2 Ruelle VarianceCITY OF CHANHASSEN
PC DATE: September 7, 2004
CC DATE: September 27, 2004
REVIEW DEADLINE: 10/05/04
CASE #: 04-28
BY: JM, MS, ST
STAFF REPORT
Z
<
.<
PROPOSAL: Request for a Side Yard Setback Variance to construct a three-season porch and deck.
LOCATION: 7200 Lodgepole Point
The Woods at Longacres, 4th Addition, Lot 16, Block 4
APPLICANT:
James & Kristin Ruelle
7200 Lodgepole Point
Chanhassen, MN 55317
PRESENT ZONING:
2020 LAND USE PLAN:
ACREAGE: 0.6 acre
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
Planned Unit Development-Residential (PUD-R),
Residential - Low Density (net density range 1.2 - 4u/acre)
DENSITY: NA
Request for a side yard setback variance to construct a three-season
porch and attached deck.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed
project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high
level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established
standards. This is a quasi judicial decision.
Planning Case #04-28
Ruelle Variance
September 7, 2004
Page 2
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
The applicant is proposing the construction of a three-season porch and attached deck. The proposed
three-season porch would be located 6.75 feet from the southern property line. The applicant is
requesting a 2.25-foot side yard setback variance from the required 9-foot side yard setback to permit
the construction of a three-season porch. The proposed addition would be located approximately 35 feet
from the nearest structure on the neighboring lot to the south (see Applicable Regulations).
Staff wishes to clarify that for the purposes of this variance the side yard setback was measured from the
eaves of the proposed porch rather than the footings; Chanhassen City Code 20-908 (5)(a) states:
(5) The following shall not be considered to be obstructions (variances granted from a
required setback are not entitled to the following additional encroachments):
ao
Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line,
cornices, canopies, eaves, or other architectural features may project a distance not
exceeding two (2) feet, six (6) inches;
APPLICABLE REGUATIONS
On October 6, 1993 the City Council
adopted PUD #93-3 with 34 conditions; one
of the conditions of approval stated:
Developer is responsible for
demonstrating a minimum 20-foot
separation is provided for side yards
as each building permit is requested.
Interior side yard setbacks of 6
feet for garages and 9 feet for living
areas are permitted. Side yard
setback of 10 feet is required for all
free-standing accessory structures.
All lots must comply with all other
rear and front yard setbacks.
BACKGROUND
Lake Harriso
The final plat for The Woods at Longacres 4th Addition subdivision including this property was approved
on April 14, 1997. The house was constructed in 1998. The house lies on a comer lot and, therefore, has
two front yards with setbacks of 30 feet and two side yards with setbacks of 9 feet.
Planning Case #04-28
Ruelle Variance
September 7, 2004
Page 3
ANALYSIS
The subject property is a corner lot located southwest of the intersection of Longacres Drive and
Lodgepole Point. The lot contains a single-family home, has an area of 26,136 square feet, and is zoned
Planned Unit Development-Residential (PUD-R). Because the property is a corner lot it has no rear
yard, rather, it has two front yards (those having street frontage) with setbacks of 30 feet and two side
yards with setbacks of 9 feet.
The southern corner of the house is set back exactly 9 feet from the southern property line (side yard);
however, the house was built at an angle of approximately 45° to the south property line. The patio door
which would access the three-season porch is located 5.75 feet from this southern corner leaving little
room to build out from the structure given its angle to the south lot line and its setback.
Planning Case #04-28
Ruelle Variance
September 7, 2004
Page 4
Staff realizes that the portion of the three-season porch which will require a variance is trivial (4.68 square
feet); however, in order to recommend approval of a variance, a hardship must exist. Staff has determined
that the applicant could build a three-season porch and deck without the need for a variance. The owners
have chosen a three-season porch design that would encroach on the required 9-foot side yard setback. It
would be possible to build a three-season porch that meets required setbacks by choosing a smaller design
or angling it. Therefore, staff believes this constitutes a self-created hardship.
6.75 feet
foot Setback
........... Living Ar
/ ----- = ea
/
= Eaves Overhang
Staff has reviewed variance applications filed for properties within 500 feet of 7200 Lodgepole Point. The
following are variances that have been reviewed:
Case # Address Variance Notes
00-05 7163 Fawn Hill Road 4' side & less than 20' separation Denied for screened porch
03-14 2350 Hunter Drive 26' wetland setback Approved for patio
Planning Case #04-28
Ruelle Variance
September 7, 2004
Page 5
FINDINGS
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a
variance unless they find the following facts:
ao
That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means
that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or
topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500
feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize
that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-
existing standards without departing downward from them meet this criteria.
Finding: The literal enforcement of the ordinance does not create a hardship because the design of
the three-season porch can be altered to maintain the required side yard setback. A reasonable use is
defined as the use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet. In this case, because
it is in a PUD-R zoning district, a reasonable use is a single-family home with a two-stall garage.
The property owner currently has reasonable use of the site. Approving this variance will depart
downward from pre-existing standards and set a precedent.
bo
The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other
property within the same zoning classification.
Finding: The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all properties in the
PUD-R zoning district.
Co
The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of
the parcel of land.
Finding: The three-season porch will increase the value of the property. However, staff does not
believe that is the sole reason for the request.
d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship.
Finding: The applicant has chosen a three-season porch design that will not maintain the required
setback and, in doing so, has created the hardship.
eo
The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land
or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located.
Finding: The granting of a variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other land or improvements in the neighborhood.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or
substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger
the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
Planning Case #04-28
Ruelle Variance
September 7, 2004
Page 6
Finding: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property or substantially increase the congestion of public streets or increase the danger of fire or
endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission denies a 2.25-foot side yard setback variance from the 9-foot side yard
setback creating a 6.75 foot setback to permit the construction of a deck and three-season porch at 7200
Lodgepole Point, Lot 16, Block 4, The Woods at Longacres, 4th Addition, as shown on the plans
stamped 'Received August 05, 2004' based on the findings of fact in the staff report and the following:
1. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship to warrant a variance.
2. Sufficient buildable area exists on the site at the required setbacks to permit the construction of a
three-season porch.
Should the Planning Commission choose to approve the variance, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission adopt the following motion:
"The Planning Commission approves variance 04-28 for a 6.75-foot setback as shown on the plans
stamped 'Received August 05, 2004' with the following conditions:
1. A building permit must be applied for within one year of approval of the variance or it shall
become void.
2. The proposed addition must be built per plans stamped "Received August 05, 2004."
3. The proposed addition must not encroach into the existing 5 foot drainage and utility easement.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Development Review Application
2. Letter from James and Kristin Ruelle dated 07/20/04
3. Location Map
4. Lot Survey
5. Architectural Plans
6. Affidavit of Mailing Notice
7. Findings of Fact
g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-28 - ruelle variance-7200 lodgepole pointXstaff report - rucllc.doc
CITy OF CHANHASSEN
7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:'72-00 L~J~c.~,tl¢ ~'
TELEPHONE (DayTime) ~'7.- 17
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
OWNER:
crt70l~ Ct'I~EI~I
RECEIVED
0 5 2004
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Conditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
Non-conforming Use Permit
Planned Unit Development*
Rezoning
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review
Site Plan Review*
Subdivision*
Temporary Sales Permit
Vacation o[ Right-of-Way/Easements
Variance
Wetland Alteration Permit
Zoning Appeal
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Notification Sign
X
Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost**
- $50 CUP/SPR/VAC/VAR/WAP/Metes & Bounds
- $400 Minor SUB
TOTAL FEE
Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the 15roperty must be included
with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be
invoiced to the applicant.
If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box [~
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
*Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 81/2'' X 11" reduced copy for
each plan sheet.
**Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract.
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION: 7ZOO
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
/) Cc, A..
TOTAL ACREAGE:
WETLANDS PRESENT:
PRESENT ZONING:
REQUESTED ZONING:
/~ /~
YES
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION:
REASON FOR REQUEST: '1r'~
. NO
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Plannin,g Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that if development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review, the city requires an automatic 60-day extension for development review. Development
review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by the applicant.
SignatUre of Applicant
~r~'n"a u~ ~f I~e~Dwner
Application Received on ~/,~ / 0 ~
Date
Fee Paid ~--~0 ~
Receipt No. ~'}UO /~_~SO 7
/
The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the
meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application. DOC
July 20, 2004
Sharmee A1-Jaff
City Of Chanhassen
770 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Variance for 3 Season Porch and Deck
James & Kristin Ruelle
7200 Lodgepole Point
Chanhassen MN 55317
952.401.4399
CIT~OFCHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
Please find enclosed our application for a variance to build a 3-season porch and deck on
the west facing side of our residence.
Written description of variance request.
Addition of a 3-season porch and deck that would not conform to the city of
Chanhassen's 10' minimum required setback distance on a side lot line.
Written Justification:
1. The Builder Lundgren Bros d/d not conform to the City of Chanhassen's 10'-0"
Side lot Setback when building this house.
2. The back left comer of the house was originally built 9'-0 from the south side lot
line.
3. The house was built at a 30+ degree angle toward the south lot line. The front of
the house is 42.26' from the property line and the back is 9'-0"
4. Because of the above three, any structure built will immediately impede on the
10'-0" setback see attached plot plan.
5. We have looked at many different options that are neither architecturally
appealing nor structurally possible. Options including:
a. Angling the 3-season porch.
b. Moving the 3-season porch to the north side.
c. Moving the sliding glass door and removing window.
d. Exchanging property with adjacent property owners.
6. Our home backs up to a pond and wooded area. We currently have a concrete
patio that would remain under the proposed 3-season porch. Because of the
wetlands are a hatching are for insects, the patio is almost useless after the
sunsets.
7. The rear of our house does not back up to any additional homes and the existing
wood and pond are a buffer.
8. Steven and Heather Ostermann 7224 Lodgepole Point support the issuance of this
variance. The Ostermann's share the south lot line and are directly affected by
this variance. They have seen the enclosed elevations and plot plan. There is a
large tree that buffers any visual site lines. They are in agreement that the
acceptance of this vahance has no long-term impact on there property.
9. Only 1'3" of the proposed 3-season porch will extend past the existing 9'-0"
setback that the house was originally built.
We invite you to stop by our residence and view the existing conditions.
.~.ere. l,v,
James & Kristin Ruelle
Location Map
7200 Lodgepole Point
Variance
City of Chanhassen
Planning Case No. 04-28
Lake Harrison
Lon~
~ed FoX
Subject Site
Jul 30 1,~:22:~-8 F:\SU,~60120',286\60120286 M1CHELLE
PONo TEL[/PHON[
N04°23'20" E' 10'~09
L.% 2_
/
/
/
/
/
/
I/
II
fl
11
ft
II
tt
II
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
August 26, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing requesting a variance to side yard setback for a three-season porch at 7200
Lodgepole Point -Planning Case No. 04-28 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by
enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the
envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid
thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the
records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records.
Kar~n J. Enge[fiaj/dt, Depul/y Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this ~L-~'Xday of ~, ~r:, ~., :'.~ 4- ,
2004.
Notary Public
SCANNED
o=
Lake
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is
a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and federal offices and
other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not
warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free, and the
City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose
requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features.
if errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466,03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the
City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third
parties which adse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
Lake Harriso~
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one This map is
a compilation of records, information and data located in vadous city, county, state and federal offices and
other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not
warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used to prepare this map are error free. and the
City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose
requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features.
If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §46603, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the
City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives afl claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the City from any and ali claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third
padies which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided
SCANNED
Public Hearing Notification Area (500 feet)
7200 Lodgepole Point
Variance to Side Yard Setback
City of Chanhassen
Planning Case No. 04-28
Lake Harrison
Harrison
Lone
Subject Site
SCANNED
BRUCE W & ANN L ALLEN
7215 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
WILLIAM J & JILL M BORRELL
2300 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN C BRUNO &
SONJA HAMMOND-BRUNO
7235 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
FRANCIS H & TERRI L CHEUNG
7238 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN F & NICOLE J COYLE
2333 HARRISON HILL CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHARLES T & LORI L DINNIS
2362 HUNTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOHN F & RHONDA S DOLAN
2383 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID W & PENNY J DONELSON
7164 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOSEPH R & JUDITH M EULBERG
7136 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DANIEL P & SUSAN J FAGAN
7184 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MARK J & COLLEEN M FELLNER
2323 HARRISON HILL CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DANIEL J & LISA R GLEESON
7200 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MARK R & SHEILA B HAGEN
2343 HARRISON HILL CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DANIEL J & KIMBERLY K HANSON
2390 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
THOMAS J & AMY L HIRSCH
2290 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SCOTT F & GREER A HUSSEY
2235 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHRISTOPHER ANDRIS KAULS &
NICHOLE LEE KAULS
7254 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PATRICK T & TERESA K KOCOUREK
7192 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ROBERT THOMAS KRUEGER
2350 HUNTER DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID C & GAlL J LACY
7167 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
LONGACRES HOMEOWNERS ASSN
INC
C/O LUNDGREN BROS CONST INC
935 WAYZATA BLVD E
WAYZATA MN 55391
MARK & ROBIN MULLEN
7201 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PAUL B & KRISTI L NYBERG
2391 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
STEPHEN J & HEATHER
OSTERMANN
7224 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
NICHOLAS T & NANCY L PAPPAS
2198 RED FOX CIR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
STEPHEN M & RENEE L
PAWLYSHYN
7266 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
PETER G & TRISHA T RINZEL
2251 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JAMES A & KRISTIN M RUELLE
7200 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
GARY P & JANET M RZONCA
7230 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
MARK B & MARY M SCHNELL
7227 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
SCANNED
CRAIG A & LOIS S SCHULSTAD
2378 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ROBERT T & SUSANNA A SHARP
7232 LODGEPOLE PT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
WILLIAM M JR & DEBORAH A SHAW
2278 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RUSSELL A SIMATIC &
CHRISTIE A OLSON-SIMATIC
2320 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JAY M & KELLE L STAATS
7147 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ERIC D & SHARLA K STAFFORD
2219 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
CHRISTOPHER D & SANDRA
STENDAL
7242 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JON C & DEBORAH S WADDELL
2375 LONGACRES DR
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
ANDREW I & TINA M WHITE
7122 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
JOSEPH J WITTERSCHEIN &
LESLIE M WlTTERSCHEIN
7150 HARRISON HILL TRL
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
THOMAS L & SUSAN M YEZZI
2320 HARRISON HILL CT
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
DAVID J & PATTI P ZIMMER
7214 FAWN HILL RD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
RICH SLAGLE
7411 FAWN HILL ROAD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
IN RE:
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND ACTION
Application of James and Kristen Ruelle for a side yard setback variance to
construct a three-season porch and attached deck.
On September 7, 2004, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly
schedule meeting to consider the application of James and Kristen Ruelle for a side yard
setback variance to construct a three-season porch and attached deck located at 7200
Lodgepole Point. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed
variance that was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission
heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the
following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development - Residential
(PUD-R).
The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density.
The legal description of the property is: Lot 16, Block 4, The Woods at
Longacres, 4th Addition.
The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City
Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts:
The literal enforcement of the ordinance does not create a hardship because
the design of the three-season porch can be altered to maintain the required
side yard setback. A reasonable use is defined as the use made by a majority
of comparable property within 500 feet. In this case, because it is in a PUD-
R zoning district, a reasonable use is a single-family home with a two-stall
garage. The property owner currently has reasonable use of the site.
Approving this variance will depart downward from pre-existing standards
and set a precedent.
b. The conditions upon which this variance is based are applicable to all
properties in the PUD-R zoning district.
Co
The three-season porch will increase the value of the property. However,
staff does not believe that is the sole reason for the request.
The applicant has chosen a three-season porch design that will not maintain
the required setback and, in doing so, has created the hardship.
The granting of a variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood.
The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of public streets or
increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially
diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood.
5. The planning report #04-28 Variance dated September 7, 2004, prepared by
Josh Metzer, et al, is incorporated herein.
ACTION
The Chanhassen Planning Commission the variance to allow the
construction of a three-season porch with attached deck within the required side yard
setback.
2004.
__ by the Chanhassen Planning Commission on this 7th day of September,
CHANHASSEN Planning Commission
BY:
Planning Commission Chairperson