Loading...
Findings of Fact Ú"\- \ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION INRE: Application of Greg and Kelly Hastings for a side yard setback variance to permit the expansion of a single-family home. On June 1,2004, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly schedule meeting to consider the application of Greg and Kelly Hastings for a setback variance for the property located at 9217 Lake Riley Boulevard. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan was preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single Family Residential, RSF. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lots 24 and 25, Shore Acres. 4. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall not recommend and the City Council shall not grant a variance unless they find the following facts: a. That the literal enforcement of this chapter would cause an undue hardship. Undue hardship means that the property cannot be put to reasonable use because of its size, physical surroundings, shape or topography. Reasonable use includes a use made by a majority of comparable property within 500 feet of it. The intent of this provision is not to allow a proliferation of variances, but to recognize that there are pre-existing standards in this neighborhood. Variances that blend with these pre-existing standards without departing downward from them meet this cri teri a. Finding: The applicant has made a reasonable proposal that conforms with the existing use of the property. b. The conditions upon which a petition for a variance is based are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Finding: The condition upon which the petition for the variance is based is applicable to other properties within the same zoning classification. There are numerous properties in this neighborhood that have received variances. c. The purpose of the variation is not based upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land. Finding: While the proposed expansion will increase the value of the property, the intent of the variance is to create a more functional interior, match the existing roof lines and provide a home office. d. The alleged difficulty or hardship is not a self-created hardship. Finding: The expansion of the house is caused partially because the house was developed prior to the current ordinance and the proposed expansion is dictated by the location of the existing structure. e. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel is located. Finding: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or other land or improvements in the neighborhood. f. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: The proposed side yard setback variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood since this structure already exists. 2 5. The planning report #2004-19 dated June 1,2004, prepared by Nathan Bouvet is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDA TION The Planning Commission approves seven-foot (7') side yard variance to Section 20-615 of the Chanhassen City Code to allow a home office addition to a single-family home provided the wall, including the eaves, follows the garage foundation line. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 1 st day of June, 2004. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: çcw Its Chairman 3