Loading...
PC SUM 2005 01 04 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 4, 2005 Chairman Sacchet called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and gave an introduction on the role of the Planning Commission and procedures for the meeting. MEMBERS PRESENT: Uli Sacchet, Steve Lillehaug, Dan Keefe, Kurt Papke, and Rich Slagle MEMBERS ABSENT: Craig Claybaugh STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director, Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and Matt Saam, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Janet Paulsen 7305 Laredo Drive Deb Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive Deborah Zorn 7574 Ridgeview Point Curt Kobilarcsik 9149 Springfield Drive Melissa Gilman Chanhassen Villager PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AND SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 41, SOUTH OF HIGHWAY OVER DRIVE AND NORTH OF GUNFLINT TRAIL, YOBERRY FARMS, LLC, DAVID HURREL, AND KAREN WEATHERS, PLANNING CASE NO. 04-43. Public Present: Name Address Bill Borrell 2300 Longacres Drive Rodd Wagner 6915 Highover Drive Karen Weathers 7235 Hazeltine Boulevard Tom Stokes 2200 Shadywood Road Steve Johnston 510 1st Avenue No, Minneapolis 55403 th Chuck Alcon 6138 76 Lane, Greenfield, MN th Bill Coffman 600 West 78 Street Dean & Jackie Simpson 7185 Hazeltine Boulevard Stuart Henderson 7240 Gunflint Trail Larry Lovia 2475 Gunflint Court Rick Pinamonti 2527 Longacres Drive Stacey Riecks 7256 Gunflint Trail Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 Mark Brown 7210 Gunflint Trail Tom Kirsch 2290 Longacres Drive Scott Wosje 7125 Northwood Court Jennifer & Michael Rysso 7108 Harrison Hill Trail Rachel Wexler 7200 Madison Avenue W, Golden Valley Lisa Hokkanen 2456 Hunter Drive Kim Keyes 2448 Longacres Drive Abby DuMoulin 6966 Highover Drive Chairman Sacchet excused himself from the Planning Commission due to a personal conflict of interest in order to speak as a resident of the Highover neighborhood. Vice Chairman Slagle became Acting Chair for this item. Sharmeen Al-Jaff and Matt Saam presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Lillehaug asked staff to explain how the proposed roadway on the very east side impacts the parcels so they have a road basically on each side of them, the number of lots. If the applicant is trying to fit too many lots into this piece of property, and the size of the back yards. Commissioner Keefe asked for clarification on the need for a variance for the radius of the northeast cul-de-sac, grading and tree loss, and clarification of construction traffic having access off of Highway 41. Commissioner Papke suggested the possibility to minimize or decrease the impact if 3 homes were scrubbed out of the plan, questions about grading and impact to bluffs on the site. Commissioner Slagle asked staff to comment on condition 21 which refers to lowering the street elevation, the number of units on the site, the traffic circulation with the different additions, condition 44 which asks the applicant to remove the sidewalk on the west side of Gunflint Trail, and the bluff calculations. th Chuck Alcon, 6138 76 Lane, Greenfield, Minnesota, introduced the development team of Bill Coffman, Tom Stokes, Steve Johnston and Jesse Larson. Also in attendance are the property owners Dean and Jackie Simpson and Karen Weathers. He asked for clarification on condition 22 and commented on how they intend to make some of the back yards more useable. Steve Johnston commented on the technical details of items 11(b), (c) and (h) and also on item 21. 11(b) talks about maintaining 10 foot horizontal separation between all sanitary, water and storm sewer mains, 11(c), revise the storm sewer pipe size to maintain a minimum 15 inch, and 11(h), Re-route the proposed watermain in the southwest corner of the parcel to be between Lots 5 and 6 and 10 feet off the proposed sanitary sewer within the 30 foot utility easement. Commissioner Keefe asked the applicant to elaborate on their landscaping and buffering plan. Commissioner Lillehaug asked the applicant to explain how the depth of the existing sanitary sewer is the driving force behind the grading. He also asked for clarification about the cul-de-sac and road that goes up to Outlot D, what has been done for the residents to the east to fit in with their back yards rather than putting a road right up against their lot line. Acting Chair Slagle opened the public hearing. Tom Hirsch, 2290 Longacres Drive spoke as President of the Longacres Homeowners Association on behalf of the 222 homeowners and lot owners. He reviewed the entrance monuments, landscape medians and private parks that are maintained by the Homeowners Association, and stated he did not see in the staff report any traffic studies, environmental impact studies or any application or rule as to the feasibility from 2 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 the State on access into Highway 41 that could potentially disperse traffic out away from Longacres. Commissioner Papke suggested the new developer talk with the Longacres Homeowners Association about joining their association. Acting Chair Slagle asked staff to explain how the Planning Commission should address the issue that no parks are planned for this 57 home development. Commissioner Lillehaug asked for clarification on the extension of the streets from Longacres and Highover developments. Rodd Wagner, 6915 Highover Drive, his concern is primarily around traffic, particularly the number of homes that are being picked up by Highover Drive. He also had concern that the people in this development would be enjoying the benefit of those properties north and south, the way they’re maintained without being a party to either one of those homeowner associations. Larry Lovik, 2475 Gunflint Court raised concerns with the local road system feeding Galpin Boulevard and the private park in Longacres being used by people in this development. He asked to change the condition which reads street cleaning daily as needed to street cleaning daily. Stuart Henderson, 7240 Gunflint Trail stated he didn’t have a problem with the development and saw the sign saying the road would connect in the future but thought there would be a road out to 41. He didn’t anticipate 57 homes going in this area. Dr. Jennifer Rysso, 7108 Harrison Hill Trail which is one of the properties that back up to the proposed road. Her first concern is safety for children in the area and the height of the retaining walls along the street. She suggested that the road either be re-routed along the wetlands or the area used for a park. Uli Sacchet 7053 Highover Court South spoke on behalf of himself and his neighbors, Ruth and Tom Rolfs. Their properties adjoin this development by the end of the cul-de-sac. He summarize a letter that had been submitted by the Rolfs in their absence hitting two points that have not been brought up. Their letter is basically an outcry against urban sprawl. Against the destruction of the existing wildlife corridor, the extreme grading, the number of lots and drainage, specifically Lot 1, Block 4 being a wildlife corridor and drainage path. Speaking on his own behalf, Mr. Sacchet stated he is ending up with a cul- de-sac and side yard in his back yard. He mention that a strip of no man’s land was discovered between Highover to the north and the owners to the south. He commended the developer for saving trees and the layout of the development with the exception of the corner adjacent to his property. He outlined in detail the tree inventory plan. John Graham, 6935 Highover had concern with the traffic and steepness of Highover Drive in relation to the bus stop and asked that a stop sign be placed somewhere on the road to slow traffic down. Stacy Riecks at 7256 Gunflint Trail, which is on the corner of Gunflint Trail and Longacres, adjacent to Lot 5 on the plat. Her concern was with traffic, specifically with the bus stop at the corner of Gunflint and Longacres and safety. She also had a concern with drainage from this area onto her property. Paul Addiston, 7080 Harrison Hill Trail was concerned with having a road on the front and rear of his property. Rich Bray, 6983 Highover Drive provided history of what had been told to him by Jerome Carlson and his realtors when they purchased their property. He also stated that he planted 3 evergreen trees on the corner of Highover Drive and Highover Way and the City made him remove the trees. Move them 3 feet back for the purpose that at some point there’s going to be a stop sign at that intersection and they didn’t want a blind intersection. He was disappointed to find out that the City has not considered any type of traffic control on that road, and hasn’t looked at Highway 41 as another potential entrance. Mark Brown, 7210 Gunflint Trail stated that besides concerns about the traffic and the lack of access to 41, he was also concerned with the line of sight from his driveway and drainage. Deb Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive brought up questions about the staff report regarding the format of the compliance table regarding the 90 foot width at the setback line and where it shows 4 lots with rear lot setback as NA. Scott Wosje 3 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 from the Longacres neighborhood stated there’s already an existing traffic problem that’s on record with the City in their neighborhood, and this development is only going to add to that traffic problem. Bill Borrell, 2300 Longacres Drive questioned the comparison of Longacres Drive functioning the same as Lake Lucy and Galpin as collector roads. Acting Chair Slagle closed the public hearing and brought the issue back for Planning Commission discussion. Commissioner Lillehaug asked staff to elaborate further on the issues of parks, sight lines and bluffs. After discussion the following motion was made. Lillehaug moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission table the rezoning and subdivision request for Yoberry Farms with direction to staff to re-work the northeast quadrant and to invite the Park and Rec Director to speak or provide written comment regarding the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 22 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LYMAN BLVD AND THE FUTURE REALIGNED HIGHWAY 101, SAND COMPANIES, INC., PLANNING CASE No. 05-01. Public Present: Name Address th Jamie Thelen 366 South 10 Avenue, Waite Park, MN th Jim Sand 366 South 10 Avenue, Waite Park, MN Al Klingelhutz 8600 Great Plains Boulevard th Richard A. Hennings 366 South 10 Avenue, Waite Park, MN Christopher Hol 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North Keith Collins 7420 Coventry Way, Edina Patty & Craig Mullen 611 Summerfield Drive April Halbe 9151 Great Plains Boulevard Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. Commissioners asked for clarification on traffic circulation on Lake Susan Drive, turning movements and traffic circulation through the retail area, the median on Lake Susan Drive, and affordable housing. Jim Sand, Vice President of Development introduced other members of the team, Senior Architect, Richard Hennings and Jamie Thelen, President of Sand Companies Inc.. He stated they had held a neighborhood th meeting on December 16 which approximately 30 residents attended. Richard Hennings showed additional renderings and addressed the issues of the median on Lake Susan Drive, utilizing a wetland in this project as part of an area wide water clarity project for the Lake Riley watershed area, and affordable housing. Chairman Sacchet opened the public hearing. Patty Mullen, 611 Summerfield Drive asked for an opportunity to meet with the developer to get more input on the project as she was unable to attend the neighborhood meeting. Her biggest 4 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 concern is that the project stay consistent with projects in the area and buffering. Kate Aanenson stated staff would facilitate a meeting between interested residents and the applicant. Chris Hol, 8687 Chanhassen Hills Drive North had concerns with the height of the apartment building stating a two story building would be okay, but three stories will block views. He also had concerns with possible cut through traffic. Al Klingelhutz, 8600 Great Plains Boulevard asked about the median on Lake Susan Drive and how the old farmstead property, which is being developed as a Klingelhutz family development, will get access off Lake Susan Drive. Chairman Sacchet closed the public hearing. After commission discussion the following motion was made. Papke moved, Lillehaug seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the concept PUD Planning Case No. 05-01, Sand Companies, Inc., with the recommendations as outlined in the staff report and Commissioner Lillehaug’s comments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW FOR FIVE LOT SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES ON 3.36 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF), LOCATED AT THE END OF CRESTVIEW DRIVE, (SHIVLEY ADDITION), CRESTVIEW. APPLICANT LECY BROS HOMES, PLANNING CASE NO. 05-02. Public Present: Name Address Pam Johnson 2050 Crestview Drive Paul & Rachelle Tungseth 2051 Crestview Drive Andrew Johnsrud Lecy Bros Homes Alan Nikolai 6282 Cartway Lane, Excelsior Dick Herrboldt 6464 Murray Hill Road Tim Larkin Peter Knibble Terra Engineering Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Slagle asked for clarification on staff’s recommendation that the road be connected to the Pinehurst development and if staff had concerns with adding additional traffic onto Crestview Road. Commissioner Papke asked about ownership of the existing cul-de-sac and to showing a new curb going in and removal of the bituminous. Commissioner Keefe asked about landscaping and buffering along the street connection to Street B, and the use of Minnetonka Middle School West as a park for this area. Chairman Sacchet asked how the Planning Commission can reconcile a street connection for this development when they recommended a cul-de-sac for the Pinehurst development. The civil engineer, Peter Knibble with Terra Engineering introduced Andy Johnsrud with Lecy Bros Homes. Their two issues are asking that the trail to the Minnetonka Middle School West be connected through Pinehurst and not through this small 5 lot development, and support of staff’s recommendation to eliminate the street connection to 5 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 Pinehurst. Chairman Sacchet asked the applicants if they were opposed to any type of trail connection. Andy Johnsrud stated if the road was to go away, they’d be willing to put a connection between Lots 2 and 3. Chairman Sacchet opened the public hearing. Dick Herrboldt, 6464 Murray Hill Road stated his opposition to the recommendation that the trail run along the north property line to Minnetonka Middle School West. There’s a tremendous amount of trees that are going to get cut down in order to access a sidewalk. He’s also opposed to the road connection to Pinehurst because it will cause traffic problems with parents dropping kids off in the cul-de-sac. Tim Larkin, 2150 Crestview Drive, who owns the only existing home in the proposed development, stated that due to a clerical error he received no notice of the public hearing for the Pinehurst development. If City Council doesn’t take the recommendation of the commission and puts that road back in, it will literally be at the end of his driveway. He also stated if a trail connection was made, he would like to see it located between Lots 2 and 3. Alan Nikolai, 6282 Cartway Lane, spoke on behalf of his mother Doris Nikolai who lives at 6570 Galpin Boulevard, on the corner of Galpin and Crestview. She does not want to see an extension to Pinehurst to the south at all because of the additional traffic concern on Crestview. She supports the bigger lot sizes in this development but would not support an additional lot with the vacation of that road and does not like the idea of the walkway extension from Pinehurst up to Crestview. Janet Paulsen, 7305 Laredo Drive stated that having a setback from public streets to save trees was a bad precedent to set and the variance should not be granted. Dick Herrboldt added a concern with drainage problems. Deb Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive stated she did not believe conditions had been met to grant the variance. Chairman Sacchet closed the public hearing. After commission discussion the following motions were made. Slagle moved, Sacchet seconded that the Planning Commission table Planning Case #05-02, the preliminary plat for a 5 lot subdivision with variances. Slagle and Sacchet voted in favor. Keefe, Papke and Lillehaug voted against the motion. The motion failed with a vote of 2 to 3. Keefe moved, Papke seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #05-02 for a five lot subdivision with a variance for a reduced right-of-way (50 feet), plans prepared by Terra Engineering, Inc. dated 11/22/04, based upon the findings of fact in the staff report and subject to the following conditions: an easement for 1.The developer shall include a sidewalk in the extension of Crestview Drive 2 and 3 and from the end of the cul-de-sac between Lots and then along the north lot line of Lot 2 to the school property located west of the site. 2.The developer shall dedicate a trail easement from Crestview Drive to the west property line between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 to accommodate the pedestrian access to the Middle School site. 3.A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 4.Separate water and sewer services must be provided for each lot. 6 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 5.No burning permits will be issued for trees to be removed. Trees and shrubs must either be removed from site or chipped. 6.A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., street lamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters. Pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance #9-1. 7.Fire apparatus access roads and water supply for fire protection is required to be installed. Such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction except when approved alternate methods of protection are provided. Temporary street signs shall be installed on each street intersection when construction of the new roadway allows passage by vehicles. Pursuant to 2002 Minnesota Fire Code Section 501.4. 8.A minimum of two overstory trees shall be required in the front yard of each lot. 9.The developer shall be responsible for installing all landscape materials proposed in rear and side yard areas. 10.Tree preservation fence shall be installed at the edge of the grading limits prior to any construction. 11.All trees shown as preserved and outside of the grading limits as shown on plans dated 11/22/04 shall be saved. Any trees removed in excess of proposed tree preservation plans will be replaced at a ratio of 2:1 diameter inches. 12.Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Time (maximum time an area can remain unvegetated Type of Slope when area is not actively being worked) Steeper than 3:1 7 Days 10:1 to 3:1 14 Days Flatter than 10:1 21 Days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other man made systems that discharge to a surface water. 7 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 13.Daily scraping and sweeping of public streets shall be completed anytime construction site soil, mud, silt or rock is tracked or washed onto paved surface or street that would allow tracked materials or residuals of that material to enter the storm water conveyance system. 14.Construction site access points shall be minimized to controlled access points with rock entrance and exit pads installed and maintained throughout construction. 15.Based on the proposed developed area of 3.36 acres, the estimated total SWMP fee, due payable to the City at the time of final plat recording is $12,761. 16.The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff-Creek Watershed District, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), and Minnesota Department of Health) and comply with their conditions of approval. 17.The storm sewer must be designed for a 10-year, 24-hour storm event. Submit storm sewer sizing calcs and drainage map for staff review and approval at time of final plat. 18.On the grading plan: a.Add a note to remove the existing driveway access of Lot 1. b.Show the benchmark used for the site survey. c.Show a minimum 75-foot rock construction entrance. d.Add a legend. 19.On the utility plan: a.Any connection to existing manholes or catch basins must be core drilled. b.All sanitary services must be 6”PVC-SDR26 and water services 1”copper. c.Show watermain pipe class as C-900. d.Show sanitary sewer pipe type and class. e.Show storm sewer pipe type and size (minimum 15-in.) f.Add a hydrant on the eastern property line of Lot 1. 20.If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with a detailed haul route and traffic control plan. 21.The sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for each of the new lots. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 for sanitary sewer and $2,955 for watermain. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel at the time of building permit issuance. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council. 22.Public utility improvements are required to be constructed in accordance with the City's latest edition of Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. Detailed construction plans and specifications must be submitted at time of final plat for review. The applicant is also required to enter into a development contract with the City and supply the necessary financial security in 8 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 the form of a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee installation of the improvements and the conditions of final plat approval. 23.In conjunction with the final plat approval, the developer shall vacate the existing Crestview Drive right-of-way dedicated as part of the Shively Addition. 24.Full park fees shall be collected at the rate in force at the time of final plat.” 25. Delete the road connection to the Pinehurst development but keep the trail connection to the end of Street B. 26. The applicant will work with staff to shift the cul-de-sac to the east. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL WITH VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RETAIL BUILDING AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN LED MONUMENT SIGN ON 1.61 ACRES OF PROPERTY ZONED HIGHWAY AND BUSINESS DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER TH OF MARKET BOULEVARD AND WEST 79 STREET (AMERICANA BANK BUILDING), WALGREENS. APPLICANT, SEMPER DEVELOPMENT, LTD AND ROBERT DITTRICH, PLANNING CASE 05-03. Public Present: Name Address Cindy MacDonald 4210 W. Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington Allen W. Obernolte 106 Tanager Road, Mankato Neil Tessler GEI Engineering John Kohler Semper Development 821 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis Sharmeen Al-Jaff presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Keefe asked for clarification on how cross access agreements are enforced, internal traffic circulation, specifically with the drive thru traffic, and the truck loading area. Commissioner Slagle asked if the drive thru circulation patterns were much different than CVS Pharmacy, which has a one way. Commissioner Lillehaug asked for clarification on staff condition 23 recommending an approval withdrawing the previous site plan and on page 13, the recommendation of a variance for the reduction in parking. Commissioner Papke asked about the distance from this LED sign and the Legion’s sign. Chairman Sacchet asked about the variance for hard surface coverage. John Kohler, an architect with the developer, Semper Development showed renderings of the site. Commissioner Papke asked the applicant to explain how this building would differ from the Walgreen’s in Eden Prairie at the corner of Highways 4 and 5. Commissioner Slagle asked the applicant if they would place a couple of benches and landscaping. Commissioner Lillehaug 9 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 asked about the number and size of similar stores in the area. Commissioner Keefe asked the applicant to comment on the traffic circulation for the loading area and drive thru. Chairman Sacchet opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. After commission discussion the following motion was made. Papke moved, Slagle seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval of Site Plan 05-3 for a 15,000 square foot building to house a retail building and pharmacy, with a variance to allow a 70.4% hard surface coverage and reduction in parking, based on the findings of the staff report, and as shown on the plans dated received December 3, 2004, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall increase landscape plantings to meet minimum requirements. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City prior to final approval. 2. Landscape islands shall have a minimum inside width of 10 feet. 3. Add the latest City standard detail plate Nos. 5207, 5300, and 5301. 4. On the utility plan: a. Revise the proposed inverts for catch basin No. 1 to 949.25 and 949.19, respectively. b. Label the existing water stub to the site off Market Boulevard as 8" DIP. 5. On the grading plan: a. Add a benchmark. b. Show the proposed storm sewer. c. Increase the rock construction entrances to a minimum of 75-feet in length. d. Show the parking lot stall locations and striping. e. Show the missing 954 contour elevation along the north side of the property. 6. Installation of the private utilities for the site will require permits and inspections through the City’s Building Department. 7. The applicant must show the location/elevation of an emergency overflow point for catch basin No. 2 that is 1.5-feet lower than the proposed building elevation. 8. Storm sewer sizing calculations will be required at the time of building permit application. The proposed storm sewer must be sized for a 10-year storm event. 9. Sanitary sewer and water hookup charges will be applicable for the new building. The 2005 trunk hookup charge is $1,458 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,955 per unit for watermain. The 2005 SAC charge is $1,525 per unit. All of these charges are based on the number of SAC units calculated by the Met Council. Since there is an existing building, only hook-up charges for the additional SAC units will be charged. These charges will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. Sanitary sewer and watermain hookup fees may be specially assessed against the parcel. 10 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 10. If importing or exporting material for development of the site is necessary, the applicant will be required to supply the City with detailed haul routes. 11. Permits from the MPCA, Watershed District and Railroad will be required for the site grading. 12. All drive aisle widths within the parking lot must be 26-feet wide per City Code and the existing driveway aprons must be upgraded to current City standards per Detail Plate No. 5207. 13. The existing assessment for the recent 2004 Street Overlay Project, totaling $11,436.83 plus interest, must be paid prior to building permit issuance. 14. The proposed development shall maintain existing runoff rates and meet NURP water quality standards. 15. Erosion control blanket shall be installed on all slopes greater than or equal to 3:1. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can Steeper than 3:1 7 days remain open when the area 10:1 to 3:1 14 days is not actively being worked.) Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or manmade systems that discharge to a surface water. 16. Street cleaning of soil tracked onto public streets shall include daily street scraping and street sweeping as-needed. 17. The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies (e.g., Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NPDES Phase II Construction Permit), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (for dewatering), Army Corps of Engineers) and comply with their conditions of approval. 18. Fire Marshal Conditions a. A 10-foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants, i.e., streetlamps, trees, shrubs, bushes, Xcel Energy, Qwest, cable TV and transformer boxes. This is to ensure that fire hydrants can be quickly located and safely operated by firefighters (pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinance 9-1). b. Indicate on utility plans the location of PIV (post indicator valve). Fire Marshal must review and approve. 11 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 19. Building Official Conditions: a. The building is required to be protected by automatic fire extinguishing systems. b. The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. A demolition permit must be obtained prior to beginning demolition activities on the site. d. The site must be protected with an 8 foot high fence during demolition and construction activities. e. Detailed occupancy related requirements cannot be reviewed until complete plans are submitted. f. The owner and/or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 20. All rooftop equipment shall be screened. 21. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary financial securities. 22. The applicant must obtain a sign permit prior to erecting the signs on site. A detailed sign plan incorporating the method of lighting, acceptable to staff, should be provided prior to requesting a sign permit. 23. The Planning Commission recommends the withdrawal of approval of Site Plan 92-1 for the Americana Community Bank building, concurrently with the approval of Planning Case 05- 3. The applicant shall file the notice of withdrawal against the property at Carver County." 24. Alter the drive up on the north side to one way. 25. Allow additional hard surface variance coverage for an additional bench on the southwest corner. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Papke moved, Sacchet seconded that the Planning Commission recommends approval for Conditional Use Permit 05-03 for the LED display within a monument ground low profile sign. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Chairman Sacchet made a comment to encourage the City Council to consider staff’s reasoning about the two way traffic circulation and monitoring of it. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Slagle noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 7, 2004 as presented. Chairman Sacchet adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 11:30 p.m. 12 Planning Commission Summary – January 4, 2005 Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 13