The URL can be used to link to this page

Correspondence Section C HASSE 690 Cig Center Drive 1~0 Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937. i900 GeneralFax 952.937.5739 Engineering Department Fax 952.937.9152 Building Department Far 952.934.2524 Web Site u,wmci, chanhassen, mn. us October 11, 2001 Mr. Steve Berquist 7207 Frontier Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear~q'e: ~ I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered· I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again· Sincerely, pTa°rdkd2~fefcmr ea;i ° n D i re c t ° r c: Mayor & City Council ,,'Park & Recreation Commission · . . elanmng Commission Todd Gerhardt, C~ty Manager Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director ,,,,4.,.. .... 7.-7'"- [ Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Teresa Bnrgess, City Engineer G:\park\th\task force CITYOF C SEN 690 City Center Ddve PO Box I47 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937. I900 General Fax 952.937.5739 Engineering Department Fax 952.937.9152 Building Department Fax 952. 934. 2524 Site www. ci. cha,hassen.,m, us October 11, 2001 Ms. Nancy Mancino 6620 Galpin Boulevard Excelsior, MN 55331 Dear N,~: ~://(~ I am writing to celebrate the closme of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have ~ecently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, / "~ .4r Park & Recreation Director /,~ /? ~ ../~.A~ ,/~ "--- .~--r'"~ c: Mayor & City Council ' ,z'Y./~~' Park & Recreation Commission 5 '~47c7f ~'~.~'~' - Planning Co~ission ~x~ ~[(~ x~/ ./" ~ ' Todd Gerhardt, City Manager . v~ ~,/.-- ~/z~,/. Kate ianenson, Co--unity Development Director Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ~/ Teresa Burgess, City Engineer / ~ GApark~th~task forc~ ~ ff_~ ~~~' CITYOF 690 Cig Center Drive PO Box147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952. 937. i 900 General Fax 952.937.5739 £ngineering Deparnnent lax 952.937.9152 &dlding Department Fax 952.934.2524 Web Site wwutd, c/Ja,hassen, mn. us October 11, 2001 Ms. Anne Graupmann//,~t~/.,//)~dd', , ~ ~ ~ Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear~ bd/g~ I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on f6rever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, Todd Hoffman Park & Recreation Director C: L, Mayor & City Council Park & Recreation Co~ssion~' Planning Co~ssion ' / . . d~ ~ Todd Gerhardt, C~ty Manager Kate aanenson, Co--unity Development Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Teresa Burgess, City Engineer ~ ~~ 7- CITYOF CI HASSEN 690 GSv Center Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952. 937.1900 General Fax 952.937.5739 E,gl,eedng Department Fa,: 952.937.9152 Building Departme,t Fax' 952.934.2524 Web Site Ivwlv. ci.c/;a~#~asse,.mn, us October 11, 2001 Ms. Alison Blackowiak 8116 Erie Circle Chanhassen, MN 55317 Deart.~' ~f I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The bordms of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. ~ Sincerely, ~/~' .. t Park & Recreation Director ...... ,~.5-, ~ ~ c: Mayor & City Council Park & Recreation Commission ~ b~ i~ Planning Co~ssion b' ~,,, ~ /~ ~~" ~ ~'~. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager ~ ~' 6~w / / ,~,~ Kate Aanenson, Co--unity Development Director / . Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ~t ~ ~l Teresa Burgess, City Engineer '~ ~-~ G:,park,th,taskforce ~ ~[~ /~' The Gtt, of Chanhasse,. A erowi, a com,umity with clean lakes, quality schooh, a chatTning downtown, thrivi,g businesses, and beautifid parks. A ~, reat place to live, work, a,d play. CITYOF 690 Ci{7 Center Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937.1900 General£ax 952.937. 5739 Englneerhtg Department lax 952.937.9152 Building Departme,t Fax 952.934.2524. Web Site www. ci. chanhassen, mn. us October 11, 2001 Mr. Jim Manders 6791 Chaparral Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear,~f ~. I am writin brate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, Todd Hoffman Park & Recreation Director C: Mayor & City Council '~~ Park & Recreation Co~ssion Planning Co~ssion ~' Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Kate Aanenson, Co--unity Development Director Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ~ "~~~ Teresa Burgess, City Engineer ~ ~ft .~ G:XparkXthXtask force CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 G~y Center Drive PO Box I47 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937.1900 General Fax 952.937.5739 E,gineering Department Fax 952.937.9152 Building Deparonent Fax 952.934.2524 ll3b Site www. ci. cha,hasxen, m,.tts October 11, 2001 Mr. Richard Wing 3841 Shore Drive Excelsior, MN 55331 I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, Todd Hoffman /55.~ ~'~(-~[ T~:~' /rS ;~ : ' ' Park & Recreation Director Y~ / ~ c: Mayor & City Council __ . /J . Park & Recreation Co~ssion ~ /~( ~XJ~*'x~'{~ .... ' / Planning Co~ssion ~ Todd Gerhardt, C,ty Manager ~}'~~~ Kate Aanenson, Co--unity Development Direct~ Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ~ Teresa Burgess, City Engineer~'-~[/ , force ' ' ' : ' ~ ! ' /'. ! ;., J ...... t ...... tl,'ivi,v businesses a;, 4 beautihd oarkv A ereat vlace to live, work, aM pul: CITYOF 690 G~v Center Drive I~0 Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 October 11, 2001 Mr. Michael Lynch 6630 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear ~i7.' 5~ Phone 952.937.1900 General Fax 952.937.5739 £nginmqng Department Fax 952.937.9152 &dlding Depamneut Fax 952.934.2524 Web Site u,wu:ci, chanhassen, mn. us I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Sincerely, Park & Recreation Director ~,~ .. c: Mayor & City Council" /~)/j~ Park & Recreation Co~ssio~ / Planning Co~ssion Todd Gerhardt, City Manager // Kate Aanenson, Co--unity Development Bruce DeJong, F,nance D~rector Teresa Burgess, City Engineer G:XparkXthXtask force px/~/ ~1 ~" CITYOF CHANHASSEN 690 O~y Center Drive PO Box 147 C/sanhassen. Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937.1900 Ge, eral Fax 952.93Z5739 £,gineeri,g Deparnne, t Fax 952.937.9152 Buildi,g Deparnne,t Fax' 952.934.2524 Site October 11. 2001 Mr. Kenneth Potts 9431 Foxford Road Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear K~~.' ~5~J~ I am writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your comn~unity as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. ~/" Sincerely, JA ~ ,~ ·/~ w~ ~4~~ /.._. . Todd Hoffman '~43' Park & Recreation Director ff '~, c: Mayor & City Council Park & Recreation Co~ssio~ Planning Co~ssion Todd Gerhardt, City Manager son, Co ni y Bruce DeJong, Finance Director Teresa Burgess, City Engineer G:~park~th~task force CITYOF 690 G~y Center Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phollt 952.937.1900 General Far 952.937.5739 £ngineering Department Fax 952.937.9152 Building Depamnent Far 952.934.2524 ~b Site www. ci. cha,hassen, mn. us October 11, 2001 Mr. A1 Raymond Senior Project Manager The Trust for Public Lands 420 N. 5th Street, Ste. 865 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Iarn writing to celebrate the closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Properties Limited Partnership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached diagram). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemnation hearings, and faced with an imminent trial, we were finally able to settle out of court for a purchase price of $1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look for~,~r,~l to~..vorking with you again. .. , ,.' Todd Hoffman '~fi ' Park & Recreation Director ~ ,/~L~ c: Mayor & City Council ~.[~~ Park & Recreation Co~ssion/"~ ~ Planning Co~ssion ~4 ~~ ' ~o~d Qerhardt, ~ty Manager ~ate ~anenson, ~o~unity Development DirectS' Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ~~ Teresa Burgess, City Engineer ,ff G'XparkXthXtask force ~ TI,~ (Tin, o£ Cl, a,hasse,. ,4 orau,i,~ commu,itv with clean lakes, aualin, schooh, a charming downtown, thrivin~ businesses, and beautifid parks. A great place to live, work, and play 6rYo 690 City Center Drive PO Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937.I900 General £ax 952.937.5739 952.937.9152 Building Department tax 952.934.2524 1I% Site "" ,'u,u:ci. cha,hmsen, mn.~ts October 1 i, 2001 Ms. Judy Scott .... / Dear I am writing t e he closure of the duties associated with the 1997 Park, Open Space, and Trail Referendum. On Monday, September 24, the City and Fox Prope~ies Li~ted Paanership entered into a Settlement Agreement for acquisition a 37-acre open space preservation parcel (see attached dia~am). The task force identified this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. After extended negotiations, condemation hearings, and hced with an i~nent trial, we were finally able to settle out of cou~ for a pumhase price of $ 1,295,000 ($35,000/acre). As you know, this purchase represents one of the most significant acquisitions of public open space ever made by the City. The legacy of your hard work as a task force member will live on forever! The woods and wetlands encompassed by this acquisition are simply magnificent. The knowledge that these trees will never be cut down to make way for development is truly heartwarming. The borders of the park have recently been signed as public open space and the neighboring property owners contacted. The closure of this remarkable 6-year effort is truly worth celebrating! Thank you again for all your hard work and dedication while serving your community as a task force member. The entire referendum process was a journey I will never forget! Your 6-month commitment soon turned into a year and then two! The task was monumental and yet you persevered. I am extremely proud of your accomplishment and wish you the best in your future endeavors. I look forward to working with you again. Park & Recreation Director Planning Co~ssion Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Kate Aanenson, Con, unity Develo~ b~rector Bruce DeJong, Finance Director ' Teresa Burgess, City'Engineer .~ G:XparkXthXtask force /~J~ ~ {at4' .4~f~ff)~ []~/ Tobacco-Free Olympic Winter Games Labor meetings smoke free 4 Minnesota Thunder poster that says, "Play with fire in your heart not smoke in your lungs." All of the recreational activities were staffed with volunteers sporting T-shirts that bore the TFYR and USA CUP logos. "Volunteers are the key to this large an undertaking," said ANSR's Ellie Watkins. She helped recruit volunteers from many organizations: ANSR, school tobacco-free clubs in Anoka County, Unity and Mercy Hospitals, Anoka County Public Health, Spring Lake Park District Community Education, several police departments, and Chicanos Latinos Unidos En Servicio (CLUES). The CLUES volunteers were especially helpful since many of the international teams came from Spanish-speaking countries. Schwann's USA CUP 2001 was the beginning of a long-term plan to have an enforced tobacco-free component for every activity held at the National Sports Center. Since its activities include hockey, volleyball, cycling, soccer and golf, the potential impact is substantial. "The goal is for it to be as unthinkable for adults - whether coaches, parents or officials - to carry or use tobacco at these events as it would be for them to carry and use alcohol while working with these young teams," said Watkins. "We hope to change community norms." During the coming year ANSR will be working with the staff at the National Sports Center to plan future activities implement tobacco-free policies. Use of tobacco, smoked or chewed, will be severely limited at the Salt Lake Olympics. Although tobacco use will be allowed in some designated outdoor areas, these areas must be at least 25 feet from any building entrance, open window or air intake. Areas under the control of the Organizing Committee are covered by the regulations. Outdoor stadiums, including seating areas, will be smoke free. Staff break and hospitality suites, areas that have tradition- ally allowed smoking ,will join the clean air ranks. Stogies smoldering in a crowded, noisy room is the stereotype of a labor union meeting. While the vote at the Saint Paul Trades and Labor Assembly will have little effect on noise, the nearly unanimous vote to banish smoke will likely improve the size of the crowd Labor leaders have been troubled in recent years at their difficulty in getting members to attend meetings. Particularly troublesome was actively involving members in the political endorsement process. Among committed members who did not attend meetings, a common complaint was tobacco smoke. Union members, like their management counterparts, are smoking at reduced rates and resent being trapped in a closed room with burning cigarettes and cigars. Given a choice of a room filled with smoke and a room filled with ac- tivists, the choice was easy. At their monthly meeting in August the Assem- bly voted to make all union meetings smoke- free. Congratulations and thanks to the union leadership and membership for their solid public health stand. Schwan's USA CUP tobacco free 3 among the tobacco executives that realized that paying researchers to write scientific articles, letters to the editor, guest editorials or to speak at conferences tarnished their credibility. He showed incredible hubris in believing it possible that high-powered reputable scientists would perform these tasks gratis. The full article, available in the American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 91, No. 9 (September 2001) pp. 1419-1423, is entitled "The Smoke You Don't See: Uncovering Tobacco Industry Scientific Strategies Aimed Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke Policies." Tobacco Free Youth Recreation (TFYR) strutted its stuff at the annual Schwann's USA CUP, an international soccer tourney held in Blaine. In years gone by coaches, officials and family members were often clustered at various places on the campus to smoke. All that changed when TFYR and the USA cup organizers joined forces to make the tourney a truly tobacco- free event. Signs were posted at each of the 50 fields. TFYR sponsored all of the 60 recreational activities from the evening dances to "human foosball" available for the young people when they were not competing. TFYR's presence began at the Olympic-style opening ceremonies. TFYR joined the parade of nations with a contingent of youth carrying signs that read "No tobacco use or possession allowed." These were then placed at each field. The TFYR booth offered free posters of the US Women's Soccer team with the phrase, "U.S. Women rule with fire not smoke" and a [~nonsmokers' rights as a: __ Guarantor $100 __.$200 __ __ Sustaining Member $50 __ Contributing Member __$30 __ Regular Member $25 __ Associate Member __$5 $10 __ ANSR is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organiza- tion. Contributions are tax deductible ANSR Membership Form I want to help in ANSR's work for .~lready a member? Not your renewal date? Pass this form along to someone you think might be interested. Share your newsletter. Other $75 $4O Name Street Address $15 [~Please call me about volunteer work: __ Telephoning on action hotline phone tree __ Talking with or writing to legislators __ Recruiting members in my community __ Writing letters to editor of local paper City/State/Zipcode H( w( Home/Work Telephone E-mail address __ Working on garage sale Please mail this form with your check to: __ Fundraising Association for Nonsmokers--Minnesota __ Other telephoning 2395 University Ave. W Suite 310 Other St. Paul, MN 55114-1512 TFYR teams-up with Star of the North Games Rochester makes city parks and ball fields smoke Bloomington youth athletic facilities to- bacco free Phillip Morris attaches a high cost to second- hand smoke 5 Tobacco Free Youth Recreation (TFYR) recently teamed up with the Minne- sota Amateur Sports Commission to develop a tobacco policy that will en- sure that the Star of the North Games in Minnesota will be a tobacco-free event. The 2001 Summer Star of the North Games were held in Rochester from June 16-24, and the tobacco-free message was present throughout the week. TFYR was very excited to work with the Minnesota Amateur Sports Com- mission to promote tobacco-free lifestyles to those present at this year's Star of the North Games. We look forward to building on these efforts. Contact TFYR to find out how you can help makecertain that recreation groups and events in your community are tobacco-free. Call us at 651-646-3005. Rochester took a key step in protecting the health of youth when the Park Board unanimously passed a policy that prohibits smoking within 100 feet of a city playground or youth athletic field. The two major concerns related to smoking at these facilities were the health impact of secondhand smoke and the message that smoking sends to youth. Denny Stotz, assistant super- intendent of Rochester Park and Recreation, stated, "If kids see adults smok- ing in areas that are intended for kids, there could be a subliminal message that smoking is all right." The city hopes that this policy will help change the widely-held assumption by youth that tobacco use is an acceptable and normal behavior in our society. On June 18, 2001, Bloomington passed an ordinance that bans the use of all tobacco products on city-owned athletic fields during organized youth ath- letic events. The city hopes that this policy will aid local youth athletic orga- nizations in their efforts to promote tobacco-free lifestyles to participants in their programs. The new policy will give many of these organizations the tools they need to enforce their own tobacco-free policies when using city- owned facilities--something that was previously missing. Recently Phillip Morris commissioned Arthur D. Little International, Inc. to "determine whether costs imposed on public finance [in the Czech Republic] by smokers are offset by tobacco related tax contributions and external posi- tive effects of smoking." The study found that the costs of smoking that the state incurred for such things as health care, fires, and early mortality were more than offset by taxes and duties collected on cigarettes and by reduced expenditures for those that die prematurely. In other words, the death of a smoker saved money that the nation, municipalities, or Czech insurance com- panies might pay for health care, senior housing, pensions, and other services to the elderly. Rightly, the report has been denounced. But commentators have largely ig- nored one of the study's interesting aspects. The analysts assumed that "envi- ronmental tobacco smoke (second-hand smoke) may be harmful to the health of non-smokers (emphasis added)." Nevertheless, they estimated the costs of treating conditions related to passive smoking to be high - about ten percent of the costs of treating conditions related to active smoking. Garage sale best ever Philip Morris touts ventilation We started with virtually no inventory, and the supply of yesterday's trea- sures dribbled in very slowly, but by the time of sale set-up mountains of stuff had been contributed. With more volunteers than ever, the stuff turned into organized piles of priced merchaindise. The income was $5,614, before taxes and expenses. Thanks to everyone who contributed merchandise and very special thanks to our volunteers and staff: Dave Johnson, Amanda Rudolph, Sandy Sandell, Jeanne Weigum, Ellie Watkins, Jane Onalo, Mike Hindin, Brian Begalle, Michele Benkert, Carol Bergh, Carolyn Radke, Peggy Lynch, Anne Joseph, Janelle Waldoch, Connie Green, Arlene Swanson, Chris Tholkes, RonYlitalo, Michael Marcotte, Paul and Klm Pentel, Heather Britt, Marilyn Conklin and Claudia Egelhoff. Start saving your goodies for next year. Even though ANSR currently re- ceives grants from the Minnesota Department of Health and receives some funds from Community Health Charities, the "Famous ANSR Garage Sale" is still an important event in the ANSR year and makes a substantial contribu- tion to our coffers. Don't let good stuff go to waste. We have LIMITED stor- age space, but if it is good and you must get rid of it, give us a call. We will try to store it until next spring. If you've been following the approach advocated by the hospitality and to- bacco industry in communities considering ordinances, you've discovered that they set forth ventilation as the way to solve problems with secondhand smoke. At best ventilation can improve the comfort of staff and patrons of res- taurants and bars; it cannot protect their health. To promote its agenda, Philip Morris sponsors a program called Options. It encourages restaurateurs to al- low smoking and install more sophisticated heating, ventilation and air condi- tioning systems to deal with the smoke. The company claims it will provide assistance to businesses to evaluate their system and line them up with con- tractors that can improve it. Who benefits? Phillip Morris and the contractors. Who loses? Restaurant and bar owners that pour a lot of money into a system that does not work and their patrons. Association for Nonsmokers--Minnesota 2395 University Avenue West Suite 310 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55114 - 1512 NON-PROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID Minneapolis, MN Permit No. 2985 CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED Date to renew is 4/19/2002 Mr. & Mrs. Warren C. Leininger 5440 OLIVER AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55419-1533 Association THE for Nonsmokers- Minnesota Sept2001. Vo115 No.3. Cities join war on indoor smoking Public smoking bans most effective way to cut smoking Cities across the state are exploring their options in restricting tobacco smoking in restaurants and other workplaces. With the state legislature unable to pass even modest improvements to the Clean Indoor Air Act, cities are taking the problem into their own hands. Just as a wave of ordinances to reduce youth access to tobacco swept across Minnesota in the early '90s, a new wave to make indoor air a reality for restaurant workers and patrons has begun. First out of the blocks was Moose Lake - followed by Duluth. On August 7, the Cloquet city council voted 5-2 to make all the city's restaurants smoke- free. Rochester has taken testimony on an ordinance but has postponed final consideration. Hutchinson is the latest city to take up the issue. An ordinance banning smoking in both restaurants and bars advanced on a 4-1 vote, but at a second hearing restaurateurs convinced the City to try a voluntary approach. The retreat by the council surprised virtually everyone because the community strongly supported an ordinance. The Duluth ordinance is under attack. The Duluth Hospitality Association launched a petition drive to place the ordinance on the fall ballot. They got just enough signatures to leave the final decision up to the voters. If surveys are accurate, Duluth's ordinance will be affirmed by the people. There are very good reasons for cities to address the problem. While patrons may be able to choose whether to dine at home or in a smoke-free restaurant, restaurant workers often have no such choice. These workers often have few employment options outside the food service sector. Many of them work part-time, and wages tend to be low and benefits few. Conditions that white collar or unionized workers would not tolerate are often the norm for restaurant staff. While most office workers have had good protections since 1994, restaurant workers have been largely ignored. The city councils which have boldly taken on this issue deserve credit for standing up for the health of workers who are often powerless over their working conditions. Heroes are emerging in this battle for breathable air: the Smoke-Free Coalition staff, Pat McKone and Steve O'Neil in Duluth, Mayor Marlin Torgerson from Hutchinson, and Jean Gornick and Jan Salo Korby from Citizens for Smoke-Free Environments in Cloquet. According to Philip Morris, Inc's vice-chairman of the board, the environmental tobacco smoke issue is the "single most important challenge we currently face .... ETS is the driving force behind smoking restrictions in the workplace, on airlines and other forms of public transportation, and in 2 ANSR board member exam- ines tobacco companies tac- tics CHARTER MEMBER .~-~ cCommumt3, Health Charities virtually all areas offering public access. If present trends continue, smokers will have fewer and fewer opportunities to enjoy a cigarette. This will have a very direct and major impact onconsumption." Because of the effectiveness of smoking restrictions in helping people to cut down on their smoking or quit, one of the strategies of the Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco (MPAAT) is to inform Minnesotans about the health consequences of exposure to other people's tobacco pollution. MPAAT is currently running television and radio ads about secondhand smoke. Focus group research done by ANSR and others has found that Minnesotans are now much better informed about the real dangers of secondhand smoke. "Until a few months ago many Minnesotans believed that breathing other people's smoke was merely irritating or that the complaining nonsmokers were just whiners. Focus groups we have observed and surveys conducted by MPAAT show people are much more aware of the real dangers of breathing secondhand smoke. This must really be causing tobacco executives fitful nights," said Sandra Sandell, director of ANSR's Secondhand Smoke Resource Center. ANSR board member, Professor Jean Forster, is coauthor of a recent article examining the tobacco industry's war against policies to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke. She was part of a team of researchers including Monique E. Muggli, Richard D. Hurt, and James L. Repace; that investigated the tobacco industry's attempts to prevent regulation of smoking. Research findings on the health effects of ETS, the industry foresaw, would reduce cigarette consumption and profits, spur litigation, and undermine its political clout. Tobacco companies feared secondhand smoke would be classified a carcinogen and then heavily regulated, especially in the workplace. As the body of evidence about secondhand smoke's dangers grew larger and larger, the industry's tactics changed. During the 80s, they tried to persuade the public that agents other than secondhand smoke were the prime culprits in poor indoor air quality and that singling out secondhand smoke in worksites ignored other air-borne substances that harmed health. By the end of that decade, they realized that this strategy was not working. Phillip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, and Lorillard were among those that ponied up money for the nonprofit Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR), the ostensible purpose of which was to fund research on indoor air and communicate the research findings. Squeamish about accepting money directly from the tainted tobacco industry, researchers were less reluctant to ask CIAR to provide money to them. With control of CIAR, the industry could control what projects it funded and allay some researchers' concerns. Some of the approximately 250 studies funded by the CIAR provided ammunition in the industry's battles against the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Such a funding mechanism also made the research seem more objective than it would have been had it been funded directly by the industry. Steve Parrish of Phillip Morris was The ANSR Bulletin is published quarterly by staffpersons Dave Johnson and Sandra Sandell, and president Jeanne Weigum. For more information contact ANSR at 2395 University Ave. W. Ste 310, St. Paul, MN 55114 (651) 646-3005. Permission to reprint articles with credit to ANSR granted. CARVER COUNTY Office of County Sheriff Carver County Government Center Justice Center 600 East Fourth Street Chaska, Minnesota 55318-2190 Bud Olson, Sheriff Emergency: 911 SheriffAdmin: (952) 361-1212 Admin. Fax: (952) 361-1229 Dispatch: (952) 361-1231 (Non-Emcrgency) September 13, 2001 City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: ICR# 01-15674 Dear City Officals: I have personally reviewed the report you recently filed with the Carver County Sheriff's Office. From the information received, it is difficult to proceed with an investigation because of the lack of leads and/or evidence. If new information is discovered regarding your case, please contact Detective Roatch at (952) 361-1134. The Carver County Sheriff's Office is committed to assisting you in solving this case. Sincerely, Lt. Hubie Widmer Investigations Carver County Sheriff's Office krl A.[]i'rul(ztivc Aclit~t/l:'qmd Opl~ormzfiO' I:'mldoycr Prizm'd (m 30'); Ih).w ('~nwmwr Ib'cvch'd I'(qwr | CITYOF CHAN EN 690 CiO, Ce,ret Drh,e PO Box 147 Cha,l~asse,, Mi, nesota 55317 Plione 952.937.1900 Ue.eral Fo: 952.937.5739 Engi,eeri,g Department Fax' 952.937.9152 October 10, 2001 Mr. Dave McCormack Minnesota DNR Fisheries 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Re: Preliminary Application for Shoreline Habitat Project Funding Dear Mr. McCormack: Please find enclosed the City of Chanhassen's preliminary application for the above grant. The project proposes the revegetation of approximately 1000 feet of shoreline on Lake Susan in Chanhassen adjacent to that lake's public access. It will involve several departments within the City, as well as a number of local organizations. The City is eager to improve the aesthetic and habitat value of the public lakeshore on Lake Susan. If you have any questions about the proposed project or the application itself, please feel free to contact me at 952/937-1900, extension 105. Thank you for your consideration of our application. Sincerely, CITY OF CHANHASSEN / Lori Haak Water Resources Coordinator G:kENG2,ORr',ADMII'&BudgetLatPR Grant Cover Letter.doc Project number Preliminary Application for Shoreline Habitat Project Funding Complete and submit to the appropriate Regional Fisheries Office. Contact and mailing information is found on the last page. Description: - If multiple properties are involved, please complete this information for each one. If available, include photos of the site. If needed, attach additional pages that describe the project site and goals. Name of Owner: Address of Property: City of Chanhassen Lake Susan Park Lake Drive - Chanhassen, MN 55317 (Please see Attachment 1 for project location.) Land ownership at project site: [] Private [] Public Current uses: Par'k/Open Space: Fishing, swimming, boating. Name ofwaterbody/watercourse: Lake Susan (13P) County: Carver Township 116 N Range 23 W Section (s) 13 & 14 (* if known) List known biologically or historically significant features (e.g., rare or listed species, critical habitat, archaeology): Don't 'know / None (circle one) Known features: American Lotus (Nelumbo lutea) population on west side of lake. List known invasive or exotic aquatic species present in the water body/watercourse: [] Don't know / None (circle one) [] Zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) [] Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) [] Curlyleaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus) [] Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) [] Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) [] Other List existing management plans for the water body attd/or related funding (existing or being applied for): [] Don't know / None (circle one) [] Lake Management Plan [] Vegetation Management Plan [] Conservation Partners grant [] Other: City of Chanhassen Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Is there a septic system located on site? [] Yes [] No. If yes, is it compliant? What do you want to accomplish with this project? (Additional pages may be attached.) Please see Attachment 2. Project Partners: Preliminary Application for Shoreline Habitat Project Funding, No. Key contact (Initiator): Loft Haak Organization: City of Chanhassen Address: 690 City Center Drive, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 Telephone: I Fax: 952/937-1900 x 105 952/937-5739 ITitle: Water Resources Coordinator IEmail: lhaak@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Other Partners: 1. Name Organization Title Conrad Fis~ess RPBC Watershed District District President Address 8033 Cheyenne Avenue, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 Telephone Fax Email 952/934-5581 None None 2. Name Organization Title Julia Bohnen U of M Landscape Arboretum Wetland Restorationist Address 3675 Arboretum Boulevard, PO Box 39, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317 Telephone Fax Email 952/443-1498 None juliaOarboretum.umn.edu 3. Name I Organization I Title Steve McComas Blue Water Science Limnologist Address 550 South Snelling Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55116 Telephone I Fax [ Email 651/690-9602 651/690-9602 mccomasOpclink.com Grants are administered on a reimbarsement basis. If this project is funded, who will be the designated grantee (asually a local unit of government)? City of Chanhassen Budget: Estimated project cost (total): $57,000 Contributions to Project Cost: I Source Activity/Item Type (grant, inkind, [ Amount cash) City of Chanhassen Project management; Installation Cash; inkind $10,000 RPBC Watershed District Technical expertise; Monitoring Cash; inkind $5,000 U of M Landscape Technical expertise Inkind $2,000 Minnesota DNR APM Grant Plant material; Erosion control materials Grant $40,000 Lake Susan City of Chanhassen State Proposed Project Location Lake Susan OHW 881.8 5 City-Owned Property 500 0 500 1000 Feet Attachment 2: What do you want to accomplish with this project? Background Lake Susan is an 88-acre lake located entirely within the City of Chanhassen. Its watershed is approximately 2,400 acres. Of those 2,400 acres, approximately 1,170 are in the immediate drainage area and 1,230 are indirect drainage from the watersheds of two upstream lakes (Lake Lucy and Lake Ann). Land use within the watershed consists primarily of Iow-density residential, office/industrial and parks/open space. Planning The City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) was published in February 1994 and addresses management strategies and goals for each of the creeks and lakes in Chanhassen. The SWMP recommended establishment of a monitoring program to quantify stormwater runoff pollutant loads coming into Lake Susan. In 1997, the City of Chanhassen hired Steve McComas of Blue Water Science to conduct monitoring on Lake Susan and to develop a management plan for the lake and its watershed. The Lake Susan Management Plan was completed in February 1998. It made several recommendations for the management of Lake Susan including carp control through a combination of harvesting and barrier installation, aluminum sulfate application, continued monitoring of vegetation and water quality, capital improvements to treat stormxvater from the subwatersheds and resource-sensitive landscaping. Recent Efforts Since 1998, the City of Chanhassen has conducted several projects in Lake Susan to improve the lake's water quality and plant community. These projects have included an alum treatment, installation of carp barriers and several harvests of rough fish. These measures have yielded improvements in water quality; however, the plant community in Lake Susan is still suffering. There are only a few small patches of emergent and submerged vegetation remaining. Included in the remaining vegetation is the rare American Lotus (Nelumbo lutea). Rationale The SWMP also recommended a diverse submerged plant community be reestablished in the lake if the water clarity improved. Recent in-lake projects have improved water clarity, so City staff believes that the DNR's Aquatic Plant Restoration Grant will provide an excellent opportunity to begin the reestablishment of aquatic macrophytes in Lake Susan. Project Size and Location The project is located along the lakeshore of Lake Susan in Chanhassen, Minnesota. It will extend from the western park property approximately 1,000 feet to the east (Attachment 1). The enhanced buffer zone will be in excess of 25 feet wide wherever possible and will include the public boat launch, fishing pier and will abut the existing asphalt bike/pedestrian trail. (Upon preliminary review, it appears that the existing asphalt trail may limit buffer width to less than 25 feet in some areas. The proposed project will enhance all buffers and make them as wide as practical (25-50 feet in some areas) in as many areas as possible. In areas where upland buffers must be less than 25 feet wide, emergent and submerged vegetation will be established to achieve buffer width in excess of 25 feet.) Project Goals The goals of this project are: · To eliminate reed canary grass (Phalaris arundicea) within the project area; · To encourage existing populations of native plants to expand within the buffer zone; · To establish a diverse submerged native plant community, as well as enhance the native plant populations within the buffer zone; · To improve the aesthetics of the lake and its buffer areas; · To provide a demonstration area on public property where lakeshore property owners can see what a well-established native buffer zone can look like; · To involve the community in a restoration effort; To determine whether rough fish or water clarity have been more limiting for the growth of aquatic macrophytes by growing aquatic macrophytes in exclosures to limit grazing by rough fish; To encourage the public to become familiar with many different kinds of submerged, emergent and wet meadow vegetation by planting diverse native vegetation on public property; To encourage the City Council, Planning Commission, Environmental Commission and Park and Recreation Commission to incorporate native lakescaping and buffer zones into future City projects as components of successful stormwater and lake management plans; and · To develop educational materials, programs and/or signage to promote the establishment of buffer zones through the use of native aquatic plants. Project Assessment The City will assess its progress toward these goals by: · Taking bi-weekly photographs of the project area from set photo points; · Conducting monthly monitoring of aquatic plants; - · Conducting water quality monitoring; · Asking volunteers to complete evaluations of the project and their participation in the planting process; · Asking grant partners to complete evaluations of the project and their participation in the process; and · Requesting comment from neighbors and users of the park about the project. SEPTEMBER 2001 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION Doggedly Pursuing Solutions: Planning and Regulating Dog Parks By Fay Dolnick Dog ownership is on th'e rise in this country. According to the Pet Food Institute, there were 58.5 million dogs in the United States in 1999--a two percent increase over 1998. APA's Planning Advisory Service has received an increasing number of inquiries regarding the planning and regulating of dog parks. This issue of Zoning News reports on the pertinent issues about them and how some communities have acquired and managed the parks through community organizing, proper siting, and regulatory control. The physical, mental, and social benefits of pet ownership have been well documented, and dogs have historically been closely associated with human civilization. Given that rising numbers of dog owners are city dwellers, the need for a place to get fresh air and exercise for urban pets is growing, as is the pressure on municipalities to allow dogs access to public open space. The organizers of Wiggly Field dog park in Chicago's Lincoln Park neighborhood define a dog-friendly area as, "a designated space specifically designed for use by dogs and their guardians for off-leash recreation, socialization, exercise, and training." Because dog owners constitute a significant group of park users, the owners feel that parks departments should accord them the same rights as other groups engaged in activities such as baseball, skateboarding, and inline skating. Many parks either prohibit dogs outright or permit them only when leashed. However, more municipalities are cooperating with dog park groups by providing areas (referred to by Boulder, Colorado, as "dog exercise and socialization areas") where dogs can run off- leash and learn to socialize in a safe environment; these dog parks are proliferating across the country. Conflict Dog parks often arouse considerable opposition from other park users. To minimize such conflict, the regulating authority-- normally the parks department--needs to address the potential difficulties of health and safety. Many problems can be avoided through good design standards for off-leash areas. Most jurisdictions have leash laws prohibiting dog owners from allowing a dog to run at large in public places. Some of these even specify the length of the leash: In Arlington County, Virginia, leashes may not exceed six feet; in Chicago, the limit is eight feet. Simply put, leash laws respond to the needs of citizens to feel protected from boisterous or potentially dangerous dogs. According to the Ann Arbor [Michigan] Dog Park Project, dog parks may be "the only viable solution to the inherent conflict between the legitimate needs of dog owners for open space for watching and playing with their dogs off-leash and the equally legitimate needs of citizens that led to the adoption of leash laws in the first place." Standards for dog parks should address location, fencing, size, ground cover (and the maintenance of whatever surface is chosen), drinking water, and sufficient shade; within the park, the provision of whatever is necessary for the disposal of dog feces, such as plastic "poop bags" and lidded trash containers. Location As with any other land use that has LULU or NIMBY potential, appropriate site selection for a dog park is of prime importance. Depending on the availability of land, the area should contain shade, good drainage, and fresh water. In an urban setting, where the competition for open space is significant, dense vegetative GUIDELINES FOR BEHAVIOR OF DOGS AND OWNERS In order for dog parks to remain viable places for dog owners to exercise their animals off-leash safely and without hazard to other park users, certain rules must be clearly posted so that lack of awareness can never be cited as a reason for ignoring them. The following is a list of comprehensive rules and regulations from the Chicago Park District: I) Owners are legally responsible for their dogs and any injuries caused by their dogs. 2) Owners must remain within the fenced area at all times. 3) Dogs must be leashed prior to entering and upon leaving the area. Gates to the area must remain closed at all times. 4) Owners must immediately clean up after their dogs. Failure to do so can result in a fine up to $500. 5) Dogs with a known history of, or who exhibit, dangerous behavior are prohibited. 6) Dogs must be healthy, fully immunized, de-wormed, licensed and wearing ID tags. 7) An adult must accompany children under 12; young children must be closely supervised. 8) Puppies under four months old and female dogs in heat are prohibited. 9) Only three dogs per person are allowed. 10) Dogs must be watched at all times. 11) Cooperation between dog owners is essential. buffers are not likely, so dog parks require excellent fencing. Residential development should be buffered from the noise of barking dogs and the inevitable shouting of dictatorial dog owners~a problem that brought complaints from neighbors of Wiggly Fidd, which is located in a dense neighborhood. Park boundaries also should confine the dogs and be effective in buffering neighbors from odor. Suburban dog lovers have the luxury of more open space, like in Waukegan, Illinois, where a county forest preserve operates a dog park that is surrounded by wetlands, a bike path, and a three-rail split cedar fence. However, creative solutions are possible anywhere. Fence Height and Design Many breeds of dog can jump fences, so the height of a dog park fence is a safety concern for the public at large. In the off-leash dog area of Fairfax County, Virginia, a chain link fence should be five feet in height; Eugene, Oregon, requires a four-foot fence but does not specify the type; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, specifies a six- foot chain link fence, but a local dog park committee says a four- foot fence is sufficient. Chicago's Wiggly Field has a safety feature of double gates (a corral of sorts) so that dogs cannot enter and leave at the same time--a feature also recommended by Chapel Hill and the Ann Arbor Dog Park Project. Size The size of dog parks ranges mostly from a quarter of an acre to five acres--although Richmond, California, has a 21-acre park that is visited by about 9,000 dogs per year. Fairfax County FURTHER SITE DESIGN FEATURES Wiggly Field includes a fenced-off"agility area" where special equipment is provided for dogs to exercise vigorously. This is considered an excellent method for obedience training and socializing of dogs. The following is an inclusive list of necessary provisions for dog park sites from the San Diego D.O.G. (Dog Owners Group), which meets the requirements of most communities: A. 2-3 acres or more of grass with routine maintenance B. Fence--5 to 6 feet high--divided into 3 adjacent fenced areas; 4 foot portable fencing lot: small/timid dogs an~c~parents~ children; 10 foot X 1~0 fo0t double-gated entry--also entrance for maintenance vehicles C. Accessible from major roads and public transportation D. Parking based on park size E. Water facilities/drainage F. Covered trash containers with routine trash removal* G. Signage for posting appropriate laws, people etiquette, animal control, park staff, police/emergency phone numbers, and notices H. Dog debris dispensers* I. Shade J. Seating/picnic tables K. Lighting L. Comfort stations!portable bathrooms *Thc need for adequate methods for the disposal of dog waste is a key i~sue for any communal dog area. Serious health concerns, such as the passing of parasites and roundworm larvae to humans-- particularly children--mean that uncollected dog waste is more serious than a matter of inconvenience, aesthetics, or olfactory displeasure. requires a minimum size of 10,000 square feet but prefers half an acre, providing a minimum of 700 square feet for each dog. The Ann Arbor Dog Park Project recommends a minimum of 10 acres in a major city park, allowing 25 dogs per acre. Arlington County, Virginia, requires 11,000 square feet to 34,000 square fe~t, which provides 450 square feet per dog. Eugene suggests between one and three acres. Research by staff at Chapel Hill indicates that between one and five acres is the ideal size for a dog park and, where urban communities may have to contend with smaller areas, more parks should be provided to avoid the problems of overuse and overcrowding. These estimates are based on observation of dog behavior. There are as yet no established formulas for arriving at such numbers. According to Stacy Hawk, a community organizer for Wiggly Field, most dog organizers are self-policing over this issue, and concern for the welfare of their dogs often prevents them from entering a crowded dog park. She agrees with the Chapel Hill staff that more neighborhood parks are needed in dense urban areas to prevent overuse. Wiggly Field is often overcrowded because of use by residents from all over the city, and because it is a public park, there is no legal way to restrict which residents use the facility. Ground Cover and Maintenance The ground cover in an off-leash area must be appropriate for expected dog activities, such as running and digging, and be amenable to routine maintenance to prevent degradation of the immediate area and negative environmental and aesthetic impacts Pictured clockwise from top left: Signage from Chicago's cleverly named I~/i../i,~l(Y Field, a former underused tot lot that had become a hang-out for / sets before its conversion to a thriving dog park; unleashed dogs are pb,~,,tially dangerous in urban settings, like this unofficial "dog beach" in Chicago's Lakeview neighborhood; a thirsty Pug contemplates a drink at a dog fountain; dispenser for "doggie doo" hags; early morning at a well- designed dog park in Chicago's Uptown neighborhood, featuring an appropriate mix of gravel, paved surface and trees (note the benches for weary dog owners and the enter/exit "corral" on the left); an "agility area" at Wiggly Field; a notice I~oard for dog-related literature. on the surrounding area. Grass turf, wood chips, and gravel are the most commonly preferred substances. Fairfax County prefers turf and requires a turf management program, although dirt in some areas is acceptable. The Ann Arbor Dog Park Project recommends turf with supplemental irrigation for efficient maintenance; it does not recommend dirt. Arlington County recommends that wood chip mulch be removed and renewed periodically when it retains odor and waste. The county permits a gravel base on some level areas. Eugene also recommends wood chips and gravel but requires special treatment such as concrete near entrances where heavy usage may be expected and where mud holes can easily form. However, Hawk strongly recommends a hard blacktop surface for small urban parks, which is not only easy to maintain (the park district power-washes it three times a year) but does not harbor parasites and prevents the transmission of disease from feces. Hawk says it is impossible to expect perfect cleanup from users. Financing the Dog Park Funding for dog parks may not be a priority for overtaxed parks department budgets. In many cases, citizen groups of dog park users are willing to contribute time and raise money from corporate donors such as dog food and pet supply manufacturers or private donations from individuals and nonprofit organizations. They also may be willing to volunteer for maintenance duties and supervision to assist in enforcing compliance with park rules, thus saving the salary of a city employee. Fines for failure to obey the rules of the park also may be a source of revenue. A Januaty 2001 report by the Chapel Hill Dog Park Committee states, "Park professionals in other areas of the country estimate approximately $8,000 in annual maintenance costs for a one-half acre (approximately 22,000 square fect) park. This includes about three hours per week in cleaning labor, refilling scooper dispensers, printing costs for dog park literature, and lawn care. In parks with high volume, turf maintenance is constant and can become expensive." Wiggly Field organizers are considering a pilot program that would require park users to purchase a permit. Pending proof of vaccination, the dog owner will be issued a key card to enter the park. The Program would solve two problems: Providing needed ongoing revenue and confirming the health of the dog. It also may help to limit the use of the park to neighborhood residents. Ann Arbor officials, who are considering a proposed dog park, will provide the land for the park but expect maintenance and supervising to be the responsibility of a private nonprofit organization. Such is the case with many other dog parks, where the municipality finances only a portion of what is required to successfully operate a facility. In Virginia Beach, Virginia, park guidelines state that park staff "will monitor and spot check usage, licenses, and compliance with guidelines. Animal Control xvill ensure compliance with city ordinances." Arlington County provides a city employee for 40 hours each week to empty trash and clean and rake the ground cover. Insurance and Liability Dog fights can and do occur. More seriously, dogs can bite people. According to the Ann Arbor Dog Park Project, none of the parks department administrators it surveyed had purchased liability insurance or had felt the need to do so. The organizers of a campaign for dog parks in Vacaville, California, contacted the risk managers from five Bay Area dog parks, who reported no claims for aggression or damage related to the use of dog parks. Liability in these cities is, in any case, the personal and legal responsibility of the dog owners. However, in order to ORDINANCE PROVISIONS AVSTrN, T~a,s: RULES ~ND DEFINITIONS: 1. Owner: any person owning, feeding, keeping, maintaining, or harboring a dog or cat. Harboring shall include knowin~ly'Mlowing a dog or cat to remain on the owner's premises. 2. Running at Large: not under the direct physical control of the owner or handler by leash, cord, chain, or similar direct physical control. SA~ DI£~;o Cot~rrv ZONING ORDINANCE: mAt Large" means being on any private property without the permis- sion of the person who owns or has a right to possess of use the property; or unrestrained by a "Leash" on either public property, unless expressly permitted by law, or private property open to the public; or in any place or manner which presents substantial risk of imminent interference with animal or public health, safety, or welfare. OREGON REVISED STATUTES: "Running at Large" means a dog is off or outside of the premises occupied by the keeper of the dog, or is' not in the company of and under the control of its keeper. MINNEAPOLIS CODE OF ORDINANCES: Off-leash dog areas; permits and regulations. (a) Dogs may be unrestrained by chain or leash in areas designated for off-leash activities by the City or Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. No person shall use a designated off-leash area without first having obtained a permit for each dog using such an area from the department of licenses and consumer services. A dog deemed a dangerous animal.., or as a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog . . . is not permitted to use off-leash areas. (b) The annual fee for an off-leash area permit for a resident of the city shall be twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for one (1) dog and fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each additional dog owned by the same person. A resident permit may only be issued upon verification that the dog has been issued a current Minneapolis dog license and verification of rabies vaccination. The annual fee for an off-leash area permit for persons residing outside the city shall be fifty dollars ($50.00) for one dog and thirty dollars ($30.00) for each additional dog owned by the same person. A nonresident permit may only be issued upon verification of rabies vaccination. The department of licenses and consumer services shall provide a tag containing a registration number and the year registered for each permit. Permits shall be valid from the time they are issued until January 31 next after the date of issuance. (c) Upon application for a permit, the applicant shall be provided with the rules for use of off-leash areas. As a condition for the issuance of a permit, the applicant shall sign and agree to abide by these rules. A permit may be revoked for failure of the applicant, or any person who takes the dog into an off-leash recreation area, to abide by these rules, or for violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or park board ordinances that occur within an off-leash area. Permits may be revoked by the director of licenses and consumer services. (d) The person responsible for a dog must have the dog restrained when entering and leaving an off-leash area. If so directed by a law enforcement officer, animal control officer, or animal warden, persons using an off-leash area must immediately restrain their dogs and remove them from the off-leash area. approve a new dog park, the city of Vacaville will require park patrons to raise $2,000 annually for general liability insurance. · In cases where the municipality does not carry insurance to cover park users, this should be made clear. The following is a · Waiver and Release of Liability from Escondido, California, for · the use of the Mayflower Dog Park: W~IVER fi. ND RELEASE OF LIABILITY · By entering this park I agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless · the City of Escondido ("City") and its officers, agents, and employees · from any and all lawsuits, damages, claims, judgments, loss, liability, · or expenses arising out of 1) any death or personal injuries or property damage which I may sustain or which I or my animal may · cause while I ara using this park or any equipment owned by or under the control of the City, or while participating in any activity sponsored · by the City, or 2) any death or injury which results or increases by any · action taken to medically treat me. The terms above shall apply · whether or not the alleged injury is also caused by or arises out of any dangerous condition of property, or the alleged negligence or any · acts or omissions of the City, or its officers, agents, or employees. · I also understand that the City does not carry insurance to cover · users of this park. I understand there are risks associated with this · park, and I assume the risk of any injuries that my animal or I may · sustain at this park. Putting It All Together · The establishment of a dog park involves public participation-- dog owners are enthusiastic about an off-leash area where dogs · can freely play and develop socialization skills. The initiation of such a facility inevitably comes from a dog park group. A well- · represented task force should include municipal employees and · citizens to share the financial and administrative duties involved. WEBSITES · Ann Arbor Dog Park Project · www. ur-net, com/aadogs/ Dane County, Wisconsin, Parks Department www. co. dane. wi. us/parks/parkhome, btm · Dog Advisory Work Group (D.A.W.G.), Chicago www. dawgsite, org/html/d_a_w_g_.html · Position Paper from the Special City Subcommittee on Dogs. · October 1997. · www. thedogsbesoSiend, com/dogpark, htm · Report on Potential Locations of Dog Parks. January 2001 · Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Dog Park Committee · www. town. ci. chapel-hill, nc. us/Agendas/caOlO122/4e- Dog%20Park %20report. htm Santa Monica, California, Staff Report Regarding the · Establishment of Dog Parks. 1993. pen. ci. santa-monica, ca. us/cffyclerk/council/agendas/1993/ · s93100508-A.html · Zoning News is a monthly newsletter published by the American Planning Association. · Subscriptions are available for $60 (U.S.) and $82 (foreign). W. Paul Farmer, Executive · Director; William R. Klein, Director of Research. Zaning News is produced at APA. Jim Schwab and Michael Davidson, Editors; Shannon · Armstrong, Barry Bain, Heather Campbell, Fay Dolnick, Nate Hutcheson, Sanjay Jeer, Megan · Lewis, Marya Morris, Reporters; Sherrie Matthews, Assistant Editor; Lisa Barton, Design and Production. Copyright ©2001 by American Planning Association, 122 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60603. The American Planning Association also has offices at 1776 Massachusetts · Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20036; www.planning.org All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the American Planning Association. · Printed on recycled paper, including 50-70% recycled fiber ~ · and 10 V0 postconsumer waste. Chan ! Chaska Soccer Club CC S Boys & Girls U13 C3 Teams Make State The U13 C3 boys summer traveling team finished fourth in the West District with a 4-3 record. They qualified for state after defeating Westside FC Silverhawks in a shootout at dis- tricts. The team was coached by Josh Mann and Bob Porter Team picture on left. The U13 C3 girls summer traveling team finished fourth in the West District with a 5-4-1 record. They won :i~eir first two district games, but suffered a 2-1 loss to Orono in the final. They advanced to the State Tournament on a 1/2 seed The team was coached by Tom Brenton. Team picture not available. Moving Forward By Joe Scott, Letter From the President ! hope that you and your family enjoyed the '"rime off" between the StatefDistrict Tournaments and the start of the fall sea- sore We have experienced an increase in fall participation this year, mostly due to the recruitment of players from our Recreational Program and retention of more summer players. Fiscal 2000 - 2001 was another successful year in the history of our club. This was due to the creativity and effort of our play- ers, volunteers, committee members, team managers, coaches, assistant coaches and ];lli[ard members. To share the details of our :ess and plans for the future, I would ,.he to invite you to the Annual CCSC meet- ing which will be held on Sunday, October 14, at 6:30 pm at the Chanhassen Recreation Center. During the meeting we will share with you the following information: - Fiscal 2000 - 2001 financial results; - Dollar allocation of your registration fees; - Skills evaluation procedures and team placement; - Time commitment for C1, C2 and C3 levels of play - MYSA rule changes for team promo- tion/relegation; - Coach development plans, paid vs. volunteers; - Olympic Development Program (ODP) update; - Small-sided soccer, beginning Fall 2002 for all U9 and Ull participants; - Recreation Program update and plans for 2002; - Status of the "Mighty Kicks" legisla- tion; - Field construction/renovation update; - Registration process & details; - CCSC scholarship program; - Club Administrator introduction, player statistics, etc.; - CCSC web site; - Club name change; - Club positions open for annual election (November 6) or appointment. I look forward to seeing you at the Annual meeting. If you are interested in being nom/nated for an elected or appointed posi- tion for the upcoming CCSC Annual Elections on November 6, please send me an e-mail at joesC~cottassoc.com. All positions are for two years. The fol- lowing are available positions: (elected) - Secretary, Director-At-Large, (appointed) - Registrar, and Girl's District Representative. See you on the pitch! What Makes an Olympic Development (ODP) Player? ByTom Turner, US. $occer National Staff Coach, Region II Women's ODP Coach, Ohio North State Director of Coaching and Assistant Coach U.S. Women's Pan Am Gold Medal Team Many young soccer players are probably wondering what it takes to become an"elite' player at the State, Regional or even National ODP level. While some players have good technical skills, others have speed, and still others can kick the ball a long way or are strong in the air Is it any one thing, which makes a player get noticed? The answer of course is yes...and no! While some elite players have impressed coaches by doing one or two things better than their peers, others may have impressed by simply being good over a wide range of abilities. The key component for all elite level or ODP players, however, is the ability to control the ball and be com- fortable with it when in possession. This is the first thing a coach looks for when evaluating talent: what can the player make the ball do? The ~es' and ~no' answers can be illustrated by comparing the following two teams. The first team has 11 players who work hard to get the ball, but do not have the individual talent to take advan- tage of their possession and therefore struggle to win games. The second is loaded with individual talent, but has no one willing to do the hard work in winning the ball back when it is lost. This team also struggles to win matches. Finding the right blend or balance between the two teams is the key to choosing select team rosters. There needs to be players who work hard to win the ball and there need to be players with the individual talent to take advantage of the opportunities presented to them. Choosing rosters for the Olympic Development Program, like any other team, is in part a question of balance. Coaches must try to blend the'kvorkers' and the "players", the consistent with the bril- liant~ The following is a list of terms which identify what coaches look for in "elite" level players. While each coach has his/her own preferences in looking for talent, these components will all be con- sidered in selecting players for ODP teams. TOUCH ON THE BALL - Does the player have control over the ball with both feet? Can he/she make the ball do what he/she wants while in possession? Does the player look comfortable with the ball under pressure? BALANCE - Is the player in control of his/her body? Is the player able to change direction in a controlled manner with the ball? TECHNICAL SPEED - How fast does the player control the ball and play it? Does the player have the ability to use good skill quickly? COACHABILITY - Can the player carry out a directive from the coach? While many young players are tactically weak, a good play- er will be coachable, and therefore have the ability to develop good habit~ WOP~ PATE - Is the player willing to push him/herself to the limits? Does the player attack and defend? AWARENESS - Does the player see good opportunities to pass/dribble/shoot? Does the player have vision of what's happen- /n~ on ~he field or does he/she make the game difficult? REACTION TO FAILURE - How does the player respond to a bad call or a mistake? Does failure result in a drop in perform- ance? LEADERSHIP QUALITIES - Does the player communicate to others? Does he/she demand the ball? Will they take charge when the game is on the line? PHYSICAL SPEED - Is the player fast? Does the player have enough speed to be effective without being exploited by opponents? SIZFJSTRENGTH - Is the player physically able to play with big- ger opponents? Is the player's size the reason for his/her success (especially at younger ages)? As you can see, there are many components, which can go into making an "elite" soccer player. Different positions call for differ- ent requirements in players' abilities. During the State Olympic Development Program camps, you will learn many new ideas about soccen It will be a chance to compare your abilities with other players of the same high standard. For those who advance to the Regional teams, it is another step towards national team recognition. Reprinted with permission from MYSA Travelling 2002 Summer Tryouts Friday, September 21 Location: Bluff Creek Elementary 5:00 pm - 6:30 pm - Ull girls 6:30 pm ~ 8 pm - U12 girls Monday, September 24 Location: Bluff Creek Elementary 5 pm - 6:30 pm - U13 girls 6:30 pm - 8 pm - U14 girls Friday, November 2 Location: Eden Prairie Dome U15-U17 Boys & Girls, Time TBA All players must have on file with the club a completed tryout form, copy of birth certificate and paid the appropriate tryout fee before participating in any of the aforementioned sessions. There are no make-up sessions. Please arrive 20 minutes early to check- in. For registration and tryout details contact the club website, hot- line or send us an email! Note: If you are trying out for an age group other than your MYSA age group, you must first tryout with your own age group and comply with the "Roster Up Policy". Requires coach recom- mendation and approval of the Director of Coaching. Ca ling All Equipment If you have not yet returned all of your equipment from the sum- mer season, please contact the Hotline at 763-493-0118, box i to make arrangements to drop off your equipment. Mike Wafter College Scholarship This program of college tuition awards, is supported and adminis- tered by MYSA. The scholarships are in the form of tuition awards and are to be used toward expenses in an accredited col- lege, university, or community college beginning in the fall of 2002. Two scholarships, one tea Male Player and one to a Female Player, will be awarded. This program is open to Minnesota play- ers who are registered to an MYSA affiliated club and are graduat- ing high school seniors. For more information and/or an applica- tion please contact MYSA at 952-933-2384. Application dead- line is October 20. 2 Special Thanks... CCSC would like to thank all the people who volunteered their time working at the Eden Prairie Tournament and Districts. Both tournaments were very successful, partly due to all the people who put in time to help. We really appreciate all who helped. Thanks once again/ Coaches Corner By Terry Leiendecker, Director of Coaching The club will be hosting an MYSA "D" and "E" coaching clinic this winter at the Eden Prairie Dome. I encourage all coaches who do not yet obtained an "E' or "D' license to attend. The "E' Certificate is an 18-hour course consisting of 15 hours of instruction and 3 hours of testing. Course material will cover proper technical execution and education in addition to an intro- duction to the tactical, physical and psychological aspects of the game. Applicants must be 16 years of age. The "D' License is an 36-hour course consisting of 30 hours of instruction and 6 hours of testing. The course is designed to pre- pare coaches for training players U-13 and above by expanding the player's tactical awareness and development of their technical ability. Course curriculum will build upon the basic principles covered at the 'E' course in addition to individual and team tactics. Applicants must be 17 years of age and have held an 'E' for at least one year '~" Certificate Course - $125 November 28, 29, 30:6-9 pm December 1:9-12 & 1-4 pm December 2:3-6 pm *q)" License Course - $200 November 28, 29, 30:6-9 pm December 1:9 am-12 pm & 1-4 pm December 2:3-9 pm December 6, 7, 13, 14:6-9 pm December 15: Time TBA Registration deadline is October 26. To register or for more information contact MYSA at 952-933-2384 or visit www. mnyouthsoccer, org/programs/mvsacoachingschools.htm. Rec Corner By Scott Simonson, In-House Coordinator ~)),~' As we close our Summer 2001 Summer Program, we are asking all families who participated this past season to take time to fill out the enclosed survey as we begin to prepare for Summer 2002. Surveys received by October 15 will be eligible for soccer prizes and entered into a drawing. Please mail your com- pleted survey to CCSC, Attn: Rec Survey, P.O. Box 735, Chanhassen, MN 55317. Use a separate piece of paper for other comments/suggestions. Please note that our Summer 2002 traveling registration process will begin in December for interested U9 (born between 8-1-92 to 7-31-93) and U10 (born between 8-1-91 to 7-31-92) participants. The registration deadline is January 10, 2002. Tryouts for these age groups will be held at the Eden Prairie Dome on Saturday, February 2. Times will be announced later. For registration and tryout details contact the club website, hot- line or send an email ccscadminC~worldnet.att.net. CCSC 2001 Summer Recreation League Program Survey Circle All That Apply - Age groups participated in: Gender: Boys Girls 1. Pre-K K i 2 3 4 5 6-8 Uniforms - We liked the complete set (jersey/shorts/socks) Agree Disagree No Opinion 2. Length of Season - Eight weeks is appropriate for program Agree Disagree No Opinion 3. Dates of Program - We would prefer the season to run: Mid-May to Mid July Early June to Late July Mid June to Mid August 4. Registration Form/Process - Was clear and concise Agree Disagree No Opinion 5. Club Hotline - I used the hotline to contact someone or to obtain information and the response time was satisfactory Agree Disagt-ee No Opinion 6. Weather/Field Cancellations - Were satisfactorily communicated to me by the coaches and/or hotline Agree Disagree No Opinion 7. Fees - The associated costs were reasonable for the program Agree Disagree No Opinion 8. Volunteer Coaches ~ Coaches taught soccer skills to my child Agree Disagree No Opinion 9. Junior Coaches - Were helpful in the development of skills Agree Disagree No Opinion 10. Youth Referees - Showed up as scheduled, were professional in appearance and made appropriate calls Agree Disagree No Opinion 11. Fields/Equipment - Both were adequate to provide a quality soccer experience Agree Disagree No Opinion 12. Club Newsletter - I found the information in the newsletter informative and helpful Agree Disagree No Opinion 13. My child had a tim experience playing soccer this summer Agree Disagree No Opinion 14. Do you plan on participating in the CCSC programs next season? Yes No 3 CtlA.N / CHASKA CCER ....... Club P.O. Box 735 Chanhassen, MN 55317 www. etearnz, com/ChanChaska Nonprofit Organization U.S. Postage Paid Chanhassen, MN Permit No. 72 CURRENT RESIDENT OR Todd Hoffman 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 2Voveraber l December newsletter submissions due October 15, 2001. Send us your photos, story ideas, comments and letters. IRn .......... DATE EVENT TIME PLACE September 8 U11-U14 Boys Summer 2002 T~outs* 8 am - 1 pm Bandimere September 21 Ull & U12 Girls Summer 2002 T~outs* 5-8 pm Bluff Creek Elementa~ September 22 U9 & U10 MYSA Jamboree TBA National Spo~s Center September 22 Youth Day w/CHS Lady Hawks Soccer 1 pm Chaska High School September 23 CCSC Board Meeting 6:30 pm Chan Rec Center September 24 U13 & U14 Girls Summer 2002 T~outs* 5-8 pm Bluff Creek Elementa~ September 30 MYSA Day w/Gopher Women's Soccer 1 pm Elizabeth Lyle Robbie October CCSC Board Meeting TBA TBA October 6 MYSA Fall Symposium 9 am - 4 pm Richfield Middle School October 14 CCSC Club-Wide Forum 6:30 pm Chan Rec Center October 20 Mike Wa~er College Scholarship Deadline October 20-21 U11-U14 MYSA Fall Ha~est Fest TBA Rochester, MN October 26 "D" & "E" Coaching License Registration Deadline November 2 U15-U17 Boys & Girls Summer 2002 T~outs TBA Eden Prairie Dome November 2-3 MYSA Soccer Fair 2001/AGM November 6 CCSC Board Meeting/Annual Elections 7 pm TBA Nov/Dec CCSC Sponsored "D" & "E' Coaching Clinics Eden Prairie Dome November 30 CCSC 2002 Winter Clinic Registration Deadline December 4 CCSC Board Meeting TBA TBA Janua~ CCSC 2002 Winter Clinics TBA Eden Prairie Dome January 10 Ull-U17 Summer 2002 Traveling Registration Fees Due (2nd Payment) January 10 U9 & U10 Summer 2002 Registration Deadline Februa~ 2 U9 & U10 Summer 2002 T~outs TBA Eden Prairie Dome March Summer 2002 Traveling Coach Fees Due March Summer 2002 Traveling Indoor Training TBA Eden Prairie Dome *For registration and t~out details contact the club website, hotline or send us an emafl/ CITYOF CHAN EN 690 O~v Center Drive ?O Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Phone 952.937. i900 General Fax 952.937.5739 Engineering Depar,nent Fax 952.937.9152 Building Departme,t Fax 952.934.2524 Site MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director DATE: September 26, 2001 SUB J: Park and Recreation Commission Recommendation; Roundhouse Neighborhood Restoration Project The Commission was informed on September 25th that the neighborhood initiative to restore the roundhouse did not get off the ground this past summer. Deanna Bunkleman, the project leader, experienced an extended family health issue over the summer and was unable to put everything together. Anticipating that Ms. Bunkleman will be asking the City Council for a time extension to complete the work, the Commission made the following recommendation: Park and Recreation Commissioner Karlovich moved that the Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council consider granting a one-year extension on the Roundhouse renovation project, affording Deanna Bunkleman the necessary time to mobilize her group and neighborhood in order to complete the work. Commissioner Howe seconded the motion and it passed 6 to 1, with Commissioner Moes voting against. Park and Recreation Commission Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 50() lxd'ayclt¢ R()ad St. Paul, Mi)mcsola 55155-4() 20 September 2001 Dear Friend of the Minnesota Valley: Enclosed please find the notes from our last Citizen Advisory Committee meeting. We want to thank you for your time and contributions. We made a lot of progress during those two hours! The next Citizen Advisory Committee meeting has been postponed due to the possibility of a strike by state employees. We appreciate your patience as we wait for more information before we schedule the next meeting. You will be notified when the next meeting is scheduled. Until then, we have plenty of background work to do in order to get the maps together that you requested as part of your work groups! Please feel free to call or e-m~iil with any questions or concerns that you might have. Again, thanks for your time and interest and we look forward to meeting with you again. Sincerely, Nanc3; Albrecht State Park Planner 651-284-0263 nancy, albrecht~dnr, state, mn. us enclosure SEp 2 5 2001 OF CHANHASSEN DNR Information: 651-296-6157 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity ° 1-888-646-6367 · TTY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-657-3929 Pdnted on Recycled Paper Containing a Minimum of 10% Post-Consumer Waste Meeting Notes Mn Valley SRA Planning Process Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting #4 Thursday, September 6~, 6-8prh; Scott Co. Gov't. Center, Shak0pee Participants Included: Pat Steckman, Henderson Chamber of Commerce & Mn River Valley Scenic Byway Dave Jeurissen, Snowmobile Club-Belle Plaine Karen Ross, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Larry Granger, Joseph Brown Interpretive Center, Henderson John Granlund, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux C. ommunity Leonard Wabasha, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community/Dakota Language Todd Murray, Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists Marty Walsh; Carver County Parks Paul R. Stanuch, Shakopee Lon Berberich, City of Henderson Shirley Hunt Alexander, Friends of the Minnesota Valley Jim Wolf, Friends of the Minnesota Valley Dennis Porter, Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists Keith Velaski, Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists & Penn Cycle John Dahl, Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists Chris Willhoit, Minneapolis biker Steve Peterson, Bloomington City Council Rick Schultz, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge Lance Anderson, City of Bloomington Kathie & Fran Burke, Jordan Art Straub, LeSueur Don Youngdahl, Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists Blake Goehring, Montgomery Richard Olson, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Earl Remmeke, LeSueur Diana'Regenscheid, DNR.Wildlife Lysa Dele, Belle Plaine Mark Cleveland, DNR Parks/For[ Snelling& Mn Valley Judy Thomson, DNR. Parks, Metro Region Frank Knoke, DNR Parks, Mn Valley Nancy Albrecht, DNR Parks, St. Paul Group 1' Int, erpreta.t!on of the Natural & Cultural Resources in the Valley Fai:ilitator: Judy Thomson Questions: 1) Are there areas along the trail, or in the SRA, that need to be interpreted to the public (that are currently not interpreted)?; 2) What type of interpretation would you recommend that we spend our limited time and resources on (i.e., brochures, kiosks, signs along the trail, naturalist-guided activities)?; and 3) Are there opportunities to interpret off-site that ~e are missing? Other partners? Recommendations: The Ecological-Cultural Interpretive Corridor of the Minnesota River Valley is a listing of the cultural and environmental features within the physical landscape extending approximately one half mile on each side of the Minnesota River between Fort Snelling and LeSueur. Within this space a number of trails, visitation points and vistas will be developed primarily on lands owned by federal, state, local governments and nonprofit organizations. Opportur!.ities for interpretation will bc identified within an inventory of the corridor and lir~ccd to trail locationl; where feasible. Goals: 1. To inform trail users of the distinctive ecological/cultural history of the Minnesota River Valley ovi:r the past 10,000 years in a variety of ways. 2. To identify how informational signs and kiosks can be combined and coordinated with such trail user facilities as benches, rest rooms, picnic shelters and picnic tables. 3. To develop a "user friendly" signing system at entry and exit locations to trail and. for guiding visitors to attractions at off trail locations. 4. To develop interpretive/educational messages that convey not only the story of the immediate area or feature, but "The Big Picture" within the Minnesota River Valley. 5. To integrate cultural and ecological aspects of interpretive messages where appropriate. For example, different cultures in the River Valley may have completely different views on land USe, plant value and how wildlife should be treated. 6. To design linkages between Minnesota River. Valley trails 'and trail systems from communities along the river in interpretive themes and possibly coordinafed signage and visitor facilities. 7. To identify locations along River V. alley'and community trails where "living history" programming would be appropriate. 8. To develop a formal or informal collaborative of agencies and organizations involved in cultur.aJ, a.n.d ecological education in the Minnesota River Val!eywhich will coordinate efforts in trail related interpretation and regularly review and update these joint efforts. What Next? (For subsequent meetings, Fall 2001) 1. INVENTORY AND REVIEgE...inventories, reports and maps identifying potential trail attractions (Dr. Robert's report... Cultural Resources reports of Mdewakanton Sioux Community... County Biological Surveys... Corps of Engineers report on flooding..., individual community and county trail plans, etc. 2. SEEK ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE of culture and/or ecology of Minnesota River Valley (Ney Environmental Learning Center, Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, Gideon Pond Heritage Society, county historical societies, Scenic Byways Group, etc). 3. SEEK INVOLVEMENT IN PROdECT FROM ALL COMMUNITIES IN CORRIDOR (Bloomington, Inver Grove Heights, Burnsville, Savage, Shakopee, Eden Prairie, Carver; Chaska, Belle Plaine, Faxon Township, Jessenland Township, Henderson, LeSueur, etc.) 4. IDENTIFY MAIN THEMES FOR INTERPRETATION that cover much or most of the River Valley 5. REVIEW INTERPRETATION AND SIGNAGE EFFORTS TO DATE to see what can be learned for other trail locations 6. IDENTIFY POSSIBLE TRAIL INTERPRETATION SPONSORS along the River (community organizations, individuals, local governments) who could coordinate their resources with the $ provided for interpretation by the State Group 2: the Bloomington Trail Area Facilitator: Mark Cleveland Questions: 1) Given that the State is committed to developing a multi-use trail in this area (along with the protection of the natural mud cultural resources), hcw should this b,..~ be accemplishEd? Is there a compromise to be found that will meet the needs, of most users (skinny-tired bikers, families with children, bird-watchers, walkers, mountain-bikei's, others)?; 2) Can you recommend trail specifications that will work (width, type of surface, signing/orientation, rest stops, creek crossings, other)?; and 3) what are your recommendations for trail maintenance? Who will do it and how? Recommendations: An official trail corridor does not exist in this area; hence enforcement by .the agencies is difficult, as well as self-enforcement by the bikers--designate a trail corridor ASAP. Consider not using the same surface for the whole Minnesota Valley Trail; the current users prefer a natural surface for this stretch. Opportunities for biking, roller-blading and strolling on paved trails are easy to find in the metro area; opportunities to bike, walk, jog or stroll in an undeveloped natural area are difficult to find in the metro area. Trail users will need information and education in order to reduce user conflicts. Interpret the natural and cultural resources along the trail. Further progress in this discussion will require good aerial photos with the trails and boundaries digitized. Consider organizing a field uqp to the area as part of the planning process. Next_ Meeting: Use good maps to work. on trail alignmentfs), qnd owne. rship issues. Group 3: Belle Plaine South Facilitator: Frank Knoke Questions: 1) What is the trail alignment that you would recommend to DNR for the portion of the trail from Belle Plaine to LeSueur?; 2) what are your recommendations for the Belle Plaine Wayside? How should it be managed/utilized?; 3) Would you recommend that the Rush River Unit be expanded? If yes, how?; and 4) Would you recommend that the Rush River Unit be managed differently than it is now? Recommendations: Look at using the east side of the river from Belle Plaine to Blakely. Then cross the bridge and use the west side to Henderson. Once at Rush River, will need to go up on the bluffs l to LeSueur (come out of Rush River on the upside west of 93). Be aware that libusing developments are on the way between Henderson and Rush River and sand prairie. Find a way to acquire land more efficiently and more quickly or there will be many missed opportunities for the Rush River Unit. No changes in how the Belle Plaine wayside is being managed. Manage the Rush River Unit differently. It needs a physical presence on-site for security and enforcement (especially ATV use). Perhaps station a person there on weekends and Holidays. Require park permits. Increase the operational budget for the unit. Complete a user survey at the Rush River Unit so we know how many people are using it when and for what reasons. Further work on trail alignments and the Rush River Units will require good maps showing ownerships, current easements, railroad lines, water treatment facilities and the like. If we had good maps at the ne'~t meeting, w..e could also pencil in the trails that we are aware of (snowmobiles horse~ etc.) that already exist and cross private owv_erships. Next Meeting: Use good maps to work on alignment(s) andpossible expansion of Rush River. Look at visitor info, if available. The Next Meeting was scheduled tentatively for the first week of October. NJA 9/12/01