Loading...
HRA 1982 11 18r f l� AGENDA REGULAR MEETING Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority Thursday, November 18, 1982 Chanhassen City Hall, 690 Coulter Drive City Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Minutes of August 19, 1982 Meeting. 3. Review Minutes of October 7, 1982 Special Joint Meeting with City Council. 4. Review and Endorse Position Paper on Status of 9:30 p.m. 13. Adjournment. Downtown Redevelopment Project. 5. Authorize Extension of Downtown Project Purchase Option Agreements: I t a. Chanhassen Tire & Auto (Havlik Property) b. Riviera Supper Club (Krueger Property) 6. Authorize Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the Adaptive Reuse of the Instant Web Building. 7. Authorize Market Analysis Study to Determine Market Potential for Full -line Supermarket in Downtown Project Area. 8. Consider Request of Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce for HRA Acquisition of Guy Peterson Property (Highway 5 and Dakota Avenue). 9. Status Report on Chamber of Commerce Transportation Task Force Efforts to Improve Highway 5. 10. Approval of Bills. 11. Old Business. 12. New Business. 9:30 p.m. 13. Adjournment. Y MINUTES - CHANHASSEN HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 19, 1982 r CALL TO ORDER Chairman Bill Gullickson called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Present were Commissioners Horn, Whitehill, Gullickson, and Bohn.. Commissioner Russell arrived at 8:40 p.m. Executive Director Martin and City Attorney Larson were also present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Whitehill moved, seconded by Bohn, to approve the minutes of the May 20, 1982 meeting as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Whitehill moved, seconded by Horn, the re- election of the same officers for 1982 -83 as had served during 1981 -82: Chairman - Bill Gullickson; Vice - Chairman - Cliff Whitehill; and Secretary - Jim Bohn. All voted in favor and the motion carried. HAVLIK PROPERTY PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT EXTENSION (Parcel #30) John Havlik was present and questioned the method used by the HRA's appraiser in determining the current fair market value of his property. Larson explained that the use of hypothetical fac- tors in the analysis of land value was not unusual, and that this approach was only one of several used by certified appraisers in determining the value of real property. Havlik said that he would accept the new appraised value and live -up to his agreement with the HRA if the option term was extended in accordance with the agreement. Whitehill moved, seconded by Bohn, to extend the purchase option agreement for the Havlik Property for a three (3) month period (September 1 - December 1, 1982) in accordance with Section 3.1(a), and to adjust the purchase price to a total of $250,105, in accordance with Section 6.1 of the Agreement and with the reappraised fair market value of the property. All voted in favor and the motion carried. RIVIERA PROPERTY PURCHASE OPTION AGREEMENT EXTENSION (PARCEL #31) Bohn moved, seconded by Whitehill, to extend the purchase option agreement for the Riviera Supper Club property for a three (3) month period (September 1 - December 1, 1982) in accordance with Section 3.1(a), and to adjust the purchase price to a total of $405,606, in accordance with the Section 6.1 of the agreement and with the reappraised fair market value of the property. All voted in favor and the motion carried. HRA Minutes (8- 19-82) Continued - Page 2 OFFER TO SELL CENEX SERVICE STATION (PARCEL #40) Representatives of Minnesota- Victoria Oil Company were present to discuss their offer to sell the Cenex Service Station property to the HRA for $100,000. Whitehill asked if Cenex would be interested in a lease -back arrangement with the HRA if the property were purchased by the HRA. He also asked if Cenex would be willing to guarantee the lease as a condition of purchase by the HRA. A representative from Cenex replied that Cenex is not interested in operating the station, but the current tenant has expressed an interest in either buying or leasing the business. The tenant only leases the service bays presently, while Cenex operates the fuel pumps. Cenex would agree to provide the necessary fuel supply if the property were purchased by either the HRA or current tenant. Whitehill asked about the terms of the current lease and the potential revenue for lease of the fuel pumps. The Cenex repre- sentative said that the current lease is on an annual basis and that it is due to expire on October 1, 1982. The tenant pays $500 per month in rent, while Cenex pays utilities, taxes, and insurance. He suggested that any future lease provide that all expenses be the obligation of the tenant and that the fuel pumps be leased at a rate of 7 1t per gallon of fuel pumped, payable on a monthly basis. He added that approximately 20,000 gallons of fuel is currently being sold each month. The Cenex representative added that the property has been offered to the current tenant for a price of $100,000, with terms of 20% down payment and an 8 year Contract for Deed at 128 interest. Whitehill expressed concern about the financial capacity of the current tenant to meet lease payment obligations and restated his feeling that Cenex should be required to guarantee any lease arrangement if the HRA purchases the property. He added that any purchase by the HRA without a guaranteed lease would be too great a risk, and that the HRA could potentially end up with a vacant business property. Whitehill moved, seconded by Horn, to table the offer to sell the Cenex property until the seller determines whether or not they will guarantee the lease as a condition of any purchase by the HRA. The seller must also provide the HRA with specific details of any proposed leasing arrangement so that a financial analysis of such a transaction can be made prior to any committment by the HRA. All voted in favor and the motion carried. _ HRA Minutes (8- 19 -82) Continued - Page 3 APPROVAL OF 1983 OPERATING BUDGET (RESOLUTION #82 -8) , Martin presented the proposed 1983 HRA Operating Budget (Fund #460), which also provides for the full prepayment of Dayco Concrete and Fluoroware Special Assessment Reduction Agreement Obligations in December, 1982. Bohn moved, seconded by Horn, adoption of Resolution #82 -8 approving the 1983 HRA Operating Budget (Fund #460), as prepared by the Executive Director and as presented to the HRA. All voted in favor and the motion carried. UNITED MAILING, INC. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT (RESOLUTION #82 -9) Bohn moved, seconded by Whitehill, adoption of Resolution #82 -9 'ratifying the execution of the United Mailing, Inc. Assessment Agreement during the absence of the Executive Director. All voted in favor and. the motion carried. APPOINTMENT OF BRA DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, (RESOLUTION #82 -10) Horn moved, seconded by Bohn, adoption of Resolution #82 -10 appointing Don W. Ashworth as the Deputy Executive Director of the HRA. All voted in favor and the motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Whitehill moved, seconded by Horn, to approve the bills from June, July, and August, 1982, as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Commissioner Russell arrived at this point in the meeting. He apologized for his late arrival, but said that the entrance door had been inadvertently locked and that he couldn't get into City Hall. NEW BUSINESS Martin informed the Commissioners that he and the City Engineer had recently inspected the heating and ventilating systems in the Instant Web building in anticipation of the upcoming heating season. He expressed concern with certain operational charac- teristics of the system and said that a mechanical engineer may be brought in prior to the relocation of Instant Web in order to better assess the system's operational needs if the building stands vacant throughout this winter. Martin also said that he was exploring possible short -term lease arrangements for the Instant Web building with several parties. Instant Web has informed him that they will complete the reloca- tion to their new building around January 1, 1983. HRA Minutes (8- 19 -82) Continued - Page 4 Martin also updated the Commissioners on his recent discussions with Kraus- Anderson concerning a redesign of the Downtown Redevelopment Project. He said that Kraus - Anderson was asked to prepare a Concept Plan for staff review which includes the ideas discussed to date. This plan will be forwarded to the HRA for initial review and discussion at an upcoming meeting sometime this fall. ADJOURNMENT Whitehill moved, seconded by Russell, to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. All voted in favor and the motion carried. L Minutes Special City Council Meeting with Planning Commission and Housing r. and Redevelopment Authority i Thursday, October 7, 1982 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers .I Present: City Council: Hamilton, Neveaux, Geving, Swenson, Horn Planning Commission: Conrad, Watson, M. Thompson, H. Noziska Housing & Redevelopment Authority: Bohn, Russell, Whitehill, Horn Staff: Ashworth, Martin CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hamilton called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and explained that the purpose of this special meeting was to determine the current status of the Downtown Redevelopment Project. He also acknowledged the presence of Don Ringrose of BRW, Inc., the City's Planning and Engineering Consultant on the project. KRAUS- ANDERSON STATUS REPORT: Dennis Spalla of Kraus - Anderson was present to update local officials on the status of their development plans. He said that recent improvements in interest rates improved the financial outlook for their portion of the project, but added that only a smaller Phase I development would be feasible in light of local retail market conditions. He introduced Ron Krank of Korsunsky, Krank, & Erickson Architects, Inc., who presented two proposed concept plans for Kraus - Anderson's development. Both concepts provided for a first phase of approximately 46,000 square feet of leasable retail space, including a 10,000 - 15,000 square foot grocery store and an 8,000 square foot drug store. A planned second phase would add another 50,000 square feet of retail space in front of Phase One. The project would be constructed to the north of the concrete portion of the Instant Web Building, and would require demolition of the wood -frame portion of this structure. Phase one public improvements would be minimal under either alternative plan. Spalla indicated that a Spring, 1983 construction start might be considered if plans are approved in a timely manner. Geving said that he supported the idea of keeping Phase One public improvement costs to a minimum, as would be possible under either Phase One alternative. Swenson urged the Council to strongly consider the option of con- verting the Instant Web building to a Community Recreational Center, especially since Kraus - Anderson has presented no specific plans for use of the back portion of the building. Cliff Whitehill felt that special attention should be directed towards reuse of the Instant Web building during Phase One nego- tiations, since the City made a substantial investment in the property for the purpose of converting it into a use which is compatible with the downtown business district. He suggested that part of the building be utilized for the grocery store. I SPECIAL JOINT MEETING MINUTES - October 7, 1982 -2- BLOOMBERG COMPANIES STATUS REPORT: Herb Bloomberg presented a brief update on the status of his Company's financial condition and reitereated his support of'the adopted Downtown Redevelopment Project Plan. He said that he still believes that there is a need for an 80 -120 room Hotel in downtown Chanhassen, and that Bloomberg Companies is still interested in participating in the future development of the downtown. He stressed the importance of the southern portion of the planned ring road, especially insofar as improving the design image of downtown. Bill McRostie of Bloomberg Companies said that they could live with either of the two alternatives presented by Kraus - Anderson. He added that some advantageous use must be made of the back por- tion of the Instant Web building in a very early phase of redevel- opment if the overall plan is to succeed. He said that Bloomberg Companies would have no problem "in principle" with a Kraus - Anderson development on the site of the Frontier Building. Tim Russell suggested complete demolition of the Instant Web building as a viable alternative which should be considered when options are developed in the near future. s Hamilton said that the City is still committed to the Downtown Project and that he is very enthusiastic about the project. He said that the City and both developers must begin immediately to look towards specific options and reach agreement on the respon- sibilities of each party. Horn asked if the City could do secure tenants for the project. support of the City in terms of the most helpful. He added that leases with both supermarket and development can proceed. anything to help Kraus- Anderson Spalla replied that the full redevelopment assistance would be Kraus - Anderson will need signed drug store tenants before the Hamilton suggested that a Redevelopment Project Steering Committee be established to work with the staff, consultant, and both developers in the formulation of specfic options and to reach a consensus position on a specific revised plan that would be acceptable to both developers and the City. He recommended that the Mayor and Chairpersons from both the Planning Commission and HRA be appointed to such a Committee. Following a brief discussion, the Council agreed to establish a steering committee as recommended by the Mayor. RESOLUTION #82 -62: PERTAINING TO CITY REVIEW OF METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S REVISED TRANSPORTATION PLAN: Neveaux moved, seconded by Horn, to adopt Resolution #82 -62 pertaining to the revised "Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan for the Year 2000" as prepared by the Metropolitan Council. All voted in favor and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. i CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LM690 COULTER DRIVE • P,O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 1612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: November 10, 1982 SUBJ: Position Paper on Status of Downtown Redevelopment Project — The Downtown Redevelopment Project Steering Committee has pre- pared the attached "position paper ", and has directed that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission, City Council, and HRA for review and endorsement. Review by the Planning Commission is scheduled at their November 10th meeting and by the City Council on November 15th. I will present an oral report on the action of both bodies at your meeting next Thursday. A motion endorsing the Position Paper, as drafted, is recommended. Attachment 1. 'Position paper dated November 2, 1982. CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE - P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SS317 (612) 937 -1900 November 2, 1982 CHANHASSEN DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT POSITION PAPER ON STATUS OF PROJECT AND TID #1 Prepared by Downtown Project Steering Committee Thomas Hamilton, Mayor Cliff Whitehill, HRA Vice - Chairman Ladd Conrad, Planning Commission Chairman The Downtown Redevelopment Project Steering Committee was established by the Chanhassen City Council on October 7, 1982, and was given the following duties and responsibilities: 1). To evaluate the current status of the Project and Tax Increment District #1; 2). To formulate specific options and alternatives available to the City in regards to Project implementation; 3). To review and comment on specific redevelopment plans submitted to the City by the Project Redevelopers, and to determine the consistency of such Plans with the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Project; and, 4). To report the findings and recommendations of the Committee to the City Council, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Planning Commission. The Steering Committee met on October 14, 1982 and reviewed the goals and objectives of the adopted Redevelopment Project Plan as well as the historical background of the project. The Committee also reviewed a preliminary report on the financial condition of Tax Increment District #1 and discussed possible options available to the City in light of the District's financial con- dition. Finally, the Committee reviewed the two alternative redevelopment plans submitted to the City on October 7, 1982 by Kraus - Anderson Development Corporation. = Steering Committee Position Statement November 2, 1982 Page 2 POSITION STATEMENT Based on our review and assessment of the above issues, the Steering Committee supports the following positions concerning the Downtown Redevelopment Project: 1). The City continues to support the overall Downtown Redevelopment Project, and reaffirms the City's desire — to implement the adopted Core Area Concept Plan, including: A. Establishing a local retail shopping area which compliments our new industrial growth and protects existing housing values by providing local shopping convenience; and B. Establishing a definable downtown area whichfprovides sufficient land area to support short and long — range local retail needs; and - C. Relocating inappropriate land uses so as to provide a — better aesthetic appearance for existing property owners as well as attracting new businesses; and D. Upgrading municipal infrastructure (storm sanitary — sewers, water, etc.) including a road system which better utilizes commercial properties and protects residential land uses; and E. Developing a compact commercial core which provides local retail and service opportunities to the residents of Chanhassen, including a full -line supermarket;; and F. Supporting the concept of the ring road as a means to accomplish stated goals and as a means to provide local identity, i.e. open courtyard concept. 2). The City will not renew or extend the existing Redeveloper Agreements with Kraus - Anderson Development Corporation and Bloomberg Companies when both agreements expire in November, 1982. The City is not prepared at this time to grant exclusive development rights within the Downtown Core Area to any developer. The City desires to retain the maximum degree of flexibility in the redevelopment program and to keep our redevelopment 7 options open in order to accommodate proposals and input from a wider range of developers. The City recognizes the fact that extension of the existing redeveloper r ! agreements would not guarantee completion of the private Steering Committee Position Statement Page 3 improvements outlined in the agreements. Consequently, the agreement expiration date is not a critical deadline date from the City's perspective. 3). The City intends to assume a much stronger leadership role in the redevelopment process in order to stimulate development consistent with the Redevelopment Plan. Towards this end, the City is re- evaluating its ability to provide additional development incentives which may be successful in attracting desired redevelopment propo- sals, such as a full -line supermarket. The City also intends to evaluate the potential for the HRA to assume the role of developer, in an effort to stimulate devel- opment. Finally, the City will attempt to accelerate the redevelopment process by completing first phase public improvements (to the extent such is economically feasible) consisting of utility relocations and construction -of the north half of the ring roadrF 4). The City intends to renew the Purchase Option Agreements for the Havlik and Riviera properties prior to their expiration on December 1, 1982, and intends to exercise both options before August 31, 1983. Acquisition of both properties is critical to the successful implemen- tation of the Downtown Redevelopment Project. 5). The City intends to evaluate options for both short -term and long -term reuse of the Instant Web building during the next 60 days. The City will evaluate the feasi- bility of converting the IW building to uses consistent with the Downtown Plan, including retail, office, enter- tainment, and recreational uses. This feasibility study is intended to determine if the building is an impedi- ment to Downtown Redevelopment or if it is a marketable asset. CONCLUSION The Downtown Redevelopment Project Steering Committee is opti- mistic about the future of Downtown Chanhassen. We are espe- cially encouraged by the financial health of the tax increment district. We believe that the City should assume a much stronger leadership position than was possible during the first few years of the Redevelopment Program. Time is on our side. We should seek only the highest quality project for Chanhassen and not settle for anything less. We believe that the positions outlined above will provide us with an opportunity to have the best possible project. f SENNETT, RINGROSE. WOLSFELO. JARVIS. GARDNER, INC. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: TO: FROM: RE: October 28, 1982 Scott Martin HRA Executive Director Peter Jarvis, AICP Arijs Pakalns, AIA, AICP uot� I(�ZIB2• `� RCHITECTU E 2829 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SE '• MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55414 PHONE 8121379 -7878 CITY OF CHANHASSEN prCi~ IVE® OCT 28 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Evaluation of the Revised Kraus- Anderson Development Proposal — You have requested that we review the latest redevelopment plan for the CBD area as proposed by Kraus - Anderson Development Company. — The plans under discussion consist of four boards, dated 9/27/82 and 9/29/82, and illustrate a basic scheme for Phase One and Phase Two as well as an alter- nate scheme for Phase One and Phase Two development. Our comments do not repre- sent a general design critique but rather are directed at assessing how well - these plans relate to the adopted project plan as described in the Preliminary Feasibility Study and Design Report. - Since the two plans (the basic plan and the alternate) represent essentially the same concept, we will deal with them as one scheme, except where indicated otherwise. We will evaluate the plan in terms of development program, layout, relationship to other developments, and implementation. 1. Development Program The first phase of the Kraus - Anderson proposal will consist of approxi- mately 50,000 S.F. of retail (leasable and service area) plus 8,000 S.F. of enclosed sidewalk area. This is far below the originally proposed - 158,000 S.F. of retail /office (84,000 S.F. of new retail and 74,000 S.F. of office, retail and /or recreation) for Phase One development. Also, the current proposal Indicates a 12,000 S.F. food store whereas the ori- ginal plan included a 35,000 S.F. full -line supermarket. 2. Layout The current proposal shows a linear development parallel to and south of W. 78th Street with all parking located between the structure and 78th Street. This essentially represents a "strip center" and is in marked contrast to the compact mall and courtyard combination approach of the - MINNEAPOLIS DENVER CHEYENNE PHOENIX October 28, 1982 Scott Martin Kraus - Anderson Development Proposal Page 2 original plan. Because of the linear layout, the walking distances within the enclosed sidewalk become excessive (over 1,000 feet from one end to the other); and, the visual and spatial experiences would not approach the potential of the original plan. The basic plan, in addi- tion, relocates the ringroad further to the west thus requiring more land acquisition and reduction in the size of the adjoining parcels. 3. Relationship to Other Developments The linear plan would weaken the linkage and interrelationship to the other uses, such as the Chanhassen Dinner Theatre and the commercial or hotel uses in the northeast corner. Furthermore, by elongating the deve- lopment as proposed in either of the alternatives, many tennants would not relate to the courtyard at all. They are simply too far west. In this plan there appears to be little relationship between the center and the Instant Web building. 4. Implementation In terms of implementation there are two major concerns. First, if the initial phase is developed totally as a strip center with all access and parking "out front," it is improbable that phase two could be developed "in frontf' of the existing stores. Leases may preclude blockage from the street and /or adjacent parking; tennants in the initial phase might find difficulty in conducting business during the construction period of the second phase; tennant types in a total linear Phase I might be quite dif- ferent from the tennant mix found in at least a partially enclosed or open mall concept. Second, if the first phase is developed as a rela- tively small strip center with a small grocery store, this will preempt, for a long time, the development of a full -line supermarket. In summary, while the adopted CBD Plan and the revised submittal by Kraus - Anderson may appear on the surface to be quite similar, in fact there are substantive differences which cannot be ignored. For reasons of scale, building organization, the ultimate implications for Phase II, and the size of the super- market, we recommend that the City withhold its approval of the proposed revised Phase I development as presently configured. AP:jh CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 ,u• (612) 937-1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Directory DATE: November 12, 1982 SUBJ: Purchase Option Agreements for Chanhassen Tire and Auto and Riviera Supper Club properties. The current options for the acquisition of the above properties expire on December 1, 1982. Extension of the Riviera option to March 1, 1983 will require a payment of $5,000, and a like extension of the Havlik option requires a $500 payment. Approval of both option extensions is recommended, based upon the positions outlined in the Downtown Project Steering Committee's Position Paper dated November 2, 1982. I CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T ' ®' 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 -ui (612) 937 -1900 TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director �'Aryy` DATE: November 12, 1982 r RE: Proposal for Professional Services to Conduct a Feasibility Study for Adaptive -Reuse of the Instant Web _ Building The Downtown Project Steering Committee asked BRW, Inc. to submit the attached proposal to the Committee for preparation of a feasibility study which would explore the potential for adaptive - reuse of the Instant Web building. The Committee reviewed this proposal with representatives of BRW, Inc. on November 2nd, and unanimously agreed to accept the proposal and to request funding for the study from the BRA. Also attached for your information is a preliminary report from BRW concerning the potential for community recreational use of the Instant Web Building. The proposed study would be much more detailed than this report, and would also explore other possible uses which would be compatible with the Downtown Project. I have also attached a copy of the legal opinion prepared by Holmes & Graven which pertains to the Instant Web Building. I will be prepared to discuss this issue with you in more detail at next Thursday's meeting, if you so deisre. Approval of the Steering Committee's funding request for the feasibility study is recommended from the Downtown Project Bond Fund. g L �1 BENNETT RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. ING. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SE Mr. Scott Martin HRA Executive Director City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Martin: PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55414 PHONE 612 379 7878 We are pleased to submit this proposal for professional services to conduct a feasibility study for adaptive -reuse of the Instant Web Facility. The proposal includes a Project Overview, Work Program of Services to be provided, Compensation, Project Team, Time Schedule, and Related Experience. Project Overview The City of Chanhassen, which Is currently engaged in redeveloping its downtown area, had acquired the Instant Web Facility with the intent of reselling it to a developer for reuse as a retail or office complex. However the City is interested in evaluating other options for redeveloping the facility.. The purpose of this feasibility study facility for a variety of alternative development plan for downtown Chanhas issues of accommodating various uses, issues, such as market demand, market feasibility study. MINNEAPOLIS DENVER is to explore the potential for adaptive -reuse of the uses that would be compatible with the long -range 3en. The study will be limited to physical planning layout of space, and construction. Other development absorbtion, and financing are not a part of this CHEYENNE PHOENIY Work Program The basic work tasks to be completed in this study are listed below: 1. Alternative Uses 1.1 Identify the range of alternative uses for the Instant Web Facility including but not limited to community recreation, full -line supermarket, office and retail. 1.2 Review and determine with the City a flexible, comprehensive recreational /community use program. 1.3 Establish the typical current market construction cost per square foot for each alternative use. 2. Potential for Adaptive Re -use 2.1 Document and evaluate the existing condition of building systems in each portion of the facility. Collect any missing building or site data. 2.2 Evaluate the opportunities and constraints for physically accommodating each alter- native use in the facility. 2.3 Determine the square foot capacity for development of each feasible alternative use. 3. Development Alternatives 3.1 Based on the conclusions reached in Task 2, generate physical development alternatives. 3.2 Document each alternative with conceptual design drawings of the site and building. 3.3 Determine preliminary construction budgets for each development alternative. 3.4 Compare the construction budgets for adaptive —reuse of the facility with the current typical construction costs of new facilities for each alternative. 4. Final Report 4.1 Prepare the final written report (text and graphics) documenting the tasks above and the conclusions. 4.2 Reproduce twenty copies of the report and present the report to the City of Chanhassen. 5. Coordination and Project Management Compensation For services rendered, BRW will invoice the City of Chanhassen monthly on an hourly basis, plus direct outside costs. The following is an estimate of the hours required to perform each task. Task 1.1 Identify uses 8 1.2 Program Assumptions 24 1.3 Market Construction Costs 8 2.1 Existing Conditions /Data 32 2.2 Evaluate Feasibility 32 2.3 Development Capacity 8 3.1 Development Alternatives 16 3.2 Conceptual Design Studies 96 3.3 Construction Budgets 36 3.4 Comparison with Market Costs 8 4.1 Prepare Report 4.2 Reproduce and Present 40 R 5.0 Coordination and Project Management 24 Total 48 Grand Total Estimated Hours 340 The total hourly cost of providing professional consultant services shall not exceed $15,500.00, unless additional amounts are approved in writing by the client. The value and cost of this analytical study should be evaluated in light of the $3,500,000 asset which the City now controls.. Direct outside costs, including photographic and reproduction services, maps and other required site documents, topographical surveys, soil reports, and drawings shall be invoiced at their cost to BRW. Direct outside costs are not part of the maximum hourly compensation. The hourly rates (effective until March 1, 1983) are as follows: Classification Hourly Rates Principal $75.00 Senior Associate /V.P. $60.00 Associate $50.00 Senior Professional $40.00 Professional II $35.00 Professional 1 $25.00 Technician $20.00 Project Team The Principal -In- Charge will be Peter Jarvis. Mr. Jarvis is responsible for all planning services performed by BRW and has extensive experience in development and feasibility studies. Mr. Jarvis will provide overall direction to the project. The Project Manager /Project Architect will be Mark Swenson. Mr. Swenson specializes in facility planning and management studies and teaches this subject at the University of Minnesota, School of Architecture. Mr. Swenson will be the key contact person and will coordinate all work between the City of Chanhassen and BRW staff. The Project Planner, Arijs Pakalns, will provide assistance In all site - related issues and direction in how this study fits into the long -range plans for the entire area. Jack Myers will provide all cost estimating services. Mr. Myers has thirty years of experience in estimating all types of facilities. Resumes of the key BRW members follow this proposal. Time Schedule After BRW has been authorized to proceed, the study will be completed within two months. This takes into account the lost calendar time associated with the Thanksgiving /Christmas season. Related Experience BRW has completed many similar studies in the past including feasibility studies, develop- ment planning, space planning, and land use planning studies. Also, we are experienced in all of the various alternative uses identified earlier. In addition to numerous retail cen- ters and office buildings, BRW recently completed design of the Brooklyn Park Community Activities Center. Finally, BRW has completed a number of adaptive re -use projects for many clients including Hennepin County, the University of Minnesota, Carleton College, and Macalester College. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, we would be happy to answer them over the phone or in person. We hope that this proposal communicates both our strong Interest in your project and our ability to perform the work. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, 4RENINET NGROSE- O LSFELD- JARVIS- GARDNER, INC. . enson, AIA Vice President MGS:sh CITY OF CHANHASSEN Q r—(= rIgf o OCT 28 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. BENNETT, RINGROSE, WOLSFELD, JARVIS, GARDNER, INC. October 4, 1982 Mr. Scott Martin HRA Executive Director City of Chanhassen 690 Coulter Drive P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Martin: 2829 UNIVERSITY AVENUE BE • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PLANNING TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE PHONE 612/379 -7878 Attached you will find BRWts report on the Instant Web property. The report includes the following: o Conclusions o Existing condition o Potential community recreational uses It is our conclusion that the facility can accommodate a wide variety of com- munity recreational activities. This conclusion, in itself, is not reason enough for the City to authorize a feasibility study. Several other issues must be addressed by the City before the determination of whether or not a feasibl- lity study should be undertaken can be made. Some of these issues are iden- tified in the conclusions. If the City decides to proceed with a feasibility study, BRW would be very 7 interested in performing the work. I know that David Bennett is looking forward to presenting BRWts capabilities and experience to you on October 7, 1982. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Bennett- Rinse- Wolsfeld- Jarvis - Gardner, Inc. 4 e� Mark G. Swenson AIA Vice President MGS: jh CITY OF CHANHASSEN cc: Arijs Pakalns R7C,E1VED Peter Jarvis David Bennett UCT 041 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER INSTANT WEB BUILDING POTENTIAL FOR COMMUNITY RECREATION ADAPTIVE REUSE IONS 1. The Instant Web facility can very easily accommodate most community recreation activities including: • Racquetball /squash • Medium -sized swimming pool • Running track • Volleyball gym • Bowling • Sauna /whirlpool /lockers • Lounges /meeting rooms /crafts /etc. It cannot accommodate the following: o Indoor tennis • Large swimming pool • Indoor hockey • Regulation basketball court 2. The precast high -bay area on the south (21,000 sq.ft.) is in very good con- dition and offers the most potential and flexibility due to the large struc- tural bays. The flat concrete roof is supported by steel beams and columns. The concrete block high -bay area (35,000 sq.ft. In the middle) is less attractive on the exterior, is not in excellent condition, has smaller bays, but could accommodate most recreational uses. The wood frame area to the north (21,000 sq.ft.) is the least attractive area for adaptive reuse. its use is limited to meeting rooms and support spaces. Upgrading to meet life safety requirements would be more elaborate, while the building life expectancy would be the shortest of the three areas. Furthermore, the wood frame area may not be needed since the two high -bay areas total 56,000 sq.ft. 3. The following additional questions should be addressed by the City in deter- mining if a feasibility study is of value: • Does the City want to take on the financial and management respon- sibility for providing community recreational services? • Is there any public support for a community recreational facility? • Are there any practical options for financing the project? • Assuming Kraus Anderson does not exercise its option, and the City does not want an industrial user on the property, are there any other uses for the building besides a community recreation center? 4. The purpose of a feasibility study should be to answer the following questions: o What type and number of community activity spaces can be economically supported by Chanhassen and the surrounding market area? o How could the facility be physically developed to support the space program? 0 I 0 I How much would the project cost? Based on projected income, financing of the capital improvements, and the City's cash flow objectives, is the project financially feasible? The study will require a recreational facility market consultant, an architecture /engineering /planning consultant (such as BRW), and substantial input from the City staff and City Council. EXISTING CONDIT There are three basic sections of the Instant Web facility: o the southern two bays with precast wails o the remaining high -bay area in the middle o the wood frame area on the north side 1._ The southern high -bay area is more than 20 feet high. It is approximately 21,000 sq.ft., not including the loading dock area to the west. This area is in very good condition. The large 421 x 27.51 structural bays provide the most flexibility for conversion to recreational uses. The exterior pre- - cast expression is reasonably attractive. 2. The remaining high -bay area in the middle is also more than 20 feet high and includes about 35,000 sq.ft. of floor area. The approximately 27.51 x 26.5' bays somewhat limit the flexibility for laying out recreational spaces. The walls are concrete block with a folded plate roof deck supported by steel beams and columns. Upgrading the insulation to meet the state energy code may pose some problems since the metal decking is curved and does not appear to be able to support much additional loading. The concrete block walls are not in excellent condition (in terms of appearance, cracking, etc.), and the - exterior appearance is both different from the precast section and not very attractive. 3. The wood frame area to the north includes 36,000 sq.ft. of conventional office height space. The floor of this area is about 10 feet higher than the other areas. The structure is wood frame and wood joist. The west 10,000 sq.ft. is open warehouse space, and the remainder is sub - divided into many small offices. The height precludes nearly all active recreational uses. Also, fire protection requirements may require substantial additional cost to accommodate community recreational uses within wood frame construction. POTENTIAL COMMUNITY RECREATIONAL USES The following analysis is based on the ability of the existing high -bay space to physically accommodate various candidate program activities. CAN IT BE USE ACCOMMODATED? COMMENTS Racquetball Yes Squash Yes Placement somewhat limited by additional required length and width. Indoor Tennis No Swdmming Pool Yes Medium -sized Pool (about 40' x 801) only. Pool would likely be built down below the slab. if so, the excavatlgn around columns and footings is somewhat complicated. Running Track Yes 1/8 mile track could easily fit around the perimeter on three sides. Basketball Gym No Must remove a row of columns and lower floor which probably makes costs prohibitive. Volleyball Gym Yes Bowling Yes Indoor Hockey No In addition, sauna /whirlpool, lockers, showers /toilets, lounges, craft and meeting rooms, kitchens, etc. can be accommodated in any part of the building. Any new plumbing needed will necessitate cutting through the concrete floor which is messy but not particularly complicated. JAMES S. HOLMES Attorney at Law October 7, 1982 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority Larson & Mertz 1900 First Bank Place West Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 Telephone 612/ 338 -1177 You have indicated that the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Project (the "Project ") was created as a redevelopment project pursuant to Section 462.521 and a tax increment district (the "District ") pursuant to Section 462.585 of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act (the "HRA Act ") by action of the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") and the City of Chanhassen (the "City ") in 1977 and 1978. I am assuming that no subsequent action was taken by the HRA or City that would bring this District within the coverage of Sections 273.01 through 273.08 of the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the "Tax Increment Act") Certain property owned by Instant Web (the 'Instant Web Property ") in 1977 and 1978 was included within the Project and was designated by the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") for acquisition by the HRA and subsequent resale to the private sector for rehabilitation and commercial retail use. The HRA acquired the Instant Web Property in September, 1981 in contemplation of resale to and rennovation by a specific developer. The developer was subsequently unable to perform and the HRA and City are now contemplating other uses for the Instant Web Property, including a transfer from the HRA to the City for rehabilitation and use as a public recreation center. You first ask whether the HRA is empowered to convey the Instant Web Property to the City for a nominal price. There is ample authority in the HRA Act to support a conveyance of redevelopment property by the HRA to the City. See, Section 462.445, Subd. 1(5) and Section 462.445, Subd. 4(2). Normally, conveyances must be made pursuant to Section 462.525, Subd. 1 and Section 462.541, which require taking into account the fair market value of the property conveyed. However, Section 462.525, Subd. 3 provides that an authority shall have "the power to transfer by deed to local public bodies those pieces of property which, in accordance with the redevelopment plan, are to be devoted to public uses, ... Except for such property as may be pay to the authority such sums as may be agreed upon." City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority Larson & Mertz October 7, 1982 Page 2 This language seems to support the view that consideration for such an intergrovernmental transfer could be nominal. In addition, cities are given broad power with respect to redevelopment projects by Section 462.581, including the authority to "do any and all things necessary or convenient to aid and cooperate in the planning, undertaking, construction or operation of such project." We also find nothing in the bond sales resolution or pledge agreement impeding the ability of the RA to convey so as to render properties within the District tax exempt. co it is our opinion that a conveyance for nominal consideration in t case would be authorized. However, in order to do so, it is further our opini his on that the Redevelopment Plan must first be amended pursuant to Section 462.525, Subd. 6 and that, since the amendment would "substantially alter or affect the general land uses established in such plan," a public hearing and City Council approval would be required. In response to your second question, we can find nothing to support a contention that an amendment of the Redevelopment Plan and a conveyance of the Instant Web Property to the City for community recreation purposes would give rise to an obligation on the part of the HRA to return previously collected tax increment. Pursuant to Section 462.585 of the HRA Act, tax increment collections are based upon the taxable status of property within the District as of each January 2nd. The fact that as of Jaunary 2, 1983 the Instant Web Property may be tax exempt by reason of public ownership will reduce both the original assessed value and the current assessed value for 1983, but the statutes make no provision for retroactive tax increment adjustments. You then ask whether tax increment generated within the District can be used by the City or HRA to remodel the Instant Web Property for use as a recreation center. Section 462.585, Subd. 3 authorizes the use of tax increment to pay the "public redevelopment costs" of a "redevelopment project." "Public redevelopment costs" are defined in Section 462.545, Subd. 1 to include all costs authorized to be incurred by the HRA Act in connection with a "redevelopment project." A "redevelopment project" is defined in Section 462.421, Subd. 13 to include "acquisition of real property and ... rehabilitation of buildings and improvements thereon to ... eliminate obsolete or other uses detrimental to the public welfare ... or to provide land for needed public facilities." In addition, a "redevelopment project" includes "installation, construction, or reconstruction of streets, utilities, parks, playgrounds and other improvements necessary for carrying out the objectives of the ... project." These definitions of "redevelopment project," together with the power granted HRA's in Section 462.445, Subd. 1(4) to "provide for the construction, reconstruction, improvement, extension, alteration, or repair of any project or part thereof" provides sufficient authority, in our opinion, to utilize tax increment for the remodeling of the Instant Web Property, so long as accomplished by the HRA while owned by it. Although not dispositive, it is City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority Larson do Mertz October 7, 1982 Page 3 interesting to note that Section 273.75, Subd. 4 of the Tax Increment Act specifically authorizes the use of tax increment to provide "a facility used for ... recreational . purposes and not primarily for conducting the business of the municipality." Our conclusion that tax increment can be used by the HRA to remodel the property before conveyance to the City for recreational purposes, does not alter our opinion that the conveyance can be made for nominal consideration. Your final question related to the need to hold public hearings and formally amend the Redevelopment Plan, which we indicated above would be necessary. We will be happy to discuss the conclusions of this letter with you at your fconve cee. ours Holmes JSH:mj i.' I' [ } % 1.J 1 7. n CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 101 U(612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM r TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: November 12, 1982 RE: Market Analysis Study to Determine Market Potential for a Full -Line Supermarket in Downtown Chanhassen The Downtown Project Steering Committee met on November 10, 1982 with representatives of Kraus - Anderson, BRW, Retail Systel{1s, Inc., and staff to discuss means by which the City might success- _ fully interest a full -line supermarket operator to locate in the Downtown Project. Mr. Elliot Olson, President of Retail Systems, Inc., provided the Committee with a great deal of information concerning trade areas and corporate philosophies for various types and sizes of supermarkets. Mr. Olson's firm specializes in retail market studies designed to identify appropriate site locations for supermarkets and other large retailers. The Steering Committee has asked Mr. Olson to submit a written proposal for professional services to the HRA which would provide .the City with information concerning the market potential for a full -line supermarket in the Downtown Project Area. His written proposal will be forwarded to you as soon as it is available, . which will hopefully be in advance of next Thursday's meeting. A preliminary figure of $6,600 to conduct a 3 -4 week study was quoted by Mr. Olson at the Committee meeting. Mr. Olson has been asked to attend your meeting on November 18th in order to present his proposal and answer any questions you may have. AA MIL, November 12, 1982 Mr. Scott Martin Planner /HRA Executive Director City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Scott: SYSTEMS, INC. 3025 HARBOR LANE NORTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55441 Enclosed are six copies of our proposal for the study of the Chanhassen Downtown Redevelopment District. If you have any questions regarding our proposal, please feel free to call. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Best regards, t►/is/82 RETAIL SYSTEMS, INC. � 4:R9 za �.. oO d,.-` ^,"a`tt/A/�/ ` C�tClctX¢I /Y I1! (U 0 L f Elliott W. Olson '�—� A Q A Jstvw�. President El Encncl . CITY Of CHANHASSEN Pre' ;71VF 0 Nov 15'1982 rOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT PROPOSAL TO THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN FOR A STUDY OF THE POTENTIAL FOR A SUPERMARKET IN THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BY RETAIL SYSTEMS, INC. Retail Systems, Inc. is a national company providing, research and planning services to the retail industry. Headquartered in Plymouth, Minnesota, it has branch offices in Atlanta, Georgia, and Portland, Oregon. RSI specializes in programs to improve use of existing retail facilities and planning for new ventures. RSI has developed and uses the most modern and efficient retail business model. RSI has worked with private developers in providing sales forecasts which have been used to assess site costs and rental capabilities. Our clients span the continent and the retailing field. Retail Systems' experienced employees have a varied background from many areas of retailing. Background The Chanhassen Downtown Regional Development Project is the result of concern for the long -term viability of the existing commercial area of Chanhassen. The preliminary feasibility study and design report prepared by B.R.W. was preceded by initial planning efforts that date back to 1969 and 1972. The study area is the existing downtown Chanhassen, located north of the railroad tracks and west of Trunk Highway 101. Objective The objective of the study is to assess the current and future potential for a supermarket within the study area. Methodology Retail Systems' approach consists of the following sequential steps: Step 1 Two to three hundred interviews with respondents scientif- ically selected within the potential trading area to give a representative sample of the customer base. This study, conducted by telephone, will establish the existing shopping patterns. It will also help in delineating the trade area, and identify the competitors for a supermarket in Chanhassen. Step 2 RSI will delineate the town Chanhassen. This mentioned phone survey RSI will establish the area and assess the fu trade area for a supermarket in down - delineation will be based on the above and on established traffic patterns. existing potential within the trade -ure growth in this potential. Step 3 RSI will construct a computer model of the Chanhassen food marketing area. This model will include the existing and future customer base and the competitive stores that are now serving the Chanhassen area. The model will enable Retail Systems to project sales for a supermarket or warehouse -type supermarket in downtown Chanhassen if it was built today and at different times in the future. The flexibility of the, computer model allows projections for the specific performance characteristics of different retailers and for different store sizes and site plans. If it appears that a supermarket is not presently viable, we will project the timing that it would be, and the criteria needed. Step 4 RSI will provide eight reports on the findings, including our recommendations. We will make an oral presentation of the study at your offices. .1 Proposal Retail Systems, Inc. proposes survey of the Chanhassen area potential for the supermarket study will be completed withi The fee for the study will be to complete a market analysis and phone for the purpose of establishing the in the downtown Chanhassen area. The 1 30 days of a e of this proposal. $6,600, plu expenses payable as follows: Upon acceptance of this proposal Upcn completion of the study 1 0 0 e• Mr. Joe Kelly Hudson- Thompson, Inc. U.S. Highway 80 West Montgomery, AL 36105 Phone: (205) 288 -6250 Mr. Ed Heisler Gateway Foods of Minneapolis 3501 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, MN 55418 Phone: (612) 781 -8051 Mr. Dale Caldwell Weis Markets, Inc. 1000 South 2nd Street Sunbury, PA 17801 Phone: (717) 286 -4571 Mr. Joe Mercurio Walgreen's 200 Wilmot Road Deerfield, IL 60015 Phone: (312) 948 -5000 Mr. Ron Fish Red Owl Stores, Inc. 215 Excelsior Avenue East Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: (612) 932 -2132 Mr. Chester Vogt Wetterau, Inc. 8920 Pershall Road Hazelwood, MO 63042 Phone: (314) 524 -5000 fir. Lee White Harris - Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. P.O. Box 2177 Charlotte, NC 28233 Phone: (704) 535 -0338 Mr. William VanDeMark Golub Corporation /Price Chopper 501 Duanesburg Road Schenectady, NY .12306 Phone: (518) 355 -5000 Mr. Bob Smith Fleming Foods Company ; P.O. Box 1160 Topeka, KS 66601 Phone: (913) 233 -2848 Mr. John Noonan Food Town Stores, Inc. P.O. Box 1330 Salisbury, NC 28144 Phone: (704) 633 -8250 Mr. Craig Schnuck Schnuck Markets, Inc. 12921 Enterprise Way Bridgeton, MO 63044 Phone: (314) 291 -5400 Mr. Jim Gutting Fairway Foods, Inc. 1111 West 5th Street Northfield, MN 55057 Phone: (612) 341 -4423 CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 -u• (612) 937 -1900 MEMORANDUM TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Director DATE: November 12, 1982 RE: Request by Chamber of Commerce for HRA Acquisition of Guy Petersen Property at Intersection of Highway 5 and Dakota Avenue Attached for your consideration is a request from the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce for HRA acquisition of property owned by Guy Petersen and developed as a "Quick -Stop Grocery Store ". You should note that this request was made by the Chamber during the transition period between the operation of "Guy's Drive -In" and the "Quick -Stop Grocery ", businesses on this site. The acquisition of this property for the development of a "gateway park" is consistent with both the Adopted Redevelopment Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. However, the Redevelopment Plan identifies the property for acquisition during the second phase of the Downtown Redevelopment program. Earlier acquisition will require the transfer of limited Phase One resources to a lower priority project (according to the adopted plan). Recommendation Although this acquisition request is generally consistent with adopted City Plans for the area, I believe that acquisition is premature at this time. Limited redevelopment funds should not be allocated towards second phase activities to the detriment of Phase One priorities. The owner has substantially improved.this business property during the last two months, which will add to future redevelopment program income. Consequently, I recommend that no action be taken towards acquisition of this property at this time. (If the HRA elects to pursue this acquisition, however, an appraisal of the property should be ordered before any acquisition negotiations commence.) Attachments 1. Letter from Chamber to Mayor Hamilton dated September 15, 1982. 2. Adopted Downtown Redevelopment Plan Acquisition Map. September 15, 1982 Mayor Tom Hamilton City of Chanhassen Chanhassen City Offices Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Mayor Hamilton: The Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce is interested in the visual appearance of the Chanhassen community, community pride, and the protection and enhancement of property values in the City. We would like to have the City of Chanhassen examine the feasibility of two special projects that have been discussed in Chamber of Commerce Executive Committee meetings. The community improvements outlined have been submitted and approved as Chamber of Commerce objectives by the V general membership of the Chamber. d First, we would like to have the City examine the possibility of acquiring the triangle property owned by Guy Peterson at the entrance to the City of Chanhassen for a "gateway park ". A part, or all of this property, could be attractively landscaped in cooperation with the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and would provide an attractive entrance to our future commercial and retail district. We have discussed the idea with Dr. Francis DeVos, Director of the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum. He has indicated interest in cooperating with the City of Chanhassen but has cautioned that financial limitations and academic considerations may prevent active participation. They will, however, act as advisors and consultants to an acceptable community entrance project. They will discuss their community involvement with the Board of Directors. Burt Haglund, architect and designer, has agreed to prepare architectural and landscape concepts for review by the Arboretum designers and officials of the City of Chanhassen. Burt is a partner in Design Two, Inc. and a member of the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce. He has met with City RECEIVED SEP 2 0 1982 CITY OF CHANHASSEN f Mayor Tom Hamilton September 16, 1982 Page Two officials and is in the early planning stages in the preparation of conceptual ideas for a "gateway park ". The Chamber of Commerce Executive Committee would like to have the City, together with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, study the possi- bility of acquiring the Guy Peterson property. The Chamber, however, has agreed that they feel the property owners must be "fairly" compensated for the land if the City agrees to the "gateway park" program. ,_.• The Chamber of Commerce Executive Committee feels that the delays in the downtown redevelopment project should not impact progress and planning and believe that a "gateway park" would become an attractive landscaped pylon for the entire community. It would increase commercial and retail property values and would provide residents with increased community pride. A second project discussed by the Chamber of Commerce is a continuing reforestation project for the entire City. The Chamber of Commerce would like to have the City consider offering maple trees (at cost) r-- to residents of the City for yard plantings and boulevards. Chanhassen means Sugar Maple in Dakota "Sioux" Indian language. The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum has offered their cooperation in the preparation of a guide to the proper planting and care of Sugar Maple trees. We feel, if the City provides direction, leadership and enthusiasm for the suggested community improvement projects, we can enhance the already existing beauty of the community and provide everyone with more reasons for everyone to be proud of our City. We have copied Don Ashworth, City Manager; Scott Martin, City Planner; Ladd Conrad, Chairman City Planning Commission and Bill Gullickson, Chairman of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. We hope you and other city officials will actively support our suggestions and we look forward to meeting and working with you in developing the suggested creative ideas into attractive realities. Sincerely, Arnie Hed cc: Don Ashworth, City Manager Jerome Carlson, President SPECIAL PROJECTS Scott Martin, City Planner Bud Vogel, Treasurer Ladd Conrad, Chairman City Jerri Martin, Secretary AH:jm Planning Commission Dan Herbst, Vice President Bill Gullickson, Chairman, HRA Burt Haglund, Design Two, Inc. i 1 l l Acquisition 0 Stage 1 ® Stage 2 ® �-J -ka A � 1t�4�90 igve 5 f , f J Ir a ,7 CHANHASSEN HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 690 COULTER DRIVE • P.O. BOX 147 • CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317 101 (612) 937 -1900 TO: Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: Scott A. Martin, Executive Directory DATE: November 12, 1982 \ RE: Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce Transportation Task Force The Chamber of Commerce has established a Transportation Task Force to serve as a focal point for dealing with local transportation issues which may affect the Business Community, in particular, and all citizens of Chanhassen, in general. Current active members on the task force include the following: John Neveaux, Clark Horn, Jerome Carlson, Rod Hardy, Tom Heiberg, and Al Klingelhutz. ^ I have been providing staff support to the task force since last February, so I felt it appropriate to update you on recent efforts of the task force to have Highway 5 upgraded in the immediate future. Since a wide variety of efforts are currently underway, 'I` will not attempt to summarize them here. Rather, I would like to review this with you briefly at your next meeting and answer any questions you may have at that time. Attached are recently adopted City Council and Chamber of Commerce Resolutions and a Chamber of Commerce mailing which per- tains to a proposed revised Metropolitan Council Transportation Policy Plan. I will also brief you on this and related issues next Thursday. Mayor Hamilton has requested that $500 in HRA funds be contri- buted to the Task Force to assist them in their efforts to gain Regional, State and Federal funding approval for upgrading Highway 5. Since the need for major improvements to Highway 5 is identified in the Adopted Redevelopment Plan and since this need was further verified by the Traffic Analysis Report prepared for . the HRA last spring by BRW, Inc., approval of this funding request is recommended. i l CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DATE: October 7, 1982 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -62 MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER: Neveaux SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER: Horn RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO CITY REVIEW OF THE "REVISED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE /POLICY PLAN FOR THE YEAR 2000" PREPARED BY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has prepared a revised Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan for the Year 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the "Transportation Plan ") which is a state- ment of the direction that major transportation investments are to take between now and the Year 2000 in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, said Transportation Plan designates certain highways which are planned to comprise the Metropolitan Highway System in the Year 2000; and WHEREAS, said Metropolitan Highway System Plan includes the Construction of a new TH 212 from Chaska to Eden Prairie as a Metropolitan Transportation priority; and WHEREAS, said Plan does not include TH 5 in the Year 2000 Metropolitan Highway System, and therefore, does not recognize the need for substantial upgrading of TH 5 as a Metropolitan Transportation priority; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has requested comments con- cerning said Transportation Plan from the City of Chanhassen prior to November 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Subcommittee of the Metropolitan Council has scheduled a Public Hearing for October 12, 1982 in order to take testimony concerning the revised Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen has reviewed said 'Transportation Plan, especially insofar as it impacts the Citizens of Chanhassen. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen offers the following comments for consideration by the Metropolitan Council during their deliberations on the proposed Revised Transportation Plan: 1. The Plan for Right -of -Way acquisition and construction of new TH 212 is supported by the City of Chanhassen, with the need for new TH 212 identified in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. Resolution #82 -62 2. The City of Chanhassen believes that TH 5 serves as a Regional Transportation route, not as a local road. Highway 5 provides the primary regional access to Downtown Chanhassen, therefore, we recommend that TH 5 also be included in the year 2000 Metropolitan Highway System Plan. 3. According to a Traffic Analysis Report prepared for the City of Chanhassen in March, 1982, TH 5 is in need of immediate upgra- ding to four -lane divided arterial standards from I -494 west to Carver County Road 17. Such improvements will relieve the severe congestion and very long traffic delays presently experienced during peak hours along this segment of TH 5. This traffic study also recommends that TH 5 be upgraded to four- lanes west of Carver County Road 17 to TH 41 by 1985 in order to adequately handle forecasted traffic volumes. P 4. Due primarily to capacity limitations and traffic operations problems which exist at uncontrolled intersections on TH 5, the average accident rate along TH 5 within the City of Chanhassen _ was 15 percent higher than the average rate for similar roads in the Western Suburban Area during the period of 1976 -1980. 5. Redevelopment activities designed to induce development in the City of Chahassen are presently underway. These activities are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council. However, in order to be successful in promoting the orderly economic deve- lopment of the City and the Region, adequate Regional Transportation facilities must be developed. In keeping with the goals contained in the revised Transportation Plan, the City of Chanhassen believes that upgrading TH 5 will "produce positive impacts upon the social, economic and physical environment, and conserve the supply of Metropolitan energy resources ". 6. The Transportation Plan emphasizes the need to make maximum use of existing Transportation facilities before resources are com- mitted to major new investments, and that all Transportation investments, should be made on the basis of need. The City of Chanhassen supports this general policy. We believe that the most cost - effective approach towards improving the regional transportation system which serves Transportation Subregion 3 would be to upgrade TH 5 to four -lane arterial standards. Under this policy, improvements to TH 5 should receive a higher priority than the construction of new TH 212. Right -of -Way acquisition and grading costs will be substantially higher for a new TH 212 corridor than they would be to upgrade the existing TH 5 corridor. The upgrading of existing transpor- tation systems makes more sense than does the construction of new systems, expecially when highway construction funds are scarce. -2- Resolution #82 -62 C 7. The City of Chanhassen urges the Metropolitan Council to re- evaluate the Regional significance of the TH 5 corridor in light of these comments, and pledges the full support and cooperation of the City in any efforts to provide the residents of Chanhassen (and of the Metropolitan area in general; with good accessibility to subregional and regional opportunities. Passed and Adopted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen this 7th day of October, 1982. ATTEST Don Ashworth, City Manage Yes Thomas L. Hamilton, Mayor No Absent Hamilton None None Horn Neveaux Swenson Geving -3- Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce A RESOLUTION REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF THE "REVISED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT GUIDE /POLICY PLAN FOR THE YEAR 2000" PREPARED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has prepared a revised Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan for the Year 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the "Transportation Plan ") which is a statement of the direction that major transportation investments are to take between now and the Year 2000 in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has formally r,erquested review and comments concerning said Transportation Plan from Metropolitan Area citizens prior to November 15, 1982; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce has reviewed said Transportation Plan, especially insofar as it impacts Business and Citizens of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, said Plan does not include TH 5 in the Year 2000 Metropolitan Highway System, and therefore, does not recognize the need for substantial upgrading of TH 5 as a Metropolitan Transportation priority; and WHEREAS, TH 5 is over capacity and deficient at the current time; and WHEREAS, new Highway 212 through Chanhassen, from Eden Prairie to Chaska, does not currently exist and is not scheduled for construction before the year 2000; and WHEREAS, improvement of TH 5 would provide the greatest cost benefit for the limited public dollar in serving the south- western Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen has already gone on record in support of this resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of Directors of the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota: 1. T.H. 5 should be included in the Revised Transportation Development Guide /Policy Plan as part of the Metropolitan Highway System. Page 2 2. The Metropolitan Council should direct the appropriate implementing agencies to incorporate improvements to T.H. 5 in their current Capital Improvement Programs as a top priority project. 3. TH 5 should be upgraded immediately to four -lane divided arterial standards from I -494 west to TH 41. Adopted by the Board of Directors of the Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce on this day of November, 1982. Jerome Carlson, President October 26 1982 CITY OF CHANHASSEN WE NEED YOUR HELP!! OCT 2 8'' The Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce Transportation rTaskuNForaeVELOPMENT DEPT, is organizing a "write -in and call -in" campaign aimed at con - vincing the Metropolitan Council and State Legislators that Highway 5 is in need of immediate upgrading, and we need your help! The Metropolitan Council has prepared a revised Transportation Plan for the year 2000 that does not include Highway 5 in the Metropolitan Highway System. If this Plan is adopted in its pre- sent draft form, State and Federal funding for Highway 5 improve- ments will be extremely difficult to obtain, since the Metropolitan Council has considerable influence over transpor- tation improvement programming and funding in the Seven County - Metro Area. Therefore, our initial goal is to convince the Metropolitan Council that Highway 5 serves as a regional transportation corri- dor, and should therefore be included in the Metropolitan Highway System. A Public Hearing on the Revised Metropolitan Transportation Plan was conducted on October 12, 1982. Mayor Hamilton presented a City Council Resolution at this hearing which urges the Metropolitan Council to include Highway 5 in the Plan and empha- sizes the need for immediate upgrading of Highway 5 to four -lane divided arterial standards from I -494 to Highway 41. However, it is still not too late for you to express your opinion to the Metro Council concerning Highway 5. The official Public Hearing record will remain open for public comment until November 15, 1982. Your support in the form of direct personal contact or correspondence with State Legislators, Metropolitan Council representatives, and community leaders would be most effective in convincing transportation decision - makers of the urgent need for Highway 5 improvements. Regardless of wlc_her you choose to call or( write concerning ` the future of Highway 5, the Transportation Task Force recommends that the following points be addressed: - Highway 5 serves as a Regional transportation route, not as a•local route, and therefore should be included in the Metropolitan Highway System. - Upgrading Highway 5 to a four -lane highway seems more cost effective and realistic than does the construction of a new TH 212 prior to the Year 2000. Transportation Policy #3 in the proposed plan says that Transportation Systems should be developed and managed to utilize existing investments more efficiently and effectively." The upgrading of existing transportation systems makes more sense, espe- cially when highway funds are scarce. Highway 5 right -of -way acquisition costs would be minimal compared to costs for acquisition of TH 212 right -of -way. - Highway 5 serves as Chanhassen's principal transportation link to the freeway system, so travel time to I -494 is cri- tical to your business. (Information on the average number of existing and projected future daily trips generated by your business, the origin /destination of those trips, average travel time to I -494 during your peak traffic hours, and the cost in terms of man -hours due to traffic delays, etc. could demonstrate the impact of Highway 5 capacity problems on your business operations.) - Any information you may have concerning traffic accidents on Highway 5 involving your employees in their personal automobiles or in company vehicles. - General comments on the relationship between transportation facilities and the operation of your business. - The Traffic Analysis Study prepared for the City of Chanhassen in March, 1982 projects average daily traffic to increase by more than 458 from 1980 to 1985 on that segment of Highway 5 adjacent to downtown Chanhassen, and by another 64% during the period of 1985 to the year 2000. In . terms of actual volumes, traffic is projected to increase from 16,000 vehicles per day in 1980 to 23,500 in 1985, and to 38,600 vehicles per day in the year 2000. Moreover, the capacity analysis for Highway 5 indicates that by 1985, without upgrading, Highway 5 segments in Chanhassen will be operating near or over capacity during peak periods, resulting in "severe congestion and long delays along Highway 5 ". The Traffic Study concludes that "the upgrading of Highway 5 to four -lane divided arterial stan- dards between New County Road 17 and I -494 is needed immediately ", and that "current traffic volumes justify this improvement ". By 1985, Highway 5 should be upgraded all the way to Highway 41 according to the traffic study. Any additional comments you may wish to add to the above ideas would certainly be helpful in presenting Chanhassen's case 7 to the Metropolitan Council and State Legislators. Your letters and calls should be directed to the following officials prior to November 15, 1982: Charles R. Weaver, Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 291 -6453 Senator Robert Schmitz 306 State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 296 -7157 William Sando, Representative Metropolitan Council District 16 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 447 -2056 Representative R.J. McDonald State Office Building Room 323 St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: 296 -8872 4 • • s • • • 4e. • • • w UHANHA }SEN M.H.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A B 1, E DATE. 11 -15 -82 PAGE 2 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 018355 1.703.22 -B R N INC FEES, SERVICE.- 018356 1.298.40 BLOOMS ERG COMPANIES - - DEBT PRINCIPAL AND-DEBT INTEREST 11 • 018357 2.596.80 CMAN CHAMBER OF ,CO MMERCE_ __.. p '/� DEBT PRINCIPAL ,.j7A� h-1 AND -DEBT INTEREST • 018358 48.00 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT._ FEES. SERVICE 018359 35.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERV TRAVEL ♦ TRAINING 018360 1.000.00 HOLMES +GRAVEN FEES. SERVICE • 018361 .180.20 _LARSON • MERT2 -_ _ FEES. CONSULTING 018362 324.60 DOUG HANSEN 1 ' DEBT PRINCIPAL �; �-y 't� I ASL.q� _ - AND-DEBT INTEREST l 018363 906.15 LAKE SUSAN HILLS DEBT PRINCIPAL AND -DEBT INTERESY— J\ 1 018364 387.09 REAL ESTATE MGNT INC A PRINCIPAL ND-DEBT INTEREST _V) _ 018365 324.60 TOMKAY BUILDERS INC DEBT PRINCIPAL L AND OFB, TNTFRFCT ^" 11 IA`^ 1Z �� 0, 014082 37.844.33 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER REMITT TO OTHER AGENCIES 1 37.844.33 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING J J :1 J J J J PROMISSORY NOTE $ 1,000.00 November 21 1977 Five (S) years after date the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, promises to pay to Bloomberg Company or order the sum of One Thousand Dollars and no /100 ---------- - - - - -- Dollars $ 1,000.00 f+or value received • with simple interest payable at maturity at the rate of 6 .percent per annum for date until fully paid. This is an unsecured promissory note, the principal and interest .being paid solely from future tax dollars received, in total or par*_, as anticipated in the "Redevelopment Plan for Chanhassen" which was adopted by the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority in November of 1977 and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council in Dece^i'-e of 1977 all of which having been certified to the County Auditor on December 23, 1977. Payable at Chanhassen, Minnesota n L 1`177—l;r0d-/1-) (0.'1O IQ9? (oO.OJ City of 'Ch nhassen 9V 5 _ /.�.yor and/�_' -/, _ City Manager 7 L PROMISSORY NOTE $ 2,000.00 November 23 1977 Five (5) years after date the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, promises to pay to Chanhassen Community Development Corp. or order the sum of Two Thousand and no /100 --------------- - - - - -- Dollars $ 2,000.00 for value received with simple interest payable at maturity at the rate of 6 13,2-cent _Je. - inf.um for date until fully paid. This is an uuu,et.-ured promissory note, the principal and interest being paid solely from future tax dollars received, in total or part, as anticipated in the "Redevelopment Plan for Chanhassen" which was adopted by the Chanhassen dousing and Redevelopment Authority in November of 1977 and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council in December of 1977 all of which having been certified to the County Auditor on December 23, 1977. ' r Payable at Chanhassen, Minnesota City of r By v !i and / Lassen Mayor ty Manager PROMISSORY NOTE $ 500.00 December 1 1977 Five (5) years after date the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, promises to pay to Hansen & Klingelhutz Construction, Inc. or order the sum of Five Hundred Dollars and no /100 ------------ - - - - -- Dollars $ 500.00 fbr value received With simple interest sayable at maturity at the rate of 6 percent per annum for date until fully paid. This is an unsecured promi.sse)ry note, the principal and interest being paid solely from fu`_ure tax dollars received, in total or part, as anticipated in the "Redevelopment Plan for Chanhassen" which was .adopted by the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority in November of 1977 and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council in Decembe of 1977 all of which having been certified to the County Auditor on December 23, 1977. Payable at. Chanhassen, Minnesota ........... i ?'! / —!_ o/2r.� +.) ',. City of C'ia hassert nO Y ^ By or ani .ss► City Manager V PROMISSORY NOTE $ 700.00 December 20 1977 Five (5) years after date the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota ,Municipal Corporation, promises to pay to Lake Susan Hills or order the sum of Seven Hundred and no /100 ----------- - - - - -- 700.00 Dollars $ f�r value received with simple interest payable at maturity at the rate of 6 percent per annum for date until fully paid. r This is an unsecured promissory note, the principal and interest being paid solely from future tax dollars received, in total or part, 1 as anticipated in the "Redevelopment Plan for Chanhassen" which was ;adopted by the Chanhassen }sousing and Redevelopment Authority in i I November of 1977 and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council in December — of 1977 all of which having been certified to the County Auditor on l December 23, 1977. Payable at Chanhassen, Minnesota n Ci I I dh r" "'t? i2- yaoo By • 7y- y,. no x.0.3 r. and r- PROMISSORY NOTE $ 300.00 December 20 1977 Five (5) years after date the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation, promises to pay to Real Estate Management, Incorporated or order the sum of no /100 ----------- -- - - - - -- Dollars $ 300.00 Three Hundred and fp,r value received with simple interest payable at maturity at the rate of 6 percent per annum for date until fully paid. This is an unsecured promissory note, the principal and interest being paid solely from future tax dollars received, in total Or part, as anticipated in the "Redevelopment Plan for Chanhassen" which was adopted by the Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority is November of 1977 and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council in ')ec�F.!^bez of 1977 all of which having been certified to the County Auditor On December 23, 1977. Payable at Chanhassen, Minnesota City of By assen ana tiL rit-v Manaaer 1CHANHASSEN H.R.A. A C C O U N T S P A Y A 3 L E DATE 10 -18 -82 ?AGE CHECK- A M 0 U "; T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 018174 4A. 00 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT FEES2 SERVICE. 018175 165.00 LARSON t MERTZ FEES, SERVICE I DJ8176 33.10 SCOTT MARTIN TRAVEL + TP,AINING 3 246.10 CHECKS. WRITTEN TOTAL OF 3 CHECKS TOTAL 246.10 GHANhASJi. H.R.A. A G G 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 09-20-02 PAGE I G L A I M A N I wlwwwwwmm� P U R P 0 S E CHECK• A M 0 U 14 1 013908 Martin 75.00 MINNESOTA tiAHRO TRAVEL ♦ TRAINING Registration for conference, Scott 0 1394 6 00 JOHNN HA-VL1K-JR--- --,--,--.----LAND-.-,.P6,RCH,ASE, v- -.IMP_ --..------Payment. for extension of option to purchase _500. to and including 12-1-82 . 013947 5.000.00 TH,;MAS J KRUEGER LAND-PURCHASE + IMP Payment for extension of option to purchase and _82 including 12:117 3 51575.00 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING � GHQ }SEe ).A. ) l: 0. _. }T S --- } Y E._...jMTE -- T0 -0 AGE CHECK" A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 018085 ..____— 128.76 8 R H INC ..' _FEES. FEES. SERVICE - _ Presentations regarding tiaffic study,3uly �! 018086 772.20_LARSON- ±'HERTZ FEES ._CONSULTING_._:,_..___:`___ i 018087 176.96 MINNEAPOLIS STAR *TRIBUNE PRINTING AND PUBLISHING ` 018088 1.900.00 LYLE H.'NAGELL,CO INC FEES. ,SERVICE Apprai of Riviera Chub and {Mobile Stafion 018089 2.818.44.` FLUOROHARE SPL ASSESSMENT_ PAYMENTS _ _Special Assessment Reduction Payment #1 Authorized by NRA 5 -20 -82 S 5.796.36 CHECKS HRITTEN TCTAL OF 8 CHECKS TOTAL 11.371.36 i c I� I RUSSELLH.LARSON CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOBGH Chanhassen HRA c/o Scott A. Martin, Executive Director Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 LARSON & MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (6I2) 333 -1511 November 1, 1982 To,professional services rendered in October, 1982, as follows: HRA - 7% Program 10/15 File assessment agreement w /Recorder and check index for changes of ownership; 10/18 corres to Brockpahler re recording of assessment agreement w /Carver County Recorder: 2.7 hours at $66.00: $178.20 Expense: RecordFluoroware 7% Agreement w/ Carver County Recorder: 2.00 TO_ FEE: � Q ,;st AW kt 'L I1 '1� CITY Of CHANHASSEN p�7P- Flvpt) Nov 2 M2 MMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT LARSON & MERTZ i ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1900 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST RUSSELL H. LARSON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 '- CRAIG M. MERTZ OF COUNSEL October 1, 1982 HARVEY E.SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH Scott A. Martin Executive Director Chanhassen HRA Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 TELEPHONE (6f2) 333 - I S 11 To professional services rendered in September, 1982, as follows: HRA - General Legal 9/27 conf w /Jim Holmes re sale of Instant Web (IW) building to City and use of tax increment funds for renovation for community facilities use; 9/28 corres to Holmes re transfer of IW building to .City: '61S� %- Total hours: 2.5 $165.00 ��[[ I M1 -O'm I declare, under the penalties of perjury, that the above claim is just and correct and that no part thereof _ hds been paid. RHL:ner cc: All Council Members Jean Meuwissen Don Ashworth v Chanhassen HRA Attorney RECEIVED OCT 0 51982 C17Y OF CHANHASSEN RUSSELL H. LARSON CRAIG M. HERTZ OE COUNSEL HARVEY E. SKAAR MARK C. MCCULLOUGH Scott A. Martin Executive Director Chanhassen HRA Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 LARSON SC MERTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1906 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 7, 1982 TELEPHONE (612) 333 -ISII a To professional services rendered in August, 1982, as follows: HRA General Legal: 8/3 corres to Zinter and Stolz notifying them of filinglof assessment agreements re United Mailing; corres to Stolz re status report on taxable status of Instant Web building; prepare resolutions appointing DWA as Deputy Director and confirming his signing of United Mailing's assessment agreement; 8/4 draft addenda to K -A and Bloomberg contracts and dictate letter to SAM, McRostie and Spalla re same; 8/9 proof resolution re authority of DWA to sign resolution re assessment agreement for United Mailing; proof extension of developer agreement re downtown project; 8/12 forward HRA copy of United Mailing contract to SAM; trip to Atty Bennett's office to collect missing signatures on assessment contract re Fluoroware and forward same to SAM (7% Program); 8/24 telcon from SAM re whether Fluoroware contract can be filed now and telcon to Atty Bennett re owner's duplicate certificate of title; 8/25 review encumbrances on Fluoroware's owner's duplicate and telcon to SAM to alert him that 7% assessment agreement will be filed 8/27 w /Carver Co. Recorder; 8/26 review memo from DWA on accounting procedures; trip to Chaska to check for change in ownership on Fluoroware building, file 7% assessment agreement; corres to SAM and Atty Bennett re same: Total General Legal: 7.3 hours: $481 le Havlik Acquisition ( Chan Tire & Auto ) tld✓-��s\) 8/19 review Nagell appraisal, telcon w /Bill Wolfe of same re overa vs two -value approach; review Ruppert & Nagell appraisals, conf w /JH re land value issue, attend HRA meeting re option extension; 8/24 draft notice of option extension; direct staff to draw check; conf w /Mr. and Mrs. Havlik re option extension, make payment and secure receipt: Total Havlik Acq.: 2.75 hours: 181. �3b1 � Scott A. Martin Chanhassen HRA September 7, 1982 Page Two Riviera Acquisiton 8/19 review Ruppert & Nagell appraisals, attend HRA meetin re option extension; 8/24 draft notice of option extension; direct staff to draw check:�l Total Riviera Acq.: 1.45 hours: $95.70 Minnesota Victoria Acquisiton T 8/19 attend HRA meeting re Minnesota Victoria acquisition: Total Mil /Victoria Acq.: 0.2 hours: 13.20 Summary i HRA General Legal: $481.80 Havlik Acquisition 181.50 Riviera Acquisition 95.70 Minnesota Victoria Acquisition 13.20 TOTAL: 772.20 I declare, under the penalties of perjury, that the above claim i just and correct and that no part �heereo has been paid. I RUSSELL H. LARSON j Chanhassen HRA Attorney RHL:ner cc: All Council Members Don Ashworth Jean Meuwissen HOLMES R GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 Telephone 612,778 -1177 Invoice #821014 OCT09ER 21. 1982 CH130 1 CHANHASSEN HRA GENERAL C/O CRAIG MERTZ 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BLDG. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 FOR ALL LEGAL SERVICES FROM SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 THRU OCTOSER 7, 1982 AS FOLLOWS: 9727/82 LUNCH WITH LARSON AND MERTZ 10/06/82 REVIEW TRANSCRIPT, REVIEW PLAN, DRAFT LETTER, RESEARCH 10/07/82 WORK ON OPINION TOTAL SERVICES; 1,000.00 �Ojujti- 64. �anM CITY OF CHANHASSEN Pa r' EIVFED OCT 26'12 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, J SH 1� INVOICE {� — 17�1`iU MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER City of Chanhassen DATE: September 30, 1982 7610 Laredo Drive — Chanhassen, MN 55317 JOB NO: 62 -8214 ATTENTION: Mr. Scott Martin RE': Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project r I TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1,703,22 4K- km CITY OF CHANHASSEN ��r:Et��ED `64 -43i�G OCT 19 1o(2a s�. RATHER. RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S . MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55414 PHONE 6121 3791818 as per Agreement. 1 Per Diem Services - Pahse I Work Task 1.7 I Period of: September, 1982 F' Downtown Redevelopment Plan - 1982 Review and Update. Review of K/A proposal and analysis of Instant Web building for community center. i Classification Hours — Principal 6.00 Sr.. Associate 11.50 Associate 11.00 Technician 3.00 Salary Cost - $ 851.61 _1 Fee 851.61 x 2.0 = $ 1,703.22 r I TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 1,703,22 4K- km CITY OF CHANHASSEN ��r:Et��ED `64 -43i�G OCT 19 1o(2a s�. RATHER. RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC. 2829 UNIVERSITY AVE. S . MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55414 PHONE 6121 3791818 7 7 MINNEAPOLIS CHEYENNE DENVER City of Chanhassen 7610 Laredo Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 ATTN: Mr. Scott Martin INVOICE N 32125 DATE: October 31, 1982 JOB NO: 18 -8201, 62 -8020 62 -8214 RE:, Engineering /Planning /Surveying Services for Downtown Redevelopment Project as per Agreement Per Diem Services - Phase d Work Task 1.7 Period of September and October, 1982 Continuing assistance and consultation regarding project. Review of K/A proposal and preliminary feasibility of Instant Web building for community use. Meeting with staff, council and committee. Classification Hours Principal 35.00 Sr: Associate 15.50 Associate 61.00 Technician 6.00 Salary Cost - $3,358.07 Fee - $3,358.07 x 2.0 = $6,716.14 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $6,716.14 61 RECEIVED 11JIB�� "2 o+�sl tse2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BATHER. RINGROSE, WOLSFELD. JARVIS, GARDNER, INC. 21129 U WVERSITY AVE. S.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55414 PHONE 612 1 379 7878 AvoIC2 COORDINATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. 8401 WAYZATA BLVD. SUITE 300 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 CITY 01F C? AD* AtSSEN Poll. cc)! 14'1 CHANH1..SS N 55317 STANDARD PAleS STCRAC:E .tf- INFACT STC�AG. 6.00 PRIM x: COIN 13.5-) ' NON -PRIME CONN. 9.03 PRIME CCU .110 NON -PF I' ;Z CRU .4)70 STANDARD TINSSHARING USAGE -------------------------- CO"IECT USER PROJECT STCRA>E ^ -- - --- ----- PR 1. N0N -PR -- - 310 TID NC1 ----- . +d - -- - -- 4.0 370 STOPAGv 35 TOTAL 300 35 4.0 100 STOTAGE 52 TOTAL STAIDA. RD 147 .G 4.0 CURMEI4T MONTH TOTAL STATE?dENT OF ACCOUNT --------------- - - - -- INVOICE NUi�BEa 6302 SATED 09/30/1982 INVCICE NUMBER 6923 DATE OCTOBER 31, 1982 USAGE FOR OCTOBER 1982 NET 10 DAYS CRUS PRIME NON -PR TOTAL ------ ----- 0 770 89.90 67.00 C 770 146.90 27.28 0 770 174.18 S 174.18 48.72 48.72 TOTAL DUE 222.90 A 1 -1/:5 PER MDiTH CARRYING CHARGE kILL AUTOMATICALLY 4,A� 5c: ILU D TO ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE OVER 30 DAYS OLD. W tPt!PECIATF I(OUR COOPERATION. RECEIVED NOV 181982 CITY OF CHANHASSEN