Loading...
HRA 1982 02 18AGENDA SPECIAL JOINT MEETING CHANHASSEN HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Thursday, February 18, 1982 Chanhassen City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive City Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order. 2. Approve Minutes of December 3 and December 17, 1981 BRA Meetings. 3. Downtown Project Status Report! Bloomberg Companies and Kraus - Anderson Development Corp. 4. Continue Discussion of Proposed Special Assessment Reduction Program for Business Park Lands (Including United Mailing, Inc. Development Proposal). 5. Downtown Project Land Acquisition Status Report: Parcel #26. 6. Establish Policy Concerning Private Improvements to Existing Businesses within Downtown Project Core Area. 7. Discuss Housing Programs and proposed use of Year VIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Funds. 8. Discuss Accounting System for HRA Funds. 9. Adopt Resolution #82 -1 Confirming Past Expenditures of Tax Increment Revenues. 10. Approval of Bills. 11. Old Business. 12. New Business. 10:00 P.M. 13. Adjournment. Chanhassen Housing r Special Meeting December 3, 1981 Minutes L L ,1) Call to Order and Redevelopment Authority The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Gullickson. Present were Commissioners Gullickson, Bohn, Horn, and Russell. Absent was Commissioner Whitehill. Executive Director Scott Martin, Attorney Russ Larson, and City Manager Don Ashworth were also present. Whitehill arrived at 8:15 p.m. Approval of Minutes Bohn moved, seconded by Horn, to approve the minutes of the September 10 and October 6, 1981 meetings as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Carver County Joint Cooperation Agreement Bohn moved, seconded by Russell, to adopt Resolution #81 -7 approving the Joint Cooperation Agreement with Carver County for participation in the 1980 Community Development Block Grant Program under Grant #B- 80 -DS -72 -0010 and authorizing the Chairman and Executive Director of the BRA to execute the agreement on behalf of the HRA. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Approval of 1982 Administrative Operating Budget Don Ashworth, City Manager, presented a brief overview of the HRA's 1982 Administrative Operating Budget, as adopted by the City Council on October 13, 1981. Gullickson requested that the Downtown Project Construction Budget be available for review at the next regular meeting. Martin explained that the construction budget consists of the expenditure budget approved with the first bond issue, but agreed to provide up to date report on the fund status at the next meeting. The Commissioners also discussed the necessity of establishing a separate accounting system for BRA revenues and expenditures that would provide for approval of bills by the HRA rather than the City Council. Martin was directed to request a legal opinion from the Attorney concerning legal requirements for HRA accounting of tax increment revenues. Russell moved, seconded by Bohn, to approve the 1982 HRA Adminis- trative Operating Budget as presented, contingent upon presentation of an up to date status report on the Downtown Project Construction Budget at the next regular meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. n HRA Minutes December 3, 1981 Page 2 CHavlik Property Purchase Option Agreement (Parcel #30) Russ Larson, Attorney, reviewed the contents of the Purchase Option Agreement and Memorandum of Option Agreement offered to and accepted by John and Loretta Havlik dated December 3, 1981 for purchase of the Havlik Mobil Station property. Commissioner Whitehill arrived at this point in the meeting. Whitehill moved, seconded by Bohn, to approve the purchase option agreement and the Memorandum of Option Agreement as executed by the Havliks, and to authorize and direct the Chairman and Executive Director to execute both agreements on behalf of the HRA. The attorney was also ordered to immediately file the Memorandum of Option Agreement in the office of the County Recorder. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Huber Property Acquisition (Parcel #26) Larson presented a status report on his negotiations with John Huber for acquisition of his vacant property identified as Parcel #26. He pointed out that an error had been made in the appraisal of this property, which consisted of including existing public street right -of- way in the property's land area computations. He concluded that the "saleable" portion of the property consists of only 88,000 square feet, and not the 99,590 square feet reported in the appraisal report. As a result of this error, negotiations for acquisition of the property have become confused and no progress has been made to acquire the property in the immediate future. He recommended that authority be given to him to have the property reappraised and to commence eminent domain proceedings for acquisition if the property owner does not accept an offer equal to the newly appraised value. Whitehill moved, seconded by Horn, to authorize reappraisal of the Huber property and to continue acquisition negotiations following receipt of the new appraisal. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Riviera Property Acquisition /Relocation (Parcel #31) Larson presented a status report on the Riviera property acquisition/ relocation negotiations. At issue was the amount of monthly rent to be paid by the Riviera if occupancy of the property continues beyond the date of acquisition by the HRA, and the amount to be paid for extensions to the original option period. The Commissioners agreed that monthly rent following HRA acquisition should be set at 1 /12th of the annual real estate taxes, exclusive of special assessments, on the property payable in the year of closing. The Commissioners also agreed to accept a provision in the purchase HRA Minutes December 3, 1981 Page 3 option agreement which provides for a $5,000 payment by the HRA for each quarterly option term extension, subject to the requirement that option extension money paid shall be deducted from the total purchase price upon HRA acquisition. HRA Acquisition /Rental Policy Horn moved, seconded by Whitehill, to extablish a formal HRA property acquisition policy that provides for a uniform rental payment to the HRA by businesses occupying properties following final HRA property property acquisition which is equal to one - twelfth (1 /12th) of the annual real estate taxes, exclusive of special assessments, on the property payable in the year of closing. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Downtown Redevelopment Project Status Report Martin updated the Commissioners on the current status of activities concerning the Downtown Redevelopment Project. He reported that Red Owl stores had not yet completed their market analysis study, but that completion of the study was imminent. He also reported that Kraus - Anderson was interested in possibly constructing their mandatory building improvements in two phases rather than all at once, due to the recessionary economy. Any decision by Kraus - Anderson relative to project phasing would not be made until the supermarket issue is resolved. Martin also reported that project field survey work has commenced, and is presently more than one -half (�) completed. Completion of this work is anticipated within two (2) weeks, weather permitting. Traffic Analysis Study - Highway 5 Intersections Martin reported that completion of the HRA's intersection study for Highway 5 intersections in the area of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park was temporarily delayed while Minnetonka, Inc. prepared an Environ- mental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and traffic study, which is required as part of their plan review requirements prior to receiving city approval. The results of the Minnetonka, Inc. traffic analysis will be incorporated. in the HRA's overall intersection study. No completion date for the study is known at this time. Martin also reported that the State Department of Transportation has determined that traffic signals are warranted for the intersection L of Highway 5 and Powers Boulevard (Co. Rd. 17) based on current traffic volumes. L l� HRA Minutes December 3, 1981 Page.4 Kraus - Anderson /Bloomberg Companies Redevelopment Agreements Expiration Dates Whitehill moved, seconded by Russell, to adopt Resolutions #81 -5 and #81 -6, which clarify the expiration dates of each Redevelopment Agreement by estaziishing Lb1ay 27, i962 as the expiration date of each. All voted in favor and the motion carried. West 79th Street Realignment Study The results of the West 79th Street realignment study, as prepared by BRW, Inc., were reviewed by the HRA. No action was taken, except to review the consultant's findings and recommendations and to file the study for future reference. Adjournment Whitehill moved, seconded by Horn, to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried. 5! I' L L L-. L L Chanhassen Housing Regular Meeting December 17, 1981 Minutes Call to Order and Redevelopment Authority The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Gullickson. Present were Commissioners Gullickson, Horn, and Bohn. . Absent were Russell and Whitehill. Also present were Executive Director Scott Martin, Attorneys Russ Larson and Craig Mertz. Approval of Minutes Horn moved, seconded by Bohn, to table action on the December 3, 1981 minutes until the next regular meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Riviera Purchase Option Agreement (Parcel #31) Russ Larson presented an overview of the terms included in the Purchase Option Agreement for acquisition of the Riviera property, as executed by the owners. Bohn moved, seconded by Horn, to approve the Purchase Option Agreement and Memorandum of Option Agreement for the Riviera property as . presented, and to authorize and direct the Chairman and Executive Director to execute the agreement on behalf of the HRA. The Executive Director was also directed to pay the option money to the Riviera owners, and the Attorney was ordered to immediately file the Memorandum of option Agreement in the Office of the County Recorder. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Special Assessment Reduction Program Martin presented a historical review of past HRA actions concerning methods available to the HRA to induce development within the Business Park and adjacent industrial lands. Craig Mertz reviewed an outline of a proposal to reduce outstanding special assessments within the area served by City Public Improvement Project #78 -3 based on the value of new construction on a.lot -by -lot basis. Seven percent (7 %) of the cost of new on -site private improvements excluding land cost would be used to compute the amount of each specific assessment reduction. The Commissioners expressed concern that such a program may not result in more rapid development of Business Park lands if the overall land costs to developers remained at current levels. Martin was directed to invite representatives from Rauenhorst Corporation and Instant Web, Inc. to the next meeting to discuss this program with the Commissioners in greater detail and to resolve concerns about the effectiveness of the program. HRA Insurance Coverage Larson reviewed recommendations for insurance coverage for the HRA. Presently, no separate coverage exists for HRA officials or property. Chanhassen HRA Minutes December 17, 1981 Page -2- Horn moved, seconded by Bohn, to instruct the Attorney to secure all C recommended insurance coverage for the BRA immediately. All voted in favor and the motion carried. HRA Fund Status Reports Martin presented Fund Status Reports for the HRA Fund #460 and #604, along with a recommended Revised Budget for #604. The Commissioners reviewed the reports, but felt that it was unnecessary to revise the budget at this time. HRA Accounting Requirements Craig Mertz presented a letter (dated December 17, 1981) outlining legal requirements for HRA fund accounting. The Commissioners preferred the establishment of a separate accounting system for HRA funds, rather than contracting with the City under a Joint Powers Agreement to provide the HRA with this service within the-City's accounting system. Martin recommended delaying any action on this matter until the City Manager was consulted concerning the two available options. The Commissioners agreed with this recommen- dation, but directed Martin to prepare a list of past disbursements/ expenditures of the HRA since the date of first receipt of tax increment revenues. This list should show the dates, check numbers, amount, and names of payees. The HRA will act on this expenditure list by resolution at the next regular meeting. CApproval of Bills Bohn moved, seconded by Horn, to approve the bills for November, 1981 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Adjournment Horn moved, seconded by Bohn, to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried. CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 U(612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM CONFIDENTIAL TO: Chanhassen HRA FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: February 12, 1982 RE: Downtown Project Status j As you know, Bloomberg Companies and Kraus - Anderson announced at the City Council meeting on February 1, 1982 that the current National economic recession is having a substantial impact on their ability to lease space in the downtown project, and consequently, on their ability to proceed with construction during the next 12 -18 month period. Obviously, this announcement results in a major setback for the redevelopment of downtown, but contrary to I some currently held opinions, it does not necessarily mean the end I of our downtown redevelopment efforts. The Current economic. Crisis in cu- riat.inn is h.3;79ng a. cu}+L•tavitial detrimental affect on all facets of the construction industry, especially on retail development, and homebuilding. Current office t and retail construction activity in the Twin Cities Metro Area Il consists primarily of projects which were financed and approved as long as 2 -3 years ago, before the recession reached it's current depths and interest rates skyrocketed. The adopted Chanhassen downtown redevelopment plan was designed during 1978 -79 based on what was considered to be realistic future economic conditions in terms of both the national and local economies. As it turned out, by the time development agreements were executed and construction of public and private improvements were scheduled, the economy had worsened, and downtown plans began to look overly Optimistic. However, what may presently be considered to be an overly ambitious plan for Downtown Chanhassen must be tempered by the knowledge the economic conditions will likely improve in the future. One or two or three more years of waiting for economic conditions L_ to improve so that the construction on downtown can proceed as planned is a very short time frame in comparison to the overall history of Ithe City of Chanhassen. It is important that we put this recent setback into the proper L perspective, and guard against overreacting or succumbing to short- term public reaction. I firmly believe that given a "normal" economy, the adopted plan for LDowntown Redevelopment is realistic and attainable. L Chanhassen HRA February 12, 1982 Page 2 Within the past week, I have met with Dennis Spalla of Kraus - Anderson, Herb Bloomberg and Bill McRostie of Bloomberg Companies, and with Don Ringrose, Peter Jarvis, and Arijs Pakalns of BRW, Inc. concerning the future of the Downtown Project. My discussions with each party have left me with an optimistic feeling towards the Project. Each discussion eventually focused in on the current temporary economic crisis and its impact on our Project. Although it is extremely difficult to draw specific time lines for project implementation at this time due to national economic uncertainties, I did get a feeling for the direction each developer would likely take after their respective development agreements expire on May 27, 1982. However, since the HRA still has valid contracts with each developer at this time, I have elected to inform you of these discussions in a confi- dential memorandum, and would caution you to use discretion in your discussion of these issues until after expiration of both contracts. 'Dennis Spalla told me that Kraus - Anderson is no longer interested in renovation of the Instant Web building, since the floor area and spatial layout of this building is too large and difficult to renovate and lease for retail and /or office uses. He said.that Kraus- Anderson would be willing to consider the construction of not more than 40,000- 50,000 sq. ft. of new retail space, possibly as soon as next year if interest rates allow. This represents only about one -third of the total floor area which Kraus- Anderson is presently under contract to build in the Downtown Core. Area. He also indicated that Kraus - Anderson prefers to build a free - standing "strip" retail center either within or immediately adjacent to the Ring Road, rather than construct an addition to.the existing downtown complex. However, an addition of retail space was not ruled out during our discussions. Although he provided no assurances, Mr. Spalla indicated that he would likely be able to attract a smaller - sized supermarket to their portion of the project once the economy improves. Herb Bloomberg was very optimistic during my meeting with him earlier this week. He said that Bloomberg Cos. still is very anxious to see the redevelopment project proceed as planned, even if construction must be delayed indefinitely. He still plans on constructing a free- standing "Home Center" and adding new retail space to the existing complex. He also is considering the construction of a new "scene shop" and possibly a new 1200 -1600 seat dinner theatre as part of the overall complex.. His preliminary plans would be consistent with the adopted downtown plan, but he was unable to provide me with any specific timetable for construction of any element of his plans. Of special significance wasBloombe�g'a sincere interest in acquiring and renovating the Instant Web building. According to Mr. Bloomberg, they have conducted preliminary studies which have determined that this building could potentially be renovated into a 120 room hotel, with a few small retail shops and the hotel lobby in the front section of the building. ... � ..- ... ,•ws. � _.:,a.,... _ a.x .::, .. .._ ; ..,;.,,„;Y ..ate ,. ...+0.;,.a ...:........ . . _. t...:..ti :viB...a,...._ r. ws..hlsa.n::.oi . i..s t,w...;.f.e;•_'.+'� t.;nannassen HRA February 12, 1982 Page 3 Probably the most significant comment that Mr. Bloomberg made during my meeting with him was that he intends on focusing his .business efforts in Chanhassen during the next several years in order to fulfill his dream for a new Downtown Chanhassen. I would once again ask that you keep the above information confidential, as neither developer wishes to have their comments made public prior to the expiration of the development agreements. In light of the fact that the HRA is under contract with two developers for construction of the downtown project, we are limited in our immediate options for project.implementation. I believe the best approach at this time is to adopt a "wait and seell attitude until the contracts expire. During the next few months I will be evaluating what our options are in regards to the Instant Web building and the overall Downtown Redevelopment Project. A substantial number of options have surfaced within the last ten days, but more thought and study is required before I will be prepared to discuss the pros and cons of each option in a public forum. In the meantime, I wi 1 1 evaluate the current financial status of . the tax increment district in order to determine what resources are . . available to the HRA for future downtown activities. I anticipate the receipt of tax increment revenues in excess of amounts projected last summer, but a more accurate estimate can now be obtained due to the availability of 1982 tax information. Again, I believe the . adopted downtown I plan still merits your full support, even in light of our recent setback. CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 STAFF REPORT TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director ` A�f,�A DATE: January 15, 1982 RE: 'Special Assessment Reduction Program As directed at your meeting of December 17, 1981, I have invited representatives from Rauenhorst Corporation and instant Web, Inc to the meeting of January 21, 1982 in order to discuss the proposed Special Assessment Reduction Program for Chanhassen Lakes Business Park and Park Two lands. Representatives from Fluoroware, Inc. and DayCo Concrete Company will also likely be in attendance to observe the discussion of this item and present their positions concerning their eligibility for any program established by the HRA to induce development within the Project Area. Attached are several copies of correspondence related to this item, as well as a copy of the same materials presented by the Attorney at your last meeting which provide for program implementation. Depending on what action, if any, you take in regards to this program.on January - 21, 1982, modifications will likely be required in various legal documents before any final action can be taken by the HRA. Enc. Report Update (2 /10/82) Since the postponement of your January 21, 1982 meeting, I have been attempting to arrange for a new meeting date for Rauenhorst Corp. However, Rauenhorst off ,_,•__ to attend the meeting of February 18, 1982 due to unavoidable businss conflicts. They are very interested in meeting with the HRA as soon t as possible, however, so I have tentatively notified them to be in attendance at your next regular meeting of March 18, 1982. Officials from Dayco Concrete Co., Fluoroware, Inc., and Park Two /United Mailing, Inc. still plan on being at next week's joint meeting of the HRA and City Council. L .1 LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST .. Y RUSSEUL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CRAIG M. MCRTZ OF COUNSEL December 8, 1981 HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH L L L L Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority c/o Scott A. Martin Executive Director Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 TELEPHONE (512) 333 -1811 nl'r : 1 Li, l r AJJEN DEC 0 91981 -NT DEPT. Re: The Reduction of City Project 78 -3 Assessments As A Redevelopment Cost Dear Scott: The HRA has long discussed the possibility of paying a portion of the Public Improvements Project 78 -3 assessments as a method of stimulating the development of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park and the properties abutting the Business Park. Initially the proposed program would 'paved entailed the discretionary award of tax increment monies on a case -by -case basis, with actual payment being accomplished by means of a HRA purchase of parcels and an immediate resale of such parcels at a "written down" price. The discretionary aspect of the proposed program caused the City's bond counsel to express serious reservations regarding the program In addition, numerous practical problems arose from bond counsel's stated requirement that assessment reductions could only be accomplished in the form of a land purchase and resale. Recently, you have advised me that because of the format of the proposed overlay zoning ordinance for the Downtown Project, it would no longer be necessary for the assessment reduction program to be discretionary in nature. On November 10, 1981, a breakthrough was achieved with Mr. Kennedy, the City's bond counsel. Mr. Kennedy reversed his previous position on the manner of payment of assessment reductions. Mr. Kennedy agreed that he would no longer object to the concept of making.'direct payments from the BRA treasury to the City treasury in reduction of the Project 78 -3 assessments. Mr. Kennedy's consent to a direct payment program was necessary because the City can issue further bonds in support of the Downtown Project only if it has received the approving opinion of bond counsel. Scott A. Martin December 8, 1981 Page Two Mr. Kennedy's approval of a direct payment program for the reduction of Project 78 -3 assessments was conditioned upon: 1. Adoption of certain modifications to the HRA Plan, and 2. City Council approval of those modifications, and 3. Preparation of a form of assessment agreement to be signed by developers who wish to participate in the assessment reduction program. In an attempt to implement the program as discussed with Mr. Kennedy, we have prepared the following documents for your consideration: a. The proposed text of Modification No. 5 to the HRA Plan; b. A form of H.R.A. resolution approving Modification ' No. 5; C. A form of City Council resolution approving Modification No. 5; d. A form of HRA resolution approving a form of assessment agreement to be signed by program participants; e. The text of the proposed form of assessment agreement to be signed by program participants; f. A form of HRA resolution approving the retroactive participation of Fluoroware, Inc. in the program. Document "E" needs the most explanation. In Section 2.2(c) the redeveloper agrees to build certain improvements at a stated cost. In Section 3.1 the HRA agrees to make an assessment reduction payment upon completion of those improvements. The amount of the assessment reduction payments is equal to 7% of the value of those improvements measured upon completion.(See Section 3.2) In the event that the HRA experiences cash flow problems it can postpone assessment reduction payments without incurring any obligation to pay interest during the postponement. (See Section 3.3) The assessment reduction payment program ends in 1987. (See Section 3.4) In document "B" the HRA reserves the right to extend the program for further periods of time. Scott A. Martin ! December 8, 1981 Page Three The redeveloper agrees that it will not seek reductions in real estate taxes below the amount of taxes which will be payable in the first year that the new construction is fully taxable. (See Article V of the Assessment Agreement) The redeveloper forfeits his rightsunder the agreement a) if the completed improvements are less expensive than originally contemplated or b) if he fails to complete the improvements within the 5 year life of the program or c) if the redeveloper goes into bankruptcy. (See Sections 6.1 and 6.2) The weak element in the program, as described in the enclosed documents, is the assumption that the county assessor will be cooperative and assess the completed improvements at a value at least as great as the value upon which the 7% payment was made. The assessor is not a party to the assessment agreement and cannot be compeled to abide by its terms In the case of the agreements with Kraus - Anderson and Bloomberg, this particular problem is disposed of by requiring the redeveloper to guarantee the HRA's revenue shortfalls and by requiring the redeveloper to file a letter of credit. We have attempted to ameliorate the problem in these documents by stating in Section 6.1 that completion of the improvements at less than the promised cost works a forfeiture of the redeveoper's right to an assessment reduction payment. If you have any questions, pelase call. Very truly yours, &_tom " 'K4_" CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney CMM:ner enc OUTLINC JF PROPOSED 7% INCENTIVE `GRAM I. FORMAT A. BRA by Resolution Adopts Plan Modification No. 5. B. City Council by Resolution Adopts Plan Modification No. 5. C. HRA Approves Standard Form "Assessment Agreement" to be Signed By All Program Participants. D. HRA Decides Whether Program Retroactively Includes Fluoroware. II. ELIGIBILITY Any Redeveloper of a lot which is subject to assessments for City Project 78 -3. Redeveloper required to sign an "assessment agreement" with the HRA.(The word "assessment" refers to the fact that the agreement affects the value ` - --� the property will be assessed for real estate tax purposes). III. CONTENTS OF THE ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT A. Redeveloper agrees to construct certain "minimum improvements" at a specified dollar cost.(92.02(c)) B. Upon completion of the minimum improvements BRA agrees to pay a portion of the Project 78 -3 assessments on that lot. ( §3.1) C. Amount of the BRA payment is 7% of the value of the completed improvements excluding land value. ( 93.2) D. (1) Should the Redeveloper landscaping? (2) Payment cannot exceed assessments which are minimum improvements. Timing of the HRA payments. also receive 7% of the value of amount of the Project 78 -3 unpaid upon completion of the (1) Documents as drafted contemplate a lump sum settlement with the City Treasurer upon completion of the minimum improvements. Cash flow problems are ameliorated by reservation of a power to postpone program payments to future years. (2) Alternative position - HRA assumes responsibility for payment of the individual installments of assessments until such time as the total dollar amount of the installments equals the amount of the promised special assessment reduction. Events Causing Forfeiture of Right to Participate in the Program. (1) Failure to complete minimum improvements before end of program in 1987.( §3.4) (2) Failure to complete minimum improvements at a cost equal to or exceeding the promised cost. ( 56.1) (3) Bankruptcy of Redeveloper. ( 56.1) (4) Failure to keep real estate taxes current( ?) How Are Redevelopers Obligations Secured? (1) 7% payment is based upon values upon completion ( §3.2) L (2) Redeveloper agrees that it will not seek real estate tax reductions or tax abatements.( §5.1) L E. L L F. (1) Should the Redeveloper landscaping? (2) Payment cannot exceed assessments which are minimum improvements. Timing of the HRA payments. also receive 7% of the value of amount of the Project 78 -3 unpaid upon completion of the (1) Documents as drafted contemplate a lump sum settlement with the City Treasurer upon completion of the minimum improvements. Cash flow problems are ameliorated by reservation of a power to postpone program payments to future years. (2) Alternative position - HRA assumes responsibility for payment of the individual installments of assessments until such time as the total dollar amount of the installments equals the amount of the promised special assessment reduction. Events Causing Forfeiture of Right to Participate in the Program. (1) Failure to complete minimum improvements before end of program in 1987.( §3.4) (2) Failure to complete minimum improvements at a cost equal to or exceeding the promised cost. ( 56.1) (3) Bankruptcy of Redeveloper. ( 56.1) (4) Failure to keep real estate taxes current( ?) How Are Redevelopers Obligations Secured? (1) 7% payment is based upon values upon completion ( §3.2) L (2) Redeveloper agrees that it will not seek real estate tax reductions or tax abatements.( §5.1) L A. MODIFICATION NO. 5 TO CHANHASSEN DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND PLAN Pursuant to Section 1, G, of the Chanhassen Redevelopment Plan, dated October 28, 1977, as amended heretofore, said plan is hereby further modified as follows: Subsection A (Project Expenditures) of Section V (Financial Plan) of the Amended Plan Booklet (February, 1980, Revised March 20, 1980) is amended to read as follows: A. PROJECT EXPENDITURES Project Expenditures include all estimated public costs for assembling and clearing land and constructing public improvements. They are presented in two groups. (1) The first group - short -term expenditures - is presented in Table 4 and consists of all costs associated with Phase I and Phase II developments in the CBD area as well as all public costs for developing Phase I of the Business Park and abutting real property (the area between State Highway No. 5 and the railroad tracks to the south of it) . The City of Chanhassen acting in cooperation with the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority installed streets, curbs, gutters, watermains, sanitary sewer mains, and storm water facilities in the westerly portion of the Business Park and abutting real estate as City Improvement Project 78 -3. The City carried out the construction of said improvements under the authority of Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. On September 8, 1980, the Chanhassen City Council adopted an assessment roll levying special assessments against the benefited land in the Project 78 -3 area. Prior to the completion of Project 78 -3 the Project 78 -3 area was a "blighted" area and a "deteriorated" area as defined in the Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Act (Chapter 462 Minnesota Statutes). Under an assessment reduction program to be established by resolution of the Chanhassen HRA a portion of the Tax Increment Proceeds will be paid to either the redeveloper of individual parcels of land, or Chanhassen City Treasurer or the Carver County Auditor as a credit on a parcel by. parcel basis against the Project 78 -3 assessments. The amount of each such reduction shall be computed according to a uniform formula which takes into account the value of private improvements which various redevelopers contract to construct within the Project 78 -3 area. No such assessment reduction payments shall be made unless the f redeveloper of any such parcel enters into an assessment agreement with the HRA specifying the nature of the private improvements to be constructed and stipulating a minimum value of said improvements for tax assessment purposes upon completion of the improvements. Because the Project 78 -3 area is a scenic, rolling lakefront site, the cost of Project 78 -3 was high compared to more typical grid - patterned flat industrial parks in other communities. Accordingly, land costs in the Project 78 -3 area are not competitive with land costs in other communities. The Project 78 -3 area will continue to lie stagnant and unproductive unless some portion of the Project 78 -3 costs can be absorbed through the tax increment process. Unless an assessment reduction program, as described above, is established and implemented, as part of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project, the entire Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project will not be feasible. (2) The second group - long -term expenditures - is presented in Table 5 and consists of all costs for developing the remainder of the Business Park area. These costs would be incurred only if additional future development of the Business Park and the abutting real estate occurs. Dated: November 1981. LApproved As To Form L Executive Director L L -2- Y' C, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Dated: Resolution No. Motion by Commissioner RESOLUTION Seconded by Commissioner APPROVING PLAN MODIFICATION NO. 5 I BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01. The Chanhassen City Council and this Authority have approved a redevelopment project to be undertaken by the Authority, designated as the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project (the "Project "), and a Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), for the Project. 1.02. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.525(Subd. 6) empowers this Authority to make minor changes in the Plan under certain limited circumstance which do not require approval by the governing body of the municipality within which the project is located. 1.03. Modification No. 5 dated 19 , has been presented to the Authority for its consideration and approval. 1.04. Modification No. 5, if adopted, would implement the program of expenditures in the area of Chanhassen Lakes Business Park as described in Table 4 ( "Project Expenditures Short -Term Costs ") of the "Amended Plan Drafted February, 1980, Revised March 20, 1980" booklet which was approved as Modification No. 3 to the Plan on March 20, 1980. SECTION 2. FINDINGS AND APPROVAL. 2.01. The Authority hereby finds that the approval of Modification No. 5, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, would not have the effect of substantially altering or affecting the general land uses established in the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Project. 2.02. The Authority hereby approves said Modification No. 5 to the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Project. l.� L L 2.03. The Authority hereby finds that but for the approval of said Modification No. 5 and the assessment reduction program described in said Modification No. 5 the land in the Chanhassen Improvement Project 78 -3 area will continue to lie stagnant, underutilized, and unproductive. 2.04. The Authority hereby finds that the entire Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project will not be feasible unless the assessment reduction program described in Modification No. 5 is established and implemented. 2.05. The findings made by the Authority in its Resolu- tion dated November 29, 1977, approving the Plan and in its Resolution dated December 18, 1978 approving Modification No. 1 to the Plan, and in its Resolution dated March 20, 1980, approving Modification No. 3 to the Plan are hereby re- confirmed. 2.06. The Authority hereby finds that the costs of implementing the assessment reduction program described in Modification No. 5 a) are expenditures necessary to carry out the purpose of the Minnesota Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, b) are expenditures necessary to prepare the Project 78 -3 area for private redevelopment and improvement, and c) are a proper part of the public redevelopment cost of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. SECTION 3. IMPLEMENTATION OF MODIFICATION NO. 5. 3.01. No assessment reduction payment shall be made or authorized unless the following conditions have been met: a) The payment is made pursuant to the terms of an assessment agreement between the redeveloper (and owner) of the parcel of land to be redeveloped (the "Redevelopment Property ") and the Authority; b) Said assessment agreement provides that such redeveloper is obligated to complete certain private improvements upon the Redevelopment Property in accordance with plans and specifications which are in conformance with the ordinances and regulations of the City of Chanhassen; c) Said assessment agreement provides that the amount of the assessment reduction payment shall be a percentage of the value of the private improvements for real estate tax assessment purposes, and that the redeveloper and owner of said parcel, their heirs, successors and assigns, shall not seek any reduction in the annual real estate taxes paid in respect of the Redevelopment Property below the amount of such taxes which are payable in the calendar year next following the calendar year in which said private improvements are completed. -2- 3.03. In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which have already been certified to the Carver County Auditor in connection with any parcel of land,any assessment reduction payments shall be made directly to the Carver County Auditor as a credit against the outstanding Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) levied against said parcel. In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which have not been certified to the Carver County Auditor in connection with said parcel of land, any assessment reduction payment shall I be made directly to the Chanhassen City Treasurer as a credit against the Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) which would be certified to the Carver County Auditor for collection in future tax years. 3.04. In the event that the redeveloper of any parcel of land subject to an assessment agreement, shall have paid in full the Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) subsequent to the date of execution of such assessment agreement, then the assessment reduction payment shall be made directly to the redeveloper of such parcel. 3.05. The obligation of the Authority to make assessment reduction payments pursuant to Modification No. 5 shall be subordinated to the obligation of the Authority to make payments on the Bonds issued either by the Authority or by the City of Chanhassen in support of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. 3.06. Any amounts to be paid pursuant to the above L described assessment reduction program shall be paid only from tax increments received by the Authority pursuant to Section 462.585 of Minnesota Statutes in connection with the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. L L -3- 3.02. The amount of any assessment reduction payment made pursuant to Modification No. 5 in connection with any parcel I of land shall not exceed the lesser of the following amounts: a) The sum of the principal balance of the Project 78 -3 assessments levied against said parcel (and accrued interest thereon computed in accordance with Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes) outstanding against the Redevelopment Property at the time of the completion of the agreed private improvements; b) Seven percent of the Assessor's value of the agreed private improvements measured upon completion not including the value of landscaping, parking, and utility improvements constructed upon the Redevelopment Property. 3.03. In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which have already been certified to the Carver County Auditor in connection with any parcel of land,any assessment reduction payments shall be made directly to the Carver County Auditor as a credit against the outstanding Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) levied against said parcel. In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which have not been certified to the Carver County Auditor in connection with said parcel of land, any assessment reduction payment shall I be made directly to the Chanhassen City Treasurer as a credit against the Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) which would be certified to the Carver County Auditor for collection in future tax years. 3.04. In the event that the redeveloper of any parcel of land subject to an assessment agreement, shall have paid in full the Project 78 -3 assessments (and accrued interest thereon) subsequent to the date of execution of such assessment agreement, then the assessment reduction payment shall be made directly to the redeveloper of such parcel. 3.05. The obligation of the Authority to make assessment reduction payments pursuant to Modification No. 5 shall be subordinated to the obligation of the Authority to make payments on the Bonds issued either by the Authority or by the City of Chanhassen in support of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. 3.06. Any amounts to be paid pursuant to the above L described assessment reduction program shall be paid only from tax increments received by the Authority pursuant to Section 462.585 of Minnesota Statutes in connection with the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. L L -3- 3.07. In the event that the Authority determines that the tax increment generated by the'Downtown Redevelopment Project is insufficient to pay: a) payments of principal, premium (if any) and interest which will be due in any given calendar year on the Bonds, and b) assessment reduction payments which will be due in that same calendar year according'to the terms of any assessment agreements entered into pursuant to Modification No. 5, then the Authority's obligation to make such assessment reduction payments shall abate until such time that the Authority determines that such tax increment is sufficient to pay both such types of payments. Any assessment reduction payments so abated shall not bear interest during the period of such abatement. In the event that such tax increment is sufficient to pay a) all payments of principal,interest, premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds and b) a portion (but not all) of the above described assessment reduction payments, then such tax increment shall be applied as follows: First to satisfy the principal, premium (if any) and interest due in that calendar year; Second to satisfy assessment reductions owing under assessment reduction agreements chronologically (according to the date of execution of the assessment agreements by the Authority) with tax increment being applied to the satisfaction of payment . due under the most senior of such assessment agreements. For purposes of this resolution, the term "Bonds" means obligations issued either by the Authority or the City of Chanhassen to finance the costs of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project, including but not limited to the costs of Chanhassen Improvement Project 78 -3 and the costs of the assessment reduction program which is described in Modification No. 5. 3.08. The above described assessment reduction program shall terminate on , 1987, with no further assessment reduction payments to be made on or after that date, notwithstanding any language in any assessment agreement to the contrary. The Authority, however, reserves the right to extend the assessment reduction program for additional periods of time beyond the , 1987 expiration date. Passed and adopted this day of 19 , by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Chairman -4- i I t I i I ' 1. L. L L L L C Attest: Executive Director Yes No _5_ Absent 4 f: Exhibit A To Be oupplied (A copy of Modification No. 5) f- I I I I l_ L L L L L CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION Dated: Resolution No. Motion by Councilmember Seconded by Councilmember RESOLUTION APPROVING REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT f WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the plan of the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project (hereinafter the "Plan "); and WHEREAS, said Plan contemplated that the Authority would pay a portion of the costs incurred by the City in connection with the installation of utilities south of State Highway No. 5 as a part of Public Improvement Project No. 78 -3; and WHEREAS, the Authority has transmitted to the City a copy of the Authority's Resolution No. dated 19 , adopting Modification No. 5 TO the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan; and ( WHEREAS, by said resolution the Authority has implemented a program whereby the City would be reimbursed for those costs of Project 78 -3 which were assessed pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes but which remain unpaid; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen City Council as follows: - L L L 1. Modification No. 5 to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as described in the Authority's Resolution No. dated , 19 , (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved. 2. The City Council hereby finds that the approval of said Modification No. 5 would not have the effect of substantially altering, or affecting the general land uses established in the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan and Project. 3. The City Council hereby finds that but for the approval of said Modification No. 5 and the assessment reduction program described in said Modification No. 5 the land in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park will continue to be stagnant, underutilized, and unproductive. 4. The City Council hereby finds that the entire Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project will not be feasible unless the assessment reduction program described in Modification No. 5 is established and implemented. 5. The City Council hereby finds that the costs of implementing the assessment reduction program described in Modification No. 5 a) are expenditures necessary to carry out the purposes of the Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Act, b) are expenditures necessary to prepare the Project 78 -3 assessment area for private development and improvement and c) are a proper part of•the public redevelopment cost of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project. 6. The findings made by the City Council in its Resolution dated December 19, 1977, approving the Plan, and its Resolution dated December 18, 1978, approving Modification No. 1 to the Plan, and its Resolution dated May 27, 1980, approving Modification No. 3 to the Plan are hereby reconfirmed. Adopted this day of 198 Attest: City Clerk Manager Yes No -2- F-4 Absent Exhibit A To Be Supplied r (Copy of HRA Resolution Adopting Modification No. S) r L lr L L { L l HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING FORM OF ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT Dated: Resolution No. Motion by Commissioner Seconded by Commissioner WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority has approved Modification No. 5 to the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, said Modification No. 5 contemplated the preparation of a form of assessment agreement between the Authority and private redevelopers who wish to participate in the assessment reduction program described in Modification No. 5; and WIiEREAS, the proposed form of such agreement has been presented to the Authority for its review; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen housing and Redevelopment Authority as follows: 1. The form of assessment agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, is hereby approved. 2. The Executive Director and Chairman of the Authority, however, are not authorized to execute any such assessment agreement with any redeveloper or land owner unless specifically authorized to do so by a further resolution of the Authority. Passed and adopted this day of 19 , by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Attest: Executive Director Yes No Chairman Absent ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the day of 19 , by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Chanhassen, a public body corporate and politic (the "Agency "), established pursuant to Laws of Minnesota 1947, Chapter 487, as amended, being Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.411- 462.711 (the "Act "), r and II (the Redeveloper "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Agency was created pursuant to the Act and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers j by a resolution of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen (the "City ") ; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the Agency has undertaken a program for the clearance and reconstruction or rehabilitation of blighted, deteriorated, deteriorating, vacant, unused, underused or inappropriately used areas of the City, and in this connection is engaged in carrying out a redevelopment project known as the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project (the "Project "), in an area (the "Project Area "), located in the City; and WHEREAS, as of the date of this Agreement there has been prepared and approved by the Agency and the City a redevelopment plan for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency requested the County of Carver (the "County ") to certify the current assessed value of the real property within the Project Area pursuant to Section 462.585 of the Act thereby establishing the Project as a tax increment financing district; and WHEREAS, the major objectives of the Redevelopment Plan are to: acquire for rehabilitation economically or . functionally obsolete or underutilized buildings and land; provide a redevelopment site of a character that will encourage future development of the area and improve sources of public I revenue; elimiate blighting influences which impede potential L development within the aforementioned redevelopment project; provide maximum opportunity for redevelopment by private enterprise, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole; encourage private rehabilitation of structures within the redevelopment project; and L WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and particularly to make the land in the Project Area available for redevelopment by private enterprise for and in accordance with the uses specified in the Redevelop- ment Plan, the Agency has determined to provide substantial aid and assistance to the Project through the sale of bonds to finance the public costs of the redevelopment of the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Agency believes that the redevelopment of a portion of the Project Area pursuant to this Agreement, and fulfillment generally of the Agreement, are in the vital and best interests of the City and the health, safety, morals, and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of the applicable State and local laws and requirements under which the Project has been undertaken and is being assisted: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meani— ng clearly appears from the context: "Act" means the Municipal Iiousing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.411 et seq., as amended. "Agency" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Chanhassen. "Agreement" means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, amended, or supplemented. "Assessment Agreement" means any agreement substantially similar to this agreement providing for payment by the Agency of Project 78 -3 assessments from the tax increments received by the Agency in connection with the Project. "Assessment Reduction Payments" means payments made by the Authority to either the City or to the County's auditor, as a credit against Project 78 -3 assessments, pursuant to Article IV of this Agreement or pursuant to agreements similar to this Agreement withot'2r redevelopers of land in the Project Area. "Market Value" or "Market Valuation" means the estimated fair market value of real property as determined by the assessor in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.11 (or as finally adjusted by any assessor, board of equalization, commis- sioner of revenue, or any court). -2- I L L "Assessed Value" or "Assessed Valuation" means the value of real property as determined by the assessor in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.13 (or as finally adjusted by any assessor, board of equalization, commissioner of revenue, or any court) against which the real property tax is imposed. "Assessor" means the Carver County Assessor or a City Assessor having the powers of the Carver County Assessor. "Bonds" means the general obligation bonds or obligations issued by the City or the Agency to finance the costs of the Project including but not limited to the Assessment Reduction Payments made by the Authority pursuant to Modification No. 5 to the Plan. The term "Bonds" shall also include any general obligation bonds or obligations issued to refund any Bonds. "Certificate of Completion" means the certification provided to the Redeveloper, or the purchaser of any part, parcel or unit of the Redevelopment Property, pursuant to Section 4.2 of this Agreement. "City" means the City of Chanhassen. "Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents on the construction work to be performed by the Redeveloper on the Redevelopment Property which (a) shall be at least as detailed as the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents which are submitted to the building inspector of the City, and (b) shall include at least the following for each building: (1) site plan, (2) foundation plan; (3) basement plan; (4) floor plan for each floor; (5) cross sections of each (length and width); (6) elevations (all sides); (7) landscape plan. "County" means the County of Carver. "Critical Areas Act of 1973" means the statutes located in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116G.01 et seq., as amended. "Event of Default" means an action by the Redeveloper listed in Article VI of this Agreement. "Maturity Date" means the date when the principal of, premium (if any), and interest on the Bonds are paid in full. "Minimum Improvements" are more particularly described made a part hereof. -3- menas those improvements which on Exhibit A attached hereto and "Minnesota Environmental Policy Act" means the statutes located at Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116D.01 et sec., as amended. "National Environmental Policy Act" means the federal law located at 42 U.S.C. § 54331 et seq., as amended. "Plan" means the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan as described in the "Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project Amended Plan, February, 1980, Revised March 20, 1980" booklet, as further amended from time to time by the Agency. "Project" means the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project as described in the "Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project Amended Plan, February 1980, Revised March 20, 1980" booklet, as further amended from time to time by the Agency. "Project Area" means the real property located within the boundaries of the entire redevelopment district as described in Figure 1 contained in the "Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project Amended Plan, February 1980, Revised March 20, 1980" booklet. "Project 78 -3 Assessments" means the costs of City of Chanhassen Improvement Project 78 -3 which were specially assessed against benefited real property pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. "Real Estate Taxes" means ad valorem taxes on real property pursuant to Chapter 273 of Minnesota Statutes and not including any special assessments levied pursuant to Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes. "Redeveloper" means or its successors and assigns. "Redevelopment Property" means the real property which is more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. "Redevelopment Plan" means Plan. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Official" means any City or County assessor, county auditor, City, County or State board of equalization, the commissioner of revenue of the State, or any state or federal district court, the tax court of the State, or the State Supreme Court. -4- L II L. L ARTICLE II. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.1 Representations by the Agency. The Agency makes the — mellowing representations as the basis for the undertaking on its part herein contained: (a) The Agency is a housing and redevelopment authority duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. (b) The Project is a "redevelopment project" within the meaning of the Act and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the Act. (c) The Project is a "tax increment district" created, adopted, certified and approved pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.585. (d) The Agency has established the Project Area as a "tax increment district" and has requested that the County auditor of the County certify the Assessed Valuation of all taxable real property in the Project Area pursuant to'Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.585. (e) The activities of the Agency are undertaken for the purpose of removing, preventing or reducing blight, blighting factors, or the causes of blight, and for the purposes of eliminating or preventing the development or spread of deteriorated or deteriorating areas. (f) To finance the cost of the activities to be undertaken by the Agency, the Agency proposes to use the proceeds of Bonds issued either by the City or the Agency and to pledge tax increment generated by the Project Area to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Section 2.2 Representations and Warranties b the Redeveloper. The Redeveloper represents and warrants that: (a) The Redeveloper is a corporation duly organized and in good standing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, is not in violation of any provisions of its certificate of incorporation, its by -laws, or the laws of the,State of Minnesota, has power to enter into this Agreement and has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by proper corporate action. (b) The Redeveloper will construct the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Plan and all local, state and federal laws and regulations (including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, building code and public health laws and regulations). -5- (c) The Minimum Improvements constitute a permitted use under the zoning ordinance of the City, a permitted use under the Plan and the Act and will be constructed at a cost at least Dollars ($ ) not including the Redeveloper's cost of acquisition of the Redevelopment Property and not including the cost of landscaping improvements, parking improvements, and utility improvements constructed (or to be constructed) upon the Redevelopment Property. (d) At such time or times as may be required by law, the Redeveloper will have complied with all local, state and federal environmental laws and regulations, will have obtained any and all necessary environmental reviews, licenses or clearances under (and will be in compliance with the requirements of ) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act, and the Critical Areas Act of 1973; as to the Redevelopment Property that Redeveloper has received no notice or communication from any local, state or federal official that the activities of the Redeveloper in the Project Area may be or will be in violation of any environmental law or regulation (other than those notices or communications of which the Agency is aware). The Redeveloper is aware of no facts the existence of which would cause it to be in violation of any local, state or federal environmental law, regulation or review procedure or which would give any person a valid claim under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act. (e) The Redeveloper will use its best efforts to construct the Minimum Improvements in accordance with all existing local, state or federal energy- conservation laws or regulations. (f) The Redeveloper will obtain, in a timely manner, all required permits, licenses and approvals, and will meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all local; state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the Minimum Improvements may be lawfully constructed. ARTICLE III. ASSESSMENT REDUCITON PAYMENTS Section 3.1 Obligation of Agency to Make Assessment Reduction Payments. Upon completion of the Minimum Improvements and issuance of the Certificate of Completion, the Agency, from the tax increment generated by the Proejct shall make a payment (in the manner and in the amount provided hereinafter) in reduction of the Project 78 -3 assessments which have been levied against the Redevelopment Property. In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which have then already been certified to the County's auditor for collection with real estate taxes, said assessment reduction payment shall be made directly to the County's auditor in full or partial satisfaction, as the case may be, of said Project 78 -3 assessments. am In the case of Project 78 -3 assessments which i have not then been certified to the County's auditor for collection with real estate taxes, said assessment reduction payment shall be made to the City's treasurer in full or partial i satisfaction, as the case may be, of said Project 78 -3 assessments. In the event that the Redeveloper has then already fully paid the Project 78 -3 assessment which have been levied against the Redevelopment Property, said assessment reduction payment shall be made directly to the Redeveloper or his designated successors and assigns. Section 3.2 Amount of Assessment Reduction Payment. The amount of any assessment reduction payment made pursuant to this f Agreement shall be equal to the lesser of the following amounts: (a) the sum of the principal balance of the Project 78 -3 assessments levied against the Redevelopment Property, together with accrued interest thereon, both principal and interest being computed as of the date of completion of the Minimum Improvements; or (b) seven percent (7%) of the value Minimum Improve- ments, which shall be the Assessor's Market Value of the Redevelopment Property measured upon completion of the Minimum Improvements not in- cludingthe value (as determined by the Assessor) of the underlying real estate, and not including the value (as determined by the Assessor) of the landscaping, parking and utility improvements constructed upon the Redevelopment Property. Section 3.3 Obligation to Make Assessment Reduction Payments Subordinated to Other Obligations. Any assessment reduction payments which the Agency is obligated to make pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid only from the tax increments received by the Agency in connection with the Project. In the event that the Agency determines that such tax increment is insufficient to make both (a) payments of principal,premium (if any) and interest which will be due in any given calendar year on the Bonds, and (b) all assessment reduction payments due the L Redeveloper or other persons who have joined in assessment agreements with the Agency similar to this assessment agreement Lthen (Section 3.1 of this Agreement notwithstanding) the Agency's to make assessment reduction payments to the Redeveloper iobligation ` -7- C shall abate until such time as the Agency determines that such tax increment is sufficient to make both such types of payments. Any assessment reduction payments so abated shall not bear interest during the period of such abatement. In the event that the Agency determines such tax increment is sufficient to make all of the above described payments on the Bonds but only a portion of the assessment reduction payments due under the various outstanding assessment agreements, including this Agreement, then such tax increment shall be applied as following: First, to satisfy the principal, premium (if any) and interest due in that calendar year on the Bonds, and Next, to satisfy assessment reduction payments owing under all then outstanding assessment agreements, said payments to be made on the basis of seniority (according to the date of execution, by the Agency, of each such assessment agreement), with such tax increment being applied to the satisfaction of payments due under the most senior of such assessment agreements. Section 3.4 Termination of Entitlement to Payment. Notwith- standing language in this Agreement to the contrary, .the obligation of the Agency to make any assessment reduction payment to the Redeveloper (or his successors and assigns) shall become —null and void on 1987, unless the Redeveloper has obtained a Certificate of Completion on or before said date. ARTICLE IV. CONSTRUCTION OF MINIMUM IMPROVEMENTS Section 4.1 Construction of Minimum Improvements. The Redeveloper agrees that it will construct the Minimum Improvements on the Redevelopment Property and at all times prior to Maturity Date will not cause a reduction in the real estate taxes paid in respect of the Redevelopment Property through: (a) willful destruction of the Minimum Improvements or any part thereof, and /or (b) willful refusal to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements if or damaged or destroyed property. Section 4.2 Certificate of Completion. (a) Promptly after completion of the Improvements in accordance with the provisions the Agency, upon the written application of the W$z Minimum of this Agreement X- ed::e1opa_, ✓vil- M furnish the Redeveloper with an appropriate instrument so certi- fying. Such certification by the Agency shall be a conclusive determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in this Agreement to construct the Minimum Improvements. Such certification and such determination shall not constitute evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any of the Redeveloper's obligations to any holder of a mortgage or to any insurer of a mortgage, securing money loaned to finance the Minimum Improvements, or any part thereof. (b) If the Agency shall refuse or fail to provide any certification in'accordance with the provisions of this Section 4.2 of this Agreement, the Agency shall, within thirty (30) days after written request by the Redeveloper, provide the Redeveloper with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects the Redeveloper has failed to complete the Minimum Improvements in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or acts it will be necessary, in the opinion of the Agency, for the Redeveloper to take or perform in order to obtain such certification. (c) The construction of the Minimum Improvements shall be deemed to be completed when such Minimum Improvements are substantially completed. ARTICLE V. REAL ESTATE TAXES Section 5.1 Real Estate Taxes. The Redeveloper agress that, subsequent to comp etion o the Minimum Improvements and prior to the Maturity Date, it will not cause a reduction in the annual real estate taxes paid in respect of the Redevelopment Property below the amount of such taxes payable in the calendar year next following the calendar year in which the Redeveloper obtains the Certificate of Completion, and that it will not seek a reduction in the assessed-value of the Minimum Improvements below the value determined by the Assessor pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement: (1) By seeking administrative review or judicial review of the applicability of any tax statute determined by any Tax Official to be applicable to the Project or the Redeveloper or l raising the inapplicability of any such tax statute as a defense ` in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; (2) by seeking administrative review or judicial review of the constitutionality of any tax statute determined by any Tax Official to be applicable to the Project or the Redeveloper or raising the unconstitutionality of any such tax statute as a Ldefense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax proceedings; L L (3) by willful destruction of the Redevelopment Property or any part thereof; (4) by willful refusal to reconstruct damaged or destroyed property; (5) by requesting the Assessor to reduce the Market Value or Assessed Value of all or any portion of the Redevelopment Property; (6) by petitioning the board of equalization of the City or the board of equalization of the County to reduce the Market Value or Assessed Value of all or any portion of the Redevelopment Property; (7) by petitioning the board of equalization of the State or the commissioner of revenue of the State to reduce the Market Value or Assessed Value of all or any portion of the Redevelopment Property; (8) by maintaining an action in the District Court of the State or the Tax Court of the State pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 278, seeking a reduction in the Market Value or Assessed Value of the Redevelopment Property; (9) by applying to the commissioner of revenue of the State requesting an abatement of real property taxes pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 270; and (10) by maintaining any other proceedings, whether administrative, legal or equitable, with any administrative body within the City, the County, or the State or with any court of the State or the federal government. The Redeveloper shall not, prior to the Maturity Date, apply for a deferral of property tax on the Redevelopment Property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.86. Nothing in this Agreement shall limit the discretion of the Assessor to assign to the Redevelopment Property a Market Value to the Redevelopment Property in excess of the Minimum Market Value established pursuant to Article V of this Agreement. ARTICLE VI. EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 6.1 Events of Default Defined. The following shall be 'Tents of Default' under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean,whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any one or more of the following events (and the term "default" shall mean any event which would with the passage of time or giving of notice, or both, be an "Event of Default" hereunder): (a) Failure of the Redeveloper to complete the Minimum Improvementsat a cost equal to or exceeding the amount specified in 1(c of Section 2.2 of this Agreement. (b) Failure of the Redeveloper to complete the Minimum Improvements on or before the date stated in Section 3.4 of this Agreement. (c) Failure by the Redeveloper to observe and perform any covenant, condition, obligation or on its part to be observed or performed hereunder, within thirty (30) days after written -10- notice to the Redeveloper specifying such failure and requesting that it be remedied (or within such other period as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement); or if the failure is by its nature incurable within such thirty (30) days, failure by the Redeveloper to furnish to the Agency satisfactory assurances that the Redeveloper can and will cure such failure or failures within reasonable time. (d) If the Redeveloper shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy or shall make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or shall consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the whole or any substantial part of the Redevelopment Property. (e) If the Redeveloper shall file a petition or answer seeking reorganization or arrangement under the federal bankruptcy laws. (f) If the Redeveloper, on a petition in bankruptcy filed against it, be adjudicated a bankrupt, or a court of competent jurisdiction shall enter an order or decree appointing, without the consent of the Redeveloper, a receiver of the Redeveloper or of the whole or substantially all of its property, or approve a petition filed against the Redeveloper seeking reorganization or arrangement of the Redeveloper under the federal bankruptcy laws, and such adjudication, order or decree shall not be vacated or set aside or stayed within sixty (60) days from the date of entry thereof. Section 6.2 Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in Section 9.1 of this Agreement occurs, the Agency may make any one or more of the following actions: ( (a) Cancel and rescind this Agreement. l (b) Withhold the Certificate of Completion. (c) Cancel any pending Assessment.Reduction Payments due under the terms of this Agreement, causing a forfeiture of such payments in favor of the Agency. L (d) Take whatever action at law or in eauity mav_ appear necessary or desirable to the Agency to C, collect from the Redeveloper full reimbursement for any Assessment Reduction Payments previously Lmade pursuant to this Agreement. -11- Section 6.3 No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred Upon or reserved to the Agency is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statutes. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the Agency to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice. Section 6.4 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver. In the event any agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by either party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. ARTICLE VII ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 7.1 Conflict of Interest; Agency Representatives Not In ivi ually Liable. No member, official or employee of the Agency shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in the Agreement, nor shall any such member, official, or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he is, directly or indirectly interested. No member, official, or employee of the Agency shal be personally liable to the Redeveloper or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the Agency or for any Assessment Reduction Payments which may become due under the terms of this Agreement. Section 7.2 Duty of Agency to Act Reasonably. Wherever this Agreement requires the Agency to approve any action of the Redeveloper, it is understood and agreed that the Agency will not unreasonably withhold or delay such approval. Section 7.3 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. e� 4 g =-nt as otherwise expressiy provided in this agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under this Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally and -12- (a) in the case of the Redeveloper, is addressed to or delivered personally to the Redeveloper at (b) in the case of the Agency is addressed to or delivered personally to the Agency at Chanhassen City Hall or at such other address with respect to either such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section. Section 7.5 Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 7.6 or i of Registrar of to any subse, Property, or and shall be Notice to Subsequent Purchasers. The recording this Agreement with the County Recorder or County Titles shall constitute notice of this Agreement 3uent purchaser or encumbrancer of the Redevelopment any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, binding upon them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agency has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf and its seal to be hereunto duly affixed, and the Redeveloper has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its name and behalf and its corporate seal to be hereunto duly affixed, on or as of the date first above written. THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN By its And its idame of Redeveloper) QI And i L I -13- L STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 - - , by and the an of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Notary Public County: My Commission Expires: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19_ , by and the and of —a- corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public County: My Commission Expires: -14- LJXIII13I T A "SPECIMEN ONLY" r "Minimum Improvements" means a 20,000 square foot office building constructed of tilt -up concrete panels and masonry. l l l.. L L L L EXIiIBIT B "SPECIMEN ONLY" Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, according to the map or plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, in and for Carver County, Minnesota. r Conments On Assessment Agreement I P. 1 Name of Redeveloper must be supplied: P. ? Name of Redeveloper must be supplied. P. orcpaoo 2.2s a� must be revised if Redeveloper is an individual P. 4 Estimated construction cost must be supplied. P. 8 Expiration date for assessment reduction program must be supplied. P. 13 Redeveloper's address must be supplied. MOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY or CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION OF FLUOROWARE, INC. IN ASSESSMENT REDUCTION PROGRAM Dated: Resolution No. Motion By Commissioner Seconded by Commissioner WHEREAS, Fluoroware, Inc. (Fluoroware), the owner and developer of Lots 8 and 9, Block 5, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, Minnesota (the "Subject Property ") appeared before the Authority on March 20, 1980, and June 5, 1980, and requested that the Authority assist Fluoroware in its development of the Subject Property by utilizing a portion of tax increments received by the Authority pursuant to Section 462.585 of Minnesota Statutes to pay a portion of the costs of City of Chanhassen Project 78 -3 which was assessed against benefited properties including the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Authority on June 5, 1980 approved such assistance to Fluoroware in the form of a purchase of the Subject Property and a subsequent resale of the Subject Property at a reduced price; and WHEREAS, the above - described action of June 5, 1980, —Vas contingent upon the Authority's bond counsel issuing an approving opinion for such assistance to Fluoroware; and WHEREAS, Fluoroware, relying on the Authority's action of June 5, 1980, proceeded to complete its development of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Authority by its Resolution No. dated , 19 , adopted Modification No. 5 to the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project, thereby instituting a comprehensive program for the reduction of the Project 78 -3 assessments on all land in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park including the Subject Property; and ' WHEREAS, the assessment reduction program in said Modification No. 5 is similar in substance of assistance to Fluoroware which was contemplated Authority in its action of June 5, 1980; L L L L described to the form by the NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority, as follows: 1. The participation of Fluoroware in the assessment reduction program for the City of Chanhassen Public Improvement Project 78 -3 area is hereby approved retroactively provided that Fluoroware execute an assessment agreement with the Authority in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. 2. The Chairman and Executive Director of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the Authority. Passed and adopted this day of 19 by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Attest: Executive Director Yes 17.7 Chairman -2- Absent Exhibit A To Be Supplied ( Copy of Approved Assessment Agreement) C I I I [ l I 1. L [w L L RAUEMH®RST CORPORATION 1 DESIGNERS -BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS/MINNEAPOLIS -CHICAGO • M I LWAUKEE February 18, 1982 CITY GF CHANHASSEN F_ L_ U $2 Mr. Bill Gullickson, Sr. _ n gEl 'F + "" 'T COT�.aI4 ^III I �Cr' D E'r . Chairman v Chanhassen Housing & Redevelopment Authority 7610 Laredo Drive P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Re: Tax Increment Financing Policy for Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Dear Chairman Gullickson, Allow me to introduce myself. I am Robert Worthington, Director of Planning and Governmental Affairs for the Rauenhorst Corporation. Rauenhorst has recently acquired a major development interest in the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park and is looking forward to the challenge of fulfilling the goals and objectives created by the city for this planned development. It is my understanding that the HRA will be considering the policy of using tax increment financing to underwrite the special assess- ments spread against the industrial land in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park as a part of its February 18 agenda. I apologize for not being in attendance at that meeting to personally present Rauenhorst's views and position regarding this policy. However, be advised that Rauenhorst does support the policy of using tax increment financing to assist in paying for the public cost of installing streets and utilities designed to service this business park. Rauenhorst supports this possition for the following reasons: 1. The city council and HRA expressed an early intent to use a com- bination of special assessments and tax increment financing to cover the public cost for improvements implemented to service the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. Reference to this intent is made L_ in published minutes and written communications between city staff, L the HRA, and Council. We think the HRA and Council should stand by their early commitment, especially now when we at Rauenhorst are mobilizing our resources to aggressively market and develop parcels within the Park. L EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 220 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER, 7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 (612) 830 -4060 February 18, 1982 Mr. Bill Gullickson, Sr. Page 2. 2. The use of tax increment financing to underwrite assessments for street and utility construction is needed to provide a competitive edge over other business and industrial land in nearby communities. Rauenhorst owns industrial and business type land in several communities within the metropolitan area. We are aware that, in communities such as Chaska, Shakopee, and Eden Prairie, land costs range from $.60 to $2.00 a square foot with specials included. We need a price which is the same or less than the lowest average square foot cost of other industrial land to wage an effective campaign for attracting new business into Chanhassen. The tax increment financing approach being considered by the HRA, in our opinion, will provide for a land price which will be very competitive with other nearby communities. 3. In our opinion, the use of tax increment financing will allow Rauenhorst to market and develop land within the Park at a faster rate than without such financing. This will allow the debt for the installation of utilities servicing Chanhassen Lakes Business Park (and other benefited lands contiguous to the Park) to be more quickly retired than might otherwise be the case. In these uncertain times of.public finance for improvements and ser- vices, this should be "good moves" to elected officials and taxpayers alike. Let me dispel any misconception about Rauenhorst being the only benefic- iary if this policy is adopted by the city. Rauenhorst is committed to a position that any benefit derived from implementation of this policy will be passed along to the end users of land and /or buildings purchased from us within the Park. By making new businesses relocating in the Park the recipients of such a benefit, the city will be using tax in- crement financing in a way consistent with its original legislative intent. I will be happy to personally meet with the HRA at a future time to clarify or enlarge upon any point raised by this letter. We at Rauen- horst hope, again, that the City HRA adopts the policy allowing use of tax increment financing to reduce the public cost for improvements in- stalled to service property such as the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park. Very truly yours, Robert A. Worthington Director, Planning & Go ernmental Affairs RAW/bls RAUENHORST CORPORATION 'I'RE ETER ANDRUS R E A LT O R S I I FJanuary 21, 1982 I E t` Mr. Roman Roos 701 Heidi Lane Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Roman: 17809 HUTCHINS DRIVE; MtNNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343, PHONE (612) 474 -1128 55317 CITE' OF CHANHASSEN FL61810 COMMU�iiiY DEVELQPNILS DEM. I am sorry I won't be able to attend the HRA meeting this evening, because needless to say I have some real concerns about the direction in which the Chanhassen Lakes Business Center is heading. I first met with the HRA in November of 1979 and was encouraged to learn that they were contemplating some programs that would have a positive impact on businesses considering moving into our community. Special assessment costs on this project kept rising (see attached letter projecting specials at $14,000 - $14,200 per acre - they wound up in excess of $20,000 per acre). When the project was completed, prices we needed to ask for sites in the Business Park were no longer competitive with adjacent communities. For instance: F.S.I. spent quite a bit of time looking over and considering all aspects of Chanhassen Lakes. They finally purchased a -ten acre parcel on Lake Hazeltine in Jonathan for $22,480 an acre with all utilities in and paid (we have to get $40,000 in Chanhassen Lakes). - Dick Fillburn of Lake Region and I met at least three times to discuss the possibilities in Chanhassen. They too wound up building a beautiful new building in Jonathan on a 15.6 acre site on Lake Hazeltine for $25,961 per acre, all utilities in and paid (again we must get $40,000). i - H.E.I. looked at Chanhassen but wound up purchasing a 4' L! acre site on Highway #5 in Victoria for $23,333 per acre with sewer in and paid. L L [ COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL DIVISION L Individual Membership, Society of Industrial Realtors • Certified Commercial & Investment Membership • National Association of Realtors • Minneapolis Commercial Multiple Listing Service • Independent Fee Appraisers Association Mr. Roman Roos January 21, 1982 Page 2 Industrial land in Jonathan according to the latest MLS information, ranges from $11,678 per acre on the site across from Peavey to $28,029 per acre for a beautiful 10 acre site next to Preferred Products. All utilities are in and paid. Next summer, the new owners of Jonathan plan to be opening up more industrial sites. This will be added competition. American Crystal Sugar Co. has three sites in Chaska with rail as well as city utilities. Prices range from $9,000 per acre to $20,000 per acre. The only industrial site that I can find along #5 in Eden Prairie is close to #494 and is selling for $60,000 an acre. I am never quite sure how badly Chanhassen wants jobs and industrial growth. But if they do, I think a willingness to provide some program of encouragement to employers considering Chanhassen is very important. It has been over two years since this subject was first discussed by the HRA, which would lead one to believe there really isn't much interest. Sincerely, Bud Andrus BA /11 r- C CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 / January 7, 1982 Mr. Jerome Carlson Instant Web, Inc. 570 W. 78th Street "Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Special Assessment Reduction Program for Park Two and Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Dear Jerome: Enclosed for your review is a copy ok the materialns to be discussed by the Chanhassen HRA on January 21, 1982 pertaining to the proposed 7% Special Assessment Reduction Program for Park Two and Chanhassen Lakes Business Park properties. As we discussed, the BRA would like an opportunity to discuss the :impact of such a program with you prior to taking any final action on this proposal. I -would suggest that you direct your attention to the proposed "Assessment Agreement ", which establishes the basic terms of the program and would be required between the HRA and the .developer of each lot included in the program. If you have any specific comments or recommendations concerning the enclosed materials, I would appreciate receiving such in writing by January 14, 1982, so that they might be forwarded to the HRA in advance of their meeting of January 21. 19x2 . DUNKLEY AND BENNETT LAW OFFICES 1750 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST PILLSBURY CENTER 7CUl.. 4IXTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55407 TELEPHGNEI (612) 339 -1290 JAY L. BENNETT W11-LI'1.1 *. 7tINKlEY THOMAS O. CREIGHTON December 29, 1981 Mr. Scot Martin Executive Director Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority Chanhassen City Hall Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Fluoroware, Inc.: Assessment on Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Property Dear Mr. Martin: Attorney Craig Mertz advises that the entire issue of the means by which the City of Chanhassen will grant credits against special assessments in Chanhassen Lakes Business Park is to be discussed at a HRA meeting at Chanhassen City ^"' Hall on January 21, 1982. Mr. Mertz suggested that I drop you this note requesting that I be provided with an agenda so that I know the exact time and location of the meeting which I will certainly want to attend on behalf of Fluoroware, Inc. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Happy New Year! V y truly yours, h.1 . Bennett JLB:cam CITY OF CHANHASSEN r- ZFC`.r'!Li V0 OEC;; 01981 CCtJM1.1i:ITY DEVELOPM =.1T DEPT. .jAnl..?r6• lit 19-2 City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Attention: H R A Members Dear Members: It is my understanding in talking to Mr. Scott Martin that the Special Assesment Reduction Program is still pending. If the program is adopted I understand that there may be a legal problem as to the eligibility of people having built before the program. [ I am confident that every consideration will be given to myself and Fluroware. I would appreciate it if any new information would be forwarded to me as it has been some months since I worked with Mr. Don Ashworth and attended the H R A meeting on this matter. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you. Sincerely, GWA ,1�4 JL�' David W. Brockohaler, President Day Co.: rzta Company DWB:kk L L CITY OF ;TY , �•, irea ? °:.1T DEPT. a �_ � a C Concrete Company CHANHASSEN L LAKES BUSINESS PARK 1340 PARK ROAD • • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 PHONE: 474 -5246 lit 19-2 City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Attention: H R A Members Dear Members: It is my understanding in talking to Mr. Scott Martin that the Special Assesment Reduction Program is still pending. If the program is adopted I understand that there may be a legal problem as to the eligibility of people having built before the program. [ I am confident that every consideration will be given to myself and Fluroware. I would appreciate it if any new information would be forwarded to me as it has been some months since I worked with Mr. Don Ashworth and attended the H R A meeting on this matter. If you have any questions feel free to contact me at any time. Thank you. Sincerely, GWA ,1�4 JL�' David W. Brockohaler, President Day Co.: rzta Company DWB:kk L L CITY OF ;TY , �•, irea ? °:.1T DEPT. a �_ i WEB SPECIALISTS Mr. Bill Gullickson, Sr. 830 Pleasant View Road Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Bill: 571 WEST 78TH STREET CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 (612) 934 -1151 January 27, 1982 As I indicated at the Chanhassen Chamber meeting yesterday, we are ready to make a final commitment to move United Mailing into Park Two during the calendar year 1982. We would greatly appreciate consideration by the HRA and the City of Chanhassen on three essential points. (1) We feel very strongly that the HRA and the City should adopt the 7% Special Assessment Redevelopment Program which will be discussed this Thursday evening, - January 28, 1982. (2) To finalize the development of Park Two, it is necessary for a cul -de -sac to be installed according to our development agreement with the City. We would like the cul -de -sac to be a public improvement and covered by the 7% Special Assessment Redevelopment Program. (3) We would like the cul -de -sac improvement costs to be applied on a per acre basis against all of Block 1 and Block 2 in Park Two. (see map attached) We are willing to contract with the HRA and the City of Chan- hassen for the building of United Mailing, Inc. in Park Two to assure construction of the new United Mailing building. Following yesterday's Chamber meeting, I spent considerable time with Don Ashworth, Scott Martin and Bill Monk, discussing the three points listed above. They didn't see anything wrong with the overall proposal, but were going to be discussing this entire matter with Russ Larson this morning. I have just received a call from Scott, and he informed me that the HRA and City Staff will support this proposal. L L L January 27, 1982 Mr. Bill Gullickson, Sr. Page Two Once again, we are really under the gun on our timing. We honestly did not anticipate a decision to move United Mailing at such an early date. We had expected to be renewing our lease for the current premises, but that simply does not seem practical or feasible which is why we feel that we have no choice but to relocate. The only question remaining is do we stay in Bloomington, move to Eden Prairie, or move to Chanhassen? I publicly expressed our sentiments yesterday at the Chamber meeting and stated that our first choice is Chanhassen. However, we need to arrive at an understanding and agreement upon the three points shown in this letter at the earliest possible date, hopefully, tomorrow evening with the HRA and at the next City Council meeting if we can get on the agenda. EJC /dal Att/ cc /Clark Horn, HRA & Councilman Clifford Whitehill, HRA James Bohn, HRA Tim Russell, HRA Scott Martin Don Ashworth Russ Larson Bill Monk ' .Frank Beddor, Jr. Jules Smith Lawrence B. Carlson Mayor Tom Hamilton Councilman John Neveaux. Councilwoman Pat Swenson Councilman Dale Geving Kindest regards, / E'. Jerome Carlson President INSTANT WEB, INC. CITY OF CHANHASSEN REc- '- iV7'..!0 1110 2 7 M CO,?,RMUi,1:'; ;Y DDEVEL(1 Sri IT DEPY. W.Ted'st OMMY.111) TO DOWNTOWN CHAMRABBEN park two PROPOSED PLAT & ZONING NOTE: Pr000mad bWldlngs and parking we for M rfll.a Purpose. M,-rat Part of IN. o.] BLOB, P Tat f3LOQ i In 0 PE r P aread ,YVIT o fK site plan we KMSUNSY KRANK ERCKWN PARK TWO �M AMA E I--CHITE CTS, INC 7. - MINNESOTA I ro UQ m W C CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SS317 1612) 937 -1900 STAFF REPORT TO: Chanhassen HRA j FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: January 15, 1982 RE: Status of Huber Property Acquisition (Parcel $26) As directed at your meeting of December 3, 1981, staff has ordered and subsequently received a new appraisal for the Huber Property. You will recall that Russ Larson discovered an error in our initial appraisal that involved the inclusion of street rights -of -way in the property legal description. The new appraisal estimates the current market value of this property to be $154,000 or $1.75 per square foot. - This figure compares with an initial appraised value of $185,000 or $1.85 per square foot. The higher figure was computed using the erroneous figure of 99,590 square feet for the area of this parcel (which includes street rights -of- way), rather than using the correct land area of 88,000 square feet, which represents the "saleable" portion of the property. Russ Larson will be prepared to give you a full update on the status of his negotiations with Mr. Huber at your next meeting.. f %p LAW OFFICES William F. Kelly AND ASSOCIATES 331 SECOND STREET EXCELSIOR. MINNESOTA 53331 (61 2) 474.5977 WILLIAM F. KELLY JOHN C. SANDERS DENNIS J. ORKE c� o KENNETH N. POTTS January 28, 19(f 82 Mr. Russell Larson Attorney at Law 1900 1st Bank Place West Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Russ: I transmitted your offer of this morning to John Huber. I explained to him that on the basis of your computation of square footage, 88,000 square feet, Chanhassen would be willing to pay $1.75 per square foot or $154,000.00 and that this offer is a cash offer -- payment to be forthwith. John has instructed me to notify you that he is not in- terested in selling his property to the city for this amount of money. The minimum which we would consider is $207,000.00, the figure agreed to between you and John almost a year ago. The offer of $207, 000.00 will be withdrawn if not accepted prior to February 10, 1982. For your information we are planning to use Lawrence Real Estate Appraisals, a Certified MAI Appraiser. Looking forward to hearing from you. Sineer /l y, W I1 a�lF. e41y WPh:mw �) C.C. John Huber CITY 'OF CHANHASSEN 3 i,82 C0 !(l iii Y �_VELPUPW.. T DEr G_ CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 ( Staff Report I TO: Chanhassen HRA ttt FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: February 11, 1982 RE: Policy Concerning Private Improvements to Existing Businesses Within Downtown Project Core Area Following the February 1st announcements of Bloomberg Companies and Kraus - Anderson that no construction activity was likely to begin in the Downtown Area during the remainder of -1982, I received several inquiries as to what the City's position is concerning proposals from existing downtown businesses for making improvements f to their property. Several owners of downtown properties identified for acquisition by the HRA expressed concern that another moratorium on building would be established by the City, and that long needed { physical improvements would not be allowed for an indefinite period while the HRA's project is put on "hold" awaiting improved economic conditions. These owners indicated that it would be unfair to continue to restrict their ability to enhance their property and business for another year or two, while new businesses are allowed to be established in Chanhassen. I tend to agree that further prohibition of private investment in the Downtown Core Area by existing businesses would be unfair and would not be in the best interests of the business community and citizens of Chanhassen. Although.property improvements will no doubt result in higher acquisition costs for the BRA in the future, continued deterioration of the downtown area may be more costly in terms of reduced tax revenues (due to tax delinquencies and /or lower assessed valuations), business failures, vacant buildings, l and the poor image portrayed by the Community to the thousands of visitors who pass through Chanhassen each year. l_ I believe that the City can retain adequate control over downtown business improvements through the reasonable application of existing .� zoning regulations in nearly all cases. In the case of vacant parcels, I feel it is highly unlikely that any bonafide development proposals would be received by the City L during the current economic crisis in this country. If a proposal were submitted to the City for approval of building.permitS, the City and HRA could evaluate the status of the overall Downtown Project L at that time and acquire the property, if necessary to protect the integrity of the Project, rather than issue a building permit. L . :ei.......M.:.r.. -1. .. 1.rv- :1......nv.. ..r ..... .... .. ... �. w..-. a .... +<... ..�=.' .. yiy{ _ �.. vY. +t.. ..:. .. s3 in. - -... .1 Chanhassen HRA Page 2 In the case of existing buildings, I would be surprised if property owners would be willing to invest substantial amounts of capital' in property destined for eventual acquisition by the HRA. One might expect, however, that cosmetic or maintenance -type improvements would be made to some properties if permitted by the City. The two properties currently under purchase option by the HRA should also be allowed to be improved, but any improvements should be at the owner's risk. .If the HRA elects to exercise these options, you will only be responsible for payment of the balance of the negotiated purchase price, not for the added value of improvements made after the options were executed. Thus, I would expect that substantial improvements would not be made during the option period. The City Attorney has been asked to address the legal issues involved with the establishment of any HRA policy related to private improve- ments, and will be prepared to report his findings at your meeting of February 18, 1982. Assuming that there are no legal problems with such, I would recommend that the HRA establish a policy permitting private improvements to existing downtown core area businesses (buildings) to the extent permitted by the City Zoning Ordinance. CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 STAFF REPORT TO: Chanhassen HRA FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: February 10, 1982 RE: Year VIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Chanhassen is preparing to enter its second year as a participant in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). As such, program priorities for the upcoming grant period (July 1, 1982 - June 30, 1983) must be established within the next month. The primary objective of this program is the provision of decent, affordable housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities for primarily low and moderate income persons. f With this in mind, the input of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority is essential in establishing priorities for the use of CDBG funds. I During the first year of Chanhassen's participation in the CDBG program, $42,918 was placed in reserve for the future partial subsidy of land acquisition and site improvements for a senior citizen housing project. The remaining $1,000 in grant funds was allocated to cover program administration costs. Due to Federal Budget cuts, we anticipate that we will only receive about $37,000 for the upcoming funding period. I have invited Mr. Larry Blackstad of the Hennepin County Planning Office to your meeting of February 18, 1982, Mr. Blackstad serves .I as the County's representative for Chanhassen and nearby cities, and t provides principal administrative assistance to the City in carrying out CDBG program activities. I have asked him to present a brief I overview of what other participating cities have done and are 1. presently doing with their CDBG funds, and to discuss general program eligibility requirements. Mr. Blackstad will also discuss the current status of Federally subsidized housing programs and housing L program options available to Chanhassen during the next year or two. From this discussion, the HRA should arrive at a recommendation for Luse of CDBG funds during the next year and for future program years. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on March 1, 1982 for L the purpose of deciding which activities will be funded during the next grant period. A copy of the hearing notice is attached. L Chanhassen HRA CDBG Program February 10, 1982 Page 2 Recommendation Program activities which I recommend you consider funding during the upcoming year include the following: 1. Preparation of a housing needs assessment study to determine if there exists a real need for new senior citizen housing and low /moderate income family housing in Chanhassen. (est. Cost = $8,000 - 10,000) 2. Rehabilitation grant program for private, owner - occupied homes, with a grant maximum of $7,500 per home. This program could be easily administered and funding could be set at whatever level you determined, based on the number of homes that might reasonably be rehabilitated within the next year. Three (3) homes in Chanhassen were rehabilitated during 1981 under a similar program operated by the Carver County HRA. However, this program has since expired, so you may wish to establish your own program as a replacement for the expired program. (est. cost = $22,500 - 30,000) 3.. If either or both of the above activities are funded, remaining grant funds should be placed in reserve for covering program administration costs and for future senior citizen housing site improvements and /or senior center development. Funds not expended during the current program year may be set aside for use within the next two year period. • M7i ' W • t71 1 171• • I ■ 1 • Y• NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE CITY OF OMNHASSEN PURSUANT To TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT 1974, AS AMENDED, ARE SPONSORING A PUBLIC HEARING ON MCNDAY, MARCH 1, 1982 AT 7:30 P.M. AT CHANHASSEN CITY HAUS,, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, TO OBTAIN THE VIEWS OF CITIZENS ON LOCAL AND URBAN COUNTY HOUSING AND COM NITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND TO PROVIDE CITIZENS WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO COVENT IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY STAMVJENT OF OBJECTIVES /1982 AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSIN'S PROPOSED USE OF YEAR VIII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CCMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS. Pursuant to the Act the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Cbjectives /1982, has been developed, a summary of which follows: Program Administration. Develop and implement a Housing and Coamtmity Development program which addresses Urban County community development objectives and meets local needs and priorities in a timely and efficient manner and emphasize activities which benefit low and moderate income persons. Neighborhood Revitalization. Maintain and preserve viable neighborhoods through a program of concentrated community development activities. Housing: New Construction. Facilitate the development of new housing, including but not limited to, site acquisition, public improvements, assistance with front -end costs and multi - community projects. . Housing Rehabilitation. Provide housing rehabilitation assistance to income eligible households in all sub - grantee communities. I Public Facilities and Improvements. Maintain existing public improvements and facilities and assist the development of new facilities and improvements which will principally benefit low and moderate income persons. { Handicapped Improvements. Help assure that programs, facilities and housing are I accessible to handicapped persons. Economic Development. Undertake activities appropriate to improving economic conditions in deteriorated areas, based on local plans. Energy. The administration of the UM CDBG program should be sensitive whenever possible to energy conservation issues through the development of energy use strategies. 'Public Services. CDBG funding for public services should directly benefit low and moderate income persons. For a complete copy of'the Statement of Objectives contact the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development, C -2353 Government Center, Minneapolis, PMI 55427, (348- 6418). L The City of Chanhassen is proposing to fund the following activities with Year VII Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds starting July 1, 1982. For additional infonnation on proposed activities contact the City of Chanhassen, L Community Development Director, 690 Coulter Drive, Chanhassen (telephone 937- 1900). The public hearing is being held in accord with the Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement pursuant to M.S. 471.59. L BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Scott Martin, Community Development Director L(Publish in the Carver Co. Herald on February 17, 1982.) I CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (612) 937 -1900 STAFF REPORT TO: Chanhassen HRA rROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director VATE: Janlary 15, 1982 RE: HRA Accounting System As you recall from our meeting of December 17, 1981, the HRA was provided with two available options for future accounting of HRA funds. The first option, preferred by the Commissioners present I at that meeting, provided for the establishment of an HRA accounting system that is separate and distinct from the City's system. The second option provided for the HRA to continue to utilize the City accounting system under a Joint Powers Agreement with the City Council that would authorize the City Treasurer to handle all HRA funds. According to the opinion of the City Attorney, the HRA must authorize the expenditure of all HRA funds, regardless of which accounting system option the HRA chooses. I have explored this matter further with the City Manager since your Last meeting, and we have both concluded that utilization of the City's accounting system under a joint powers agreement is the best method available to us. Use of the City's system will enable us to obtain computerized reports for HRA funds at a nominal cost compared with the cost of contracting with a separate firm to produce similar reports. The City's system also provides us with existing personnel who are familiar with required accounting practices in general and with HRA fund accounting in particular. This option also avoids numerous bookkeeping problems for the City Treasurer in preparing payroll checks for personnel funded in part by the HRA, (A list of affected personnel is attached for your information.) `- Under this recommended system, the HRA will be provided with a monthly listing of current HRA accounts payable which you will be asked to L review and approve. Following your approval, the City Treasurer will be directed to pay approved bills. City checks will continue to be utilized for this purpose in order to simplify matters, but the signa- 1 ture of the Executive Director will also be required in order to disburse HRA funds. Based on past expenditures and anticipated future expenses, the monthly accounts payable should not.include more than six or seven vendors. Chanhassen HRA January 15, 1982 Page 2 If the HRA agrees with the recommendation to utilize the City's accounting system, the attorney should be instructed to prepare the necessary joint powers agreement to formalize this approach in time for final action at your next regular meeting of February 18, 1982. Attachments 1. Letter from Attorney re: HRA Accounting Requirements (btd.12 /17 /81). 2. List of City Staff funded in part by HRA. L L L �- • C C RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF 'COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH Scott A. Martin Executive Director Chanhassen HRA Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear Scott: LAasox & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 December 17, 1981 TELFPNONE ( 612) 333 -1511 Re: HRA Accounting Requirements We have received your letter dated December 7, 1981 requesting an opinion concerning the handling of HRA Imoney. For the first six years of the HRA's existence, the HRA had no money, other than money advanced to the HRA by the City Council from the City's budget. These monies were deposited in the City's checkbook. The HRA's creditors were then paid by City checks which were issued upon approval of the City Council. Now the situation has changed. The BRA has an independent source of revenue, namely the tax increments. These tax increments have been deposited in the City's bank account, but in a fund (or subaccount) which is in the HRA's name. The HRA is a separate governmental entity. It alone is authorized to expend its money, which would include tax increments, proceeds from land sales, and revenue from HRA -owned enterprises. The State Auditor's Office, which has the audit responsibility for BRAS, requires that HRAs keep books and records in the same manner as City books and records are kept. Ideally the HRA should keep its own accounting system, separate and distinct from the City's system. The present arrangement was proper in the years before the first tax increment was received. If the BRA wishes to continue to utilize the City accounting system, the HRA and the City Council should sign a joint powers agreement authorizing the City Treasurer to handle the HRA's money. CITY OF CHANIMSEN UEC 1 '11981 COMMU: aTY DEVELOPM-AT DEPT. Scott A. Martin December 17, 1981 Page Two Regardless of whether the HRA decides to continue to utilize the City accounting system or establish a separate accounting system, it is the HRA's board, not the City Council, which must authorize expenditure of funds in general and the issuance of specific checks in particular. Technically the City Council has no authority to order the expenditure of tax increment funds. If the HRA wishes to regularize past expenditures it should ask the City Treasurer to make a list of past disbursements showing the dates, check numbers, amounts, and names of payees. The HRA should then meet as a board and after examining the Treasurer's list, pass a resolution confirming the past expenditures. If the HRA does decide to establish a separate accounting system, the HRA checks would be signed by the iember of the board who is Secretary- Treasurer and also by the Ex6cutive Director. If you have any questions, pelase call. ry truly yours, a CRAIG M. MERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney CMM:ner P. S. The City Treasurer's list of checks can be limited to dis- bursements made since the first tax increment was received. /CMM December 7, 1981 Mr. Russell Larson Larson and Mertz 1900 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Request for Legal Opinion Concerning HRA Accounting Requirements Dear Russ: As you know, the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority has expressed an interest in having 4reater input in budgetary and accounting operations which pertain to their activities. Specifically, the HRA feels that all invoices received by the City which are related to HRA activities and funded by HRA monies should be approved by the HRA rather than the City Council, as is presently done. As a result of this concern by the HRA, 2 have been directed to ask you for your written legal opinion concerning statutory requirements for HRA accounting and finance operations. My questions, therefore, are as follows: What are the current statutory requirements for accounting of HRA funds? Are HRA's required to maintain their own accounting system which is separate and distinct from the City system? Are the requirements the same when tax increment revenues are used to fund HRA operations and redevelopment projects? Does the City Council have authority to approve or not approve bills and invoices involving expenditures which were authorized by and are the obligation of the HRA? Does the City or HRA need to take any specific action to retroactively legitimize past accounting practices in order to comply with State Laws? Your response to these questions would be appreciated by December 17, 1981 if possible. Please contact me immediately if you have any questions or if you will be unable to meet the above deadline. Sincerely, SAM :nh cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager tAtSc tt MM artin Executive Director L Chanhassen HRA SAM :nh cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager January 15, 1982 1982 CITY STAFF SALARIES AND BENEFITS PARTIALLY FUNDED BY CHANHASSEN HRA (As Per Adopted 1982 Operating Budget) NAME OF STAFF MEMBER Scott Martin Nancy Herfert Rebecca Foreman Don Ashworth Kay Klingelhutz Mary Jean Meuwissen PERCENT POSITION TITLE HRA FUNDED HRA Executive Director/ Community Development Dir. 75% Administrative Aide 25% Planning Secretary 25% City Manager 12'x% City Treasurer 10% Senior Account Clerk 10% CHANHASSEN HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DATE: January 21, 1982 RESOLUTION NO: 82 -1 MOTION BY COMMISSIONER: SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER: RESOLUTION APPROVING PAST DISBURSEMENTS /EXPENDITURES OF ALL TAX INCREMENT REVENUES RECEIVED BY CHANHASSEN HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority has received Tax Increment Revenues from the establishment of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Tax Increment District since 1977, and, WHEREAS, said Authority has not routinely approved all past disbursements of Tax Increment funds since such funds first became available to.the Authority, and WHEREAS, said Authority wishes to regularize past expenditures of tax increment funds in accordance with the Minnesota Housing Redevelopment Authority Act and Tax Increment Financing Act, and WHEREAS, the Executive Director of said Authority has prepared a complete listing of all past disbursements /expenditures of HRA Tax Increment Funds since first receipt of said funds, and WHEREAS, said Authority has examined said list of Tax Increment disbursements and has determined that all such disbursements are proper and in order; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority hereby approves and confirms the past disbursements /expenditures of HRA Tax Increment funds as listed on the attached expenditure report for years 1977 through 1981, consisting of fifteen (15) pages showing the dates, check numbers, amounts, and the names of payees, and dated "prepared January 6, 1982 ". Passed and adopted this 21st day of January, 1982, by the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority. ATTEST: Executive Director Chairman YES NO ABSENT GtTY OF CNANN455EN S U 8- L'E.O G E R R E P 0 R T EXPENDITURES PERIOD ENOING 11-35-61 PAGE 267 T T.! 469 H.R.A, r I^ .. iT -'DEPT- -ACCT`PROG- INDEX- 'VENOOE CHELK- PO %JE'- DATE—DESCRIPTION- (8UDG'T1 ; 1 A1f0 -U -N -T -MHO T= TO =Ddi T L N C/_ : 150 - -150- 11IJ ". - DOWNTOWN 9EDEV. DISTRICT SALARIES -"'D f WAGES, PEG. v SSC 401 4713 0 0 73i5 L 1997[ 12537 02- 27- 81- - SCOTT"HARTIH-- - - - 164' ;92 12,7 ^. -- 15J 4037 0001'8 C1997C '12565 03 -13 -81 SCOTT MARTIN 519.41 164.92 I1rY35.ti9 150 - '4430' :07242_:19373' 012592 -- 007104 719977 012624 r, 3-31 -81 SCOTT MARTIN -RA 51[.41 675.33 1,185,74 11,324,67 r 150 4[17 000242 019970 012660 OL- 15 -81S CCT7 PTIN G4 -39 -81 SCOTT PARTIN i; 157 401^_ _ 000103 05 -15 -81 SCOTT MAR -IN 51C.41 212'E.56 9,792,44 ` 1500 4011 _019970__012707• 9 ^220.7 C1997J 012743 05 -29 -81 -SCOTT PARTIN 510.41 �,41 2,716.97 n 9,293..3 154 4011 000123 C19975 C12786 06 -15 -81 SCOTT MAR•_H 51 7 � , -27.39 9,772, E2 -- ___150_ 4310_ 000393 )19977 012823 G6 -39 -81 SCOTT MARTIN 513.41 3,737.79 8,262.2, 157 4110 000112 -019970'_ "012870_ --, 7 =15- B1 SCOTT--M4 RTIN 510.41 4,248.2; -.fi1 7,71.87 ,. 157 4010 007294 C19973 012909 '07-31 -81 SCOTT MARTIN 510.41 ' 6 758 5269,0 _ 7 ,24.•39 153 401" ?�! CCOL'7 E19970 012954 OA -14 -81 SCOTT MARi:tI 510.41 - • 2 6.73 ,98 150. 471['` -- 093265 - 1119970 - 012993 CB= 31 =81 -SC 0T T-MpRT`N 510.41 5,779.43 `51D.41�'; 6,22'.57 �.i 1500 4919 pJ71Cg 019970 013031 09 -15 -81 SCOTT MARTIN 289:8' 5,7.0. -16. -. -- 150 4016 -- 000266 019970 013969 99 -33 -81 SCOTT MARTIN 513.41 6,907.25 5.199.75 "r 159 4719 000111 19970 OS 112 3 10 =15 =81 -SCOTT M4RTt PS 51 ?.41 '7.310.66 - -'f-; 4,6Q9.34 ' • 159 4010 007259 [19970 . 013143- 10 -30 -81 SCOTT HARTIH 510:41 g2��j 1,179.93 153 4013 ' 00[193 039973. 013182 " - 11 -13 -81 SCOTT HARTIH 51'.41.- - 8,331.48 3,66P.52 157 4080 003319 `Ci 9970 ` 013224 --" 1i= 30- B1 - SCOTT MARTIN- 51)•41 5,841.89 3,15 5.11_ :I 153 4[10 000325 019970 613225 0- 11-3 81 SCOTT MARTIN 510.41 8.981.69 3�C18. 31 - _ 9,492,10 2,527.91 • 150 - 4010- DOWNTOWN- REOEV.- OISTRICT-SALARIESi1iAGES: REG. -* TOTALS° 4. 157 _ 403 ^_ DOWNTOWN PED_EY. DISTRICT .' CO_N TRI8„ -- - -- -D RETIRE. - 1_,_400.00 ,. 150 4030' C60336 3100J�-012541 - - 02 -27 =81 STA7c TREASU4ER- _ -42�ya ._09 -' f 150 4034 000337 031: GJ [12541 02 -27 -8 1 STATE TR EASU F,E.9. 42.48 1357.52 • .._. 150 .._ 4030 000272__031000. 012602 C3 -31 -81 STATE ? T.. EAcU.4'cR 9.07 51.55 1,341.45 .; 150 r. 4731 T _ _ ," 000287 L.1 CQC '012603- 03 -31 -81 -STATE TREASURED 56.14 107.69 1.292.31 150 403[ .- CC0374 031030. 012686 - - C4 -30 -81 STATE TREASURER 67.89 -' 175.59 X23 _ 1. 224.42 •' 150 __4030__ OJ039 `, 031[70 - 912687 :` - .';C4- -GC 30-81: STATE TP.. EA SU RER - -. 56.14 - 1.72 8,166.29 t.l 150 4 ^. 39 ^370 C31J0� 012758-" �05 -29 -81 $TA.'E �T?EASUCE2 67.89 299.61 1s10 :. 39 ' 157 r 1,7 4J 3' T• 020365 0310[[ [12843 C6 -30 -81 STATE TREASURES 56.14 56.14 c 3.5,75 _ 1s944.25- 40.0 009004 0310 C0 912747 600_6_04 C6- 30 -_81_ STATE 2EASt1 °EE 411.99 98 %.IS .n 159 4370- 077385 031000 - 012933 -07 __T -31 81 STA7 r c F'" E TR_A_uF._3 67.89 479.78 �• o :92. 2- • 150 1030 0504Q1. .31000 012934 07 -31 -81 STATE TREASURER - 56:14 535.92 "664.'6 - 3+ � 150 35140 4031 3C- - OO 0055 0:1000 012846 000705 " - "C 07 -31 -81 STATE TREASURER' 67.89 67.89 6 ^.3.81 796.19 -' CS736 - 31 a0 _T- 013009 _ - 81 STATE TREAS -` -56.14 671.79 '26.1: P G 157 4037 000376 013']09 ,P..EF( GB -31 -81 STATE T ^Ep S!.�R 6@ - 67.89 727:8+ 672.16 '! - 150 4007 C3170C 000335 C310QG 013]86 Q9 -37 -81 STATE T?'cASURER 56.14 795.73 604.27 1504030 C90385� 031360 L13797- _. L9 -39 =81 � STATE TZ EASUR E:, 851.97 548.13 15] 4030 000344 031•]00 013158 17 -30 -81 STATE TREASURER 67.89 91 °..76 48`.241 i5O 4032 ______CC036J 031903_513159 10 -30 -e1 TRc- ASU %EP 56.14 975.9) 424.17 r 157 4 ^, 33 [70395 C 31:00 013239 _STATE 11 -30 -81 STATE TR EASU.: E%c 67.99 - Ss.47,79 35E.2! ., 159 403^. CJ6447 031000 013244 11 -30 -81 STATE TREASURER 63,84 1,1[7.63 292. -- 9 77.iB 1.184.61 215.119 • 150 4030 `DOWNTOWN REOEVo DISTRICT CONTRIB.4 11ETIRE - '*TOTALS• 1,400:00 ► - -'- 1,184.81 • 1.184.81 215.19 .,.• 151 -151 4041 DOWNTOWN --- P.EJEY, DISTRICT CO_NTR_IS., INS, 5; O.00 - "" "[35675 404? 000303" 612604 -' 3- 0 31 -81 MIS[ONSI NEMPLOYE45 GRP21.62 .00 21.62 507. C9 -- i 47 ?.38 i 1: OI7Y OF G„ANHASSvm S U 0• L E C G E k P E P 0 R EXPf NOT TURFS PERT00 FN9INf. 11 -tC -8l CITY OF CHANHASSEN S U 8- L E D G E R R E P O R T EXPENDITURES PERIOD. ENDING 11 -30 -81 PAGE 268 _. 46'3 H.R.A. .c • ,.1 DEFT ACCT P9CG SNOE% VENOOn CH°_CK- PO?-JE -- OAif` DESCRIPTION- ---!BUDGET! A M 0'U- N- T- 7(KOUNT= TO =OAT �B p �'p f1 "C E -{_n, 1� 159 4040003318OC7299 03 -31 -61 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE. CO 6.60 28.22 471.7? T..�. _ ___ 150 4046 ___ _ _912505 SSJ3 ;6 _ 0356755 - 712574 04- 30 -81- WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS ..GRp - 21.E2"- " " " - - -49. B4 - 450.16 15G 4040 CC0321 OC7299 012675 04-30 -51 C ^OWN LIFE INSl1:,AliC°_ CO 6.60 56.44 44i. 56 150 494,'• 009175 635675 012723 05 -26 -81 HISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 21.62 72.'F. 150 4040 -` GC 11.75t67299"012724 05- 26- 81CFON!; _._�... LIFE INSU ;AIICE CO 6.6L _ 44.6E - _421.9. 415.34 151 4740 2 ?1329 031JJz 912147 06 -29 -91 STATE Tc.EASU;E 67.49 152.55 " 347,45 15C 404f. 60:346 C67299 C1275J 05 -29 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANV GO_ 5.60 159.15 341.85 �.� 157 4340 - -- �C'JG355 °- 0Z7299 312305 - 005505- G5- 31- 81 -CFOWN LIFF. INSURANCE-CO -- 6.67CR 152 :55 -� 347.45 - -� I, •, �� 350 4940 001187 035675 712901 06 -24 -81 WISCONSIN EMFLOYE °.S GRP 21.52 174.17 325.13 159 4040 CCG382 0:7299 312445 C6 -30 -31 CF.CWN LIFE 3NSUi ANC_ CO 6.63 12'..77 319 ?a - 150'" 4440 - " - -'- -007398 -- 031700 - 632446 LG- 3G- B1- "STATE T!?EASURE- - "- -- -67.29 248.66-- 251.34 -�,j - 157 4047 020005 031CO' 012747 600604 06 -39 -81 STATE TPSASURTA 67.99CR lEC.77 319.3}, 150. 4040 C00232 035675 012994 07 -24 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 21.52 X 2.39 ?97.61 • __ " Il,ri - 159 - -- 4040---- CJC367- &;7299- 012931 07- 31 -81- CROWN LIFE IMSUi ANCE`CO -- --6.60 208.99 291 :,1 r' 1 r �;{ 151 4046 CIGJ56 031JGU 612346 000705 07 -31 -01 STATE TREASURER 67.Z9CR 141.19 358.9" �0'1 '' -- 159 4040 CCO325 OC7299 013306 -ECO343 - 08 -31-81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 6.60 147,79 352.37 r! 150 35675- 0130"08-31 -81- WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP !21:62 - 1632 23:63 i ll 150 4940 027353 035675 013088 09 -30 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 21.62 1 90.94 369.36 -- 153 4040 - 000369 027299 D13U89 .... _`09 -30 -81 .CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO -_ 6,6,0 - - 197.54 3 ",2.46 �' 157 `4047 00037 7- 035675 -- 013152 '10- 29-- 8i- hISCONSI N EMPLOYE ?S GRP 21 :6Z--- 3 C > 150 4040 070323 OC7299 013153 10 -29 -81 CROWN LIFE INSUe At;CE CO 6.60'. 225.76 274. ?4 r; a _ 157 4040 090411 067299 013240 11 -30 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO - 5.60 232.36 267.64 1 157` 404'. - '7X428- 035675 - 013241 - -11- 30 - -81- WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP -21 62 .253:98 24E::2 � �• • Ile- 150 4040 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT CONTRIB:• INSr .*TOTALS* 500.004 - 253.9a •• - 253.98.+ 246.32 + is 157 4050 DCWWTGNN P.ECEV, DISTRICT. NORKY.ENS COMP. 200.00 .07 201.0: I 150 4050 GG0071 C08800 016867 08 -17 -81 DOLLIFF INSURANCE INC 134.95 134.05 E5.95 r ' ' -� • 150. 4050 OOWNTOWN.REOEV. DISTRICT- WORKMENS COMP. - *TOTALS* 200.00•- - 174.05 +' 134.05 • 65.95 + - f� - -153 " - 4110 - -- DOWNTOWN- REOEV.-OISTRICT- SUPPLIES: OFFIC>^ -- " -' " -- 450:07 45 0o c - - ,.; 15C 4110 CECG97 012194 016649 06 -15 -81 GENERAL OFFICE PPODUCTS 12.21- 12.21 437.79 150 4110 000618 012194 016537 000604 06 -30 -81 GENERAL OFFICE PROCUCTS 18.42 31.63 419.37____ ' ,:. 15l- '4116- "--- CG2 °86- L12194- 01E757 07- 20 -8T- GENERAL OFFICE- PRODUCTS .29.33 -59.96 39:.74 f <' ;.� 150 4110 DOOC16 03308[ 016955 09 -21-61 HALTER. S BOOTH CO 26.44 - `86.40 363.66 -`4110-DOWNTOWN`REDEV .._ y1 {'q- •- 150 - DISTRICT- SUPPLIES: OFFICE - -`+ TOTALS +�`---- -450:80+''u- 86.40 -+ 8fi. f -O-�- 767:60 • I.21 c' -' '._._. 150 415C DOWNTOWN PEOEV. DISTRICT MAINTENANCE MATERIALS .07 Gi: 150_.- 41 50"- 000076-_. 03 180C-- "- 017iII2--- "- ' "- I0- 19 =81- 'FRONTIER- LUMBER' - -'` -- . -- 7.22- `- b�2202- " • 150. 4150 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT• MAINTENANCE MATERIALS *TOTALS*_ - .800 87.22 87.22+ -., ,+ , �A7.22CR• 153 157 4300 4370 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT FEES, SERVICE- 0 ^_0150 0058OU C4 OG .00 .0; ' 016403 -20 -81 CHANHASSEN FAMILY 16.00 18.00 SB.000 150 4309 -- - - - 103124 - 012400 - 616663 - - 06.15= 81- LARSOII F HERTZ _ i.�. 54.24-- 3�'372.2�1�372. 240_ ' OI7Y OF G„ANHASSvm S U 0• L E C G E k P E P 0 R EXPf NOT TURFS PERT00 FN9INf. 11 -tC -8l •'150 4320" DOWNTOWN REOEV. DISTRICT- UTILITI V'd r b -+ 158.25 4v- 158.25C S JI : :1 "i ti i11' i 1 _ 3 .1 i ins i� N G G z. i1 �I 3 .1 1 = 7 1r f� CITY OF CHANHASSEN S V 8- L E D G E R 'P. E P 0 R T 'EXPENDITURES PERIOD ENOING 11 -30 -01 PAGE 269 ,y 460 M.R.A. ;4-'DEPT PRO G- INDEX- VENDOiT-CW_C IC - -- POZJc DATE 0E SCRi!P rxaN - - -' -M UDGE T) A- M "O�U : ?TT --ANO UNT -T0=0A T£ e A--C A N C-E- ,j 150 4380 000130 C18400 016896 - 08 -17 -8i LARSON ♦ HERTZ 541.90 1,914.14 1,914.1409 la1 _ -. ... .._____----- -..... _.__. .__.. ..._ -. .__.._ • 150 4300 DOWNTOWN REOEV. DISTRICT FEES, SERVICE *TOTALS* .009 1,914.14'+ 1,914.14 • 1,914.14CR• __. 150 4311--DOWNTOWN ?.EOEV: DISTRICT __F EE Si-CO NS UCTING-- " " _ 0;- '. 159 4391 000908 082399 016699 C6 -15 -81 0 R N INC - 1,228.13 1.228.1'_ 21.771.47 4311 000198 029000 C6 -15 -81 SCHOELL + MADSON 1,198.35 2,426.49 2 1,573.52 -�'•� - _1512 159 4311 - - -0O CO 39- '0.2399 _016692 916318 - 090605 C6- 3�] -B1 B R N -INC - -' 1,759.13 3,485.fi1 _ 19.51 �. 39 f 153 4391 CC0542 OC2399 316490 000605 06 -30 -81 B R N INC 1,901,50 5,38E.11 17,613.89 150 1-301 20CE47 CO2399_ 016110 600606, 06 -39 -81 B R H INC 450.05 51536.11 17,163.89 150 -4391 - 0090530.19 4 0 -0- 0 162 5 6__0 u 9606- 06-30 =81 TLAaS ON- ♦ MER Z 1x785,30 -- 7,621 -;41 -15,378.59 - :. 150 4301 CCC058 O1S40C. 016351 000606 .06 -30 -81 - LARSON + MEk TZ - 1,981.65 9,503. 06 13,396.94 .. 158 4391 COC263' C184OC 'G16435 0 10606 - C6 -30 -8S LARSCN + HERTZ '� 1,519.65 '- 11422,71 11,871.29 157... 43,1 .__.- c� � --F 0,.62 ,34367- b16470 001-606- 06 =30 -81 _ VON XLUG- +'ASSOCIATES - - -- 31.93- -31.154:51 _ 11,945.49 150 4351 090864 OC2399 016488 000606 C6 -37-81 B R H INC 1,053.75 12,285.26 13.79..74 15C 4331 C60166 C184CO 916549 000606 06 -30 -81 CARSON + M_ETZ 19539.75 13 ,71.31 9,284.99 150 MANAGEMENT- 395.73- 14.- S0S;74 3.899.26- - ..,, 150 4301 CCO156 - OC9000 016748 -. - 07 -20 -81 DO?SEY HINDHOFST *_TALC 259,89- 14.3E "..63 8,539. 17 153 4301 - 000117 01840° 016777 - _ C7 -20 -8i LARSON + MEFTZ - - 752.00 15.112.63 7,8:7'.'7 ,: 150 4371 "004212' "029930 X16114 '- _07- 20 =81- RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC 4CC:04 _i5_9512.63_7.487.37_ _ :i 150 4301 C00036 609000 716748 000704 07 -31 -81 OORS -cY BINDHOF.ST ETAL' 259.89CR 15,252.74 7.747.261 i.� 15.0 43.1 000305 EC2399 016943 P8 -17 -BS E R W INC 594.25 15.846.99 7,15!.:1_ -- "150 - -4391- CCJ315� -b Sv56C- 016884 OB- 17-81 -'HOLM ESrGPAVEN- -- 38S :C 0- 15;226:99- 3,77 ?. ?I 150 4311 000011 002399 016952.09 -21 -81 B R H INC 231.25 16,455.24 6,541.76 F,? 150 4331 030099 61940.' 017118 15 -19 -81 CARSON + HE?TZ - ';' - 36.25 16,494.45 6,5'5.51__ �y 15C 4361 -- OC -v088 01840 -u "- ➢17214 '11= 16 =81- CARSON ♦ MERi2 - - - - - -i 26.90 16,621.39 6,77?.61 '. • 150 4301- DOWNTOWN REOEV. DISTRICT FEES, CONSULTING .*TOTALS* 23,000.00• 16,621.39 ".+ 16,621.39 • 6,770.61 150 4310 DOWNTOWN FEDEV. DISTRICT TELEPHONE 350.00 -03 35 O.CC 150 4310 004179 025100 012891 ) 07 -23 -81 N0RT HH ES T£P,N BELL 26.54 26.54 323.46 " -150' 431C --"- 010311- 02510C- 913005 08- 31- 81 -NORT HWESTER14 BELL -- 28.28- X54 :82 _ 299.16 ♦ �, 150 431C 603156 025100 013147 09 -22 -81 NORTHWESTERN BELL 2.55 57.37 292.6' 150 431^ 01;1290 C2510C .013159_ 1: -26 -81 NORTHWESTERN BELL 25.16 82.53 267.47_ 150 -� 4310 -- " -C 0465- 02510II- II13246- - 11= 30= 81- NORTHWESTERN _ BELL' - 25.00 1�J7,53 242.47- ;" • 150 4310 DOWNTOWN REOEV. DISTRICT TELEPHONE . +TOTALS+ 350.00• 107.53 + 107.53 • 242:47+ :1 .� .� 157 4320 DOWNTOWN F.EO EY. DISTRICT UTILITIES .07 .01 .C? 150 432C 07 -28 -81 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 42.69 42.69 �'42.69C2_ _ 150 4324 - _009329 _024900 _012916 090145 924900 0129612 OB- 27 -B1` N091HERIJ STATES PONER`CO 44.1'S 66.84 8E.d4CR 159 43 ?0 ECO145 0.2490& 013125 10 -21 -81 NOITHERN STATES POWEI CO 26.07 11 ?. 91 .112.910 159 4320 CC 9291 '021350013148 11-26 -81 MINNEGA3C0 3.92 116.83 !11- .81C4_ 150 4320 009317 824900 _ 013232 11-25 -81 HO °THc F.N STATES _ POWcR _ CO -- 28.59 145.42 345. 42CF .� ., 150 4320 C00455 021250 913245 11 -30 -81 MINNEGASCO 12.83 158.25 150.250.4 •'150 4320" DOWNTOWN REOEV. DISTRICT- UTILITI V'd r b -+ 158.25 4v- 158.25C S JI : :1 "i ti i11' i 1 _ 3 .1 i ins i� N G G z. i1 �I 3 .1 1 = 7 1r f� IF CITY OF CHANHASSEN S U B- L E 0 G E R R E P O R. T EXPF.NDITU3ES PERIOD ENDING 11 -30 -81 PAGS 270 r t' 7 460 H.R.A. DEPT ACCT PROD INDEX- V£NODR -- CHECK -- POTJq --- OATS -"" "DESCRIPTION-- 'IBUDGETI A�170 U N'T -AtT6Q t�- Tb =0A7E 8 A L A N C 150 4340 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT PRINTIIG AND PUBLISHING 3.300.0'1 .0: 3.30'.0 ". 1 150 ' 4340 -- 070023 14909 - G16730 07- 20- 81 CARVER COUNTY _ HER4LD 28.58.54 '.271.46 ti 15: 4340 C "_8313 0:4900 017382 1' -19 -81 CARVER, COUNTY HERALD 16.32 44.96 3.2`.5.14 ` 150 4340 OGJ117 021333 017122 10-19 -81 MINi.EAPOLIS STAR,T,:IBUNE 171.18 216.84 3. 8'_.96 �I. i • 150 4340 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT PRINTING AND PUBLISHING *TOTALS* 3.300.00+ 216.04 .• 216.04 • 3.083.96 150 -4370 CCWNTCWN-EEDEV. CISTRICT- TRAVEL +'TRA ?NING 600,00- 60D.0�) :0E 159 4370 :07003 C23660 G12611 C00604 G6 -30 -81 NAIOP 10.00 19.3^ 59;.30 I' 15C 4370 0502'1! 0.77766 616296 00-3604 C6-3G -81 DUN STEGER 57.00 61.1, 533 .0; y_!, - - -- 159 - 4370- -' - - -- CC0138- C1997 0 - -0 167 84 '_ - -- 07- 20 -81 -' -SCOTT MARTIN--- - - - - -- `19.67 '86.E3 _ 513.4? -_ . -,..' ••150 4370. DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT TRAVEL + TRAINING *TOTALS* _ -_ 600.00+ 86.60 .+ 86.60 • - 513.40 • ,: 150 4703 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT OFFICE EOUIPTMENT 1,410.09 .0J c! 150 47;,3 GCC916 OC430C 016727 07 -20 -81 BUSINESS FURNITURE 1,646.42 1,646.42 246. 42Cp 15C -- 4703 - - - -C 00018 - -C 44 3 0 0- 0168 53'--- "08- 17= 81 - -BUSI N_S7'FUP.NITUdE - - -' ; - - - 349.26 ; 1_995:68 - -- 59'..68 C ?+ - . • 150 4703 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT OFFICE EOUIPTMENT: ', *TOTALS * - 1,400.00* 1,995.68 ,•' 1,995.68 + 595.68GR* 150 4761 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTPICT LEGAL ► FISCAL .00 .00 .00 F'3 150 4761 000007 977760 012971 001103 11 -30 -81 MICHAEL SORENSON 21500.09 2,500.8: 2.5GC.C;Co -- -150` 4761- "- - -'- 000013 - -.; 77 75 0 - 0 1 30 5 7- 0 011Q3- 1130 =81 NICNAEI`S07'cN50N - 22500.30- 25'.00 • 150 4761 DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT 'LEGAL * FISCAL .- *TOTALS* .00 *.,- 25,080.00:.+ -' 25,000.00 • � 25,000.09CR4 . -. 150 IN- ACTIVE ACCOUNTS DOWNTOWN REDEV. DISTRICT. 50,250.00 ... ' ri 1 - 44150. - OOWNTOWN- REDEV:' - DISTRICT-'-•• 'DEPARTMENT- TOTALS' * + -- 93, 450.00 *'- 57�338:f9- +��T•73�1 r- 36.111:81 • �S i; -- -- - - r r, is l t' 7 CITY CF S u U.. -1. E P 6 ' p 1 ; P r. is ' n t- r^i Y r7ANH= 7- = S 17- L - : E -71 E � 'R 7- %PE -- UREA 46.7 H.,. A. '- `I:IOO -DI NI'__`�30 -'•�� P•'�-� 27,` -� -`OEpT -ACCT PROG INOE7f'- VEN90P, CFECK-- P07JE- DATE DESCRIPTION - fBUOGETf -A N 0 O N f ISNOUNT-TC -GATE B A L A N C E I� !T 155 4010 HCUSING • REOEV. AUT_H. SALARIES ♦ WAGES, REG. 91200.00 .Cd 9.201.06 f 155 4010 COO107 -- 61411+ GI243S 81 -15 -a1 NANCY HER FEnT - 416.8 �- 416.84 8,783.16 i 155 4310 C0 1.172 014110 012447 CI- 30 -81 NA!!CYI HE.'.FEC T 441.36 858.2•: B,i41.e. ; ]55 401C C12:63 01411: 012486 02 -13 -81 NA`1CY H= ?FF.';T 392.32 -- ..350.6E 51251.52 7r 949.48 'i -- 155 4019 C1 ?233 014119 C!2522 02-27 -81 - -NANCY HE 4F°RT `--- '-- - - - - 1, 6 J4. 58 7.569.42 .. 155 401C OOCG62 014113 C12557 4343-81 NANCY HERF_PT 392.32 2,622.9[ 7.177.17 155 4010 JC7196 014110 012584 03 -31 -81 NANCY HER F!iFT __ 49:.46 2.513.30 6.606.71 _ _ 155 4010 - _ 060058 - 014116- _ 012623 04 -15 -81 -NANCY HE 7FEF T 392.32 2.955.62 6,204.39 t = +ni 155 4010 COC196 51411[• 012552 C4 -30-81 NANCY H0_ ?FEPT 441.3E 3,34E.95 5.85!.:2 155 461'. 601126 61411C 012711 05 -15 -81 NANCY H �FERT 462.81 3,809.79_ _5,391.21 {' . "- -'155 - 4010 -- 09-] 254 'G 14110__ 012735 C5 -29 -8I —NA4CY H_fFEP.T 343.12- _ 4,192.91 5,007. ^_9 �!% .•1 155 4010 C30082 014110 012778 06 -15 -81 NANCY HEPFSFT 453.62 4.646.53 4,553.47 155 4014 8.0257 G14llJ 012812 - 06 -30-81 NANCY HERFFRT __ 438.29 5,984.82 4.115_.15 165 4010 -`- 000 ' .6E ".14110 - 012362 --07 -15-81 NANCY HER FEAT 4 ^.7,64 5.492.46 3, 7•.7.54 155 4010 000312 014110 '012912 07 -31 -81 NANCY HERFTRT 496.40 5,982.8'0 3,217.14 155 4010 O09C61 C14110 012946 08 -14 -81 HE P. F2RT 380.06 E,3E2.92 2.837.:8 I -155 4614 -` - -- C C 0219 "-C 14110- 012932 08 -31 -81 _NANCY --NANCY HER FER T-' - 435.23 6,798:15 2,4±1.85 155 491G 050062 :14110 013022 - 09 -15 -81 NANCY H":TFERT 392.32 71190.47 2.0. ^9.53 155 471: 00:289 014316 013773 -- '09- 30 -81' NANCY HERFEPT 386.06 -' •7.570.53 -8.611 1,629.47 1 155 401E 800363'014110- 013103 10= 15 -81- NANC Y` HERFEr•. T 441.36 89 1,188.1 155 4C10 000213 014110 013175" SG -30-81 NANCY HERF =PT 441.3E 8.453.25 746.75 155 4210 009127 014110 013187 11 -13 -81 NANCY HERFSF;T 429.10 E,8E2.35 317.65_ _ -- 155 - 4010--- G!0233 - 014110 - 013208 11- 31 =81' NANCY NE3 Fr_F;T 585.85 9�06d.2: 131.89 ; �' • -I 155 4010 000239 014310' 013209 11 -30 -81 NANCY HERFERT 437.24 9.505.44 305. 44CR 155 - -4010 :- HOUSING- s - REOEV. -AUTF -SALARIEST- NAGES';- REG -.'-' +TOTALS +' - -9i 200: 0O 9-505,44 31.305. -44' 305 44CR4 i 1 155 4C36 HOUSING ♦ FEDEV. RUTH. CONTRIB., RETIRE. - - -1 155 155 4030 -- 090231 "0 314 0 0 - - -O 135.58 - -` -- 01- 30-- 91'STAT -81--STATE-TREASURER- x.7:20 -- 44.20 -' 1'A 155 4030 CCO275 071000' 012465 - OS -30 -81 STATE TP.EASUKER 57.08 174.28 995.8 995.72 155 4C30 cc .3318 .; 012538 82 -27 -81 'STATE TREASURER - 51.36 - 155.64 944:36 155 40 ?G C C J 273 _ 031000 - 012502 03- 31- 81 -STAi E -TR EA SUi::n 48.58 264.22 H95.78 t i 155 4030 060288 031 COJ. 012603 03-31-81 STATE TRSASURER 58.71 2E2.93 837.07 155 4036 GPC 375 031000 012686 04 -39 -81 STATE TREASUP.E�; 45.85 308.78 791.22 -- 155- 40-- 'C - - - -- CC0391'- 031000 - 012687 - C4 -30 -a1 'STATE TREASURER - 55:43 364.21_735.7 155 4030 000719 031000 - 012538 000403 04-30 -81 STATE TREASURER .. iu.97 '"'375.18 '.421.70 724.82 f - -,• 155 4030 020375 03!007 '812758 05 -29 -81 STATE_ TREASURER 46.52•-. +1�!i- -155 - 4030- -C 6 G36 6-- 6 313 0 0- 8 124 4 3-- C6- 39 -81 -S TATS TREASURER_ 49.05 47'. 629.25 155 4930 CO0006 0310GJ 012747 060604. 06 -33-81 STATE TREASURER 56.24 526.99 97 3.91 i__ 155 4030 000386 G310aa_012933_ 07- 31 -81__ STATE_ TREASURE? - 49.39 576.33 523.62 �4�3,91 _ }7 155 '4030- 000402 031066 012934 07-31-31 STATE TREASURER 59.71 -. 636.99 ' 155 403C COCC57 531000 .012346' 000705 07 -31 -81 STATE TREASURER 59.30 695.39 404.61 -j j .n '.j 4836 v 06,.61 031000 C130J8 08- 31-81_ STATE_ a c Ti _ASUEE. 740.23 _ ,359.77 _.._. _155 155. '4C3G C ^.6377- 031008 013009 C8-- 31 --81 STATE TREASURER _44.84 54.24 794.473 -5.53 155 4030 - 000335 031COJ' 013086 09 -39 -81 STATE TREASURER 42.48 836.95 263.35 r' "� 155 4C 3C ^:386 COG 013690 09 -30 -81 STATE TREASURE, 51.35 818.35 .' 211.76_____ 155 40'.6 __G 603345 _031 031000 _ 013158 10-30 -81 - STATE _ N: EASUr:ER -__. 48.57 936.87 ]E 3. 13c- ' 1 155 ., 4030 099361 031000 '- 013159 SG -30 -81 STATE TREASURER �• 58.71 995 50 -f 104.42. - 155 4020 OCJ396 031GOG 013239 11 -30 -d1 STATE TREA SUP E3 57.87 1,053.45 _46.55 ,i �y 5 u. c n K e Y U ,v, 1 t. XPe+IDITULES P5eI00 ENDING 11 -30 -8t FAG= 3 %1. 460 H.R.A. If i ` DEFT" 7 ACCT- PRO G- INDEEX-- VENDOk' CHECK- POTJ•E-DATE -'- -" DESCRIPTION -- EBUDG7TI- -- A-N "0 "11- N-T-AM OUNTZ0= 0ATF'-O -A "L A N : E i ' 155 4030 000448 031000 013244 11-30 -81 STATE TREASURER 69.99 1.123,43 23.4 �,•J • 155 4030 HOUSING ♦ REOEV. RUTH. CONTRIS., RETIRE. *TOTALS* Ss100.00• 1,123.43 • 1,123.43 • 23.k :7 - . �•,� 155 4040 HODS I \G -1 RECEV, AUT H. CONTRIB.;-I NS 1, 00 n; 0q- --'- - - -- -- "` ,OY SsCC0.0 �!:•.� 155 4049 0:0311 0.7299 012472 01 -28 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4.51 4.51 913 4: - _ 155 4C43 _ 0C ^297 035675 012466 -- "[12347 G1 -29 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 67.93 72.44 927.5; ; 155 4041 010353- LC7299 02- 27- Bi`CROWHI LIF- INSU� ANC_ CO 4.87 77.31 922.6• �..: � - ♦.,d 155 4045 081367 :07299 012544 62-2 ? -81 C °OWN LIFE INSUI:ANCe CO 4.51 81,82 931. 1� I'•`i . 155 4Z43 0,1392 035675 ^12545 02 -27 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYEES CRP 69.71 151.53 840.4, 5` 155 4040---`-'-- CC530.4- :35675 - -C 12604 C3 -31 -81 W1SC ONSIN EHPLOYE6.S GRP ---79. 72 -- 231.25 _ 76?.T 155 4040 000319 657299 C126L5 03 -31 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4.P.7 236.12 763.8: {_ 155 - 414C "4340 " - 000307 535675 012674 - "C 04 -3L -81 WISCONSIN EHFLOYE45 GRP 79.72 315.84 684.1!: '• y,I 155 CC 322 107299- CI2675 '04= 31 -81- -CROWN LIF2 INSU5.ANCF CO -' - -- L,g7 720.71 579.2• - -', E ., - -� 155 4840 CC 0176 035675 012723 05 -26 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYE :S GRP 79.72 407.43 599.5; 9 + _ 155 _404 "._ -- J9C191_ 6 7299 712724 05 -26 -81 CROWN INSU...ANCE CO 4,87 465.3? 155. 4O4C 06033C 031G�; - 912747'- 05 -29 -81 STATE Tn EASwe 2; - -56.24 461.54 - 533.41 a) 155 4040 OCO347 6.7299 012750: : •'05 -29 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4,87 "- 46E.41 t55 _404.^ 007056 C'u7299 012605 605005 �'J12d01--- .: C5- 31 -81. CROWN LIFE INSURANCE_ CO 4.87CR - 461.54 .533.5 53S.4i {' 155 4040 6G21dS 135675 �06 -24 =81 NISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP - 79.72`- 5yf -,26 455.73 t 155 4140 Cl-.253 CL•7299 312345 56 -30 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4.87 546.13 453. 3f fJ • _ X 155 4040 -4041 0 00399 031100 '112946 06 -33 -81 STATE T,(- ASUP.Er, 59.30 - 655.43 394.5" I' 155 IC9 ]G7- 031Lu "0'- 012747 16- 30 -81'- STATE TREASUd ER .� 1 1 155 4048 0L02C3 635675 012894.: ,:'.07 -24 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS 'GRP 79.72 628.91 371,38 �� • 155 -_" -4047 4040 - 010358 0:7299 912331 -: -- -C 07 -31 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO - 4.87 633.78 SEE. 22 ! .. 153 090058 310L0'012346�0TD'S- TT =31 =81 -STATE T.'iEASUit'K -" - 59.3GCf�- 574.538 425.52? 155 4040 0:9327 007299 013306 63 -31 -81 CPOWN LIFE INSU. ^.ANCE CO 4.87 579.35 - 42:,65 �j • _ 155 4143 -4040 600344. 035675 013907 - `235675 08 -31 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLGYEkS GRp 79.72 659.07 155 00035ti 913388 C9- 30- B1- 'WISMISIN EMPLOYEES GRP 79.72 738.79 _34'.93 26121 14 !' 4 155 4040' 000372 607299 013089 V9-33-81 c CROWH LTF_ INSURANC•F CO 4,87. - '743.66 25E:34 l.' • 155_ -4042- 4049_ *-- 500368_ ^35675 013152 - - Id -29 -81 WISCONSIN EMFLOYcP.S GRP 79.72 823.39 576.62 �.� 'E 155 005324 ti7 29 9- 0 1 31 5 3 _ Su =29 =81 CROWN LIFE INSUi ?ANC_ CO 4.87 828 25 171.75 _1:.� id 155 4040 CCG412 007299 013240 11 -30 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4.87 833.12 lEE. 88 ,U • 155 4040 OC3429 C35675 013 ?41 11 30 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYE -4S GIR P 79.72. - - -- 912.84 97.16 ., f • 155 4040 HOUSING ♦ REDEV. AUTH.. CONTRIB.♦ INS. _ .•TOTALS• . 1,900,000 912,811 . • -• ..912.84 • - 87,16 + �'= • 1 355 4055 HCU$IHG -ii?'c CE V: AU7N. N0P.iCXEN S- 7`.OM-r". 20.07 ; 155 40.50 0'0072 OC8800 016868 08 -17 -81 DOLLIFF INSURANCE INC 12.60 12.60 7.4. '! .., • 155 -- 4050 - HOUSING + REDEV: AUTfl.- WORXNENS `- COXP:- "--- ' + TOTALS* -i` `- "7;yp • f2:80-' 1 l.( �.�a /f-,- 155. -155 4110 HOUSING ♦ FEDEV. AUTH. - SUPPLIES, - -0:7801 -6 OFFICE. .. 150.00 .. _ .07 Is a.06 ' • (I i-- 4114- G00.032 16132 0057.04 05-31-- Bf- OIIL €S OFFICE PitO DUCTS _ 7:773 Z -75 �.Sk7. 25 '► CS 155 4115 OC 0O42 057809 016516 005004 05 -31 -81 DALES OFFICE PRODUCTS 11.65 14.4: . 135.6'. :� •j • 155 4111 -- C00045 016100 016859 __ 08 -17 -81 CHANHASSEN PHA•ZMACY -. 3.10 . 17.45 '132.64 155 4130 606110 512194 016879 C2 -37 -81 GENE RAL OFFIC: PROOUCTS - 27.86 45.26 ^132.613 '• 155 411C 659183 C26E72 016915 08 -17 -81 THE PHOTO FACTOEY 10.40 55.66 94,34 r.. 5 4 IT Y ANWA� �U 8 " --1- -5 0 G. -C-is, R_a_o_0 P. CS EfjMA r, 11- .11. -1 27.i� V 460 H.R.A. 2PT- ACCT -PROD `IN6EK "'- 'VENCOA- CHECK '"P6 /JE- -- BATE-- " "'OESCRIPT TON —IBUDGE' T1 A-- N-O-U- 'N ""T-'- AMOUNT- TO -CATF - 91 A L A N C E'��� u - 0 155 4030 OCC445 031000 013244 11-30'61 STATE TREASURER 69.99 1,123.43 23.4300 • 155 4030 HOUSING + REOE Y. AUTN CONTRIB., RETIRE. *TOTALS* L.100.00. 1.113.43 ' 1.322.43 • iJ. 43CR• w�• c .',� r' -155 -4040 -RO0ST NG -&' -x ECEV AUTN: - "'C ONTRIB:. INE. V 155, 4040 000311 1:7299 012472 01 -29 -81 CROWN L:FE INSURANCE CO 4.51 4.51 995.49 - 1IIN 155 4040 0(.029^ 035675 012466 01-24-61 WISCONSIN FMPLCY°:, GRP 67,93 72.44 927,56 •Mf - -- 155 - -404 -- ?[0353 - ..7299' - 012543 - - - -- 02 -27 -81 CROWN L:Fc INSU'. ANC'-.' CO' 4. °7 - "� - - - -- 77.31- "_ "' - a2 ?.69 Y 155 404C 0 37367 007299 012544 02 -27 -81 CROWN Li F: INSURANCE. CO 4.51 81,02 9. 1 IA 155 404C 000382 035675 012545 02 -27 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYEES G?P 69.71 151.53 84A.47 : 355 4440 -- 003304 _135675- C12634- -C3- 31-81- WISCONSIN EMPLDYE-r GRP 79.72 -- Z21..25--- "----- 7E °.7r 0 "d 155 4040 - [00319 CC7299 C12605 03 -31 -61 CROWN LIFE INSU%,ANC`. CO 4,77 23E.12 761.88 155 404C 000307 035675 012674 04 -30 -81 WI3C CNSIN EMPLOYERS VP 79.72 315.04 684.16 'p uT7299-- L12675'----- 'I4- 30 -61'" "CROWN LIFE--Th UFANC° CO - 4.87 _2-.73' - " " "' 171.21 V 155 404C 000176 135675 012723 05 -26 -61 WISCONSIN EMFLOYERS GRP 79.72 40'.43 599.57 � 155 4G4C 000191 G77299 d1Z7Z4' 05 -25 -61 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4,87 405.3" 59 4.7^ °1-- 155'-- 404L-- D"G773E- - "U3ia ac-- 712747-- '---05- 29 -81- STATE -TF, F.ASU.F., "'-- -'_ -'- 56. Z4 -462 54 53 1. 46 '0 �I 155 404^ 000347 C17299 012750 C5 -29 -PS CROWN LIFE INSUr,.ANCE CO 4,97 4E6.41 53 *.59' 155 404[ CC 0056 .097299 012605 005005 05-31 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4. 07CR 461.-k 53 ".46 355 - -4C 40 -'CZ 7189 -L39675 ^.12d ^. 1'- '_- _ "'--- ' "06- 24 -91- NISCCNS:N EMPLOYERS GP F- "'- -79.'2 -- -54I ,2E " 47-.7- q • 155 4047 C 10383 C .^7299 012345 06 -30 -81 CROWN LIFE INSURANCE 00 4.87 54E.13 44'.97 155 404^ 000399 031 HOC C12546 06 -30 -82 STATE TPEASURER 59.30 6C5.43 394,57 155---4124 OO OT- 931000- 012747 -- 040684- -46 -Sn -F 1' -- 17,6-31-El STATE T19ASU C4' " - -_ - -" - 56:24CR- '549.19 -- -- - -- 45 ^.91 • 155 4040 C06 035675 012994 07 -24 -81 WISCONSIN EMPLOYERS GRP 74.72 628 91 3711.r9 155 4040 O G 03368 8 0c7299 012931 07 -31 -81 GROWN LIFE NSU CD 'ANCE CC 4.27 63 *.78 -f55 -4741 '0C -005P- '031300- ^.12846 --- COOT"--- C7 -31 -81 STA.0 TREASURFV -- - - "' -- 59.3CCR--' - -' -574 48- "'_' - -' a 155 404[ 000327 OC7299 013 ^.05 09 -31 -81 CROWN LTFE INSURANCE CO 4.87 579 T5 42'.65 ' 155 4047 090344 C35675 013007 08 -31 -81 HISCONSIN EMPLOYERS G'P 79.72 659.e? 34 .93 9 �, Ye�404Q 000354- P35675- 013)88 '09 -30 -81 - WISCONSIN FMPLCYES'S' -GRP- 79:72' - X36.19 -- -- - ?E 1. 21 '; • :,.� 155 404[ 000370 0[7299 013089 C9-30-el GROWN LIFE INSURANCE CO 4.87 743.66 ZFE. 74 :. 155 40'" 000306 03 1 1P 11-29-61 EMPLOYERS GRP 74.72 823.3R 176.62 c 15. - 404 - -t0 ^324 1'7299'- 013153- - -- 1 29 -8f "CROWN LIPS NSU ANC' - "'RP 4.87 -- -92° 25 -''_' - -171.'5 pN ` 155 -61 INSU °ANC- CO 4.87 03. 17 16•.89 155 `040 40 C 000429 935675., 013241 C35675TW OL324CON1RIB.• -30 I1 -30 -61 _ WISCONSIN WISCONSIN FMPLOVVS IN EMPLOY ES GRP _ 79.72 912.64 -, _ ._n7.15 -, 4 • 155 04 HOUSING O M G I11 ALE` 1,900.00• 9.2.94 • 931.94 • 97.16 „�i 155_... 4058.- HCUSING' ♦+EOEV.- AUTN:_-- WOR%NENS - Comp. _.__. _... ___ _ -___- 20.0 ?__ - - _ -____ __ 9•.__.... 2 • 155 4050 000072 018800 016868 08 37 81 COLLIER INSURANCE INC 12.60 12.60 4'. ,J "� -155 - 4450- MOVSIMG- +"'RELE V. -AUTN. - NOR KMEN$ COMP. - - -- '_•TOTALS•- '- _ -20 -. 08 +- 1t.60 7.4' -'; 155 4110 HOUSING • PEOEV. AUTN. SUPFLIES, OFFICE 150.00 _ 0' - -' 155 --" 411 ^. -_v'- 10['32 - " -G C7 EO C' -- [16132- 0¢5OC4_'C5 -31 -81 'CALF OFFICE F=000rTS --- -- ''2.78- y 155 4110 O4GO42 QC7800 016516 005004 05 -31-81 DALES OFFIG PRODUCTS 11.65 14.4,: 05.6 E'1 155 41lC 000946 OC6102 016859 08 -17 -81 CHANHASSEN PHA7MACY 1.20 17.4: 1' 6C 255" -4126 0D 0110- 'CIZ194 --- 016879 -OL V -81 GENERAL - OFFICE- PRODUCTS- - Y :8E$ 114.74 r' J �' 155 411C 000183 026672 016915 08 17 -CA THE PHOTO FACTORY 10.40 55 E6 9-.74 ; - 4 'I 2 . 4 III i . ..�.. :.'.. I•a:' .Mil+,^u+M9t4NWJW+WYV -,. ,i•^:4j Y+w f t>Jt +.l . t r• r- r —CITU�MANNA l U 8 P'-'O R `EXPE— :;tZS— -) E—. Si. 4r 3 i c H� c � 4r V 4r G7 V :V :V b V 1. 469 . H.° A. W FPT ACCT PFOG-- -INiSF'X -- VEND -Ok CHE7:K -' V07 JE"— OAT E" — - OESCRIPTIOR-- '-Y000GETT "— A— O- U-R-T— AMOUNT -TO-DATE - 8 "A L A N C -E "" I �y j + i5i 411d- NoUSIWG + PEDEY.- AUTH.— SUPPLIES, OFFICE - "- " -'- " "• TOTALS + " --- - - +- "' 94.34 yN iI 5 4340 -4340 HOUSING • RECEV. RUTH. PRINTING AND PUBLISHING ___O089f3-- -1_ 01 ,p, ,0 I^ '� 155 C -- Uib317 ----- - 03 -iE -01 ARTCRAFT 00190 - " -PR ESST NC -- -Z1.7,�- -01:75 21.15 R f 55 4340 HOUSING . REDEV. AUTH. PRINTING AMU PUBL:'SNING +TOTALS+ .00+ 21.75 • 21.75 • 21.75CF. r155 4370 HOUSING • RECEV. AUTH. TRAVEL + TRAINING 300.01 0 55 4370 .100070 OC895C 016412 04 2C ei GEOGE DONNELLY 2C.65 2 65 279.35 55 -4370- '-- 003109- "- C2fi400- 016571 - - - - -- PETTY -CASK FUNO- CITY -- 9.25- 29.90 -' -- -' -- ?7C. 1? iJ • 155 4370 HOUSING + REDEV. AUTH. TRAVEL + TRAINING -TOTALS* 3.10.09' 29.90 • 29,90 + 270.1^ 155 4530 HOUSING • RECEV. AUTH. REP. + MAINT.. EDUIPT. .0, y IM 155 4530 000115 015600 016659 C6 -15 -81 I B N 214.00 214.00 • 155 4530 HOUSING + REDEV. AUTH. REP. + MAINT.. £OUIFT. 'TOTALS' .00• 214..10 • 214.00 + 214.00CR+ -- -' - -4590- -aREOE - -_. 255 HOUSING Y. AUTH. -" "125.1- CONTRACT SY C: : - -- ------ '- '----- - ".V?--- -- - - -- -- p_-- .__ _.. �- � 155 4590 000075 015600 016249 02 -23 -61 I 9 N 94.00 94.00 qu.0 7 -•'- 155 -4591 -HOUSING- "EOEV: -AUTH.- -MISC- CONTRACT "SVGS- - -- TOTALS •--- - " -' -- X00• -' --94 -.DID D— Witt --- •- -" -'"" 94,0)CR•- 155 4703 HOUSING + REDEV. AUTH. OFFICE EDUIPTHENT 600.0? .00 -- 155- 47t3' -" -____ 000]55-- 00759C - "- '016366 -'_ -- - 08- 17 -61-- DALE' OFFICE - 'MACHINES -' -__- 98.95' _ "99.95' - -- "'-- - 571. "5 ' 155 4793 HOUSING + REDEV. AUTH. OFFICE EOUIPTMENT -TOTALS' 600.03+ 98.95 • 98.95 ' 501.05 + 155 IN- ACTIVE ACCOUNTS HOUSING + REDEV. G.UTH. 4 ?0.00 -Y' 155'- ' "'NOVSING's- REpEY:'AUTH: ••- OEPpRTMENT " TOTALS 4•- '--- - -_12r T79.03•-�- 12.069.97- •-- 22.?L0 .91- -'•"-_ -- 7.1.43 •';1 _I _ =TY :1 ANH= 7 - L' - .. u G E n R E r v R '.' EXPENDITURES 460 H.Q.A. PERIOD ENDING 11 -30 -81 PAGE 272 r o 1 PT- ACCT_PROG INDEX-- p-EN70R CHE CK'P07JE- BAT _ __ - DESCRIPTION -A -N a fBUOGET1 N O U ��AMOUNT= TO -DPiE 8 A L - -p 155 155 __4010_ 4010 ' HCU_SI14G + RE__0_EV. AUT_H. SA_ L_A_R_IE_S ♦ NAGES, REG. 1 9.200,00___ N C, E 155 4010 CO0107- C1411J 000172 012433- - -' 01- 15- 81- NAHCYIH`c RFr�T -` - 416.8- •Od 9r207.00 . �.� 155_ 4p 1C 014117 C ?9:63 :1411: 012447 012486 71 -30 -81 NANCY HE =FEdT 441,36 y16:H4 856.2•: i ., - -- 155 155 4017 --" -- C0 ?233 01411:3- 012522 02 -13 -81 02 -27 -81 NANCY HERFERT r E - -- -NANCY H_RF --- 392.32 1,253.52 di. 8.341.d' 7, 94 y.48 i 155 4010 4017 000062 JSv 112 C12i 57 0 -81 -RT NANCY HF.R FE? T , 35•,: E� 1.630.56 _ _ 7,569.42 i✓ 'Irl -155 4 n 31_- JC2196 41411) .• . -' - -C, 4.58- 01411G 012584 -- 01262) _13 0., 31 -61 NANCY HERFFFT 392.32 491.4C 2,322.97 2.513.37 7,177.11 , , CJelg6 214114. 012652 C4- 15- 81-- C4 -30-81 NAVf,Y HE iFcFT r_ r NANCY H_;F_RT 392.32 2,905.62 6,6E6.71 0 6,2 4.39 -�.,.: 'n _ 155 155 4U 1.� 4010 673126 61411_° 012711 05 -15 -61 NANCY tf %' +Fcr.r 441.3E ,+, n ,346.9. 5.853•.2 r 155 4010 CJGJ82 014136- 112735 C5 -29 -81 -NAVC Y- HERF EFT 462.61 - 3.892.79 -4 5,391. 21 -,' 4010 070282 014110. 012778 08 -15 -81 NANCY HEFF Fr Jd3.12 - • 192 91 5 OC 7.99 1 t l' _155 155 -- '4010` DCC257 014110 - C 00 "fiE- ".14110012362 012812 .• 06 -30-81 r NANCY HERF P,T- -NANCY 453.62 438.29 4.646.53 5,J84,82 4x55'.47 �)ti,1 155 4010 030312 014110 " 012912 07- 15--d1 07 -31 -e1 -HER F..,GT e r ^ - 4.7 64 -��- X492 :46 4,115.18 3�T =7.54 {i- " __ 155 4010 - 000f,61 014310 012946 08 -14 -81 IA,yCY H..RF_RT NANCY HERF ?T 496,40 5,982.86 . 3.2_7,14 f >j 155 155 4010---- GOJ219 _Z 14139- 012292 08- 31-61 - 'NANCY HF,RFEYT -- T _ 380.06 Er 7E2.92 2,837. ^8 ij �'- 4510 OG0J62 ,514110 013022. 09- 15 -81. NANCY HF•RFEBT 435.23 - - 6 798:15 2 .4 ' 1.9 155 4917 - - 007289 014110. 013173 ...'' - 09 -30 -81 . '- NANCY HER Fcfa �' 392.32 7,190.4) 2 0 "9.53 ._ f._� 155 155 401E 4;10 700)63- 914110 7113103 Su- 15= 91- NANCY- HERF °F.T r 360.06 7.570.53 1x629.47 ' 044213 C14110 013135 r- 1.. 35 -81 NANCY HERFFaT 441.36 8. 111.8 1,18.9.11 155. 155 4.10 -4010 - CO ?127 414110 013187 - 11 -13 -81 MANGY HERF °RT 1 441,..E 6,453,25 746.75 CJ 090233'- 014110 013209 11 =Jd -81 � -NANCY HER FcF,T __- 429,10 8,862.75 317.65 C" 155 4010 000239 6141103 013209 - 11 -30 -81 NANCY HERFERT -,. 365.10 9.068.27 131.80- �I '" - -• _ - 155'- •. -:• ... 4010-- HCUSING -4 - REDEV.-- AUTW-- SAXARIES -"' A'GESi- REGW - -4 TOTALS* - 437 24 9,54'5.44 305.44CR '! - 9-200.00• 9-505 -:44 9 :305�44'�""- -305: 155 155- 4030 HJUSING 4030 - ♦'F.EOEV. RUTH. 070231-- 031- O0C-'- CONTRIB.,, SIZr,59�- - `- RETIRE. - • 1,100.01 ' 155 4030 000275 97iC00 012465 01- 30 =51 -'STAY E"TREASURER- -' ' " -` °- 4T3 �- •0E 1s107.00 -47.20 1s052. 8G - - '; -C� (p 355 •403G- 4C 3C 002318 031 i0O '012538 71 -30 -81 02 -27 -81 -STATE + STATE-TREASUnER TREASURER 57,08 '174,28 995,72 155 155 4030 000273- 831000 - 012602 03 -31 =81 -STAVE _ TREASURE< - 51.36 �48.58 155.E4 944.36 �- �f',, 155 4730 CCO286 021000 0,)6375 031000 0126C3 012686 03-31 -81 04 STATE TREASURER - 58.71 234.22 262,93 i '- ^+ ' 155 '4030--- Ot0391- 031000- 012687 '- -30 -81 04 -30 -81 STATE TREASUBE:i 45.8 7 08, 3 837 837• -' 791.79 153 4C 30 OCJ719 OJIOOC 012538 000403 04-30-al , STATE TREEASURER-- STATE TREASURER 3 55.43 7- 3 364.21 - 735•)9'�', 1!�, 155 -155 '473[-- 4030 G' 0375 93!009 '- CG0366` 031000�J12343 012758 - "05 -29 -81 - STATE TREASURER 'STATE - 10.97 46.52 .375.19 421.70 - :724.92 ` 155 4130 000005 031000 012747 .000604. 06 -39 -81 06 -35 -81 TREASURER STATE _ 49.05 47 ?:75 678.39_ -029.2.5 "V, 155 155 -Y55 4030 - -- 000386 021000 - 012933 07 -31 -81 TREASURER ' STATE TREASURE? 56.24 526,.99 - 573.51 4030 040402 031000 - 012934 - 07- 31- BS-- S7AiE`7REAS U3 En -- - 49.39 576.38 523;62 7 w. r 155 4030 CO 0057 031000 012346 000705 07 -31- 81 STATE Tdc`ASURER 59.71 63fi :79 463.91' -- " -- 155 155 �- 4030 4L3C� - 0 C)361 03100, - -C 013038 OB -31 -81 r STATE T"-. EASU,c, - 59.30 0 9 6,5.3_ - .1. 0•4.61 a ! ^,)377- 031000 tl13J09 '0 8- 31 - -81 r __ S7 A. ETR EASUi:..Q 44.94 n, 74. 23 359.77_ 155 4C 3? 900335 331 Doi 013:66 09 -30 -81 STATE TREASURE >, 54.24 0 7 ,4.47 3:5.53 w -- 155 40 3C - - -- -3386 _031000 CO 345 013390 -14 G9 -JO -81 -� STATE TREASURE-, 42.48 8JE.95 ZE 3, ?5 - 155 4010 G31000- 077361 021000013159 C13159 -30 81 -3J 81 _ -T E TR EASU ?ER _-- •=- A' - - -.51 .35 ` 48.57 _ .- 936.87 _ 16.13 'I 155 4029 000396 031000 . _ 013239 11 11 -3C dl_ STATE TREASURER STATE TREASURER ER 56.71 995,5P. 104.42 __.__... - .. _. ..._ __ 57.tl7 1.453.45 46.55 55 ' r o 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN S U 8- L E 0 G E , R R E P O R T EXPE40ITUIES PERIOD ENDING 11 -30 -81 V 460 H.R.A. PAG_ 27" ;;�- -DEPT- ACCT -PROG- INDEX- VENDOT- CHECK- -P"OTJE -'O ATE- "DESCRIPTION--- t9000 =T1 - A- H- O- U- N- T'�AKOI�oT= fd= -DATF- 9"�[ -A � 158 4310 MIST Pa ESERVATION DIST TELEPHONE -- _. 400.0'7 Ij 159 4310 OuC256- 02512u" C124o3--- DJw29 -81 NORT:HNESTERN- BELL':- " - -- 29�E2 .05 29.82 40(.01 --" -� :� ' 158 4310 CG0279 925100 012131 02 -25 -L, NORTHWESTzRN O=LL 29.53 59.35 37:.18 3c', 158 158 - 4311 4310- EC9123 02i10e 012572 03 -23 -z `CC113 3- 0 25105-012633 'C4- -HORT NOR. HWESTERN BFLL 29.53 88.88 65 311.12_ • 159 4310 21- b_ 000147 02510C 012721 05 -26 -81 HWESTEPN OEL L�- NORTHWESTERN RFFLL -29.53 318.41 -- -- 261.59 -� •� X158 4310, 000168 625108 012797 06 -23 -81 NORTHWESTERN BELL 77.50 56.61 195.9i 252,52 2 ^4.79 "•' 147,48 •,, ..'..._._ • 158 4310 H25T PRESERVATION DIST TELEPHONE *TOTALS* ' 400.00 + - 252.52 + 252.52 • 147.48 158 -` 4320- .....� TfTST-'FPESE-VATIOF•ri1I ST-- UTILITIEa. ,.._ -- - - " - -" - 4,800: 0!i ' - "- r.86 1 _ i 156 158 432C' 432•; 000241 C24900 012460 DS -28 -81 NO3THERF7 STATES POW'P, CQ.160.36 - .0'i� 167.3E 4.E39. E4 158 4320 0.0294 024900 812136 i" 02 25 -8.: OCA13fi - 024903- 012574 NOP,TH =RN STATES_POA-R CO_ � 121.49 281.85 4.51.':.15 .j 159 ,4320 03- 27 -6;.- 93U269 024900 012666 04 -30 -8 '- NO•',THFPH STATES PON.R CO - "95.47 _ '371,32 4,422.66 '•.! - _ 158 _ 4320 000157 024900 012722 OS- 26 -B.: NORTHERN STATES POW -R CO N01 H°_P,N STATES POW52 CO_ 56.64 42.93 435.96' 4.364.:4 ,•'� 158 432: - 000157 X24900 - 012796 -.' C6- 18 -B1 -N '600330 CRT HEP,�� STATES POW °_?CO'-- - "5, ^6 478.89 '83.95 4,321.11 - -'- 7 ;•! 158 "_ 4329 024900 '012916 " 07 -29 -8 ,. NORTHERN STATES POWER Co - 3.48 + 487.43 4, 316. 75 4.312.57 j 1 -...'' _ 15 4320 00.6146 _624900 012968 C8- 20 -8:.. NOR: H =RN STATES CO_ 3,?5 - 49 ". 413 ^.9.52 -. 153 43 23 4.- ,___C00146- 024900 013125 iC- 21- 8a- NOi;tHEPN STATES POWER CO - -- -2.12 .4E� 492.60` -- '4.377.4[` jrl -� 158 4320 0 ^0358 024900 813232 11-25 -81 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO 12.32 504,92 4s295.•l9 - -+ 158 - 4320- ' -NIST -PRESERVATION - DIST - UTILITIES -- -` +TOTALS+`-- 4;800.'00f' '5D4:S Z7-w------50 ;:92 -9- 4:295.08 -' -' 158 47CZ MIST FRESE'V_ATI3N DIST BUILDINGS o. STRUCTURES - -- 51.000_.00 5.005.07 ' 158 47P2- 000039 p27750T .16140 tl084C4 u "4- 3_ ^ ^ -81 _ _ L +L EL ECTRICINC 151.0 ,0D 15i'.CO 4,849.01 - 158 4782 000041 C3030C '016167 000404 - 04 -30 -81 SOUTHWEST PLUMBING 3.885.00 4.036.00 964.01 + -- 158 4702 -MIST PRESERVATION DIST - BUILDINGS -4 STRUCTURES TOTALS* 5s000.00* 4s036.00 -;- 4�D36.B0 '. - ' J a, 158 IN- ACTIVE ACCOUNTS. MIST PRESERVATION DIST 11400.00 .p �i • +150 - MIST PRESERVATION DIST DEPARTMENT TOTALS ! +' 111600.00+ 41793.44 '• 41793.44 :: .•460 -- -- N.A.A. TrFUNOTtlTA LS. +"- •. 117.020.00• -. 74,200. 20 ; •' 74 ,200 3D M3,fi19. 80 .1 F o O -1 V 1 y • J J .�1 m _ CITY OF CHANHASSEN S U B L E D G E R R E P O R T EXPENDITURES PERIOD ENDING 11 -3C -81 PAGF 309 ♦� • 604 8C -3 RING RD PUS IMP DEPT--ACCT-PRO[ CF " "OESCRIPT ION - (BUDGET) _A 9_O_U-N�T- AHOUNT =TD= OATS -U SA N C E__ 4300 +s•• +r<sr+ +,•, r+r•r "' -- +. rrr EESPO SERVIC-OATE-- ., 00 I b, •:1 4337 CGG:17- '0:2399 - 016318- -- 03- 16 -81, __ -8 F. H INC -- - 636:32 606.32 - 6 ?6.3 ?Cr • 430C C^_C.45 0:7241 016334 C3 -16 -91 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT 155,40 7E1.72 761.77f,? �ali , - 4357 438. 00C122 318400 - 000127 019400 016535 - 816663 C4 -20 -81 06 -15-81 CARSON a YEP.TZ _ _ 1,519.65 _Z 291.77 2,281. 370°._ • 437: 050150 019470 •G1E667 06 -15- r LARSOFP.O.HLING AND ASSOC 294.00 _ 4307_ 096013 E34367 C16375 000604 C6 -39 -81 VON KLUG , ASSOCIATES 315,00 2,913.9? 430, - 000C15 002399 71E490 - 00'7604 G6 -30 -ei _ B F, H INC 39x.48 _3.229.93 3.619.41 3,228. 97CR 3.519.41Ld _! • :. 4390 4370 000728 027240 03 0001 &25900 016130 016157 000605 06- 3C -81'- 030605 06 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT 690.90 4,219.41 4'219,4109 74300 - - C00033- 029930` -30 -81 016166 - 000605- 06 -30 -81 PATCHIN APORAISALS INC -RUSS -ELL SMITH ASSOC INC 300.00 4.519.41 67 ^..�0- x;119:41 4 F19.41fR -S• - v 4377 000035. 034367:. 016174 000605 06 -30 -81 VON KLUG t ASSOCIATES 345.10- S,LE4.51 5,119. S1C4 5s454.51CR __ 4300 - 000J37 0[72240. 5000741- 016233.'.000605 06 -30 -81 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT - 46-1.90 5,925.41 5,925.41CR �;�� aw 4371 OCT24� C1647B- '016513 050605- 06= 30 -81 -C 00405!!4 TED MANAGEMENT. 155.40 6;78!.81 b,CA'.91C_ 41I 4350 000045 007240 000605 06 -30 -81 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT 155.40 6,236.21 6, 236. .! • ` 4377 4370 - -- 000057 G16400 000054- 019400- 016142 - 016256 - 009606 06 -39 -81 000606- 0fi- 37- BL --IA LARSON t HERTZ RSON + - 8,805.50 15,&41.71 15,841.7304 �. -. 43C7 COOZ56 002399 016318 000606 06- 39 -81. MERTZ B R N INC 1s7A5.30 26,828.44 365827.71 43,655.45 16,8 -T. 01r� + _ 4300 - 000067 018400 -'0C - - 016549 - 000696 C6 -30 -81 LARSON t ME%TZ - - 1,509.75. 45.1E5.20 43,E55.45rR 45,3E 5.2 ?fR f k 'N 4378 7071 3 04 7 0;5 016224 000677- 06- 317 -81 "- CARVER'000NTY_ABST$ZACT---°" 42.75 45,2L7,95-- 45,2:7.95Ci -, -i y 4730 4390_ 020573 072399 016318 000607' 06,;30 -BS B R N INC 3,62?.20 48,;31.15 48,831.15,4 F,� y _ 000713 CC2399 016721 07 -20 -81 B ° M P1C 4,754.38 53,595.53 53,585. 5305 ' 437; 0, 0111�i 17190- 616773 07 =20 =81 -KCHL RU SCH -A 8STR ACTII NO --7, ?35.37 65:821.53 60.92 ". 53C ? p 4339 437 ^_ 000112 017190 - C16773 07 -20 -81 KCHLRUSCH ABSTRACT AND 757.50 61,578.03 E1,57 P,. A3CR r .._...__.._- 430` -' 000121 013400 516777 007203-- C2993-aJ6814 07 -20-81 - 07- 20 -81-- LAR90A1 + METZ RUSSELL- SMITH ASSOC- INC'-- 1,254.25 62,832.2°. --403.CC�- 52,A32.28CR�:, 4390 C777F7 0:2399 016343 08 -17 -81 8 R H INC 6?�2?2:29 67,232. 7Arq .r�l 4301 ---�- -4370 007350 027240 016862 - 08 -17 -81 COORDINATED MA_AGEMENT 3,471.50 185.47 6E,7C3.78 66,889.25 66,7'3.78;9 66 889.25Ci CCO134- 75]8400 016896 - 08 -17 -81 LARSOtJ + MERTZ - - '811,79 67,781.@4 ' 67,731.C4L' A7 .� 4330 C7 "213 634360 716931 - G9 -17 -81 YON KL UG + ASSOCIATES 385, ?J - 69,u 80.74 58,:8 E.C4CR Fj 431C - - 4300_'___ OCQ113 CC2399 016952 GD0951 00724C 016979 `- 09 -21 81 09 -21 BS- B R N INC_ COORDINATED MANAGEMENT 1,520.10 - 69,606.]4 69,675. 14r+ i;1 v 4330 0 °2058 710350 016997 C9- 21 81 FIN4'CIAL COMMUNICATIONS 94.80 32.58 b9.7.7J.94 69,733.52 62.70:.9 -CR 69,733.5 ?CR'� 4333 - " -- 000112 317199 - 017017 09 -2] 81 KOHLFUSCH &BST A_C_T_AND 137.50 69,871,92 69,871.02CR ' .t 43C7- 000119 C1540C 017313 - 09 -21 =81 LA?SON -t -MEtTZ - - -- - �701 .25 'r 0;572.27 77, 572.27CO j p 4379 070194 023396 017725 - C9 -21 -81 MOONS INVESTORS SERVICE 1,599.90 72,372.27 72.0'2. 27f,R �9 4300 CO 7406 _002399 017073 10 -19 -81 B R H INC 73,573.45 73,573.45CP -�• 4301___ 005052- 0:7244 017096 _ YO -19 -81 _ COOr'.OINATSD MANAGEMENT _1_,501.18 - - 48.00 73;621.45 73,621.4 =CR V 4379 CC0795 616475 017115 10 -19 -81 ,JUPAN + MOODY INC 17,912.58 91,533.95 91,533.950° rn 4370__ - 010096 G1719C 017116 17 -19 -Bi KCHLRUSCH ABSTRACT AMU 2,01 ^,.70 93,543,95 93,54.,950' 4300 GO51J5 01840: 017118 10 -19 -81 LARS ON t ME,FTZ - - `- ' -3.399.90 46.942.95 98.94 ?.95CR _ IIr' 40 4300 C00004 GC ?399 017165 11 -16 -81 B R H INC 2s023.58 9A.9E5.53 4377 4309 703236 U:724p017194 & ^JOH3 01719) 11 -16 -81 COOROINA TED MA!14 GEMENT 48,00.99.014.53 99,714.53CR� 43CC 017210 11- 16 -61- _ KCHL SUSCM ABSTRACT AND '�- -452.50 99,467.OS 99,467.r3;R •� p 9GOJ92 018406 017214 11 -16 -81 LARSON a HERTZ 1,538.10 101.DC5.13 1C1.005.13LR, • 4300 + + + + +••+' + + + + ►• + ++ + ++s•r+ -FEESi SERVICE - -` -`- +TOTALS +- '-- '- '"-;00 +; -` 101, 005. 17- 1Q1OQ5.37--101.00S.S3CR + -,'i V 4341 •s•••r, •r. •r r•s•rtrr•s•r PRINTING AND PUBLISHING OO i °4 - .. 4347 - - -` 000025- `004800 - 016130 ----- 07- 20 -81- _; CARVER- COUNTY_HERALD- A 4 �. S U 8 w L E D G E R R crry or CHAKHASsEm, E P 0 R 7 EXPENDITURES PERIOD ENDING I1 -30-81 PAGE 310 604 80-3 RING RD PUS IMP I)FPT- _ACCT 'PROG___'INDr_K__V ?JDO;C—CH_VCK—PO7JE— DATE—- DESCRIPTION -(BUDG5T)----A-M-0-trN-T-----AMDUNT--TG--UATr—"-L- A- k 'C - E___' i1 1 4340 010062 L, )350 .' 016753 07-29-81 FINANCIAL COMMUHICATIONS 31.27 52.34 52.34CR "- -- 4340 -600024--l'. 1,80 3-016855 ----------- 7-08-17-BV- CARVER COU11TY HERALD 34.33-86*.67— 86.67r�--- 4340 000143 t 905 017136 10-19 -81 POUCHER PRINTING AND 868.20 954.87 954.87CO, .1 4340- • *****Vvf--PRINTING-ANO-PUBLISHING-*TOTALS4 4701 LAND - PURCHASE * IMP •00 4791 :'77'- 013092- - 10- 07 -81 -TITLE 114SURA4C---COHP*ANY--3,ICO,Doc-.Do-----I,io-l;.30T.oa---3,ioL,Or?.03co- 47cl 000004 c "29; 013393 10-07-81 INSTANT WES INC 382.673.00 3:482,673.00 3,482,673.GrCR • .*****v*—LANO'-PURCHASE -+-IMP *TOTALS*— .00W7-3.482,673.04--w-3 4761, LEGAL ► FISCAL' aG 476,1 -- 000069_77 • 4761 LEGAL t FISCAL *TOTALS*. .00* 1t981.65 11981.65 1,981.65CR.- 4604 80-3 RING RD F IMP FUND TOTALS.** .00• -'395869614.65 3035,614.65 3,586,614.65CR- 1. III J -It Kr J "i U a d CITY OF CHAN HA SSEN S U E- L E D G E R R E P R T EXPENDITURES PERI00 ENDING 12 -31 -50 PAGE 313 I 604 80 -3 RING RD PUS IMP DEFT ACCT PPOG INDEX VENDOR CHECK PO /JE DATE DESCPIPTION (BUDGET) 4300 4300 430C 4300 4300 4300 430' 4330 4300, _._.... 4309 4300 43CO 4300 4300 4300 4300 .. ___ .... .. 4300 4300 4300 4310 430C 4309 4300 43'3 4300 4300 4300 4309 .._.. _.. 4300 y s s1! 4300 4300 43JO 430& 4300 4309 4309 4300 4399 4303 430C 4300 4310 4300 439& 4303 4300 000109 002399 COC207 C34360 .. ... _ 000347 015400 CES049 OC2399 000,351 034360 _. C20353 C16400 000355 034360 000057 GC2399 ._.. 000159 067240 C00061 618400 000063 013560 _.. 000065 034360 000067 OC7240 000369 C1840C C''•C071 034360 C00073 018400 OCIO75 034360 C00078 OO7z40 C06079 OC7240 000081 019400 000083 029930 000085 034260 CCC987 042399 C00039 0,7240 C00092 025900 000093 025900 ..,nna. x.20030 000097 029930 CCO099 018400 000101 025900 GC1194 C29930 000105 029330 000107 034360 000199 OC2399 CCG111 013460 00011,3 018960 000115 025900 000117 029930 009120 002399 OCOIZL OCZ399 003123 018400 000125 019500 000t27 025900 CC3129 029930 000131 034360 ,,,.. F 015544 015723 008157 C08191 00 824 3 00 82 84 008316 008327 008337 008353 008354 008384 011777 015337 015425 015489 015532 015563 015560 015579 015511 0 156 21 015634 015653 015703 015703 01 .71 . 015715 015777 015799 a15a11 015811 D15817 015861 015978 015910 015932 015943 015993 0 153 93 016041 816042 016065 016089 016091 -ES, SER' 001218 C0121B 011210 931216 001218 001218 001218 031218 C01218 001218 001218 001218 OC121a 001218 001218 001216 C01218 001216 001218 001218 001218 001238 001218 001218 n)121R 001218 001218 001218 001218 031219 031218 001218 Oa1218 001218 001218 001218 0 ^.1218 00121a 001218 001218 001218 0 ^,1218 001218 IICE .00 08 -18 -80 B R N INC 09 -22 -80 VON KLUG 6 ASSOCIATES 12 -31 -80 LAR ?ON , MER TZ .. 12-31 -80 8 R N INC 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG . ASSOCIATES 12 -31-80 LARSON , HERTZ ... 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG a ASSOCIATES 12 -31 -80 0 R M INC 12 -31 -80 COORDINATEO MANAGEMENT 12 -31 -80 LARSON E MERTZ 12 -31 -80 - LASALLE RUOP_2T 1 ASSOC. 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG s ASSOCIATES 12 -31 -80 COGROINATED MANAGEMENT 12.31 -80 LARSON t. HERTZ 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG 4 ASSOCIATES .. 12 -31 -80 LARSON r HERTZ 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG 4 ASSOCIATES 12 -31 -80 COOKOINATEO MANAGEMENT 12 -31 -80 COOFOI NATE3 MANAGEMENT 12 -31 -80 LARSON 1 HERTZ 12- 31 -80. RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC. 12 -31 -80 VON KLUG , ASSOCIATES 12 -31 -80 6 R N INC 12 -31 -80 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT 12 -31 -80 PATCHIN APPRAISALS INC 12 -31 -80 PATCHIN APPRAISALS INC 12 -31 -Aa RIKCFII CHTTH ASS11C TNC 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -89 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -87 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31-80 12-31 -8 0 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 12-.71 -80 12 -31 -80 12 -31 -80 RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC LARSON ♦ P4hTZ PATCHIN APPPAISALS INC RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC VON KLUG r ASSOCIATES B R N INC LARSON * MEPTZ LEFEVEF.E LEFLER PFAv SON PATCHIN APPRAISALS INC" RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC B R N INC 0 R N INC LARSON , P.EP,TZ LASALLE PUPPEF.T ♦ ASSOC PATCHIN APPRAISALS IMC RUSSELL SMITH ASSOC INC VON KLUG ♦ ASSOCIATES 4300 s,+,.„s,,,sss,.,,,s,s + +• FEES, SERVICE *TOTALS* .00+ 434r ,,,....009630. „ .,,,,,,. PRINTING AND PUBLISHING .00- 4349 000026 004800 016003 12 -22 -80 CARVER. COUNTF HERALD A M O U N T AMOUNT -TO -LATE 6,948.50 371.30 465.30 _. _ ... 7,825.63 1,306.64 899.25__... 127.50 3,098.00 593.33 ..1,089.00 5,200.00 360.20 ._ 680.83 1,062.60 195.00 _.._.._ 592.98. 397.60 78.61 . 157.20 1,610.75 59C.CC 52.50 3,541.24 76.20.... 3,695.aC 192.50 750.00 750.00_ 670.00 ...10.256.50 ..... 1,607.00, 1.6C7.00 3.755.57 ...... 4,734.72 1.389.50 412.50 1,997.50 1 s7 CC.00 3.341.30 35.879.11 7.610.70 14,925.00 2E'9.07 500.00 13.133.30 .. 146,383.35 :• 85092 .D9 6,946.50 1.319.80 7,765.11. . 15.610.73 16.917.37 17,816.E2 17,944.12 21.042.12 21.635.45 ... 22,724.45 27,924.45 28.284.65 _.... 28,965.48 3a,Jza.Ca 30.223.08 ._.. 33.816.36 31,213.66 31,292.26... 31.449.46 33,069.21 33,560.21 33.612.71 37,153.95 37.270.15 .. 4C.925.15 41,117.65 41.967.65 _._.. 42.617.65 43.287.65 53,544.15 55,144.15 56.744.15 60.499.72 .... 65.ZJ4.44 .EE,623.94 67,935.44 65,733.94 7C.733.94 74.075.24 _ 199,954.35 117,5E5.05 132,499.05 132.750.05 133,250.05 146.383,35 146.383.35 • .CC 05.92 146.383. ;CR• •Ce .I 85. 'CR O B A L A N C E 00 6.948. 52Cp 7,319. 89CP. e 7.785.ICCR _. 15.E12.73CR •� 16,917. 37CP e 17,316.6X0. , 17,944,12CF 21042. 12CR 9 _. 21.635.45CR 22,724. 45CR �• 27,924.45CR e 28,284.65CR 29,965.48CR ,. 37,028. 13CR s 30.223.08CR _I 39,%IE.36CR 31.213. 66CR q 31,292.25CP 31,449.46CF 33,060.21CR g 33,569. 21CR._._�. 33,612.71CR 31.153.95CR A 37,23C.15CR 1 43,925.15CR . 41,117.6507 Y 41,867.65CR 42,617.65CR 43,287.65CR '. •_ 53,544.15CR 55,144..15CR .. 5E, 744: 15 C 9 6C,499.72CR 65 .234. 44CR PP 65.523.94C r E7.036.44CR 69,C33.94CR 70,733.94CR a 74,075.21.CR. I C9,954. 3'CR 117.565.9 CR 1s- IZZ,491.r CR .. 122,759. CR 133,250. .CR a 146.387. -CP 146.383. ;CR• •Ce .I 85. 'CR O t+ a' Sw+> j. �/ Ya✓, �' Jf�di�-0 �' i�i1. '�'Fi�ikpH,' ���i.�ir'r1 tN'.WfM,'i��•'i�IwM 604 80-3 RING RU PUB I IMP ACCT P PROG INDEX VENDOR CHECK PO /JE D DATE - DESCIIPTI0N ( (BUDGET) A M O U N T AMOUNT -TO -GATE B B A L A N C E �I -DEPT A • 4 4340 • ••`•••`••••••••••••••• *• PRINTING 'ND P PUBLISHING *TOTALS* . .004 85.92 • 85.92 • 8 85.92CR• r, _..,•604 _ _ _ - -80 -3 RING RD PUB IMP. FUNt T TOTALS •• _ _ .004 146,469.27 ',+ ,146.4E9.27 • 1 146 , 4E9.27CR• I r I / I II I � � II I � w u I.I I r r y I I V V .. I II I/v W o74� / 9562.50 6115 1 -16 -78 #460 HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUIHORITy Legal 292.25 6131 2 -20 -78 B.R.W. Consultants C21ECK # DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1448 1 -17 -77 Larson, Russell Legal 35.00 1716 2 -28 -77 Carver County Herald Publication 32.81 1645 2 -28 -77 Larson, Russell Legal 145.60 1709 2 -28 -77 Streeter - Andrus Appraisal 75.00 1710 2 -28 -77 Klingelhutz -cravens Appraisal 65.00 1793 3 -21 -77 Larson, Russell regal 52.50 2024 5 -16 -77 Larson, Russell Legal 182.15 2960 11 -21 -77 B.R.W. Consultants 2089.50 2944 11 -22 -77 Waibel, Robert Misc. 3.90 6031 12 -19 -77 Larson & Mertz Legal 147.00 6003 12 -19 -77 B.R.W. Consultants 4773.38 6057 12 -29 -77 B.R.W. Consultants 1825.34 6061 12 -29 -77 Carver County Herald Publication 37.28 6061 12 -29 -77 Carver County Herald Publication 98.04 9562.50 6115 1 -16 -78 Larson & Mertz + Legal 292.25 6131 2 -20 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 472.50 6159 2 -20 -78 Larson & Mertz legal 131.50 6315 4 -17 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 671.25 6396 5 -15 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 4244.34 6431 5 -15 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 112.00 6515 6 -19 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 161.00 3593 7 -17 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 90.99 6563 7 -17 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 1064.46 6598 7 -17 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 45.50 6620 7 -17 -78 Schoell & Madson Engineering 1588.50 6666 8 -21 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 287.00 6658 8 -21 -78 Finside Office Supply - 200.00 6685 8 -21 -78 Pro -color Supplies 536.85 6689 8 -21 -78 Schoell & Madson Engineering 110.00 6756 9 -18 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 229.25 6715 9 -18 -78 Artcraft Press Supplies 1143.88 6830 10 -16 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 49.50 7020 12 -18 -78 B.R.W. Consultants 1159.50 7054 12 -18 -78 Larson & Mertz Legal 271.25 12861.52 7093 7116 1 -15 -79 `Carver County Herald Publication 56.75 7199 1 -15 -79 2 -28 -79 Larson & Mertz Legal 1179.50 7223 2 -28 -79 Larson & Mertz Sclwell & Madson Legal 18..00 10579 3 -15 -79 B.R.W. Engineering 54.00 7259 3 -19 -79 Carver County herald Consultants Publication 838.50 21.93 7284 7355 3 -19 -79 4 -16 -79 Larson & Martz Legal 183.00 417 5 -21 -79 Larson & Pirtz Dixon & Associates Legal Appraisal 417.00 150.00 7417 7427 5 -21 -79 -- 5 -21 -79 Dixon & Associates Appraisal 200.00 7427 5 -21-79 Klingelhutz- `'ravens Appraisal 300.00 5 -21 -79 Klingelhutz- Cravens Appraisal 200.00 L7428 10826 6 -18 -79 Larson & Mertz Pro -Color Leger- 876.00 Supplies 175.00 I page 2 CIIECK # DATE VIIDOR DESCRIPTION A6IOUNT '7488 6 -18 -79 Carver County Herald Publication 54.97 7513 6 -18 -79 Larson '& Mertz Legal 375.00 7601 7 -16 -79 Prairie Offset Printing Printing 20.75` 7602 7 -16 -79 Pro-Color Supplies 238.00 7660 8 -20 -79 Larson & Mertz Legal 1287.00 7683 8 -20 -79 Pro-Color Supplies 128.00 7740 9 -17 -79 Larson & Mertz Legal 867.00 8019 12 -17 -79 Larson & Mertz Legal 448.50 11424 1 =09 -30 State Bank of Chanhassen Purchase Lard 18.00 16609 6 -15 -81 B.R.W. for Holiday Station 7500.00 8061 1 -21 -80 B.R.W. Consultants 2839.25 8095 1 -21 -80 Larson & Mertz, legal 147.00 11523 2 -18 -80 Coordinated Management Timesharing 453.76 8157 2 -18 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 465.30 8264 4 -21 -80 Carver County Herald Publication 19.71 8284 4 -21 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 899.25 8333 5 -19 -80 Carver County Herald Publication 20.51 15387 6 -16 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 1062.60 15489 7 -21 -80 Larson & Mertz legal 592.98 8218 7 -31 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 2405.70 15544 8 -18 -80 B.R.W. Consultants 4305.63 15579 8 -18 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 1610.75 15683 9 -22 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 310.00 15723 9 -22 -80 Von Klug & Associates Appraisal 371.30 15777 1'0 -20 -80 Larson & PIertx Legal - 670.00 15908 11 -17 -80 Larson & Mertz Legal 1389.50 16041 12 -22 -80 Larson & Mertz Photocopies 258.27 $25321.51 16403 4 -20 -31 Chanhassen Family Clinic Physical 18.00 16609 6 -15 -81 B.R.W. Consultant 1228.13 16649 6 -15 -81 General Office Products Supplies 12.21 16663 6 =15 -31 Larson & Mertz Legal 1354.24 16692 6 -15 -81 Schoell & Madsai Ehgineering 1198.35 12611 6 -30 -81 N.A.I.O.P. Travel & Training 10.00 16110 6 -30 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 450.00 16256 6 -30 -81 Larson & Mertz Legal 1785.30 16296 6 -30 -81 Don Steger Travel & Training 57.00 16318 6 -30 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 1059.13 16351 6 -30 -81 Larson & Mertz Legal 1981.65 16435 6 -30 -81 Larson & Mertz Legal 1.519.65 16470 6 -30 -81 Von Klug & Associates Appraisal 31.80 16488 6 -30 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 1050.75 16490 6 -30 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 1900.50 16530 6 -30 -81 General Office Products Supplies 18.42 16549 6 -30 -81 Larson & Mertz Legal 1509.75 16727 7 -20 -81 Business Furniture Office Equip. 1646.42 16730 7- 20 -81• Carver County Herald Publication 28.54 16745 7 -20 -81 Coordinated Management Timesharing 385.73 16757 7 -20 -81 General Office Products Supplies 29.33 16777 7 -20 -81 Larson & -Mertz Legal 752.00 16814 7 -20 -81 Russell Smith Assoc. Appraisal 400.00 16784 7 -20 -81 Scott Martin Travel & Training 19.60 page 3 CI= 4 D7kTE VE'IDOR DESCRIr^TION 3 AMOUNTS 12891 7 -23 -81 Northwestern Bell Telephone. 26,54E 12916 7 -28 -81 N.S.P. Utilities 42.69 16843 8 -17 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 594.25 16853 8 -17 -81 Business Furniture Office Equip. 349.36 F r 16884 8 -17 -81 Iiolres & Graven Legal 380.60 C- 16896 8 -17 -31 Lesson & Mertz Legal 541.90` 12968 8 -20 -81 N.S.P:-, Utilities 44.15 13005 8 -31 -81 Northwestern Bell Telephone 28,2gm 16952 9 -21 -81 B.R.W. Consultants 231.25` 16955 9 -21 -81 Walter's Booth Co. Supplies 26.413 13047 9 -22 -31 Northwestern Bell Telephone 2,5tt 17082 10 -19 -81 Carver County Herald Publication 16.L 17102 10 -19 -81 Frontier L=ber Paint & Supp, g7, 24 L 17112 10 -19 -81 Mpls. Star & Tribune Publication 171.1r 17118 10 -19 -81 Larson & Mertz Legal 13125 10 -21 -81 N.S.P. Utilities 26.07' 13148 10 -26 -31 Minnegasco Gan 3.wo 13150 10 -26 -81 Northwestern Bell Telephone 25,1E` 17214 11 -16 -31 Larson & Mertz Legal 126,911 r" 13232 11 -25 -81 N.S.P. Utilities 1 28.59- 12971 11 -30 -81 Michael Sorenson Property 2500.00Sc 13050 11 -30 -81 Michael Sorenson Property 22500.00'c 13245 11 -30 -81 Minnegasco Gas 12.8Tc 13246 11 -30 -81 Northwestern Bell 1 Telephone 25.06'£ $46273,25 L L L I L L L L C). CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 (61 2) 937 -1900 The bills included within this packet for HRA approval on February 18, 1982 pertain to a two -month period due to the cancellation of the regular meeting of January 21, 1982. Scott A. Martin rhanhassen City Council d W. Ashworth ary 4, 1982 I� age B:At Z;v cj HRA - General Legal 17' — 12/1 work on resolution adopting 7% incentive program and work on form of assessment agreement; meet w /SAM to give progress report on drafting documents for 7% incentive; 12/2 work on assessment reduction. agreement (7'n program); meet w /SAM re assessment agreements (7% program); 12/3 telcon Dan Hoffman of Dolliff Insurance Agency re HRA insurance requirements; 12/4 work on documents for 7% incentive program; 12/7 telcon Dan Hoffman of Dolliff re insurance coverages for HRA; 12/8 review Hoffman corres re HRA insurance and report to SAM re same; proof outgoing typing re HRA 7% incentive; research re what action HRA must take in approving the manner in which the city has paid expenses in the past; 12/9 review public officials' liability coverage application and forward same to SAM; meet w /SAM re 7% incentive program and telcon from Ed Dunn re status of same; 12/11 telcon from SAM re forwarding 7% incentive materials to Sellergren and dictate instructions re same; 12/14 draft outline of 78 incentive program for presentation to HRA; meet w /DWA and SAM re 78 incentive 1 program; 12/15 telcon from Dave Sellergren re 7% incentive program; research in Chapter 462 and telcon w /State's Urban Affairs office re accounting practices for HRA funds; telcon w /State Auditor's office re accounting standards applicable to HRA; 12/16 attempt to call State Auditor's office re approved accounting methods and work on written report to SAM; 12/17 attend regular HRA meeting; telcon w/, Sellergren re document prepared for the program and telcon w /SAM re I same; dictate report to SAM and telcon w /State Auditor's office; telcon I w /SAM re same; telcon w /State Auditor's office re accounting practices; 12/29 forward 7% incentive materials to Fluoroware attorney and telcon [ w /attorney re same; 12/30 review of completed application form and rn I financial report, corres to insurance agent requesting insurance 4( ��1' coverages for IIRA: M'� Senior Professional Time: 20.5 hrs. $1,353.00 Paralegal Time: 1.0 hrs. 25.00 HRA - Havlik Acquisition , L_ 12/1 telcons w /atty Hassel and SAM re Havlik option agreement; revise same per conf; 12/2 draft memorandum of option for recording purposes, telcons JH re option terms, instructions to KE re copy preparation; 12/30 corres to Schneider Agency re insurance coverage for Havlik property: Io4_ 4,u Senior Professional Time: ti 2.9 hrs 191.40 t7 LdQ HRA - Riviera Acquisition L 12/2 telcons Lou and Tom Krueger and atty Jaspers re option terms; 12/3 preparation of confidential negotiation report re Riviera for HRA members; attend HRA meeting re option approval; 12/4 telcons L Tom Krueger re option, prepare option agreement per HRA authorization of 12/31/81 and TK's approval; 12/7 prepare copies of option agreement L 1 HRA - Riviera contd. and exhibits; 12/9 conf w /Tom Krueger re option agreement, rental, relocation, re- appraisal; and relocating within TID #1: 4'� Senior'Professional Time: 4.7 hrs. $ 310.20 CC -HRA - Huber Acquisition 12/3 attend HRA meeting re valuation of property and negotiation authority; 12/8 send appraisal and prepare appraisal materials to Sybe Nagell for appraisal work; 12/9 review Kelly letter re acquisi- tion price, review file notes, draft response thereto w /copy to SAM:�� -'C3 Senior Professional Time: 1.6 hrs. 105.60 LARSON & HERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST RUSSELL H. LARSON _ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 CRAIG M. MERTZ TELEPHONE (612) 333 -1511 or COUNSEL January 5, 1981 HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGM Scott A. Martin Executive Director Chanhassen HRA Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 I Dear Scott: Enclosed you will find a statement for services which we were received from the LeFevere, Lefler law office. The first, second, fourth and fifth item on this billing statement represent occasions on which this office sought expert advice from the LeFevere office. We feel that this office should.pay those charges as a cost of doing business. Accordingly, we enclose our check in the amount of $130.00, payable to the Chanhassen HRA. The balance of the charges on the statement represent legal work done for the municipality by the LeFevere office in its capacity as bond counsel for the City of Chanhassen. We feel that those charges are a proper cost of the downtown redevelopment project. We recommend their payment. Very truly yours, CRAIG M. HERTZ Assistant Chanhassen City Attorney CMMoner enc LARSON & MERTZ 3088 t ATTORNEYS -AT -LAW 1900 FIRST BANE PLACE WEST _ MINNEAPOLIS, nnNN. 55402 January 5 82 17 -2 C ln_ 910 �Y •i•o ur•rtu; - — olt:Itul— Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority I $ (f One Hundred Thirty and no/ 100--------------------------------- - - - - -- '�' First BankMinneapolia ..,,e ea.kr 'lon M Fimt National Bank of Minneapolis ^ First Bank Place s Y Minneapolis. MN 55480 Poll LeFevere Law Office — Statement a e L II'00 308811' ' O9 1001 00 2 21: 60 2 3 2 36 6 Oil• seal LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE. LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN 6 DRAWZ A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2000 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 333.0543 Mr. Craig Mertz Assistant City Attorney City of Chanhassen 1900 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, MN 55402 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REHoEPED December 14, 1981 TELEPHONE 14121 333 -0543 For legal services rendered in connection with consulation with City Attorney on various matters involving tax increment financing including the following: r 2/9/8116 Office conference with C. Mertz; —4/8 r/4-Li Telephone conference with Larsen re IDR's policy; copy of Burnsville guidelines; 5/1 Telephone conference with C. Mertz re maintenance assessment; study law; office conference; 6/10 3z-i° Telephone conference with R. Larsen re strategy in condemnation;' —6/11 /a.z" Telephone conference with C. Mertz; 9/22 /-•-, "Telephone conference with Sellegren re methods of financing; 10 /1 si.ci Conference with Larsen, Mertz, Ashworth, et al. re tax increment problems; 11 /106s Office conference with C. Mertz re assessment program; 12/8 Telephone conference with C. Mertz re assessment program. AMOUNT DUE: I d'clar° under pecalt;_ ^s Ot law that thlS CITY OF CHANHASSEN account, clam er c,31;.± is j;i;t and car. REC- MVVI-0 rect and that no part i,, I,1as been pai LJA 1i b 1vUC Sidneture of Claimant Y C01;h;U,::7V uEl/EI n°P _AT DEPT. $390.00 OX- DA 4to, X50 - 001 -� INVOICE MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER City of Chanhassen DATE: November 30, 1981 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 JOB NO--- 18 -8102 ATTN: Mr. Scott Martin L_17_ .. . ✓.r ra'�..._..��ui....,...sv.'_r .__...1't� 't «v ix.._ c a.:.{ {' 1 ? RE: Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project j as per Agreement 1 r Per Diem Services - Phase 2 Work Task 2.1 (Letter of Authorization 10/21/81) Period of October and November 198 1 *Preliminary surveys for base maps. Classification Hours - Principal 6.50 Sr. Professional 12.25 Professional 1 11.50 Sr. Technician 1.50 3 -Man Field Party 12.00 2 -Man Field Party 20.00 Salary Cost - $1,743.91 Fee - $1,743.91 x 2.0 = $3,487.82 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $3,487.82 CITY OF CHANHASSEN$ L RC 1v t: '1 L COM"J "' :T( �ct'EtOP „” 11T DEPT. BATHER, RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER, INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S . MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PHONE 6121 3747878 MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Mr. Scott Martin INVO��3jICE it 30155 DATE: November 30, 1981 JOB N0: 62 -8020, 6 -8110 62 -8109, 62 -8119 40 -8107 RE: Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project as per Agreement Per Diem Services - Phase I Work Task 1.7 . er_i_od of October and November, 1981 iE Coordination and project review with utilities companies, W /DOT and County. Provide assistance to title insurance services for land acquisition process, analysis of 79th Street relocation, and continuation of EAW. Classification Hours Principal 8.00 Sr. Associate 6.00 Associate 26.00 Professional II 24.50 Technician 25.25 i Salary Cost - $3,532.96 ?� Fee - $3,532.96 x 2.0 = $7,065.92 ') e r Vk � 664 -43�D r� i F� t F HANHASSEN CzIV: .4 COMMli1:;TY C� +EL ^ "'!_.1T DEPT. BATHER, RINGROSE, WOLSFELD, JARVIS, GARONER, INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PHONE 6121 379-7878 P.'. .;'1 .., COORDINATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 8401 WAYZATA BLVD. SUITE 300 MiNNEAeOLiS, MINNESOTA 55426 - j Pr ill" C.0 .?i) Si__i7__D 1' E51't4I`iG USAGE ' -T ---------------- 00Nt ?ECT LrUs U- -- Gr.LJ_C1 SICPn PRL_E NO_-PP P 31 m, F INON—_R TOTAL 3J9 ST C', -G_ 29 17.40 TO_''.L 3C^ 29 .0 .0 0 0 17.40 10 0 51" L ",. ". C• :i 0 .00 ' TOTAL 7 T .-'LA: D 29 .: ^, 0 0 17.4 C TOTAL DUE 17.40 ?. P" :U'.,'Tii CARi:YIrG CiiARG ^, aILL AUTO?ATICALLY LL' AEL D iC ACCUU2l13 REC'1VA9LE CVES 30 DAYS CLD. f'!E ?.PP CI;,T:, 4i)t)n COOPEP.ATION. rg� Lod -4 1. - z-iVED JAN 0 31�E2 Gi:Y OF CHANHAS5tl� Chanhassen City Council c/o Donald W. Ashworth e-Te—bruary 1982 Page Three Septic Systems 1/28 Telcon w /Legal department -at PCA to confirm conclusion that MPCA regulations on septic systems cannot be enforced in Chan unless ordinance is adopted: $ 8.25 Traffic 1/5 Telcon from Clerk of Court re pending parking citations; 1/26 trip to traffic court to review Colley file and dictate memo to VanDenBroeke re court date: I $ 53.60 Hanus - West 79th Street [ 1/5 Finish drafting restated conditional use permit and draft letter to SAM re same: ev_8R $ 86.6 Downtown Redevelopment Project 80 -3 (Ring Road) 1/26 Review resolution authorizing public improvement project; research on joint action by City and HRA to acquire Huber pare to strengthen public purpose approach under eminent domain; 1 2 f telcon DWA, draft resolL;:.;;r; or4�ri:. Public hearing and notice of Ipublic hearing; corres to DWA re same; 1/28 telcon BRW (Don Ringrose) re Ring Road project estimated cost: s -� $ 369.75 East Lotus Lake Sewer Project (DNR) I 1/8 Conf w /DWA and Rod Sand of DNR re how to resolve license application and dictate report to DWA: $ 72.50 MSAS 101 (Kerber Assessment Appeals) 1/4 Telcon from Myron Dixon re valuation arguments being made by property owners; 1/7 preparation for pretrial conf on 1/8; 1/8 prep for pretrial conf and attend same; 1/13 prep of procedural transcript; 1/15 prep of procedural transcript; office conf re Lorganizing a trial workbook; 1/20 procedural transcript: '$ 460.50 L - L L Chanhassen c/o Donald February 8, Page Four City Council W. Ashworth 1982 S> HRA - General Legal 9A1Att v 1 '� D Z 1/21 Corres to Dolliff Agency re HRA general insurance coverages; telcon Hoffman and SAM, corres to JA Price Agency re insurance on Instant Web building, furnish copy of lease; 1/26 office conf re joint HRA /City exercise of power of eminent domain; 1/26 review HRA and Chap 429 laws re public improvements (Ring Road) procedural requirements, i.e., eminent domain and special assessments, telcon !�Q -�'z'o� DWA and SAM; office conf re assessing acquisition costs and HRA conveying easements to City: - Total hours: 3.1 $ 204.60 Huber Parcel #26 1 /11 Forward copy of Nagell appraisal to SAM, make copy of same; 1/25 review Nagell appraisal in prep for conf w /Huber atty; telcon Frank Kelly re Huber acquisition, arrange conf; 1/27 research joint action by City and HRA to acquire Huber parcel under 429 HRA proceedings to strengthen public purpose approach; telcon Dean of Bond Counsel re same; 1/28 conf w /Frank Kelly, Huber a re acquisition of Parcel #26, conf w /BM re width of 78th Stree R/W and Laredo Drive R /W, telcon county recorder: Total hours: 3.95 on and 260.70 b Commonwealth Parcel #32 (Hanus /Reckdahl).. 1/19 Telcons Malmon (Reckdahl atty) and SAM re gift of Parcel #32; 1/20 review appraisal and stub abastact to determine lien holder er telcon w /Malmon on 1/19; 1/25 telcon Jay Kohlrusch (3) and SAM �n,�_4'J re title insurance binder; 1/27 telcons Reckdahl and atty re 11��1 required debt service per month and total liabilities: Total hours: 2.6 $ 171.60 I I RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 • PHONE 612 335-9565 TO F�O %% DATE v /Q 7, 7z u PP-1,4 11142T1N -_.__ EEC � BY ro.m N.Nn c LE o.,....a e,,.e. i.., e.,. ws. Dale.. L.a, wn T. I. KEEP YELLOW COPY .'3u SEND w ES. NO CP RK CO1iE9 INTPCT. 1. ww'T. rA Nub s'" U,,, y Cr CH, ANPIASSB UJ�� I _ �c SIGNED ♦N ETw Ucim NS TO E U w P• UEiY.R wwi:. REPLY. 3. OETncN STUB. K[EP P.MK cOiE CO PY V. e LYLE H. NAGELL CO. Inc. 7515 WAYZATA BOULEVARD N? 13168 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 Telephone: 544 -8966 January 8, 1982 Larson and Mertz 1900 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Appraisal of Chanhassen HRA Parcel 26 $300.00 MAI%- - � X04 -360 i s,. - �.',', ..:� i .Y.` y r++ : a..� � 1 ♦�..r r ,n . w .F� 's «. =� .:.�r''. ♦ .s �: . r.a. -« Lv MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Mr. Scott Martin INVOICE 30657 December 31, 1981 JOB NO: 18 -8102 ( RE: Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project as per Agreement Per Diem Services - Phase 2 Work Task 2.1 (Letter of Authorization 10/21/81) (s Period of December, 1981 Preliminary surveys for base maps. i Classification Flours Principal 3.00 Sr. Professional 1.50 ' I Technician III 3.50 3 -Man Field Party 10.00 2 -Man Field Party 34.00 Salary Cost - $1,705.38 Fee - $1,705.38 x 2.0 = $3,410.76 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $3.410.76 Olt 1ti'g2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN LI L BATHER, RINGROSE, WOLSRELD. JARVIS. GARDNER, INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S.E. 11 Iy MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55610 PHONE 612 / 379 -7878 Sey MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER Gity of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Mr. Scott Martin INVOICE 1T 3050 DATE( December, 31, 1981 JOB NO: 62 -8109, 40 -8107 RE: Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project as per Agreement Per Diem Services - Phase I Work Task 1.7 Period of December, 1981 Continued assistance on Project E.A.W. Traffic analysis studies. Classification Hours Associate 3.00 Professional II 4.50 Professional 1 12.00 Technician 5.00 Salary Cost - $382.35 Fee - $382.35 x 2.0 = $ 764.70 ii TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 764.70 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Aati P1-7c 01 V im, I a i, I 1 V2 _4�+C11 CO1 MIL';?y DEVEL0P1%rt =:VT DEFT. BATHER, RINGROSE. WOLSFELD, JARVIS, GARDNER. INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PHONE 612 13794878 ABSTRACT & TITLE SERVICE, INC. P.O. Box 251 Shakopee, Minn. SS370 Telephone: 445 -3196 - - J. C. KOHLRUSCH Scott and liegisteied Abstracter sac ounty February 2, 1982 Chanhassen Housing Redevelopment Authority c o h an assen Gity HalT P. 0. Box 147 _ Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 ( Attention: Scott Martin Continuation of Abstract Title entries and certificate New Abstract of Title entries and certificate Registered Property Abstract Searches Special Assessments Taxes: Treasurer Auditor Names Searched Title Insurance ($ 425,000. 00 OWNERS POLICY 975 00 Service Charge Plat Drawing Recording Fees Warranty Deed /Quit Claim Deed Mortgage/ Assignment Satisfaction/ Partial Release Mortgagee's Duplicate Certificate Mortgage Registration Tax State Deed Tax - i Re: HANUS TOTAL f 5799 — P�Rf FI 49 $975 00 ABSTRACT & TITLE SERVICE, INC. - P.O. Box 251 Shakopee, Minn. 55379 Telephone: 445 -3196 - - - J. C. KOHLRUSCH Scott and Registered Abstracter er county _ t February 2, 1982 Chanhassen Housing Redevelopment Authority` c o Chanhassen City Hall P 0 Box 147 - Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Attention: Scott Martin Continuation of Abstract Title for TRACTS A B & C of entries and certificate P/0 Sec. 12- 116 -23 200100 New Abstract of Title entries and certificate Registered Property Abstract Tracts D & F of P 0 Sec. 12- 116-23 2 RPAs made 80 00 Searches Special Assessments _ Taxes: Treasurer Auditor Names Searched - Title insurance (s ) Service Charge Plat Drawing Recording Fees Warranty Deed /Quit Claim Deed Mortgage/ Assignment - Satisfaction lPartial Release Mortgagee's Duplicate Certificate t,l l ! Mortgage Registration Tax i� ?'' °' ' a State Deed Tax r Re: HANUS I (/T TAL $365 00 Application No. C -5799 - PARCEL 32 I a4�r THE,HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 1.11 Vu I L• COORDINATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 8401 WAYZATA BLVD. SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 CITY OF CHANHASSEN f P.O. 9GX 147 I CHANHASSEN.. MN 55317 STANDARD PATES STORAGE .60 INFACT STORAGE 6.00 PRIME CORN 13.50 NON -PRIME COIN 9.00 fPRIME CRL' .110 NON- PRI.'IE CRU' .070 INVOICE NUMBER 5418 DATE FEBRUARY 1, 198 SAGE FOR JANUARY 182 -� NET 10 DAYS STANDARD - TIu_SHARI,G -USAGE CONNECT CRUS USER PREJECT STORAGE PRIME NON-PR PRIME NON -PR TOTAL l 300 STCPAGE 30 18.00 't TOTAL 3 0 30 .0 .0 0 0 18.00 I 100 STORAGE 0 ,00 TOTAL STANDARD 30 .0 .0 0 0 18.00 TOTAL DUE 18.00 A 1 -1/21 PER MOITH CARRYING CHARGE WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE ADCED TC ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE OVER 30 DAYS OLD. U, I WE APPRECIATE YOUR COOPERATION, L F_3 81982 CITY OF CHAIN' f i 66 L- L 3437 B ! (A Division of Hughes Associates, Inc.) 287 WATER STREET 44p EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 5 3h--� PRINTING COMPANY PHONE (6 7a -6896 // SOLD TO: DATE � //V QUANTITY D DESCRIPTION A AMOUNT