directly on it or is it like a bridge sort of thing?
Jay Pomeroy: No, it's directly on it.
Larson: It is? Okay. So like from the tennis courts, you see where the scoop is for the stadium?
I mean can you see down to that or is it?
Jay Pomeroy: The stadium, actually the tennis courts, I'm sorry. This walk is about 15 feet
higher. I'm guessing but it's going to be, this walk is higher than the tennis courts.
Larson: Oh it is? Here I'm thinking the other way around.
Jay Pomeroy: And then the track is down again. So as you walk, the track is depressed. Not sad
but just down. And as you walk around, as you walk around the end of the track, you're coming
down into that bowl, but our elevation here is still higher.
Larson: Okay.
Jay Pomeroy: This is going to be one of those sites that the landscape architecture is always
asking for interest no matter where you're at.
Larson: Bob, you should have used a different color where it slopes. Darker green maybe.
McDonald: We're looking at different terrace levels and everything.
Aanenson: Correct.
McDonald: This isn't just a straight site. This is going to be all over the place. Brought up by
the walls and buildings.
Larson: And there's only 8 tennis courts?
Jay Pomeroy: Don't ask for more.
18
77
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
McDonald: Anything else Alyson?
Fauske: No, not unless the Planning Commission has any other questions.
McDonald: Any questions of Alyson concerning any more of the retaining walls?
Papke: Not on the walls. On the traffic flow, you know having a dedicated bus entrance here is
a little different and we're going to great lengths to accommodate that. Were there any other
design alternatives looked at? I assume there were and we, I'm sure we settled on this for a good
reason but obviously there's a lot of effort that's going to have to go through to make that
dedicated bus entrance.
Fauske: Certainly, to answer your question regarding access points. When we first started
meeting with the school district and the school district came to us with the 3 access points and
we started having discussions, does the traffic warrant 3 access points, and in short the answer is
yes. The school district got a traffic study for the site to show the trip generation and the school
district has always desired to have this separate bus access. It's aligned with Audubon Road so
it's a positive place for an intersection in that it connects with an existing roadway here to the
south of Lyman. So that was always something they wanted to accomplish, was to separate that
bus traffic from the passenger traffic. And again they looked at, there are other access points
here along Lyman Boulevard. With this middle access aligning with Hazeltine Drive, for the
parent drop off, which comes up into this area here, and for this to be the main entrance and we
looked really hard at where does it make the most sense to have this access point so, to answer
your question, we certainly looked at the number and location of these access points.
Aanenson: Let me just add one thing, they also looked at directional traffic as one of the issues
that we had too was where the trips were coming from and where is the best place for the bus.
And the signalized intersection.
McDonald: Can I ask a question? When you say parent drop off, what do you mean by that? I
mean I understand the buses. What's a parent?
Fauske: Where the parents drop their kids off at school.
McDonald: So is the plan for them to come in and do a circular route so that they go back out
the entrance coming in to keep you know all of that kind of traffic to one side so it's students
coming in?
Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, with buses and parents and students and visitors who may not know quite
where they're going, the intention is always to try and separate the bigger cars, or I'm sorry, the
bigger trucks and buses from the smaller, and so by separating the bus traffic and having them
use the Audubon intersection, and keeping those buses separate, they don't have to worry about
mom or dad cutting them off at any particular part of the morning or the afternoon. The parents
again will have a pre-designated drop off area for their children. Not to drop the parents off, but
the children off, and they will have to commingle with the students or the faculty and we'll leave
that to the school to determine what's the best location for the students to park is, but again, they
19
78
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
will be separated. Visitor parking will be in this same drop off area, along with the parents so
that they don't have to mingle too, too much with crazy students or the service vehicles…
Dillon: Is there going to be a traffic light with the bus on Audubon?
Aanenson: Yes.
Generous: There's one already but it will be modified. I believe at Hazeltine we need another
signal.
Fauske: I'm just looking for it in the report.
Aanenson: It's on page 14.
Generous: And page 14 shows the improvements.
McDonald: We're just kind of jumping around here so. I've got a question off my head. We're
looking at a variance on the wetlands because of the fact that they do, they go into the primary
zone. What's the trade off there? What are we getting in return to help maintain the Bluff Creek
area?
Generous: The school district has granted MnDot an easement for a restoration project within
that. We also anticipate that the school, as part of their curriculum will do some enhancements
and environmental studies out there. There's an opportunity for revegetation to take place
through the school. They are providing some as part of this project, but as Jill said, we should
leave something for the students to do in the future also.
McDonald: Okay. So there will be an ability to utilize the area even better than what it currently
is?
Generous: Yes.
McDonald: For the trade off for all this.
Aanenson: Yeah, and just creating a higher and better quality wetland.
McDonald: Does anyone else have any questions of either staff or, well we haven't heard from.
Papke: One for staff here. Besides the gas pipeline we have a railroad tracks to the north and a
rather substantial substation to the south. And one of the things, I didn't see a lot of examination
of any safety issues. I mean parking students right inbetween a substation. Right over a gas
pipeline. Right next door to a railroad track. Seems like a very safety challenged environment.
Can you speak to what sort of measures were put into place to make sure that we don't have any
issues with that.
20
79
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Fauske: When we look at the overall site plan, the location of the railroad, we'll work from the
south here. We have the railroad here. The elevation of the railroad is much higher than this,
than the softball field here and the baseball field. They show retaining walls all through here. So
that's, there's one physical barrier right there. And I believe at this location is the only area
where there's no retaining wall separating the athletic fields from the, and the railroad so, we can
have conversations with the school district to see if they have a safety issue associated with that
but as I mentioned, there is a physical barrier along the majority of that corridor.
Papke: Do we know what the train schedule is like? Is it unlikely to be operating during school
hours or what's the.
Aanenson: It does run 4 times a day. It will be running 4 times a day, so it may be during school
hours.
Larson: Is it practice fields along there or are those real, I can't see from the.
Jay Pomeroy: Real. They're real.
Larson: Okay.
Papke: So is there any potential issues with traffic you know, school commencing or leaving out
at times when there's a train running on those tracks?
Aanenson: Given the fact that it runs through the core of downtown, I mean there are times that
it's passed, a short inconvenience. We did look at that with the driveway locations. That was
discussed in the EA too, the stacking. The separation there that we didn't have kids stacked on
tracks for that driveway entrance. That was taken into consideration. So we don't have that
situation.
Fauske: The second question that you have is with regards to the gas line, which lies along here.
Again there is a physical barrier between the parking area and the pipeline. The mezzanine
meets grade here but just along the north side of the parking lot there is a retaining wall there.
These gas lines lie in people's back yards. They have a 100 foot easement. From my
understanding the pipeline is centered within the easement so there is an additional 50 feet from
the edge of that parking area to where that gas line lies. Your third concern was with regards to
the electrical substation. It's pretty much, it's completely surrounded by access drive aisles.
There's no activity that would draw any of the children to that area. And again it's also got
retaining walls pretty much all along this side of the drive to here, and then again along this
locations.
Papke: It's a big high fence around the substation?
Generous: Yes, around the substation.
McDonald: Okay. Would the applicant care to come up and add anything or make us aware of
anything?
21
80
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Steve Pumper: Yes, great. Chairman McDonald, commissioners, good evening. I'm Steve
Pumper, Director of Finance and Operations for District 112. I'm happy to bring this plan
forward finally for the City of Chanhassen. I'll be real brief and then I'll introduce Jay Pomeroy,
who's already been up here but at least get his name out here, who is our civil engineer and he'll,
he can talk more about the site plan itself. Answer some of the questions you have regarding
retaining walls and what they'll be made of and how they might look and any other questions you
would have on the site plan. And then Steve Miller, who is our principle architect from
Rozeboom Miller is here as well and he can answer questions regarding the design of the
building. The components, what it will be made of, and have some information here to show you
regarding the look of such. After that's over, perhaps I'll address some of the conditions that staff
are proposing as part of the site plan approval. One thing before I step down though, just to
reinforce what Alyson was saying regarding the railroad. In addition to the natural conditions,
the road will be much higher than the fields. There's also a fence along that whole corridor as
well so it's kind of two buffers to try to keep both students and/or spectators as opposed to going
to and the opposite is true as well. To try to keep students from accessing our site or
neighborhood on the other side of the railroad to try to get into the school site, so again we have
kind of two buffers there in place to help with the road condition. But with that I'll bring up Jay
Anderson, or Jay Pomeroy, sorry, from Anderson-Johnson Associates and he can talk to you
about the site plan.
McDonald: Thank you.
Jay Pomeroy: Thank you Chair and commissioners. We were back here in November,
December I think with our earlier bid package and so I appreciate coming back again. I won't go
into the site too, too much. Bob did a wonderful presentation and he colored it so everything
looks very apparent, but I'll just run through it very quick and so again, you can go to the site
plan. The two entrances off of Audubon and Lake Hazeltine, again we've gone through what the
use of those are. The parking lots to the west of the building provide about 500 stalls and then
the parking lots to the north are another 400. 400 and some odd stalls. The bus corral, when it's
not being used, will also be striped for event parking or for open houses. That provides another
140ish stalls as well so there's about 1,000 parking stalls included with the plan. The parking
stalls that parks has asked for would be an alternate along the south side of the building and if I
recall that was another 45.
Generous: 48.
Jay Pomeroy: 48 stalls. And really it just gets down to budget. It's at the south end of the
building. It would be perhaps used more for faculty and shop classes at that end of the building
and it's proximity to the athletic fields really is fairly distant at that point so we felt it was an
appropriate alternate. As we walk around the site to the west we have two soccer fields or
practice fields. Just to the north of the pipeline we'll have our softball field, baseball field, and
we talked a little bit about the depressed poor thing stadium with it's plaza up top and concession
and ticket tooth. The home grandstand. This will be very similar in count to Chaska High
School. I should probably put that out there but the seating counts for the home side is about
1,600 seats and that will actually be pushed right into the slope of the hill as it comes down so,
22
81
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
there's actually informal seating provided on the grass on each side of the home side bleachers.
And as you go down that pathway to the visitor's side there's about 800 seats on that side. Again
very similar to what Chaska High School has. As you go down that sidewalk it's either discus
throw areas, the shot put throw and then just to the north of that, the long triple jump, pole vault
area. The storage building is actually considered future, if there's budget for it there'll be a
building down there but right now it's considered future. And then practice fields and softball
fields at the very north end of the site, and again all this kind of transitions down in elevation.
By the time you get down to the northern soccer and softball fields, we're about down to the
Bluff Creek elevation. The only thing I didn't touch on was the 8 tennis courts. It's a great
number. And then as Bob has colored in blue, there are 3 storm ponds basically. Just to the west
of the parking lot, just to the southwest of the parking and then a third one between the building
and Bluff Creek. Bob's also colored in nicely wetland mitigation area, existing wetlands. What
he didn't do, and I'll criticize him for that, is that this is actually a wetland corridor in here.
There's a blue line, right. It's a lot bigger than that, at least in mitigation terms or delineation
terms but that, we are trying to maintain that. …but it's certainly a neat swaled area that we're
trying not to intercept that and use that for biology class. That will pass under the bus entrance
and continue to feed Bluff Creek. The character of the site, once we're done, we're trying to keep
it in context with Bluff Creek, meaning prairie grasses and native seed mixes, native trees. So
over the gas main, around the fields, pretty much encompassing the border of the site would be
those native grasses. In one case certainly it's less maintenance for the schools, but it's also just
kind of keeping in tune with the natural surroundings, and we feel certainly the curriculum will
benefit from that as well. Maybe if I can, before I bring Steve up, the architect I'll answer a
couple of the questions that I heard come up. The fence heights and the setbacks off the walls.
They're going to vary. Certainly the minimum height is going to be 4 feet, but where especially
we have some higher volumes next to the discus and shot put area where there's a fairly high
wall, that will be an 8 foot high wall. Certainly we're also going to soften that, what we've done
since this design is actually have a two tiered wall where the wall will basically be in the same
location but you'll drop down about 3 feet so that we can have about a 10 foot wide planting area
before you drop down the balance of the 20 feet. So as you're on the discus, as you're on the
discus throw area, you can see trees growing in the planter and not just a drop and then you'll see
trees. Along the bus entrance there'll be actually guardrail and it won't be the MnDot type of
guardrail but more of the heavy post and beam type of a guardrail, with the fence as well. So not
only from safety but just from traffic and I'm concerned obviously about icing conditions and
traffic accidents, if they ever did occur against that. That fairly substantial wall. The wall types
are as well, there's going to be 2 styles and I'll use Keystone as an example. That's a name brand
but it may be anchor or round or whatever, but the smaller modular block will be used on the
smaller height walls. Where we require some more substantial, and more substantial looking
wall systems, especially along the bus entrance drive, those will be the bigger block, kind of like
what you see at Home Depot, right. Traffic flow we talked about. Steve mentioned the fencing
at the railroad, and there is a fairly substantial tree area between the railroad tracks and our
property line. This is 100 scale so there's about 80 feet of width all the way up to this point and
then there's probably 30 feet of at least vegetation between our property line, which would be
fenced, and those railroad tracks. The gas main, just so you know, we did go out and what's
called pot hole it. We did go out with a backhoe and determine that it is all about 3 feet deep. It
does run exactly down the center of that easement so it's right down that corridor and there's 50
feet on either side of it before we can do anything to the grade or have any sort of an
23
82
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
encumbrance so unfortunately we can't plant trees in it. We can't cross it other than really in a
perpendicular direction with our paving. So we're again trying to treat that as sensitively as we
can with again the prairie grasses, but also trying to undulate walls where we can or affect grades
so that it doesn't look like a corridor. I think those are the questions that you had. I can certainly
come back up if you have more, and I'm sure you will, but Steve Miller can talk a little bit about
the architecture and some.
McDonald: If you don't mind before you go, I've got a question about the gas pipeline. I see the
two access points across there but will people be able to cross at other points or are we at a point
where the terracing is that, that's just not going to be possible.
Jay Pomeroy: No, the two paved paths that we've provided certainly…those are where we hope
they path. But this path for instance, and it actually connects down to the track. This will be
where the football or soccer players at halftime, they will actually travel that path into the
gymnasium at halftime for instance. That is a hard surfaced path for them to travel, and for that
matter the community as they come up and tunnel under the railroad tracks as they come up,
they'll be able to follow that same hard surface trail. So that's ADA accessible. 5% slopes.
Everything is passable.
Larson: Okay, back up. Tunnel? Is it like a path?
McDonald: There's an existing tunnel.
Jay Pomeroy: Yeah, there's an existing trail from the neighborhood to the north of the railroad
tracks, and we're going to continue that trail.
Larson: Oh, okay.
Jay Pomeroy: Actually why don't I talk a little bit about that. It goes from the northeast portion,
actually outside of our property limits but it will come through Bluff Creek. Up through our site.
Past the tennis courts and then right all the way along the school, all the way down to the
Audubon Road.
Larson: Is that what this is?
Generous: That's the existing. The City has a trail within Bluff Creek also.
Larson: Why is there a car?...
Jay Pomeroy: Yep. Does that answer your question? Alright.
Steve Miller: Thanks Jay. Good evening Mr. Chair and commission members. I'm Steve Miller
with Rozeboom Miller Architects. We've been working with the district for about a year now on
the planning of the internal components of the building as well as the site planning. I know that
you are probably more interested in some of the site planning aspects, but I'm going to go over
the exterior of the building. How it complies with your planning ordinances, but also I can
24
83
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
answer questions and tell you a little bit about the inside of the school as well, because I have a
feeling you might be interested in that. First off I just want to put it in context. The size of the
school and the size of the site is very, very similar to Chaska High School, which opened in I
believe 1996. And the capacity of the school will be identical to Chaska High School, so Chaska
High School was just expanded and completed last year and is for now 2,000 students. And so
this new high school will also be for 2,000 students. So in the future when these schools are at
capacity, there will be grades 9 through 12. 500 students approximately in each grade level, and
neither of the two schools are intended to be expanded upon that size. They're both in the
400,000 square foot range. Chaska High School is slightly larger. This school is a little bit more
efficient. The circulation inside so it has just slightly less square footage. About 406,000 square
feet. Just to, if I can look at the site plan for a minute, the components of the school include the
classroom area of the building, which is subdivided into four teams, if you will. If you're
familiar with Chaska High School, as you drive by, you can see the team areas towards Pioneer
Trail. In this case it's, the circulation is a little bit more internalized and you won't be able to
depict the team areas from the outside of the building. So it's more in one area of the building,
which focuses on a commons. And the entrance, the commons to the building is both the
vehicular drop off and the bus drop off. So one of the things from a security standpoint that
we've always tried to do on this project is to bring people directly into the commons so we don't
have a lot of spread out entrances, and that's one of the things that led to the bus drop off being
on the east side and a lower level. The vehicular drop off being on the west side at one level
above so the commons really connects the floor levels. The main floor level and that lower floor
level and when the kids come in off the bus, there's main doors and steps coming up. I'll show
you that in a minute, but the commons is in the center of the building and it feeds into the
classroom area. Also into the performing arts area which faces the west, and the gymnasium
which faces the east. One of the reasons that it works out very well to have the walk out level is
because the gymnasium is a top loaded gymnasium, like Chaska High School, if you've attended
basketball games there. You come in at a commons level and you come in at the top of the
seating and descend down and the playing court is at a lower level. So as we go through this you
can understand that the playing level is at that 20 foot level below the main floor level, and there
are approximately one-third, maybe less than one-third of the floor area is on the lower floor
level. I can go into the plan in more detail if you'd like to know more about it but I'll tell you
more about the exterior of the building, and could you help me with the control on this. I don't
know if we need to change it, yeah. This is an image of the west side of the building from
Lyman Boulevard. This shows some of the wetland areas and storm drainage that would be in
the foreground. The approximately 500 parking spaces on the west side. The drop off area
coming toward the main entrance. The main entrance going directly into the commons. You can
see the glassy wall of the commons beyond this façade is classroom area. It's a two story façade.
These are team resource areas that project outside the building. Those are feature places within
the school. The administration area is right at the front door, next to the commons. You can see
the 3 flags that we have at the entrance. This façade is the music area. There are choral,
orchestra and band rooms along there and you can see the clear story windows all along that west
wall bringing natural light in. The tallest piece of the building is this element which is the fly
loft on the theater, or auditorium. It will be approximately the same size as at Chaska High
School. 650 seats. And what you can see about this, on this exterior, a few of the materials.
We're trying to use warm, natural materials. Two colors of brick. Using kind of a horizontal
layered pattern, and then we're using cast stone as the light colored material. It's like a concrete
25
84
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
product that looks very much like natural stone. We're using that as a contrasting high light at
the entrance area on the fly loft, and also at the main team resource areas and special places
within the building. This then is a close up. Basically zooming in on the shop before. There's
an automobile drop off here. This is the main vehicular entrance. This is the administration
area. A portion of the music wing. A portion of the classroom wing, and then this glassy area is
the commons. So you mentioned in your previous meeting talking about seeing activity. Have
light spill out. That's the important idea in this design. That the commons area will be a beacon
of light after hours and it will attract people and demonstrate the activity inside of the building.
And we know now that rather than saying New High School it will say Chanhassen High School.
Here's another colored plan that we don't really need to talk about, but this is a view from the
southeast. If you were coming from the intersection of Lyman and Audubon Road towards the
southeast side of the school. This would be an image of the bus drop off and/or after hours
parking area. Event parking. It shows the character of the landscape that we're hoping to
achieve. That a lot of it is very natural in areas away from the building. This wall in the distance
is the southern wall of the gymnasium and that is a feature wall of the cast stone material. You
can see how the lowest level of the building, which is really the walkout level is treated a little
bit differently from the upper two floors of the building so that it emphasizes that walkout. And
we think it's going to be a good opportunity for the kinds of learning activities that are down
here, including industrial technology, shop to us older folks. The art program is on that lower
level with a lot of glass and the ability to walk out to the eastern side. And then beyond that
point is the bus entrance that we'll show you. On the south end of the building are, on the upper
two floors are the 12 science classrooms, so they get nice south light. There's a greenhouse on
the upper floor actually that projects out from the façade so that that special angled façade with
continuous glass is in the science wings where they need more light for biology and so forth.
The remainder of the typical classrooms have approximately 12 feet, 12 foot wide windows.
They're approximately 6 feet tall. This is, could I just look at the partial floor plan for a second.
This is the lowest floor plan and it again shows the industrial tech. Art classrooms. The bus
entrance coming directly in and then stairs going up. And then there's also access to the lower
two floor levels where we have a main gymnasium that has 3 full sized basketball courts.
Bleacher seating for 2,000. A central area with all the team locker rooms and PE locker rooms.
And then the other side of the gymnasium is 3 gym spaces of an auxiliary gym and 2 open gym
spaces. Above the locker rooms on the upper level are things like weights, fitness, etc.. This
image is looking from the east back towards the bus entrance, so you can see the bus pulling up
here. The gymnasium on the side. This is the entrance façade with students going in. You'll be
able to see through the glass, up to the commons beyond, and that's, so on this side we go in and
up stairs to the commons. There's an elevator access also on the opposite to come directly into
the commons level. Just briefly I'll show you some images of the commons with stairs coming
down from the upper level. A lot of natural light coming into the commons. In terms of the
plan, you can now see this central commons with the classroom area, the gym, the food service,
the auditorium, administration all centering on that common space, and this is the stairway down
to the bus entrance. So again entering that commons from two different sides. These are the
ways of getting out from the building to the north. So from the music area, from the PE area,
one will be able to go out towards the north. I won't go into the second floor plan, but this is an
image of the north side of the building. So you might be standing about at the pipeline looking
back towards the building and you can see the, this is the tall part of the auditorium. You can
also see how the building steps down and gets lower in scale as it goes toward the wetland on the
26
85
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
west. And there's kind of a main walkway that goes along the west side of the building that
brings people from the front door of the building to the competition field area. Another quick
glimpse of the commons on the inside of the building. And there's one last shot that I wanted to
show you. This is the night shot of the building where we're hoping to let the commons be very
illuminated and welcoming as you arrive. We're showing lighting on the flags and the signage
for the building. This was one of the comments that staff made about the directionality of the
lighting and one of the things that we are hoping to achieve is to illuminate that cast stone wall
on the auditorium and in a way, if you've been by Chaska High School you know how for
instance the conical skylight is kind of a beacon and at night. It draws people in. That's the
intent here is to make it be a very welcoming community place by doing some exterior lighting
like this. I'll stop there. Do you have any questions for me about the design?
McDonald: I just had one question. On your drawing it shows the view of the north science
wing and you say that that's the road for the bus. Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought we were
talking about there would be, is that, does that grade depict the elevations of the road?
Steve Miller: It doesn't depict, if you look, I'll show the image. To the right it would drop off
more severely as you back off. So it's not, I wouldn't say that it's perfectly accurate.
McDonald: I was expecting something else and then I see this and I'm wondering about the issue
with.
Steve Miller: Could I just show you this one, which is looking from the neighborhood towards
the building from the, on the east side of the building and you can see retaining walls here, and
here. The retaining wall that I believe you're referring to Chairman McDonald is down here
where there's a pretty significant retaining wall from the bus drive down to the wetland. And
that one doesn't show in the other view that I showed you. Any other questions?
Steve Pumper: Great. Then I'll just end with some comments if I may, before I know you open
it up to the public and have some deliberations, etc. Just to respond to a few points that were
raised tonight and also by the parks and rec commission. They're asking for a continuous path
around the building. It's something that we would certainly support and can accommodate. As
far as additional parking goes, and the turf fields, we want to achieve both those things.
However it will be a financial concern and I know that it's just staff's recommendation that they
would like to see that happen. Not necessarily as a part of the approval process, but I don't want
to mislead this commission or you know the City Council that that is going to be a for sure thing.
That's not part of our plan submittal. It's something that we want to achieve but it will be a
decision that we'll make on bid opening day, or shortly thereafter.
McDonald: Excuse me. Can you explain that a little bit, what's meant by turf fields and if you're
not going to put that in, what are your plans?
Steve Pumper: Sure. You mean what are our plans if we don't have artificial surface?
McDonald: I guess yeah. That's what I'm trying to get at is I guess turf field, what we're talking
about is natural grass.
27
86
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Steve Pumper: Yeah, right now the plans as they are submitted are grass fields. So grass
stadium field and grass practice fields. What we will have in our bids are three alternates. One
is to have artificial surface put on the stadium field and one, or the second alternative would be
to put artificial surface on one of the practice fields and the third would be to make the third
practice field, or the second practice field, excuse me, artificial as well. So what we'd like to
achieve are 3 fields with artificial turf but it really is a budget concern.
Dillon: Why was the Park Director making that recommendation?
Aanenson: They just thought it would be more practical. It's not a city ordinance, as Mr.
Pumper has pointed out. They just felt that they wanted to give them that heads up. It's not an
ordinance requirement. And as he stated, they're accommodating it in the bid.
Larson: Is there a reason why they would want that?
Aanenson: Just to get more use out of them.
Larson Like spring, fall?
Aanenson: Well yes.
Steve Pumper: If you don't mind Kate.
Aanenson: Sure, go ahead.
Steve Pumper: I'm speaking on behalf of the park commission but certainly the school district,
as we do with Chaska and as we do with Chanhassen right now and actually with other entities,
we share fields as much as possible. Our communities have been very kind to let the school
district use their fields when we need them and you know we kind of return the favor as well as
much as possible. So if our fields are artificial turf, they'll be able to be played on much more
than if they're grass fields. You know they can pretty much be played on all the time without
having any recovery time as is the case if you have grass fields. So just getting more use for the
school district and more use for the communities.
Larson: Is that tougher to play on?
Steve Pumper: Pardon me?
Larson: Is that tougher to play on?
Steve Pumper: No, not with the type of fields they have now, it's actually very good.
Larson: I have a daughter that would be on it once so.
28
87
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Steve Pumper: Oh okay. And then I'd also like to comment on Lyman Boulevard. The staff
report shows what I would suggest is a minimum standard of, be required for access points for
the schools. What we would like to see is a third stop light on the intersection that's closest to
the railroad track. That will be somewhat dependent I think ultimately on what the County
decides on letting us have it or not and certainly we're in the negotiation phase, as is the City of
Chan and the City of Chaska and the County you know as well. What is that boulevard going to
look like? Ultimately how is it going to be designed? So we can't stand here before you, nor do
I think your staff can as well and say this is what it's going to look like but again would propose
there are some minimum standards but we are really hoping that that, that we're going to have 3
intersections, 3 lighted intersections going to the site.
McDonald: Excuse me. Would you show on that map the intersections that you want to have
lighted?
Steve Pumper: These two are, as part of the approval, will be lit. This one right now is just turn
lanes in and out. We would like to have that lit as well, and that's strictly a safety concern. I
mean it's not a traffic.
Larson: Is that something that would affect, or would it trip the light if there was a train coming
or something to make sure that it's a red or.
Steve Pumper: Boy I don't know. Jay, do you know if they have that stuff? I'm not sure. All I
can tell you is this, we have 3 stop lights now, as probably many of you are ware, on Pioneer
Trail at Chaska High School. Actually 2 of them are right adjacent to the high school, or
connected to the high school, and then just down the road is Pioneer Freshmen Center and that
has the third traffic light. What is good about that, and what I know they can do is they time
them so that you know for those 15 minutes of the day in the morning and the 15 minutes of the
day at night, that's when you know we have a lot of traffic coming in and out. Certainly there's
some traffic throughout the day but that's the heavy time and they time the lights so that you
know they turn red and green quite often during that period of the day and the rest of the day
they are green considerably most of the time for traffic going on Pioneer Trail. So I would
certainly suspect the same would be achieved on Lyman Boulevard. That the 3 lights would be
green most of the time for people traveling on Lyman and then again during the brief time in the
morning and the brief time in the afternoon, there would be more frequent reds and greens. I'm
not sure how it would tie into the railroad track but.
Larson: Yeah, I don't know because.
Steve Pumper: Your staff might know because actually I get caught up on the railroad track
when I go on 101 quite often so I know those lights are fixed somehow that way. Let's see if I
have something else. I think the last piece I want to talk about is the staff's recommendation
about the lighting of the building itself, which Steve Miller alluded to a little bit. And this is
following Chairman McDonald's conversation of how he feels about variances so I stand before
you a little sheepishly because certainly this is not a hardship. We can, you know this thing is
not dependent upon whether or not we have a variation on the lighting or not, but what our goal
is, is for the 3 flag, and they're actually depicted well there. We want to have a United States
29
88
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
flag. We want to have a Minnesota flag and then we want to have this Chanhassen High School
flag, whatever that logo will be and they're deciding that on March 22nd, if you're interested. But
we would like to have those 3, and they will be in front of the building, as you can see, and we
would like to have those up lit again just to kind of drawing people and drawing attention to the
front entrance of the building. We also want the theater fly loft, the façade there, to be up lit as
well. Once again just kind of showing off the building. Saying this is a gathering point. This is
kind of a signature building in the city of Chanhassen. It's a place where we expect to see many,
many of the residents of Chanhassen and the residents of the cities included in District 112
gather, so we're just, we would like to see that variance, just as an aesthetic focal point you know
for this, this is a special building. If the commission feels differently or the council feels
differently, we will certainly accept that and work with whatever you say but that is what we're
asking for as a variance. And I think those are.
McDonald: Can I ask you a question?
Steve Pumper: Yeah.
McDonald: What affect is this going to have on the neighborhoods, because I know at one time I
talked to people in the area and there was concern with the football fields. I think we settled
most of that but what affect would this have on the surrounding neighborhoods?
Steve Pumper: I'm going to ask Steve, if you have a, if you can answer that question, if there's
any. Certainly you're going to see a lit façade.
Steve Miller: Yeah, this side of the building I would say has no affect on the neighborhoods,
facing the west. This, actually the façade of the fly loft is not going to be seen from many, if any
existing neighborhoods because most predominantly it's going to be seen from Lyman as you go
across there. The people that are the furthest south may be able to see that. Certainly it's not
going to be on later than 10:00 at night or you know, I mean it's not an all day, all night kind of
thing. Our assumption would be that it's for events. Like you're having a performance in the
theater and then it might be illuminated like a marquee. The other point that was made by staff
was can we down light it rather than up light it? The fly loft is approximately 64 feet high and
we believe that it would be a safety issue to re-lamp lights up on the cornice of a 64 foot high fly
loft rather than have them on the roof, the readily accessible roof below and to be able to
illuminate that wall. The other point is that the name of the high school, Chanhassen High
School, we would like that to be evident when people arrive.
McDonald: And again you're only talking about illuminating one face, is that correct? And this
is all reflective. It will shine up, the light will shine off of based upon the stone and based upon
color.
Steve Miller: It would be, I mean this is maybe a rough analogy but you know the façade of the
Walker Art Center when they have shows advertised on that, on the north façade of that and it's
illuminated. It would be, we're not saying it would always be, that there would be banners or
anything on there but it would be kind of a symbolic image.
30
89
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
McDonald: Okay.
Steve Pumper: And those are my comments. Thank you.
McDonald: Okay, thank you very much. Do we have any questions of the applicant before
everybody sits down?
Papke: You mentioned that the lighting of the stadium had been addressed.
McDonald: Right. I guess what I meant by that was from talking to people in the neighborhood
that had been one thing, you know during football games and those things, what was going to be
the affect of those lights on the homes directly behind there. I don't see where that's become a
big issue because it is a football field and it seems to have been accepted and again they're only
going to be turned on during certain times and there seems to be an acceptance of that for the
purpose. But I was just concerned about you know the lights on the fly house and everything,
what's that going to do. Okay at this point then I guess we're now ready for public comments.
Anybody wishing to address the council, we would ask that you please come forward. State your
name and address and address your comments to the commissioners.
Andy Kayati: Good evening Mr. Commissioner. Mr. Chairman, commission members. My
name is Andy Kayati. I reside at 8715 Valley View Place in Chanhassen. Reside in Bluff Creek
Estates neighborhood which is directly east of this proposed location, or actual location. I've
attended a number of meetings. A number of issues have been addressed by staff, by the
architects and there are still some questions that I have related to this project and if you don't
mind, your props are far better than mine so I'd just like to use them so that I can, I have a
tendency to look at north.
McDonald: Go right ahead.
Andy Kayati: Some of the questions that I have myself, my neighbors, revolve around the
retaining walls. There are a significant number of retaining walls within this project. Those
retaining walls being this area here, this area here, here, here, throughout this area. What's not
shown on this depiction, which I'd like to show here. Well actually that doesn't give a good
depiction, but is the well, this here works a little bit better. This is the photo that I took off of the
internet, and this is the neighborhood in which we reside. If you'll notice these houses here, I
reside right here. Mr. Gomez resides right here. All have a direct view of all these retaining
walls that are shown there. These being the retaining walls here, here. My concern, my
questions as it relates to the construction and the materials. Frankly we're not going to avoid the
retaining walls. They are a given. We've all come to accept that. However I attended the same
meetings that we discussed, or council, or commission, where we discussed the Autoplex project
on Audubon Road. I don't believe that all the members here were all a part of the commission at
the time however the developer in that particular project, and that project was far further from
houses than our houses are currently, and we're not going to move them but that's where they are.
That project, it was required that they not use traditional Keystone blocks. That they be a more
architecturally pleasing material. Something along the line of a boulder wall or something like
that was my understanding. Considering the magnitude of the these walls, I propose to the
31
90
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
commission to make the stipulation that it be a requirement that these walls be constructed in an
architecturally pleasing to the eye manner. Not just this brick edifice of Keystone facing our
neighborhoods. We've had the luxury of I'll call it for the last 13-14 years of looking at a very
nice landscape and that's changing and we can't do anything about that but we'd like to see it so
that what we are looking at is pleasing to the eye so I'd like to propose to the commission to take
that under advisement. To at least use what you had proposed for.
Aanenson: Let me make a point of clarification. We're just talking about this right now. We
don't remember that as a condition. I can check on that and be happy to do that but I do not
recall that as a condition of approval for that subdivision. It said it had to meet city ordinance.
I'm not disagreeing with you…
Andy Kayati: Well I believe that that condition may have been exerted at or issued when it went
in front of council.
Aanenson: The City Council?
Andy Kayati: Yes.
Aanenson: Yeah, I'll have to double check on that. I don't think it was all retaining walls. It
might have been one or two.
Andy Kayati: I'm not asking for every retaining wall. Frankly the ones that face the west side,
face the street but I mean were facing the neighborhood, so that's one of my concerns. Another
issue is the site plan currently shows pedestrian walkways. Pedestrian walkway accessing here
from Boulder Creek neighborhood, which is up here. And this is the creek. This depiction does
not show currently, this depiction shows that in this particular area, shows a walking path that
comes in from the existing walking path on the east side of the bluff.
Aanenson: That's been removed.
Andy Kayati: It has been removed?
Aanenson: That's correct.
Andy Kayati: Okay.
Aanenson: The one you have in front today is correct. That's an old one.
Andy Kayati: However this one still exists?
Aanenson: That's correct.
Andy Kayati: My concern with regard to that has to do with access to the school from the
neighborhoods. Frankly if it's partly a blessing in disguise that you moved this one so they'll still
have access from the current path on the east side. My concern being students being what
32
91
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
students are, wishing to get around the parking permit rules, will park in the neighborhoods on
either side. They'll park in the neighborhoods as it relates to sporting events, particularly
football. You're talking about bringing in 2,000 people into this stadium with access area for the
comment about Eden Prairie. We play well, whoever it may be. How does the commission and
eventually council protect the neighbors of the area from street parking as it relates to that in
those areas?
Aanenson: Do you want me to answer that Alyson or do you want to?
Fauske: I can. Mr. Chair and Planning Commissioners, if I may interject at this point. When
staff, today staff went out and visited out to the Eden Prairie High School site. There's an
existing neighborhood across Valley View Road from that neighborhood. We really do draw on
other neighboring communities with this. What staff is looking at is an opportunity, if this
becomes a problem, we can look at doing a no parking Monday through Friday from, Eden
Prairie has from 7:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., during the school hours. We would certainly want to
look at something like that if it becomes an issue. That would require council resolution though
for a no parking ordinance.
Aanenson: But we are prepared to address that if it becomes a problem.
Andy Kayati: And I guess what I'd like to is just interject this point that, that if that were the
case and you address that, that you extend the hours to include special events. Football games,
things of that nature because frankly it'd be quite an incurament on the neighborhoods.
Aanenson: We're committed to monitoring that.
McDonald: Okay.
Andy Kayati: Another question I had is, the exposure of the building has a number of large
windows. I believe that you said they were 12 foot high, 6 on the eastern exposure. One of the
questions that I had as it relates to those is, are there any provisions as far as reflective, anti-
reflective coatings or anything like that because we're going to have a large number of windows
there that directly in the east for sunrise, in the morning and they're large panels that are going to
be reflecting off of that. That view that you're showing there is actually from the northeast.
That is the eastern exposure.
Aanenson: That's the best, if we can zoom in on that. About how much windows are on that
side.
Steve Miller: Would you like me to answer that?
Aanenson: Yes. Can you zoom in on that, that side of the building?
Steve Miller: It's clear Low E glass so there's no, I mean glass has no reflectivity. We feel
strongly about not putting in reflective glass on buildings like this so you will not be any more
reflective than a normal house glass would be.
33
92
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Andy Kayati: Okay. As long as that's taken into consideration, we'd appreciate that. Another
question that I had was in regards to the property for the Chanhassen High School has been both
farm and wetlands up until this point. I guess what I'm requesting is a comprehensive
landscaping plan so that we can see what that landscaping is going to be on the east. My
particular concern is the east side of the building. But all around. Specifically as you can see in
this view here, there's rather a larger large edifice that goes, that the neighbors to the east have to
look at. By looks today, wanting the Planning Commission to see what the requirements are for
vegetation height, tree heights and things like that. What I'm requesting is that if, whatever that
is, that it be let's put it this way, maximized or made, the vegetation be larger starting out.
Frankly at my age, in 20 years when I'm much older and much grayer, that's when the vegetation
is going to cover the building and I'd like to really take advantage of it at this particular point in
time so anything that can be done in that area.
Aanenson: Mr. Chair, the landscaping plan was submitted. It is one of your sheets. We can
show it here quickly. I guess it's multiple sheets. We did describe it in detail. I don't know if
you had a chance to read through the staff report?
Andy Kayati: No.
Aanenson: Okay. Those are available on line too. That's alright. It's on page 9 for the Planning
Commission's information. The staff report. They do exceed the requirements, except for the
parking lot plantings but they do meet all the requirements, except for some addition on the
parking lot, which is up on the other side. Again, kind of the theme that we had, because of the
wetland and the location of the site, we did go with more native type species. We also did
recommend that they put tubes in there around the seedlings and some of the other plantings
regarding deer and other wildlife that may want to eat that. I'd be happy to show it to you what
we did in the staff report.
Andy Kayati: As far as the trees though and that type of vegetation, for instance that are shown
down along this area here. I mean are, is there a size requirement?
Aanenson: Sure. Yes, there is.
Andy Kayati: And what is that?
Generous: 2 1/2 caliper inch is the minimum requirement. They start at that. They have 3 1/2
inch. They have 3 inch, so they mix it up.
Aanenson: Then there's also a recommendation, and going back to the retaining wall. This is on
the landscaping part of the staff report. There is also a recommendation that they put vines on
those walls such as Virginia Creeper, English Ivy to add interest and color so that you're not
looking at that blank wall, and again they're not, they're different heights to the walls. Some of
them are stepped so again as they indicated there'll be plantings inbetween some of those too, the
trees to break those up, so maybe we can go through that in more detail with you at another time.
34
93
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Andy Kayati: Okay. And I guess, so this question here, I think you've answered my question.
The only thing I would like to see as far as the caliper, dimension of the trees, them be at least an
inch or so bigger because they're going to be dwarfed outside a building of that size. The next
question I had with regards to this, and it's probably something that should be addressed to the
school district, and that is with regards to the Bluff Creek Estates neighborhood is directly east of
this property and the prevailing wind comes out of the west. My question is, what provisions are
there for preventing debris, trash, things like that from being blown into the wetlands, and then
subsequently into our neighborhoods as a result of football games, baseball games, general
student daily activities and things like that, and I don't know if it's something that the fences
would capture. I'm not sure what kind of daily maintenance is done and those types of questions
but it's a question that I have. The other question that I have was related to the illumination
hours on the building and I, you know frankly illuminating the theater portion of the building is
fine. The only thing that I would ask is that it not be illuminated all night. If there could be
some limits on that. I guess my last question would be, looking at the bus drop off area, I think
that having the appropriate vegetation will help with noise abatement in that area as it relates to
buses and things like that. That's another reason for asking for I guess more mature landscaping,
specifically on this side of the building because as I said before, our properties are considerably
closer than some of the other projects that I've seen and the activity levels are far higher than
those too so. And with that I'll rest.
McDonald: Thank you very much. Does anyone else wish to make comment?
Al Gomez: Chairman, commissioners, good evening. Al Gomez. I'm one of Andy's neighbors.
8748 Valley View Place. Yes, I would like a little better understanding. When we started the
meeting with the previous proposition with Heartland, Chairman you were very adamant about
the variances and we're here to talk about two main variances as I understood them. One was
this entryway here, and the other one was a third story for the walkout piece. Is that correct? Of
which I'm still marveled that we approve landscaping or grading and we yet still proposing a
variance at this stage as to whether it should be 2 or 3 story, and that's the piece we tried to bring
up to the committee the last time we were here was we were passing a grading ordinance without
having this in front of us to say you know, okay we're going ahead and grading, yet we haven't
approved 2 versus 3 stories. We're going through a ton, a ton of work to preserve the wetlands as
the city can attest to, yet again as we look at some of the vegetation, some of the retaining walls
that we're doing, it's almost counter to the amount of money and effort that we're putting into
preserving this. The, I know we mentioned on the traffic lights. I'm in full support of the
Finance Director that with my daughter now attending the Chaska High School, those lights are
critical. That's a ton of traffic with 1,100 parking spots. Not having one there is to me, I'm
marveled that that's not already in the plans and further along. I know we mentioned a traffic
study with the railroad tracks, and we talked about the impact of when that comes through the
city, but do, can we compare the traffic through the city at any given time to the entry or exodus
of the number of students and/or buses coming through here? And again I would say that's going
to be a hazard whether it's to or from school in the morning, when they get out of school and in
evening activity that takes place, specifically sporting events. Again, this entry way with the
buses is news to us. It's not anything we have seen before. Obviously we were concerned about
the grading and the building, but seeing the entryway now and the bus and the amount of traffic,
I too an concerned about the buffer. How do we protect number one, the aesthetics of the
35
94
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
wetland and again part of the main reason why a lot of us bought the properties along the area
that we did, but also to protect the noise and garbage, potential garbage control. Couple other
concerns that I have with the pipeline. I guess with the amount of dirt that we moved, I'm a little
curious as to whether there was an opportunity to utilize some of that to improve the grading or
the level on the side of where the athletic fields are at. With that being lower and adjacent to and
draining down to the wetland, obviously that's a concern as to how it's going to drain and what's
going to drain into not only a natural wetland. And I know we talked about the possibility of
artificial turf or a composite of some sort and fully understand why you would want to consider
that, but again as you start to put that other material in there, how does that impact if there is
drainage and it goes into this wetland that we've spent so much money to preserve. So those are
a few of the comments that I had and concerns with the project. Again, please don't get us
wrong. I've got two daughters that will go the high school. We fully support the high school and
welcome the facility. We take advantage of the Chaska High School now and love it, but it's
still, when we've got the property, you know we bought it with a lookout and a higher property
value because of that so we're trying to find that common ground of what can we do to make it
you know usable and maximize for the school, yet still appealing for us and retain some of the
privacy that we've gotten to enjoy this far.
McDonald: Okay, thank you very much.
Al Gomez: You're welcome.
McDonald: Does anyone else wish to make comment?
Thor Smith: Commissioners, I'm Thor Smith at 2139 Boulder Road. I guess my only comment
would be, or request would be that we get some type of a commitment from the school district to
work with the city and the county when the ultimate widening of Lyman happens. My concern is
with the railroad tracks and the, along Lyman Boulevard where you'll have a lot of children or
kids walking across the railroad tracks from the neighborhood to the north of there, and I just, I
have a safety concern with the kids crossing you know right over the railroad tracks. I know that
train comes very frequently. I live right, it's right in my back yard. It comes very frequently and
it's not, it's not on a scheduled routine at all, and I guess my concern, I know I've talked about
this a number of time and it's not necessarily, it'd be difficult to put on their property because the
railroad tracks isn't on the school's property but, to have some type of a commitment or
something from them that would you know, let us work together to create some type of a safe
crossing for the students to get across the railroad tracks.
McDonald: Thank you. Does anyone else wish to make comment?
Joel Lehrke: Good evening. My name's Joel Lehrke, 2329 Boulder Road. I'd like to first start
off by saying, Mr. Pumper thank you. We appreciate the conversations we've had with you.
You've been very receptive and we appreciate like our comments on the fence. The first item I
would like to talk to about is that railroad track along here with the fence. I know that you guys
have said you are going to do one but like you made the comment…kids will hike those fences.
Just remember Homecoming night, football games, kids kind of wander around. I think it's very
neat that it's going to be kind of recessed. I went to school in Waconia and that has the old
36
95
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
stadium that has the, basically field that all the grass and everything stayed and it's just a really
neat effect that it has, but it also will cause, I think during those games kids will run to the ends
of the field and disappear into the trees. Disappear into the tracks and the tracks will be a
freeway, and we want to make sure that there's something higher maybe than 4 feet there to make
sure the kids aren't getting there. I am trying to find, Kate if you could help me, the page that has
the stop lights plan.
Aanenson: Page 11 or 14.
Joel Lehrke: Is that what I'm looking for?
Aanenson: Yeah, page 14. The diagram. Yep.
Joel Lehrke: If I could get you to zoom.
Aanenson: Yeah, just keep zooming. There we go.
Joel Lehrke: As we were talking about with the area with the stop lights here, we've got the
railroad tracks. This would be the area we're talking with the fence. One other area I would like
to ask you to help us with. I know we're fighting the colony on this one when it comes to this
road. As a fellow was saying here you know looking into the widening of this road. What we're
really looking for you know, it's like expected to happen in 2009. It's hoped to happen in 2009
and I know when it comes to county road systems, the city can only really basically ask the
county to do the things but whatever efforts that you can put forward to get the county to first
look into widening of that road. To get it done in time for the high school. And the other thing
is, the possible future stop light, I would highly recommend that would be there. This is a very
curved type deal with Lyman Boulevard. I live in this area right here. This will become a major
feed from Highway 5 going towards school for the kids there to the north, and it's a high accident
rate just because it's a tough view to see the way the road is curved. My son is just starting
driving and he's just as bad where he doesn't always stop fully to the full stop and kind of floats
through because you try to cut it. A lot of screeching there so whatever efforts you could do. I
agree with the other stop lights. I think we'll need them all. I think county will eventually come
to us and say that the stop lights are all too close. I'm sure that will be a problem in the future so
we'll have to work something out there, but it is going to be an issue. The other thing is with, as
you said with the train, that crossing. We've looked at such things, you know the superintendent
and Mr. Pumper have both talked to us that basically a railroad is basically almost a sovereign
nation. We're going to need efforts from the city, the county. We have some possibilities with
certain congressmen that are on the transportation committee that we've heard some funds
available that come in regards to safety that we're going to try and follow through in our
neighborhood and try and make contact with them but we're just asking for your help. Whatever
you can do to be pretty forceful there to help us to get something there because I don't know if
you know or not, right now there isn't even a bike path crossing the railroad. It's basically just
road and the side of the roads and you know our kids will be in that area probably where it's not
even considered busing and when they're that old, they don't want to really ride the bus anyway
anymore so they're going to walk. That's all I have is the consideration for the fence, the stop
37
96
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
light and whatever efforts you can do to make sure that we get that road expanded on time and it
doesn't happen maybe 4 years after the school opens.
McDonald: Okay, thank you. There was a gentleman back there by the door that wanted to
speak.
Dennis Chadderdon: My name is Dennis Chadderdon. I live at 8900 Audubon Road. My
concern right now is with the erosion control that's going on inside the wetland. Kate, do you
know what type that is?
Aanenson: That's a MnDot project within the wetland so.
Dennis Chadderdon: Okay. So that has nothing to do with the city?
Aanenson: Correct. They're managing that project, but I can follow up on that for you.
Dennis Chadderdon: Yeah, that would be great because when I built my place 5 years ago and I
worked both with Kate and Bob, I had to put Type III erosion control in there and I'm 75 feet off
the creek. At the closest point of the creek, which if you know anything about that, it consists of
a snow fence, bales of hay, 2 stakes in each one, and I'm sorry, Type I in front of the snow fence,
dug 6 inches in. I mean it was a major process, and they're back there scraping everything and
they've got a few little Type I's around the trees. And when you put the people who live in the
city and make jump through all the hoops and make, you know go through all the processes of
doing things correctly, and then they come in there and just kind of put it here and there and
totally scrape the earth, it causes a concern so, that's just my point at this time. Thanks for your
time.
McDonald: Thank you very much. Does anyone else wish to come forward and make a
comment? Seeing no one else come forward, I will close the public meeting and I'll bring it back
up to deliberation for the commissioners and Kevin, you look ready. I'll start with you.
Dillon: Wow. A lot to process on here. Thanks to the school and their people that they're
working with on this. I thought they did a good job of explaining things and also thanks to the
neighbors that raised some concerns. You know it sounds like some of the biggest of the
concerns that the neighbors have are in the process of getting addressed. You know maybe not
all of them but they're certainly not getting ignored, and so I would just encourage the staff and
the school district to continue to try to collaborate with the neighbors to see if there's, you know
find a common ground that was soft because also things like, you know people just aren't
being…about it. I mean they've got good legitimate concerns and you know it seems like both
sides are listening so I would hope that we could work through that, and it sounds like good
progress is being made on the key ones anyways.
Larson: Okay. Well this has been a mountain of work that has gone into this and I read every bit
of it today and it's amazing how much you've had to address. One of my main concerns that I
have is the stop lights, it's effect on the proposed possible stop light at, where the parking lot is
for the kids. I too will have a high school student there that year and she would probably be
38
97
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
crossing the railroad tracks and so that is a concern for me. The fencing, by the retaining walls,
that's another issue I would like to make sure that we have the steeper ones with the taller fences.
Just on the off chance that kids are going to be hopping the fence, if it's an 8 foot, they'd be less
inclined to do so. And then let's see, which gentleman brought up the fence along the railroad
track? I think that's a great idea and I didn't see that that was part of any of the proposals
anywhere so perhaps that's something that would be considered as well. Other than that, looks
like a fabulous project.
Thomas: I have a real quick question. Just on the railroad tracks. Is this part of the completely
the school's property or is it? It's not even their property right? I mean.
Aanenson: No. It's a separate easement over the railroad right-of-way.
Thomas: Okay.
Aanenson: A sovereign nation as kind is similar…
Thomas: Okay. So…a fence would be quite nice there. However if it's going to be just
impossible, sovereign nation and they're not going to be able to put a fence in there so.
Aanenson: They've got a fence there.
Thomas: Well yeah, but not next to like the, it's on your property right?
Mr. Pumper: It's on our property.
Thomas: Yeah, okay.
Mr. Pumper: 6 foot high.
Thomas: That's fine. So that sounds good. I guess addressing some of the neighbors concern,
the retaining wall, I'm curious as to the Keystone possibilities. How that's going to affect the
retaining wall. And I'm also very concerned about that parking in the neighborhood. Knowing
how, at least when I was in high school how we did our best to do whatever possible to get
around parking in the lot and not having to pay the fee so…how creative kids can be when it
comes to how far away they can park and walk and stuff like that so, as long as we're going to
monitor it, make sure that we're watching that, I feel secure in that and staff did a good job so.
Papke: Okay. It's not very often as a planning commission that we have to deal with a major
public building like this, and one of the things I've been wrestling with a little bit is the last
speaker from the public who was mentioning the MnDot activities, it kind of sensitized me to,
you know we're doing a number of things here that if this was a single family dwelling, we
wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole. I mean we're always very adamant about the Bluff Creek
primary zone and so on, yet this is a public structure and I think we're doing the right things here
but you know, it makes me, it gives me kind of butterflies in the stomach because we're doing
things that you know, were this a single family dwelling, we certainly wouldn't do. So in regards
39
98
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
to the variances we're granting, I think going through the Bluff Creek primary zone, and again
getting back to some of the environmental issues that were mentioned before, makes me a little
nervous but I think it's the right thing to do. I think in the findings of fact that staff pointed out, I
don't think there's too many alternatives to this and I think from a safety perspective it makes a
lot of sense. The variance for the 3 story building, again if this was a single family dwelling, we
would not hold still for it but the fact that this is, the site is really perfect for this. It really
accommodates the bus entry. I think it makes great sense under the circumstances. One of the
things that we haven't chatted about too much is item number 3 under recommendation C of the
staff, the façade flood lights. I've been wrestling with that a little bit as we've been talking here
and I just, again it's just a public building. It would seem to me that we're not talking tremendous
amounts of light pollution here, particularly when looked at in the perspective of the stadium
lighting. I think the stadium lighting is going to be 1,000 times more powerful than a couple
little light bulbs we're going to shine up on the side of the building, so I think from a light
pollution perspective, which is why we don't allow up lighting in the first place, I think this one
is fairly reasonable so I'd be somewhat inclined from aesthetic perspective to actually allow that
to go against the staff recommendation. I think that makes pretty good sense.
Aanenson: While we're on that Commissioner Papke, could I just add. The staff didn't address
that in your variances so while you're talking about that, I'm on page 24 of your staff report.
Papke: Yep. That's where I am too.
Aanenson: Yep, so if you did choose to add lighting, I guess we were looking at that from a
neighborhood and light pollution but.
Papke: But it is on the west side.
Aanenson: Correct. I would concur with that and the stadium lighting is recessed. We get the
same issue at Lake Ann. On a warm softball night, the lights illuminate and one of the things the
city has worked hard to do is to provide cut off lighting so we don't have that ambient light going
up. But I just wanted to address, if you did want to add that as a condition, I just want to point
out for the record that you would have to add that for a 3 story building. You'd also want to add
for up lighting, and then also under your findings of fact, which would be found on page, it's the
findings of fact fall right behind that. It'd be on the fourth page of findings of fact where it talks
about variances. Then you'd also want to add one for up lighting and for the reasons you may
want to state. That it's not within the neighborhood's visibility. It would be cut off at a certain
period of time. Whatever you feel would be appropriate just so, that would have to be on the
record.
Papke: Okay.
Aanenson: Just point of clarification.
Papke: That's it.
40
99
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
McDonald: I would support an amendment like that, if you wanted to make. I think the school
didn't make a case for what you want to do. I'm kind of amazed at this whole plan. I kind of
visualized this thing. You've done a good job I think putting something of such importance in an
area that I'm not sure we'd build anything else there. It really isn't a good area to put a
subdivision. It's not really a good area for I think commercial development or anything so I
think you've found a good use. But there's a number of things I guess to address all these
problems. This is not the first high school that's ever been built. We have 3 of them around us.
Chaska, Minnetonka and Eden Prairie They all had the same problems and I guess you know
staff has made the comment that they intend to go out in the community and go look lessons
learned there. I'm very familiar with Minnetonka and I have to say you've learned lessons quite
well there about traffic flow because that is one of their biggest problems. So I encourage you
again to find out you know what problems have happened at these other schools and design
around it. I have confidence that you're doing that. A lot of these other issues, I mean I applaud
you for the fence. That's probably the only way anything is going to get done there. You're
going to have to put it on your property and you made the commitment to do that. I think to do
anything else, people mentioned the federal government going to get that. That will take forever.
As long as the school's willing to do it, I think that does solve the problem. There is a safety
issue, which is why I was asking about the elevations, especially down toward the soccer field
because those are pretty level. That is going to become a natural egress. Kids are kids and that's
what's going to happen. So yeah, I would encourage you to kind of look at that area and I think
you're aware that you've got a problem down there. On the other thing, yeah on the variances. I
think what we have to look at is, this is a public good. This is also going to become a source of
public pride for our community. I think that you know this is going to be an area that people will
point to with pride and it will become a landmark within this community. It is something I think
we can all be very proud of. It was voted on by the voters of this community and I think
everyone does support it and again, the design I believe reflects the concerns and I really have no
problems granting any variances to this for those reasons, and I did ask about the mitigation
within the wetlands because I do feel yes, we should hold everybody to the same standards but
again, we are getting something out of that which is what we always ask for. If we're going to
allow people to do things and to grant variances, there should be a trade off and the school seems
willing to do all that. It will become, and again it now I think opens up these areas to the public
much more than was open before. And for all those reasons, and you know as I said, I would be
a supporter about the up lighting that the school is requesting. It sounds as though that is a
reasonable request. If that's an amendment, I believe that it could be supported by this
commission. Having said all that, again my hat is off to you all. I think you've done a good job
for an area that I think is very difficult to deal with and I do think that in 5 years, yeah everybody
will look upon this and again it will be a source of pride for the community and people will be
very proud of the fact that they live next door to a high school. I just look at all these other areas
where neighborhoods have had high schools put in. You talk about property values. That's one
of the things that raises property values more than anything. Is the fact that there's a school that's
close by and we have access to fields and places for children to go and play. So I just don't know
of any high school or school period that's a negative as far as a community and I really can't see
any reason to stop any of this. Again, there are issues that need to be worked out. You've raised
those today. I think the school understands that they do need to address them. It's in the plan
here, as far as looking at things. The fencing. The landscaping. I mean we will hold their feet to
the fire on all those issues, but again there is a reasonable standard, you cannot expect them to
41
100
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
plant a tree that's going to be a mature 10 or 15 year old tree. I mean there is a cost factor in all
this and yes, you are paying for it. It is our school. This belongs to the public. So I would also
expect them to be good standards of their money. But having said all that, we will make sure
that it is pleasing to the neighborhood. You know the standards in the codes are there and you
will have to adhere to that so, with that I would accept a motion going forward.
Dillon: I would move that the Planning Commission adopt the following four motions. And
adopt the attached findings of fact and recommendations. A. The Chanhassen Planning
Commission recommends that City Council approve the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High
School site from Agricultural Estate District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office
and Institutional District, OI. B. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with
a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone, in conformance
with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates dated February 2, 2007, subject
following to conditions, the following number 1 and 2. And C. The Chanhassen Planning
Commission recommends that City Council approve the Site Plan with Variance for a three-story
building for a High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square-foot building,
athletic fields, concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, with
plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated February 2, 2007, subject to the
following conditions 1 through 11. And D. The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends
that City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands
on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering, dated
February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions 1 through 5.
McDonald: Okay, do I have a second?
Papke: Before that I'd like to propose a friendly amendment to Commissioner Dillon's motion.
That motion C, condition number 3 to be amended to the building façade flood lights shall be
allowed during school events and activities and to request staff to update the findings of fact to
correspond to that amendment.
McDonald: Okay. And then with that I have a question for staff. You gave us a new page with
the Park Director's conditions. Should that be part of.
Aanenson: Those are recommendations. They're not ordinance. Again we'll pass those on to
City Council as a recommendation. I think Mr. Pumper identified that those are bid alternates
that they're putting in for the turf. The other one regarding additional parking, they meet the
standards. That's certainly they'll look at something for cost effective. And the other one was…
Papke: Commissioner Dillon, do you accept my friendly amendment?
Dillon: Yes I do.
McDonald: And do I have a second on the amendment with the friendly amendment.
Larson: Yes.
42
101
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate
District, A2, and Planned Unit Development, PUD, to Office and Institutional District, OI. All
voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek
Corridor with a Variance to locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary
zone, in conformance with the grading plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc.,
dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions:
1. The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the
easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project.
2. To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor, the applicant shall submit a plan for the
restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor (including the drainageway along
the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus/event entrance) with species
consistent with the City’s Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City
Council approve the Site Plan with Variance for a three-story building and up lighting for a
High School campus including an approximately 406,000 square-foot building, athletic fields,
concession building, stadium, storage/maintenance buildings and parking lots, plans prepared
by Anderson Johnson Associates, Inc., dated 02-02-07, subject to the following conditions:
1. The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas, plazas
and scenic overlooks. Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site.
2. The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop-off access west of the building
entrance.
3. The building façade flood lights shall be allowed during school events and activities.
4. Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect.
5. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school:
• Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Lake Hazeltine Drive intersection.
• Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard/Audubon Road South intersection for
the addition of a north leg to the intersection.
• Construct the following turn lanes:
43
102
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
Approach Left Turn Lane Right Turn Lane
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North
School Access
Bypass lane
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North
School Access
200 feet
Westbound North School Access at
Lyman Boulevard
Through lane becomes
turn lane
300 feet
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake
Hazeltine Drive
200 feet
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake
Hazeltine Drive
200 feet
Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at
Lyman Boulevard
100 feet
Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at
Lyman Boulevard
300 feet Build
through/right
Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon
Road South
200 feet
Westbound Lyman Boulevard at
Audubon Road South
200 feet
Northbound Audubon Road South at
Lyman Boulevard
Build to add through
lane
Southbound Audubon Road South at
Lyman Boulevard
200 feet Build
through/right
6. Building Official Conditions:
a. The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems.
b. The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the
State of Minnesota.
c. Building permits are required for all structures (including, but not limited to, storage
buildings, concession stands, bleachers, retaining walls).
d. Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the
State of Minnesota.
7. Fire Marshal Conditions:
a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees,
shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure
that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to
Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1.
44
103
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
b. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed.
Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of
construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided.
c. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load
of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.3.
d. Yellow curbing and “No Parking Fire Lane” signs will be required. Contact Chanhassen
Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed.
e. No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either
be removed from site or chipped.
f. Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and
approval. Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503.2.4.
8. Forester Conditions:
a. Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156
trees.
b. Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce.
c. Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected. Fencing shall be installed around trees
prior to grading.
d. Understory seedlings shall be located among overstory deciduous trees.
e. The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping.
f. All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes. Tubes shall be monitored and
removed at the appropriate time. All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting.
g. All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternative species.
h. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east
property line. Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in
addition to trees.
i. The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as
Armstrong red maple, Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species.
9. Engineer Conditions:
45
104
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
a. The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to
Lyman Boulevard.
b. ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the
access through the substation property.
c. Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland/wetland mitigation and Lyman
Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100-year event.
d. Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman
Boulevard will be treated in the ponds.
e. Hydrology to the wetland/wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access
point must be maintained.
f. The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting.
g. The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of
softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher’s mound.
h. Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner.
i. Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must
be approved by the appropriate private utilities.
j. Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan.
k. The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer.
l. Pond, drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands.
m. The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City
standard detail plates.
n. The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine
if the high school construction has damaged the pipe. If the City televises this sanitary
sewer before the high school construction mobilized, the developer will only be required
to televise the line after construction is complete.
o. The school district will be reimbursed $166,424.00 which is the cost difference between
the 18-inch trunk and 10-inch lateral watermain.
p. Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access
Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued.
46
105
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
q. The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do
not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds.
r. Based on the proposed utility plan, an irrigation meter is required.
s. The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer, existing overhead utilities
and existing gas pipelines.
t. Mylar and digital as-builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver
County coordinates.
10. Water Resources Coordinator Conditions:
a. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project’s Wetland
Alteration Permit, Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
(MR 8420).
b. The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for
Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.
c. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) including all information required
by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer.
d. Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site. The
emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed. The
emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re-enforcement mat or fabric and
riprap.
e. The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site. The
timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow
area. The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans (2 tons per acre,
disc anchored).
f. All riprap/fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end
section installation.
g. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year
round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can
Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area
10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.)
Flatter than 10:1 21 days
47
106
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a
curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other
natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water.
h. Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J-Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet.
i. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas. The
areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan. A temporary and/or
permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared
End Sections (FES) 7 and 8. This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a
temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland. If it is used as
a temporary pond, it should stay in place until all turf is established. Temporary outlet
structures (e.g., a perforated riser and rock cone) shall be provided for the ponds; details
should be provided.
j. Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering
methods from the City’s project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior
to conducting any and all dewatering on-site.
k. Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets.
l. The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen’s standard details for erosion and
sediment control (i.e., Details 3102, 3104, 3107, 3108, 3109, 5300, 5301, 5302, 5302A).
m. The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area.
n. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and
street sweeping as-needed.
o. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
(i.e., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency) and comply with their conditions of approval.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Dillon moved, Larson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends
that City Council approve the Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of
wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen High School, plans prepared by Pinnacle
Engineering, dated February 9, 2007, subject to the following conditions:
1. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet in width (with a minimum average of 16.5 feet) shall be
maintained around all Ag/Urban wetlands. All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be
protected by silt fence during grading. Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved, surveyed and
staked in accordance with the City’s wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland
buffer edge signs, under the direction of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay
48
107
Planning Commission Meeting - March 6, 2007
the City $20 per sign. All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the
wetland buffer edge. The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans.
2. Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MR 8420).
3. The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and
hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re-established.
4. A five-year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted. The replacement
monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non-native species,
particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. The plans shall show fixed photo
monitoring points for the replacement wetland. The applicant shall provide proof of
recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland.
5. The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110% of the cost of the wetland creation
(including grading and seeding) to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland
are met. The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of
final approval. The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation (including
grading and seeding) so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of
credit.”
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Dillon moved, Papke seconded to note the verbatim and
summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 16, 2007 as
presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0.
Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
49
108
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 2271125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
11
l
MEMORANDUM
TO Paul Oehme City EngineerDirector of Public Works
Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer
March 26 2007 J
FROM
DATE
SUBJECT Koehnen Area Street Reconstruction Project 07 01 Call
Assessment Hearing
REQUESTED ACTION Simple Majority Vote Required
Council is requested to call the assessment hearing for the Koehnen
Reconstruction Project No 07 01 for April 23 2007 and approve the attached
resolution
DISCUSSION
The project includes the reconstruction of the Koehnen area streets and utilities
Bids were received and opened on Friday March 16 2007 and are currently being
tabulated Funding for the project will be discussed at the assessment hearing
Per state statute the City Council must call the assessment hearingflIldpublish
the hearing date at least two weeks prior to the assessment hearingjiifStaff intends
to publish the notice in the April 5 2007 edition of the ChanhassenVillager
This schedule provides just over two weeks time between the publication date and
the assessment hearing
Attachment Resolution
c Marcus Thomas Bolton Menk
g eng public 07 01 koehnenyosemite road imp 03 26 07 call assessment hearing doc
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play109
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
DATE March 26 2007 RESOLUTION NO 2007
MOTION BY SECONDED BY
A RESOLUTION CALLING THE ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR THE
KOEHNEN AREAlYOSEMITE A VENUE STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO 07 01
WHEREAS Minnesota State Statute 429 regarding special assessments for public
improvement projects requires City Council to officially set the assessment hearing date for capital
improvement projects
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA
1 A hearing shall be held on the 23rd day of April 2007 in the Council Chambers at
city hall at 7 00 p m to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons
owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with
reference to such assessment
2 The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing and
shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement The clerk shall also cause mailed notice to
be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to
the hearings
3 The owner of any property so assessed may at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor pay the whole ofthe assessment on such property with interest
accrued to the date of payment to the City of Chanhassen except that no interest shall be charged if
the entire assessment is paid within 60 days from the adoption of the assessment The property
owner may at any time thereafter pay to the City of Chanhassen the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made
Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31
of the succeeding year
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 26th day of March 2007
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
110
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952227 1400
Fax 952227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www cLchanhassen mn us
ie
MEMORANDUM
Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer
0
TO
FROM Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer
DATE March 26 2007 6
SUBJECT Dogwood RoadTanadoona Street and Utilities Project No 06 06
Approve Plans and Specifications Authorize Ad for Bids
REQUESTED ACTION Simple majority vote required
City Council is recommended to approve plans and specifications and authorize
ad for bid
BACKGROUND
On November 13 2006 Council officially authorized Kimley Hornto prepare the
feasibility report This was the same feasibility report paid for by a property
owner in February 2006
On January 22 2007 Council approved the preliminary plat of The Arbors the
proposed development south of Dogwood Road and west of West 78th Street
contingent upon the approval and construction of City Project 06 06
On March 12 2007 Council held the public hearing and authorized the
preparation of plans and specifications
DISCUSSION
Roadway
At the public hearing Council directed staff to design Tanadoona Drive and
Dogwood Road north of the Arbors Development to a width of 26 feet Also
Council directed staff to design Dogwood Road in the Arbors Development to the
City s standard 31 foot width The roadway sections were decided to be
urbanized with curb and gutter
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
All homes are currently served by individual wells Three of the northern
properties are served by a small City owned and maintained lift station and
forcemain the remaining properties are served by individual septic systems
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play111
Paul Oehme
March 26 2007
Dogwood RoadlTanadoona Drive Project 06 06
Page 2
The proposed utility improvements will provide service to the proposed
development at the southern end of Dogwood Road The Arbors Gravity sanitary
sewer will be installed within Dogwood Road and will connect to the lift station at
the southeast corner of Dogwood Road and Tanadoona Drive The lift station is
proposed to be replaced to handle the ultimate flows for this area The forcemain
from the lift station to the gravity sewer within Tanadoona Drive is also proposed
to be replaced to convey the additional flow
Drainage and Runoff
The runoff from the Arbors Development will be conveyed to a storm water pond
constructed with the development This pond will be constructed and paid for by
the developer The runoff outside of the development will be directed to the
corner of Dogwood Road and Tanadoona Drive Staff has contacted Camp
Tanadoona to pursue a drainage and utility easement over the low area of land on
the southwest corner of the Camp property for ponding If an easement cannot be
acquired an environmental manhole would be installed to remove some of the
sediment from the roadway prior to draining into Lake Minnewashta An
appraisal has been completed for the proposed easement area
ASSESSMENTSMETHOD OF FINANCING
Special assessments are proposed to be levied against benefiting properties for the
improvements included in this project The City will assess benefiting property
owners based on the construction bid amount of the improvements The costs for
the improvements are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties on a per
unit basis The development will be assessed 100 of the benefit from the
project 100 of the water and sanitary sewer improvements will be assessed
back to the benefiting property owners 40 of the roadway improvements will
be assessed back to the existing benefiting property owners consisting with the
City s assessment practice The estimated assessment for existing properties is
30 106 81 per unit and 17455 45 per unit for properties that have existing City
sanitary sewer service Assessments are proposed for 10 years at 6 interest
Funding for this project is proposed as follows
Special assessments
Revolving Assessment Fund
Storm Sewer Utility Fund
Total
1 541 362
431163
365 075
2 337 600
G ENGIPUBLICI06 06 Dogwood Road ImpI03 26 07 approve PSorder ad for bid doc112
Paul Oehme
March 26 2007
Dogwood RoadTanadoona Drive Project 06 06
Page 3
SCHEDULE
The anticipated project schedule is as follows
May 14 2007 Call assessment hearing
June 11 2007 Assessment hearing Accept bids Award contract
June 2007 Construction begins
October 2007 Construction substantially complete
RECOMMENDA TION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the plans and specifications and
order the ad for bids for City Project No 06 06
Attachments
c Jon Horn Kimley Horn
Chadd Larson Kimley Horn
G ENGIPUBLICI06 06 Dogwood Road ImpI03 26 07 approve P S order ad for bid doc113
I
oo
N
g
j
iD
5i
5
G
a
iD
g
8
i
g
5
ij
I
@16
III
c0
e
f
o
I
J0iIV
I
l
cTI
l I j
IA A CR
c
cc
AN RO D o
0 mIirJI
j
u
X
II i
I
1
IiI
@ 1 h cc oo
o1
1
r
I
c y 0 i i i
I
v
I
II
III e 1I
I
Ii i
i i
J
@
I iL 1 i
i i 78TH S E
c tr
i i
m
l
i fJ ili
II
L
II
IIII
I
I
I t u
EXHIBIT
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
DOGWOOD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT 06 06
@
I
j I imley Horn
and Associates Inc
550 U oIEASlTY AoL WEST SUITE 34N Tn NO 5S 54r 419
T PoWL IolNIESOT 551 rx NO nl 645 511
o 100 200
r li J LJ
PROPOSED BOO
pvc WA1RMAIN II
I J
r I
1 I
I
LAKE
MINNEWASHTA
LIFT
i
@ r5Y
Ci
I I
I
1 1
CITY OF
n I HI lJailtlfitlcubl
PROPOSEO
PONO
L
c
J i
114
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
DATE March 26 2007 RESOLUTION NO 2007
MOTION BY SECONDED BY
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING AD FOR BIDS FOR TANADOONA DRIVEDOGWOOD
ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO 06 06
WHEREAS pursuant to the resolution passed by the Council on March 12 2007 the City
Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the Tanadoona DriveDogwood Road
Reconstruction Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council
1 Such plans and specifications a copy of which can be reviewed at the office of the City
Engineer are hereby approved
2 The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official city newspaper and
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications The ad shall be published at least three times shall specify the
work to be done shall state that bids will be opened and that the responsibility of the bidders will
be considered by the Council at 7 00 PM on Monday May 29 2007 in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be
given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a bid security payable to the
clerk for 5 of the amount of such bid
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 26th day of March 2007
ATTEST
Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
115
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
iJ
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM
Id6
6
Karen J Engelhardt Office Manager
DATE March 19 2007
SUBJ Approval of 2007 Liquor License Renewals
Attached is a listing of all of the liquor licenses that are renewed annually by the
City Council This renewal is for the licensing period of May 1 2007 through
April 30 2008 As of this writing staff has not received all of the necessary
documentation from every license holder This is typical and no license will be
issued until all documentation is complete
The Carver County Sheriff s Department is in the process of completing
background investigations on the applicants and the operating manager of each
establishment This background investigation includes criminal history
outstanding warrants and driving records No license will be issued if negative
comments are found
Staff also reviewed property tax and utility bill records for each applicant One
establishment s utility bill is delinquent and this amount will be collected prior to
issuance of the license
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 2007 liquor license
applications as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all
necessary documentation and a favorable background investigation Approval
requires a simple majority vote of those City Council members present
Following Council approval I will forward all of the licenses to the Liquor
Control Division at the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for final
processing The state requires that these documents be in their office by April 1
2007
ATTACHMENTS
1 2007 Liquor License Holders
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play116
2007 LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS
ON SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES
All fees listed include 200 Sunday Sales fee except High Timber Lounge
Axel s 560 West 78th Street
Chanhassen Dinner Theatres 501 West 78th Street
Applebee s Neighborhood Grill Bar 590 West 79th Street
High Timber Lounge Meeting Rooms 545 West 78th Street no Sunday Sales
Houlihan s 530 Pond Promenade
Chanhassen American Legion Post 580 290 Lake Drive East
Buffalo Wild Wings 550 West 79th Street
Chipotle Mexican Grill 560 West 79th Street
Rey Azteca 7874 Market Boulevard
OFF SALE INTOXICATING LICENSES
MGM Liquor Warehouse 7856 Market Boulevard
Cheers Wine Spirits 530 West 79th Street
Byerly Wine Spirits 780 West 78th Street
Century Wine Spirits 2689 West 78th Street
Winestyles 600 Market Street Suite 140
OFF SALE 3 2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSES
Kwik Trip 402 2201 West 78th Street
Chanhassen Citgo Company 380 Lake Drive East
Cub Foods 7900 Market Boulevard
Holiday Stationstore 390 2960 82nd Street
ON SALE 3 2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
Bluff Creek Golf Association 1025 Creekwood Drive
RSS Golf 825 Flying Cloud Drive
ON SALE BEER WINE LICENSES
Na s Thai Cafe 566 West 78th Street
Byerly s Restaurant 800 West 78th Street
Happy Garden Restaurant 2443 Highway 7 West
Frankie s Pizza Pasta Ribs 7850 Market Blvd
CJs Coffee Wine Bar 600 Market Street 600
Sr Poncho s Mexican Bar Grill 7765 Century Blvd
Total
Fee
6 315
13 304
9 809
7 862
9 809
9 809
9 809
6 315
6 315
200
200
200
200
58
58
58
58
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
83 659
117
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
ie
MEMORANDUM
tJ
TO Paul Oehme Public Works Director City Engineer 00
FROM Charles Siegle Equipment Superintendent
DATE March 26 2007
SUBJECT 2007 CIP Light Duty Vehicle Purchases PW016MMM
REQUESTED ACTION
Authorize purchase of light duty vehicles for street utility and building
departments
DISCUSSION
Annually the City considers replacement of vehicles that have reached their
average life expectancy and are showing signs of needing major maintenance It
has been the City s practice to replace these vehicles before major repairs are
required All of the vehicles proposed to be replaced are used basis and
have to be reliable to maintain current standard City services
DISCUSSION JUSTIFICA TION
1 STREET DEPARTMENT PICKUP
The 1991 Ford pickup to be replaced has severe rust This vehicle has
miles and 16 years of use and will have a big potential of needing expensive
repairs in the near future This truck will be sold at auction in the fall with an
estimated sale price of 1 500 if a new replacement vehicle is purchased The
new pickup will be used for day to day operations in the Street Department which
includes towing equipment such as skid loaders and other equipItlent
2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT PICKUP
The 1992 Ford Ranger pickup scheduled for replacement has 51 000 miles and
has severe rust This vehicle is 15 years old and will need expensive repairs in the
near future due to rusted brakes body work and total fuel line replacement If a
new vehicle is purchased the 1992 Ranger will be sold at the fall auction with an
estimated resale value of 1 000 to 1 500 The new pickup would be used for
building inspections
The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play118
Paul Oehme
2007 CIP Light Duty Vehicle Purchases
Page 2
3 UTILITY DEPARTMENT
The Utility Department is in need of another vehicle due to an added treatment
plant operator the City hired last year Staff is recommending the Utility
Superintendent s vehicle Chevy 2500 pickup be used for the new position The
replacement vehicle for the Utility Superintendent is proposed to be a lighter duty
vehicle with better gas mileage Staff is recommending a Ford Escape
BIDS AND QUOTES
The following quotes have been received from state bids for the two pickups and
utility department vehicle
1 STREET DEPARTMENT PICKUP
2007 Chevrolet 2500 lID 4x4 Pickup 21 72820
2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT PICKUP
2007 GMC Canyon Pickup 17 158 67
3 UTILITY DEPARTMENT
2008 Ford Escape 18 00028
TOTAL 56 887 15
The budgeted amount in the 2007 CIP for these three vehicles is 89 000 Tool
boxes and strobe lights will need to be purchased and installed for these vehicles
at an estimated total cost for all three vehicles of 2 000 City staff will install all
the necessary equipment
SUMMARY
The City s fleet continues to go past the normal replacement age of ten years for
most vehicles It is important to replace these units that are over 15 years old at
this time
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the bids for the purchase of these
vehicles
Attachments
G ENGIBudget CIP CIP2007 Purchase CIP vehicles Memo doc
119
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen MN
I
2007 thru 2011
Account 1 4004120 4704 Account 3
Contact Unassigned
Department Major Equipment
Type Vehicles
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Street Equipment
Priority nla
Total Project Cost 94 000
Project EQ 029
Project Name Light Duty Trucks Public Works
Account 2
Description I
Provides for scheduled replacement of light duty trucks in the street and garage departments Repla ement units are generally purchased early intheyearinordertoaccommodatethetimeframesestablishedbyHennepinCountyandtheStateofMNCooperativePurchasingProgram
Justification I
These vehicles are used for a variety of services throughout the conununity The average replacement age is 13 years These purchases areconsistentwiththeVehicleReplacementProgram
Expenditures
Vehicles
2007
31 000
Total 31 000
2008
32 000
32 000
2009
31 000
31 000
2010 2011 Total
94 000
94 000
Funding Sources
Capital Replacement Fund
Total
2007
31 000
31 000
2008
32 000
2009
31 000
31 000
2010 2011 Total
94 000
94 00032000
Operational Impact Other I
These purchases will include a limited warranty and will reduce annual maintenanGeand repair costs as compared to the vehicles replaced
120
Capital Iri1provement PrograID
City ofChanhassen MN
Project EQ 015
Project Name Community Dev Light Duty Trucks
2007 thru 2011
Account 1 4004107 4704 Account 3
Account 2
n
Contad Unassigned
Department Major Equipment
Type Vehicles
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Community Development
Priority nJa
Total Project Cost 168 000
Description I
Provides for scheduled replacements starting in 2001 These purchases are consistent with the Vehicle Replacement Schedule Replacement units
are generally purchased early in the year to accommodate the time frames established by Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota Cooperative
Purchasing Program
Justification I
These vehicles are used to provide building inspection services throughout the community be average replacement age is over 10 years
Expenditures
Vehides
Total
2007
26 000
26 000
Funding S ources
Capital Replacement Fund
Total
2007
26 000
26 000
2008
30 000
30 000
2009
55 000
55 000
2010
28 000
28 000
2011
29 000
29 000
Total
168 000
168 000
2008
30 000
30 000
2010
28 000
28 000
2011
29 000
29 000
Total
168 000
168 000
2009
55 000
55 000
Operational Impact Other
These purchases will include a limited warranty and will reduce the annual maintenance and repair costs as compared to the vehicles replaced
22
121
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen MN
2007 thru 201
Contact Unassigned
Department Major Equipment
Type Vehicles
Useful Life Unassigned
Category Utilities
Priority n a
Total Project Cost 156 000
Project EQ 062
Project Name Light Duty Trucks Utilities
Account 1 700 00004704 2007
Account 2 7010000 4704 2009
Account 3 701 00004704 2011
Description I
This allows for replacement of existing vehicles in the Water and Sewer department
Justification
This replaces pickups in accordance with the vehicle replacement plan
Expenditures
Vehides
2007
32 000
Total 32000
2008 2009
54 000
54 000
2010 2011
70 000
70 000
Total
156 000
156 000
Funding Sources 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Sewer Utility Fund 54 000 70 000 124 000
Water Utility Fund 32 000 32 000
Total 32 000 54 000 70 000 156 000
Operational Impact Other
46
122
02
CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT
P O Box 97 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen MN 55317
Bus Phone 952 227 1200 Minnewashta Station NO 2 Phone 952 474 7094
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Gregg Geske Fire Chief
Roger Smallbeck 1 st Assistant Chief
Randy Wahl 2nd Assistant Chief AAI
Mark Littfin Fire Marshal dJ
DATE March 19 2007
SUBJ Monthly City Council update
Fire Department Overview
Staffing is at 44 active firefighters as of March 16 2007 allocation is 45 PTEs I will be out of town
during the Council Meeting and unable to attend for the council update Feel free to contact me if you
have any concerns or questions before the April meeting We will be teaming up with the Chanhassen
Lions for the annual Pancake Breakfast on April 1 st
As ofMarch 3 2007 we have responded to 100 calls up 22 calls from this same time last year We had
no structure fires since our last council update We responded to mutual aid to Chaska for a garage fire
Fire Training
This month training consisted ofmedical refresher training for our First Responders and EMTs and
EMT practical testing We also participated in firefighter training of map reading GPS operation
thermal image camera training and radio training In April we will be doing firefighting skills training
and Skywarn training
Fire Inspections
The initial hotel motel inspections are finished and we will be doing re inspections in the next few days
The inspections went very well with the exception of some minor violations Abra received their
Certificate of Occupancy on Friday March 16 2007 No major problems with that project The water
treatment plant finished up last week with just a couple of small items that need attention The Town
and Country project is also receiving some Certificates of Occupancy in the next few days The ongoing
123
Todd Gerhardt
March 19 2007
Page 2
projects at Waytec Gateway Apartments and Lifetime Fitness Office are in various stages of
construction along with a few small remodel and tenant finish projects
Fire Prevention
Last week representatives from the Chanhassen Fire Department Carver County Sheriffs Department
and Ridgeview Paramedics had four training sessions with Instant Web Company s senior staff to
review with them different emergency scenarios involving police fire and medicals The presentations
were very well received and everyone learned a great deal about how the 911 system works in Carver
County and the interaction between the different agencies and their employees
124
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
INfW ci chan hassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
3
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a channing downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play
FROM Bob Generous Senior Planner
DATE owMarch262007
SUBJ Heartland America Building Expansion Planning Case 07 05
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The developer is proposing a 31 200 square foot expansion to an existing building The
proposed expansion would continue the architectural detail and color of the building
Since the project was originally approved the City has adopted standards requiring 50
percent fa ade transparency for building elevations visible from public roads The
northern elevation contains mostly warehouse space which does not support the
installation of windows The applicant is requesting a variance from this requirement
ACTION REQUIRED
City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6 2007 to review the
proposed development The Planning Commission voted five for and none against a
motion recommending approval of the site plan with the variance The Planning
Commission felt that the fa ade transparency requirement was not appropriate since the
rest of the building was built under different standards in 1997 The fa ade transparency
requirement was adopted on September 24 2001
The Planning Commission minutes for March 6 2006 are item la of the March 26 2007
City Council packet
The Planning Commission directed staff to evaluate the fa ade transparency requirement
relative to the function and use of buildings
RECOMMENDA TION
Staff recommends adoption of the motion as specified on pages 11 12 in the staff
report dated March 6 2007 approving the 31 200 square foot expansion with a
vanance
ATTACHMENTS
1 North Elevation Picture
2 South Elevation Picture
3 East Elevation Picture
4 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 6 2007
g plan2007 planning cases 07 05 heartland building addition executive summary doc
125
126
t
r
t
1
i
I
co
A
127
128
1 It 1
c
No Windows
CARTLAND
AMERiGA
Boes
l No Windows
HEA RTLAND
A11 RIGA
815i e15
i
HEt RTU ND
AMERICA
oib
l f10 HTT 4ReCEJTLTU3JJSii ESS 2RK
SHEET NO
J l L l
rr
l
o J
C 1
II PL
8 02 2 1 CE fTUR
C JH H i JNESC
No Windows
r llilJIl
INTERLAKEN T CHNOL00Y
iff Kw
yllliD
I
L
e 15
1 1 11 I I Ii i I II I i iiLLliLLLI
I ri i 1 1 I
i
i
II
IrUlc
I
1
1 11 8 OS 0
i
I
I
J
I D
fl
lj
I
N OfiTIl
Ii Ii
129
El
Z
U
El
El
00
PC DATE March 6 2007
CC DATE March 26 2007
CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE April 3 2007
CASE 07 05
BY AF RG LH ML JM JS
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL Request for site plan approval for a 31 200 square foot office warehouse expansion to an
existing 101 600 square foot building with a variance for property zoned Planned Unit Development
LOCATION 7975 Century Boulevard Lot I Block I Arboretum Business Park
APPLICANT Martin Woody Architects
4048 Spruce Road
Minnetrista MN 55375
952 446 9991
Coeur Terra LLP
c o Summerhill Commercial Real Estate LLC
1458 White Oak Drive Suite 106
Chaska MN 55318 lid do7
PRESENT ZONING Planned Unit Development PUD office industrial park with support commercial
2020 LAND USE PLAN OfficeIndustrial
ACREAGE 10 14 ac DENSITY F A R 03
SUMMARY OF REQUEST The developer is proposing a 31 200 square foot office warehouse
expansion to an existing 101 600 square foot building with a variance for fenestration
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING
The City s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed
project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements If it meets those standards the City must then
approve the site plan This is a quasi judicial decision
The City s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance The City has a relatively high level
of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards
This is a quasi judicial decision
Notice ofthis public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet
130
Location Map
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case No 07 05
City of Chanhassen
I
I
11 III UI ttUItt ItMHIIHHHtIIII II III III II n II
c
cO
T
DD D
0
CD
0
CD
0
o
0
0
W78TStateHwy5ArboretumSoul
0 evard
j2
c
c3r
co
I T o i y f
l
II
I
City of Chanhassen
City of Chaska
CD
SeMINED
131
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 2
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The developer is proposing a 31 200 square foot expansion to an existing building The
development is located within the Arboretum Business Park a light industriaVoffice park with some
support commercial uses The proposed expansion would continue the architectural detail and color
established with the rest ofthe building Since the project was originally approved the City has
adopted standards requiring 50 percent faade transparency for building elevations visible from
public roads The northem elevation contains mostly warehouse space which does not support the
installation of windows The applicant is requesting a variance from this requirement Staff
believes the variance request is reasonable and is recommending approval with the condition that if
the area is converted to office space then windows will be installed continuing the pattern on the
east side of the building
The PUD estimated up to 30 percent floor area ratio on this site to which the proposed expansion
brings the site The PUD permits up to 1 295 350 square feet of building area within the project
Based on the analysis ofthe existing and proposed development 1 014 035 square feet of building
area will be developed within Arboretum Business Park This site was previously graded for the
initial development ofthe 101 600 square foot building Water and sewer service was provided to
the site as part ofthe Arboretum Business Park development
The proposed development complies with the Chanhassen City Code subject to approval of the
variance and the development design standards Staff is recommending approval of the proposed
site plan with the variance to the fenestration requirement subject to the conditions of the staff
report
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
Chapter 20 Article II Division 3 Variances
Chapter 20 Article II Division 6 Site Plan Review
Chapter 20 Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and Office
Institutional Developments
Arboretum Business Park Development Standards
BACKGROUND
On December 10 2001 the City approved an amendment to the Planned Unit Development
PUD 92 6 Development ContractIPUD Agreement for Arboretum Business Park
incorporating printing as a light industrial use permitting indoor recreationhealth clubs and
recording studios in the existing office industrial buildings in the project and prohibiting
vocational schools public buildings except in Outlots A and B screened outdoor storage and
food processing
On July 28 1997 the City Council approved the following the ordinance for PUD 92 6 rezoning
approximately 154 acres from Agricultural Estate A2 to Planned Unit Development PUD and the
PUD 92 6 granting final plat approval for Arboretum Business Park
132
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 3
On June 23 1997 the City Council approved a Resolution that the AUAR be revised to incorporate
the summary of issues and mitigation plan contained in this staff report that the revisions to the
Traffic Study prepared by SRF outlined in the staff report be incorporated into the study and that
the revised AUAR be adopted by the City
On June 9 1997 the City Council approved site plan 97 6 for Heartland America a 101 600
square foot office industrial building Steiner Building 1 on Lot 3 Block 1 Arboretum Business
Park
On May 27 1997 the City Council approved the following
Approved the first reading for rezoning the property from Agricultural Estate A2 to Planned
Unit Development PUD
Approved the preliminary PUD 92 6 for an office industrial business park and preliminary
plat approval for 12 lots 2 outlots and associated right of way subject to the plans dated
April 4 1997 revised May 23 1997 with conditions
The City Council approved a Wetland Alteration Permit for Gateway Business Park subject
to the conditions of preliminary PUD 92 6 approval
The City Council approved Interim Use Permit 97 1 for Gateway West Planned Unit
Development site subject to conditions
SITE PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE
1
t
tc
N r r
U C UlC
r l
H tIti ir
l Jl
o
S lItr
OOOIiIP JI
V
i
I t I
t a 00
ilJ
1
r
1
i
4r
I
IoI q
i
0t
l l Jntrl
c t aot 4
w
1 ler
i t
fi It t lJQ
c
133
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 4
Size portion Placement
The building elevation incorporates an arched recessed treatment at the entryways and false
entryways on the north end of the building to enhance building entry areas Entrances
incorporate a champagne anodized aluminum system Painted pre cast concrete panels with
reveal edges to mimic windows are continued on the north building fayade
Material and detail
The building is constructed of pre cast concrete panels Windows are incorporated in each panel
on the east side of the building Knock outs for windows are incorporated on the north side of
the building
Color
The primary building color is off white color 1 that encompasses the top halfof the concrete
panels The areas in the window band and along the top of the building consist of tan color 2
The applicant is proposing terra cotta colored entrance feature accents color 5 two brown 8
inch reveal accent bands color 3 above and below window trim and an 18 inch browntan
color 4 reveal separates the top from the bottom half ofthe building
Color 1 Modest White SW 6084 offwhite
Color 2 Sand Dune SW 6086 tan
Color 3 Grounded SW 6089 brown
Color 4 Down Home SW 6081 browntan
Color 5 Awning Red SW 2314 terra cotta
Height and Roof Design
Building height is one story with the top of the parapet at 28 feet The arched building entrances
rather than an entrance canopy provide a pitch roof motif for the building Mechanical
equipment located on the roof shall be screened by the parapet walls through either placement or
the use oflow profile units
Facade transparency
The applicant is requesting a variance from the 50 percent transparent windows and or doors
requirement The northern building elevation conceals warehouse space which is not
appropriate for the installation of windows However the panels are designed such that if office
space were to be constructed in this area the wall panels can be punched out to provide for
windows All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and
articulation see attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation
134
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 5
Site Furnishing
The developer shall incorporate a gathering space in the northeast comer ofthe site including
benches and or tables overlooking the natural areas to the east
Loading areas refuse area etc
Screening of service yards refuse and waste removal other unsightly areas and truck
parking loading areas is provided by locating these facilities on the western side ofthe building
Screening of service yards and loading docks is accomplished through the location and site
landscaping with conifers along Water Tower Place
Landscaping
Minimum requirements for landscaping for the Arboretum Business Center Lot I Block 1
addition include 1 392 square feet of landscaped area around the parking lot 6 trees for the
parking lot and bufferyard plantings along property lines The applicant s proposed as
compared to the requirements for all landscape requirements is shown in the following table
Required Proposed
Vehicular use landscape area 1 392 sq ft 1 392 sq ft
Trees vehicular use area
Overstory trees 6 canopy trees 6 canopy trees
Islands peninsulas 3 islands peninsulas 5 islands peninsulas
Water Tower Place 9 canopy trees 8 canopy
bufferyard C 460 23 understory trees 16 understory
30 width 23 shrubs 11 shrubs
Century Blvd 4 canopy trees 6 canopy
bufferyard C 220 11 understory trees 12 understory
30 width 11 shrubs 15 shrubs
West property line 3 canopy trees 3 canopy
Bufferyard B 250 5 understory trees 5 understory
30 width 5 shrubs 40 shrubs
The applicant will need to increase plantings along Water Tower Place in order to meet
minimum requirements for bufferyard categories
Lot Frontage and Parking location
The building expansion is designed to front on Century Boulevard Access to the site is via Water
Tower Place Parking is distributed around the building Approximately 54 percent 33 of61 of
the parking is between the front fayade and the street
135
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 6
LIGHTING SIGNAGE
The developer is proposing the installation of five light poles with single headed light standards
and four wall mounted lighting units Four ofthe poles have a 25 foot height The pole to the
west ofthe building has a 30 foot pole height Wall mounted units are proposed at a height of
25 feet A decorative shoebox fixture high pressure sodium vapor lamps or metal halide lights
with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting All
lighting shall be shielded
Each property is allowed one monument sign per street frontage The sign shall not exceed eighty
80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight 8 feet in height The sign treatment
is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality ofthe development The signs
should be consistent in color size and material throughout the development One sign is installed
on Century Boulevard Another monument sign could be installed on Water Tower Place Wall
signs shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park sites However a separate sign
permit is required for each sign
ACCESS
A new driveway is proposed accessing Water Tower Place Truck traffic primarily will use the
existing access via West 82nd Street The developer shall extend a sidewalk from the building to
the sidewalk on Water Tower Place
GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
The 10 2 acre site is bordered by Water Tower Place to the north Century Boulevard 82nd Street
to the south and Arboretum Business Park 2nd and 3rd Addition to the west The
136
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 7
office warehouse building that exists on site will be expanded from 101 600 square feet to
132 800 square feet
The high point of the site divides the site into two main pieces Approximately 50 percent ofthe
site drains through a series of catch basins to the pond at the intersection of 82nd Street and
Century Boulevard The remaining 50 percent of the site drains through catch basins and enters
an existing pond at the intersection ofCoulter Boulevard and Century Boulevard
The hydrologic calculations have not been provided The ponds in the area have been designed
to accommodate the storm water for the building addition but it is unclear if the drainage areas
are the same as what was previously accepted Drainage area maps and calculations shall be
provided to ensure that they are the same as what was previously accepted Rational method
calculations to ensure proper sizing of the storm sewer shall also be provided
Ground ie non paved surface grades shall not be less than 2 Paved surfaces shall be a
minimum of 1 Curb line grades shall be aminimum of 5
Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan
An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off site grading If
importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary the applicant will be
required to supply the City with detailed haul routes
Any grading in the City right of way will need to be sodded
RETAINING WALLS
There are no retaining walls proposed for the building expansion
UTILITIES
The sanitary sewer and water connections were constructed as part ofthe original building site
No additional connections will be required for the building addition
All ofthe utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City s latest
edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates The applicant is also required to enter into a
development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in the form of a
letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of
final plat approval The applicant must be aware that all public utility improvements will require
a preconstruction meeting before building permit issuance Permits from the appropriate
regulatory agencies will be required including the City MPCA and the Watershed District
Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the
time of building permit issuance All ofthese charges are based on the number of SAC units
assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance
137
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 8
EASEMENTS
No additional easement will be required with the building expansion
STREETS PARKING LOT
There are currently two access points to this site One of the accesses is on Century Boulevard
and the other one is on 82nd Street The developer has proposed another access point on Water
Tower Place to provide circulation Staff has checked to see ifthis access can line up with the
accesses across Water Tower Place but the grades do not allow this to happen Ifthe driveway
was moved to line up with either ofthe other two driveways across Water Tower Place it would
be too steep and not conform with the driveway ordinance The trip generation during the peak
hour ofthe day is 27 trips per access Since the trip generation is low for this type of building
staff believes that this access will not be a safety hazard and recommends approval of this access
The pavement sections for light duty and heavy duty will need to be shown on the plans Upon
completion ofthe parking lot the applicant shall submit a set of as built plans signed by a
professional civil engineer
Access for tractor trailers shall be limited to 82nd Street The access on Water Tower Place is not
sufficient due to the cross slope of the entrance turning radius of the trucks and the parking lot
pavement section
MISCELLANEOUS
The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system All plans must
be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota Detailed
occupancy and building area related code requirements cannot be reviewed until further
information is provided The owner andor their representative shall meet with the Inspections
Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures
COMPLIANCE TABLE
PUD Arboretum Business Park Bldg 1 Expansion
Building Height 3 stories 1 story 28 feet
Building Setback N 30 E 50
W 0 S 30
N 92 E 117
W 158 S 495
Parking stalls 30 62 stalls
Parking Setback N 20 E 20
W 0 S 0
N 20 E 43
W 35 S 20
138
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 9
PUD Arboretum Business Park Bldg 1 Expansion
Hard surface
Coverage
70 73
Lot Area 1 acre 10 14 acres
The development may average 70 impervious surface over the entire project lndividuallots
may exceed the 70 coverage Based on the analysis of the existing and proposed development
within Arboretum Business Park the overall impervious surface would be 68 percent
Variances Required building transparency Only ten percent of the northern elevation has
windows and doors Fifty percent ofthe first floor elevation that is viewed by the public shall
include transparent windows and or doors
Parking Standards office 5 per 1 000 sq ft or 10 spaces warehouse 1 per 1 000 sq ft for the
first 10 000 sq ft then 1 per 2 000 sq ft or 20 spaces Total required parking 30 spaces The
applicant has provided 62 spaces
Project Building Lot Area Impervious Notes
Area acres Coverage
square feet
Heartland SPR 97 6 132 800 10 14 73 Proposed expansion
and Planning Case 07 under review
05
Arboretum Business 113 600 9 2 70
Park Bldg II SPR 98
4
Arboretum Citco 5 737 1 88 58
SPR 99 1
Steiner Bldg 3 59 990 453 61
SPR 99 13
Parker Hannafin 64 000 54 75 32 000 sq ft future
SPR O 1 06 expansion included in
building area and site
coverage
Arboretum Auto 7 800 15 65
Services Center
SPR O 1 08
US Bank SPR 02 04 3 066 1 07 67
Kinder Care Learning 10 434 1 81 45
Center SPR 02 05
Century Blvd Court 10 366 1 14 52
SPR 03 01
Vengra Design 20 000 1 8 68
139
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 10
Project Building Lot Area Impervious Notes
Area acres Coverage
square feet
SPR 03 04
Holiday Inn Express 53 000 3 13 54
SPR 03 08
Lifetime Fitness 309 000 22 18 70 2na of three buildings
Planning Case 04 22 under construction
Arboretum Business 25 300 2 69 68 Not constructed
Center Planning Case
06 16
PUD Lot 2 Block 1 30 320 est 232 70 undeveloped
PUD Lot 1 Block 2 159 822 est 12 22 70 undeveloped
PUD Lot 1 Block 3 8 800 est 2 02 70 Undeveloped
Totals 1 014 035 83 03 68
OFFICES
CUNICS
HEALTH CLUB
TOTAL 151 73 ACRES
eM StRflTrca
Po
if 1
PrdIBibTnib
CHANHASSEN MN
INDUSTRIAL OFFICE VMAY t
FICUllE4
The proposed site plan subject to the modifications contained in the staff report and approval of
the architectural variance appears to meet or exceed the development design standards for
Arboretum Business Park
140
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 11
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and f lmmellBS that the Planning Commission recommend that City Council adopt the
following motion and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation
The PlaRlliRg Clmmi88i lR relmmellBS that thCity Council approves Planning Case 07 05 for
a 31 200 square foot office warehouse expansion to an existing 101 600 square foot building with a
variance to permit only 10 percent building transparency on the northern building elevation plans
prepared by Martin Woody Architects dated February 2 2007 subject to the following
conditions
1 The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the City and provide the necessary
security to guarantee erosion control site restoration and landscaping
2 The developer shall incorporate a gathering space in the northeast comer of the site including
benches and or tables overlooking the natural areas to the east
3 If the interior of the north end of the building is converted to offices windows shall be
installed along that area of the building
4 The developer shall extend a sidewalk from the building to the sidewalk on Water Tower
Place and include pedestrian ramps at all curbs
5 The applicant shall have a minimum of 9 canopy trees 23 understory trees and 23 shrubs
along Water Tower Place
6 The applicant shall replace the evergreens located in the northwest parking lot peninsula with
overs tory deciduous trees
7 A revised landscape plan shall be submitted before building permit issuance which specifies
size quantity and species of proposed plantings
8 The building addition is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system
9 All plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of
Minnesota
10 Inlet protection shall be installed around all catch basins after installation and maintained
until final stabilization occurs
11 The plans shall be revised to address issues that could arise as the result of run on in the
northwest comer of the site
12 Silt fences shall be installed with J hooks to prevent runoff from running around the end of
the silt fences
141
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 12
13 Until building construction begins the rock construction entrance shall be 75 feet in length in
accordance with the City s standard detail
14 Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3 1 All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round
according to the following table of slopes and time frames
Type of Slope
Steeper than 3 1
10 1 to3 1
Flatter than 10 1
Time
7 days
14 days
21 days
Maximum time an area can
remain open when the area
is not actively being worked
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes and any exposed
soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system such as a curb and gutter
system storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man
made systems that discharge to a surface water
15 Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street
sweeping as needed
16 The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
e g Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
NPDES Phase II Construction Site Permit and comply with their conditions of approval
17 Provide drainage area maps and calculations to ensure that they are the same as what was
previously accepted
18 Provide rational method calculations for the storm sewer
19 Ground ie non paved surface grades shall not be less than 2 Paved grades shall not be
less than 1 Grades along curb line must not be less than 5
20 Emergency overflow locations and elevations must be shown on the plan
21 An easement is required from the appropriate property owner for any off site grading
22 If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary the applicant will
be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes
23 Areas disturbed areas in City right of way must be sodded
24 Show heavy duty and light duty pavement sections on the plans
25 Access for tractor trailers shall be limited to 82nd Street
142
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case 07 05
March 6 2007
Page 13
A TTACHMENTS
1 Findings of Fact and Recommendation
2 Development Review Application
3 Letter from Peter A Kordonowy to Bob Generous Dated 2 14 07
4 Reduced Copy Site Plan
5 Reduced Copy Floor Plan
6 Reduced Copy East Elevation
7 Reduced Copy Grading Drainage Plan
8 Reduced Copy Site Survey
9 Reduced Copy Landscape Plan
10 Reduced Copy Site Lighting Proposal
11 Arboretum Business Park Design Standards
12 Memo from Mark Littfin to Robert Generous dated 2 13 07
13 Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
g plan2007 planning cases 07 05 heartland building additionstaff report heartland exp doc
143
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE Planning Case 07 05
Application of Martin Woody Architects and Coeur Terra LLC for Site Plan Review for a
31 200 square foot office warehouse expansion to an existing 101 600 square foot building with
a variance to permit only 10 percent building transparency on the northern building elevation 0
On March 6 2007 the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the application of Martin Woody Architects and Coeur Terra LLC for a site
plan review with a variance for the property located at 7975 Century Boulevard Lot 1 Block 1
Arboretum Business Park The Planning Commission conducted apublic hearing on the
proposed site plan with variance was preceded by published and mailed notice The Planning
Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the
following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development PUD
2 The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for officelindustrial uses
3 The legal description of the property is Lot 1 Block 1 Arboretum Business Park
4 Site Plan Findings
a The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city s
development guides including the comprehensive plan official road mapping and
other plans that may be adopted as well as the design standards for Arboretum
Business Park
b The proposed project is consistent with the site plan review requirements
c The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by
minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with
the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing
areas
d The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space
with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual
relationship to the development
1
144
e The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and
site features with special attention to the following
1 An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a
desirable environment for occupants visitors and general community
2 The amount and location of open space and landscaping
3 Materials textures colors and details of construction as an expression of the
design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring
structures and uses and
4 Vehicular and pedestrian circulation including walkways interior drives and
parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets
width of interior drives and access points general interior circulation separation
of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking
f The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable
provision for surface water drainage sound and sight buffers preservation of views
light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations
which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses
5 Variance Findings
a Literal enforcement of the zoning requirements for fa ade transparency would cause
an undue hardship since this area of the building is proposed for warehouse not office
use
b The conditions upon which this variance is based are not applicable generally to
other properties in the Planned Unit Development district which are not proposed for
office or retail type uses
c The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or
income potential of the parcel of land
d The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self created hardship but is a function of
the proposed use of the building
e The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is
located
f The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the
danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood
2
145
6 The planning report 07 05 dated March 6 2007 prepared by Robert Generous et aI is
incorporated herein
RECOMMENDA TION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site plan with
variance for faade transparency for the 31 200 square foot expansion
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6th day of March 2007
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY
Its Chairman
3
146
Planning Case No 07 OS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1100
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
FEB 0 2 2007
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
PLEASE PRINT
Applicant Name and Address
S
u
NOTE Consultation with City staff is reauired prior to submittal including review of development
plans
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit CUP Vacation of Right of Way Easements 01AC
Interim Use Permit IUP Variance VAR ZoO
Non conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit WAP
Planned Unit Development Zoning Appeal
Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
1 Site Plan Review SPRl
x Notification Sign 200
City to install and remove
Subdivision
X Escrow for Filing Fees Attorney Cost
I C t 50 CUP SPRNACNARIWAP Metes Bounds
450 Minor SUB 6umC c
TOTAL FEE J3 2 pet C K rl Lfla 2
An additional fee of 3 00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing
Sixteen 16 full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted including an 8 X 11
reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diQital COpy in TIFF Group 4 tif format
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews
NOTE When multiple applications are processed the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application
CCAtltlED147
PROJECT NAME l o 0M bJ 1 dL rLD0 nJ6 ArorntQN
LOCATION Av O t t AfLJ c vwJ
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOrl l b M D V1A
tsV 1 tJes AUL
TOTAL ACREAGE 10 l41
WETLANDS PRESENT
Mves
YES NO
PRESENT ZONING p U U qt1 a 11 jLJ lJ2A AL
REQUESTED ZONING e
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
REASON FOR REQUEST S V l LD IJ J rUDN OF s I lJX S 1
xv TlJ0 lO l loVD Slf bJtL bl
Wtn Dt1o J T I lhlo AbOiTlONAG
UA c A LOUOX MlXA I US
10tJ l olt ctJ at P J IV Gi
S cor a
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title Abstract of Title or purchase agreement or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies etc with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge
III A J
1
L IOl
Signatu Date
l
Si nature of Fe Owner
212 01IlDate
G pLAN forms Development Review Application DOC Rev 12 05
SCANNED148
SUMMERHILL
Commercial Real Estate LLC
February 14 2007
Bob Generous
Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
via e mail togbenerous@ci chanhassen mn us
and mail
RE Arboretum Business Park I Building Expansion Heartland
8085 8175 Century Boulevard
Fac ade Transparency Variance Justification
Dear Bob
This letter is being written to address the requirement for a written justification of how the fo ade
transparency variance request for the Arboretum Business Park I building expansion meets all
conditions for granting of the variance
1 The proposed 31 200 square foot building expansion will improve the look of the existing
site by filling in a vacant lot in an architecturally uniform and tasteful way within the design
criteria that were required when the building was originally built in 1997 By maintaining
the uniformity of the existing design of the building the site will provide good aesthetics for
this corner lot and give a sense of completion to this area of Arboretum Business Park
Features designed in to the proposed plan submitted to the city include four 4
articulated entrances with landscaping building standard windows along the entire east
side a new driveway entrance and wrap around double row parking The proposed
fac ade transparency is 1 280 square feet versus 2 020 square feet required by Sec 20 1068
The architect for the project Martin Woody is proposing to provide knock out panels in the
north pre cast walls of the expansion in the warehouse area for future additional windows
if the area is ever converted to office which would create 1 536 square feet of fo ade
transparency Literal enforcement of Sec 20 1068 Fac ade transparency would cause
undue hardship to this proposed building expansion because it is not possible within the
original design of the building and attempting to meet it would create an unusual hybrid
designed building element into an otherwise generally uniform and well planned set of
properties located within 500 feet
As Arboretum Business Park I was the first building built in Arboretum Business Park in 1997
it sets the baseline for preexisting standards Completion of this project in a uniformly
designed way will not depart downward from any properties within 500 feet but will
complement and improve them by completing this corner
1458 White Oak Drive Suite 106 Chaska MN 55318 tele 952 556 5151 fax 952 223 3302 cell 952 221 7580 peterk@summerhillcommercial com
www summerhillcommercial com
149
SUMMERHILL
Commercial Real Estate LLC
2 When Arboretum Business Park I was originally built the potential for a future expansion
was shown on plans submitted to the city however for the next two 2 multi tenant
buildings built within Arboretum Business Park Arboretum Business Park II at 7920 8030
Century Boulevard completed in 1999 and Arboretum Business Park III at 2909 2925 Water
Tower Place completed in 2001 no plans for expansion were shown or intended and as
such using the two 2 neighboring projects as examples the conditions for this petition of
variance are generally not applicable within the same zoning classification
3 The purpose of the variation is to create a project that completes the vacant lot in a
uniform and aesthetically appropriate way within the design elements of the existing
structure built in 1997 No consideration has been given to increase the value of the land
on the cheap but only to build the expansion in a manner that is in harmony with existing
projects in the neighborhood
4 Martin Woody the third party architect for this project has stated that the new faade
transparency requirements cannot be met for the building expansion of Arboretum
Business Park I within the design elements of the existing building The hardship is not a self
created hardship as it is clearly being caused by the difference between the original
approved design in 1997 and the current design requirements based on Sec 20 106
5 Granting the variance for the building expansion of Arboretum Business Park I will in no way
be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the
neighborhood rather granting this variance will positively impact the neighborhood by
completing a vacant corner lot in a tasteful and architecturally uniform way in a manner
appropriate to the originally approved development
6 As the proposed addition meets the city s setback requirements height restrictions and
other zoning requirements justification of the variation does appear to include discussing
adequate light and air to the adjacent property congestion of public streets or visibility
and site distances and therefore the variance is in compliance with these criteria
Property values of the area will not be impaired by this proposed variance rather
completion of this project as proposed will have a positive impact on the adjacent
properties by completion of the corner vacant land in a manner that is uniform to the
existing structure s design creating a finished and complete building that is in harmony
with the original design of the structure built in 1997
No increase to fire danger or endangerment of public safety will occur due to this variation
as the nature of the faade transparency variation is not a life safety issue
1458 White Oak Drive Suite 106 Chaska MN 55318 tele 952 556 5151 fax 952 223 3302 cell 952 221 7580 peterk@summerhillcommercial com
www summerhilcommerciaLeom150
SUMMERHILL
Commercial Real Estate LLC
Thank you for the opportunity to present this letter If you have any questions on the above please
contact me at 952 556 5151
Sincerely
Summerhill Commercial Real Estate LLC
Peter A Kordonowy
Property Manager
cc Martin Woody Martin Woody Architects
1458 White Oak Drive Suite 106 Chaska MN 55318 tele 952 556 5151 fax 952 223 3302 cell 952 221 7580 peterk@summerhillcommercial com
www summerhillcommercial com
151
03NNVOS
n
t
SJ3LIH
JlI
EllAGODMN
IL
II
Ell
III
DrJ
i
liU
hf
a
I
I
3NO
lcnUlQ
d
SlNISne
1lnLJ
VwcIlIIf
I
I
I
f11
I
I11111IHH1IIIIi
ft
I
al
tUlIUlll
III
I
ll1111
I
l
lal
1
1
lit
IIIlllllllll111
111
11
1
ll
1
11111
11
ljt
1I
II
1
11
I
1
101
1
1
IHI
1111
IU
1
111111111111111II
Wi
111
11
Il
lll
11
1
11
1
I
H
1
1
l
IIII
IIIIIII1111
1
1
11
1111
I
Illl
lU
IIB1
1U
It
JU
II
Iln
II
Ill
II
rluIIn1tlU11IIIU
I
1111
sllll
1111
11Iall1111
rlU
li
1
1111
1
1
t
J
i
oJ
I
1
M
QNt8
oftzj
II
t
11ill
I
z
Clw
lh
w
f
0
f
c
f
c
0
Cl
z
r
w
2z
zJ
W
0
00
z
I
uUJ
m
m
I
r
j
oa
If
Ii
15
II
Ii
oj
i
I
II
L
Ii
lV
i
f
II
II
II
Il
Ii
If
ti
i
fd
II
hLilis
5ilIfa
dill
IlNiIDiII
E
III
I
lillll
b
IU
llIIlma
istfOralSlI
df
L
I
zja
III i
Iij
I1ili
II
II
I
en
I
litlliJ1
1
II
IIMI
I
152
cumvos
f
Z
llW
W
r
Cl
UJUJ
Z
Co
Cl
Z
IW
Z
Z
CN
5
lIW
c
ll
uU
Z
u
UJ
co
UJen
00
LU
CJ
LJ
0
llS
ttfIl
Ir
SJJ3
LIHJlIllIAGOCMNlJ
lIll1W
D
I
I
lru
NOI1vlWlI3l
JO
NNIW
NiI55fHNYtO
II
aNO
Nla
lna
QIVI
Nlsna
Wnul
V
tGILIlIlW
I
r
i
t
i
1I
l
a
i
II
I
11
iti
@
153
C3NtlVS
D
su
soum
nrDxaoDM
n
NILlIElII
41
cuiti
f
j
NOI1IlWlDl
NNlloI
tG5SfHNvlO
t
NO
Nlcnln9
IVf
S93NISn9
1oI
I
lillijlll
lIunIeGg
II
t
Z
a
W
WCl
en
Cl
Cl
en
Cl
to
l
z
CW
Z
z
z
t
5
cw
0
a
aU
z
u
W
CO
w
on
W
enen
r
lJ
5
z
Jl
0
ILI
ii
it
Jill
i
i
i
I
t
nJ
II
II
I
I
f10IIIII
154
03NNVJS
zwenen
0IWZIWoUu
W00o
EallH
IIWll
St
1
l
133WS
pU
9
II
cII
i
I
Wiii
1
i
O
i
i
i
il
liS
i
ii
I
1
gi
r
LC
1
1
Ie
I1111ItJ111
1IIIIII1
11
1
1
ILwClCzZzS0ZmWcr1bI
tl
OJ
rJ
i2
Vu
0
n
I
IiUnUIUa
i
B
fiJ
0
D
I
i
D
i
h
h
n
H
tails
B
I
Pi
Q
I
11
I
l
I
I
I
f
e
I
1ii
1
w
i
il
l5
m
i
r
IH
I
HU
i
I
j
I
i
li
a
i
i
I
E
I
i
I
wi
i
f
I
iill
IS
I
i
5
0
r
t
5
l
I
i
jl
I
I
I
i
i
III
I
I
I
i
I
t
Ii
t
Ii
Ii
I
Ii
I
x
I
e
r
9
r
I
d
i
r
H
I
I
d
i
1
i
l
f
w
xii
i
II
g
i
i
i
i
I
A
t
i
e
ft
ml
L
Ii
31
tII
III
t
oC
a
01il
I
t
I
x
JIIllil1
II
ili
I
lIulI
I
I
I
I
155
C3NNVOSzUJUJUJX
0
r
W
ZXr
WO
Il
W003
133
lS
S
ONlB
4
II
jLi
w
I
IJ10m
Y
I
I
I
I
ilIiIi
lll
1
0
IIIIJ1IIId
i
IIIIIII
h
uLII
ILw0C2Z2sQ2Wenenc2cu
ih
I
It
i
t
l
ljfWj
i
if
i
II
j
ii
H
E
co
t
co
l
H
j
t
i
h
11
f
h
i
Ii
2
lll
t
S
dillIt
t
11
IIIII
S
J
iH
1
Jl
H
H
i
H
H
hhI
jiHUHHHHH
1
iiiij
lHI
il
II
i
I
I
I
n
I
I
i
1 u
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
32
f
I
o
I
h
i
L
100IN
n
0
0
D
VW
ci
z
z
Z
IUw
Z
0c
W
a
VVr
vi
zru
t5
sf
1
f
n
II
1
I
it
i
d
ol
l
i
Itrn
I
i
t
l
r
Or
i
1j
3
l1Ji
1
I
f
t
l
II
P
i
l
g
ri
11
i
ili
f
1
IiI
If
1
t
t
H
tZWWClowjo0WZWtV
15Ju
zsq5
j
O
Ii
jii
JIGtI
Iiir1
U
1
2
hSf
1
t5
1
j
l
lpIffr
0
rl
tJl
J
AIl1
11661
t
I
aQ
9
lIfI
I
looc
lEi9
IOO
U
tJI
1
156
Q3NNV
lS
ZillCOIWZ1r
WaUu
WaUf
N
a
ll
3
SS
N
HJ
3
ifW3iJS
xo
N311S
o
N
id
jd
v
i
1
CJmwu
0
j
111
1
1i
jIIIIAU21
J
157
OlNNV
S
toUJQJZZzUJenICCCESQ
GlLJmsol1J
t
W00ll
UJ00to
ICOl1ILL
oIoCJIIadu
PROPOSED
ADDITION
31200
SQUARE
rEET
FIN
FLIXR
ElEV
984
0
EXIST
OJ
J
OJ
OJ
I
I
HIJ
JIolIsll
II
I
I
II
II
II
II
J
OJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
B8t
U
B
VING
I
I
UPlJ
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
ll
I
Jj
I
OJ
OJ
N
00d
15
17
E
679
67
FT
cSlfloQ
y
0
s
s
cS
a
cS
a
OJC
0lfl
s
QI
J
CCJE
IjiiftIII
I
i
J
lfllflQIClflJQ
QI
C
I
QI
I
lfl
C
lfl
rQ
o
e
C
QUcS
s
osU
C
l
ol
fif511
giE
d
H
i
i
ii
II
I
J
i
1
1
1
Hi
It
Jl
if
lj
u
1
h
j
i
jfi
f
h
i
if
h
t
iJl
l
Hi
it
i
I
l
l
i
I
Ii
Hii
d
iih
Q
A
158
Adopted 7 28 98
Amended 7 26 99
Amended 813 01
Amended 121 1
Amended 4 14 03
Amended 8 23 04
EXHIBIT C
ARBORETUM BUSINESS PARK
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS
Development Standards
a Intent
The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD light industrial office park The use of the PUD zone is
to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive
proposal All utilities are required to be placed underground Each lot proposed for development
shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below Photo
composite images of proposed development adjacent to Highways 5 and 41 shall be submitted as
part of the review process The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality
of architectural standards and site design Ancillary uses may be permitted as listed below if they
are ancillary to a principal use on the individual lot Commercialretail uses are prohibited
except those uses specifically noted below
b Permitted Uses
The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to light industrial warehousing office and other
uses as defined below The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein If there is a question as
to whether or not a use meets the definition the City Council shall make that interpretation
Permitted uses shall be allowed on the different Blocks and Lots for which they are specified
below The Blocks and Lots specified below are those designated on the attached PUD plan The
Block and Lot designations in final plats approved for phases of development may differ from those
specified below However the permitted uses shall continue to be those specified below for the
Lots identified in the PUD plan
Light Industrial The manufacturing compounding processing assembling packaging printing
or testing of goods or equipment or research activities entirely within an enclosed structure with no
outside storage There shall be negligible impact upon the surrounding environment by noise
vibration smoke dust or pollutants Lots 3 4 and 5 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 2 Lots 1 2 3 and 5
Block 4 and the Wrase property Amended 1210 01
159
Warehousing Means the commercial storage of merchandise and personal property Lots 3 4
and 5 Block 1 and Lots 1 2 3 and 5 Block 4
Office Professional and business office Lots 1 2 3 4 and 5 Blockl Lot 1 Block 2 Lot 1
Block 3 Lotsl 2 3 4 and 5 Block 4 and the Wrase property
Health Services establishments primarily engaged in furnishing medical surgical and other
health services to persons Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 3 and Lot 4 Block 4
Conferences Convention Center establishments designed to accommodate people in assembly
providing conference and meeting services to individuals groups and organizations Lot 5
Block 4
Indoor Recreation Health Club establishments engaged in operating reducing and other health
clubs spas and similar facilities featuring exercise and other physical fitness conditioning Lots
3 4 and 5 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 3 and Lots 2 3 4 and 5 Block 4 Amended 1210 01 and
8 23 04
Hotel Motel establishments engaged in furnishing lodging or lodging and meals to the general
public Lot 1 Block 3 and Lot 4 Block 4
Utility Services Water towers and reservoir Lots 3 4 and 5 Block 1 Lots 1 2 and 3 Block
4 and the Wrase property
Recording Studio Lots 3 4 and 5 Block 1 Lots 2 and 3 Block 4 Amended 12 10 01
Commercial uses permitted on lots specified as commercial in development standards
tabulation box
1 Restaurant permitted on Lot 1 Block 3 or Lot 4 Block 4 One stand alone restaurant
2 Convenience store with or without gas pumps not to exceed 12 000 square feet on Lot 1 or
2 Block 1 only One convenience store
3 Banks with or without drive up windows Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 3 and Lot 4
Block 4
4 Day Care establishments providing for the care and supervision of infants and children on a
daily basis Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 Lot 1 Block 3 and Lot 4 Block 4
5 Auto service center auto body repair is prohibited Wrase amended 8 13 01
6 Personal Services amended 4 14 03
Ancillary Uses in conjunction with and integral to a primary use
1 Fast Food no drive through and only in conjunction with and integral to a convenience
store
2 Restaurant only in conjunction with hotelmotel or convention conference center
2
160
3 Showroom showroom type display area for products stored or manufactured on site provided
that no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for such display and sales for entire
development Amended 825 97
4 Telecommunication Towers and Antennas by conditional use permit only
5 Car wash in conjunction with convenience store
6 Day Care
Interim Uses Amended 7 26 99
Church facilities i e assembly or worship halls and associated office meeting and other
required spaces subject to the following criteria
1 The church shall not occupy more than six percent 6 of the one building on Lots 3
and 4 Block 2 Arboretum Business Park 2nd Addition
2 The church congregation may not exceed 200 adult members
3 Shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the same procedures specified in
the city code for conditional use permits
Prohibited uses Amended 12 10 01
Contractors Yard
Lumber Yard
Home ImprovementlBuilding Supply
Garden Center
Auto related including sales and repair except on the Wrase property amended 8 13 01
Home furnishings and equipment stores
General Merchandise Store
Vocational School
Public buildings except on Outlots A and B which are public park land
Screened outdoor storage
Food processing
c Setbacks
The development is regulated by the Highway 5 and the PUD Standards There are no minimum
requirements for setbacks on interior lot lines in the PUD zone The following setbacks shall apply
3
161
Street Frontage Minimum Setback
Buildin arkin
70 50
50120
Maximum Setback
Buildin arkin
150
100
Hwys 5 41
Coulter Century
Boulevards
82n West Local 30120 NA
Lot 5 Block 4 must only meet the maximum setback on one Highway frontage
The average hard surface coverage does not include Outlots A and B The PUD standard for
hard surface coverage is 70 for office and industrial uses Anyone sitellot can exceed the 70
percent requirement but in no case can the entire finished development exceed 70 percent
d Development Standards Tabulation Box
1 Building Area
LOTIUSE ACRES Building SizelFAR PARKING
Ri ht of wa
TH 41 dedication
82n Street Dedication
Interior Roadwa
Park N A
Outlot A B
Uland 16 6 30
Wetland 28 7
Ponds 3 01
Industrial 30 office 74 07 30 FAR
Lot 3 Block 1 10 02 131 006 262
Lot 4 Block 1 545 71 218 142
Lot 5 Block 1 441 57 688 115
Lot 1 Block 4 438 57 199 114
Lot 2 Block 4 540 70 597 141
Lot 3 Block 4 8 98 117 371 235
Lot 1 Block 2 1223 159 822 320
Lot 5 Block 4 2320 4 FAR 404 279 3 1000 1 213
Wrase 2 64 35 500 68
Commercial 14 59 15 FAR 1 30 FAR
Office
Lot 1 Block 1 1 80 11 746 23 520 5 1000 59
Lot 2 Block 232 15180 30 320 4 1000 61
Lot 4 Block 4 4 06 26 536 53 060 5 1000 133
OfficelHotel
4
162
LotI Block 3
Restaurant Office
Gateway Business Pa
Total
TOTAL
1OFAR 27937 I
83 770
1
1
1 186 079
1 295350
1611000 447
Commercial sites may develop as office industrial uses Square footage for individual lots
may be reallocated within the development by type provided the maximum square footage
is not exceeded
Building Square Footage Breakdown
Office 31 368 000 1 432 000
Light Industrial 31 368 000 1 432 000
Warehouse 31 368 000 1 432 000
Commercial 7 81 000 1 0
Total 100 1 186 000 I 1 295 000
includes the Wrase property represents conversion of commercial uses to office
industrial uses
2 More than one 1 principal structure may be placed on one 1 platted lot
3 Building height shall be limited to 3 stories or 40 feet
4 Lot 5 Block 4 is intended to accommodate a major corporate headquarters or office
research high end manufacturing with limited warehousing type user While the majority
of the development is based on 30 percent office space Lot 5 must have a minimum of 40
percent office use and include multi story building s
e Building Materials and Design
1 The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural
standards and site design All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material
compatible to the building
2 All materials shall be of high quality and durable Masonry material shall be used Color
shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted cinder block
3 Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity
4 Block shall have a weathered face or be polished fluted or broken face
5
163
5 Concrete may be poured in place tilt up or pre cast and shall be finished in stone textured
coated or painted
6 Metal siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials
or curtain wall on office components or as trim or as HV AC screen
7 All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure
8 All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by walls of compatible appearing material or
camouflaged to blend into the building or background Wood screen fences are prohibited
All exterior process machinery tanks etc are to be fully screened by compatible materials
9 The use of large unadorned pre stressed concrete panels and concrete block shall be
prohibited Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces exposed aggregate
and or other patterning All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping The buildings shall have varied and interesting
detailing The use of large unadorned concrete panels and concrete block or a solid wall
unrelieved by architectural detailing such as change in materials change in color
fenestrations or other significant visual relief provided in a manner or at intervals in
keeping with the size mass and scale of the wall and its views from public ways shall be
prohibited Acceptable materials will incorporate textured surfaces exposed aggregate
andor other patterning All walls shall be given added architectural interest through
building design or appropriate landscaping
10 Space for recycling shall be provided in the interior of all principal structures or within an
enclosure for each lot developed in the Business Center
11 Each buildings shall contain one or more pitched roof elements depending on scale and
type of building or other architectural treatments such as towers arches vaults entryway
projections canopies and detailing to add additional interest and articulation to structures
12 There shall be no underdeveloped sides of buildings visible from public right of ways
All elevations visible from the street shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual
qualities
f Site Landscaping and Screening
1 Landscaping along Highways 41 and 5 shall comply with Buffer yard standard C Coulter
Boulevard Century Boulevard and West 82nd Street shall comply with Buffer yard standard
B The master landscape plan for the Arboretum Business Park formerly Gateway PUD
shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments Each lot must
present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process
6
164
2 Storage of material outdoors is prohibited unless it has been approved under site plan
review All approved outdoor storage must be screened with masonry fences and or
landscaping
3 Undulating or angular berms or elevation changes of 3 in height shall be placed along
Coulter Boulevard and Century Boulevard The berms shall be sodded or seeded at the
conclusion of each project Phase grading and utility construction The required buffer
landscaping may be installed incrementally but it shall be required where it is deemed
necessary to screen any proposed development All required boulevard landscaping shall be
sodded
4 Loading areas shall be screened 100 percent year round from public right of ways Wing
walls may be required where deemed appropriate
g Signage
1 All freestanding signs be limited to monument signs The sign shall not exceed eighty 80
square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight 8 feet in height The sign
treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the
development The signs should be consistent in color size and material throughout the
development The applicant should submit a sign package for staff review
2 Each property shall be allowed one monument sign per street frontage
3 The signage will have consistency throughout the development A common theme will be
introduced at the development s entrance monument and will be used throughout
4 Consistency in signage shall relate to color size materials and heights
5 The Arboretum Business Park PUD shall be permitted two Arboretum Business Park
identification signs One sign per project entrance at West 82nd and Century Boulevard
and at Highway 41 and the westerly roadway shall be permitted Said sign shall not
exceed 80 square feet in sign area nor be greater than eight feet in height
6 Wall sign shall be permitted per city ordinance for industrial office park site
7 All signs shall require a separate sign permit
8 In addition to the two signs identified in g 5 above signage for the main entrance on
Highway 5 and Century Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council
h Lighting
7
165
1 Lighting for the interior of the business center should be consistent throughout the
development The street lights should be designed consistent with the existing lighting
along the existing Coulter Boulevard
2 A decorative shoe box fixture high pressure sodium vapor lamps or metal halide lights
with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area
lighting
3 Lighting equipment similar to what is mounted in the public street right of ways shall be
used in the private areas
4 All light fixtures shall be shielded Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 12
candle at the property line This does not apply to street lighting
i Alternative Access
1 Each site shall accommodate transit service within the individual development whenever
possible
2 Pedestrian access shall be provided from each site to the public sidewalk and trail system
3 The developer and site users shall promote and encourage Traffic Demand Management
Strategies
4 Each site shall provide areas for bicycle parking and storage
8
166
u
s
i
i
ffl0M
II
coCl
COM
cxicxi
II
co
V
II
II
II
II
C1
3
t
O900
o
l
z
8
WtW
Da
a
a
Dit
o
J
l
t
l
t
b
E
e
b
l
iil
lI
II t9
UJou uo
9
UUW
Z
U
ft
ffi
P4
OE
rZ
P4
Wuaoalaet
s
Ii
UJouuoJSIIlII
167
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952 227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
VNIW ci chanhassen mn us
MEMORANDUM
TO Robert Generous Senior Planner
FROM Mark Littfin Fire Marshal
DATE February 13 2007
SUBJ Request for a site plan approval for a 31 200 square foot office
warehouse expansion to an existing 101 600 square foot building
with a variance for property zoned Planned Unit Development
located at 7975 Century Boulevard Lot 1 Block 1 Arboretum
Business Park Martin Woody Architects
Planning Case 07 05 Heartland Building Expansion
I have reviewed the site plan for the above project In order to comply with the
Chanhassen Fire DepartmentFire Prevention Division I have the following fire code or
city ordinance policy requirements The site plan is based on available information
submitted at this time If additional plans or changes are submitted the appropriate
code or policy items will be addressed
I have no issues or concerns at this time I will review building plans as they are
submitted
g safety ml pIrev07 05
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play168
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on
February 22 2007 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen
Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Heartland Building Expansion Planning Case 07 05 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit A by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate
records
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of 1lI fr r if 2007
V WLWt4NotarybItc
I r
f KIM T MEUWISSEf
J Notary Public Minnes
My Commission Expires Jan 31
169
0s00
0
5
s
ll
m0
E
I
E
2
0CU10Dosc
o
s
0
mDo
o
cZollmJcmJU0c00C
0
0
c
ll
m0
E
I
E
2
0cU10Dos c
o
C
0
mDo
o
czollmJcmJCJ
8
CI
t
g5
g
0l0
J
0
CIl
c
tl
W
m
CIl
CIl
O
o
COW
o
oo
oo
0
n
cEJ
c
oocz
U
U
CIl
ooc2t
coJ
ia
d
0
m
0
5
0
ro
E
1
88
E
0
0
C
O
CIl
CI
c
c
m
0
en
0
c
U
C
Ci
0
0
0
c
c
9
2
z
0
m
0
Q
0
E
E
CIl
E
0
0
C
uo
0
0
m
E
J
J
0
0
CIl
c
c
CIl
J
0
CI
C
i
ffi
0
0
E
a
g
8
c
S
11
CD
g
g
w
0
c
0
J
CIl
0
J
nEE
0
0
Q
g
m
c0
c
e
o
mJ
o
w
E
C
ooz
mUl8
O
o
Coo
0
Oo
o
oo
tl
E
m
N
Cl
c
CCll
00
s
CCi
13
uCi5
c
o
0
CIl
0
0
CIl
J
0
0
m
0
0
W
0
ci
Ql
0
0
g
t
CIl
0
o
s
S
E
S
c
u
J
C
0
o
f2
8
S
E
o
0
Ci
0
g
2
0
U
0
CI
oo
co
oro
mSo
m
O
o
o
O
E
o
x
o
Ulo
n
o
c
n
CIl
mo
mow
IJ
e
cO
z
ro
J
0S
0
00
0
CIl
CIl
o
c
en
0
0
E
1J
a
o
CIl
0
C
CIlo
CI
CI
c
0
m
2
E
Gi
g
8
g
J
fu
CIl
m
m
c
9
0
0
n
0
C1
J
CIl
0
Gl
n
0
0
0
2
Ci
0
C
n
0
0
gQlE
U
CD
C
J
O
u
0
ES
C
3
con
N
o
o
mo
c
J
O
aCDU
s
O
CIl
wJ
n
om
0
0
o
n
o
CI
OC
cCOI
cso
O
c
c
CIlmE
J
Ec
c
J
m
S
S2mCll
CIl
O
N
0
CI a
a co
iii
c
m
I
Q
0
0
0
0
0
2
m
o
J
0
J
Qlg
O
J
cOL
Ci
Ci
e
o
5C1
SOOO
jEg2gEo
CIl
EgecoJ
ECIlm
0
c5
E
fficocC0
Q
E
6m
0
co
CIloo
m
Ql
C
oO
o
m
J
m
o
o
C
eo
Q
u
E
CI
I
0
C
C
0
E
c
o
en
OCl
o
Q
c
mEC
O
g
g
og
0
0
00
O
0
E
0
2
56
o
M
s
8
OOQ
CliEiCIcoC
wClC
C
C10o
CI
co
CI
I
ECIcoc
c3
1
CcoUC
iawoaoa
oc2
C1a
co
o
U0
a
J
CocoUoJ
o
g
E
J
O
W
0
t
CIl
o
oo
oo
CIl
c
oocz0
m
0
CIl
OlE
cbO
Q
0
6
m
o
en
o
c
O
c
c
c
c
Z
U
9
oo
c
o
m
o
0
CIl
m
E
J
J
0
P
00
v2
CIl
Cl
00
roooClx
OE
CIlod
Ul
OOw
O
oooo
E
Co
O
O
0
2
0
c
es
o
o
J
n
E
t
c
0
c
0
0
C
0
0
Z
m
Ul
8
0
C
o
q
N
Cl
c
CIl
0
0
0
E
0
m
5
CIl
g
0
0
CIl
J
0
ci
Ql
0
0
g
t
CIl
0
0
Qo
S
J
C
J
co
O
0
Cc
E
o
o
c8
E
O
O
ero
mSo
2
o
ec
uCCllOo
o
O
Ulo
nJo
c
m
c
z
ro
J
o
o
OO
m
g
0
a
m
0
s
E
Gi
2
0
0
0
c
CIl
0
0
Qlna
CIl
cJo
O
CIl
Co
O
GlnO
o
g
c
g
CD
c
J
60
u
Cl
J
co
Q
co
o
0
m
0
c
CIl
c
O
a
CIlc
wJO
n
CIl
Om
3
cCCll
O
J
CI
m
I
O
o
uJo
cmc
C
0
I
ro
0
o
m
CIl
Ql
en
x
m
6
c
0
0
e
c
0
g
C
0
U
Ql
0
0
J
C
0
L
0
0
0
SOOO
O
uECIlCll
0
Q
J
CIl
E
0
c
2
c
8
m
E
2
e
m
m
6oQ
roo
SJ
mE
6
02
I
0
J
c2
c
u
J
0
0
CIl
Ol
0
0
0
en
0
Cl
J
o
Z
g
g
1ij
og
0
o
on
6
5
0
M
CIEiCIcoC
C10a
CI
co
CI
I
ECIcoc
c3
1
CcoUgC
CocoUoJ
oc2
C1a
co
o
U0
D
J
cowoaoa
wa
C
C
o
CIE
l3
E000
o
CI
n
S
c
0
CIl
0
c
co
co
CIl
0
0
n
co
EJ
ooc
t
CO
ro
E
88
UC
O
CIl
CI
E
m
o
O
c
c
gJ
E
g
om
E
c
0
L
J
oo
0
0
oo
cCll
oCi
E
CIlmOQ
COCl
mJ
o
W
E
0
oO
O
oo
tl
S
C
Ci
cj
Ci5
C
0
m
@oO
wo
f5t5
J
C
O
2
S
O
UO
CI
0
L
0
0
0
n
mo
mowE
CIl
00
0
C
ctl
en
0
0
E
c
CIlCll
J
CI
mmc
o
g
o
Ci
0
C
n
0
0
0
E
5
C
S
S
co
n
c
J
0
m
aCDU
C1
5
CIl
O
0
C1
oc
o
u
gJ
0
EClJ
E
Q
CIlo
mco
ClCllo
o
J
0
cJ
J
CI
a
e
c
0
c
CI
0
m
n
0
C
J
E
CIl
m
CIl
0
C
c
m
CIl
0
c
0
gJ
0
c
cj
CIl
e
m
0
E
CI
oS
6
8Q
O
Ec
C
0
E
g
2
s
8
ooQ
CIl0CIlm0Ci
wa
C
C
o
CIE
l3
E000
1
ID
ID
w
o
g
c
m
u
0
Q
c
@
c
o
a
tV
9
2
c1
01
co
co
a
c
c
c
UQ
rn
u
Q
o
a5
g
2m
@
g
@
Cl3
z
n3
g
c
Q
Q
0
Q
ODO
c
IDa
Q
m
Ctt
8
w
c
c
rouE
EoornoE
TI
v
2
cu
g
5
Bt
i
g
c
c
w
g
lj
a
J
en
0
5
g
Egcg
c
g
CUID
Eg
c
E
g
13
u
5
0
E
o
s
Ctt
g55
C
3
Orn
UcID
E
ow
C
Zg
oa5g
f
QJ
U
gt
IDg
uu
Erou
5
ro
O
Q
2
E
g
g
S5
8
E
6
8
Q
c
5
n1
Q
u
S
0
z
Q
cE
E
g1
mE
UE
ofr
0
8
ID
Q
j
EID
C
g
00
U
g
o
Q
5
gg
0
IDt
OIDCttc
rn
Eo
Om
c
ID
Q
u
ugrnai
gEtl3c
l
oc
c
rag5
0
0
0
c
a
0
Q
Q
g
u
g
u
ev
g
B
C
2
D
onc
S
Q
ev
c
Q
g
U
Q
lise
8
E
E
Q
a
Q
o
Q
g
wQ
EU6Q
Q
E
rn
wEQ
n
Q
g
ronS
ro
rom
cn
a
E
oE2
gc
Q
a
g
2
Q
R
E
n
i
Q
e8
Q
ro
8
o
romErr
g
nQ
a
C
gQ
ID
c
g
c
n
Q
o
S
a
E
Q
en
E
0
5
ro
g
Cl
U
C
0
O
O
Q
D
OU
Q
O
Q
E
5
Q
Q
C
U
ro
C
E
c
r
a
E
E
5
c
B
C
0
Q
Q
B
g
c
ll
0
ro
0
ro
0
l
o
E
1
22C1lEenQit
Ug
Ql
i
E
2
g
Q
c
gga
rou
o
ES
E2
E
i
a
E
u
W
o
enS
c
5
Uo
EE
rororogg
c
Q
Ou
n
oE
C
O
C
Q
roroc
oQ
c
c
wUo
5
co
ro
B
roQ
oB
g
w
U
c
g
g
Q
g
ro
O
0
E
5
g
8
oi
g
S
8
i
c
ll
1
1
E
E
1
C
en
c
13
l
0
E2
r
oE
2
Q
B
85
ig
0
w
Q
Q
g
t
Cr
C
n
0
8
E
Q
9
Q
n
ro
ro
o
rocg
ES
c
c
Q
OQ
2
g
o
Q
Q
o
Q
a
m
gS
g
ECd
m
m
l
OJ
0
aJ
5
B
Q
e
8
1
cti
a
ij
evO
c
g
eroa
rnE
c
0
en
C
29
ma
EoE
O
513
g
S
C
C
c
ro
a
s
n
Oro
oo
on
ro
5E
ro
Q
Q
00
E
c
o2C
0
gom
O
ID
g
ro
OEg
oi
c
2a
C
ro1ijr
uQ
Eo
Cd
C
Oe
EroQ
m
O
Em
n
c
i
8
g
ro
O
5oooco0
if
c
c
Qi
E
1
1
u
CIl
C
1
evcwwuO
EroO
ro
O
g
i
5E
g
m
8
s
8
w
53
c
5
ro
Q
w
S
0
z
D
en
CE
E
1
mE
UE
efr
06Q
8
2
K
n
Q
C
w
EQ
g
00
0
g
li2
Q
gn
a
wt
om
rocCE
0
0
aJOevmgo
EroECo
c
ijg
CC
0
g
0
c
a
n
Q
Q
co
a
Q
c
o
oDgC
Eg
8
Q
roOn
O
cD
r
OroQ
CO
c
c
2
c
ouc
DQ
c
Q
U
Q
lise
5
8
E
E
Q
a
Q
o
Q
g
1
Eu
en1
l1
E
E
C
EQ
li
Q
g
roO
ro
roID
cO
t
a
C
s
0
C
0
C
S
C
Dffi
ro
c
g
g
5
EgO
e8
S
roQ
o
ro
Frr
C
g
oQ
nc
gQ
c
5
g
C
li
Q
o
a
E
D
C
E
0
5
m
0
C
f
O
O
oE
c
oo
a
Q
Q
g
E
c
0
5
E
c
E
E
5
c
G
cDQ
w6ccll
oro
R
ioro
o
E
Q
2
w
S
1D
0g
Q
i
E
2
gg
Q
cQ
O
a
roooE
Eo
oEQ
uu
g
D
8
w
g
f
9
5
8
m
i
wU
nro
m
roDOS
c
uoroe
Oou
C
r
a
0
t
g
n
nt
c
w
c
g
0
J
c
go
0
E
g
ro
8
3
t
c
E
nm
EEu
g
ffi
8
n
Q
Q
8
Woc
w
S
OU
3
a
roa
mro
u
170
W7a1HatrIJeHwy5ArtxretBoulevard
oj5I
QxJfe EW
ODD
Disclaimer
This map is neither alegally recorded map nor asurvey and is not intended to be used as one This
map is acompilation of records infonmation and data located in various city county state and federal
offices and other sources regarding the area shown and isto be used for reference purposes only
The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infonmation System GIS Data used to prepare this
map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational
tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance ordirection or precision in
the depiction of geographic features If errorsor discrepancies are found please contact952 227 1107
The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466 03 Subd 21 2000 and
the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly
waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims
brought by User its employees or agents or third parties which arise out of the use s access oruse of
data orovided
t fbj
DO 0
Disclaimer
This map is neither alegally recorded map nor asurvey and is not intended to be used as one This
map is acompilation of records information and data located in various city county state and federal
offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only
The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infonmation System GIS Data used to prepare this
map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational
tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance ordirection or precision in
the depiction of geographic features If errorsor discrepancies are found please contact 952 227 1107
The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466 03 Subd 21 2000 and
the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly
waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims
brought by User its employees or agents or third parties which arise out of the use s access oruse of
data orovided 171
FAE HOLIDAY NORWOOD LLC
4567 AMERICAN BLVD W
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55437 1123
J J REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES
C O A Z RENTALS
6641 MINNEWASHTA PKY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 9657
JTT PARTNERS LLP
C O KAY MAASS
201 SUNSET BLVD
WACONIA MN 55387 1234
WATERTOWER PARTNERS LLC
PO BOX 532
VICTORIA MN 55386 0532
ARBORETUM III REALTY PTRS LLP
3610 CO RD 101
WAYZATA MN 55391 3424
COEUR TERRA LLP
C O SUMMERHILL COMMERCIAL R E
1458 WHITE OAK DR
STE 106
CHASKA MN 55318 2525
CHASKA GATEWAY PARTNERS
3610 CO RD 101
WAYZATA MN 55391 3424
MICHAEL D JANE E SCHLANGEN
1941 MELODY HILL CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 8805
CHASKA BUSINESS CENTER LP
C O SENTINEL REAL ESTATE CORP
1251 6TH AVE
35TH FLOOR
NEW YORK NY 10020 1180
GENE G SUSAN L O BRIEN
6628 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331 8845
S P PROPERTIES LLC
C O STEVEN D ROBINS
4311 PEAVEY RD
CHASKA MN 55318 2351
BAILIWICK ENTERPRISES LLC
4260 NOREX DR
CHASKA MN 55318 3047
4275 NOREX LLC
4275 NOREX DR
CHASKA MN 55318 3046
CENTURY 2000 PARTNERS LLP
C O STEINER DEVELOPMENT
3610 HWY 101 S
WAYZATA MN 55391 3424
PARA PARTNERS LLC
1620 WEST FARM RD
CHASKA MN 55318 9507
CHANHASSEN ACQUISITIONS LLC
C O PARKER HANNIFIN CORP
6035 PARKLAND BLVD
CLEVELAND OH 44124 4141
172
Public Hearing Notification Area 500 feet
Heartland Building Expansion
Planning Case No 07 05
City of Chanhassen
cO
173
CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952227 1170
Finance
Phone 952 227 1140
Fax 952 227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952 227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952 227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952227 1300
Fax 952 227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952 227 1110
Web Site
www ci chanhassen mn us
4
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Bob Generous Senior Planner
March 26 2007 ovf
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
DATE
SUBJ
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students grades
9 12 The total area of the building is approximately 406 000 square feet The
approval includes a rezoning a conditional use permit with a variance site plan
approval with variances and a wetland alteration permit
ACTION REQUIRED
City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 6 2007 to review the
proposed development The Planning Commission voted five for and none against a
motion recommending approval of the Chanhassen High School
The Planning Commission minutes for March 6 2006 are item 1a of the March 26
2007 City Council packet
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of the four motions as specified on pages 23 30 in
the staff report dated March 6 2007 approving the new high school
ATTACHMENTS
1 Rezoning Ordinance
2 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 6 2007
g plan2007 planning cases 07 06 chanhassen high schooIexecutive summary doc
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play174
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY S ZONING ORDINANCE
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS
Section 1 Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code the City s zoning ordinance is
hereby amended by rezoning the Chanhassen High School Site see exhibit A for legal description
from Agricultural Estate District A2 and Planned Unit Development PUD to Office and
Institutional District 01
Section 2 The rezoning of this property is subject to all conditions of City Council
approval
Section 3 The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the
aforesaid zoning but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk s Office
for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance and all of the
notations references and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference
and made a part of this ordinance
Section 4 This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 26th day of March 2007
ATTEST
Todd Gerhard City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor
Published in the Chanhassen Villager on
175
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Per Warranty Deed Document No 148445
That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 North Range
23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as
Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22 thence on an assumed bearing of North
89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 969 75 feet along the north line of said
Northwest Quarter thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138 88
feet to the center line of County Road No 117 thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a
distance of 5645 feet thence Southeasterly 484 22 feet along a tangential curve to the right
having a radius of 3322 60 feet thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241 78
feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter thence South 89 degrees 06
minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570 38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the
Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds
East a distance of 1326 84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of
beginning according to the Government Survey thereof
Outlot B CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER according to the recorded plat thereof
That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range 23
lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 Excelsior and Shakopee Road and that part
of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line
running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant
660 00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330 00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof Less
and except the following described tract
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range
23 Carver County Minnesota described as follows Commencing at the southeast comer of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West
assumed bearing 2649 54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast
comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 said point also being the
point of beginning of the tract to be described thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53
seconds West 499 83 feet along said south line thence northwesterly 247 29 feet along the center
of a public roadway on a non tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954 93
feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds chord bearing North 72 degrees
54 minutes 36 seconds West 246 59 feet thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West
592 50 thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377 00 feet thence South 71
degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377 58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast
176
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East
550 00feet along said east line to the point of beginning
Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the
east side thereof Subject to other easements reservations or restrictions if any Subject to a
public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements reservations or
restrictions of record Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress being 40 feet in
width lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline
Commencing at the southwest comer of the above described tract thence North 00 degrees 24
minutes 57 seconds West 321 50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the
centerline to be described thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45 00 feet
thence southwesterly 46 69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of
50 00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds thence South 50 degrees
00 minutes 00 seconds West 224 89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public
roadway and said centerline there terminating It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of
said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of
land described as follows
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range
23 Carver County Minnesota described as follows Commencing at the southeast comer of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West
assumed bearing 2649 54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast
comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 said point also being the
point of beginning of the tract to be described thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53
seconds West 499 83 feet along said south line thence northwesterly 247 29 feet along the center
of a public roadway on a non tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954 93
feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds chord bearing North 72 degrees
54 minutes 36 seconds West 246 59 feet thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West
592 50 feet thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377 00 feet thence South 71
degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377 58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550 00
feet along said east line to the point of beginning
177
u
00
PC DATE March 6 2007 ICCDATEMarch262007
CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE April 3 2007
CASE 07 06
BY AF RG LH ML JM JS
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSAL
Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District A2 and Planned Unit Development PUD to Office
and Institutional District 01
Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus including an approximately 406 000
square foot three story building athletic fields concession building stadium storage maintenance
buildings and parking lots
Conditional Use Permit with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District
and
Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling ofwetlands on site
LOCATION North ofLyman Boulevard south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad and west of
Bluff Creek
APPLICANT Anderson Johnson Associates Inc
7575 Golden Valley Road Suite 200
Minneapolis MN 55427
763 544 7129
Independent School District 112
11 Peavey Road
Chaska MN 55318
952 556 6261
PRESENT ZONING A2 Agricultural Estate District and PUD Planned Unit Development
2020 LAND USE PLAN Office Institutional and Office Industrial
ACREAGE 95 DENSITY F A R 0 1
SUMMARY OF REQUEST The developer is proposing a High School Campus
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the City is acting in its
legislative or policy making capacity A rezoning must be consistent with the City s Comprehensive
Plan
The City has limited discretion in approving or denying conditional use permits based on whether or not
the proposal meets the conditional use permit standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance Ifthe City
finds that all the applicable conditional use permit standards are met the permit must be approved This
is a quasi judicial decision
The City s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed
project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements If it meets these standards the City must then
approve the site plan This is a quasi judicial decision
178
Location Map
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case No 07 06
City of Chanhassen
CCAtINED179
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 2
The City s discretion in approving or denying a wetland alteration permit is limited to whether or
not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance If it meets these
standards the City must approve the wetland alteration permit This is a quasi judicial decision
The City s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance The City has a
relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation
from established standards This is a quasi judicial decision Notice of this public hearing has
been mailed to all property owners in excess of 500 feet
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students grades 9 12 The total
area of the building is approximately 406 000 square feet which is slightly smaller than the
recently expanded Chaska High School 415 000 square feet When completed Independent
School District 112 will have two high schools with a total district high school capacity of 4000
students The building is designed with three distinct functional components Academic
Performing Arts and Physical EducationAthletic around a central commons space that
contains the primary public entrance student dining student support services and building
administration
A neighborhood meeting was held on January 18 2007 at the Chanhassen Recreation Center
Approximately 20 residents attended the meeting An overview of the proposed High School
was presented including a history of how we got to this point a summary of the public hearing
process and a presentation of the site and building plans Brick and pre cast with a stone colored
veneer concrete are the predominate building materials
Issues that were raised
How does the development blend into the wetland to the east The proposed building site will
be approximately 50 feet above the wetland The slopes are proposed to be seeded with a prairie
grass mix similar to what was used in the City s wetland restoration project in the Bluff Creek
Corridor
Where will retaining walls be located how will they look and how large will they be A
suggestion was made that something architectural is expected by neighbors Staff directed the
developer to increase the plantings east of the retaining walls to help soften them
A question was raised about how they could be assured that what wasproposed both
financially and visually would be ultimately built
They were several comments about students parking in adjacent neighborhoods Bluff Creek
Estates Stone Creek and Creekside and then accessing the High School site This issue will
have to be monitored to determine if it becomes a problem
180
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 3
There was concern that the erosion control fencing will not be removed when the project is
complete The contractor will have the erosion control fencing removal included as part of their
contract
Questions were raised about bus noise It was pointed out that 1 there is little noise and 2 bus
operations are during a limited time during the day for 15 30 minutes in the morning and
afternoon
Questions about the football stadium operations and lighting It was pointed out that the
stadium would be in a bowl rather than above grade level Use of lighting will on a limited
basis
Questions were raised about improvements to the street network particularly Lyman
Boulevard but also complaints about existing improvements to Audubon Road north of
Lyman Boulevard The Cities of Chanhassen and Chaska and Carver County in consultation
with the School District are discussing roadway improvements However these specific roads
are beyond the scope of the school project itself
The site is located south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad and the Stone Creek
neighborhood residential single family west of Bluff Creek and the Bluff Creek Estates
neighborhood residential single family as well as the Sun Ridge neighborhood residential large
lot single family and north and east of Lyman Boulevard Chaska s electrical substation lies
between the school s south property line and the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon
Road To the northeast is the Chanhassen Business Center an office industrial park West of
Lyman Boulevard is a Chaska industrial park
The majority of the property was farmed for agricultural purposes with the highest point of the
site and the steep grades along its east boundary area made up of native grasses and trees A
fairly significant wooded area lies along the south edge of the property The old farm
homestead with some remnants still remaining lies in the southwest corner of the site just
opposite Hazeltine Lake Drive Existing wetlands predominantly lie along the east edge of the
property with localized fingers extending at the north and south edges of the property toward the
west Approximately 25 acres of wetland areas exist within the property limits
The topography of the property varies in elevation from 985 at the lowest point east to 1075 at
the top of the grassy height in the center of the site Because the center of the site is at the
highest elevation drainage typically is directed toward the extents of the property eventually
reaching either the Bluff Creek wetlands to the east or to the Lyman Boulevard ditch to the west
and south Drainage immediately south of the high point of the site will be carried to Bluff
Creek via a fairly significant natural gorge immediately north of the electrical substation
Water is available at the northwest the northeast corners of the site A 12 inch water main
extends approximately 200 feet south of the northeast property corner where it terminates
Water off the northwest corner of the property actually lies north of the railroad tracks and at the
intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard Sanitary trunk sewer is located along
the length of the east property line and connects the neighborhood to the north to a point
extending south of the Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road intersection
181
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 4
The new high school campus includes parking for approximately 1 000 cars bus parking for
approximately 30 buses and overflow and event parking for an additional 140 vehicles Three
entrance drives off Lyman Boulevard provide access to the school site The south entrance drive
is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road and will primarily support bus and
event parking The entrance drive at the southwest corner of the site at the intersection of Lyman
Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive will serve for limited ingress egress The entrance drive
west of the school will serve as the main entrance for students visitors and service deliveries
With the existence of the Magellan gas pipeline north of the school and north parking lot the
athletic facilities find themselves north of the pipeline easement The exception to this is the
proposed tennis courts and soccer fields which lie just south of the Magellan easement and are
located northeast and northwest of the building respectively Softball and baseball facilities are
located in the northwest quadrant of the site and are tucked between the gas main and railroad
tracks The running track and field stadium which is aligned in a northwest southeast direction
will be carved into the hillside to allow the home bleachers to transition from an upper spectator
plaza down to the field level Home bleachers for 1 600 spectators and visitor bleachers for 800
spectators are provided Field events including high jump long triple jump pole vault shot put
and discus are located along the east and southeast corners of the running track Practice fields
will be developed in the northeast quadrant of the site and tucked between the railroad tracks and
existing wetland areas
The Office Institutional 01 District limits building height to two stories The proposed school is
three stories by City definition If the height H of the basement is more than 12 feet at any point
or if the height H is more than six feet for more than 50 percent of the perimeter of the building
then it is considered a story The lowest level basement of the school building has a height of20
feet Therefore a variance is required from the 01 district regulations Due to the significant
elevation changes on the property staff encouraged the school district to develop the site with a
walkout style building This design maintains more of the site topography by using the building
itself to accommodate elevation changes than would be possible with a typical i e flattening of the
site design However it also leads to the need for a variance Staff recommends the granting of the
variance for a three story building
This parcel is partially encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District Section 20 1255 of the
Chanhassen City Code requires a conditional use permit for all development within the Bluff
Creek Corridor The applicant has proposed the location of the southerly driveway access
encroaching in the primary zone The encroachment into the primary zone requires the approval
of a variance Due to the location of the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road
the location of this driveway is fixed and the encroachment in to the primary zone cannot be
avoided
The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provided information about the project that may have
the potential for significant environmental effects The EAW was prepared by the Responsible
Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement
should be prepared The most significant potential issues associated with the proposed project
are
182
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 5
1 Traffic There will be temporary impacts to vehicle traffic due to construction related
activity during excavation construction materials delivery and storage and tie ins to existing
subgrade utilities These predicted vehicle traffic impacts will last for much of the
construction life of the project and will be geographically associated with the phasing of
construction Some of the potential impacts can be mitigated through implementation of City
ordinances relating to hours and days of operation noise nuisance conditions etc
Post construction traffic impacts are anticipated after the project is constructed and are
detailed in the traffic study These impacts are anticipated to involve slight decreases in
Level of Services LOS in the project vicinity Plans for mitigation of these impacts include
adding turn lanes and signalization of nearby intersections and are included as conditions of
approval
No additional traffic impacts or issues have been identified that require further investigation
2 Wetland Impacts A total of 1 66 acres of wetlands are proposed to be filled as part of the
project Mitigation measures will include on site replacement new wetland creation as well
as public value credits according to MN Wetland Conservation Act rules which are
administered by the City of Chanhassen
No additional wetland impacts or issues have been identified that require further
investigation
3 Storm Water Runoff There is potential for impacts to Bluff Creek and associated wetlands
from temporary and permanent storm water runoff Potential impacts from temporary storm
water runoff include those from sediment loading during and immediately after construction
These potential impacts will be mitigated through MPCA storm water and local permitting
Potential impacts from permanent storm water runoff include those from performance of
storm water engineering design and construction These potential impacts will be mitigated
through local review of design plans as well as on site inspections during construction
No additional storm water impacts or issues have been identified that require further
investigation
Based on this review of the potential environmental impacts the mitigation measures
incorporated in the site plan should address the impacts
The proposed development generally complies with the city requirements and staff is
recommending approval of the project subject to the conditions of the staff report
APPLICABLE REGUA TIONS
Chapter 20 Article II Division 2 Amendments
Chapter 20 Article II Division 3 Variances
Chapter 20 Article II Division 6 Site Plan Review
Chapter 20 Article IV Conditional Use Permits
183
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 6
Chapter 20 Article VI Wetland Protection
Chapter 20 Article XXI 01 Office and Institutional District
Chapter 20 Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and Office
Institutional Developments
Chapter 20 Article XXXI Bluff Creek Overlay District
BACKGROUND
On December 11 2006 the Chanhassen City Council approved an Interim Use Permit to grade
the site in preparation of development and a resolution of Negative Declaration of the Need for an
Environmental Impact Statement for the Chanhassen High School Campus
On March 4 2004 the Chanhassen City Council approved a Land Use Amendment to permit
Office Industrial and Office Institutional uses on the site
REZONING
The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 95 acres from A2 Agricultural Estate
District and PUD Planned Unit Development to Office and Institutional District 01 The project
consists of a High School campus The proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive
plan
SITE PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE
The project is a new High School campus for Independent School District 112 consisting of a
three story 405 367 square foot building athletic fields concession building stadium
storage maintenance buildings and parking lots The building is designed with three distinct
functional components Academic Performing Arts and Physical EducationAthletic
composed around a central commons space that contains the primary public entrance student
dining student support services and building administration The high school building is divided
into two sections separated by a main entrance corridor and commons area with classrooms located
on the southern half of the building and performing arts facilities auditoriums and gymnasiums
located in the northern half of the building The lowest floor area is 102 096 square feet The main
first floor area is 197 174 square feet The second floor is 92 043 square feet The building
footprint is 235 907 square feet The building exterior is highly articulated with multiple materials
and vertical and horizontal architectural elements
184
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 7
Size portion Placement
The main entry to the building is located in the middle of the structure The lower level provides
access for students from the bus drop off to the east The main entrance faces west toward
Lyman Boulevard and will be visible from the north and central access drives and provides
access to students who drive or are dropped off as well as visitors to the school Ground level of
a multi story is visually distinct from the upper stories through the use of materials windows and
other architectural building elements The public entrance to the building and central commons
faces west The student bus entrance is on the east side of the building also with access to the
central student commons directly opposite the main public entrance
East Entrance View from the Southeast
185
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 8
Material and detail
Building materials are high quality and consist of brick architectural pre cast panels and glass
curtain walls and windows The exterior building materials include two colors of brick and one
color of pre cast stone The two brick colors are composed horizontally to emphasize the
connection to the geology of the natural site and to emphasize the walk out level on the east side
The lighter colored cast stone is integrated as vertical planar accents at the significant
architectural elements of the building the entrance the commons the fly 10ft the team resource
areas and the science wing
Color
The brick colors are coppertone velour burnt red and mountain shadow velour grayish red
The pre cast concrete color is travertine texture sand The aluminum curtain wall is extra
darkdark bronze The pre finished metal panels are charcoal gray
Height and Roof Design
Height is limited to two stories in the Office and Institutional District However due to the type
and function of building as a school and the direction that the City provided to the school to
reduce site grading the construction of a walkout type building is warranted Normally the
lower basement level would not be included as a story However because the lower floor
elevation is more than 12 feet it is by definition a story It is reasonable to grant the variance to
permit a three story building see attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation for the
variance
The proposed roof has significant and varied parapet and enclosure heights to create the vertical
articulation as part of the roof design required by city code Mechanical equipment shall be
screened within enclosures
Facade transparency
The westerly elevation is the only elevation directly viewable by the general public This
building elevation is highly articulated with 50 percent of the elevation that is viewed by the
public incorporating transparent windows and or doors Natural light is essential to the learning
environment Windows are organized in a hierarchy of groupings and sizes from the punched
openings at each classroom to the large storefront windows in the team resource areas to the
clerestory windows and curtain walls that will flood the common areas of the building with
natural light and capture views ofthe natural wetland areas near the school
Site Furnishing
Community features may include landscaping lighting benches tables and art The school
district should add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas plazas and scenic
overlooks Bicycle parking storage racks should also be provided on site
186
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 9
At the top of retaining walls the developer is proposing the installation of 4 foot chain link
fences Surrounding stadiums and ball fields are proposed 8 foot fences The baseball backstop
is 18 feet tall The softball backstop is 14 feet tall The tennis court fence is 10 feet tall
Loading areas refuse area etc
Screening of service yards refuse and waste removal other unsightly areas and truck
parking loading areas is accomplished through the location of these areas on the north and south
sides of the building Enclosure walls are also provided around these areas to provide additional
screemng
Landscaping
Minimum landscaping requirements include 39 176 square feet oflandscaped area around the
parking lot 156 trees for the parking lot and bufferyard plantings along property lines
Applicant s proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and
parking lot trees is shown in the following table
Item Required Proposed
Vehicular use landscape area 39 176 sq ft 57 300 sq ft
Trees parking lot 156 overstory trees 134 overstory trees
North property line 43 overstory trees Existing mature tree line
Bufferyard B 2190 87 undertstory trees 40 tree seedlings
131 shrubs
East property line 27 overstory trees 35 overstory trees
bufferyard A 2720 54 understory trees 9 understory trees
81 shrubs 76 shrubs
30 tree seedlings
SouthWest property line 40 overstory trees 43 overstory trees
Bufferyard B 2030 80 understory trees o understory trees
120 shrubs 8 shrubs
4 tree seedlings
Prairie planting
The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for the parking lot plantings The applicant
also does not meet quantity specific categories of bufferyard plantings however the proposed
plan does incorporate beneficial landscape elements such as native species and prairie plantings
Staff recommends that the applicant increase plantings in order to meet minimum ordinance
requirements for parking lot plantings and the east buffer yard
The applicant is proposing seedling plantings and prairie native grass plantings Staff
recommends that all deciduous seedlings be protected by tree shelter tubes The tubes need to be
installed when the seedlings are planted and monitored throughout the next 3 5 years to insure
that the tubes are removed at the proper time All of the seedlings are native species with the
exception of Black Hills spruce Staff recommends that this conifer be changed to a native white
spruce Also the understory selections ironwood and blue beech are trees that grow naturally
187
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 10
in the shade of taller trees Their placement in the landscape does not replicate this natural
habitat Staff recommends that the understory seedlings be located among overstory deciduous
trees Additionally staff recommends larger quantities of seedlings in each grouping The
prairie seeding will need ongoing maintenance and monitoring to insure successful establishment
of the plants and that weeds and other invasive plants are controlled
Staff recommends that the columnar Norway maple listed in the plant schedule be replaced by a
different columnar tree such as Armstrong red maple Autumn Spire red maple or even an
ornamental species Staff also recommends that in the interest of long term heath all species of
ash be replaced with alternative species because of the impending threat of the emerald ash
borer
Staff recommends that landscaping be increased at the base of the retaining walls along the east
property line to include shrubs such as Chokeberry Aronia that are naturally spreading and
have wildlife benefits that would enhance the environment and provide further visual relief of the
wall expanse Increasing the overstory and ornamental plant quantities would help add stronger
vertical relief as well The applicant could also incorporate vines such as Virginia creeper or
Boston ivy on the walls to add color and interest
Note Several plant abbreviations are not noted in the plant schedule They are CD pagoda
dogwood PN Austrian pine SR ivory silk Japanese tree lilac
Lot Frontage and Parking Location
The project fronts on Lyman Boulevard Parking is distributed throughout the site with the
majority west and north of the building Due to site topography and the fact that this is a high
school with restricted access it makes sense that the majority of the parking is located to the
north and west of the building The southern access drive entering the site from the
Lyman Audubon intersection will be used on a daily basis exclusively for student bus access
Required Parking Four per classroom or office 207 rooms or 828 spaces plus one per 150
square feet of seating area within auditoriums 6 400 sq ft or 43 spaces Total 871 spaces
Proposed Parking 920 spaces In addition there are 140 event parking stalls located to the east
of the building in the bus corral Additional angled visitor parking 23 can be accommodated in
the drop off access west of the building entrance An alternate 48 stall south parking lot is
shown sheet C6 1 for the access drive south of the building As a comparison there are 1 030
parking stalls at Chaska High School
188
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 11
COMPLIANCE TABLE
01 Chanhassen Hieh School
Building Height 2 stories 3 stories @
Building Setback N 15 E 40
W 35 S 35
N 970 E 350
W 490 S 260
Parking Stalls
visitor
871 stalls 920 stalls 140 event 48 south alt and 23
Parking Setback N 0 E 40
W 35 S 35
N 492 E 308
W 104 S 172
Hard Surface Coverage 65 26
Lot Area 032 acre 94 83 acres
@ As part of the site plan review the developer is requesting a variance to permit a three story
building
The 40 foot setback is from the Bluff Creek Overlay District primary zone boundary
LIGHTING SIGNAGE
The developer is proposing a 27 foot light pole with a 3 foot concrete base for area lighting
within the parking lot Single and double headed light fixtures with square shoebox type heads
are proposed Plaza lighting in the stadium area is proposed on 15 foot poles Walkway lighting
on 12 foot poles is proposed at the main building entrances with walkway lighting bollards along
sidewalks and alternate entrances Walkway lighting has a 90 degree cutoff to limit light spilling
skyward
Section 20 913 e prohibits lighting directed skyward except for lighting designed for
illuminating the United States of America flag The developer is proposing spot lights for the
flags at the entrance to the building type DDl on sheet EOlO Additionally the developer is
proposing building fa9ade flood lights type DD on sheet EOlO which will be directed skyward
to illuminate the building The installation of such lighting requires a variance approval
B@ie es tHat if af@Hite@hifal ligHting is desired tHen it HHlld Be installed Iii tHe BMilding fa ade
and direeted ds n afd THef@lf@a alialiee 8HsMld nst Be a3 3fs ed The Planning
Commission felt that due to the importance of the building as a community meeting place
the architectural lighting should be approved
The developer shows a monument sign at the northwest entrance to the High School This
monument may be a maximum of five feet in height with a display area of 24 square feet If the
School district intends to install a motion sign they will have to receive a separate conditional
use permit A separate sign permit is required for the monument sign installation
189
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 12
ACCESS
Access to the site is proposed via three driveways off Lyman Boulevard The southerly access is
at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road The middle access is at the
intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive The northerly access is
approximately 800 feet south of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad Pedestrian access is
provided at each of the driveway entrances as well as a connection to the Bluff Creek trail in the
northeast corner of the site Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the
sidewalktrails connect
A traffic study was included in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet identifying projected
traffic volumes and analyzing the proposed access points onto Lyman Boulevard Carver County
has reviewed the proposal and has given preliminary approval of the accesses The applicant
must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses
Carver County has begun background studies for the future widening of Lyman Boulevard
Design details are not available However based on the projected traffic volumes Lyman
Boulevard will likely be reconstructed as a four lane divided roadway It is anticipated that the
widening of Lyman Boulevard will take place prior to the high school opening in Fall 2009
The existing one half right of way of Lyman Boulevard adjacent to the property is 50 feet wide
The school district will dedicate an additional 10 feet as a roadway drainage and utility
easement The 60 foot one half right of way will accommodate the future widening of Lyman
Boulevard
The northernmost access is approximately 880 feet south of Galpin Boulevard The
southernmost intersection aligns with Audubon Boulevard to the south and will be for bus
ingress and egress This access lies within the electrical substation property therefore ISD 112
must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska
The remaining access to the site lies 950 feet south of the northern access and 700 feet north of
Audubon Boulevard The wetland north of this driveway dictated the access location
The proposed driveways are 30 feet wide and drive aisle widths are 26 feet wide which meets
the minimum requirements of the City Code
Traffic Improvements
Based on the analysis in the Traffic Impact Study the existing roadway network will
accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed Chanhassen High School if the following
mitigation measures are implemented by opening day of the school
190
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 13
Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman BoulevardlLake Hazeltine Drive intersection
Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard Audubon Road South intersection for
the addition of a north leg to the intersection
Construct the following turn lanes
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane
School Access
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet
School Access
Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet
Lyman Boulevard turn lane
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet
Hazeltine Drive
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet
Hazeltine Drive
Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman 100 feet
Boulevard
Westbound Lake Hazeltine Dr at Lyman 300 feet Build
Boulevard through right
Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet
Road South
Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet
Audubon Road South
Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through
Lyman Boulevard lane
Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build
Lyman Boulevard through right
191
FUTURE IMPROVEMENTSVPERCHANHASSEN
2005 AUAR
Lyman Blvd
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 14
Twin Cities
Western R
Lyman Blvd
POSSIBLE FUTURE
TRAFFIC SIGNA
CONSTRUCT
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
REVISE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
N
1 E
S
No Scale
LEGEND Figure 21IStopSignRecommended NewSSignalizedIntersection
4 Through Traffic Lane Lane Configurations
6ypa8S Lane Traffic Control
r Turning TraJfic Lane New District 112 High SC hool
Right or Left Lane ChanhassenJ MNft100feet
B 200 feet
C 300 feet Prepared by TOI
LoVl Vol UTile Driveway October 2006
192
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 15
In addition operation of the Lyman Boulevard Galpin Boulevard and Lyman
Boulevard Audubon Road north intersections should be monitored for potential improvements
Both intersections will likely require traffic signals and additional turn lanes in the future
Impacts to Regional System
The following corridors will be at or over capacity in the future whether or not the high school is
built They should be monitored and appropriate improvements should be made when needed
Lyman Boulevard east of Lake Hazeltine Drive
Audubon Road C S AH 17 south of Lyman Boulevard
The final funding allocation for the Lyman Boulevard C S AH 18 and Audubon Road
C S A H 17 improvements will be determined in consultation with the City ofChanhassen
Carver County and the City of Chaska
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
The site presents a challenge for grading operations due to the steep grades along the railroad to
the north the gas pipeline running east west through the northern portion of the site Bluff Creek
to the east and the electrical substation to the south The six inch diameter gas pipeline is owned
and operated by CenterPoint Energy and is centered within a 1 DO foot wide easement
CenterPoint is allowing up to four feet offill over the gas pipeline Two crossings are proposed
over the pipeline a trail on the east side from the tennis courts to the stadium and a concrete
walk from the parking lot to the stadium
The HydroCAD calculations submitted indicate that the 1 DO year elevation of the
wetland wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point will extend onto
Lyman Boulevard and the access Spot elevations must be shown between the wetland wetland
mitigation and Lyman Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 1 DO year event
The proposed ponds along Lyman Boulevard have been designed to treat runoff from a portion
of the east half ofLyman Boulevard There is no additional land in this corridor of Lyman
Boulevard for ponding therefore additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire
future roadway width will be treated in these ponds
Hydrology to the wetland wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access point must
be maintained
The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting which requires
separating the storm water inlet pipe from the outlet pipe
The proposed drainage pattern on softball field 1 is from the outfield to the infield due to the
grade difference between the railroad tracks and the pipeline easement The development team
should re examine the proposed grades within the infield of this field to eliminate the low area
between second base and the pitcher s mound
193
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 16
The pavement grades within the north parking lot can be increased to reduce the height and or
length of retaining walls 12 and 13 The school district may consider reducing the width of the
eastern drive aisle of the north parking lot to further reduce the height and or length of these
retaining walls
Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner Grading
within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must be approved by
the appropriate private utilities
Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan
The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer
Pond drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands
SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
All stormwater ponds must be accessible for maintenance purposes The plans must be revised
to accommodate a 20 foot wide access lane for maintenance vehicles and equipment for Pond 3
It is recommended that this access be provided from the southeast corner of the bus corral to the
flared end section at the south end of Pond 3 The slope of the access should not exceed 15
Manholes with two foot sumps should be installed as the last road accessible structures prior to
discharge into the storm water pond This will help to prolong the maintenance interval of the
proposed storm water ponds
The project proposes three rain gardens in the main drop off area of the school The plans
provide a cross section and general seeding plan However more detailed plans should be
provided The revised plans should include details regarding the subsoil mix that will be used
measures that will be taken to counter compaction that has occurred in surrounding native soils
draintile configuration draintile tie in and drainage areas for each rain garden The rain gardens
should be designed to draw down in a maximum of 72 hours to ensure mosquito breeding cannot
occur For best results staff recommends that the rain gardens be planted using minimum 2 inch
plugs instead of seed Additionally the rain gardens should be mulched with shredded hardwood
mulch to keep weeds from invading and to lock in moisture
Concrete pavers are proposed for the drop off area In preliminary discussions with the
applicant the applicant indicated that pervious pavers may be used for this area If pervious
pavers are used the subsoils should be decompacted to a minimum of 48 inches prior to paver
installation Additionally pervious pavers should be installed with a corrected subgrade to
ensure adequate drainage The applicant should work with the City on the final design of
pervious pavers if used to ensure appropriate design and installation procedures are followed
In order to reduce the demand for potable water for irrigation the applicant should consider
utilizing stormwater ponds as a source for irrigation water
194
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 17
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP including all information required by the
NPDES Construction Site Permit should be located at the job trailer
Erosion Control
Stable emergency overflows are needed for the proposed ponds on site The emergency
overflows should be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed The emergency overflows
can be stabilized with a turfre enforcement mat or fabric and riprap
The plan should include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site The
timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow area The
rate of mulch application should also be included on the plans 2 tons per acre disc anchored
All riprap fabric at the flared end section should be installed within 24 hours of flared end
section installation
Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3 1 All exposed
soil areas should have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round according to
the following table of slopes and time frames
Type of Slope
Steeper than 3 1
1 0 1 to 3 1
Flatter than 10 1
Time
7 days
14 days
21 days
Maximum time an area can
remain open when the area
is not actively being worked
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes and any exposed soil
areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system such as a curb and gutter system
storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems
that discharge to a surface water
Sediment Control
Silt fence that is not placed on the contour must have I Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet
Temporary sediment basins should be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas The areas of
temporary sediment basins should be labeled on the plan A temporary and or permanent
sediment pond will need to be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared End Sections
FES 7 and 8 This should be installed prior to grading and then used as a temporary sediment
pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland If it is used as a temporary pond it should
stay in place until all turf is established Temporary outlet structures e g a perforated riser and
rock cone are needed for the ponds details should be provided
195
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 18
Contractors and their subcontractors must receive approval of proposed dewatering methods
from the City s project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior to conducting
any and all dewatering on site
Wimco inlet controls or similar should be used to protect all storm sewer inlets
The plans should be revised to include Chanhassen s standard details for erosion and sediment
control i e Details 3102 3104 3107 3108 3109 5300 5301 5302 5302A
The plans should be revised to include a concrete washout area
Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets should include daily street scraping and street
sweeping as needed
RETAINING WALLS
Due to the site constraints outlined in the GRADING AND DRAINAGE portion of
this report numerous retaining walls are proposed throughout the site
The locations of the retaining walls are generally shown on the drawing below
196
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 19
A summary ofthe proposed walls is as follows
Wall Approximate Maximum
number length height
1 143 ft 26 ft
2 180 ft 22 5 ft
3 903 ft 27 6 ft
4 688 ft 29 ft
5 350 ft 10 ft
6 138 ft 2ft
7 110 ft 13 ft
8 364 ft 13 ft
9 160 ft 5ft
10 164 ft 5ft
11 137 ft 6ft
12 189 ft 9ft
13 160 ft 6ft
14 593 ft 10 ft
15 74 ft 5 5 ft
16 541 ft 10 ft
17 865 ft 28 ft
18 365 ft 10 ft
19 979 ft 6ft
20 317ft 11 5ft
21 739 ft 10 ft
22 225 ft 5ft
23 115 ft 2 5 ft
24 223 ft 2 5 ft
25 233 ft 11 5 ft
t
North
The estimated total square footage of the walls is 95 000 square feet The development team is
redesigning the grading for softball field 1 and baseball field 1 This redesign will reduce the
height and length ofretaining walls in this area
Four foot high chain link fence will be installed at the top of all of the proposed retaining walls
All retaining walls over four feet high must be designed by an engineer and require abuilding
permit
197
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 20
UTILITIES
A City owned 18 inch diameter trunk sanitary sewer lies to the east of the site near Bluff Creek
The grading plan indicates that up to one foot of fill and up to two feet of cut is proposed over
the existing trunk sanitary sewer on the northeast corner of the site The type of and the current
cover over this pipe is sufficient for the proposed changes The developer must adjust the
manhole elevations according to City standard detail plates
The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine if the
high school construction has damaged the pipe This section of sanitary sewer is scheduled for
televising in conjunction with the City s sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration abatement
program If the City televises this sanitary sewer before the high school construction is
mobilized the developer will only be required to televise the line after construction is complete
Eighteen inch trunk watermain will be installed on the north side of Lyman Boulevard The
school district will be reimbursed 166 424 00 which is the cost difference between the 18 inch
trunk and 10 inch lateral watermain
The property was assessed 200 897 79 in 1996 for City Project 91 17 Upper Bluff Creek
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain These assessments have been paid Based on the assessment
rolls the property was only assessed for trunk sanitary sewer and watermain therefore the trunk
water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access Charge in
effect at the time the building permit is issued
The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do not lie
within the high water level of the adjacent ponds
Based on the proposed utility plan an irrigation meter is required
The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer existing overhead utilities and
existing gas pipelines
Mylar and digital as builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver County
coordinates
MISCELLANEOUS
The project is planned to utilize two petroleum storage tanks for fuel oil and diesel fuel to
support facility operations The fuel oil tank will be a 10 000 gallon underground fiberglass tank
with electronic monitoring and double walled underground piping This fuel will be piped to the
boilers and is designed to serve as backup fuel for the boilers in case of natural gas supply
interruption
The diesel fuel tank will be a 2 700 gallon skid mounted above ground storage tank piped to a
1 500 KW diesel powered electrical generator to be used to provide backup electrical power
should the normal power supply be interrupted
198
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 21
Emergency response plans for releases from either fuel storage tank shall be included within the
emergency evacuationresponse plan Also due to the capacity of the diesel fuel storage tank a
Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures SPCC Plan will need to be prepared and
implemented
The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems The building plans must
be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota Building
permits are required for all structures including but not limited to storage buildings concession
stands bleachers retaining walls Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a
structural engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota The utility plans marked preliminary
were not reviewed by the building official A detailed building plan review cannot be done until
complete plans are provided
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BLUFF CREEK OVERLAY DISTRICT
The site is partially within the Meadowlands Region of the Bluff Creek Overlay District This
region of the overlay district is characterized by fragmented forest communities high quality
wetlands and diverse wildlife populations
The goals set forth in the City s Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan
Bluff Creek Plan for the Lowlands Region are to
1 Preserve high quality wetland systems riparian areas and remaining forests
2 Regenerate impaired ecosystems especially wetlands to the extent practical under the
present land use constraints
3 Re create natural links between major natural features within the Bluff Creek corridor
and
4 Development of environmental educational opportunities within the corridor
Wetlands A and B are being restored by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as
mitigation for wetland impacts that occurred in conjunction with the construction of Trunk
Highway 212 The restoration project was envisioned as part of the Bluff Creek Plan and is a
result of cooperation between MnDOT the City and the school district It will enhance the
vegetative communities along Bluff Creek restore a portion of the creek to a more natural profile
and improve the hydrology of the wetland complex The school district dedicated an easement to
MnDOT as part of the project for some of the mitigation to occur on school district property
The construction activities associated with the proposed project should not conflict with the
easement granted to MnDOT
The project proposes construction of an access road through a portion of the Bluff Creek Overlay
District The encroachment into the primary zone requires a variance see attached Findings of
Fact and Recommendation for variance justification This road is necessary for safety purposes
199
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 22
to maintain separation between bus and automobile traffic To mitigate for the impacts to the
primary corridor the applicant should submit a plan for the restoration of areas adjacent to the
Bluff Creek Corridor including the drainageway along the north side of the substation and the
area east of the bus event entrance with species consistent with the City s Bluff Creek
Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan
WETLAND AL TERA TION PERMIT
WETLANDS
Four AgUrban wetland basins exist on site Pinnacle Engineering Inc delineated the wetlands
in July 2006
Wetland A is a 6 03 acre Type 2 3 67 wetland located in the northeast corner of the property It
contains a swale that drains the northern portion of the site to the wetland complex in the eastern
portion of the site adjacent to Bluff Creek The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass box
elder cottonwood elms and willows The applicant is proposing to impact 0 82 acres of
wetland A for the construction of a stadium
Wetland B is a 17 94 acre Type 2 wetland located in the east central portion of the project It
contains a swale that drains the southern portion of the site to the wetland complex in the eastern
portion of the site adjacent to Bluff Creek The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass and
contains cattails and willows The total proposed impacts to wetland Bare 0 77 acres for the
construction of the southwest parking lot and the eastern bus access Currently the plans show
two wetland boundaries for this wetland specifically in the southwest corner of the wetland
The plans should be revised to show the delineated wetland boundary
Wetland C is a 023 acre Type 2 wetland located along Lyman Boulevard in the southwestern
corner of the property The wetland is dominated by reed canary grass No impacts are
proposed to Wetland C
Wetland D is a DAD acre Type 2 3 wetland along Lyman Boulevard on the western edge of the
property The wetland has been altered historically by farming and draintile and is dominated by
corn nightshade and reed canary grass However it is still a jurisdictional wetland The
applicant is proposing 0 10 acres of impact to wetland D to allow for the construction of the
northwestern access
A wetland buffer 16 5 to 20 feet in width with a minimum average of 16 5 feet must be
maintained around all AgUrban wetlands All wetlands and wetland buffer areas should be
protected by silt fence during grading Wetland buffer areas should be preserved surveyed and
staked in accordance with the City s wetland ordinance The applicant must install wetland buffer
edge signs under the direction of City staff before construction begins and must pay the City 20
per sign All structures must maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the wetland buffer edge
The wetland buffer setback should be shown on the plans
200
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 23
Wetland Mitigation
The applicant is proposing to create 2 57 acres of New Wetland Credit NWC and 0 81 acres of
Public Value Credit PVC The mitigation will occur at seven different locations four of which
will be adjacent to the Bluff Creek wetland complex Wetland replacement must occur in a
manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
MR 8420
The new wetland credit needed to satisfy the Wetland Conservation Act MR 8420 is 3 38 acres
with a minimum of 1 69 acres in the form of new wetland credit and the remainder in public
value credit The applicant is proposing to meet the requirements with 2 57 acres of NWC and
0 65 acres of PVC
Wetlands C and D are proposed to be restored as part of the overall mitigation plan for the
property The applicant should provide additional information as to how the vegetative
communities and hydrology will be re established in these areas
A five year wetland replacement monitoring plan should be submitted The replacement
monitoring plan should include a detailed management plan for invasive non native species
particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass The plans should show fixed photo
monitoring points for the replacement wetland The applicant should provide proof of recording
of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland
The applicant must submit a letter of credit equal to 110 of the cost of the wetland creation
including grading and seeding to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland are
met The letter of credit should be effective for no less than five years from the date of final
approval The applicant should submit a cost estimate for wetland creation including grading
and seeding so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of credit
OTHER AGENCIES
The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies e g
Carver County Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency and comply with their conditions of approval
RECOMMENDATION
Staff and reelmmeH ls that the Planning Commission recommend that City Council adopt the
following four motions and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation
A The Chanhassen PlaHHiHg Clmmi88i lH reelmmeH ls that City Council approves the
Rezoning of the Chanhassen High School site from Agricultural Estate District A2 and Planned
Unit Development PUD to Office and Institutional District 01
201
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 24
B The Chanhassen Ploo RiRg C0mmissieR f@@emmemas tkat City Council approves the
Conditional Use Permit for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor with a Variance to
locate the south access drive within the Bluff Creek primary zone in conformance with the grading
plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates Inc dated 02 02 07 subject to the following
conditions
1 The construction activities associated with the proposed project shall not conflict with the
easement granted to MnDOT for its wetland mitigation project
2 To mitigate for the impacts to the primary corridor the applicant shall submit a plan for the
restoration of areas adjacent to the Bluff Creek Corridor including the drainageway along
the north side of the substation and the area east of the bus event entrance with species
consistent with the City s Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan
C The Chanhassen PlaRRiNg C0mmissieN f@@emm mas tkat City Council approves the Site
Plan with Variance for a three story building and up lighting for a High School campus including
an approximately 406 000 square foot building athletic fields concession building stadium
storage maintenance buildings and parking lots plans prepared by Anderson Johnson Associates
Inc dated 02 02 07 subject to the following conditions
1 The developer shall add benches and tables to take advantage of the gathering areas plazas
and scenic overlooks Bicycle parking pads and storage racks shall be provided on site
2 The developer shall include angled visitor parking in the drop off access west of the building
entrance
3 The building faade flood lights shall be a@l@t@a allowed during school events and
activities
4 Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs where the sidewalks or trails connect
5 The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by opening day of the school
Construct a traffic signal at the Lyman BoulevardlLake Hazeltine Drive intersection
Modify the existing signal at the Lyman Boulevard Audubon Road South intersection for
the addition of a north leg to the intersection
Construct the following turn lanes
Approach Left Turn Lane Rieht Turn Lane
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at North Bypass lane
School Access
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at North 200 feet
School Access
Westbound North School Access at Through lane becomes 300 feet
Lyman Boulevard turn lane
202
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 25
Approach Left Turn Lane Ri2 ht Turn Lane
Southbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet
Hazeltine Drive
Northbound Lyman Boulevard at Lake 200 feet
Hazeltine Drive
Eastbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 100 feet
Lyman Boulevard
Westbound Lake Hazeltine Drive at 300 feet Build
Lyman Boulevard through right
Eastbound Lyman Boulevard at Audubon 200 feet
Road South
Westbound Lyman Boulevard at 200 feet
Audubon Road South
Northbound Audubon Road South at Build to add through
Lyman Boulevard lane
Southbound Audubon Road South at 200 feet Build
Lyman Boulevard through right
6 Building Official Conditions
a The buildings must be protected with automatic fire sprinkler systems
b The building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the
State of Minnesota
c Building permits are required for all structures including but not limited to storage
buildings concession stands bleachers retaining walls
d Retaining wall plans must be prepared and signed by a structural engineer licensed in the
State of Minnesota
7 Fire Marshal Conditions
a A lO foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants i e street lamps trees
shrubs bushes Xcel Energy Qwest cable TV and transformer boxes This is to ensure
that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters Pursuant to
Chanhassen City Ordinance 9 1
b Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed
Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of
construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided
c Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load
of fire apparatus and shall be serviced so as to provide all weather driving capabilities
Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503 2 3
203
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 26
d Yellow curbing and No Parking Fire Lane signs will be required Contact Chanhassen
Fire Marshal for exact location of yellow curbing and locations of signs to be installed
e No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed Trees and shrubs must either
be removed from site or chipped
f Submit radius turn designs to City Engineer and Chanhassen Fire Marshal for review and
approval Pursuant to Minnesota State Fire Code Section 503 24
8 Forester Conditions
a Increase plantings for parking lot area in order to meet ordinance requirement of 156
trees
b Replace Black Hills spruce seedlings with white spruce
c Existing trees to be preserved shall be protected Fencing shall be installed around trees
prior to grading
d Understory seedlings shall be located among overs tory deciduous trees
e The applicant shall increase the quantity of seedlings planted in each grouping
f All deciduous seedlings shall be protected by tree tubes Tubes shall be monitored and
removed at the appropriate time All tubes shall be fitted with protective bird netting
g All ash trees shall be replaced by an alternati e species
h The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yard plantings along the east
property line Native shrubs and vines shall be incorporated into the landscape in
addition to trees
1 The columnar Norway maple shall be replaced with a different columnar tree such as
Armstrong red maple Autumn Spire red maple or even an ornamental species
9 Engineer Conditions
a The applicant must obtain permits from Carver County to construct the accesses to
Lyman Boulevard
b ISD 112 must obtain the necessary easement from the City of Chaska to construct the
access through the substation property
c Spot elevations must be shown between the wetlandwetland mitigation and Lyman
Boulevard to ensure that the road is not flooded during the 100 year event
204
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 27
d Additional ponding is required so that runoff from the entire future width of Lyman
Boulevard will be treated in the ponds
e Hydrology to the wetland wetland mitigation area north of the Lake Hazeltine access
point must be maintained
f The outlet for Storm Basin 2 should be relocated to prevent short circuiting
g The development team should reexamine the proposed grades within the infield of
softball field 1 to eliminate the low area between second base and the pitcher s mound
h Grading operations on adjacent properties must be approved by the property owner
1 Grading within the overhead electric and gas easement near the eastern access point must
be approved by the appropriate private utilities
J Identify all emergency overflow locations and elevations on the final grading plan
k The final grading plan must show the linework for the storm sewer
I Pond drainage and utility easements are required over the ponds and wetlands
m The developer must adjust the sanitary sewer manhole elevations according to City
standard detail plates
n The trunk sanitary sewer line must be televised before and after construction to determine
if the high school construction has damaged the pipe If the City televises this sanitary
sewer before the high school construction mobilized the developer will only be required
to televise the line after construction is complete
o The school district will be reimbursed 166424 00 which is the cost difference between
the 18 inch trunk and lO inch lateral watermain
p Trunk water fees must be paid with the building permit based on the City Water Access
Charge in effect at the time the building permit is issued
q The hydrant locations along Lyman Boulevard must be adjusted so that the hydrants do
not lie within the high water level of the adjacent ponds
r Based on the proposed utility plan an irrigation meter is required
s The utility plan must show the existing trunk sanitary sewer existing overhead utilities
and existing gas pipelines
t Mylar and digital as builts for the pond grading and utilities must be submitted in Carver
County coordinates
205
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 28
10 Water Resources Coordinator Conditions
a Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner compliant with the project s Wetland
Alteration Permit Chanhassen City Code and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
MR 8420
b The project shall comply with the conditions of its Conditional Use Permit for
Development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District
c The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP including all information required
by the NPDES Construction Site Permit shall be located at the job trailer
d Stable emergency overflows shall be provided for the proposed ponds on site The
emergency overflows shall be clearly labeled on the plan and a detail is needed The
emergency overflows can be stabilized with a turf re enforcement mat or fabric and
nprap
e The plan shall include detailed specifications for temporary stabilization of the site The
timing of stabilization will vary depending upon slope and if it is a concentrated flow
area The rate of mulch application shall also be included on the plans 2 tons per acre
disc anchored
f All riprap fabric at the flared end section shall be installed within 24 hours of flared end
section installation
g Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3 1 All
exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year
round according to the following table of slopes and time frames
Type of Slope
Steeper than 3 1
10 1 t03 1
Flatter than 10 1
Time
7 days
14 days
21 days
Maximum time an area can
remain open when the area
is not actively being worked
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes and any
exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system such as a
curb and gutter system storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other
natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water
h Silt fence that is not placed on the contour shall have J Hooks or rock every 50 to 75 feet
1 Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed prior to disturbing upslope areas The
areas of temporary sediment basins shall be labeled on the plan A temporary andor
permanent sediment pond shall be constructed at the locations of the outlets for Flared
End Sections PES 7 and 8 This shall be installed prior to grading and then used as a
temporary sediment pond prior to discharging the runoff into the wetland If it is used as
a temporary pond it should stay in place until all turf is established Temporary outlet
206
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 29
structures e g a perforated riser and rock cone shall be provided for the ponds details
should be provided
J Contractors and their subcontractors shall receive approval of proposed dewatering
methods from the City s project inspector or erosion and sediment control inspector prior
to conducting any and all dewatering on site
k Wimco inlet controls or similar shall be used to protect all storm sewer inlets
1 The plans shall be revised to include Chanhassen s standard details for erosion and
sediment control i e Details 3102 3104 3107 3108 3109 5300 5301 5302 5302A
m The plans shall be revised to include a concrete washout area
n Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and
street sweeping as needed
o The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies
i e Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency and comply with their conditions of approval
D The Chanhassen Planning CJIRIRi88i Jn n @JIRIR@nd8 that City Council approves the
Wetland Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on the site of the Chanhassen
High School plans prepared by Pinnacle Engineering dated February 9 2007 subject to the
following conditions
1 A wetland buffer 16 5 to 20 feet in width with a minimum average of 16 5 feet shall be
maintained around all AglUrban wetlands All wetlands and wetland buffer areas shall be
protected by silt fence during grading Wetland buffer areas shall be preserved surveyed and
staked in accordance with the City s wetland ordinance The applicant shall install wetland
buffer edge signs under the direction of City staff before construction begins and shall pay
the City 20 per sign All structures shall maintain a setback of at least 40 feet from the
wetland buffer edge The wetland buffer setback shall be shown on the plans
2 Wetland replacement shall occur in a manner consistent with Chanhassen City Code and the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act MR 8420
3 The applicant shall provide additional information as to how the vegetative communities and
hydrology for Wetlands C and D will be re established
4 A five year wetland replacement monitoring plan shall be submitted The replacement
monitoring plan shall include a detailed management plan for invasive non native species
particularly purple loosestrife and reed canary grass The plans shall show fixed photo
monitoring points for the replacement wetland The applicant shall provide proof of
recording of a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland
207
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case 07 06
March 6 2007
Page 30
5 The applicant shall submit a letter of credit equal to 110 of the cost of the wetland creation
including grading and seeding to ensure the design standards for the replacement wetland
are met The letter of credit shall be effective for no less than five years from the date of
final approval The applicant shall submit a cost estimate for wetland creation including
grading and seeding so the City can calculate the amount of the wetland creation letter of
credi t
A TTACHMENTS
1 Findings of Fact and Recommendation
2 Development Review Application
3 Letter from Jay R Pomeroy to Bob Generous dated January 31 2007
4 Chanhassen High School Building Design Narrative dated January 15 2007
5 Chanhassen High School Key Sheet and Exterior Color Scheme
6 Reduced Copy Site Reference Plan Sheet CO O
7 Reduced Copies Grading and Drainage Plans Sheets C3 1 34
8 Reduced Copy Site Retaining Wall Plan Sheet 3 5
9 Reduced Copies Utility Plan Sheets C4 1 C44
10 Reduced Copy Erosion Control Plan Sheet C5 0
11 Reduced Copies Site Finishing Plan Sheets C6 1 C 64
12 Reduced Copies Landscape Plan Sheets C7 1 C74
13 Reduced Copies Floor Plan Sheets A101 A103
14 Reduced Copy Building Elevation Sheet A301
15 Reduced Copies Electric Site Plan Sheets EOlO and EOll
16 Letter from Steven Von Bargen Center Point Energy to Robert Generous dated 2 15 07
17 Letter William Monk City of Chaska to Robert Generous dated 223 07
18 Site Profile
19 Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
g plan2007 planning cases 07 06 chanhassen high schooIstaff report chanhassen high schooldoc
208
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
INRE
Application of Anderson Johnson Associates Inc and Independent School District 112 for
Rezoning from Agricultural Estate District A2 and Planned Unit Development PUD to Office
and Institutional District 01 Site Plan approval with Variances for a High School campus
including an approximately 406 000 square foot three story building athletic fields concession
building stadium storage maintenance buildings and parking lots Conditional Use Permit
with Variances for development within the Bluff Creek Overlay District and Wetland
Alteration Permit for the grading and filling of wetlands on site
On March 6 2007 the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the application of Anderson Johnson Associates Inc and Independent
School District 112 for a High School Campus including rezoning site plan review with
variances conditional use permit with variances and a wetland alteration permit The Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed rezoning preceded by published and
mailed notice The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to
speak and now makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The property is currently zoned A2 Agricultural Estate District and PUD Planned Unit
Development
2 The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office Institutional and OfficeIndustrial
3 The legal description of the property is see Exhibit A
4 The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six 6 possible
adverse affects of the proposed amendment The six 6 affects and our findings
regarding them are
a The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan
b The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area
c The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance contingent on approval of the variances
d The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed
1
209
e The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not
overburden the city s service capacity
f Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the
property
5 Conditional Use Permit
a The proposed project will not be detrimental to or enhance the public health
safety comfort convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city
b The proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the city s
comprehensive plan and this chapter
c The proposed project will be designed constructed operated and maintained so to
be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general
vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area
d The proposed project will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or planned
neighboring uses
e The proposed project will be served adequately by essential public facilities and
services including streets police and fire protection drainage structures refuse
disposal water and sewer systems and schools or will be served adequately by
such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the
establishment of the proposed use
f The proposed project ill not create excessive requirements for public facilities and
services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community
g The proposed project will not involve uses activities processes materials
equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons
property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic noise
smoke fumes glare odors rodents or trash
h The proposed project will have vehicular approaches to the property which do not
create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding public
thoroughfares
1 The proposed project will not result in the destruction loss or damage of solar
access natural scenic or historic features of major significance
J The proposed project will be aesthetically compatible with the area
k The proposed project will not depreciate surrounding property values
2
210
I The proposed project will meet standards prescribed for certain uses as provided
in this article
6 Site Plan Review
a The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city s
development guides including the comprehensive plan official road mapping
and other plans that may be adopted
b The proposed project is consistent with the site plan review requirements
c The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable
by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping
with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or
developing areas
d The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open
space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a
visual relationship to the development
e The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures
and site features with special attention to the following
1 An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and
provision of a desirable environment for occupants visitors and general
community
2 The amount and location of open space and landscaping
3 Materials textures colors and details of construction as an expression of
the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and
neighboring structures and uses and
4 Vehicular and pedestrian circulation including walkways interior drives
and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public
streets width of interior drives and access points general interior
circulation separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement
and amount of parking
f The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through
reasonable provision for surface water drainage sound and sight buffers
preservation of views light and air and those aspects of design not adequately
covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring
land uses
7 Variance Bluff Creek Primary Zone Encroachment
3
211
a That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship Undue
hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size
physical surroundings shape or topography Reasonable use includes a use made by
a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it The intent of this provision
is not to allow a proliferation of variances but to recognize that there are pre
existing standards in this neighborhood Variances that blend with these pre
existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria
Finding The granting of the variance to encroach in to the Bluff Creek primary zone is
unavoidable due to the configuration of the Audubon Road C S A H 17 and Lyman
Boulevard C S AH 18 intersection and the access to the site
b The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable
generally to other property within the same zoning classification
Finding Entrance drives are generally not as proscribed as that for the High School site
The encroachment in to the primary zone is unavoidable
c The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land
Finding The location of the entrance drive does not increase the value or income potential
of the high school site
d The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self created hardship
Finding The hardship is not self created since the variance is unavoidable due to the
configuration of the Audubon Road C S A H 17 and Lyman Boulevard C S AH 18
intersection and the access to the site
e The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located
Finding The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located
The project will create additional buffer zones and enhance the bluff creek corridor
f The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood
Finding The variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood
4
212
8 Variance Three Story and uplighting
a That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship Undue
hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size
physical surroundings shape or topography Reasonable use includes a use made by a
majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it The intent of this provision is not to
allow a proliferation of variances but to recognize that there are pre existing standards in
this neighborhood Variances that blend with these pre existing standards without departing
downward from them meet this criteria
Finding The need for a variance is due to the type and function of building as a school and
the direction that the city provided the school to try to reduce site grading The construction
of a walkout type building is warranted Normally the lower basement level would not be
included as a story However because the lower floor elevation is more than 12 feet it is by
definition a story Additionally the intent of the up lighting is to highlight the building and
provide a means to further identify the site
b The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable generally to
other property within the same zoning classification
Finding The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the proposed
development of the site for a high school
c The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income
potential of the parcel of land
Finding The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or
income potential of the parcel but to the utilization of the site in an efficient manner and to
provide an enhanced identity to the building
d The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self created hardship
Finding The alleged difficulty or hardship is due to direction provided by the city
e The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located
Finding The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located
The up lightning shall be limited in its duration and only during events or activities at the
school
f The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values
within the neighborhood
5
213
Finding The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger
of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood
9 The planning report 07 06 dated March 6 2007 prepared by Robert Generous et aI is
incorporated herein
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning
conditional use permit with variance site plan with variances and a wetland alteration permit for
the Chanhassen High School Campus
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 6th day of March 2007
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY
Its Chairman
6
214
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Per Warranty Deed Document No 148445
That part of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 North Range
23 West of the 5th Principal Meridian described as
Beginning at the north quarter comer of said Section 22 thence on an assumed bearing of North
89 degrees 05 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 969 75 feet along the north line of said
Northwest Quarter thence South 56 degrees 57 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 1138 88
feet to the center line of County Road No 117 thence South 32 degrees 02 minutes East a
distance of 5645 feet thence Southeasterly 48422 feet along a tangential curve to the right
having a radius of 3322 60 feet thence South 23 degrees 41 minutes East a distance of 241 78
feet to the south line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter thence South 89 degrees 06
minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 1570 38 feet along said south line of the North Half of the
Northwest Quarter to the southeast comer thereof thence North 0 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds
East a distance of 1326 84 feet along the east line of said Northeast Quarter to the point of
beginning according to the Government Survey thereof
Outlot B CHANHASSEN BUSINESS CENTER according to the recorded plat thereof
That part of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range 23
lying easterly of the centerline of County Road 117 Excelsior and Shakopee Road and that part
of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 lying westerly of a line
running from a point on the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant
660 00 feet east of the southwest comer thereof to a point on the north line of said Southwest
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter distant 330 00 feet east of the northwest comer thereof Less
and except the following described tract
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range
23 Carver County Minnesota described as follows Commencing at the southeast comer of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West
assumed bearing 2649 54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast
comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 said point also being the
point of beginning of the tract to be described thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53
seconds West 499 83 feet along said south line thence northwesterly 247 29 feet along the center
of a public roadway on a non tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954 93
feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds chord bearing North 72 degrees
54 minutes 36 seconds West 246 59 feet thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West
592 50 thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377 00 feet thence South 71
degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377 58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East
7
215
550 00feet along said east line to the point of beginning
Subject to a public roadway easement on the south side thereof and a power line easement on the
east side thereof Subject to other easements reservations or restrictions if any Subject to a
public roadway easement along the south side thereof and other easements reservations or
restrictions of record Subject to an easement for utilities and ingress and egress being 40 feet in
width lying 20 feet on each side of the following described centerline
Commencing at the southwest comer of the above described tract thence North 00 degrees 24
minutes 57 seconds West 321 50 feet along the west line thereof to the point of beginning of the
centerline to be described thence North 76 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West 45 00 feet
thence southwesterly 46 69 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast with radius of
50 00 feet through a central angle of 53 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds thence South 50 degrees
00 minutes 00 seconds West 224 89 feet tangent to said curve to a point on the center of a public
roadway and said centerline there terminating It is intended to extend or shorten the side lines of
said easement so as to terminate at said centerline of the public roadway and at the west line of
land described as follows
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 Township 116 Range
23 Carver County Minnesota described as follows Commencing at the southeast comer of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 22 thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53 seconds West
assumed bearing 2649 54 feet along the south line of said Northeast Quarter to the southeast
comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 22 said point also being the
point of beginning of the tract to be described thence continuing South 89 degrees 57 minutes 53
seconds West 499 83 feet along said south line thence northwesterly 247 29 feet along the center
of a public roadway on a non tangential curve concave to the northeast with a radius of 954 93
feet through a central angle of 14 degrees 50 minutes 14 seconds chord bearing North 72 degrees
54 minutes 36 seconds West 246 59 feet thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds West
592 50 feet thence North 89 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East 377 00 feet thence South 71
degrees 53 minutes 06 seconds East 377 58 feet to a point on the east line of said Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 24 minutes 57 seconds East 550 00
feet along said east line to the point of beginning
8
216
Planning Case No 0l a 0
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1100
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION FEB 0 2 2007
PLEASE PRINT
Applicant Name and Address
Anderson Johnson Associates Inc
7 7 nlrl n V ll y Rn rl nn
M nneapol MN 4 7
Contact Jav Pomerov LLA
Phone 763 544 7129 Fax 763 544 0531
Email oomerov@a ainc net
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
Owner Name and Address
Chaska Area Schools ISD 11
l D lfey Road
rha k MN R
Contact Steve Pumper
Phone 952 556 6261 Fax 952 556 6269
Email oumoers@distri ct112 org
NOTE Consultation with City staff is reauired prior to submittal including review of development
plans
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit
x Conditional Use Permit CUP Vacation of Right of Way Easements VAC
Interim Use Permit IUP x Variance VAR
Non conforming Use Permit x Wetland Alteration Permit WAP
Planned Unit Development Zoning Appeal
x Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
X Notification Sign 200
City to install and remove
x Site Plan Review SPR
X Escrow for Filing Fees Attorney Cost
50 CUP SPRNACNARlWAP Metes Bounds
450 Minor SUB
TOTAL FEESubdivision
An additional fee of 3 00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant
prior to the public hearing
Sixteen 16 full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted including an 8 X 11
reduced copy for each plan sheet along with a diaital COpy in TIFF Group 4 tif format
Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews
NOTE When multiple applications are processed the appropriate fee shall be charged for
each application
SCANNED
217
PROJECT NAME New High School Chanhassen
LOCATION Lvman Boulevard and Audubon Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION See attachment
TOTAL ACREAGE 94 85 Acres
WETLANDS PRESENT X YES NO
PRESENT ZONING A 2 Agricultural Estate District
REQUESTED ZONING I a
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION Offi ce Industr i a 1 or Pub 1 i c Semi Pub 1 i c
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION
REASON FOR REQUEST See attached 1 etter
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
either copy of Owners Duplicate Certificate of Title Abstract of Title or purchase agreement or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies etc with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge
tr
Signature of Fee Owner
Feb 2 2007
Date
Feb 2 2007
Date
G pLAN forms Development Review Application DOC Rev 12 05
SCANNED218
January 31 2007
ANDERSON JOHNSON AllASSOCIATES
INC
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING
Mr Bob Generous Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
crrv 0CHANAAS NJRECEVEt
FEa 0 2 20D
Ill l
ii JJ ru JIJ r f
RE Development Review Application
Proposed New High School Chanhassen
Chaska Public Schools ISD 112
Dear Mr Generous
On behalf ofIndependent School District 112 and Rozeboom Miller Architects we are pleased
to provide the enclosed information in support of the proposed New High School in Chanhassen
With this packet we are applying for the following permits
Conditional Use Permit CUP
Rezoning from A2 to 0 1
Site Plan Review
Variances
Wetland Alteration Pennit
As you know the School District received approval for an Interim Use Permit for early grading
work and received acceptance of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet EAW from the
City of Chanhassen in December 2006
We understand that receipt of this application and supportive infonnation and yourdetenninationofthepacketscompletenesswillallowustobeontheMarch62007 PlanningCommissionagenda
General Proiect Description
Existing Conditions
The 94 8 acre parcel is bordered along its north side by the Twin Cities Western Railroad to its
west and south by Lyman Blvd and Bluff Creek and its adjacent wetlands to the east Chaska s
electrical substation lies between the school s south property line and the intersection of LymanBoulevardandAudubonRoadThemajorityofthepropertyiscUlTentlyfarmedforagricultural
purposes with the highest point of the site and the steep grades along its east boundary are made
up of native grasses and trees A fairly significant wooded area lies along the south edge of the
property The old farm homestead with some remnants still remaining lies in the southwest
VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER SUITE 200 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD MINNEAPOLIS MN 55427
PHONE 763 544 7129 FAX 763 544 0531 SCANNED
219
corner of the site just opposite Hazeltine Lake Drive Existing wetlands predominantly lie along
the east edge of the property with localized fingers extending at the north and south edges of the
property toward the west Approximately 25 acres of wetlands areas exist within the property
limits
The topography of the property varies in elevation from 985 at the lowest point east to 1075 at
the top of the grass bluffin the center ofthe site Because the center of the site is at the highest
elevation drainage typically is directed toward the extents of the property eventually reaching
either the bluff creek wetlands to the east or to the Lyman Boulevard ditch to the west and south
Drainage immediately south of the bluff will be carried to Bluff Creek via a fairly significant
natural gorge immediately north of the electrical substation
Domestic water is available at the northwest the northeast corners of the site A 12 water main
extends approximately 200 south of the northeast property corner where it terminates Water off
the northwest corner of the property actually lies north of the railroad tracks and at the
intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard Sanitary trunk sewer is located along
the length ofthe east property line and connects the neighborhood to the north to a point
extending south of the Lyman Blvd and Audubon Drive intersection
Proposed Site Improvements Complete Build out
The new high school campus includes parking for approximately 1 000 cars bus parking for
approximately 30 buses and overflow and event parking for an additional 80 vehicles Three
entrance drives of Lyman Boulevard provide access to the school site The south entrance drive
is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon Road and will primarily support bus and
event parking The proposed entrance drive at the southwest corner of the site at the intersection
of Lyman Boulevard and Lake Hazeltine Drive will serve for limited ingress egress The
entrance drive west of the school will serve as the primary main entrance for students visitors
and service deliveries
With the existence of the Magellan gas pipeline north of the school and north parking lot the
athletic facilities find themselves north of the pipeline easement The exception to this is the
proposed tennis courts and soccer fields which lie just south of the Magellan easement and are
located northeast and northwest of the building respectively Softball and baseball facilities are
located in the northwest quadrant of the site and are tucked between the gas main and railroad
tracks The running track and field stadium which is aligned in a northwest southeast direction
will be carved into the hillside to allow the home bleachers to transition rom an upper spectator
plaza down to the field level Home bleachers for I GOO spectators and visitor bleachers for 800
spectators are provided Field events including high jump long triple jump pole vault shotput
and discus are located along the east and southeast corners of the running track Practice fields
will be developed in the northeast quadrant of the site and tucked between the railroad tracks and
existing wetland areas
We have met with Carver County regarding the potential upgrades of Lyman Boulevard We
understand that until there is a Design and Construction Agreement between Carver County and
SCANNED
220
the cities ofChanhassen and Chaska fonnal design of Lyman Blvd cannot take place With that
in mind and in an effort to anticipate the impacts of the Lyman Blvd upgrades we have provided
a general layout for the proposed 4 lane roadway with turn lanes into out of the school site
Bob with this application we are providing the following infonnation
1 Completed application Development Review Application
2 Fees will be submitted directly by ISD 112 as follows
a Conditional Use Permit CUP 425
b Rezoning from A2 to 0 1 500
c Site Plan Review 500 4 000 see note below
d Variances 200
e Wetland Alteration Pennit 275
f Notification Sign and Escrow 850
3 Legal Description of property
4 Plan Sheets 16 full size sets folded 1 11 xI7 copy and 1 8 5 xl1 If
5 Costs associated with the Trunk Water Main along Lyman Boulevard
5 Colored renderings 6 copies
6 Disk PDF files of the Plan Sheets
We trust the enclosed information satisfies the City s requirements If you have any questions or
require additional or revised information please do not hesitate to contact our office
Respectfully Submitted
ANDERSON JOHNSON ASSOCIATES INC
R
Jay R Pomeroy LLA
Project Manager
enclosure
cc Steve Pumper Chaska Public Schools ISD 112
Steve Miller Rozeboom Miller Architects
Mark Bosch Bossardt Corporation
SCANNED
221
II
R M A
CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL
BUILDING DESIGN NARRATIVE
JANUARY 15 2007
BUILDING PLAN
The new Chanhassen High School will be constructed for 2000 students grades 9 12 The total
area of the building is 405 000 which is about equal to the recently expanded Chaska High
School When completed Independent School District 112 will have two high schools with a
total district high school capacity of 4000 students
The building is designed with three distinct functional components Academic Performing
Arts and Physical Education Athletic composed around a central commons space that
contains the primary public entrance student dining student support services and building
administration
The public entrance to the building and central commons faces west toward Lyman Blvd and
will be visible from the north and central access drives The southern access drive entering the
site from the Lyman Audubon intersection will be used on a daily basis exclusively for student
bus access The student bus entrance is on the east side of the building also with access to
the central student commons directly opposite the main public entrance
This arrangement of entrances will enhance supervision and security of the main public spaces
of the school
The Academic Wing of the building is accessed from the student commons and extends south
It is composed of four classroom areas each sized for 500 students Two of the 500 student
classroom areas are on the 1st Floor Level and two are on the 2nd Floor Level The Media
Center is in the center of the Academic Wing two stories in height and accessible from both
floor levels of student classroom space The science classrooms are located on the south end
of the Academic Wing 6 per floor level facing south with a shared greenhouse on the 2nd floor
level
On the lower floor level below the Academic Wing is a partial floor area containing the art
classrooms and industrial technology classrooms This walkout level is advantageous because
it keeps these classrooms near the academic area allows vehicular access from the to the shop
areas and access to the outdoor site areas from the art classrooms
The Performing Arts Wing of the building is also accessed from the student commons and
extends to the northwest This is a single story area that includes a 650 seat auditorium a
multi purpose black box theater and the music department comprised of three large rehearsal
rooms and numerous support spaces
Also adjacent to the student commons on the north side is the food service comprised of a full
service preparation kitchen and large serving area capable of serving up to 600 students in
each of three lunch periods
The Physical Education Athletic area is in the northeast quadrant of the building also accessed
from the student commons The student commons will serve as a lobby and concessions area
for athletic events The PE Athletic area includes a main competition gymnasium with 2000
moveable bleacher seats and three full sized basketball courts when the bleachers are not
deployed The area also includes three other multi purpose gymnasium courts a wrestling
room fitness room weight room locker rooms The floor level of the courts is one story below
the student commons area so that the bleachers are top loaded A running track circles the
Rn7hnnm lAill r Arrhitrtc P n 1
222
competition gymnasium at the commons level and also provides access to the bleachers
BUILDING EXTERIOR
The building exterior was designed to be welcoming and expressive of the learning qualities of
the school using natural materials to create a sense of warmth and timelessness
The exterior building materials include two colors of brick and one color of cast stone The two
brick colors are composed horizontally to emphasize the connection to the geology of the
natural site and to emphasize the walk out level on the east side The lighter colored cast stone
is integrated as vertical planar accents at the significant architectural elements of the building
the entrance the commons the fly loft the team resource areas and the science wing
Natural light is essential to the learning environment Windows are organized in a hierarchy of
groupings and sizes from the punched openings at each classroom to the large storefront
windows in the team resource areas to the clerestory windows and curtain walls that will flood
the most common areas of the building with natural light and capture views of the natural
wetland areas near the school
While the building is three stories in height the mass of the building is embedded into the
existing hillside so that from the west the building will appear only two stories in height and from
the east the final building height will be about one story higher than the elevation of the existing
natural hillside
BUILDING SYSTEMS
Exterior Construction
Typical Masonry Exterior Walls
Masonry cavity walls with 8 12 CMU structural backup 2 rigid
insulation 2 airspace and 4 masonry veneer typical Brick will have
special patterns and or blends Brick to be modular size wood mold
sand faced equal to Belden Brick 4 thick architectural pre cast panels
integrally colored and sandblasted in lieu of brick veneer at up to 25 of
wall surface window sills copings etc
Metal Panel Walls Aluminum Composite Panels equal to Alucobond
Gymnasium Fly Loft Exterior Walls
Masonry cavity walls with 10 pre cast concrete wall panel backup with 2
rigid insulation 2 airspace and 4 masonry veneer typical Brick will
have special patterns and or blends Brick to be modular size wood
mold sand faced equal to Belden Brick Interior precast wall surface to
have sandblasted or acid etched texture and pattern of reveals at the
Gymnasium Walls to have a KalWall clerestory at the Gymnasium
Sheet metal flashing and trim Fascia Roof Edge Spandrels
Prefinished sheet metal metallic Kynar finish
Windows
Anodized aluminum thermally broken fixed and awning windows with
metallic Kynar paint and 1 low E clear glass equal to Wausau 3250T
Up to 25 of classroom exterior wall area typical
Rn7hnnm MillrArl hitltc P n
223
Storefront Entrance Framing Curtain Wall
Anodized aluminum frame thermally broken with metallic Kynar paint
and 1 low E clear glass equal to Wausau Superwall 6250 SW with 2
frame width
Clerestory Windows at Commons Areas Media Center Main Corridors
Cast channel glazing equal to Profilit by Pilkington with anodized
aluminum frame thermally broken translucent areas will contain
insulation
General Roofing System
75 of area to be flat roofs 4 ply ballasted built up roofing system equal
to Garland 4 average depth poly iso tapered and flat rigid insulation All
roof slopes created with tapered insulation not sloping structure except
at the gymnasium
25 of area to be visible sloping roofs standing seam metal roofing
system
Interior Construction
Partitions Masonry non load bearing partitions full height to underside of structure at all
interior and exterior classroom walls public corridors and commons areas Exposed face brick
at commons and IMC areas Burnished CMU at corridors Painted CMU inside classrooms and
at building service areas and service corridors
Abuse resistant drywall on metal studs at party walls between classrooms office areas and
support areas within media center Party walls between classrooms to be double 3 5 8 steel
studs with 4 acoustic batt insulation Drywall partitions full height to underside of structure
Special Wall Surfaces
The auditorium and auditorium commons walls and ceilings will be clad in pre finished wood
veneer wall panels lobby doors to the auditorium control room and adjacent lobby walls will be
clad in the same panels to match The lobby support spaces will be clad in brick masonry to
match adjacent exterior walls
Interior Windows Doors
Hollow metal frames full height sidelights at classroom doors hollow metal windows typical at
classrooms and offices aluminum storefront system @ office media center and misc openings
into commons spandrel glass where aluminum storefront meets structural elements
Doors
Assume Flush Panel Wood Doors throughout spaces unless noted otherwise Assume Hollow
Metal Doors and Frames at all service spaces
Glazing
1 Insulating Glass w low e coating at exterior aluminum curtain wall windows
Rn7phnnm lAillpr Ar hitprtc Plnp
224
clear float glass spandrel at interior aluminum storefront systems and clear float glass
hollow metal systems
Stairs
Cast in place concrete stairs with terrazzo finish at monumental commons media center stairs
lobby stair and auditorium steps concrete filled steel pan stairs at other building stairs painted
steel ship s ladders serving mechanical rooms and tech level @ auditorium
Railings
Stainless steel guardrails with glass intill panels typical
Casework
Plastic laminate casework w solid PVC edging flush overlay style heavy duty construction and
hardware in classrooms epoxy resin countertops at science labs and art rooms hardwood edge
at admin reception desk Stainless steel countertops at laundry room training room and 3d art
room Provide locks for all cabinets Nurses Room to have all locks upper and lower cabinets
Athletic Equipment
Wall pads basketball backstops volleyball inserts gymnasium divider curtains scoreboards
wrestling mat hoist pole vault pit with cover
Gymnasium Flooring
3 station competition gym will be wood sports floor system 3 station Phy Ed gym will be
resilient sports flooring
Telescoping Bleacher Seating
2000 seats at main gymnasium Molded plastic seats on steel frame Power assisted action
Irwin or Hussey
Lockers
Student hall lockers Single tier all welded powder coated steel 5 0 x 12 x 15 standard
Athletic lockers Alternate Double Tier and Five Tier all welded expanded metal Powder
coated steel 6 0 x 15 x 15 standard
Toilet Partitions
Provide stainless steel floor mounted toilet partitions
Food Service Equipment
Full service kitchen See equipment list from food service consultant
New Proscenium Theatre
The new high school theater will be a 650 seat proscenium theatre that will support
a wide variety of music drama and special events The theater will include a full fly house with
counterweight rigging and a gridiron for service access above the stage Stage width and depth
will support large musical theatre productions and a full orchestra pit will be provided for the
musicians A system of catwalks and galleries will provide lighting and rigging access
throughout the theatre
Rn7 hnnm IlIill r Ar hit rt P n 1
225
Stage lighting fixtures will be located at catwalks and on box boom structures in front of and on
either side of the stage Circuits will be provided at these locations and will be wired to
permanent dimmers These dimmers will be remotely controlled by a portable lighting control
console There will also be smaller user friendly control panels installed at strategic locations
for the control of houselights and work lights
The lighting of the audience will consist of dimmable quartz lighting with an emphasis on stairs
aisles and egress points Specialty fixtures will be integrated into the interior design to
accentuate architectural details The auditorium lighting will be designed for maximum lamp life
and ease of maintenance Step lights and aisle lights will be utilized throughout the facility as
necessary Quartz floodlights will be provided for work lights on stage
The stage house will contain a counterweight fly system The rigging will consist of
approximately 30 line sets A fire curtain will be provided at the proscenium opening as required
by code Masking curtains including black legs borders and traveler curtains will be provided
for standard configurations within the stage area A white cyclorama backdrop and black
scrim will be included in the rigging package
The stage floor will be sprung and have a painted hardboard or edge grain pine surface This
floor surface will allow scenery to be secured when necessary and may be painted as desired
for individual performances Floor traps will be considered during the Design Development
phase The finish of the floor will be dark and have a low sheen
Lighting and audio control rooms with sliding glass windows will be developed at the rear of the
auditorium A temporary audio mix and lighting control position will also be accessible in the
center of the house Auxiliary control receptacle panels will also be provided throughout the
facility to accommodate control consoles automated lighting fixtures special effects etc
Follow spotlight locations will be developed in a dedicated area at the rear of the auditorium
Two metal halide follow spots will be included in the lighting inventory
A continental seating arrangement will be studied to provide maximum comfort and optimum
sightlines Wheelchair locations will be developed to meet ADA guidelines Seat end aisle
lights will assure safe circulation throughout the auditorium
STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
Academic Wing
And Commons Cast in place reinforced concrete footings foundations retaining walls
and slabs on grade
Structural steel frame
Pre cast concrete plank supported floor slabs with lightweight concrete
topping
Steel bar joists and long span joists with metal roof deck acoustical deck
where exposed
Gymnasium Pre cast concrete structural tilt up wall panels with masonry veneer
Cast in place reinforced concrete footings foundations retaining walls
and slabs on grade
Drain tile below slab and at perimeter footings under gymnasium floors
Rn7 hnnm lIIill r Arrhit rt Pln t
226
Load bearing masonry with pre cast concrete plank supported floor slabs
at locker rooms and mechanical areas
Long span steel bar joists and metal roof deck acoustical deck where
exposed
Auditorium Cast in place reinforced concrete footings foundations retaining walls
and slabs on grade
Structural steel column and beam frame at fly loft with a combination of
CMU and metal stud wall intil
Steel bar joists and long span joists with metal roof deck acoustical deck
where exposed Auditorium will be a large volume with a visible sloping
roof Metal catwalks hung from roof
Mech Penthouses Steel frame with steel studs and metal panel walls supporting
Pre cast concrete plank floor slabs with concrete topping and Steel bar
joists with metal deck
Rn7 hnnm MiII r Arhit rtc Pln R
227
Key
IJ Architectural Precast
Travertine Texture
As Cast Finish
IJ Alum Curtain Wall
Extra Dark Dark Bronze
q Face Brick
MT Shadow Velour
Face Brick
Coppertone Velour
QJ Prefinished Metal Panel
Charcoal Gray
Chant
II Rozeboom Miller Architects Inc
R M A
CHANHASSEN HIGH SCHOOL
228
Chanhassen High School West Elevation
nze
Iour
Iour
anel
EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME
FEBRUARY 16 2007
L
229
LEGEND
@ REFERENCEKEYTOSITEDETAILS
C91
DETAIL 1 0 NUMBERITQP
SHEET HUMBERfBOTT@rJHEAVYOUTWEMENT
3
92
cJMEDIUM DUlYPAVEMENT
@cJUGHTOUlPAVEMENT1
e9
CJTRACK ANO FIELD EVEN r AND TENNIS COORT PAVEMENT W
clAGlIME INfIU D
I tt CONCRETE WALK
cJNATIVE SEEDING
o 60 120
j UISTlNG
1Vf TLAfO
i
rf
E ISIl
e J
c
e8Be
i I
Owner
Chaska PublicSchools
Independent School District 112
11 Peavey Road
Chaska Minnesota 55318
952 556 6100
Zoning
Existing A 2 Agricultural Estate
Proposed 0 1 Office Industrial
Parcel Size
4 131 752 Square Feet 94 83 Acres
Proposed Building Size
Gross Floor Area 406 209 Square Feet
Surface Coverage
Building Footprint 242365 S
Additiona Impervi us SUrfac are Feet 5 56 Acres 5 86 OF SITE
Lots Drives Walks
Athletic FacT 83Illes 5 000 Square Feet 19 2 Acres 20 25 OF SITE
Proposed Wetland Alteration
Existing On5ite Wetlands 1 071 500
Proposed Wetland Filling 73 423 S
Square Feet 24 6 Acres
quare Feet 1 69 Acres
Proposed Wetland Construction 1 5 1
Proposed Upland Buffer Constructio o
Square Feet 2 55 Acres
00 Square Feet 0 85 Acres
Total Proposed Constructed Dedicated
Wetlands @ 2 1 R d 148eq 000 Square Feet 3 4 Acres
Number of Parking Sp P
920 Spaces
aces rovlded Including Handicapped
AUDUBON
9 W
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
II RZllboomMLllerArch edsllC
244 F rslAVBNltINortI
M lnlMpoliS M nneSOla5i401
ph 612 332 2110 li1 612 664 5152
flossvdlCorporal OIl
Sutta we
1 12b3
Andelson JotlnsonAosooaI9S Inc
7575Gold6nValleyRoad Sluill200
tI1nllpOhS Mrmesola5S427
ph 163 544 7129 lax 76J Sol40531
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
IKE e o ec
1 0 Bo 7SJ7
Fargo lIimhOakota58109
ph 701 2fll ot49 10 701 780 9686
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL EIGINEER
a le llEnyK1OO1i
1750CommceCurI
WMe8earlaXa Il nl asota55110
ph b51 748 1100Iex651 748 931O
fOOD SERVICE CONSUL TANT
1
ji
Denn s ItM 4
311 F unhA ffiueSluth
Sanell M nneslllil 56377
1JI137Q 1596557 uJ2S298W5
TrlEATERCONSULTANT
SdlLS ooIr
123 Thi j Sir NO1h Sotta 10
r 1 ardos IN 55401
ph 6 1 lJ9 51i la 6 l J37 7
SOUNO ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
V
J v slren Ronl1holm Alsoclillas
th St JOO
ph tlllJ74 38 la 612374 3133
h Ab C9l1tf lhallhs plan spl rlkllOOll Of
lPlf1 a Pl8Pflrelt meoturxlElrmylor81
lWp onandIt al I am a duly lKI nl9d
PrOfllSSKII1alf ngo unllerthe
Ia soflhllSlaleofM nnesota
OANlfLl JOHNSON
RllINo Oale
ffi 06085
1 120
02 02 07
JRP
OLJ
SITE
REFERENCE
PLAN
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ON LY co o230
GENERAL NOTES
ALL CONSTRUCTION MUSTCOMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STATEAND lOCAL
ORDINANCES
LEGEND19NOFINISHEDSLOPESSHAllEXCEED3HORIZONTAlTOlVERTICAL31UNLESSOTHERWISE
NOTED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR AND PAY FOR AllCONSTRUCTION
STAKING LAYOUT
20 ALL DISTURBED AREASOUTSIDETHE BUILDING PAD WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED TO BEPAVED
OR RECEIVE AGUME SHALL RECEIVE ATlEAST 15 OFTOPSOilAND SHALL BESEEDED OR
SODDED REFER TOLANDSCAPING PLANS FOR SOD AND SEED LOCATIONS ALLOTHER AREAS
DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIfiED TO RECEIVE ACERTAIN SEED MIX
SHALL BE seEOEDWITH SEEDMIX 2
@ REfERENCE KEY TOSITE DETAILS
1 DETAIL I D NUMBER TOPl
C91 SHEET NUMBER BOTTOM
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL RELATED CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS INCLUDING THE NPDESPERMlT FROMTHE MreASUBMIT A COPY OFALL
PERMITSTOTHE CITY
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLTRAFFIC CONTROLSlGNAGE
CONSTRUCTION ZONESj NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
ALL SIGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY
LOCAL AUTHORlTlES
21 FAILUREOF TURF DEVELOPMENT IN THE EVENT THE COfHRACTOR FAILS TOPROVIDE AN
ACCEPTABLE TURF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE SEEDOR RESOOALL APPUCABLE AREAS AT
NO ADDlTlONALCOST TO THE OWNER TO THE SATISFACTION Of THE ENGINEER
ALL WATERMAnPIPESHALL BE DIP CLASS 52 OR PVt A900 AS SPECifiED All WATERMAlN
SHALL HAVE MINIMUMa o BURY TOP OF PIPE TOFINISHGRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
23 ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE ASTM 0 3034 SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED PROPOSED CATCH BASIN eB
EXISTING CONTOUR
21 2 PROPOSEO SPOT ELEVATION
JoI PROPOSED CONTOUR
INSTALL CONTROLFENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARY TO PROTECTTHE
PUBLIC
o PROPOSED MANHOLE MH
INSPECT SITE AND REVIEWSOIL BORINGS TO DETERMINEEXTENT OFWORK ANO
NATURE OF MATERIALS TOBEHANDLED 24 ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE RCP CLASSlll MIN WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C361 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NOTES
REFER TO SPECIfiCATIONSFOR DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS
1 CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TOSITE AND
PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATIONAND SITE FEATURES CURBS
WALKS PAVEMENTS OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES
SIGNAGE fENCING ROADWAYS DRAINAGEPIPING AND DITCHES
ETC WHICH ARE TOREMAIN
CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FlELDLAYOUT
25 LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES VERIFY LOCATION SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OFAlL
EXISTING UTILITIES VERIFY LOCATIONS SIZESAND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION
REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSFOR BUILDING AND STOOl DIMENSIONS AND
LAYOUT PRIORTOBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHAlLVERIfY If fiLL ISTO BEPlACEO
WITHIN EXISTING SANITARY SewER EASEMENT CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ANITARY SEMR
UNE TELEVISEDPRIOR TO PLACING ANY FILL COORDINATE llilS WORK WITH THE CITY OF
CHANHASSEN
2 REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITEFEATURES
INCLUDING GRASS AND VEGETATION WHICH ISTOREMAIN THAT IS
DAMAGED BY THE WORK TOOWNER SSATI FACTION AND ATNO
ADDITIONAL COST TOTHE OWNER
REFER TO THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PlAN SWPPPJ NARRATIVE
PARTOFSECTION112270 FOR EROSION CONTROLREQUIREMENTS SECTION02270
SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR FULLIMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP
11 MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND PUBLIC STREETS CLEAN FROMCONSTRUCTION
CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRISON A DAILY BASIS PROTECTDRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM
SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULTOF CONSTRUCTION RELATEODIRT AND DEBRIS
PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITYSERVICES STORM SANITARY SEWER
WATERYAIN VERIFY ALL PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICEPIPE SIZES LOCATIONS AND
ELEVATIONS WITH MECHANICAL PLANS COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTIONS WITH
MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR
3 VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TOBIDDING BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL
CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD EXTRACOMPENSATION W1U NOT BE
ALLOWED fOR CONDITIONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEENDETERMINED
OR ANTICIPATED BYEXAMINATION OF THE SITE THE CONTRACT
DRAWINGS ANO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE PERTAINING TO
EXlSTING SOILS UTIUTIES AND OlliER SITE CHARACTERlsncs
12 MAINTAIN OUST CONTROL DURINGGRADING OPERATIONS CONTRACTOR SHAlL STAKE LIMITS OF WALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO lNSTAUATIONOF GATE
VALVES CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES GATE VALVE AND MANHOLELOCATIONSSHALL BE
ADJUSTEDTO AVOID PLACEMENT OFTHESE STRUCTURES IN WALKS AND CURB AND GUTTER
CURBAND GUTTER SHAll BE STAKED TO ALLOW CURB INLETTYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE
PROPERLYLOCATED IN LINE WITH CURSING C CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LIMnS OF
VEGETATION REMOVAL CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE fORTHE
REMOVAL OF ANY FALLEN TREES OOWNEDlIMBS BRANCHES IN
UNDISTURBED AREAS ADJACENT TOAPPROXlMATED REMOVAl
LIMITS
13 ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHALLCOMPLY WITH MPCAAND LOCAl
REGULATIONS
14 CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBA NCE TO snE AND PROTECT EXISTING SITE
FEATURES INCLUDING TURF AND VEGETATION WHICH ARE TO REMAIN 23 FUTURE DRIVES AND PARKING LOTS SHALL BE PREPARED SUBGRADE ASREQUlREO DEPTHOF
FUTURE AGGREGATE BASE AND ASPHALT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH COMPACTED SUrTABLE FILL
AND COVEREDWITH 4 DEPTH GOOD QUALITY TOPSOILPROPOSEDCONTOURSANDSPOTELEVATIONSARESHOWNTOFINISHGRADE
UNLESS THERWlSENOTED
16 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOW TYPICALLY so 1 OR 50 SHAll BE UNDERSTOOD TO
MEAN 950 1 OR gSG
5 PRieR TO REMOVALOf ANY TREESOR VGFTATlON ORANGE
SNOW FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIPLiNE OF ALL TREES TO
REMAIN PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE PROVISIONSAS
REQUIRED BY THE OWNERAT NO ADDITIONAL COSTTO THE OWNER
MAINTAIN SNOW FENCEFOR THE DURATION OFTHE PROJECT
SUBSEQUENT TOSUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION REMOVE SNOW FENCE
AND RESTORE AREAS ASREQUIRED
17 SPOT ELEVATIONSSHOWN IN PARKING LOTS DRIVESAND ROADS INLXCATE GUTTER
GRADES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE SPOTelEVATIONS WITH LABElSOUTSIDETHE
BUILDING PERIMETER INDICATE PROPOSED GRADES OUTSIDETHE BUILDING SPOT
ELEVATIONSWITH lABELSINSIDE THE BUILDING PERIMETERINOlCATE PROPOSEO
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR REcSTA8U5HING ANY
BENCHMARKS WHICH ARE SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED OR
RELOCATED PRIOR TOBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION18THECONTRACTORSHALLBESOLELYRESPONSIBLEFORDETERMININGQUANTITIeS
OF FILL AND WASTE MATERIALS TOBE HANDLED AND FOR AMOUNT Of GRADINGTO
BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPLETELY PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE
DRAWINGS COSTOF IMPORTING FILL DREXPORTINGEXCESS OR WASTE MATERIALS
HIAL E INCIDENTALTOTHE ONTRACT
It u
IJ I
0 U
I
7 ROCK DISSIPATION SHALL BEINSTAlLEOATALlPIPEOUTLETS
WITHIN 24 HOURS OFPLACEMENT OFTHE OUTLETPIPES
8 PRIOR TOBEGINNING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE
ALL SILT FENCE ADJACENTTO WETLAND AREAS SURVEYED IN PER
CITY OROINANCE
9 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCTTEMPORARY SWAlES AND
DRAINAGE DITCHES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO
MINIMIZE RUNOFF AND EROSION AND ENSURE POSITIVE FLOW OF
STORMWATER TOTEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
II R zeboomltlerArchltectslne
2HF IAoer0J8North
N 9apOl s ltn sota 1
ph 612 3J2 2110 fax 612 ij64 6152
Bos511rdlCurporatbOn
8585 West 78th Slrtl Su 100
W nneltpcOl5 nntla55438
ph 9S28J1 4fj1 952IlJ1 1261l
Aid Jot1nsonAnoClalBlf w
AlJ 54 t 200
ph 76J544 719 oo 76J 544Q5J
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
IRE HsyI Jlj 8eVjl PC
PO B 797
Far n Nooth Oa ota 58HlI
ph rUl IWw49 fa 7Cl I lM6
MECHA CAL ElECTRICAL ENGINEER
tlHallbolr lllltneonno
7tJComm reCourt
W 19 Be rLe hnnesota551 O
ph 651 701S1100 tax 651 7411 9J70
i
DonnlSHiIhl AslOCatlas
3 1 FourlhA envosvlh
Sarl nll sola 5ti377
ph 32Q2S96557 I 32D529ll05
Sc
12J ThLl jSlfIlel NUf1h Swlo21Q
pOl MN 55401
ph 612 319S95ll1612337 5097
SOUND ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
V
K emSIOIn Ronnholm As50Claknl
2ol44aryanl Aoue Soulh SUltIl300
nl9apc l s MN55405
ph 612J74 3 OO 130 612 374 313J
IlfleflYC4r1 1y lhal ll spbon peabca Ort or
rvpxl a p 9a edbyrneorunr1lrmydOf lCi
SoJperOn9lldllatI amactulyllC9llS9dpOnoonalt9lIieIunder I
luwSoIhISlal901Mnneso a
DANlf L L JQl INSON
ResJljo D le
ffi 06085
1 50
02 0207
JRP
DLJ
GRADING
DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 1
231
J i i
I it I i HA i
f
l
I i i I i
Xi 1
i53
I
DELINEATED W ETLAND
GRADING BUFFER
WETLAND
16 6
GRADING BUFFER
LEGOND NOTES
1 RefERTO SHEETC3 1 GRADING P LAN FOR GENERAL NOTESREFERENceKEY
DETAIL 1 0 NU
TOSITE DETAILS
SHEET NUMBE g
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOUR
52 PROPOSED SPOT ElEVA 1101
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED MANHOLE MH
PROPOSED CATCHBASIN CB
50
WETLAND
tl
UJ1UJz
i iIGc
CITY 5
FOR REV WMITTALONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCiiITECT
r Ivch OClSlnc
2
55401
fax 612 6601l152
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
liiillim C
ii M nnta
eS 78lhSt eel Swte1
IEl p 95
00
aJl S4oaIaX 952 1 126
CIVIL ENGINEER I LA DCAPEARC
6
AndsonJoh
HrrECT
e n I
Y lek1
Ph 763544 7
ne i
I51
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
g 6 1 PC
Fargo North
ph 70 280
Oa oIa 58109
l9491701200J686
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEEFt
ng
I1 le Bear la 9
C
p 651 746 1 00 f
I1esota55110
fOOD SERVICE CO
IX 651 7462J711
I
NSULTANT
l i
I
AsS1Clflle3
1tiI Sar1ell M
el1ueSOl1h
J pi 3202
7
2a 59 8905
TNEATER CONSULTANT
SchulStlook
123Th dSIfinneaPOhS
N 1e 210
612 339 5956 faJl 612337 5097
SOUND ACOUSTICSCONSULTANT
Kv IOlll1 R
e at
p b12 J74 31100laJl612 74 313 1v
t t plat sPedllCat071
SplheSlaleofMnnesolil
undartll
Reg No H2
If L l JOHN5ON
Date
GRADING
DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 2
060135
1 50
02 0207
JRP
DLJ
232
50
LEGEND
REfERENCE KEY TOsrTE DETAILS
DETAIL 1 0 NUMBERITOP
SHEETNUMBER IBOnOM
EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOUR
J PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
14 PROfOSEO CONTOUR
PROPOSED MANHOLEl H
o PROPOSED CATCH BASIN eB
NOTES
DIN GPLAN FOR GENERAlNOTES1REFERTOSHEETC31GRA
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
Y lCn
2 7 61Hb48152
1
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
m oo
oef 952 831 1263liiilltmI
CIVil ENGINEER UNOSCAPE ARC
lncise200AJJA
STRUCTURAL e e
neenng PC
a
g
lU511 2ao9f8Iiph701280
MECHANICAL ELECTRICALENGINEER
H rlbrtJF c9ooerong
1750 CommarcllCu1
e5Ola551l0
t1 651 7489370
fOOD SERVICE CONSULTANT
u
h
v lrlo 32l 5 fj5
THEATER CONSULTANT
ee1N
l lSuilIt210rfl
fax 612 331 5097
SOUND ACOUSTICSCONSUL
AsoootesllJSouthslfI300Vj5612J74J13
erebv Cflfy thl
orra
ll m alhJIY lIeaiaM6SOIa
DANllllJOHNSON
RgNo Dale
ffi 06085
1 SO
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
GRADING
DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 3
233
J
c
1l
J
c c
s tr
J i i
c
k A
GfJ t iJ
C
c
l ic r ji i III
l
i j 0 F L d 1
k0 E S l tL i ii i Ill i r i j J I
0 2 ftI0 t L ml ti fi l I
i
t JfIil If 1 j l A J f 1 iI t i c i l l
l f v j jqTYVjrIfYiiIlInlli I
S I r
ii
I
SOCCER1 1 Jii
i
f I i I iSo 3 j
t t i f If i I I I f I i
H 11
I r I
I
1 1 j iJ I i
c t IT iil Ii I 1
i
V l I IIliiiAI
I
it 13 8 6 i i I j liictN
ii t 1 yjZ6yij1
i t il 1
1
1tjI
l
ir
r 1
i
i i i JJI i
i i j r 70 I2YJiI
S r i I
i
1
rl j t
Z tf 5
i 3 A
i iF r r J i
1 J ef h i
j i0 ja f72 32 S
1
f
i tJ f j
i j c
00 5 p d
17
i j
l
1 iqif2 F S f fj
rt i
i I I
h 1
i
1
r
Ci i i 1
l r
I
t7i i
c 1 yliD i
i i i
i i Jj i tfC1to
IJtl1if
o 25 0
LEGEND NOTES
t REFER TOSHEET C3 1 GRADING PlAN FOR GENERAL NOTES
@ REFERENCE KEY TOsITeDETAIlS
1 DETAlL1 0 NUMBER TOPC91SHEETNUMBERSOnOM
i
I n
EXISTING SPOTELEVATION
EXISTING CONTOUR
0 1 PROPOSED SPOT ElEVATION
HI PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED MANHOLEMH
o PROPOSED CATCHBASIN ce
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
j
i h
1
F
rma
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ROZlllOOm M ltev cMec15lnc
244 FlfslA 9nvaNorth
Mmna pOh5 Mlnnsola5 Ul
pIl 6 2 332 2110 fll 612 664 8152
A
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Imlim i a oo
I ph 9528Jl 5olll r 2 63 1268
CIVIL ENGINERLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Anrson JoflnsonAsSlCldlOS Inc
17A 7575GoId9n V y Roa SulIOO
MltlnrapOl s t4 f108S0la55427
ph7b3 544 7129fal 763 500531
IE ec
PO 60 7397
FafiO NortrD3I oIa56109
pl 701 280l 9Ia 701 2ElO96llb
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
HalIW 9Eng ll8Onl1g
175QComme CfICourl
WMII Bearlakt4nn9WIa55 10
pn S51 7411 1100 fllJl651 746 9370
h
v
f S 1e1I MinneSlla56Jrr
ph J20 25965 71 3 n S291lI05
SOO
123 Thd SI o NorthSu e 210
pOI PIAN 5S401
pIl612 339 5956 f 12 337 5097
SOUND ACOUSTICSCONSULTANT
K oms Ronf hoIm Ass ClC
444arypnIAueSoulh SJIleJOQ
t V 3 612 3UJ1Y1
IherebyeftlyIMllh Spin gpeoflCClloon OI
report wasprepared by meOf yrtder my d ed
supervision and Ihat lamadIJtylicomled
P ofessionalEft9lle underli1e
lawofIhe SaleolMltIr 6SOla
DANiEl L JOHNSON
Reg No Oale
ffi MI IIo 06085
SCAle 1 SO
OAT
0202 07
vRAM JRP
t HEIEO DlJ
GRADING
DRAINAGE PLAN
C3 4
234
UIt18
UJllEIOQTH Iooll01
MAXIitJGHr O lj
WALL 17
r AIfROJ LEHGlH NiSOI 1
IIlAllI1EIGHT 18 f
f
I
PPROX LENGTH 1 LO i Icj
wu u
II OJl lENGfl l 11 OH
fIlAJlf1EIGHT rr
WAL 125
APPROJI lENGTI 111 0 I
IlAXtlEIGHT lI
WAllh
PPROlIlENGTH lWOI 1
I IIHIIOHT 13
o SO 100
NOTES
t REFER TO SHEET C3t GRADING PLAN FOR GENERALNOTES
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RozftboomM I AtcholocI6Inc
244 sIAvenueNo1h
MII lapolI6 MmMS011l55401
pI1 612 32 2 Oax612 66o 8152
SlS5 lfdlCOfpoatJOn
8585Wet781hSlrool S tetOO
MI OIlflpolls nnesot 5S48
ph 957 8 11 5408 lax 95 a3t l 511
IIr1nersOfl JohnsooA llOCIIltltnc
IT 7575Guloon Vallay Rod S ta200
MlnnHlpohs M n MlSQIa55477
pI1 76J 544 719 ra 763 544iJ5J1
STRUCTURA LENGtNE
IRE He moo
PO Bo 7397
FlIrgo NorlhOlkol858109
ph 701 280 09 9 a 701 200 geIl6
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
lIbO Ql n9nClll nl
1750 CommeCourt
WI11 Boar Laka MlnesoIa 55110
pfl651 746 11UOlllx651 746 9J70
Denn sl1ahl l As3OClaloo
311 FourtllAvenueSooI
Silr1 II Mrnnes ta56377
ph 3l0259 65571 xJ252 OO5
THEATER CONSULTANT
ScltulerShoI
113lh dSt 9tllNorlh SlJIle210
n
5 6
0
2 JJ7 5 m
v
K m Rom tolm Msocia1
2 HefYilfIA SouII1 SlJteJOO
Mneapnl MN5S405
pl1 612 74 38UQlax 612 374313J
II18oIy COlfl fy lt1t 11 1 pi poc oatJof l Of
report asPfr6dby meor undJormy d ocl
UPI SlOOand Ihlll 1 am a duly hclltlS8d
Ploro65 onaIEnyon6l UI1defthl
lilWsclIheSI h oIM nnSQla
DANI lL JOHNSON
Rll No O I
ffi ALE
DAII
N
06085
1 100
02 027
JRP
DLJ
SITE RETAINING
WALL PLAN
C3 5235
P7NV O HOT DiPPED GAlVuD
e D f 1H2RCTIOMS
l
ILU t AC
STEEl lIAR
UCH
GRATE DETAIL
NOTES
REfER TO SHEET C3 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE
PLAN FOR GENERALNOTES
LEGEND
REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILSGDETAIL10HUMBERT0l
SHEETNUMBER BOTTOM
PROPOSED WATERIAAlN
75 BURY MIN
VE@
PROPOSED AHITARY SEWER
@
PROPOSED CATCHBASIN eB @4PROPOSEDDRAINTILE
1 lI COOllMG
T OOQtialE
rTMICIlCONCllfTEII4Il1EWlTH
EBAII r D C IIIQTH l DOWElED
lHTOSlOE oIlS DfCSlOE Of
I STll UCTlJIU IJDlH TTGYI5UoII
I
I
UTILITY NOTES
1 REFER TOSHEET C4 4 FOR UTILITY NOTES
S tf E
nuo
TOOlfIIU IPE
s j
f
I SECTION
e GEHE llllCTUIlEJ
IIEQJIRU ENlIPE DETl
Q OUTLET CONTROL
STRUCTURE BASIN 1
51
I PROVIDE 20 0
rNO GRADING BUFFER
I
I
I
i
EJlS
1 1G 2 EClST YERlfl
lHV 17 2 1NWI
EXISTING
WETLAND
COMNfCTIfEWs tHITA IlY
rDELINEATED WETLAND
1
1 S
3G
1
1
1
1J1C r 1
ri
VICE I
tr
IJLjI
e IE
T 41
1
I
I
I
I Iii
i i
I I
L J
1
I
I
i
I
1
I
I
I
1
II
1
I
I
I
FFe SOO UPPERlEVELl
FFE UO 5ILOWER LEVEL
FINISHSUBGRADE 10 INCHES BELOW
FiNISH FLOORELEVATION FFE TYP
s
rrTj
i7
11 lJ
1
PROVJDE 6 6
NO GRADING BUFFER
C 49
SC 6
r
1
r
FFE 950 0 UPPERLEVEll
FFE 930 5 LOWER LEVEL
FINISH SUBGRADE 10 INCHES BELOW
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATiON HE TYP
MA TCHLlNE 1
M HL 2 i illI11
or
I
L
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
II RozboomM II Archl11ClS
244 Fusl A enYeN1h
Minneapali9 Mlnneool355401
pt1 612 332 l110fall612 664i1152
Suole100
95 e 12fa
C1Vll ENGINEER I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Andarsoll JonmOn AssoclleS me
7575 Golden Valley Rod SUIte 200A1MjnnepolllSMinnesota55427
ph 763544 7129Ia 763544 Q531
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
1 HeyerEJlgin PC
P O 80 7391
90 NortllOekotaS Iog
pIl 7o 1 2R00949fa 7ll1 20096B6
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENJNEER
HlIbergEngm 9
Comm m C
ll Elearl3k M nnlSOlaS5 1O
ph 651 748 1100 1 651 748 9310
fOOD SERVICE CONSULTANT
Dennis Halln Assoclaloo
311 Folt1A anuSdh
Sartell Minne8ota56371
ph 320 259 6557IaxJ21162il ll905oW
THEATER CONSULTANT
0 r elN lI1h SYile2 O
Mmapofi5 MN 551U1
pIl 612 339595BIou a 2 3 75OQ7
SOUND ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
n
i I
i V 561 374 313J
I hllrellf certJf thallh pIn specmaoo or
raportwprepa 9dbymeorunrlarmydwllCl
ng
amadUIYh lh8
k1wSoflleSlateofMi
DANIEL l JOHNSON
Heg No Oate
KIYP1AN
Rr VISiONS
ffi s
W
06085
1 50
02 027
JRP
DLJ
UTILITY
PLAN
C4 1
236
1 L MM AATTCCHHLLIINEE irItfEI fftPAAT
i STJ I
l ri I
u
7
w
i
f yJ j C6 I
1 jil
I i i ll l lli
I L i r Ii i
I I II V I
i
I j 1TllHrfilIiji
I JfY I lO I 1 I I f
VALVE I I ca r OOAUIrIAtVES I I I IhYORAOlllS2tII l
l
t 1 L i il
I 7 C r v x f 70 2 j j
DROPOFF dL ll i 1 1 i If B jV11iil
1 K Ji r Go
AREA
STAlLSI X V10
V
y S 1r
K TORMBASlN Z nonkCfBOAf1IHPjIXXJk
Ii
Y Nr d L
1 TU A OG1lfrI
v
0 r nr
ffi W
DELINEATED WETLAND
fiifit
p i5ii j Y
y
32
C
EXISTING
WETLAND
1rolP
IIINI
STORM SEWER SCHEDULE
NOTES LEGEND
REFER TO SHEET C3 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE
PLAN FOR GENERAL NOTES
1 PROPOSEOWATERMAIN
7 5 BURY MIN ll
R m vOo v Ltnet glh L17 lzerl Ope 1 1ft Rlm V UP tni UD
I FES1 Ctll 940 93400 12 27 032
2 cel CB2 942 93505 11 7 24 036
3 CSiCB3 94 9 93691 fo 21 o so
4 CB3 CB4 9419 93785 96 18 I 100
S CB4 CBS 9448 94047 69 15 117
6 CBS CB6 9469 94157 41 15 127
7 CB3 C87 948 0 94259 42 12 086
8 CB4 ce8 944 8 94110 XI 12 137
9 CB8 CB9 9466 94328 81 12 175
1 FES2 ClIQ 9180 91900 34 42 018
2 C810 C811 9305 92347 105 30 075
3 Cel C8 2 9517 9 635 124 27 on
4 ce12 C813 933 92948 158 27 oaa
5 ca13 C614 965 93U5 96 21 107
6 C614 CB15 938 5 93475 Sl 12 1 1
7 celS C81A 939 7 93595 66 12 un
8 C811 cal 9317 92699 046 18 0 80
9 ca17 ce18 932 9 ln810 48 15 044
0 effie cels 93241 9 690 57 12 098
II C817 ce20 9329 9 915 63 12 254
12 C813 CBll 966 93262 131 15 125
13 C821 CB22 9368 93505 79 12 208
t 1g3 I
16 CB1S CB25 097 93600 S3 12 058
I FE53 MHlOI BStlQ 8i1100 150 XI 025
2 o101 C82 9115 897049 XI 21 059
3 C826 C827 9239 89886 89 27 047
4 C827 C829 9225 89921 92 27 025
g
7 CBJO CB31 924 7 III 12 L8C631C8329259922755112167
j t
11 C826 CB35 9239 91865 11lG 18 064
12 CB3S CII36 9237 9 Q41 9 12 09
13 C829 CB37 9211 90120 241 18 029
14 C83iC8ja 912 92 is lfl5 16 021
t 1 t
17 C837 CB41 9114 901174 25 12 1 00
18 C838 CB42 6 00332 z6 12 I 069
19 C633 C843 9290 92550 22 12 068
I FES4 C844 9190 91900 71 12 0 83
2 C844 C845 923 9 066 26 II OSO
1 FES5 MH102 6 1 0 1 9100 52 42 015
2 MH102 MHt03 9100 90470 91 27 120
3 M H103 MH104 9 9 587 163 24 1 02
4 MH1i MHI05 9289 1806 164 24 093
5 MtllOs Mril06 9277 92076 220 18 on
15 MH100 BOl 929 7 92247 18 076
MHIOJ BD3 9291 92236 30 18 213
MH105 B02 927 7 922 14 45 HI 188
DELINEATED WETLAND
IN
W1Wzz
J
I IUU111II
SuucO Nefmlh
In C ng
9J440 9424 CBl 49 R 30671
13672 9419 C82 48 R 7 V
9J699 19 C8J 48 R 3ls7 Y
93661 9446 C84 48 R JOj71
904128 9469 CBS 49 R3067 V
94116 9480 ce6 46 R 3Q67 V
94295 9465 C87 48 R 30671
904189 9468 CBB 48 R 3067 11
il44 70 9493 C89 48 R 3067 V
91900 1J05 CBIO 72 R 30671
91426 9j 7 C811 501 R 3067 V
92726 9336 C812 48 R 3067v
929 87 9366 C813 S4 R 3C67 V
95i 37 93if5 Ca14 48 R 30671
935 47 9397 Ce15 48 R 3067 V
937n 9413 C816 48 P 3067 V
92736 932 9 CS 17 48 R 3067 V
928 31 9324 C818 49 R 3067 V
929 5 934 5 ee19 4i1 P 30671
930 75 9354 C820 48 Plii67V
934 26 988 CB21 48 R3067 y
936 70 iM05 C822 48 R lJJ6 I
9 Y J 937 C825 48 RLG V
691 37 9115 MH101 501 R H33
69183 9239 C826 60 RC67 Y
69928 9U6 C827 48 P 3067 V
699 51 9206 Ca2S 48 R 3067 V
900 15 921 1 Ca29 48 P J067 V
920 9 9247 CBQ 4 Tnv
92212 9259 C631 46 P 3C7 J
923 kt 9273 cen 48 IR nV
92553 9290 833 48 R 3067 V
92716 9312 CS34 48 p 30671
91985 9n7 CAl5 4R R 1067 V
92050 923 7 C836 R lO 7v
9Q191 9124 C837 49 R 1067 y
90265 goo 6 C838 49 R 3067 V
904 61 911 2 Ce39 48 P 30671
90855 9 iT4 C84 0 48 P 306Tij
909 00 9122 C841 48 R 3067 V
90350 Sw 6 CR41 48 1 R 67 V
92565 9288 CE43 49 R 30671
91959 9243 C844 48 R 3067
920 79 9242 C845 411 R 3067 V
69108 9 00 MH102 J A 1733
90S 79 929 1 M ncn 0 R1733
91753 9289 MtlI04 48 R1733
9195 9217 MHI05 I R 17Jl
92i47 9297 MH1CiE 4il R 1733
92300 RlOO 801 NA fiA
92300 9300 8D3 A No A
92300 9305 8D2 N
PROVIDE 20 0
NO GRADING BUFFER
C DELlNEATED WETLAND
@ REFERENCE KEY TO sITeDETAILS
DETAILI D NUMBER TOP
SHEET NUMBER BOTTOM
PROPOSEO STORM SEWER
iO
PROPOSED MANHOLEMH
PROPOSED CATCHBASIN tCB @
t PROPOSED DRAIN TILE
PROPOSEO GATE VAL
G2
PROPOSED HYDRANT
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
o 25 50
59100 104
90603 49 24
9068a 223 4
2i3 93 al 21
93896 4J I
94039 65 18
94177 43 15
3 ost 2 1
9 tll l107 CB51 9110 90785 61 12
10 MHI09 CH5 I 9j15 92459 31 12
11 C846 CS53r94iS 940941 16 12
12 C848 CB54 457 942191 40 12
HS1 t 83CHSMH11l 924 5 909 93 181 1i
4 MH1tl MH112 S339 91163 29 12
5 MH 12 cssa 9392 91 4 7 12
6 C85 C851 9400 914901 230 12
7 c e i Ctj5a 9405 91595 37 12
8 CB58 C859 91519 306 12
9 Mlll10 860 917 91076 76 21
10 CB60 RII 9212 91270 52 18
11 Ii Ri 9212 91347 e2 fe
12 112 RI3 9112 9116 l 18
13 Rb R 9212 91461 82 8
14 R14 R5 921 2 9 495 78 18
15 RIS R15 9212 91556 78 18
5 R15 RI7 9212 91630 76 IS
l R17 CB61 9212 9172J 53 12
iiI H HH
A 111022RI11RI12 9212 91566 82 16
I
25 R114 FIllS 912 916il4 62 12
2 t 4H112 C862 992 160 12
1 FfS6 MH113 I 688 0 88 EO I 40 12
2 MH113 ce63 9138 90425 I 212 12
SC 8B8 64S6 Cc B8 r5 9ll99 s
L 0I I
CBfi6 C8 1 91 4 th5
7 MH113 MH114 9138 9102Q 80 12
a MH114 CB68 9171 91245 40 2
9 CR65 C 8 9 91 8 91237 12S 12
8 1 0
9110
9116
9326
ABBREVIATIONS
CB CATCHBASIN MH MANHOLE FES FLAREO END SECTION
80 BUtLONG DRAIN lO IN OEOlAMETER tI A NOT APPLlCA8LE
031 e l132 9110
1 906619116
060 906 21 9321
1 40 9 806 9449
0 2 939J6 94 2
i 30 4 1 23 945 1
119 94228 9465
1 4 94165 9476
2 73 909 2 26
l S 9 85
402 114400 9475
214 I 943 IS 8
0 26 88i18 91i7
1 30 90064 9245
094 9 if63 9339
065 91377 9392
122 ijli90 fioo
9159 9405
0155 9 1619 950 5
044 91755 21 2
123 91169 9212
094 91 47 9212
084 914 16 m2
054 914 iR92 2
042 91495 9212
081 91558 9212
079 916lfJ 9 2
097 911 OS 921 2
169 91809 9245
t E
078 914 92 2
075 g15G6 9212
023 91569 9212
03 9 633 9212
043 91684 9212
045 i917l0 9i12
050 6n934
t
055 90595 9097
050 iOi17 916 8
050 li260 iWj
050 91340 9 70
063 91070 1171
050 91265 91 0
O 91300 9iil3
M007
MH108
MH109
CS
C8 7
csia
C649
C85if
C651
C652
Cl53
c or
MH1tO
C895
Mi 1 11
MH112
cs
CB57
CS
CB59
BOO
R
7i2
FI3
FW
C861
R
RiS
RIIO
Rill
01112
Rl13
RI14
RIIS
Cfl62
MHI13
C963
eElIi4
C80S
Cc6
caS7
MH114
48
60
48
1 1733
R I733
R 1733
R 1067 V
R 3067V
R Q67V
R 305711
RWi v
R 2S73
A 257
Rn7 V
R3067 V
A ll3
R 2573
R 17JJ
R 1733
R 2 rij
R 2Sn
R2573
R 25n
R 302
R 4018
R4018
R4018
R4018
R41 16
R 4U18
R4018
A 2S7
11 40111
R40i8
R 4018
R4018
R4018
R4018
R 4018
R 4018
R 2S71
R I733
R2573
R2S73
R 2573
R 57J
R 2573
R 1733
R 573
R 2573
NOTES
1 AUS1DRM SEWER PIPE SHALL eEReP CLSS IIIOR 8EmR
2 ALL unLrTY CASTINGS SHl LL BE FUflNlSHED WITH LOCKBOLTS AS SuPPLIED 8Y NEENAH FOlfjDRY OR APPROVED EQUAL
J NEENAH R l133CASTINGS SKALL 8E FURNlHEO WIlH SOLOLUSWITH TWO LIFT HOLES AND SHALL BESTAMPED STORM SEWER
4 NFEIiAH R 2 ST3 CASl1NGS SHALL BE FURNISHED WITrvPEC GPATES
PROVlDEJlI2SS
ANI Ov e D6 SIlD
1112 xvr
1 m I
l
11 4 STEElBAA
WllDlO
fAOllllEllBER
GRATE DETAIL
1
1VElll
L OI CHAAQf OO
s gFOIlPlPflEHGIllS
AND SlOPfSlYPJ
12 PIPE
Q
SECTION
OUTLET CONTROL
STRUCTURE BASIN 3
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RCHITtCT
Rozeboom MiJleArchiaCtsIrlc
244FlfstAvenoeNOI1h
Mlnnapolls MJnnesola55401
ph 612 332 2110 faK 612 664 8152
aossarjtCorporation
8585WlIsI78lhSlroolSuit8100
Mlnneapol s MinnesoLa5S438
ph 952 8 1 5408fllx9S2 I31126l1
Ailrson Johnsoo Associates In
A IT 7575 GoId9l ValiaRoad Sui1e 200
MirmeapOhS IISOil5S427
ph 76J544 7129lax 76J544 1
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
ill Hoo PC
P O Box7397
farlO NorthOakOlaSSQ9
ph 701 1lOt9oI91 701 280 9686
MECHANICAL ELECTRICALENGINEER
HallberQEOl
1750 CommercaCourt
White Bear Lake Minne90la 551 0
ph 651 748 1100 fax 651 748 Y370
4iitE
liiilJ
Uennis Hahn Associlltas
311 fOllrthAll4lnueSoulh
Sao11I1 nrwsola563T1
ph 320 2 Y 6557lax J2O 529fl9tl5
Schuler ShOOK
123Th dSlrIlllNorth Su 1I210
Mnneapol s MN 55401
pII t 12 3J9 59SI fax 612 3J75097
SOUNO ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
yl
Kvemsloen RonnlOlm Asroaales
1444 Hry UII Sutn sune 300
nneapols MN55405
pIl 612 374 38OQ1612 374J133
I hereby tllllbf lhallht plan spaaficalJoo 0
reportasprepa elbymeorundermya red
supervllknlllndthilllama ly1lcen6ed
ProiesslOrlIlEngin lHlClerlt1e
laws oftileStale ofMn185llla
DANI L l JOt1NSON
Reg No 1lllL Oal
ffi 06085
1 50
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
UTILITY
PLAN
C4 2
237
i E
I
1z
jIJ
EXISTING
WEllAHD
EXISTING
WETLAND
0
0
o
NOTES
E T CJ 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE1
F ORS
NERALNOTES
LEGEND
CE KEY T05ITE DETAILS@RE
llD NUMBER TOP
SHEET NUMBER BOTTOMC
PROPOSED WATERMAlN
1
7 5 BURY MIN
H PROPOSEOGATEVAL
PROPOSED HYDRANT
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED MANHOEMHI
PROPOSED CATCH 8ASIN e8
10 PROPOSEDDRAIflInLE
I
SERVICE 1bFn
1G1LpllOOiRfurft
IItifjAt
I r
J J
r
i j 1 I 1
1 1
he X r l J u 0L
I I
SLOG
v
6 C i
J iI11
1
MO
AN
T
L
Cl 1 REVISIONS
i
j b o
1 11 T 1
WI
f
J
I t
y
I f
1
I c
ll I i
1 i
I 1 1
I of
n
1 1
I d C
I 1 t IJ 10 I f j
1
I Ii 1
ilL0I
I I I
i
I
5
U V
I Iur d
1
1I U
i
2 V
1
11 ili n
1
v
I 1 j JI il1 CJ
1
j f I i
i i w t n T
J
ii
u
1
i
1 I
1 Ii
I d I JjL i n
1
1 I
I f
I
1 It
r c
ITI l j J
j
I 1
l
I r
eo
J
i i
i r i
i I I l f j i
r f I li i i II 111 11 i L
I
i I I I I
I iN V
1
LCZ i iUL itt I 1 I
1 c
0
1 Ii j i 1 i
TCHLlNEjJ 1
j
1I r
11 Iii I
A
j A d lf I 0
INE4
L l
I
MA TCHL
N
UTILITY NOTES
1 REFER TOSHEET CUFOR UTILITY NOTES
PPEOGAll MZED
Pfl I
IHJSfCTION8WICUPS
O
I f1
l l 4 S ci
UCHIlIEIlI6EIt
GRATE DETAIL
DISCHAAae
L S PFE
NOTCH WEIR
1TPIPE
PLAN
rOlcllcOOlcR g DIW
I TRUCTUilfAH080
r E TCH 1It
I I 121
1StQPE
i HWlt21ot
1 c
Lumm
L rPlPE I Q
l t1851
I
ITOM SEWER PIPE
REfER TOSTORM
8fWf SCtfEoutE
fORPlPflJttOTMiS
UlO SLOPES TYP
i
IeGHIEftJloSTRUCTUREJ
IItMf HSPfRDETMOO
SECTION
OUTLET CONTROL
STRUCTURE OCS 2Q
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHlnCT
alIa612 6t g15Z
I
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
r eI oo
952 831 26l
I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCIVILENGINEER
Aasodalel II
d hV sa S i 200
1
7 l9fait 76 440031
ST 3E
STRUCTURAL E F
r eenng PCTUGpOeO7391
ota58109
1 9 la 701 80 9688
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
a oe5da55 0I
B 1a 6S1 748 9370
FooO SERVICE CONSULTANT
SOClaMIDe1nSHlIIAsSoothtfiI
u e
7
O S298905ph32j259S
TH CONSULTANT
r OfJCNN 61Su e210
I fa 61337 5097
SOUNO ACOUSTICSCOHSUlTA
AssoCIatesn
i Soultl Surt8300
i
612 374 m3
3
lher Zr
I
onllndlt1 maduly
erlh8pea
l rat MorreOta
172
lHl
1
N
207RegNo
06085
50
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
UTILITY
PLAN
C4 3
238
1 1li
i Jr
I 1111JI
I IIJ
tSri 3
I I
i Ir
I I
w
H
ft l
01 I
1rOIl
l1J llURN 1
f
ES 7
8 011
lrDlP
7 5 N
V
11 0
1SIIURYMlN1
Iilv
1rGAn VlVE
UTILITY NOTES
1 REFER TOSHEET C3 1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR GENERAL NOTES
2 REFER TOSHEETS 5 0 SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLPLANS FOR EROSION CONTROLMETHODS UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL FURN H
INSTALL MAINTAIN AND REMOVE CONTROLDEVICESOF STORM SewER INLETS
3 CONTRACTOR SHAll BERESPONSIBLE fOR All TRAfFICCONTROL SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION ZONeSl NECESSARY TOCONSTRUCT PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS ALL SlGNAGE LAYOUTS MUST BE DESIGNED B THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES
4 INSTALL CONTROL FENCING AND BARRICADING AS NECESSARYTOPROTECT THE PUBLIC
S INSPECT SITE AND REVIEWSOIL BORINGS TO DeTERMINE EXTENTOf WORK AND NAnJRE Of MATERIAlS TO BE HANDLED
6 REFER TOSPECIFIC 1I0fllSFOR DEWATERING REQUIRfMENTS
7 CHECK ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY SAME BEFORE FIELDLAYOUT
8 REFER TO ARCH1TECTURAL PLAfIIS FOR BUILOlfllGtoND STOOP DIMENSIOfllSAND LAYOUT
9 ALlTRUNK WATER MAIN Pipe 1 DIAMETER SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52 LL OTHER WTERMAlNPIPESHAll BEDIP CLASS 52 OR PVC C900WITH
METALLICTRACER FURNISHED AND INSTAlLEO THROUGHOUT THE PIPE LENGTH MET LLIC TRACER SHALL BE TTACHEO TOALL HYDRANTS WITH
WIRE BRACKETS
10 ALL WATER MAIN SHAlLHAVE MINIMUM rfi BURYTOP OF PIPE TOFINISHGRADE
11 ALL FITTINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CEAM 2611 2 4 1 ALL FITTINGS SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPEWITH POLYETHYLENEENCASEMENT
12 NO BENDING OFPVC WATERMAIN WILL BE ALLOWED FmlNGS MUSTBE USED TO FACILITATE ANY CHANGESINV RTlCAL OR HORIZONTAL
ALIGNMENT
13 USE GATE VALVESFOR ALL APPLICATIONS
14 ALLHYDRANTS SHALLBE INSTALLED 0 FEET FROMBACK OFCURB
15 ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PIPE ASTM 0 3034 SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
18 SANITARY seWER INLET AND OUTLET PIPES SHAlL BE JOINED TOEACH MANHOLE WITH A GASKETED FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION TO
ALLOW DIFFERENTIAL senLEMENT BETWEEN THE PIPE AND MANHOLETOTAKE PLACE
17 UPON MAKINGCONNECTION TO AN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STUB OR MANHOLE DIRT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROMENTERING THE
EXISTING SEWER BY IMMEDIATELY iNSTALLING AWATERTIGHT PLUG ASNEEDED IN THE EXISTING MANHOLE
18 ALLSTORM SEWORPIPE SHALL BE RCP CLASS III MIN WITH FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C361 UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
19 LOCATE AlLEXISTING UTILITIES VERIfYLOCATION SIZE AND INVERTELEVATION Of ALL EXlSTlNG UTlUTIES VERIFY LOCATIONS SIZESAND
ELEVATIONSOF SAME BefORE BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTlON
20 PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED BUILDING UTILITY SERVICES STORM SANITARY SEWERS WATER MAlNl VERIFY ALlPROPOSED BUILDING
UTILITY SERVICE PIPE SllES LOCATIONS ANO ELEVATIONSWITH MECHANICAL PLANS COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ANDCONNECTIONS WITH
MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR
21 CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LIMITS OFWALKS AND CURBING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION Of GATE VALVES CATCH BASINS AND MANHOlES GATE
VAlVEAND MANHOlE LOCATIONSSHAlL BE ADJUSTEDTO AVOID PLACEMENT OF THESE STRUCTURES IN CONCRETE WALKS AND CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE STAKED TOALLOW CURBINLETTYPE CATCHBASINS TO BE PROPERLYLOCATEDIN LINEWITH
CURBING
22 UTILITY CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE AND SHALL PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING LAYOUTtoND AS8UII TUTlLITYPLANS OF THEIR WORK
23 CATCHBASIN AND MANHOLES IN ROADWAYS AND PARKING LOTS SHALL BE HELD DOWN TO ASPHALT BINDER COURSE ELEVATION AND AOJUSTEO
IMMEDIATELYPRIOR TO PLACEMENT OFFINALASPHALT WEAR COURSE
24 UTILITY CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM PRIOR TO FINALACCEPTANCE OFTHE SYSTEM
25 THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TESTING OFALLAPPUCABLE UTlLmESIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CITY OFCHANHASSENS ENGINEERING GUIDELINES
26 ALL OPENUTILITY STRUCTURES SHALL8E PROTECTED WITH EROSION CONTROLIN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCAANO CITY OFCHANHASSEN
STANOARD OETAILS MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL INCLUDING SIlT REMOVALUNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION REMOVE EROSION CONTROL FOLLOWING
TURF RESTORATION AND ESTABLISHMENT ATTHE COMPLETION OFTHE PROJECT THE STORM SEWER SHALLBE FUUY CLEANED SUBSEOUENTTO
FINAL CLEANING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PROJECT CLOSEOUT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND ENGINEER THAT
THE STORM SEWER HAS BEENCLEANED
27 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVtoE TEMPORARY WATERMAIN CORPORATIONSTOP FOR TESTING AT THE END OFWATERMAlN
STUBS FOR IRRIGATION STUBS AND WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING
28 TELEVISING Of THE EXISTING TRUNK SANITARY SEWER LINESSHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR ISACCORDANCE WITH CITY
OfCHANHASSEN REQUIREMENTS ACOPY OF TEST RESULTS LOGS REPORTS VIDEO TAPESANO DIGrrAL VIDEO MEDIA SHALL BESUBMlneDTOTHE
ENGINEER AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCEOFTHE SYSTEM
CONNTN 1 OlP
rWMTOEXIStlNGI
I
i
I
ilI
iI N ORNTic
i v
T
j
LEGEND
@ REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAlLS
OETAIL 1 0 NUMBER TOP
SHEET NUMBER BanOMj
t PROPOSEDWATERMAlN
7 5 BURY MIN 1
INORANttc1
tNtIGAT E
VIILVE
PROPOSEO GUE VAlVE
WPROPOSEDHYDRANT
PROPOSED SANITARY SewER
PROPOSEO STORM SEW R
0oPROPOSEDMANHOLEMH
PROPOSED CATCHBASIN CB W
4 PROPOSEO DRAIN TILE
EXISTING
WETlAND
UJ1UJzz
i i
o 0
I0 0
NOTES
REFER TOSHEET C3 1 GRADING AND DRAiNAGE
PLAN FOR GENERAL HOTES
o 25 50
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
Rozltboom M d1Ilectlllne
44 FlrslvenftN m
Mlrlneapoils rbrNlsota55401
pl 61332 2110ao 612 664 8152
8ossBtolColllnboll
8585Wt7Il1SI t SuiIII100
1oot noIlaOils e9Ola55430
ph 9S2 631 S4Olla 952 B31 1268
Anoeon JoInsonA srooaIIlSlnc
rr 7575GoIdflflVallltYRoad S e200
Minneapol MlI1nesoIa5S427
ph 763544 1 ZS fa 76J S44l531
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
1 HeYfl Eng PC
PO eo7J91
hl gO North 0a ola58109
pI170T 280lJ94llltx701 2IJO 9616
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
tJHalloorgEl1illlltlf in9
1750ComoIetftCourt
WhiteBovlllkll M oollOla5511O
ph 651 74811001aJr 651 741S370
AU
Wi
OennlSHahn AuooalllS
311 Fou hA ueSoulh
Slrtnl Mimeslla563n
ptl 320 25551IilxJ2 Xl5
123ThiflSlr North SviI210
Mnreapohs N 5540
phll12 JJ9S958 ax612 3J7 5W7
i
Klerostoen RQr1PlhotmSAsSlelill S
24448f V ueSOUth Su JOO
Miolllapohs MNK405
ph 612 373800 lax 612 374 313J
lherebycllrt fylhallIspi3n liJ8Clr 3lIOO or
report liS preparell by mil11 under my dlred
sllfll isilnandlhatlamadu1yllcer sed
Pro s Ql11iEc Ofll8 ullOefthe
laws ofthe Sl8le 01 MomeSOl8
OANIU l J0HJoSON
Reg NOZm D8le
CMM
C7ME
06085
1 50
0202 07
JRP
OLJ
UTILITY
PLAN
C4 4
239
STOR I WATER POLLUTION PREVt NTIOIO PLAN GENERAL SUMMARY STORJ I WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN GENERAL SUMMARY
endrfre us contmct the h l D stnct f anhwork Cuntractocmurk1I Ar i ral l work Illdull
1 CVII lrucu r hJI 1 dpt1cCmJNlIlberm along outer pCllnlctcr orsite l c fi lI alonK the h I h 8 Hid orthcatqllacll lIh urIne Ie
2 Ctlll lrudim ofT lI1l rary J mcnrBusm III the uUllWcl1st nd onll qluulmnt llfthe slle
3 llivcr 1I ofrun t trum theCllntrudlon Ie tothe e pI ti e l M
4 L on lrucllllnofoullcl le iu fromlcmporary edllllnlhlls n
StuhiliLaho nml mamtcn n e 0 area oon tre1 n ofoutlet
onslrud OIl1l cpanllflhcbuildingpad
n J i n of neel uhtn rlh qualr mt of Illslle
JIt J 1 erosIonconlrt l denlI11U pr lk W lln n1l I anc s tolhn
Inspe1er O conlrol a mlntl1llm 01 unce t wek8ml siler o h nllno nl Rxurd inspcdionon lng hIed m lIl1lrodor condTU li n IMIlLt lJl b ui lblc r1ll lOl lI Mtornge
Pro iumaimC11am e fur nll dn as oll ws
al Sillfencesand enliconl l oJc ices 01 Iorm ewer U1kb I ll b Iel for deplh Qr sedlllenl lears 10 ICeit f hri i iCcurdy srtndJIu lU 1f1 1 1 ur slru lu llnd
1 st lhalIMlShanJJ l e IlI I urc pl c
1 SillfenelOS erosioncumrol dn ol nn cr inkK duneDr logs oJ other CTO Oncontrol 11 shall b kaMd halCU llClll re l l lloe h hl ufthc et t lun
courrolde i e ilh 4n
Rock cunstrulllQClIlrarK nshall be Illspled rvrclol lpng llfmerrod River lUCk thaI has bee1med K edwllh lmcnlsllll be I mooI anl rql cd nh freh n C1
rock
I RI l nirsor l lacCn 1ll l allen ione nrr ldo shall o curwnhjn 4h li
cJ Thc slQnn walerhaMn an1 lllpUfary Jnnnl baslll shall b lcaned h 1l sed menl re u h 1htoutlet IlclhlOf lilebH Iu wlullIc 11 biJ inshall 00 dn u
and CJimen enl e hm72 hllun
f TCOlp r ryJi e hct1h tllhcln la Ja brchc pr t1y1 j
TIlI ktdM JllTllnt lln p d 111fnll eUIlrnK d Ic dl inI cd area on Ihe eontruclk l ue oh ll hc reroovJjlun 24Ik ofd ny
hI The bollum anu ik 1 fIC ofth I r fkCd om Inh sln hall bo lJu hze ilhin 200 feet ufllx PlOjft hntOf I lnt I f d harflc to 311 tmf atcr S hllu n uon
sluillbe Oml IC h n 4 houn 01 eonnn1ml
EXISTING
WETLAND
i
i
i
hii I
q Ihhli111f
f iIJWIIf JilIIIIiljlt
O r i I
l
l Js lii10I0i1ilik
I I 2
i 11 I
01 3 Ji Ii
11 1
0
Upon ilf prulal ofpcnmele SIll encc rk k e lTucli etllranCCS olherr ll n e olTOI dc cs eorllmCII e Wllhthc folk ng eonlruclion ocqueOe
I Mni lln e L no in pl e lopwil stockpiles al llle nonh MIJCofllle SI1 anl temp mtb tms alunllUlcrll TUlleter of 11 Irioally along Ihsourhv eS south 8rdCasquadronl of
th Ile
Maullaln the lemar JilT1nl ba 1S allhsuull andea 1 Slk of U sue Rc e ll 1l 1 ary JJnnl b n 11 11 ll lnI01 Itll
llil rtrulltrfflmthe on rruc Onille 1SmucllaSplblcIlhelc PtiU d II l1rros n
lalOunol lcel 0 1 e n lOClcd b ldm p d
C nslrucC theSlmm Ihin Nu 1 2 a lIt c fh sc basins 11 Ic1tlI ral J n nt ba rul dunt cot lruclmD irol Cllhe lJ IOSfnom Ill and nl lOldm I n
Hegm re nu l ufl r il S1uc4 lo lhdt glll e avlllion e n lruet f 3reOl r oc o P1an d bUllJlIl P d mdudlll parhntt mddrive hgrldcs balllic J and other athlell
Iih dlllei and ptl alioo f r relam alJ
Ruugh gradSilc nOl eon lnllhe ram lrdcns unlll th slormSv lT 1ll V funclkllal anulhe dl lT h rm IS In pbee
S COn tnIclllM ltIcrclelrudallInjarca
Q ConMruelorh r Icml uaryemh bem10 dlcn lonnwat l nlllulllu lIlCpmf sturm wer sl n IU alerIJ1lllmelll ru 1l or olller Icmpu Ii 1 lxIsUl 1IS luir1
10 In 1l11 TcrrnUlg 11 fenreanu cdlmcnllog imm 11lclfull n n h gr oelhll hl1lef1l
11 CIMru 1 l tlll cr c IIl PrOI 1 Mruture inlclSwirh8lprmcd de it h bJJamullrl llOlS and II f ocelll ct ClI lIng ll notbe lOC cp ablc
12 COll lrucl ar rma nanisanll Y r yl m
lJ C nsllucln 1atmlllOalls
I Cln lru 1 lbe e lCnle lruel 1I hjn
IS CunslnKllsrlmg 1 1 allJ dnvs bgmks
I h rnde ball fid a d balan ire lea In 3lk uale nd quITed a uut Ofl psl f r I g IImun1 li lure rs s mJ lunuapc areas nund lh build
I U1nl ldecon lr tionornsllllngillllW emenl
111 Stab l 1 1 ilh seed aNI er SlOn blankeScedI nd c hh h thefine graded I tl aJCa nh llarWe f8 j
l un ITKlcurb nd gutter
2U CUnSltlKlpa enlCnlsellun
21 COllol1lctlh raillganlen
2 Esl hh hpbl 1sandCgel311unill rD1Ut ardll
23 11l la1l1 nj plngA durh li l r emenl n0CcSYrrillrlos Ming
24 l tovidfild Sill 111lg m d landsc reresllllalinn WIth miOlmulIl e htccIIlIld rlllJXOtl an l Pill Ide1Il1 i U Il1klSl kj j s l i 1 m criul alsrca wcp In s s ale
hollOm I
25 len lemp mry d c nn bemlS oDI afkrrUmgarden vcl l ti n i l bhshcd and h l e n ImnlCdtSlclyresto Ihe fthctemlrar UiHlk n berm
2b Stnhihl slol uphiilfromlheinliltral nhasinsan nilngurJcnshxlanJ llonblanh1
21 hmcdiald lma um one ccllprior 10 anl Ctpaled tinal l M b lll l n e Jm e r trIIll sulldmll lCtTlI Ve leI lT scd ocnlra ill and lelllporH 1 c n berrrui
1 elOlr J n ber anJ lilfn II1 t lM shull nulbe 11 11 until al1lrllng ar as lLte eaPfd lh CIai al re l hIIc COUNe alld theall c paled allu l JII1sch dule
isnOmolelh n ne Ckaay
21 I m ide tinJISlahllllhon t
Pn viiedc alennlofexea ar un ssld IlI rkutnSpCSh IlU2200 D schalj 3ktlhsll he routel tl mugblempornysc JinlCnIOa I liorlodl cbrge fl lh sll
Slabilired llllk Ja1l asandolO kplleswllhIUlh follulIlgrmrnherufdtr ofla lmo trulIllOlIdivilyjnlhllturea
1 Slttpllrhan3 1 wilh D1da s
1O llo 1 ilhiIl14do s
Flallcrlhan lQ I wUhin21do s
Temrrdl nl 1 Cpllc h ll h Ircalcd IIh JII pnate elUsinn eontrol meaSUleindl1Hl SIltlence and lemporary 1101whcn l kpilc Otelen IIlact e furperi l longer lhan
11J I
rT1 idll1 im snce ofalllenporlry scCkd Jrol tllIIII fllly eSI bl hed
Apply for Pennil Transfer Modifieallon h PC PcnOlllr lnSrrWill nr in aboulMay 2005 confirm ldlh Cun lr1l110ll anllglT
AnUlipaledProj 1 Schclule
I Phase I s l rouh grading Buldlllg Plld h lllhcrs
HlIlldmgpad grlling t othcl
I bse 2 Il rough grdmg I n hl e fSle ll g nl
BuIldgconlrUClion tfOIll gI bluck cIC I hen
SiICrlltghl Tadil1gtcuml cle
l bblCcofsllefinlshgrodmg
sd andFros nConrrnIBlal cllnll nIof lie t lIlrlclc
B BUlldingconslrw on c mr elc forocc p k yl
9 Soedmgand sodlng enmrlete
n c n11e tJH6
Mllr h Jl
1 u 7
by2OI
Sl tcmhcT mH
sl telOlxt I
lW1e2 N
June U09
7F 0
r ir
i II
000
BLUFF CREEKPRIMARY ZONE
o
PROyt0E21lr
NOORAOltrG BJfFER
r UIlOlSTUR8EOI
OlsrUfl8EO
VEGETATl H
It
t
1
C5 Q
CAT TRACKING SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 6 1
LEGEND
SIlt CE tHSlAUPRKllno GAADlNG Q
V
I LTfEIICE STAlLI DlATRYRlLl
1IG UiEHEAYTouTYMOI MIIOOIDNlEASAS
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6B
o
REFERENCE KEY TOSITE DETAILS
DETAIL I D NUMBER TOP
SHEET NUMBER l3arrOM
E ROSIONCONTROL DEVICE KEY
SILT FENCE @
SEDIMENT LOG @
ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE @
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SEED @
RlCI COIISTltUCrIONEHlRAItGE LD
Q
RNIlQAflDEIIIBIDfILTRATlOIIAAf A i
@
E TlOGtl
EROllIOlltOIlT1lot IlJIolIIErt2 V
WETLAND BUFFER
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
o 50 100
I j
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
Rru eoonMiller rcIllClSlr c
2 4 fltSl erueNorlt1
M T1eapOlrs MI eoraS5401
p t612H2211Ofax 12 6848152
BMSmCorporalloo
65a5I lI t181hSfool SullelOll
M eapOlls M tlfeSOla55438
ph 9 2 611 S4061u Il52 8Jt lfi8
ln JohnsonAssotial9s
l rTfI 7575GoIOrlVi lleyRoad Sulle200
M nneaDOls Mlf1nesola55427
ph 76J 4 7129IaJ1 76J 544Q5l1
IJrn H y PC
P 0 80 nJ7
Fargo NorIh DakOla 5810l
ph 701 200lJ49 Ill 701 2lIO9686
MECHA NICAL110 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Hn11bar9t tIlII0iIef10Q
1750CommtlfCAlCourt
Whlte8rLak9 MlIln a5511O
ph 651 748 1100 1il 651 74lH 310
FOOOSERVICE CONSULTANT
I
J
t
om aHah AsSOClJl
311 FourthA l OflSoJIrl
Sartl I MmesOla56377
ph2 259fi557 a J20529 8905
S
123 Ttllrd Strflel llinrth Suile210
MIlVoINIPOlIS JlN 55401
ph 612 3J9 59l la 612 3 7 5097
V
K emstoeo Roo hOIm Associat
2444 I ryll11 Averve Sooll SuteJOl
Jl nneapOlts MN5S40S
ph 612 374 3800 fa 612 374 3133
IhertlbyeertIPylharlhlSplan splClficaIKltl or
tepOwlSprep rlilbymeorl ltld9tmydrrfJd
upllsionandll1atlallllldolylice slld
PrOr slllOl1atEIfTI un lltl1Q
lewsoflheSI8leorMItVlllSOla
UANIU l JOHNSON
R9No U22 Dalfl
ffi C
LAL
06085
1 50
02 0207
JRP
DLJ
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
C5 0240
NOTES
REFER TO SHEET C31 GRADING PLAN FOR
GENERAlNOTES
REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE SECTION02270
fOR CONSTRUCTION SeQUENCING AND EROSION
CONTROL REQUIREMENTS Gj
LEGEND
REFERENCE KEY TOsITeOETAIlS
L eM 4
cJHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT @cJMEDIUMDUTYPAVEMENT
cJLIGHTDUTYPAVEMENT @
cJTRACKAND FIELDPAVEMENT @
rl AGUME INFIELD 10
LJ t21cJCONCREeWK
SJGN
@ EIGHT
cJCONCRETE PAVERS
o 2 50
I
gl
I
I
I
l
W
Z
J
U
EXISTING
WETLAND
STORM BASIN s
IltEFf ToStEnC6
F ENlARGEDPl AZA
PLAN MOIT
DIMENSIONS
4 HlGlfENct
AlloPJfWAU
rB
1
PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL
REFERTO ARCH SHEETS
FFE 9M1 0 UPPER LEVEL
FFE 930 5 LOWER LEVEL
FINISH SUBGRADE 10 INCHES BELOW
FINISHFLOOR ELEV TION FFE TYP
I
I
r
r r PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL I
r J L J REFER TO ARCH SHEETS IIL
ILJI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
tlIGHfENl
AT10 WAU
l
iI
i
lHE9500UPPERLEVEl
FFE 930 LOWER LEVEl
FINISH SUBGRADE 10 INCHES BELOW
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FFE TYP
r 1
1 y
r
0
MATCH LINE 1 A1TO o WAlL 1
U flMATCHLINE2
PROPOSED HIGH SCFiOOr
REfER TOARCH SHEETS
tlIGtlfENCE
r
u
AllOPOf WU
i
i
i
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
J
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RoaboomMHle Archilectslnc
44 frrslAvenue Norlh
M nnlap i S Mnesola5S401
ph 612 332 2110 lu612 6M8152
AJl
AMerSOf1 JohnsOrlAssocia1s 1rc
1575 GOJdflfl Valley Road Su rn200
tlinn poI s Mnesola55421
ph 763 544 7129 lu 16J54405J1
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
TIm HeyerFnqln PC
PO Bo 73fl
filljQNor1hDalola S8109
ph 701 2800949fax 701 Z808i
MfCHAN1CAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
llallbolrgfnYlI nng
175QCommerooCJ1ff
Wrul BearLakv M flnesOla5511O
ph 651 7481100 lax 651 7 8 9370
Denn Hlhn Associilles
Jl1 fOUdh Avenue SooUl
SadefIM eOlaS6J77
ph 320 258fi557 fall 3 0 529ilO5
THFATERCONSULTANT
S
123 ThdSI ool Nor1h SoilQ210
MI nea g MN 55401
1lI 612 339 5958 fax612 37 5097
v
Kvestoon Ronnholm AsSOClaltlS
2444 BY lIl1 Avenoe SotJlh SuIIG300
MlI1ntlapolis MN
pn ij1374 3800 16Jl 61374 3133
IM tlycerhfylhatth sJlktn spec jClt or
r porIWlIsprepa edbymeorundermyoirecl
sUpllrvlsion and t al I amaduly licansed
P ulQs ionalEnginflfl vnderlhe
IllWft oflhe SlillllofMUlnflsota
OANIILLJUHNSON
ReijNo Olltl
ffi 06085
1 50
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
SITE FINISHING
PLAN
C6 1241
0i
e
I
I
I
I
I
L
COPfCREnST
IRHUTOoRCH
MATCHLlNE 1
L1U
r
MATCHLlNE 2
PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL
IREfER TOARCH SAEETS
I
1
@
NOTES
REFER TO SHEET C31 GRADING PLAN FOR
GENERALNOTES
REFER TO SWPPP NARRATIVE SECTION312500
FOR CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCINGAND EROSION
CONTROLREQUIREMENTS
o 25 50
IN
WIWzzJ
J J
U u
1
12
LEGEND
@ REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAlLS
C9 1 DEl AIL 1 0 HUMBER TOP
SHEET NUMBER BOTTOM
cJHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT LiJ
CJMEDIUM OUTY PAVEMENT
cJLIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT W@7@cJTRACKANDFIELDPAVEMENT
rl AGLlME INFIELD Lm
@1237CONCRETEWALK21
l
SlGN
LD FENCING KEY TOPttEIGHT
BOTTOM WIOTHfTYPE
cJCONCRETE PAVERS
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RozobGw mt1 HermMEl tslrc
244 il1Il A en NoM
Monneapoh llomesola55401
pI1612 J32 2110fa 61H64 8j52
CONSTRUCT10 MANAGEMENT
BussardtCoparaoon
8s85VVMI7ell Slr8lI S 100
VIt poI s t Msotas4J8
ph 952llJ1 5408r 95J llJ 1W
CIVil ENGINEER J LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Merson JoMSonAMocatos Ioc
S s 1l200
ph76J 544 7 ra 163 54405J1
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
IJiE H ec
P O 80 7397
fargo Nov O Ia5B109
pt1 101 2 91a 10 2009ll86
MECHANICAL ElECTRICALENGINEER
liiOlltrQ I 9LIIollefl
1750Coml11OlrcoCNrt
Wtllteeeaflale MiNesolas 511Q
ph 651 74Bl100 raJ 651 148937Q
D6I nlSHaln AsscIal
311 FQJr hA enofISoulh
Sar1ell M nl tsola56377
ph no2S9 65571a 32o S9890S
THEATERCaNSULTANT
s
123 Third SlrOlEt JIortl Su e 710
Mlrlna pols N 55401
ph 612 J39 S95Blll 612 JJ7 5091
SOUND causTlcsCONSULTANT
v
i ms
Minn8ilpollS MNS54OS
ph 612 J74 J8OQ fa 812 J74 J1JJ
Iherooycer i1ylhallhrsplnapeuIIc8llOf1 or
raDQrtwos prer lll by TIll or unl1my llirct
sUpoVlSlQnondll ollamadulvlocolnel
ProfISIOrlIlIEnll unClerlhe
lwsofu eSlatDlM
ONIEL l JOHI SLlN
Reg NolL DII
REVISIONS
ffi 06085
1 50
02 0207
JRP
DLJ
SITE FINISHING
PLAN
C6 2242
j
I
y
IIt It
W w
zl Z
J J
x x
u u
p
J
n
i C
EXISTING
WETLAND G
EXISTING
WETlAND
nNINGWAU
ET OOCWAl l
i I
@ @
oC lfIGIffNCE ILill
ro AT
092
m G if
C92r@ f
f@IIt
PROf
I
I
I6D
i
i
i
i
J
I
I
II@Ii
o
NOTES
C31 GRAOINGPtAN FORREFERTOSHEET1
GENERAL NOTES
REFER TO SWPPP NA dl C ihNLSENTS
r I
f
fi
I
J
i
IL
f
P
i
L T
I
GIlR I
TO W
I
I
I
LEGEND
SlTEOETAILSWRECIDERTOP
SHEET NUMBER BOTTOM
CJHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT
@LUcJMEDIUMDUTYPAVEMENT
cJLIGHTDUTY PAVEMENT @ t11
TRACKAND FIELD PAVEMENT @7
rl AGLlME INFIELD
C9 2
cJ CONCRETE WALK
C9 1
SlGN
FENCING KEY TOPHEIGHT@SOTTOMWIOTMYPE
cJCONCRETE PAVERS
1 @
I
I
I
I J
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
7
612 6648152
CIV L ENGINEER I LANDSCAPE R
a n
O IeVRSl te200A4Aiine
a765440531
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
HeyorEnlllll iJ PC
9O or a 280S6p17012SvTIm
MECHANICAL ElECTRICALENGINEER
esola5S110I
18 651748 9370
FOODSERVICE CONSULTANT
I
esfriIOfa320 529e90S
THEATER CONSULTANT
U I
1nle2 Or595efa6123375097
SOUND ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
KVe01SI00 ROlnholrn
e
612 J743mph612J74JOVOJv
I n flty certIfy thallt s s oa
l aduly
ltee
t 7 ontSOta
7
NI L L J
I
N
07RIlNoo
KEyPlN
REVISIONS
06085
1 50
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
SITE FINISHING
PLAN
C6 3243
77RUAININGWAU i
r RHolININGWAlI IlI TAlNINO
WAll
I
I m
2Y
f26I
07
I
i
TH AlL
i
111
SOCCER2
wi
1
I
I
I
i
RVAlNIHG
@ V
i
i
ii
SOCCER 1
LEGEND NOTES
t1 REFERENCE KEY TO SITEDETAILS
M ggJ
C3 HEAVY OUTYPAVEMENT @WcJMEDIUMDUTYPAVEMENT
cJLIGHTDUTY PAVEMENT @
cJTRACKAHOFIELOPItVEMENT @
cJAGUME INFIELD
2E2TIJCONCRETEWALK
SIGN
@ p
EIGHT
cJCONCRETE PAVERS
REFER TOSHEET C3 1 GRADING PLAN FOR
GENERAL NOTES
REFER TOSWPPP NARRATIVE SECTION31 25001
FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND EROSION
CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
o 25 50
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
Ih
WIWzz
j
o 0
I
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
II Rozeboom Wier AnMoclS kIc
244 Forst AvenueNOI1h
irmeapoh 4 0111 54tl1
ph 612 332 2110 fa 612 664 8152
BossardtCorpora1k1
8585 Wesl78th Slrool Suilfl lOQ
M fleapohs Mif Il Ola5S4l9
pl9S2 631 5408 10 9f 831 1266
AnosonJoln Ol1AssCleshc
L IT 7575001Valley ROiOd Sule 200
b neapol s MresolaS5421
763 544 71291763 5440531
1 gm eo
P O Box 7397
f go NorthOa otJ58109
ph 701 2IJO 0949fnw 701 ZIlG961l6
MECHANICAL ElECTRICALENGINEER
fJHallber9En9jrnoenrog1750CommerceCourt
WMe Boor Lake Mnnesda55111J
ph 651 748 100 lax 651 7 8 937U
FOOD SERVICE CONSULTNT
DenniS Hahn Assori tes
311 f oorth Averwe South
SlIrtIIMinnesola 6377
pi 32l 259 6557 la 320 529 tl905
THEATER CONSULTANT
huIerShook
123TfjrdSlrooINor1h SUiIl710
MonneapOlis MN 55401
ph 612 339 595SlJ 617 331 5JQ1
SOUND ACOUS1tCSCONSULTANT
v
Kvelnsloen Roronlolrn AasoclaI8S
Bryanl AvenueSouIt1 SuteJOO
fIlnapoi MN55405
ph 617 374 3800 fax 61Z 374 3113
lheratlycertrfylhal t1isplan 8peC1rotahOl 1 Ot
eporlwal pr9pwedby me ocunclor my dlred
8uperv sionaMt1afI am a duly Iicerrsed
ProlesSIOIlalfngineer vnder
Iawt oflhe Stale of MinnesOla
DANiEL L JOHNSON
Reg Nl Dale
ffi 06085
1 50
Q2o2 Cl7
JRP
DLJ
SITE FINISHING
PLAN
C6 4244
PLANTING SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES LEGEND
1 lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECTAND APPROVE fiNISH GRADING BEfORE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS
WITH SEEDING OR COOING REFERENCE KEY TO SITE DETAILS
eM fr 12ALLDISTURBEDAREASWITHINTHELIMITSOFCONSTRUCTIONSHALLBESEEDEDORSOOOfOUNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
3 BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELYAFTER SEEDING AND SODDING REFER TO SPECIFlCATION FOR
PROCEDURE j rnoCONlfEROIJSTREE
DECIDUOUS TREE @4AlLTREESTOBEBAllEDANDaURlAPPEO
5 All TREES AND SHRUBSSHAlL RECEIVE 4 DEPTH OFCLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
I ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE EOGEDW1THA POlYEOGER STAKED AT S a c MAX SHRUB BEDS TORECEIVE
3 DEPTH OFROCKMULCH OVER 4 MIL WEEO BARRIER
7 ALLPLANT MATERIALSSHALL BE NO 1 QUALITY NURSERY GROWNAND SPEClMENS MUSTBE MATCHED
AUOVERSTORYTREES ADJACENT TO DRIVE AND IN PARKING LOTSHOULD BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER
THAN6
a CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 8 HOURS PRIOR TOPLANTING RELOCATED TREES
FOR FIELD LOCATION BV LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
t AlLSLOPES OF 1 OR GREATER SHAlLRECEIVE FIBER SlANKET REFERTOSHEETS C31 C32 AND C3 3
FOR DEFINED GRADING WillITS
o 25 50
10 S d Mix 1 CAlhlllHc Fhlld Anlas
e The Cantr dorhall prvvidll two 21 Kentucky Sluegravarieties 2510 each for totalof50 ofthemix from
UM following Choice N Blue Ab5Olw Rugby II Adelphl parlKlo Midnight Brilliant Moonlight erHl North tar
b TMCootractor hall prOo Id two 12l Pennia Ryegs n Ues 25 each lor totalof50 ofthemlxl from
the following chole Manhatten II Omega II Brightslar II Catalina Charger II nd Manhlrttan 3
11 NatraGraUl PntlrieSeedMix Ar as Sall be IINIOOT Seed Mix 1SB M lerallgraas Prairi j
12 Infrtf UIOn and Rlill G rdllll Areas
Th4 Ccmtrac10r hall providethefollowing seed mix noted below
Big Blue t m 34
Canada WildRi 11
Switchgr 104
Indian GraM 6
Llttl Blue tem 15
Cordgrass 10
M do BInln9 Star
Canada TIckt foll 3
Common Oxy 3
Wild Bergamot 3
Smooth t r 3
13 Wetland SeedMix MnlDOTSeed Mix 258 Pureha5ll from e t1tputable 9atetIn unbroken orlglnel contflln
tagged and labeled toU S Agriculture Department Applicationrllt Shall 1M 30Jlbs per ac
e Acceptable Selld Soure8 Ail seed sall be supplied by oneor mor1Iofthelallowing vendo
P airleResloratioos In
P O 80x327
Princeton MN 55371
6121389 2
I
gl
I
I
I
J
Applied EcologIcal Solutions
21938 MuahtoownRoad
Pr orLake MN55372
952171919phone
95217 1920f
I
j
I
I
J EXISTING
WETLAND
W
Z
J
U
SEEOIiII
HlISI
D
I
00
I O ou
Pi 000000 b
0
00 rJ8NIS
I N G O Od iwImz0
V h iy L u
w @ h ORO oFF
s
13
1eG of JFB UoP
I 01
PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL n j Jtri l O 0l rlr O 0 OJIREFERTOARCHSHEETSj11IIrlSODtfISOlI
p l r il 98 Q
r S r PROPOSED HIGH SCHOOL 1 1 1
L J
u REFER TOAReH SHEETS 111I800
Ol CJt nvElIlIOlNGon f
f L
CONCRETE8TEP8 T L D
I REFER10NlCHI i
L TIr j
I
tj
7 j N
U
I r
c
MA TCHLlNE 1 rtEtaontJIlIt7 o
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
RozeboomMII crUMCtsInc
244 FilslAvenveNortll
nneapohs MIIlnesOIIl55401
pI1 612 3J2 2 10fa62 664 fll
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
l oss 1 C
6585Wsl7l IlnSlrl Surttl00
Minneapoh Minn 00l155438
95 H31 54oa lu95 6 Jl 1 1ll
CIV L ENGINEER I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Andefson JOOIllOrlA WC81e6 1nc
A f7 7S75Go1aenV yR08l Su e200
PMlnnaapohs tI r048S427
ph 163 54 7129 763 544 0531
STRUCTURALENGlNEER
IXE Heye Fnl g PC
POBo 7J97
F go NonIlOllk a58109
ph 701 21 009 ll 701 2BO 96t6
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
HlBbt r9EnQ1fMlrlI9
175l CommalC8 Coul
WhitaBearLake Mnn a55110
pI 651 74B l100I 651 74B 9J70
0 Hall Associules
31 FourthAvOOueSoulll
Sllrtell Mflf1esnla56377
ptl 320 2596557tu 32o 5l989llS
Sch
11lh d Slrwl Nonll Su le21Q
Mnf ellpOl s MN 5540
pl 6 2 3J9 59 1 612 331 5097
SOUNO ACOU5If
I
K erTsloen Roonholm
7444 llryanlAyOnveSoulh Sue300
nf eapOl MN5540S
ph 617 374 3800 lu612 J74 J133
Ih ellyc lythatrh Splal1 sperlic Iko1 OI
rlDOl1wlIsprapa edbym Oluc mydi lICl
8uPlrv sional1dtl1i111ama llylKfln oo
ProfSSS Jl1aIFng fle unollflM
a oI1I19Stat ofMnesoIil
DANIELL JOHNSON
Ril9No D Is
RfVISIONS
ffi 06085
1 50
02o2 7
JRP
DLJ
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
C7 1245
I
FNATlVfORS1I IP1
A n D
k fltJ G n l Lj00rt
I E J11
1
I
1 1JjHPyF101rIII
SOD 4GTj l SOD tl soo0E7Qr
4cj@
SOUTHWEST
PARKING LOT
TALLo
j3j ell
I
v
L MATCHLlNE 1
I
00 I
II t1
O c g
L r@
I
I
I
of
MATCH LINE 2
PROPOSED HIGH SCHOO
REFER TOARCH S
EETSI c
r f
c @@ NORTHWEST
PARKl6l0T
324 STALLS
@
rfj
@ o@r1
J fUTURE
MONUMENT
W1Wzz
J J
I I
t t
t It
PLANT SCHEDULE
SYMOOL COMMON NAME
CANOPYTREES
AF m
A
eA
811
F
GS
GT
A
TC
21 2 1JZ ca BSB
23 2 1i7clO B B
13 m2 Ca 6a
s J iiic1 BS S
2 1 7 cal 8 13
I 2 2
a
al
24 2 11 eal BAS
13 i al 1388
16 2 1lical siB
29 J eal BSS
8 2 II2eal Bl B
S 3 cal SSS
13 2 112 eal B S
siENNA GLtN MAPLE eex jman SleM
COLU NAR NOR1fIi t MAPLE ACep alarcMde C vn 1nare
AlfrLIMN RAOi E RD MPLE Aeer nJlUfFlAutumnRad arIe
FALLFif SfSUGAR M APlC Acef occharumEalISla
BLACK ASi1 fraxtnvs nigra
RIiERe CH Betulan9ra
NORTHERN BlAZE ASH f raxlOus flmenCarla JelIno
AunJMN BLAZE ASH franusamenCar1a AutumnBlale
MARSHAlI S SEE6LESSGREENASii Fram ian caMyMillsSeeQie
AlTljMr i dOLO GINKGO GmkQO blklba AutumnGold
SUNBURST HONEYlOCUST Gfedlls a Inacanlhos WI nem1S SuncOH
QUAING SPEN Populus Iremvlodes
WHITE 0 QuercusaiM
GRENSPIRE lINDEN Tihe codmaG1 Iprll
OTY
6 12
6 12
8 16
6 8 1
6 18
5 12
5 12
4 8 18
8 18
DECloOOuS SHRUBS
BG CHICAGOLAND GRIEN eoxv OvD ButuGlencoe
t A AU EMAISCOMPACTD6GWOOD cooiu aihaAilemarl Coipacr
R iiuRoi OQGwOOO Camus racemOSl HUIZ8m
CS BllOS YELLOW DOGWOOD Camus S lCea 8ud s Yellow
lOA FiRE BALL EUONYMllS euooymus iiirtus Select
RA ALPINE CURRAN Rbes elpmum
S8 ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA Spianoa x bumalda Anlhooy Waler
va BLUE MLlFFIN VIB N Ul VbUrnum di m9lum Slue MuIln
VD NORTHERN BURGUNDY VI8URNUM V bumum derrt9lum Morton
VP BlACIHAWVIBURNUM Viburnum prumlOh
Fra S 9la
8etua grll
GymnOclftdU jio Cli5
Pop lusl e mu oKle
QUfflC US lIlb
29 lB
2e
8 24
9 24
B 24
12 2
14 lB
20 24
2B U
1 2
B B
8 8
B 8
8 8
8 8
B8 EI
B B
B S
S B
S B
LarTilatc la
Pkeagla ICacktr1Silla
C nU CMIinana
Os aw n ana
CONIF EROUS SHRUBS
IS ANnORRA OMPACT JUPER Jun 08US honZor11ahs Plumos COT1pa a
C
r
ri
f 1
1
r if
f
L
f
LEGEND
PLANTING SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES @ REFERENCE KEY TO SITEDETAILS
DETAllID NUMBER lTOPI
SHEET NUMBER BOTTOM
1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECTAND APPROVEfiNISHGRADING BEfORE
CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SEEDING OR SODDING @
oChi
GCONIfEROUSTREE
DECIDUOUS TREE @
2 All DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEEDED OR
SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
3 BEGIN TURF ESTASUSHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDINGAND SODDlNQ REfER TO
SPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE
4 ALL TREES TOSE BALLEDAND SURLAPPED o UNDERSTORY TREE
5 All TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 4 DEPTH Of CLEAN SHREDDED HARDWOOD
MULCH o DECIDUOUS CONifEROUSSHRUB
6 All SHRUB BEDS SHAlL BE EDGED WITH A POLYEDGER STAKED AT S O C ltAX
SHRUB SEDS TO RECEIVE 3 DEPTH OFROCKMULCH OVER 4 MIL WEED BARRIER
1 ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO 1 QUALITY NURSERY GROWN AND SPECIMENS
MUST BE MATCHED AUOVERSTORY TREES ADJACENTTODRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT
SHOULD BEGIN BRANCHING NO lOWERTHAN6
140 SPRINKlERHEAD
o l ADJUSTABLESPRINKLER HEAD
1 20 SPRINKLER HEAD
8 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAJE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS PRIOR TOPLANTING
RELOCATED TREES FOR FIELDLOCATION BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS
t AlLSLOPES Of 4 1 OR GREATER SHALL RECEIVE fiBER BLANKET REFERTOSHEETS
C3l C32 AND C3 S FOR DEFINED GRADING UMrTS BUFFERYARD A
REQUIRED PLANT UNITS PER 100
10 Seed Mi 1 IAthIetlefield ArlIas
The ConlrlKtor h lt PfOfIdetwo 2 KntuckyBluegill lietIes 2S4 uch for total
01 50 ofthemix from Infolfowlng choices N Blue AbBOllle Rugtty U hIpill Pilrade
MidnlghL Brilliant MoonlighL and North tar
b The Contractor hall pr two 12 P1rlllnnirRyegraM VnliN 254 INCh tor total of
0 ofttII mUll from thefollowingcltofe5 II1Mtten II Omol9a II rillhtstlr II C rlCrgIIndManhatlanJ
CANOPTREES
UNDERSTORY TREE I EVERGREEN TREE 16 FT
INSTALL HEIGHT
11 Niliv Grassi PllIirieSeed Mix Areas 8M be MNJDOT Seed MI 158 Me e T lIl1ruPralrlel BUFFERYARD B
REQUIRED PLANT UNITS PER 10012IntiltrUonandRaInGrdenAr
The ContrlC1or hlll prvIiuthefoflowiog seed miA II IKtedbelow
BillBluealem 34
C nadaWlldRlee 10
SItchgru 10
IndlnGras 6
UtllBlve51enl 15
Cordg O
do BllZlng StI 3
C nad Tlcktreloil
Common O ye 3
WildBergamot J
SmoothAter 3
CANOPYTREES
UNDERSTORY TREE I EVERGREENTREE 6 fT
INS AlLHEIGHT
SHRlIBS
INTERIOR BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS
13 W tl md SeedMhl MnlDOT Seed Mix 258 Purch se lrom lllpulabl as l In
unbroken original eonlainelll tagged nd labekld toU S Agriculture O partment Appllcallonralellallbs301IbaperlC1p
Acc eplable Se d SOIJrclS All seed shllllbe supplied by oneor moreofth following
ndonl
TOTAL VEHICUlARUSE AREA
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISlAND AREA
Pr lrIeR ltoretions lnc
P O 80ll327
Prinellon MN 5SJ11
6121J894342
SUPPLIEDLANDSCAPE ISLAND AREA S73DOSf
REQUIRED INTERIORLANDSCAPING TREES 156 TREES
AwliedEcologicalSolutlo219J8MushtownRoad
Prior Lake MN 55J12
tS2I4411919 phone
9521 7 1920fu
SUPPLIED INTEROR LADSCAPINOTREES 156 TREES
o 25 50
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
00
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ROlelloom Mille ArmlOClsInc
2ddFifsIAvell eNorth
Mneal1ohs M nes0t3
ph 612 33l 2110ax 611 6648152
Bolosardl Corpo a on
I5l15Ws178thSlr I Surte100
M na3 1 M rtols ta5 38
ph l 2 ij31 S408 lax 852 831 1268
AfIj oo JohnsonAsOCIaes1r1c
r 7575GojdenVallllyflOlld Surte200
Mm1espohs Mi1 oIa55421
ph 763 544 1129f76J S44D5Jl
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
1 HayEnq nll g PC
P080 7J97
hrNor1hOakol85Bl09
ph 701 280 0IJ49fax101 26096ll6
MECHANICAL ISo ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
HDllllrllE 9INllll
1750 Commerce Court
WhlB lakM nresola55110
ph 651 7481100 iU 6S1 7 8 S370
J
u
L
Qomn s HaM 1SoA scwatM
JliFolJl1hA 8fU6Sno Itl
Sarteli M nesclil563T7
p JXl596557 fflX 320 529t905
123 Th1 SIAe North Surte 210
M lIapol5 MN 55401
ph 812 3J9 59S81ax612 337 5097
SOUND ACOUSTICS CONSULTANT
I
KII9 n5loen Ror1nholm Assoc OS
2444 Brya11 Avenua Soult1 SU le 300
Minnepolis MNSS405
ptrt12 314 3iOO hlO 61l37 313J
I herbY llrllfylhal lhlllpall speufocabon or
Olport wa preparad oy me or uodW myllfllCt
Sl Pl sonilndu ajlemaIy6d
Proial O1AIEnr iIeer Vmlllrlh9
lawsofllleSlaleOfMomesoIa
DANIUlJOtiNSO
RIljNI Dala
ffi 06085
50
02 02 07
JRP
DLJ
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
C7 2246
o 25 50
LEGEND
@
00
O
o UNDERSTORY TREE
o DeCIDUOUSCONIFEROUS SHRUB
140 SPRINKLER HEAD
o 0 ADJUSTABLESPRINKLER HEAD
1 20 SPRINKLER HEAD
INTERIOR BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS
4897QOSF
REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ISLAND AREA SF
57300 SF
REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING TREES 156TREES
SUPPLIEDINTEROR LANDSCAPING TREES
PLANTING SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES
1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST INSPECTAND APPROVEFINISHGRADING BEFORE
CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SEEDING OR SODDING
2 All DISTURBEDAREAS WITHIN THE LIMITSOFCONSTRUCTlONSHALL BE SfEOEO DR
SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
3 BEGIN TURF ESTABLISHMENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING AND SOODlNG REFER TO
PfCIF1CATIOH fOR PROCEDURE
S ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL RECEive DEPTH OFCLEAN SHREDDED HAROWOOO
MULCH
6 ALL SHRUB BEDS SHAU BE EDGED WJTHA POlYEOGER STAKED ATS O C MAX
SHRUB BEDS TO RECEIVE 3 DEPTHOFROCK MULCH OVER 4 MIL WEED BARRIER
7 AlLPLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NO 1 QUALITY NURSERYGROVvN AND SPECIMENS
MUST BE MATCHED AUOVER TORY TREESADJACENT TODRIVE AND IN PARKING LOT
SHOULD BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 8
I CONTRACTOR SHAll NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS PRIOR TOPLANTING
RELOCATED TREES FOR FIELD LOCATION BYlANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
9 ALL SLOPES Of 4 1 OR GREATERSHALL RECEIVEFIBERBLANKET RfFER TOSHEETS
C3 1 C32 AND C33 FOR DEFINEDGRADING UMJTS
10 Seed Mi11 A1hletk FleklAreas
a The Contractor shall providetwo 2 Kentucky BluegraS varietiotS f25 e h for II total
of50 ofthemill trom thefollowingeho eos NeBlue Absolllbl Rugby II Adelphl Parade
Midnight 81ll1lant Moonlight and Northstar
b The Contractor shall providetwo 2 Perennial Ryegran varieties 25 eaeh fOlatotalof
51 ofthemill from I followingthoie9s MollNUllnn Omega 1 8rightstar II Calalina
Charglr II and Manhllttan 3
11 NlltGrassl Pnlirie SeedMillAreas Shell be MNIDOTSeed M llI15B Mesic Tallgre
Pnlirie
Infillrallon and Rain Garden Anlas
The Contractor shall provide the foIlowingdmillas notcl beloM
Big8luesten 34
Canada WildRrea 1010
Swlllhgrass 1010
Indian Gress 6
LltlleBlS1em 15
Cordg 10
MeadowBlazingSter
Canada Tlektr foil
Common Ollye
WildBergamot
SmoothAster
3
3
3
13 Wetland Slwtd Mill MnlDOT SMd MIll 258 Purlhase from I reputabl deiller In
unbroken originalcontainers ta ed and labeled toU 8 Agrlcullurs DepartmentApplieatiOl l
rel shilnbe30iIb per
Aeptable S d Sources All seed hall b aupplled by ona or 01 u fofloi
v d
Prilirie Restorations Ine
P O BOll327
Princ elOfl MN55371
61213894342
Applied Ecologlcal Solutions
21938 MuahtolmRoad
PrlOl lake MN55372
9521447 1919plIooe
9521447 1920fax
I
w
I
I
Wz
J
t
U
j
L rt G 0 oc c i c L Fr
L
I
r i @@ @ cjr IIHPcPOu
D 0030000jO bOOOOOoPOo000
I@000
00
r1T l rl j 1
0 YCi0 j 0 CU I I
j l I I10210i3TENN
7r r I wj Crr J i CT1 LJ J HorFsuoIj
ATlIlETIC ll I t I W G I
tJ 0 USI i II GW
I1
C I
SHOT 19 J I S l S IPUTfEDII
PI j r 15 TJ T CI SJ 111 I
H L I I if IilTJriicCCltllIIiIJl1ibdl1ib1
l
t l
IilIP
NATMGIlJlS
g I PlWlllEKEDIU
i soo I00
SOb 0
1
00 I
0
Ii rf 0 fARNGLOT LII42STALLSI
I I i IIC1
30
0 ill J @
m
iC i 9 8 E Bjt J
cctiDIj
0 f tTh 1 1
DJ
CWh HO m 8 J
1
I
EXISTING
WETLAND
j
l
I
IlATM GfW31
PlWIIlESEEDMlX
I
I
I
soo 1
NAT1IElfIAS
IRAlRlfIlEEOIIIl
i1
r
CI
i
PERIMETER BUFFERING REQUlli E TS
1
MATCH LINE 4
t
O i
L l I i I litrITTTTrTlr
15 2G8
2 8
BUFFERYARD A
REQUIRED PLANT UNITS PER 100
i
H
IIIi
o j
l
i P
CANOPYTREES fO IIPTIS
UNOERSTORY TREE I EVERGREEN TREE f6 FT
INSTALL HEKHT i tOr j
SHRUBS
BUFFERYARD B
REQUIRED PLANTUNrTS PER 1GO
CANOf y TREES fO
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
UNDERSTORY TREE I EVERGREEN TREE 6 FT
INSTALL HEIGHT
SHRUBS
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
Rozeboom erArcMect lr1c
2H fIrStA 1 NOOh
MHlOJlpohs M nnesoll5W1
ph 612 3J2 2110fa 612 664l152
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
S BossamtCOIXlrallOrl1116585Wasl78thStreet Sulle100
I ne
l l2ffl
Anarson Johrn onAssoc1al1nc
TTA 7575GoIdallValleyRoad SuIIl2OJ
n apohs l jn 80la55427
plI 763544 7129 IIllI 763 54 531
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
TIm HeflllEngooeemg PC
PO 80 1397
FargO Nortf1Dakota5tll09
ph 701 2800949 fa 701 2Jla96Il6
MECHANICAL ElECTRIC lENGINEER
Hl lerilEng noonng
1750Comme caCoorl
Wh e Bear laka l lOla551 10
ph 651 748 lOQ fax 65 7489370
DennIS Ha n AssocieIM
3 1 Fourth AvenueSulh
Sartell nnBSta56377
plI320 25SeS57f 3lG 52fl8OO5
SthulerSholol
123 ThdSlree flor1h Suile 211
M napohs N 55401
plI 6 2 3JS 5958 I 612 3375Ol7
KvamstO1 Ror rohoIm Associale
2444 Bryanl Avenua Soulh SUIIe JOO
f nneapsMN 55405
ph 612 374 3800fa 612 3743133
1 herftby ce fy lt1a1 his pan speoftcabrn01
repOrt wasprepared by meOf fldEIrmydiract
supervisionandlha1lamadulylotlnsed
Pro 95s onalErg1Ner undllflt16
I8ws oftheStaleoff 1lffSOla
DANIL JONNSON
Reg o OI
ffi 06085
1 SO
0202 07
JRP
DLJ
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
C7 3
247
r c
I iI1 I
I i
ILlI
1
I
L
I
i
f
I
I
nuJ
PLANTING SEEDING AND SODDING NOTES
1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUSTINSPECT AND APPROVE FINISH GRADING BEFORE
CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH SEEDING OR SOODlNG
2 ALL DISTURBED AREASWITHtN THE LtMtTS OFCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEEDED OR
SODDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
3 BEGtN TURF ESTAElLl5HMENTIMMEOIATElY AFTER SEEDtNG AND SODDING REFER TO
SPECIFICATION FOR PROCEDURE
4 ALL TREES TOBE BALLED AND BURLAPPED
5 ALL TREESAND SHRUBS SHALL RECEIVE 4 DEPTH Of CLEAH SHREDDED HARDWooO
MULCH
II ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BEEDGED WfTH A POLYfOGER STAKEDAT5 O C MAX
SHRUB BEDSTO RECEIVE 3 DEPTHOFROCKMULCH OVER 4 MIL WEED BARRIER
7 ALL PLANTMATERIALS SHALL BE NO 1 QUALITY NURSERYGROWN AND SPECIMENS
MUST BE MATCHED ALL OVERSTORY TREESADJACENT TO ORNEAHD IN PARKING LOT
SHOULD BEOIN BRANCHING NO LOWERTHAN 6
a CONTRACTOR SHALLNOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHmCT48HOURS PRIOR TO PLANTING
RelOCATED TREESFOR FIELD LOCATION BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
9 ALL SLOPES OF 4 1 OR GREATER SHALL RECEIVEFIBERBLANKET REfER TOSHEETS
C3 1 C3 2 AHD C3 3 FOR DEFINED GRADING LIMfTS
10 SwdMi f1IAthl llcFI d Aasj
L The Contractor ahall provide two 2 Kent ky Bluegraas vari U 12 ch fl Iotal
or50 ofthemIx from thll followingchctic N w Blue Ab50lul8 RugbyII AOelphl P lld
Mlanlght Brilliant Moonllghl 00 North tar
b TIM Contractor hall provld two 12 P rermfal R grau varlal 25fo ndlfor a lotalof
5C ofth mix from t1 following cholat anhatten II Ornega It Brlghltlar II Cataltn
Cnarg rllendMiIOhallan
11 Nallv GraulPralrl Se d Mix Areal Shallbe MNlOOTSeed Mix 158 MalicTallgra
Prairle
12 filtratlon a d Rain Gard Area
L no Conlractor h ll prgyld thefollowlnlil seed mlll s nolad 10llt
8igBlutm 3410
Canida WUd RIc 10
Switchgraas 1010
dianGrus 6
UttI 8luaoslltm 15
Cordgf1ll 10
Meadow Bluing SI r
Canada Tict foll 3
Common O y 310
WildBergamot 3
SmoothAal 3
13 W Und Snd MIl MnOOT SeedMill25B Pll haH from a repulMbI dlllerln
unbroken orllilinill coot lners taggfli Indlabeled toUS Agriculture Oepar1manl Appllc lon
rat haIl 30lIbapar cre
Acceplabl Seed 50111 All Ned ahall b IUpplild by 01 mort 01 t following
v ndoB
Prairl Reator t1ona tnc
P O 801 327
Pr1ncetOll MN55311
61213894342
Applied Ecologlul Solutlon
21i38Mu htown Road
PrlcnLek MN 55372
S217 1919ptort
9S2I441 192Qfltl
j t
I
I
I
t J
I
L
I
SOCCER 2
WIWzz
j i
J J
U u
1
LEGEND
LU REFERENCE KEY TOSITEDETAILS
j eM ii J
f9
t CONIFEROUS TREE
WDECIOUOUSTREE
0 SPRINKLER HEAD
o 140 ADJUSTABLESPRINKLER HEAD
1 20 SPRINKLER HEAD
o 2S 50
CITY SUBMITTAL
FOR REVIEW ONLY
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RooboQm iHorrctlJCb lnc
244 Fif5lA enueNorlh
Minneapolis MOVllOl3 5MQ
ph 612 332 2110 taxc6 2 6l4tl162
BossardlCClTIbon
8585W 1711IIlSIreISude OO
MinneapIMiIoesola55438
ph 952831 5406 1 x952 BJ1 12h6
AndersonJolmsonAssOCIates lne
Tf il 7575GoIdenVyRoadSuile200
Minneapolis MiI1nasla55427
ph 763 544 7129 faxe 763 5445Jl
Dennis Hahn A S0C3I
311 FourthAvenua South
Sarlell Minnesola56377
ph 320 2596551 I x 32S298905
THEATER CONSULTANT
IlulerSXxk
123Thi dSI jNor1h Svpte210
Mneapohs MN 55401
pfI 612 J39 5958 lax 612 J37 5097
v
Kvemijloen RCOtllolm ssocI
2444 Bryan 8I usoJlh SuilelOO
Mrnmpolis MN55405
ph 612 374 3800 1a 61Z 374 3133
Iherelrrtartlfylhaltl1i pIan ion rx
epIIl S p parebyme01 t6OeImy d1racl
SlIPl vilOfland lhat I i1madulylocensed
P orIe al EIlgJ underlhe
ullt1aStateofMonnosoIa
OANIEL L JQHtSQN
RegNo Dae02 C2 Ql
ffi 06085
1 SO
0202 Q7
JRP
DLJ
LANDSCAPING
PLAN
C7 4248
I
I
1I
I
I
0
7 r t 1 jt H r L Lf d
i I i Ii
Iii I I i I I
I I III
1 l j I
I
i GT F 111 rIT i j C
r I t 11 1 r 1
J t U 1 rr I 1 fJ l
C f Y II JJ r
r i J f I Y l J I ditT11itfIjii
C I l 10 r t I L i d 1
i jl II F1 1 llF tJliiLcJJLlLJjLnt
I i
t I
1
I
i
n 0
I
I
i
i
0
1 @
t0
iiI
lii3
to
i
j 0
10
0
i
4 0
j l
iBula
9
1
0
to
u
o
9
o
0
i 9
Ze
t
9
ot
o
I
i
t @
I
0
L
0
9
to
0
J
i
o
LLDING
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS FFE
or
I
o
0I i
j i
1
o i
II
1
oH1
I
I8 1lJ
i
I
I1
i
i
L
I i
i
i I
1
hIii 1
I
I
nTII
n i1ri n
Ii J
I
i
0
o ii
1
0 r
i r
I
ill
0 1
ill
f r
i
I
en
9
o r
8
I
10t
III1
o ir
o l
i
I
o i
CD
I
ok
o j
O
0 l
ot t
o j j
@
1
0
I0J
I
01
o J
0 I
I
I
j
I
Il
j
t
I
I
1
t
i
0
i
0 i
0
o
1
1
I
l
LOWER LEVEL FFE 930 00
FIRST LEVEL FFE 950 00
SECOND LEVEL FFE 964 00
SQUARE FOOT CALCULATIONS
FOOT PRINT SIZE
LOWER FLOOR AREA
FIRST FLOOR AREA
SECOND FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
235 907 SF
102 096 SF
197 174 SF
92 043 SF
405 367 SF
1
District 112
New High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHlrEg
Rozeooom M 6tcMects lot
244F SIAverlueJkrth
Minneapol s MlnneSQIa55401
ph 6 2 3J2 2110 Ion 612 6648152
CT10 MANAGEMEN
Bossa dlCOfjOI1IIIIlPlJj1 OO
ph952 s J1 540e 95 a3t1268
gIYo ERILANOS s 9 q
AJM
AndersonJohnwnAS9OCletes lnc
7575Go1denVaJlayRoad Suila200
pols li lnlIWIa 55427
ph 763 544 7129lu763 544OS31
STRUC Y 9INEER
1 322 firsl Awnue NorH Su 201
Minn r s MN55401
ph612 1 A 3005Ia 612 2383806
@ 1750 ClITlTIIr1eCourt
WM 8earlakMsota55110
pIl65H48 1100 lub1748 93l0
fOODSE VlC NSUlTANT
DenllS Hahn AsWClOlWS
311 0IJr1h Avenue5o Jlh
Sarte M eso1506377
pl32 2Sl 6557fl nO S98905di
THEATER CONSULTANT
SclulerShook
123 Third SlrlffiINhSU 8 210
Mnnropolos MN 5401
ph612 B9 958 fa 612 337 5OiI7
SOUND ACOUSTICS CONSUtT I
tV
Kvemsloen Rbnlholmllo AsoCIalas
24448ryloIA tC ueSouU Sulte300
M ea s MNS 05
ph 612 374YOOf 612 374 31J1
l HEREBY CERtiFY THAT THISPlAN SPECIFICATION
OR Ill Oll WAS IRf PARIoD BY MIo OH UNDEoR MY
DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND l lAT l AM ADUL Y
LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATEOf MINNESOTA
KEYPLAN NO SCALE
CO1MISSiON 37 011OOEB1k
fI
I
OVERALL
LOWER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
CITY REVIEW SET
A101249
OfJ
Io L
oilyI111
o 1
O
8j c
OJliOjjI
o L
i i
IoU
1
IOt
i i
1 i
I
OH
oil
O lo nii
t iI
oi oj
0j011i
0 I oi
I
o L
0 5
ihIi
0L
i
tt 1J
oiLi
Jj
01
0 l
9o1
O t
0
r r r f t L f i ri f f
i I I II I IIIIii I
I
I
1
I Ii I I i I
I Ii I w IiiIihhIT
lr LJ t I bJIH Bj
u
i
I k P ti i r i
J f rr l T
1 i Ii1ttfIftrI
I
I
l L 2L I 0
1 or 1 I
1 u
C I t I IIttUlHctirltILhZfnigILldiJLq1Tt1IIu
T I I I I IlfIdi i I
J5 itilllLc tlWq J I 0 7 f
T f J
I o P I I UJIj k
n I I I 0 1
fl I J r 1 II I I VfictIJdLfrvJi II
H UJ l 1 u
i kt j lltJr
L j I l J I
r I 1 3 Al l c iro r C
I
u
C i
N J 1 t i i t 0
I L wJ I L j MIffi C i
Ii 1 I l tDlo V
i io fJ t 1 J l Wf1 m
o
nuilL2 11
0 Ai P I
I
II t ljI
fE u 1 3 t L T or
I loP L i 11 lI1aL
I 1
c c J i j
Ic I i i
l
i lj i lli I
i 1 7
c
A It fru Iy l
L p I 1 C I
z t z I f rfffiC roo
i fPc i I J 1
ill n c 0 I L C Fi c I
c l T ri IC I J
n L
L 1 lg 1
If bl H i t nG
1
C i
n T
f C 11 lem L J i f
6 616 0 0 6 t
T I
l L
1
Itt i rl ii3Ji OrFTiIf
i il
i L J iTiIIiL71dj
l Cr
il
i
fo
lj r
I
j
IrniL 1
miLar
Ii
TL
t
r r
n iJ
la J
I
1H
I
ttI
I
I I
T j
r l o
p
o 0
r f
00 o 0
0
I
I
I
I
i
i g
i
I10
1 0
1
jo
1
s
j0
fo
10
I
I
101010
j
0
J
i 0
0
0
0
l
hJe
1
1j
@
t
100
I4
0
10
10
i 0
l
J0
0
o
lUILDING
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS FFE
LOWER LEVEL FFE 930 00
FIRST LEVEL FFE 950 00
SECOND LEVEL FFE 964 00
SQUARE FOOT CALCULA nONS
FOOT PRINT SIZE
LOWER FLOOR AREA
FIRST FLOORAREA
SECONO FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FLOORAREA
235 907 SF
102 096 SF
197 174 SF
92 043 SF
405 367 SF
District 112
New High
School
fQJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT
Rozboom MilAr lnc
244 FirsIAv ue NorIIl
Mnn llpoIJs MiIlM oIa55401
ph 612 332 2110 ra 612 64 8152
CONS1lUCTtQN Il GEMENT
ao fdlCoroornhon
IID 1l5ll 101 1 78th SIma5111 100
I D er 9 1268
rvlL EtiGINEEA IlANOSCAPE ARCHITECT
4lJtf
JoOnsofl Ies lnc
7S15GoilenVallllYROltd Suotll200
Minn pOlis M VlEISOt155477
ph 763544 7129 fa 763 544 0531
lUCTU uNQE
TIm 322 Fon lAvenue Norlh Suil201
MinnllapoJis MNS5401
ptl B 2 7 1Il 3MS fa 612 23A 3806
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAl ENG
@ 1750 Commerce Courl
WMeSearLake nmlOtaS5110
pll651 141l 1100ta 65 748 9370
fQOOSERVICEC
o sHlnn Assoe1I1C5
311fourtnAvenueso th
SartM nltSolS6371
ph3lO 259 6551 fl 3l0 S2 800Sd
I E CONSlt TAN
Sd Il rhock
23 Third Streel NorthS 210
M lIIapoi MN 5S401
ph 6t23 9 59 fa 612 JJ7 5097
9 IO A I J CONSUL T
I
KVflrnsloo R molm AsSOCIalas
2444 BryllnIASoulh SuLto 300
MlnnllaJXIlis MN55405
ph 612 374 3600 ra 612 374 3133
I HEREBYCERTIFY THAT TillSPLAN SPECIfiCATION
OR RfPOfCIT WAS PRFPARfO BYMF 011 UNDER MY
OIRlCTSUP RVI510N ANO THAT 1 AM A OlILY
LICENSED ARCHlT CTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE
SlATEOf MINNlSOT
REVISIONS
u C6MMISSI6N 13i 011 00ffilg 200J
OVERALL
FIRST
FLOOR PLAN
CITY REVIEW SET
A102
250
0
o
I
I
lt
l
0tt
e J
CH
Ii I
Ii
0r
i
OHiIIi
o r
0 f
il
01
i
Or
II
frl
8
1
I
o
t r f 4 r
I I
I
j i
o nQ i 0 1flLjo4fIIfll
i i i 1 t
I i P I I
i
jI
i
T
I
J
fj
0
1
i
0
0
o
B
e
00
t
J1 010
I G
J e
Je
0
r
IJ
I 0
10
J 0
j
8
J
1 0i
10
J
10
I
I
0
0
1 0
is LI
iJlI JJtQ
FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS FFE
LOWER LEVEL FFE 930 00
FIRST LEVEL FFE 950 00
SECOND LEVEL FFE 964 00
SQUARE FOOT CALCULATIONS
FOOT PRINT SIZE
LOWER FLOOR AREA
FIRST FLOOR AREA
SECOND FLOOR AREA
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
235 907 SF
102 096 SF
197 174 SF
92 043 SF
405 367 SF
1
I
I District 112
New High
School
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHfTECT
RorolOom MillerArcMec II c
244 flfTt Avenue North
MlI1n p d I Minnesota 55401
ph 61Z 332 2110 fax 612 6M6152
i
O J
e
0l
i
oJJ
oi
gi
0
I t
l
0
I
0 11
o
i I
i I I iL i 7 vili1iir
I r lJ l r i
I l I i I I I m Tstr
r tlJcf i
n
7
19j I e
r
I l r jr l c
I ci JI I il 1
i i I
r
L
j i II I l
I h 1 l J11 1 1 rIitltJr
t T I
L
i ttIIi
I 11 i
n
Y
Ifii
b 1
4
Ii
i
I
Ij
0H
i
j
I i
0 i
i
Ii@
1 1
I I il oj 1 Ei1ri1itlEfjhHIIiUtkIES
l 0 0
n
n
n
i
I
a
d ji L t f iu1
L i m m
t
n
1 I Flf t f 1 t l I I
b r i J PT cIJ r 1Jn i
L 10 L 1 H l
t L 11 Ti c 1 i Jl
I
lIT fL 9iUl rJ c
H L
T jEi il I
i g I
t f i J
I b
i tBn fJj I I
I II dC n
L r c T P T i t
m 4 1 II H 1J
i f
t t 0
iIlcf
0
i
t O
CONSTRUCTION M i AgMEN
l 6o dtCorplhon
1IIISIlD Jj i 6585West 76th Street Su l 11Yl
IllilllliiNh nnepos M nnesota 5 M
ph 952 831 08Ia Q583 t 1l
CIVIL ENGlNEE1o PE ARco
0JJAl
AndersonJohnson AssociateInc
7575GoldanVallayRoad Su ta200
tljnna polos Mionesola554n
pl76 3 S044 7129fax 763 5t4 0S31
I iO 1
UCTUR GINE
IE 322 First Arenoe Norlh Suite 201
Monrl apolil MN 55401
pIl612 238 3f105fax 612 231l 380il
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
HalloorgEng oog
17500 CommerceCourt
WllleFJea Lake M el la5 11Cl
p 651 748 1100 fax 651 74993fQ
EQQILERVICE CO TANT
DennosHilhn Assoc c
3 1 Four1hAvenueSoultt
SiH1eU 1 nnesola 56377
pn 320 259 6557 fax320 529 800Sfi
II TERCQ
S hul Shook
123TIt d SlroetNortn Sule21Q
innepol MN 554111
p1612 J39 5958 fa 612 331 5Oill
qUlQ 9U LK fONSU
KVflrmlOftn Roonholm Asooco I s
24448ryunIAvenueSoulh Su IIl300
MinnlJl polt MN 554C5
ph 612 314 38QO f 612 314 3133
t
P
I
Oi 1
lJ
I
J
I
l
lI
I
I I
P 1
T i r
I HERE8Y CERTiFY THAT nus PLAN SPEClrlCAnON
OR I PORrwsPRfPAHfOD BY ME OR UNOf R MY
DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM AOUL Y
tlCENSfDMICHITECTUNDER THE LAWS F THE
STArEOF MINNESOTA
REVISiONS
C6MiiiSSi6tr 137 011 00CB1y OOi
OVERALL
SECOND
FLOOR PLAN
CITY REVIEW SET
L A103
i
1
T
ci
I i l J r I
t i r i i ii l j l tlJ0i
I
l J
01
l 1 L i 101J6uH
1
I
00 0 0
Ii
4t
251
0 THELEVA nON
0 T ELEVATION
L
1i1 I
r
I
W 0
iL
@I@ Cjl@lo@rilC@ICip@ocpooCiJ
r l
o
Ot
rM 4J
cp o o 0cp
i
00
II
il
4 llii7
h rr
iji
1 1 1
W
iE
2 TH ELEVAT ON
i XIlJJj
FOR Sff PJ S AA
0 TELEVATION
t
cp0 o 0JoQoGCI01I
k
t r
cp C 901 01
I
CUWA N AlL jCLERESDRYwiA1RrOIL
SUNSli r 8Er OfND
18 RIGlcisl
rG
@l 9 cip @ o
K OL
y
e
Sl EIJO f
fOR TC VlJIl l PtUt THIS MEA
o
fob
kWi
f
Llili
i W
LiLwt 6fv
o liil
rrW
11j
1I
KEY NOTES
1 PRfiNISrlED METAL COPING TRiM
2 ARCH PRECAST COP NG
3 FACE BRICK A
4 FACE 8RiCK B
5 ARCH PRECAST SiLL
6 ARCH PRECAST PANEL
7 ALUM Ct RiAlN WALL
8 ALUM SLOPED ClAZINC SYSTEM
9 ALUM STORE FRONT
10 ALUM WINDOW
1 AIRFOil SUN SHADE
12 SUN SHA QE
1 ALUM LOuvER
14 HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME
15 STUCCO SOFFIT
t HSO T ONAL DOOR I18PREFiNISDMETALPANEL
19 GALVANIZED PAINTED STEEL RAil
20 PR FiNISHDALUM 12 LmERS 2 mus
21 ARCH PRECAST COLUMN COYER SEE 7M A80
District 112
New High
School
PROJECT TEAM
RlleOOom Moller AtCll ecl1flc
244 F SlAVlllIJlNorth
M nttapols MIn ola55401
pIl 612 332 2110 II 612 564 8152
O STRUCTIQ Err
B dlcooral
6565We171lIhI et uile1lQ
Mione3pol I1 t lS543B
phliS2 831 5408fax g57 831 1268
VNGlNEER I LA1 t APE A3 tfEf
AIMl
Arderson IolvIsorlAssoc 3Ieslnc
7575 Golden V lltlyRoad Su e lOO
M apollS MIO a55427
ph 763 544 7129 x 763 5440531
IiUCTURAL E NEER
ffi J22FifsIAWlUIINorthSudll 201
MlflnOllpoh5 MN5401
ph 612 238 38 5 la 612 2J8 3806
MECHANICAL ElECTRtCAlENGINfER
@HHlIOO 9Eng noerIg
11 CommerceCoort
n o Kn I
7 70
fQQQSERlltCE CQISUlTAHT
r
iI 1f
Oen ISHarm Assx aIe5
311foorthAvanueSoolh
SJf1e M nneslIB56377
phJll 2 6557rax J20 52 8005
TIEAJER CONSU1l
Schule ShoolI
1nThwd Slr611 ofh Su tl2 O
lnne8polis MN 55401
ph 612 J39 SS58 fax 612 J37 5Q97
Q N O ACOUSTICS CONSUL T
v
KVflm lftn Ronnl1olm A SOCials
2444 BryilnlAvenue Soulh Surte300
Mlnnllapolis MN55405
1 612 374 3800 ax 512374 3133
I HEfU BY CERTIFY THAT nus PLAN SPECIFICATION
Of l f po r WAS PflEf ARED IVMl OR UNDER MV
OIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT AM AOUL V
lICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE
SlATE OF MINNESOTA
F
S 1 7 1
I CB l t c
I
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
CITY REVIEW SET
A301
252
0
0
0
LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
lm f1XTtmr FlXWRE ciDC3CR1fl1Clo1
DL GtiT ZT P1LE foNOJ
S
2711 OllRUDEO WMlIIUIol lJSlNG U1HCltlAKSESERIES
CClftCRtt ElSE xrCOlD WEATHER CUSTOIrol CQOIt fUl t PIlro KlAA ES
rWAGNETIC GtASSl IS lHSlllCONEGA T GAACCOFORlll0SE llES
C OR SQJAA AU olLSVlIES
T g fsl S
m DmlUOCO AlUWlIlUIot HOUSlNC U11iOlI 1CSCSER1ES
2l COUIllEATHOi CUSTotI CClOIl FlAT ThlPEllED Kill A SERIES
2 tiEAO IfW GNEllC GLASS LENS WITH SILICONE GASIET GO ROCOFOIllot10SE RlES
SE ElTlOREftECTOR SQOARf AU At SERlS
OISffllBUlION TYPE 1
A2 Z T 1aL aC m SI AA
N ElmNDEO IJJlt UN HOlJSItfG lfTl O KSESER iES
2J COLDWEATHR CUSTOtl CCl0fl fLAT lUolPEllfD KIIolMSEIlIES
HPrGN llC GlASS lENsrnSlllCONEGASlET nA o smES
SlGll NlEO ROlfCTOIl SQUARf
ljSTRlQUTlON TYPE V
PAllKIIG LOT UGHT l S AA WCOUI wrATIER
l lRVOEO oLUJ lrNllN HOUSING lIlHQNlAKSESERlES
POLtAADllASE OJSTOW CaOR fLAT lEtlPEREO IlYN SElIES
IWfwrool nc GlASS LENS I OH SIliCONE GASIET GAROCOFCIIUA OSERlES
SfGWENTEO REFECTOI l FORlIAAO AU oll SERIES
tHROWOlS1RIBUTION IV
PAMING lOTUGHT 2rPOlE AND f1h Nl
27711 UTRUOfD AL lNW HOUSING UTHONlAKSESERIES
POl ANOBS CONCR Tl 8osE 2 COlDWEATHEll OJSTQN CClCIR FUT TEWFERfD KlllAAstRlES
2 HEAD tlPflllAGNEllC GLASS LEICS MTH SlUCHE GASKET Rl t8 D SERIES
SEGMfNlUl FlmECTOIl fOllWARO
THROW OISTRI811T1ON Iv
PA lHG lOT tiGHT 2T POlL ANO 1 OOW l JV EXlRUDED owWINUIl HOUSNG Ull1ONl KtS WlSPDUDllASECONCRETE8ASEHPSCllARErrnERQJSTONCelORFUTnWPEflEDKIIolAASERlES
GLASS LfNS WITH S1UCONE GlSKtT lDSEII2S
SECWENlUlIlt1LECTCfl ROADyrA
OISTRI9UT1ON II
00 BUIDPNGrACAOE R
BASE Sl n D
n lSW 01 ClST HOUSING CUSTQll
SElIIESfLOOOUGHTlOCOWIIEATHERCOLORTAIolPRHARDWJREGAROol
WAGNEllC r N SlENS DE FLOOD twXO
So R SlD S1t1tO
illY ISWDIE CAST HOOSlNG evsTOW tlmRU 7100 SERIES
CONCIlETE BASE 2Il COtDllf ArnEll COlOR TAWPrR HAROIIIAAE GAJlOCO SERIES
tllrWA Gmnc TUlPERED QASSIEHS SPOT ruu NAOCO SOIIES
w l f ON lTE S1 ltl
m CAST AUtIfjUW BOROSIlIO TE ARDl AAU UGHllNSPl SERIES
lI COlOlIllAIHEIl GLASS UNS CA l St1A vt lCUlSPOOl KA SlRllP
WACNC1IC NATURAl AWWIHIJII rlNlSH IIWlHUS IfI ZOSERtS
LOIJlER IlLAOC OJTOfF WllECNUlOSEIlIES
CCfjOiETE l
ltll
illY CAST AlUlllNUW HCIUSlNG AND AAOl REA UGHTING SP2 SERIES
E
A THER COVER HINGEO COIoR LLNS JjITW OR EWAL
SlUCONE GASIET BAUAST lKIUN
INTFRNAllY aJSTOW rWISH roBE
SElEcn o ARQ1jTECT
f
b
g g
6
0
f
1
CD 6
o TRICAL SITE PLAN CB
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
J ROZlltlOOmM lIfl ArtllWtllnc
2 r r1AYlt lIeNotlh
M apoli Mll1nol601a55401
ph 612 332 2110f 612 664ll152
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
II CooDJn
Id OOla1ph28315loaIilt9SB31126B
AJeroo JolnscnAS O 1nc
7575Go1OenValIeyRoad Suo18200
M 8poh M nneSJlaS542T
ph 763544 71291 71 3 5440S31
TIm C
PO Bo 7397
FJ Nn Ollkrt SIlH19
ph 701 28Q091l9f8 C 701280 9686
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGIHEER
@HoIloorIlE 9lMel 9
1750Com lllJI1
Wh teflaarlaloe M nnoosrtaS illO
fIl651 Na1100ra 6S1 7 a 9370
D n sHahn Ar
31 1 r l1n A 50ulh
SafleW M nMSCIl 371
1 320 2596551 I 320529 ll905
5
123 TIl rdSlfllOlNorlhS 1d210
M nepoIis MN 55401
PIl 612 33g 5958 1u612 331 5097
SOUND COUSncSCON
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THISPLAN SPECIFICATION
OR REPORT WAS PRtPAREO BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUPERVlsrON AND THAT I AM DULY
lICIoNSEDPRDfESS ONAL ENGINE EI UNOE THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA
PAULJ FETTINGER
LICENSE NUMBER 3079
06 3124
FEBRUARY 1 2007
JMH
CITY SUBMITTAL
E010
253
LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE
L1R DTVRE I t
AA 1 L T1lCIH g 1E d OTJlUD41UWIMJWI t SlNG UnlOjIA IO S SERIES
ATHR CVSflCOlO FLI1TDlPtRED o All SERPES
QASSlENSlIITHSIlICClN ColSlTCAAOCO FOIl O SERES
iS ON
C saJAAE ALlALSDlfES
LO T
iE d f2s El1RUOC041IJlo NJlot 1oIG U1HOlAKSESERlES
2Vcao IlEA1I101 ClJSTOIoICOL nJroTTDIPDl Ell lUolAASERlES
2 HEO 11PFGNEllC ClASSUIIlS mSIJCONE GASKET O iOSDil
S
SWAAE
MJ T POlE POO
TE lhl
FI W OfflXlt O U tOU51J loG
SE SSERlf5CVSTQIlCOLtIFUllTDMEREO
GUSSUNSlIIniSlUCONE GASKET O OSERlES
S
RE C SWAAE
OL T
H
1E AR
OW XIRUOEO AlUIMNJIlI HCIJlNG UllialIA S SEflIES
20 COlD llfATHE CUSlUIolCOLOR Fv TEMPtRED Kill AR SfRj S
HPfGHETIC GltSSU lSlIITHSlUCONECASKEl GAAOCO fCAO SERIES
SQ4NTEO REFIECl R FOftWAAl AUAl SERItS
lHIlOW0lS1RIBUTION 11
l T 27 E IC Y
S
ElIIRUO DAluwtmMI1OJSlNC UTHCNA I SE SERIESCONCRETEeASE20CcwOIIEATHERClJS1UtCOflATTU4PEREO
o SERIES2tIEAOHPfWoGNfTICGUtSSLSTHGSIrT
S NTWRfL CITflf woRD oW ALSEtILS
lliROW DlSlJllBIJl1Qt1 IV
1 L lGHT
TE
2711 E IRJQ Altolol HOuSlIG Ul11OII I SESERlES
20 Cl10 M lI1DI CVSTotICOLOR fIIIl o lI AA SUlIES
iWF WGIolETlC QASSlENSWTWSl COkECSIET GNlOCO rrn IQ SERIES
SEQlfNTED RUUCTCfi ROADY AlLSEJOCS
D1STllIWTlON
eoJllOlIIG ro CAOE 1I IUlSUl 1 15C1l OW lC1 OIECASTIOJSlNC OJSTOIoI HYORa 7100SERlB
11000 lJQil CNCRU 80 liPSconn 2Q CQOIEoTHEIl CClJ lll T HAAnWJoR GoROCtlSERlf S
HPf loloGNETlC lEHS WllOfnooo HIOO
R
8o lJsl TED r
STOW 1llOREL7100 SlRlB
2O CClDIoEATHEll GAADCO SERlt S
l1PfClTIC f SSlNS sPQT FUlLHAOCO SERIES
IIIII wo v liGHT
n
1 15011 m C1oSr AlUtollNlIll IlOROSIUCATE o ROi AREA UGHTlNG 92 SlJlllS
IUAM So SE HPSCQI TtO 20 CClDWEA TWER 1 i LOUlSPOUlSNI Sl1l1lP
HPFWAONiETlC LUWIffiJ W620 RrS
llllJUl9L AOE CUTaT LUWEC NEMO SERIES
l USHCONCIfT 1h 1
1ID
C STUIolJNUIIl HOUSlNC ANO ARCI1 AREUCHTlNG Sf2 SlIlIES
2U CO1 VIUTHEll COvER k1NGEOCOvER lENStllTH OR APPROVED QUAl
I1PFMACNHIC lICQNECASl fT ellL TMWNlD
t fHI9i TO lIE
District 112
Future High
School
PROJECT TEAM
J Rozeboom Millef AChileCls Inc
244 Fi stAveolleNorlh
M neapolis Minneoola55401
ph 612 332 21101alc612 6648t52
BOSatdlCOrporalior1
8565WesI781I1Slrnet Suil IOO
M nllilpcl lI MinreSlIa5Sol3B
ph 952831 540BI 952 S31 1168
Andar60 OMsonAsocIltleS I
54 19200
ph 7635447129 ac 16J5440S31
1 110
TIm H M E9 eo
P O BOl 7397
Fargo NorthOakol956109
ph 701 2800949 rax101 2llC9686
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
HalltlergEng
1750 Com Cowl
While r Lake MinOO90ll55110
ph 651 7481100fax651 74B937Q
Dloni Hann Associales
311 Four1hAYOOSuut
S rtf Minnesotl 71
ph 320 2596557fwc J2oi298905
TIiEATERCONSIJLTANT
ShulorShook
123Th IdSlreeINoM Sutle210
n 5
12J37 5097
IiEAEBYCERTiFY tHAT THIS PLAN SPECiFICATiON
OR REPORT WASPREPARED BYME OR UNDER ff
DIRECT SUPERVISIONAND THAT I AM ADULY
lIaN OPROfESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE
LAWS OFTHE STATE OFMINNESOTA
PAULJ FETTINGER
UCH Sf NUId3ER lI3079
CD o TRICAL SITE PLAN CB
LIJ LMISS
I7 RAWN
06 3114
FEBRUARY 1 2007
JMH
ELECTRICAL
STADIUM PLAN
CITY SUBMITTAL
E011
254
G CenterPoint@
Energy
RECEIVED
FEB 2 0 2007
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
700 West Linden Avenue
PO Box 1165
Minneapolis MN 55440 1165
February 15 2007
Robert Generous
Senior Planner
City of Chanhassen
690 City Center Drive P O Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
RE Planning Case 07 06 Chanhassen High School
Dear Mr Generous
Referencing the proposed high school CenterPoint Energy a division of
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp owns and operates a 6 inch diameter natural
gas pipeline located in an easement on the east end of the property
The first easement number 1960 84 was recorded October 28 1960 in Book 61
of Deeds on page 490 The second easement number 1960 92 was recorded
October 28 1960 in Book 61 of Deeds on page 499 500 Carver County
Minnesota
CenterPoint Energy s pipelines are operated and maintained in accordance with the
Code of Federal Regulations Part 192 Title 49 Transportation of Natural and
Other Gasses by Pipeline Minimum Federal Safety Standards No grading or other
earth movement will be allowed in the easement unless other arrangements have
been made with CenterPoint Energy Enclosed is a copy of the Guidelines for
Construction and or Encroachment Within Gas Pipeline Easements to aid in any
design before approval by CenterPoint Energy
The reduced set of plans that were sent cannot be read Please forward a large set of
plans for review and approval to me at the address below Our engineering staff
will review and make necessary changes to safely maintain the pipeline
Respectfully
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
jt it
Steven Von Bargen
Right of Way Administrator
P O Box 1165
Mpls MN 55440 1165
pc Andrew Balgobin Administration Engineer
Dale Sodahl Design Technician
Cherie Monson Sales Consultant
255
CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP D B A CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA GAS
GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OR ENCROACHMENT WITHIN GAS PIPELINE EASEMENTS
The following are general requirements only Center Point Energy must inspect the area and review construction
plans Final construction plans must be reviewed and approved in writing by Center Point Energy Engineering prior
HUhe start of any construction within CenterPoint Energy s easement Grading and utility plans showing
CenterPoint Energy s approval must be on site and available to Center Point Energy personnel during construction
within the easement
1 Soil shall not be removed or placed in a manner that will result in earth or pavement cover over the pipeline of
less than three feet or more than five feet unless otherwise approved A level area of not less than six feet on
each side of the pipeline shall be maintained at all times Slope beyond 6 from the pipeline shall not be steeper
than 4 to 1 unless otherwise agreed Any amount of cut or fill within the 4 to 1 slope area shall increase the
width of the level area on each side of the pipeline by that same footage of cut or fill Blasting in the vicinity of
any pipeline requires review and written approval by a CenterPoint Energy engineer prior to start The pipeline
must be fully accessible at all times before during and after the construction
2 Landscaping over and within ten feet on each side of the pipeline is restricted to grass cover only Beyond ten
feet on each side of the pipeline upright plantings are restricted to and shall not exceed an eventual growth
height of six 6 feet No trees shall be planted or remain within the easement Any trees removed by
Center Point Energy from within the easement while performing maintenance activities shall not be replaced by
CenterPoint Energy or the current owner their successors or assigns
3 Any buried utility line installed across the in place pipeline shall be placed below the pipeline with no less than
one foot of vertical separation padded with well compacted 95 Standard Procter and cross at an angle
between 45 degrees and 90 degrees from the pipeline unless otherwise approved
4 With prior CenterPoint Energy approval by a Senior Engineer or Right of Way Administrator parking lots
perpendicular driveways or roadways of portland cement concrete or asphaltic concrete or similar materials
may be placed within the easement but shall be limited in width when crossing the easement to minimize the
interference with or access to the pipeline for inspection and maintenance Any contractor equipment
movement over the pipeline shall only be at an angle greater than 45 degrees to the pipeline and must be on
a constructed haul road composed of well graded gravel 3 feet thick for a minimum distance of ten feet on
each side of the pipeline Permanent structures including but not limited to buildings signs screen walls
decks tennis courts and swimming pools are not allowed under any circumstances within the easement
Installations including but not limited to retaining walls and fences crossing the pipeline require approval by
the Center Point Energy Senior Engineer or the Right of Way Administrator before construction All fences
crossing the pipeline must have a 10 foot wide gate centered over the pipeline All fences installed parallel with
the pipeline will maintain a minimum of 10 feet of separation from the pipeline
5 Once CenterPoint Energy and the Owner Developer or Contractor have reached an agreement CenterPoint
Energy shall be given at least two working days advance notice of planned construction activity so
arrangements can be made for Center Point Energy Personnel to monitor the construction CenterPoint Energy
will locate and stake the pipeline but will not assume responsibility to expose or backfill the pipeline or to
determine the actual elevation of the in place pipeline Excavation to expose the pipeline shall be parallel to the
pipeline Center Point Energy Personnel must be present during this excavation Backfill must be free of rocks
and shall be compacted to 95 Standard Procter
6 Any subsequent damage or removals caused by Center Point Energy in the exercise of its easements rights of
any and all of those certain foreign constructions landscaping driveway roadway utility lines etc which
may be permitted within the easement area will be permanently repaired or replaced at the owner s or
contractor s not Center Point Energy s expense
7 In accordance with Federal Department of Transportation Codes Center Point Energy must place markers over
transmission pipelines These markers will be placed at all road crossings in back of curb or at property line at
changes of direction and periodically along the pipeline All natural gas transmission line locating markers
placed by Center Point Energy will not be removed
If you have any questions call 612 321 5426 or 612 321 5381
January 20 2005
256
February 23 2007
Chaska
Mr Robert Generous
Chanhassen Senior Planner
7700 Market Boulevard
Box 147
Chanhassen Mn 55317
REceiVED
FE82 6 Z007
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RE Planning Case 07 06 Chanhassen High School
Dear Bobf
The City of Chaska would offer the following two comments to the site plans submitted for the
Chanhassen High School
1 The traffic improvements outlined in the High School EAW dated 11 03 06 should be
considered the minimum required to be in place prior to the opening of the school
Said improvements modify the existing street system and are viewed as meeting
short term needs Reconstructing the portion of Lyman Boulevard impacted by the
High School to its ultimate section as presently being discussed by Chanhassen
Chaska and Carver County provides a permanent access solution and is preferable
from a traffic flow safety and economic viewpoint
2 Chaska is working with the School District on modifications to its electric substation
that will be necessary to allow transfer of the easements to accommodate the access
drives to the school and realignment of the entrance drive to the substation Chaska
foresees no problems in resolving these details and furnishing the required
easements
If you should have any questions about these comments please feel free to contact me at your
convenience
Sincerely
William Monk
City Engineer
WM ms
cc Dave Pokorney Kevin Ringwald and Steve Wilker City of Chaska
City Of Chaska Minnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318 1962 Phone 952 448 9200 Fax 952 448 9300257
o oo o oooooooo
m OOO NNWW m mm
O O O O O O O O O O O O
I TT I Iii
d
Iid
g
mmmmmmmOOOOOOGGGGGGOGGoa
Z 8 g g g
z
COo
rr
cntu
o l
rrotu
o en
en
CD
l
a
a
Ill00
0
0
ila8ll5ll
L
JI
UJNCD C
CD
o H
f
mmmmmmGaGOGGooooooaooaoo
mmGOOO NNww mm mm
o o ouo o o o o o o o o
5
WH
OfaL g 3
pS 1
t ll6g
g SQIl
g
I0
0II
q 8
j JJ J
1 1 1ItteL
i g BB E I
o f o o o
I H
m
Cl
l U
0
8 0gTl
m r
m
a
Ii
m
258
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on
February 22 2007 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen
Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Chanhassen High School Planning Case 07 06 to the persons named on
attached Exhibit A by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner
and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage
fully prepaid thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such
by the records of the County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate
records
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this hay Of R 1 ru 0 f 2007
LAV Jl
Nota ublic
259
o
C
C
tIl
z
0
C
C CD
0
5 CCQI
o
o
313CD
CtIlt
tIl
OCQ
s
CD
CD
CQ
eo 00 aE rtJ tJ r C
wro w nnm WW W o s o 0 0ma58mmiT00003CDTO0000CD25go33imu2g3CDCD00120ggOs01UIoCD000fggQaen0505cag@ShgEssCD0soss
oomw 5 m o ua m o jjUl CD 0 r 3crmo00w000rogaaromggoW3n120CDCD
5 J 5 0 J g 0 g j g 0 m CD CD @ en U s s
3 g ag g i If UI
nm mm o 3 3 CDa
ro O o oorooro 3 o C
O 0 0
ao o i o Orn QCDCDcr Q Q 0 0 0 G S Et JJZ x X OJJ 0 ca3ug5gqoagqOgCOEcoc00T00J0CO C53CDOCDOocrCDaoO000COo0COJoCOC0CDW0en032tCDCD030JEaogi@gmms3JCOcToaJcOgaTCO0CICD3JCO00COCoTo00Cil0COmgfficroggo0CO0000E03COaTOcfOgog5san33TJ000000COJcooUI0ocr3EoogrJJJQCD5Co@aoCDoumCDTS0en0003TJ30oQ0gffggaQwc2iQaCDo01000TCO00en003c0mgQwm3TNCOJ0CO0CJJCD0COlglOJ0COCOcioroi23g25tJCDTOT0000lOo0inE
T J CDCDJU8CDu3DJgm5CDaCDfCO00NCOJ0CO00COcJ3OOCOQBgwggCDJOCDgmgQT3TN3COCOJOJCOTOCOoCOOJ00CONT000aigaggggas0CDCOICO00QcoOoooeoJ0rEo0
00 J C 0 00 O COCD2w3wCDoaaoJiDUIsa90ETxO J r o NCDcenOJCDCDOOJogonCOlO0ICO0gwJ@5ocnaw35wCDaIC0cc3COCOS2OTJC00PgoJVJ0OJ003CD3cnJWCDOCD
0 lO g J 0 Q o CO 0 0 1 0 0 tg956a0atooCOTJOCZ 0 J
ag 5 g CD3 Q o CD o co i O O COco 00 colO I l o iir co 003OgJJ00flO00cot0TacnItcorE5CDumgiagjj003U10S0oocoOOEQco0colcogtU9Qa3n3rou3m31COc02cocoJ0JlcnOOJJogCDJ800Q0030coJ0UlCDoccoIT5cnJ0wgCDCDaag3cnoUIEoooiQ030coJ5m0
rOocwga33oCDm0Jg@coTJTJcolOo0z0OUlCO0
CD
m 5 g 8 CD en 0 0 6 g g s CD T 0 g Q Q CO 00 CO Q 5 00 2 st 0 I 0 0 Q3owCDgoaccnJ3
aO g e S J CO 0 aOgeScu6ro3QTwo3Q00concooCOCIICO0000CDJmgcnu5@m3ow3CDwUIOTOJococo0
0 IQcno5OCDggmCD00000033OTOOEJIJOsa2350Qgg0UrrE0203aOCDcoOooJcooCO3coooo30cnoECII
000 0 o OJ rrCDQOCJECDOJCD0CT0CO00coa
I J CD CDaoCDCDCJQ33SUaOc3gt000200gggigiOco3l320TT3IETpog5omCDoaCDCDUCDsnocoO0coiiNCD
CD O 3 i ff5 T co 0 co 0 J 0 J 0 Oco SO
CD ooCOE J 0 00 0 0 0 35CJffa51crigCD8cr000Ecoc
0 r0 IIIOCDaCD003CDCDiiifCD003OJ00cocC0JJ0gOCDQlU3JOlg0jjg000oTO00JQCaQO02uc000saa2iQ53JcCco00coocEcogCJCD50CDo
en a Tm 00 E en tu 00 CIlgcoQiii6aOCD@COOTCOS0SiQ0000OT00g00TTOCOCOenCDc52aCDJ0COo
ro CD 0 J
C
C
tIl
z
0
C
C CD
0
5 C
CQI
o
o
313CD
CtIlttIlsOCQ
s
CD
CQ
0 00 aE rtJ tI r C
CJ Qlro OQl OE OO@ WQl OO o s 0 0 0@a8CDCDig3CDT001200TO0000CDga50CDio33iCDO2gBm3CDCDc0120EggCD@CD0so0UIo
Qg Q c ui ui Q o ac5 2 J o CIl g e s s CD 0 so s a s f
SOCDQl g CJ Ql OJ is oCJ jjUl CD 0 r 3crJUJCDOTJ6iQlCDenaCJen00CDgiiiuam@ggQlQl3g120CD
S J 5 3 0g s Ql g 8 m m t CD g l s sg305Qaa3g5IfUI
a co CD CD co o c CD 3 3 1 CD a D
ro Ol o OODtlro 3iiio coEQ2a2CDCDJQ2 0 aO 0 G VJ N 0 0 0 JJ Z x X OJJ n c
J a3 0 rJ J Q 0 l CD CD 0 OT 0 T C 0 0 T 0 0 J 0 CO R C5CDgooiQ030COCOcr00CO0l0COJDCOCDCJCJT03QJ03CJa030JJnOoagsgOgarco0CIgoCDJc3giCDsJCD3J3coOn
c coCDgCOCOTOrOcgQ00 Oo0co0000E000g6ogffmaao330COJcoo000gg3colcolor00JJJsQro5QoiaoJCDQmCDrs0en0003TJ003EooUl030coQ0gg3QCJci@a001000rCO000030reggmogCD
1 TJ N CO J 0 cocoJ J coco 0 CJJ c CD 0tJCDCOgTco0
0 o lO Q 2 0 0 inE T J CDgCDOCDmCD5ia3J300cofOON000000COcQT8ilegCDO2gQT3TN3COcooCOOJCIlcoN50JCOfco000aaggaws2CDCOIco00lOOooeoJ0gSJlcoEOc00oCOCDgCJ3CJCDo2aO5CDsa900ETxOJToNCDBeCJ0CDCDJog0JJ00JQ000ICO05Ql0CJaw3wCDaLCg05VJS3COOTcJc00PgOJ003roEQg3owmOECDffi0fl0t0Q0CO5Q100tUcoa2craoaOaECz0J
o CD CO cO O 00 CO CO T lO 0 I l o 0 COSgCD3remsnCOCOoocoiilacniir 0 03CDTJOOOOQJtCOgJCDCDCDroQ2O000CO0CO00CCD0TCD00SU0aCDQlsCJCDJao0JcooTOco0tU2gQ3Q3rna3U10000EcoSOcS00JoCOc02CDcnOOJsaguCJCDDcJa83aUlCDoccoC000E3IrcnJJ0wsaag3JrooUIETooiQ03OJcoJJJm0
rOoca33aomCDCD0J0@coTJtJco5lOo0zx0
OUl CO 0
CD
m sa g i 0 0 r 5 g c g 0 s O OOO J CO T 00 CO lO O 00 2 Y 0 00 s Q33ggaCDTooTOCOOOesJCO0a
i 3i m 3 3Q 00cooCOo CO CII CO 0 000 CD
UI O rO J oo J co 0 l 0 I
QCJ o S OgCDg g CDO c 00 00 3 3 c 00 E J sa 2 20TO00T0JIJO350cogoQlcrEo203aOCDcoOooJcooco3cooco300cnoECIl
o III rrmwOJCJECDOJm03CTOco0000IJCDCDaoroCDgCJ33SwUOcgtOOo00co3200ggQW2miCD3enJJ0000TTETCggg1ffCD
0 aCD CD P i CJ Oco 00 3 lO 0 co co N CD
m o 3 ff5 T co 0 co g J 0 Oco so
CJ 0 Q J 51 0 g Q 0 CD 0 crQ m CDO OO E Q c 2 E c 00 0 0 0 3
0 r0 IIIgCDagaCDg6ff1003OJcolO0omCDJwQ3oJ000TOJJ0g0jjg00000JsgcSgCDT0tCDcomOO0saa2gro3JcCco55OQSEcogCJg55CDCJam00E00CIl
D g Q 2 tu co 0
m ni 00 O T CO S
0 Si Q 00 CD OT 00agEg5g00r00rocoCD00m
2 2 m J 0 COo 3roCD0
260
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and isnot intended to be used as one This
map isacompilation of records information and data located in various city county state and federal
offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only
The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System GIS Data used to prepare this
map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational
tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance ordirection or precision in
the depiction of geographic features If errorsor discrepancies are found please contact 952 227 1107
The preceding disclaimer isprovided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466 03 Subd 21 2000 and
the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly
waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims
brought by User its employees or agents orthird parties which arise out of the use s access oruseof
data provided
Disclaimer
This map isneither alegally recorded map nor asurvey and isnot intended to be used as one This
map isacompilation of records information and data located in various city county state and federal
offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only
The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System GIS Data used to prepare this
map are error free and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational
tracking orany other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in
the depiction of geographic features If errorsor discrepancies are found please contact 952 227 1107
The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 466 03 Subd 21 2000 and
the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly
waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims
brought by User its employees or agents orthird parties which arise out of the use s access oruse of
data provided 261
Public Hearing Notification Area 500 feet
Chanhassen High School
Planning Case No 07 06
City of Chanhassen
262
ABDALLAH A EL SANJAK
1839 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
ANCHOR BANK
1055 WAYZATA BLVD E
WAYZATA MN 55391 1812
BARRY L SUZANNE L L1BENGOOD
8950 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8412
BRIAN T SONYA A BENKSTEIN
2292 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
CARL M JR KIM A ILIFF
1731 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
CHADWICK HOUWMAN
2219 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
CHET A LARSON
2259 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
CRAIG H HOLLY L MELL
8670 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
DANIEL J NANCY R LYNCH
2255 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
DARYL W CATHERINE M HARTSEL
1851 SUNRIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9663
ALBERT B JANET K BEETY
2193 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
ANDREW J KAYATIIII
8715 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
BONITA ANN JUNGELS
2338 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
BRUCE H CLARICE G FEIK
1773 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
CHAD A JULIE M EVEN
2198 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
CHARLENE A STENDER
2321 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
CHRIS B LESLIE J ERICKSON
1831 SUNRIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9663
CRAIG S WENDY L O CONNOR
1702 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
DANIEL J PAMELA J CULHANE
2333 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
DAVID D KATHLEEN A THORP
2330 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
ALVARO J NANCY A GOMEZ
8748 VALLEY VI EW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
ANTHONY D PAMELA R STRAND
8640 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9401
BRADLEY J RENEE L VANBERGEN
2175 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
CARL DRAY
2245 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
CHAD M JILL C HAKE
2115 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
CHARLES DEBRA OLSON
1748 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
CITY OF CHASKA
1 CITY HALL PLAZA
CHASKA MN 55318 1962
DANA R BENSON
2203 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
DANIEL K ROBIN L EDMUNDS
1861 SUNRIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9663
DAVID HESTER
2199 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
263
DAVID J LISA M KIRKBRIDE
2080 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
DAVID R CHERRI A SALTZMAN
1800 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8418
DEAN L SHELLEY L BUSSEY
2145 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
DEBRA LYNN LUDFORD
8615 VALLEY VIEW CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8423
DONALD JENNIFER HARMS
1783 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
DOUGLAS G SARAH P HIPSKIND
2317 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
DOUGLAS VERNON JOHNSON
2322 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
ERIK M LISA A MAGNUSON
2001 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7410
GARY L FELDICK
2231 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
GERHARD HELENE A SCHOCK
2309 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
DAVID KESSLER
1750 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
DAVID W LYNNETTE A BAILEY
2273 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
DEBORAH A HUM
1761 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
DELORIS B HOLASEK TRUST
2015 STAHLKE WAY
CHASKA MN 55318 3239
DONALD W CATHY BORGMANN
2308 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
DOUGLAS J WINZENBURG
1710 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
EDWARD E ELLEN L RAWSON
2266 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
EUGENE C JAN M KRUCHOSKI
2030 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
GEORGE W CAROLE A PHILLIPPE
1711 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
GERHARD G SALLIE L BERGESON
2220 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
DAVID M LORI J KENDALL
2063 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7410
DEAN LOIS
9111 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9412
DEBRA KAY NOTERMANN
1766 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
DENNIS RUTH CHADDERDON
8900 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8412
DOUGLAS A CINDY L MERRIGAN
8736 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
DOUGLAS V ANN M JOHNSON
PO BOX 83
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 0083
ERIC MELISSA NOYES
8622 VALLEY VIEW CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8423
GARY D JOYCE D THEIS
1696 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9401
GERALD W JANICE K CRAWFORD
2079 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
GREGG J AMY M KLOKE
1836 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8418
264
GREGORY S SHELLY M SCALLON
1814 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
HOA LE CA
1738 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
JACK R BECKER
1751 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
JAMES M JENNIFER D
LARRANAGA
2318 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
JAYSON JEANETTE KIRMEIER
2094 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
JEFFREY P SARAH L WENDORF
2291 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
JEFFREY T JUANITA M SCRIBNER
1780 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
JOEL E HEIDI M LEHRKE
2329 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
JOHN F PATRICIA G VANNUCCI
1798 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
JOHN T MORAN
2150 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
GREGORY W SUSAN I PROVO
1762 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
IND SCHOOL DIST 112
11 PEAVEY RD
CHASKA MN 55318 2321
JAIME L STERBENZ
1848 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8418
JARED CHRISTINA A GRUNIG
1747 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
JEFFREY J KARLA M ALTHOFF
2326 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
JEFFREY R EDITH M STEARNS
2052 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
JEFFREY W GAIL H MOODY
1800 SUNRIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9663
JOEL K KERI L JOHNSON
1806 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
JOHN T JANET K ST ANDREW
1811 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
JOSHUA T KRIENKE
2375 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403
HADI ANBARGHALAMI
8381 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7417
J T MORTON ENTERPRISES LLC
6911 YUMA DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9560
JAMES K MELISSA J CARLSON
2122 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
JAY BARBARA GRIZZLE
8760 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
JEFFREY L JENNIFER T BENKE
8643 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
JEFFREY S KRISTI J STRANG
1701 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
JERALD D LISA R STIELE
8755 VALLEY VI EW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
JOHN MARDI PERLlCH
2163 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
JOHN T KELLY A LABATT
2109 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
JURGEN W CAROL A SEEMANN
8401 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7422
265
KAJ JODI M DOERRING
2231 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
KENNETH D DIANNE W KEMP
2162 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
KYLE S JACKIE L DUEA
2133 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
LYNDELL F MARY F FREY
1822 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
MARK B JENNIFER A DAVIDSON
1841 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
MARVIN V CAROLE J LUECK
2019 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7410
MICHAEL JACQUELINE R MROSKO
2305 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
MICHAEL D BETTY WRIGHT
2280 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
MICHAEL J MARY M YAZCEC
1813 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
MICHAEL R DANA B HOWE
2169 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
KELLY K MORLOCK
2325 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
KEVIN ELIZABETH ROGERS
2023 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
LAWRENCE P HOLLY WHITE
8657 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
MARK LAURA THORNE
1827 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
MARK R CARLEEN A LAPINSKI
2103 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
MERLE JANE VOLK
180 WASHINGTON VALLEY RD ATTN
NETWORK R
07921 2120
MICHAEL A JULIE A SALENTINE
1784 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
MICHAEL D MUFFENBIER
8652 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
MICHAEL J KRYCH
2127 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
NANCY L WHAYLEN
2334 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
KENNETH A MARCIA S STRAND
8631 VALLEY VIEW CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8423
KRISTOPHER E MINDI L H DAHL
1774 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
LDW PROPERTIES LLC
1340 PARK RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9527
MARK A NANCIANN S OLSON
1792 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
MARK R LAURA G JOHNSON
1807 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
MERLE L ELIZABETH J OELKE
2242 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
MICHAEL C JENNIFER ANDERSON
8772 VALLEY VI EW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
MICHAEL J JOANNE COCHRANE
1751 SUNRIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9663
MICHAEL JOHN HOLLANDS
2051 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
NEIL BUTCHART
1796 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
266
NORMAN E KATHLEEN EVILSIZER
2207 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
PAMELA K KERBER
8743 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
PATRICK L SHARON M ARBOGAST
1801 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
PAUL P AMINA M RINKES
2208 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
PETER G KRISTIN A TERRELL
2136 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
RICARDO A RAYLENE S SEGURA
1740 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
RICHARD J PAMELA E SCHWARZ
2157 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
ROBERT J CHRISTINE R FINN
2108 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
RONALD S LAURIE A BLUM
2081 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7410
SCOTT A HANSON
2267 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
OUTHAI SOLEY A
1700 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
PATRICK A BRENDA J TODD
1772 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
PAUL LINDA SPEKMAN
2121 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
PAUL R JENNIFER A SPORS
8658 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
PHEAVANH SOUVANNALATH
1829 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
RICHARD D CHRISTINE M BALM
2093 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
RICHARD L LINDSTROM
2642 COMMERCE BLVD
MOUND MN 55364 1402
ROBERT T AIMEE M O MALLEY
1721 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
RORY D AMY J LEA
2313 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
SCOTT H SUE J FERRELL
2243 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
P SCOTT JENNIFER G PHARIS
1815 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8419
PATRICK C MICHELLE MCNALLAN
2287 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
PAUL L LYNETTE M ERICKSON
2217 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7420
PAUL S LAURA E GRAVES
8634 VALLEY VIEW CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8423
PHILIP D MARGARET STANDAFER
8767 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
RICHARD J CHERYL A HARTMAN
2254 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
ROBERT FU
1718 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
RODDY Y LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH
2337 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
SALLY E STUCKEY
1785 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
SCOTT T NICOLE M BRUSH
2301 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401
267
STEPHEN B SANDRA L MEYER
8724 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
THEO A TERRY L JENSON
2065 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
THOMAS R AMY B EDSTROM
10 HILL ST
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9586
THOMAS V BEVERLY L ANTILLEY
2361 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403
TIMOTHY BRENDA MOORE
1812 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8418
TIMOTHY J MARY C KRAFT
2279 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7400
TODD A JILL M GATES
1795 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
TRENT A KIMBERLY M DAVID
1797 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
WILLIAM M LAURI J WEISMAN
1771 VALLEY RIDGE PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8416
K V LEASING LLC
118 PEAVEY CIR
CHASKA MN 55318 2347
STEPJEN J MARY P MONSON
8850 AUDUBON RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9407
THOMAS A SUSAN A KODET
1741 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8414
THOMAS S SUSAN M TISCHER
8729 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8421
THOR C LYNN M HEIMDAHL
8671 VALLEY RIDGE CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8417
TIMOTHY G GEEHAN
1819 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
TIMOTHY J MELISSA C MCNEILL
1824 VALLEY RIDGE TRL S
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8418
TODD M DEBORAH S DOLAN
2187 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
WILLIAM B TERRE D KEMBLE
1782 VALLEY RIDGE TRL N
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8415
TWIN CITIES WESTERN RAILROAD
2925 12TH ST E
GLENCOE MN 55336 3368
LAKE REGION MFG CO INC
340 LAKE HAZELTINE DR
CHASKA MN 55318 1034
STEVE BARKER
8712 VALLEY VIEW PL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8424
THOMAS M CAROLYN D
THOMSON
2186 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
THOMAS TODD COOK
2037 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
THOR E DAWN K SMITH
2139 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
TIMOTHY J KATHLEEN C BATTIS
2066 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7407
TIMOTHY N TERRI L RENDALL
2174 BOULDER RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7402
TODD M JONI J NELSON
8610 VALLEY VIEW CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8423
WILLIAM D LEZLlE M DAWSON
2181 STONE CREEK DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7415
VICORP RESTAURANTS INC
400 48TH AVE W
DENVER CO 80216 1806
ROLAND A STINSKI
3647 MCKINLEY ST NE
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55418 1599
268
CITY OF
CHANIlASSEN
7700 Market Boulevard
PO Box 147
Chanhassen MN 55317
Administration
Phone 952 227 1100
Fax 952 227 1110
Building Inspections
Phone 952 227 1180
Fax 952 227 1190
Engineering
Phone 952 227 1160
Fax 952227 1170
Finance
Phone 952227 1140
Fax 952227 1110
Park Recreation
Phone 952227 1120
Fax 952 227 1110
Recreation Center
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Phone 952 227 1400
Fax 952 227 1404
Planning
Natural Resources
Phone 952227 1130
Fax 952 227 1110
Public Works
1591 Park Road
Phone 952 227 1300
Fax 952227 1310
Senior Center
Phone 952 227 1125
Fax 952227 1110
Web Site
WINIci chanhassen mn us
5
MEMORANDUM
TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager
FROM Kate Aanenson Community Development Director
DATE March 26 2007
O
SUBJ Planning Commission Vacancies
The terms of Jerry McDonald Dan Keefe and Kevin Dillon will expire on March
31 st and would like reappointment All have only served one term or less on the
Planning Commission On Tuesday March 6 2007 the Planning Commission
interviewed five candidates for three vacancies on the Commission
Based on their interviews the Planning Commission would like the City Council
to consider reappointment the following incumbent candidates
Jerry McDonald
Kevin Dillon
Dan Keefe
If the City Council chooses not to reappoint any or all of the incumbents the
Planning Commission ranked the candidates in the following order
Corey Bergman
Thomas Koehnen
Richard Simmons
Philip Denucci
Thor Smith
g plan planning commission pc appointments 3 26 07 doc
The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a channing downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play269
270
271
272
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344