PC Report 11-16-04
~
z
<
u
~
~
~
~
<
<
~
<
~
~
~
~
rJ)
PC DATE: 11/16/04
[!]
CC DATE: 12/13/04
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
REVIEW DEADLINE: December 14, 2004
CASE #: 04-31
BY: RG, LH, ML, MS, JS, ST
ST AFF REPORT
PROPOSAL: Hidden Creek Meadows - Subdivision approval for a 23-lot subdivision with
Variances. The development proposal includes a Wetland Alteration
Permit to permit the crossing of a creek and wetland with a public street.
LOCA TION: At the ends of Pipe wood Lane and Cartway Lane north of Highway 7.
APPLICANT: D & G of Chanhassen, LLC
7820 Terrey Pine Court
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
(952) 949-4715
PRESENT ZONING: Single-Family Residential, RSF
2020 LAND USE PLAN: Residential- Low Density (net density range 1.2 - 4.0 units
per acre)
ACREAGE: 19.2 acres
DENSITY: 1.2 units per acre gross; 2.04 units per acre net
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting subdivision approval for a 23 lot
development with a variance for one flag lot. In order to cross the creek for the extension of
Pipewood Lane, a wetland alteration permit is also being requested.
LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning
Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. This is a
quasi judicial decision.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Subdivision Ordinance for a variance. The City
has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a
deviation from established standards. This is a quasi judicial decision.
Location Map
Hidden Creek Meadows
City of Chanhassen
Planning Case No. 04-31
Lake Minnewashta
8CANNED
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16, 2004
Page 2
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The developer is requesting subdivision approval to create a 23-lot subdivision with one outlot
containing a wetland and creek as well as the proposed storm water pond for the project and right-
of-way for the extension of Pipewood Lane and a small cul-de-sac. One lot, located on the eastern
edge of the development, is proposed as a flag lot for which a variance is being requested.
The property is located in an area that is zoned Single-Family Residential, RSF District. The
property to the east was developed with single-family homes as part of the Minnewashta Meadows
subdivision. The property to the south is being developed with single-family homes as part of the
Hidden Creek of Chanhassen development.
A large wetland complex is located in the southern portion of the property, which is located within
proposed Outlot A. A creek from Lake Minnewashta to Lake Virginia traverses the southern
portion of the property. The site has scattered areas of woodlands with canopy coverage of only
nine percent. The site slopes from the north to the south with a high elevation of 970 in the north-
central portion of the project, adjacent to the regional trail, and a low point of 938 at the creek.
Sewer and water service is available at the end of Pipewood Lane. The watermain is being looped
to Meadow Court.
The proposed development, as recommended to be revised, complies with all the requirements of
the RSF district regulations and is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff is recommending
approval of the proposed development with the elimination of two lots and subject to the conditions
of the staff report. These building envelopes would not accommodate the types of housing the City
has typically seen in adjacent development. Nor will the building envelops permit construction of
accessory structures that many residents want including decks, storage sheds, play equipment and
pools and may in the future lead to variance requests.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 18, Article III, Design Standards
Chapter 20, Article VI, Wetland Protection
Chapter 20, Article XII, "RSF" Single-Family Residential District
BACKGROUND
These properties were originally platted as part of Schmid's Acre Tracts in 1914 at which time the
right-of-way for Cartway Lane was dedicated. There are four existing homes with outbuildings on
the site. Three of the homes are currently accessed via Astor Trail in Victoria. The other home is
accessed via Cartway Lane. The property to the east of the site, Minnewashta Meadows, was
platted in 1988. The property to the southwest of the site, Hidden Creek of Chanhassen, was platted
in 2003.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 3
LANDSCAPINGffREE PRESERVATION
Tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations for the Hidden Creek Estates development
are as follows:
Total upland area (excluding wetlands)
Total canopy area (excluding wetlands)
Baseline canopy coverage
Minimum canopy coverage allowed
Proposed tree preservation
13.12 ac or 571,866 SF
1.18 ac or 51,726 SF
9%
25% or 142,967 ac.
0% or 0 ac.
Developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage allowed and is proposing to remove all
trees on site, excluding those located within a wetland or wetland buffer and setback area. The
removal of the existing 9% canopy coverage will be penalized by requiring replacement
plantings at a rate of 1.2 times the existing coverage.
Difference in canopy coverage
Multiplier
Total replacement
Total number of trees to be planted
51,726 SF
1.2
62,071 SF
57 trees
Additionally the developer must bring the total canopy coverage for the site from 9% up to the
required 25%. The calculations are as follows.
Difference between existing and required coverage
Number of trees required for 25 % coverage
16% or 2.1 acres
84 trees
A total of 141 trees are required for this development. The applicant's landscape plan proposes
141 trees, but fails to specify the quantity of each species proposed. The landscape plan plant
schedule shall be revised to reflect this.
Bufferyard requirements are as shown in the table:
Landsca in Item
Bufferyard B* - South
property line, 260'
Re uired
3 overs tory trees
5 understory trees
5 shrubs
Pro osed
6 overs tory trees
13 understory trees
existing vegetation
The applicant meets the minimum requirements for the bufferyard. No existing vegetation shall
be removed for the planting of the bufferyard. Any existing trees removed shall be replaced at a
rate of 2: 1 diameter inches.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 4
WETLANDS
Existing Wetlands
One wetland basin was delineated on December 8,2003 by Wetland and Wildlife Consulting,
Inc. The delineated wetland located along the southern portion of the property has been
classified as a Type 3 wetland with Type 1 characteristics around the wetland perimeter.
Vegetation within the wetland boundary included reed canary grass and river bulrush.
Proposed impacts to the wetland include the filling of 5,756 square feet of wetland and installing
a 42" culvert within Hidden Creek, a DNR protected creek. Mitigation of filling activities are
planned by creating 7,420 square feet of created wetland area. The remaining mitigation area
needed of 4,317 square feet is to be addressed through storm water ponding. The preliminary
plans do not call out the amount of area to be provided with proposed ponding activities. The
area of the created stormwater pond should be included on the construction plans to verify
wetland mitigation plan areas.
The applicant should submit a detailed plan of new wetland credit construction. Construction
plans should include a cross sectional diagram of proposed new wetland credit construction. It
appears that the proposed wetland mitigation area may not receive adequate hydrology to support
a replacement wetland. The applicant should work with staff to revise the wetland mitigation
area so it receives adequate hydrology (e.g., discharge from the proposed storm water pond) to
sustain the required wetland functions and values. A vegetation plan should be created for new
wetland credit construction with approved native, noninvasive species. The applicant should
also create a 5-year monitoring plan for new wetland construction to ensure proposed wetland
function and value is obtained. Monitoring plan should include annual reports as stated in
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (8420.0600-0630).
Wetland buffer widths of 16.5 feet to 20.0 feet must be maintained around all wetlands on-site.
All structures must maintain a 40-foot setback from wetland buffer. The buildable areas of Lots
1,10 and 13, Block 2 should be revised to eliminate encroachment into wetland and creek
setback areas. Wetland buffer areas should be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance
with the City's wetland ordinance. The applicant should install wetland buffer edge signs, under
the direction of City staff, before construction begins and will pay the City $20 per sign.
Creek
The DNR protected creek running from Lake Minnewashta to Lake Virginia runs through the
site. All structures should maintain a 50-foot setback from the ordinary high water level of the
creek.
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
The plans propose to grade about 75% of the site for the 23 new house pads, proposed street
ending with a cul-de-sac, and a storm water pond. The proposed grading will prepare the site for
full basement, lookout, and walkout-type dwellings. The plan proposes a retaining wall in the
back yard of Lot 8, Block 1. It appears the wall will be some six to eight feet in height. The
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 5
applicant should be aware that any retaining wall over 4 feet will require a building permit and
must be designed by a Minnesota Registered Professional Structural Engineer. Also, the
retaining wall must be 20 feet off the back of the building pad to provide adequate area for a
backyard and deck.
The existing site drains to a wetland along the south side of the parcel. Under developed
conditions, the street, front yards and most of the house roofs and rear yard drainage will be
conveyed via storm sewer to a proposed storm water pond for treatment prior to discharging to
the existing wetland. The proposed development will be required to meet the existing
stormwater runoff rates for the 10- and 100-year, 24-hour storm events. The applicant has done
a good job of attempting to preserve the existing drainage pattern of the wetland on the site
through the use of a storm sewer culvert. Where the proposed street has bisected the wetland,
the culvert will act as a conduit and allow the water to flow as it would under existing conditions.
There is an area in the rear yard of Lot 10, Block 1 that will need to be revised to prevent
trapping water behind the curb. Also, staff recommends that storm sewer and catch basins be
added in Pipewood Lane between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 to capture and treat additional site runoff
prior to it flowing off-site. In order to capture storm water runoff from Cartway Lane, a catch
basin shall be included on the north side of the cul-de-sac at the east end of Pipewood Lane.
Staff has received drainage calculations for the development and only minor revisions are
necessary. The proposed pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program
(NURP) standards. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a lO-year, 24-hour storm
event. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the public
storm drainage system including the pond, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100-year
flood level. The minimum utility easement width must be 20 feet wide.
The applicant has included silt fence around the grading perimeter. Adjacent to the pond and
wetlands, silt fence type II must be used. A 75-foot minimum rock construction entrance must
be added to the entrance that will be accessed during construction. In addition, an erosion
control blanket will be required for the steep slopes along the north property line of the site. The
applicant should be aware that any off-site grading will require an easement from the appropriate
property owner. All disturbed areas must be sodded or seeded and mulched within two weeks of
grading completion.
Storm Water Management
The proposed development is required to maintain the existing runoff rates. Complete storm
water calculations should be submitted to ensure the proposed storm water pond is adequate to
support post-development runoff rates.
Easements
Drainage and utility easements should be provided over all existing wetlands, storm water inlet
and outlet structures and storm water ponds.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 6
Erosion Control
Erosion control blanket should be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3: 1. All exposed
soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year-round, according to
the following table of slopes and time frames:
Type of Slope Time
(maximum time an area can remain un vegetated
when area is not actively being worked)
Steeper than 3: 1 7 Days
10:lt03:1 14 Days
Flatter than 10: 1 21 Days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil
areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system,
storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that
discharge to a surface water.
Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets should be completed anytime construction site soil,
mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked
materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system.
Construction site access points should be minimized to controlled access points with rock
entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction.
The City's standard detail plate for silt fence should be included on construction plans. Silt
fencing should also be considered on the northwestern portion of the property if runoff from
offsite creates an erosional threat to northwestern slopes of the construction site.
Surface Water Management Fees
Water Quality Fees
Because of the impervious surface associated with this development, the water quality fees for
this proposed development are based on single-family residential development rates of
$1,028/acre (2004 rate). Based on the proposed developed area of approximately 11.26 acres,
the water quality fees associated with this project are $11,575.
Water Quantity Fees
The SWMP has established a connection charge for the different land uses based on an average
City-wide rate for the installation of water quality systems. This cost includes land acquisition,
proposed SWMP culverts, open channels, and storm water ponding areas for runoff storage.
Single-family residential developments have a connection charge of $2,545 per developable acre
(2004 rate). This results in a water quantity fee of approximately $28,656 for the proposed
development.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 7
At this time, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat
recording is $39,231.
Other Agencies
The applicant shall apply for and obtain pe¡mits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g.,
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, United States Army
Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval.
UTILITIES
Municipal sewer and water service is available to the site from existing mains, which run along
the eastern property line and from Pipewood Lane on the southwest corner of the parcel. The
applicant is proposing to extend sewer and water lines along the proposed streets to service the
proposed lots. The watermain will be looped through the site to avoid stagnant water issues.
According to the City's Finance Department records, there is a remaining assessment balance of
$25,477.05 on the parcel. This balance is required to be paid at the time of final plat recording.
Since the developer will be responsible for extending lateral sewer and water mains, the sanitary
sewer and water connection charges will be waived. However, the sanitary sewer and water
hookup charges will still be applicable for each lot. The 2004 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for
sanitary sewer and $2,814 for watermain. Each of these charges is based on the number of SAC
units calculated by the Metropolitan Council. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be
specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance.
Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest
edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and
specifications must be submitted at the time of final plat for staff review. The applicant is
required to finance all of the proposed improvements. The applicant will also be required to
enter into a development contract with the City and to supply the necessary financial security in
the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the
conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies must be
obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, Department of Health, MnDOT, etc.
STREETS
The plans propose to extend Pipewood Lane, as the main road, approximately 1300 feet within
the site. The public streets are shown within a 60-foot right-of-way, as per City ordinance, along
with street pavement widths of 31-feet back-to-back and a 45.5-foot radius on the cul-de-sac.
Staff is concerned with the tight curb radius on the cul-de-sacs. In order to accommodate
emergency fire vehicles, the curb radius must be a minimum of 30 feet. Due to the long length
of the proposed cul-de-sac and the practice of having two connections int%ut of developments,
staff is recommending that the existing gravel road known as Cartway Lane be connected to the
proposed cul-de-sac at the eastern border of the site. This will be an interim connection until the
properties to the north develop and Cartway Lane is vacated.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16, 2004
Page 8
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
Comprehensive Park Plan
The proposed Hidden Creek Meadows is located very near Cathcart Park. Cathcart Park is a
neighborhood park owned by the City of Shorewood, but located within the corporate boundaries
of Chanhassen. Convenient access to the park is provided by the proposed sidewalk connection
along Pipewood Lane connecting with Cartway Lane. No parkland dedication is recommended
as a condition of this plat. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final
plat.
Comprehensive Trail Plan
This property abuts the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Light Rail Transit
Corridor. Currently this corridor is managed by Three Rivers Park District as a regional trail
with an aggregate surface. Access to the trail from Hidden Creek Meadows is provided by the
proposed sidewalk connections to Pipewood Court and Cartway Lane. No additional trail
construction is recommended as a condition of this plat.
COMPLIANCE TABLE
Area (square feet) Frontage (feet) Depth (feet) Setbacks (feet):
front, side, rear,
wetland (from
buffer edge)
Code 15,000 90 125 30,10,30,40
Lot 1, Block 1 46,554 108 281 30,10,30,40
Lot 2 20,072 88 @ 179 30,10,30, na
Lot 3 15,071 90 167 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 4 15,079 90 167 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 5 15,086 90 167 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 6 15,175 90 169 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 7 17,931 90 171 30,10,30, na
Lot 8 15,395 72 @ 147 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 9 38,795 55 @ * 165 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 10 15,011 65 @ 144 30, 10, na, na
Lot 1, Block 2 24,102 175 171 30,10,30,40
Lot 2 16,240 90 180 30, 10, 30, 40
Lot 3 16,669 90 191 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 4 15,050 94 195 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 5 15,167 94 206 30,1O,30,na
Lot 6 15,385 94 222 30, 10, 30, na
Lot 7 19,855 90 229 30,10,30,40
Lot 8 20,701 90 230 30,10,30,40
Lot 9 20,711 90 230 30, 10, na, 40
Lot 10 20,714 90 230 30, 10, na, 40
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows'-Planning Case No. 04-31
Novernber 16,2004
Page 9
Area (square feet) Frontage (feet) Depth (feet) Setbacks (feet):
front, side, rear,
wetland (from
buffer edge)
Lot 11 20,673 90 230 30, 10, na, 40
Lot 12 16,365 90 200 30, 10, 30, 40
Lot 13 48,655 # 30& 368 30, 10, 30, 40
Outlot A 259,580
ROW 88,073
Total 832,129
@ Meets 90 feet width at the 30-foot building setback line.
* 90 feet width at the 30-foot building setback line must be verified.
# Excludes 6,045 square feet included in the neck portion of the lot.
& Meets the 100-foot lot width at the flag.
Flag lots are appropriate when the configuration of the property, natural features and abutting
development make it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. The subdivision
regulations, section 18-60 (a) states that "all lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage
on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or by a private street; or a flag lot which shall
have a minimum of thirty (30) feet of frontage on a public street". Had this property and the
property to the east developed concurrently, a public street could have been extended south from
Cartway Lane with lots on both the east and west sides of the street. However, the property to the
east was developed previously with access from Meadow Lane. The use of the flag lots creates a
large lot which can be developed without encroaching in to the wetland area.
Historically, the City has required that wetlands be included within Outlots. Staff is recommending
that the lot lines for Lots 1 and 13, Block 2, be revised to include most of the wetland within Outlot
A. This reduces the potential for residents to inadvertently impact the wetlands due to alterations to
their property. Lot 1, Block 1, which includes the creek and adjacent wetland, has a significantly
constrained building site with a width of 35 feet and a depth of 60 feet. This building envelope
would not accommodate the types of housing the City has typically seen in adjacent development.
We are recommending that the wetland and creek on the west side of Pipewood Lane be
incorporated in a separate outlot resulting in the elimination of Lot 1, Block 1, as it is presently
proposed. Another lot that is severely constrained by wetland setbacks is Lot 10, Block 2. The
building envelop will not permit construction of accessory structures that many residents want
including decks, storage sheds, play equipment and pools and may in the future lead to variance
requests. Staff is therefore recommending that Lot 10, Block 2, be eliminated in its present
configuration and that the area of this lot be included in the areas of the other properties in Block 2,
allowing other lots to gain additional width to accommodate the wider type houses that we have
been seeing in the community.
In order to remove individual lot frontage on Highway 7, the southerly portion of Lot 13, Block 2,
should be included as part of Outlot A. A preferred area would include all the lands up to the
forcemain manhole located just east of the property line and north of the lift station.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16, 2004
Page 10
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion:
'The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends preliminary plat approval for a subdivision
with a variance for a flag lot, plans prepared by Ryan Engineering, dated August 20, 2004, revised
October 14,2004, subject to the following conditions:
1. A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard setback area of each lot.
2. Tree protection fencing is required around all trees proposed to be saved. Any tree lost will
be replaced at a rate of 2: 1 diamctcr inches.
3. Applicant shall submit to the City a table listing the lot and block and the number of trees
required on that property prior to final plat approval.
4. A landscape plan with a plant schedule that specifies the proposed quantities of each species
shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval.
5. The developer shall reduce the grading on Lot 9, Block 1, to reduce the amount of tree
removal in the northeast corner of the site.
6. The developer shall verify that Lot 9, Block 1, meets the 90 foot lot width at the 30 foot
building setback line.
7. The developer shall revise the southwesterly lot line of Lot 1, Block 2, to incorporate the
wetland within Outlot A.
8. The developer shall revise the westerly lot line of Lot 13, Block 2, to incorporate more of the
wetland within Outlot A. Additionally, the land in Lot 13, Block2 lying approximately 270
feet south of the south lot line of Lot 12, Block 2, shall be included in Outlot A.
9. Lot 1, Block 1, shall be eliminated as presently configured. The wetland and creek west of
Pipewood Lane shall be incorporated in a separate Outlot.
10. Lot 10, Block 2, shall be eliminated as presently configured. The additional area shall be
apportioned to the other lots in Block 2. The re-configured lots shall permit building areas
for the typical longer homes being constructed in the vicinity as well as provide a yard area
behind the home for accessory structures without encroaching in to the wetland setback
11. Wetland buffers and wetland buffer setbacks shall be shown on all surveys for properties
impacted by wetlands.
12. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before
building permits will be issued.
13. Demolition permits must be obtained prior to demolishing any structures on the site.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16, 2004
Page 11
14. Separate sewer and water services must be provided cach lot.
15. Retaining walls more than four feet high must be designcd by a registered structural engineer
and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction.
16. No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be
removed from site or chipped.
17. Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed.
Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of
construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary
street signs shall be installed on each street interscction when construction of new roadways
allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4,
18. A 20-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees,
shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure fire
hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen
City Ordinance #9-1.
19. The area of the created storm water pond shall be included on construction plans to verify
wetland mitigation plan areas.
20. The applicant should work with staff to revise the wetland mitigation area so it receives
adequate hydrology (e.g., discharge from the proposed storm water pond) to sustain the
required wetland functions and values.
21. The applicant shall include details to new wetland construction including: 1) cross-sectional
diagram, 2) revegetation plan and 3) wetland monitoring plan.
22. A wetland buffer 16.5 to 20 feet and a wetland setback of 40 feet from the wetland are
required. Buffer edge shall be maintained around all wetlands within the development.
Wetland buffers shall be preserved, surveyed and staked in accordance with the City's
wetland ordinance. The applicant shall install wetland buffer edge signs under the direction
of City staff, before construction begins and shall pay the City $20 per sign.
23. The buildable areas of Lots 1, 10 and 13 within Block 2 shall be revised to eliminate
encroachment into wetland and creek setbacks.
24. All structures shall maintain a 50-foot setback from the ordinary high water level of the
creek.
25. Final storm water calculations shall be submitted indicating that the development shall
maintain exiting runoff rates and storm water infrastructure is adequately sized for the
proposed development. Calculations shall consider imports from offsite that will use
proposed storm water infrastructure.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 12
26. Drainage and utility easements shall be providcd ovcr all cxisting wetlands, storm water inlet
and outlet structures and storm water ponds.
27. Erosion control blankets shall be installed on all slopes greater than 3: 1. All exposed soil
areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to
the following table of slopes and time frames:
Time
(maximum time an area can remain unvegetated
Type of Slope when area is not actively being worked)
Steeper than 3: 1 7 Days
1O:1t03:1 14 Days
Flatter than 10: 1 21 Days
These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil
areas with a positive slope to a storm water convcyance system, such as a curb and gutter
system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems
that discharge to a surface water.
28. Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site
soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow
tracked materials or residuals of that matelial to enter the storm water conveyance system.
29. Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock
entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction.
30. Silt fencing shall be installed along the northwestern edge of the property to reduce the
effects of storm water run on from off site onto the project.
31. The total SWMP fee based on the 2004 SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of
final plat recording is $39,231.00. These fees may be revised after the beginning of 2005.
32. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g.,
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, United States
Army Corp of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval.
33. Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat.
34. Prior to final plat approval, a professional civil engineer registered in the State of Minnesota
must sign all plans.
35. Prior to final platting, storm sewer design data with a drainage map will need to be submitted
for staff review. The storm sewer will have to be designed for a lO-year, 24-hour storm
event. The pond is required to be designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
standards. Drainage and utility easements will need to be dedicated on the final plat over the
public storm drainage system including ponds, drainage swales, and wetlands up to the 100-
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 13
year flood level. The minimum utility easement width shall be 20 feet wide.
36. Type II silt fence must be used adjacent to all ponds and wetlands. A 75-foot minimum rock
construction entrance must bc added to the entrance that will be accessed during
construction. In addition, an erosion control blanket is required for the steep slopes along the
north property line of the site. The applicant should be aware that any off-site grading would
require an easement from the appropriate propcrty owncr. All disturbed areas must be
sodded or seeded and mulched within two weeks of grading completion.
37. The remaining utility assessment due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is
$25,477.05. In addition, the sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for
each of the new lots. The 2004 trunk utility hookup charges are $1,458 per unit for sanitary
sewer and $2,814 per unit for water. Each of these charges is based on the number of SAC
units calculated by the Metropolitan Council.
38. Public utility improvements will be required to be constructed in accordance with the City's
latest editions of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and
specifications will be required at the time of final platting. The applicant will also be
required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial
security in the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the
improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. Permits from the appropriate
regulatory agencies must be obtained, including but not limited to the MPCA, MNDOT,
Department of Health, etc.
39. Show all of the existing and proposed easements on thc plans.
40. Show all of the existing utilities on the plans.
41. The proposed development is required to meet the existing storm water runoff rates for the
10- and 100-year, 24-hour storm events.
42. The walk-out elevation of the proposed homes must be a minimum of 3 feet higher than the
adjacent pond or wetland high-water-Ievel.
43. Revise the plans to show a 30-foot minimum curb radius on the cul-de-sacs.
44. On the utility plan:
a. Show the proposed storm manhole rim and invert elevations.
b. Show the proposed culvert invert elevations.
c. Add a note "any connection to existing structures must be core drilled."
45. On the grading plan:
a. Show the benchmark used for the site survey.
b. Show all emergency overflow elevations.
c. Show all proposed contour elevations.
d. Show the location of thc 75-foot rock construction entrance.
e. Show the retaining wall top and bottom clevations.
Planning Commission
Hidden Creek Meadows-Planning Case No. 04-31
November 16,2004
Page 14
f. Show the proposed NWL and HWL of the pond.
g. Add a catch basin on the north side of the cul-de-sac at the eastern end of the project.
46. On the plat sheet revise the street right-of-way adjacent to Cartway Lane from 33.5 feet to
43.5 feet.
47. The existing temporary pavement turnaround for Pipewood Lane just south of this site must
be removed when Pipewood Lane is extended. Any disturbed area must be sodded and
restored.
48. The retaining wall in the rear yard of Lot 8, Block 1 must be 20 feet off the back of the
building pad.
49. Add storm sewer and catch basins in Pipewood Lane between Lots 1 and 2.
50. Revise the rear yard grading of Lot 10, Block 1 to prevent trapping water behind the curb.
51. The existing gravel road known as Cartway Lane must be connected to the proposed cul-de-
sac at the eastern border of the site.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
2. Development Review Application.
3. Letter from Dean Carlson to City of Chanhassen dated 10/15/04.
4. Reduced Copy Existing Conditions Plan.
5. Reduced Copy Preliminary Plat.
6. Reduced Copy Preliminary Site and Utility Plan.
7. Reduced Copy Preliminary Grading Plan.
8. Reduced Copy Tree Replacement and Landscape Plan.
9. Affidavit of Mailing Notice, Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List.
g:\plan\2004 planning cases\04-3l - hidden creek meadows\staff report.doc
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE:
Application of D & G of Chanhassen, LLC, for subdivision approval for a 23 lot and one
outlot residential development with a variance for a flag lot and a wetland alteration
permit for the crossing of a wetland with a public street.
On November 16, 2004, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly
schedule meeting to consider the application of D & G of Chanhassen, LLC for
preliminary plat approval of propel1y. The Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by publishcd and mailed notice. The
Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and
now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Rcsidential, RSF, District.
2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential - Low Density.
3. The legal description of the property is: see attached Exhibit A
4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven
possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven (7) affects and our
findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance and meets all the
requirements of the RSF, Residential Single Family District;
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional
plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan;
c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography,
soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding,
1
and storm water drainage are suitable for the proposed development subject to the
conditions specified in this report.;
d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm
drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements
required by this chapter;
e. The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage;
f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record, but will
provide all necessary and required eascments; and
g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the
following exists:
1.) Lack of adequate storm water drainagc.
2.) Lack of adequate roads.
3.) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems.
4.) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems.
5. In order to permit flag lots, the city must find that the following conditions exist:
a. The prevailing development pattern makcs it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct
a public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of
existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence
of wetlands. Ideally, a roadway would have been extended straight south from
Cartway Lane with half the right-of-way contributed by each property. However,
the property to the east was developed previously with access off Meadow Lane.
b. After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public
street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to
provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. Additional public
street access is not required for the property to the east which is already developed.
c. The use of the flag lot will permit cnhanced protection of the city's natural resources
including wetlands and forested areas since the flag lot is sufficiently sized such that
any proposed structures can comply with all required wetland setbacks.
6. V ARIANCE FINDINGS - Flag Lot
a. The hardship is not a mere inconvenience, but provides a means for preserving
natural features on site.
2
b. The hardship is caused by the PaJ1icular physical sUIToundings, shape or
typographical conditions of the land.
c. The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally
applicable to other propel1y.
d. The granting of the variancc wi II not be substantially detrimcntal to the public
welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of the subdivision ordinance, the
zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan.
7. The planning report #04-31 dated Novembcr 16,2004, prepared by Robert Generous,
et aI, is incorporatcd herein.
RECOMMENDA TION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
Preliminary Plat with a variance for the use of a flag lot.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16th day of November,
2004.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING
COMMISSION
BY:
Its Chairman
3
EXHIBIT A
All that portion of the n0l1heast qua¡1er of the northeast quarter of Section 6, Township
116 North, Range 23 West, lying south of the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad
Company's right-of-way as now established, Carver County, Minnesota.
Records of Carver County
Abstract Property
Property Address: 4001 Aster Trail, Chanhassen, MN 55331
AND
That part of Lot 8, Schmid's Acre Tracts, lying n0l1h of a westerly extcnsion across said
Lot 8 of the south line of Lot 6, Schmid's Acre Tracts; together with an easement for
driveway purposes over and across the east 50 feet of that part of Lot 8, lying northerly of
a line parallel with and distant 16.5 feet southerly of a westerly extension of said south
line of said lot 6 across said Lot 8, Schmid's Acre Tracts.
Property Address: 3921 Aster Trail, Chanhassen, MN 55331
And
That part of Lot 8, Schmid's Acre Tracts, lying south of a westerly extension across said
Lot 8 of the south line of Lot 6, Schmid's Acre Tracts.
Established Carver County, Minnesota
Records of Carver County
Abstract Property
Property Address: 3931 Aster Trail, Chanhassen, MN 55331
AND
4
Lot 7, Schmid's Acre Tracts, according to thc rccordcd plat thercof on file and of record
in the Office of the Register of Dccds, Carver County, Minnesota.
Abstract Property
Property Address: 6301 Cm1way Lane, Chanhassen, MN 55331
5
o~ /3 J
RECEIVED
AUG 2 0 2004
CITY OF CHANHASS!N
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION
APPLICANT:
.ò+ <b 0-+ C1Aú'^- hçS:;Sé""-, Lee
7Z-~2o 'ìt.H è.r. l ?'Yl~ (;.:"v.-.--1--
~~-e."- \d('c...~, í~ C- . p'Vl", <;s-.?¿/ 1-
OWNER:
Se-e_ A--\\c..c1..t qQ \>ro(d'U"Lr
6~ l"le4~ L"ð f--.
ADDRESS:
ADDRESS:
-- Î ' -A
1:,\".' VL J b \,,,",
I"A"
TELEPHONE (Day Time) C;S'2 -9i/9-tj 7-1 S--
TELEPHONE:
'60C; -!.oCC'(') eJJJ..12
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit
Conditional Use Permit Vacation of Right-of-Way/Easements
Interim Use Permit "K Variance;:> 2, G.- {-¿CÐ ,CLJo
Non-conforming Use Permit K Wetland Alteration Permit Æ27-S~ ~
Planned Unit Development* Zoning Appeal
.
Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Sign Permits
Sign Plan Review K Notification Sign .t( / '7 S-o CJ
X Escrow for Filing Fees/Attorney Cost** 51>. -
Site Plan Review* - $50 CUP/SPRNACNARIWAP/Metes & Bounds
(1 $400 Minor SUB)
K '1lo~ TOTAL FEE $-'2 uL-lo, ~ 1 J lo~D
Subdivision* C£o ~C~'d 0 ;~ ;/'(0
Mailing labels of all property owners within at least 500 feet of the boundaries of the property must be included
with the application -OR- the City can provide this list (Carver County properties only) for an additional fee to be
invoiced to the applicant. ,') . \ f f! . I' .- j
/ '<.: s....L~ /0 b fDf
If you would like the City to provide mailing labels, check this box IL:?"
Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews.
*Twenty-six (26) full-size folded copies of the plans must be submitted, including an 8%" X 11" reduced copy for
each plan sheet.
**Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract.
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
SCANNED
PROJECT NAME:
N l\R~evt ê-r eeh fJ'ZcC2C{~
?-Q~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
(7
~e
/I" \ .,
( r L ¡, Ilt'te \:..L;0- X .
, a J\ i iA '-'"
LOCATION:
PRESENT ZONING:
Î cr. I 2- ¿(
;X YES
K'bF
i~ )) R.
NO
TOTAL ACREAG E:
WETLANDS PRESENT:
REQUESTED ZONING:
?e2 )&e;A~Q lDvJ
REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION: LJ)~
REASON FOR REQUEST: \ V¡~_ -.Ç,V\cY Î? O_~-Ife'1\ ( CGKI.·lt1G\çJ/'ê'~
~.;W~~>-I\ C_'f"t.':-~~ ts.i-e...k~
Oú\ç>l~
PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION:
ø~
This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information
and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, you should confer with the
Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application.
A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of application submittal. A written
notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within ten business days of application.
This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with
all City requirements with regard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom
the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have attached a copy of proof of ownership
(either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title or purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person
to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application.
I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further
understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any
authorization to proceed with the study. The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
The city hereby notifies the applicant that if development review cannot be completed within 60 days due to public hearing
requirements and agency review, the city requires an automatic 60-day extension for development review. Development
review shall be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by the applicant.
~~~~~~
Signature of Applicant
c¿ (.20/0 l(
ate
Signature of Fee Owner
Application Received on
V!le> ,/~?!
Date
tf;
J . ñ~
Fee Paid , l" 10 .
Receipt No.!iJW 55<-14-
The applicant should contact staff for a copy of the staff report which will be available on Friday prior to the
meeting. If not contacted, a copy of the report will be mailed to the applicant's address.
G:\plan\forms\Development Review Application.DOC
~;'j.,;..~ \.';' . <';,
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Blvd.
Chanhassen. MN. 55317
Attn: Planning Department
October 15th 2004
Subdivision application for: Hidden Creek Meadows
This proposal for Hidden Creek Mcadows has a long history of anticipation and
prcparation by these four property owners and the developers. With the recent complction
and development of Hidden Creek Estates. they have joincd together cooperatively to
facilitate the city ofChanhassen's plans for its furthcr expansion.
The city's vision for Pipewood Lanc to somcday reach Cartway Lane or 6211d Street West
will with this projects approval be one step closer to reality. The redevelopment ofthis
approx. 19.24 acres of land is in kccping with the city and county's vision to eliminate
the ecological damage caused by the active wells. septic systems and hohby farm runoff.
Thesc parcels are located on one ofthc county and cities most important water shed's.
Effecting the lakes of Minnewashta. Virginia, Minnetonka and hence the Minnehaha
Creek water shed. With the approval of this subdivision plan the bcnefits can only
enhance thc areas quality of living for mothcr-nature and its currcnt and future residents.
The plans provide for improved storm water run ()ff collection ponds \vith natural
purification bcfè)re it contaminates the crcck running fmm Lake Minnewashta to Virginia.
While creating 23 affordable residential building sites for residcnts of these adjoining
communities Chanhassen, Victoria. Shorewood and even Excelsior.
..
Our application contains only one request for a variance which meets with District
Regulations and is compliant with ordinance standards. Variance to create Lot 13 BJock 2
via a 30 ft. curb flag lot extension providing access a viable 54,700 SF parcel (over 3.5
times the minimum lot size) with 136 feet of right of way on highway seven. The
approval of this lot via the flag/neck provides fè)r a quality use of this large parccl
eliminating the need for any access from Hwy 7. while creating an attractive westerly
oriented walkout building site.
We respectfully thank you in advance for your time and thoughtful consideration for
approval for this subdivision plan.
\
Dcan Carlson, President
0& G of Chanhassen, LLC.
7820 Terrey Pinc Court
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
952-949-4715
..
SCANNED
R€ng
LAND DfVELOPMfNT SERVICES
434 Lake $treel
Ex_, MN 553:rI
(952) 380-5000
------
1,*""'~_:tIiop'""""""""",,,,,
",,~_,,_"'b1mt"'INoOO"'1
_...,.,.-.....thOIl'"".~
:-::_tho_o/!ho
......
~
o;¡;
Hidden Creek
Meadows
Chanhasaen. MN
~
.~~ for
..
~~.
.~
" D&Gof
Chanha.ssen, LLC
r.~.. Eden Prajrie, MN
1-
ProjfÞcl N",
li ~,,";"gvom~
Ndokrt~.dwg
Dr,"",8)'
"'-0
Ch«*..a By
""
Dot.
4120/Q..4
~--_.-
1:ItI5I1)4 FM Wetland ~b
/~. ---
Ileue<.lFor- Cat&:
~~l ~.
-....... -
......
~
Existing
Jf Conditions
Plan
~ "-
P-1
~Z\AJ04 mArt
~
><
¡¡
~....
§
$
..
\
. DOIOTES fCU/D SI.JR\.£'r' Iof<>UWÐH
<SJ CEN01ES EX!S11101G s.AAlTAAY SùIUt W""'*iŒ..E
:tI ŒNOTES UOfT PO.!
-0- œHOTES ÞO'/II£R PO....E
,~ O(HOID EX!S11101G ~ !£III£R WANHŒL
o DOICTrS 07S111«> 1D.D'HON£: BOX
. DOI01ISEXIS11HO~'IRŒ
oS Of.NOTE!EX!S11Io1G'TRŒ
~DÐ.¡I
LEGEND
EXISTING CQnOJRS
- 927 - PftCPOSED COt1'UllR'S
U.' EXIS11NG SPOT El£VA nOH
-<J- Sontt'Ql')'Seww
-1- WATER
----1--------t H'rO. W!VIoLV[
-<M- STORW SE'I€R
~!:ng
lAND DEVUOPMEI>iT 5U1VI(~S
434 LU:. Sb-eet
EtcellØ', ~ 55331
(952) 300-5000
-.....--
........,...,.......---.
.--,.-.,....-...
=:E:.-::"":'':.::-'..
-
-~
-
Hidden Creel<
-~/----- Meadows
CI>e.Ma8oen. IAN
----r ,,~ (
-- for
" ~*
-----
'-. D&Gof
ChanhaBSel\ l.l..C
E- Eden Prairie. MN
""".kl I\iø.
[ ()rvíl~rr-", ,""""
~-md-pr~
or-c-iJ"
"-"
~odBT
""
~-
.-
..-
1OfI5/C\(I"'wrCb~
~ '1)/'tI.'04~N.-
~""'.
"'""'~-
---
-- -
~ -
-
C2004I'11'AN~Þk::.
LOT AREA DATA
;wQ.£ F-'.M. OC\1lCAlÐ<r ~
LOTM.NfJOI W. co
~oo" ...,,,
10.072 ,
;~~~ ,
,,~ ,
;7.~~~ ,
,
r5.J95 ,
Jð".,5 ,
/5.011 "
"
DEVELOPMENT DATA
-.
~cr~ LLg:::::::::=::::
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
/
/
/
/ /
/ /
/C
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
RECEIVED
OCT 1 5 2004
éHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT
"0
2~.I02
rð,)f{!
r&,"'"
.,"'"
1~1I7
.,'"
.""
2(J,70r
20.]11
;~:;~;
,~,~
,,=
/
~
l>-
II
i
u
12
13
,: /,
¿/
'"
9 10 11
~ I
(I
~ ,
;::....;1I:t...--....--~ '"
........w~
r.:xn "",,""UlJO
O<~"'».>J'
V
~
,
TWo
!!
4""::;d:"
! /",.;F"
A
/!
I 0' S I
!
f
ovn..OT
A
'v
..
..
1
B~OCK
----s c---¡{ ¡'
~9(J,_'iZ1
j',J27
.,
.,
~~:1E::~."::.ø~~:./~..d.~7':,'~;I~H:
_"r~ÇcunI)'
=:~<KJ01"-1"'T<df.~_j$JJf
...
~~,j :t~~~¡'¿1Tfi:~-;;:~~ ~~;!i:ff~1
:::::;J::':-'~~Traf'~ ~:"~_lÞl 6 __ Jt1Jd L-x &. S<;hnJd'. A<n li"tJe11
...
'::f'\~ ~~ 1. ~. =- r~~ ,,..., -..VI 0'" .....,MI" -.,,- --- -
...t~c..:-C<>II!I)I~<J.
R~ '"~ c--- Ccu~IJ'
~::;;g, ~ )'PJr A,I,., rrnII. 0'>a?II"",...,. /IN ßJJr
...
~1t:.~:: ~rv.:','~~~~t;O ¡,¡r:,~::r;- plot tt...-,
,oþ_I~y
f'r<:p«!.~A4<T~ðJ(J1~lf'(1yl......Q\<r>""""",.¡'¡II!i&JJr
"
< Ý'
.' .
¥-~ //
.\" /
.. /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Tolol8l.00<:
"'9-II-CICK
Preliminary
Plat
P-2
-
)f
~
I
\,
~
í'i'
¿. 60' 120 1~
Ø'
- ~
/"-~
'-!1
.....00
"
.'
. oyiLor
I "
f
¡-- - I t-----"""" c~':""'"
S£CTl<:H5
I' .
a-'
f----- -r---::::" /' ¡<:,"
/ ~ v--:v-
~ ~ ;;~.!;~~!:;r: ~[
~
~
~
i;
I
I---~~*
.
I 2 I
~-----~
/
// I
"//// )
~~~ /
" /
V
R~~2ng
LAND DE\¡ElO:>MENT SErrviCES
434 Lake street
ExoeWor, MN 55331
(952) 380-5000
-----
,,.....,.-u,O'>q\....P'<r\..-t"'"
..'--'_~od~""'(;fin:lor"'
di'1ocI--'ot>dU'>QI''"'''~
=.....ooj=.in:Ioru.o_oltho
s'"""",,,-~--
...--
~
Hidden Creek
. C<H£C7ICW '" Meadows
~ ... Chanhassen. MN
~~
~o~~ for
---<~..
" D &: G of
Chanhassen, LLC
Eden Prairie, MN
ProjK-r.^/o.
I DH;i!d Dro,.,y,r; Nom.
~, ~~.dwg
Orc"", By
<La
Chr:dnM 8"
.....
Dat.
ð/ro/0.4
R~"~imJ
tJ!J5fQ4PerCltvCorfvnenb._
Isou&d For: ~_
-""""~
""""~~
,.,..,..,.,-~
-- ~
....... -
""""""""
:;;..:-
Preliminary
Site and
~ j( Utility
~i Plan
I --
-
~ P-3
1Z0'
-þ-
-,-
-I-+-
II
t
"i
~¡, ,
II '
"
s
/
/
/
/
/
,,~
LEGEND
...,... """"'"'"
SotIItorys.-- -<1_ SAH1"ARY~
WATER -. I - WA1'£R
WT'tl. WfVN....'IE ----j-~ H'!'C. w;V~1/E
STORWSE'/IID! -<3<,1- S'T<R.4SE"\II£R
~~.".'...'."..'..'..'.''''.''
q~
""''''''''"'''
"""""
·---·-------_~_'.!!:!.I~.!-.~_~
o /'
/' '.~
/
/
/
I
I
I
I 2
~-----
~"I
i~i:11
I "II
I ii!1
II ::11
11)111
1-\1
I :'11
1;- : ~II
':: II
IIi II
o 2004 RYAN ene:fIH). NC'..
BUILDING DATA
RfJTR ro ARCH7FC7!.A?A1. DRAWWCS FOR EXACT 8Uf/..IJING DlMÐ6KlN$.
SITE DATA
~ -
GR'OSSS1TE:~ ~I'"
RlGHTOF~rs no""
WIT SlTF M£)' --
SITE DENSITY -
2J S1NGl..£-FN.IIL Y DIlf£UJN(; UM1S ON 18.2.- >'Ie U./Ac'
SETBACKS
f1ICWT YIIRD (FR'OiI ROW) Je'
"'" ''''''' I~
REM ''''''' XI'
/
i
\, I
m
~ ,- -l
I I
~-----~
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~ /
~,\ / - )
\ / ¿
',,~ /
,
~"0 /
", ';;V
"""'"
BU>G """'"
/
/
/
/
/
/
R~~~ng
LAND DEVELOPMENT SH¡\':CE5
434 Lak., SVeeJ
Ex_, MN 55331
(952) 380-5000
------
1....«>oo<Uy_INO"""'~'......
"'''-'_pr......yll'lO''',,-,dw.,J
..<I___OI'Id~I,",,'ÛY
=~=-'"""'tI>o_oItt-.o
'-'
~~!!<>.~
...
Hidden Creek
Meadows
Chamasser\. ~
for
D &: G of
Chamasaen, LLC
Eden Prairie, MN
noj«:f i'<c.
DigfMI Drooti'lr; Nom~
~,.dpl..a..dIIog
Drawr> By
<1Q
CMcl'>d By
""
DaM
"20/Q..4
~--~
k)tJ:5/04 PerCtIY ~
IAue< For: [)at&'
-"-">-
~~;;:;"A===
""'- -
~ ~-
-
Preliminary
Grading
Plan
- -
.....
P-4
,
,
oc'
-LL" ~
-..' . ----( . '\\
~~ ~
. ~~..
.,,~
V '-
- ...
\ r,..
\ ¡L.
¡:;,
. .~
~7:"
'~
"
\)
';.\
\
t
* * é w<nA>V
y....-- NW1. _ 919..0
HWl - ,,,.. J"
)(
..~ ~
~
~
::>
o
, .
l
~
I I
WETLAND REPLACEMENT CALCUlA nONS
FUmWE1\...ANO.. ~
TOTAl. FU.£D \ll£'l\..AHD ... 5.75ð SS
RE?t..JoCOIENT REQlJR£D ... 2:1 .. ~n:,e . 2.. 11.~12 SF
1ST 1,1 NÐ :as Œ 2J« 1:1 R[W\Rn) 1'0 BE HEW WEtl.M()
N£W~REQUft£D- S.75ð.1-Z:1-7.~SF
(AREA F'LUD . 1.2~)
CRUPEÞ 'lCrUND .. Lf2Jl.1i[
TOTI>L NEW WE11.ANO AA[A
REMAI,*,C 75:11: ~ 2H) ,,1
RÐ.IAI~Q-'REARECIlJIRED
SIJRf"",œ AA£A c:F ~Q
5.7""xQ,15-4.317SF
120'
"
'"
I
I
--
/
e2004m~~f'IIC.
GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
COHTfUCTCR 5HAl.1. CCl<iTACT ~ STAÆ "aE CA.I1.. Fœ UWTY LDCArICWS loT ~-ß4-C002
THE COIffflACTOff 91Ai..l. ~ T'H£ LOC::04 710/11 AND lUVA ~ (Y' asr/N(; vnu7D Me
~ F£A1lJItfS.",1/'I me otfNfRS ND F'EJ.J>-'rfR£Y PRIOR ro CONStRVCT'KW. THe
CONTRACroR SHALl. ~1D.Y NO'f1r( THf: ~ (Y NlY~.A.NC1E5 ~ vARIATIONS.
~~~~¿~~~~~~~~PÐi'aN~~~ SHOWN
\oER~CtJII>\.£~ATION.
141.1. 5I.r flJtIC:E SHALL 8£ N f'l.AŒ .Pfl!(B ro HJ7AlXW CF f:MTHWORK AND SHALL (1C
WJNTNNCD UN71/.. VIABtE TI.JRf'" OR QIKJl.M) CO~ IS !:ST,I,8.J9fl). A r WHIaf 1IIoŒ Ir S11ALL B£ ROIO'Æ11
TÐIPQR,IJfy Pa«JIM;, DuŒS,. HA nMl.L:S £1C., R!OUR£D BY M' Grr ~ 8C INCVOfTN.. ro 11-1£ GRADING.
!HE CQ1<11lt4CroR SX4LL IJSC Á J«XI( Ct:JHS71fUCT1ON DlTRAHCE ...~ TO THe DCTM.S. ALL ~a-rs
0tS7IJRB£1) 0URlNG ~ HCIU?S IAJST B£ a..£WE1J AT THe ÐfD or O,a/ ~ !Mr.
THE COHTRACTDR 91AU.. ~ P'OSITTVC ORAIfAGC IS ÞJAJN/ÅJ/oIJ) fflaI THe 5H'[ ... T AU.. m£S.
CfJi11lACroR SHALl. Be ~ fUR IDIPOIMRY lM1C1f:S. P1Pf//G, DR OTHOf JIÐ.HS M(MRU} ro
IHSUH£ PRCP£R ORAJHAŒ [)(MI>K) t::X.JNSTRUC1KM. LOW PUNTS III RQAOJ't.o. rs OR 8fA.I»I(; f',ws
wsr BE PI'fU\ofDfD JIITH A POSITM: roTnOJr:
AU. AR£AS DIS7UR/JCD AS ... RCU. r or ca.tS'TRUC7ION S1W...L BE M.ItfP!A m y RcrTCRED *' TH saD
,4JÐ DISC JIIJL.OfCD at IKJO()...FJ8Of ~ (If sœ IN"'~ "'rH mr- ~ f'U.NS.mw
1')110 AED<S ~ CXNPt.£71OH OF o'Œ ACl1"Þ1TY IN ,(~Œ ",m '1M: arrs BESr
/H4N.f,ŒJE}(T PRACTICC HANDBOOK.
ror",,- ors71JR8£D AR£A _ 17.72 Á~ -t-/-
ror",,- PRCPC1SED f'RO.£CrAArA.. 7P.Z-4 AC1I£S -t-/-
LEGEND
~'J};>~___ - EXJSlIoIG CONTtU!S DmIIi
_927_ PRtPOSED c;a.¡TOUR'S SANTMY S£1IER--<1-
11110\1Ðt -I~
- SILT ÆNŒ H'i"D. W(VALVE. .........,---------..
i.J.1 ÐQSTIHG SPOT ElEV....rot S'T'CAoI S£KR ---..;)<:1-
.,¢ PRCPOS£D SPOT ElEVA-noH fIIIZSIEI:l
SAWTAAY SE'«IER ---4_
.1)15.5 fNSI-IED Fl..COI Ð..EVATIOH WA'Tffi -1_
_ DfU..NAct DIR£:c'T)(J. H'ft). vt(VÞJ...'I£ -+----4
S'TCR),!ÐÆR -.M_
~CAHT mŒ
"
R~~~ng
LA~D D,/HOPME'H SER\lIC¡:S
434 L.e.k$ stre.et
Ex_, MN 55331
(952) 38<>-5000
-~-
, ......... -uy II>a! !No -. "'-1""
<#,-,_pnp<n4.,,,,,,,,,,,,*m
_____Wth<:1I_tUJ
~":-=-IIÔ"""'-,,!t>o
".....
~--.;---~
,..
--1----1----
, ,
, ,
I
¿
Hidden Creel<.
Meadows
Chanhassen, ~
for
D&Gof
Chanhassen, LLC
Eden Prairie, MN
p,."jt~d IV",
Dlqiral Dr,,_q ."""'"
tIdd-<:rt.~.œ.g
Dr~ Bf
(LO
Clo=*:tJd By
....,
001.
alZIJI04
R.."i~ion" ~-~
"rn;/04 Per CII'I CarrYnenb
Iaued For: ~
-,,- -
"-".,..,.......-
~~--
-- -
...... -
~
Tree
Replacemen1
and
Landscape
Plan
- -
-
P-5
~3=':.:. ~
... ---r \(
----;-;- ~. ~
,: --- -~......
- ~
þ'" '-
...
, c"
" L
)(
~
120'
/
REQUIRED TREE CANOPY COVERAGE CALC. /
"
~~i;;7RgSÇ':;,c'(ÞNd:~;~VEf(~~ ~~~;O,) _ ~~x ,{-
R[p~ct..nnR[OUIRf.Dc /
rARGnC"'NO!'r-[XlSTlNGCAN(FYÄlJPU.NOAR[ADI"'DED8Y\~
~~~-9~ - ¡6X) 16~ X 571,866/1089 - 6. TR[ES '"
EXJSTlNC COIltRAG[ ROW\£D (9X) x 12 (P(NAlTY) Dr\ltO~"'"
51,726 t 1.2/1089 .. 57 T11EE$
TOTAL mE[ R(Pl"co..OH REQUIRED & 141
e INDICATES REPLACro "'NO/OR TRJl.NSPLAN~TR[E /
. INDICATES RfJ'lACW AND/OR TR,&.N7'~ -CONI'. mn
nŒS rtfJ't-^CID r-
Ii
~
BASELI'<E TREE CANOPY COVERAGE CALC.
TOTA.LPlATAR[A_ 638.168:tSf
M:TL,I.,NO . 265..302± Sf
~n I'\..).T J>.RI::^ . 571,B66± Sf
8RUSH/'REE CO\oERAG( ~ 258.53\:t Sf
'E,ClUO<NGI\'£T!J..N()S)
'BEE CANOPY CO\I'ERAG( 51.n6:t Sf (QX EXISTlNG COV[RAGE)
(BAS[D ON 'IUD OBSERvATION Of Ai'P1<OX 20X Of BRUSH AREAS ^RE ffiEES
e 2004 FlYÁH ~ NC.
PLANT LIST
s-.-... Qrr~K""[
. ~ ~=tQ~[
""........,."""tQ""'-"""....~
--
OoVI"'-CCl.U5nR1KN'U
~OIOOI;'.~
--
¡-·Ir.....
¡-'IT" .....
j::~=
'-'fT" .....
i::~m
BA2D ~ ..........t HA&..-.Jrt", TH( (::I(\{J.<:t"EI\ !I!ÐVt~ T!-E fO!O<'
roSl.eS'T1T1JT(TI«~lIO!'!:."S"1HKlH(:¡"""'¡;Þ,TN)O!'('(OOITH
PRlOR~,"-fI!OWT!-EClTTOfD1~TI<[TTl:a5"""""'1'[¡)""-'-OC~,o${D
lJP(J,AW"o...-.Jrr...'IH£-":;~ 2002 A1....0ITIoII(A.......... .........¡¡¡¡:.........DU;
1'>!EISW$T[I(f'ROWTHE~1.IST0fPC':il<J.8L(SP(CU;
(I'''£1U<PÇ( ÇI'I()I ~œ mŒ.S D£SIQoATI:D AS KATM:)
""'o.KRTI<AH(JoE-_(1ÞIOFTI-II"T>!{:(S.....'!I!'T'!OIoO....V(;>,¡£fq'R:EI<;I-'[(J!
TREI:iSH.<u.A'Æi\.A()(ATLlAS! !W<)-AJC)-C»«-.....J-INCI< CJo.P(1I:ANO..1Œ
...-....OfO>l(_.uI;>-ONE_H.oil_I'IO<~
""TL£!3T1<""T'ÆNrr(2'O)P'ÐOU),T(}F1H!1I'IU:S!>1A1..LB(~
~~(5~~~~AC( S£>n< (I) rt(1 AHO""'J.LI.!IE. ....~..
~SltAU.ElEusrn THAT AM Jon ~T'( m 1H! sr::., CXN:>I'IIcooSIUJ~ "" _ Sln:-.
TRŒ5SH.<u.!II;f1!CWm1'FID~5TOO<.5C1!J'1..rn.....oCOl<'T1'K:L1..rnÐY-.F;S()1.
ST.nm: '>tcnot<S 1&,44 THROJG>< \8.~1, 11<1: I'\.M P£ST ..cT
f¡
. tÐIOlES F'OlJIo«) SI..JIt\'['f WCH.JNÐH
~ tÐIOTES Ð1STJoç ~ARY SE'\IÆR IoIAH-ICtl:
:r:i œJCTE:$ UCHT Pa..£
-0- IJE>«J1!S PO't(R PCU
CENOTES [)CIS"T»O S'Tœ!ot SE'IIÆR W.w-o...E
8 rotO"IES EXIS1't;ç 'T!l..EPHC:)<[ BOX
.Œ)()TES~Q~TREI
* 0Ðf01ES ÐOSTI<tQ gQ¥)CAA"T lRŒ
~ tÐIOTES BRUSH
DaSTJ<fO COIflOJI'tS
- "27 - PROPOSED rom:uRS
'1n1 Ð:lsn.lGg>()TEl£VA1"IC1H
-<~ bltø-y s...
-1- WA1Ðt
-I--t H'YD. W/,o.J..Yf.
----Q<- STORW srø
,
,
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
I, Karen J. Engelhardt, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on
November 5, 2004, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen,
Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mai led a copy of the attached notice of Public
Hearing for Hidden Creek Meadows - CORRECTION - Planning Case No. 04-31 to the
persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope
addressed to such owner, and depositing thc envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United
States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were
those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurcr, Carver County, Minnesota, and
by other appropriate records.
~¡ i , ,,¡~1"( {j / ¡
Karen J. Engdh¥'dt, Dep~y Clerk
, .../
((//----
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this '3)~ h day of -) hi t ¿ L< 1-'" t ., 2004.
lj/"- ) JI .
.' l ¡ ¡.\~ I Nota~y Pu~c~ , ¡ ... ' .J J l
~A AA^^AAAAAAAA~AAA
~";I. ' K.IM T MEUW'S"c-N ;,.
- . ÜC¡
_ .. " ,11,'«).1..1'1.:-, '.;. !..n.~U9lC. Minnesota ~
. ,'. It' , {-;í\i\~1f1~ COUNTY ~
····,·vv~~~~
Notice of Public Hearing - CORRECTION
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
Notice of Public Hearing - CORRECTION
Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting
TUESDAY , November 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for approval of a 23-lot subdivision with variances
and a wetland alteration permit to permit the crossing of a
creek and wetland with a public street. The site is 19.2 acres
zoned Single-Family Residential. RSF - Hidden Creek
Meadows.
04-31
Date & Time
Location:
I
Proposa
TUESDAY , November 16, 2004 at 7:00 p.m
City Hall Council Chambers, 7700 Market Blvd.
Request for approval of a 23-lot subdivision with variances
and a wetland alteration permit to permit the crossing of a
creek and wetland with a public street. The site is 19.2 acres
zoned Single-Family Residential, RSF - Hidden Creek
Meadows.
04-31
D&G
Date & Time
Location:
Proposa
D & G of Chanhassen
Located at the ends of
north of Highway 7
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:
LLC
Pipewood Lane and Cartway Lane
Planning File
Applicant:
Property
Location
ofChanhassen, LLC
Located at the ends of Pipewood Lane and Cartway Lane
north of Highway 7
A location map is on the reverse side of this notice.
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the
applicant's request and to obtain input from the neighborhood
about this project. During the meeting, the Chair will lead the
public hearing through the following steps:
Planning File
Applicant
Property
Location
Staff will give an overview of the proposed project
The applicant will present plans on the project.
Comments are received from the public.
Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project
1
2
3
4
What Happens
at the Meeting:
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop
by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about
this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or
e-mail bqenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to
submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the
department in advance of the meeting Staff will provide
copies to the Commission
Questions &
Comments:
Staff will give an overview of the proposed project
The applicant will present plans on the project.
Comments are received from the public.
Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses
the project.
If you want to see the plans before the meeting, please stop
by City Hall during office hours, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. If you wish to talk to someone about
this project, please contact Bob Generous at 952-227-1131 or
e-mail bqenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us. If you choose to
submit written comments, it is helpful to have one copy to the
department in advance of the meeting. Staff will provide
copies to the Commission
1
2
3
4
What Happens
at the Meeting:
Questions &
Comments:
City Review Procedure:
· Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
· Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation. The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial
· Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for the City Council meeting.
· A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
· Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City CouncIL If you wish to have
somethinq to be included in the report, please contact the Planninq Staff person named on the notification
City Review Procedure:
· Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Site Plan Reviews, Conditional and Interim Uses, Wetland Alterations,
Rezonings, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the
Planning Commission. City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the
application in writing. Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting.
· Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation.
These reports are available by request. At the Planning Commission meeting, staff will give a verbal overview of
the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of
the hearing process. The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council may reverse, affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning
Commission's recommendation. Rezonings, land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the
City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commercial/industrial.
· Minnesota State Statute 519.99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant
waives this standard. Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete. Any
person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its
status and scheduling for fhe City Council meeting
· A neighborhood spokesperson/representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city. Often developers
are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal. Staff is also available to review the
project with any interested person(s).
· Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing, the City Council does not. Minutes are taken and
any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council. If you wish to have
somethinq to be included in the report, please contact the Planning Staff person named on the notification.
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county. state and
federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used
to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the G IS Data can be used
for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found
please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of fhis map acknowledges fhat the City shall nof
be ¡iable for any damages, and expressly waives aJl claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third
parties which arise out of the user's access or use of data provided.
Disclaimer
This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one
This map is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, state and
federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference
purposes only. The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System (GIS) Data used
to prepare this map are error free, and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used
for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or
direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features. If errors or discrepancies are found
please contact 952-227-1107. The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes §466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of fhis map acknowledges that the City shall not
be liable for any damages, and expressly waives a1l claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims brought by User, its employees or agents, or third
parties which anse out of the user's access or use of data provided.
DALE H COLLINS
10758 130TH ST
GLENCOE MN 55336
WILLIAM H & KIMBERLY A KOHMAN
3780 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
PATRICK L & BONNIE C MONAHAN
3801 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
BRIAN R CARLSON
3828 MEADOW CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
BLAKE L BOGEMA
3841 LINDEN CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
VINCENT 0 & BEATRICE E DECKER
3861 LESLEE CRY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DAVID C & LISA A GAUPP
3870 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
PAVEL & OLGA L GLUSHENYA
3891 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JOSEPH J & CASEY J BERGQUIST
4011 PIPEWOOD LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RVC HOMES INC
62 HAMEL RD
HAMEL MN 55340
TONKA DEVELOPMENT LLC
21470 EXCELSIOR BLVD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
WILLIAM J & KARl L MCREAVY
3790 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
ROBIN S O'MEARA
3814 MEADOW CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RANDALL A & LISA M MAYER
3831 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JEFFREY F JEWISON &
LISA J WECKWERTH
3842 MEADOW CT
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STEPHEN A & SANTINA CASTER
3861 LINDEN CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
LAUREANA YOUNG BOUALOUANG
3884 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
KATHY A SCHURDEVIN
3921 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
LOCH HC LLC
4100 BERKSHIRE LN
PLYMOUTH MN 55446
TERRANCE LANE TOLL
6250 CARTWAY LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
MOMCILO SPASOJEVIC &
SMILJANA SPASOJEVIC
3771 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RALPH A & SHIRLEY A NELSON
3800 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
VICTOR Q & DIANE T MORAVEC
TRUSTEES OF TRUST
3821 LINDEN CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
DALE E & LINDA J KEEHL
3841 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JEFFREY R BERGE &
DENISE E ZOELLMER
3856 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
PATRICIA B CHARNEY
3861 MEADOW LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
GARY CARLSON
3891 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
PETER ALEXANDER THOMSON &
CYNTHIA L GESS
4001 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
CITY OF SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
LUANN M FALENCZYKOWSKI
6274 GINGER DR
EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55346
MARK F MACPHERSON
6301 CARTWAY LN
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
CRAIG C MILLER
6450 MINNEWASHTA PKY
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STEVEN M & MICHELLE L BECKER
6510 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
S JOHN & LISA A JORDAN
6541 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
STEVEN P & SHEILA A MCSHERRY
6571 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
KEITH R & JODI L KORINKE
6310 CHURCH RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
GREGORY W & JENNIFER
GREENWOOD
6501 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JAMES E & PEGGY A MARKHAM
6520 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RICKY W & HEIDI S HUEFFMEIER
6551 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
T JB HOMES INC
9100 BALTIMORE ST NE
#102
BLAINE MN 55449
WAYNE M HARTUNG &
TONI R JOHNSON
6330 CHURCH RD
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
MICHELE L MUEHLBERG
6508 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
MARION A OLIN
6540 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
JEANIE ANN SEEHOF
6561 KIRKWOOD CIR
EXCELSIOR MN 55331
RICH SLAGLE
7411 FAWN HILL ROAD
CHANHASSEN MN 55317
GREGORY A & CYNTHIA L AHLM
6429 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8819
SCOTT D & PAMELA M HOWARD
6384 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8816
DARREN D KAHMEYER &
MONICA M KAHMEYER
755 GRANT ST
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-3026
MICHAEL & KATHLEEN KERBER
27110 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8907
WARREN D MCLAUGHLIN
CATHERINE C MCLAUGHLIN
6434 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8818
THOMAS G & BRENDA L PALKERT
255 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8806
JEFFREY P & LINDA S OBERMAN
175 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8806
MARK JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION
INC
PO BOX 21327
EAGAN MN 55121-0327
DONALD & MONA PETERSON
6414 ASTER TRL
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8818
WILLIAM A & REGINA R
GREENWOOD
195 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8806
MICHAEL H & JANET M GILMORE
165 62ND ST W
EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8806
HENNEPIN CO REG RR AUTHORITY
HENNEPIN CO GOVT CENTER
300 6TH ST S
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487-1308