Administrative Section
Administrative Section
"TI
o
...
..03
(.110
~...
. (1)
co -.
coj
--
. 0
co'"
_3
0.0
0. :::!'.
o g
...
n
o
j
ë
n
-
""C
«It
~
j
ñ-
::r
@
8
...
(1)
o
~
n
o
3
"
...
o
C
«It
I
>
j
a..
(1)
...
«It
o
j
'"
(1)
o
~
~
(1¡
P-
~.
::1
· · ::r:
~~o
\D 0 8
~0(1¡
"-J\.>J'"';j
00 00 ....
VI \.>J ¡::;.
(1¡
~ ~
~: M" C/)
::r ::r ~
¡.....·¡...o·u
::1 ::1 0
o r-t <:
::1 ::r (1¡
re .... r-t
8~R""
..... 8 >:;Ì
ñ) ==-: ~
re .....
'" ::1
Q
r-t
ñ'
'"
~
re
....
~
(JC¡
~
8-~
re re
~cÆ
..... re
· · ::1 ::r:
~~Qo
ON·rot ¡::
00 0 '<; r6
v v ~ ::r
~G\<:o
ooore_
"-J\D~p-
~~(JC¡........
¡...oo _. n ::1
S-S- 8
S' 5' 8
o r-t re
::1::r ¡;;.
re (i '"
8 re ¡::
:=..:8 ~
(t) _. r-t
(;" ~
'" ::1
r-t
E
~
~
0-
o
<:
re
,-~;~d.--- -
~
o
"'0
¡::
-
~
r-t
· · * * · õ'
~7N"-J~::1
N ,:::.,. v \D
~a.~~oot:J
....·0 ....... \D re
::rb~...........8
~ ::1 re .... 0
re JQ ::1 ~. re (JC¡
(JC¡ re ¡:: p-~. ~
.... . . e:.. re p- "'0
~ \.>J ::1 re ::r
p- ~ "'0 ¡;¡ ::1 .....
¡:: ,g ~ ¡;¡ Q
~ ¡::..... ~ ..
re r:> 8- ;;.
o r-t..... ::r
.... õ·::1....·
¡:: ::1 0 ::1
::1 (JC¡::1 8-
p- .... re ....
~ 0 8 re
(JC¡ ~..... re
~ ::r (;" ê.
¡:: (;"
~ '"
r-t
re
P-
re
(JC¡
....
re
re
'"
----.
tJ:I
E.
p:
S'
.....aq
$:~~~
~OVlVl
ñ' (i g g
r-t '"
::rr-t
(1¡ ~
~ ¡::
r-t ....
re ~
.... ::1
..... r-t
en ~.
.... r-t
re re
::1 '"
~ ~
~
r-t
S'
(JC¡
$:Ë3
><' Õ'
re ....
P-8
¡:: ~
'" r-t
re õ·
(i P.
r-t
Ë.:
'" '"
...... ......
o 0
...... ......
::1 ::1
re (1¡
~ ~
o (i 9
EB PJ rÞ
() _. Þ-t
Po) (t) ¡..o..- r-t
_. CI'J (/') ¡:ù
r:> "'0 "'0 S .
0-~~8
~(;"~~g
r-t
re
><
"'0
~
::1
p-
S'
(JC¡
~
o
ffi
()
re
.
r-<
o
()
~
r-t
õ'
· p.
.
~ g5:. a ~
o r-t p:; Ë.: ()
o ~ () ~
o ~ re ~ re
<:::1greP-
g... p- 8 g Ëï
5..:98-~8-
re ~ ~ ~ (1¡
"'::1"....::r
"'0 ::r ~ ::1' re
~ ~ ~ 8 ~
C/) C/) I-t (1) I"""t
o-re:;;-"::1o
'<: ::1 ~ r-t ......
r-t t:J CI"J e-: r-t
::r ........0 '" R""
¡;;'::1 ¡:: ~
'" ::1 ~ ¡::;. n
..... re .... r-t ::r
~ .... (1¡ ~
re >-J5- ::1
~ ::r 0 ::r
() re"'O ~
::r ~ "'0 ~ p- ~ 5' 9
~ (JC¡
o
::1
::r:
¿q'
::r
~
~
VI
~
~;::o
n __ '"
:r)( m
Q CD
:J 0.. .....
:r I
Q c: (I)
~ ~ .....
~ ;:0 ;::0
.. CD m
~ª'. m
-. - .....
5.......
CD 0 (I)
~ ~ ;::!
늷 ~
ë5
z
r/:~'}'f) If~(f'~...,,¡
ry.:r
~
d- '.lJb CÀ .w"'k.~ r do.
*
If you report elsewhere, see over.
05.. /
a:
d.rr ~ s c. II fÐ '1Í...:S L. r/Jt.1
What is the total number of Bluebird boxes you monitored this year?
What is the total number of boxes paired?
What is the average distance nom one pair to another?
How often do you check your trail?
(Often ] 00-200 yards)
';;0
:2...
.:J..S'
;;. r:~
'3
3
Ie¡
I~
/3-
0 ð
¡V,¡J~
How many Bluebird boxes were occupied by Bluebirds? (nest started)
How many successful Bluebird broods? (where one or more Bluebirds fledged)
How many Bluebird eggs were laid? ,
How many eggs hatched? (cannot be greàterthan # of eggs laid)
How many chicks fledged? (cannot be greater than # of eggs hatched)
How many Bluebird boxes did House Wrens try to use/use successfully?
What methods were used to discourage House Wrens?
How many Bluebird boxes did House Sparrows try to use/use successfully?
How many boxes were used successfully by tree swallows?
J~
;...
# Boxes used by chickadees? /1 ¡/ ~ # Boxes used by other species? tJo µ-'L
Was predator protection used on pole? Yes I@ Did it work? Yes I no
Type of pole protection used: mnooth PW baffle, grease, other, none, (Circle one)
Was predator protection used on entrance? Yes I@ Did it work? Yes I no
Type of entrance protection used: wire guard, 2X4 wood block, other~ (Circle one)
ProblemslComments:1Pplt ð"f.C.A.V4.- ~ ~
· ::tk.4..l .....I.... If
~
.......r
If f.AA.c..~ -.<
.s~
. at!
~
Please return this form by September 15,2004 if you wish to be included in and receive a copy of the Bluebird Directory 2004.
Send to: BBRP/Scriven, 2044 Cedar Lake Pkwy, Mpls., MN 55416.
/C< _ _ ~ _ 1 n
....
1'r'(J 1 11 t"\~
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Minnesota Valley
National Wildlife Refuge
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
Project Update
September 2004
Comprehensive Conservation
Plan Receives Final Approval
In September 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) announced the completion of the comprehensive
conservation plan for the Minnesota Valley National
Wildlife Refuge and Minnesota Valley Wetland
Management District.
The comprehensive conservation plan, or CCp, is intended
to outline how the Refuge will fulfill its legal purposes and
contribute to the National Wildlife Refuge System's
wildlife, habitat and public use goals. The plan articulates
management goals for the next 15 years and specifies the
objectives and strategies needed to accomplish these goals.
While the planned future condition is long- term, we
anticipate that the plan will be updated every 5 to 10 years
based on information gained through monitoring habitat
and wildlife, as well as recreational usage.
Established in 1976, Minnesota Valley NWR was borne out
of citizen concern for the diverse and abundant fish, wildlife,
and plant communities of the Lower Minnesota River Valley.
Today it consists of eight units along a 34-mile stretch of the
Minnesota River located between historic Fort Snelling and
the City of Jordan. The Savage Fen Unit is also located in
the valley but is not immediately adjacent to the river.
Nearly 12,500 acres of the authorized 14,000 acres are
currently owned in fee or managed as part of the Refuge.
Some areas are not owned by the Service but are adminis-
tered through management agreements. Although the
Refuge is the single largest landowner along this portion of
the river, the valley itself contains a patchwork of owner-
ships including private landowners, non-profit organizations,
corporations, cities, counties, and lands administered by
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR).
Scott Sharkey
This mosaic of ownerships offers great opportunities for
partnerships but also requires a great deal of coordination
and cooperation among all land managers.
Where You Can Find the CCP
The CCP is available online at http:// midwest.fws.gov/
planning/Minnesota Valley/index.html, and copies are also
available at Refuge Headquarters: Minnesota Valley NWR,
3815 American Blvd. East, Bloomington MN 55425.
The Planning Process
The Minnesota Valley NWR CCP effort began in 1998 with
internal scoping of the issues among Refuge and Regional
Office staff. Throughout the duration of the planning
process, we worked with the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, representatives of local communities,
Friends of Minnesota Valley NWR, and many others.
Public involvement has been a key part of the process. We
began by hosting seven open houses to discuss the plan.
Based on the comments we received in these meetings, we
formed issued-based work groups to study particular
Minnesota Valley NWR and Wetland Management District Comprehensive Conservation Plan
Scott Sharkey
issues. These groups included volunteers, technical experts,
hunters and anglers, local government officials, and DNR
staff. Once the draft CCP was released for comments, more
open houses were conducted in July 2003. The plan received
final approval in September 2004.
The foHowing is a summary of major issues that are
addressed in the goals, objectives, and strategies developed
in the CCP:
Refuge Recreational Uses
· Hunting
· Fishing
· Recreational trail system
· Bicycling
· Horseback riding
· Canoeing
Habitat
· WetJands
· Grasslands/oak savanna
· Floodplain forest
· Upland forest
Fish, Wildlife and Plants
· Exotic plant species
· Nuisance wildlife
· Critical migratory bird nesting areas
· Endangered and threatened species
Resource Threats
· Storm water, spi11s and persistent contaminants
· Land use and development adjacent to the Refuge
Land Protection
· WetJand District
· Existing Refuge and beyond
Environmental Education
· Public use facilities
· Qua1ity of interpretive media
· Qua1ity of exhibits
· Public awareness of Refuge and resource protection goals
Who We Are and What We Do
The U.S. Fish and Wild1ife Service is the primary federal
agency responsible for conserving, protecting, and
enhancing fish and wildlife and their habitats for the
continuing benefit of the American people. Our specific
responsibilities include enforcing federal wildlife laws,
managing migratory bird populations, restoring nationaHy
significant fisheries, administering the Endangered Species
Act, and restoring wildlife habitat such as wetJands. The
mission of the Service is to work with others to conserve,
protect, and enhance fish, wildlife and plants and their
habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
The Service's role also includes managing the National
Wild1ife Refuge System, the world's largest co]]ection of
lands specificaJly managed for fish and wildlife. The System
is a network of more than 540 national wildlife refuges
encompassing more than 93 mi11ion acres of pub1ic land and
water. The mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System
is to administer a national network of lands and waters for
the conservation, management and, where appropriate,
restoration of the fish, wild1ife and plant resources and
their habitats \vithin the United States for the benefit of
present and future generations of Americans.
Scott Sharkey
Project Update / September 2004
Refuges are also unique places for people. When it is
compatible with wildlife and habitat needs and the purpose
for which the refuge was established, they can be used for
wildlife- dependent activities such as hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, photography, environmental education
and environmental interpretation.
Refuge and District Vision
The Refuge and the District will add richness to the social
cultural, economic, and ecological communities by holding'in
public trust, a portion of the natural heritage of the Minne-
sota River Basin and the Cannon River Watershed for the
continuing benefit of the American people. Within its area of
influence, the Refuge and District will make significant
contributions toward:
· Establishing an unbroken corridor of floodplain and
hillside forest, wetlands, oak savanna, and native prairie
along the Minnesota River
beginning at historic Fort
Snelling and proceeding up
river to its origin at Big
Stone Lake;
· Managing diverse and
abundant native fish and
wildlife populations that use
healthy and productive
native plant communities of
the Minnesota River and its
watershed plus the Cannon
River and its watershed;
· Providing Minnesota citizens Scott Sharkey
the opportunity to revitalize
their spirits through high
quality \vildlife-dependent recreation such as hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography,
environmental education, and interpretation;
· Supporting a community-based effort where citizens,
businesses, private conservation organizations, and local,
state, and federal agencies combine their efforts to
restore and protect the Minnesota and Cannon rivers and
their watersheds for future generations.
Refuge Goals
The CCP established clear goals for Minnesota Valley
NWR and Wetland Management District over the next 15
years. Objectives for achieving each goal and strategies for
achieving each objective are detailed in the CCP. Goals for
the Complex are:
· Floodplain Forest: To restore, protect, and maintain
natural species diversity while emphasizing priority
wildlife and plants characteristic of floodplain forests
within the northern tallgrass prairie ecosystem.
· Wetlands: To restore, protect, and maintain natural
species diversity while emphasizing priority fish, wildlife
and plants characteristic of wetlands \'lithin the
northern tallgrass prairie ecosystem.
· Upland Forest: To restore, protect, and maintain
natural species diversity while emphasizing priority
wildlife and plants characteristic of upland forests
within the northern tall grass prairie ecosystem.
· Land Protection: To enhance the integrity of lands
within the authorized boundary of the Refuge and
contribute to the protection and restoration offish and
wildlife habitats within the Minnesota River watershed.
· Public Use: To provide high quality wildlife-dependent
recreational and environmental education opportunities
to a diverse audience. These activities will promote
understanding, appreciation and
support for Minnesota Valley
National Wildlife Refuge and the
Wetland Management District as
well as the entire National Wildlife
Refuge System.
To accomplish these goals, 27
objectives have been identified. A
number of strategies for each
objective provide additional detail
regarding how the objective will be
accomplished.
Management Direction
Over the course of the next 15 years, we will promote active
management of existing habitats, higher quality recreational
experiences for visitors and improved public outreach
strategies. Refuge staff"will continue to restore and maintain
existing wetland, grassland and floodplain forest areas. Oak
savanna habitats may receive new and intensive mainte-
nance applications. The Refuge's authorized boundaries are
expanded by 10,737 acres. Actual acquisition \vill be depen-
dent upon willing sellers and the availability of funds. The
Wetland Management District's Waterfowl Production Area
program will also expand as worthy sites are identified.
Integrated biological controls and harvest methods will be
used to control exotic plant or nuisance wildlife species.
Horseback riding and the use of snowmobiles and mountain
bikes will be limited to authorized segments of the Minne-
sota Valley State Trail. The environmenta] education
pro¡"'Tam could see a new visitor education facility upriver
with needed improvements in existing exhibits and interpre-
Minnesota VaUey NWR and Wetland Management District Comprehensive Conservation Plan
tive materials. Additional staff, along with volunteers and
interns, will be essential to implement an expanded public
use program.
Refuge Mitigation Projects
Beginning in 1989, the Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC) began to explore alterna-
tives for expanding the operations of the
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
This action lead to the preparation of an
environmental impact statement that consid-
ered building a brand new airport or expand-
ing the existing facility. Ultimately, the
Minnesota State Legislature weighed in on
this issue and directed MAC to construct a
new north-south runway on existing airport
property.
Implementing the Plan
This CCP outlines an ambitious course of action for the
future management of Minnesota Valley NWR and Wetland
Management District. It will require considerable staff
commitment as well as funding commit-
ment to acquire more wildlife habitats,
to maintain existing public use facilities
and to develop additional high-quality
public use facilities. The Refuge will
continually need appropriate opera-
tional and maintenance funding to
implement the objectives in this plan.
The new runway will be constructed on the
west side of the airport roughly parallel to
Cedar Avenue. Although the south threshold
of the runway will be nearly 1 mile away from
Refuge lands, the use of this runway will
result in overflights, on average, every other
minute between 500 and 1,000 feet above the
river valley. The impact of these overflights to the Refuge
and its various programs is significant. Although current
literature is not conclusive concerning the impacts of
overflights on area vrildlife, there is no question that the
noise generated from these flights will significantly affect
noise-sensitive public use activities such as bird watching,
environmental education, and nature hikes.
USFWS
Following prolonged negotiations, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service agreed to a settlement to compensate for damages
associated to Refuge facilities and programs.
In developing this Plan, the Service sought to replace the
public use and wildlife values that ",,:ill be affected on the
Refuge by future aircraft overflights. In addition, the
Service sought to provide mechanisms for the long-term
administration and management of the new lands and
facilities that will be acquired with Refuge Mitigation Funds.
Included as strategies within this CCP are projects that
have been designated as airport mitigation projects. They
include the acquisition of lands, the construction of the .
environmental education center and interpretive facilities,
plus intern housing. These projects are described in greater
detail in Appendix L of the CCP
The CCP details program planning
levels that are above current budget
allocations. As such, the Service will use
the plan for strategic planning and
programs. The plan is not a commit-
ment for staffing or operational and
maintenance increases, or funding for
future land acquisition.
Our highest priority projects for the
Refuge include:
· Improve maintenance of visitor facilities
· Inventory and control the spread of exotic species
· Construct Rapids Lake Environmental Education Center
or Classroom Modules on Refuge units
· Construct residence at Rapids Lake Unit for Refuge
employee with law enforcement authority
· Convert historic home into environmental education site
· Construct intern housing on or near Rapids Lake Unit
· Hire park ranger and staff for Rapids Lake Environmen-
tal Education Center.
Wetland Management District priority projects include:
· Hire a full-time maintenance worker
· Improve visitor access to District lands
· Hire a senior \Vildlife biologist
· Hire a full-time law enforcement officer.
CHANHASSEN PARKS AND RECREATION
7700 MARKET BLVD.
P.O. BOX 147 RECelV
CHANHASSEN MN 55317' ED
, SEP
PHONE 952-227-1121(Jerry Ruegemer:-) 012004
CJTY OF CHANHASSENICNIC EV ALU A TION
In order to better serve participants using our picnic facilities, we ask that you take a few
minutes to answer the following questions and give us some suggestions. Thank you!
Group Name:( optiona~ ~JriJ ('(I./J.f)
~{/lÀ-lf
Excellent
Picnic Facility ~ Anr)f' p(LV\~
Good A verage Fair
(Please circle one)
Poor
Procedure for reserving picnic YB 2 3 4 5
Picnic Reservation Fee 2 3 4 5
(!)
Was facility clean 1 3 4 5
Were there enough tables/grills, etc. 1 2 3 4 5
Did facility meet your expectations 1 Q 3 4 5
Overall impression of facility 1 G 3 4 5
Comments: ~ Û'v\_LLt, fvó0 Le n·, ~ hew\.. l.L.O.o ~.. ~
~. ~l$~~~ .
~~~!b D"DC~ ~f~· " ~- - ' '. ; .l'ŒD ';1~~
What did you like most about your picnic facility: ~WJ\ JeÁl\ C2 , ~~-'
-t~~ 'tZ~~~l.d~L ~tê"-'~ ~~¿~Y.J'
(Evaluation Form continued on other side)
What amenities would yóu like added?
What improvements could be made to better the facility?
Do you have any suggestions or ideas to better the picnic reservation process?
Additional Comments:~-(,. h (I tL 0- rue); ~r' <4-. ~
(1 J-tM cLe.A b J~..J ~ J aJ.- ~ ~ (~J !
~~ )~
Thank you for taking the tiâcomPlete this evaluation.
Your input and comments are very important to us.
Have a great day!
CHANHASSEN PARKS AND RECREATI~CEIVED
7700 MARKET BLVD. SEP 0 9
P.O. BOX 147 2004
CHANHASSEN MN 55317 CIlYOFCHANHASSEN
,
PHONE 952-227-1121 (Jerry Ruegemer)
PICNIC EVALUATION
In order to better serve participants using our picnic facilities, we ask that you take a few
minutes to answer the following questions and give us some suggestions. Thank you!
Group Name:(optional)
so
Picnic Facility LA cL C Sv5 ~
Excellent Good A verage Fair Poor
(Please circle one)
Procedure for reserving picnic CO 2
Picnic Reservation Fee 1 (i)
Was facility clean 1 2
Were there enough tables/grills, etc. CY 2
Did facility meet your expectations Q 2
Overall impression of facility ø 2
Comments: -r ()41 f'J ¿¿ '7<..-1...1 I
3
4
5
345
;:;')3 ~~5 12e;-r .
~ æ.ro"""5 W&;-f4:.
C7 Ie .jv<ý
3 4 5 ¡f Eí'!-¿O'''
5 I~Ü ,N'&-
3
4
5
3
4
5
What did you like most about your picnic facility: VIa-tV M 7l-fç L.4~b¡
f Ilc y. ( A.{{ -[ '( d f- f uw kllc-Ã- Co,¿ (' rJ r <-II tlov; ,+..f-d E; P ¿A c£,
(Evaluation Form continued on other side)
What amenities would you like added? 5/ N k ;ð--t- ¡J /W ) LION.
What improvements could be made to better the facility?
Do you have any suggestions or ideas to better the picnic reservation process?
Additional Comments:
Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation.
Your input and comments are very important to us.
Have a great day!
· .
CHANHASSEN PARKS AND RECREATION
7700 MARKET BLVD.
P.O. BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
PHONE 952-227-1121 (Jerry Ruegemer)
PICNIC EV ALVA TION
In order to better serve participants using our picnic facilities, we ask that you take a few
minutes to answer the following questions and give us some suggestions. Thank you!
Group Narne:(OPtionai)æ,~"t:-V~T Picnic Facility L4ke 4"'1 ßt//'l~~
,
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
(Please circle one)
Procedure for reserving picnic cJ 2 3 4 5
Picnic Reservation Fee 1 cD 3 4 5
Was facility clean 1 2 @ 4 5
Were there enough tables/grills, etc. cD 2 3 4 5
Did facility meet your expectations 1 6) 3 4 5
Overall impression of facility 1 (j) 3 4 5
Comments: ¡;/ /?;(¿ -þ:.. !ý, J;yvy Ú45 -eyþ~<A'Lý h,þþ!
I / / )
What did you like mo t about your picnic facility: ~r ~¡;;/¡; (¿ - ?-U? if 4~/1¿Æ'.f
Vb e.""0 g. rC S)
(Evaluation Form continued on other side)
What amenities wouldyóu like added?
What .improvements co~ld b~ made to better t~~ facil~ty? ~ 4¿z cf! 0 /aj c-f c¿ e-j;¿ .~
~ -¡-c:.,. .4'~.¡;~ CL--J ~ . e>lJ v5f ¿.ie-/',' -~, ov-£' ~
w (J. €~ v- 54.vV1s . /-'t ,Cc jZe., //4 ú;: /~".h h
Io/¡ 4 ke ,1- ed.5' e>..--. fr--- P'7.s- /..u--t{ v-- þ/4 4-v'-' ~ ~ ? fi; I
¿/' ~
Do you have any suggestions or ideas to better the picnic reservation process?
P</ t:..e '-'l.-
?t./ð2 5 0..01 vc--
,. 3
~ ~~.f?. ,
/e. , J-
ø:> /:7' / S' d¿1e.iq
Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation.
Your input and comments are very important to us.
Have a great day!
CHANHASSEN PARKS AND RECREATION
7700 MARKET BLVD.
P.O. BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
PHONE 952-227-1121 (Jerry Ruegemer)
RECEIVED
EP 0 8 2004
CHANHASSEN
PICNIC EVALUATION
In order to better serve participants using our picnic facilities, we ask that you take a few
minutes to answer the following questions and give us some suggestions. Thank you!
Group Nome:(optionol) {Øü,/¡J t:í?fÝP/ Picnic Facility .lúk~ ßa ,/o,!
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
(Please circle one)
Procedure for reserving picnic LY 2 3 4 5
Picnic Reservation Fee 1 éJ 3 4 5
Was facility clean 1 ~ 3 4 5
Were there enough tables/grills, etc. 1 (j) 3 4 5
Did facility meet your expectations (i) 2 3 4 5
Overall impression of facility (þ 2 3 4 5
4~
What did you like most about your picnic facility: r;~~ . ~
(Evaluation Form continued on other side)
Whataménitie5-,ouldyoulikeadded? .¿~ -/ /h,@Þ A ~.~
./..h~á~.~A~
What improvements could be made to better the facility? ø¿f// £q~ k
~
Do you have any suggestions or ideas to better the picnic reservation process? ~/
Additional Comments:
(;t2J: ;f/<Z///.Þ --+ ;Ii ¿0 /þ~
/4jVúÁ¿Vt"ß,
Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation.
Your input and comments are very important to us.
Have a great day!
CHANHASSEN PARKS AND RECREATION
7700 MARKET BLVD. RECEIVED
P.O. BOX 147 SEP 0 7 2004
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
PHONE 952-227-1121 (Jerry Rue8élrl;2~fHANHASSEN
PICNIC EVALUATION
In order to better serve participants using our picnic facilities, we ask that you take a few
minutes to answer the following questions and give us some suggestions. Thank you!
Group Name:(optional)~\Me(~ Picnic Facility ~ ~
~
Excellent Good Average Fair Poor
(Please circle one)
Procedure for reserving picnic ø 2 3 4 5
Picnic Reservation Fee Q 2 3 4 5
Was facility clean 1 CD 3 4 5
Were there enough tables/grills, etc. ð) 2 3 4 5
Did facility meet your expectations {D 2 3 4 5
Overall impression of facility Ð 2 3 4 5
Comments:
What did you like most about your picnic facility:~
of ~ ~kt __ ---:6k:>'4 ~5
çÞt-lc~ \~ ~
'1P u..Þ<l~
(Evaluation Form continued on other side)
What amenities would you like added?
What improvements could be made to better the facility?
Do you have any suggestions or ideas to better the picnic reservation process?
Additional Comments: \).Je W~ ù~ ~D ~~ '\k
~c.k- l0o-'\Lk?\ ~ ~~ L.iérM=..:>· ~ -\~ 010
"--(ùi+l- ~u.- Þ4.YfDk~"\\c..J><...U...-\ ) 60-\ ~ u.-\~ Lk-l~ --(~
~ \..-0Cù4) ~ ut.e/, -
~ \-t~~r;;- ~ \D.:)~~EL-- *"Ç>~ \L ~ ~. ..--
Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation.
Your input and comments are very important to us.
Have a great day!
ù£ Lé0 ~
..J>0 C-C~ ~
~~'\Ó r-(~.. - t
~ fLJé>\ic-----\~
~~t>L? ~ H~-\
f:;A~ J--:c-
~ Gal\~